User talk:Euku/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1

Image:Administratorengalerie_der_deutschen_Wikipedia.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Administratorengalerie_der_deutschen_Wikipedia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

__ ABF __ _ _ 16:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Anjouanflag.svg

Image deletion warning Image:Anjouanflag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lokal_Profil 16:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Myers banyan

FYI. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:

  1. Hello, the result of this voting grants me leave to delete all images of this type
  2. http://91.197.89.189/5elvpb49anu76rzmykh85byb6i9h8c7.jpg http://91.197.89.189/7tqst5wns106w9c16ra1iutwiodrffl.jpg

--Szczepan talk 14:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Hans_Julius_Zassenhaus_and_Hellmuth_Kneser.jpg

File:Hans_Julius_Zassenhaus_and_Hellmuth_Kneser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

 — Mike.lifeguard 21:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aachener Katze

Hallo Euku,
der Bezug der Katze zu Aachen ergibt sich daraus, dass sie in Aachen-Steinebrück aufgenommen wurde, wie auch in der Beschreibung steht. Im Falle einer Selbstauskunft würde sie sich sicher als "Aachener Katze" bezeichnen. Ist aber nicht so wichtig. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Philipp, 2009-06.jpg

Hast du hast Sternchen hinterm Namen bekommen, weil du schon ein Bild vom neuen OB ergattert hast? ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, noch besser wäre es, wenn es ein gutes Bild wäre, aber muss ich wohl noch etwas warten. :) --Euku:⇄ 11:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Euku!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 12:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vrijthof in Maastricht.jpg

Hallo Euku,
eines deiner Fotos ist im Evangel. Gemeindebrief von Aachen, der mir eher zufällig in die Finger gekommen ist, benutzt worden (siehe File talk:Vrijthof in Maastricht.jpg). --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, sogar mit (fast korrekten) Autorenangaben. :) Danke für's Bescheidsagen. --Euku:⇄ 09:50, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Noch 2x benutzt, siehe File talk:Vrijthof in Maastricht.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings ...

(You'd be welcome to improve on this) edit. lg, [w.] 10:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Verwendung von Bildern

Hallo Euku,
ich hoffe, du bist gut ins neue Jahr gekommen und wollte dich darauf aufmerksam machen, dass hier ein Bild von dir (korrekt) verwendet wird: http://www.artfact.ulg.ac.be/af/visites/af_journees.html . --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Danke nochmal. Was finden die alle bloß am Vrijthof so toll? Das war nur ein Bild im Vorbeigehen... Tust du mir noch ein Gefallen und schupst den da auf den richtigen Namen? :) Nicht, dass das noch einer sieht. --Euku:⇄ 21:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{thx}} --Euku:⇄ 09:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auf folgenden Seiten wird jeweils eines deiner Fotos re-used:

--Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Und dabei wollte ich den Rüttgers eigentlich direkt löschen... --Euku:⇄ 13:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wieder berühmt geworden, File talk:Armin Laschet, 2009.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, langsam füllt es sich. :) --Euku:⇄ 14:12, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Resolved section

Hallo Euku. Ich habe bemerkt, dass dieser von mir angelegte Redirect vom Bot nicht „geliebt“ wird. Soll ich ihn wieder löschen? --Leyo 09:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leyo. Den kannte ich gar nicht, so auch der Bot nicht. Er liest nicht den Inhalt der Vorlage (oder des Redirects), sondern schaut nur, wo der er {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} im Text findet. Ich finde, dass zu viele Alternativen im allgemeinen unter den Anwendern eher Verwirrung stiften, so zumindest meine Erfahrung. --Euku:⇄ 10:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Der Hintergrund ist, dass ich mich nie erinnern konnte, ob die Vorlage nun „section resolved“ oder „resolved section“ heisst. Ich könnte mir gut vorstellen, dass noch andere die falsche Reihenfolge erwischen. Weitere Redirects sind von meiner Seite nicht geplant. --Leyo 11:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nagut, solange es das hier nicht gibt. :) --Euku:⇄ 12:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. Nur wurde der Abschnitt nach Commons:Forum/Archiv/2010/März statt Commons:Forum/Archiv/2010/March archiviert und die geschweiften Klammern stehengelassen. --Leyo 12:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Den dt. Monatsnamen kann ich mir nicht erklären, aber beides ist nun behoben. Das März-Archiv kann weg. Danke fürs genau Hinsehen! --Euku:⇄ 13:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Danke auch! --Leyo 13:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hast du deinen Bot angehalten? Einige Abschnitte sind nun von MiszaBot archiviert worden. --Leyo 21:07, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ne angehalten habe ich nichts, aber den Fehler gerade gefunden. Ein Copy&Paste-Fehler hat dafür gesorgt, dass der April nicht erkannt wurde. Danke für die Meldung, nun geht es wohl. --Euku:⇄ 08:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Super, danke. --Leyo 09:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, wo hast du denn Yulia getroffen? Du verkehrst ja in Kreisen. Ich wollte letzte Woche einen Nobelpreisträger von 1991 vors Objektiv bekommen, er hast es aber vorgezogen krank zu werden. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, schau mal auf de: (Donald) - rechts. ;) Das Julija-Foto könnte besser sein, aber Marcel und Marcin waren auch da. Die Merkel-Fotos waren aber nicht gut, darum lasse ich sie weg. --Euku:⇄ 21:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JIRA, Dashboard, Screenshot (de).png

Pay attention to copyright
File:JIRA, Dashboard, Screenshot (de).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--FunPika (talk) 11:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct move request

Please can you correct your move request of Category:Deutsche Fussball Route NRW; you did fill in a date as new name!!!--Havang(nl) (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Euku:⇄ 20:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beispiel.jpg

File:Beispiel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.170.180 10:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sprache der Monatsnamen

Hi Euku. Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass Commons:Forum abhängig vom Bot in zwei verschiedene Monatsseiten archiviert wird: Commons:Forum/Archiv/2011/June vs. Commons:Forum/Archiv/2011/Juni. Wäre es möglich für SpBot, auf die engl. Namen umzustellen? --Leyo 09:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ohje, das geht ja schon einige Zeit so. Ganz früher waren sie auch Englisch. Habe gerade den Fehler gesehen und korrigiert, nun sieht es in der Vorschau richtig aus. Danke fürs Bescheid sagen. --Euku:⇄ 18:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die prompte Reaktion (die mir auf der Watchlist durchgerutscht ist)! Ich habe jetzt alles korrigiert (Cut/Paste, Redirect). --Leyo 07:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verschieben

Ich habe einen Tippfehler gemacht. Kann die Datei File:Herkules Ochsenalle 2.jpg nach File:Herkules Ochsenallee 2.jpg verschoben werden? -- Tietgen (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, kann. Aber ich bin kein Admin und kann das nicht direkt. Nutze dazu Template:Rename. --Euku:⇄ 19:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank. :) -- Tietgen (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

spBot Archivierungsproblem

Moin!

Es gibt ein Problem mit der Archivierung. Ich selbst bin mir nicht sicher ob es mit deinem Bot oder eher mit Commons zu tun hat, aber Leyo fand's sinnvoll, dich zu informieren (ist es sicher auch). Die detaillierte Problembeschreibung findet sich in Commons:Forum#Archivierungs-Bug?. Wäre gut, wenn du das mal anschauen könntest. --Accountalive (talk) 22:59, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archiv-Optionen

Ich hätte auch gleich eine kleine Nebenfrage dazu, würde generell ein Redirect (oder speziell vom de:Wikipedia konsistenten Namen {{Erledigt}}) funzen?[1] VG -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 00:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, das ist nicht gewollt. Hier läuft eben alles auf Englisch wie auch diese Vorlagen, die damit eine 1:1-Entsprechung zu jeder anderen Sprache haben. Es ist nicht sinnvoll hier Aliase und Ausnahmen zu schaffen, da so was früher oder später zu Überschneidungen und Verwirrung führt commons:erledigt entspricht übrigens dem de:Vorlage:Erl.. --Euku:⇄ 08:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ist nun aber ein Redirect, mal sehen ob's funzt. VG -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 16:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Im Forum wurde darauf hingewiesen, dass {{Erledigt}} in der deutschen Wikipedia funktioniert, nicht aber auf Commons. Weil {{Erledigt}} so selten eingebunden war, habe ich es kurzerhand - wo ich konnte - ersetzt und nun nach {{Section resolved}} umgeleitet. Nach einiger Recherche bin ich nun auf diesen Abschnitt gestoßen.
Einerseits könnte {{Erledigt}} nun anzeigen, dass man bitte {{Section resolved}} nutzen solle oder es kommt mit in Deine Liste. Wie siehst Du das? Danke. -- RE rillke questions? 14:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Siehe oben. --Euku:⇄ 10:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Troyes, médiathèque.jpg

File:Troyes, médiathèque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding SpBot

Hello Euku. I've seen SpBot takes care of de:Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung by putting in the page if the user has been blocked or the page protected. I was thinking in proposing something like that for our COM:AN/V vandalism noticeboard. But before doing it I'd like to know if a) you'd be interested in that and b) is it possible to implement here. Best regards, --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 15:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marco, yes, it is possible, but I don't have the time to implement this on commons. If you like I can send you the source code. --Euku:⇄ 17:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Euku. Thanks for the answer. If you really don't mind giving me a copy of the source code I can try running it here. Do you need my email for that? Best regards, --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 19:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this makes things easier. :) --Euku:⇄ 20:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What programming languages does it use?  Hazard-SJ  ✈  00:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving could not be finished - Auf sehr vielen Seiten

Hi SpBot hat gerade auf alle möglichen Seite geschrieben, dass sie nicht archiviert werden könnten. Kannst Du mal nachsehen, ob ein Fehler des Bots vorliegt? Danke -- Rillke(q?) 08:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot

Hello. Is it possible for you to either run SpBot on Wikidata or publish the source code? Thanks.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  01:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This should not be a huge problem. I'll take a look later. --Euku:⇄ 08:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  00:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please import Template:Autoarchive resolved section + /doc + Template:Section resolved to wikidata? … It is using Python. --Euku:⇄ 20:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silent bot

Hi Euku. User:SpBot is silent since 5 April (see here). Could you please take a look at it and maybe restart the bot? Trijnsteltalk 07:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trijnstel, thank you for the message. It is running again. --Euku:⇄ 17:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And it's silent again, this time since 28 August. Could you please make it work again? Thank you! Trijnsteltalk 22:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hum, again. He only worked on 2 September (and sorry for giving you extra work!). Trijnsteltalk 17:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Trijnsteltalk 10:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's still not working probably (or working at all). Could you fix it once and for all and/or reply here? Trijnsteltalk 16:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The bot hasn't worked now for a week, since 10 September to be exact. I've send you an email. Trijnsteltalk 10:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is, that I can't run the bot in the WMLabs grid automatically since this HTTPS thing for some reason. I can only start it by hand. This only happens on commons... --Euku:⇄ 11:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should report the problem via the contact details on m:HTTPS. We really need your bot. :) Trijnsteltalk 10:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you fix your bot (again)? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I ran it again, but the problem is still not solved, sorry. --Euku:⇄ 15:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You mean "jsub"ing the script won't work but not for running the script directly on login server? Or can you try upgrade the pywikipedia to git? Or let me see what's the exception made when running on the grid. See also a diff of family.py of yours and mine (sorry to hack it):
8c8
< __version__ = '$Id: family.py 11768 2013-07-20 10:47:15Z xqt $'
---
> __version__ = '$Id: 255cc3dc08b2410093f318dc48471c6f3ff691e5 $'
4725c4725
<         return '1.22wmf10'
---
>         return '1.22wmf12'
4728a4729,4731
>
>     def protocol(self, code):
>         return 'https'

--Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the problem. It does not happen on de:WP, de:wikisource etc., but only on commons and wikidata (something related to the familiy). I start one bot per project (with cron) using:
jsub -once -N archive-erl-commons -mem 156m -cwd python archiv-erl-bot.py -project:commons
My bot is already using the git version. The error log file says:
Fatal Python error: Couldn't create autoTLSkey mapping
Sorry, I don't get the meaning of the last diff. Mine pywikibot/family.py says at WikimediaFamily -> version(): return '1.22wmf20' (I didn't change anything there). … Thank you for the help. :) --Euku:⇄ 17:45, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I've found the trouble reporter http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/tip/Python/pystate.c#l690, but can't see what caused the trouble. Btw, can I temporally take over the bot (until the issue is fixed)? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 02:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot archiving for Japanese Wikipedia

Is it possible to let SpBot work (for archiving discussions) on Japanese Wikipedia? I can help you with localization (if needed) and the bot flag request. whym (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Whym, yes, we can run it on the jp:WP too. It already has a flag, but it was for interwiki links. I think that I am allowed to start, as this script is running since 2007 in other wikis.
The main problem will be that I don't understand anything in Japanese. So, I need you to translate all the stuff behind Template:Autoarchive_resolved_section, i.e. you should discuss or decide the main template names, parameter etc.
Also, please translate these fragments. --Euku:⇄ 20:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for giving your help. A couple of points: 1) Here is my translation. I don't think the template name and parameters need translation - ja.wikipedia users usually accept English for these reserved words. 2) Just to make sure, does your bot parse Japanese dates (which looks like "YYYY年MM月DD日 HH:MM:SS") properly, as mw:Manual:Pywikibot/archivebot.py (now) does? 3) I think it's better to file a new bot approval request, since interwiki and archiving are significantly different tasks, and because the community is not used to automatic archiving except for my relatively new bot. Requesting approval for each task is not explicitly required on ja.wikipedia, but I believe it's a good practice. 03:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, parsing dates is a good point. E.g. 2014年2月25日 (火) 09:30 (UTC). Is 年, 月 and 日 always fix? Do the symbols change? I think 火 is the weekday? So, it doesn't matter for me. I expect UTC to be the default timezone.
I made a request. --Euku:⇄ 09:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again. You got it right as for parsing the Japanese date. 年, 月 and 日 are fixed, and (火) indicates the weekday which can be skipped (note that you should skip only one character in Unicode otherwise it may overrun [2]), and on Japanese Wikipedia it's always UTC. The month can be in 1 or 2 digits, whereas the hour and minute must always be 2 digits (prepending 0 for 1-9). I will finish translating the template documentation. --whym (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask you to create ja:Template:Section resolved for Japanese Wikipedia from Template:Section resolved? This template looks compilcated to me, so I'm (still) not confident to do that. All the translations should be in the template's LangSwitch. I have done with others - ja:Template:Section resolved/doc, ja:Template:Autoarchive resolved section and ja:Template:Autoarchive resolved section/doc. Thank you for your help. whym (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I created Template:Section resolved/standard module. Can you take a look on the categories? This is the background of /standard module. You may want to translate this section too... --Euku:⇄ 23:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! I will add the relevant categories and portion to the Japanese docs. I think we are ready more or less. Did you already schedule the bot for Japanese Wikipedia? I might want to give a test run or two. whym (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, there are still some changes to be made. For regular runs I would like to schedule it at 19:xx UTC (4:xx am JST). --Euku:⇄ 16:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All right, please let me know if you are ready. whym (talk) 00:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I made a small run, and everything seem fine to me. Can you please delete 1 and 2? There is nothing to archive for 利用者‐会話:赤の旋律:
# Head age numer of signatures age of 'resolved' target
1 ノート:電波系/過去ログ 2.35 3 2.35 →
2 削除措置お礼 2.35 2 2.35 →
3 『理化学辞典』削除依頼の件ありがとうございます 5.82 2 - →
4 対米従属論 4.32 1 - →
I didn't see that earlier: does is make sense to have two forms of ((month:long)) and ((month:short)) in Japanese? For me it seem to be always the same. --Euku:⇄
Looks perfect, thank a lot! I'm sure there is no long/short distinction of month names in Japanese. The strings generated by any of the two is correct (but the same) month name. I think you could just leave it, since it causes no harm. whym (talk) 00:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I placed the template at ja:MediaWiki‐ノート:Common.css about a week ago. The bot can archive the marked sections, I suppose? Please let me know if I did something wrong. whym (talk) 09:23, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You did nothing wrong, it was a bug that is solved now. --Euku:⇄ 09:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing it quickly. :) whym (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Two more requests: both are minor requests, so there is no rush. :) 1) Could you please update this parameter self.archiveSumOriginMulti = u"%d件を%sに過去ログ化"? It is an update to add "件" to classify the number, and to save the length by removing extra spaces. 2) Could you please use {{Talkarchive}} instead of {{Archives}} as the archive header? There is a slight incompatibility as you can see in the red link on top of ja:MediaWiki‐ノート:Common.css/過去ログ/2011年.whym (talk) 13:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Both changes done. Thanks for help! --Euku:⇄ 20:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2 questions

  1. SpBot (talk · contribs) is not running since thursday. Can you fix it?
  2. Can you run SpBot on Korean Wikipedia, like Japanese Wikipedia above? Thanks. — Revicomplaint? 03:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hym, thanks it runs again.
ad 2: Yes, but I need the same help as on ja:WP. 1. So, I need a translation of this. 2. Can you please copy, translate the templates and parameters (if needed). 3. Does the timestamps work the same as in ja:WP? 4. I made a request for a bot flag. --Euku:⇄ 13:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Korean Wikipedia uses YYYY년 MM월 DD일 (<local name of weekdays>) HH:MM (KST). And KST=UTC+9. And here's translation. I'll create related templates soon. (Korean does not use plural.) — Revicomplaint? 14:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help me with Section resolved template? I am not sure where to add standard module. — Revicomplaint? 14:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The problem seems to be solved in the meantime. It works.
As far as I see, (like in Japanese), you don't have names for months and just count them. So, there is no distinction between a long and short form, right?
What about these parameters? Do you want to translate them? --Euku:⇄ 21:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comparing ko:틀:완료된 토론 and my user talk page, I cannot see my signature. Is there any problem with div settings?
Yes, there is no name for months, so no need to long and short.
I will translate it and tell you. — Revicomplaint? 03:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, right, this was missing. --Euku:⇄ 20:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the translation for you. — Revicomplaint? 14:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, this is the full list. It seems to work:

Bot run for ko:사용자토론:Hym411 at 2014-03-25 um 23:20

  • Archiving starts after 2.0 days
  • Target pattern: 사용자토론:Hym411/보존문서/2
  • On headline level 2
  • Number of sections: 2
  • Number of sections to archive: 1
lfd. Nr. Headline Age of oldest signature Num. of signatures Age of 'resolved' Target
1 피터 선생님께서 8.45 3 3.39 →
2 오태석 3.29 8 0.67 →

I scheduled it nightly at 19:06 (UTC). So as long as it runs without a bot flag, you will get a notification. --Euku:⇄ 23:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an equivalent to Template:Talkarchive? --Euku:⇄ 23:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK to get notification. And, Template:Talkarchive's Korean version is ko:틀:보존. — Revicomplaint? 03:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot on Wikidata

Hello Euku, it appears your bot has stopped archiving on Wikidata. Could you please look into it? Thanks.  Hazard SJ  06:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. It is working again. --Euku:⇄ 09:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks.  Hazard SJ  22:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

You have new message at my kowiki talk page, FYI. — revimsg 16:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: — revimsg 14:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot

Hy Euku, is there any way (that does not cause any problems to you) your bot could also archive sections not tagged with {{Section resolved}} on my user talkpage?    FDMS  4    18:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)I guess not. You should use MiszaBot (talk · contribs). — Revicomplaint? 04:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But MiszaBot cannot archive to quarter archives ...    FDMS  4    17:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If I step in into the "normal" archiving, I know that in this case the German Wikipedia wants me to support the template of the other bot(s)... But, I like the simple idea of adding a new parameter "TIMEOUT" or "AUTO RESOLVED", that matches after x days if you don't set a template:resolved section. This makes it possible to use it in old-style (with section resolved) and in the same way as de:Vorlage:Autoarchiv and MiszaBot works. On the other hand, this is a little bit mixed. I have to think about the concept.... --Euku:⇄ 21:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that sounds great!    FDMS  4    22:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@FDMS4: Der neue Parameter heißt timeout. In de:WP ist es Zeitbeschränkung --Euku:⇄ 08:28, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke vielmals, funktioniert großartig! Würde ich Barnstars vergeben hättest du nun definitiv einen auf deiner Diskussionsseite.    FDMS  4    14:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bot dead

SpBot hasn't edited for a week. Restart? — Revi 05:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't start on Commons for some reason... But it also had a bug when it ran on non-German projects. I fixed both. Thx! --Euku:⇄ 12:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful. Thanks! — Revi 12:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 12:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

kowiki BRFA

Update requested: here. — regards, Revi 14:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/155255321

Hallo, hier dürfte etwas schiefgelaufen sein – anscheinend nicht mit dem Archivieren selbst, sondern nur mit der Nachricht. Grüße,    FDMS  4    13:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(@Steinsplitter: ) Hallo zusammen! Das Problem ist die Transklusion von Autoarchive resolved section in z.B. Template:OTRS_Noticeboard/Editnotice/en. Das funktioniert so nicht. Die Vorlage darf nur auf der Seite Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard direkt benutzt werden. D.h. alle Verwendungen auf den Seiten Template:OTRS Noticeboard/* müssen raus. Praktischer Weise braucht man dafür Admin-Rechte und außerdem blicke ich nicht so ganz in den Übersetzungsmasken durch. Könnt ihr das beenden? --Euku:⇄ 16:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Stale}}

Hi Euku, I hope you are well. A few pages that are archived by SpBot imply that it will also archive sections marked as {{Stale}}, e.g. the comment <!-- mark request with {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} when finished or {{stale|1=~~~~}} when inactive for at least two month to trigger automatic archiving --> on Commons:Graphic_Lab/Map_workshop. I can't find that in the documentation, and the bot doesn't seem to be doing that - could you clarify? Thanks, Storkk (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Storkk! You are right, it doesn't work with Stale, because it is not intended to work. I don't want to add an additional template for {{Section resolved}}, because it is not needed. You can either use section resolved instead of stale or set timeout=60 to Autoarchive resolved section. In any case you should change the comment. :) --Euku:⇄ 11:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Storkk (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use your image

Hi Euku, I would like to use your image of Vrijthof found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vrijthof_in_Maastricht.jpg in a brazilian TV serie entitled "Critical Uncertainties". Please email me at teka.xxxxx gmail.com so we can talk a little bit more about my project. Thanks, Teka. (17:26, 7 October 2015‎ Teka.carbonell)

pls check your mails (removed email address) --Euku:⇄ 15:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot "previous edit:" edit summary

Hi Euku... I hope you are well. Out of curiosity, what is the purpose of the "previous edit" portion of SpBot's archiving summaries (e.g. Special:Diff/176298855/176311320)? I had assumed that would be the previous edit to the section being archived (which would otherwise be non-trivial to piece together), but it looks like it's the previous edit to the page, which seems like it would be easy to just look at the page history for. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 09:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Storkk, if you deselect the checkbox to expand your watchlist the bot may hide previous edits (comments, vandalism, ...). This feature was requested on the German Wikipedia (and is also implemented by de:Spezial:Beiträge/TaxonBot), so I also added that for Commons too. --Euku:⇄ 10:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that makes sense. Thanks, Euku! Storkk (talk) 11:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sections missing?

Hi Euku... something appears to have gone wrong: can you tell where these edits went? They don't appear in the archive, and SpBot hasn't edited the archive since 9 November. Storkk (talk) 12:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Storkk! I've found these lines in the log file:
ERROR: editpage: abusefilter-warning-otrs
Hit AbuseFilter: Adding OTRS permission by non-OTRS member,
WARNING: Page commons:Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/archive/2015 not saved
This filter is Special:AbuseFilter/69 and it happens again. I created a report to Commons_talk:Abuse_filter#Report_by_Euku_.28Special:AbuseFilter.2F69.29. --Euku:⇄ 15:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Euku. It is mildly amusing that one of the comments that wasn't archived was specifically discussing that abuse filter rule, but oh well. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Persönliche Bekanntschaften-Statistik

Hallo Euku,

könntest du eine neue Version von File:Confirmations and participants of project Personal acquaintances, 2014-10-30.png erstellen?--Kopiersperre (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Generell habe ich das noch auf dem Schirm, aber vielleicht warten wir noch dies hier ab. --Euku:⇄ 16:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot nicht aktiv trotz Einbindung

Hallo, Euku, ich versuche gerade herauszufinden, warum Dein Bot auf Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports nicht (mehr) aktiv ist. Dabei sind mir ein paar Umgereimtheiten auf der Templateseite Template:Autoarchive resolved section aufgefallen:

  • Sind die Hochkommata ' für den Archivpfad nun nötig oder nicht (oder nur, wenn eine Variable benutzt wird)? In der Template-Doku fehlen sie in der Parameter-Tabelle und Variablenauflistung, werden aber unten im Beispiel verwendet.
  • Laut Beschreibung sucht der Bot nach dem Datum mit abgekürztem Monatsnamen. Die Signaturen enthalten aber seit einiger Zeit den vollen Monatsnamen. Vielleicht sollte der Bot nach beiden Varianten suchen?

— Speravir_Talk – 18:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Dem Bot wird gemeldet: SpamfilterError: Edit to page Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports/Archive/2016 rejected by spam filter due to content: network54.com Ursache ist das hier. Seitdem haben auch IPs und selbst SpBot die Seite bearbeitet, aber das verhindert MediaWiki gar nicht, sondern es geht darum dass ein solcher Link nicht eingefügt werden darf. Das würde er, da der Bot dabei ist, den Link nach /Error reports/Archive/2016 zu übertragen, was ja eine andere Seite ist. Sollte heute Nacht wieder gehen.
Die Kommata vorne und hinten sind optional und nur drin, weil es der andere Bot auf de:WP auch in der Syntax hat. Der lange Monat wird auch unterstützt. --Euku:⇄ 22:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Infos. Zum Datumsformat, damit man das in der Beschreibung ändern kann: Der Bot sucht also „nur“ nach dem Datum in der in Commons üblichen Schreibweise, egal, ob der Monat dabei kurz oder lang angegeben wird? — Speravir (Talk) – 18:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Und tatsächlich, der Bot war sehr aktiv … — Speravir_Talk – 18:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Genau! --Euku:⇄ 09:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ich hab die Vorlagen-Doku mal nicht nur dahingehend überarbeitet und dabei hoffentlich keinen Fehler gemacht, vergleiche Special:Diff/192714016/207019246. Eines gefällt mir nicht so: Im Parameter timecompare wird auf eine Verwendung in Commons hingewiesen, aber wäre es nicht schöner, diese als Grundlage für das Beispiel zu nehmen, wo bisher ein nicht mehr aktuelles Setup aus de:Wikipedia:Readaktion Chemie genutzt wird? — Speravir_Talk – 20:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot at bn.wiki

Hello NahidSultan! Same as in the section above, please follow: User:SpBot/How to make SpBot archive your wiki. I think I'll need some explanations for the timestamps. :) --Euku:⇄ 21:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot at idwiki

Hello,

I am currently using your SpBot to let my user talk archived. I am also curious if your bot can be operated in id.wikipedia to do so, mainly to archive village pump discussion posts, and other pages, e.g. user talk. If it is possible, I'd love to talk to the community to see if they are also interested. This will also be a time saver for several users in that wiki that are currently have task to archive the posts once in a month. Please let me know your thought. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 09:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rachmat04! Yes, I can migrate the bot also for id.WP. I think there will be some more requests like this, so I created this page User:SpBot/How to make SpBot archive your wiki some hours ago. --Euku:⇄ 21:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great! I have posted this news to the idwiki village pump to get the community approval. I'll let you know when it's done. Many thanks, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note to myself: Bot still has bot flag --Euku:⇄ 17:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nowiki'd section headings

Does SpBot have problems with nowiki'd and commented out section headings? See Special:Diff/268575436 and my attempted manual fix at [3][4]. Incidentally we had a similar issue with archivebot.py of Pywikibot: phab:T182496. whym (talk) 05:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg was recently deleted

File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg was recently deleted by Missvain for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in :Category:The Arts in Early England (1903)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot deleted text

Hi. Please look at the text deleted from the bottom of the page in this edit, perhaps due to a race condition. I restored it.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot malfunction?

Hi again. SpBot has been inactive here on Commons for 6+ days, since this edit 03:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC), and on Meta a minute later.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons talk:Video2commons archiving

Hi again. Would you please look into why Commons talk:Video2commons has not been archived by SpBot since this edit 22:09, 20 February 2020‎ (UTC)?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jeff G., sorry I missed you message somehow. None of the section uses {{Section resolved}}, so the bot shouln'd do anything (see the documentation). You need to add the parameter timeout to get what you expect. --Euku:⇄ 22:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, hopefully this does the trick.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contents in pre tags omitted

hi! special:diff/612139968 omitted some lines (around line 190) embedded in <pre>. RZuo (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RZuo: The skipped part looks to the bot like an unsigned level 2 talk page section. You may archive it yourself.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source code for SpBot

Hello,

Could you please provide the source code for User:SpBot so that others can fork it and use it themselves on their own wikis? Please note that this is required for Toolforge projects, per the right to fork policy.

Thank you,

EpicPupper EpicPupper (talk) 04:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://github.com/euku/spbot/tree/stable/scripts/userscripts
Where should I link it? Euku:⇄ 22:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link! There should be a field on https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/. EpicPupper (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo 141.41.236.88 11:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Karlsmedaille für europäische Medien

Hello Euku, since you created the category, just wanted to inform you I created Category:Charlemagne Medal for European Media. Since I do not know what language is preferred, French maybe? I'll ad it to that category. You micht wish to take some action here. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, English is ok. I guess Commons:Naming_categories#Language changed a bit since the last 12 years (when I created the category). --Euku:⇄ 22:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot aktiv?

Hallo User:Euku. Ist SpBot aktiv? Auf meiner Seite User talk:Matutinho werden die Abschnitte, die mit {{resolved|1=Unterschrift}} markiert sind, nicht archiviert. Ich verstehe nicht, warum der Bot das nicht macht. Kannst du bitte mal ein Auge darauf werfen. Danke.

Hi! Doch, der Bot ist aktiv. Habe deine Seite angepasst. Warten wir mal die Nacht ab. Bist du dir mit ".../((month:short))" sicher? Du hast Jahresarchive. --Euku:⇄ 07:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Danke@Euku. Ja, früher war ich weniger aktiv. Ich wollte eigentlich, dass die Seite neu monatlich archiviert wird, wenn's denn etwas zu archivieren gibt. [[User:Matutinho|Matutinho]] (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SpBot for Wikifunctions?

Hi. We at the newly created Wikifunctions are interested in bringing SpBot there. I've imported the relevant templates from Commons, and followed the instructions at User:SpBot/How to make SpBot archive your wiki with the exception of adding the templates to Wikidata (Wikifunctions sitelinks are not yet supported on Wikidata). If you'd be willing to add the support on your end, it would be much appreciated. Let me know if you need any help on my end. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I already prepared the bot but I must wait for support: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343573 This project is too new. ;) --Euku:⇄ 16:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The bot is now turned on and runs every night at 3 UTC. What about a bot flag? Euku:⇄ 07:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thanks! I will ask for a bot flag. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeout

I thought |timeout=180 would archive first section of COM:사랑방. Why didn't bot do it? (Also, my kowiki user talk page is not archived... it has timecompare=resolved, and 3 days for waiting.) — revimsg 14:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi revi, the problem here is a regular expression that does not find the end of the template (marked by the second }}). So the the bot just sees the underlined part... :(
{{Autoarchive resolved section … |latest archive=[[Commons:사랑방/{{CURRENTYEAR}}년]] … |timeout=180 }}
I wounder why nobody had this problem before. I can't solve that quickly, because it is some more work to do, but I changed the order of the parameters, so it should work now. --Euku:⇄ 18:34, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is this the same issue Commons:Translators' noticeboard is having? Riley Huntley (talk) 22:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, yes.. :( I fixed that page. --Euku:⇄ 07:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


SpBot stopped

hi! your bot stopped since 20 november. RZuo (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. It works now. Euku:⇄ 16:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It stopped again. :(   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thx, it's back now. Euku:⇄ 09:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Thanks for running it. Is there anything you have done or can do to ensure that it doesn't stop again?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I refactored some code, which went wrong in this case. Euku:⇄ 20:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, please take care when doing so.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Euku/Archive_1&oldid=842083208"