User talk:JuTa/Archive 38

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bern%C3%A1th_Ferenc

hallo, Schönen Guten Tag/Grüss Gott entschuldigung weil ich störe Sie im Ihren arbeit, aber muss ich sagen nach viele Tage lang wir haben die voll Recht für die photo von: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bern%C3%A1th_Ferenc welche Sie gelöscht keine nach fragen, nach suchen, und ich habe auch die gesendete Brief für : (ich habe keine Verantwortung weil nicht arbeitet pünktlich/in Zeit die permission-co. Danke. Adresse/meine@gmail.com> May 4

to permissions-co.

I hereby AFFIRM that i , András Jakubecz the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright both of the media both of the depicted work as shown here (both of!! fro sure ) : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bern%C3%A1th_Ferenc_git%C3%A1rm%C5%B1v%C3%A9sz_zeneszerz%C5%91.jpg

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bern%C3%A1th_Ferenc#/media/File:Bern%C3%A1t_Ferenc_Artisjus_d%C3%ADjas_Git%C3%A1rm%C5%B1v%C3%A9sz_-_Tan%C3%A1r.jpg and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above mentioned content under the free license Creative commons attribution- share a like 4. International I acknowledge taht by doing so i grant anyone the right to use the work even commercial use or otherwise modify  provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other of applicable laws. I am aware that not limited only to wikipedia and related sites. I am aware that the copyright holders always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right attributed in accordance with license chosen. Modifications others make to the work not be claimed to have been made by teh copyright holder i acknowledge that i cannot withdraw this and the content may or may not be kept permanaently on wikipedia project

Both of on the picture existed/depicted Person (Ferenc Bernath) given to me aggreement to show him on the Picture!

2017.05.03. sender: Jakubecz András copyright owner: same

Kijelentem, hogy az alábbi kép(ek) szerzői jogainak tulajdonosaként jogosult vagyok a képek szerzői jogairól nyilatkozni: <<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bern%C3%A1th_Ferenc_git%C3%A1rm%C5%B1v%C3%A9sz_zeneszerz%C5%91.jpg>> Beleegyezek, hogy a képek a Wikimédia-projektek oldalain a „Nevezd meg! – Így add tovább! 4.0” (CC BY-SA 4.0) licenc alatt kerüljenek közzétételre.

Kérem, hogy engem mint szerzőt az alábbi módon jelöljenek meg: <<Jaq>>

Ezzel hozzájárulok, hogy a képeket bárki szabadon felhasználja, illetve azokat bárki módosíthatja is, amennyiben betartja ezen licenc és az egyéb jogszabályok szabta feltételeket. A hozzájárulás nem korlátozódik a Wikipédiára, vagy az ahhoz kapcsolódó oldalakra. Jelen engedélyemmel szerzői jogaimról nem mondok le, de a mások által végzett módosítások nem lesznek nekem tulajdonítva. Elfogadom, hogy ezt a beleegyezésemet nem vonhatom vissza. Tudomásul veszem, hogy a képeket a Wikimédia-projektek nem biztos, hogy örökké megőrzik. [2017.05.04.] [JAKUBECZ ANDRÁS] a fent nevezettek mint készítő és megrendelő közös kapcsolatban állnak egyik a másiknak kölcsönös engedélyt adott a kép együttes puBLIKÁLÁSÁRA A KÉPEN SZEREPLŐ SZEMÉLY BERNÁTH FERENC (nyilvános) EGYETÉRÉTÉSÉVEL !

und auch die automnatische antwort: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons May 4

to me

Dear andreas/lappantyuu,

Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#: 2017050410006428].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team

so bitte rückzogen diese letzte

nicht umsichtig bearbeiten von Ihn Danke sehr, nächst mal Fragen Bitte! Andreas --Lappantyuu (talk) 12:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Lappantyuu Lappantyuu (talk) 12:18, 25 May 2017 (UTC) Lappantyuu

Hi Lappantyuu, I restored the one image and set {{OTRS pending}} for both. If the images finaly will be kept or or depends on the result of the OTRS process, which I cannot influence. regards. --JuTa 15:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of photo

Hello, you deleted the file Candice_Cuoco.jpg due to permissions, however I took the photo, I uploaded the photo, I gave permission when I uploaded it, and I emailed permission according to the instructions after someone flagged it. I don't know what else I can do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emeybee (talk • contribs) 20:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Well, it appears in the internet i.e. here. Anyhow, I restored it and set {{OTRS pending}} to it. Next time please do this yourself. And dont forget to login before doing so. --JuTa 20:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

People by name und Men/Women by name

Hallo JuTa! Ich habe bemerkt, dass Du bei den Namen viele Ergänzungen machst. Weist Du, warum People by name by gender‎ nicht eine Unterkategorie von People by name ist und warum wahrscheinlich daher bei den Personenkategorien People by name und Men/Women by name parallel eingetragen sind? Beste Grüße aus Niederösterreich: --GT1976 (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Damit beides eine möglichst vollständige Liste ergibt. Also People by name mit möglichst allen Leuten die eine eigene Cat habe. Men by name mit möglichst allen Männern und Women by name mit möglichst allen Frauen. Alle 3 sind sog. Flat-Categories. Gruß --JuTa 16:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Mit dem selben Argument könnte ich z. B. Konrad Adenauer statt 30 in tausende Kategorien geben, z. B. Category:People of Cologne, Category:Recipients of awards, etc. , um möglichst alle Leute direkt in die Kategorie zu geben. Wer legt hier eigentlich fest, wo Flat-Categories gemacht werden, und wo redundante Kategorien vermieden werden? --GT1976 (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Das wurde an versch. Stellen diskutiert, siehe dazu z.B. Category_talk:People_by_name#This_is_flat_list, Category talk:Men by name und Commons:Categories for discussion/2010/11/Category:Women by name. Ich finds gut so wie es ist. Gruß --JuTa 17:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, ich möchte das nicht zu sehr hinterfragen, mir ist es nur aufgefallen. Bei Wikipedia war ich in den letzten Jahren ziemlich aktiv und da hatte ich ähnliche Diskussionen. Schönen Gruß: --GT1976 (talk) 19:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

from/of

Hallo JuTa! Sorry nochmals für die Störung. Weißt du, was richtig ist: Category:Sportspeople from Lower Austria oder Category:Sportspeople of Lower Austria. Ich finde bei anderen Gelegenheiten beide Varianten. --GT1976 (talk) 07:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Geht, soweit ich weiß, beides. Kommt drauf an, was in der entsprechenden "parent category" vorherrscht. Gruß --JuTa 07:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, danke! --GT1976 (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Question

He JuTa,

How can i find the creator of a deleted category, category:Kurdish terrorism? It'll be very helpful for a LTA case on wikipedia. 46.221.175.21 09:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

If the deletion reason does not show it, you cannot. In this case it was an IP in September 2016. --JuTa 09:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Can we know where the ip is from? Was that ip from Germany? 46.221.175.21 09:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

No, from Bulgaria. --JuTa 11:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I think it's probably a proxy, because there are evidences which confirm that the sockmaster used proxies before. By the way, user:Kinetsubuffalo is the sock of the same long term vandal and was banned for impersonating user:Kintetsubuffalo. Both accounts are registered on commons. I think the impersonator sock should be blocked from commons too. It is sock of banned user:Lrednuas Senoroc who was also banned for impersonating user Srednuas Lenoroc. This vandal is involved in sockpuppeting, meatpuppeting, canvassing, ip socking, proxy socking, impersonating, vandalism, tendentious edits, etc. 46.221.216.195 14:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Augustus_Welby_Northmore_(given_name)

Category:Augustus_Welby_Northmore_(given_name) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Van (not the car)

If you want to categorize by the simple surname "Van" is fine. What can't be done is taking the "van" part of a Dutch/Belgian surname as a surname itself. For example Alex van Halen's family name, who's Dutch (although by now U.S. national) is "Halen, van"; Belgian family names with capitalized Van are sorted by "Van XXXXX". Beware of some Van Dyck's, they are listed as Belgian but some are Dutch and should be van Dyck or most probably van Dijck. Who knows? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 17:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Natural monuments in Landkreis Wesermarsch

wieder ein Fall zum wiederherstellen. danke. Holger1959 (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 19:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

About File:Seal of Haikou.svg

Hi, JuTa. About [1] User:Anna Frodesiak and I have a new discuss, I hope you are concerned on this.--Iflwlou (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

No, I'm not realy interested in that chinese seal. But thx for letting me know. --JuTa 17:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Kategorien unterhalb Nature reserves in Landkreis Waldeck-Frankenberg

Bitte stelle meine Kategorien wieder her, sonst ist das Projekt, sie alle mit Photos zu vesehen ab sofort gestorben Fragen wäre auch höflich gewesen. Du hast meine Arbeit von 4 Tagen kaputtgemacht. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visaswises (talk • contribs) 16:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Visaswises (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Die waren leider, so wie sie waren, völlig nutzlos. Sie waren leer und unkategorisiert. Ich arbeite ab und zu Special:UncategorizedCategories ab, und vergebe Cats wo ich leicht welche finde, oder markiere sie als unkategorisiert wo nicht oder lösche völlig leere cats. Wie dem auch sei, sie sind wieder da. Ich habe jetzt auch gleich Category:Nature reserves in Landkreis Waldeck-Frankenberg vergebem. Das nächste mal bitte neue Kategorien bitte gleich kategorisieren, dann fallen sie auch nicht in mein "Raster". Gruß --JuTa 17:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:2GPO to be checked (temporary category)

This category should be red deliberately. I even protect it. I, together with user from he.wiki taking car to full categorize those files. It may take a week or two, so please leave it that way for a while. Thanks in advance. -- Geagea (talk) 21:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Well, hidden should IMHO be better tha a "prominent" red link on the file description pages. --JuTa 21:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

It is really temporary category. I will take care that no file has that category. It is simply easier to remove large red category after categories added. -- Geagea (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

De Filippo

Hi JuTa, I don't understand the reason of this: the surname is "De Filippo‎", not just "Filippo". --Jaqen (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

It contains of 2 parts, De and Filippo. --JuTa 17:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

So? --Jaqen (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Thats like every other double or tripple sur- or given name. If it contains multiple parts, it will be a sub-cat of each single name. You will barely find other double surnames directly within Category:Surnames. --JuTa 20:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

But you created, e.g. Category:Van Dyck (surname), as a subcat of Category:Van (surname) and Category:Dyck (surname). Should I create Category:De (surname) and (re)create Category:De Filippo (surname) as a subcat of it and Category:Filippo (surname)? --Jaqen (talk) 21:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Now I got our problem :) Normaly name-parts like "of", "de", "van" or "von" are supressed in the surname-cats. If this is not a normal "de" (which means of) then it should be handled as you said. I did so now and hope we both happy now. --JuTa 21:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, where are the guidelines about surnames you are following? Categories like Category:De (surname) seem meaningless, since that is not a surname. The complete surname, in that case, is "De Filippo". --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 14:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, did you read my message? --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 20:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but I dont agree with you. --JuTa 21:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

That is not an answer to my question, which was "where are the guidelines about surnames you are following?" --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 19:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Look to any other surname cat, and you will find the same pricinple for double, triple, .., surnames. --JuTa 19:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

That is not' a double or triple surname, that's the difference. That is one surname with two words. Again, "any other surname cat" created by you basing on some guidelines or just on your own? --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 20:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

I dont know about any guideline. But there are a lot og de facto standards without any written guideline here. --JuTa 20:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

There is no problem, it's wiki mechanism: someones edits, and it is ok until someone finds something eventually wrong, so the latter opens a discussion :-) here it is -> Commons:Village_pump#Splitting_surnames. I just wanted to know if there was a guideline or there wasn't. One last thing: the fact that "it is widespread all over Commons [because I widespread it all over Commons]" cannot be obviously a defense on people's remarks. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 07:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Addendum: Category:Dios Ruano Gómez (surname) -> the surnames are Ruano and Gomez. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 12:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

And Juan de Dios is the given name? --JuTa 17:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

It seems so, taken from d:Q320171 (like the name Francesco Saverio which is derived from the saint). Maybe @Syrio: can confirm that. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 11:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it's a commons practice in spanish (and in other languages, too) to take as given name the whole name of saint, including his/her original surname or other epithets. There are plenty of people named "Juan de Dios" (cfr), and you can also find some María de las Mercedes, Teresa de Jesús, Juan Nepomuceno, and so on. -- Syrio posso aiutare? 11:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

OK, I'll move it back. --JuTa 18:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

ko vs 공용 정책

Look at these categories, please:

• Category:공용 정책
• Category:Commons policies/ko

Can you split them together? It must be done manually... Thanks in advance, Wieralee (talk) 07:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I allready tried that, whithout success. As most pages are "translation pages" you might ask on Commons:Translators' noticeboard or if you get no reaction there on Commons:Village pump. regards. --JuTa 07:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Emil Eikner

Sorry about that! I never got around to having time to add the gallery - had planned to put about 50 images of him with notables. Other things came up & got in the way. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

no problem. --JuTa 18:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Lenin

JuTa,

As specified in the description, the photo of Lenin I previously uploaded is a derivative work of a picture that has already been uploaded to Wikimedia commons and has been identified as belonging to the public domain (see File:Lenin1921.jpeg).. Since it is in the public domain, I was under the impression that I did not need to provide license information.

If this is not sufficient, please me in the right direction of website guidelines that provide otherwise and I'll see what I can do. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emiya1980 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

That was a falso positiv of mine because {{Remove this line and insert a license instead}} was on the description page too. Sorry for the trouble. --JuTa 07:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Restore Category:Narendra Jha

Hello, I noticed that you deleted Category:Narendra Jha stating that the category was empty. Now I have uploaded a new image of this person. So there is one image in that deleted category. So I request you to kindly restore the category. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 08:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

OK, its back. --JuTa 08:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

It would had been more great if you had also reviewed the file. Anyway, thanks for restoring the category. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 08:47, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

I'm not very familiar with the bollywood thing. I leave that to others with more expirience in that matter. --JuTa 08:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

OK. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 08:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please undelete FSPS photos (again)

Can you please undelete File:FSPS Arundel Street, Nos 9-7, 14-1-D.png and File:FSPS Arundel Street, Nos 10-12, 14-3-C, 1978.png, so that I can ensure that my local copies are correct (I've downloaded all the files, but not yet got all the page histories).

Are you aware that these are part of the ongoing discussion about the Fremantle Society Photographic Survey? That whole collection is going to be deleted, according to User:Jcb.

If you want to delete it, can you please raise a mass deletion request for the whole set of 1,474 pages that will need to be deleted (I can provide this list). This process will be even more frustrating than it already is if admins keep randomly deleting one or two at a time.

— Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 01:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

That depends when they fall out of tbe {{OTRS pending}} period. That likely after 2-3 months after the template was added. And as User:Jcb stated here: Unfortunately it has become clear in the meantime that FS never became the copyright holder of these pictures. They will likely get deleted all. --JuTa 01:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

I realise that they'll probably be deleted, but that will happen all at once rather than piecemeal; that way, I can be sure that I've migrated all the data and page histories to another wiki. Please can you undelete these two files, just temporarily. As for "OTRS pending": these all have valid OTRS numbers, and so shouldn't be deleted for that reason (the other reason, perhaps; but that's a separate issue and they shouldn't be speedy-deleted). Thanks for your help. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 02:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please ask User:Hedwig in Washington, as I saw she confirmed the OTRS release as minimum for some other images, if she can confirm it for these 2 as well. She is admin too, so she can view the deleted files and undelete them if OK. --JuTa 02:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

I have asked her. Thanks. — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 02:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

I have undeleted the files for now, they will soon be redeleted with the other files. Jcb (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

hide change logs,

Hi, i uploaded my personal photo for commons and haven't any problem with it, but i forget to log in and i edited some of them, now in change loge i see my ip addresse, please hide my changes with ip addresse in change history.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Diagonal_method.jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Diagonal_method_Right.jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rule_of_thirds_portrait_lighting.jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Diagonal_method_Left.jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Diagonal_method_Center.jpg&action=history

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Portrait_photo.jpg&action=history

thanks, Aswaran (talk) 06:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

As far as I know thats something we dont do normaly. Please ask again on COM:AN for it.--JuTa 06:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

it's for my privacy,Aswaran (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Mr. Juta!

Hi, Mr. Juta. Template:PD-RU-exempt/lang was protected, and I can't add the information for Template:PD-RU-exempt/hy. If you can, please, add the information. Prethanks... Vahe (talk) 14:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have added the Armenian language link. De728631 (talk) 14:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! Vahe (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Elisabeth Binder.jpg

Hallo JuTa. Das Bild File:Elisabeth Binder.jpg wurde gelöscht mit der Begründung "No OTRS permission since 31 May 2017". Mir wurde versichert, dass die Fotografin bereits anfangs April 2017 ihr Einverständnis gesendet habe. Könntest du bitte nachschauen, ob kein solches Mail vorliegt? Vielen Dank. --Hadi (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, {{OTRS pending}} war seit 1. April gesetzt, ohne dass ein OTRS Mitarbeiter die Freigabe bestätigt hätte. Nach einer gewissen Zeit (aktuell 51 Tage) "fallen" solche Bilder automatisch in Category:Media missing permission. Nach einer weiteren Woche werden die Bilder gelöscht. Ich hatte da nur eine entsprechende Tageskategorie abgearbeitet. Ich bin selbst kein OTRS Mitarbeiter, und kann somit die Mails nicht einsehen. Am besten fragst Du auf Commons:OTRS noticeboard nach. Falls doch alles OK ist kann die Datei wiederhergestellt werden. Gruß --JuTa 19:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Erklärung. Ich hatte geduldig gewartet, weil die OTRSler ja Freiwillige sind wie wir. Und finde es frustrierend, wenn Dateien gelöscht werden bei denen eingetragen ist, dass ein OTRS-Mail geschickt worden ist, ohne dass dies überprüft wird...--Hadi (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Update?

Hi. Can you please save the original picture from this so-called update? Either people do not know what an update is or they take the liberty to destroy beautiful pictures... Danke. --E4024 (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

No Idea. Ask the uploader User:Mardon01 for the reasons. I marked it to get splitted now. --JuTa 07:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your vandalism on Category:Museum database templates/doc …

May I ask you, why you aren't able to discuss your vandalism doing as to deleting

• Category:Museum database templates/doc
• Category:Museum database templates/doc/en
• Category:Museum database templates/doc/nl
• Category:Museum database templates/doc/fr
• Category:Museum database templates/doc/de

or visiting MY talk page for a consultation or explanation. May I search the wiki rule, to informatin a page creator about (a possible) deletion? Had you have a look at these pages and the containing informations for every single template? Typical …! You don't own Wikidata even though with an B/A! --Plagiat (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

HI, the doc template appeared to be complete empty. I missed the noinclude tags. I restored them and moved them into the

template namespace, where they belong to. You find them now under:

• Template:Museum database templates/doc
• Template:Museum database templates/doc/en
• Template:Museum database templates/doc/nl
• Template:Museum database templates/doc/fr
• Template:Museum database templates/doc/de

regards --JuTa 23:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:St Georges Crest.jpg

• I have contacted the owner of the Facebook page (by email) that was the source of this file to see if they will release a licence for this file. The Facebook page owner is also a contributor to Wikimedia Commons so may chose to release a licence for this image. We'll give them a few days to reply and see what they say. Ken Heaton (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

You will have a week. --JuTa 15:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Undelete

Can you please undelete File:Budapest Horse.jpg and File:Budapest Horse focus.png? The photographer uploaded the first one and also sent a permissions email on 6 April 2017. I created the other image based on it. Thanks. --Felcotiya (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Felcotiya, such images get deleted after about 2-3 months if no reaction of any OTRS volounteer is visible. The best is you ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard for your case, as I am no OTRS volounteer and cannot see the mails. regards --JuTa 16:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Ok, all sorted, thanks! --Felcotiya (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Hilfen Sie bitte

Hallo. My Deutsch sucks, no? Somehow I couldn't manage to put in correct position the pic in File:Melisa Torres.jpg. Could you have a look please? --E4024 (talk) 06:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

I purged it. Looking better now. --JuTa 06:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:PD-Gov license tags

Hallo, könntest du die Unterseiten der PD-Gov-Vorlagen wieder aus o.g. Kategorie entfernen? (Ich hoffe das funktioniert mit Cat-a-lot.) Soweit ich weiß ist es gängige Praxis die Kategorien nicht auf jede der teilweise sehr zahlreichen Unterseiten zu kopieren; wie du vielleicht mitbekommen hast ist der eine Nutzer, der dies anscheinend im Alleingang änderte, nicht bereit seine Motive näher zu erläutern.    FDMS  4    12:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Is in Arbeit... ich geh jetzt alle Templates systematsich durch. Dauert etwas... --JuTa 12:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

With regards to these edits, I think it makes very little sense to have, e.g. {{PD-AustrianGov}} be a member of Category:PD-EUGov license tags, but {{PD-AustrianGov/de}} be a member of its supercategory Category:PD-Gov license tags. Where CFCF was the last edit on template translations, I decided to just roll these back, as I explained to him on his talk page... but on some of these you and FDMS4 were the last editors, usually just moving the noinclude closing tag. Does either of you mind if I revert back before you and CFCF on these templates? I think Category:PD-Gov license tags should contain only strict subcats like Category:PD-USGov license tags, Category:PD-EUGov license tags, etc. with no translations. Storkk (talk) 10:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Storkk: (Sorry for initially writing in German.) I agree, but AFAICT I am not the last editor of any templates the user categorised. Thanks again for the cleanup efforts of both of you.    FDMS  4    15:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

More like I should apologize for butting in in English to an existing conversation between two German speakers. :) Storkk (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

As said above, I took this case as reason to check lots of license templates. This will take a while and I will correct the false categories when I see them. If someone else is quicker -> fine. --JuTa 18:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

vimeo is hiding the license

Hi, you marked a file (File:Maurizio Lazzarato DCRL Interview.jpg) as "permission needed", but now that we received the OTRS mail I realized that it wasn't needed. The free license is already present in the vimeo page... it's just hidden! If you click on "plus", in the middle of the page, you'll see a text area. At the bottom of the text area, there is th CC by-3.0 icon, in light gray. Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 09:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Thx for the note, for me (in german) the plus is called mehr. --JuTa 09:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Wie ist hier zu handeln?

Hallo JuTa,

Template:OTRS pending Hier gelistet, LG Hystrix (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

War mir auch schon aufgefallen. Ich würd sagen: Bilder in Cat löschen und Cat löschen, auch wenn die Vorlage noch drin ist. Ein miniedit auf die Vorlage würde sie wahrscheinlich in die heute OTRS pending cat verschieben. --JuTa 23:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hello JuTa, in the file Collage Mollet1.jpg you have threatened to erase it in 7 days, under the pretext that it is not clear who is the author and the origin. I inform you that the author is ME and the work is OWN, and so put it on the file tab. I ask you to remove the warning. I am new to wikipedia, so if there is a problem, I would ask you to let me know and help me solve it. On the other hand, I have received a message from you regarding the legal status of Collage Mollet.jpg. I do not know how to fix it, but I have asked for the deletion of this file, since it is duplicated and is no longer useful. If you could erase it, I would appreciate it. I wait your answer. Thank you Marcbcn (talk) 00:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Marcbcn, you shot every single image of that collage yourself? Or you only created the collage yourself using other images? Only the first case would be OK. In the second case you should state the source of every single image on the description page. regards --JuTa 07:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Good morning JuTa. I think the photos google. How do I put the origin of the photos? Putting the link of each of them in the description? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcbcn (talk • contribs) 11:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but if you got them from google, its likely a copyright violation, and your file must get deleted. We need for every image a free license which allows commericial reuse. Everything in the internet is by default "all rights reserved" and forbits any reuse anywhere. You would need to find for each photo the original photografer and ask him he is willing to publish the file under a free license like {tl|cc-by-sa-4.0}} if he agrees he has to send a mail to the commons support team as documented on Commons:OTRS. But is only one of the photographers does not send such a mail the whole collage will become unfree and will be deleted. --JuTa 13:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Leerzeichen in Defaultsort

Hallo JuTa, ich habe gesehen, dass Du in einem meiner Edits den Defaultsort-Eintrag korrigiert hast. Ich dachte immer, mehrteilige Vornamen würden in Defaultsort zusammengeschrieben (also ohne Leer- oder Trennzeichen) - aber das war offenbar falsch gedacht. Finde leider die Seite mit den Defaultsort-Grundregeln nicht mehr, habe aber noch einige weitere Zweifelsfälle, bei denen ich vielleicht durchgängig Fehler mache (Umlaute, scharfes S, Adelstitel). Hast Du einen Link mit einer Übersicht für mich? Dann erspare ich Dir künftig gerne die Fehlerkorrektur... --Rudolph Buch (talk) 08:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, ich hab da Commons:Category scheme People und Commons:Sorting of categories named after people. Ich editier die aber allermeist trotzdem, da ich ja weitere Kategorien hinzufüge. --JuTa 08:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of File:ShrinivasKulkarni2016.jpg

Hello Juta. I have been having problems uploading the above file, because although the release of copyright from the creator and the current owner of copyright have been given and sent to wikipedia, the volunteers have not been able to keep up with mounting copyright work, which is not the fault of the people uploading the files. I feel particularly frustrated, because I have been working on this since January. Could you please do something instead of just deleting files without investigating it properly? Or can you suggest something better. The last round of permission forms have been sent to wikipedia permission site in April with no effect. --Smallshrine (talk) 22:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Smallshrine, please ask for your case on Commons:OTRS noticeboard as I am not a member of the Commons Supportteam and cannot see such mails. Please also note there the ticket number Ticket#2017041510012198 and that the mails was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org that will help them to find the case. If everything checks out OK, the file will get undeleted. regards. --JuTa 01:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Kategorien in Calw

Hallo, du hast vorhin die Category:Ernstmühler Weg als "leer" gelöscht. Die war aber nicht leer. Mich würde auch interessieren, von wem der Antrag kam. Der User:H. Sellmoene hat kürzlich die vor allem von User:Ies angelegte Calwer Kategorisierung extrem zusammengelöscht und dabei auch wichtige Kategorien wie Kulturdenkmale entfernt. Die geleerten Kategorien ließ er zurück. Ich habe ihn darauf angesprochen, er selbst ist offenbar nicht bereit das wieder zu korrigieren, und mir fehlt die Zeit, obwohl ich schon einige seiner Änderungen zurückgesetzt habe. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 16:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sitacuisses, die Kat ist wieder da. Sie war leer als ich sie gelöscht hatte. Falls es noch mehr zum Wiederherstellen gibt -> sag mir bescheid. Gruß --JuTa 22:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

The work you're flagging IS NOT copyright stuff

Hi, I uploaded two files & you are constantly flagging it to be copyright when it is NOT. I have given the source of the images & they have been put by the user for public distribution via his twitter handle, for public consumption. The person is a public figure & a very renowned Indian who frequently distributes all his works to be consumed by the public without his consent. Please be informed that while you're demanding explicit letter or authorization from the user for using his image, Twitter provides no such feature to satiate your queries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy9bond (talk • contribs) 05:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jimmy9bond, where do you see a statement on https://twitter.com/AmitShah/status/880875537756860416 that the image is in public domain? I couldn't find one. And in this case it is per default "all rights reserved" as everything else in the internet. The original photographer has to send such a letter to the commons support team, otherwise the image will get deleted in about a week. regards --JuTa 05:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I think you have no idea how Twitter works. As I mentioned before, it provides no such feature. Keep making things complicates to massage your ego & people like me will stop contributing to Wikipedia due to such harassment. Kindly delete the files please & be happy. Enjoy your childish powers instead of helping people out. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy9bond (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I think you have no idea how copyright works. Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright rules. --JuTa 05:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Not interested anymore. Especially when dolts like you are invigilators. Won't respond to your amateurish rants anymore so please spare me. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy9bond (talk • contribs) 06:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Maria Irigoyen (given name)

Category:Maria Irigoyen (given name) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: Empty Category If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Thx, I've deleted it. --JuTa 07:09, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Gluteal muscles

I'm sorry. I forgot to add them to the Category:Gluteal muscles. But these muscles are not of the leg. Gluteal muscles belong to the pelvis. Jmarchn (talk) 05:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

You left them umcategorized. But now its perfect. --JuTa 07:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Ursula Wolf 2010-05-23.jpg

File:Ursula Wolf 2010-05-23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Jean Lhermitte BIU Sante CIPB1939.jpg

Hi, I tagged that as no license because the template says This license only covers sui generis database right and not copyright. As such, it can't be used for media files. But reading an English translation of the license text, it seems to be a valid license for media files and is specifically CC-BY 2.0 compatible. Should we change the template to remove that warning? Guanaco (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

I see that this incorrect warning displays in English but not in German or French. I'm removing it. Guanaco (talk) 04:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

OK. --JuTa 06:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Unter- und Überkategorien

Danke Ju für diesen Hinweis. Das sollte eine Unterkategorie für diese Kategorie sein, die ja eh aufgeführt ist. Leider bin ich nicht in der Lage, dies entsprechend zu handhaben, bei der Gebrauchsanweisung unter "wie funktioniert´s" blick ich nicht durch. Vielleicht kann mir da jemand mal den rechten Weg weisen?! Gruß und Dank --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 07:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Pimpinellus, ich hab' sie jetzt der Überkategorie zugeordnet - siehe hier. Sie sollte wahrscheinlich noch in polnisch oder english umbenannt werden, denn eine deutsche Bezeichnung für eine Polnische Bibliothek passt nicht so wirklich. Gruß --JuTa 07:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

File:360 1997-02-28 16-10 Lauenfoerde-Beverungen.jpg

File:360 1997-02-28 16-10 Lauenfoerde-Beverungen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marokobu (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Hallo JuTa,

eine Markierung seitens user:Marokobu als Duplikat hätte gereicht, immerhin ein sehr erfahrener user, siehe: User_talk:Hystrix#Category:52_3109. Außerdem vermutlich eine weitere Sockenpuppe, ähnlich wie user Dewornom, aktiv vom 28. Juni bis 4. Juli, hauptsächlich auch im Bahnbereich tätig, ähnliche Arbeitsweise. Meine Frage: Wie kann ich Sockenpuppenverdacht überprüfen lassen? LG Hystrix (talk) 17:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for checkuser? --JuTa 18:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Schon traurig. Da editiert einer oder mehrere ca. 10.000 Edits in zwei Wochen. Was für für eine Erfahrung. Sollten für das Zurücksetzen ein Bot angefordert werden? Und was hat er zwischen dem 4. und 11. Juli getan? Weder Bots noch CU scheinen das Problem zu greifen. LG Hystrix (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Muss denn alles zurückgeetzt werden? Sind alle Edits falsch? Er ist zumindest ungesperrt. --JuTa 23:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Es waren zwei weitere Socken. Hedwig hatte den Zoo schon entdeckt. Hystrix (talk) 12:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Visaswises

Hi,JuTa and all, are you not capable to respect my decisions? I really am annoyed by the interventions of the admins. I said it as clear as possible, that I claim the right to decide, how my files are categorized and that I need some time to build my structures. There were a lot of interventions of admins, who didn't even talk to me or tried to understand, what I am doing. By now, I am regretting uploading any files, and I asked to delete them. Alas, nobody cares now! To me, it seems to be miracoulous, why everyone claims the right to decide over my decisions. I won't accept this. I know what I am doing and if anyone feels a need to interfere, he would have to ask me about it.

Visaswises (talk) 02:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Bitte den Benutzer sperren, damit das disruptive Verhalten aufhört. --Magnus (talk) 05:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Super, noch einer, der was besser weiß, ohne auch bloss einmal nachzufragen. Arroganz scheint hier die Methode zu sein. Du hast nichts verstanden, also halt Dich bedeckt.Visaswises (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Visaswises:

1. Wenn Du Bilder löschen lassen möchtest, stell bitte einen Löschantrag darauf. Wie das geht siehe Commons:Deletion request, Commons:Löschrichtlinien und Template:Delete. Allerdings sind die von Dir vergebenen Lizenzen nicht widerrufbar, "mir gefällt es hier nicht mehr" ist eigentlich kein Grund Bilder zu löschen.
2. Bitte überschreibe keine Bilder durch andere, auch nicht von Dir hochgeladene, sndern stell, wenn, wie gesagt, eine Löschantrag drauf.
3. Commons ist, wie Wikipedia & Co., eine Gemeinschaftprojekt. Und zwar eines das chon einige Jahre läuft. Da habin sich natürlich zwischenzeitlich einige Regeln eingespielt an die man sich halten sollte - siehe z.B. Commons:Policies and guidelines. Und dutzende von leeren Bentzer-Kategorien zu erzeugen gehört nicht dazu. Auch das entfernen von richtigen Kategorien, also solchen in die die Bilder sachlich gehören, wird nicht gern gesehen - siehe Commons:Kategorien. Du kannst im Straßenverkehr auch nicht (komplett) sagen: Ich entscheide wie ich mein AUto lenke, da gibt es dann halt ab und zu ein Knöllchen bzw.in härteren Fällen ist der Führerschein weg.

Gruß --JuTa 07:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Ich hatte sehr deutlich darum gebeten, mir Zeit zu geben, meine Ideen zu entwickeln.

Visaswises (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Visaswises, Du hast alle Zeit der Welt. Wenn die Ideen fertig sind, können wir gerne nochmal hier drüber reden. Du hattest aber am Ende schlicht sämtliche Kategorien von Deinen Bildern entfernt, die aus meinen Augen sinnvollen hatte ich wieder hinzugefügt. Gruß --JuTa 02:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Coat of arms for North Bengkulu

Hello JuTa, please delete the previous images for Bengkulu Utara. The best is the last one.

Regards. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 03:13, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, which image(s) are you talking about? --JuTa 03:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

I was talking about images on this page.

Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 03:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, I dont see why. Maybe somebody else likes another version better. --JuTa 03:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

BERDO'A should be written BERDOA as well as the official vocabulary in Bahasa Indonesia.

Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 03:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Still no real reason to hide something. But anyhow I hided the 1st version now. --JuTa 04:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

The real reason is I love all better things. Anyway, thanks. Please delete the 2nd version too, because I didn't erase the background. I hope not hidden, but deletion. I hope Kepahiang will be deleted too the 1st version. I cleaned the background perfectly on the 2nd one.

Regards. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 04:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, no and no to both. Maybe you find another admin.. --JuTa 06:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Okay and alright. Relly Komaruzaman | Talk 07:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Adivasi.jpg

File:Adivasi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roland zh (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Please undelete

…this. Thank you. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 18:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

…also these two. Thank you. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

 Done too. --JuTa 01:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Likewise, Category:Number 794 on trams is no longer empty again. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:42, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

• …as also neither is Category:Number 694 on trams. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
• …and Category:The Street Railway Review (Vol. 1, No. 1. January 15, 1891.). Thank you. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 00:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

My own works have been systematically eliminated

Hi, JuTa. I think there has been an error and is that despite having sent the copyright statement to permissions-commons-es@wikimedia.org stating that such works are my own which I did in Inkscape. These are my works, I think I have the right to accommodate them here to nourish encyclopedic articles. I have never uploaded the works of others without their permission or without attributing their respective license in Creative Commons. The deleted files were:

• File:File:Emblema del Ejército del Mariscal López.svg
• File:Bandera del Ejército del Mariscal López.svg
• File:YPJ Emblem.svg
• File:YPG Emblem.svg
• File:Bandera de la Agrupación Campesina Armada.svg
• File:Bandera del Ejército del Pueblo Paraguayo.svg
• File:TKEP-L Rojava Flag.svg
• File:TKP-ML TIKKO Flag.svg
• File:Antifascist Internationalist Tabur.svg
• File:RUIS Flag.svg
• File:International Revolutionary People's Guerrilla Forces flag.svg

--Mikelelgediento (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Mikelelgediento, even if you redraw something copyrithed yourself, the copyright still belongs to thr original creator. You linked on most images a source page without any sign of a free license. About your mail to permision... please ask on Commons:OTRS noticeboard. regards --JuTa 20:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

The images that I have created, mostly are versions made by me based on the original versions (such as: Emblem of the Army of Marshal López.svg, Flag of the Army of Marshal López.svg, Flag of the Army of the Paraguayan People, etc. ) In addition, all these are illegal armed groups which, in the legal framework, do not have license of their authorship for obvious reasons.

As for TKEP-L Rojava Flag.svg, TKP-ML TIKKO Flag.svg, Antifascist Internationalist Tabur.svg, RUIS Flag.svg and International Revolutionary People's Guerrilla Forces flag.svg, I have contact with all of them (members of ancoalition internationalist) Who gave me permission to upload the files for encyclopedic purposes.

How can I give them proof that I have their permits? --Mikelelgediento (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Please see Commons:OTRS for details. --JuTa 22:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

TheoFak Göttingen

Halla JuTa. Das Bild kam von der folgenden Webseite: http://www.uni-goettingen.de/de//55423.html; vgl. http://sammlungen.uni-goettingen.de/objekt/record_kuniweb_906202/.

Nach dem folgenden Vorbild habe ich's hochgeladen und benutzt: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AUni_gottingen_siegel.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foosland (talk • contribs) 20:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Foosland, das war ein "false positive". Ich habe deshlab den "mising licemse" Baustein entfernt. Aber ich beweifle dass eine Uni eine Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts ist.Deshalb habe ich eine regulrären Löschantrag gestellt. Gruß --JuTa 20:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Ich habe gerade geguckt, und auf der Webseite der entsprechenden Universität steht das Folgende: "Die Georg-August-Universität Göttingen ist eine Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts. Sie wird durch die Präsidentin Prof. Dr. Ulrike Beisiegel gesetzlich vertreten" (https://www.uni-goettingen.de/de/impressum/79571.html). Aber wir können ruhig sehen, was die anderen meinen.--Foosland (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Du hast das ja auch bereits auf der Löschantragsseite verlinkt. Ich rechne jetzt eigentlich mit einer Behalten-Entscheidung, möchte das aber nicht selbst... --JuTa 20:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:CenicerosVideoInterview.webm

Just doble checking to see that there is no problem with the above file created and uploaded by Wiki Learning Tec de Monterrey. It was removed from the subject's enwiki article stating that there is no permission, but the CC-by-SA 4.0 is on the video itself, in the credits.Thelmadatter (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, cannot check it. Everytime I click t the end of the videao its broken, and I dont wanna watch all the 18 hours. --JuTa 20:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate photos of United Kingdom MPs

Please note Commons:Village pump#Duplicate photos of United Kingdom MPs and preserve the images which are named in series. Andy Mabbett (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Why? --JuTa 15:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:AJ_(given_name)

Category:AJ_(given_name) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleting image?

Recently I uploaded an image to improve a certain article. However, you seem to have flagged it for abusing copyright... please can you explain to me why this is copyright infringement?

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Na-120-Lahore.jpg This is the image Masterpha (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@Masterpha: Generally all drawings and photographs are copyrighted the moment they're created. There are some exceptions, but this doesn't appear to be one. Images uploaded to Commons must either be free from copyright (public domain) or under a free license from the creator. Have a look at Commons:Licensing for more information on our rules. Guanaco (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Masterpha. As Guanaco allready said: You just copied it from another copyrighted website. That violates the copyright of its original author and is not accepted on commons. regards. --JuTa 17:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for being so careful

Thanks for reverting my edits, you were perfectly right . But actually, I am a trusted person and OTRS team member, please note my message at the OTRS notice board, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=254828640. So you can trust the edits concerning permissions I did today. When in doubt, please check with an OTRS member to check the ticket. With kind regards, Hetty Pangel (talk) 16:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Catholic priests from Iraq

I am a Taiwanese, please delete, no content! --114.136.133.151 12:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done. --JuTa 12:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Please undelete

Category:Number 3452 on vehicles -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

OK. --JuTa 14:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Commons Seite des Suchbegriffs "Dummheit" gelöscht?

Hallo JuTa, ich wollte mal fragen warum sie das Bild (Commons) zum Suchbegriff "Dummheit" entfernt haben? Es war doch richtig mit Beschreibung eingestellt und vom Motiv her mehr als passend... Danke für die Info!

--Frank Lemon (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, wenn dann ordne das Bild bitte Category:Stupidity zu. Ich finde allerdings nicht dass das passt. --JuTa 21:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, kann ich nicht ganz verstehen. Die Category die sie nennen beschäftigt sich weniger mit Dummheit, mehr mit Albernheit und scheinwitzigen Geschehen. Die Category Dummheit ist genau das was ich mit dem Bild untermalen wollte. Es geht um das geistige Unvermögen seine eigenen Taten so zu gestalten das sie für die Umwelt nicht zur Belastung werden. Bei dem Bild, welches ich gern wieder unter Dummheit sehen möchte ist sind diese Taten in Frage gestellt. --> Wenn gesunde Menschen ein Auto so parken das drei Behindertenparkplätze nicht nutzbar sind dann ist das nun mal Dummheit!

--Frank Lemon (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Schau, Commons ist ein internationales Projekt. Da werden solche Kategorien im allgemeinen auf Englsch abgelegt. Man könnte Dummheit als {{Category redirect}} auf Category:Stupidity anlegen, aber dann würde das Bild auch dort landen. Außerdem glaube ich nicht dass der Parker auf dem Bild dumm ist, also einen sehr niedrigen Inteligenzquotienten besitzt. Das kann ein hochintegilennter Mensch gewesen sein, halt nur in Eile oder mit sehr gering ausgerägten soziealem Sinn. Ich hab' dem Bild jetzt mal die Category:Illegal parking gegeben, dass passt IMHO deutich besser. --JuTa 23:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, ich denke wir belassen es dabei....PS: Auf dem recht großem Parkplatz standen incl. dieses Wagens drei Autos, bei denen zwei Fahrer in der Lage waren das Richtige zu tun und ca. 8 Meter weiter zu parken...

--Frank Lemon (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)