Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:City of Capitals in Moscow-City 28-03-2010.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: DR is at Commons:Deletion requests/File:City of Capitals in Moscow-City 28-03-2010.jpg. There is now architectural FOP in Russia since 2014. = {{FoP-Russia}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per {{FoP-Russia}} Ankry (talk) 14:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: done by Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

vishal badmeraa

UNDELETE THIS FILE FOR UPLOADING IT ON MAIN WIKIPEDIA USERNAME:VISHAL BADMERAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishal badmeraa (talk • contribs) 11:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Published eg. here and likely out of scope. Ankry (talk) 14:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose No relevant Google hits -- out of scope. Also, as Ankry notes, previously published. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done, photo of Wikimedia user without significant number of edits. Thuresson (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2009-abraham-lincoln-commemorative-silver-one-dollar-uncirculated-reverse (1).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is an image of the reverse of the 2009 Abraham Commemorative silver dollar. You can find a copy of this image here. The reverse was designed by U.S. mint sculptor-engraver Phebe Hemphill, who is an employee of the mint (source). The reverse (but not the obverse) of the coin is therefore in the public domain. See Commons:Determining if U.S. coins are free to use for more information on determining the public domain status of U.S. coinage.  Mysterymanblue  19:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural closing -- this image was never deleted and the related DR was closed several hours before this UnDR was posted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Scott Miller, Virginia Wesleyan University President.png

I submitted the documentation containing the copyright information via email. Was told to reupload the image for secondary consideration. File:Scott Miller, Virginia Wesleyan University President.png Akscripter (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The usual procedure is that once the email is processed and accepted, the VRT volunteer will either restore the image -- if they are an Admin -- or request its restoration here. There is never any reason to upload an image a second time as nothing is ever actually deleted, merely hidden. In fact, uploading an image a second time is a violation of Commons rules. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Restored by King of Hearts --pandakekok9 03:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Le Corbusier buildings in Moscow

Files at Commons:Deletion requests/Le Corbusier artwork

Per {{FoP-Russia}} and COM:FOP Russia. Russia has architectural FOP since 2014, and these buildings still exist today. Category:Tsentrosoyuz building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

 Support per {{FoP-Russia}} Ankry (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mike Winkelmann (Beeple Crap).png

This file is awaiting verification by the VRT and I forgot to place the {{OTRS pending}} tag. I would prefer if it can be restored so that I do not have to reupload the image. ––FormalDude (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

I assume you mean undeleted. It was my understanding that the file could stay uploaded with {{OTRS pending}} tag while awaiting VRT processing. Is that incorrect? ––FormalDude (talk) 06:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
As a general rule, that is not correct. Until we have a verified OTRS ticket, the image should stay hidden. We do this because there are many images where the uploader promises to get the appropriate OTRS message and it doesn't ever happen. In any event, you will not need to -- indeed, you must not -- upload the image a second time. Although we use the word "deleted", "hidden" would be better as nothing is actually ever deleted from Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - see instructions at the top of the page: "If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed." There is nothing to be accomplished here. Эlcobbola talk 16:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: the file will be restored if a valid permission is received. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Patrick Duff Nick Drake Book Launch.jpg

The artist/subject of the photograph has requested that this photo be used on the artist's/subject's Wikipedia page. It has been requested over the last few years, yet the photograph is continually rejected by Wikipedia. Below is a copy of the email conversation between myself, the artist/subject, and the photographer on the use of the photo.

File:Photo permission p duff wiki.jpg

{{--Jazzie303 (talk) 00:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC) 1 August 2021|Jazzie303}}

@Jazzie303: there are two things: a) is the subject the copyright holder and not the person who took the photo? And b), please avoid uploading correspondences; it is not the correct method. You must follow instructions indicated at COM:VRT. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 OpposeThere are two issues here:
  • The permission must come directly from the copyright holder using VRT, which is usually the photographer, not the subject. It cannot be forwarded.
  • Permission for use on a Wikipedia page is not sufficient. The permission must be a free license for any use anywhere by anybody, including commercial use.
I have deleted the image of the e-mail exchange. Private information should not be uploaded and it is irrelevant in any case. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per above. Ankry (talk) 17:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cover edisi 1992.jpg

And also:

Copyright violation reason only stated "book cover" without proper explanation. The image in question is taken by myself from my own book collection. I believe this deletion is invalid, and the image in question should be restored. Kqha84 (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose @Kqha84: At upload you claimed that Wikimedia user Kqha84 is the original author and exclusive copyright holder of the book cover. As for any already published image, per policy, such claims require an evidence and you failed to provide any. On what grounds do you claim that you are authorized to allow anybody to use this image or its derivatives for commercial use, eg. as covers of their own, books? Ankry (talk) 06:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done VRT permission needed. Ankry (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

(File:Patricia Murphy in Fort Lauderdale.jpg)

I have emailed a copy of the letter in which the Fort Lauderdale Historical Society granted me permission to use this photo to Creative Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Busypencil (talk • contribs) 14:49, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

In order to undelete the photo, a free license permission needs to be receive=d and verified by VRT. However, I see at least three problems here: (1) a permission limitted to Commons cannot be accepted - we need a free license; (2) we cannot accept forwarded permissions due to legal reasons, and (3) I doubt how can the Fort Lauderdale Historical Society be the copyright holder if they even do not know who is the author whom they should have received the copyright from. Ankry (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, per Ankry. If you have emailed to OTRS/VRT then a volunteer there will take appropriate measures. Thuresson (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr. Markus Pieper MdEP im Europäischen Parlament.jpg and File:Dr. Markus Pieper MdEP.jpg

Please restore those two. We have permission per Ticket:2021022510009259. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Declassified Complete UFO footage - USS Omaha - San Diego - July 15, 2019 - Temp upload.webm

This file was deleted as "license laundering" without further explanation by User:Billinghurst and without warning. The video is part of a series of leaks of so called Pentagon UFO videos. These are videos which have been confirmed by the Pentagon as authentic (as in, filmed by government personnel) and are part of the US government investigations under the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force and formerly the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Similar videos are "FLIR", "GOFAST" and "GIMBAL", which are all on Commons already, as is a screencap of another video (USS Russel). Regarding this particular video, the spokesperson of the Pentagon has confirmed it was filmed by the US Navy aboard the USS Omaha in statements to NBC News and others [1] [2] [3] "The Pentagon has confirmed that the video is real in a statement to various outlets, including NBC News and The Debrief. “I can confirm that the video was taken by Navy personnel,” spokesperson Susan Gough said. She added that the footage is under review by the UAP Task Force, the Pentagon’s recently launched team dedicated to investigating such incidents."

As part of a government official work, it's under the public domain. This video was leaked by a private individual named Jeremy Corbell, who watermarked the video. No other version of the video exists publicly yet, and Corbell doesn't claim to own the copyright. The video is used to illustrate the Pentagon UFO videos article on Wikipedia. As the name of the article implies, the videos themselves are an essential part of the article. --Loganmac (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

This is a COM:DW of a US Navy video. Can you provide an evidence that the DW creator made it as their US Navy-related duty? Ankry (talk) 21:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes, the video itself is part of an official briefing. The screencaps of the briefing show the material they used is the cellphone (or handheld) recording I uploaded (minus the watermark), filmed inside the Combat Information Center of the ship in question, as such it was filmed by US Navy personnel during official duty and handled to an official investigative agency (the UAPTF), with the material being part of "ongoing investigations" by the U.S. government. [4] [5]. Regardless, take in mind the cited policy states "All subsequent works based on another, previous work but lacking substantial new creative content are merely considered copies of that work and are entitled to no new copyright protection as a result and should not be referred to as "derivative works"". I wouldn't consider a cellphone video of a screen to be substantial creative work to guarantee new copyright, else you could consider a cellphone recording of a cinema screen/movie copyrighted. --Loganmac (talk) 02:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
And similarly, simply adding a watermark to a video does not create any new copyright. It's hard to tell without seeing the video, but based on the description I'd give good odds any watermark was automatically added by whatever video editing software the leaker used. Unless the specific content of the watermark qualifies as a creative work on its own (which I find highly unlikely), the only relevant copyright here is the original one which is covered by {{PD-USGov}} Xover (talk) 18:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose As I understand it, this is a cellphone video of a screen in a US Navy ship. As such, it was almost certainly made by a government employee. However, for it to be {{PD-USGov}}, it must have been taken in the course of the employee's duties -- that is, the creator must be employed as a photographer or must have been ordered to make the video. It seems unlikely that a Navy photographer would have used a cell-phone to produce a video in the course of their duties. It also seems unlikely that a sailor would be ordered to take a cellphone video. Therefore substantial doubt arises as to whether or not this is actually PD-USGOV.

As for the argument that a video of a screen is not itself copyrightable, please remember that Bridgeman applies only to stills and that there is no case law suggesting that a cellphone video does not have a copyright, no matter what the subject. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per COM:PCP as per Jim. Ankry (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Химерный белок носитель для "ЭпиВакКороны".tif

This is my drawing that I did personally myself. Please restore it. Olgamatveeva (talk) 18:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done restored per VRTS. Ankry (talk) 06:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rabbits antibody detection scheme.tif

Also:

This is my drawing that I did personally. I gave this image or similar images to a few publishers and it is used in a few publications that had my authorship. I never transferred any copyright to this drawing to any publisher. Please restore it. Olgamatveeva (talk) 18:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

@Olgamatveeva: If an image has already been published elsewhere, then we need an evidence of free license. On-wiki licensing is restricted to original images that has never been published. COM:OTRS is the right licensing process for images that were published without evidence of free license. Unless you can provide an evidence that the images were published in a freely-licensed publication, we can do nothing here and need to wait for OTRS processing. Ankry (talk) 07:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done restored per VRTS. Ankry (talk) 06:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yamaguchi a.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Temporary undeletion requested. We now have an email permission, but I don't know what to do without seeing the deleted file and file page. I think it will depend on whether the image was circulated on the web, or the file page attributed it to a photographer that is not the uploader. ticket:2021072810003713. whym (talk) 11:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Whym: This seems to be a low-quality (76k) version of a studio photo with a Picasa-generated non-original EXIF, claimed by the uploader as {{Own}}. Ankry (talk) 11:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
@Whym: The photo was deleted due to doubts whether the uploader is the photographer. And their authorship needs to be verified some way. Do you confirm your undeletion request? Ankry (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
I think I now know enough about the deleted file from the size and your description, and do not wish to continue this request. Thank you for your help. whym (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 06:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo of Micaela Wittman.png

Please restore the following photo: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandyevenmoore (talk • contribs) 19:25, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

I am the photographer. All content shown is subject to my personal copyright and the file has been uploaded by me. Thank you.

✓ Done restored by a VRT agent per VRTS permission. Ankry (talk) 06:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Panebianco.JPG

Panebianco.JPG

The file was my own work, thus it cannot be deleted.

--Gmauri (talk) 11:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The file was deleted because it is small and has no EXIF -- therefore we assumed that it was not actually your work. If you actually took the photo, please upload a new version at full camera resolution.

I also note that you have uploaded the file under the name File:Angelo Panebianco.jpg. It is a violation of Commons rules to upload a file a second time after deletion unless instructed to do so (as above). .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Jim. Ankry (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mlandini.jpg

The file was my own work. The web site indicated took the photo from Wikipedia (y own work) after my publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmauri (talk • contribs) 12:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The file was deleted because it is small and has no EXIF -- therefore we assumed that it was not actually your work. If you actually took the photo, please upload a new version at full camera resolution. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Jim. Ankry (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nikki Haley (15808384257).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Public Domain Mark 1.0 is now OK on Commons per {{PDMark-owner}} A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The photographer is Zach Pippin, not the governor herself. The template is only acceptable if is is the copyright owner that licenses his or her own photos. Thuresson (talk) 15:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 05:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Spokesperson logo.jpg

== [[:File:Spokesperson logo to undelete.jpg]] ==

It is not a work created by others. It is a official logo of our Spokesperson Group Limited.

2/8/2021--Family SP (talk) 04:28, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose It is above COM:TOO, so we need a writte free license permission from the logo copyright holder officials, send to VRT following instruction described there. Also, we need unformation where the logo needs to be used in Wikimedia (eg. in a Wikipedia article). Ankry (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 05:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrew Pecora M.D.jpg

This might not have been deleted on accurate grounds. The photo is from C-SPAN, depicting a congressional hearing. Nothing that transpires in the US Congress is subject to Copyright. C-SPAN, as exhibitor, does request attrtibution -- which was in the chyron of the photo.

Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSPAN


Please also see: https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ which states: "Under C-SPAN's copyright policy a license is generally not required to post a recording of C-SPAN's video coverage of federal government events online for non-commercial purposes so long as C-SPAN is attributed as the source of the video." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Middleground1 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Copyright owner do not allow commercial use. See also {{PD-CSPAN}} Thuresson (talk) 21:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Thuresson: non-commercial licenses are not acceptable. Ankry (talk) 05:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Teatro Aparte 2011.jpg

Tengo la autorización del fotógrafo y de los actores para haber subido esta fotografía.

I have both the rights of the photographer and the people who appear in this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JavierMorales1 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:P1_Bild_VPscreeen_ppt_051003.jpg

The image was taken by me. All content shown is subject to my personal copyright and the file has been uploaded by me. Thus I am requesting undulation of the image. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BHossbach (talk • contribs) 17:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@BHossbach: This looks like the software VectorWorks. Which license is this software published with? Thuresson (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per lack of response. Ankry (talk) 05:29, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rep-Drew MacEwen Portrait.jpg

This is an official Washington State House of Representatives portrait, here are the applicable links:

https://drewmacewen.houserepublicans.wa.gov/about/ https://drewmacewen.houserepublicans.wa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Rep-MacEwen_Drew-2019_900x1200.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewkada (talk • contribs) 18:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Ewkada (talk) 18:41, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Not done. drewmacewen.houserepublicans.wa.gov says "© 2021 Washington State House Republicans". No indication of any Creative Commons license. Thuresson (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Foto de Bolinha

A foto em questão foi autorizada por Vitória Cury, filha legítima do apresentador Edson Cury oi Bolinha a minha pessoa, e eu a colorizei digitalmente . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninobravo33 (talk • contribs)

@Ninobravo33: Which exactly deleted photo you mean and who is the photographer? Ankry (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No response: unclear request. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:تمثل هذه الصورة امر قوة ... مع ضباطه والمحبين من جنوده ومقره 15-4-1949.jpg

This Picture as well as the other pictures deleted before, are from my personnel family archive. There is no copyright issues associated with this picture. Please note That deleting these picture without a real reasonable cause will only harm the articles which am creating and make them less readable.

أبراهيم غيث (talk) 03:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@أبراهيم غيث: Almost any photo is copyrighted since its creation. However, determining copyright terms require information about author and initial publication and depends on the initial publication country. Note, that in US anonymous unpublished photos are copyrighated 120 years since creation. This term obviously did not expire yet. Note also, that providing false or inacurate information is against Commons policy (at upload you claimed that you are the original photographer and copyright holder who made the photo in 2014). Ankry (talk) 06:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done A free license permission from the actual copyright holder needs to be send to VRT in order to undelete the photo. Ankry (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HSE COVID-19 vaccine Pfizer information booklet, July 2021.jpg

Hello. Please may you undelete this file: It is the work of a public body and re-use is permitted since it is a work of the government. As already stated "There is no copyright notice or prohibition of re-use." in the information booklet. Also please see S.I. No. 525/2015 - European Communities (Re-use of Public Sector Information) (Amendment) Regulations 2015. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2015/si/525/made/en/print read together with "Did you know that you have the right to re-use information which public bodies hold, under the European Communities (Re-use of Public Sector Information) Regulations 2005?" https://data.gov.ie/pages/re-useofpublicsectorinformation. The booklet was given for free to members of the public during COVID-19 vaccination. Thank you. Ear-phone (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Conditions of use (excerpt):

"Re-use is subject to the following conditions. You must:

  1. Acknowledge the source (HSE) and our copyright in cases where you supply the information to others;
  2. Reproduce the information accurately;
  3. Not use the information in a misleading way;
  4. Not use the information for the principal purpose of advertising or promoting a particular product or service;
  5. Not use the information for or in support of illegal, immoral, fraudulent, or dishonest purposes."
Thuresson (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

As highlighted by https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/yourhealthservice/psi the use falls entirely within this remit. "The HSE is subject to the Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations, available at data.gov.ie ( https://data.gov.ie/pages/re-useofpublicsectorinformation)" The HSE was acknowledged, the photo was an accurate reproduction, the information was not misleading, it was not principally an advertisement or promotional and certainly not for illegal, fraudulent, etc. purposes. Ear-phone (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - The condition precluding use "for the principal purpose of advertising or promoting a particular product or service" violates our requirement that commercial usage be allowed. As is also explained by COM:L, freeness conditions (like commercial use) must apply to "anyone, anytime, for any purpose." That Commons itself happens, or WMF projects themselves happen, not to be a commercial usage is of no relevance ("the use falls entirely within this remit"). Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

"The HSE is subject to the Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations, available at data.gov.ie ( https://data.gov.ie/pages/re-useofpublicsectorinformation)" - to quote the legislation "Open data policies which encourage the wide availability and re-use of public sector information for private or commercial purposes, with minimal or no legal, technical or financial constraints, and which promote the circulation of information not only for economic operators but primarily for the public, can play an important role in promoting social engagement, and kick-start and promote the development of new services based on novel ways to combine and make use of such information." https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.172.01.0056.01.ENG. So commercial use is possible. Ear-phone (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ear-phone: The contradicting declaration must be resolved elsewhere, not by us, prior to publishing the image in Commons. The declared restriction of using for advertisements is definitely not acceptable. Ankry (talk) 06:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: There is no contradiction. The principle law the HSE is subject to is clearly mentioned on the page. This supersedes any apparently contradictory declaration. I have linked to the actual law which is unambiguous in its stance. Ear-phone (talk) 07:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ear-phone: Well, it is still unclear to me why this particular image may be under the PSI license: the on-site declaration clearly states that only information, videos and documents provided there are under PSI license and Photographs and artwork of any kind are explicitely excluded.  Oppose per this. Ankry (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: You may be perhaps deliberately misreading and quoting statements out of context. Obviously material that is owned by third parties is what is being referred to in that portion e.g. "Brochures, leaflets or other documents whose author is not HSE." https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/yourhealthservice/psi. And it is completely untrue what you claim, "that only 'information, videos and documents' provided there are under PSI license". Anyhow, the law is very clear. I do understand legal language can confuse some people. Unfortunately, time is finite; I now no longer have time to debate unalienable rights enshrined in law. Ear-phone (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: While the leaflet in question is in fact being offered as a download at the HSE website, the re-use conditions of the HSE are not compatible with our requirements for commercial re-use. All uploads here need to be free for use as a principal component of advertising or promotion which is explicitely ruled out by the HSE terms of use. --De728631 (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gbenga Daniel.jpg.

== [[File:Gbenga Daniel.jpg]] Re: Gbenga Daniel image ==

The URL described as copyright owner does not own the copyright to the image. The image is on the social media pages of Gbenga Daniel and is free for all to use. The blog picked the images from the website of Gbenga Daniel otunbagbengadaniel.org Opelogbon (talk) 15:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Social media is not a free buffet. Somebody's Twitter profile photo at twitter.com. Thuresson (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Photographs like this are automatically copyrighted and non-free unless there is an explicit free licence mentioned at the source page. --De728631 (talk) 19:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kristin Sutton in the recording booth, 2021.jpg

Kristin Sutton is my sister-in-law. We own this image. It was taken from our own files. She also uses the image on Twitter. CaptainChaosDunDunDun (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Somebody's Twitter profile picture at twitter.com. Also, Draft:Kristin Sutton has been rejected. Thuresson (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Photographs are usually copyrighted to the photographer and not the subject depicted. So we need a permission coming directly from the actual copyright holder. There is also the issue that the subject of the photograph does not seem to be within our project scope. --De728631 (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:辭修高中陳誠銅像.jpg

Photos of sculptures are allowed according to the current interpretation of Taiwan's TOO law: COM:TOO Taiwan. --Wcam (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 Question Is Cixiu High School (辭修高中) area open to public? Ankry (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: That I am not sure. You're welcome to close it as not done, though. --Wcam (talk) 17:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ntezi jpg

The jng on the article Ntezi is a first hand jng belonging to the creation of Ntezi. Hence has no association to plagiarism. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilspress (talk • contribs) 21:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Hilspress: Which exactly deleted image you mean? If this is about File:Ntezi.png, then note, that on-wiki licensing is acceptable here only for original images directly from a camera. For any preprocessed image, we need an evidence for a free license by the photographer or another copyright holder if copyright tas already been transfered, see COM:EVID and VRT for details. Ankry (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ABC 123 currently MN plate from my collection.png

The same person comes back again to harass me and make a 4th deletion request on this license plate picture when the moderators have already restored it THREE times. So I make this request in advance, and if an administrator is passing through I thank him for block this user which now threatens me on my talk page and also threatens WF, in violation of COM:HA and COM:NLT

Thanks again. Drake317 (talk) 07:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done Not deleted so nothing to do here. Ankry (talk) 14:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sankowski Pottery 1.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021071910008566 regarding File:Sankowski Pottery 1.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 14:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rwanda 3717 r11.1 sep18.jpg‬ Undelete this file. It is licensed for sharing by UN Geospatial

Hi, this file in question is a map of Rwanda. It is licensed for sharing on Wikimedia Commons, as are all UN Maps.

This pre-2006 map of Rwanda, also published by UN Geospatial, is under copyright and licensed for sharing. Note the discussion on that page, which reads: "This image is a map derived from a United Nations map. Unless stated otherwise, UN maps are to be considered in the public domain. This applies worldwide. Some UN maps have special copyrights, as indicated on the map itself."

Here is the source URL and publication information. Note the absence of a year and version number in the URL, indicating that this is the current political map of Rwanda.

Author: UN Geospatial Publication Date: Saturday, 01 September 2018 Location of Publication: Rwanda Document Topic/Theme: General Document Type: National & territory Copyright: United Nations

Please see also their discussion of licensing.

I recommend further that the outdated map be renamed with a year so that users do not mistake it for the current political map of Rwanda.

--Honest Egret (talk) 14:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

@Honest Egret: In order to undelete you need to provide info about a valid license template that can be applied to this map. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--That sounds like a great idea. Regrettably I don't know what that means, and the wizard forbids deleted files. There is a tutorial, but I'm not interested in completing a tutorial.

The issue as I see it is that Wikimedia Commons has an outdate political map of Rwanda. I'm doing my best to correct that. The terse and oblique references to provide a "valid license template" are effectively "read the fine manual" to newbies.

What exactly do I need to do in order to fix the metadata for the deleted image? None of the documentation provided succinctly answers that question.

Best,

Honest Egret (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

{{PD-UN-map}} is the right template to use, which I have done for you. That said, it seems like there is a technical issue with this image. The full-size original is fine, but every reduced version is blurry. I think it's because it's not a real raster JPEG. Can you please flatten and export the file as a real JPEG and re-upload? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: Why did you re-delete the image? I believe it is inappropriate for you to be making judgment calls on the applicability of {{PD-UN-map}} when you are so heavily w:WP:INVOLVED on one side of the debate (which was ultimately closed against your position). Note that the UN copyright notice is meant to be for the general site, and states: "None of the materials provided on this web site may be used ... without permission in writing from the publisher." And https://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/about.htm is precisely the written permission we need. It is clearly identified as a UN Geospatial work at the source.
Feel free to re-nominate the template for deletion, but do not take an action on an individual file contrary to consensus just because you happen to disagree with it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I had not seen the duplicate request when I deleted the image. I had forgotten the discussion of this template 5 years ago -- I simply read the copyright notice attached to the page the image came from. It is a very clear ARR. However, I have no interest in getting involved in another heated discussion.
I note, by the way, that you have been rather quick to close several requests here without any input from others. There was a time when we had an informal agreement among those who frequent this page that nothing except the very most obvious cases would be closed without at least two comments unless at least 24 hours had passed. I think that's a good rule to follow. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Ah, sorry if I came across as a bit brusque; I thought you were aware of my undeletion and knowingly re-deleted it without attempting to discuss. Sure, the 24-hour rule makes sense. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Anyone who believes that this image does not qualify for {{PD-UN-map}} may open a regular DR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christ of Maratea.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cristo Redentore (Maratea) the author died in 1986. This must be OK now per new exception at COM:FOP Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per nomination. The statue is publicly accessible and was created by Bruno Innocenti (d. 1986). --De728631 (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fiann Paul portrait 2020.jpg

Author agreed on sharing this file with Wikimedia Commons. Isivensk1 (talk) 16:25, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@Isivensk1: agreed on sharing is not the same as granted a free license. We need the latter, and a written form is required by law. Ankry (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

The author emailed it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. He said he has been sending such statement previously. Could you please confirm if it worked. Isivensk1 (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

@Isivensk1: The sender should have received a ticket number in automatic response. If you know the ticket number, you can ask about its processing at COM:ON. Note, that if this is indeed a selfie, the permission sender may be asked to prove that they are indeed the photographer (the person holding the camera). We cannot host images made by bystanders unless we know who they are and receive permissions directly from them. Ankry (talk) 06:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
He said he had responded to the previous ticket that referred to a case like this, the number is 2018060310001191.
This picture is one of those mentioned in this series. This is his website, he is a professional photographer. Isivensk1 (talk) 09:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
A license is valid only to images specified in it. It cannot be granted in advance for legal reasons, so 2017 permission cannot be valid to a 2020 photo. Ankry (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
I meant that he sent new permission but responding to the old ticket. Could you please take a look at it?Isivensk1 (talk) 15:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
@Isivensk1: No as I am not a VRT member. You may ask about this in COM:ON as noted above. Ankry (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Once the permission has been approved by the VRT, the file will be restored automatically. --De728631 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cerissa A Brown.jpg

Someone deleted this without permission to smear my candidate.

--Bisquitedits (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

 Info Draft:Cerissa A Brown has been rejected. Ping @JuTa: who deleted the file. Thuresson (talk) 20:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Bisquitedits: It seems we have two serious doubts here:
  1. COM:SCOPE: if the subject does not qualify for a Wikipedia article, you need to prove that the photo is educationally useful elsewhere
  2. Copyright: as this is small resolution (not original) photo, you were asked on the image description page to provide a free license permission to <permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org>; you would also need to provide an evidence of your authorship. I note that User:BottleOfChocolateMilk's no permission requests likely should be considered out-of-process; however, you are just notified about the request and its lack is not the only problem here.
Ankry (talk) 06:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 06:49, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:34, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Russell payne-oojr4cbzs3vopb5lrrbi058iz0ne4pl7g0o4anuhp4.jpg

== [[:File:Example.jpg]] Photo taken by me of Russell Payne at comic convention ==

I own copyright of this photo, but it was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rightmaster (talk • contribs) 11:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above: VRT permission is needed. Ankry (talk) 17:33, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Patera Building Stoke-on-Trent 1982.jpg

Through [Ticket#2021080610006134] and e-mails exchanges with Alfred Neumann, the file File:Patera Building Stoke-on-Trent 1982.jpg should be undeleted under Template:Non-free promotional "The copyright for it is most likely owned by the company who created the promotional item or the artist who produced the item in question; you must provide evidence of such ownership. Lack of such evidence is grounds for deletion." the company Longton Industrial Holdings Plc no longer exists. "where the image is unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it;" The building isn't in that location any more "This tag should only be used for images of a person, product, or event that is known to have come from a press kit or similar source, for the purpose of reuse by the media." Yes it was a part of a sales promotion packs issue in significant numbers by Longton Industrial Holdings Plc in 1982.Nigel PG Dale (talk) 16:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Nigel PG Dale (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose OP refers to a fair use template at English Wikipedia, en:Template:Non-free promotional. Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Nigel PG Dale. Thuresson (talk) 19:06, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done Non-free images are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chau-Doc.jpg

Source of image was misinterpreted. The image was deleted due to a non-permissive Flickr license found in the URL found in the image description. Flickr was not the source. The image was uploaded by Noël Hanna, verifiably the original photographer. This was done on Wikipedia, and under a permissive license. It was later transferred to Commons by a different user, which caused this information to be lost. --Elephanthunter (talk) 07:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

A view over the river in Chau Doc.
Photo by Noel Hanna, 2007.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mummifiedleprechaun/378940589/
== Licensing ==
{{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}}
It was transferred to Commons seven years after its original upload to Wikipedia, so apparently there was no doubt that the two accounts at Wikipedia and Flickr were operated by the same person. De728631 (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Done, undeleted. Ping @Elephanthunter: . Thuresson (talk) 20:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Madhaba Nanda Behera.jpg

The above image was uploaded from: odishaassembly.nic.in/memberprofile.aspx?img=156, for licensing see bottom of the page, where it is mentioned that The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Previously File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg was restored on 10 Feb. 2021 and File:Aswini Kumar Guru.jpg on 20 Apr 2021, which are also from the same source. Thanks--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 06:38, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 Support per above but pinging @I dream of horses and JuTa: if they have any doubts. Ankry (talk) 07:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Restored and description page updated. --JuTa 07:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gs-poster-final-1200x1600.jpg

File:Gs-poster-final-1200x1600.png

This is my creation, my intellectual property that I'm uploading to Wikimedia Commons for everyone to use, you communist assholes! Stop claiming it's not my work, refer to the below link for press material and awards that confirm that this is my fucking movie. https://www.nrgeorge.com/films/GhostSearchers/

Tell your comrade pricks to back off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilreubengeorge (talk • contribs) 16:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Neilreubengeorge: The poster is not an original work: it is a DW od some photos. In order to license it under CC-BY-SA you need to prove that eithe all the photos are made originally by you or that alle the photos were published under a compatible free license. Moreover, the poster seems to be published prio ro upload here and I do not see information about the license and/or your (User:Neilreubengeorge) authorship of the poster. This issues cannot be resolved on-wiki and if you are the exclusive copyright holder of the poster, you need to provide a free license and an evidence of you authorship (and maybe other documents) to VRT. Ankry (talk) 17:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


  • @Ankry: The images used in the poster as typically used in most movie posters are the actors. Again, if you go to this page and view the film; https://www.nrgeorge.com/films/GhostSearchers/ You will see that the people in the poster are the actors and the images in the poster are taken from the film. I have signed talent release forms from all actors to use their image, recording, and likeliness to promote Ghost Searchers. This is an abuse of power. Tell me what you specifically need from me. You want proof, google Ghost Searchers and read all the reviews, and watch the film. To me, there is enough proof for you to access to show that this is my work.

--Neilreubengeorge (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

  • @Neilreubengeorge: Uploading photos at Commons means that the burden of proof lies on you. In this case we need an email to our Volunteer Response Team with copies of the relevant releases or contracts that allow you to use the original pictures AND allow you to relicence the result for free use to anybody else. This is required per our rules in order to protect the rights of the original copyright holders. On another note: Name-calling and swearing at other editors may get your account blocked. De728631 (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
  • @Neilreubengeorge: The standard YouTube license does not grant you the right to create derivative works and license them under a Creative Commons license. And I see no evidence of another license for these actors photo at YT. If the photo copyright holder does not care about their copyright, we still need an evidence that they cannot change their mind in future as Creative Commons licenses are irrevokable. Ankry (talk) 11:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Gs-poster-final-1200x1600.png

Gs-poster-final-1200x1600.jpg & Gs-poster-final-1200x1600.png are my creation. This is a poster created for my short film Ghost Searchers. I have all the original files, I can provide that upon request. https://www.nrgeorge.com/films/GhostSearchers/ In this link are press and festival links that show that I am the creator of this film. Please stop deleting my original work. Please stop claiming it is infringing copyright laws without any proof. Just because it looks professional doesn't mean it is stolen, it just means I'm good at what I do.

--Neilreubengeorge (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

@Neilreubengeorge: Please contact VRT following instructions there as we are not able to verify your declaration on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 11:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, please do not call Wikimedia users "communist assholes". Please follow the instructions at Commons:Volunteer Response Team if you wish to submit any information regarding your ownership of copyright. Thuresson (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The-Olympic-Medals Tokyo2020 01.jpg File:The-Olympic-Medals Tokyo2020 02.jpg File:The-Olympic-Medals Tokyo2020 03.jpg

Reason for Undeletion requests: Some of resent Olympic Game medals are still published/uploaded in Wikimedia Commons. I'm aware these medal designs are by people who are still alive today. And these photos are looks like taken at exhibition. File:2018 Winter Olympics medal.jpg PyeongChang 2018 Olympic Medals - Design, History & Photos - Olympics File:Bronze medal of Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics at PRC70 Exhibition (20191203162835).jpg File:Gold medal of Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics at PRC70 Exhibition (20191203162821).jpg File:Silver medal of Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics at PRC70 Exhibition (20191203162831).jpg Beijing 2008 Olympic Medals - Design, History & Photos - Olympics File:As close as I'm going to get to an Olympic gold medal (7654484286).jpg London 2012 Olympic Medals - Design, History & Photos - Olympics --RuinDig (talk) 05:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@RuinDig: Feel free to nominate them for deletion if you think that they violate copyright. This is not the right venue to discuss copyright issues of non-deleted images.
 Oppose as you did provide no evidence why the deletion reason in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:2020 Summer Olympics medals would be invalid. Ankry (talk) 11:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ka Pepe Diokno Award.png

This picture was taken at the Ka Pepe Diokno Awards in a public area last 2020. This is considered part of the public domain. Please allow the picture to be published. Thank you for your kind consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rarionite (talk • contribs) 16:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Subject, Jose Diokno, died in 1987. This photo of a photo is not considered public domain by Philippine law, Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines. Thuresson (talk) 23:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 06:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Image-Scarpa BrionCemetery exterior.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: the artist w:Carlo Scarpa has been deceased, means this image must be acceptable now here as per recently-accepted exception to no FOP in Italy at COM:FOP Italy (as a work of a deceased author). {{FoP-Italy}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per nomination. Qualifies for {{FoP-Italy}}. --De728631 (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Freelo Logo.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I do own this logo, would you please let me undelete it or guide me how to upload it again without breaking any rules? More information about the logo: https://isdv.upv.cz/webapp/!resdb.oza.frm. It is officially registered. Thank you very much. KarelDytrych (talk) 13:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Restored - per discussion. Templates test logo and trademark added to the file page. Elly (talk) 05:07, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AlphaGeekHost Logo.png

Hello good day, i notice now that my company logo uploaded by me has been deleted please i am pleading for undeletion request kindy grant me Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iambravolee (talk • contribs) 04:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Not done. No response, OP did not upload this image. The image was uploaded by a globally blocked user. Thuresson (talk) 20:57, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Politics Racism Homosexual Interracial Oral Sex.jpg

Image mistakenly deleted for potential copyright violation. Referenced source https://cdn.sex.com/images/pinporn/2020/08/02/23414769.jpg?width=620&site=sex&user=semendemon gives 403 Forbidden error. Any use of this image was granted permission by me as public domain, I took this photo. Image addresses the irony in regards to today's pornography and recent political events. --SSmith1990 (talk) 20:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: the link could present a copy from Commons. Any comment? Ankry (talk) 07:37, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Ankry, 1) the Commons upload was 6 August 2021; the image at that link is from August 2020 (indeed, see the URL); 2) the image at the link is an uncensored version (i.e., could not have come from commons); and 3) the Commons upload shows crude use of a clone tool in image editing software in the lower right (see characteristic streaks). It was clearly to remove the watermark and replace it with new text/a bogus PD claim. This is trolling/vandalism. Эlcobbola talk 12:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Here's another (working) link as an example. I used the previous one because the URL included clear dating evidence, but this is in many places if you reverse image search (see also this from the same set with a 2020 URL date). Quack. Эlcobbola talk 12:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, per elcobbola. Thuresson (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

:San Nicolás de Iza de Menagarai.jpg,

Por favor, deshaga el borrado de la imagen. Es una injusticia enorme su borrado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimena auzoa (talk • contribs) 16:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

What part of "everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here" (e.g., here in 2011) in the innumerable warnings your various accounts have received has been unclear? Utterly shameless. Эlcobbola talk 22:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done blocked user cannot respond. Ankry (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Estela discoidal medieval menagarai.jpg,

Ruego que se deshaga el borrado. Un saludo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimena auzoa (talk • contribs) 16:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

As per above, utterly shameless. Эlcobbola talk 22:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done blocked user cannot respond. Ankry (talk) 05:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Assimilation of Hungarians in Marosvasarhely.jpg

The file was nominated for deletion with the reason: Does not appear to be own work if other information in template is accurate. The actual author and source were not written in the description. On June 30, I added that information. It was eventually deleted for the original document isn't free per COM: ROMANIA. But on the mentioned page it says:

Under Law No. 8 of March 14, 1996 on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, the following shall not benefit from the legal protection accorded to copyright: [...] (b) official texts of a political, legislative, administrative or judicial nature, and official translations thereof;

The file is a scan of an official document made by the Mureș County Committee of the w:en:Romanian Communist Party in 1985. So the reason invoked by rubin16 is void ab initio.--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 19:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Undelete. Follows cited law by the letter. Here is the image online so that everyone understands what's the request about.
Two additional comments from me: 1) it seems there were two comments added on the original document after the scan; but those are simple texts, thus non-copyrightable; 2) there may arise a question of authenticity – @Kun Kipcsak: what is the source and is it safe to say the document is authentic? Gikü (talk) 19:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Ankry, still PD in Romania, as the older law explicitly mentioned only "intellectual creations in the litterary, artistic or scientific domain" and even contained a list of protected work types (art. 9).--Strainu (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Aside from its status in the US, I am not even sure that it is {{PD-RO-exempt}}. While the Communist Party was the dominant force in Romania in 1985, it was not the government, so this is not "an official text". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

That's an interesting point, Jim, but this is about official texts. Likely, in modern Romania it is equivalent to "governemnt-issued documents". However, the constitution of the time mentioned PCR as "the leading political force in RSR". I don't think you can get any better official endorsement than the constitution.
De facto, in the counties the differentiation was also totally formal. The president of the party's county committee was also the president of the executive committee of the county council ([6], p. 115) and the two organizations held common meetings (same, p. 118 and [7]).--Strainu (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
My thought was the same as @Jameslwoodward posted above. The party is still different than the government, it can’t issue decrees or laws directly despite having an enormous influence on things going on. Otherwise we can start thinking of releasing of all works of Communist parties in ex-USSR with the same logic… rubin16 (talk) 19:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
My argument was not that the party was the government, but that the party had the same status and importance from a legal PoV as the government. I don't know enough to comment on the situation in USSR, but I would not be surprised if the same applies there.--Strainu (talk) 19:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Support the undeletion per my arguments above.--Strainu (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Again, while the constitution may say the party is "the leading political force in RSR", the leading political force is not the government. If it were, there would have been no need to maintain two sets of organizations and titles. Also, I note that this isn't even on letterhead, so it is hard to say that it is an "official text". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done, it has not been shown through case law or other judicial review that texts created by a political party in Romania is considered "official" in the sense used in Romanian copyright law. The text is not simple enough to be PD-Text. Thuresson (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Lion of Judah Monument (Maurice Calka)

Please restore these files:

Reason: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lion monument (24590950953).jpg. The monument was commissioned in 1955 (66 years ago) by emperor Hailé Selassié of Ethiopia, that means the economic rights belonged to the Kingdom/Republic of Ethiopia (not to sculptor Maurice Calka) for 50 years, and now it's in the Public Domain per PD-Ethiopia.--Holapaco77 (talk) 09:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

 Question @Holapaco77: I see no information about different copyright term in COM:Ethiopia about commissioned or government-owned works. This just means that the government is the copyright holder. And Maurice Calka is still the author. Why do you think that copyright term expires before 2050? Ankry (talk) 06:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose. {{PD-Ethiopia}} consists of 5 points. Points 1, 2, 3 and 5 are not relevant. Point 4 says: "It is another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author)". The work was commissioned by Haile Selassie and COM:Ethiopia says: "the original owner of the rights shall be the employer or the person who commissioned the work." That means: copyright belongs to Haile Selassie. He died in 1975 and copyright lasts until 2026 (50+1 years from death). Bytheway, as Ethiopia has not sighed Bern convention, URAA does not apply and 95 years from erection are not demanded. Taivo (talk) 06:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with above. There is no information that comissioner is the author. They are the initial copyright holder only. I know no case when copyright lenght depends on copyright holder's life. Haile Selassie death date is irrelevant. Ankry (talk) 10:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 Support It is a mistake to claim that the copyright belonged to Haile Selassie. If the work is administrated by the State, it belongs to the Ethiopian Government. Following the Civil Code (art. 1445 and 1446.c) the work shall be in the public domain. Thus I support the undeletion of those files (and we should amend {{PD-Ethiopia}} for works managed by the State). --Ruthven (msg) 07:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I thought about who is the copyright holder. Haile Selassie was not prime minister or president, but emperor, so for me makes sense, that he is copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Ruthven's cite is tempting, but I read "public domain" there in the sense of "public ownership". I see nothing in the cited statute that says anything about copyright. I think the law is clear that the copyright is owned by the government, but it is still measured by the life of the creator, not the owner -- that is true in general, as otherwise you could make a copyright last forever by transferring ownership to ever younger people. Maurice Calka died in 1999, so the copyright runs until 1/1/2050. I see nothing to suggest that the fact that the government owns the copyright makes it PD. Only a limited set of government works are PD:

"any official text of a legislative, administrative or of legal nature, as well as official translations thereof". ({{PD-Ethiopia}})

The situation is similar to the copyrights on some US coins -- the US Mint owns the copyright but the works are not PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

 Neutral While in some legal systems regulations concerning copyright may be distributed among various legal acts, we need some evidence whether the "Public Domain" term in Civil Code is related to copyright, or not. Ankry (talk) 08:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
A little  Oppose, even though they are public domain in Ethiopia, they might still be copyrighted in the United States, we call it URAA-protection, @Holapaco77: you might need to read COM:Hirtle Chart to know when you can see they join US public domain, if you have evidences, however, that can explain why URAA can't apply here (NB: "Government works" don't automatically be an exempt of URAA, see an Ukrainian failed case Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2020-10#Files_deleted_under_Commons:Deletion_requests/File:FC_Arsenal-Kyivshchyna_Bila_Tserkva_Logo.png), please continue explaining below. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: URAA is irrelevant as per Taivo. The country has no copyright relations with US and is not a signatory to Berne. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 Info Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lion monument (24590950953).jpg is still open, technically (as the older, October 2020 request is not yet closed accordingly). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
@JWilz12345: The above DR was ended up deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks A1Cafel for notifying. Well as the image involved at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lion monument (24590950953).jpg ended up being deleted, I will add my negative poll here.  Oppose. Whoever is the copyright holder (the heirs of late sculptor Calka or late commissioner Selassie), it is clear that this public art is still  Not OK for Commons, at least for this year or next year. Perhaps an amendment to the Ethiopian law is the only way if one desires to restore these images immediately. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, no consensus to undelete. Thuresson (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nardelli bass 20210410.jpg

This is my own work which refers to a moment of work of the Italian producer Federico Nardelli. Please don’t delete it. Lucia Carrino — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucia Carrino (talk • contribs) 18:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

@Lucia Carrino: If you are the photographer, who made this photo, plese contact VRT providing a free license permission. Ankry (talk) 05:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lucia Carrino. OP has been instructed on how this may be resolved. Thuresson (talk) 14:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mahdi Elmandjra.jpg

I own the copyright of this photo. --Toufik68 (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Previously published at [8] without a free license and without crediting Toufik68. Thuresson (talk) 20:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

But I am the owner of this website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik68 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

I repeat that I am the owner of the website where the photo is now and I have all rights to use the photo but you have deleted it from wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik68 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

If you operate the website, please grant a free licence for the image directly at your website, so we can verify your authorship. De728631 (talk) 14:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Please note also that owning copies of a photograph does not automatically make you the copyright holder. Copyright is usually held by the original photographer, so you may not be in a position to relicense this photo. De728631 (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

The specific CC license is now noted (CC BY) as you can see at this link: https://amaquen.org/mahdi-elmandjra-award-quality-education-and-reasearch/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik68 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes thank you, there is a now a mouseover at the image. But for a CC licence to be valid, you need to mention the version of the licence (e.g. 4.0) and provide a link to the original licence. Please see the CC by 4.0 website for reference. You have now demonstrated that you operate the website, but the question remains if you are also the copyright holder of the photograph. See my second note above about the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 19:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Now the CC licence version is mentioned and the link provided. But how to give the evidence that I have the copyright of the photo? My objective is to change the current photo in wikipedia by a higher quality photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik68 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Are you the original photographer? If not, please provide evidence that the photographer transferred their copyright to you. You can do this by contacting the Commons Volunteer Response Team. If you are the photographer, I think another administrator should undelete the image. De728631 (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I am the photographer, please let me know what I have to do now? --Toufik68 (talk) 21:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

 Support undeletion per discussion and the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license for this image at the abovementioned site. Ankry (talk) 07:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Done, undeleted. @Toufik68: Thuresson (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toufik68 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vanessa Maurischat und Annie Heger.jpg

My name is Annie Heger, I uploaded the image to Commons. I am not only in the picture, I also took the picture at a friend's wedding in a photo booth. So uploading the image was no copyright violation. It would be great, if you agree to undeleting the photo file. Thank you for your work. Annie Heger--Annie Heger (talk) 14:58, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Support The subject is notable and the rationale seems plausible to me: The EXIF mentions a company called JNS that offers a mobile photo booth. German law is applicable here where the copyright in automated photos does not rest with the operator of the booth but with the person that activates the automated camera. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining this problem. Will the file upload automatically? Sorry ... still a newbie at Wiki Commons.--Annie Heger (talk) 11:55, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

An uninvolved administrator will eventually close this discussion and decide on restoring the file or leaving it deleted. So, in any case there is nothing you need to do now other than wait for the result. De728631 (talk) 12:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

[[Media:]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kao bun song (talk • contribs) 07:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

@Kao bun song: Which file do you wish to undelete and why? Ankry (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, no response. Thuresson (talk) 14:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Arwin P Manurung.jpg

Please check the license of the image, I think this license is without copyright. Tateabulan (talk) 18:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Not done, per elcobbola. Thuresson (talk) 14:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lateral Santuario Santa Filomena CMN.png

== [[:File:Lateral Santuario Santa Filomena CMN.png]] my image is not a violation of rights because I cited the institution and website from where I took the photograph ==

my image is not a violation of rights because I cited the institution and website from where I took the photograph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigonzala (talk • contribs) 00:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose That is not how copyright works. What you need is a free licence for the original image that has to be given by the original copyright holder, and in this case there is no evidence of a free licence at Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales. You cannot simply grant your own licence for an image you found on the internet. De728631 (talk) 12:19, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose @Abigonzala: that is the wrong method. The correct method is to contact the copyright holder of the photograph and ask them if they would allow the use of free (commercial) license on their photo. If OK, the copyright holder must send a correspondence to Wikimedia Commons via COM:VRT method. Just by citing the website does not make your upload (their photo) free. Citation is usually applied in fair use contexts (like researches), but fair use is perpetually not allowed here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, per discussion. Thuresson (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Joana Gyan.jpg

Hello,

Why does this keep happening.

the file uploaded is not mine and the owner submitted an OTRS some months back immediately i uploaded them

Please check with the photos submission team.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruby D-Brown (talk • contribs) 14:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


Not done. No file by this name exists. Please follow the instructions above. Thuresson (talk) 14:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Front cover of Don Pendleton's The Executioner, Issue 4

I posted this image, I took the photo myself today, therefore there is no copyright violation because I took the photograph and am giving it to wikipedia to use. It has been deleted incorrectly — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShaggyRogersMadeMeDoIt (talk • contribs) 15:50, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Even if you took a photograph of the cover, the original image is still copyrighted to the publishing company or the original artist. So you are not allowed to publish a derivative photo without permission from them. --De728631 (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Takab photos.jpg

لطفا این پرونده را دوباره احیا کنید. با تشکر — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shayanarvic (talk • contribs) 20:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No reason for undeletion was given. --De728631 (talk) 14:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Trigger_Witch_cover_art_(Japanese_version).jpg

This image should not be deleted as it is promotional material / cover art for a published work. The artist has sold the work to the publisher for promotional purposes, including online reviews and listings such as this Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans Unterf376 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Promotional material is usually still copyrighted and non-free unless otherwise noted. In this case no evidence for a free licence has been presented. --De728631 (talk) 14:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stdi.jpg

Прошу отменить удаление этого скриншота, поскольку он относится к программе, распространяемой по СВОБОДНОЙ ЛИЦЕНЗИИ - это указано в верхней строке скриншота Stdi.jpg. Та же ссылка на свободную лицензию указана на сайте скачивания этого ПО http://statsoft.msu.ru/Podr2~1.htm ("бесплатная версия для самообучения и работы по свободной лицензии" с уточнением: "данная лицензия позволяет пользователю свободно распространять данную версию и все полученные с ее помощью изображения"). Поэтому я могу свободно использовать любые скриншоты этого ПО везде безо всякого разрешения!

Please cancel the deletion of Stdi.jpg screenshot, since it refers to a program distributed under a FREE LICENSE - this is indicated in the top line of the screenshot Stdi.jpg (in Russian). The same link to the free license is listed on the download site of this software http://statsoft.msu.ru/Podr2~1.htm (in Russian: "free version for self-study and work under a free license" with the clarification: "this license allows the user to freely distribute this version and all images obtained with it"). Therefore, I can freely use any screenshots of this software everywhere without any permission! AKU-47 (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Screenshot was deleted corredctly, do not undelete it. Please note history of this file at nominators talk page. Permission to download and "freely distribute this version and all images obtained with it" does not allow to "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially." as says free license cc-by-sa. This software is not truly free. --Drakosh (talk) 05:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
After discussion in ruwiki, author changed license on dowload page. Source code is still not available. --Drakosh (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Aside from the copyright issue, which is not clear and therefore requires deletion, there is also the fact that there is no useful description of this, so it is out of scope -- it can't be educational if we don't know what it is. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No reply. Please come back when you are ready to explain why it is freely licensed and useful for an educational purpose. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unicredit Tower images

Restoration of uncropped version

Said files, deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unicredit Tower (Milan), can now be acceptable here via updated COM:FOP Italy (first exception to no FOP: work of a deceased author). Architect w:César Pelli died in 2019. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

ADDITIONAL More files from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Porta Nuova (Milan)

Also the ff.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Кролики для БиоМолекулы.tif

This is my drawing that I did personally myself. I gave this image or similar images to a few publishers and it is used in a few publications that had my authorship. I never transferred any copyright to this drawing to any publisher. Please restore it Olgamatveeva (talk) 17:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ankry (talk), In my article https://biomolecula.ru/articles/problema-vybora-peptidov-dlia-epivakkorony the figure number 3 represents the file in question. It is written below the image that it is supplied by author (me). The only way to prove that the drawing belongs to me is to ask the publisher of the article related to the image to write to Wikipedia staff that I sent them this and other drawings but retained my copyrights when reusing the drawings. Therefore, the English versions of the drawings are mine as well. I wonder to whom these messages from the Editor should be addressed to? Thank you in advance for your attention to this issue. Sincerely Olgamatveeva (talk) 21:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, undeleted on July 11 by Racconish. Thuresson (talk) 08:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Suman Ranganathan at 60th South Filmfare Awards 2013.jpg

Bollywood images are under cc-by license per Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama--219.78.190.8 02:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

 Question Is this a photo from Bollywood event taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs) 05:05, 8 July 2021‎ (UTC)
Source. You can see that the watermark of Bollywood Hungama can be seen, so I believe this is a work taken by a BH photographer--219.78.190.8 03:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suman Ranganathan at 60th South Filmfare Awards 2013.jpg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Augmented Reality Foosball (3477405245).jpg

AFAICT this photo from flickr is fine. The user that has deleted is was banned and I don't see any reason to not include it in commons. It is (unfortunately) still one of the best free photos of an interactive augmented reality installation I could find. --StefanCFFT (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 Info Administrator Russavia deleted the file but also had the file uploaded to Commons in the first place. The source is [9]. Thuresson (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
@StefanCFFT: Do you need to use it in Wikimedia? Where? Ankry (talk) 15:07, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
No, in the OSM wiki, namely https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction --StefanCFFT (talk) 13:07, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 Weak support if the reason is its potential usability. More related files can be found at Category:Augmented reality. Though I have some concerns this (and other files) about the potential COM:Derivative works issue, but that is another thing to be discussed in a separate forum and not here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:17, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Deletion of a self-uploaded photo can be interpreted that the uploader does not want the photo to be in Wikimedia Commons. Per policy, we override such decisions if the photo is intended to be used in Wikimedia. If someone wants to use it elsewhere, they can take it from Flickr. Ankry (talk) 15:25, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
None of the photos in Category:Augmented reality show a similar AR installation with projectors and visual motion detection AFAICT. I can upload the flickr picture directly to the target wiki, no big deal, but it would still be nice to have it (or a similar one) in commons. I don't want to advertise but if you don't know what I mean, take a look at attraktion.com/products/attraktion-playoke-dance-kids-game/ or www.motionmagix.com --StefanCFFT (talk) 13:07, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Anyone could have just re-transferred this image without asking for permission, but it's easier to just undelete the copy we have. A formal DR is required to justify, on the grounds of COM:SCOPE, excluding Flickr images that at least one person wants on Commons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:M自拍照.jpg

File:M自拍照.jpg

這是我的個人自拍照，我並沒有違規，且這照片不屬於F10. Personal photos by non-contributors 我不了解為什麼會列入快速刪除標籤中．Marco56333 (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

@Marco56333: Please explain:
  1. why User:Adad01023 claims authorship on YOUR SELFIE?
  2. why should you be considered a significant contributor to Wikimedia projects? (Which your contribution and to which project you consider significant?)
  3. where do you want to use the photo?
Ankry (talk) 15:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry:
  1. sorry..第一點是我表達錯誤了，這張照片為Adad0123的自拍照，但是他有授權給我做為wiki的照片使用．
  2. 這句話透過翻譯我不太了解你的意思，這張照片用在林芙芙（維基百科）上，而Adad0123為林芙芙本人．
  3. 這張照片原本從instagram上傳的，我跟Adad0123確認過，他接受以CC3.0的方式共享，也知道會放在wiki上．至於你的問題，我只會用在wiki上．

--Marco56333 (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Per policy, only significant Wikimedia contributors are authorized to upload a photo for use on their homepages. You are neither significant contributor at the moment, nor you have a homepage in any project. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 18:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry:
  1. 我是林芙芙(wiki)專頁的創建人兼主要內容貢獻人，這樣也沒有資格嗎？
  2. 還有你說的根據政策，是哪一條？你說的主頁是指哪裡？所謂的維基媒體貢獻者定義是什麼

我只是個維基人，Adad0123本人同意我把圖片放在林芙芙(wiki)專頁上，而且我並沒有在wikimedia commons"上傳"圖片，我是把連結放在wiki上． --Marco56333 (talk) 19:16, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your contribution to Commons is none; your contribution to zhwiki is limitted to few edits in zh:林芙芙 and most ot them are reverted. I do not consider this significant contribution but this is, of course, an arbitrary opinion and I welcome opinions of other admins. Also, there is no page where you can use the image at the moment. Unused personal image of a non-notable person should be deleted. So, maybe in some time... Ankry (talk) 19:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry:

你好，Marco56333確實是我授權給他的，我的instagram上的這張圖片我也有給予共享． 另外，在zh:林芙芙中，確實他編輯的部分有被還原，但他也是該頁面的創建人，而且他盡力的去遵守wiki的"中立"政策，即使被還原次數有點多，但他也盡力改善zh:林芙芙，讓該頁面所表達的方向更加中立且符合規章．希望你不要因此刪掉File:M自拍照.jpg．--Adad01023 (talk) 22:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Not done, Adad01023 is not significant Wikimedia contributor according to [10]. Thuresson (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artist at Spotify

== https://0pen.spotify.com/artist/1WRTr2ACFSGgMSDvAlwM2n?si=f9iieo7Sq6-9JkHsQh1ig&utm_source=copy-link&di_branch=1 ==

Elder Manley also known by his stage name Jahfeeil is a singer-songwriter from Los Angeles, California raised in Houston Texas Check out Jahfeeil Music and song writing credits in Spotify www.jahfeeilmusic.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elder Jahfeeil Manley (talk • contribs) 03:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, not an undeletion request. Thuresson (talk) 07:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Diego Durán Solís I.jpg File:Diego Durán Solís II.jpg File:Diego Durán Solís III.jpg File:Diego Durán Solís IV.jpg

Hello, I request your restoration, I would like to reach an agreement, since I have the rights to the images, I am the author responsible for the content, I would like to keep it for a long time, I am a YouTuber.--User:Lomeno 24 Lomeno 24 User talk:Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 02:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

@Lomeno 24: Why the images are in COM:SCOPE? Ankry (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done out of scope. Ankry (talk) 11:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AmiralBattı_Yuma.jpg

Hello, I don't understand why this picture was deleted. This image was originally taken by me from my own board game cover. The original of the picture is not owned by anyone but me, but anyone who has the original cover of the board game can take this picture, so the photo is not copyrighted. I want you to do what is necessary to re-upload the photo. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atillamd (talk • contribs) 11:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Atillamd (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Additional requests by same user:

Requests converted to a list by Thuresson (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Copyright does not work this way. You need show that the board game designer has released the board game under an acceptable free license. Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Atillamd. Thuresson (talk) 16:15, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 10:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mohammed Shanooj.jpg

My Photo has been deleted, User Reason (https://www.flickr.com/photos/193653675@N05/)

Both are mine account and i would like to add Same image again in wikimedia commons. How can i add same image which have on any other platforms photo.?? Strange editor 2 (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - It addition to copyright issues (non-free license there, and would be unacceptable even if otherwise as account is controlled by the subject, not the photographer), this is OOS/self-promotion nonsense by x-project sock. Эlcobbola talk 15:57, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per elcobbola. Ankry (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grb FK Miljakovac.png

I am requesting the undeletion of the logo File:Grb FK Miljakovac.png because I am the author of the logo. The logo can be found on the club's website at https://fkmiljakovac.com/. --MiletichDzordze (talk) 22:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

@MiletichDzordze: I see no information about your authorship nor about the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license on the abovementioned club website. The club authorities need to follow VRT instructions in order to confirm the license and/or your authorship. Ankry (talk) 04:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sn portrait 3.png undeletion

I work for Sheila Nirenberg and she requested me to change her Wikipedia picture as currently there is no image. I have full permission to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubhomb (talk • contribs) 17:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - 1) You'd claimed yourself to be the author, which you now imply to have been a lie; 2) copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject, so a request/permission from Nirenberg is not meaningful; and 3) previously published images require COM:VRT evidence of permission. Эlcobbola talk 20:15, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done As per elcobbola. Ankry (talk) 10:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mahantha_Thakur.jpg

I had taken this photo. We all media persons were available there. Many of us took photo at the same time. Hence, this may have seen to be copyright violation but it's the case! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curious km (talk • contribs) 19:47, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per elcobbola. Ankry (talk) 10:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Arezzo courthouse1.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arezzo courthouse1.JPG. But now, acceptable here via updated COM:FOP Italy (first exception to no FOP: work of a deceased author). As Howhontanozaz indicated on DR, the architect died in 2017. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Breda Tower.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Breda Tower.jpg. But now, acceptable here via updated COM:FOP Italy (first exception to no FOP: work of a deceased author). As Raoli indicated on DR, the architect died in 1961. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Addio.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: the uploader, @Scuraball: , has already found the underlying image. According to them, it is File:Seagull in capitol hill.jpg. The meme image can now be restored as the source of the ubderlying work (image) has been identified by the uploader of the deleted meme image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Iarnród Éireann Irish rail train social distancing sign - July 2020.jpg

Greetings. This is a photo which I took aboard a public train of a COVID-19 social distancing public sign. The work was produced by a government/public sector entity, Iarnród Éireann, which is under the "Open data policies which encourage the wide availability and re-use of public sector information for private or commercial purposes, with minimal or no legal, technical or financial constraints, and which promote the circulation of information not only for economic operators but primarily for the public, can play an important role in promoting social engagement, and kick-start and promote the development of new services based on novel ways to combine and make use of such information." https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2019.172.01.0056.01.ENG. This photo helps to depict the range of responses to the pandemic across various sectors. Thank you. Ear-phone (talk) 22:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Iarnród Éireann is a subsidary of Córas Iompair Éireann, a Statutory Corporation. Whole or partial ownership by the government is not at all the same as being the government. No evidence whatsoever is on offer here that Directive (EU) 2019/1024 is applicable to Iarnród Éireann works. Эlcobbola talk 20:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
"Iarnród Éireann (or Irish Rail), a subsidiary company of a State-owned company, Coras Iompair Éireann (CIÉ), is responsible for operating rail services. Iarnród Éireann falls under the remit of the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport." https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/travel_and_recreation/public_transport/rail_services_in_ireland.html#
"As Ireland’s public service railway, Iarnród Éireann is ready and able to support..." https://www.irishrail.ie/Admin/IrishRail/media/Content/About%20Us/IE-Strategy-2027_Final_One-Page_20210114.pdf In short Iarnród Éireann is a public sector entity. Ear-phone (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Verily, Iarnród Éireann provides rail services. Iarnród Éireann is operated by ("under remit of") the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport. These do not make it a government entity. It is telling that you've provided no source that says Iarnród Éireann works are under Directive (EU) 2019/1024. Where is an Iarnród Éireann site that says its content is so released? For example, compare and contrast the presence of such a page at actual government sites like citizensinformation.ie (which you've referenced) to the equivalent at www.irishrail.ie (!!!) that says "All content included on the Digital Platforms, such as text, graphics, logos, button icons, images, audio clips and software is our property or the property of our licensor and is protected by applicable copyright and/or other intellectual property laws. You acknowledge that you are only permitted to use any material contained on the Digital Platforms as authorised by us and you further agree not to copy, reproduce, transmit, distribute or create derivative works of such material without our prior written authorisation." How do you figure Iarnród Éireann would have such terms if the directive actually applied to them? Эlcobbola talk 13:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
There is very little point since you do not understand that Iarnród Éireann is state/government owned, thus funded by tax payers and revenue from public service users. It is straight forward. For instance, following your logic this image should be deleted too https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COVID-19_Social_Distancing_Bilingual_Sign_T%C3%ADr_na_n%C3%93g_Park_Carpenterstown_(2020).jpg (but obviously not, since it is a public sign, with the logos of government entities on it). Or deleting this picture where at least four people are identifiable from their faces, with no record of them giving their informed consent https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/High_Street_in_Galway_%282012%29.jpg. Yet you spend time deleting legitimate content related to COVID-19 public health. I do understand interpreting law can be challenging. I now no longer have the time to debate, at length, straightforward issues clearly enshrined in law. 213.233.155.175 16:01, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Controversial case which has not been subject to a full DR, so one will be started now: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iarnród Éireann Irish rail train social distancing sign - July 2020.jpg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ismaatun.jpg

I was editing Isabel Saint Malo's wikipedia page with verifiable and reliable information with cited sources, including news agencies, governments, and organizations. One of the photos I had placed in her wiki page was the file first called Isabel Saint Malo at the United Nations.jpg and now it is called Ismaatun.jpg. I think that there has been this problem because it was me who at first deleted the picture from her page and then tried to re-insert it.

I hope this helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saxahoya (talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per elcobbola. Ankry (talk) 00:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Нагрудный знак ВВ МВД СССР «За отличие в службе».JPG

So a bunch of files was deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Departmental awards of the Soviet Union. While most of them are indeed external pictures of the 3D object and arguably there is something above ToO to copyright, the file in question seems to actually be uploaded by the photographer, it is unclear why it was deleted. --Base (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Even if the uploader was also the original photographer, there is still the question of copyright for the two medals depicted. The photograph as such is a derivative work. De728631 (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
I think they are PD per {{PD-RU-exempt}} with no doubt: official medals of Soviet Ministry.  Support undeletion Ankry (talk) 10:13, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Pinging @Well-Informed Optimist: the deletinhg admin if they wish to comment. Ankry (talk) 10:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done undeleted by the deleting admin. Ankry (talk) 00:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Kindredgrey

== Undeletion request: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Kindredgrey#Files_uploaded_by_Kindredgrey_%28talk_%C2%B7_contribs%29 ==

This is a request to UNDELETE this collection of figures: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Kindredgrey#Files_uploaded_by_Kindredgrey_%28talk_%C2%B7_contribs%29 These figures are from a series of FOUR open textbooks published by Virginia Tech. They were created and uploaded by Kindred Grey at my direction. I am the managing editor of this series of open textbooks.

The books (whose citations link back to Wikimedia Commons) are located at: Fundamentals of Business 3e http://hdl.handle.net/10919/99283 Significant Statistics https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/introstatistics Strategic Management http://hdl.handle.net/10919/99282 Aerodynamics and Aircraft Performance http://hdl.handle.net/10919/96525

I can ADD A LINK link to each book. We are also happy to add alternative text (alt text) for each item. We can provide SVG for most items if needed. However, it is most important to us anyway to have them reinstated because links within the books that go to Wikimedia Commons are now broken.

I can provide additional documentation/author agreements, etc if needed. Thank you

File:Trigonometric Relationship Between Turn Angle phi and Load Factor n.png File:Intro hw 1.png File:Intro hw 2.png File:Climb Capability on Power Graphs - updated.png File:Thrust and Drag Influence on Climb - updated.png File:Altitude Effect on Drag Variation.png File:Effect of R & e Variation on max Range Cessna 182.png File:Max Rate of Climb vs Altitude Cessna-182, Citation III.png File:Rate of Climb at Sea Level for Citation III and C-182.png File:Power at Sea Level For Jet.png File:Power at Sea Level For Prop.png File:Thrust & Drag at Sea-Level.png File:Thrust and Drag Versus V e For Straight and Level Flight.png File:Plot of Drag vs Velocity and Thrust Available.png File:Maximum (& Min) Speed for Straight and Level Flight Versus Altitude.png File:NACA 4412 Airfoil Data.png File:NACA 2415 Airfoil Data.png File:NACA 2412 Airfoil Data.png File:NACA 64 1-112 Airfoil Data.png File:NACA 64 1-412 Airfoil Data.png File:NACA 0012 Airfoil Data.png File:Complete V-n Diagram.png File:"Skid to Turn" Using Side Force (a) Top View (b) Side View.png File:Takeoff Segments.png File:Angle of Turn.png File:Forces on an Aircraft in Take-off or Landing.png File:Integrating to Get Time to Climb.png File:Climb Maxima on Take-Off.png File:Comparison of Constant Power and Constant Thrust Available Cases.png File:Climb Capability on Power Graphs.png File:Thrust and Drag Influence on Climb.png File:Winglet Operation (a) Winglet.png File:Leading Edge Vortex.png File:3-D Aspect Ratio Effects on Lift Curve Slope.png File:Horseshoe Vortex System.png File:Finding the Center of Pressure.png File:Weissinger Method for Cambered Airfoil.png File:Five Panel Weissinger Sketch for Flapped, Symmetrical Airfoil.png File:Solution Method at Second Control Point.png File:Solution Method at the First Control Point.png File:Use of Two Panel Weissinger Method for Flapped Airfoil.png File:Solution Method fo Weissinger's Approximation.png File:Basic Sketch and Equations for Weissinger's Approximation.png File:Mathematical Model of a Vortex.png File:Lift Coefficient Curves for Symmetrical and Cambered, 2-D Airfoils.png File:Model of Upper and Lower Surface Speed Difference.png File:Modeling Airfoil Flow With Multiple Vortices.png File:A Balloon as a Simple Jet.png File:Momentum Equation Terms for Propeller Flow.png File:Upper and Lower Surface Speed Difference Gives Lift.png File:Often wings are twisted to keep the tip area from stalling when the inboard wing stalls, as well as to give a low induced drag lift distribution over the span.png File:An Elliptical Lift Distribution.png File:Downwash and Induced Drag.png File:The "slope" of the lift curve decreases as AR decreases.png File:Ideal (2-D) and Real (3-D) Lift Distributions on a Wing.png File:Supercritical Airfoil Shape.png File:Other effects of wing sweep.png File:General effects of wing sweep on transonic drag rise.png File:Typical Leading and Trailing Edge Flap Effects.png File:Relationship Between Lift, Drag, and Free Stream Velocity.png File:Plots of Lift and Drag Coefficient Versus alpha, Showing Stall (a).png File:1.1Definition of the Pitching Moment Sign.png File:Drag Coefficient Variation with Reynolds Number for a Sphere.png File:Flow Around a Circular Cylinder.png File:Drag Coefficient Increase Near Mach One.png File:A Pitot-Static Probe.png File:Shock Wave Formation in "Transonic" Flow.png File:Airfoil terminology.png File:Some wing planform shapes.png File:Wing planform terminology.png File:Example Matrix Organization Sentara Hospital System.svg File:CH 7 Apple Pie Chart.svg File:Divisional Structure.svg File:Sample Line-and-Staff Organization Simplified.svg File:Sample Matrix Organization.svg File:Sample Line-and-Staff Organization.svg File:Typical Organization Chart Functional.svg File:Modes of Foreign-Market Entry along the Investment and Control Continuum.png File:Figure 9.17.png File:Figure 9.5.png File:Figure 9.14.png File:Figure 9.13.png File:Figure 9.12.png File:Figure 9.10.png File:Figure 9.9.png File:Figure 9.4.png File:Figure 9.8.png File:Figure 9.3.png File:Figure 8.8.png File:Figure 9.2.png File:Figure 8.6.png File:Figure 8.3.png File:Figure 7.5.png File:Figure 7.4.png File:Figure 6.8.png File:Figure 6.7.png File:Figure 6.11.png File:Figure 6.6.png File:Figure 6.4.png File:Figure 6.3.png File:Figure 5.14.png File:Figure 5.15.png File:Figure 5.12.png File:Figure 5.13.png File:Figure 5.11.png File:Figure 5.8.png File:Figure 5.10.png File:Figure 5.9.png File:Figure 5.7.png File:Figure 5.6.png File:Figure 5.5.png File:Figure 5.4.png File:Figure 5.2.png File:Figure 3.13.png File:Figure 4.7.png File:Figure 3.12.png File:Figure 3.11.png File:Figure 3.7 redo.png File:Figure 3.9.png File:Figure 3.8.png File:Figure 3.6 idea.png File:Figure 3.7 idea.png File:Figure 3.6 redo.png File:Figure 2.44.png File:Figure 2.47.png File:Figure 2.50.png File:Figure 2.46.png File:Figure 2.45.png File:Figure 2.43.png File:Figure 2.41.png File:Figure 2.42.png File:Figure 2.40.png File:Figure 2.39.png File:Figure 2.37.png File:Figure 2.38.png File:Figure 2.36.png File:Figure 2.35.png File:Figure 2.34.png File:Figure 2.29.png File:Figure 2.33.png File:Figure 2.31.png File:Figure 2.28.png File:Figure 2.27.png File:Figure 2.20.png File:VT and NVCC chart.png File:Figure 2.22.png File:Figure 2.18.png File:Figure 2.17.png File:Figure 2.16.png File:Figure 2.15.png File:Figure 2.13.png File:Airline Complaints 2.png File:Virginia Tech and NVCC stats.png File:Ages and proportions.png File:Classification of Statistics Students.png File:Airline Complaints.png File:Other Guy's Investments.png File:Acme's Investments.png File:Sun Exposure Confounding Factors.png File:Block Design.png File:Three Government Branches.png File:Hospital System Organizational Structure.png File:Product Manager Organizational Structure.png File:Example of Simple Organizational Structure.png File:The Game of Risk Origin.png File:GE Organizational Structure.png File:BCG Matrix examples with CocaCola.png File:The BCG Matrix.png File:Estee Lauder brand and acquired companies.png File:Technology adoption life cycle - breaking the chasm.png File:The VRIO Framework with numbers.png File:The value chain - primary and support activities.png File:Adding value within a value chain - new.png File:Business responsibilities.png File:Entering International Markets.png File:2019 World Exports by Product.png File:Cost pressure v. Local responsiveness pressure.png File:Difference between profits and sales.png File:Product Life Cycle.png File:Product Extension and the product life cycle.png File:Interaction of market and technology.png File:Adding value within a value chain - primary and support activities.png File:VRIO Framework flow chart.png File:Breadth of menu vs. Quality.png File:Porter's Five Forces.png File:Chapter Layout for Strategic Management.png File:Intended, Deliberate, Realized Strategy.png

AnitaWalz (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@AnitaWalz: The https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/99283 and https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/99282 are under a non-commercial license that is not compatible with Commons. Please, asignn the images to the two other publications in order to continue. (Note: their licenses are not the same - CC-BY-SA vs. CC-BY) Ankry (talk) 07:43, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry. Thank you 1) As ALL of these images are original work, we are happy to release all of these figures as CC BY. Do you require any documentation of this, and if so what kind of documentation and how should I submit it? 2) Kindly clarify what you mean by "Please, asignn the images to the two other publications in order to continue." AnitaWalz (talk) 15:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Per COM:NOTHOST. Wikimedia is not a file host for Virginia Tech. Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kindredgrey. Thuresson (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Well, freely licensed published books and illustrations therein are rather in scope as educationally useful, regarless who is their publisher. However, CC-BY-SA 4.0 license for one of them is likely incompatible with ToU requirements for text. But this is disputable. I agree that images from non-commercial publications are out of scope unless otherwise proven. Ankry (talk) 06:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support blanket allowance for any admin to unilaterally restore any image(s) they can find an immediate use for on any Wikimedia project.  Oppose restoration as a whole as most of the diagrams are specific to data from one publication and are unlikely to be useful outside of that publication. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question @AnitaWalz: So the question is: how and where would you like to use the images? If you wish to transcribe the publications in Wikisource, they might be OK. (But do you?) If you wish to use them just on your (your company) webpage, they are not. Ankry (talk) 10:55, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no explanation why the images are in scope; if you request again, please be ready to respond to questions in 24h. Ankry (talk) 13:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Venezia 1965 BassoRagni.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: per both Commons:Deletion requests/File:BassoRagni.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Venezia 1965 BassoRagni.jpg, the artist Basso Ragni died in 1979. As works of the deceased author, these must be OK now as per recently-accepted exceptions to no COM:FOP Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 13:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Varian.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images

Promotional images can be used. As indicated this image is from the press release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonanz (talk • contribs) 10:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Even promotional images from press releases are copyrighted and non-free by default. All uploads here at Commons need to be free though for any purpose, and not just for promotion or for illustrating a certain subject. De728631 (talk) 12:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no evidence of free license. Ankry (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Torre Solaria a Milano.jpg

- There is a 2015 amateur Wikipedia photo of the twin building (Torre Solea), and no copyright infringement. The building is part of a public square: according to this reasoning then we should wait to take photos in Italy for 70 years? The whole area of Gae Aulenti in Milan is public and recently built, there can be no opposition to the FOP

--Alerove (talk) 20:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, not an undeletion request. This subject may be discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Thuresson (talk) 00:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:23frSwathiTirunalportraitjpg.jpg

File:23frSwathiTirunalportraitjpg.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreekanth2006 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

The image has not yet been deleted, but we need information about the original painter to verify a possible copyright for the image. I think though that this qualifies for {{PD-India}}. De728631 (talk) 12:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
@Sreekanth2006: Any information about the painter? Ankry (talk) 07:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Florian Schwegler.jpg

I have the permission of the owner of the picture, for the use on wikipedia for the puropose of informing others. I have the permission in digital writing and with a signature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techniker32 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose If you have a permission from the photographer that is under an acceptable license, you can follow the instructions at Commons:VRT to verify this. Thuresson (talk) 15:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Thuresson" VRT permission needed. Ankry (talk) 13:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eurobasket Roma Logo.png

The logo is the official one of the sport club described in the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco Munno (talk • contribs) 16:24, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

@Marco Munno: And you (Wikimedia user Marco Munno) are the author and exclusive copyright holder of thir logo? No such information on the club webpage. We need an official confirmation of this. And a written free license permission through VRT or the club website as for any already published image. Ankry (talk) 20:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

This is the official logo of the team; you can find it in the official website too: https://www.eurobasketroma.it/

And here you can find me with my role of communication manager: https://www.eurobasketroma.it/staff-societa/

That's why I'm working on this and I'm allowed to do it as a member of the club :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco Munno (talk • contribs) 08:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Marco Munno: Please do not open new requests concerning this image while this discussion is still open. They will be closed without a response.
  • The logo was deleted due to copyright issues, nobody doubts that the logo is the official one.
  • I see no mention of your Wikimedia account on the abovementioned page, se we cannot verify your identity basing on that page. However, this may be irrelevant as it is still not clear whether a communication manager is authorized to sign contracts in behalf of the club. And the required license is a contract. A time-unlimitted contract.
  • As you claimed at uplad to own the logo copyright personally, and such organization logos are in most cases the organication property, not personal property, we doubt whether you are familiar with copyright issues you are involved in here and so we need to confirm what you say basing on public records or on e-mail communication.
  • If the club did not grant a free license to their logo on public, following the email-based procedure described in VRT is the only available undeletion path (as for any previously published image). Ankry (talk) 12:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 13:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos by Ludovic Ismael

Please restore

We have permission per Ticket:2021081610006286. – Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 11:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Golden hd.png

This was deleted in a deletion request because the admin who deleted it (@P199: ) didn't like the fact that it lacked context (whatever that means) or a description. Both of which are ridiculous reasons to delete a file. Especially when people two people had voted to keep the file. So I'd like it restored, per the consensus to keep it in the deletion discussion. FYI, to @P199: it's a logo for the Mexican television channel Golden Edge. All logos of companies in Mexico are public domain. Which you could have easily determined and added to the description if the file not having one was so important. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

@Adamant1: The logo was deleted due to scope doubts, which are unrelated to copyright. As we generally do not host unused logos in Wikimedia, please advice, where the logo is intended to be used (eg. the appropriate Wikipedia article) or ask for undeletion when such an article appears.
Note also, that it is irrelevant what other users like or dislike and discusing their preferences on-wiki, and especially here, is inappropriate. COM:AGF is still our policy, that should be applied unless your earlier interactions with the user deny good faith (but even so, UDR is not the right venue to discuss them). Ankry (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: The file not being used wasn't the only reason @P199: gave for deleting it, that wasn't what the deletion request was for, and no where did I say anything about the files scope in my un-deletion request. In the meantime, 99% of the files on Wikimedia Commons aren't currently being used anywhere. Especially logos. So I don't see how it's relevant to this. What is though, is that the file was deleted because it didn't have a description and it was done against consensus not to. If you can point a policy that says files can be deleted for not having descriptions or one that states admins can ignore votes in a deletion discussion by deleting a file that no one wants deleted, then I'd be happy to withdraw this. Otherwise, I'd like the file restored.
Also, it's a little weird that your telling me it's inappropriate to talk about someone's preferences in the same comment where you said "The logo was deleted due to scope doubts." If it's inappropriate for me to cite what @P199: literally said, then I assume you saying what their feelings are would be. Also, I'd love to know how that's not related to @P199: 's preferences. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
  • This logo is for one of their subsidiaries, Golden HD. Which I assume is Plus HD or one of it's other HD channels. I'm not really sure which though. I was actually planning on adding it to their Wikidata entry at some point once I figured it out, but the file should be restored regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per King of Hearts. Ankry (talk) 13:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Recent History of the United States 1865-1927 (IA recenthistoryofu00paxs 0).pdf

This file was deleted as a result of this deletion request. It was subject to a separate undeletion request, where it was by accident omitted. This work is copyright 1921, 1926, and 1928. The 1921 copyright is irrelevant. The 1926 copyright was renewed, but has recently expired. The 1928 copyright, however, was not renewed, and thus expired after the 28-year term (well before the 1926 copyright). Thus, the 1921 and 1926 copyrights are PD-US-expired, and the 1928 copyright is PD-US-not renewed. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

The U.S. copyright on renewed 1926 publications will expire on January 1, 2022. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Carl. And added to Category:Undelete in 2022. Ankry (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vlastimil Kučaj.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission in ticket 2021072910011622. janbery (talk) 13:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Janbery: FYI. Ankry (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TI SN74LVC07A Package (49798442937).jpg

The file is marked as public domain in Flickr: [11] The reason for deletion was "No license". Drahtlos (talk) 20:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 12:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Munchinthepool black out md.jpg

使用此圖片絕無任何營利用途，只是希望更多人可以去了解 圖片是從woowonjae本人的instagram上下載的 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppp82qqq (talk • contribs) 04:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC) Ppp82qqq (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2021 (UTC)ppp82qqq

 Not done: Procedural close: not deleted. — Racconish 💬 12:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Duomo di Milano, dettaglio di un portale 1.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Duomo di Milano, dettaglio di un portale 1.jpg. However, its creators/authors are deceased (Franco Lombardi died in 1943, and Luciano Minguzzi in 2004), which means this image now passes the updated COM:FOP Italy (exception 1, a work by deceased authors, via a 2008 Italian parliamentary pronouncement). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:12, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

  •  Comment I often read on Commons there would be an Italian "FOP exception for deceased author". This seems to come from this 2008 ministerial response which does not say that. It merely says that a work by a living author is protected. Assuming that a work from an author deceased less than 70 years ago is unprotected seems to me to be an extrapolation. Or did I miss something? — Racconish 💬 12:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
    • @Racconish: the entire discussion which resulted to the acceptance of new exceptions to no Italian FOP is found here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:20, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Thanks, it seems - if I understand correctly - the assumption of a "de facto" exception for deceased authors is yours. Nevermind which Wikipedian expressed it, the key point IMO is this is an extrapolation on the text of the ministerial response which does not explicitely say this. I read the minsisterial response as saying simply: if the author is alive, then his work is obviously preotected. It does not imply IMO that if the author is dead, his work is unprotected. Is there any reliable source on the matter? I would expect, if such a "de facto" exception exists since 2008, there should be some published sources on the matter. — Racconish 💬 13:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
        @Racconish: that was not my assumption, but rather assumption of Italian Wikipedians who participated there. According to them, it is a common notion there that works are supposed to be freely photographable. Restrictions begin once the work becomes "public domain" (which means the likes of Colosseum and the Leaning Tower of Pisa cannot be reused freely without prior authorization from the Soprintendenza, so "unfree public domain works", of which {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} does the job). But for works of authors who died less than 70 years ago, these are supposedly freely photographable. I'm not sure if reliable sources exist. I already mentioned them here (see the ping here) yesterday (see the ping here). But nevertheless, I'll try to mention them again. @Ruthven, Blackcat, and Marco Chemello (WMIT): . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
        Here is for example an article of a Swiss journalist on the vagueness of this ministerial response and the fact it is so poorly formulated it could be interpretated as contradicting the Italian law according to which architectural creations are protected for 70 years. On the other hand, this article published in 2018 by the Italian Wikimedia, says ther is no FOP for authors deceased less than 70 years ago and this article published in 2018 does not make any reference to a FOP for authors deceased less than 70 years ago. Same here in 2019 : No FOP for authors deceased less than 70 years ago. — Racconish 💬 14:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
        @Racconish: in that case, I don't have to say anything more. It appears external sources are more authoritative. One is from Luca Spinelli, who was mentioned at en:Freedom of panorama#Italy. It is frustrating that these articles, as well as the ministerial response of 2008, have no English translation equivalents. I cannot read Italian language, unfortunately 🙁 I will wait for the responses of the involved Italian Wikipedians though. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Sorry but we all were busy with WLM Italy. As said in the other page, there are no news till last discussion. It is possible that in the next months there will be some changes about the Italian copyright laws: in that case we will reopen the discussion. For now, the only pronunciation of an Italian government about panorama freedom is favorable for us. Other opinions are just... opinions. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 07:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Duomo Out S7.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Duomo Out S7.jpg. However, its creators/authors are deceased (Franco Lombardi died in 1943, and Luciano Minguzzi in 2004), which means this image now passes the updated COM:FOP Italy (exception 1, a work by deceased authors, via a 2008 Italian parliamentary pronouncement). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

More images of Lombardi/Minguzzi FOP-reliant work

These were deleted due to no FOP in Italy reason. However, its creators/authors are deceased (Franco Lombardi died in 1943, and Luciano Minguzzi in 2004), which means this image now passes the updated COM:FOP Italy (exception 1, a work by deceased authors, via a 2008 Italian parliamentary pronouncement). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:24, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anjos Cantores.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anjos Cantores.jpg. However, now OK for Commons according to updated COM:FOP Italy (exception 1, a work by a deceased author). The artist has been dead since 1973. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Benevento BN, Italy - panoramio - RobyP (17).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benevento BN, Italy - panoramio - RobyP (17).jpg. However, this now passes the updated COM:FOP Italy, under the 1st no FOP exception (a work by a deceased author). As the closing admin indicated, the author died in 1987. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Milano Torre Parco Sempione.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: per the DR and Google searching, the architect has been dead since 1979, hence the building is now OK for Commons as per newly-accepted exceptions to no Italian FOP at COM:FOP Italy, as a work of a deceased author. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grattacielo pirelli pirellone milano.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: should this file show w:Pirelli Tower, then this must be OK now here per newly-accepted exceptions at COM:FOP Italy. Both Ponti and Nerva died in 1979, and Danusso in 1968. Hence this is acceptable as a work of deceased authors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

All files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pirelli Tower, Milan

Building is now OK here in Commons through the newly-accepted exception at COM:FOP Italy. This is a work of deceased authors. Both architects Gio Ponti and Pier Luigi Nerva died in 1979 = de facto {{FoP-Italy}}.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nomentano - Nostra Signora del Santissimo Sacramento e Santi Martiri Canadesi 2.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: per this DR, the architect died in 1989. Now OK per the exception at COM:FOP Italy as a work of a deceased author. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Arlecchino con mandolino (1920) Jacques Lipchitz.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: artwork was made by Jacques Lipchitz (who died in 1973 according to this DR). As a work of a deceased author, this must be OK now per the new exceptions at COM:FOP Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Siegesdenkmal Bozen

Per the DR the author is dead, which means the public work is now OK for Commons, under the new exception at COM:FOP Italy.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pirellone2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: the architect died in 1979. Now OK for Commons as per the newly-accepted exception at COM:FOP Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Melchiorre Cartoni Gianicolo 2011-03-27.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Works by deceased author are considered having de facto COM:FOP Italy (Sculptor Giuseppe Tonnini died in 1954) A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ancona - statua a Pinocchio di Vittorio Morelli.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Works by deceased author are considered having de facto COM:FOP Italy (Sculptor Vittorio Morelli died in 1968) A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2012-02-17 ex Cinema Teatro Corso Roma.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Works by deceased author are now considered having de facto COM:FOP Italy (Architect Marcello Piacentini died in 1960) A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Igor Mitoraj

Works by deceased author are considered having de facto COM:FOP Italy (Sculptor Igor Mitoraj died in 2014)--A1Cafel (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Torso alato by Igor Mitoraj Greve in Chianti

Works by deceased author are considered having de facto COM:FOP Italy (Sculptor Igor Mitoraj died in 2014)--A1Cafel (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Porta Nuova (Milan)

Works by deceased author are considered having de facto COM:FOP Italy (Architect César Pelli died in 2019)--A1Cafel (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images of Teatro Comunale Città di Vicenza

Images of the Teatro Comunale Città di Vicenza:

  1. File:Teatro comunale di Vicenza.jpg
  2. File:TeatroComunaleVicenza.JPG
  3. File:TeatroComunaleVicenzaSalaMaggiore.jpg
  4. File:TCVI.JPG
  5. File:TCVI2.JPG
  6. File:TCVI3.JPG
  7. And any other image about the subject deleted in the past (I have no idea) for no-FOP.

Reason: the architect w:it:Gino Valle has been deceased, means those images must be acceptable now here as per recently-accepted exception to no-FOP in Italy at COM:FOP Italy (as a work of a deceased author). {{FoP-Italy}}. --Marcok (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pirelli Tower (Milan)

Italy has de facto COM:FOP for deceased authors. Both architects Giò Ponti and Pier Luigi Nervi died in 1979. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alfredo Oriani - panoramio.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per DR info, sculptor Ercole Drei died in 1973. Italy now has de facto COM:FOP for deceased authors. A1Cafel (talk) 08:50, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Marica Massaro

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: details at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro della Germinazione ad Avezzano.jpg indicate this is a work of a deceased author. Thus it is now OK per newly-acceptes exceptions to no COM:FOP Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination because: [23] JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Jameslwoodward

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: now OK at Commons per exception to no FOP (see COM:FOP Italy and {{FoP-Italy}}). Breda Tower's designers are already deceased: architects Eugenio Soncini (died 1993), Ermenegildo Soncini (died 2013), and Luigi Mattioni (d. 1961). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Luis Trenker des David Moroder Museum Gröden.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via this. But it may be eligible for exception at COM:FOP Italy, as its sculptor is already dead. Location determined via its public log]; the link w:St. Ulrich in Gröden redirects to w:Urtijël which is a comuni (city or town) in Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination because: [25] JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Beggar Saint Elisabeth Group.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: deleted via this. However, its sculptor is already deceased, which means it may be applicable to {{FoP-Italy}}. Location determined via the public log, which reveals a name "Ortisei" (Italian name for w:Urtijëi). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 14:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rainbow_Grocery_Cooperative_Vertical_Logo.png

Hello there,

I'm new to Wikipedia and Wikimedia, so it's intricacies are somewhat challenging for me. I'm not intending to brake any rules here. But to clarify, I am one of Rainbow Grocery Cooperative's Marketing & Creative Strategists. I'm responsible for all public-facing representation of the store. As such, I realized that the Wiki page needed some updating. I'm not sure who had uploaded the old logo, but we no longer use it. Might someone be able to help me correctly label the logo file so it may be able to stay on the page? I'd also like to upload some old photos that are in our archive as well; how would you suggest these be labeled for copyright purposes? Thanks for all your assistance.

—Cody Frost — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haus of Qwert (talk • contribs) 19:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

@Haus of Qwert: Any works of corporate authorship must go through COM:VRT. Please follow the instructions there and send us an email using your corporate email address. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done As per King of Hearts: VRT permission is needed. Ankry (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eta Carinae Nebula 1.jpg

This image was selected as PotD for August 21, 2007 and deleted in 2014 because portions of it are copyrighted by CTIO and NOAO. The copyright notice at the time did not allow commercial use without permission. However, NOIRLab now states that all media on its website is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 "unless specifically noted." Assuming this is the image in question, then it should now be under a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Undeleted. @Ixfd64: Please, fix the description / licensing info to comply the image current legal status. Ankry (talk) 12:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I've updated the licensing information. Ixfd64 (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Now available under a free licence. --De728631 (talk) 17:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wir rufen Sie zu Hilfe!.jpg

Please restore the photograpy, it is free common. The photography is from the Archives of the Bundesverband Rehabilitation. It was made from an printed artwork (which was destroyed in the Second World War) by Wilhelm Böhm in 1920. I want to put it into Wikimedia with the licence {{Bild-PD-alt}}James von Hassell (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

@James von Hassell: Please clarify, this is by Wilhelm Böhm (1877-1957)? And this image is free because 1957 is more than 70 years ago? Thuresson (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no explanation. Ankry (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:INS Shivalik as seen from USS John S. McCain during MALABAR 2020 Phase I, seems to have been equipped with the ATLAS ELEKTRONIK ACTAS towed array sonar. Also not the torpedo tube doors..jpg

This was deleted as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Subhadip ojha, but Andy Dingley did find a source which documented this photo was a U.S. Navy photo. I missed that he found an alternate source here, which gives fuller author information, so this one is {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} and OK to keep. I should have removed it from the DR but did not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

@Clindberg: temporarilyu undeleted; feel free to fix information. Ankry (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thanks, done. The source was not the exact photo, but apparently a different frame from the same video (or at least another photo taken from the same place and near the same time), so that should be enough to show authorship. There are smaller versions of that same photo online though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Ankry (talk) 06:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Putin_palace_exterior_2626.jpg

We had permission per Ticket:2021043010008237. It was then restored, but later it got deleted again. Maybe that I just missed to insert the permission template, or maybe someone removed it afterwards by an act of vadalism. Can the file please be restored again?

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: Temporararily undeleted, please check again. Thuresson (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: The ticket had not been processed at the time of deletion, but it is now valid. --De728631 (talk) 13:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Horsehead Nebula by NOAO.jpg

NOAO images are now available under the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. [27] Ixfd64 (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per nomination. NB: It is not a share-alike licence but the simple CC-by-4.0. --De728631 (talk) 12:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Piazza ognissanti, Ercole che lotta con il leone, romano romanelli 2.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: per recently-accepted exception to no FOP at COM:FOP Italy. The author of this artwork has been dead since 1969. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 10:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Velodromo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: both files were deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atrio Velodromo.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Velodromo.jpg, because no FOP in Italy. However, per w:Bocconi University#Campus it was designed by w:Ignazio Gardella, who has been dead since 1999 and as such it is now acceptable here under the newly-accepted exceptions at COM:FOP Italy, a building that is a work of a deceased author. {{FoP-Italy}} as a work of architect Ignazio Gardella (1905–1999). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 10:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Milano, Torre Galfa 02.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Torre Galfa is now acceptable under the recently-accepted exception at COM:FOP Italy. The architect, Melchiorre Bega, has been dead since 1976. So = de facto {{FoP-Italy}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:37, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 10:14, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by INeverCry

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: files deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vanvitelli station (Naples metro). However, their architects are already deceased since 2003 and 2005, which means the building can be hosted here now as per recently-accepted exceptions to no Italian FOP: see COM:FOP Italy. This is the work of the deceased authors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion here. — Racconish 💬 10:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kisii native with his harp.tif

I am requesting for the undeletion of the file. I believe the deletion of the file was erroneous given that the copyright license was entered upon receiving a notification to provide the licence information. The file licence information was provided as PD-self as it was personally uploaded. 217.148.142.157 03:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

The photo comes from an external source that declares PD status with no clear PD rationale, so it is doubtful. The uploader claims that they can grant the PD status as the author. This is also doubtful as the photo seems to be about 100 years old. They were asked to resolve the doubts trough OTRS. Note, that anonymous photos, unpublished before 2003 become PD in US 120 years after creation, see Hirtle chart. Ankry (talk) 07:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Can the photo be reuploaded again with proper licence information? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:6010:AB03:E93F:459D:A4EF:F244:1F5F (talk) 11:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
No, reuploading is out-of-process. However the proper license information needs to be provided here to be verified. Ankry (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

What are the steps for provision of license information for self-published or personal work? 2603:6010:AB03:E93F:3CCD:35B3:C0FA:9D49 23:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

See Commons:But it's my own work! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
You need to provide some evidence that you were an active photographer in Africa in 1920s. Ankry (talk) 13:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 10:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RE Logo 2017 (HQ).png

This logo image represents all current branding for the Random Encounters channel, videos, and merchandise. It was deleted due to a lack of source information, which I can provide:

This image is my Own work creation. I originally designed and distributed it, and retain full ownership of it. The deleted file previously lacked a licensing template, so I would like to release certain rights to my work through this template: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}

I request the file be undeleted as it remains relevant and informative to the topic of the Wikipedia article.

--FungusRidden (talk) 04:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

For an image used elsewhere (eg. by Random Encounters) we need a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder following instructions at VRT. You may also need to provide an evidence of your authorship there. Ankry (talk) 12:33, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by a VRT agent. Ankry (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BIG Naughty boi.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: BIG Naughty allowed his fans to use Zero.ling0.0 (talk) 07:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

@Zero.ling0.0: And what about those who are not his fans? Ankry (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no free license: the images here need to be free for any use by anybody (not only by fans) for any purpose. Ankry (talk) 10:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shrine (Syed Ali Alaa Ud Din Bukhari).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I want this image because it is very useful for me now. Ttttt321 (talk) 21:24, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ttttt321: The image is severely overexposed. What article(s) do you want to use the image on? Low-quality images like this one are routinely deleted per COM:SCOPE unless there is no better picture of the subject available. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

on this article, en:Syed Ali Alaa Ud Din (khansahib) Bukhari Ttttt321 (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: File:Syed Ali Alaa Ud Din (Khansahib) Bukhari.jpg as we have no better photo of this shrine. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Spiel des Jahres 2021.jpg

Laut https://www.spiel-des-jahres.de/bildergalerie-preisverleihung-2021/ hat der Rechteinhaber das Bild mit cc by sa 4.0 lizensiert. Was muss geschehen, damit Wikipedia diese Lizensierung akzeptiert? --Schrapers~commonswiki (talk) 16:41, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Support Unter der Bildergalerie steht der Hinweis: "Bildquelle: Thomas Ecke für Spiel des Jahres e.V. | Lizenz: CC-BY-SA 4.0". De728631 (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per info on the source page. Ankry (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hiroshige Cherry Blossoms.jpg

{{PD-Japan-1899}} per https://collections.mfa.org/objects/236215/cherry-blossoms but nominated as missing permission and for deletion en masse out of an overabundance of caution at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Necrocancer, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per request. — Racconish 💬 15:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

‪File:Artister för Miljön.jpg‬

Hello! I hope this is the right channel for this request. Artister för Miljön (Artists for the Environment) is a Swedish sustainability NGO that has been active since the earlu nineties. It originates from the Natural Step Framework and the members are Swedish artists wanting to use culture to drive sustainability. We recently made a Wikipedia site describing our organisation and the only illustration was our logotype that has been created by the fanmous Swedish artist Lasse Åberg who is a member of the association. Our entry was immediately nominatde for deletion by someone with the tag "Yger". We ask you to undeleta and we also want to report Yger for bad behaviour.

Best regards

Jan Peter Bergkvist Chairman, Artists for the Environment Sweden--Janpeterbergkvist2 (talk) 08:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi,
even if Lasse Åberg is member of your association, the copyright for his works is not automatically with you. This would require a contractual transfer of copyright. Therefore it was quite correct to nominate this image for deletion, especially as you claimed to be the author.
So, first you should clarify internally whether your association really owns the copyright (! not just the trademark) for this logo. If that is the case, then the association resp. it's legal representative should send from the association's official email addresse an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org confirming its copyright-holdership and intent to release it under the choosen free license. You might use the boxed template on Commons:E-postmallar.
If that is not the case, then Lasse Åberg himself needs to send his permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and confirm the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Túrelio. Ankry (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gyaldem Tish.jpg

I shot the picture and i think i have the right to have it here. Please consider undeleting it for me. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhizaina1 (talk • contribs) 11:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Ankry (talk) 12:24, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mein Freund das Ekel Serie.jpg

To whom it may concern.

This account is used by the Film Production Company "Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH" in Munich, Germany. We are therefore the copyright owners of the image file File:Mein Freund das Ekel.jpg which depicts the logo of the soon to be released TV show "Mein Freund, das Ekel" that is produced by our company.

We therefore request an undeletion of said image, so we can use it for the Wikipedia page that is being created for the series.

Kind regards,

Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmecho (talk • contribs) 08:47, 20 August 2021 (UTC) --Filmecho (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Billy Ofar.jpg

This pic is taken with my phone

100% original from me.

so please, undelete

i just create a profile of my friends, he's a musician. and i want this pic for his profile.

sorry if my english not good, i hope u understand what im saying.

--KyloRen182 (talk) 15:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - 1) Previously published images require COM:VRT evidence of permission; this has been subject to the following:

 Not done per elcobbola. Ankry (talk) 18:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HSNU Logo.png

The permission is pretty clear, see school's offical website, it's CC0.--Jonathan5566｛Talk｝ 06:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

「除非特別註明，所有內容皆適用CC0授權」--Jonathan5566｛Talk｝ 15:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 Support From Google Translate: "Unless otherwise specified, all contents are subject to CC0 authorization." This can be found on the front page below the time stamp. De728631 (talk) 16:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Arashi Ryūzō I trong vai Ishibe Kinkichi, vở Hana Ayame Bunroku Soga.jpg

{{PD-Japan-1899}} per https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/37330 but nominated for deletion en masse out of an overabundance of caution at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Necrocancer, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: FYI. Ankry (talk) 18:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cuckoo and Full Moon.jpg

{{PD-Japan-1899}} per https://collections.mfa.org/objects/236271/cuckoo-and-full-moon but nominated as missing permission and for deletion en masse out of an overabundance of caution at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Necrocancer, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: Noting that {{PD-Japan-1899}} is not mentioned in COM:Japan. Probablu it is obsolete and should be replaced with another PD template; likely {{PD-Japan}} can be applied here. Ankry (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A Ludwig Múzeum – Kortárs Művészeti Múzeum bejárata a 2019-es Múzeumok Éjszakáján.jpg

Hi,

Please undeleting these files:

The permission is in the 2021082110006052 numbered ticket. Thank you! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Hungarikusz Firkász: FYI. Ankry (talk) 10:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai portrait.jpg

licensed the image Template:Freeflickrnote — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 110.93.227.246 (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done procedural close: image not deleted. Note, this is likely flickrwashing. Ankry (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:111012268-Artistic-WCh-Tokyo-JPN-2011-CARMONA-Regulo-VEN.jpg

I am Jessica Carniel, the person who has modified the page of Regulo Carmona professional of artistic gymnastics. The photographs that you uploaded to your file were authorized directly by the International Gymnastics Federation. If you need the email of the agreement, I can send them to you. The photos are legally authorized. If you need any documentation please tell me. Our interest is to update the athletes' pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carniel2306 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Please contact our Volunteer Response Team by sending them the email of agreement. They will then initiate the restoration of this file. De728631 (talk) 21:50, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, OP has been informed on how to proceed. Thuresson (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Henry Pease.jpg

Hello, I request that the image of Henry Pease be restored since it was done in the correct way and respecting what the license indicates. Previously I did not know how to upload images but now I have corrected myself and I do it as several users have indicated to me. I hope you can return the image and understand this request. Greetings--Junior2912 (talk) 23:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Junior2912

@Junior2912:
  1. "Copyright © Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú | Todos los derechos reservados" is not the CC-BY-SA-2.5 license declaration; where can you see the CC license information on the photo source page?
  2. "PuntoEdu PUCP" cannot be the author; per Copyright Law of Peru author is the natural person who accomplishes the intellectual creation
Ankry (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no evidence of free license. Ankry (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hyaku Fuji v3.jpg

{{CC0}} per https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/hyakufujiv3kawa but nominated as missing permission and for deletion en masse out of an overabundance of caution at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Necrocancer, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Well the book is likely {{PD-Japan}} due to its age and per the author; I doubt who can license it CC0. And while the CC-BY-SA-4.0 license is also incorrect, I suggest that both moninators should be mode careful with their nominations.  Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 10:26, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thanks, I will be more careful. I guess the Smithsonian put CC0 on their scanning, but Congress should make it clear that's illegal.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:23, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Congress has hesitated on declaring PD-USGov works as PD worldwide (or at least did in 1976, even though such status had been assumed before that), plus the Bridgman ruling is technically just binding in the U.S.; a CC license would make clear those (theoretical and remote) possibilities. Nothing illegal about such a license, although in most/all jurisdictions there are no rights to license.
There is no USGov work involved. The author is Kawamura Minsetsu and scanning does not establish new copyright. Ankry (talk) 19:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nove_Cronicas_poster.jpg

I hereby affirm that I, Gustavo Galvão, owner of film production company 400 FILMES, am the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work depicted in the following media:

The work was ordered, created and designed under my supervision to a feature film produced by my company. As confirmed previously by e-mail, I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

Gustavo Galvão 400 FILMES 2021-08-22 --Nova400 (talk) 08:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by a VRT agent. Ankry (talk) 19:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cartaz Uma Dose para sites.jpg

I hereby affirm that I, Gustavo Galvão, owner of film production company 400 FILMES, am the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work depicted in the following media:

The work was ordered, created and designed under my supervision to a feature film produced by my company. As confirmed previously by e-mail, I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

Gustavo Galvão 400 FILMES 2021-08-22 --Nova400 (talk) 08:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@Nova400: In order to host copyrighted posters, a free license permission needs to be verified by VRT. If you have already emailed the permission you need to wait for their action. If you have a ticket number, you can ask about its processing status at COM:ON. Ankry (talk) 10:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by a VRT agent. Ankry (talk) 19:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ainda Temos a Imensidão da Noite poster.jpg

I hereby affirm that I, Gustavo Galvão, owner of film production company 400 FILMES, am the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work depicted in the following media:

The work was ordered, created and designed under my supervision to a feature film produced by my company, which means this work is an official image of the film in question. As confirmed previously by e-mail, I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

Gustavo Galvão 400 FILMES 2021-08-22 --Nova400 (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

As confirmed previously by e-mail, I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

Gustavo Galvão 400 FILMES 2021-08-22 --Nova400 (talk) 09:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 Info The poster seems to be in scope. Ankry (talk) 10:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by a VRT agent. Ankry (talk) 19:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tareq.al.mahmud.png

TAREK AL MAHMUD
File:Tareq.al.mahmud.png
তারেক আল মাহমুদ
Born (age 25)
Cumilla, Bangladesh
Occupation
  • Student
  • Player
  • composer
  • Photographer
Spouse(s) In a Relationship Tasnova Mahmud Tanha (2020)
Parents
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarek.Al.Mahmud.0 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Procedural close. Please discuss this file at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tarek.Al.Mahmud.0. Thuresson (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gustavo Mohme Llona.jpg

Hello, I request that the image of Gustavo Mohme be restored since it was done in the correct way and respecting what the license indicates. Previously I did not know how to upload images but now I have corrected myself and I do it as several users have indicated to me. Greetings--Junior2912 (talk) 23:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Junior2912

  1. Where did you find the CC-BY-SA-2.5 license information on the photo source page?
  2. Who is the author of the photo? "Fundación Gustavo Mohme" is not a natural person (see below).
Ankry (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 22:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jane Albright in 2016.jpg

The deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jane Albright in 2016.jpg was closed as delete even though I specifically pointed out that an earlier speedy copyvio deletion request was in error; as such, the parent file of this photo File:Chris Gobrecht and Jane Albright in 2016.jpg was restored in July. Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Missvain: any comments? The deletion reason is unclear. Ankry (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 Support I don't understand how this was deleted "per nomination" when the purpose of the nomination was to keep the file. Thuresson (talk) 05:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:cropped low res image of Dr Joyce Lishman (honorary degree).jpg

The request to undelete is because a licence has been provided by the copyright owner (the University of Edinburgh via their Head of Content, Communications and Marketing, Barbara Morgan conveyed to me by Susan Halcro, Senior Graphic Designer who was handling my query) to publish this image as CC by SA 4.0 as described below. .............

HALCRO Susan 16:15 (3 hours ago) to me

Dear Karen,


I asked Barbara, my line manager and Head of Content at CAM, for advice on this. Please see her reply below (I had included a larger version of the image when I contacted her).


Best wishes,

Susan ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Susan Halcro Senior Graphic Designer (available Mon-Thurs)

Communications and Marketing

The University of Edinburgh


From: MORGAN Barbara (Redacted) Date: Monday, 23 August 2021 at 16:06 To: HALCRO Susan (Redacted) Subject: Re: Image permission request

Thanks Susan


I've taken a more detailed look at this now and we are fine to grant Wikipedia permission to use the image, and we don't need to double check with the photographer. We would be granting permission under creative commons CC by SA 4.0 not under public domain. We should supply the cropped lower res version though, only, as the bigger version doesn't fit with the Wikipedia site requirements. I think Karen needs to upload this herself though, as we don't have log ins to Wikipedia.


thanks again

Barbara

...............

Karen Bowman Kaybeesquared (talk) 18:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Kaybeesquared: Please read in VRT how permissions should be provided. We cannot verify them on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 19:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done file not deleted. Ankry (talk) 22:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Удаление файла: File:Acto_de_constitución_del_Aula_Gabriel_Miró.jpg

Доброе утро Андрей Романенко: Я получил уведомление об удалении изображения, созданное этим профилем. Сообщаю вам, что вы ошибаетесь, поскольку это фотография, сделанная из определенного альбома, принадлежащего семье писателя. Это фото не опубликовано и не нарушает авторских прав, так как получено с разрешения наследников, которые предоставили мне изображения. Скажите, пожалуйста, как действовать, чтобы вы могли заменить это изображение. Спасибо --Womeninart (talk) 07:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

procedural close: image not deleted, nothing to do. Ankry (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mehr-e-Reza Foundation Logo.jpg

We are the only organization that has the right to use this picture as a logo, and also this picture has been registered as our logo legally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atefeh.Zahra (talk • contribs) 05:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

@Atefeh.Zahra: But per Wikimedia Commons policies, you need to provide an evidence that a free license has been granted for the logo (copyright) and information where do you want to use it in Wikimedia (scope). Otherwise, the logo cannot be hosted in Wikimedia Commons. On-wiki ("own work") licensing is possible only for images that were never used anywhere prior to the upload. This in not the case. If the copyright holder does not want to grant a free license, that allows anybody to use the logo for any purpose, including commercial reuse (except when restricted by trademark law) ans to create its derivative works, then the logo also cannot be hosted here. Ankry (talk) 09:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No evidence of free license provided; VRTS permission needed. Also, likely out of scope. Ankry (talk) 11:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Faraz Khosravi Danesh in live concert.jpg

Hello to the managers This photo belongs to me and my work and the copyright belongs to me. Please prevent it from being deleted so I can request copyright. ThanksFkhdanesh (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose A free license permission needs to be sent to VRT and accepted prior to undeletion of the photo. Ankry (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No evidence of free license provided; VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Faraz Khosravi Danesh (Conductor).jpg

Hello to the managers This photo belongs to me and my work and the copyright belongs to me. Please prevent it from being deleted so I can request copyright. ThanksFkhdanesh (talk) 10:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose A free license permission needs to be sent to VRT and accepted prior to undeletion of the photo. Ankry (talk) 18:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No evidence of free license provided; VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2.Album of Damour Vocal Band & Faraz Khosravi Danesh.jpg

Hello to the managers This photo belongs to me and my work and the copyright belongs to me. Please prevent it from being deleted so I can request copyright. ThanksFkhdanesh (talk) 10:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

@Fkhdanesh: Which one of the seven photos are you talking about? Ankry (talk) 18:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No response and no evidence of free license provided. Ankry (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cotabato City Grand Mosque Bird eye view.jpg

For reupload under fair use in Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mosque.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

  •  Support as a temporal measure so that the enwiki article has an illustration. Hariboneagle927, it is not fair use but an Exemption Doctrine Policy for unfree global buildings, using w:Template:FoP-USonly. As of now for buildings completed from December 15, 1972 to today, including this mosque, there is no FOP, which means it must be OK at enwiki per their Exemption Doctrine Policy that allows images of unfree buildings under their full/original resolutions, by virtue of U.S. FOP, using that tag. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose Not necessary since this file is available here. Thuresson (talk) 02:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Key IVR logo.jpg

Hi! I tried to re-upload the logo (cropped and resized) for the page which I was creating. The logo was deleted according to the policy rules.

@Lisa Eclair: Hi, and welcome. I am sorry to inform you that you have triggered Special:AbuseFilter/153 by trying to cross-wiki upload a smaller (<50,000 bytes or <2,000,000 pixels) jpg logo as a new user while leaving the summary intact. The logo you tried to upload is smaller, and you indicated it's your own work. Usually when someone uploads a smaller logo, it's a copyright violation taken from the web. Please upload the full-size original of it per COM:HR, including EXIF metadata, but as-is it may be judged too complex to be under TOO in the country of origin, so you may need to post COM:L compliant permission for such works on your official website or social media presence or send permission via VRT. Also, any raster image will look jaggy when scaled up, so you may want to upload an svg version, too. If you can't get a compliant license, the logo may still be uploaded to English Wikipedia in compliance with en:WP:F because we don't allow Fair Use here. If you change the summary or use our Upload Wizard instead, you should be able to avoid that filter. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


From this alert, I understand that I need to investigate how to use the logo according to the compliant license but why I can't find the page which I was creating and put a lot of effort in it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisa Eclair (talk • contribs) 14:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The logo is {{PD-textlogo}}. @Lisa Eclair: In which Wikipedia article do you intend to use the logo? Ankry (talk) 22:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry and Lisa Eclair: Please see en:WP:REFUND re unreferenced promotional en:Draft:Key IVR.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done out of scope. Ankry (talk) 11:16, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Byron Eliazim Photographer Narong Sok 2021.jpg

Please undelete. Attached is the necessary document.

File:Narong Sok Copyright Permission.png
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddiegarcia244 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Nat

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: They were deleted after Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Parlamentul Republicii Moldova Flickr stream. However, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Parlamentul Republicii Moldova Flickr stream, which is a DR involving all photos from that flickr stream, has just been closed as Keep. The files I'm requesting to undelete were in the same category, but with a temporary technical problem of not having the right license attached. Gikü (talk) 20:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Info The mentioned DR has not been closed as "kept". It is still open.  Oppose undeletion at this moment. Ankry (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

I'd like to  I withdraw my nomination the request since I grossly misread the vote as a DR closure decision. Gikü (talk) 20:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2 Francs Jean Moulin 1993.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Currencies of France are allowed on Commons per {{Money-FR}} A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: 1) The artwork of the pictured object is not free in the United States. Therefore the image cannot be on Commons. Whatever copyright status the artwork on the pictured object may have in other countries does not change its status in the United States and on Commons. The copyright in the United States disposes of the question. 2) The template Money-FR is misleading. The point of the court decision was that the copyright of banknotes was temporarily suspended during the time when those banknotes were the actual legal currency in use (which was the case in 1998 for francs, at the time of the facts at the origin of the case), specifically because they were the currency in legal use then. The decision did not say nor imply that the copyright did not exist or that the copyright was suspended forever. The copyright holder still held the copyright. Only, that copyright was suspended, unenforceable, during the time the banknotes in question were the legal mode of payment. The logical corollary should be that the copyright became enforceable when francs definitely ceased to be the legal currency (francs ceased to be the legal currency in 2002, could be exchanged for euros for ten years and became definitely void in 2012). Logically, the suspension should not apply to francs anymore. It ended when the francs ceased to be the legal currency. The designs of francs are protected in France as any other works until their copyright expires normally. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment: Hello. I'm by no way laws specialist so I won't argument about the point 1 comment from Asclepias above. About the point 2, for my understanding of the template {{Money-FR}} (which I discovered here - thx Ankry!) and the Court's decision, that last one was promulgated in February of 2002, so after the euro became the official currency. In that way I don't think the reasoning of point 2 above is correct and for me that decision is still in force. Again, no specialist, just a comment which may help decision. Sting (talk) 23:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sting, The facts, the actions performed, which the courts had to decide if they constituted a copyright infringement or not in 1998 at the time when they were performed, were performed in 1998, when the francs were the legal currency. That's even the essential point of the decision. After the case was judged by the court of initial jurisdiction, it eventually went through the steps of appeal, something that can take many years. The final step at the Cour de cassation was in 2002, but that doesn't change the situation that the facts of 1998 that were judged were judged in relation to the context that applied to them in 1998. Courts must judge the legality of the actions posed in 1998 in relation to the legal situation that existed when those actions were posed. They can't apply retroactively a new legal context of 2002 to past actions that were not forbidden when the actions were posed in 1998. That would be irrelevant and unjust. If it interests you, there is a summary of the case that I wrote almost 10 years ago there, with links to the decisions of the Cour d'appel (1999) and the Cour de Cassation. My comment then was a bit lengthy. The short paragraph above does just as well, for the essential. Aussi un court commentaire en français là, avec des liens vers les articles de loi. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
@Asclepias: If you are right, the {{Money-FR}} template should be deleted. Ankry (talk) 09:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
And if you are right, there are many coins images that will have to be deleted, not only from Fifth's Republic but also up to the early 20's century. Sting (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done by Ankry. If Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Money-FR is deleted then more than this one image will need to go, no need to keep this open indefinitely. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JUSC Logo.jpg

The logo of that organization is updated. I have found the new one in various sources. Here are some sources provided below. - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=munna.jutecbd.juscwebsite&hl=en_US&gl=US - https://media-exp1.licdn.com/dms/image/C560BAQHsWczC6ei_WA/company-logo_200_200/0/1585201400286?e=1635379200&v=beta&t=CvgofGQmi5k_Q-z01XGFZFWso3bOUfhtnBvnNlODztE - https://www.thedailystar.net/bangla/node/207717 (National Daily, The Daily Star, Logo in the upper right corner) 

So, the logo must be updated, the existing logo is also from YouTube. Thank you. It is the updated version of the existing (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_Jahangirnagar_University_science_club.jpg) logo.

--Tareq1619 (talk) 11:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Tareq1619

 Waiting for a decission in this DR concerning File:Logo of Jahangirnagar University science club.jpg. IMO, they have the same copyright status. @Tareq1619: feel free to discuss this case there. None of the provided sources claim that the logo is published under free license. Ankry (talk) 09:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2018_current_Kansas_plate.png

Hello,

I am making a new request, although the previous one was refused. After proofreading, I did not have enough arguments advanced since it was my first UR at the time.

Since this plate not been deleted and came as a replacement for my deleted picture, it is therefore considered acceptable by Commons. I formally request the undeletion of this picture.

The Kansas seal in the plate background was created in 1861, is here a stylized version and only the upper part is shown. It may fit PD but as I think it is a federal element and not being American, I don't know its legal status.

Thank you. Drake317 (talk) 10:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done as per King of Hearts.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SEAL Team Season One DVD.jpg

File:SEAL Team Season One DVD.jpg. I failed to add the owner of the image: ViacomCBS. I would like to add the owner. Pete2024 (talk) 19:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose DVD cover, see Commons:Fair use. Thuresson (talk) 20:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Túlio Régis músico.jpg

Boa noite, sou editor há 7 anos da Wikipedia sempre cooperando com o bem dos artigos, as imagens excluídas são minhas! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendell John (talk • contribs) 21:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

You uploaded this with the information that you took it from the subject's Facebook page. Please ask the photographer to follow the instructions at Commons:VRT to verify the claimed license. Thuresson (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done as per Thuresson: VRT permission needed.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera.jpg

pls.....its my humble request to not delete this image........this image is related to that article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpis123 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The image does not have a free license, and therefore is not permitted on commons. Being a title-screen or similar material from a commercial media production that does not seem to be free, there is no way any such image could be uploaded here. Uploader has ignored many notices about it on their talkpage, several ultimatums to stop, and I have now blocked them. DMacks (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Uploader blocked - no need to wait. Ankry (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chateau Cramirat Place des Templiers Sergeac 2.jpg

/ The person who took the image agrees to its use on Wikipedia. Please direct us to where licensing and copy rights are granted, I am uncertain where this is done, and require you assistance in granting credit permissions for this image so that it will not be removed for copy rights violation. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anutig (talk • contribs) 19:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Image already restored per VRTS permission. Ankry (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chateau Cramirat Place des Templiers Sergeac 3.jpg

/ The person who took the image agrees to its use on Wikipedia. Please direct us to where licensing and copyrights are granted, I am uncertain where this is done, and require your assistance in granting credit permissions for this image so that it will not be removed for copyrights violation. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anutig (talk • contribs) 19:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Image already restored per VRTS permission. Ankry (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saint Luke's Global City (BGC, Taguig)(2018-06-04).jpg

For reupload under Template:FoP-USonly for St. Luke's Medical Center – Global CityHariboneagle927 (talk) 03:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored the enwiki version at w:File:Saint Luke's Global City (BGC, Taguig)(2018-06-04).jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Heralds of God.djvu and Hector Macpherson - Herschel (1919).djvu

Please restore the following pages:

  1. File:Heralds of God.djvu (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
  2. File:Hector Macpherson - Herschel (1919).djvu (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason:

File:Heralds of God.djvu was deleted by Billinghurst as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heralds of God.djvu. The nominator's (ShakespeareFan00) rationale was that the work is still in copyright in the UK, due to the UK pma.+70 copyright term and the author still being alive as late as 1990. However, in a discussion of the same work at English Wikisource research indicated that the work was published in the US within 30 days of the UK publication (which is also the most likely based on the nature of the work).

Hector Macpherson - Herschel (1919).djvu was deleted by Billinghurst as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hector Macpherson - Herschel (1919).djvu. The nominator's (ShakespeareFan00) rationale was that the work is still in copyright in the UK, due to the UK pma.+70 copyright term and the author's death in 1956. However, my research indicates that this is the first edition (1919 is the first publication found for this work), and it lists both UK and US publication info on its title page. The primary publisher is the UK-based "SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE", whose stated goal was to push Christian books both at home and in the British colonies, primarily in America (and later on in Scotland and India). In other words, absent any actual evidence to the contrary the most reasonable assumption is that this was a pre-1923 simultaneous UK+US publication and thus within policy for Commons.

Billinghurst and I discussed this briefly last year, but were unable to come to a firm conclusion due to uncertainty about how simultaneous publication interacts with Commons licensing policy (and because I was lame about following up on it). However, I did raise the issue at VP/C and the summary of that discussion is that when a work is simultaneously published (within 30 days) in two Berne convention countries, the "country of origin" is the country with the shortest effective term. Thus, legally, due to the Berne convention, both these works are US works for copyright purposes. Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, which is designed to align with the rules of the Berne convention, requires "both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work" and after saying that's generally the country where it was first published, it adds "In cases where a work is simultaneously published in multiple countries, the "country of origin" is the country which grants the shortest term of copyright protection, per the Berne Convention." (in the footnote on the first para).

As US works under Berne, they are also explicitly ineligible for restoration under the URAA.

Herschel was published in 1919 and so its pub.+95 term expired at the end of 2014 so it is {{PD-US-expired|country=US}}); and Heralds of God was published in 1946, with copyright notice (US edition owned by w:Charles Scribner's Sons, a US publisher) but the copyright was not renewed (verified with a search of both the Stanford database and the scans of the Catalog of Copyright Entries for the years 1973–1975), so it is {{PD-US-not-renewed}}.

In other words, both these files should be undeleted.

PS. I would appreciate pings on replies since COM:DRV has a lot of changes that are hard to catch on the watchlist, and both these files have been evacuated to English Wikisource (where the policy always considers only US status) so the shadow files will need to be deleted there once they are undeleted here. --Xover (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

@Xover: The cases should be investigated separately, so rather need to be handled in separate sections.
  • Ad. 1. I tend to  Support. But pinging @Billinghurst and ShakespeareFan00: . Ankry (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Ad. 2.  Neutral as the colophon was sometimes not considered sufficient evidence. (This may be an evidence that the work was distributed in US, but why in 30 days?) Ankry (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
    @Ankry: When the work itself lists both US and UK as place of publication (i.e. the same physical books are to be sold in both places) the reasonable assumption is simultaneous publication (the publishers themselves are asserting it). In addition, as mentioned, the primary publisher here was the "Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge", whose mission it was to promote Christianity through distributing books in Britain's current and former colonies, particularly in America. In other words, there is less reason to think the first publication was in the UK (the secondary market) than in the US (the primary market). I've been unable to track down any positive evidence of when it went on sale in the US, but the first mention of it in the UK is in a review in The Guardian for December 19, 1919 (p.14), so there is barely time for it to have been published more than 30 days later and still be published in 1919. Given the date it is most likely that US publication happened either in December or even earlier. The US publisher is Macmillian, with whom the SFPCK entered into a partnership in 1918 (New-York Tribune, October 19, 1918. p. 6), and who are still their distribution partner. In other words, there is a theoretical possibility that the publication was more than 30 days later in the US (just barely), but absent specific evidence to the contrary the most reasonable assumption is simultaneous publication. Xover (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
    Ok, I still can't find a direct notice of publication in the US for Herschel. However, what I have eventually found is a capsule review in Popular Astronomy Vol. XXXVIII, No. 1 for January 1920 p. 136. It lists the work as being "Published by the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London, and the Macmillan Company, New York." It also appears alongside a notice that Discovery, a new popular scientific journal, "… will be launched … in January 1920." (i.e. at the time of writing it is not yet January 1920. Given Popular Astronomy (which was published by the Goodsell Observatory at Carleton College in Minnesota) actually reviews it, it must have been in sale prior to that point. Given the lead time for publishing the journal issue (its headline article reports on events from May 1919) and writing the review, and the fact it was published in the UK on 19 December 1919, there is no way it could have been published in the US more than 30 days after the UK publication; and the highest likelihood is that it was published either actually simultaneously or before in the US. Xover (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per discussion,. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Raia da Atalaia Fernando de Noronha 05.jpg

The image was deleted after the Flickr source was changed to a restrictive license. It was previously available under CC-BY prior to October 2006. Considering that Creative Commons licenses are not revocable, this is not a valid reason for deletion. We now have {{Flickr-change-of-license}} for such situations.

The only issue is that the author stated that he did not like the idea that others could make money off the image without him getting paid. It's possible that the author didn't understand what a Creative Commons license meant at the time. Even assuming that's the case, I'm not sure if a courtesy deletion would apply as the image was in use for over a year. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

@Ixfd64: The image was uploaded in Jan 2006 and deleted in Dec 2006 due to -NC- license. Any evidence that it was ever under a free license in the meantime? Ankry (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 Support While not a formal review, the licence change was documented here (Flickr tag 2006-10-02). De728631 (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 Support if someone is ready to LR the photo basing on this. Ankry (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Érection à 40 ans.jpeg

Bonjour, Le but était de montrer l'évolution d'une érection tout les 10 ans à partir de 30 ans. La première datait de 2009, et donc la à 40 ans. Mais il n'existe pas de page montrant cette évolution et je ne sais pas comment la créer. Un montage des 2 photos est peut être plus adapté ?

Sinon, garder supprimer le fichier, tans pis. Bonne journée à vous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiki14 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

@Kiki14: Please elaborate, where exactly do you need to use this image and why none of the existing ones is suitable for your purposes? Ankry (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done, no response. Also, no license. Deleted after nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Érection à 40 ans.jpeg. Thuresson (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2018 currently NE plate from my collection.png

Hello,

I am making a new request, although the previous one was refused.

Since this plate not been deleted and has even been undeleted despite a deletion made by Ankry, it is therefore considered acceptable by Commons. I formally request the undeletion of this picture.

This is not about deleting my pictures at the first request made by IP addresses that constantly stalk me. If this picture does not have to be, the other either : simple equality.

Thank you. Drake317 (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Info The other image is still awaiting for a decision in this DR. Ankry (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Ankry, I didn't know. For those who have doubts about the sower, this is the statue which is located on the Nebraska State Capitol roof, it was installed in 1930. Therefore, I think that we cannot prevail an author copyright for a stylization of a probably PD statue. This is only my personal opinion of course. Drake317 (talk) 18:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: The rendering of the sower clearly has a copyright, no matter whether it was made from a photograph or a drawing. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aoife McLysaght.png

Hi,

This is a photo of me that was taken by a photographer and shared with express permission to use for publicity. The linked page in the complaint is actually one where I previously shared the picture with them (ie, the Royal Institution does not own the picture).

Can you please release it?

Thanks,

Aoife --Aoifemcl (talk) 20:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

@Aoifemcl:
  1. does the photographer wish to be attributed as Aoifemcl? (we may need an evidence if they do) Attributing the photo author is one of license requirements
  2. a permission to use for publicity does not allow you to grant a free license and a free license is required in order to host the image here. If you have a copyright transfer contract with the photographer or a clause that allows relicensing there, then you need to provide a written free license permission together with the contract following VRT instructions. Otherwise, we need such a permission directly from the photographer.
Ankry (talk) 13:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo PUL.png

On behalf of communication office of the university, the logo is the official one that we use therefore I had carried out the modification because the old circular one is no longer in use — Preceding unsigned comment added by WonderlandCat (talk • contribs) 12:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@WonderlandCat: The logo was uploaded without licensing information. We cannot host copyrighted images without a free license granted by the copyight holder. Logos are not exception to this policy. Note, that some Wikipedias (eg. English Wikipedia) accept Fair Use logos uploaded locally to Wikipedia. If the logo copyright holder wishes to grant a free license, the right procedure is described here. Ankry (talk) 13:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Requires a free license from an authorized official of the university via VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Images provided by Théâtre de l'Œil

Please restore

We have permission per Ticket:2021082610010467

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: ✓ Done Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Steffen Wick 1b Deniz Saylan.jpg

Photographer has granted permission for non-commercial use on the internet. Thus, the image is also publicly available on https://steffenwick.com/biografie/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kakonone3 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Yes, it is publicly available with "© Steffen Wick 2021. Alle Rechte vorbehalten". Also, please read Commons:Licensing. Images on Commons must be free for any use anywhere by anybody. "[P]ermission for non-commercial use on the internet" is nowhere near sufficient as commercial use must be permitted as well as use in print or other non-internet media. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done Non-commercial permissions are incompatible with COM:L. Ankry (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chateau Cramirat Place des Templiers Sergeac 1.jpg

This image was captured by the chateau owner Dan Alexander who agrees to its copyright use on Wikipedia. Should there be a way to express this content more clearly, please direct us to the where credit issues are resolved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anutig (talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

  1. a permission to use on Wikipedia is not valid here. Wikimedia Commons is not Wikipedia
  2. images made by third parties cannot be licensed on-wiki; we need to receive a free license from the copyright holder directly (or that is tracked to the copyright holder basing on [ublic records). If there is no free license at the source page (I cannot find any) the VRT procedure is the right path.
Ankry (talk) 13:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Also please note that the photographer's permission to "use on Wikipedia" is not sufficient for either Wikipedia or Commons. Images used in either place must be freely licensed for any use by anybody anywhere, including commercial use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done per discussion: VTRS permisionn is needed. Ankry (talk) 21:39, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bernard Fernandez.jpg

The use of this photo is authorized by Bernard Fernandez, the party pictured in the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryofJournalism (talk • contribs) 18:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose The subject of an image rarely has the right to freely license it as required here. That right is almost always held by the photographer. Although the uploader, User:HistoryofJournalism, claimed to be the actual photographer, I suspect that they made the digital copy but are not the original photographer. In order for the image to be restored, the actual photographer must provide a free license using VRT or the subject must provide written evidence that they have the right to freely license the image, also using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. --De728631 (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ancestry of Dominican Republic.PNG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Was deleted as part of a Massive spam of fake flags but this specific file doesn't seem to have anything to do with fake flags. Pppery (talk) 17:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose That's perfectly true, but the user was blocked for repeatedly uploading more than 300 fake flags. Given that record, I don't think we should assume that this file is any more accurate or useful than the flags. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 Comment The original description was "Municipal Map of the Dominican Republic showing the Ancestry volume due to 2002 Census." There is no link, however, to back up the figures represented in the map. De728631 (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done; this map is useless without a detailed description of what it is supposed to show? Is there really a parish where the majority population has Hungarian heritage? Thuresson (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Polikarpov_VP.jpg

This was a photo of my grand father for the family archive, which I would like to share through CC BY-SA-4.0 license. Alexeyshaytan (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Please note that owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically make you own its copyright too. Copyright is usually held by the original photographer and their heirs. So we need to know who took this photo. De728631 (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs either a free license from the original photographer or evidence that the copyright has expired. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Whitchurch High School.jpg

Hello, I am requesting for the undeletion of the image I had uploaded. I believe the image is freely available and is already in the public domain - available on the website of the school, and also has been uploaded to their Google Maps location. #REDIRECT[[32]] - found on school website, and also on Google Maps - https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Whitchurch+High+School/@51.5131638,-3.2228681,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipMJNUL2r_H-u_lXWeew3-AXaVhoXaLOgmioUxv9!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipMJNUL2r_H-u_lXWeew3-AXaVhoXaLOgmioUxv9%3Dw114-h86-k-no!7i2816!8i2112!4m5!3m4!1s0x486e1b9feb764c57:0x390272a7b35fb113!8m2!3d51.5130831!4d-3.2232265

I believe it complies with 'Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0' and full credit goes towards Whitchurch High School, Penlline Road, Whitchurch, Cardiff, Wales. The image is used many times across the internet. The file was uploaded to provide an updated and better quality image for the Whitchurch High School Wikipedia page. The image has not been altered from the source which is - https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/p/AF1QipMJNUL2r_H-u_lXWeew3-AXaVhoXaLOgmioUxv9=s0 . The image is not copyrighted to my knowledge and is freely in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserJ6542 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Sorry, but you clearly do not understand the concept of public domain. You must have permission from the photographer if you wish to distribute this photo in any way. The photographer's permission is stated in a license which clarifies what others can do and not do. Please read Commons:First steps. Thuresson (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 Oppose First, "The image is not copyrighted" is incorrect. With few exceptions, all created works are copyrighted from the moment of creation until the expiration of the copyright which, in the UK, is 70 years after the death of the creator. Second, the fact that the image appears on the Web says nothing about its copyright status -- most images on the Web are copyrighted and not freely licensed. In fact, it appears without a free license on the school's own Web site https://www.whitchurchhs.wales/index.html.
In order for the image to be restored, either the actual photographer must send a free license using VRT or an authorized official of the school must send a free license together with written documentation showing that it has the right to freely license the image, also using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PAPER TIGER Poster.jpg

Poster is owned by the filmmakers of PAPER TIGER, not 120E Films. Producer is part of 120E Films and posting the poster on her site courtesy of filmmakers.

--12ja23asld (talk) 01:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose @12ja23asld: (1) As this means that your initial authorship and copyright ownership declaration is false, we need an evidence of your further statements, and (2) for any previously published work, we need a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder; as the poster has no printed licensing info, VRT process is the only available path. Ankry (talk) 08:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license via VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CCS Logo.png Wrong copyright status used.

This file was uploaded with the wrong copyright. The file is a school logo, under Category:Fair use school logos " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All_non-free_logos?from=Fa ". May this deletion be reverted with correct use please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliver Wasson (talk • contribs) 02:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

@Oliver Wasson: Please upload fair use logos to Wikipedia instead: w:Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard (select "Upload a non-free file"). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Commons is not Wikipedia. The source has "Copyright © Cooperstown CSD 2021. All rights reserved. " Either upload it to WP as a fair use logo or have an authorized official of the school send a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Needs a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2021-08&oldid=587540592"