User talk:掬茶

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 掬茶!

CategorizationBot (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Template:Barnstar documentation


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, 掬茶!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please see {{rename|new name|reason}} or {{speedydelete|reason}}. -- RE rillke questions? 11:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you request the rename of this file to Suzuran Takasaki.jpg ? Filenames can be in Kanji. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 19:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

'高崎伊勢崎自転車道' means a bicycle track on Takasaki, Gunma to Isesaki, Gunma. The name is inapposite to name individual object. 'Suzuran' is a department store in Gunma area. This file shows Suzuran department store Takasaki branch.掬茶 (talk) 03:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

掬茶さんへ。[edit]

こんにちは、掬茶さん。

先日ファイルへのカテゴリ付与についてご指摘をいただいていたことを、先ほどやっと気づいたもので、お礼を申し述べるのが遅くなりまして申し訳ありません。 改めて、ありがとうございました。

初心者なくせにどしどしファイルをアップロードしておりましたが、カテゴリの付与についての知識がこれまでありませんでした。 ご指摘をいただいたことを参考にさせていただき、これから気をつけていきたいと思います。 いろいろ至らない点も多くある自分なので、また何かお気づきの点がありましたら、ご遠慮なくおっしゃっていただければ助かります。 それでは失礼いたします。 Tomio344456 (talk) 11:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

北海道に関するカテゴリについて[edit]

はじめまして。いつも精力的な編集お疲れ様です。

さて、掬茶さんが新たに作成されたカテゴリのうち、北海道に関連するものが「Category:XXX of Hokkaido prefecture」といったカテゴリ名になっているのを拝見しました。実は、「XXX of Hokkaido prefecture」という形式のカテゴリ名について、prefecture を外して「XXX of Hokkaido」という形式にすべきであるという意見を以前に提出し、こちらで議論をしているところです。従いまして、掬茶さんが作成された Category:Sports in Hokkaido prefecture, Category:Sports venues in Hokkaido prefecture, Category:Athletics venues in Hokkaido prefecture, Category:Baseball venues in Hokkaido prefecture の 4 カテゴリにつき、 {{Category for discussion}} テンプレートを追加し、議論対象に加えさせていただきましたのでお知らせします。この件について何かご意見がありましたら、左記の議論場所までお寄せください。

また、今後北海道関連のカテゴリを新規作成される場合も、この議論についてお含みおきいただければと思います(「XXX of Hokkaido prefecture」のカテゴリ名で作成されるのはご自由ですが、同様にテンプレートを貼付させていただきます。また議論の結果によってカテゴリ名が変更されることもありえますのであらかじめご承知おきください)。

なお、投稿記録を拝見しますと、すでに議論対象となっているカテゴリからテンプレートを除去する編集を何度かなさっておいでのようですが、議論が終了するまでは該当カテゴリのテンプレートは剥がさないでください。よろしくお願いします。Yasu (talk) 15:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ありがとうございます[edit]

はじめまして。私のアップロードした写真をカテゴライズしていただき感謝いたします。初めてでよく理解していなかったのですが、これを参考に今後はしっかりカテゴライズしていきたいと思います。 - みちまん (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Koganemakiのカテゴリーを作っていただきありがとうございます。また、御礼申上げるのが遅くなり申し訳ありません。--仕事中の (talk) 07:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akita-Chuo Police Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 04:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

駅カテゴリの並べ替えについて[edit]

はじめまして。DAJFと申します。下手な日本語で失礼しますが、最近のこれや これなどの掬茶さんの編集についてちょっとお聞きしたいことがあります。掬茶さんはたぶんCategory:Stations of Toei Oedo Lineのように、駅のカテゴリを全て駅番号順で並べ替えたいようですが、何かのメリットがあるでしょうか? 僕が思うのは、このような路線のカテゴリ内の駅名を探している利用者はその駅順がわからないと、結局駅名を全部一々探さないとだめになってしまい、不便です。普通のABC順だと、駅順が知らなくてもすぐ見つかるじゃないですか。掬茶さんはたぶん日本人でその路線に馴染みがあって違和感を感じないかもしれませんが、全ての利用者の立場からも考えなければならないと思います。掬茶さんはどう思いますか? ちなみに、ウィキペディア英語版はウィキメディアコモンズとは別の存在だとわかりますので、あくまでも参考ですが、ウィキペディア英語版ではen:Category:Toei Oedo Lineのように普通にABC順でやっています。(僕が決めた形式ではありません)。掬茶さんの意見をぜひお聞きしたいですので、よろしくお願いします。 --DAJF (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • 先日から駅カテゴリの番号順(以前は東京メトロなど全てアルファベット順に統一されていたように記憶していました)が一部変わり始めていたのであれ?と思っていました。DAJFさんが編集されていたのですか。ごめんなさいね、私としては単純に以前つくばエクスプレスや東京メトロなど、駅ナンバリングが導入されていた事業者の鉄道駅では番号順にカテゴリが並んでいたことから、慣例なのかなと思って編集していただけです。そのため最近駅番号を導入した東武鉄道などにもそれを反映させていました。私としては遠い地域などが混在するアルファベット順よりも、起点からの駅の配置が番号順に並ぶ方が分かりやすいかと思うのですが(駅番号の本来の意義がその国の母語話者でない方にも駅の所在地を分かりやすくするためのものですし)、DAJFさんの方針を強力に否定するほどの論拠は持ち合わせていません。したがって編集競合なども望んでおらず、アルファベット順に再修正していくならそれに異を挟むつもりもありません。日本以外での事例では、台湾・高雄の地下鉄の駅が番号順に配置されているようです。--掬茶 (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ご意見を丁寧に聞かせてくれてありがとうございます。今後、ABC順に並べ替えて行きたいと思いますが、混在しないようになるべく路線ごとで作業を進めて行こうと思います。けっこう時間がかかりますけどね。 --DAJF (talk) 02:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

カテゴリの改名について[edit]

こんにちは。私が以前作成していました川棚温泉駅と越前東郷駅のカテゴリについて、このほど掬茶さんが Category:Kawatanaonsen Station‎ から Category:Kawatana-Onsen Station へ、Category:Echizen-Togo Station から Category:Echizen-Tōgō Stationに移動したのを拝見しました。しかしながら、当初のカテゴリ作成に当たっては JR おでかけネットを参照し、両駅のページにおいてそれぞれ「Kawatanaonsen」「Echizen-Togo」の表記が使用されていることを確認したうえで、これらが JR 西日本による公式な表記であると判断してカテゴリ名を決めております。こちらで従前のカテゴリ名に戻すことまでは考えておりませんが、今後はこの点についてご配慮いただければ幸いです。どうぞよろしくお願いします。

なお参考までに、カテゴリ名を変更する際には、明らかな書き誤りがある場合やコモンズの命名規則に従った名称に変更する場合以外、あらかじめ当該カテゴリページで改名を提案することが推奨されておりますので、あわせてご案内いたします。Yasu (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

駅カテゴリの英語表記について[edit]

こんにちは。以前にもコメントを残したDAJFです。 掬茶さんが日本の駅のカテゴリを積極的に整理しているようですが、英語の使い方について、気になる点がいくつかあって、書かせていただきます。

  • 先ず、「ABC Station of XYZ Line」のような書き方は、はっきり言いますと、不自然な英語です。「ABC Station on the XYZ Line」または「ABC Station operated by the XYZ Company」がより自然な感じになります。
  • また、英語版のWikipediaを参照していただければわかると思いますが「XYZ City」や「XYZ Town」は基本的に英語ではあまり使いませんので、不自然な印象を与えます。

今後、新しい駅カテゴリを作る場合、英語の説明も入れる時、上のような英語に統一していただければ、より完成度の高い感じになります。引き続きよろしくお願いします。 --DAJF (talk) 02:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


この写真はフリーではないのでコモンズでは受け入れられないと考えられますが、Wikipedia日本では屋外美術としてja:WP:FOPに従えばアップロードできるかもしれません。As this file is considered no-free content, Commons cannot accept this file but Wikipedia Japan. You may consider to upload such image at Wikipedia Japan in accordance with ja:WP:FOP. Yours sincerely, Nightingale (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

カテゴリ[edit]

diff

清掃してありがとうございます。私のファイル内の他の多くのがあります。

でもこのカテゴリには間違っていますか. OpenStreetMapのデータです. Bourrichon (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

英語の文法について[edit]

こんにちは。DAJFです。最近、日本の駅に関するカテゴリーを全面的に整理しているようですが、その中で英語の文法について気になる点があります。カテゴリの英語の説明文の最後に、掬茶さんはピリオドをあえて入れていますが、これは日本語の文法に影響されたスタイルでしょうか? 英語では、こういった動詞のない「文断片」(sentence fragments)には、基本的にピリオドを付けるのは間違いになりますので、入っていないのが正しいです。この点について、英語のネイティブでもない方のために書かれているWikipediaのSimple English版のガイドラインには割と分かりやすく書いてありますので、ご参照になれば、わかっていただけると思います。「Images」や「Bulleted lists and numbered lists」に「文断片」の扱いについての説明があります。その点だけ、直していただければ良いと思いますが、引き続き頑張ってください。 --DAJF (talk) 00:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mascots of Omagari Fireworks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teishaba Komachi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fire stations in Higashimatsuyama, Saitama has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

埼玉県東松山市の消防署カテゴリについて[edit]

このすぐ上にお知らせがある Category:Fire stations in Higashimatsuyama, Saitama の削除依頼に関してご相談です。私はこの削除依頼ページで当該カテゴリは存続すべきとの立場からコメントしたものの、依頼者の方から反応はありませんでした。結局、当該カテゴリは削除されましたが、これは削除依頼によるものではなく、単にカテゴリが空になった(もともと当該カテゴリに属していたファイルが編集され、カテゴリを外された)ために即時削除対象となったためであるようです。削除依頼提出者の方の会話ページで改めて問い合わせたのですが、今のところ納得のいく回答が得られていません。

そこで、当該カテゴリのもともとの作成者である掬茶さんのご意見も伺いたいのですが、まず「当該カテゴリは“東松山市が運営する消防署”ではなく“東松山市内に存在する消防署”である」という私の解釈の是非、そして掬茶さんご自身は当該カテゴリの再作成をご希望であるかどうか、以上 2 点についてお聞かせいただければと思います。よろしくお願いいたします。Yasu (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yasu様のお察しの通り、Category:Fire stations in Higashimatsuyama, Saitamaは、“東松山市が運営する消防署”ではなく“東松山市内に存在する消防署”としてカテゴリを作成したものです。これはさいたま市(Category:Fire stations in Saitama, Saitama‎)をはじめとする埼玉県内の他の自治体に合わせた対応となります。川口市のように、親カテゴリとしてCategory:Kawaguchi City Fire Department‎を作成し、その下にCategory:Fire stations in Kawaguchi, Saitama‎を置いて消防施設と消防車両他でカテゴリを分けたように、東松山市でも同様な対応(現行のCategory:Hiki Wide Area Fire Departmentの下にCategory:Fire stations in Higashimatsuyama, Saitamaを再作成)を行うことが可能と思います。この場合、Category:Hiki Wide Area Fire Departmentを一つ上の階層であるCategory:Firefighting in Saitama prefectureに置くことになるでしょう。しかし今のところカテゴリの再作成をする必要性は乏しいように思います。比企広域消防本部内における消防車両等の画像が増えた際または管内の他の自治体(滑川町・吉見町・嵐山町・小川町・ときがわ町・東秩父村)の消防署画像が増えた際に、東松山市内の消防施設を区別するサブカテゴリとしてあらためて再作成という形でもよいのではないかと思います。もちろん、カテゴリを再作成した方が分類がスマートであるとYasu様がお考えの場合、それを妨げるものではありません。--掬茶 (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
さっそくのご回答ありがとうございます。当該カテゴリの定義が「東松山市内に存在する消防署」であるという認識を共有していることが確認できて安心しました。必ずしも今すぐ再作成すべきというわけではないが、少なくとも今後対象のファイルが増えた際などに再作成する余地はあるということも承知しました。掬茶さんのご意見を削除依頼提出者の方にも伝えて理解を求めたいと思うのですが、このやり取りをあちらで案内してもよろしいでしょうか。Yasu (talk) 15:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
はい、よろしくお願いいたします。ご多忙の折配慮いただきありがとうございます。--掬茶 (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
上記の会話ページにてお知らせをしておきましたのでご報告いたします。こちらこそ今回はありがとうございました。Yasu (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

画像の上書きについて[edit]

こんばんは。DAJFです。 先程、掬茶さんが以前にアップしたFile:Kasai-Rinkai-kōen Station.JPGを見ていまして、元の2008年の画像を別の2012年に撮られた画像で上書きしたことに気付きました。どちらもの写真が掬茶さんが撮った物でも、別の画像で上書きすることはNGなんです。(もちろん、同じ画像を色調整やトリミングした場合はOKですが) したがって、元の(2008年)画像にとりあえず戻させていただきました。確かに2012年の画像の方が新しいし、画質がいいですので、ぜひもう一度、別のファイル名でアップしていただければと思います。お手数ですが、よろしくお願いします。 --DAJF (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Train_interiors_in_Japan_by_class has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


KTo288 (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Interiors of Odakyu 3000 series (I) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


DAJF (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Interiors of Odakyu 3000 series (II) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


DAJF (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Interiors of Odakyu 3100 series has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


DAJF (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akita Campus, Akita Prefectural University 004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vantey (talk) 02:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Uto Turret, Kumamoto Castle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Michael D. Gunther (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/10/Category:610 mm track gauge locomotives Andy Dingley (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

removed Category:Skyscrapers in Kobe; added Category:High-rises between 100 and 149 meters in Kobe‎ using HotCat)等の編集について[edit]

こんにちは。節題の編集について、神戸市と日本の他都市、外国の都市(ニューヨーク)を比較してみて、整合性が取れていないように思いました。整合性を取ろうと試みましたが、すべて掬茶さんがされた編集の前に戻すことになりますので労力もかかるため一旦作業をストップしています。どういう意図でこの編集をされたのでしょうか?ご教示ください。よろしくお願いいたします。--663h (talk) 00:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

掬茶さんの投稿履歴から私からの当質問はスルーされたものと判断します。当方で神戸市が日本の他都市と同様になるようカテゴライズします。--663h (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Hi, Might I suggest you rename all of these yourself?, The names are fine so it's better if you renamed them instead of taking up valuable editors time, You can install com:catalot to move the images from the old category to the new one :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, I've seen from your contributions that you're more than capable of moving categories yourself so from hereon in all category requests made by you will be declined,
I don't have an issue with moving them as I know some editors don't know how to and plus I enjoy helping out here however judging by your contribs you know how to move these and your name requests aren't controversial or problematic so I will kindly suggest from hereon in you move them yourself,
As I said you can move the images with com:catalot too so it's not difficult to do :),
If you need any help just ask :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Continuing the requests could see you blocked as you're now disruptively editing the project, As I've said you're more than capable of renaming these yourself because you've done so in the past and as I said these names aren't problematic and don't require any admin intervention or category-mover intervention, All's you're doing is wasting editors time and I would kindly ask you to stop,
Consider this your only warning!, Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 15:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi 掬茶, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 08:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

--Ralth Galth (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Photographs by photographer" のカテゴリについて[edit]

こんにちは。DAJFです。Category:Photographs by User:掬茶 taken in 2016のような掬茶さんの個人用カテゴリが最近、他の方によってCategory:2016 photographs by photographerに入れられているようですが、実はCategory:Photographs by photographer内のカテゴリはWikimediaのユーザー以外の写真家のためのカテゴリであり、現在、日本語での説明がないようでちょっとわかりにくいですが、各カテゴリの上の方にその旨で書いてあります。お手数ですが、掬茶さんのカテゴリが本当に当てはまるかどうか検討していただき、適切に外していただいた方がよろしいかと思います。 では、今年もどうぞよろしくお願いいたします。 --DAJF (talk) 02:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Tatsuko with misty Lake Tazawa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Tatsuko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katagashira-no-reisen 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Description of the Arayashiki Shell Mound.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiroomote Chance Center, description.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 07:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Description of the Minato Castle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 08:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Yojiro in Area Nakaichi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bust of the Taro Shoji in Senshu Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 06:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keisei Yūkarigaoka Sta 003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 01:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Description of the Minato Castle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 08:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toa-no-Otome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takayama Station gate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Halowand (talk) 03:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, DAJF (talk) 08:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Namahage at Akita station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nummy & Huggy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tobitakyu Station coin-operated locker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

3 ft 6 in gauge trams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Roy17 (talk) 01:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

わたらせ渓谷鐵道間藤駅のカテゴリについて[edit]

今般、掬茶さんが首記のカテゴリを Mato Station から Matō Station に改名したのを拝見しました。改名の理由について特段のご説明はありませんでしたが、この駅の駅名アルファベット表記は、わ鐵の公式サイト上では長音符なしの MATO と書かれており、また現地の駅名標ではサーカムフレックス使用の MATÔ となっているようです。今回の改名先である Matō という表記はどこで使用されているものでしょうか? Yasu (talk) 15:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • 済みません。公式表記の確認を怠り発音だけでMatōとした私の手落ちです。復帰させた方がよろしいでしょうか。それとも英語版wikipediaの記事名ともなっているMatō Stationの表記に準拠して存置しても良いものでしょうか、ご見解を賜りたいです。Mato Station表記に戻す際は私で行います。--掬茶 (talk) 11:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
結論から申し上げますと、私個人としては当初のカテゴリ名である Mato が最良であると考えています。まず、公式な表記が Mato または Matô であること、また、長音符のない Mato でも「まとう」のアルファベット表記として間違いではないことから、そもそも改名の必要はなかったものと思います。英語版ウィキペディアがなぜ Matō の表記なのかは分かりません(おそらく独自の命名ガイドラインがあるのかもしれません)が、コモンズにもやはり命名ルールが存在し、それによれば ISO/IEC 646 という文字コードに含まれる文字を使用することが望ましいとされています。ISO/IEC 646 にはマクロンやサーカムフレックス付きの文字はありませんので、その点からみても Matô や Matō よりも Mato のほうがルールに沿っているといえます。
なお以前にもお伝えしています通り、カテゴリの改名の際には、あらかじめ提案を出すことが推奨されていますので、改めてお含みおきください。提案なしにすぐに改名を行う場合でも、ひとこと理由を書いていただければ、無用のやり取りが減らせることもあるかと思いますので、ご理解のほどお願いします。Yasu (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ご回答の程ありがとうございます。後ほどMatoに復帰させる形で移動したいと思います。この件については私の誤りの復帰という形ですので特に諮らずそのまま訂正を進める所存ですので、あらかじめご理解の程よろしくお願いします。--掬茶 (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

English  español  മലയാളം  Türkçe  +/−


Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi 掬茶,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

-- ~riley (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Metacategories[edit]

Hello, 掬茶. When you use the {{MetaCat}} template, you need to include a parameter for the sort criterion. For example, the template on Category:Buildings in Minato, Tokyo by location should look like this:

{{MetaCat|location}}

Thanks. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're still creating metacategories without the needed parameter. See this diff of a change I made for an example of what is needed. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore Postcard[edit]

Greetings! Thank you for your contribution in Wiki Loves Folklore 2020 Commons photography contest. The world is richer with your contributions today. Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, we are sharing a digital postcard as a token of appreciation. Please fill this form before 10 July 2020 to recieve your digital postcard from us.

Looking forward to welcome you next year in February 2021.

Wikilove and Gratitude

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Libraries in Mito, Ibaraki has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mario1257 (talk) 15:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Hi! Thank you for helping with the categories for the files I moved from Japanese Wikipedia. I have moved the files in Category:Files uploaded by Tokatsu Kokubu and that was mostly related to transport (buses and a few trains). Atm. I work on the files in ja:Category:Files uploaded by Bakkai. They seems to be a mix of everything so it is not that easy to find a good category for those. If you like trains and know any users on ja.wiki that have uploaded many photos of trains I can perhaps move them too. --MGA73 (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category damage[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Shanghai_Xiaochi_(Chinese_restaurant)&diff=436861247&oldid=142211533 : You moved this from a category that exists to one that doesn't! Do you plan to create that category, or should I move it back? - Jmabel ! talk 16:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 掬茶. I undid your change to this category because it is not a metacategory. It is not a metacategory because the subcategories are not for multiple things with the same name. Instead, each subcategory is for a single restaurant. For comparison, see Category:Hotels by name. Each subcategory there, for example Category:Hotels named Victoria, is for any hotel with the indicated name.

Don't feel bad, though. The "by name" categories are used in both these different ways, and that can be difficult to remember. Only the second way, however, makes a metacategory. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main hall of the FPDM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:53, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campas of Tokyo Dental College 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument of the Tokyo Skytree 'To The Sky'.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Starbucks Coffee Dazaifutenmangu Omotesando Store has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zenwort (talk) 20:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is out![edit]

Hi, Greetings

The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is announced!

We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 7,707 images represented on commons in over 20 countries. Kindly see images here

Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.

We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.

Thank you,

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

カテゴリを修正いただきありがとうございます[edit]

はじめまして、紅い目の女の子と申します。 Image:鶴見緑地 水の館.jpgImage:鶴見緑地 噴水.jpgなどのカテゴリを適切なものに修正いただきありがとうございました。 ja:Wikipedia:コメント依頼/笹目ヤヤ等の議論も拝見して、少しでもお役に立てればと思いカテゴリ付与のご協力を最近させていただいているのですが、却ってお手間をおかけすることになってはおりませんでしょうか……? できるだけ適切なカテゴリを探そうとは思っているものの、こうして後追いで修正いただくのを確認しますとまだまだ調査が不十分であるのかと感じております。 お邪魔になっているようでしたら、自信のないものについてはCategory:Unidentified subjects in Japanを外さないままにして他の方にもご確認いただける状況を維持するであるとか、他の似たようなファイルのカテゴライズを参考にできるものだけに作業を留めるなど、編集のハードルを上げたいと思います。 --紅い目の女の子 (talk) 07:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • こちらこそはじめまして。ご丁寧なご連絡ありがとうございます。作業に関してこまやかなお心遣い重ねてお礼申し上げます。まずコモンズでの活動に関しては、参加してくださる方を増やすこと、参加しやすい雰囲気づくりを目指すことが何よりですから、それほど肩肘張らずにメンテナンスにも目を向けていただければそれで十分なのではないかと思います。ですから、紅い目の女の子様が自身の活動を邪魔になっているとお考えになる必要は全くありませんが、判断に自信のないものについてはCategory:Unidentified subjects in Japanを残しておくといった対応が穏当であるかもしれません。プロジェクトの性質上、まず画像等のメディアの蓄積があって次にその分類に進む訳ですから、カテゴリの構築は後行して行われるものです。したがって当初「○○ in Japan」といったおおまかなカテゴリしか与えられなかったファイルでも、「○○ in city」というようにより細分化した形にカテゴリが付け替えられるということは一般的に起こり得るものです。Image:鶴見緑地 水の館.jpgを例に説明すると、当初紅い目の女の子様はCategory:Tsurumi-ku, Osakaとカテゴリをつけておられますが、その後私が大阪市鶴見区内の公園であるCategory:Tsurumiryokuchi Expo '90 Commemorative Parkに付け替え、Category:Tsurumi-ku, OsakaCategory:Parks in Japanを除きました。しかしそれは分類上より適切であるからそうしたのであって、紅い目の女の子様の対処に問題があるという訳ではありません。ただ、分類上は最も細分化されたカテゴリ内に収まっていればいいのであって、例えばCategory:Tsurumiryokuchi Expo '90 Commemorative Park内にあるファイルに、重複してCategory:Parks in Japanをつける必要は全く無いことにご留意いただければと思います。乱筆失礼いたします。--掬茶 (talk) 12:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
丁寧なお返事を頂きありがとうございます。カテゴライズについてはご教示いただいた点理解いたしました。現時点でサブカテゴリが存在するものについてはできるだけ細分化した分類を心がけるとともに、判断の悩ましいものについてはカテゴリを残すなどして、作業に慣れた方が確認できる余地を残すようにしたいと思います。
自分でもいざ作業してみますとなかなか大変な作業で、こうした作業を以前から実施されている方には頭が下がります。今後とも可能な範囲でコモンズのメンテナンス作業にもご協力できたらと思いますので、よろしくお願いいたします。 --紅い目の女の子 (talk) 01:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

カテゴリ除去荒らしやめて頂きとうございます[edit]

まあまあ御迷惑です。よろしくお願いいたします。 File:2020マスク品薄.jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 03:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Benzoylさん 横から失礼しますが、他の利用者による編集がご自分の意図と異なるからといって、その編集を安易に荒らしと呼ばないようお願いします(当該ファイルのノートページに投稿されたコメントは除去させていただきました)。ご自分が付けたカテゴリが除去され、それが不当であるとお考えの場合にすべきことは、なぜそのカテゴリが必要なのかを説明することであって、除去した利用者を荒らし呼ばわりすることではありません。そもそも、Benzoyl さんによるカテゴリ編集については、以前より私だけでなくいろいろな方から疑義が呈されてきており(たとえば Commons:井戸端/過去ログ15#User:Benzoylさんの問題点についてCommons:井戸端/過去ログ17#Benzoylさんの編集姿勢についてUser talk:Benzoyl/log2#Categories など)、ご自分の編集内容が必ずしもコミュニティに受け入れられているわけではないことは Benzoyl さんご自身も認識していらっしゃるはずです。他の利用者との対話をないがしろにして「自分の編集が正しくて、それを変更する利用者は間違っている」と決めつけるようなことを今後も継続されるのであれば、いずれ Benzoyl さんご自身がコミュニティから受け入れられなくなります。よくよくお考えください。Yasu (talk) 15:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


nice work on the gold leaf cat. USA[edit]

thanks for the code., just follow the breadcrubs on PHp tp say thanks


david adam kess — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.189.65 (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confectionery shops or Candy stores[edit]

はじめまして、Krorokeroroと申します。日頃掬茶さんがコモンズに画像をアップロードされていること、またカテゴリーを積極的に加えて頂いていることに感謝申し上げます。さて、Category:Confectionery shops in Japan はわかりやすいネーミングで私もそれを使おうとしたことがありました。ただ Category:Confectionery shops in FranceCategory:Confectionery shops in Switzerland は Candy stores へのリダイレクトとなっていて Poland や Germany などでも同様です。Candy stores とはどうもしっくりしない言葉のように感じるのですが、他国が使っていて、またCategory:Candy stores in Japan がありますので、そちらにカテゴライズさせて頂きました。ご了承頂ければと存じます。よろしくお願い申し上げます。--Krorokeroro (talk) 15:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Architecture of Oita, Oita has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Lower secondary schools in Minato, Tokyo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us![edit]

Hello 掬茶,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

  • 1st prize: 500 USD
  • 2nd prize: 400 USD
  • 3rd prize: 300 USD
  • Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
  • Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
  • Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
  • Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
  • Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group


Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

珍しい画像アップロードに感謝いたします[edit]

日頃、画像をアップロードして頂きどうも有難うございます。さて、今回は大変に珍しい画像をアップロードして下さったことにお礼を申し上げたくて書き込ませて頂きます。風力発電風車のブレード輸送という、中々お目にかかれない光景を撮影・アップロードして下さり、どうも有難うございます。アップロードして下さった File:Transportation of wind blade in Noshiro City1.jpgFile:Transportation of wind blade in Noshiro City2.jpg の画像には驚きました。考えてみれば風力発電は塔を立てて羽根を取り付けなければいけないわけで、当然その羽根は移動して持ってくるものです。私は羽根がついた風力発電風車しか見たことがありませんので、今回掬茶さんがアップロードして下さった画像には本当に驚きました。このような機会をよく捉えて撮影して下さったと感謝の念に堪えません。日頃、掬茶さんが素晴らしい画像をアップロードして下さっていることには感謝の気持ちをもっておりますが、それを一つ一つこの会話ページで申し上げるのはご迷惑になるのではと考え、いたしておりませんが、今回は本当に珍しい画像でしたので会話ページを使わせて頂きました。篤くお礼を申し上げます。--Krorokeroro (talk) 09:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • これは、ご丁寧にどうもありがとうございます。私もブレード輸送が深夜行われているという事は知っていたのですが、たまたま遭遇したので持っていたカメラで慌てて撮影したものです。自分でも珍しい光景だと思って撮影したものですが、こうしてコメントを頂けると励みになります。--掬茶 (talk) 08:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Containers of JR Freight has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Soren Bradley (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]