Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

I reset the Creative Commons license on this photo to Public Domain. Jim Neal, ALA 2017-2018 President (jneal0@columbia.edu) has requested that this photo be submitted to Wikimedia Commons and understands that it can be reused by anyone, at any time, for any reason. https://www.flickr.com/photos/ala_members/40512957773 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:James_G._Neal.jpg

Does that work?

Jan Carmichael Web/New Media Manager American Library Association — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan-carmichael-mlis (talk • contribs) 01:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done License is now PD on flickr Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: copyright of the photo was granted through the owner Azimm19 (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dy51P8uX4AAJfEy.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Direct permission was given to the user Azimm19 by me the owner of the copyright of the photo Amckeo04 (talk) 22:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

How did it come about that you own the copyright of various photos of Andrew McKeough? Thuresson (talk) 02:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose As there is no information on Twitter that this photo is free and it was used there prior to upload to Commons, COM:OTRS permission is needed. Ankry (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I request undeletion because I wrote in a message that the owner of the picture Trude Haugseth Moe has given me the permission to use the photo. I did not and do not understand the way this permission can be brought to your attention in another way. I copied the website were the photo was published to illustrate that I do know that I am not the owner. I entered the owner’s email address to demonstrate that this was a reliable information and for you to get in touch with the owner. Below you will the email communication in Norwegian which prove that I have been given permission to use the photo.

Fra: Trude Haugseth Moe Sendt: mandag 18. september 2017 09.51 Til: Kjell Magne Mælen Emne: SV: Bruk av bilde du har tatt

Hei Kjell Magne,

ja, selvfølgelig må du bare bruke bildet. Har også tatt flere bilder av henne, for eks. her http://forskning.no/2017/03/kvinnedagen-vi-er-ikke-framme-enna/produsert-og-finansiert-av/uit-norges-arktiske-universitet

Menn har ofte mer makt i familien - forskning.no forskning.no Likelønn og vold mot kvinner må fortsatt være kampsaker i dagens Norge, mener jusprofessor.


Så flott med Hege på Wikipedia!

Ha en god dag,

Trude

Fra: Kjell Magne Mælen Sendt: 16. september 2017 13:38 Til: Trude Haugseth Moe Emne: Bruk av bilde du har tatt

Hei,

jeg holder på å skrive en Wikipedia-atikkel om Hege og ønsker å bruke det bildet du har tatt som er publisert på denne websida

https://uit.no/om/enhet/aktuelt/nyhet?p_document_id=447629&p_dimension_id=88177. Kan du gi meg tillatelse til det?


Når bildet evt. er publisert, blir det ugjenkallelig tilgjengelig i Wikimedia Commons.

Vennlig hilsen Kjell Magne

Tromsø 29.03.19 Kjell Magne Maelen (----) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmmaelen (talk • contribs) 18:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

  1. Permission "to use" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements. We need a free license.
  2. Ask the author (photographer) to follow COM:OTRS instructions if the license was not provided on a public author's homepage when initially publishing the photo. Ankry (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

大動脈センターロゴは、川崎幸病院センターの一つである、川崎大動脈センターのロゴである。 川崎幸病院のウイキペディアにおいて、川崎大動脈センターと外部リンクさせている。 よって、川崎幸病院の外部リンク表示画面に、大動脈センターロゴを提示したい。 削除解除をお願いしたい。 --宮本 雅代 (talk) 07:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)宮本 雅代

@宮本 雅代: You declared that you are (personally) author and copyright owner of this logo, which we doubt. If the logo was used, as you say here, we cannot rely on uploader's license declaration. We need either a written free license permission from the logo copyright holder to be send to us via email following COM:OTRS/ja instructions, or an evidence of free license for the logo provided publicly on the copyright holder's website. Ankry (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Reason: I purchased this photo with a license from SHUTTERSTOCK_213446470 https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/los-angeles-ca-august-3-2014-213446470

Receipt info from Shutterstock:

Mar 26, 2019 365-day Images On Demand, with 2 Standard License Downloads $29.00 SSTK‑0BFDA‑DAC6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by L-Hexoses (talk • contribs) 08:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Your contract with Shutterstock does not allow you to relicense the photo. Terms and conditions: "You may not [...] Resell, redistribute, provide access to, share or transfer any Visual Content except as specifically provided herein. For example and not by way of limitation, the foregoing prohibits displaying Content as, or as part of, a "gallery" of content through which third parties may search and select from such content." Thuresson (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Maqbool ahmed Lari

Sir, Plz I would like to undelete my details. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maqbool ahmed sifu (talk • contribs) 09:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Why? Self-promotion is not an allowed activity in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 12:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi Good Evening This File Is my own Work & not modified from other files and resource please undo this file should i change licensee for this if yes then which license i need to submit for this file Imannierathore (talk) 13:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose As the logo is official, we need a confirmmation from Aryan Cricket Academy Jaipur that Imannierathore is the designer and copyright owner of their logo. I cannot find this information on their website, however. Ankry (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please dont delete this Image. I am the actress on that image and I have buy the license from Future Image https://www.future-image.de/home.html to present my self on internet with this photo for my website, instagram, facebook or wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirijam Verena Jeremic (talk • contribs) 20:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please dont delete this file. I've purchase the license of this File from https://future-image.de/searchresult.html?suche=mirijam+verena+jeremic Because I am on that image. And I can use it for my website, instagram, facebook, wikipedia.

(Mirijam Verena Jeremic (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC))

 Oppose No copyright license. Customers who pay a fee may use the photo for editorial use (license). Previously deleted per community consensus: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mirijam Verena Jeremic bei der Premiere der TNT Comedy-Serie 'Andere Eltern' im Residenz Kino. Köln, 14.03.2019.jpg Thuresson (talk) 23:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:ALB 20070715 img 3513.jpg

Appears to be covered by {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. The description and categories need to be fixed. The file should be renamed. --Yann (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Solicito la restauración de estas dos imágenes. Fueron tomadas con un celular bastante antiguo. La usuaria no entiende de subidas de archivos ni de nada que tenga que ver con computadoras; hizo un esfuerzo enorme para subirlas guiada por mi (ella está en Venezuela y yo estoy en Argentina). El hombre de la foto es un maestro de danza venezolano, pionero de la danza contemporánea de mi país, que se acerca a los 90 años de edad y que sale muy poco de su casa ¿tendremos la oportunidad de volver a verlo para tomarle otra foto?... Por supuesto me hubiera gustado tener fotos de mejor calidad, pero esto es lo que hay, por ahora. Saludos, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

:¿Por qué está cerrada? Nadie me ha dado respuesta. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Not professional photos. Missing EXIF might be a problem here, but if they are useful I would  Support undeletion per above and per AGF. Ankry (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
@Laura Fiorucci: any comment why these images are in scope? Ankry (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: sí, estas imágenes son importantes porque no sé si me dará tiempo de conseguir otra de buena calidad (la persona de la foto es muy mayor, casi 90 años). Ese hombre es un referente en la danza contemporánea de mi país. Trataré de conseguir otra foto de calidad, pero él vive en Venezuela y yo estoy en Argentina.
La persona que tomó la foto no sabe nada de informática, ni de fotografía, ni de wiki, ni de subir archivos. Tuve que ayudarla. Puedo asegurar que las fotos son de ellas y que ella las subió.
Saludos, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Laura Fiorucci is a very trust user, there isn't reason for doubt that picures aren't free and pictures are about notable people in dance, so they are in scope Ezarateesteban 19:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Ezarateesteban 17:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

To whomsoever it may concern, I have posted a file for a Creative Commons License, titled "Infographic on NOTA None Of The Above.pdf". I had initially posted this file, which I have created myself, and received a deletion notice. Instead of requesting undeletion, however, I accidentally re-uploaded the file. (The instructions were not clear for me). I apologize for this. However after resubmitting the file, and also sending in the required permission email, I am still facing problems. I am not able to understand what is missing and what I should do about it. Could you please get back to me about the same? What can I do to successfully upload this file on creative commons? The file has been created by myself using information from various sources which have all been cited. Both instances of upload are from me - the creator. I am unable to determine what source I should cite, since I have created this myself. Kindly guide me on what I should do next. Thanks a lot. Regards, Kshiti KayMish (talk) 10:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@KayMish: It would be better to upload this as a PNG file, rather than PDF. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OP has uploaded File:NOTA Infographic.png. Thuresson (talk) 21:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

To whomsoever it may concern, I have posted a file for a Creative Commons License, titled "Electoral Bonds for Political Party Funding (India).pdf". I had initially posted this file, which I have created myself, and received a deletion notice. Instead of requesting undeletion, however, I accidentally re-uploaded the file. (The instructions were not clear for me). I apologize for this. However after resubmitting the file, and also sending in the required permission email, I am still facing problems. I am not able to understand what is missing and what I should do about it. Could you please get back to me about the same? What can I do to successfully upload this file on creative commons? The file has been created by myself using information from various sources which have all been cited. Both instances of upload are from me - the creator. I am unable to determine what source I should cite, since I have created this myself. Kindly guide me on what I should do next. Thanks a lot. Regards, Kshiti KayMish (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@KayMish: It would be better to upload this as a PNG file, rather than PDF. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OP has uploaded File:ElectoralBonds Infographic.png. Thuresson (talk) 21:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Would appear to be covered by {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 03:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per Abzeronow and

Albania

The photographical reproduction of this work is covered by Article 82 of the Albanian Copyright and Other Rights Related Law (No.35/2016 §). It states that:
  1. Reproduction of works permanently found in public spaces, i. e. streets, squares, parks, rest areas and other open areas that are accessible to the public, is allowed without the authorization and compensation from and towards the author or copyright holder.
  2. The works referred to in paragraph 1 of this article cannot be reproduced in three-dimensional form.
  3. With regard to the reproduction of architectural structures, paragraph 1 of this article applies only to the external appearance of the architectural structure.
  4. In the cases provided for in paragraph 1 of this article, the source and authorship of such copies shall be indicated, where applicable.
See COM:CRT/Albania#Freedom of panorama for more information.

Deutsch | English | 中文 | +/−

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As the President of thye Brazilian Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - www.brasil-russia.br, I kindly ask you to undelete because this picture is my copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniorosset (talk • contribs) 03:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Are you the photographer who made the photo? Ankry (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response from the requester in 24h. Ankry (talk) 07:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

All the pictures are my copyright. I kindly ask you to undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniorosset (talk • contribs) 03:40, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Are they also of your authorship? (are you the photographer?) Ankry (talk) 11:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response from the requester in 24h. Ankry (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tajvani.jpg

Appears to fall under {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per {{FoP-Albania}} Ankry (talk) 07:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like to humbly apologize and request not to delete this picture. Please kindly help for Han Zaw Latt. Thanks for your cooperation. ( Thu Ha Thi 1991 (talk) 06:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC) )

@Thu Ha Thi 1991: Any evidence of CC-By-SA license on the image source page? Ankry (talk) 00:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no evidence of free license. Ankry (talk) 08:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: We own the copyrights. MonzD (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

  • So you need to follow COM:OTRS instructions in order to undelete the image. Or provide an evidence that the album was initially published under cc-by-sa-4.0 license (I doubt for that, however).

 Not done OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 08:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good morning. I had a message this morning stating that one of your editors, Gbawden, thought that the photo (file above) that I had just published for Arly Jover was maybe a copyright violation. His or her reason was that the photo is in the webpage for Time-Art(http://time-art.com/talents/arly-jover/). Please let me reassure you that the copyright is mine. I am the one that took the photo, and the one that aloud Time-Art to use it in there page. So I please ask you to review and not to not delete the image. Best regards--Arly Jover (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Arly Jover


 Not done procedural close: image not deleted. You can discuss deletion in the DR. Ankry (talk) 09:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, As representing my best friend Dimitris Avramis, who asked me to help updating his personal wikipedia information, I request to undelete the photo Avramisdimitris1.jpg, because it is a photo that belongs to Greek Greco-Roman Wrestling Champion, Dimitris Avramis.

The following link https://slideplayer.gr/slide/13365815/, where you found a similar photo, is a link where local students from an area near Trikala (the town that Avramis comes from), created a project to honor Mr Avramis for his standing career in Greek-Roman wrestling. He was the one that gave the students all the photos and information that have been upload in this slideplayer link.

Yours Sincerely, Xristos Karakitsios

--Xristoskar (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose @Xristoskar: You cannot upload a photo that belongs to somebody else and claim that you are its author (protographer). This is against Wikimedia Commons rules and illegal. {{Own}} applies only to unpublished photos that you made yourself using your camera. For other photos the photographer (or another copyright holder if they have a contract) should send us a permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 09:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to ask if we can finally upload our photo in wikipedia, after asking slideplayer to delete the following link https://slideplayer.gr/slide/13365815/, where local students uploaded our photo. --Xristoskar (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

@Xristoskar: The problem is not that the image is available elsewhere now but that Commons is not its initial publication site. If it was ever published without free license evidence we cannot be 100% sure whether it is uploaded here by the author who is able to license it or it is uploaded by a third party who copies the photo therefrom and claims it freely licensed without author's permission. As anybody is anonymous here, we cannot verify uploader identity and we have to rely on information available on other sites in such cases. So, please, either (1) ans the author(s) to send a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions or (2) provide information that the image is under a free license at its initial publication site. The latter is much faster way, if possible, as processing OTRS permission takes months now. Ankry (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bilden är från privat samling som ägs av min bror. mvh Peter Palm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nattregn (talk • contribs) 05:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)  Oppose You need to start by finding the unknown photographer (link to discussion) Thuresson (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, this photo is a selfie made by me. https://deskgram.net/p/1870640516626992120_2908847520 - it's a link to my instagram page. Basically, Liubov Baz in the photo and in the article is me. So, I ask to undelete this file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laora-ell (talk • contribs) 22:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Anybody can say that. As there is no evidence of free license on the Instagram page, COM:OTRS permission is needed. Ankry (talk) 23:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. And how shall I mark free license on my Instagram page? What exactly shall I write in my profile? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laora-ell (talk • contribs) 02:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

@Laora-ell: You should mention the license with its version and add information depending on the license itself (sometimes the required atribution info, sometimes link to the full license text - if possible). It should be clearly stated what the license applies to. I do not know what is technically possible in Instagram. Ankry (talk) 08:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my personal collection--Nguyenqa (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

@Nguyenqa: Who is the artist? When and where was it published? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

YWB Philly

File:YWB Philly.jpg

YWB Philly

The file in question was deleted for copyright violation of the Instagram Profile Picture of YWB Philly. YWB Philly has an account on Wikipedia. User:Ywbphilly. He edited the file, and took/owns all images used. We request undeletion because there is no Copyright infringement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnyboya (talk • contribs) 23:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose You don't sign away your copyright to things you have created when you become a registered Wikipedia user. Thuresson (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose @Sunnyboya: And claiming to be the author of somebody else's work is a violation of both: Wikimedia Commons rules and law. Ankry (talk) 07:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: "Non-free historic image." Description: Picture of Northview Heights Secondary School, formerly called Northview Heights Collegiate Institute from somewhere in the 1960s Author or copyright owner: Panda Photography, Source (WP:NFCC#4): https://gencat4.eloquent-systems.com/webcat/systems/toronto.arch/resource/fo0207/ser1251/f0207_s1251_it0110.jpg, City of Toronto Archives, Fonds 207, Item 110 Use in article (WP:NFCC#7): Northview Heights Secondary School, Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8): (WP:NFCC#8) To support encyclopedic discussion of this work in this article. The illustration is specifically needed to support the following point(s): Northview Heights Secondary School looks very similar right now to what it used to look like 50+ years ago. Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1): It is a picture of a government-owned property, We shouldn't alter what they did. Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3): It is less than 200kb It is a small portion of the full page Respect for commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2): picture of the school is not a major commercial item TheLordOfMiners8 (talk) 03:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@TheLordOfMiners8: Commons does not accept fair use. You have to upload the file in the local Wikipedia if it allows it. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bonjour,

La photo que nous souhaitons télécharger a été réalisé lors d'une séance de photo dans l'atelier parisien de Ljuba (Ljubomir Popovic) par Vican Vicanovic, ami du peintre, qui a offert les photos à Ljuba. L'un et l'autre sont mort, Vican en 2003 et Ljuba en 2016. Slavica Batos, veuve de Ljuba a entrepris de classer, d'archiver les divers documents pour constituer un catalogue raisonné de son oeuvre et une biographie exhaustive. Dans ce cadre, la photo de Ljuba par Vican a été choisie pour illustrer l'inbox de la page wikipedia de Ljuba. Il semble que la licence n'a pas été bien choisi. Elle souhaite aucune utilisation commerciale et modification possible de cette photo.

Bien cordialement--GraceduVal (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@GraceduVal: Pour être importée sur Commons, il faut une licence libre, i.e. qui autorise l'utilisation commerciale et les modifications. De toute façon, Vican Vicanovic doit envoyer une autorisation écrite via COM:OTRS/fr. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

I would like to request that this file be undeleted and restored back to Samantha Barks page. The reason for the deletion, isn't a copyright violation. The photographer credited allowed United Agents (Samantha Bark's representation) use of the image on their website. They don't hold the copyright, the photographer does. Copyright violation: taken from https://www.unitedagents.co.uk/samantha-barks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaystockwell89 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jaystockwell89: The copyright holder has to send a written permission for a free license via COM:OTRS. The file would be undeleted when the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Időt- érdeklődő, nyitott szemeket, tudásvágyat hiányolok- ti mindent egy meg sem írt témával kapcsolatban. Ki veszít? Várjatok- ennyit kérek- vagy csalódunk egymásban. Én nem blöffölök.

A Vértesszőlősi szoborról nagyjából senki semmilyen igazolt , megalapozott véleményt nem írt le- a hüvelylabda, marokkő, mesterségesen göndörített hajra tippelés, teljesen a felületes, a küllem alapján készült szubjektív vélemények arzenálja mind elfogadott- a képről kijelentették, hogy bárhol, bárki bármikor felhasználhatja- a készítő nem él, a fotográfus jogai nem sérülnek- mert nem művészi alkotás, önmagáért feltenni a képet indokolatlan lenne. Ergo: alig jelent meg valami objektív, logikus hozzászólás a szoborról, (Meggyesi után: ....az nem LÚ, az szobor- ahogy itt sem igazolt, hogy NŐ-nek készült e a figura- vagy szobor, ami üzenetet hordoz és kb. 90%-a a hsz-t íróknak téved. Téved a képpel kapcsolatban és téved, amikor biztonságosan ilyen-olyan negatív véleményt ír le- hiszen bizonyított vélemény nincs, a szobor hossza, átmérője egy mondatba belefér. Nincs forrás. Ha a forrás hiánya- és nem hivatkozhatok a logikailag nagyon odavaló irodalomra, mert nem éppen erről a szoborról íródott egyik sem- de nem érteni a párhuzamokat, amire a véleményt csak el kezdtem írni- nem veszi észre senki....ez biztosan a felületesség, erre lehet hivatkozni. Az összefüggések az univerzum minden részével- biztos. Ehhez el kellene olvasni a hivatkozásokat, amiket nem tudtam csak elkezdeni, mert kezdettől törlésre lett jelölve egy olyan kép, amit mindenki szabadon használ- tehát miért fáradjak tovább azzal, hogy egy tucatnál több műből idézzek, ami a megértéshez mást is közelebb vihetne? Miért éppen a meg sem írt, még ki sem fejtett szoborfej, elkezdett szöveg az, ami ilyen káros? Miért nincs lehetőség időt adni, nem a törléssel zaklatni? Fontosságból elégtelen? Az is marad, mert senki nem minősítheti, ha nem érti az egész képet...Kb. 10 %-ot írtam, amikor már nem volt több okom elmondani, amit én több, mint egy évig tanulmányoztam? Miért jelenhet meg egy csomó hülyeség vagy indifferens szubjektív vélemény + szintén jellegtelen adatok a megtalálással kapcsolatban- ezek semmire nem jutnak a 30000 éves üzenettel kapcsolatban....? Ezek elég fontosak? Kizárt. Megérthető és sokat is mond a szobor. A türelmetlenség, az egész leminősítése semmire nem igazán hivatkozhat, max. technikai okokra- de már akkor törlésre jelölték, amikor alig pár mondatot írtam. Írnom kéne egy könyvet, hogy legyen mire hivatkozni? A szobor kevés- ill. mi vagyunk kevesek, hogy önmagából megértsük a mondanivalóját- de ettől nem jogos kijelenteni, hogy nem mond eleget. Írjuk le inkább: keveset értünk. (megmutatni, elmagyarázni szeretném, hogy más is örüljön- de nem első közlés helye.... MI az első közlés helye? Egyre inkább úgy érzem, szubjektív tudatlanság alapján egy nem érhető alkotást nem hajlandó megismerni a többség- vagy egy óra alatt kevés információ áramlást produkálok- a semminél mindenképpen több, ha leírhattam, közzé tehettem volna- fontosabbnak tudná látni mindenki. 20 millió cikk- ettől le kellene esni az államnak- pedig 2500 évig kéne olvasni egy vagon nem fontos dolgot- a Wikipédia információs csatorna, közös tudás- ha nincs idő rá, mert 100 más, ismertebb témát fel tudna szerkeszteni sok szerkesztő- az biztosan több? A kíváncsiság, a megértése a szokatlanul ismeretlennek- ez volt a cél. Keveset mondok?- nem. Kevés a nyitott elme. Kevés a valódi érdeklődés. Keveset ért az ember, de türelmetlen kivárni a végét- ha törlésre kerül- akkor mindenki, aki nem fáradt vele- ezután sem fogja tudni, hogy a világ legősibb üzenete mit mond. Az sem igazolt, hogy nő a szobor. Ennyi- és kevés, de ne is legyen több? Sajnálom, őszintén, ha ez az okolás bölcsebb, mint aki kivárta volna -pár héten túl- a lényeget. Nem tudjuk. Ez jobb? Nekem is csalódás- csak ellentétesen.Izzibell01 17:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izzibell01 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@Izzibell01: Which image you wish to undelete? Ankry (talk) 07:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I hereby affirm that File:BurghRecords Logo.png: [I, (Michael Fascia), am] the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of BurghRecords Logo: [BurghRecords/Music Making] as used here: [1], and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). (THIS IS THE STANDARD CHOICE; YOU MAY CHOOSE ANOTHER ACCEPTABLE FREE LICENSE, IF YOU WISH TO)

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

[Michael Fascia] [Sender's authority ("Copyright holder", "Director", BurghRecords.)] [01/04/2019]

Sonnyf (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)M.S.Fascia

@Sonnyf: two issues:
  1. as we cannot and may not verify your identity on-wiki, such permissions should be send to <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>. More info in COM:OTRS
  2. is the logo in scope? Eg., is there an accepted Wikipedia article that the logo may be used in?
Ankry (talk) 07:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

1980 Jeanne Letitia Lopes painting Kalua beach Hawai1 Jun 13, 1934 – Jun 27, 2009 (Age 75) died in Kamuela hawai (1).jpg.

I'm the legal owner of that painting, as such, I have the legal copyright to post pictures of them to honor the painter's legacy and help others when researching that painter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerardolagunes (talk • contribs) 18:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

No, the copyright normally remains either with the painter or his or her heirs. I don't own the copyright to Harry Potter and The Philosopher's Stone just because I own a copy of the book. Have you acquired the copyright as well a copy of the painting? Thuresson (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose OP do not respond to reasonable questions; it is not at all clear what OP believes copyright is. Thuresson (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have personally contacted the owner and subject of this work to obtain permission to publish it in Wikimedia. What should I do differently to upload it correctly? Heycci (talk) 19:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@Heycci: You should ask the author (the photographer, not the subject) to send a permission following COM:OTRS. Alternatively, if somebody has a copyright transfer contract with the photographer, they should send the permission together with a copyright transfer evidence. The permission has to come to OTRS directly from the copyright holder, not via a third party, so you could do nothing but ask for it. Ankry (talk) 07:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
And also, a "permission to publish in Wikimedia" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements. Ankry (talk) 07:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thank you for your explanation. I have explained the situation to the copyright owner and the subject (The Green Party of Finland and Mrs. Holopainen) and they will now take steps to add an image of the politician themselves, allowing them to upload it with the right licence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heycci (talk • contribs) 10:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Published previously on www.cameonation.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by PricklyPearLV (talk • contribs) 21:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

And any evidence that this site content is under CC-BY 4.0 license or that User:PricklyPearLV is its owner as a private person?  Oppose otherwise. Ankry (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Requesting undeletion of this file as the owner of the file has given permission, stating on the page it is published here: https://www.weforum.org/about/leadership-and-governance

That "This image is available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeh101 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@Mikeh101: , That is not an acceptable license for Commons. COM:L.  Oppose since commercial use and derivatives must be allowed for a file to be on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 21:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello to users of Wikimedia. I am trying to request undeletion of the file “IraVolkova(2016)”.

Why do I think that Wikimedia should not delete the photo?

Firstly, that photo was given to Ira Volkova(the person on the photo) as a gift in the year 2016, so now she uses that photo in some other media.

Besides, I know the person from the photo and before downloading she gave a verbal permission to post the photo on Wikimedia.

Thank you. Candy-Kubik (talk) 04:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

————————————-

Здравствуйте. Я пытаюсь запросить неудаление файла «IraVolkova(2016)” на Wikimedia.

Почему же эту фотографию удалять не нужно?

Во-первых, эта фотография была подарена автором фотографии изображённой и, по словам самой Иры Волковой(человека на фотографии), может использоваться в статье про неё, так как эта фотография является одним из единственных качественных изображений с ней.

Во-вторых, я знаю Ирину(Иру) Волкову и знаю фотографа лично и все они дали своё разрешение на публикацию фотографии.

Спасибо.

Candy-Kubik (talk) 04:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose First, a permission "to post the photo on Wikimedia" does not fit licensing requirements, read COM:L. Second, licensing a photo or copyright transfer both require written form (verbal form is invalid due to copyright law). So we need an evidence that the initial copyright owner (the photo author) intended to make it freely licensed and that their intention had a written form. Ankry (talk) 06:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

These questions and answers are from an 2018 exam and no law prohibits the distribution of these documents. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.237.27.30 (talk) 13:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Avtor email send.

2.99.17.252 23:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Please wait for the permission to be validated. Do not reupload the file. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This pix is property of french parliament only. There is no reason to consider it's not a common use pix. The author is a french public salary. ( not fieec ) Eric Bothorel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric bothorel (talk • contribs) 06:48, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Comment @Eric bothorel: It doesn't work like that in France. Please read Commons:Village pump/Copyright#pictures from assemblee-nationale.fr. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ayatollah Khamenei

Copyright notice of the source was fixed: [2]. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Various FoP-Albania cases in Tirana

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

These appear to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done except File:National Art Gallery of Albania.JPG that is gallery interior. I do not think FoP applies to that. Ankry (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, it doesn't apply indoors. Abzeronow (talk) 19:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tirana kullat.JPG

Appears to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per per Abzeronow and {{FoP-Albania}}. Ankry (talk) 19:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Rise of the Robots Art Cover.jpg , and 3 other files to undelete

These images are either created by, or used with the permission of the film directors. These are photos of already approved, and past published and copyrighted CD and/or DVD covers for which Stephen Melillo has composed the Music.

I am currently sitting with Stephen Melillo in his office and these artworks are coming straight from the source of Stephen Melillo's images and artworks.

 Comment If Stephen Melillo is the copyright holder, have him verify permission for a free license using e-mail template at COM:OTRS Abzeronow (talk) 18:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OTRS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:VSD Vidyartthi sevadal.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidyarthi Seva Dal (talk • contribs) 15:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


{{Not done}}: Not deleted (yet). --Yann (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Reopening: already deleted.
And  Oppose as we need clear free license permission for copyrighted logos. Either via COM:OTRS or at the copyright holder's website. Ankry (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Procedural close as  Not done. No reason for undeletion given. Abzeronow (talk) 18:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of Khaleej Times

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018070310004506 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:22, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: ✓ Done - Jcb (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

MacArthur Foundation explicitly releases as "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". produce the MacArthur Foundation legal letter ticket:2016102610013764. the deletion is astonishing, and you should expect periodic mass uploads until you do. and a mass speedy deletion is not appropriate. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Info This is self nomination by the uploader who find that there are reasons not to keep them in Commons. Why do you want to undelete them? Ankry (talk) 17:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 Comment Slowking4 has just been blocked for 3 months, so you may not receive an answer to your question anytime soon. De728631 (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS ticket:2016102610013764 says otherwise. Ruthven (msg) 13:18, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, I would like to request an undeletion of the image "virginie chomicki" as I am the owner of this picture. I am Virginie Chomicki, and someone took this picture for me with my phone while I was on this tv set. Best regards--Jnnnnnnnn (talk) 12:46, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose for two reasons: We have no means to verify your identy through your Wikimedia user account. Anyone can create an account at Commons and claim to be a certain person. What is more impoartant though, even if you own the digital photograph data on your phone, copyright for the image rests with this "someone" who actually took the photo. Therefore we need a permission by email from the original photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per De728631. Ruthven (msg) 13:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, the photo represents a chair designed by my granfather, Carlo De Carli. I'm trying to edit his page publishing some picture of its main architecture and design opera. I think this photo is public domain picture.

All of the pictures I uploaded were deleted:

Thanks, Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Looka.decarli (talk • contribs) 21:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: For the PD-Italy files, as discussed. "Sedia Compasso d'Oro, 1954" includes blueprints, which do not fall under PD-Italy. "Scritti.pdf" obviously is not a photo and needs a permission from the heirs, as per "Laboratori del Centro..." which represents a copyrighted statue (there is no FOP in Italy for artworks). Finally, "Soggiorno della Foresteria" represents a painting, also under copyright still. @Looka.decarli: if you want give the publishing authorisation, please write to permissions-it@wikimedia.org and we'll see how to arrange an explicit permission statement from the heirs. Ruthven (msg) 19:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Company which holds license & copyright has sent e-mail releasing rights for use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longjiangmei (talk • contribs) 06:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

@Longjiangmei: A free license, i.e. which authorizes commercial uses and modifications, is necessary. The file would be undeleted when the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
@Yann: IMO, {{PD-textlogo}}. Your opinion? Ankry (talk) 07:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

For your reference, OTRS Ticket:2019040110003318. I have also re-uploaded file onto a Flickr account with the acceptable attribution, so if that's a better option I can also do that. Best, User:longjiangmei (talk) 14:29, 2 April 2019 (GMT)


✓ Done: per ticket:2019040110003318. Ruthven (msg) 19:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

{{PD-EEA}} {{PD-textlogo}} Please see File:Coca-Cola logo.svg as an example. The RedBurn (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

@The RedBurn: Read carefully the template text: the first template applies only to logo uploader here more that 10 years ago and the second one is valid for simple logos below TOO, mainly originating from US, where TOO is relatively high. If you can prove that the logo is too simple to receive copyright protection in EU (or the Agency officials declares so) we can go on. Otherwise, a free license OTRS permission form the Agency is needed. Ankry (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
The logo comes from the 2006 website logo page, aren't they still in PD? The RedBurn (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
This applies to documents; unsure if this can be applied to the logo. Another opinion? Ankry (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Ok, then what about {{PD-textlogo}} like for Category:Logos of agencies of the European Union and Category:PD_ineligible? By the way, there's now a discussion for these logos in Commons:Deletion requests/File:European Environment Agency-Logo - fr.svg. The RedBurn (talk) 09:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it is not at all obvious that this is simple enough to be exempted from protection. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please, undelete file File:Dima Bamberg.jpg. I have an exclusive rights for this file (I am the author of this photo). Dima Bamberg (the person who depicted in the photo) allowed me to use this photo on the Internet.

Kostikch (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@Kostikch: Please, send COM:OTRS permission. Ankry (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: if a valid permission is received, then the image will be undeleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Il file "Edg finzi cherchi.jpg" è stato autorizzato dall'autore della foto, Andrea Cherchi, con mail di conferma del 11 marzo 2019 e di seguito ripetuto:

Con la presente, autorizzo l'utilizzo gratuito e libero da ogni diritto di tutte le mie immagini e in particolare quelle che sono associate alla richiesta [Ticket#2019021510006623]. Ringrazio e porgo distinti saluti Andrea Cherchi

Chiedo quindi il ripristino del file --Marco steiner (talk) 21:00, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@Marco steiner: Il file di cui richiede il ripristino non è stato mai caricato. Una volta fatto segunedo le istruzioni inviatele, risponda al servizio OTRS con il link al file. Grazie. --Ruthven (msg) 13:30, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ruthven, nothing to undelete. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I own the rights of the picture This file File:ParquesCircunvalarPereira.jpg is created using this pictures, i own each one.

The photomontage is created using individual photos each one with the respective meta data

File:Parque_Los_Fundadores_Pereira.jpg File:Parque_La_Julia_Pereira.jpg File:Parque_La_Rebeca_Pereira_2018.jpg File:Parque_Popular_Modelo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErreDeRua (talk • contribs) 15:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: not deleted, therefore nothing to undelete. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Had been tagged as PD-logo, like and . Tagged for deletion by seasonal user but the original image uploader was not notified. – Flix11 (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Support and immediately nominate for DR. While I disagree that these are PD-logo (the logo, unlike the arrow in the Clinton logo, is not a "simple geometric shape"--comparison to the Trump and Clinton logos is improper), they may nevertheless be below the TOO (i.e., PD-simple) and a full DR discussion, as opposed to speedy deletion, is warranted. Эlcobbola talk 15:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support undeletion and a deletion request. Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Undeleted and nominated for a full deletion discussion. De728631 (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Had been tagged as PD-logo, like and . Tagged for deletion by seasonal user but the original image uploader was not notified. – Flix11 (talk) 15:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Support and immediately nominate for DR. While I disagree that these are PD-logo (an eagle is, by definition, not a "simple geometric shape"--comparison to the Trump and Clinton logos is improper), they may nevertheless be below the TOO (i.e., PD-simple) and a full DR discussion, as opposed to speedy deletion, is warranted. Эlcobbola talk 15:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support undeletion and a deletion request. Abzeronow (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Undeleted and nominated for a full deletion discussion. De728631 (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NusratGhaniMP.jpg - valid CC-BY 3.0 license.

1. The file in question is licensed by the CC-BY 3.0 License, with the source here.

2. I cannot understand why the original image was deleted, given that hundreds of other British MPs have images from the same batch, under the same license, on Wikimedia.

3. I fear somebody on Nus Ghani's staff may have requested the image be taken down, despite it being freely available on the web anyway. Balag12 (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Support undeletion and possibly a deletion request if there is doubt that British Parliament's CC license is compatible with Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support The original file description did not link to the source page with its CC licence, so that is most likely why the file was tagged as missing permission. De728631 (talk) 23:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done undeleted and added link to the source. Ankry (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Albanian FoP Files in Durrës

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Appears to be covered by {{FoP-Albania}}. Abzeronow (talk) 16:23, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Seems that the law changed in 2016. As the deleting admin I have no objection against undeletion of course. Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS-permission was send to permissoins-commons. --DDanMar (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 23:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per De728631: waiting for OTRS action. Ankry (talk) 15:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good Afternoon,

I am requesting that this image is undeleted from Wikimedia Commons. I am an employee of Illuminations, the company that produced An Age of Kings DVD and we are the copyright holders of the cover art that has been deleted. We noticed that the image shown on the Age of Kings wikipedia page is not the correct cover art, which is why we have been trying to replace the image.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Than you and have a great day,

- Nicole Pfeiffer

https://www.illuminationsmedia.co.uk/product/an-age-of-kings-2/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npfeif88 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Thank you for releasing this cover image under a free licence. However, please send a permission by email as outlined in COM:OTRS since we cannot verify your identy through your Wikimedia user account. Another, much faster way would be adding a free licence to this image at the Illuminations official website. De728631 (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631: waiting for OTRS action. Ankry (talk) 15:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katolicky kostol elbasan albansko.JPG

Appears to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per Abzeronow and {{FoP-Albania}} Ankry (talk) 15:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the owner.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlamaOuasila (talk • contribs) 02:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Your only contribution, File:Yassine Ouaich.jpg, is "© 2019 De Acteursgilde. All Rights Reserved.". Thuresson (talk) 19:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. Ruthven (msg) 15:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

3. This file has been used before in other pages/network. 4. my request to make it come back is bc I did a misstake and forgot to mark it as the right I have from the owner I can use it. I am also new so I don't have an idea how it works on Wikimedia Commons. So if I can just fix what I wrote wrong it would be great. Thanks {{unsigned2|11:33, 2 April 2019|Jessicagomez96}

@Jessicagomez96: As the file was used elsewhere prior to upload to Commons, we need either (1) a free license declaration on the initial image publication site, or (2) written free license permission from identifiable author send to OTRS followig COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Прошу восстановить файл File:ОАО Электромеханика-logo.png, который был удален, потому что я установила неверный тип лицензии при загрузке файла. Файл File:ОАО Электромеханика-logo.png является логотипом предприятия ОАО "Электромеханика" и как другие логотипы компаний может свободно размещаться, в том числе в Википедии. --МаринаРомашкина (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

@МаринаРомашкина: Your license declaration for a copyrighted logo is void. We need license declaration from the logo copyright owner (on their homepage or via COM:OTRS). Fair Use logos cannot be stored in Wikimedia Commons. https://www.elmeh.ru/ say "© 2019 Все права защищены" that contradicts a free license. Ankry (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 16:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Не вижу причин для удаления файла File:ОАО Электромеханика-Пенза.jpg. Прошу не удалять файл --МаринаРомашкина (talk) 05:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

@МаринаРомашкина: The source page states "© 2019 Все права защищены" which is not a free license. Only images published with clear free license evidence can be uploaded to Commons from external sources. Ankry (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, I would like you to undelete this file because it is my picture and I own the full rights to it. I am Princess Vitarah's photographer and social media manager. I have full copyrights to this photo. I have been managing her Wikipedia since 2017. Every time I upload a photo it is marked for deletion, I don't understand. If you need me to prove I have rights to this photo you can email at booking@princessvitarah.com that is my official email address. Yes the photo is on Twitter because she posted it there, but it still belongs to us and we have uploaded it to Creative Commons and dont mind if anyone else uses it.

--Johnabook (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I would like you to undelete this file because it is my picture and I own the full rights to it. I am Princess Vitarah's photographer and social media manager. I have full copyrights to this photo. I have been managing her Wikipedia since 2017. Every time I upload a photo it is marked for deletion, I don't understand. If you need me to prove I have rights to this photo you can email at booking@princessvitarah.com that is my official email address. Yes the photo is on Instagram because she posted it there, but it still belongs to us and we have uploaded it to Creative Commons and dont mind if anyone else uses it. --Johnabook (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

@Johnabook: Our rules require that for images that were published elsewhere prior to upload to Commons we need either (1) free license information on the initial publication site, or (2) a written free license permission send to Wikimedia OTRS system following COM:OTRS instructions. So you have two ways: the first is faster, the second procedure can take few months. Ankry (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 16:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello dear, this image is owned and made by Miss saHHara herself, she gave me the permission to use all the images you guys deleted on the wiki page. She took those pictures and published them on Flickr, which is on a public domain with a free to use licence. Now I am confused, can you please tell me what is the right setting for the copyright agreement on Flickr for images to be used? I though 'CC0' was free to use and it is published on a public domain:

https:https://www.flickr.com/photos/miss_sahhara/33634402778/in/dateposted-public/

Please I need your advice, because I must be doing something wrong. I dont want to keep violating your rules. I want to learn more on how to publish the right contents on here. I hope you can help me. Regards. This was the rules I followed when I published all those images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr Phoenixqueen (talk) 00:33, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support Seems a selfie posted by the author with CC0 license. I think it's ok to restore it (the magazine that published it is not the copyright holder). --Ruthven (msg) 19:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
While it is possible, that some rights has been transferred during the publication process, we assume that author knows what she is doing while freely licensing the photo. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per above. @Patrick Rogel and Gbawden: please renominate for full-time DR if you disagree. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Turkiye-nin-ilk-yerli-ucagi-nu.d-38.jpg

"This is not Nu D 36, Nu D 38. The date of first flight of this aircraft was not 1939 but 1944. 2011 - 1944 = 67. The copyright will be expired in 2014." Abzeronow (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

  1. It is unclear to me how PD copyright status of the photo can be proved basing on age of the phographed subject. This works one way only: the photo cannot be older than the subject.
  2. The license template used there is {{PD-old}} which is wrong for a photo of unidentified author (I assume "Bilinmiyor" is the nick of the author of the blog where the photo was found - http://img.dmry.net/blog/01/turkiye-nin-ilk-yerli-ucagi-nu.d-38.jpg) and with unknown publication date. Without a valid license template(s) the photo cannot be restored, IMO. Ankry (talk) 13:58, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Agreed. It appears to have been a unique aircraft w:Nuri Demirağ Nu D.38 so photo creation around 1944-1945 is plausible. As you say, publication date appears to not be known to us or supplied by the uploader. I guess we may just have to mark it for undeletion around the 2060s when 120 year rule would occur. Abzeronow (talk) 15:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: {{PD-Turkey-anon}}. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion requests for tpyk's files

Please undelete the following files. As far as I can see, these files were all published before 1920 in China, and so they are also in the Public Domain in the Unted States. I forget to add appropriate license to them. After their undeletion I will add them.

The following two pictures are maps that I make about historic warfare, I forget to add appropriate license to them.

Thank you. --Tpyk (talk) 02:30, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

 Support temporary undeletion of the first set: source & copyright template needs fixing. Ankry (talk) 15:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 Support temporary undeletion of first set per Ankry. Abzeronow (talk) 14:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done for the first part. @Tpyk: Please fix the source, author, and license. Who did make the maps? Which source(s) did you use? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

I personally make the maps (the second picture set) based on the empty map file from Wikimedia(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Location_of_Siyi_within_Guangdong_China.png).--Tpyk (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose undeletion of maps. IMO unlikely based on this source (because of some details) and even if so, it would be copyvio as neither the source map is referred nor its author is attributed as required by the license. Ankry (talk) 14:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello dear, this image is owned and made by Miss saHHara herself, she gave me the permission to use all the images you guys deleted on the wiki page. She took those pictures and published them on Flickr, which is on a public domain with a free to use licence. Now I am confused, can you please tell me what is the right setting for the copyright agreement on Flickr for images to be used? I though 'CC0' was free to use and it is published on a public domain:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/miss_sahhara/46787291334/in/dateposted-public/

Please I need your advice, because I must be doing something wrong. I dont want to keep violating your rules. I want to learn more on how to publish the right contents on here. I hope you can help me. Regards. This was the rules I followed when I published all those images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr Phoenixqueen (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi there,

This photo was taken by Kirsten Boyer and is used with her permission. Below is my correspondence with the author, Tirzah Firestone, regarding this photo. What else can I provide to help with documentation so this photo can stay live?

Your help is greatly appreciated as I am a novice at posting on Wikipedia!

Thank you very much, Rachel


On Apr 3, 2019, at 12:27 PM, <name email redacted> wrote:

hr name is Kirsten Boyer She wd be delighted to be credited, and the photos are legally in my possession so all good. t

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:37 PM <name and email redacted> wrote: Hi Tirzah,

Who was the photographer of the portraits of you? I need to put a credit on the photo I put on Wikipedia of you so that it is properly attributed in the creative commons.

Thanks! Rae — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelniswiski (talk • contribs) 03:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please note that we need a permission coming directly from the original photographer. This would need to include a free licence for anyone to use this photo for any purpose, and not just at Wikipedia. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 23:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Автором фото моей тети, Надежды Притулиной https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Фото_Н._П._Притулиной.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 являюсь я, оно снято в 2014 году, в дальнейшем месте с произведениями автора представлялось на различные конкурсы, в том числе "Наше Подмосковье"https://наше-подмосковье.рф/people/64749. Данным лицам исключительных прав на данное фото мной не передавалось, его можно использовать в Википедии VictorM1988 (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

@VictorM1988: Few problems here:
  1. there are 2 photos under this name
  2. the older one is a derivative work of book covers that are not free and not your work
  3. the newer one was already published on this site with no declaration of a free license
  4. the latter photo was also reuploaded after deletion, what is against our rules.
For photos already published elsewhere prior to upload here we need either (1) free license declaration on the initial publication site, or (2) a written permission send to OTRS following COM:OTRS/ru instructions. The first way is faster, the second one can take few months. Ankry (talk) 15:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file was deleted on the wrong basis: actually it's in scope, and because used in File:Keeping events safe booklet.pdf (and can be used in several other occasions). --Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image came directly from gwagner.com/bio which states: "Photo by Rose Lincoln, Harvard, June 2018 (free to use with proper credit)".

It is the only picture there with such a note. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinewby2017 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose It is unclear if the permission allows modifications or only to use the original unmodified photo. Ankry (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This Image was deleted as by mistake we have chosen Copy Right Policy, SO 2nd time we had publish this file and made it free from copy-right policy.--Tbtimbaker (talk) 13:18, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Since this has previously been published without a free licence (see here), we require a written permission by the copyright holder. In most cases this would not be the person depicted but the original photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for details. Alternatively you could release it under a free licence at your official website, so we can restore it here. This would actually be the faster and easier solution. De728631 (talk) 12:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This newspaper in Caracas Venezuela is out of circulation from 1975, this page is 67 years old, in my country there is not copyright after 50 years, in USA 60 years, because is used to no commercials uses or lucrative porpouses, Is material of public domain. For that reason this image don´t cause a violation of law or policies rules of wikipedia. I have a complete collection of this health material more thant 400 pieces that will loose recomended me how to publish that, if you know a better way to do it. Thanks your attention Gilda Martinez Gilda-edita (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Venezuela. Thuresson (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose Copyright in Venezuela lasts 60 years since author death and copyright in US lasts 95 years since publication (unless the copyright was registered there and not renewed). Ankry (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux Morts de Tourcoing.jpg

"The architect, Edouard Monestès is dead in 1944." Been public domain in France since 2015. Abzeronow (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file was first uploaded in 2008 and then speedy deleted without process in 2019 under the claim that this file was "G10" which reads "Files and pages created as advertisements This includes only content uploaded to promote goods and services, outside our project scope. Files that illustrate contemporary or historical advertisements do not fall under this criterion." however a logo isn't an advertisement by itself and the HIE-RO is the The Hanseatic Institute for Entrepreneurship and Regional Development at the University of Rostock which is an educational institution in Germany. I personally fail to see how a logo of a division of a university counts as either "spam" or "an advertisement". This is also exactly why such deletion requests need scrutiny, something which Alexis Jazz has said for quite a while. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Undeleted. Can not find that Commons Delinker has removed this file from any pages. Thuresson (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Out-of-process deletion by a sysop who doesn’t care to define some .mw-redirect distinctive enough for them. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Indeed. The DR was about redirect, not about the original page that has been moved back in meantime. I suppose deletion by mistake. So ✓ Done: undeleted. Ankry (talk) 08:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Tirana International Hotel Files

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

These appear to be {{FoP-Albania}}, 2nd file will require a split and some renaming since there are two versions by different uploaders. Abzeronow (talk) 19:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per Abzeronow and {{FoP-Albania}}. File:Tirana International Hotel.jpg -> File:Tirana International Hotel.jpg + File:Tirana International Hotel (2).jpg
Ankry (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

javier_puente.jpg

This picture is property of Javier Puente and has been used by other websites because he has allowed them to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vadiniawiki (talk • contribs) 18:47, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Let's have him submit such a permission to Wikimedia also through COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 19:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

file:javier_puente.jpg

This photograph is owned by me and if it appears in any other website is because I have allowed them to do so. This photograph shoudn't be deleted because of any copyright reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vadiniawiki (talk • contribs) 22:31, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Thuresson and Marchjuly. Ankry (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

These appear to be covered by {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per Abzeronow and {{FoP-Albania}}. And the last one deleted later as clear copyvio. Ankry (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image is not licensed --Malojojo (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

email send --Malojojo (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Also uploaded as File:Fashionable ann.jpg. Please ask illustrator Tina Knez to verify the copyright license through COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 20:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Look it's doesn't a copyright violation. I just vectorized this logo and edited an useful article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benzir A. Shawon (talk • contribs) 20:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

As the author of the photo, I grant OTRS the permission to publish this photo. Thanks. --PAMMJ (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The permission will be checked via email. See COM:OTRS for the process. Ruthven (msg) 11:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Это фото было сделано мной на фотосессии Сергея для отбора материала для афиши спектакля. Просьба не удалять фото!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Елизавета Георгиевна (talk • contribs) 18:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose As the photo was published here without evidence of free license prior to its upload to Commons, we need a written permission from the actual copyright holder. If you are the author and copyright holder, than follow COM:OTRS/ru instructions in order to restore the photo. Ankry (talk) 08:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It looks like own work by uploader. Uploader is user:Kvartal95 official. Kvartal 95 is company owned by Volodymyr Zelenskyi (who is pictured) and should have rights for such photo. Anatoliy (talk) 12:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Uploader name is irrelevant. Anybody can choose an arbitrary user name. Also, as including company name, this uploader name does not fit our username requirements.  Oppose as we do not know who the photographer is and whether the photographer's contract (if uploader is not the photographer) allows free license. COM:OTRS needed, IMO. Ankry (talk) 08:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo is in the public domain, made available for public use by Lena Prima. --Jjohnnee997e (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi. Just requesting undeletion.

Manuel Llaneras is a photographer friend who was hired to take this picture and has no issue with the use of this photo for Wikipedia.

If you absolutely need it, I'm more than happy to contact him and get a written okay. Or you can contact him yourself. He was hired to take this picture to be used as free use.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undrgroundthug (talk • contribs) 06:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose For images providing author info in EXIF we need a clear free license permission from this indentifiable author, not from an anonymous Wikimedia user. This can be provided either via the photographer official website (if any) or following COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As there is no copyright violation for the file and I am the rightful owner and designer of the logo I would like the image to be undeleted.--Rubendalsheim (talk) 10:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

(Non-administrator observation) Hi Rubendalsheim. Apparently the file was/is being used at dalsheim.nl which means that most likely some formal verification of copyright ownership is going to be needed. See c:COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS? or discuss things with the deleting administrator Túrelio for more specific details. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Marchjuly. Ankry (talk) 23:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear all, first of all I am sorry of having uploaded again the same logo-picture. I just wanted to add a link to the official website and the press area in orfer to proof the missing license information. My interpretation during the editing was to upload the same picture again under a new name. So the original and deleted file name is „File:EDAG PS Logo.png.png". The missing information for the file I wanted to add, was the link to the licensed press download area on the company´s website: https://www.edag-ps.de/en/company/press/ The owner of the logo you can download is of course EDAG Ps which is the owner and publisher of the content shown on this site. Please kindly let me know if there is missing anything else and I am happy to forward it. If with the added link the missing information is given I kindly ask to undelete this file.

With kind regards, PS IMB --PS IMB (talk) 13:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Only logos that are too simple to be copyrighted and logos that are declared by their copyright owners to be freely licensed can be stored in Wikimedia Commons. You provided no evidence for any of them. We generally reject declarations (like yours) that a company logo is copyright is owned by an anonymous private person. If the copany wish their logo to be freely licensed that can declare that on their website or their official representative can provide a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. The latter can take few months before the permission is accepted. Ankry (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The file was properly licensed. It is not obvious to me what permission is missing. Please clarify/undelete. Sreejith K (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

I think this diff explains deletion reason of some uploads of User:Hrishikesh.kb. In cases when the author info is provided in EXIF we generally need an OTRS permission from the identified author. Ankry (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File:JERREAL203 50.jpg needs to be undeleted. I own the rights to it. I am actually the entity within the picture it is taken from jerrealrickssimpson.com NOT IMDB. Greatkingkhari (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose First, we have no evidence that User:Greatkingkhari is Abigail Gordon and claiming to be author of somebody else's work is against Commons rules and law. Second, we have also no evidence that User:Greatkingkhari is an authorized representative of Steve LLamb & Images Burnside. And as the author of the photo and the copyright owner does not seem to be the same person, we need a written free license permission to be send to our OTRS system following COM:OTRS instructions (likely together with copyright transfer evidence) in order to undelete the photo. Permission from the photo subject is also welcome, but it is not copyright related. Ankry (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This item has allowances that include use in media online and in print, explicitly including Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia. The poster is copyrighted, but allowed to be used in the circumstances outlined on the page of the official site, along with attribution from Creative Commons licensing that coincides with the chosen attribute on Wikimedia Commons when the file was uploaded. Please consider reinstatement of the image, as well as clearing warning tag and strike of violation from this account. No violation was intended. Source where clearance is given to use this image: [3]. --THBAO (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Fair use images are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. We require a permission for free use by anybody for any purpose, including commercial reuse and derivative work creation. Read COM:L for details. Ankry (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Raynold alexander young image.jpg

This image is my own. The website identified as https://reynoldalexander.com/ is owned and run by me. --Webrything (talk) 12:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Anybody can say that. And:
  1. "© 2017 Reynold Alexander" is not a free license
  2. the image does not look like a selfie
If you acquired copyright from the author, you can contact our OTRS team, following COM:OTRS instructions. But this is long procedure; taking few months. Ankry (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The picture deleted is mine copyright, I am the author and owner of that picture. File:Imran hasnee.jpg. The following link is of my website (official) where the same picture is posted with all copyright information http://imranhasnee.com/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/portfolio/portfolio_image14-300x200.jpg Kindly undelete the picture and give me the permission Thanking you With Regards IMRAN HASNEE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihasnee (talk • contribs) 16:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ihasnee: The site you mentioned seems to be site of the subject of the photo. While uploading, you declared to be the photo author (photographer). The photo does not seem to be a selfie. How can you explain this? Ankry (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Фотография взята с официальной страницы персоны в Фейсбук https://www.facebook.com/oleksandr.lutskyi/. Поскольку информация в фейсбуке является публичной и не наложено никаких ограничений на ее распространение, прошу фотографию не удалять. Кроме того, под фотографией указан источник получения фотографии - страница персоны в Фейсбуке. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gena131 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Facebook is a copyrighted site and we need a free license. Ankry (talk) 23:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: this movie is licensed CC BY 4.0, as seen in the credits sequence at around the 7m36s mark of the source: [4] Also see Special:Permalink/345485811#Blender-related Uploads "Copyright Infringement"?. clpo13(talk) 21:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: CC-BY-SA. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Church in Pogradec.jpg

Seems to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done However, the OTRS ticket needs to be reviewed because of some old template syntax. De728631 (talk) 20:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Pinging @Jeff G. July 2006 file. Looks like ticket id given is 644238. Abzeronow (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@De728631 and Abzeronow: I fixed it for you and @Bastique.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took the photograph in 2016 at the request of Catherine Conybeare using her camera. She wanted a photograph to use on her academic profile at Bryn Mawr College. I have her contact email for her to confirm this if necessary. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack1956 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

In addition to my earlier request to havr the image reinststed please note the image I uploaded is much larger than the version loaded onto Catherines academic profile at Bryn Mawr and is a completely different crop. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack1956 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support per AGF. Ankry (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Some page create to the sock of Allthingsgo in commons

  1. User_talk:S465499642
  2. File_talk:Lo-YunShui.png
  3. User:Advogato2
  4. Category_talk:Zhu_Ming_(thinker)
  5. User:Lzhwp
  6. Category_talk:User_和平奮鬥救地球

There have some evidence (See above) can prove Allthingsgo use the sock to do the vandalism of sock,but these page had been deleted,I need to see their evidence archive and record in the only,thanks.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 06:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose You can ask for the information an admin via email, explaining what do you need it for. I see no reason to undelete the pages. Ankry (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Trademark information: https://search.patentstyret.no/Trademark/201100487/262558?searchId=1413765&caseIndex=3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dariasyma (talk • contribs) 15:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

IMO {{PD-textlogo}}. @Ronhjones:  ? Definitely not private ownership of the uploader (as declared), however. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: PD-textlogo, but duplicate of File:Eqology Logo.png. @Dariasyma: Do not reupload deleted files, or you may be blocked. Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 07:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I hereby affirm that I, Lea Shabat, am the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of URLs of the content https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:לאה_שבת_2019.jpg to be used on the article https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/לאה_שבת and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Eiran Resler, appointed representative 
Date: April 8th, 2019

--Yonatan Kory (talk) 10:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose This text needs to be sent by email to the address given in COM:OTRS. Posting it here will have no effect because we need the email as proof of authenticity. Please note two additional things, too: For any uploads at Commons we require a permission to use the file anywhere for any purpose, and not just in a Wikipedia article. Also, our volunteer email team has a huge backlog, so once the email has been sent it may take weeks for it to be processed. De728631 (talk) 20:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The said stamp is public domain and is easily avaiable on google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colomb Bureau (talk • contribs) 11:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a company logo which you can find on their website. I believe it fits the fair use scenario since the wikipedia article provides useful information about the company. thanks

--Marcoandrept (talk) 01:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@Marcoandrept: In order to keep the logo here we need a working link to the company website containing information that the logo is under cc-by-sa-4.0 license (as you declared). Otherwise, the logo can be stored only in some Wikipedias that accept Fair Use logos. Ankry (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted (yet). --Yann (talk) 07:36, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It's an album cover. The subject of the article is the album. Its beauty cannot adequately be described using words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TRTJr (talk • contribs) 16:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia image is not deleted, and Fair Use images cannot be stored in Commons. Beauty is irrelevant here if the image is copyrighted and not freely licensed. Ankry (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
This is Commons. As Ankry said, the Wikipedia image is still there, and at Commons, we don't accept Fair Use images unlike Wikipedia. Abzeronow (talk) 16:39, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

logo oficial de la liga nacional bolivariana de beisbol este archivo es de uso publico y no tiene derechos de utor, se puede usar siempre y cuando benefice a la liga nacional bolivariana de besibol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andresrojasr81 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Google Translate: Official logo of the Bolivarian National Baseball League this file is for public use and has no rights of author, it can be used as long as it benefits the Bolivarian national league of besibol  Oppose Unacceptable license restriction. Thuresson (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Thuresson


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

D Wikimedia, I own this picture, I made it, it is me in the picture, Tenedle, and Sussurround is the account I use to update things on wikipedia. I am really upset about the claiming on "Copyrigth violation". It's a mistake and a disappointing wasting of time. I understand the point but it is somethnig you should check in a better way. Please make the picture ready for the use again.

Kindly

Dimitri Niccolai TENEDLE www.tenedle.com

Sussurround — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sussurround (talk • contribs) 12:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Please understand that we have no means to verify your identity through your Wikimedia account, and we get lots of impostors and fake authors every day. Therefore our rules require that once an image has been published before without a free guideline, the copyright holder sends a licence via email (COM:OTRS). It would be much faster though if you could add a free licence for this specific image at your website tenedle.com. If we get a link to your site with such a licence, it will be easy to undelete the file over here. De728631 (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image is a scan of a photograph of my great-grandfather from his PAS ID. I do not know the author and it is not possible to find her/him. What should I do? Should I put the scan of whole ID card? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qabrt (talk • contribs) 11:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Do you know when this ID card was issued? If it was more than 70 years ago, the photograph would most likely be in the public domain. Otherwise I don't think there will be a possibility to upload this photo at Commons. De728631 (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
If issued pre-1989, the photo may be {{PD-Poland}}. ID photos as standarized, are not considered copyrightable in Poland, but for post-1989 photos US copyright law applies directly. Ankry (talk) 23:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC) @Qabrt: pinging. Ankry (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 22:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LANCEROS 2018

File:LANCEROS 2018.jpg

Esta foto es din derecho de autor, puede ser utilizada por cualquiera em beneficio del equipo. Atte liga nacional Bolivariana de Béisbol — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.210.155.181 (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

File:LANCEROS 2018 este archivos es de uso para cualuier persona que quiera utilizarlo, siempre a beneficio del equipo Att liga nacional bolivariana de beisbol Andresrojasr81 (talk) 11:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Permission "to use" is no the same as free license; read COM:L/es. Ankry (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 22:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my own seating plan. I designed the seating plan and the chart myself. Stephen Melillo — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLAshby (talk • contribs) 16:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose We have no evidence that you are Stephen Melillo, nor that Stephen transferred copyright to you. 1979 images are far too new for copyright expiration. Ankry (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am requesting an undelete of the official photo of Dan Forest. His office requested the image to be uploaded on this site. Is there some additional approvals you require?

--Jimothyquick (talk) 21:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Yes, permission from Jon Eric Johnson submitted through Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 22:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Various Albania FoP Cases

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Falls under {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Seem to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 23:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

I would like to request for undeletion of the previously uploaded files:

Janine_berdin.jpg Janine_berdin2.jpg Janine_berdin3.jpg Janine_berdin4.jpg

All 4 photographs were taken with the permission of subject: Patricia Janine Berdin All of the 4 photographs were take by the uploader: Jose Larey Berdin(Wiki username: kicker2)

We hope that you reconsider. And if you need some proof or any written permission, We could provide.

Jose Larey Berdin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kicker2 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose @Kicker2: The images seem to be published prior to upload here without evidence of free license. In order to undelete them, you can either (1) provide a free license declaration on the initial publication site(s) or (2) send free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Tha later can take much more time. Ankry (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ankry

see below:

{{Information
|description= Portrait picture of [[Janine Berdin]] taken by [[User:Kicker2|Kicker2]] 
|date= January 1, 2019
|source={{own}}
|author=[[User:Kicker2|Kicker2]]
|permission= The subject : [[Janine Berdin]]
|other versions= other poses available and  upload on [[Janine Berdin]]'s official Instagram posted January 1, 2019  
from Instagram user:janineberdin 
}}
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kicker2 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Kicker2: Are they selfies? Can you provide a link to the permission which clearly declares the free license? (the image was published on Twitter and Instagram) If not, read once again my comment above. (we need a free license declaration that originates directly from the author, not from you) Ankry (talk) 23:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: I personally took the photographs, the subject is my daughter: Janine Berdin.

I also sent a free license declaration to Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> with [Ticket#2019041010000858] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Declaration of consent [...]) Thank you Kicker2 (talk)

{{OTRS received|id=2019041010000858}} Truly Yours, Kicker2


 Not done we need to wait for an OTRS agent action now. Ankry (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo in the file "Rifugio d'amore Pier Augusto Breccia 1979.jpg" has been taken by Pier Augusto Breccia in 1979 and the copyright have been released by the heirs of Pier Augusto Breccia. I uploaded the photo but, by mistake, have forgotten to specify the free copyright status of this file. The heirs of Pier Augusto Breccia have sent an email to Wikimedia Commons (RE:Ticket#2019021610000216 sent 30 March 2019), confirming that the copyright of this photo have been released and this file can be freely used.

Fiorenza Gibrani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiorenzagibrani (talk • contribs) 12:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 23:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

¡Hola! Estoy a cargo de crear la pagina de Wikipedia del señor Ricardo Asensio. Es un pintor español muy reconocido. Mantengo comunicación directa con él vía e-mail, él mismo me ha pasado estas imágenes para su página, imagenes que ustedes borraron por derechos de autor. Las obras son de su autoría y él está al tanto de que se están publicando aquí ¿Será posible que la restauren, por favor? Gracias.

Los Archivos en cuestión son:

  • Retrato de la princesa beatriz de orleans ricardo asensio.jpg
  • Carmen Martinez Bordiu Madrid 1989.jpg
  • Antonio Buero Vallejo 1996.png
  • Ana Dura 1991.jpg
  • Nicoll Horn Wiesbaden 1995.jpg
  • Luz Huerta 1983.jpg
  • Victoria Vera Madrid 1986.jpg
  • Reales Atarazanas de Valencia.png
  • Ricardo Asensio en 1994.png
  • Ricardo Asensio en 2005.jpg

--Jenychris (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jenychris: Until the painter bio page is created and accepted in a Wikipedia, these images are out of scope. Painting images may be added later; they are not necessary to verify painter's notability. Ankry (talk) 16:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:A-man-wearing-a-suit-and-tie-martin-kofi-danso-is-the-founder-of-miracle-arena-for-all-nations-which_125844_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

This photo is owned by the individual on the photo, Kofi Danso, I have permissions from him to use it. The third party news outlet that used it did not use it with permission (https://pressfrom.info/ca/news/canada/-88048-judge-lifts-veil-of-secrecy-in-pastor-s-paternity-case.html) they simply took it from the internet.

Therefore no copyright has been broken by using it on this article, please restore it immediately. --Straightshoot101 (talk) 10:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@Straightshoot101: Claiming to be the author and copyright owner of a photo made by somebody else is against Wikimedia Commons rules and copyright law. Also:
  1. Permission "to use" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements; see COM:L for details.
  2. In case, when copyright owner is not the photo author, we need a written free license permission that comes directly from the photo copyright owner following COM:OTRS instructions as it is hard to prove on public that copyright has been transferred from the photo author to somebody else.
Ankry (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Thankyou Ankry, I will go get the license permission, where do I submit it once I have it? Thanks for your time --Straightshoot101 (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@Straightshoot101: The link to instructions is in my answer above. Ankry (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is new logo Silambam-Asia-Logo.png to replace the old submission File:Silambam Asia.png Request to UNDELETION the previous submission (same new logo) submitted by Mr. Suresh Kanna in the Silambam Asia content. with thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stella7811 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:58, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file mentioned above is a screenshot from a video licensed under creative commons attribution. You guys will need to restore this image because it is not a copyright image. The website "http://cillacritic.com/category/music/afro-pop/" took the image from Wikipedia. Here is the YouTube video where the screenshot was taken from. If you check the licensing info on at the bottom, you will clearly see that the image has been licensed under CC attribution. Versace1608 (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose. The information above is not correct:
  1. Image at http://cillacritic.com/ was added in December 2018, while the photo on Commons was uploaded yesterday. Commons is not Wikipedia.
  2. The YouTube video was licensed CC-BY 3.0 ; making a DW of this video, claiming it own work, and not attributing the video author as license requires is copyright violation
  3. And finally, the image does not seem to be from this video (surely not at 1:34).
Ankry (talk) 23:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 Info The info by User:Versace1608 appear to instead match File:Mr Eazi.png. Thuresson (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done so closing as the image pointed out by Thuresson is not deleted. Ankry (talk) 08:13, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sheraton Hotel Tirana.jpg

Seems to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The file is a "Logo with only simple text (wordmark)" and does not meet the threshold of originality in Germany. Mstadlr (talk) 10:40, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


@Mstadlr: Unfortunately too detailed for global PD. Should be uploaded to dewiki. --MB-one (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 17:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ireland Baldwin for True Religion.png

The file should be undeleted as it has a compatible license with commons and has been confirmed to be the stated license by Ronhjones. The source was also recommended by Thincat on the media copyright question page. Thincat also corrected one of the statement regarding the file, stating “It was also claimed the licence itself was unsatisfactory but (if this is the same photo) that does not seem to be the case.” Bunnies959 (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Can you point out where it says on vimeo.com/187882462 that the file has been released as {{CC BY 3.0}}, or where there's a link on the vimeo page which leads to another vimeo page which states the file has been released under such a license? I also checked the main page of the vimeo uploader and I'm not finding any mention of his uploads being released as such there as well.
    Another thing to consider is whether the vimeo uploader is really the sole copyright holder. The video looks like it a promotional campaign for en:True Religion (clothing brand) and both he and Baldwin might have been hired by the company for the shoot; thus, the company may own or partially own the copyright on finished project. An agreement between the director, Baldwin and the company might allow some personal use of the work because it's seen as a means of promoting all three and it's unlikely the work is going to be used by one of the three to disparage the others and there may be restrictions in place to prevent such a thing. The same, however, can be applied to Commons under c:COM:L, which make it possible for pretty much anyone anyone anywhere in the world to download the file and then freely use it for any purpose, including commericial and derivative use. In other words, some one could download the file and try to make money off it, or use it for parody or other ways, even negative ways, that the copyright holder might not want done. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:12, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment vimeo copyright links are hard you find unless you "know" where to go (this site has caught me out before!) Under the image it says "Ireland Baldwin for True Religion" and below that "2 years ago More" - Press the "More" - it shows a CC-BY symbol linking to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:40, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
    • @Marchjuly The page doesn’t state any formal agreements so it’s assumed that all the content in the media is available under that license. If there was any agreements it should explicitly stated. This file is also currently is our only free option unless someone releases a photo to commons. If there any issues than the content creators can make contact and the file will be deleted. Thanks Bunnies959 (talk) 04:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
      • Actually, I think the opposite is assumed in cases like this. Content is assumed to be protected by copyright unless it clearly states otherwise per COM:PCP. Another option to using this file actually to use no image, and that option would be preferred to using a file with a questionable license. Commons will only keep this file if it's licensing can be verified as best as possible to actually be free and I think the link found by Ronhjones is probably good enough, but others might feel differently. That's what's going to be determined here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 Support It is accepted that the video is under copyright. The copyright statement attached to the video says it has been licensed as CC BY 3.0 which is fine for Commons free licence requirements. The link Ron has suggested provides exactly the information that is required. The licence is not questionable, see Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses. Thincat (talk) 12:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

@Thincat, Marchjuly, Ronhjones, and Bunnies959: According to this DR nobody rejected that there was a CC-BY license on vimeo. But the deletion reason was a doubt whether the person who uploaded the video to vimeo was authorised to license it. I see no discussion here about this issue. Or am I missing something? Ankry (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

At the DR someone said (twice) "the Vimeo post doesn't give a licence compatible with Wikimedia Commons" and I think that is not correct. Also, the nomination said "The uploader seems to have a history of uploading copyright infringing images of Ireland Baldwin". I support this means the uploader to Commons. I don't know anything about that but the CC licensing claim comes not from the Commons uploader but from Vimeo. Was the uploader to Vimeo authorised to CC licence it? I don't know – it would, I suppose, depend on the contract between the director of photography and "True Religion" which seems to me to be a brand of clothing (but not one that I wear!). But the Vimeo page doesn't make any claim about who licensed it or who might have authority. It simply claims the video is so licensed. Why is this being doubted in the first place? If the reason is that the uploader to Commons is untrustworthy then that seems to me (in this particular case) an irrelevant consideration. Is it being suggested that Mario de Armas is dishonest or ignorant? He is displaying the video from his own web site http://www.mariodearmas.net/new-gallery-5/2016/10/18/ireland-baldwin-for-true-religion if that adds to his credibility. Thincat (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
My only real concern is whether the Vimeo license can be accepted per COM:PCP. The link provided by Ronhjones seems to indicate that it should be OK to do so; however, this video does seem to be part of a promotional campaign which might mean that there may be another copyright holder in addition to de Armas. This is, however just my opinion, and I think the licensing is otherwise likely OK though personally I'd feel better if de Armas sent an email to OTRS just to make sure since it's not really just a screenshot, but the whole video which Commons could accept. As for the concerns raised about the uploader and their history of uploading copyvios, I think that can be separated out in this case, if the licensing is deemed OK for Commons. Not undeleting the file just because the uploader has issues seems more of an action taken against the uploader than the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 Support License at source seems OK per above Abzeronow (talk) 14:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: I think the admins in this case didn’t fully research the file and the deletion was most likely because of my previous mistakes. Thank you for having an unbiased opinion on the matter and fully researching the file. Bunnies959 (talk) 13:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


Undeleted Source was released and reviewed. --MB-one (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MB-one (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am replacing old submission File:Silambam Asia.png with New Silambam Asia logo. Requesting undeletion New Silambam Asia logo submitted in Wikipedia

 Oppose {{Own}} personally created logos are out of scope. For logos used elsewhere a link to free license lub COM:OTRS permission is necessary. Claiming {{Own}} is violation of Commons rules and copyright law. Ankry (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Chiedo il ripristino del mio logo donato da me alla Rete lilith Logo della Rete Lilith.jpg da me inserito e di cui avevo dichiarato la liberatoria cosi come da Voi previsto. Il fatto che si tratti di immagine scaricata dal Web dal sito www.reteLilith.it attualmente inaccessibile per hackeraggio ma in via di ripristino è dovuta al fatto che tale immagine era stata da me caricata nel sito suddetto a suo tempo ai tempi in cui usavo i floppy disk e ora non ho modo di ripristinarla dai floppy. Maria patrelli 12 aprile 2019 Maria patrelli (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

As the logo was used in the Internet, we cannot rely on on-wiki free license declaration. We need either (1) the logo free license declaration on the logo owner site (it is dead now, but the archived page does not seem to contain such information), or (2) a free license permission emailed to us following COM:OTRS instructions by the logo owner's official representative. This is about copyright. Also, we store only logos that are used in Wikimedia projects. Other logos are out of scope. Is there a Wikipedia page or another content page in Wikimedia where the logo will be used?
 Oppose until both conditions are met. Ankry (talk) 06:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:46, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

May I authorize you to use this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comunicarloweb (talk • contribs) 18:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

@Comunicarloweb: We need a free license that comes via email directly from the photographer. Direct them to COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:46, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image was published in 1914 by Casimir Funk in Die Vitamine. As it is before 1924 it is PD from my understanding.[5] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:52, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

  • It is public domain in the United States, but it looks like Die Vitamine was published in Germany in 1914. Funk died in 1967 but I don't know if he was the photographer. If photographer is unknown, we'd have to wait until 2035 to undelete since German copyright law is really stringent so 120 year rule. (If Funk were photographer, we'd have to wait until 2038) Reluctant  Oppose Abzeronow (talk) 15:14, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
    Am unable to find a copy of the book itself. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
@Doc James: anyway, it can be uploaded to enwiki as PD-US. Ankry (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
User:Ankry many thanks will do. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 10:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Planetshakers.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019032910001056 regarding File:Planetshakers.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: Undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:SIGAL UNIQA'S Headquarters in Tirana.jpg

Seems to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 21:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 05:31, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have previously wanted to take down this photo, but have changed my mind and would like it to be undeleted, sorry for the inconvenience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DCmax1k (talk • contribs) 23:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

--DCmax1k (talk) 23:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done as deleted per uploader request. Ankry (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Seem to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have explicit permission from the owner of this photo to use this photo from his personal facebook account for his official wiki page photo. --Feelthehurns (talk) 17:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Who is the photographer and do you have permission from him or her? Thuresson (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 06:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion requests

These pictures were taken by me, so plesae could you undeleted them ?
File:St Olaf - Portail.jpg
File:St Olaf - Autel.jpg
File:Théodelinde Bourcin-Dubouché - portrait.jpg (from a XIX centuty family painting)
Thank you, Petitpeton 19:20, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done procedural closure: images not deleted. Ankry (talk) 06:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of UAWS

Files uploaded by UAWS (talk · contribs)

I believe, this was never a violation, as the files were uploaded by the copyright owner, as was explained here.

Background

  • In Oct 2018, the files were nominated for deletion by user @Taivo: .
  • As I noticed the nomination back in October, I responded, laying out the circumstances.
  • Nobody replied for five months.
  • On April 1st, user @Gbawden: suddenly deleted the images. As of today, my pleas (1,2) for explanation with policy references remain unanswered.
  • After reading the policies that I found, it looks like OTRS demands are excessive, as per my statement, the files were uploaded by the original creator of the images.
  • Please undelete. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

P.S. If there is indeed a policy somewhere that clearly states that OTRS is required even in this case, this whole thing is still an example of poor communication. In the future, it is advisable to inform uses of OTRS requirement at the nomination-for-deletion stage and respond to their questions. This would give the uploaders both a clear understanding of what is required and time to remediate the problem. Effective communication is more appropriate for collaborative environment than spontaneous deleterious actions that I encountered so far. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

In the DR User:凰兰时罗 admitted that "Those that were not taken by UAWS photographer, but were free for other reasons." - so not own work. The Deletion was valid. If the user wants the files undeleted they need to get permission from the photographer(s) Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
User:Gbawden, now we are zeroing on the problem: you misunderstood my statement. My apologies if it was too wordy — I just wanted to explain the whole story. None of the above images are part of what I called in there "category #3" — they are all category #2. Please re-read my original response. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 04:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
@凰兰时罗: I am afraid that Gbawden is right. If the photos are private unpublished ownership of a photographer, the uploader should not suggest that they represent an organization using organization-name-like nick. If the photo copyright is not private ownership or the photos were already published elsewhere, there is no way to avoid OTRS. Anyway, we have a COM:PCP-related doubt and cannot go on without input from either the identified photographer or from an identified representative of UAWS who could confirm the imagees' copyright status. Both only through OTRS. English queue is overloaded. Ankry (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above discussion. Ankry (talk) 07:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As was clearly stated in the upload, I took the photo and own the copyright, I'm not sure how you identified this as a copyvio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steinsky (talk • contribs) 13:03, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Abzeronow. Ankry (talk) 07:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good evening,I request the undeletation of the file because I am the original autor of the file. David19970 (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

@David19970: Are you also the author of the book, the images in the book and the logo in the left-upper corner? If so, we need an evidence of that. See COM:DW for more details. Ankry (talk) 06:44, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 07:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The artist photograph for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Donley was deleted. Copyright was since sent in by the original photographer but the photo has not be readded and it has been a couple of months at this point. --Elizdonley (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

As the photo is a derivative work of the painting in backround and no evidence was provided that the painting is freely licensed or its copyright expired, a permission was requested on 3 January. And as neither permission not required information was received, the photo was deleted on 11 January. On 22 January, an OTRS agent User:Ganímedes requested undeletion because they needed to verify a received permission dated 12 January. As the permission was not marked as verified in the following 30 days, the image was deleted again.
@Elizdonley: If you think, that a correct permission was send to OTRS you may ask the mentioned OTRS agent why it was not verified. And if they do not respond, ask a question in COM:ON. Is anything still unclear? Ankry (talk) 06:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 Comment We're talking about Ticket:2019011210004623. It was a permission sending by the one in the photograph. I requested new permission by the photographer. Both emails came from Gmail accounts and they never sent the original file or a link where the file has been published before. The permission was sent, but I didn't follow it. It was a period when I was inactive, I apologize. There is also ticket:2019010410000401, unprocessed yet, with several files of paintings, sending by the author (actually lots of permissions, merged in this one). Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
So we must wait until the proper permission is received / processed. Ankry (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 07:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

La imagen publicada en https://twitter.com/revistagimnasia/status/1094358115842174978, me fue solicitada a mí. El archivo es de mi propiedad

Ratofante (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose The twitter message does not mention a free license, so COM:OTRS permission is needed. Ankry (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Although it is uploaded as external source, no license, no permission. In my opinion, it bare the same situation as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apink_Logo_01.png and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Black_Pink_logo.png. Can you un-delete or guide me through to change the license attribute of the file to {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}} same as the example above. Thanks in advance. Rly.oka (talk) 08:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: undeleted and tagged as PD-textlogo. --MB-one (talk) 14:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: https://www.sirioberati.com/licence in here the licence is outlined clearly. As well an e-mail has been sent on the 4th of April. Andinano12 (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support CC-BY 4.0. Ankry (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: There is permission. I also did a license review. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: very much in scope. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:How Does The M16 AR15 Work - 3D Animation Model - YouTube.webm. clpo13(talk) 05:59, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support restoring and opening a DR to discuss scope issues there as video is not just an image as the DR nominator suggested. Full week of discussion should be granted, IMO. Ankry (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 Support It seems it got caught by error in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by RajaSaheb PressMedia. The RedBurn (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: Clearly in scope. Deletions seems to be an error. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I missed the DR, graffiti in the Netherlands falls under com:fop Vera (talk) 08:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support per {{FoP-Netherlands}}. Ankry (talk) 08:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: Covered by FOP. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019031610002311 regarding this file, wherein the painter (and photographer) has confirmed the release. Ijon (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ijon: Ankry (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christopher Tignor - Vanishing Plane Sessions.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018081510009184 regarding File:Christopher Tignor - Vanishing Plane Sessions.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done Template:Ping:Ganímedes please, continue. Ankry (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:April Weeps performing before epica.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018092810001094 regarding File:April Weeps performing before epica.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done Template:Ping:Ganímedes please, continue. Ankry (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kinema Kadri Roshi, Kuçovë Albania.jpg

Seems to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done Unsure however, if GFDL license is correct. Wikimapia images seem to be CC-BY-SA licensed. At least now. Ankry (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

They changed to CC-BY-SA in June 2012, same month when this was uploaded. Was probably published on Wikimapia in March 2012. http://wikimapia.org/history/ Abzeronow (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Various FoP-Albania Files in Tirana

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

These seem to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per {{FoP-Albania}} Ankry (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018081410007991 regarding File:Backboners-MichellePhilips.jpg, File:Suzy&Norman-BetteMidler1976.jpg and File:SuzyWilliams-Kepes2018.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: and welcome back. Also ticket:2018053010000972 may be related (OTRS received was removed by a third party from first two files). Ankry (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Received permission via OTRS Ticket:2018122410003833. Ijon (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ijon: Ankry (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi, I would request undeletion of the above files because i have the permission and full consent of using these images by public figure Ms. Sidra Jafri herself (wwe.sidrajafri.com) , who is Author of the book The Awakening, TEDx Speaker, Television lifestyle host, Writer and more... as I am truly inspired by her work as an author and have connected with her to use her images, publication scanned copies, interviews etc...which are in public domain. I have just started editing on Wikipedia and learning the tools. These images were part of my page i am working on for my initial research and working on my sandbox to practice editing, which will help me to learn and assist in content contribution to Wikipedia pages. I would really appreciate if my request is reconsidered. Thank you! Contentshare (talk) 21:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Permission "to use" is not a free license. See COM:L. COM:OTRS permission from the video copyright holder is needed here. Ankry (talk) 06:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file we uploaded, Iskomoreno-apr2019pic.jpg, shows the official campaign photo of Francisco "Isko Moreno" Domagoso. Batang Maynila Media, the user that uploaded the file, is the official PR and Communications arm of Asenso Manileño's "Batang Maynila" campaign. We own the content, so no, there is no copyright violation at all. Thank you.

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by BatangMaynila.Media (talk • contribs) 07:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose @BatangMaynila.Media: For any photo published elsewhere prior to upload to Commons we need either (1) an evidence of free license fom the photographer at the initial publication site, or (2) a free license permission emailed to OTRS following COM:OTRS instructions. On-wiki license declaration do not work in such cases. Especially, if somebody who is not the photographer claims to be the photo author, as in this case. Ankry (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

I noticed the Triangle Factory Logo was deleted because of copyright. I am however currently employed at Triangle Factory and have the full permission to use this Logo on their behalf. If you need further information regarding my employement at Triangle Factory i'm happy to provide this to prove that I'm able to use the Logo for the wikipedia page.

VindevogelTaho (talk) 08:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose permission "to use" does not authorise you to license the logo. Fair Use logos are not accepted in Commons. Also, the logo might be out of COM:SCOPE if not used in a Wikipedia article. Ankry (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I made the logo for the radio station. The logo is not copyrighted and it is my own work Reckon Her (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@Reckon HerReckon Her: If it is unused in Wikimedia, it is out of COM:SCOPE. If it was used, we need COM:OTRS permission. We consider unused logos to have no educational value. Ankry (talk) 05:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Perhaps the logo are in COM:DM? 219.78.190.70 16:11, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

If you crop out 70% of the bottom of the photo, it should be OK. Ankry (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Фото профиля Сергея Богачева.jpg является моим собственным продуктом и не нарушает авторских прав. На каких основаниях был сделан вывод о нарушении авторских прав? Фото не взято из интернета, оно сделано мной лично в 2011 году и предназначается для статьи о Сергее Богачеве на википедии.

Вот тема про удаление фото Shaoron35 (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@Shaoron35: The photo seems to originate from Facebook. For any photo that was published elsewhere prior to upload to Commons, we need either (1) evidence of clear free license declaration by the photographer at the initial publication site, or (2) a permission email from the photo copyright owner following COM:OTRS/ru instructions. On-wiki license declarations work here only for unpublished photos. Ankry (talk) 05:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Вопрос, какого вида должна быть лицензия?. Я проживаю в Донецкой Народной Республике, в данный момент она не признана, поэтому у нас нет какой-либо государственной сертификации фотографий. Shaoron35 (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

In case of Facebook images, the simplest way may be just providing licensing information near the photo. Generally, copyright does not require any official registration or confirmation. Also, as Donieck's PR is not recognized by the US, I do not think that your local law (if any) is relevant here. Only the US law. If the license is e-mailed, its text may by just copy-pasted from the template but it needs to be send from an identifiable email address (what can be a problem in your case). And this is only my private opinion. Somebody else may provide another. Ankry (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear Wiki Commons,

I own the copyrights on this photograph of myself. I regularly use this photo when people, such as Crown House Publishing, ask for a photo for which I am a co-author as the did with “Mirroring Hands”.

Thank you for allowing me to upload this photo into Wiki Commons.

Sincerely, Ernest L. Rossi, Ph.D.

--Ernestlrossi (talk) 17:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Please send a permission by email as explained in COM:OTRS. Per our rules, this is required for content that has been published before without a free licence. De728631 (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 12:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Salve vorrei avere più informazioni riguardo il motivo per cui tutte e tre le foto elencate nell' oggetto (File:Di Ielsi.jpg - Di Ielsi e Team ITA Sitting Volley.jpg - File:Premiazione pallone d'oro.jpg) siano state rimosse in quanto ho pubblicato anche la fonte da cui le avevo prese in quanto erano presenti già su internet. Vi elenco di seguito i link da cui le ho reperite :

File:Di ielsi.jpg -----> https://www.flickr.com/photos/140558088@N02/40398016453/in/album-72157690343915793/

File:Di Ielsi e Team ITA Sitting Volley.jpg -----> https://www.facebook.com/paravolleyeu/photos/a.1123988814422701/1124253767729539/?type=3&theater

File:Premiazione pallone d'oro.jpg -----> http://molise.coni.it/images/molise/CR_Molise/Rassegna_Stampa/2018/APR__Sitting_volley_il_molisano_Emanuele_Di_Ielsi_eletto_miglior_giocatore_delle_qualificazioni_mondiali.pdf

Attendo una vostra cortese risposta, e se nel caso aiutarmi su come pubblicarle senza violare niente. Vi ringrazio

--Emanuele Di Ielsi (talk) 19:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Can you please check this? I can't really read the request, but the Flickr link is "all rights reserved" and so is Facebook. De728631 (talk) 22:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Emanuele Di Ielsi: please read COM:Licenze. Providing a source is not enough; you need also to provide a proof that the photos are freely licensed by photographers. Fair Use images are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 05:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
@Emanuele Di Ielsi: Ciao! In pratica, come è stato detto più sopra, i file caricati vengono da fonti che dicono "Tutti diritti riservati", il che vuol dire che non si possono assolutamente usare senza l'esplicita autorizzazione degli autori. per pubblicarle, devi chiedere agli autori di cambiare la licenza (ad esempio, su Flickr, chiedi di inserire una licenza Creative Commons che permetta le modifiche e l'uso commerciale). Una volta fatto questo, magari scrivimi che recupero i file. --Ruthven (msg) 08:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 12:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I myself took this photo of Woz, and contributed it to Wikipedia. Not exactly sure why it was deleted since it was certainly not a copyright violation. --Aflashinthepan (talk) 22:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

hi this photo originally published as post on instagram : https://www.instagram.com/p/BvcLnlhDuel/ , the photographer is : : https://www.instagram.com/amin.karimi70/ and we got permission from him to publish his photo in our website , instagram and wikipedia : https://www.instagram.com/p/Bv0mfoBBbMo/ Emami676 (talk) 05:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Emami676: Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OTRS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

La imagen File:Alfonso Uribe Misas.jpg es de mi propiedad, la he subido a Wikimedia Commons para compartir en un artículo sobre un abogado, político, diplomático y escritor del que estoy haciendo una pequeña biografía. Agradecería se preste pronta atención a esta solicitud, para poder continuar con mi contribución.

maumana Maumana (talk) 10:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Procedural close. File is not deleted. Discuss the file at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alfonso Uribe Misas.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was uploaded before and deleted because of a suspected copyright issue. I had the owner sent email to wiki and thought that was taken cared of. However, it was not put back so I tried to request undelete again. On Wiki Commons it says the file has been archived and to re-upload the photo. So I uploaded it again, and it is now flagged and deleted, again.

The photo is provided by Hongsheng Culture, which is the owner of the photo. They distributed the photo for free publicity use and is being used by various articles and websites. Original violation notice was because the photo appeared in other sites. I wish we don't have to go back and forth on this, again. Please kindly advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kievew (talk • contribs) 02:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Image was uploaded twice more File:Macau IMTF Award 2018.jpg and File:Wang Leehom Best Actor Award.jpg - both deleted. There is an OTRS ticket Ticket:2019013110001626 pending and image restored and annotated by Arthur Crbz, not sure why it was deleted again. Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
@Kievew: as Arthur is not here for few weeks, I suggest trying to contact him via his talk page or via email, and, if hi does not respond, raise this problem in COM:ON. We can do nothing here without an OTRS agent assistance. Ankry (talk) 16:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done needs to wait for OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

As the deletion log suggests, Túrelio deleted my photos for copyright violation. This poster was made by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery of Japan, placed in the airport to let passerbys pay attention to their luggage. As a license reviewer, of course, I have fully acknowledged the fact that there is no commercial-free FoP in Japan; therefore I proceed to the ministry that made this poster for their copyright statement. The poster could be found on their website here. If you read Japanese, you can see it is stated on the poster that, it was designed by the ministry. --TechyanTalk05:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

The above explanation suggests that {{PD-Japan-exempt}} applies (public notices, instructions, etc.) Another opinion? Ankry (talk) 20:13, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done Ankry (talk) 13:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Also:

Raising this request as this particular image is hosted on http://www.scientificanimations.com/wiki-images/ , including the inset images (Which means both of them are under same license). Let me know in case further description is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manu5 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

I tend to  Support per above. @Ronhjones and Jcb: any comment? Ankry (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Raising this request as the original work was first published at http://www.scientificanimations.com/wiki-images/ under shared common License. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manu5 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

I tend to  Support per above. @Ronhjones and Jcb: any comment? Ankry (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: undeleted, author info changed accoring to the source site and license reviewed. Ankry (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

The photo that was requested to be undeleted has been released by the copyright holder under the CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication.

Thank you for processing this request, and please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

--Orenkramek (talk) 00:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support undeletion: CC0 license at the bottom of this page. Pinging @Patrick Rogel and Gbawden: if they have any doubts here. https://derekbrysonpark.com/ seems to be the initial publication site, but the license appeared there after 11 April. Ankry (talk) 05:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Orenkramek: Please add categories to the file description. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A wrong license was used, but it seems that {{Belgian franc banknote}} applies and that this template is based on this OTRS ticket. See also [6] which says that "the National Bank allows for the electronic reproduction of banknotes in Belgian franc under the same conditions that apply to euro banknotes". The RedBurn (talk) 09:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support per {{Belgian franc banknote}} Ankry (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @The RedBurn: Please add the date. --Yann (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The Creative Commons Licence have been added to the Site in Question: https://irene-mihalic.de/pressefotos/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maik.nrw (talk • contribs) 11:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: License OK. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

Please undelete this image. After a user brought it to light that a link to permission from the owner needed to be added, the link was found and added, with specific notation to the image in question. There was no response upon notifying the user that the image was edited with the proper attribute and today it was deleted. The link for permission is this: D. S. Bradford Photo Permissions. Note the connection to Creative Commons at the bottom, along with the declaration that the images are free to use in the press and Wikipedia properties.

--THBAO (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support CC-BY 4.0 at the bottom of this page. @Patrick Rogel and Yann: any doubts? Ankry (talk) 11:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: License OK. --Yann (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Rita Nakashima Brock

Trying to create a wikipedia page for Rita Nakashima Brock. Known as a national moral injury expert (sited on Wikipedia moral injury page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrison58 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 17 April 2019‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. File is not deleted. Discuss this matter at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brock wikipedia coding DRAFT.pdf. Thuresson (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tirana-opera-2001.jpg

{{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per {{FoP-Albania}}

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have permission by Kimberly Marshall (the owner of the photos), filled out below.

I hereby affirm that I am Kimberly Marshall, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the photos as shown here: [7],[4] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Kimberly Marshall Owner of copyright for photos April 5, 2019

Thank you, Raelizbeth (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Rachel

 Oppose @Raelizbeth: When uploading, you claimed that you are the author. Now, you say that the author is somebody else. Why should we believe you?
For images that are not uploaded by the author personally, we need either a link to free license of this image on the author's web page, or COM:OTRS permission, directly from the author. Ankry (talk) 19:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 04:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have permission by the owner to add these photos to her page below. Thank you.

I hereby affirm that I am Kimberly Marshall, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the photos as shown here: [8],[4] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Kimberly Marshall Owner of copyright for photos April 5, 2019

Thank you, Raelizbeth (talk)Rachel

 Oppose and see the previous section for reasons. Ankry (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 04:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

this file has been deleted despite the owner of the photo, photographer Martin Bubandt, in an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org states that he agrees to publish the image under the free licence Creative Commons Attribution-share Alike 4.0 International. I have personally contacted the photographer who confirms having sent this mail.

I therefore request undeletion please. If this is not possible, please contact me with thorough instructions on how to upload an image that already has a free licence.

Thank you.

Meberg1234 (talk) 19:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Please wait your turn for an OTRS volunteer to process your ticket. Thuresson (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Joey Jones at SEC Media Day

This is a picture of Joey Jones at SEC Media Day. I own the rights to this picture. I work for Mississippi State University with Joey Jones and we have full rights to add this picture. I provide sufficient information when I uploaded the picture on April 3rd. Please undo deletion. Please notify me if there as any more information needed on your end.

--Allentucker11 (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 04/16/19

 Oppose @Allentucker11: Unfortunately, we are unable to verify on-wiki whether you are authorized to take decisions concerning Mississippi State Athletics' property. Please, provide appropriate documents to <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>; see COM:OTRS for more details. Ankry (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OTRS action needed. Ankry (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The book is an American book that does not turn in copyright renewals, hence it's out of copyright in the US, its source nation.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

complete list. Ankry (talk) 06:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done per {{PD-US-notrenewed}}. Ankry (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ho citato la fonte, ed ho approvazione del proprietario del sito a poter utilizzare quell'immagine. Sono anche amministratore del sito.

I mentioned the source, and I have the approval of the site owner to be able to use that image. I am also site administrator.

Simone.a86 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simone.a86 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Simone.a86: Permission "to use" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements. See COM:L for details. And license must originate directly from the image author. Ankry (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

--Simone.a86 (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC) I asked and i have the permission of the author and the owner of the image. Thanks. Simone.a86


 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 06:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

华人用户User:Wcam不知这张照片上传者就是其拍摄者,于是在没有给出任何证据的情况下无端指控这张照片侵权,并提请速删,导致照片被管理员删除。请求恢复这张照片。顺带恢复它的剪辑版本File:A Yunga Musical.jpg

Evidence:

 KeepI think this situation should be decided after discussion instead of directly deleting it.--@舞月書生(Joye Zhang) 👉Talking👈 04:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose The dates are key here.
User:BONBON1989 declared that they are the photographer who has copyright to the photo and wish to publish it under a free license.
We accept such declarations on one condition: the image was never published anywhere prior to upload to Commons.
In this case the condition was not met: this image appeared a week before upload to Commons.
In such cases we need (for legal reasons) a clear evidence that the image was freely licensed on the site where it appeared previously or that there is no doubts that the original image uploader and the Commons uploader are the same person. If neither is possible, COM:OTRS permission from an identified person is the only way to keep the image in Commons.
@Masdggg and 舞月書生: I see no evidence of any of the above in the provided links. But as I cannot read Chinese, correct me if I am wrong. Or ask a Chinese-speaking admin for handling this case. Ankry (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: I translated this Sina Weibo conversation using Huawei mobile phone.[12][13]--@舞月書生(Joye Zhang) 👉Talking👈 07:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
My opinion is that if there is an evidence that this discussion look place after the image was uploaded to Commons, undeletion would be OK. If it was prior to upload here, we need a clear license declaration from the same person there (assuming weibo.cn users are identifiable, what I do not know). But as the image was undeteted by User:Túrelio and the DR started, let the discussion go there. closing. Ankry (talk) 08:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done by Túrelio, DR started. Ankry (talk) 08:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The permission has been sent to commons by email from the adress (Redacted) on 26. März 2019 um 21:45:07 MEZ. Please undelete. Piet Parkiet (talk) 18:22, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

{{Odelay}} Ankry (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
I just looked more carefully at the image: it is a 1920 image, signed by a company (named after the founder, Franz Hanfstaengl, who died in 1877). @Secondarywaltz: Unsure whose permission was requested? {{S}} undeletion. Maybe better source information would be welcome: was it published? when? where? Ankry (talk) 20:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Secondarywaltz: and Ankry The print of Bô Yin Râ by K.J. Böhringer came out between 1920 - 1925, made by Franz Hanfstaengl. In 2005 Bertus ten Doeschot published it for the first time in the book "Ornamenten" with 24 Ornaments by Bô Yin Râ / Joseph Anton Schneiderfranken. Albergen (NL): De Boekenvriend, 2005. It was the first time that this portrait appeared in a book, under copyright, 75-80 Years after its origin. Bertus ten Doeschot gave his ok for Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 by email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Piet Parkiet (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

So as the image is still copyrighted, we must wait until the OTRS ticket is processed or until copyright expire. Ankry (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Bertus ten Doeschot is the publisher and copyright holder. He gave his permission by email to wikipedia.Piet Parkiet (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Then we have to wait until the permission is processed. Please note: processing in the German queue may be faster than in the English one. Ankry (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I do own the picture, it is my portraet. --Thamarama (talk) 08:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

owning a picture isn't authorship of that picture. You weren't the one handling the camera. It's the photographer who owns the copyright to the picture, not the subject. Vera (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

I know, I meant copyright. The photographer removed the copyright info in the file and sent me a knew one with CC-BY-SA. Do you still need an official letter? Can I upload the new file? By the way: I sent a letter to 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org' and did not receive any answer. --Thamarama (talk) 12:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Thamarama: This is a legal problem. As you said above, you are not the author. So claiming that you are the author is violation of author's rights, law, and possibly license terms (CC licenses require that author is attributed, not somebody else). Moreover, unless you have a copyright transfer contract with the author, or free license from them in a written form, you are not allowed to grant or declare free license for the image (your free license declaration is legally void). And we need an evidence that the copyright holder indeed granted a free license in written form. If it is available on the net, you can provide a link to it. Otherwise, the only way is to provide appropriate documents to OTRS. And the copyright holder has to do this personally for legal reasons. Ankry (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I sent the written license form, but I guess it was not the "proper" format. But the copyright holder will as well upload the image on their webpage with license details. After that, I will upload it and I will link to it, if that is ok.--Thamarama (talk) 08:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

@Thamarama: When the image is available under free license on the copyright holder site, do not reupload it: just request undeletion here. Ankry (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please upload Wilfredo A Ruiz Biography be Undeleted. signed Wilfredo A. Ruiz approving it.

WILFREDO AMR RUIZ

In addition to being an attorney, Wilfredo Amr Ruiz is also a Chaplain. Wilfredo is currently the Communications Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations – Florida, the state’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization, having previously served as its civil rights legal counsel for over four years. He is a board member of the Interfaith Workers Justice in Florida. Ruiz has been columnist and blogger for multiple newspapers and electronic media outlets. He regularly engages in public presentations at colleges, universities, theological seminaries and schools; as well as professional, governmental, and civic institutions on a variety of topics involving protection of civil liberties, religion, legal, and foreign policy. He has been interviewed and quoted on hundreds of instances by local, national and international media outlets on diverse issues on civil rights, politics of the Middle East and the Muslim World, Islam, and Christian-Muslim relations. Among the outlets Ruiz has been featured on are: CNN & CNN en Español, Time, New York Times, Washington Post, Miami Herald & Nuevo Herald, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, ABC News, CBS News, Financial Times, NPR, Newsmax, Telemundo, Univision, Voice of America & Voz De América, CBC (Canada), BBC (UK), Reuters (UK), The Independent (UK), The Guardian (UK), Anadolu (Turkey), Al Jazeera (Qatar), Alhurra TV, Radio France International, France 24, El País (Spain), O Globo (Brasil, Clarín (Argentina), RT & RT en Español, Sputnik (Russia), Press TV (Iran), Hispan TV (Iran), CCTV (China), NTN24, Noticias Caracol (Colombia); as well as multiple local media outlets throughout United States, Latin America and Puerto Rico. Ruiz obtained his BA and JD degrees from the University of Puerto Rico and formalized graduate studies in religion at the Hartford Seminary in Connecticut where he was admitted to the master’s degree program in Islam and Christian-Muslim relations. During 1993-97 Ruiz served as an officer for the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General's Corps where he acted as a Defense and Legal Assistance Counsel. Along with his honorable discharge, he was awarded the Navy Achievement Medal in 1997. In 2005 Ruiz re-joined the Navy as a Naval Officer in the U.S. Navy Chaplain Candidate Officers Corps. From 2010 Ruiz has been working in different capacities for the CAIR-Florida. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wruizlaw (talk • contribs) 16:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Wruizlaw: Which image you wish to undelete? Ankry (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

--Wruizlaw (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Selfpublished pdf. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wilfredo Amr Ruiz - Biography.pdf. Thuresson (talk) 06:59, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Farhat Ishtiaq Novels.jpg I'm the editor of Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/FarhatIshtiaqWriter . And I have a right of this Image.--Zindagi713 (talk) 07:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

And we need a proof of that and CC-BY-SA license requires information who is the photographer. Ankry (talk) 11:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have personally contacted Rafay for His Picture.I have permission of him.

So i request for undeletion of this Image. --Zindagi713 (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose it is not selfie. We need a free license from the photographer or evidence of copyright transfer contract. Ankry (talk) 11:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have express permission from the owner of this image to use it and upload it for commons use.

--Niepce2018 (talk) 10:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Who the photographer is? Ankry (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
We need a permission for any use, anywhere and by anybody. Permission for Commons only does not fit our license requirements. Ankry (talk) 12:39, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Photographer was me. Can be used at any time by anyone. I am unsure how to prove I have the authority for this image. Niepce2018 (talk) 13:28, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
If the photo was published on the same Twitter account with free license information and attribution to you, it would be OK, IMO.
Otherwise, I think, following COM:OTRS procedure is the only (and very slow) way. Ankry (talk) 14:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi I hereby affirm that I, Jerome Giuseppe Lam, am the creator of the exclusive copyright of Jolene Marie.jpg I am the one who's taking the picture with Samsung Galaxy phone, when in Syijuku Gyoen Park in Tokyo - Japan at 2.00 PM (Japan Time Zone) 1 December 2018. But this picture was already posted on Jolene Marie official Instagram post (https://www.instagram.com/p/Bq88_aSn_N5/) the difference beetween my wikipedia file and her Instagram post is different. I am the copyright holder of this picture, so that is why the picture that I was posted here in wikipedia commons are more HD/higher resolution than her Instagram post. You should not deleted this picture since I was the own copyright holder of this picture! But I was allowed other users for free publicity use and being used for her own Instagram post. Jerome Giuseppe Lam (talk) 12:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jerome Giuseppe Lam: Our rules require, that permissions for already published images come from the initial publication site or from identifiable person. We cannot and may not verify your identity on-wiki, so the only way is to contact <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> But the queue there is long. See COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I was already sended to contact <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> but it takes 199 days... But I have another picture that was taken by me, and not yet published on any article or social media, so can I upload it on Wikipedia under my own work, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International?? please answer me.. Thanks before..

  • @Jerome Giuseppe Lam: Please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~)
  • non-English queues may be shorter, if you can use any of them
  • yes, if the image was never published and contains EXIF info from camera, you can; lack of EXIF data or low resolution may also be considered a copyright doubt.
Ankry (talk) 14:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Добрый день, я бы хотел оспорить все заблокированные вами фотографии.Дело в том что они все наши, все они были сделаны для нашего сайта НУК,но год назад мы его полностью поменяли и информации с фотографиями тоже,но именно он был тем самым источником откуда другие Николаевские сайты брали фотографии для своих статей.Прошу вернуть все фотографии которые вы изъяли — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iryna swer (talk • contribs) 13:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

@Iryna swer: who are "we"? Are you the photographer who made the photos?
For photos that were alrready published elsewhere prior to upload to Commons, we need either (1) free license declaration at the initial publication site, or (2) free license permission sent to OTRS following COM:OTRS/ru instructions from a trackable copyright holder's email address. If the first is not possible, there is only the OTRS way. Ankry (talk) 13:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Requesting undeletion of SMILF PREMIER.jpg Copyright holder Eric Charbonneau (photographer) has directly emailed Wikipedia commons the provided permissions template for release of rights for use on Bodega Bamz Wikipedia page (person in the image). --Tanboys100 (talk) 19:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 04:46, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019030710009394 regarding File:Ines-Silva.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prefektura e qarkut Kukes.JPG

Looks like {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done De728631 (talk) 20:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS permission has been arrived (ticket:2019041710008731), please restore and rename the file. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done @Bencemac: please note that license info is missing. The image will be speedy deleted if not fixed quickly. Ankry (talk) 08:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the author of the photocopy, the photo belongs to the family — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreypl (talk • contribs) 06:50, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Please sign your messages with four tildes.
@Andreypl: Who is/was the photographer who made the original photo and when/where it was published the first time? Note, that according to US copyright law, which we have to respect in Wikimedia, unpublished photos made by unknown photographers are copyrighted 120 years since craetion. In most cases, it is irrelevant for copyright who owns the negative and/or who made the photocopy. Ankry (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 17:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is the latest company logo of AIA, according to the company website: http://www.aia.com/en/index.html

 Oppose "Copyright © 2018, AIA Group Limited and its subsidiaries. All rights reserved." is not a free license declaration. See COM:L for details. Ankry (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File name: Aerodrome-gorelovo1.webm

I have provided the link and mentioned the author. That's the only requirements from the author itself (tv news agency - https://topspb.tv/). You can contact them and ask about re-posting of their content. They will tell you it is totally fine if you provide a link to original page (you don't need a license or whatever you're trying to get from me).

--I1772102 (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@I1772102: But to keep the image here you must also provide a valid license with a link to location where it was declared. You failed to do so. Read COM:L for list of valid licenses. Ankry (talk) 08:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done no evidence of free license. Ankry (talk) 17:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

  • URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support undeletion per above. Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
  • @Mutter Erde: the quoted sentence is not a Wikimedia Commons rule, but a mental shortcut used by an admin to point out that files suspected of URAA protection should not be deleted without careful investigation of their copyright status and if any doubt, we should not apply COM:PCP for URAA-related protection. URAA is a part of US Copyright law, and our rules require that files must be free in US (the only exempt from the rule that I know is FoP). There was no community consensus to keep URAA-protected files here until DMCA is received. So my question is: can you provide any reason why you doubt that this file is URAA-protected? (Then we may need to undelete the file and investigate its copyright status further.) I  Oppose undeletion id no such doubts and no community consensus to keep such files. Ankry (talk) 13:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
    • Why do you accept brandnew FoP but not old PD stuff from Europe and many more countries ? Btw. I doubt your statement. There are only a few admins who don't want to keep such files (especially in this funny case. See the deletion request). Mutter Erde (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
      • This question is OT here, rules are established by the community and WMF. Ask them. COM:VPC should be the right place. And please note: other admins may have different opinion here; if they wish to handle this case, they are welcome. And concerning the DR: I see two admin comments there: the DR nominator and the deleting admin; the keep-supporting users were not admins. Ankry (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Mutter Erde. --Yann (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This my photo of my grandftaher, I have done myself the photocopy

 Oppose As per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Andreypl. Thuresson (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@Andreypl: Hi,
Doing the photocopy doesn't give you the copyright, which rests with the photographer, and then her/his heirs. Unless your grandpather is notable, or the image shows some special customs or event, this might not be in scope here. Then when and where was it published? This is very poor quality, so you should rather scan it properly if other issues are resolved. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 08:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I created this file, please reupload it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousboii (talk • contribs) 15:56, 19 April 2019‎ (UTC)

  1. Please sign your messages.
  2. Logos being own work are out of scope; for copyrighted logos COM:OTRS permission is necessary. Ankry (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 Not done per Ankry. Thuresson (talk) 17:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Public Domain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousboii (talk • contribs) 16:00, 19 April 2019‎ (UTC)

  1. please sign your messages
  2. CC0 is not PD. For PD status exact legal reason + evidence is needed. As well as for CC0 license. Ankry (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 Not done Fair use from en:File:Mumabai Police Logo.png. Thuresson (talk) 17:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100110005208 regarding

Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: Please add the relevant OTRS tag to the files. Ruthven (msg) 19:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The OTRS request has been sent by the photo right owner. Please proceed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JazzMusicien (talk • contribs) 18:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: alreday done. Ruthven (msg) 19:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The deleted file is the cover of a book published in 1971, photographed by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 13:47, 19 April 2019 (talk • contribs) Ivokory (UTC)

Please sign your messages
 Oppose So it is copyrighted in US till 2066. COM:OTRS permission from the cover image copyright owner is needed. Ankry (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. Ruthven (msg) 20:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Sorry I don't see the copyright/author but please don't change it because the picture of the train must be in front.

Can you back Up the photo and i will edit please


 Not done: The file was marked for speedy deletion, but I put in "No permission since" hoping for an eventual permission statement to COM:OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 20:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Have added good quality pictures of the city Okha and Machhalisahar. Aesthetics has a role in education especially wrt cities associated with tourism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amiwins (talk • contribs)


 Not done: No idea what this is about. No deleted images on this account. Not even a deletion tag on any of their uploads. Please refile with more information on what you are talking about. --Majora (talk) 02:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019030510002162.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019030510002162.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019030510002162.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019030510002162.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019030510002162.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Scumbag Poster Oct2018.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100310007033 regarding File:Scumbag Poster Oct2018.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Joemon Joshy Latest Picture of 2019 @ Charutha Program

The above mentioned statement is OK as deletion reason as it does not grant any free license and applies to the deleted photo, I think. The newly uploaded photo by another user may be OK as {{Own}} so is there anything to do here? Ankry (talk) 08:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to do here. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my work that I have raised twice and have been classified as cheats! this is never true and can not be found anywhere.. thank you --Rayanx93 (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Comment OTRS agent (verify): Ticket:2019042110001783 it's related to this file. Even when the user send permission, the file it's a derivated work consisting in a puzzle of copyrighted files. We need permission from the original sources, and we've got not yet. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted yet, and as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Skyler Howard Obic.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018093010001357 regarding File:Skyler Howard Obic.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018093010002749 regarding File:Дмитрий Олегович Рогозин.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:25, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100110006001 regarding File:DJ_Irwan_profiel.jpg and File:IrwanYC.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Stefanowski

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100410000074 regarding File:BobStefanowski2018.png and Ticket:2018100410000083 regarding File:Stefanowski.png. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Please @Yann: : Note that there is two files about the same subject in this request. Thanks a lot. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Artist died in 1944, public domain in Brazil since 2015. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. @Abzeronow: Could you please check and fix the source? What about other files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TOBELO? --Yann (talk) 16:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS permission has been arrived (ticket:2019020510010155), please restore the file. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Bencemac: , please confirm and update the tags. --Majora (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, could restore the images. The picture is taken from the site, with a free license. On the site kavalyer.com license CC-BY-SA 3.0-Kravchenko V (talk) 10:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

While there is a CC-BY-SA license declaration on the bottom, I would also like to know opinion of the deleting admin (@Christian Ferrer: ) especially, as the license declaration was also there two days earlier when this screenshot was not there. I would also note, that this screenshot is from this non-free video (8:35) with watermark removed for some reason. Lack of proper attribution also raises my doubts in this context. Ankry (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks you Ankry. I am confused and puzzled, I remember to have deleted this image, that was tagged by User:Patrick Rogel who also have obvioulsy seen the sentence "Все права защищены © Общественная организация "Кавальер", furthermore I usually check the source in order to verify the rationale. Note that I have also deleted a cropped version of the above image from that web page. Firstly sorry to have missed the compatible license, but I wonder how we have missed that, both Patrick and me, maybe a cache issue... I don't know.... but anyway the fact are here, there is indeed a compatible license, and the Wayback machine don't lie, so sorry. That being said, I  Oppose the undeletion of the both images, one have been previoulsy published on Utube without a free license, well catched by Ankry, and the other don't have any EXIFs, I don't see any reason to think that one is license laundering and not the other. See another example with a film poster. I do not think we can blindly import images from this website. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
  • @Christian Ferrer: , @Ankry: The chief editor of the channel where the video was published is the head of the organization that owns the site (kavalyer.com). I asked him if he could publish the content of the site under a Creative Commons license, as this would make it easier for me to work in Wikipedia. He agreed. He added a license to the video description.--Kravchenko V (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Ok I restored the file that come from the video. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: A free license have been added at the former source. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello This file has been created by Cécile Pozzo di Borgo herself. There is no copywrite whatsoever on this file. Please undelete Cecile Pozzo di Borgo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cecile pozzo di borgo (talk • contribs) 11:03, 19 April 2019‎ (UTC)

Two different users claim to be the photographer: COM:OTRS permission is needed to resolve this. Ankry (talk) 17:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 Not done per Ankry. Thuresson (talk) 21:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

THis pic is uploaded by the Sudigali Sudheer in his verified Instagram account and do not violate copyrights violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1995rms (talk • contribs) 05:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Procedural close, double entry of open request. Thuresson (talk) 14:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion requests for João Justiceiro files

Solicito o restauro dos seguintes arquivos, inadvertidamente deletados pelo usuário Jcb (talk · contribs) sob alegação de violação de direitos autorais:

São fotografias de minha autoria. As cinco últimas são colaborações de amigos que cederam a mim suas fotografias sem restrições de licença e inicialmente foram publicadas no Imgur.

São desenhos vetoriais de minha autoria baseados em obras de mais de 20 anos que não estão registradas em propriedade industrial. O penúltimo é feito a partir deste ficheiro do Commons, e o último é uma forma textual simples que não pode ser enquadrada em copyright.

São mapas de minha autoria baseados em trabalhos já existentes no Commons. O último é um mapa retirado da web com a devida referência.

São bandeiras e brasões que estão em domínio público pelas leis nº 9610/1998, art. 115 e nº 9610/1998, art. 8.

São formas geométricas ou textuais simples sujeitas a copyright, mas que foram identificadas como tal. Os ficheiros da Jovem Pan FM inclusive possuem outras versões em .svg disponíveis aqui no Commons.

Creio que dei uma explicação plausível sobre todos os arquivos, mas se ainda houver dúvidas, estou disponível para contato. Só quero que desfaçam esse engano absurdo, ou se possível restaurem temporariamente pra que eu possa passa-los para outra plataforma, pois eu não possuo mais os originais da maioria destes arquivos. João Justiceiro (talk) 21:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose - I checked several files which were all copyright violations. E.g. non free logos and File:Antiga UMJ da TV Itapoan (1981).png, which was taken from this non free video. Jcb (talk) 22:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Eu já havia sido avisado a respeito do referido arquivo e pretendia repor em outra plataforma. Mas o restante dos arquivos não pode ser enquadrado como violação de direitos autorais, sobretudo o que eu mesmo fotografei e postei aqui. O mesmo se aplica aos mapas derivados de outros mapas, os desenhos vetoriais e as formas geométricas e textuais simples. João Justiceiro (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 Info I think this should be split to separate requests per undeletion rationale. Eg. as some logos are IMO PD-textlogo, wile the maps are not PD-textlogo. Also as some maps clearly refer to PD maps as sources (and the deleting admin did not explain why he doubts that), others have external sources. Also, I cannot find anything about PD status of COA in the above mentioned legal references. Such cases should be discussed in COM:VPC first and if there are indeed exceptions in the law here, they need to be expressed in appropriate copyright templates, prior to coming here. Ankry (talk) 06:05, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: Sobre os brasões e bandeiras, está escrito desta forma: "Art. 8º Não são objeto de proteção como direitos autorais de que trata esta Lei: [...] IV - os textos de tratados ou convenções, leis, decretos, regulamentos, decisões judiciais e demais atos oficiais;". Os símbolos oficiais (brasões e bandeiras) são definidos por lei, e as leis são domínio público no Brasil. Há uma citação no Wikiquote que esclarece melhor. Sobre o registro de marcas, isto é, propriedade industrial, pode ser utilizado o site do INPI para consulta. João Justiceiro (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Individual depictions of CoAs have their own copyright. It's only the description that would be free under this rationale. Jcb (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Bom, essa não é uma representação individual minha, e mesmo que fosse, a lei também permitiria isso. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Senhores, por favor, alguém poderia dar uma solução pra essa questão aqui? Ao menos as imagens que eu fotografei deveriam necessariamente ser repostas, é mais do que óbvio. É um absurdo que ninguém preste atenção nisso. João Justiceiro (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done As noted above, multiple files with various deletion rationale cannot be handled in a single request. Especially as some are clearly not free. Ankry (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why the logo of organization is deleted?

Kkpk091811 (talk)

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kkpk091811. You were notified about this deletion discussion at your user talk page. Wikimedia Commons has a certain scope of content that is collected here. A basic requirement for uploads here is that the file is educationally useful, but your uploads were considered out our project scope. E.g. this would include the logo of a non-notable company. De728631 (talk) 20:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


File:Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc Logo.jpg

That is the logo of non profit organization base in Pampanga Philippines. You can visit the website www.kapampangankupagmaragulkuintl.com

Kkpk091811 (talk)

  •  Oppose And why it should the logo be at Commons? Is there any Wikipedia article about this organisation, or is it otherwise so relevant that the logo itself could be used as an educational image? Commons does not collect any kind of logo that exists. De728631 (talk) 20:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 16:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Twins & Axes From 'The Shining ~ Clarification of Deletion Requested

Hello,

You sent me a message saying my photo -- Twins & Axes From 'The Shining' -- was deleted due to copyright restrictions. I do apologize if that was the case. Just to clarify, that photo was of a small part of a temporary exhibit at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art from November 1st, 2012 to June 30, 2013. It is not a permanent exhibit.

https://www.lacma.org/art/exhibition/stanley-kubrick

So as to not make this mistake again, is everything in a museum prohibited from not-for-profit dissemination (not for financial gain)? When I attend museum exhibits, it's very clear whether photographs are allowed or not. If photographs are allowed, isn't that the equivalent of granting a kind of license to disseminate the photographs, as long as they were not being used for financial gain? One can only imagine how many photos of museum exhibits are shared throughout social media. Can the exhibitors who permitted photography prohibit the sharing of such photos?

I'd appreciate a clarification, as it seems to me that if a museum, or those private parties who present an exhibition, do not want images of their exhibits disseminated, then they would simply ban photographing the exhibit, as is often the case.

Thanks for your time,

~ Russ Loar

4-19-2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ Allison Loar (talk • contribs) 20:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

@Russ Allison Loar: : non commercial use is a not acceptable restriction for Wikimedia Commons. Everything here must be free for any use, including commercial. See COM:L. Ankry (talk) 08:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I believe this image has been deleted unfairly as I credited the source and creator clearly — Preceding unsigned comment added by KonanTheBarbarian (talk • contribs) 19:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Why do you believe that a German online clothing store owns the copyright to the coat of arms of a town in Ireland? Thuresson (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose OP do not respond to a reasonable question. Thuresson (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above and as no copyright-related information provided. Ankry (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Patrick J. Kennedy 2016.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018051810008916 regarding File:Patrick J. Kennedy 2016.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Inside PanamCity.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100510004998 regarding File:Inside PanamCity.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LekëDukagjini.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100710002165 regarding File:LekëDukagjini.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Various University of Tirana files

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

{{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 23:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per {{FoP-Albania}}. Ankry (talk) 17:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RobertDonley2018.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019011210004623 regarding File:RobertDonley2018.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Odafe Atogun 2

Should be undeleted, this file was approved on December 7th 2017 by Wikimedia specialist James G Howes. I had explicit permission by the photographer to upload the picture and it should not have been removed. Permission to undelete being requested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerinthesmoke (talk • contribs) 11:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Comment File:OdafeAtogun2.jpg. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done not deleted. Ankry (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DNR 2018.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018101510005772 regarding File:DNR 2018.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Corrush Elementary School.JPG

Appears to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per {{FoP-Albania}}. Ankry (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jean-Marc-Germain business.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018101710004546 regarding File:Jean-Marc-Germain business.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dere Otubu.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018102210007042 regarding File:Dere Otubu.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MK crop.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018102210008489 regarding File:MK crop.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 17:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:ALB 20070713 img 1204.jpg

Appears to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per {{FoP-Albania}}. Ankry (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I consider this as a wrong application of COM:PRP, as I don't see at which point we need to apply any precaution. It is very difficult to prove it five years later, but overall the situation is the following:

  • This is a screenshot from UTR News video. UTR was a government-own TV channel that does not exist anymore. As such, this channel was specialising in coverage of all official events in Ukraine, and there is no need to apply any precautions: the channel was clearly genuinely interested in covering this event.
  • The video was published by the official YouTube channel of this TV channel. Here is a snapshot of UTR official website as of February 2014. You can notice several embedded YouTube videos, all dead as of now. All these videos were pointing to the same YouTube channel. For example, you can check the video Неділя, 9 лютого, 19:30. Україна дипломатична. which is found in this Google cache of the YouTube mirror of the same YouTube channel. There is no need for precautions here either: UTR indeed published all these videos on their own channel under a free license.
  • This video was the channel's own production: they had own coverage in Crimea (for instance, File:February 2014 Simferopol Pro-Ukrainian Manifestation.jpg or File:Aleksei Chalyi.jpg are a part of that coverage). There is no evidence that this particular video was not made by UTR's journalists: see, for example, this Human Rights Watch report stating that Ukrainian journalists were still working in Crimea at that time.
  • While the channel UTR NEWS has been terminated because we've received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material that the user posted, this screenshot is not a part of any third-party material. The channel did use third-party materials labelling them as video from the Internet, but I checked all videos before uploading and this one was not a part of them.

I think that deleting this video is not a reasonable precaution: we had a legitimate material released under a free license by a legitimate copyright holder, it is harder to prove five years later but that should not be a reason for deletion — NickK (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

@NickK: Do you suggest reopening the DR? I t does not seem to me that there is anything new in the above request that was not said there. And this case shows why it is a bad idea to review own uploads. Ankry (talk) 07:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: I don't know what is the procedure. I was already told that reviewing own uploads is bad, but that was five years ago, and when I got the reviewing rights years ago self-reviewing was still normal. Is self-reviewing the only problem? If yes, there are many files from UTR News channel that were reviewed by other users. I can look for and give examples here if needed — NickK (talk) 09:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above: no longer possible to verify license by an uninvolved user. Ankry (talk) 18:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deletion discussion was closed prematurely. The photo was deleted for having "no online source and permission" even though that was demonstrably false. It was sourced to Terry Davis, who released the image into the public domain through his website templeos.org. Such was stated on the file's page. Curiously, several other photos by Davis were closed as "keep" at the same time...--Ilovetopaint (talk) 14:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ilovetopaint: We need an exact link to a page displaying this photo & its license to go on. I am afraid nobody will dig through domain guessing what did you mean. Ankry (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 18:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The logo of Yandex, File:Yandex logo en.svg, falls under Template:PD-text-logo. The image of Notre Dame Cathedral embedded in the logo is public domain in France and other countries (100+ years). As such, the file doesn't meet criterion F1 stated in the deletion summary. Brandmeister (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@Brandmeister: A link to the PD image please proving its PD status. Ankry (talk) 17:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The architecture of Notre Dame is in the public domain. But a recent logo depicting Notre Dame might not be. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: The Notre Dame image in the logo is a generic silhoutte-like outline of the cathedral, not someone's else image. As such it would be Template:PD-France per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Consolidated_list_Western_Europe#France, I believe. Brandmeister (talk) 18:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
There are many ways to make "generic" silhouette-like outlines of the cathedral. These might be close to the threshold of originality, but it's hard to say they're beneath it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per COM:PCP and above discussion. Ankry (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Guanaco deleted this file some months ago, but it was already kept due to this deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png. So could please anyone restore this file? Chaddy (talk) 13:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Why do Wikimedia need a PNG version when there is already File:FC Bayern München logo (2017).svg? Thuresson (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

There are no violation of copyrights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1995rms (talk • contribs) 11:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Not crediting the photographer is normally a copyright violation. The source is instagram.com and do not have a free license. Thuresson (talk) 21:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 04:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

 Oppose Hola administradores: El candidato Ricardo Lombana en su página web tiene fotografías colgadas para uso libre en obras derivadas que se pueden colgar en redes sociales y páginas webs y material publicitario físico, en virtud de eso, he descargado una fotografía y la he colocado en Wikipedia para ilustrar su artículo, por lo que considero que debe mantenerse el archivo. --AnelGTR (talk) 06:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 Not done procedural close: image not deleted. You can convert it to a Deletion Request and discuss deletion reasons there. But, AFAICS, this is a third party photo and an evidence of free license at the source site was not provided in the Permission field, as required in such cases. Ankry (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FierMoschee.JPG

Appears to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Solicitud de reincorporación de imagen

Solicito que se reimplante la imagen del la página de Saúl Méndez, debido a que esa foto es de mi autoría


 Not done: No file name provided. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I own this image and uploaded them on the website mentioned. Bayhaus (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose For images published elsewhere prior to upload here we cannot rely on uploader's declaration. We need an evidence of free license, which "Copyright © 2018 POVO | All rights reserved" is not. Ankry (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo TR-Azul.png: This file was made by my robotics team. Not sure why it is a copyright violation. It is our own original work.

This file was made by my robotics team. Not sure why it is a copyright violation. It is our own original work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaedo (talk • contribs) 18:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

  1. Who is "we"? Wikimedia accounts are personal. Are you personally the author and copyright holder? If not, your license and ownership declaration was a copyright violation
  2. For logos already used in public space we need an evidence of free license permission (public or emailed to OTRS)
  3. Why the logo is in scope? Is there a relevant Wikipedia artiicle?
Ankry (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my logo for my company ubale skateboard company I made it it is not copywriten in any way. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2604:3D08:7780:1250:DD24:B262:36E9:183F (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose too complex; copyrighted. also doubt whether it is in COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is the logo from Artorias Boxing a well known Boxing analyst organization that re-score fights. This is not copyright infringement: https://www.youtube.com/ArtoriasBoxing Please give me the reasons why you're flagging this content as copyrighted when I'm the one who designed the logo. I can provide proof of my workflow with screenshots and videos on my personal video portfolio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artorias Boxing (talk • contribs) 22:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose First, granting a free license for the logo by somebody who is not the exclusive copyright holder for of logo is copyright violation. And we have no evidence that the logo copyright is personal ownership of User:Artorias Boxing.
  • Second, if there is no Wikipedia article or similar location in Wikimedia where the logo should be used, then it is out of scope.
  • And third, usernames identical to a name of an organization are considered advertising and forbidden. Ankry (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


File:Ek Aasha Poster.jpg is marked as a possible copyright violation. I am creating a page for my movie and for that reason I uploaded this movie poster to use it in infobox section. Image that I uploaded is from ek-aasha.com website and this site and images on the site is owned by me. I have Modified my website with CC licence information www.ek-aasha.com at the bottom of the page below Contact section. Please review my request and undelete this file --Ek Aasha (film) (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: verified as indicated in request. --Royalbroil 02:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

We are the propietaries of the picture

We are who take the picture and we are de political party who published it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javierpintado (talk • contribs) 14:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Likely about File:Aguado 2018.jpg. Ankry (talk) 17:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
  1. Who are "we"? operating a Wikimedia account by more than a single person is forbidden. Also, there are strict rules in ToU considering sponsored editions.
  2. You provided no copyright template and no evidence of free license.
  3. PDM declared on Flickr alone is not considered a valid evidence of required copyright freedom. An evidence is needed that the photo exclusive copyright owner (who im most cases is the photographer) indeed wants it to be PD and that local law considers such declaration legally valid. Or we need a free license.
Ankry (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Добрый день, у меня на странице в википедии (https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%83%D0%BD%D1%96%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%96%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%96_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BC%D1%96%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0)пропали фотографии авторами которых являемся мы (персонал университета). Вот перечень тех файлов которые убрали с страницы википедии File:Меморандум в НУК.jpg , File:Posvyata.jpg, File:Trushliakov nagoroda.jpg, File:Михайло Миколайович Александров.jpg, File:Романовський Георгій Федорович2.jpg,File:Романовський Георгій Федорович.jpg я прошу их всех вернуть или связаться со мною и сказать как именно мы можем доказать вам что это наши фотографии вот мой емейл (iryna.tkachuk@nuos.edu.ua). --Iryna swer (talk) 11:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

@Iryna swer: We accept on-wiki license declaration only for photos that were not published elsewhere prior to upload here. For any other photo we need either (1) a clear Commons-compatible free license declaration on the initial publication site, or (2) a written permission from the photo copyright owner emailed to us following COM:OTRS/ru instructions. I see no free license for this photo on https://news.pn/ru/messages/207778 Ankry (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


✓ Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:SheshI "Nena Tereza.jpg

Seems to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

La fotografía es del Arquitecto Jorge Di Paula, que es el padre de mi mujer y que falleció el pasado 1 de abril. Al tratarse de una persona relevante en la comunidad queremos publicar su biografía en Wikipedia con una foto. La utilizada pertenece al album familiar, por lo que no tiene ningún problema de permisos. Cuando indican que el propietario de la foto es "Vale, Marti y Cris" supongo se refieren a Valeria (mi mujer e hija de Jorge Di Paula), Martina (mi hija y nieta de Jorge) y Cristobal (yo)

Al ser parte de mi familia tengo docenas de fotos de Jorge Di Paula que puedo usar alternativamente para la biografía, pero no entiendo la razón por la que no puedo usar la propuesta

Quedo a la espera de sus aclaraciones

Atentamente,

Cristóbal López Espinosa --Cristobal Lopez Espinosa (talk) 20:01, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Info from EXIF (same photo):
  1. File:Foto Jorge Di Paula.jpg: Creator VALE MARTIS Y CRIS
  2. File:Jorge Di Paula.jpg: Creator CRISTOBAL LOPEZ ESPINOSA
 Oppose until this discrepancy is resolved. Ankry (talk) 18:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Jorge Di Paula.jpg

This a familiar photo of the father of my wife (Valeria). The owner is "VALE MARTIS Y CRIS" because my PC has this name (VALEria_My wife_, MARTIna _ My daughter and CRIStóbal _me). I have houndred of photos of Jorge Di Paula, but everyone will have the same problem if I upload it from my PC and I have no other way to do it. Please don´t delete the photo or tell me how can I upload it without problems

--Cristobal Lopez Espinosa (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

@Cristobal Lopez Espinosa: what camera were the photos made with? Ankry (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done No response; I think we need further explanation about the EXIF here. Ankry (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please reference Ticket#2019032210007911. This image was included in the declaration of consent and accidentally deleted.

--Ianwikramanayake (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ianwikramanayake: OTRS is operated by volunteers and there is a long queue there; in the English queue 205 days at the moment. See COM:OTRS for details. If your image needs an OTRS permission, you have to be patient. Providing a free license information at the image initial publication site is sometimes a faster alternative. Ankry (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done waiting for an OTRS agent action. Ankry (talk) 06:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Its a photo of myself and my fellow mates Metalman5e (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Ankry (talk) 14:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 07:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I've e-mailed the state government and they said it was not copyrighted. I have attached the e-mail here. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 14:16, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose The "private individuals" argument has been countered before, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seal of Minnesota.svg. Also, Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-MNGov (2nd nomination) may be of interest. Thuresson (talk) 15:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 07:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is not copyright violation because facebook is a free source of pictures — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musl 23x (talk • contribs) 17:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose unless you point out CC-BY-SA 4.0 license declaration for this picture on Faceboook. Ankry (talk) 17:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. Do not upload files from Facebook. If you are the photographer, please upload the original unmodified file. --Yann (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

La foto es mía yo la subí a Facebook y de ahí la tomé para agregarla aquí Davo Ortiz (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose @Davo Ortiz: Do not upload files from Facebook. If you are the photographer, please upload the original unmodified file. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Lott-Sylvester Stallone-Tommy Morrison.jpg this image was deleted for being copyrighted. This is (apparently - I wasn't involved in the original discussion) the second image at https://boxinghalloffame.com/steve-lott-coo-boxing-hall-of-fame-las-vegas/ At the bottom of that page, it says "These photos are is distributed under the license of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0". I appealed the deletion with the deleting admin, and they say that isn't enough.

However, in general, we don't ask for more for that especially for historical photographs posted on the web by a museum or other historical archive, in this case, a hall of fame. We don't demand that the museum to find out who the original photographer is, track them down, find out whether they are still alive, find out their next of kin, track them down, and get them to email OTRS. That seems to be far more than we do in almost all cases. We generally take the museum's word for it. --GRuban (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support per above, but asking @Patrick Rogel and Ymblanter: why did you think that the declaration:
Photos © 2018 Steve Lott

These photos are is distributed under the license of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0
at the bottom of the above mentioned page and referred in the DR was not OK? Ankry (talk) 17:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
To be honest, I do not remember, this was two months ago. May be it was not on the site at the time.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Oh, now I know. I doubt Steve Lott has copyright for all these photos, they seem to be very different and from very different periods.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Don't remember too. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I still  Support undeletion as I do not think Ymblanter's doubts to be reasonable enough to apply PCP, but another opinion is welcome. Ankry (talk) 06:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 05:05, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion requests for João Justiceiro files

Uma vez que o pedido anterior foi rejeitado, vou estabelecer como prioridade a reposição dos arquivos abaixo discriminados, que são fotos de minha autoria. As cinco últimas são colaborações de amigos que cederam a mim suas fotografias sem restrições de licença e inicialmente foram publicadas no Imgur.

João Justiceiro (talk) 02:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose here. If I understand Google translation correctly, the user words seem to suggest that they try to grant a license on behalf of a third party. That is legally void, unless a proper power of attorney is provided. This is a legal aspect, not a goodwill aspect. As I think, that we have communication problems here, I would ask @Dantadd, DarwIn, Érico, Teles, Mike Peel, and Benoît Prieur: Portuguese speaking admins for help. (And note: the user was asked in an earlier massive request not to mix various rationale in a request) Ankry (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@João Justiceiro: os ficheiros que são de sua autoria devem ser separados dos outros. Esses podem ser restaurados, desde que não haja dúvida sobre essa autoria. Todos os outros têm de ser tratados via COM:OTRS (com comunicação directa dos seus legítimos autores).
@Ankry: You understood right.  Oppose as it is. Eventually what is provenly own work can be restored, but those should first be separated from the rest of the set.-- Darwin Ahoy! 13:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
@DarwIn: Primeiramente, esse pedido já é uma separação de outro que havia sido recusado e foi linkado acima pelo Ankry, onde todas as minhas contribuições foram absurdamente deletadas por Jcb com base numa conclusão sobre um ficheiro (esse sim com problemas de direitos autorais, tanto que eu reconheço). Agora voltando pra cá, eu não possuo mais contato com as pessoas que colaboraram com as últimas 5 imagens. Elas foram cedidas há anos e o OTRS neste caso torna-se impossível. Se for o caso de apaga-las definitivamente, nós podemos — infelizmente — deixar assim, mas o restante é sim de minha autoria. João Justiceiro (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
You cannot grant a license on behalf of a third party unless you have a legal contract to do so (and provide it to our OTRS via email). Copyright-related actions require a written form to be valid. Also, blaming admins who do exactly what our rules require in such cases will not help you here. As DarwIn noted, if you separate your photos from others' in a clear way, they may be undeleted. Maybe just <del>...</del> the others? Ankry (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 05:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, my name is Vladimir. I am an assistant of Arman Davletyarov. At his request, I change the information on his personal page (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%90%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%98%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87) under the Assist937 account. Previously, at the request of my manager, I changed his personal information as it was not reliable and I also replaced the old photo with a new one. But, the system, or perhaps your bot has blocked this photo and referred to the fact that I am violating copyright (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%90%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD.jpg) Please tell me how can I return this photo in order not to violate copyrights? What should be done? I myself work on the Muz-TV channel and received this photo from our press service. We work at events at the photographers who work under the contract and after all the events they pass all the photos with copyright to our press service. I even found the author of this photo (https://vk.com/palshkov) Nikita Palshkov. He is in touch with us and is ready, if necessary, to sign all the necessary documents and grant the right to publish this photo to you. Only I have one question, what should I do? What documents to sign? What to send and where to send. This is my first experience, and I do not know how to do it. I would be grateful for your help in my situation.

I’m looking forward to your reply.

Best regards, Vladimir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Assist937 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

@Assist937: First, please, note that your edits might be against this Wikipedia rule.
Second, we cannot rely on information from users who provide contradicting or false information. Note: you claimed previously that you are the author (photographer). And now?
Third, for any photo that was earlier published we need either (1) information about its freely licensed status at the initial publication site, or (2) free license permission from the photo exclusive copyright holder following COM:OTRS instructions. Fair Use photos are not acceptable.
Ankry (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

This picture was deleted because it's in the page of the person where making the wikipedia page on. We have permission from the person (Reynold Alexander) to use it.

--Walle8 (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

You uploaded few photos, but not with this or similar name. Are you the photographer who made the photo? We need a free license directly from the photographer. Ankry (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MarcelloMotta.jpeg La foto es una imagen pública, publicada por la banda para su apreciación y uso en medios de difusión y/o entre otros a fines. Leo Chigne (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission for a free license via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 05:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This picture is not copyright violation as it taken from facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musl 23x (talk • contribs) 17:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Facebook is not freely licensed. So unless you provide a proof that there is CC-BY-SA 4.0 declaration concerning this picture there, I  Oppose undeletion. Declaring a license when you are neither the photographer nor you have a contract with them, is copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: Do not upload files from Facebook. If you are the photographer, please upload the original unmodified file. --Yann (talk) 05:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dy-hero-logo-black.png

The reason I'm appealing this request is that it the official logo for Dynamic Yield. I'm currently writing an article about this topic, and I want to include the logo as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article. The image will be placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing Dynamic Yield, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the company and assure page visitors that they have reached the correct article about the organization, in addition to conveying the company's visual and brand identity in a way the text of the article cannot. Since this is a logo of an organization, item, or event, I also believe it is protected by copyright.

Phoebe-Retta (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

@Phoebe-Retta: concerning copyright: if the logo is over ToO (IMO it is) then we need a written free license permission from the logo copyright holder to store the logo on Commons
Concerning scope: what article are you talking about? a Wikipedia article? a Wikiversity article? The article should exist prior to the logo upload here. If this is an external article (outside of Wikimedia), the logo would be out of scope. Ankry (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OP has created en:Draft:Dynamic Yield and this image may or may not be permissable at local Wikipedia under a fair use principle. Thuresson (talk) 09:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Drehkammer-Schwingmühle Mahlrohrdurchmesser D = 500 mm mit Stäben ø 25 mm.jpg

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018091110009242.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance.

File:Drehkammer-Schwingmühlen Mahlrohrdurchmesser D = 650 mm mit Kugeln ø 25 mm.jpg

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018091110009242.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance.

File:Exzenter-Schwingmühle ESM 656-2ks.jpg

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018091110009242.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance.

File:Zweirohrschwingmühle Palla U für kontinuierliche Mahlung, Bauart Humboldt.jpg

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018091110009242.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance.


✓ Done @Olaf Kosinsky: Please check and update the images. (And please don't forget to sign your messages next time.) De728631 (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file Manne1.jpg has been deleted, but the author of the photo has sent permission letter to OTRS, but there is no answer so far, so we are pending permission. --Ղուկասյան Մարո (talk) 06:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ղուկասյան Մարո: Which language queue the permission was send to and when? Plase note, that according to COM:OTRS info, the response time in the English queue is over 6 months at the moment. Ankry (talk) 07:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The image must wait its turn at OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photographer has sent an email to Wikipedia to verify that I own the copyright of the image and have permission to upload to Wikipedia. --SweeneyClaire (talk) 11:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 17:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The image must wait its turn at OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Grant Request has been sent by the photographer to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to release rights for this file. Frenchman1912 (talk) 15:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Ankry (talk) 17:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: The image must wait its turn at OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

I´m a journalist from Spain that has made my first editing in Wikipedia adding this picture. The picture is a photocall picture made available by NBCUniversal. After the file was deleted I contact them and they confirm by email that the picture can be used in Wikipedia.


Can you let me know if the file can be undeleted and what mistake did I make?

Hope this works.


Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larazonvital (talk • contribs) 07:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

You claim that this picture is licensed under cc-by-sa 4.0. On what basis you claim so? We need to verify this. Ankry (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done For images created by third parties, we need a permission sent by email from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 12:34, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bulqiza - school (Albánia).jpg

Seems to be {{FoP-Albania}} Abzeronow (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done per request. De728631 (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oleg Andros.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018100810009102 regarding File:Oleg Andros.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: image restored. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:33, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Werk Oberau.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018101010004853 regarding File:Werk Oberau.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 02:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: image restored. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

RLM1.jpg

This picture is from my property, it doesn't belong to the digital news papers, I send the picture to the all news papers to use it. I need it back. Thanks. --Lpenotti (talk) 02:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

As anybody can say that, we cannot rely on on-wiki information for images that were published prior to upload here. We need a proof that the image is freely licensed: either via (1) information on the initial publication page, or (2) via email from trackable author's email address, following COM:OTRS. The first procedure is faster, the second can take months. Ankry (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done OTRS action seems needed here. Ankry (talk) 04:51, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion requests for João Justiceiro files (2)

Refazendo o pedido, uma vez que o anterior já foi arquivado antes da minha resposta. Deixando portanto apenas as imagens de minha autoria.

João Justiceiro (talk) 06:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


Already declined - Jcb (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Satan rising up off the pool of fire! Collection by Robert J. Wickenheiser

The Art of Bienvenido Bones Banez By Terrance Lindall

The Seraphim שְׂרָפִים in a particular plate of the Elephant Folio of my Paradise Lost have paint brushes in one hand and flames in the other. They are painting with fire. Fire, the tools of Satan in hell, is the creative force of the universe. From the first explosion of the big bang there have been worlds created out of magnificent expanding fire. God wrote the Ten Commandments with His finger in fire. I was thinking of Bienvenido Bones Banez when I painted that. Bienvenido's style I call "Fiero Electric" because he recognizes that the divine principle of creation is fire and color, and "Fiero Electric" because of Bien's striking juxtaposition of primary colors. Satanic color!

One of Bien’s many remarkable ideas is that “Satan gives color to the world.” Indeed, what a dreary world if everything were nice, sweet, and beautiful. We would soon go insane. Man struggles and finds meaning in the struggles. He writes operas and stories about the struggles of love, treachery and war and paints pictures of it. Do we not find Satan’s struggle in Paradise Lost more colorful than anything in Paradise Regained. Yes, Satan excites our imagination…he causes many of our struggles and on so doing gives color to the world! And there is no greater artist than Bien in the history of the world to capture this idea.

On display at the WAH Center is a major painting that was only recently shipped to the United States. It is 6 by 8 feet! It came rolled up and had to re-stretched for this exhibit. Having been rolled up it now requires relining by a professional conservator. It is a work of supreme genius that needs to be saved for future generations to wonder at.

The major fiery Satanic figure has outstretched arms like Matthias Grunewald’s masterpiece of crucified Christ in the Issenheim Altarpiece. In fact there is a small pale figure of Christ with a cross between his legs on this back of Satan and a church on the back of Satan’s head. I know that Bien believes the Christian church and all major religions have been coopted by Satan for his purposes. The ribs of Satan become two horns and a mouth opens with fangs that shoot lightening. Around the hole in the fabric of the universe though which Satan is manifested into our world are seen myriad worshipers and idolaters swimming in a blue circle and under Satan’s arms of Power and Dominion radiate the human tribulation of Bien’s 666 world Surreal Armageddon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bienvenido Bones Banez, Jr. (talk • contribs) 05:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paintings by Bienvenido Bones. Thuresson (talk) 12:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 Oppose per Thuresson. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  • I think we do not have the luxury to say "not notable for some WP therefore OoS". We should keep those paintings -not only this- that may be properly verified via OTRS. (Please note that I DR'ed several of those files.) --E4024 (talk) 03:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
    We don't have the luxury of being a platform for artists to promote themselves as the greatest artist in the history of the world(!) either. If this is within scope, there needs to be a coherent argument as to what educational use it is likely to serve. The ramblings that constitute this undeletion request do not even begin to address that. LX (talk, contribs) 08:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done - per DR - Jcb (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg was deleted as uncategorised.

File:Example.jpg was deleted as unused and uncategorised. I can now categorise it as Category:Hull fish trail. Could it be undeleted? Icarusgeek (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

It is not deleted. Ankry (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
D'oh. SorryIcarusgeek (talk) 06:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done - file is not deleted - Jcb (talk) 15:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The license of this image appears to meet the Definition of Free Cultural Works which Wikimedia Commons adopts as the definition of free licenses (COM:L). Discussions in Commons:Deletion requests/File:996.ICU logo.png regarding the license being non-free were regarding to The Open Source Definition, which is a different set of criteria and is not the one we use here, and should not concern us. --Wcam (talk) 12:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@Wcam: If the license of this logo fits COM:L you should either point out a suitable license template or discuss its creation in COM:VPC. This place is for undeletion discussion under already accepted rationales not about license compatibility analysis.
So my initial question which license template you find suitable and why? The DR nominator suggested it is fair use. Ankry (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The license is based on the MIT License and essentially permits anyone to use the content for any purpose. It is indeed a custom license so {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} was used. --Wcam (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This is no longer a valid template. And if the license requires anything more than {{Attribution}}, a separate template is needed, IMO.
 Neutral here; another admin opinion is needed. Ankry (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose This is another license intended for software that is technically a free license but is actually so onerous that it amounts to a non-license when applied to images. The requirement that the user "must conspicuously display,without modification, this License and the notice on each redistributed or derivative copy of the Licensed Work" effectively precludes the use of any image with this license anywhere, including WP. No one is going to post a 388 word license next to each use of this image, whether on line or in print. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose I have to agree with Jim here. The Commons community has already banned GFDL-only licensing for new uploads for being impractical, so this type of licence should not make its way here through the backdoor. De728631 (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jim and De728631. Technically free license that has onerous requirements. GFDL-only was stopped for a very good reason and this is a lot like a GFDL license. Abzeronow (talk) 20:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a picture that I took personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandabear01 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Maybe. But as it was already used on Facebook, anybody who had access to that page was able to upload it here. We need either evidence that its Facebook publication was under a free license, or clear evidence that user who uploaded it is the same person as Wikimedia user Pandabear01, or COM:OTRS permission. Except pointing out free license information on a public Facebook page containing exactly this image, none of them can be made on-wiki. Ankry (talk) 17:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 18:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Il logo è corretto, non violando nessuna regola — Preceding unsigned comment added by C5 Futsal (talk • contribs) 21:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose We need a written, formal free license permission from the actual copyright holder of the logo, as for any image that was published elsewhere prior to upload. See COM:OTRS for more details. And claiming that you are the club is not helpful here. Ankry (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 18:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took this picture with my own camera, and have posted it on the james felton keith website. File:James Felton Keith at LGBTQ Rally.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawanarogers (talk • contribs) 11:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Since this has been published elsewhere before without a free licence, please send a permission by email to verify your authorship. See COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 18:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took this picture with my own camera, and have posted it on the james felton keith website. File:James Felton Keith and Lars Løkke Rasmussen.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawanarogers (talk • contribs) 11:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

 Oppose Since this has been published elsewhere before without a free licence, please send a permission by email to verify your authorship. See COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019042910003605.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Olaf Kosinsky: you can continue. Ankry (talk) 18:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019042910003605.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Olaf Kosinsky: you can continue. Ankry (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is deleted without cause. It's licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License as stated at the bottom of the webpage where it was found: http://www.bella1970.com/presskit.html Please restore. Many thanks, --Jllman (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done CC-BY license. @Jllman: It was deleted because you did not provide the above link on the image description page despite a request to do so. License info fixed and reviewed. Ankry (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Moin liebe Admins,
bitte das Bild wieder herstellen, da ich ein Ticket#2019042910003605 habe und ja ich bin OTRS Mitarbeiter :)
Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 18:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Raboe001: you can continue. Ankry (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Moin liebe Admins,
bitte das Bild wieder herstellen, da ich ein Ticket#2019042910003605 habe und ja ich bin OTRS Mitarbeiter :)
Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 18:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Raboe001: you can continue. Ankry (talk) 18:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:KinggustafVIa.jpg

1950s Swedish photograph. If non-artistic would be {{PD-Sweden-photo}} Abzeronow (talk) 14:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support Non-artistic. Thuresson (talk) 07:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

What is the copyright status in the US though? De728631 (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't know. But it seems to have been public domain in Sweden since at least 2011 and perhaps before then. Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes, it is obviously PD in Sweden. We're talking about this photo. It looks quite official, so there's a chance that it was also published in the US within 30 days after first publication in Sweden. However, its copyright there – if it ever existed – might not have been renewed. De728631 (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
@De728631: Definitely not this photo, but a similar one (different uniform and background). However, the above comment may apply to it as well. Ankry (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd be fine with decision that this could have been simultaneously published in the US without notice or with notice but not renewed. Abzeronow (talk) 18:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. Could you please add the {{Information}} template? --Yann (talk) 06:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tiago Guitian Reis - SunoResearch.jpg File:Tiago Guitian Reis - SunoResearch.jpg

eu tenho autorização do próprio Tiago para utilizar essa foto, que é trabalho próprio e pessoal, não cabe a terceiros, questionar direitos autorais, senão mesmo ao próprio que aparece na foto, o que não é o caso, pois como dito, tenho total direito quanto a essa foto para utilizar no fim desejado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodrigoMMGomes (talk • contribs) 17:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

@RodrigoMMGomes: Who the photographer is? What we need is written free license permission from the photographer (or an evidence of a contract that the photographer transferred their right to somebody else; permission "to use" does not fit Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements). You previously claimed to be the photo author (photographer), and unless you are indeed the photographer such claims are illegal. Ankry (talk) 04:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019043010005851.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: . --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2019043010006431.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1) Anchovy.jpg was deleted as uncategorised.

File:1) Anchovy.jpg was deleted as unused and uncategorised. I can now categorise it as Category:Hull fish trail. Could it be undeleted? Icarusgeek (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2019 (UTC)