User:Raboe001/Archiv 13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiCon[edit]

Vielen Dank für deine heutigen Uploads von Bildern von der WikiCon 2019, die du allerdings in Category:WikiCon 2016 eingeordnet hast, vielleicht magst du das selber korrigieren? ;-) Gestumblindi (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Moin Gestumblindi
Ups Danke, klar mache ich gerne :) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 21:58, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Atamari hat sich inzwischen schon darum gekümmert, wie ich sehe :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Ja ist mir auch aufgefallen, Danke Atamari. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 22:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sindelfingen Motorworld 2014[edit]

Hallo Raboe. Ich bin auf diese Kategorie gestoßen und ging stillschweigend davon aus, dass das was du da fotografiert hast eine Ausstellung in Sindelfingen war. Dem ist aber nicht so, die Motorworld heißt offiziell Motorworld Region Stuttgart und der Standort ist auf dem Flugfeld, welches ein gemeinsam verwalteter Stadtteil von Böblingen und Sindelfingen ist. ABER die Motorworld Region Stuttgart befindet sich auf dem Gebiet der Stadt Böblingen. Es gibt dort inzwischen massenhaft Bilder und Kategorien für die verschiedenen Hersteller. Gruß--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Moin Giftzwerg 88,
ja das ist richtig, es war auf dem Flugfeld, danke für die Info. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 16:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: Meeting on September 26 and other stuff[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I've got a quick update for you, containing three items:

  • I’d like to invite you to our group’s second Virtual Meeting on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As last time, this meeting will serve as an opportunity to get to know each other better, share learnings, and connect in times of the global COVID-19 pandemic. If you'd like to present, please add your name and the proposed topic to the list on the talk page.
  • Also, I'd like to start a conversation about how we should be sharing responsibility for the user group going forward. I'd love to get some help when it comes to organizing things and I'm convinced that we can achieve more if a couple of people helped with coordinating stuff.
  • Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has asked me to spread the word about their latest survey: Universal Code of Conduct Survey. The goal is to create a safer environment on Wikimedia projects and the Foundation gathers feedback prior to coming up with a first draft.

Hope to see you at the Zoom meeting in September!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Reminder: User Group Meeting this Saturday[edit]

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This is a quick reminder that our second virtual meeting will take place this Saturday, September 26. The agenda entails presentations about drone photography, about the story behind a featured picture, and about the future of LRMediaWiki. We'll also discuss photographers’ contacts with the Wikimedia Foundation and the election of representatives for our user group. You'll find information about all of this on the event page:

I'm also inviting you to share some information about yourself and your photography work with other members of the user group on our new membership list:

I hope you're well during these difficult times. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Raboe001/NoFacebook[edit]

User:Raboe001/NoFacebook has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Exif-weg-bei-fb.jpg

Hi RaBoe001, mir gefällt der LA zwar garnicht, aber die rechtl. Einschätzung auf Meta, auf die der Baustein verlinkt, wurde nach dem 6. August von Jrogers (Legal Counsel der WMF) komplett umgeschrieben, insbesondere was den Konflikt CC/Facebook angeht. --Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Moin Túrelio,
Danke für den Hinweis, ich schauce mir das mal an, bin etwas überrascht. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 13:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Die Manipulationen an den EXIF, die Facebook vornimmt, sind eine URV. --Ralf Roletschek 13:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ralf, könntest du 1 Screenshot vorher/nachher hochladen. Das würde eine Diskussion der o.g. Neueinschätzung seitens der WMF erleichtern. --Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Original
In FaceBook hochgeladen und wieder hier hochgeladen
Moment, sehe ich es richtig, ich nehme eines von meinen Bilder aus Commons, lade es in FB hoch und dann speichere es von dort wieder und schaue mir die Exif Daten an, bzw lade es hier wieder hoch. Sehe ich das so richtig und dann schauen wir mal? Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 14:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Ich hab solche Screenshots gemacht, lade das gleich hoch. --Ralf Roletschek 14:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
@Ralf, schau mal ob das so für dich o.k. ist. --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Für mich ist das ok. Ich denke, für den anderen Ralf auch. --Ralf Roletschek 18:40, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Laut diesem Test werden von Facebook mehrere bildrechtliche IPTC- und EXIF-Datenfelder erhalten. Hast du in deinem Testbild einen Urhebernamen oder eine Lizenz in das Originalbild eingebaut? In dem von dir verlinkten Urteil geht es (zumindest nach kurzer Übersicht) ja nicht um EXIF-, sondern um IPTC-Daten. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 18:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Ich hab noch die Beschreibung auf Englisch hinzugefügt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Hier werden die Resultate des Metadatentests genauer aufgeschlüsselt: Die IPTC-Felder Creator, Creator Job Title, Copyright Notice, Credit Line, Source und Description Writer sowie die EXIF-Felder Creator und Copyright Notice bleiben unverändert erhalten. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 19:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Die IPTC wurden komplett gelöscht. --Ralf Roletschek 19:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Waren denn die genannten Felder ausgefüllt? Dem IPTC würde ich jedenfalls nicht unterstellen, Falschinformationen zu dem Thema zu verbreiten.
Du hast eine stark verkleinerte Version heruntergeladen, vielleicht liegt es daran? Auch MediaWiki entfernt in den Thumbnails alle Metadaten. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 19:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Versuche es selbst, das Original hier, die Fälschung. Oder probier es mit einem eigenen Foto. --Ralf Roletschek 19:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Zumindest die Felder Artist und Copyright sind samt Inhalt erhalten geblieben; die Lizenz-Nennung ist weg. Hast du ein Flugzeug? --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Bei mir ist alles verschwunden. Ich habe kein eigenes Flugzeug. --Ralf Roletschek 19:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Ich hab dein FB-Bild per Rechtsklick runtergeladen und mit IrfanView geöffnet. Artist - © Ralf Roletschek / Copyright - © Ralf Roletschek. --Túrelio (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Bei mir fehlt alles. Die Lizenzinfos (Nutzungsbedingungen) sind jedenfalls gelöscht. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Versuch's mal mit diesem Tool direkt vom IPTC. Das schlüsselt die verschiedenen Felder sehr detailliert auf. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
(ausgerückt): Interessant: Copyright Notice und Creator bleiben erhalten. XMP-IPTC-Daten werden entfernt. Insbesondere die für dich wahrscheinlich wichtigen Creator's Contact Info und Rights Usage Terms werden entfernt. Also wie beschrieben. Eine vollständige Entfernung, die in dem Urteil verboten wurde, fand hier jedenfalls nicht statt. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 19:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Aber: In 2014, a 3rd-level court in Germany ruled that the removal of a watermark, which contained copyright information, violated the provision "You must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work"[1] of the CC license (in this case CC BY-NC-2.0)[2].--Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Das erw. Urteil steht ja durchaus in Einklang mit der hier Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks genannten, älteren Einschätzung der WMF (und den dort zitierten Urteilen), wonach Copyright-Hinweise nicht entfernt werden dürfen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Also ich habe jetzt einfach mal das Original hier genommen und das Bild in FB hochgeladen und dann wieder runtergeladen und hier wieder hoch. Ich sehe keine Exifdaten, sehe ich das Richtig? Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 19:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Ja, das ist ein Unterschied RaRos Foto. Bei deinem zeigt IrfanView unter Bild/Information nicht einmal die Rubrik EXIF an. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Das siehst du richtig. Deine Version ist aber sehr klein, ich vermute, dass du ein Vorschaubild erwischt hast. Hier die Metadaten im Original, hier die der Kopie.
Bei Ralfs Foto weiter oben, das ich genauso ausgewertet habe, blieben manche Metadaten erhalten. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Nun ich habe damals die Bilder kleiner hochgeladen, habe das Bild vor Jahren als mein FB Bild genommen und heute runtergeladen und auf Commons wieder hoch. Sprich, wenn ich jetzt ein neues Bild hoch und wieder runterlade ist es anders? Hat FB was geändert? Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 20:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Der Umgang mit Metadaten hat sich über die Jahre deutlich verändert, dieser Test von 2019 und die beiden zuvor zeigen die Unterschiede.
Ob die fehlenden Metadaten bei dir daran liegen, dass du das Bild vor langer Zeit hochgeladen hast (und Facebook direkt beim Hochladen die Metadaten dauerhaft gelöscht hat), oder du schlicht eine falsche Version erwischt hast (und bei der Vollversion mehr Metadaten dabei wären), weiß ich nicht. --Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly (talk) 20:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Beide Bilder haben 1.000 × 750 Pixel. Ich probiere es jetzt mal mit einem meiner letzen Bilder aus. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 20:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Original
In FaceBook hochgeladen und wieder hier hochgeladen
Hier mal ein neuer Versuche und siehe da .............-- Ra Boe watt?? 20:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
D.h., offensichtlich bleiben nur diese beiden Felder erhalten, egal was da drin steht. Bei dir stand da der Lizenzname drin, bei RaRo nicht. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
ja sehe ich auch so und das Bild wird runtergerechnet. -- Ra Boe watt?? 21:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Photographs of identifiable people[edit]

FYI: Die Seite wurde inzwischen übersetzt.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC) Moin Giftzwerg 88, das erleichter die Sache vielen Dank, hier mal die seite auf Deutsch. Fotografien erkennbarer Personen, die muss ich mir jetzt noch mal in Ruhe durchlesen. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 21:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)-- Ra Boe watt?? 21:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group meeting on Saturday[edit]

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

I'd like to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, December 12. We'll have two presentations: Habib Mhenni aka Dyolf77 will answer the question Do "we" need DSLRs anymore? and Martin Falbisoner will walk us through the making of his featured picture File:Caribbean_Sea_-_Long_Exposure.jpg.

If you can make it, please add your name to the list of attendees to this page:

I hope to see you in three days. Also, I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2021. Your contributions to Commons make a big difference.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Flugrouten Juni 2013[edit]

Hallo @Raboe001: , hab bemerkt, dass du gerade online bist ;-) Frage: Gibt es deine Flugrouten vom Juni 2013 (Luftbildmarathon) irgendwo online auf einer Karte? Ich verliere sie immer wieder, weil du die Fotos natürlich in verschiedene Richtungen gemacht hattest und sich damit die Umrisse auf der Karte drehen. Ohne Beschreibung in einer falschen Oberkategorie findet die Fotos ja niemand. Andererseits werden Fotos auf WP gesucht und du hattest den Fokus oft so schön auf den kleinen Ortsteilen und Dörfern . Ich finde es schade, wenn die Bilder nicht genutzt werden können. Tozina (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Moin Tozina, leider habe ich keinen Flugplan und der Logger war ausgefallen, jedenfalls sehr oft, daher ist es für mich sehr schwer etwas zu finden (vorallen mit dem Notebook :) ) Hier ist eine Seite mit allen Fotos Flugsammlung. Ich hatte mal ein Tool ({{Geogroup}} gefunden, das auf Maps anzeigt welche Bilder ein Koordinate hat und dann konnten mal sich eine Linie bauen. Ich finde diese Tool gerade nicht (mehr). bzw wie es geht. Ich hatte es bei einen anderen Flug gemacht habe. Danke für Deine Arbeit, ich leider gerade unter akuter Zeitnot :) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 13:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Hilft das frag ich mich gerade
Hallo Raboe, ohne Flugroute ist zwar schade, doch prima, wenn zwei denken. Die Anzeigen von toolforge in MV und Nordbrandenburg beruhen ja auf den Objektkoordinaten, die ich selbst herausgefunden und eingegeben hatte. Nur bin ich gar nicht auf die Idee gekommen, das nun auch zu nutzen, wenn ich mich auf der Landkarte "verfliege". Danke für den Stups. - Für die Niedersachsenbilder hatte ich das Koordinateneingeben noch nicht gemacht, wollte zuerst einfach nur Lauenburg, Krümmel, Amt Neuhaus usw. aus MV raushaben. Tja, dann fand ich es schade um die kleinen Orte, und so ging es weiter. Ich werde die Ortschafts-Umrissuche auf der Karte immer mal wieder machen. Irgendjemand wird sich schon über die Luftaufnahme für seinen Mikroort freuen. Und wenn du das nächste Mal fliegst: FLUGPLAN nicht vergessen Tozina (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot 2020[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:

I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow[edit]

Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your modification[edit]

Hello,
By consulting this section, can you tell me in which case you put your use of rollback? …and why? —Eihel (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Moin Eihel,
I'm sorry, it was a mistake, I can't explain it, I think it was the wrong window. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 10:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Es tut mir leid, es war ein Fehler, ich kann es mir nicht erklären, denke es war das falsche Fenster. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 10:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 199.jpg[edit]

File:Comic Con Germany 2018 by-RaBoe 199.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Comic Con Germany Stuttgart 2017 by-RaBoe 132.jpg[edit]

File:Comic Con Germany Stuttgart 2017 by-RaBoe 132.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

File:WP-HH 2012-04 by-RaBoe-02.jpg[edit]

File:WP-HH 2012-04 by-RaBoe-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Kiel Landtagsprojekt Schleswig-Holstein by-RaBoe-025.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kiel Landtagsprojekt Schleswig-Holstein by-RaBoe-025.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: dw of temporary adverising poster
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Discostu (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Kiel Landtagsprojekt Schleswig-Holstein by-RaBoe-026.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kiel Landtagsprojekt Schleswig-Holstein by-RaBoe-026.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: dw of temporary adverising poster
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Discostu (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Kiel Landtagsprojekt Schleswig-Holstein by-RaBoe-025.jpg[edit]

File:Kiel Landtagsprojekt Schleswig-Holstein by-RaBoe-025.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday,  October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:

and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.

I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.

I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Danke für die Korrektur![edit]

Hallo Raboe001, danke Dir für die Korrektur der Kategorien zu Bugenhagenhaus Altar.jpg! Ich hatte nur den Namen gegoogelt und Treffer für Hamburg bekommen, dabei wäre es ja aufgrund der Lokalisierung in Westerhamm und den Koordinaten klar gewesen, dass das nicht passt. Schönen Restsonntag wünscht --Fl.schmitt (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Moin Fl.schmitt, kein Ding gerne, habe genau das auch gemacht und da wusste ich warum Du auf Hamburg gekommen bist. :)
Wünsche Dir auch noch einen schöne Sonntag und hoffe es es entlich mal wieder etwas sonniger wird. Fotos mit Sonne sind einfach besser :) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 18:25, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Board election: voting is open![edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.

I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Visitenkarten[edit]

Hallo Raboe. In letzer Zeit und wahrscheinlich auch in der Zukunft bin ich verstärkt auf Baustellen unterwegs und dokumentiere Bauarbeiten. Das bringt mit sich, dass ich häufig Fragen beantworten muss. Vor allem wollen die Leute immer wissen, wo die Fotos zu finden sind. Gibts irgendwie die Möglichkeit, Visitenkarten mit dem Commons Logo zu drucken?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 03:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Moin Giftzwerg 88, frag mal bei WMDE nach, ich habe bis jetzt nur Visitenkarten für die Wikipedia bestellt, eventuell mache sie auch für Commons welche. Btw. Ich persönlich würde überlegen, selber eine zu bestellen, die es gibt günstig im Internet :) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 17:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 13:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot of 2021[edit]

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

File:San Marino (city) - 2017 by-RaBoe 172.jpg[edit]

File:San Marino (city) - 2017 by-RaBoe 172.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Verbcatcher (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:San Marino (city) - 2017 by-RaBoe 173.jpg[edit]

File:San Marino (city) - 2017 by-RaBoe 173.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Verbcatcher (talk) 18:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

  • Photography in Nigeria
  • Photographing vehicles
  • I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Raboe001/Archiv_13&oldid=664984791"