Before 2015

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

archive

Image:Njlib.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Wcam/archive!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.177.181.139 07:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Yuhuatai.JPG

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Wcam/archive!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.177.181.139 07:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Volumetric flasks.jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Wcam/archive!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.177.181.139 07:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ma Ying-jeou 1.JPG

Why is this a copyright violation? Please use {{Copyvio}} in the future. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 12:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:President Hu Jintao.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

File:President Hu Jintao.jpg

File:President Hu Jintao.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Martin H. (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Xiao Ke.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Xiao Ke.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Xiao Ke.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--shizhao (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

STOP

Hello Wcam!

You are not now authorized to review flickr-images! In these three files ([1], [2], [3]), I reverted your review. That's not working like this - you must wait until your request turns out positive. --High Contrast (talk) 19:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Magneto_plasma_sphere.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Magneto_plasma_sphere.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 03:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Help requested

Hi Wcam, I just saw your work with User:Zjmm who regretably violated copyright, I now deleted all his uploads because some of them where already deleted and the newly uploaded have many different cameras. Can you help me with User:Amazingloong? From what I see I have no trust that the user created the uploaded images himself. --Martin H. (talk) 23:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Wow, very good work. A tip for Flickr links: you can find the description page of "3071177680_02f9f7370e_o.jpg" with http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=3071177680. Thank you, sad for the good quality images but the case is obvious. --Martin H. (talk) 02:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:National_Geographic_Channel.svg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:National_Geographic_Channel.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Grass_mud_horse.jpg

File:Grass_mud_horse.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

–Tryphon ^☂ 10:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

删除质疑

阁下在引用文章来证明侵权时，能注意一下所引用来源的作者的ID吗？我自己对自己侵权吗？本人并无冒犯之意，但这确实让人很无语，难道原作者不可以在维基的吗？我这文章原本只在一个论坛发表过，然后有媒体转载，但都是非商业性的，并无任何版权限制，难道连作者本人使用都算侵权吗？我是维基新人，维基的版权规范我很费解。眉毛掉了 (talk) 13:48, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Re:Re:删除质疑

1、对不起，我是维基新人，事先确实不太了解维基版权规范，仅我传的那三张图片来说确实是我自己的，这点从作者ID上可以看出来，版权信息也是该网站自己加的，我并没有对这些图片有任何版权限制。

3、以上，并无任何冒犯的意思，只是遇到这样的事情感觉比较尴尬，可否指导一下我如何使用这些图片，或者我如何证明这些图片的版权，非常感谢！

眉毛掉了 (talk) 15:11, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

不是扫描的杂志，都是自己拍的（其中一张是我父亲拍的），图片信息不同是因为并不是在同一时间内拍摄的。--眉毛掉了 (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

非常感谢您的帮助，也非常高兴能得到你的理解，为人民服务辛苦了，HOHO~ ^_^ --眉毛掉了 (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Twitter logo.svg

File:Twitter logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 23:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

RE:File:Gabriel Lee Chi Hong.jpg

So where should I put my photo? I want to put my photo on my Wikipedia user page..... --Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 06:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

關於User:蕭嘉錡上傳的藝人照片

您好，感謝您對版權努力，在下想證明User:蕭嘉錡所上傳照片為其所親自拍攝，因為她在台灣的台中舉辦社群聚會曾展示與藝人合照(如:這張合照，她位於左二而藝人m:wikipedia:zh:詹雅雯為右二)，只是為了使用於維基百科條目而使用截圖軟體切裁，導致EXIF資訊盡失，目前在下已經教導她使用原圖進行影像處理作業以保留EXIF資訊，或者改用原始照片上傳，她表示為了補齊藝人照片而特地花錢參加演唱會(當然也因為是其粉絲)，也冒著風險盡可能努力找很多其他藝人拍照，並努力好幾小時處理照片並上傳，就為了補足維基媒體，其精神相當難能可貴，故在此提出證明為其說明，並還請能與其溝通還需要那些證明才能通過。--安可 (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

@Wasami007: 您好，感谢说明。您所说明的情况在下已了解，并且在下感谢该用户的努力。同时借此机会请阁下向该用户转达，希望今后在上传自己拍摄图片时，能尽量提供详细说明信息（例如何时何处拍摄，是否为自己拍摄，以及保留完整EXIF信息），可以此文件作为参照。--Wcam (talk) 12:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

另外她認識幾位藝人，故有位藝人傳給她一張特別影像處理過的圖片已無EXIF資訊 File:許志豪.jpg，在下於是教她先上傳至自己的臉書(Facebook)並稱其為CC by SA 4.0釋出(該圖目前未被其他網站使用過)，再上傳維基共享過來，不曉得您覺得此法可行嗎？或者您有更好的建議？ --安可 (talk) 03:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

@Wasami007: 您好，在下不建议先上传至脸书，这样既无必要又有可能带来不必要的困扰。这类照片可直接上传至Wikimedia Commons，同时务必注明照片是由该艺人本人提供并且授权以CC by SA 4.0释出（不要标记为上传者自己的作品）。--Wcam (talk) 11:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Wcam. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Hi Wcam, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Wcam/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 8 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 1 character 96: Script URL. - Evidence: addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:{importScript(\'MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js\'); void(0);}', "Perform batch task", 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand', null);
ISSUE: line 15 character 84: Unclosed string. - Evidence: 'talk_tag' : '== {{Autotranslate|1=%FILE%|base=Dw image source/heading}} ==
ISSUE: line 37 character 23: Unclosed string. - Evidence: 'talk_tag' : '
ISSUE: line 38 character 18: Unclosed string. - Evidence: == [[:%FILE%]] ==
ISSUE: line 46 character 40: Unclosed string. - Evidence: 'talk_tag' : '== [[:%FILE%]] ==
ISSUE: line 54 character 23: Unclosed string. - Evidence: 'talk_tag' : '
ISSUE: line 55 character 18: Unclosed string. - Evidence: == [[:%FILE%]] ==
ISSUE: line 63 character 23: Unclosed string. - Evidence: 'talk_tag' : '
ISSUE: line 64 character 61: Unclosed string. - Evidence: == {{Autotranslate|1=:%FILE%|base=No watermarks/heading}} ==

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Hi Wcam, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Wcam/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ERROR: Cannot parse line 15 column 79: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Hi Wcam, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Wcam/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 1 character 96: Script URL. - Evidence: addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:{importScript(\'MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js\'); void(0);}', "Perform batch task", 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand', null);
ISSUE: line 23 character 35: Unclosed string. - Evidence: 'talk_tag' : '
ISSUE: line 24 character 18: Unclosed string. - Evidence: == [[:%FILE%]] ==

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Hi Wcam, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Wcam/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ERROR: Cannot parse line 23 column 21: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC).

TUSC token d93828a31a0441482f81a6c22712b40a

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

2015

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:邓华兴2010.7.7.jpg

请求不要删除本人照片“邓华兴2010.7.7.jpg”这张照片是本人参观上海世博会时在自己所摄照片裁剪而成，愿意献给贵网站和公共领域。

WashingTong (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Hunnan-1.jpg, File:Hunnan-2.jpg, File:Hunnan-3.jpg and File:Tir-sport.jpg

Hello again,

We are an registered alumni which can be considered as a part of the school. As far as these 4 photos are concerned, they were shot by some photographers for the school, we have the entire right to use them.

Is the information/copyright category OK now for Hunnan-1.jpg and Tir-sport.jpg?

Thanks and regards

Neyc.alumni.france

@Neyc.alumni.france: The legal copyright holder of these photos is the school. Please have the school send a free license to the OTRS.--Wcam (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

@Wcam: Hello, the school has sent a copyright email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, could you please restore especially File:Hunnan-1.jpg and File:Agro.jpg? Thank you--Neyc.alumni.france (talk) 11:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

@Neyc.alumni.france: I don't have the authority to restore files. Please wait for the response from the OTRS or go to Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. --Wcam (talk) 15:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

關於駱怡君照片版權問題

謝謝您的提醒。我了解照片有肖像權等權利，所以在將照片放上之前，有徵得照片主角同意使用，請問這樣是否OK？不好意思，因為是生手，對維基百科的規定怕有漏網之魚或看得不夠詳盡的地方，還望指點。謝謝。59.124.77.162 11:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

请问阁下是User:IBT PR吗？请让您的公司，依照Commons:OTRS/zh-hant的说明，向维基共享资源发送版权许可。--Wcam (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

謝謝。我剛剛看了OTRS的說明，有個地方不太懂，請教您: 版權回覆的EMAIL中有提到「我明白當我以上述授權釋出後，我便允許任何人在其他授權以及法律的限制下，對本作品進行商業或其他的再製使用、或根據他們的需求任意修改。我理解這樣的授權並不只限於維基百科以及其他相關站台之內。」這是一定要許可的？或者可依照每位著作權人的需求做調整？謝謝。IBT PR (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

维基共享资源的内容任何人均可自由使用，包括商业使用，详见COM:Licensing。若阁下不希望将照片以自由版权发布，则阁下的照片不适合上传至维基共享资源。--Wcam (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

謝謝您的指點。:)IBT PR (talk) 03:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

李慧慧照片版權問題說明

筆者於2011年於台視退休導播李旼（史屁伯）在udn網路城邦的部落格（blog.udn.com/romeolee）留言，徵得其授權轉載部分照片。2012年有一位無法理解中文的維基共享資源管理員Denniss提報刪除此類照片，當時筆者請Bencmq以英文代為說明已取得授權，詳情請見此。李導播的部落格有開放訪客留言（不必登入udn網路城邦帳號密碼），閣下可留言請他向維基共享資源發送版權許可。--Solomon203 (talk) 11:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

在下并未在其部落格见到「允許商業用途和衍生作品」相关声明，是否可告知在下如何找到？--Wcam (talk) 15:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

當時「允許商業用途和衍生作品」字樣就擺在李導播部落格大標題下方。事隔多年，李導播部落格不知哪一年改版時把相關聲明誤刪了。--Solomon203 (talk) 14:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

感謝審核通過。李導播部落格還有一張方芳芳照片也是同樣的情形，我會找時間上傳。--Solomon203 (talk) 04:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

2016

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello.

I noticed you have nominated this page on the Chinese-language Wikipedia for deletion because it is plagiarism of my Commons page here by LiXuanze. I have a list of 10 pages of mine that they have stolen. I would be very thankful if you can have them all deleted. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Wcam (talk) 00:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Picture

Hello,

im really sorry that i maked truble, it wasn my aim to violate the copyright. i only wanted to help into the asia football leagues. but i have a question: gives a option, where i can use from other peoples legal without to violate the copyrights,the pictures for my articles into the german wikipedia? gives a option where i can use the uploads picture from as example english wikipedia in the german wikipedia? Do you can help me? And sorry again for the trubles. I never will make this mistake again. Please answere me again, thank you. Yanikor

You might upload these images on the German Wikipedia (de:Spezial:Hochladen). Please be aware that, unlike English Wikipedia, the German Wikipedia does not allow "fair use" (de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte). If you have questions please ask on the German Wikipedia. --Wcam (talk) 23:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

PD-textlogo 是否可用于File:Liuzhou BRT LOGO.svg？

--Arthur 2e5 Crap·Toy 17:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artoria2e5 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

我认为不可，「柳州快速公交」的中文字体很可能受版权保护。--Wcam (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

即使受版权保护，被拍下来之后就变成 raster rendering of typeface，重新 trace 还是 PD。--Artoria 2e5 emits crap 17:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

这种理由是不成立的，那我也可以说所有的照片拍下来之后都是像素，而每个像素都是PD，所以所有的照片都是PD。建议你仔细看一下COM:TOO和COM:DW。--Wcam (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

注意我们讨论的是低清晰度下勉强还原的typeface部分。--Artoria 2e5 emits crap 20:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC) 字体部分不应该管什么COM:TOO，应该按w:WP:PD#Fonts。20:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

要管整张图片的话，应该考察的是这几个简单元素的组合：

文字「BRT」，电脑单斜体
文字「柳州快速公交」，电脑单斜体
白线，三种长度，末端变细。--Artoria 2e5 emits crap 20:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

User talk:詹奇鴻

Your note here regarding File:詹奇鴻-節目製作人.jpg says only that the reason for the speedy is "G4". I have a reasonable amount of experience on Commons and I don't know what a "G4" is, nor do I know how to find out. It is certain that User:詹奇鴻 doesn;t have a clue why his image was deleted. We try hard not to bite newbies -- please apply that thought in the future. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I DID put a valid reason on the file in question. In the future I will check the user talk page as well. --Wcam (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

關於行政院圖片

可以針對行政院檔案刪除一案用英語解釋嗎？行政院已經修改全球資訊網站資料開放宣告從「影音、圖像、樂譜、專人專案撰文或經本院特別聲明之其他著作，須經本院同意方可使用。」改為「部分的影音、圖像、樂譜、專人專案撰文或其他著作，經機關特別聲明須經同意方可使用者。」--KOKUYO (talk) 03:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Jackson Yi 20151013.png

您好!先前您已认证Jackson Yi 20151013.png ( https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jackson_Yi_20151013.png )之OTRS申请，然而之后有另外一名OTRS用户以对话截图不足以证明版权所有的原因取消了该认证，因此目前我已请该图片的版权所有人本人(即该图片出处之微博博主)寄出中英文版本的授权释出声明至OTRS，还麻烦您检阅一下是否符合认证要求，如果OK的话也麻烦您帮忙修改一下該照片OTRS的认证，谢谢您!Pico cavadino (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

您好，您的请求只有OTRS成员才可处理，在下并非其成员，恕无法处理。OTRS成员列表请前往Category:Commons OTRS volunteers查看。--Wcam (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

关于最近我的旧账号问题

Wcam，不好意思，又要跟你交谈一些事情了。我的旧账号WKDx417前一段时间还好好的，最近几天不知道什么情况，输入了正确的账号和密码也不能正常登录。我很怀疑是前几天，我的贡献页无端的出现了几张运动员的照片（相信你也有目共睹了，是8月初的事情）有关。当时我不在电脑，回来上去WKDx417的时候不知道怎么情况多了几张运动员的照片……我很怀疑以前我的WKDx417账号被盗有关（我多数情况下，UTC+8时间晚上都不在维基百科）。不过我本人事先声明：我不会上传这些乱七八糟的名牌运动员照片，我一般只是上传我眼前见到的某些景区和图片、人物（多数都是不出名的普通公民）的照片，所以我在这里注册了一个新账号来提个醒而已。--PQ77wd (talk) 01:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

您好，请问是否尝试过重置密码？否则若您希望放弃旧账户，建议告知管理员将旧账户永久封禁。--Wcam (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

未尝试过重置密码，我就最近几天发现不能登录旧的账号而告诉您而已。我现在就是希望停用这个旧的账户（怀疑被入侵而盗号）。--PQ77wd (talk) 02:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Feng Xiaogang (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Feng Xiaogang (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Feng Xiaogang (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Storkk (talk) 15:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

2017

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:NEYC-logo.jpg

This section was archived on a request by: Wcam (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

We are an alumni of a Chinese high school in France. Our school lets us to write a wiki page in French to present the school.

So we just want to add its logo to our wiki page. What information and copyright category should we assign to this logo? Which procedure should we follow?

Thanks and regards

Neyc.alumni.france

關於黄雅莉新書《禮•物》分享見面會.jpg等照片刪除問題

@Wcam: 您好!關於黃雅莉等照片確實為我所有，也有註明來源與版權，尤其黑嘉嘉和眀禎的照片，是"最近"、"最直接"的上傳，也含有EXIF(本來就不具實質參考意義)真的不理解為何被發起投票並刪除!(File:Minchen halloween.jpg/File:Joannemissingham lesson.jpg)理解你們用心的維護wiki，但小弟一再遭受檢舉、刪除，實在花費許多時間、精神與力氣，希望可以多多幫忙，高抬貴手!之後也會採用網友提供的認證方式上傳檔案，希望同為完整wiki盡一份力量，辛苦了!謝謝! (File:黄雅莉新書《禮•物》分享見面會.jpg Wcam (talk) 21:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)/File:汪小敏玩唱會.jpg Wcam (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)/File:劉思涵斬唱吧頒獎盛典.jpg Wcam (talk) 15:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 陳彥可 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

about a poster of <your name. >

说英文太麻烦了，我就不装外宾了。

偶然发现一份越南语版的海报File:Your Name's Vietnamese poster shown at CGV Hoàng Văn Thụ.jpg，这应该不是上传者所有吧.参照Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Poster_of_Your_Name.jpg和Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Your_Name，是不是也属于合理使用的图片而需要删除？——Cwek (talk) 01:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

已经提删。--Wcam (talk) 04:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

DrummingHeng's copyright violations

This is all my ""Original works"" , so why can't i upload?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrummingHeng (talk • contribs) 01:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

@DrummingHeng: the images you uploaded are official school logos. Are you the original designers of these logos? If so please contact COM:OTRS to release your work under a free license. --Wcam (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Image:Peace beings here, kumi.jpg

這張相片並無包含其他作品，這只是她在牆上寫下的文字 --Adece033090 (talk) 12:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

FOP China

Hello Wcam! I changed parts of your edits. The law allows all kinds of works to be copied, not only 3D. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: That I don't disagree for now. But could you restore the legal cases with court rulings I have added?

Also, if you read the whole Article 22 (not just clause 10), you'll soon realize that this Article is really about "fair use". The important part to consider here is the condition that "the other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner by virtue of this Law are not infringed upon". It is important to know from the court rulings that commercial reuse of photos of 3D work is OK, however, commercial reuse of 2D work is very likely to infringed upon the copyright owner's other rights, thus in violation of the copyright law. --Wcam (talk) 00:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for deleting the court rules. I re-read Article 22 and yes, it basically is fair use. But (10) is not. And since 3D isn't mentioned, 2D is also covered in my opinion. It may have been lost in translation, so you surely could be correct also. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

File:170330YangYangOnceUponATime.png

File:170330YangYangOnceUponATime.png File:161028YangYangBaicaowei.jpg File:170208YangYangRoseonly.jpg File:170314YangYangGuerlain.jpg File:170329YangYangAirport.jpg File:YangYangAlibaba.jpg File:YangYangMadameTussauds.jpg File:LinDong.jpg

The copyright holder of these photos published the work on Flickr and thus I uploaded them to WIKI under CC-BY-2.0 License. I don't understand why there is a deletion request. The copyright holder has other social media accounts and posted the work. But the copyright holder has agreed for the use of the photos listed above on Wiki. Therefore they posted these 8 photos on Flickr to allow the use of these photos on Wiki. --Venk kkkkk (talk)

These images were published somewhere else on the Internet in advance. The copyright holder will have to contact COM:OTRS and submit a free license.

Hi I have sent the OTRS (Ticket#2017050810015232). Could you please process it as soon as possible? Last time I also sent the request for releasing other photos but no one responded. Thanks! --Venk kkkkk (talk)

OTRS currently has a backlog of about 54 days. Please wait patiently for their respond. --Wcam (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! --Venk kkkkk (talk)

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Hi Wcam, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Wcam/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 1 character 104: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:{importScript(\'MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js\'); void(0);}', "Perform batch task", 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand', null);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC).

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Wcam, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Ask for help

I am indeed the owner of these photos and add it to page. https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%84%AD%E5%BF%97%E6%98%8E_(%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%95%99%E6%8E%88)

But I really don't know how to do at this time. I just want to upload a pic of this professor. He is my teacher. And I take this pic under his permission. Could you please tell me how to do correctly. I'll follow your instruction. Thank you very much. Candidas (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:PD-USGov-VOA/fr

Hi Like to the english version, could you remove the phrase "À noter que VOA republie des rapports d'Associated Press, de l'Agence France-Presse et d'autres. Ces contenus ne sont pas dans le domaine public. Vérifiez le crédit pour chaque image ou photographie. Notez également que VOA était un organisme fédéral jusqu'en 1998 et est devenu indépendant. Entre 1998 et juin 2013, VOA a versé tout son matériel dans le domaine public. Après cette date, l'usage est seulement non commercial. Par conséquent, ce modèle n'est valide uniquement pour le matériel publié avant juin 2013. Voir Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-USGov-VOA. Notez enfin qu'il existe des déclarations contradictoires sur plusieurs versions linguistiques des sites internet de VOA, mais que les conditions d'utilisation sur le site parent, www.voanews.com, indiquent très clairement que la politique du non commercial s'étend à tous les sites de VOA.". --Panam2014 (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Panam2014: I am sorry but I don’t speak any French so I wouldn’t feel comfortable making such edit. If you are a French speaker you may make this edit yourself. --Wcam (talk) 03:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Only an admin could delete the phrase. --Panam2014 (talk) 03:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

The french phrase is the equivalent of "Note also that VOA was a Federal agency until 1998 and then became independent. Between 1998 and June 2013, the VOA put all its material in the public domain. After that, it became Non-Commercial use only. Therefore, this template is valid only for material published before June 2013. See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-USGov-VOA. Note also that there are conflicting statements on several of the language web sites, but that the Terms of Use on the parent site, www.voanews.com, very clearly state that the NC policy extends to all of the VOA sites.". Who was removed from english template. --Panam2014 (talk) 03:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I’m not an admin here. --Wcam (talk) 03:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in many Asian countries ends on December 15th.
There is a special prize for Chinese uploaders
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons zh-N users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition.

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

2018

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Question about how to delete the older versions of files

Hello I got your message for asking me to delete the older versions of these files because they are copyvios but I have no idea how to do that (is there a button or link to click?)— Preceding unsigned comment added by N0104john (talk • contribs) 09:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Only an admin can delete files so there is nothing you need to do. --Wcam (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:《释名》颠倒的望日望时日月方位由香港青年陈少静发现说明什么？.pdf請求閣下的幫助。

Dear Wcam, Pls help me! I'm not promoter and spammer, and the flat earth is Wrong! I don't accept it, and pls help check this: Global_lock_for_User:月立龍头, everyone is equal, and mankind needs to know the truth! Peoples will remember you. Thank you for your help. 這篇文章不是本人寫的！文章的標題顯示在下的姓名不能夠證明本人在自我宣傳，該文件已屬於維基的公有領域，文件描述了一個關於事實的知識和實際的現象發生在地球之上，請求您幫忙恢復刪除的文章，衷心感謝您的幫助！謝謝。陈少静 | 月立龍头 (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

I am not an admin here so I did not delete your file, nor can I restore it. Sorry. --Wcam (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

RFA

Hi Wcam, do you accept my nomination for adminiship? --B dash (talk) 02:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@B dash: Thank you for your consideration. However, I don't think I'll be able to devote any more efforts to Commons than I currently can. --Wcam (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

speedy deletion

the source info doesn't verify the copyright status, but it's fine - apparently two dimensional reproductions of art that is in the public domain is exempt. Seraphim System (talk) 13:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Could you help me?

Hi, @Wcam: I was wondering if you could help close two incorrect nominations for deletion of my photos? I took the photos myself and own the copyright, and User:Jeff G. already confirmed that I have sent the original, unedited photos to OTRS (ticket#: 2018021010008141). Thank you! :) Jennychen888 (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I am not an admin. Please ask an admin for help. --Wcam (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

@Wcam: Oh, I see, you are an admin on Chinese Wikipedia, not on Wikimedia Commons. Thanks anyway! Jennychen888 (talk) 22:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

FoP-Taiwan

@Kai3952: You may start the discussion here. 您也可以使用中文。--Wcam (talk) 02:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

我的困難不在於英文或中文，而是照片所拍攝的「內容物」有各種不一樣的情況。因此，實際問題並沒有如你說的，用3D、2D就可以去判斷是不是。有可能我認為是建築物，但你們不一定是這麼想，或者我上傳沒有發現FOP問題，你們會覺得這不能上傳。因為台灣有很多作品並不是區別很清楚，甚至於FOP只能由機器人自動上傳，我就不能上傳，造成我常常分不清楚問題是在哪裡。--Kai3952 (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 我认为建筑物和3D作品的照片是没有问题的，但这只能代表我自己的观点，别人对你的照片进行提删我无法负责。而且，曾经提删您照片的Jeff G.在最近的讨论Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Naval_Mazu_Statue_of_Befangao_Jingan_Temple_20130504.jpg中也提到，他对之前标准的理解过于严格，今后也会支持恢复相关图片。您或许也可以请求恢复您早前上传的这些图片。--Wcam (talk) 12:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Wcam:

如果真的沒有問題，為什麼管理員對於建筑物和3D作品的照片仍然會刪除，所以我想請你告訴我，怎麼做才不會被管理員刪除，否則單憑你說「建筑物和3D作品的照片是没有问题」這理由是說服不了管理員不會刪除。例如說，你分享你的經驗，哪些照片看起來像是不符合FOP政策，實際上是可以被保留的。這些例子能有區別是最好，建築物是一例，3D作品是一例，這樣比較容易明白其中的區別。
至於Jeff G.，你好像你很在意他說的話，如果是你被人打了耳光，然後對你說「對不起，我幫你擦藥」，你會想聽他的話嗎？問題重點不是Jeff G.，而是管理員會不會刪除，你明白嗎，我不能在FOP問題上一直游走於「一會兒是，一會又不是」的模糊情況。--Kai3952 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

我在这里不是管理员，只是普通用户，无法代表管理员说话，因此很抱歉无法回答您「怎么做才不会被管理员删除」的问题。如果有按照我的标准没有问题的图片被删除，我强烈建议去申请恢复，并附上必要的理由和证据，例如我所举出的章忠信文章，证明建筑或雕塑作品的照片不会有问题。这里的方针也有规定，图片的上传者有责任证明图片的版权是自由的，这也包括对管理员提出的质疑做出解释。--Wcam (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

不一定，有些管理員對雕塑作品的認定是要有版權證明，所以台灣法律允許公共空間展示的雕塑作品給予我們拍攝，管理員並不會相信。更何況，有些照片看起來是藝術作品，實際上是建築，只要管理員認定它不是建築，即使你說不會有問題，我上傳的照片仍會被管理員刪除。你說，我要如何證明公共空間展示的雕塑作品是版權自由？我應當如何證明它不是藝術作品而是建築呢？正因為舉證有這種難度，所以我上傳照片都會被刪除，而且我也容易誤觸FOP政策。--Kai3952 (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Kai3952: COM:FOP#Taiwan这里已经明确说明了建筑是适用全景自由的。另外根据Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#FOP_in_Taiwan这里的讨论，COM:FOP#Taiwan的文本将会修订为允许3D艺术品的照片。届时您可以前往Commons:Undeletion requests并援引COM:FOP#Taiwan请求恢复被删除的相关图片。

你幫我判斷File:蘆洲李宅李友邦夫妻浮雕.jpg，是否符合FOP。--Kai3952 (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

我认为符合。--Wcam (talk) 00:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

這就很奇怪了，為什麼在Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument for the Yoshino Immigrant Village in Ji'an.jpg依然會被刪除，標準是在哪裡？--Kai3952 (talk) 04:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

由于COM:FOP#Taiwan尚未更新，相关用户仍然认为艺术品照片不合要求。~~如我之前所说，待COM:FOP#Taiwan的文本更新之后~~COM:FOP#Taiwan的文本已更新，您可以前往Commons:Undeletion requests请求恢复。--Wcam (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

管理員不會不知道文本是否有更新。既然昨天就裁決刪除，那麼表示這張照片不符合FOP。但是沒有人告訴我，如此起伏不定的標準，我該如何判斷什麼是FOP？感覺是看個人而定，只要一提刪就會被管理員給刪除，太不公正了。--Kai3952 (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

管理员并非不会犯错，不能以他们是否删除图片来判断什么是标准，已删除图片可以前往Commons:Undeletion requests请求恢复。由于现在COM:FOP#Taiwan的文本已更新，今后类似图片被删除的可能性会降低。--Wcam (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

我沒有足夠的版權證據請求恢復。你看他們討論，Túrelio、Ww2censor都認為應該被刪除。更早之前的討論，我與Jeff G.溝通多次，他一再地堅持要刪除。現在我已經在這裡展開討論，如果沒人解釋清楚為什麼，那麼我會依照這二次的討論去進行提刪，對象是在公共空間拍攝的紀念碑、塑像及藝術展示品，還有包括看起來像藝術品的結構物(實際上不是藝術品也依然被提刪，比如這個討論就是)。如此廣泛的對象，可能會有很多台灣維基用戶拍攝的照片會被我大量提刪。--Kai3952 (talk) 16:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

@Kai3952: COM:FOP#Taiwan的文本更新只是最近这两天的事，因此早前的讨论其他用户依据旧的解读发表意见没有问题，奉劝阁下不要继续按照旧的标准进行提删。再说一次，如果希望恢复图片，请前往Commons:Undeletion requests请求恢复。--Wcam (talk) 01:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

請你自己看你說的話：「图片的上传者有责任证明图片的版权是自由的」，你一直叫我請求恢復，意思是告訴我不需要版權證明就能恢復圖片嗎？我會想提刪，這是因為有Túrelio、Srittau二位管理員把關，他們審核結果是應該被刪除，所以我才會想按照他們的標準，去提刪台灣維基人在公共空間拍攝的藝術品照片。--Kai3952 (talk) 05:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

在你请求恢复时，请说明COM:FOP#Taiwan的文本已有更新，现已允许建筑和雕塑作品的FOP，我认为应足够说服管理员。假如管理员仍然提出更多质疑，请在相关请求处ping我，我会尽可能回应。--Wcam (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:飘柔.png

File:飘柔.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Founder's font is not free copyrighted in China. Also, 方正粗倩简体 is a commercial font.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

WQL (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:史记.jpg

File:史记.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © 1982 中华书局 Even if 史记 is a public domain work, the new typographic version of the title page does not belong to the public domain.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

WQL (talk) 03:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:CCP 50Years.jpg

File:CCP 50Years.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: © 2004 东方出版社

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

WQL (talk) 03:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:CCP 50Years.jpg

File:CCP 50Years.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

WQL (talk) 13:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Njlib.jpg

File:Njlib.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

WQL (talk) 06:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

I find a source of File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Deaf.svg (or File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Deaf.png)

I find a source of File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Deaf.svg from this site. This flag file uploaded also FOTW page. Thank you. --Tcfc2349 (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

2019

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Wcam，您好，很久不见。

这次您一定要注意一下Roy17此人，他曾经在粤文维基百科里面无恶不作的，相反来到维基分享资源又来同样的情况（就是想来破坏广东地方的特色和做出对用户恶意滋扰和挑衅的行为，无时无刻地骚扰维基的工作）。它的所为我已经在管理员留言板举报了，希望关注一下。--PQ77wd (talk) 04:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Japanese_crest_Uwajima_Sasa.svg

Cannot you see the tag 'self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0' tag on 'File:Japanese_crest_Uwajima_Sasa.svg'? This is Mukai's own work image. Mukai oneself declares that its production process of image file of the crests at Commons user page [4]. And the original of this image's crest is from Uwajima Hannate(Clan) at 17th century. How dare you add the 'No permission since|month=March|day=31|year=2019' tag on this? If you have an objection, YOU MUST carry out the proof that this image is not Mukai's made, okay?-Kyuri1449 (talk) 16:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Warning

Hi, No edit war! Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

阿云嘎的照片

我可以肯定地告诉你，那张照片File:音乐剧演员阿云嘎.jpg的上传者就是其拍摄者[5]--Masdggg (talk) 02:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

你在没有给出任何证据的前提下草率提删图片，且没有进行删除请求讨论，反而是快速删除。我对你这一行为深感不满。--Masdggg (talk) 02:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

https://i.loli.net/2019/04/18/5cb7fbd08cb5d.jpg https://i.loli.net/2019/04/18/5cb7fbf528290.jpg 证明上传者即拍摄者的证据在此。--Masdggg (talk) 04:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	谢谢啦，随便看看这是干什么的～ @舞月書生（Joye Zhang） 👉Talking👈 02:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

您好，我已经问过北京外国语大学院长和办公室

他们说没问题，我在微信上问过，请问要怎么证明呢？谢谢您！麻烦您了！ Mandarinisreallystrong (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@Mandarinisreallystrong: 维基共享资源只可接受自由版权内容，即必须允许任何人用于包括商业用途在内的任何用途。如果您确定这是校方的意愿，请联系校方，要求他们按照commons:OTRS/zh-hans中所给出的模板寄送授权信到OTRS。--Wcam (talk) 03:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@Wcam: 您好。北京外国语大学办公室已经发了两个照片的证明，请问您收到了吗？谢谢！ Mandarinisreallystrong (talk)

@Mandarinisreallystrong: 您好，请等待OTRS成员处理。--Wcam (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

现在只有两天了，我花了很多时间，希望可以快点解决，请问您可以帮我吗？ Mandarinisreallystrong (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@Mandarinisreallystrong: 只有OTRS成员可以处理，我无法提供任何协助。OTRS验证一经通过，已删除图片将会立即恢复，无需担心。--Wcam (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

The Stand News

Hi, We have had the same type of discussion earlier, i.e. how explicit derivative works should be mentioned, notably about some Indian government licenses which prevent use in a "derogatory manner". I can't find it right now, but these spanned many old archived pages. And no, some free software licenses do not mention explicitly that derivative works are allowed, but the licenses are still considered to be free. See also earlier discussion here. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

PS: Please do not edit the request on UDR.

File:余华作品《我胆小如鼠》封面.jpg‎

Hi Wcam, with regards to the above file. I've already stated the reason in the file history. For discussion, I've created a DR. Thank you :) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Re: FoP-Taiwan

去年討論過FoP，但是問題還在。由於前陣子忙於處理積壓，我即將離開Wikimedia Commons，所以現在才有空向你討論。

這一次FoP問題是宗教，因為台灣很多寺廟，門上有門神，牆上有壁畫，這些都是室內的2D作品。我注意到台灣有幾位用戶熱衷於「寺廟藝術」，長年下來就累積了很多照片是在寺廟內拍攝2D作品，那些門神、那些壁畫，照片可就很多了。由於台灣的寺廟之多，那些2D作品的寺廟藝術是幾乎成為每一座寺廟的必要裝飾。按照當前的FoP-Taiwan政策，室內的2D作品是不允許的。一旦要提交全數刪除，屆時影響是很廣的，他們可能會質疑FoP-Taiwan政策是否有問題。我建議，應該向他們這些用戶一起討論，重新檢討FoP-Taiwan政策。我推薦，向紀橋、Outlookxp二位討論。--Kai3952 (talk) 04:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:求是.svg

Wcam，您好。谢谢您发出提删通知，我在提删申请的页面回答了您的提删请求。这个图片既不是原件照片也不是原样描摹作品，而是临帖，根据我对《中华人民共和国著作权法（2010修正版）》的粗浅理解，应该不会侵犯他人（包括竺可桢先生）的著作权。--Pion (talk) 08:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

@Pion: 感谢说明。请问该矢量图片是根据您自己书写的字迹制作的，还是来自他人书写的字迹？--Wcam (talk) 15:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

谢谢，当时应该是写画在纸上拍下来然后用inkscape矢量化修正的，因为太久远了，原稿和数字中间稿应该都没有了。--Pion (talk) 08:58, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

2020

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Korea Football Association logo, 2020.svg

Hi, out of curiosity why have you marked the image as a copyright violation? Aren't vector images with simple geometric shapes allowed on commons? The image is really only made out of straight lines and polygonal shapes. --Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

@Nehme1499: I do not believe the lion face is a simple geometric shape as it takes a non-trivial amount of creativity to create this work. The fact that the image is only made out of straight lines and polygonal shapes does not matter, as all digital photographs are only made out of simple pixels and yet they are not exempt from copyright protection. --Wcam (talk) 15:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Ok I think we are talking about two extremes. A picture of a countryside will have an almost infinite amount of pixels and defined "shapes". A logo with a countable amount of polygons isn't really comparable. I honestly don't understand how I couldn't go through a formal procedure to contest your nomination. You just nominated it for deletion, and it got deleted. Seems a bit weird... --Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

关于“优酷全娱乐”YouTube截屏

我当时转为常规删除请求，不仅仅是因为意见分歧，还有更重要的一点就是给我时间去向优酷方面求证。现在优酷方面已经确认这个“优酷全娱乐”不是官方的，我也第一时间把相关情况写在删除请求里边，投了删除票。照片被删是迟早的事，你完全没必要多此一举把之前那个速删模板加回来。--Masdggg (talk) 19:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

@Masdggg: 我现在以图片审查员的身份按照规定的审查流程对该图片进行提报快速删除处理，请不要再回退。--Wcam (talk) 23:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

行吧，你随便。--Masdggg (talk) 01:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File:2019-nCoV-CDC-23313.png

File:2019-nCoV-CDC-23313.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ecklacell (talk) 00:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Logo kunming.svg

你好，我想请问关于这张地铁logo，为何别的城市地铁logo例如北上广就不会有著作权的问题，请指教--User:团子家的黑粉 —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:59, 7 March 2020‎ (UTC)

File:City seal of Yilan City.gif

File:City seal of Yilan City.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Larryasou (talk) 08:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

关于台湾县市以下行政区徽章版权的疑问？

您好，请教一下台湾的市辖区、乡镇、村徽章与旗帜是否皆可以以Template:PD-ROC-exempt方式释出至Wikimedia Commons?例如File:Logos of Gaoshu.jpg--Larryasou (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

@Larryasou: 过往的存废讨论中有图片因为{{PD-ROC-exempt}}只适用于文字的理由被删除（例1 2 3 4），个人不建议使用。但台湾的政府网站大多都有类似这样的资料开放宣告，可对应使用{{GWOIA}}模版。--Wcam (talk) 13:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

@Wcam: 屏东县似乎是一个特殊的例子，这是屏东县政府的资料开放宣告，因为他缩小了授权范围，这与其他县市的声明不同,例如[6],因此可能不适用{{GWOIA}}模版。--Larryasou (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

@Larryasou: 这里链接到的政府資料開放授權條款，对应{{OGDL}}。--Wcam (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

File:City seal of Yilan City.gif

File:City seal of Yilan City.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Jun Matsumoto 2017 松本潤.png

Check Special:Diff/420768722. This wasn't you, right? There have been several fake licence reviews to that user's uploads. See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yureka23. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@Stefan2: No this IP is not me. They faked the license review with my name. --Wcam (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:藝人于子育.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:藝人于子育.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: The permission is near the end of this page: "本照片以創用CC 姓名標示-相同方式分享 4.0 國際版授權條款發布" (translation: This photo is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0 International). --Wcam (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

File:藝人于子育.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 00:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

书法作品是否享有全景自由？

Hi, Wcam. 感谢您解答过我的疑惑。我注意到您提出删除了一些户外展示的书法作品，原因之一是: FoP-China 不包括文字作品。但是，根据法院裁判[7]，书法作品被认为是美术作品，同时Template:FoP-China 亦有相关描述。若无异议的话烦请您恢复上述文件。
専此

Larryasou (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

@Larryasou: 书法作品属于美术作品，但是其文字可能会受到单独的著作权保护（文字作品）。「澳门豆捞」只有四个字，难以构成文字作品，而毛泽东诗词的文字作品受著作权保护。不知您希望恢复的具体是哪些文件，况且我不是管理员，您可以前往COM:UD。--Wcam (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

抱歉，我没有考虑到这一点。 Larryasou (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Larryasou (talk) 10:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:GWOIA 的一个小瑕疵

Hi, Wcam。我在使用 GWOIA 标签时，会在下一个标签之间出现空行。例如File:Taiwan Power Company Logo.jpg，看起来不整齐，你可以修复吗？

@Larryasou:

Done--Wcam (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! --Larryasou (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Larryasou (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

花莲县政府网站资料许可

您好，请教一下 File:7d05887875662a27445f3faf09baa586e40ffe2e 花蓮縣長傅崐萁13日在縣府民政處長邱展謙的陪同下，前往陸軍花東防衛指揮部慰勞國軍弟兄.jpg 许可证是fair use吗？

@Larryasou: 该著作權聲明不是自由版权协议。虽然现在的花莲县政府网站有資料開放宣告，但根据网页存档，该内容发布之时并无資料開放宣告，且现在的花莲县政府网站上似已找不到该内容，故我认为该图片应属侵权。--Wcam (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

ok,感谢解答。 Larryasou (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

RFA

Hello Wcam. Have you thought of being an admin on Commons? --A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: Thank you for the recognition. However, I currently do not plan on taking on additional responsibilities as an admin. --Wcam (talk) 11:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:黨產解密.pdf

File:黨產解密.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RZuo (talk) 11:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Decasurger

Hi! I have a original file to be attached for OTRS permission. However, the file I uploaded was speedily deleted. How should I do to re-verify this file again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decasurger (talk • contribs)

@Decasurger: Please include the link to the deleted file in your OTRS email. After your OTRS permission clears the file will be undeleted automatically. --Wcam (talk) 12:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

The deleted file:File:NDHU Library.jpg The original file with metadata: Dropbox Decasurger (talk) 13:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

@Decasurger: I am not an OTRS member. Please send an email to permissions-zh

wikimedia.org. --Wcam (talk) 13:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you for the help!! Decasurger (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

有关公共场所的书法作品

您好，Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Danielkwong~commonswiki将广州地铁月台内的书法字体照片删除了，请问此类公共场所的书法作品也是受到著作权保护吗？另想请问一下，这些图片删除的时候，维基百科那边并没有进行替换，请问这是那边模板的使用错误导致未能删除，还是这边执行删除的时候存在问题？谢谢！--Tim Wu (talk) 09:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@TimWu007: 我看不到被删图片内容，无法给出准确回答，但中国的全景自由仅限户外公共场所，而地铁月台不属于户外。如您认为删除有误，可前往COM:UR。若维基百科那边没有机器人移除已删除图片，只好手动进行移除。--Wcam (talk) 10:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

了解，感谢回复。--Tim Wu (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Skull Bones black.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Skull Bones black.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Leonel Небојша Sohns 18:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

关于PRC-StandardMap

此次在共享资源列出的是无争议的中国国界线画法标准样图、世界各国国界线画法参考样图或行政区域界线标准画法图，此类图片由行政机关通过行政公文公布，是无争议的公有领域。与维基百科上之情况不同。特此告知。Patlabor Ingram (talk) 04:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@Patlabor Ingram: 既然这些地图依照著作权法第五条属于公有领域，那么使用{{PD-PRC-exempt}}即可，我仍然认为{{PRC-StandardMap}}没有必要使用，应当删除。--Wcam (talk) 12:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

理解您持有观点的权利。但是速删理由G4已经不成立了（目前模板有使用、理据为无争议公有领域）。

另：共享资源中，美国政府公有领域模板都是按政府部门分类，总数上百个，未见有存废问题。Patlabor Ingram (talk) 15:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@Patlabor Ingram: 美国政府的是按政府部门分类，那么您的分类是按照什么标准？除了地图，是否还有其它类别？如果只有地图的话，我还是认为没有必要单独建立一个特殊模板。--Wcam (talk) 16:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

您有持有个人观点的权利。

但是，方针指引并未规定一国或一个法条下只能有一个PD标签，亦未对新建著作权标签模板进行限制。维基媒体上的著作权标签有近千个，并未有统一标准限定。Patlabor Ingram (talk) 13:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

你在不顾前次存废讨论结果的情况下，擅自重建模板，做出这种不当行为前，不知有没有想过方针指引？--Wcam (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

前次存废讨论公示的删除理由是“unused template”。现在有图片可以使用此模板自然可以重建，该删除理由也自然消失。此等情况维基百科等也有先例，重建有何不妥？

此次上传的中国国界线画法标准样图、世界各国国界线画法参考样图或行政区域界线标准画法图，在之前维基百科的讨论中您也并没有异议。

我不知道我们之间有什么误会，让阁下在三天内对我提出速删7次、删除1次。如有什么歧见，我觉得还是通过讨论及时化解比较好。若有冒犯之处，本人在此致歉。Patlabor Ingram (talk) 07:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

@Patlabor Ingram: 既然您认为重建理由充分，理应先在COM:UD提请方为妥当。另外，我标记{{No source since}}的理由是，您给出的来源链接里找不到地图图片，请提供图片本身的来源，希望您能自行修正该错误。--Wcam (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

北京市行政区域界线图等已补充原始来源。

关于模板，我很少在共享资源上活跃，不了解“unused template”的重建在本站上需要经过UD。可能维基百科上重新上传因未使用而被删除的电影海报不需要存废复核给了我错误的印象。对于程序上的不妥之处我深表歉意。Patlabor Ingram (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

插一句话针对@Wcam: ，我不知道接下来的内容是否满足善意推定，如果不满足的话可径自打删除线或回退掉，不必理会。我觉得您是不是被某些明显的互联网审查规则吓怕了，就“公开使用前需要送测绘地理信息行政主管部门审核”，这很明显是审查机制下的行为好吧，其性质无非就是人肉功夫墙，如果按照这个逻辑，那么随便一个人被警察以违反香港特区国安法逮捕并搜出一些涉及所谓“黄色经济圈”、“泛民主派”等违法内容，那么这些违法内容就彻底不能自由使用了么，只能合理使用了么，哪怕就是那个人自制且正式贡献于公有领域（即{{PD-self}}）也不行么？希望您以后再提删文件时，避免搞这种将审查机制与版权自由与否相混淆的问题好不？--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: 首先，我对{{PRC-StandardMap}}提出的删除理由与行政主管部门审核无关。至于那些北京的标准地图，我也不认为这是审查机制：创作者有权限制其作品被如何使用，如果符合COM:L要求才可收录；政府部门是地图的创作者，并且规定任何修改必须送交政府部门审核，这一要求很明显不符合COM:L（The following restrictions must not apply to the image or other media file: ...Notification of the creator required, rather than requested, for all or for some uses.）。你的{{PD-self}}类比不恰当之处在于，创作者与提出限制的一方不是同一个实体，只要创作者没有限制其内容的自由使用，则是符合COM:L。--Wcam (talk) 12:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Wcam: 我愿引用上面Patlabor Ingram君的说明：《党政机关公文处理工作条例》第八条（六）：“*通告*。适用于在*一定范围*内公布*应当遵守或者周知的事项*。”同时根据《北京市测绘条例》：“编制本市各种地图的，必须符合下列要求：……（二）使用本市行政区域界线基础地理底图，作为基础底图；……”另根据《地图管理条例》，在中华人民共和国制作、修改任何地图，*公开使用前需要送测绘地理信息行政主管部门审核*。也就是说在中国大陆的任何地图，哪怕是File:China_edcp_location_map.svg，都是经过严格审核的（换言之，如果没经过审核的话，那么连发布都绝无可能发生），如果您认为这张无文字地图都不能接受，您也可以大规模，甚至统统提删，什么COM:INUSE都可以不管，但如果不是这样的话，请您接受这个既定事实吧，这些审核机制真的不会影响这些地图们的公有领域状态，不然COM:NOTCENSORED早就是张废纸了。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: 需要指出您又弄错了对象。COM:NOTCENSORED说的是维基共享资源不应审查内容，这与您讨论的问题无关。--Wcam (talk) 14:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

疑問

這張照片並非在下上傳、擁有，為何會收到違規版權通知？
這張照片的版權是否會引響在下帳號的違規數？(希望不要被牽連)

File:TR EMU3000 外觀.png --鐵路1 (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@鐵路1: 1由于您将此图片由中文维基百科导入至维基共享资源，故提报时自动化处理工具向您发出了通知。2不会影响，请放心。--Wcam (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@Wcam: 了解，感謝。(不過據我所知，這些圖確實是由臺灣鐵路管理局新聞稿中提供的圖片，並且應該適用GWOIA授權。)--鐵路1 (talk) 17:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@鐵路1: 但是来源提供的链接[8]处找不到相应的图片，无法验证其授权状态。来源应提供包含该图片的网页链接。--Wcam (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@Wcam: 了解。--鐵路1 (talk) 04:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

@Wcam: 經多次資料搜索，在下放棄幫助最初上傳者尋找更適合的來源，中間在下有尋找其他可能是合的圖片進行更換，但是在下退回最初時，使用者變成在下，請問是否會影響想在下的信用與權限，抱歉一直打擾。--鐵路1 (talk) 15:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@鐵路1: 无需担心，只要不是做出反复、蓄意、明显的破坏。不会对你有任何负面影响。--Wcam (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

關於Template:PD-ROC-oldphoto‎

其實中華民國（臺灣）歷來的著作權法都有跟如何處理修法前已存在的著作的著作權保護期的相關條文，所以該模板並不存在所根據的法律條文過期的問題。現已在中文版補上歷來相關的條文，簡單來說，在修法前已經進入公用領域者，不適用新法延長的新保護期。所以該模板所適用的老舊照片，其實仍應適用舊法的「10年保護期」而非現行的「50年保護期」，所以這些老照片在2002年1月1日之前老早就已進入公有領域，沒有涉及到URAA的問題。--祥龍 (talk) 12:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@Pbdragonwang: 感谢说明，但我重新阅读现行著作权法第一百零六條，没有读出相关意思；在别处搜寻，亦没有发现任何「在修法前已經進入公用領域者，不適用新法延長的新保護期」之类似说法，而在著作权学者章忠信的这两篇文章[9][10]中，关于老照片（可远至日據時代）的公有领域判定只需考虑现行法律规定的50年期限，且在Commons:CRT/Taiwan这个页面中，未见任何一种情况使得1960年代的照片符合公有领域条件。@Taiwania Justo: 不知阁下有何看法？--Wcam (talk) 13:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

又找到一些文章或有助于厘清问题：[11][12]--Wcam (talk) 14:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

我正是閱讀章忠信的《著作權法逐條釋義》（ISBN 978-957-11-7561-4）才寫下此一說法。該書第278頁寫說「依歷次舊法規定受保護之著作，如於歷次新法修正施行前，依舊法規定其著作財產權保護期間已屆滿者，不會因為後來歷次的修法，延長著作財產權保護期期間，以致『死而復生』，重新受保護。」（該頁即是在解說第106條）。你舉的那兩篇文章，是因為即使用現行著作權法50年保護期來解釋，也已經超過保護期，保護期更短的舊法當然更不用去考慮。--祥龍 (talk) 14:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

我在{{PD-ROC-oldphoto/zh-hant}}已增列歷年來各版本的相關條文，各條文基本上是說，完成於新法施行前的著作，在新法施行時仍在保護期者，將受到新法的規範與適用（即保護期依照新法計算）。反過來說就是已經不在保護期者，不適用於新法，也就是已進入公有領域者，不會再脫離公有領域重新受到保護。故學者章忠信的書中才會有此一說法。--祥龍 (talk) 14:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Wcam...? Are you there?

I was kinda hoping you can help me with something. Like I said at Clindberg's talk page, I discussed the matter of 2D art work on COM:FOP Taiwan with you last year, but you did not respond. Reke thought I didn't ask anyone. no matter what I explain to him, he'll not listen.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

I need your help. Can you give me any response on that?--Kai3952 (talk) 12:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@Wcam: I just sent you an email.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:53, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Nckulogo2018.jpg

And also:

File:Nckulogoold.jpg

Yours sincerely, Larryasou (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

2021

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

UCC Coffee

Exactly why File:UCC Coffee End of Eva can - Asuka version.JPG was deleted? The only reason given was ad litteram «COM:PACKAGING». What does it mean? The guide states, sic et simpliciter: «the printing on such packaging is often legally protected as an artistic work (that applies irrespective of artistic merit, and regardless of whether the design appears only on the front surface or wraps around). [...] Note that this does not depend on whether a company or product logo is shown; those are themselves often copyright-protected, but often the problem is not a logo but a printed photograph or drawing on the packaging which illustrates the contents». There was a problem with the UCC Coffee? IRRC, no logo, image or artistic work was visible in the picture. Asuka didn't appear. So? There was a problem in the font used, maybe?--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@TeenAngels1234: The overall design of the packaging, and especially the drawing of Asuka are copyright-protected. --Wcam (talk) 05:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Asuka wasn't shown, or de minimus. The overral 3D shape is not copyright-protected, as far I can say.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 09:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Former Trump Plaza, Atlantic City.jpg

Hi there,

Thanks for uploading the image File:Former Trump Plaza, Atlantic City.jpg. This is just to let you know that I've uploaded a new version with increased contrast and brightness and colour balance adjusted (no other changes).

Please feel free to revert this if you dislike the changes for whatever reason.

Thanks for the contribution, and all the best, Ubcule (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-ROC-oldphoto

To be honest, can you please withdraw it? This isn't really fair, under same clause you can also nominate {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} which is covering both Japan and United States because "based on JP laws no longer in effect". --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your comment is acknowledged. --Wcam (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

File:VS Code (Insiders).png

File:VS Code (Insiders).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This file is a Microsoft product screenshot, and while Microsoft has made clear that VS code is open source (available under MIT license), they have also made it clear that any product screenshots resulting from downloading the exe from the website is copyrighted.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A a s i m 01:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleting logos of ITV Channel Television and ITV Tyne Tees & Border

Hi. Just wondering why you have deleted the logos of ITV Channel Television [13] and ITV Tyne Tees & Border [14]? GMc (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:ITV logos. Also I am not an admin so I did not perform the action of deletion. --Wcam (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Please, no more PCP distorting

The Gang Heng case is because its calligraphic Chinese texts, your recently TOO cases are far away from calligraphy, these are not beyond TOO in general, and in China. If you still claim by PCP, then I will call people to discuss removal of your adminship, thank you. --117.136.1.58 06:48, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:KON logo.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:KON logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Déjà vu • ✉ 15:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Images permission

Please leave the images from governmental website from deletion. 紫阅 (talk) 10:26, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Old Chinese photos

Hey, I don't think it's helpful to tag old photos with {{No permission since}}. If there is an issue with the license, the remedy is almost certainly to find evidence of PD status rather than getting the copyright holder to send permission to COM:VRT (which is what npd is for). The next time you disagree with a PD tag (or find an image incorrectly tagged CC but could plausibly be PD), I would suggest opening a DR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Sorry but I think this is a misunderstanding. The moment I tagged them with {{No permission since}} the license was cc-by-sa-4.0, which is clearly incorrect as the sources do not indicate such licenses. It is the uploader's responsibility to provide correct copyright information. In some cases the uploader later may have changed CC tags to PD, so it is not me who disagree with PD tags. But I got your point and I will open a DR in the future. --Wcam (talk) 00:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

de:file:ZhurongLander.jpg

Hi Wcam, may I ask to look on de:file:ZhurongLander.jpg on the German Wikipedia and to give your opinion? This file has the same source as File:ZhurongUndLander.jpg and I'm not sure about the copyright status. In my understanding CC-BY-4.0 license is not covered by the source. Correct?--Wdwd (talk) 18:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

@Wdwd: That is correct. CC-BY-4.0 license is not mentioned anywhere on the source web page. --Wcam (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:海軍二級上將梅家樹.jpeg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:海軍二級上將梅家樹.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 02:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

2022

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

FoP-Taiwan

根據你的存檔，雖然在2018年曾討論過，但這次問題不同。我有二個問題向你請益：

第一，我前天在這裡有向Mys 721tx詢問，但因為這問題太急、太重要，所以我想拿給你討論。
第二，我的帳號封禁雖然發生在中文維基，但事情起因於我在commons的行為（即中文維基管理員在封禁中所指「缺乏合作」），如果我想請求帳號解禁，必須要先解決我在commons行為上問題。根據Reke要求，必須遵從他的指示去改善我的問題，但他所指問題太過廣泛，所以我不奢求你來中文維基處理我的申訴，因此我只挑選COM:FOP#Taiwan向你討論（注意！這意思是我犯錯很多，FOP只是其中一個問題）。問題也在Mys 721tx那裡說過，就是針對「室內對藝術品拍照」這件事討論。

乍看，第一與第二都在討論同一個問題，實際上是不同。第一討論是我在別人公司門口拍照，這有涉及到法律問題（對方向我控告），第二討論是話題僅限於我在commons提刪照片上，尤其是指Reke認為我缺乏正確判斷這件事。--Kai3952 (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

- 我知道了。那麼我很抱歉，打擾你了。--Kai3952 (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  我认为File:Infrontstarritz.jpg不符合COM:FOP Taiwan室内美术作品的规定。 Wcam (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

我正在考慮是否永久放棄提刪權

我現在所說這件事不是最近發生，但是對我很重要，因此我不得不說。早在二年前，有用戶注意到我在commons行為有很多不妥之處，他們是說我在面對用戶上傳照片，對他們進行版權審查時，缺乏正確判斷以及過度解讀政策，頻頻向用戶請求OTRS，甚至面對照片是顯示拍攝室內時，我會自認為那是藝術作品而引用FOP進行提刪，造成他們不便與困擾，實際原因我知道是因為我得罪某位用戶，因此被他誇大成我在擾民，並且造謠說是我亞斯伯格症發作所導致我對用戶的照片「過度審查」，經過他的渲染之後，很多用戶跟隨他，他們說我這二年當中，不止是在版權或FOP審查上，面對用戶也是存在爭議，頻頻引人不滿，他們當中有一位舉例說我喜歡扮演管理員角色，而另一位也幫腔，說我吹毛求疵，幾近病態，因此他們當聽到是我亞斯伯格症發作造成時，他們非常認同他的說法。我們暫時不談論亞斯伯格症，只將事情的重點放在與commons有關去談就可以，因此我找你是因為我對你相當明白，你對版權審查以及commons政策的認識是很有經驗的，所以我將這件事向你討論。

這件事是指我在commons行為上是否真的需要改變？在我的認識當中，我的行為與你是沒有不同，同樣都是審查用戶上傳照片是否符合commons政策，當然也包含版權、FOP，然而只有我會招來他們的不滿，這顯示出是我自己在本身上是有問題，因此我正在考慮他們的提議，停止對任何人的照片提刪，並永久放棄提刪權。--Kai3952 (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
	Thank you! SD hehua (talk) 15:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Talkback

	Hello, Wcam. You have new messages at Commons:Deletion requests/File:任嘉倫攝於210711 歐米茄活動 in Nanjing.jpg. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--SD hehua (talk) 11:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

~~Something wrong occurred. I mean this page Commons:Deletion requests/File:任嘉倫攝於210711 歐米茄活動 in Nanjing.jpg SD hehua (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)~~

URAA

有个关于URAA的问题来询问一下您。2012年3月1日之后上传的在来源国属于PD，但美国不属于PD的文件，是否目前的策略是“如果没有权利人来主张删除，那么就这么放着”呢。如果是这样的话，Not-PD-US的模板上还规定时间干什么。期待您的解答。 Stang^★ 21:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: URAA的问题在Commons多年来争议较大一直不了了之，目前的现状是，原则上新的{{Not-PD-US-URAA}}图片不应该再上传，但如果仅以URAA作为理由提删，管理员多半不会删除。2012年3月1日这个日期应该是个遗留问题，可能是某次讨论中提出的提议，但没有得到妥善解决。-- Wcam (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

你是管理員嗎？

為什麼你都不管事？比如：照片侵權，又或者有人違反政策，就此類的事，更何況我過去幾次向你說過，但是你都沒回覆。此外，我受到站外的不明人士騷擾，你也沒有告訴我怎麼做。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

我在这里不是管理员。 Wcam (talk) 21:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

FoP-HK

请教FoP之中对于3D作品的定义：例如这张照片是否应被认为是室外永久放置的3D作品？尽管这是一块告示牌（3D的），但是其的主体部分包含了某个高于当地TOO标准的图标（2D的图形，“graphic work”）。感谢解惑。Stang^★ 20:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: 我认为这个告示牌属于2D作品，按照COM:FOP Hong Kong的划分，我认为不属于2D "work of artistic craftsmanship"但我不是非常确定。这个问题可能涉及到一些英国版权法的概念，您或许可以询问其他熟悉英国版权法的用户例如User:Clindberg. Wcam (talk) 23:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

感谢您的回答。上面那个告示牌应该不适用于de minimis是么？顺便附带一个问题，这面上面有校徽的室外作品是否属于3D作品？Stang^★ 23:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Stang: 不适用于de minimis。这两个例子中的标志都有可能被视作建筑物的一部分，而根据COM:FOP UK建筑物的定义非常宽泛，所以我感到不确定。 Wcam (talk) 23:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Copyright on video surveillance

Hello. I think the copyright of video surveillance does not belong to a specific author and should be in the public domain. What about File:Atta in airport.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shenzhiming88 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

@Shenzhiming88: The claim that security camera footage is not protected by copyright for the most part lacks legal basis (especially in China in this case). Other similar photo exists doesn't mean you should upload one. Wcam (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay, since I'm not very familiar with copyright rules and saw that image, I mistakenly thought the surveillance footage was in the public domain. In this case, please delete it, thank you. Also sorry for the trouble.--Shenzhiming88 (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

关于版权的问题

您好！关于别人通过网络分享给我的图片，之前也要求发送授权信。七月初的时候，我让他发送了，Ticket是2022070210000487，但是直到现在迟迟没有回复。后来我让他发送给英文团队，但是他好像不太熟悉英文，所以又不行。并且照片标注的来源是他的B站主页链接，但是这上面并没有那些照片，我不知道是否符合规范。现在，我有几个问题，请您回答一下：

能否将他在聊天记录中进行授权的记录进行截图作为理据呢？您能否通过B站的账户私信他作为证据呢？
如果不行，那请问怎么样让他们志愿者团队尽快处理呢？并且发送邮件的话，怎么样证明是同一个人呢？
如果还是不行，是让他注册账号的话，是否还需要让他证明与B站上是同一个人呢？

因为我和他不太熟悉，已经麻烦他很多了，所以请您给出一个相对简便的方法，以便进行授权。谢谢您！ Shenzhiming88 (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

@Shenzhiming88: 英文的VRT队列有可能积压更为严重。您可以尝试联系VRT permission列表的中文成员，据我所知有Stang、XiPlus、SCP-2000等。作者的VRT授权可不限于某一张图片，类似「今后所有由我（张三）拍摄的照片都授权维基百科/共享资源用户李四上传并以CC BY-SA 4.0这一开放授权发布」这样的声明也是可以接受的。来源可以标注「Bilibili用户张三拍摄」，并在「张三」二字加上他的B站主页链接。 Wcam (talk) 15:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

为了避免又让他产生麻烦，我想再问得详细一点。

请问如何“联系VRT permission列表的中文成员”呢？
我让他发送邮件过去之后，应该需要证明他和B站上的用户是同一个人吧。他的邮箱名称与B站上的署名是不一样的。这应该怎么处理呢？

十分感谢您的回复。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

@Shenzhiming88: 你可以直接在这些用户的讨论页留言，或使用电邮联系功能联系他们。取得联系后，你可以向他们询问第二个问题的详情。 Wcam (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

好的，感谢您的回复。我现在就去联系他们。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

实际上英文队列的积压远小于中文队列，但目前如果邮件内有中文就会被转到中文队列；您忘了还有Mys 721tx。Stang^★ 18:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

关于使用洛天依创作的音乐的版权问题

由于我看到中文维基百科上有初音未来创作的相关音乐作品，使用了CC4.0协议进行共享，因此也想给洛天依上传自由版权的音乐，以便替换当前非自由版权的音乐。我已经找到了一位用户，他同意将自己创作的音乐作品进行共享。但是对于著作权的问题，我感觉不太清楚。根据官方网页版权说明，提到商业使用需要进行洽谈。但是又有提到“同人创作作品著作权归属同人创作者，但禁止将同人创作作品在任何国家或地区进行权利登记，包括但不限于商标注册、著作权登记、专利申请等”，这又说明制作人又有音乐作品的著作权。所以我觉得主要问题还是在洛天依的声音是否具有版权上。而参考初音未来的歌曲File:Freely Tomorrow.ogg，似乎声音没有版权。因此，我可不可以上传这个作品呢？感谢您的回复。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 11:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Shenzhiming88: 简单回答：不可以上传到共享资源，但可以作为非自由文件上传到中文维基百科，替代当前非自由版权的音乐。洛天依的声音具有版权，且不可自由商业使用，但是原创的作词作曲可以以自由版权协议发布。如有更自由的作品则应该使用更自由的作品（词、曲、声音都是非自由版权vs词曲为自由版权，声音不是自由版权），这是zh:WP:NFCC#1隐含的含义，具体阐述可参见en:WP:FREER。这虽然并非明文规定的方针，但是是符合逻辑的解读。 Wcam (talk) 12:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

但是还有一个问题，就是那个初音未来的歌曲为什么能够上传呢？初音未来的声音应该也具有版权吧。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 12:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Shenzhiming88: 共享资源上存在某个文件没被删除不一定代表这个文件是合规的，你可以自行探究初音未来的声音是不是自由版权，如果有足够的证据证明不是自由版权，可以提报删除。 Wcam (talk) 12:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

好的，谢谢您。另外我觉得不是说“有足够的证据证明不是自由版权”，而应该让他们证明“有足够的证据证明是自由版权”。如果他们给出了充分的证据，那我应该也可以将洛天依的歌曲上传吧。我刚刚发现原来已经有存废讨论了，他们说Vocaloid是一种乐器。因此，我是否也可以上传呢？ Shenzhiming88 (talk) 12:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Shenzhiming88: 不同的歌声库可以有不同的授权协议，假如初音未来的声音是自由版权，不代表洛天依的声音也是自由版权，且根据洛天依的官网信息，上海禾念信息科技有限公司主张了洛天依声音的版权，且没有允许自由商业使用，因此关于初音未来声音的结论不适用于洛天依的声音。 Wcam (talk) 12:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

但洛天依和初音未来同属于Vocaloid。en:Vocaloid#Legal implications上提到：“由软件创造的人声所产生的任何权利或义务都属于软件用户。就像任何音乐合成器一样，软件被视为一种乐器，人声被视为声音...... 另一方面，吉祥物形象和名称的版权属于其各自的工作室。（Any rights or obligations arising from the vocals created by the software belong to the software user. Just like any music synthesizer, the software is treated as a musical instrument and the vocals as sound... On the other hand, copyrights to the mascot image and name belong to their respective studios.）” Shenzhiming88 (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

即便Vocaloid是一种乐器，其歌声库的制作也可能受版权保护，尤其是采样了真人声音的，该人的声音表演也是具有版权的。 Wcam (talk) 12:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

但是我觉得这可能就是您的推测了。如果按照您所说的话，那么钢琴的制作也可能受版权保护，而钢琴的制作人也对弹奏出的作品拥有版权了。不知道我理解得对不对。维基共享资源服务器位于佛罗里达州，因此必须考虑美国的版权法。上海禾念信息科技有限公司主张了洛天依声音的版权，并不意味着制作出的作品不能够以自由版权发布。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 12:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

这个类比不恰当，钢琴的发声原理不是采集其他受著作权保护的声音而生成出钢琴的声音。而根据zh:VOCALOID条目所述，「VOCALOID沒有歌聲資料庫，實際可使用的版本由其他公司開發」，也就是说VOCALOID的开发与歌声库的开发是不同的过程，VOCALOID的开发者自然不能主张声音的版权。 Wcam (talk) 12:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

但是洛天依是属于VOCALOID的，其基于VOCALOID相关技术进行开发，就必须要遵循VOCALOID的条款。因此，无论是在哪个国家，只要遵循VOCALOID的条款，那么声音就属于自由版权。而根据英文维基百科上的介绍，VOCALOID的条款中提到：“根据许可条款，只要人声不违反公共政策，该软件的吉祥物（？）可用于创作用于商业或非商业用途的人声。（Under the term of license, the mascots for the software can be used to create vocals for commercial or non-commercial use as long as the vocals do not offend public policy.）”。因此，无论其制作过程是否是受版权保护，它的成品还是可以直接拿来用的。关于发声原理，洛天依使用的是VOCALOID，其发声原理是VOCALOID的相关原理，被授权是属于自由领域，而不是属于禾念公司。就像钢琴一样，其发声原理不受保护（VOCALOID的相关发声原理属于自由领域），但是钢琴的制作过程可能受到版权保护（歌声库的制作也可能受版权保护）。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

共享资源规定其可接受的内容必须在来源国和美国都是自由版权或公有领域。如果作品在来源国不是自由版权，共享资源就不可以收录。 Wcam (talk) 13:01, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

没错，VOCALOID的发声原理不受保护，但制作歌声库使用的素材是可以受版权保护的，因此使用受版权保护的素材生成的作品则是非自由的（参见COM:DW）。因此不同的歌声库可以选择使用不同的授权协议，而洛天依官方选择了不自由的，因此使用洛天依生成的作品，其声音部分不是自由的。 Wcam (talk) 13:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

但是VOCALOID的条款又应该怎么解释呢？我认为“不同的歌声库可以选择使用不同的授权协议”是假命题，因为VOCALOID的条款提到“因软件创建的声音而产生的任何权利或义务均属于软件用户”，而不是属于禾念公司。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 13:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

我认为VOCALOID所称「用户」指的是VOCALOID的一切下游用户，包括歌声库开发者。总而言之，共享资源不接受非自由作品的衍生作品。《中华人民共和国著作权法》第十三条也规定「改编、翻译、注释、整理已有作品而产生的作品，其著作权由改编、翻译、注释、整理人享有，但行使著作权时不得侵犯原作品的著作权。」也就是说作为软件创建的音乐作品的创作者，可以享有一定限度的著作权，在目前讨论的这个情况下，我认为这个限度不够大，不足以满足共享资源的要求。 Wcam (talk) 13:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

我不认为这是非自由作品的衍生作品。因为这是由VOCALOID制作的，而VOCALOID并非非自由作品。那要不到时候我先把作品上传到共享资源，然后再让其他用户也进行讨论。您看怎么样呢？ Shenzhiming88 (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

再说一遍，人声素材的表演录制是著作权保护的对象，如果没有明确声明其为自由版权，应视作非自由作品。另外根据预防性原则，一个文件的使用自由如有疑问，保险起见不应上传，这与通常所说的「疑罪从无」是相反的。 Wcam (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

好的，那我就先不上传。但是我还是不太认同您的观点，因此我在https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Copyright_issues_regarding_the_use_of_music_created_by_Luo_Tianyi进行了询问，看看其他用户是怎么看的。同时非常感谢您之前的耐心回复。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

以防我说的不清楚，洛天依条目中提到其采用的是「中国配音演员山新和日本歌手鹿乃录制的歌声样本」，这个声音样本的表演录制是可以具有著作权的。 Wcam (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

是的，我觉得这个歌声样本肯定是原演唱者拥有版权。 Shenzhiming88 (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

建议阁下检查一下中文维基百科上一张照片的版权

您好！这张照片的上传者称其为自己拍摄，但是该照片并没有EXIF信息，并且该照片拍摄的日期似乎在上传者出生前（见其维基百科用户页：这几个月来，我一直在大学认真学习，准备四六级，因此暂时离开维基百科。，推知该用户正在上大学，但是拍摄日期显示为1994年5月1日），同时我也在这个网页找到了相同的照片，且在该网页上的上传日期远早于在维基百科上的上传日期。因此我觉得这张照片大概率不是其本人拍摄的。希望阁下能够再核实一下，十分感谢！ Shenzhiming88 (talk) 11:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright infractions

Hi @Wcam: I'm very surprised of seeing Template:end of copyvios on my discussion. File:Harbin Beer.png was uploaded a second time with a text-only version, which falls into COM:TOO China. And you've deleted it even without discussion, which I believe it is not the procedure. Have a nice day. TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 17:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

問題

閣下您好！我近來在共享資源上傳了一批來自Flickr、作者為中華民國總統府的圖片，授權皆為ccby2.0，但後來我對其中的這一張[15]有疑慮，因為它雖然是由中華民國總統府人員拍攝、和其他同類圖片一樣授權皆為ccby2.0，但拍攝對象是台灣導盲犬協會室內陳設的藝術作品，有可能與共享資源在全景自由方面的規範有衝突。所以請閣下幫忙檢查一下這張圖片是否符合共享資源的收錄原則（如果不符的話，也請閣下幫忙提刪）。謝謝！一群貓 (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

I have indicated the source and author,Why delete it?

File:天津津湾广场.jpg

天津津湾广场

KangTyngrwey (talk) 13:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

COM:NETCOPYVIO Wcam (talk) 14:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

台湾地区全景自由条款

多有打扰。

经两次向台湾地区主管部门电邮询问，分别得到回复，其中第一次回复已刊载在電子郵件1111122（核心在于第一点之（二），其余部分系对我邮件中部分内容的误解而产生的无关回复）。由于第一次回复中第一点之（二）仅列举了涂鸦这种平面美术作品，虽然其后括号注释“美术著作”，但对立体美术作品的适用性似乎没有明确指出，故本月我又去信询问，并就我在Commons_talk:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Taiwan中指出的台湾的规定没有单独规制贩卖行为提出疑问。今得回复（预计下月初刊载在同一网站）称第一点之（二）之说理同样适用于立体美术作品，即以立体美术作品为主题或拍摄重点，同样不能专以贩卖为目的重制（即拍摄）。同时对于他人以非贩卖目的进行复制后再授权他人使用，他人将复制物贩卖亦构成侵权（类似维基共享资源的情况）。按照台湾地区主管部门的上述解释，台湾地区的全景自由规定与日本法完全相同，此时对于维基共享资源的适用性即为：

OK对于建筑作品。
Not OK对于所有美术作品（包括平面和立体）——因并非完全自由，禁止贩卖。

诚然，正如阁下在Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama/Archive_17#FOP_in_Taiwan中所列举的，有其他学者对此有不同观点。本问题牵扯事项较多，否定台湾地区全景自由条款在维基共享资源情境下不适用于任何美术作品后中文维基百科中的许多条目想必都会受到影响，同时会涉及到是否引入日维方针允许以低分辨率【原美术作品合理使用+照片以可被接受的许可证许可】上传到本地的问题（例如日维的这个文件）。故前来询问阁下意见。 Teetrition (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

@Teetrition: 感谢更新。我目前的看法是，等您收到的答复公开刊登后，可以此为据直接更新COM:FOP Taiwan的相关内容。如有疑虑亦可在讨论页先讨论再更新。至于是否允许低分辨率图片上传到维基百科本地，应在维基百科互助客栈讨论。 Wcam (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Wcam/archive

Before 2015

File source is not properly indicated: File:Xiao Ke.jpg

STOP

File source is not properly indicated: File:Magneto_plasma_sphere.jpg

Help requested

File tagging File:National_Geographic_Channel.svg

删除质疑

Re:Re:删除质疑

RE:File:Gabriel Lee Chi Hong.jpg

關於User:蕭嘉錡上傳的藝人照片

OTRS permissions queues

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

TUSC token d93828a31a0441482f81a6c22712b40a

2015

File:Hunnan-1.jpg, File:Hunnan-2.jpg, File:Hunnan-3.jpg and File:Tir-sport.jpg

關於駱怡君照片版權問題

李慧慧照片版權問題說明

2016

Hello.

Picture

PD-textlogo 是否可用于File:Liuzhou BRT LOGO.svg？

關於行政院圖片

Jackson Yi 20151013.png

关于最近我的旧账号问题

File tagging File:Feng Xiaogang (cropped).jpg

2017

File:NEYC-logo.jpg

關於黄雅莉 新書《禮•物》分享見面會.jpg等照片刪除問題

about a poster of <your name. >

DrummingHeng's copyright violations

FOP China

File:170330YangYangOnceUponATime.png

Code issues in User:Wcam/common.js

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Ask for help

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

2018

Question about how to delete the older versions of files

File:《释名》颠倒的望日望时日月方位由香港青年陈少静发现说明什么？.pdf請求閣下的幫助。

RFA

speedy deletion

Could you help me?

FoP-Taiwan

I find a source of File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Deaf.svg (or File:Flag of Chinese Taipei for Deaf.png)

2019

Wcam，您好，很久不见。

Warning

阿云嘎的照片

A barnstar for you!

您好，我已经问过北京外国语大学院长和办公室

The Stand News

Important message for file movers

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Re: FoP-Taiwan

2020

关于“优酷全娱乐”YouTube截屏

关于台湾县市以下行政区徽章版权的疑问？

File tagging File:藝人于子育.jpg

书法作品是否享有全景自由？

Template:GWOIA 的一个小瑕疵

花莲县政府网站资料许可

RFA

Decasurger

有关公共场所的书法作品

File tagging File:Skull Bones black.png

关于PRC-StandardMap

疑問

關於Template:PD-ROC-oldphoto‎

Hello Wcam...? Are you there?

Notification about possible deletion

2021

UCC Coffee

Deleting logos of ITV Channel Television and ITV Tyne Tees & Border

Please, no more PCP distorting

File tagging File:KON logo.png

Images permission

關於黄雅莉新書《禮•物》分享見面會.jpg等照片刪除問題