Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ян Гэ.jpg

Ирина Степанок фотограф разрешает использование изображения. Оно есть в сети в свободном доступе. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.242.9.39 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The uploader claimed that they were the photographer, but it came from IMDB, which is copyrighted.. In order to restore it to Commons, the actual photographer must send a free lciense using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ray Mancini photos

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017111610004208 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: ✓ Done - Jcb (talk) 15:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dariush Borbor, Flowers, Aquarel, 1953.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018022510005287 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: ✓ Done - Jcb (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Siddhartha Law College.jpg

This file is the college logo which is used for reference purposes. Please undelete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avishekp18 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: It's a complex logo. The college managment should send a permission in to OTRS (as in Jeff's comment above). Ruthven (msg) 08:23, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads of User:Meirl35

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017121410013521 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per request. Ruthven (msg) 08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Na Sady Clothes.jpg

Na Sady Photo is taken by Heaven Photography. However, Na Sady allow wikimedia common to upload and it is not copyright violation. Please undelete this photo. The permission is clear that Haven Photography and Na Sady give Rity98 to upload this photo in the wikimedia common.

Reference: https://www.facebook.com/Sady.TheMC/photos/a.533111553550455.1073741825.533111496883794/1003411309853808/?type=3&theater

Yours sincerely, 30th April 2018, Na Sady — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rity98 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Rity98: There is absolutely nothing to be seen at the link provided. No clue of any Creative Commons or other free license. You seem to try to refer to:

- Alexis Jazz 05:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: There is no reason to believe that any of these are freely licensed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:No Tears Left To Cry - video screenshot.png

The reason why i'm asking to undelete this is because it was a screenshot, I have seen many other articles that have also been screenshots from other music videos and they haven't been deleted? So is there a reason why this image has been deleted. Pineapple tuner9 (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Pineapple tuner9: You didn't mention a file name, but I suppose you mean File:No Tears Left To Cry - video screenshot.png. You can't upload a screenshot on Commons without the permission from the author of the video. But you can upload it on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: Thank you so much! haha now i know how to upload things properly, Because i was so confused. But how do i do that because every time i go to upload an image it redirects to Commons. Pineapple tuner9 (talk) 09:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

@Pineapple tuner9: en:Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard gives four options for uploading on that project: Click here to start the Upload Wizard (on top in the middle); Files for upload process; Plain form for local uploads; and Old guided form (the latter three in the right column under "Wikipedia").   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Screenshot. Cannot be kept on Commons without a license from the creator via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Capital Airport

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I think the deletion was unnecessary. I'd like a chance to expand that gallery. Evrik (talk) 19:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

    •  Oppose - This page was not a gallery. You responded to the DR 26 March], but you did nothing about it in the month the DR was open. If you want to create a gallery with this name, just create it. Undeletion of the deleted non-gallery is pointless. - Jcb (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
      • I was the only one to respond to the DR. No one refuted what I had to say. You came in and closed it with a deletion. There is no real reason why it should have been closed with a delete. Evrik (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jcb: which policy contains such norm as “a gallery disambiguation page should [only] disambiguate galleries”? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 03:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

We are not Wikipedia. The Gallery space is for galleries only. Jcb (talk) 06:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't know of any such policy. If it gets undeleted, I will see what I can do to add gallery images. Evrik (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done Please see Commons:Galleries. "Galleries are created in the same way as Articles are created in Wikipedia." This means that the "regular" namespace at Commons is reserved for gallery pages. Also, per the namespace-specific Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion, "Mainspace pages (galleries) that are empty or contain no useful content, such as pages that contain text but no images or other media" (my emphasis) qualify for speedy deletion. To create an image gallery related to this airport, the page does not need to be undeleted, but it can created again from scratch. However, galleries should not just duplicate existing categories. De728631 (talk) 18:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RafaelGuerrero.jpg

La imagen está libre de derechos por el autor Rafael Guerrero, que la ha cedido para la Wikipedia. --Rafael Guerrero escritor (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The EXIF metadata credit this image to (C) Birdy YOLANDA J.M. We need a permission from the copyright holder per email (COM:OTRS). If the copyright was transferred from the photographer to Rafael Guerrero this, too, needs to be documented. Owning a physical copy of a photograph usually does not make you the copyright holder so you are not in a position to grant free licences. De728631 (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FCE Logo Circle.svg

I am requesting that FCE Logo Circle.svg be undeleted as it does not violate any copyrights. The image was created in-house at Feeding Children Everywhere and no copyrights exist for the image or brand.

Feedingchildreneverywhere (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

By law, copyrights exist automatically for anything above the threshold of originality. If it was created in-house, then the organization would own that copyright. Since Commons does not accept fair use (the way many logos appear on Wikipedia articles), to be uploaded here that copyright would need to be explicitly licensed (or disclaimed via something like Creative Commons Zero), either by a notation on the source website, or by email using the COM:OTRS process. Since user accounts are essentially anonymous, and people taking graphics off the web is unfortunately common, we require that works previously published on the internet go through that OTRS process to confirm the license and make sure there are no misunderstandings. Once approved via that process, the file will be undeleted. We typically label anything "not freely licensed" as a "copyvio", even if not an actual copyright violation. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:VSF - Jim Edgar - 1978-1.jpg

I request a review of this photo of Jim Edgar and others that I have added to both the Forests Commission Victoria and Victorian School of Forestry pages that have been deleted.

These photos form part of a large collection that have been donated over many years by members to the Forests Commission Retired Personnel Association (FCRPA)

They are on public display at the association museum at Beechworth or on their new webpage https://www.victoriasforestryheritage.org.au/

Many are out of copyright and in the common domain because of their age. Some are very old newspaper photos. I have identified the original donor where possible.

In many cases I edited the photos to improve their quality before I uploaded them.

I hope I have now added enough information on their source so they can be kept

Other photos are

Thanks DBHOB (talk) 00:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, why would a 1978 photo be public domain in Australia? Template:PD-Australia does not seem the obvious choice for a copyright license. Thuresson (talk) 00:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
@DBHOB: Were the copyrights to these photos originally given to FCV or VSF?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi there All these photos were freely donated to the Forests Commission Retired Personnel Association (FCRPA) over many years for their use They are all freely available from the FCRPA collection either online or at its museum. Some came from the Forest Commission and some came from Victorian school of Forestry The School of Forestry merged with the University of Melbourne in 1980 and everything was thrown out. The Forest Commission ceased to exist in 1983 and they had a big clean out too. The one of Jim Edgar was taken at the Victorian School of Forestry which was then managed by the FCV in 1980 Is there another form of release that I need to use I want to do the right thing with these photos. It means a lot to the FCRPA, Thanks for your help Cheers

DBHOB (talk) 01:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose There are two questions here. Did the people who donated the photos to FCRPA collection actually own the copyrights? Please remember that owning a paper copy of a photo does not give you any rights to the copyright -- that is almost always held by the actual photographer or his heirs. Second, even if they did, did the donation include a formal, written, transfer of copyright? I think the answer to the first question is "perhaps, in some cases". The answer to the second is almost certainly "No" and unless the FCRPA can produce copies of the relevant documents, that will be the end of it.

In order for the image to be restored, it will up to you to prove beyond a significant doubt (the Commons standard of proof, see COM:PRP) that the answer to both questions is "Yes". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

hello again. Im sorry but maybe I didn't explain myself properly. Nearly all these photos belonged to the Forests Commission of Victoria or the Victorian School of Forestry. Both were Government organisations not private individuals. So the copyright was always owned by the Government of Victoria. Some are newspaper photos (Gerraty and Code). I understood they are available to use because the copyright has expired. is this not the case ? Cheers DBHOB (talk) 10:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

I have give an explanation of each photo below.

DBHOB (talk) 10:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


Again, ownership of a photo does not give ownership of the copyright. At the time a photograph is taken, the copyright belongs to the photographer. If the photographer has a work for hire agreement with an employer, then the copyright belongs to the employer. If that applies to any of these, it is up to you to prove it.
If a photograph was first published anonymously in Australia more than 50 years ago, then it is PD. However it is up to you to prove that it was actually published and that the publication was actually anonymous -- the fact that we do not know who the photographer was does not make it anonymous. Generally, you must show the published photo in situ without a by-line.
So, here are several groups:
Those that are clearly not PD:
Those that might be PD as government works, but both the date and place of publication and the fact that it is a government work requires further proof. Note that the Australian law requires publication for the clock to start, so the fact that a photo exists proves nothing unless you can prove it was published more than 50 years ago:
Those that might be PD if published anonymously, but where the anonymous publication must be proven (see above):

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello again

I can't do anything about the first group. They should be deleted. I agree with you. I miss understood the rules But I have added links to original newspaper sources from Trove for A.V Galbraith, W J Code and F G Geraty. They were all well before 1955. E J Semmens is a crop headshot from the 1946 school football team photo which is published in the University of Melbourne museum. https://omeka.cloud.unimelb.edu.au/cchc/items/show/5819. Im looking for a source for E J Semmens (2)-1 The photo for A V Galbraith comes from an obituary written about him in Australian Forestry journal. It shows him sitting at his desk as Forests Commission Chairman. Gailbriath retired in July 1969. So the photo is 50 years old. Cheers DBHOB (talk) 02:35, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Stalled. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Matthew Kennedy directing the Fisk Jubilee Singers.jpg.

Also:

The executrix for the Estate of Matthew Washington Kennedy has granted permission to Wikimedia Commons to use this photograph. Nina07011960 (talk) 16:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Such a permission can be sent to OTRS. If the permission is valid, an OTRS agent will take care of undeletion. Jcb (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose There are several problems here. Since the copyright to photographs is almost always held by the photographer, even when the photographer is paid for the work, it is unlikely that the estate has the right to freely license the photographs. Even if it does (and that must be proven), executors do not generally have the right to make gifts of estate property unless directed to do so by the will. That right belongs to the heir. Finally, "permission to Wikimedia Commons to use this photograph" is insufficient. Commons requires that images be free for any use by anybody anywhere. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

I am the heir, as well as the executrix. The Last Will and Testament was sent to Wikimedia Commons. Photographs were taken in the 1940s. The photograph of Matthew Kennedy directing the Jubilee Singers was taken in the 1970s and was given to him by the photographer, who is deceased. All of the other photographers are deceased. It is my intention that the "images be free for any use by anybody anywhere." Nina07011960 (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

You have answered one of my concerns above, but you still have provided no evidence that you have the right to freely license the copyrights. That right almost always remains with the photographer. That was particularly the case in the old days, with film and paper photographs, as charging for reprints was an important source of revenue for photographers. Unless you can provide either (a) evidence of formal written license or transfers of copyright for each photograph, or (b) free licenses from the heirs of the photographers, they cannot be restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

This is impossible. These photographers have been deceased for decades. What if they have no heirs? Nina07011960 (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Particularly, the photo of Henry Floyd Gamble was taken before 1900. Is it not public domain by now? It is already on the Internet. Nina07011960 (talk) 01:22, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Nina07011960: I restored File:Dr. Henry Floyd Gamble.jpg. Please fix the source. For others, they may be undeleted if you give an evidence of being published without a copyright notice (or that the copyright was not renewed). Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jan_Doblado.jpg

Hello there, I’ve created thi page for a notable person. He is an American Internet personality, as well as an actor. That being said, he has appeared on the film, Tess, when he was 4, and was an addition kid in the film, “Diary of a Wimpy Kid.” Please undelete this article, Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakside (talk • contribs) 15:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. File was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jan Doblado.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. Do not reupload. Probably out of scope. --Yann (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Showymc.jpg

Alright! I did not make this artwork, my friend did! And he said i have the rights to use it, since he made it for me. I payed my own money for this artwork. I did not take place for making this artwork! The creator of this picture is @MrVago on twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShowyMC (talk • contribs) 22:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Moustafa_Aly_Soliman.jpg

I've deleted the image because the dimensions were not proportional to the dimensions of the image in the infobox scientist and I have adjusted the dimensions of the image to fit the size of the image in the infobox scientists

Please return the image again

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by YBUE (talk • contribs) 01:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Support @YBUE: Deleting an image because it has the wrong dimensions for one use is just silly, please don't ask for that again, just upload another image with better dimensions. Please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

2 pictures from ELTE

Reason: The picture was taken by the official photographer of the Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) and is a free content. The source, kutyaetologia.elte.hu is an official site of the Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE). Adelkova (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Kubinyi Eniko.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The picture was taken by the official photographer of the Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) and is a free content. The source, etologia.elte.hu is an official site of the Department of Ethology, (Etológia Tanszék in Hungarian), Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelkova (talk • contribs) 07:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose I'm reading "Copyright © 2018 ethology - … ELTE Department of Ethology… " at [1]. " No Creative Commons license as far as I can see. Thuresson (talk)

@Adelkova: In Hungarian: A képek használatához szükségünk van a jogtulajdonos engedélyére. Kérlek, a hu:Wikipédia:Engedélykérés oldalon leírtak alapján kérj engedélyt az egyetemtől, majd azt továbbítsd az ott megadott e-mail címre. Amennyiben elakadnál, állok rendelkezésedre a vitalapomon. In English: huwiki-related request, I'll take care of it. Bencemac (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Emily Alyn Lind.jpeg

This photo was given to me by Emily Alyn Lind, I am in direct contact with her and have been given permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idiskseo (talk • contribs) 13:51, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose. In order to undelete this, the copyright holder (usually the photographer) must send an email to our permissions team. See COM:OTRS for information on this process. Once a valid permission is received and processed, the image will be restored. Guanaco (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. (ec) @Idiskseo: The actual filename is File:Emily Alyn Lind.jpg. @El1738 uploaded it, @Thuresson deleted it as a copyvio, you uploaded it again (ignoring the warning that it had already been deleted), and @Yann deleted it as a copyvio again. Reuploading a deleted file is a serious offense here and wastes your time and ours, don't do it again.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

I apologize, I am currently in process of getting the information for the photographer to have the information verified. --Idiskseo (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rodrigo goytortua.jpg

hi! you deleated the picture rodrigo goytortua.jpg because you bealive that its braking copyright. im the owner of that picture because im Rodrigo Goytortua, i can send you id or whatever you need to provve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luisblasi (talk • contribs) 15:43, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Please see COM:OTRS. You claim to be several different persons, so not without a formal written permission. --Yann (talk) 19:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Velório de Dom Paulo terá missas a cada duas horas na Catedral na Sé.jpg

At the beginning of uploading my photos, I was sending the wrong copyright. And this image is one of the cases. I would like EXIF ​​file. Urielpunk (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS pending, not deleted. --Yann (talk) 18:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request to undelete File:Nokia N9.jpg

The photo of Nokia N9 device was taken by me, then it was uploaded to Wikimedia by me on September 17, 2011, as the single author of the photo I distribute it under CC BY-SA license.

That said, please undelete the uploaded image.

Best wishes, Animist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animist (talk • contribs) 18:20, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. It appears to be all over the web per this link.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jeff_G. (talk · contribs),

This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here

This statement is ungrounded, and I as the author of the image claim that this statement is false.

It appears to be all over the web per

So what? Commons:Upload requirements were completely satisfied by me at the time of my image upload. Someone else on the Internet shall be blamed. --Animist (talk) 22:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
@Shizhao and Yann: Would you care to comment?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: undelete. --shizhao (talk) 01:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Caramel .jpg

OTRS permission has been arrived (ticket:2018041110010007). Before restore the file, please check that the deleted and the attached photo are truly the same. Furthermore, could you rename to „Caramel 2017-ben”? Thanks! Bencemac (talk) 14:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: I renamed the file File:Molnár Ferenc Caramel.jpg. --Yann (talk) 07:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Comic barnstar.png

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#License of File:Comic barnstar.png

I am confused as hell and the reason for deletion was "unused" so I don't think there are any pressing reasons not to undelete it. After undeletion everyone will be able to see if someone failed to attribute something or not. - Alexis Jazz 05:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

I've done a temporary undeletion for the purposes of the discussion at COM:AN. Please feel free to indicate if a permanent undeletion is desired. —RP88 (talk) 06:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Stalled. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flute playing.jpg picture to be undeleted!

I am the creator of the image in question. I have other pictures from that event when I took the picture, which nobody in the world can have because they never where published anywhere. This would prove my copyright ownership. Al the pictures mentioned have meta data of my S40 Canon camera. If there is any place where I can can prove my ownership let me know. I am not a highly trained computer operator and not very knowledgeable about wiki commons, so give me a chance to prove my copyright ownership.--Punarama (talk) 06:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

@Punarama: How did your photo appear on https://www.planetware.de/musik/anugama.html?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 06:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Запашный Мстислав Мстиславович 0.jpg

Файл не является скриншотом с указанного видео и может свободно использоваться. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DD85 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Info Google Translate: "The file is not a screenshot from the specified video and can be used freely". Translation added by Thuresson (talk) 21:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No permission, as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IEM_-_two-position_earphone.gif

Hallo there) I request to undelete the file from Commons as well as undo deletion of the link in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headphones#Ear-fitting_headphones and in https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8&stable=0&redirect=no#%D0%9F%D0%BE_%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%83_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%28%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D1%83%29 because I have all right to this gif - I am a member of NeckTec team - I am the Director for external relations Matvey Fedorov, mentioned on our website www.necktec.com. You can check this by calling our number or by writting me a letter at matvey@necktec.com. WearablesLover is my nickname at Wiki. Please restore the gif and links in Wiki articles. Best regards, Matvey — Preceding unsigned comment added by WearablesLover (talk • contribs) 17:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted. --Yann (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KymberlyMarcosPine.jpg

This photo was part of her official campaign given to press to use. I did ask Kathy Davenport in Councilmember Pine's office and she said she personally took that photo and it is fair use for any press or media to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dani808 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done "Fair use" does not allow anybody to use this photo in an encyclopedia article about red clothing. Thuresson (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Художник Владимир Селезнёв.jpg

В соответствии с рекомендациями было запрошено разрешение автора Алексея Пономарчука. Автор выслал разрешение на использование по указанному адресу: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Владимир Селезнев. 5 мая 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selesnyov (talk • contribs) 15:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Artist Vladimir Seleznev.jpg - In accordance with the recommendations, the permission of the author Alexey Ponomarchuk was requested. The author has sent permission to use at the specified address: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org - Vladimir Seleznev. May 5, 2018
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

@Selesnyov: The e-mail will reach the head of the OTRS queue in about 7 days. Then, if the license meets Commons requirements and is approved, the image will be automatically restored. Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michael Girard.jpg Don't undelete!

I'm exhausted with your "undeleted" scheme. I wrote you that I had the right to upload this file (an others). The author had sent you a clear sentence (within your form) to give the rights of her photographs to Wikimedia Commons... I don't know how to do better than that!

Please undelete this file then I can insert into the wiki page I've done!

Jocelyn Girard--Jocelyngirard (talk) 18:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alexis Adams.jpg

This archive was founded in the website of Twitter of this person: https://twitter.com/AlexXxisAdams — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techso01 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Procedural close, file is not deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mark Daniel Manning AKA MarkDanielUSA 2011 2014-05-04 00-43.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: These were not out of scope and are used by and are mandatory to the user profile they were associated with. Markdanielusa (talk) 05:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Divan Ivan Sotelo Soto.jpg

The photo File:Divan Ivan Sotelo Soto.jpg is mine, I hold all rights to release it as I am Divan's manager. I myself manage his social networks. If needed, I can send a copy of legal authorizations. Please undelete the file and let me build Divan's Wiki page. --Killa27 (talk) 11:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Katia May 3, 2018--Killa27 (talk) 11:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 05:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Пётр_Буслов.jpg

Пётр_Буслов.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolinberg (talk • contribs) 17:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 05:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZiBBZ Group.jpg & File:Stee Gfeller.png & File:Coco Gfeller.jpg

Hallo,

hiermit beantrage ich die Wiederherstellung der im Betreff genannten Bilder der Band ZiBBZ. Die Bilder sind für die Nutzung, insbesondere für den Wikipedia Artikel freigegeben. Unter diesem Link kann auch sehr gerne die Genehmigung eingesehen werden: Genehmigung einsehen

Freundliche Grüße

--TrickyNicky88 (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @TrickyNicky88: However, the permission should be sent to COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mitse Solakov.png and File:Stefan Skenderov.png

Last time I forgot to add a licence so it was deleted. But this time when I uploaded it I added the correct licence. It should not have been deleted again. Popolzani (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Popolzani: Please fix the source and the license of File:Stefan Skenderov.png. --Yann (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ben Christo playing at the Camden Roundhouse with the Sisters of Mercy.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030110011956 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: Please complete the permission. --Yann (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Emcee NICE Tonight.jpg

File:Emcee NICE Tonight.jpg The reason for this request is that the subject is "my own work" not only am I the creator of the artwork I warranty that I have the right to grant the permission requested herein, and that I have submitted to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org a copy of that permission as given to me by artist.-- (IMusicFacts) 02:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:16, 25 April 2018‎ (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please fix your signature, it changes every minute.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff: waiting for the OTRS ticket being proessed. Ankry (talk) 10:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My Brother's Blues.jpg

  • I* am the copyright owner of this image (My Brother's Blues.jpg) as *I* work for the artist and *I* created the artwork. This is MY WORK. I would be happy to send you a copy of the liner notes for the CD which clearly state "artwork by Debra Clark". That is ME. Please put this file back.

Debraannclark (talk) 02:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Duplicate, see below. --Yann (talk) 08:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:My Brother's Blues.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018050610001043 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: Please complete the permission. --Yann (talk) 08:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:captain speik.jpg

This photograph is from the family's collection, currently in the possession of the subject's son, Robert Lawton Speik. It is from a football program from 1904 and copyright, if any, has expired. It would be a great contribution to the Frederick A. Speik page and to history, especially as it proves that Amos Alonzo Stagg was using varsity letters as early as 1904 (his page states that he invented them in 1906). Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGol (talk • contribs) 17:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose In the file description, User:DGol claimed that he was the photographer, which is, of course, absurd, but means that we are not likely to take his assertions at face value. If it was published in the USA before 1923, then it is, in fact PD. However, if it has not been published until recently, then it will be under copyright until 2024. The fact of publication must be proven. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

If it was published in a football program in 1904, it should be PD. Is there any chance the entire program could be uploaded, or at least the cover or title page? If there is no printed date on the photo, not sure that alone proves anything, at least if the 1904 date is just a claim without any other supporting evidence. What shows that the photo is from 1904? Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-1923. @DGol: Please fix the source, the author, and the categories. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christine Schindler 2014.jpg

Ich bitte um die Wiederherstellung der Datei "Christine_Schindler 2014.jpg". Die fehlende Rechteerklärung der Nutzungsinhaberin wurde zwischenzeitlich an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org und permissions-de@wikimedia.org gesendet.

BaumgarteGalerie (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bungalow Park relación 7, 2013, C-Print auf Aludibond, 50 x 120cm.jpg

Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung der genannten Datei. Die fehlende Rechteerklärung der Urheberin wurde zwischenzeitlich an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org und permissions-de@wikimedia.org gesendet. Vielen Dank!

BaumgarteGalerie (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

alesco.jpg File:Alisco.jpg

this picture is my desinge — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ame5599 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LogoViSA.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I create myself this logo. Tdelavau (talk) 08:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Celine Gounder, MD, ScM, FIDSA.jpg‬

I own the rights to this photograph, and I am the one who submitted this photograph to Wikimedia. Drcelinegounder (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Luigi Trinchero (circa 1900).jpg

I'm the great-grandson of Luigi Trinchero (the one on the photo). That photo (and many others that I plan to upload) is part of my personal archive. They have more than 100 year old! They where probably taken on Argentina circa 1900. There is no information on the physical photo about who take it. I don't find any reason to delete this photo on Wikipedia:Image_use_policy. If I am legally the owner of the photo and the rights of course I'm giving them all. TBH I found nonsense removing photos like this one, even after reading Wikipedia's image use policy --Pabloab (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

  • {{O}} per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luigi Trinchero (circa 1900).jpg and COM:CRT#Argentina; if the photographer was 18 in 1900 and died in 1948 aged 66, the photo would still be copyrighted in Argentina until 1 January 2019. Owning a physical property (photograph) is not the same as owning an intellectual property (copyright). Although, for example, one may purchase and own tangible books, the intangible copyrights remain solely with the authors/publishers. Similarly, intellectual properties can indeed be inherited like physical property, but must be bequeathed or passed down by operation of law. Alternatively stated, simply being related to the author of a work and owning a copy of that work is not adequate. To accept these files, we would need a copy (e.g., scan) of the legal conveyance or other document that formally transferred to you the copyrights of these images; you can provide that documentation using the COM:OTRS process.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:55, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Article 34 of law number 11723 of Argentinian Commercial and Civil Code state "Para las obras fotográficas la duración del derecho de propiedad es de VEINTE (20) años a partir de la fecha de la primera publicación". In English: 20 years from the photo been published (post-publication, not post-mortem; also in this Wikipedia article with citations). So in this case the copyright ended circa 1920. --Pabloab (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
    @Pabloab: That law was superseded in 1997 by retroactive Ley 24.870, or art. 84 of the current Argentine copyright law. Perhaps Wikipedia did not notice this change.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Photos are special in Argentina, sorry.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
  • @Jeff G.: Law 11723 art 34 is the one that matters. At the end of the article just say it was updated (August 13, 1998) by law 24249 art 1. But the updated version is the one you link, current state of law. That's what says the link you provide (I'm from Argentina, Spanish is my native language). About copyright of photos say "20 years from the first publication date". I'm not sure what do you mean about Argentina being special about photos. All countries have their legal subtleties. --Pabloab (talk) 23:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Pabloab: Please fix the source and the author. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Leveraging-Wikipedia-book.jpg

This is a request to undelete a photo I have uploaded twice, which I have permission to upload I took the photo of a book, I have written permission from the copyright holder to upload it to Wikimedia Commons. I followed the instructions here to share that written permission with others at Commons so that everyone is all clear about this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_NOT_the_copyright_holder I did this when I uploaded the photo the second time, I added the appropriate category to the file and I emailed the clear statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org; I didn't know in advance I could have done an undeletion request the first time, otherwise, I wouldn't have uploaded it a second time. However, now that it has been deleted again, despite following those steps, it may be difficult to have the permissions reviewers understand what is happening, so I'd like for it not to be deleted so that the review process can happen. Please help. Pinging User:Ronhjones and User:Túrelio. Monikasj (talk) 04:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Monikasj: Do you have a ticket number?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I found it - it's had an auto reply and waiting in the queue. I'll undelete it and add the waiting ticket number Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WESTCOASTWALLEYELOGO.png

The logo should have no copyright issues as it was created for the charity team by one of the members and is worn by the team, having only been used by the team, in different colours depending on the jerseys they used. --Milhousetender (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kai Tietje April 2018.jpg

Hallo, ich, Jan Tietje, erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild »Kai_Tietje_April_2018.jpg«, dass ich Inhaber des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts bin. Die Fotografin des Bildes »Kai_Tietje_April_2018.jpg« ist meine Schwester und heißt Svenja Kähler-Obermann. Ich habe sie gebeten, das Foto bei einem Familientreffen extra zur Freigabe in Commons anzufertigen. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz »Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 international“«. Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch kommerziell oder gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die freie Lizenzierung nur auf das Urheberrecht sowie verwandte Rechte bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund anderer Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft in Wikipedia oder einem ihrer Schwesterprojekte eingestellt wird. Vorgangs-Nr. 1783-522e217039e70a04. E-Mail versendet am 15.04.2018 [Ticket#: 2018041510007013]. Viele Grüße, Jan Tietje (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
The Infobox at my talk-page reads "Additionally you can request undeletion here," Thats why I put it here. Jan Tietje (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
You can, but this fails unless you can prove validity of the license basing on publicly accessible information. We must wait for a German OTRS agent to process the ticket. (And it is unlikely that it will be accepted a the permission is not from the author.) Ankry (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Firozmerchant.jpg File:Firoz Merchant.jpg

It's his official Facebook page as confirmed by his Page admin email — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mublat (talk • contribs) 14:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Sankoswal and Mublat: Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Reyesdejuarez.jpg

en:Los Reyes de Juárez happens to be a municipality in México and therefore, the image (a coat of arms of the municipality) qualifies for {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. Would it be possible to undelete it? --Discasto talk 09:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Discasto: This conflicts with your opinion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reyesdejuarez.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Sure, the problem here is that I though that "Los Reyes de Juárez" (The Kings of Juárez) was sort of commercial firm and not (to my surprise) the actual name of a municipality. As I mentioned to @Victor Gibby: (when he stated that I was wrong), he had seven days to clarify it. As I do know now that the CoA belonged to a municipality, it seems that I was quite careless and therefore I'm trying to fix my mistake. --Discasto talk 12:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. @Discasto, Victor Gibby, and Ivanpares: Please fix the source and the author. --Yann (talk) 05:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Иван Курманов и Франц Клинцевич. 2013 год.jpg

Прошу восстановить фотографию, она находится в свободном доступе. Когда первый раз загружал не думал, что допустил ошибку и случайно признал фото своим собственной и не увидел. Второй раз попытался загрузить, уже как не собственную работу, а нашел ссылку на изображение. Но ваш коллега, заблокировал ее. Прошу восстановить, после ошибки. --Fety009 (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

File: Ivan Kurmanov and Franz Klintsevich. 2013 year.jpg Please restore the photo, it is freely available. When the first time I downloaded I did not think that I made a mistake and accidentally recognized the photo as my own and did not see it. The second time I tried to download, already as not my own work, but found a link to the image. But your colleague blocked her. Please restore, after the error.
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Non-free photo. Нет такого понятия — в свободном доступе. --Sealle (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Balochistan Map.jpeg

Hi, This picture are a region map that i think need acceptation. Please tell me that why deleted this image, so i Add another Information for this Image. Sultanselim baloch (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Copyrighted map from Google.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 12:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KVIS Lab test.jpg

Dear sirs, My son learns Kamnoetvidya Science Academy. I take this photo and let it to public in school network. Anyone (School or students) can use these photos. We often did it when anyone (students) have good photo. They pround to see people admire their school.

--Eakachin (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:摂津ひかり病院(大阪府摂津市)の救急車.jpg

私の投稿したファイルに著作権侵害の可能性が指摘されています。確かに投稿した写真は、ブログに掲載されており、ネット検索でもブログの画像として表示されます。しかし当該ブログは私が運営しているものであり、私が撮影しました。従って著作権を侵害していません。 尚河北病院の救急車の写真のみ私が撮影したものではありませんが、ネット上の自由に使用することが認められている画像を利用しています。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kozimakaede (talk • contribs) 14:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The possibility of copyright infringement is pointed out in the file I posted. Certainly posted photos are posted on the blog, and are displayed as images of blogs on the net search as well. But this blog is what I manage and I shot. Therefore it does not infringe copyright. In addition, although only photographs of ambulances at Hebei Hospital are not taken by me, I use images that are allowed to be used freely on the net.
translator: Google via  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Villa Beach, Iloilo City. Philippines 07.jpg

Request undeletion for my image Villa Beach, Iloilo City. Philippines 07
May be my fault is its a wrong description name.
I am still a member of Flicker team those images Ryan Sia Photography are mine.
Kindly check the author of the image and camera settings that I used for capturing my image. Its Ok if It has been deleted, I will upload next time :::: with the correct description title but I just want to inform you guys that I am Ryan Sia Photography which I want to share my Images to the whole  :::: world.

Riyan0721 (talk) 01:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I understand now jeff thanks a lot i find my file was a small size. I am just a beginner here I figuring it out all on how to post and reply with any discussion thanks again Riyan0721 (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Riyan0721: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 12:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cher Here We Go Again Tour.jpg

The entire poster: because the image is poster art, a form of product packaging or service marketing, the entire image is needed to identify the product or service, properly convey the meaning and branding intended, and avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the image.

Main infobox. The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work, product or service for which it serves as poster art. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work, product or service and know they have found what they are looking for. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the creator providing graphic design services, and in turn the marketing of the promoted item.

As poster art, the image is not replaceable by free content; any other image that shows the same artwork or poster would also be copyrighted, and any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for identification or commentary.

Use of the poster art in the article complies with Wikipedia non-free content policy and fair use under United States copyright law as described above.

This image is of a poster, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher or the creator of the work depicted. It is believed that the use of images of posters to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustrationon the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TioTayumi (talk • contribs) 20:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose You summarized pretty well why this poster is not allowed on Commons: We do not host fair use files. From what I understand, the English Wikipedia has a different policy, and it may be allowed to upload the poster there locally. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not, fair use not allowed. --Yann (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Staatsiefoto-koningin-maxima---2018---erwin-olaf.jpg

Source of image

This image is a official portrait

The website of the Royal House makes a difference between official photographs and photographs made during public occasions.

Pages with official photographs have a special statement of use, which means that the photographs under this heading do not fall under the general copyright statement.

The general copyright statement is:

"Unless stated otherwise, CC0 (Creative Commons Zero) applies to the content on our website.

This means that the content on this website may be re-used freely, unless indicated otherwise in a copyright notice for a specific section. CC0 does not apply to photos, videos, infographics and other images. This means you are not permitted to re-use or share images, unless permission is clearly stated for a specific image. "

https://www.royal-house.nl/copyright

The statement on pages with official photographs is:

Official photographs

"The Government Information Service (RVD) expressly reserves all rights to the photographs under this heading. The photographs may however be downloaded and used for editorial purposes by news media, for display in public places, for private use and for educational purposes. No advance permission is required to place photographs on household items intended for public distribution. However, the RVD reserves the right to take action at a later date if it deems the use of the photographs or the manner in which they are made public to be incompatible with the dignity of the Royal House, to have a promotional purpose (advertising) or to be ideological in nature. The RVD will not respond to questions from third parties on whether legal or other action will be taken in given circumstances."

https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/official-photographs

I think we all agree that Wikipedia is used for educational purposes. In the statement is written that photo's may be used for educational purposes, just like where this site is for.

There is absolutely no complaint because there is no question that this file is being used for:

  1. "to be incompatible with the dignity of the Royal House."
  2. "to have a promotional purpose (advertising)"
  3. "or to be ideological in nature."

("However, the RVD reserves the right to take action at a later date if it deems the use of the photographs or the manner in which they are made public to be incompatible with the dignity of the Royal House, to have a promotional purpose (advertising) or to be ideological in nature.")

The fact that only pages which include official portraits have the special statement of use, means that they don't directly fall under the general copyright statement. The special statement is there for a reason and not because it's makes the webpage look nicer. Please stop using the general copyright statement to compare this image with, because (like I said) the general copyright statement is not just for fun at those pages: It is there to say that these photographs have special rights, because they are official portraits and not pictures made during public occasions.

I hope you'll finally come to the conclusion that there are different rights for official photographs: Which I'm trying to make clear for a couple weeks now. You can not use the general statement for the official photographs, because they fall under a different heading (with another statement of use).

The pages of Queen Máxima are using a 15 year old picture right now, which is despicable. The image is very old and is not relevant anymore, because that photo was taken when she just lived here for 1 year or something and she looks a lot different now.

The older image of Máxima, taken in 2015 (which had been on this website for 3 years), has been removed recently. I think this is strange, because it had never been a problem before. Because of the deletion of this images we have to use an ugly, 15 year old picture of the Queen. Why are the pictures of her husband and children (also taken in 2015), still on this website and the picture of Queen Mäxima not? Or are these files going to be deleted too for no reason, after 3 years of usage on this website?

The usage of this file is just like the statement says: We want to inform people, educate them and help them with their education. It fits perfectly with the statement that is shown on the page with official portraits. (("The photographs may however be used (...) for educational purposes.")

We use it exactly for what is in the statement: educational purposes. I do not understand what the problem is, because it is used properly, and exactly like the rules.

I would be most grateful if you would look into this matter as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.adriaans (talk • contribs) 14:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Sources

Source of image: https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/official-photographs Source of special stament: https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/official-photographs

Source of general copyright statement: https://www.royal-house.nl/copyright

Example of pages with photo's taken at public occasions, these pages do not include the special statement of use and fall under the general copyright statement:

- https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/state-visits-outward/italy-and-vatican-city-june-2017

- https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/state-visits-incoming/belgium-2016

Example of pages with official photographs, these pages include the special statement of use and do not fall under the general copyright statement:

- https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/photographs-of-members-of-the-royal-family

- https://www.royal-house.nl/photos/photo-sessions-king-willem-alexander-and-his-family

Service improvement

I think you do not take enough time to investigate things, which is a bad case for a big professional website of this size. You give no reason at all for a deletion, just a general statement without any information about this specific photograph.

This whole way of informing people and deleting images disappointed me. I donated every month a small amount of money to Wikipedia. I decided that last month was the last time I did this.

I will not spend my money on an organisation where personal information and contact with users is one of the lowest priorities. The messages with no information, the bad investigation before deleting an image, and just no response to my questions when I send them to moderators, like I don't exist or are just foolish (because I'm on this site for just a few months I think? I want to help just like other users, and want to make this community better. That I have just been on this site for 3 months, doesn't mean that my questions have to be ignored) made me come to this decision,

So you can improve your services to provide more personal information, and stop ignoring messages or deletion disscusions. It gives the editor a feeling like he/she's not important enough to take time for. We have to make this a better website together, but I have the feeling that I'm not very welcome here. In stead of giving me help, information or tips, the only thing I get are general messages with warnings.

You have to help people who are new, and not give them the feeling like they are dumb and give them a feeling of "What the hell are you doing here when you don't understand it." I think more people will stay here if you give them the feeling that they are welcome, and providing them more information and help.

When you want to delete this file, I want to have an explanation why you did this. That way I can finally understand your decisions: A lot better than just a general statement in a big red box.

Thank you.

Mark.adriaans (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Please read Commons:First steps. This is not Wikipedia.
 Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Staatsiefoto-koning-willem-alexander---2018---erwin-olaf.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 15:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Staatsiefoto-koning-willem-alexander---2018---erwin-olaf.jpg - and you are not realistic about what to expect from us. Hundreds of copyright violations are uploaded here everyday and we are just a small number of volunteers (remember that we are all volunteers!). Jcb (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Janosch Moldau, Musician. The Fields VIIII.jpg

I am the Photographer of that Foto. Please restore it. Why was it deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tennislehrer1974 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Restored for discussion. --Hystrix (talk) 13:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kaleidoskop Ini Talkshow 2016 - Keren! Ini Talkshow Sampai ke Negeri Sakura 2m20s.jpg

This file is errorously deleted by user:Hystrix. clearly cc-by-licensed by the official youtube account of the broadcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inY3gla4lAc archived page. Licence infomation html code: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed). also, this file was successfully reviewed by User:Techyan. (google cached page) Puramyun31 (talk) 10:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Support I don't see why this should have been a copyright infringement unless there are significant doubts that the YouTube channel is an official outlet of the show's producer. With a reviewed licence, the file should then have gone through a deletion discussion instead of speedy deletion. De728631 (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Hystrix: Was there any reason to delete this? Yann (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
I apologize for my mistake. --Hystrix (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kirsten-Harms.jpg undelete

Für dies File wurde mir von der dargestellten Person, Kirsten Harms, persönlich die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung erteilt. Sie hat das sowohl mit dem Fotografen Bernd Uhlig als auch mit der Leitung der Deutschen Oper Berlin, auf deren Webseite das Foto ebenfalls abgedruckt ist, abgesprochen und dafür die Erlaubnis erteilt bekommen. Frau Harms, doe fr+here Intendantin der Deutschen Oper Berlin, hat mich gebeten, ihre Seite technisch zu bearbeiten und das Foto dort mit einzustellen.

aribengeorge, 08-05-2018, 10:50 h — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aribengeorge (talk • contribs) 08:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

For this file, the person represented, Kirsten Harms, personally gave me permission to publish. She has agreed with the photographer Bernd Uhlig as well as with the management of the Deutsche Oper Berlin, on whose website the photo is also printed, and has been given permission to do so. Ms Harms, director of the Deutsche Oper Berlin, asked me to edit her page technically and to add the photo there.
 
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yasser-Lecture 2.jpg

Kindly undelete the mentioned photo Yasser-Lecture 2.jpg from the page of https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B1_%D8%AB%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%AA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasser_Thabet

The deleted photo belongs to Yasser Thabet and it is on his personal blog and it is a public photo. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgoete (talk • contribs) 09:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Curran at Mineola Train Station.jpg

Arthur "Artie" Raslich is a Nassau County photographer. He is a Civil Service Employee and his photographs - taken in this capacity - are wholly owned by the County of Nassau. I am the designated and authorized agent for the County of Nassau and Mr. Raslich's supervisor. Not sure what else I can say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamStone18 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Laura Curran Headshot.jpg

I am the designated agent of Nassau County who uploaded this photo to the Nassau County website. It was taken by Mary Danenbaum - a Nassau County photographer. Her work in this capacity is wholly owned and copyright protected by the County of Nassau, of which I am the designated and authorized press/media agent. Very similar situation to that explained here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Curran_at_Mineola_Train_Station.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamStone18 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JUDr Pribyl.jpg

Hello, I would like to ask for the recovery of this photo. We´ve recieved an OTRS permission for that. Thanks, --Michal Lenc (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Michal Lenc: please add the final OTRS tag and the actual licence. De728631 (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritratto di Annibale Cavriani.jpg

hi, I would like to ask for the restoration of the following portrait made in 1779 by the priest Luigi Nicolini

Source of Portrait:https://www.comune.mantova.gov.it/index.php/cultura/mantova-citta-di-cultura/news-cultura/item/download/378_ece275d4c53206725d5beb4d24fff34e

--95.245.76.102 17:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose created by abuser —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.194.210.136 (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2018‎ (UTC)

 Not done: LTA requests are not acceptable. Ruthven (msg) 21:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Martin Romberg, D. Margau 15.jpg.

Hi,

We sent the written permission for this file 2-3 weeks ago to the wikipedia email. Please update.

Thanks,

Bob —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.51.43.117 (talk) 08:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Bansuri69: You uploaded this. Did you get permission from Delphine Margau yet?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello there, I do not get any of this. Point 1) Delphine Margau is my "(#/&%# wife. We sent a scanned written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) over 3 weeks ago. Can someone please check that mailbox and reinstall the photo please. Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bansuri69 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: There is no reason to do it before other requests in queue. Please wait at least 74 days. Ruthven (msg) 22:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Mass TechCrunch restore request

Please restore all images deleted in the following DRs and the following individual images:


Original discussion

Per the close by Ruthven at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gavin Wood in 2017.jpg. TechCrunch has every right to release their photos under a free license if they choose to do so on their confirmed Flickr account. Them being present on Getty, and the metadata, do not discount the fact that TechCrunch has this right. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

I just added six more files and another mass DR that was just deleted by Jcb. This is getting ridiculous. These are TechCrunch's images. Released by TechCrunch on their Flickr page. You can't have this both ways here. Getty does not own these images. TechCrunch has every right to release them under a free license. --Majora (talk) 02:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Just for reference there are 24 other images from the TechCrunch account that have Getty in the metadata. So, again, can't have it both ways here. Total, there are almost 700 images from TechCrunch's flickr page (which is now blacklisted) on Commons. --Majora (talk) 02:32, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a photographer who works for or with Getty Images and is not a TechCrunch employee takes photographs at a TechCrunch event, then the photographer or Getty Images owns the copyright. It is certainly possible that Getty has licensed the images to TechCrunch for use in their own publicity and publications, but it is very unlikely that Getty has given TechCrunch the right to freely license them -- that's not how Getty works. If such a license exists, TechCrunch must offer evidence of it via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 Comment These photographers simply delegate to Getty the management of their rights. Getty usually requires exclusivity, but there could be exceptions. It could very well be that some have allowed TechCrunch to publish their images under a free license. Anyway, if a permission is needed, it is from the photographer, not from TechCrunch. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
I contacted TechCrunch. See Ticket:2018041510004936. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
I've sent them emails as well. But to a more limited number of address. Thank you Yann for being more thorough. It is common for events such as these to hire photographers to document them. Which would constitute a work for hire contact for the company so permission from TechCrunch would be fine since it would be corporate ownership. It is possible that TechCrunch even hired Getty which would then depend on how the contract was worded. I was just flummoxed over this. Two different admins closing the same thing different leaving out images that have the same potential issue. If you are going to do cleanup at least do it completely. And at the very least, do it evenly. --Majora (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

 Withdrawn For the time being pending any response to Yann's query. I've watched the ticket so I'll reopen if and when there is a proper response. --Majora (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I've pulled this request out of the archive since Yann received a response on Ticket:2018041510004936 that indicates that the images in question are indeed under a free license and that the copyright holder has agreed to put them under said license. I'd like to restart my request to undelete these images in light of the OTRS ticket. The original discussion is included above in the collapsed section for referral purposes. Also pinging Jameslwoodward as they opposed the original request. --Majora (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 Oppose All we have in the OTRS correspondence is "Yes you may publish and credit TechCrunch". Nothing more. There is no explanation of how TechCrunch came to have a license that allows Tech Crunch to freely license Getty property and not even a signature. We have no evidence at all that whoever wrote the message had the authority to do so. I also note that the message was forwarded to OTRS, which we do not ordinarily accept, although since the forwarder is Yann, I'm OK with it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what you are looking for here. The question asked by Yann was "Could you please confirm that the copyright holder have allowed to publish the images under a free license". The response to that specific question was an unequivocal yes. The response came from an official TechCrunch account that is confirmed to belong to them via their website. The account is the "events" account that would deal with these events and therefore know the circumstances behind their photographers. The response is short, yes, but it answers the question posed in a way that indicates that the license on Flickr is correct. If you want something more perhaps Yann can unlock the ticket so you can get whatever working you want out of them. --Majora (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Technically it's not needed that the ticket owner unlock the ticket. If you press 'quick close', it will no longer be locked. Jcb (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose - without some more explanation we cannot take their statement for granted. We do not even know whether the person responding has a proper understanding of copyright regulations. Any OTRS agent is expected to be aware that a lot of statements from customers are mistaken and that we have an active role in helping them sorting things out. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Majora, well, for one thing I expect a signature of a person with at least the apparent authority to give away their employer's property. The OTRS files represent a legal record of the licensing of an image and without a signature, we have nothing. But, as Jcb suggests, I also expect an explanation of how it is that TechCrunch thinks it has the right to freely license images whose copyright is apparently owned by Getty Images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Stalled. --Yann (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Berdyaev2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_in_public_domain Image should be considered as in "Public Domain", since it was reproduced in several English books shortly after Berdyaev's 1948 death, with no indication of "restrictive ownership " or suchlike. Frsjanos (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - for two reason's: 1) Berdyaev is the depicted person, not the author, so it's irrelevant when Berdyaev has died and 2) if Berdyaev would have been the author, it's still not 2019. Jcb (talk) 18:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Frsjanos and Чръный человек: This could be in the public domain, but we need more information. Seeing his age, it probably dates from the 1930s, at a time when he was living in France. The source is probably this, but there is no information. It would be in the public domain if it was first published in France in the 1930s without the mention of an author. Any idea? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. Please ask again if you find the information. --Yann (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

user:LokoWiki uploads

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018050310000344 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation and mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately. Files are:

Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I don't understand why these files were tagged and deleted, there wasn't any reason to do so. There are all of high resolution with consistent EXIF data. Yann (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Kane_2008.JPG is taken with a different camera, and there is derivative work issue. Yann (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: Please complete the permission. @LokoWiki: Please fix the categories. --Yann (talk) 09:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Travis_Karter_Live_at_Torrent,_2018.png

File:Travis_Karter_Live_at_Torrent,_2018.png

Good afternooon, I noticed that a file I uploaded to wikimedia commons was unrightfully deleted today, May 8, 2018 by user Hystrix. I assert that this was a wrongful deletion, as I received explicit permission from the photographer and copyright holder himself, Lucas Miranda, to release it to wikimedia. In addition to the explicit permission I received, the photographer ALSO sent an email stating his release permission to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" I am thereby requesting the undeletion of this file at the earliest convenience. Thank you for your understanding, AK

(Andrewkazimi (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)) May 8 2018 --Andrewkazimi (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Ticket:2018043010008691. For future reference, please have the permission sent in first for files that you did not take yourself. The explicit permission you claim to have received cannot be verified by us. --Storkk (talk) 09:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bartsch-Memhardt Potsdamer Potsdamer Stadtschloss.jpg

Sorry I forgot the license {{PD-art|PD-old-100-1923}}, see creators--Tanzmariechen (talk) 23:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Hi @Tanzmariechen: , auch im angegebenen Link steht CC BY-NC-SA. Für non-commercial siehe bitte COM:L. --Hystrix (talk) 04:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support... and I don't understand the opposes above, especially @Hystrix: 's, who can see the file. How is {{PD-art|PD-old-100-1923}} not appropriate? Storkk (talk) 09:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-Art-100. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kirsten-Harms.jpg Undelete on page KIRSTEN HARMS

Bitte wieder herstellen auf der Wikipedia-Seite <Kirsten Harms>. Die Deutsche Oper Berlin, deren Intedantin Kirsten Harms von 2004 bis 2011 war, hat der Benutzung dieses Fotos zugestimmt und ebenso der Fotograf Bernd Uhlig. Dass das Foto auch auf der Seite der Deutschen Oper Berlin eingestellt ist, steht dem nicht entgegen.

aribengeorge, 2018-05-09, 13:59 h Aribengeorge (talk) 12:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Solange wir keine Freigabe per Email durch den Fotografen erhalten haben, können wir das Foto hier leider nicht behalten. Bei Fotografien und anderen Werken, die bereits zuvor ohne erkennbare, freie Lizenz veröffentlicht wurden, benötigen wir immer eine Genehmigung direkt durch den Urheber. Die Anleitung dazu steht in COM:OTRS/de. De728631 (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cher Here We Go Again tour.jpg

1) I asked the creator of the poster about the permission to use it (via Twitter) and although they didn't respond with a written message, they gave it a heart which I would see as an approval! https://twitter.com/tiio2208/status/993945410065616896?s=09 In case that's not enough, I sent them the formular and if they send it to you, you will see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TioTayumi (talk • contribs) 14:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose @TioTayumi: Permission via Twitter doesn't work. The copyright holder has to send a formal written permission for a free license via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Keith Sykes profile shot.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018022210014059 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: Please complete the permission. --Yann (talk) 03:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Battery operated water guns Playtime Tyco Amron.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030210003418 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: please consider also that most of these are also derivative works of other non-free images. If any of them fails the permission test please feel free to mark for speedy deletion. De728631 (talk) 04:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Graciela Chichilnisky Economist.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030210010544 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Jeff G.: fyi. De728631 (talk) 04:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Бабенко любий друг.jpg

Доброго дня. Завантажений файл належить театрові ім. М. Заньковецько, я як працівник маю право використовувати матеріали театру. Буду вдячна, якщо Ви його розблокуєте! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simeon1984 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose The copyright holder must confirm not just that you have the right to use the photo, but that it is released under a free license allowing anybody to use it. Please have the copyright holder follow the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 03:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files are copyright to DB Cargo (UK) Limited

Hello,

Please note this file was uploaded by DB Cargo (UK) Limited to update our branding and information relating to the company. The previous pictures & information on Wikipedia regarding DB Cargo (UK) Limited was completely incorrect and was not providing the correct information when the company is searched online. Please undelete the photo forwith.

Thanks

Simon Lock DB Cargo (UK) Limited — Preceding unsigned comment added by DBCSLUK (talk • contribs) 16:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@DBCSLUK: Which file or photo?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Apparently this is about File:DB Cargo (UK) Limited Locomotive 67028.jpg and File:Leading the next generation of rail freight.jpg. The problem here is that the EXIF metadata of both files credit a different person as the copyright holder. Therefore we need a permission by email sent from the actual copyright holder. If the photos were taken by employees of DB Cargo UK in the course of their employment, please have an official representative send this email. See COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 03:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 03:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by LyricSamantha & User:LyricSamantha

Please consider this file for undeletion. It was uploaded with the permission of the copyright owner and an official release (OTRS) is being sent through the proper channels. File:Lidiya Yankovskaya.jpg File:Lidiya Yankovskaya conducting.jpg

As I was gathering information to have the release sent in, another editor marked these files for copyright infringement (which is not true). After the second file was flagged, my user page was deleted. Please restore it.

LyricSamantha (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Also, we need permission from the photographer, not just the subject.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 03:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Gral Hermes Soto.png

File:Gral Hermes Soto.png Es la Imágen Oficial del General Director de Carabineros, Libre y Autorizada por Carabineros de Chile. XxxWolfxxx (talk) 22:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:07, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 03:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of Abuziyadjogja

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030310000446 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: Please complete the permission. --Yann (talk) 03:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paradoxical Sajid (AA).png

This is the cover of the book 'Paradoxical Sajid'

There is no reason to delete this picture. It has no copyrights and is free to upload — Preceding unsigned comment added by The revealer (talk • contribs) 16:55, 12 May 2018‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Do not reupload again.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not, as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 06:25, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Barrett M90.png

Hello, I am requesting you un-delete the photo, as I obtained permission from the author to use this photo as long as he was credited.

Take a look at our exchange via email below:

From: Jay C■■■■■■
Sent: Friday, May 4, 2018 11:41 PM
To: Max Popenker
Subject: RE: Permission to use Barret M90 photo for Wikipedia page

Sounds good! Thanks.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Max Popenker <mpopenker@modernfirearms.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:04:22 AM
To: Jay ■■■■■■■
Subject: Re: Permission to use Barret M90 photo for Wikipedia page

go ahead, just link to my site as source

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:09 AM, Jay C■■■■■■■ <h■■■■■■■@live.com> wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering if I would have permission to use this photo on the Wikipedia page for the Barrett M90.

I’ve searched online and cannot find any other good photos of the M90, as it is a discontinued firearm.

Your response would be appreciated, thank you!!

Sincerely, Jay

-- Yours, Maxim Popenker
Modern Firearms website at http://ModernFirearms.net (formerly known as world.guns.ru)
email: <email>
Skype: max_popenker
Mobile/Viber/WhatsApp: <phone>
--Hoodlook (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Hoodlook: Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission for a free license via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:کانالت ساخت طراحی اجرا بهره برداری و نگهداری.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030510001656 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Yann (talk) 07:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:»Light and Heavy« Katerina Belkina, Kunsthalle Erfurt, Retrospektive 5 Jahre HANT - MAGAZIN (1).jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030510006884 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Yann (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:David Mabberley.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030610003009 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Yann (talk) 07:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Deng Lun 2018.jpg

This is a photo of the public activity of Deng Lun Studio on Weibo.--AimeeLHP (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The source website (http://www.sina.com.cn) cleaarly states: Copyright ©1996-2018 SINA Corporation, All Rights Reserved. Ruthven (msg) 07:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hinh hieu Ai la trieu phu 2018.png

This is a valid image with source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG1pDCf63xI H.V.T Pro-4 (talk) 11:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose "Standard YouTube License". Thuresson (talk) 11:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aşk Laftan Anlamaz Cover.png

The show banner is free for fair use.


--BangtanSwift (talk) 09:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:04, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Fair use not allowed on Commons. --Yann (talk) 07:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fantastic Four Vol 1 2.png,File:Fantastic Four Vol 1 3.png,File:Fantastic Four Vol 1 4.png

File:Fantastic Four Vol 1 2.png File:Fantastic Four Vol 1 3.png File:Fantastic Four Vol 1 4.png

Are deleted, but this covers is a part of http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Fantastic_Four_Vol_1 This files are public and i think that this is not a violation add this files here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moriarti92 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FORD 2018 FOCUS ST-LINE STUDIO 04.jpg

This image was from a Press Kit published by Ford Europe, non-commercial use is permitted without written permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameronmaher (talk • contribs) 00:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Commercial use not permitted.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Restrictions to "Non-commercial use" solely is not allowed here. Ruthven (msg) 07:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ruthven: I think you meant to write that files restricted to "Non-commercial use" are not allowed here, as all our use here is "Non-commercial use".   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Sure, thanks. Just a slipping on the language. --Ruthven (msg) 07:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of Hreinn Gudlaugsson

All of the following files where deleted due to not proving permission from the author. The first one in the following list is the only one that went through deletion discussion, an link to it is provided after the name. All of the files are credited to the uploader and the uploader became an verifed user via OTRS after these deletions where made, as can be seen on his userpage. This verification makes the deletion argument of all of those files moot and frankly incorrect. Let's correct this mistake of the past.

--Snaevar (talk) 23:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nikhila_Vimal.jpg

Nikhila vimal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamnrs (talk • contribs) 02:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Iamnrs and Gsivakumar be: This file has been deleted four times now. Please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Copied from Facebook, no reason for undeletion. Already deleted 4 times. --Yann (talk) 09:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kirsten-Harms.jpg Undelete

Please undelete the Kirsten-Harms.jpg foto. Ms Harms has now not only got the agreement of fotografer Bernd Uhlig but also form the DEUTSCHE OPER BERLIN. Here is the mail:

Von: "Gysbers, Ina" <email> Datum: 9. Mai 2018 um 15:29:55 MESZ An: Kirsten Harms <email> Betreff: AW: Photo für Wikipedia Sehr geehrte, liebe Frau Harms, unsererseits ist die Verwendung des Fotos von Bernd Uhlig absolut zulässig unter Benennung des Copyrights © Bernd Uhlig.

Falls diese unsere Einverständniserklärung nicht ausreichend ist, raten wir, eine Rechtefreigabe von Bernd Uhlig zu erbitten.

Hilft Ihnen das so? Unsererseits bestehen wirklich gar keine Bedenken. Liebste Grüße bitte auch an Bernd natürlich auch von Marion Mair, Ina Gysbers


DEUTSCHE OPER BERLIN Vertrieb und Marketing Richard-Wagner-Straße 10 10585 Berlin [GERMANY]

Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

Von: Kirsten Harms [2] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2018 11:37 An: Gysbers, Ina Betreff: Photo für Wikipedia

Liebe Frau Gysbers, Um das Photo von Bernd Uhlig, über das wir gesprochen hatten, für Wikipedia benutzen zu können, brauche ich eine schriftliche Genehmigung der Deutschen Oper, dass Wikipedia es verwenden darf. Sonst veröffentlichen sie es nicht, da es auf der Website der DOB ohne Freigabe zur weiteren Verwendung drauf ist. Würden Sie so nett sein, und mir einen entsprechenden Zweizeiler per Mail schicken? Vielen Dank und liebe Grüße Ihre Kirsten Harms <Intendantin Kirsten Harms_21det.jpg>

aribengeorge, 2018-05-10, 05:21 UTC Aribengeorge (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Nein, das hilft leider auch nicht weiter. Genehmigungen nur für die Benutzung auf Wikipedia sind sowohl bei Wikipedia als auch hier auf Commons nicht ausreichend. Wie shon oben erwähnt, brauchen wir eine freie Lizenz direkt durch den Fotografen per Email, und nicht etwa von der Deutschen Oper. Dies bedeutet auch, dass jedermann das Foto für alle möglichen Zwecke auch außerhalb der Wikimedia-Projekte verwenden können darf — einschließlich kommerzieller Verwertung. De728631 (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Permission for Wikipedia only. Please see COM:OTRS for information on how the copyright owner can verify that the photo can be published with a free license. Thuresson (talk) 20:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Screenshot of a Singlish IME for Windows..jpg

This from a freeware software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasiths (talk • contribs) 07:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy close. File not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 07:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request for Undeletion: Hagfish Endoskeleton

Good evening,

Recently, I have tried to submit some pictures for the hagfish wikipedia page that has been deleted multiple times. I believe that this is due to my incorrect labeling of copyright concerns initially.

The image I uploaded was originally from an article that I have cited multiple times. However, I have modified the image extensively as to make it more simple for a Wikipedia page. The paper is from 1906, so I'm not sure what osrt of copyright applies to academia sources this old. Could you direct me to what sort of copyright disclosure I need to put on this paper? Or, because the image I am trying to upload has been extensively modified by myself, do I not need copyright disclosure?

Thank you,

Zaro7315 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaro7315 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. File:Hagfish endoskeleton.png is a reupload of File:Anatomical sketches of the hagfish endoskeleton as drawn by Cole in 1905.png, which was deleted as a copyvio with external source, no license, and no permission. What is the source, license, and permission? When and where was the original created, by whom, and what was their lifespan? Please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Simone Strey.jpg

I hereby apply for the restoration of the above mentioned image. the rights are with us. the head of our organization applied for the release of use via mail to the wiki-commons team 2 weeks ago.ZeusUlrich247 (talk) 09:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 08:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logo WIZINK

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018040410008882 alleges permission (perhaps PD-textlogo apply?) of File:AF Logo WIZINK tagline digital VV RGB.png. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation and mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done This is obviously {{PD-textlogo}} so I think we don't really need a permission. De728631 (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 08:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Deepak verma.jpg

The particular file in question is part of the public record and available for free and fair use. Being a lawyer admitted to practice in India, I see no copyright violation for using a particular work which is part of the public domain. The source of the picture is the official website of the High Court of Judicature at Karnataka and even the source website does not claim any copyright over it. More over, fair use of documents and photographs available in public domain, especially content found in the government websites can be freely used. I thereby, request undeletion of the photograph. I am trying to improve the wiki content pertaining to Indian legal history and that includes the Supreme Court and its past justices. I feel that such obstruction in editing would make it impossible to add substance and credible material about India's legal history. If information and facts available on the official websites cannot be relied upon, then there is no way to improve the content.

For example: I fail to understand if this is not a copyright violation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hrkhanna-supremecourtofindia.nic.in.jpg then how the file in question be. Hrkhanna file is also using content avaialable in the public domain. High Court of Karnataka and Supreme Court of India are part of the same instrumentality of the state Judiciary.

I humbly request you to consider the above points and take an informed decision.


Kind Regards

Indian Legal History — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indialegalhistory (talk • contribs) 10:15, 12 May 2018‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Oppose per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India and Commons:Fair use. Also, High court's website does claim copyright, "2014 © Copyright High Court of Karnataka. All Rights Reserved". Thuresson (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
We tend to label anything not freely licensed (per Commons:Licensing or freedomdefined) as a "copyright violation", even though that is not necessarily true. The files are undoubtedly fair use or fair dealing for most purposes, but being a public record does not change the primary copyright status, and per site policy the media here must be usable even for commercial purposes. Hosting files under a fair use rationale is explicitly barred (see Commons:Fair use). So, either the copyright must have lapsed (in both the country of origin and the U.S.), or the existing copyright must be licensed freely, to be hosted here (by policy, even if otherwise legal). Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:05, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per Carl. Additionally, I believe you are confusing or conflating the copyright term-of-art "public domain" with the British English common usage about it "being found in the public". They are not the same, and explicit claims of copyright are not necessary for a work to be copyrighted. --Storkk (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Suess Michael.jpg Picture of the director of the board of OC Oerlikon, Switzerland

To whom it may concern: We (Dynamics Group AG, Zurich) are a consulting company who is mandated to do some minor edits on Wikipedia for the firm OC Oerlikon, Switzerland. We would like to have the picture of Michael Süss, Director of the Board, to be published together with his short CV/Vita. Can you please undelete the file as soon as possible. The copy- and distribution rights are at OC Oerlikon, Freienbach, Switzerland. https://www.oerlikon.com/de/

Thank you very much in advance. Sincerely

--Julia von Känel (talk) 20:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC) Julia von Kaenel, Assistant

 Oppose The metadata in the JPG file credit this image and its copyright to a certain photographer, so we need a confirmation by email from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS/de for instructions. De728631 (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per De728631. OTRS-confirmation from copyright holder required. --Storkk (talk) 11:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:I once checked out every Sophie Calle book from the library. I forgot to return them and eventually the library mailed me a bill for $1,054.90.jpg

File:I once checked out every Sophie Calle book from the library. I forgot to return them and eventually the library mailed me a bill for $1,054.90.jpg to undelete.jpg


I got a nofication saything that the file: I once checked out every Sophie Calle book from the library. I forgot to return them and eventually the library mailed me a bill for $1,054.90.jpg is to be deleted. User: theinstantmatrix is challenging everything I post here. I am new an learning the rules. theinstantmatrix claims that this images is out of scope, but I would argue that an image documenting a varriaty of artist books by Sophie Calle is educational! Art eductation! Maybe theinstantmatrix holds issue with my image title names? But if you know anything about Sophie Calle's work, she uses alot of personal narratives, and this is refrential and appropriate. Further more, I am interested in making these images open source. For other people to be able to use other places. This image can be taken many directions: stack of books, catalogue of artist Sophie Calle's work, documentation of library books... I ask that this post be undeleted. Thank you so much!

(Oliviadesalve (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC))

Procedural closure This board is for files that have already been deleted, but this file is still being discussed. Please reply at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Oliviadesalve instead. De728631 (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request to undelete these files

Those files were created by me. I hold the copyright to them. I did not have time to discuss them when nominated for deletion.--Ashashyou (talk) 07:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Nobody is disputing that you took the photos. The problem is that it was presumed that you don't own the copyright to the posters that you have photographed. If you own the copyright to the original materials, please confirm this via OTRS and after that, we'd prefer the actual posters rather than pictures of the posters, where they are in scope. For more information, please read COM:DW, as linked to in the DR. Storkk (talk) 09:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ashashyou: Now is the time to discuss. Please explain in detail why the files should be undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 09:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done: No answer, no valid reason for undeletion. --Yann (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eisaxt Villa-Haas.jpg

Die Datei ist meine eigene Arbeit. Bitte wieder hochladen. anne1234Anne1234 (talk) 14:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done The original upload had {{Own}} as a source, but subsequent edits by the uploader broke the description template leaving no visible source entry. De728631 (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I have reopened the discussion because I found and inconsistency in the attribution. Marked as "temporarily undeleted".
@Anne1234: Nach dem Hochladen hast Du "K.F.Mueller" als Urheber eingetragen. Das passt nicht zu Deinem Benutzernamen, also stellt sich die Frage, ob das Bild tatsächlich Deine eigene Arbeit ist. De728631 (talk) 14:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 16:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Personal photos from albums

http://shanson-e.tk/forum/search.php?searchid=6037678 - Personal photos from albums — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ненашева Татьяна (talk • contribs) 22:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ненашева Татьяна: Does this concern one or more of the redlinks in this log?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:10, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 Not done not clear what is requested and user is not responding. Ankry (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Model of the Role of Netrin-1 Signaling in the Topography of Thalamocortical Projections in the Ventral Telencephalon.png

comes from open-access article under CC BY

I cannot see what that file contains, but judging from its derivative File:Netrin 1 knockout model cropped.png, it comes from

  • Powell AW, Sassa T, Wu Y, Tessier-Lavigne M, Polleux F (2008). "Topography of Thalamic Projections Requires Attractive and Repulsive Functions of Netrin-1 in the Ventral Telencephalon". PLoS Biology 6 (5): e116. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060116.,

which is available under CC BY 2.5. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 20:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

 Info Tagged as a copyright violation for the following reason: "copied from "Figure 11. Model of the Role of Netrin-1 Signaling in the Topography of Thalamocortical Projections in the Ventral Telencephalon" |source=http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060116.g011" Thuresson (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The PDF has on page 1 Copyright: (c) 2008 Powell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. I could not find any data as to which CC-BY version is to be used. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ronhjones: That would generally imply {{Cc-by-1.0}}, wouldn't it?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
The requester is saying CC-BY-2.5 - If he can provide a link... Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:14, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ronhjones: there is CC-BY 4.0 link here. This should cover the above-mentioned article. Ankry (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: link to cc-by-4.0 found. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritratto di Annibale Cavriani.jpg

hi, I would like to ask for the restoration of the following portrait made in 1779 by the priest Luigi Nicolini

Source of Portrait:https://www.comune.mantova.gov.it/index.php/cultura/mantova-citta-di-cultura/news-cultura/item/download/378_ece275d4c53206725d5beb4d24fff34e --87.0.97.194 20:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Please stop proposing your files at UNDEL. Since you're blocked, these requests will NOT be considered. --Ruthven (msg) 06:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: LTA request. --Guanaco (talk) 05:10, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Кирилл Дыцевич.jpg‬

Добрый день. Данный файл принадлежит официальной группе актера. Нигде в сети данной фотографии нет. Сделана специально для статьи в википендии. --Oxiket (talk) 16:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC) 14.05.2018 Oxiket

 Oppose This image contains author information: "Olga Kasyanyuk www.7life.com.ua". As any Wikimedia user is anonymous, and we cannot verify on-wiki whether the above mentioned author and the uploader are the same person, we require a written permission following COM:OTRS to be send to us in such cases. Ankry (talk) 21:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Waiting for OTRS email to restore the file. Ruthven (msg) 18:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hamlet-Model-Essays-for-Students-Brendan-Munnelly.jpg

Hi,

This is a request to undelete a cover image of a book, written by me, Brendan Munnelly.

The book's details are as follows:

Title: Hamlet: Model Essays for Students Author: Brendan Munnelly ISBN-13: 978-1980540519 ISBN-10: 1980540519

The book's entry on WikiData is here:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q52958853

I am the author and copyright-holder of the book.

I also created the cover image for the book.

I uploaded the book's cover image to Wikipedia Command and - as part of that process - I released the cover image under Creative Commons licence.

But, for some reason, the cover image has been flagged under 'fair use' rather than Creative Commons.

To repeat, I am very happy for the book's cover to be licensed under Creative Commons.

And I would be grateful if the cover image file could be undeleted and restored.

Thanking you for your time and attention.

Brendan Munnelly — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrendanMun (talk • contribs) 20:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @BrendanMun: Since anybody can register any username here, we cannot verify that you are actually who you say you are, or that you as the author retained copyright to the book cover. Please follow the instructions on OTRS so that we can confirm and archive these facts confidentially, at which point an OTRS agent will request the file's undeletion. Storkk (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The file will be undeleted once we have a permission email from a verifiable email address. Ruthven (msg) 18:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:31540 b.jpg

Пожалуйста восстановите этот фото, фото удалили и сказали что Сайт защищён авторским правами. Но на сайте есть ссылка на https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ ; а там написано "You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.". А это означает что фото можно вставить например на википедии, не так ли?--Armenia004am (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose CC-BY-ND licenses are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. We need derivative work creation to be allowed. Ankry (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mühlpfordt (Fuhg).jpg

Mit der Bitte um Wiederherstellung damit ich es mir ansehen kann, Ticket Nr 2018050810010682 Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 15:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
With the request for restoration so I can see it, ticket no 2018050810010682 bye-bye -- Ra Boe watt?? 15:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Raboe001: Ankry (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Thx -- Ra Boe watt?? 20:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Group On The Beach (6238424967).jpg

Interesting historical document deleted for frivolous reason by Admin:Taivo after a discussion where the original nominator failed reply to additional information aduced, closed with two keep-votes and no delete-vote. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Comment I am a hardcore inclusionist, but I fail to see the usefulness of this file. There is no information about the picture content. Where is that place? Who are these people? Are they on vacation, or some other purpose? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I will keep on, yes, and it has served me beautifully so far. Now, since you do can read, go ahead and read the discussion (especially Alexis Jazz’ comment and the linked pages) again: That’s where I learned about the origin of these photos, and I’m sure you can too. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Yep! I can see the photo in the link below, and as I expected, just because there were Nazis in France, the waves didn't magically turn into swastikas. Given the lack of information about the photo, it's actively more useless than a picture of the beach today, in hi-res full color with information about when (time of year and time of day) and where, would be. I've got piles of family photos I can legally upload; Berlin at the end of the Cold War and Vietnam-war era Vietnam are not uninteresting places, but I'm not about to dump entire piles of photos up here with little to no information on them on the grounds that that alone is enough for them to be useful.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I have quite some of the same, and they would rightly be deleted if I would upload them. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
How is "other stuff exists" or poking Tuvalkin helpful? This appears to be parody, not about interpreting scope for well known archive material or whether Commons should host archive photographs in order to help identify the subjects in the future. Please support or oppose with your rationale, I did not upload these archive photographs so you could take the piss out of each other. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
If you need it simplified, works are not in scope merely because they were in [nation] during [major event]; they still need to show something educational, which this one does not.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
@Prosfilaes: I'd argue it does. "While Lois was kept busy with a wide range of tasks, she found some time every day to spend with the children. They ranged from toddlers to age 16. They walked on the beach nearly every sunny day". This photo illustrates that part of the story. But as for keeping it or not I'm neutral. Several other photos from the same album illustrate the same thing but have better quality. Would be a strong keep if this was the only one. - Alexis Jazz Please ping when replying to me 03:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. An old picture may be useful in itself if we know the context, if it is related to some event, or if we can see something (clothing, etc.). None of this is the case here. --Yann (talk) 07:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aleksandra Popławska.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030610170436 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Yann (talk) 07:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BxB Sound Of Revolution.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030610175441 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Yann (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Javier Fake

Lamento colocar esto en español pero es mi idioma nativo y creo que puedo interpretar mejor mis palabras así. Se me han eliminado todas mis fotografías subidas desde 2017 porque un usuario acusó infracción de copyright siendo esto totalmente erróneo ya que las fotografías fueron tomadas por mi no pudiendo controlar quien pudiese tomar las fotografías desde Wikipedia y publicarlas en sus web posteriormente. Intente comunicarme con quien realizo esto pero no he recibido respuesta por lo que solicito vía este medio restaurar mis archivos para no tener problemas a futuro, no los he tenido en 8 años y no quiero comenzar ahora. A continuación dejo el listado de archivos:

Saludos --Javier Fake (talk) 21:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry to put this in Spanish but it's my native language and I think I can better interpret my words like that. I have removed all my photographs uploaded since 2017 because a user accused copyright infringement being this completely wrong since the photographs were taken by me unable to control who could take the pictures from Wikipedia and publish them on their web later. Try to communicate with whoever did this but I have not received an answer, so I request via this means to restore my files so that I do not have problems in the future, I have not had them in 8 years and I do not want to start now. Here is the list of files: ... Salutations
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Please do not reupload content that has been deleted in a formal deletion request.
Why are the photos uploaded as PNG? Why do you not use JPEG with EXIF data?
Why are some photos small, "internet sized"? File:LarryValenzuela.png (443x510), File:LuisFelipePinilla.png (418x660), File:KevinVasquez3.png (363x845)
Why do some photos look like they have been scanned? (File:RafaelViotti.png., File:ReinerCastro.png)
I suggest that you use COM:OTRS to verify that you are the copyright owner, for example by submitting a few of these photos as uncropped JPEG images. Thuresson (talk) 19:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
My english it's no good but I try wrote in this language.
The original pictures are in JPG, I don't know what is the EXIF data, but I edit the photos before upload because mostly are from football games and appears another players, resize near to player's template photo in spanish wikipedia (250px) and change the format to PNG.
Don't are scannedd photos it's a cam effect.
How I can use the OTRS system? I don't understand, sorry, but I really wants reupload my photos.--Javier Fake (talk) 20:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Javier Fake: I suggest that you upload the original files in JPEG format, or you send a permission via COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish). Regards, Yann (talk) 03:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, I will try with OTRS.--Javier Fake (talk) 17:03, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Druk tsendhen.ogg

This file is a from nationalanthems.info, and was published under a CC 3.0 License. Druk tsendhen was adopted as the national anthem of Bhutan in 1953, which means the composition is older than the 50 year copyright length in Bhutan. The United States has no copyright treaty with Bhutan, meaning this work is public domain in the United States. SpanishSnake (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

{{S}} undeletion per above. Ankry (talk) 21:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
@SpanishSnake: Copyright in Bhutan is 50pma. Any evidence that Aku Tongmi, the music author, died more than 50 years ago? Or any exception in Copyright law that applies to the anathem? Ankry (talk) 09:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Apparently Tongmi died in 2007 [3], so his music is still copyrighted. I don't think that Nationalanthems.info is in a position to licence the works of third parties. {{{PD-Bhutan}} doesn't seem appliccable either: "audiovisual" means film recordings and the exception for government works is limited to texts. Apart from that, an audio recording creates also a copyright for the performing musician(s) and not just for the composer. De728631 (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Android 8.1 Oreo.svg

This is some easter egg logo as seen on https://www.androidpolice.com/2017/10/25/android-8-1-feature-spotlight-new-oreo-easter-egg-appears-double-stuf-form-octopus-remains/. (and some say a new official Android logo)

It was deleted as copyvio, but when you take File:Android robot 2014.svg out of it it's probably PD-ineligible anyway. - Alexis Jazz 10:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

 Question The file was deleted because of missing valid license tag. Which license tag you find appropriate here? The android logo is not PD, it is CC-BY licensed by google. Ankry (talk) 21:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: derivative of File:Android robot 2014.svg so CC-BY 3.0, PD-shape for the alterations. How exactly we usually describe that here I don't know. The few times this happened before I just described for every license tag I added to which part of the image it applies. I'll be happy to do that if it is undeleted. - Alexis Jazz 03:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: The problem is that CC license cannot be assumed. It must be explicitely declared. Does this derivative fit CC-BY license requirements? What attribution is required? Maybe, its author(s) got a separate license from Google...? Ankry (talk) 09:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Google is the author? Am I missing something? The copyright status for this particular image doesn't seem to be clear net yet, but the Android robot is CC-BY. And without the Android robot, the Oreo cookie is (imho) PD-ineligible. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo EU Naval Force (EU NAVFOR) Somalia - Operation Atalanta.svg

Its a COA. so the permission is:

{{PD-Coa-Germany}}{{Insignia}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunnar.offel (talk • contribs) 12:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:03, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo EU Naval Force (EU NAVFOR) Somalia - Operation Atalanta.jpg. {{Insignia}} is not a copyright license. No explanation why German law is relevant here. Thuresson (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Thuresson is right. This was not originally designed as an official work of the German government so it is copyrighted and non-free. Apart from that it is not a coat of arms but a logo which may not be redrawn without permission. De728631 (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mihai Pohontu.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the owner of the photo and I've used that picture several times in the past for various articles, but it is my property and nobody can claim it. Pikamim (talk) 20:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If it was already published anywhere without evidence of free license, then in order to keep this we need a written permission from the photo actual copyright owner following COM:OTRS. We cannot rely on "ownership" declaration by an anonymous user (every user in Wikimedia is considered anonymous) for an already published photo. Ankry (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: A discussion has taken place about a photo of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands. The source and photographer are the same. The deletion request of the files of Princess Beatrix are denied. So, this photo can also return to Wikimedia. For discussion about Princess Beatrix, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prinses Beatrix.jpg. DWiki2 (talk) 07:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

 Support Should have never been deleted. {{Koninklijk Huis}} is clear about this. As the Dutch would say, deleting this because it is copyrighted by the w:nl:RVD slaat als een lul op een drumstel. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support This was published before 1 January 2016 [4], so the CC licence per {{Koninklijk Huis}} does include photographs from the Royal Dutch website. De728631 (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done by Ciell. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lead-acid battery for commercial purposes..jpg

I am the rightful owner of the picture. I took the picture, edited the picture and have sought permission from the company to upload the media.--User383838 (talk) 04:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. This appears to concern File:Lead-acid battery for commercial purposes..jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Jeff: The file will be restored after we receive and process the permission to publish under free license at the OTRS service. Ruthven (msg) 07:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Julia Hanzl - Offizielle Pressefoto - Hell.jpg

Hey - I have received the approval of the photographer + presspic of Julia Hanzl by herself (She's the person on the photo) via Mail. Would be great if you could restore that picture. Merci :) --Timon.Straub (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: @Timon.Straub: The file will be restored after we receive and process the permission to publish under free license from the photographer to the OTRS service. Ruthven (msg) 07:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LeafCurlingSpider01.jpg

This file was donated to wikimedia by me, it was taken by me with my camera, I'm happy for anyone to use it for any reason. Please undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjoyce (talk • contribs) 23:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per IRC talk. https://www.survival.org.au/leaf-curling-spider.php specifically refers to this file description page; appearing everywhere on the internet because it was uploaded over a decade ago. if someone disagree then file a DR and have due process. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daniel Hoffman, Violinist.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: this is a screenshot from a video that I own all the copyrights for. 85.250.51.219 07:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Youtube standard license. Thuresson (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. If you hold the copyright, the change the license to a free one, in order to reuse its contents here. Ruthven (msg) 05:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Drew Fortier.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the rightful owner of the file and would like to request it to be undeleted. I grant full permission. Thank you. Drewfortier (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Drewfortier and Thatguy1987: Can you change the license on Flickr?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: I don't believe that i've ever had this photo on Flickr before. Is it possible that we couuld be talking about two different photographs with the same file name? I checked out the photo history and I don't know anything about the one uploaded in February, also called Drew Fortier.jpg, that got deleted. Drewfortier (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

There were two different uploads at this filename. The one Jeff is referring to is this image by Joe Schaeffer at Flickr. However, the recent upload was credited to Michael J Photography, so we need evidence that the copyright was transferred to you. Owning a copy of a photograph does not automatically make you own copyright for it unless it was explicitely transferred to you by the photographer. De728631 (talk) 14:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image appeared here either before or contemporaneously (27 April) to upload to the Commons with a credit to "Michael J Photography". We would require evidence of permission from Michael J Photography to host this file. Drewfortier, as the mere subject, would not generally hold the copyright (held by the photographer) unless transferred by formal written conveyance. A copy of that document, or direct contact from Michael J Photography, would need to be submitted using the process at COM:OTRS. Эlcobbola talk 14:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Elcobbola: ah ha! That Flickr photo is definitely not the one I uploaded. Okay cool. So what can I do to show that the photo that I DID upload is legally mine? Also is there a way we can change the file name so there is no more confusion with that Flickr photo? Thank you! Drewfortier (talk) 14:35, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
As per above, Michael J Photography can contact us directly releasing the image under a free license, or you can provide us a copy of the document that transferred the intellectual property (copyright), as opposed to mere physical property (photograph) from Michael J Photography to you. Эlcobbola talk 14:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: Sorry, was writing the reply when you replied, and absolutely no problem! Written permission as far as e-mail or perhaps messages via Michael J Photography's Official Facebook? I apologize for the invonvenience! Drewfortier (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Please have them email our volunteer staff. See COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: Would it be easier to just have Michael J Photography upload the photo himself since he is the one who took the photo? Drewfortier (talk) 14:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

No, they would still need to contact OTRS to verify their identify, which saves no time or effort. If this the is the Michael J Photography, they can email OTRS using their @aol.com address referenced on that Facebook page and reference OTRS ticket 2018050110009018. Also, you do not need to use the {{Reply}} template; I am watching the page. Эlcobbola talk 14:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I'll have him e-mail OTRS ASAP. He just needs to verify his identity as well as allow permission for the photograph to be used correct? Just to confirm, do I him him do this via the release generator on OTRS? Drewfortier (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Use of the @aol.com address referenced on that Facebook page will allow us to verify his identity, so he will not need to do anything else in that regard. Yes, it would be best to have him use the release generator. Эlcobbola talk 14:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your assistance. I will update this thread once he sends the e-mail. Drewfortier (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Generally, any uploader who asks a rightsholder to send permission for a work via OTRS should ask to be copied on the email message so they can be in the loop.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Not sure if this will speed up the process or not matter at all but if you go here https://m.imdb.com/name/nm1977694/ and click on the photo, it shows the copyright belongs to Drew Fortier. Drewfortier (talk) 20:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I just had the photographer email the required form from the required email. Drewfortier (talk) 14:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS Received. --Эlcobbola talk 15:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos of Marketa Galuszkova

Hello, I would like to ask for the undeletion of the following photos. We recieved the OTRS permission from the author shortly after the deletion. Thanks.

--Michal Lenc (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

@Michal Lenc: I hope you have a ticket number.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:10, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Sure, 2018033110003015. But it´s in Czech. --Michal Lenc (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
@Michal Lenc: Unfortunately, I am not allowed to see it, which queue is it in?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:54, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: info-cs (Czech permission is usually sent to permission-cs, but this one has come to info-cs). But I don´t think there is a need to check it again. As an OTRS agent, I can see it and I am allowed to add the permission. --Michal Lenc (talk) 14:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
@Michal Lenc: Commons permission tickets should be moved to permissions-commons. They should not remain in info queues, since those queues cannot be checked by Permissions-Commons OTRS agents. Storkk (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
@Michal Lenc: Further to what Storkk wrote, you may find {{subst:OU}} and links like Ticket:2018033110003015 helpful.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Ok, I´ve moved the ticket. As far as I know, the template isn´t necessary for the undeletion, am I right? Because this is not my first request and the previous one was accepted without any ticket number or the template. --Michal Lenc (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Template is not necessary for undeletion, and the [[Ticket:...]] syntax isn't either, but it makes links much easier to follow rather than requiring the agent to copy/paste a ticket number. Storkk (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored, authorization OK. @Michal Lenc: Please overwrite the OTRS templates. --Mates (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logos by Southern Armada

I personally created the Whales In Danger (WID) logo for my website whales.org.au I own the copyright. --Southern Armada (talk) 13:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

I created this logo for my Youtube and Patreon channels. I own the copyright. Why would you think otherwise? --Southern Armada (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose There is no way for us to verify, on this public forum, that you are who you say you are. If you are indeed the copyright holder, and you wish to license the logo for anybody to use, please confirm that fact either by updating your website's footer to explicitly license the logo under a free license, or follow the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Southern Armada: I think you mean File:WID-Logo2.jpg, but I agree with Storkk.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ilya Marotta.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018010610003503 alleges permission of File:Ilya Marotta.jpg. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation and mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately. Regards.--Ganímedes (talk) 16:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Ganímedes: fyi. De728631 (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

La planta és meva. Prego la restitució. Jbarberà — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbarberà (talk • contribs) 23:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Procedural close, file is not deleted, wan't uploaded by the uploader. Too many of the uploader's deleted files to guess.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Joseph Tartakovsky.jpg Please undelete

Hi, I am not sure why this was deleted. please undelete and let me know if there is anything i need to add to it: File:Joseph Tartakovsky.jpg

--Darrenleva (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

You didn't specify a proper source and author. Both were given as "Joseph Tartakovsky" but this is highly unlikely because the copyright is usually held by the photographer and not the subject depicted in the photograph. Where did you find this image? Especially if this is a stock image that has already been published without a free licence, we need a permission sent by email from the copyright holder. De728631 (talk) 20:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Photographer must confirm a free license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 17:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elnökség.jpg

OTRS permission arrived: photosubmission ticket # 2018032210005843. --Regasterios (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Regasterios: please take if from here. --Storkk (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Acrotholus NT.jpg

Hi,

According to the website which I have pulled the following image, it allows the of the image under the following: Licenced under CC BY NC ND 3.0. You may use this image as-is without seeking permission, under the following conditions: 1. You must credit the artist/s and provide a link to the licence and the source 2. You must not edit this image 3. You must not use this image for commercial (making or intending to make a profit) purposes URL: http://www.dinochecker.com/gallery/acrotholus.php

In addition, other works of this author have been commonly used throughout wikipedia pages on prehistoric organisms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoboWarriorSr (talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

RoboWarriorSr: You'll notice that {{cc-by-nc-nd-3.0}} is a speedy deletion template, because that license is incompatible with our licensing requirements for two reasons: we don't host content restricted to noncommercial uses, and we don't host content which cannot be modified. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary to understand the basics of what this project is about and what you can and cannot upload here. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 15:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Neither NC nor ND clauses are compatible with Commons. See COM:L. --Storkk (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Acrotholus_audeti_by_malvit-d6b1bbq.jpg

Hi,

I have received explicit information from the artist in using this picture for the wikipedia page. I am willing to upload my screencap regarding this from deviantart if necessary.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoboWarriorSr (talk • contribs) 15:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

RoboWarriorSr: We only host content that is free for anyone to use for any purpose. Permission for you to use a file on a specific Wikipedia page is not sufficient. Please follow these instructions to obtain and submit an appropriate permission, if the copyright holder is willing. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per LX, permission to use media on Wikipedia is not sufficient. See COM:L. --Storkk (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JChaboud.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Agent (Verify) — Ticket #2018052110009651: A permission for this file has been received through OTRS. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, please ping me when the file has been restored. Thanks. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 17:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @AlvaroMolina: please take it from here. Storkk (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC).

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MustafaKemalAtaturk crop.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: FILE NOT USED ARE NOT CORRECT!!

SEE HERE: https://gutezitate.com/zitat/161862 

93.192.133.116 07:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose This was not deleted because it was not in use. It was deleted because it violated Cemal Işıksel's copyright, which will last until 2060. Storkk (talk) 11:52, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done The claimed reason for undeletion is unclear but this was deleted following Commons:Deletion requests/File:MustafaKemalAtaturk crop.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Padre Clemente Giraldo.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Padre_Clemente_Giraldo.jpg

Municipio de San Luis, Antioquia (Colombia) Alcaldía municipal Nit: 890.984.376-5 San Luis Antioquia (colombia) 22 de mayo de 2018-05-22 Señores wikipedia asunto: revisión de fotografías e información licencia commons.

la administración municipal del de san luis Antioquia (Colombia) se permite notificar que actualmente se encuentra realizando un trabajo de actualización de la información y de fotografías del municipio de San Luis con el fin de dar información precisa y actualizada sobre el territorio sanluisano. Se está utilizando información veraz y pública, así mismo archivos fotográficos que por su carácter cultural son de dominio público para los sanluisanos y que se han tomado a lo largo de las distintas administraciones publicas pasadas.

Frente a las imágenes del PADRE CLEMENTE GIRALDO. Este es el fundador del municipio de San Luis y cuya imagen se registra en los archivos históricos del Municipio de Granada Antioquia, que es el pueblo que colonizó a San Luis. Esta fotografía a sido usada sin ánimo de lucro o interés comercial, de hecho en la historia reposa como regalo que el pueblo de granada dio a San Luis y cuya obra reposa en el recinto del Concejo Municipal. Son otras páginas en que esta imagen libre y que data de más de hace 70 años el presbítero falleció hace 85 años y esta foto data de de 1930 es por ende un registro histórico y patrimonial de importancia para la gente de San Luis y Granada Es por esto que aparece en el blog de http://robertozocodice.blogspot.com.co/2013/11/ pero esta foto no pertenece a él, sin embargo al ser una tarea informativa y por la antigüedad de la misma consideramos que no hay violación de derechos


El trabajo de actualización de datos y fotografías lo está realizando el equipo de comunicaciones bajo la dirección de Diego Alejandro Hoyos, comunicador social de la alcaldía de San Luis y cuyo usuario para la edición en wikipedia es alek25 cualquier duda o inquietud en el membrete se encuentran los datos de contacto de nuestra Administración Pública Municipal

Cordialmente: Diego Alejandro Hoyos Comunicador Social Alcaldía Municipio de San Luis Antioquia ColombiaCr 18 # 17-08 PBX: 8348560-61-62, Línea gratuita: 01 8000 400105, Celular: 3148325965 Correo: alcaldia@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co, alcalde@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co, contactenos@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co, bquejasreclamos@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co.Web: www.sanluis-antioquia.gov.co.


Municipality of San Luis, Antioquia (Colombia) City Hall Nit: 890.984.376-5 San Luis Antioquia (Colombia) May 22, 2018-05-22 Lords wikipedia Subject: review of photographs and information commons license. The municipal administration of san luis Antioquia (Colombia) is allowed to notify that it is currently carrying out a work of updating the information and photographs of the municipality of San Luis in order to provide accurate and updated information on the sanluisano territory. It is using truthful and public information, as well as photographic archives that, due to their cultural nature, are public domain for Sanluisans and have been taken throughout the different public administrations in the past.

In front of the images of FATHER CLEMENTE GIRALDO. This is the founder of the municipality of San Luis and whose image is recorded in the historical archives of the Municipality of Granada Antioquia, which is the town that colonized San Luis. This photograph has been used non-profit or commercial interest, in fact in history rests as a gift that the people of Granada gave to San Luis and whose work rests in the precincts of the Municipal Council. They are other pages in which this free image and dating from more than 70 years ago the priest died 85 years ago and this photo dates from 1930 is therefore a historical and heritage record of importance to the people of San Luis and Granada.his is why it appears in the blog of http://robertozocodice.blogspot.com.co/2013/11/ but this photo does not belong to him, however, since it is an informative task and due to its antiquity, we consider that it is not there is violation of rights

The work of updating data and photographs is being done by the communications team under the direction of Diego Alejandro Hoyos, social communicator of the San Luis City Hall and whose user for the wikipedia edition is alek25 any questions or concerns on the letterhead are the contact details of our Municipal Public Administration

Cordially: Diego Alejandro Hoyos Communicator Social City Hall Municipality of San Luis Antioquia Colombia Cr 18 # 17-08 PBX: 8348560-61-62, Toll free: 01 8000 400105, Cell: 3148325965 E-mail: alcaldia@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co, alcalde@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co, contact us @ sanluis-antioquia.gov.co, bquejasreclamos@sanluis-antioquia.gov.co.Web: www.sanluis-antioquia.gov.co.

thumb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alek25 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Not done as per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Colombia.Uploader has not provided name of photographer, publication history or a license. Thuresson (talk) 03:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1000 Yaroslav.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Based on its usage at en:Millennium of Russia and naming convention (compare files in Category:Millennium of Russia's details), I believe this image is part of the aforementioned sculpture, which was completed in 1862. The sculpture is almost certainly in the public domain by now, so the original deletion rationale is invalid. clpo13(talk) 22:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Clpo13: Deleted following request at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Yaroslav I the Wise in statues. "Millenium in Russia" is from 1862. This is almost the same image as File:1000 Monomah.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wojciech Bojanowski.jpg

The author of the picture allowed to use it on Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noaibanda (talk • contribs) 22:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Permission to use on Wikipedia is not enough. Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS if the photographer has published the photo with an acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 04:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dick Ponzi.jpg

I don't understand why this was deleted. I supplied a link, as requested, to the copyright page associated with this image where it states that educational use is allowed. Link here: http://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/terms_of_use.html. This image is part of an academic collection and use on educational sites such as Wikipedia is permitted. Please let me know how to get this undeleted.--Birdeaux78 (talk) 17:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

There were two files deleted, the one in the title and this one as well: File:Dick Ponzi in his winery.jpg which is from the same source under the same educational use permission. I'd like this undeleted as well. Please advise, thanks.--Birdeaux78 (talk) 17:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Birdeaux78: For our purposes here on Commons, those terms at http://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/terms_of_use.html boil down to "do not use unless there is an explicit CC license for that work" because we don't accept Fair Use per COM:FAIRUSE. For Fair Use on English Wikipedia, please see en:WP:F.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Birdeaux78: Is there any way to use the images? Could the copyright holders upload them? Thank you for helping me understand this.--Birdeaux78 (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Birdeaux78: Yes, with OTRS permission.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per discussion. The easiest way is to change the Terms in order to have the works published under an acceptable Creative Commons license. Ruthven (msg) 06:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

1990 Vauxhall Nova L 1.2

Two of the files I uploaded where deleted from a OTSR ticket request. The person claimed that the photos breached their personal data because the registration plate on it was uncensored.

What happen was, About a month ago I encountered the said car and I was thrilled since it was a modern classic so I photographed it and uploaded it on Wikimedia Commons. One month later I saw it was on sale on a classic car website. So I thought I show my gratitude to the person and said there image is being used for educational purposes. The car was in a public space and I didn't mention the exact location other then the town name. The registration plate was uncensored which should makes sense for it to be deleted. I personally think a registration plate doesn't reveal their personal data because I photographed thousands of cars. I blurred out the registration plates on all cars unless they are older than 25 years.

Although, after I exchange email with the person. They said that the car was taken off sale and be used in car show exhibit. (i.e Letting hundreds photograph their car where people could share it on other websites.) Another fact I pointed out was that the pictures on the car sale page they had pictures of the car where the registration plate is clearly visible.

I understand that you usually need to ask permission from the owner but this usually the case with individuals and not cars which are often parked on public roads and car parks. I personally think my images been wrongfully deleted just because it shown the registration plate despite the facts above and there thousands of images on here, including mines are on the commons with registration plates uncensored.

If it does get undeleted I will with all due respect to the owner censor the registration plate.

The page got removed but can be still viewed on a cache. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C990917

--Vauxford (talk) 10:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Though I performed the deletions, based on the OTRS ticket (to which I have no access), I think the only thinkable "privacy problem" might be the well-visible car plates, which could easily be censored. The car was obviously pictured while parking in the public. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
The photo was also used in the Opel Corsa article as a quality example of a pre-facelift Vauxhall Nova. I'm very happy to censored the plate. --Vauxford (talk) 10:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Visibility of the number plate was one of the reason, but the customer has some other concerns too. The OTRS ticket can be found here. @Túrelio: I just forwarded the email to you please check. Thank you GSS (talk|c|em) 10:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
But I'm unable to view it. How will I know about the other details the person put on the ticket request? --Vauxford (talk) 10:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, GSS. I hope this was OTRS-conform. Anyway, after reading the request, IMO the only reasonable rationale is "car-plates visible". AFAIK, the owner has no right over an image of his/her car, especially if taken in public space. So, I would allow upload of carplate-censored versions of the images. However, as I'm no expert in UK law, the deciding admin-colleague might also take into account whether there is a legal risk for User:Vauxford, who seems to be identified towards the car-owner. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Are license plates really private information? My gut says that if you're displaying something to the public it's hard to argue that it's private... but I'm sure this has been fought over before and don't object too much to censoring them out, since I'm not sure there is strong argument that they're educationally valuable. I also cannot see the ticket, though, and don't know exactly why it was deleted. Just to confirm, Túrelio, you were able to see the ticket at time of deletion, and it has since been moved? Storkk (talk) 10:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@Storkk, no, as I am no OTRS-volunteer, I wasn't able to see the ticket at the time of deletion. The deletions were based on the provided rationale (as per this request on OTRS ... for privacy reason.) and trust towards OTRS-volunteers. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@GSS: In which queue is the ticket? Please move it to a Commons queue. Storkk (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@Storkk: It was in info-en I just moved it to commons. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Having now read the ticket, I still support undeletion, possibly with the license plates censored, depending on whether that is actually considered private information in the UK. Storkk (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I usually censor the registration plate but I choose not to since it basically a classic (The car is almost 30 years old). Regstration plates in the UK should be kept censored but it not mandatory from what I recall. The best you can do with the registration plate in the UK is finding out the year, make, model, colour, engine size etc. You can find out whether it a write-off or if it stolen as well as finding previous owners but that cost money and usually need special request from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency which can take days and require a valid reason. --Vauxford (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
According to a FOI request from 2015, the DVLA apparently considers number plates to be personal information if the owner is an individual. Now, whether or not that should make a difference is another question (your face is also personal information, but if you're walking around in public, it's not private...) but do I think there is a decent rationale to remove the license plate and undelete. Storkk (talk) 11:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Can I write "wiiikis" on it? (Wikipedia says that would be a valid license plate) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I like the idea but I usually censor registration plate using colours that match the plate. Also the deleted photo was taken at a three-quarters angle which could be difficult to replace each letters. --Vauxford (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
(Edit conflict)If there is consensus to undelete, then I would suggest leaving a clear white or black space to make it obvious that something has been removed, not alter it in a fashion that might be misleading to people without knowledge of the history of the file. But so far, there has only been my opinion, no consensus has been demonstrated. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
@Vauxford: I will have no problem with the angle. I could also replace it with "EXAM PLE" or something. I also support the undeletion btw, assuming OTRS doesn't have much more information than what can be read here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
You are welcome to incorporate File:CENSORED.JPG or File:CENSORED.SVG.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate the suggestions, although I have my own of censoring registration plates.--Vauxford (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
So have we made a decision? Or is there further things need to discuss about? --Vauxford (talk) 21:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support undeleting on the basis that the plate's blurred - In the UK atleast one can obtain the name and address of any vehicle owner though any UK website so the whole privacy thing rather fails on that point, Outside of the UK I don't know if these sorts of things exist but if they do then the only way to "protect" yourself is by never driving your car if that makes sense..... –Davey2010Talk 22:09, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per discussion: the files were reuploaded with the plates blurred. I added an OTRS info template in the talk page. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Peripheral edema of a woman's face, before and after; Annapurna Base Camp, 2015.JPG

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030810000535 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Undeleted as per request. Thuresson (talk) 18:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
@Thuresson: Thank you. How about File:ERC& ASC w-5 duaghters.jpg? If approved, I will fix the filename.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Thuresson. Ruthven (msg) 06:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two W Langdon Kihn works

per my close of Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:W._Langdon_Kihn. I've now checked 1924-1930 as well as the requisite renewal dates. The only Kihn work that appears to have been renewed (that I could find) was The tiger who walks alone Frontispiece. Storkk (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

 Support Pinging @Srittau: who deleted these. De728631 (talk) 20:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support per Storkk's analysis. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support per link above. Thanks again for your help Storkk! -- Deadstar (msg) 08:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done per above. Ankry (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Greg_J._Marchand_MD.jpg

I am the owner of the image, please kindly undelete it. You can see on my webpage that I have posted the image with the cc0 logo under it after attesting. http://gregmarchandmd.com/images-cc0-licensed-used-freely/ This file may be used on different wiki platforms having to do with physicians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClaraBell89 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. We need permission from the photographer, not just the subject.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 21:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mandalynn on Greys Anatomy.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I took this photo on the set, with all actors permission, including my daughter, Mandalynn Carlson. I uploaded to the wiki page. I have the original photo, taken on my phone. I'd like to see this photo back on the page, please. Sherri Carlson MandolinPictures (talk) 02:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Please send the original file, not one that has been through Facebook.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done Please follow COM:OTRS instructions and prove your copyright there. It cannot be verified on-wiki for Facebook images whether the uploader is copytight holder. Ankry (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Visoko-2.jpg

I made this picture self, with my camerea, i am the owner of all rights,

undelete this please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woaxit (talk • contribs) 03:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Did you upload it to http://semirosmanagic.com/en/bosnian_pyramid.html?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done please follow COM:OTRS instructions and prove your authorship/copyright ownership there. Ankry (talk) 21:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Duck_Butter_Poster_Print_Hi_27X40_JohnWesleyCredit.jpg

This is the final poster provided by the distribution company. The poster on the page is incorrect and does not include an artist credit. Please use this poster! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brigademkting (talk • contribs) 13:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Uploader has been informed on user talk page about licensing and OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Troféu Taça de Ouro e Campeonato brasileiro de 1981.png

Esta imagem está livre de direitos autorais — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alandelima1996 (talk • contribs) 16:24 May 24, 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
This image is free of copyright
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Alandelima1996: Que prova você oferece? What proof do you offer?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done COM:OTRS permission from the actual copyright holder is needed. Ankry (talk) 21:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Treatyrights2013.jpg

There was never a reason to delete this file, why the heck is it being deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve348 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 24 May 2018‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Treatyrights2013.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 Info Published here by David Atkin in 2013. Thuresson (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 21:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Express November 10, 2017.jpg

File:Express November 10, 2017.jpg

File was published on Flickr using an Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) license. The original image, with the Creative Commons license, can be found here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/perspective/38286894736/in/photolist-q93hLg-pRu3mu-pchkAz-pRt819-pRAPvp-pRu2sf-q8YY8s-s7enDQ-q93iDt-25uMaQt-s5uEJH-pRC8bk-soPSor-pRt96W-q8YZWN-fAFEJs-pchji4-pc3XVC-pRt7sA-YLiQwu-RVuVoT-soEmrY-HKxxTm-XQ966a-YrSY7S-fAriJi-YsFrd3-YNHwSN-YM9wFb-RiDon8-YsFsgq-RauRDh-YM9vZS-Dib8YE-ZqrFCi-Z4VmLV-Z4Vmhi-Hu8ZrE-YrSZbq-Z471tV-XQ7A6Z-YRievx-YQtH1i-YNFjw9-YNFkn7-PzSNtn-fYFFx7-21khkUL-GBuBbQ-z1puXq

This is a Creative Commons, non-copyrighted image. --Chumash11 (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, not every image on Flickr is correctly licensed. This photo shows the cover of a recent newspaper, containing likely copyrighted artwork.[5] Freedom-of-panorama exception does not apply. The Flickr-photographer violates the copyright of the photographer of the cover-portrait. --Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Photo by Associated Press photographer Brynn Anderson: From AP web site: "In this Monday, Sept. 25, 2017, file photo, former Alabama Chief Justice and U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore speaks at a rally, in Fairhope, Ala. According to a Washington Post story Nov. 9, an Alabama woman said Moore made inappropriate advances and had sexual contact with her when she was 14. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson, File)" File id:17313719039991. Thuresson (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Samebug-logo.png

Please restore, we have permission (under CC-BY-SA): Ticket#2018051110008974. --Pallerti (talk) 13:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done. @Pallerti: please, continue. BTW, it would be nice if you have a link on your user page that allow admins to verify that you are a member of the OTRS-members global group. Ankry (talk) 21:43, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

NASO.member.JPG

This is the image NASO captured during the total solar eclipse 2009. I am the executive and founder member of NASO till 2013. So I think there is no any point of copyright violation. Also the caption is NASO members for group photo after grand success of TSE2009. So where is the copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 27.34.104.218 (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Filename not found. A request from an anonymous IP contributor claiming to be the owner of the copyright has no validity. We see far too many people here who claim to be something they are not, or who canvass.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy close. File not deleted, any discussion concerning this file should be had at Commons:Deletion requests/File:NASO member.JPG. Thuresson (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bharat rawat.jpg

File:Bharat rawat.jpg
Bharat Rawat in 2017
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcrazydreamer (talk • contribs) 07:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 Not done Procedural closure: file is not deleted. Ankry (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:"True Prosperity".jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Deletion was done at Commons:Deletion requests/File:"True Prosperity".jpg.

In OTRS ticket:2016052510034637 the artist / copyright holder gave permission by sharing a copy of the file but neglected to connect the file attachment to their Commons upload. In the follow up there was no response with a URL.

I am writing to make the connection that (1) the art is an attachment in this ticket and (2) the art matches to that upload.

User:PolskaGoyl asked for my help in undeleting the file. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done @Bluerasberry: please add the final OTRS template. De728631 (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I fixed the OTRS template. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eric Garris 2018.jpg

The photographer tried to give permission for the photo the same day it got deleted. He said he now knows the permission process, and will give permission as soon as he can if undeleted.


--ChicoDesigns (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Francisco Pesqueira. Cantante, actor, autor y escritor.jpg

--Carlos Héctor Bonfiglio (talk) 22:24, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image like File:Francisco Pesqueira. Cantante,actor, autor, director y escritor.jpg a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request undeletion of File:Douglas Reid Skinner.jpg

I uploaded this image on behalf of Douglas Reid Skinner himself, who owns the photograph and gave me permission to use it. Furthermore, the McGregor Poetry Festival blog you cite as reason for deletion is NOT in fact the owner of the photograph. The photograph was provided to them by Douglas Reid Skinner to promote his poetry reading on a blog post. There is no copyright infringement involved, as the image is free and freely circulated with the permission of the owner. MinkiPool (talk) 07:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. We need permission from the photographer, not just the subject.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:กวนอิม.jpg

The author is myself and is also publishing free copyright (CC BY-SA 3.0 TH). Please undelete it. --Thyj (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Botev-Plovdiv-João-Paulo-Kirov-Kochev.png

I am the original author of the photo. I want it to be published under open source license. Please return the deleted photo. Leon.anavi (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Reuploaded version had a correct license (the reason for the original deletion). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the copyright owner of the file film poster File:TSB small poster image.jpg.

Hi there.

I am the copyright owner of the file film poster File:TSB small poster image.jpg.

Can I add it to the text for the Silver Branch film, which I also am the copyright owner for?

Thanks. Katrina Costello

Katrinacostello (talk) 06:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:بدر بن صالح الراجحي.jpg, is my picture, the same i'm using in my Twitter account, my twitter account link is also mentioned in my page and the essay (https://twitter.com/badr_s_alrajhi?lang=ar).

Please undelete, this is my picture the same i'm using in my twitter profile account, https://twitter.com/badr_s_alrajhi?lang=ar,--بدر صالح الراجحي (talk) 08:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This picture is my picture and i used also for my twitter profile image https://twitter.com/badr_s_alrajhi?lang=ar بدر صالح الراجحي (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose per Jeff --Alaa :)..! 09:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mike Jackson - High Resolution 04-26-2018.jpg

Copyright release sent to Permissions-Commons. This should have been handled properly.....

e-mail received from Permissions Commons...... "Thank you for your email. This is an automatically generated response to inform you that your message has been received. Because all emails are handled by volunteers, it may take some time for us to reply. We kindly ask for your patience and understanding as we try our best to reply as quickly as possible. If your article or file has been deleted in the mean time, please don't worry. Any administrator can restore these later.

If you want to send more emails about the same subject, please add the following to the subject bar of the email: [Ticket#:018052110012708].

Yours sincerely,

The Volunteer Response Team

__________________________________________________

'To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I Elizabeth Anzalone represent AutoNation Inc Office of Corporate Communications and Mike Jackson Chairman and CEO of AutoNation Inc, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of Photo described in File File:Mike Jackson - High Resolution 04-26-2018.jpg as shown here: Mike Jackson - High Resolution 04-26-2018.jpg,[4] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5]

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. 


 Elizabeth. Anzalone Coordinator Office of Corporate Communications and Public Policy AutoNation Inc. Ft Lauderdale Florida' — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorporateMapWiki (talk • contribs) 13:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: The OTRS process will sort this out. Please be patient, our volunteers are backlogged several weeks. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dalida Gigi.jpg

Entering the link that I provided for photo you can clearly see that the buyer of photo has the right of publishing it on internet pages. I bought the photo without watermark and uploaded it on wiki. It was then deleted by user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DalidaEditor (talk • contribs) 18:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose You paid Getty for 15 years of editorial use, not for an indefinite Creative Commons license. Thuresson (talk) 18:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

I have uploaded a photo of Patrick J Kennedy to the Patrick J Kennedy wikipedia page which has been removed twice.

On first upload, I followed protocol set forth in the upload guide regarding release of rights.

On second upload, I followed these protocols and additionally sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the image and Wikipedia's direct language for release of rights on 5/18. It seems to me that this should be sufficient for use of the photo.

I am an authorized representative of Mr. Kennedy, who is requesting that this photo be used. I am a novice wikipedia user and am following protocol to the best of my understanding. I appreciate any further assistance.

Thank you

Shellackingoff (talk) 19:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)shellackingoff 5/23/18

  •  Oppose We need a permission sent by email from the copyright holder. In most cases this is not the subject depicted in the photograph but the original photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: It seems an e-mail was already sent to OTRS. This means the OTRS process will sort this out. Please be aware that our OTRS volunteers are severely backlogged. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:58, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Large Scale DND Protest by Nawab Singh Nagar.jpg

This is a genuine photo of Nawab Singh Nagar's protest against DND toll on 28th August. Kindly make the necessary changes.


--Nagar.siddharth543 (talk) 03:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)SiddharthNagar 24/05/2018 With regards Siddharth Nagar

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Not a valid undeletion reason. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Players.jpg

This pjoto should not be deleted. Original author is unknown and possibly death and is's just my photo of original. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatfan21 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose As per File talk:The Players.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No evidence that file is free. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Players '64-65.jpg

This photo should npt be deleted, original author is unknown and probably death, and is's just my photo of original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatfan21 (talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose "Google.com" is not enough of a source. A lot of people who lived in 1964 are still alive and well. Thuresson (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No evidence that file is free. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:W. Ian Lipkin, Columbia University.png

I provided copyright permission, Ticket#2018052210013563, for this specific file. Kindly undelete as Columbia University has authorized the usage of it.Kh2907 (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kh2907 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Kh2907: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}}?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Apologies for not initially signing. Still getting the hang of this. I did submit an email as directed and the ticket number is cited in my original post. I have followed up directly with that automatic email that issued the ticket number. Thank you for the update. I will continue to monitor.Kh2907 (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: This will be sorted out through the OTRS process. Unfortunately our OTRS volunteers are quite backlogged, so please be patient. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Meriem Zobiri

Les droits d'utilisation de ce fichier appartienne à l'actrice créatrice de la page qui en a payé les droits au photographe auteur du shooting — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merimzobiri (talk • contribs) 03:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
The rights to use this file belongs to the creative actress of the page who paid the rights to the photographer who made the shooting
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


Not done, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meriem Zobiri, portrait en noir et blanc.jpg. Please do not claim that you created a photograph if you didn't. Follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS to verify that the photographer has released all rights to you. Thuresson (talk) 04:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Professor_Dr_Rogério_Miranda_de_Almeida.png

A foto é do próprio professor. Não é cópia ou plágio. A mesma está disponível para uso. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcopensak (talk • contribs) 03:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
The picture belongs to the teacher himself. It is not copy or plagiarism. It is available for use.
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. @Marcopensak: Que prova você oferece? What proof do you offer?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G. and Jeff: So, i live with him and i'm the manager of the site fasbam.edu.br where its photo is. If you want, you can ask for him in his own email e-mail removed. Here is his website: http://www.rogeriomirandadealmeida.com/Marcopensak (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Not done. Mail address removed. Neither a web site nor a mail address will be available to verify a license 50 years from now. Please follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS if the copyright holder wish to release the photo under an acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GrammyAward.jpg

This image was initially uploaded by Colby Sharp to Flickr at https://flickr.com/photos/61421932@N08/14048518715.

File was uploaded on April 28, 2014, and is licensed by the author under the terms of cc-by-2.0.

So, the publication https://www.shine.cn/archive/world/2018-Grammy-Awards-returning-to-NYC-beyond14-years-in-LA/shdaily.shtml at May 9, 2017 can not serve as a reason for removal.

SaltVisor (talk) 03:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Unambiguous copyvio and Flickr-washing. 1) It was here 21 January 2014, before the upload to Flickr; and 2) Even if the Flickr user were the photographer, the photograph is derivative of the Grammy award statuette whose copyright is held by the National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. (see, for example, VAu000691693). --Эlcobbola talk 07:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undelete many files.

Please, restore this files:

its use was authorized by the copyrights holder by this OTRS ticket: [6].Leon saudanha (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 07:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Principales clientes de Teknia Group.pngRequest undeletion

Hi, I am on charge of Communications at Teknia and the original author of the presentation I use as a source of the pic, as you can check on my dropbox (https://www.dropbox.com/s/tpz7stug0h3kk8m/Dossier%20Prensa%202018.pptx?dl=0) and on Properties of the PPT itself:

File:Screen Shot PPT Teknia.png
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Falvarezcano (talk • contribs) 07:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I am on charge of Communications at Teknia and the original author of the presentation I use as a source of the pic, as you can check on my dropbox (https://www.dropbox.com/s/tpz7stug0h3kk8m/Dossier%20Prensa%202018.pptx?dl=0) and on Properties of the PPT itself:

File:Screen Shot PPT Teknia 2.png
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Falvarezcano (talk • contribs) 07:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. This applies to both files.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above - at best this requires COM:OTRS permission; it is, however, hard to see how this could be reconciled with COM:ADVERT. --Эlcobbola talk 08:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by VoidWanderer

Several files of mine were deleted, and I have reasons why they should be restored.

1. I've received a permission by Pavel Netesov, the author of the Blokpost Pamyati exhibition {{PermissionOTRS|2018040410013134}}:

2. Large batch of files are exhibition plates, and are falling under {{PD-text}}, because simple geometrical shapes, logos and tiny pictures may not be considered as copyright violation:

The depicted text is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it is not a “literary work” or other protected type in sense of the local copyright law. Facts, data, and unoriginal information which is common property without sufficiently creative authorship in a general typeface or basic handwriting, and simple geometric shapes are not protected by copyright.

--VoidWanderer (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose

1) These must wait their turn at OTRS. When they reach the head of the queue there in about 50 days, if the license is acceptable they will be automatically restored.
2) I looked at about half of these and all of the ones I looked at have photographs and/or drawings which have copyrights and all have far more text then is necessary for a copyright. I don't see how we can restore them without a free license from the copyright holders. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Jameslwoodward, all of the photos in a nomination are taken by me personally. OTRS ticket was aquired for the exhibition as a whole, not the pictures whose author I am already. So no one will mark them on OTRS queue, they're literally not queued.
Are you really saying exhibition plates that I took photo of are violating the copyrights? --VoidWanderer (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

1) I understood your comment to mean that the creator(s) of the works portrayed had sent a free license to OTRS. I have now looked at them, and in every case that will be required. In some cases, there are photographs, text, and other copyrighted works in the images, so the copyrights for those will also have to be freely licensed.

I do not understand "So no one will mark them on OTRS queue, they're literally not queued." OTRS Ticket 2018040410013134, which you cite above, is in the OTRS queue. It will be read and acted on by an OTRS volunteer when it reaches the head of the queue, which will be around June 1.

2) Yes. All of the images that I examined infringe on the copyrights for the drawings, photographs, and the texts shown in them. While I did not look at all of them, I doubt very much that any of them can be kept on Commons. This should not surprise you. Sealle, Christian Ferrer, and I, all experienced Commons Admins, all reached the same conclusion -- that they are all far above the threshold of originality anywhere. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Jameslwoodward, I mean how would those photos be possibly restored, if I have no guarantee OTRS Ticket even have those exact pictures mentioned? I suppose there's only the author's permission to take pictures of his exhibition. So I doubt volunteer will be even notified there're deleted photos that require to be restored. --VoidWanderer (talk) 09:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jim, if the permission is valid then the images will be automatically restored. When you take a photo of something then you own the copyright on your photo, that is true, but if the thing depicted is protected by copyright (which is the case as soon as there is creativity) then the copyright holder of the depicted thing has also some rights on the publication of your photo, and in such cases it is required that we have his permission to publish here the photos. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Ticket 2018040410013134 has permission for the Exhibition "Блокпост Пам'яті" from Pavel Netesov. It looks OK for me. But I do not know what pictures are from this exhibition.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
    @Ahonc: You can restore the files and add the template {{OTRS received}} while you check which files have been authorised. I've left you a note in the ticket, and we can continue the discussion there. Cheers --Ruthven (msg) 12:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per discussion. Batch 1 has to follow the OTRS process, batch 2 contains derivative works. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedinsource:59832923@N02 -hastemplate:delete

It's probably better to see what comes from Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedinsource:huntingtontheatreco before we start deleting a few dozen randomly nominated files. I suspect File:Tristano and Matteo in The Miracle at Naples.jpg was actually https://www.flickr.com/photos/huntingtontheatreco/6762342679/ so this probably wasn't even a list of really obvious copyvios.

I've been meaning to organize that mess a bit, but was holding out to hear from the digital content manager from Huntington. - Alexis Jazz 23:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: no valid undeletion rationale. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos of Wilson Cleveland

File:Wilson Cleveland Non-Transferrable Premiere.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image is my own work. I am the author of this image and have noted CC-BY-SA 3.0 permissions in the description on both the Pro IMDB page (my account): https://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0166505/ and on my Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/26783817967/ Does this meet your requirements? Thank You. Wilsoncleveland (talk) 01:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

NB: ticket:2018051810012974. --Ruthven (msg) 06:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Wilson Cleveland and Milo Ventimiglia on set.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This image is my own work. I am the author of this image and have noted CC-BY-SA 3.0 permissions in the description on both the Pro IMDB page (my account): https://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0166505/ and on my Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/12043571106/ I sent this image to Tim Ryan at TAR Productions for his blog. That post is here: https://tarproductions.com/5-realities-about-branded-entertainment-every-creator-should-know/ Does this meet your requirements? Thank You. Wilsoncleveland (talk) 01:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Sure, I can talk to Tim. The TAR Productions copyright covers his entire site so he probably wont change that. Can I ask him to make this attribution in the caption? ©2014 Wilson Cleveland. CC-BY-SA 3.0. The photo was taken by Mark Rywelski. I hired him to take the photo. I own the files. Wilsoncleveland (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

  • @Wilsoncleveland: As before: the copyright holder of a photograph is the person who took the photograph, rather than a person who appears in it, unless the copyright is transferred by operation of law or contract. Can you please have the photographer send in a free license release for this image, or clarify how the copyright was transferred? --Ruthven (msg) 06:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Wilsoncleveland

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I hold the copyright for all of these images. They are stills and poster images from content I've created. I've licensed these images CC-BY-SA 3.0 and included those permissions in the captions on my IMDB Pro and Flickr Pro accounts. IMDB Pro and Flickr image links below for your convenience. Thank you.

File:Wilson Cleveland and Shannen Doherty in the Lifetime series Suite 7.jpghttps://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0166505/photos/#rmConst=rm1605847808

File:Wilson-cleveland-milo-ventimiglia-the-temp-life-season-5-law-and-lunch-order.jpg https://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0166505/photos/#rmConst=rm1705921280

File:The-temp-life-wikipedia-poster.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/26741544127/

File:Taryn-southern-sandeep-parikh-the-temp-life.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/26741544457/

File:Jaime-murray-eddie-mcclintock-suite-7-poster-image.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/39801586660/

File:Jaime Murray and Eddie McClintock in the web series Suite 7 distributed by Lifetime.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/39801588090/

File:Hartley Sawyer.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/15801687904/

File:Hartley-Sawyer-cup.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/thetemplifetv/16424178635/ Wilsoncleveland (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

  • For this sort of thing, we'll really need to go through the COM:OTRS process, where you email in a verification of identity. If you do this broadly enough, and establish whose account this is, you should only have to go through the OTRS process once, and can get permission that also lets this account upload your work in the future. Basically, you'll get a ticket number and that ticket can be put in a template you can use in the future.
  • Please understand, this is for protection of your rights, really the only way we can know that this Commons account is not someone impersonating you. We had a lot of times someone claimed to be a given designer or photographer and wasn't, which is why we initiated that system. - Jmabel ! talk 06:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Leap Year title poster.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I hold the copyright to this image. This is a series I created. I've licensed as CC-BY-SA 3.0. Here is the link to the image on my IMDB Pro account with license permissions in the caption: https://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0166505/photos/#rmConst=rm3808054272 Wilsoncleveland (talk) 05:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

@Wilsoncleveland: We cannot base on information located on non-public pages, including pages that require loging in. Ankry (talk) 11:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Of course. Sorry about that. Here's the image on my Flickr with permissions info: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8438/7910617948_ac225a94c8_n.jpg Will that work? Wilsoncleveland (talk) 18:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: From the discussion I understand that permission has been sent to OTRS. Let's wait for that process to conclude. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:58, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Atle r s (talk · contribs)

@Atle r s and Jameslwoodward: Back in 2013, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Atle r s was closed as Delete, because the source page, http://atle.no/?p=1421 was marked Creative Commons Non-commercial, and Atle r s couldn't prove he was the Atle of http://atle.no. A mere 5 years later, I found another one of Atle r s's files, and opened Commons:Deletion requests/File:SynnøveMacodyLund.jpg on basically the same principle - in response to which Atle change the license on his pages - all his pages - to CC-BY-SA! So not only do we get to save File:SynnøveMacodyLund.jpg but we can undelete the other files as well.

Also, if some knowledgeable person can find a template to mark User:Atle r s as having been verified as the Atle of http://atle.no, we can avoid possible future misunderstandings. --GRuban (talk) 20:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

The file File:Lasse-lehre.jpg is not published at atle.no, in fact according to the image description the photo is from www.hoyre.no. I can't find the photo there today. Thuresson (talk) 04:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Not having the mop, I can't see the deleted images. Is the other image at least from and on atle.no? --GRuban (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done File:Forfatter Stig Sæterbakken.jpeg, but am unclear about File:Lasse-lehre.jpg, which as Thuresson noted, is credited to Høyre. I appreciate that it is reasonably likely that Atle r s was the photographer, but given he credited it to Høyre, I'd be more comfortable with OTRS confirmation. Likewise, marking his user page as OTRS confirmed would require actual OTRS confirmation. Storkk (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: by Storkk. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Ararat.png

Hello. Can you restore this logo that belonged to the organization en:Xoybûn (1927). I myself had sourced with a source dating from the 1930s. This request and the deletion seems incomprehensible to me. Thanks.--Ghybu (talk) 13:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose - per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Ararat.png - Jcb (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
@user:Jcb: Have you looked at the sources that I added? I think this logo has been removed regardless of the sources. We are told that there is no source but there are sources--Ghybu (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, but I am not impressed. These 'sources' seem to support the concerns of E4024 rather than contradicting them. Jcb (talk) 14:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
These sources (for example: (1928), 1930 "Publication de la ligue national kurde de Hoybun" (n°2 and 6) - These are writings published by the organization Xoybûn in the 20s and 30s and we see this logo) attests to the existence and veracity of this logo. I am told there is no source and I show sources to prove otherwise. But I'm not trying to impress anyone. I'm just saying this organization is encyclopedic and it has many pages on Wikipedia. And if there is no copyright problem I do not see why we could not download this 30s logo on Commons.--Ghybu (talk) 15:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Ps:The name of this page was different when I added sources (this page was a redirect). I am for restoration under the other name (File:Logo of the Hoyboon Organization.png) and the deletion of it.--Ghybu (talk) 15:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  • "This request and the deletion seems incomprehensible to me." Subtract "and the deletion" from there and I also sign your sentence. You are telling us that the image was not what it said it was but you're surprised that... Surprised of what? That at some point of time one of the so many baseless information given to WP users for years hit a wall? Will someone apologize for fooling millions of readers for such a long time? I believe we should discuss these things more profoundly in Commons. If we do that once, people will think twice before uploading whatever they wish to our pages and use them the way they wish afterwards. Please let us all not try to help "make" history; but help "tell" it, objectively, to the people who trust WMF projects as a source of information. Image files in Commons are not an exception. --E4024 (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Do not play the candid, I spent time correcting and sourcing this image; in spite of that you still supported the deletion . A request for deletion that can also serve to clarify some points but in this case you have ignored the changes made. This image in the form that I saw and let should not be deleted., that's why I made a request for restoration. I remind you that we are on a wiki and there is also a discussion page that can be used for corrections concerning the informations.
As for your neutrality, your sweet words and your posture of lesson givers seen your passive I do not believe too much. I think it's a camouflage to get your own POV. And in terms of deceiving people you are well-versed:
See cross-wiki on Kurdish and Armenian Genocide articles: [7] (es), [8] (en), [9] (fr) and on ca.wikipedia ([10] and [11]).--Ghybu (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I am a quite "objective" user (and I appreciate it more than being so-called neutral) and in this case happy to have made some users go to search things, it always makes you learn. Now do you feel better informed about some part of history? Good. No need to thank me. BTW I will not respond to your ... (fill in the blanks). If you want to play, use the sandbox. Discuss the file, I will not contribute any more to this. --E4024 (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Now that the veracity of this logo has been established (demonstrated by documents of this period) can we restore this logo?--Ghybu (talk) 16:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Undeletion request is for a redirect. I see no reason to undelete that. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Henrietta Berk

"Copyright violation: Henrietta Berk - died 1990" - completely irrelevant, she's an American. All that matters is the date of the work. As I haven't found any copyright registrations, everything before March 1, 1989 should be public domain. (it doesn't look like she painted copyright notices either, I checked the back of a painting) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: When were these painted? If after 28 February 1989, her copyright lasts until 1 January 2061 per COM:HIRTLE.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I doubt she painted anything the year before she died, but if you tell me exactly which paintings those files show I'll see what I can find. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) Both were painted in the early 1960s according to the Henrietta Berk Research Project. The IA copyright records are currently down for me for a few of the salient years, but there appears to be no renewal by either a "Berk Henrietta" or "Robin Henrietta", but I find my searches on https://cocatalog.loc.gov to be flaky at best, and so the fact that I haven't found it isn't gospel. Storkk (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
@Storkk: Thank you. Do you have better names for these paintings? The names provided by User:Califpaint leave much to the imagination.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The {{Information}} template described them as The Valley, Vacaville and Picnic, but whether those are accurate or not I have no idea. Storkk (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
I hadn't even noticed these were also from Califpaint. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Califpaint. I found them at Category:Undelete in 2061 when searching for other works by Henrietta Berk. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Is File:Henriettaberk.jpg also a painting? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes and no. It's an old photograph of her painting a picture. So it includes the photographer's copyright for the portrait as well as Berk's copyright for the painting. De728631 (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
When was their first publication, and did they have copyrighted notices then? If they were first published in a book, they wouldn't be required to have independent notices. If they're post-1963, they don't need renewals, and even before that they could have renewed as part of the larger work. Proving a painting of that era is in the public domain is really hard unless you're really familiar with its history.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Unclear copyright situation per Prosfilaes. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Professor Md. Saidur Rahman.png

This file was created with the intention of using it in a page on Dr. Saidur Rahman, who is a renowned computer scientist and mathematician in Bangladesh. I have just put a publication request for this page that uses this image.

Here is the draft of the page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Md._Saidur_Rahman --Djyoti Mondal (talk) 03:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

@Djyoti Mondal: The target article en:Md. Saidur Rahman was not ready on 2 May due to en:WP:CSD#A7, and the draft is still not ready (awards & honors need refs). Are there other articles which this image could help, perhaps in Bangladeshi Wikipedia?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: For now. Please reupload only if the page is moved to Wikipedia's main namespace and is not deleted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Capture d’écran 2017-12-12 à 18.26.03.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2018051010011364 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Redeleted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ERC& ASC w-5 duaghters.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018030810010221 alleges permission. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
@Thuresson: Thanks, now we need photographer permission for a photo from ca. 1949...   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: And deleted again for now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vince Duverge 2017.png

I am requesting the undeletion of this photo as I own the rights of the photo.

While deleting the page someone stated that it belonged to this following page: https://www.facebook.com/vinceduverge/photos/a.163722523687617.39625.163721353687734/1496639987062524/?type=3&theater

As a matter of fact, it is my Facebook page. I am Joseph Guy Vincent Duvergé and can provide identity confirmation if need be. I only wanted to update the photo as the previous one appeared to have been someone else's file.

Regards,

Vincent Duvergé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph1595 (talk • contribs) 05:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose You have previously claimed that you are Jonathan Ah-Yu. Please use Commons:OTRS to provide information that you are the copyright owner. Also, if you intend to continue to edit articles about yourself, friends and family, please be advised to read en:Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SmokeDawg-Profile.jpg

The file is publicly posted on Smoke Dawg's SoundCloud profile page (https://soundcloud.com/smoke-dawg-878) and is free to use.

GoldenTyper X1 (talk) 23:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done Uploaded without license template or information about licensing. Published at Soundcloud without any information about licensing so presumably all rights are reserved. Thuresson (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Integrated recco reflector search.jpg

This file is an integral part of this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RECCO. It was deleted due to a misunderstanding between editors but was cleared up to User:JGHowes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IpsoFacto123 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as duplicate of File:Detector RECCO apuntando a un reflector RECCO integrado en el pantalón.jpg. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done. Why are you wasting our time with two identical files that you uploaded yourself? Thuresson (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Luca Magri.jpg

I have the copyright for this picture, and I've uploaded it in the IMDB page. Please do not delete from the page of Luca Magri. Thank You.--Leonweaver (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


Not done. Published elsewhere on the internet without an acceptable copyright license. Uploader has been informed about OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Government buildings in Ivanovo Oblast

Reasoning clearly no longer applies. Gone Postal (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. @Gone Postal: . Deleted in 2014 for not having content. In line with similar categories, eg. Category:Government buildings in Russia by region. Thuresson (talk) 21:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Protestas por el Caso La Manada - 3.jpg

The photo was removed under three arguments:

  • That it has rights of a third party. False, according to EXIF ​​data I took the photograph by myself.
  • That violates the moral principles of a person, false. The images of the persons in question are of subjects identified and sentenced by the Spanish justice system in a case of public interest (in fact foreseen in the 15/1999 law of the country, although this is not the case, Commons is under US jurisdiction) of which many media outlets (including the country's main television networks) have done the task of dissemination after they were sentenced. The interpretation made of the rule in any case should come from an affected third party and not from a Wikipedia contributor, as it was here.
  • Finally the administrator has stated that it is a derivative work, it is not so, the images of the faces of the people involved are not subject to copyright by the Spanish justice, who presumably is the one who took them the photographs. I don't want to lose the chance to indicate that the User: Iusnaturalista made a presumption in bad faith of me that I violated the rights of a third party as proof of his argument. False absolutely. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Sinceramente no puedo entender el empeño que hay en el escarnio público cuando en las consideraciones morales establecidas en Commons se dice claramente que el derecho humano a la intimidad y el honor son susceptibles de priorizar más allá de cualquier otra cuestión técnica o jurídica, con independencia de lo que se haga fuera de la Fundación. Tampoco hay manera de saber si el retrato fotografiado tiene derechos de autor en España, pero el individuo retratado sí tiene derechos sobre su propia imagen, como cualquier persona, siendo innecesario que el afectado reclame este derecho para juzgar la procedencia en Commons. En todo caso, para el artículo enciclopédico no es de interés un retrato con el nombre del enjuiciado; eso se llama amarillismo y es algo que se recomienda evitar.

La foto, además, constituye una difamación (nombre, cara y la palabra violadores), algo explícitamente prohibido https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people/es#Ejemplos

Considerar que la foto podría tener derechos en un sitio web privado o preguntarse cómo es posible que un mejicano haya podido sacar la foto en España, no es presumir mala fe, es duda razonable. --Iusnaturalista (talk) 10:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Unless you are also the photographer of the portrait photos on the board, your photograph of said installation infringes on the copyright of these individual portrait photographs. Presumptions that these portraits were possibly taken by the Spanish justice are insufficient because you as the uploader need to provide hard evidence that your work is free to use. Photographs from Spain have a copyright term of 25 years from their creation {{PD-Spain-photo}} and according to our database the copyright exemption for Spanish government works applies only to texts, but not to images. De728631 (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JeanpaulGonzalez.jpg

This photo has been taken with my own camera during the One Health Innovations meeting in Kansas City (August 27-28, 2017). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertrand Glorot (talk • contribs) 17:31, 24 May 2018‎ (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Þróttur Vogar.png

i feel it is unfair to delete a picture that in all fairness should be fair use, it´s a logo for a soccer team in iceland. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikki9876 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Oppose Commons:Fair use. Please read Commons:First steps before making additional contributions. Thuresson (talk) 21:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elisa_Izaurralde.jpg

This picture file, Elisa_Izaurralde.jpg, got deleted, but I emailed the email I got from the photographer (Constance Brukin) granting permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on May 17. I got an automated response, with the ticket number Ticket#: 2018051710013402 but nothing more. Please let me know what I need to do to get the file restored. Thanks Biochemlife (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Biochemlife: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} or {{subst:OR}}?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Thanks - no, I didn't tag the file... (sorry, I'm still new to all this)Biochemlife (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PatrickODonnellinFrance.jpg

I own the copyright on this photo, not the Pritzger Museum. I provided it to the Pritzger Museum for their article on Patrick K. O'Donnell. Please undelete the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckharveyid (talk • contribs) 13:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Oppose. The Pritzger Museum web site did not credit you or somebody else for this photo. Please use Commons:OTRS to verify that you are the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 14:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:James Naleski.jpg We sent a release contract to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Hello,

Hope all is well; We wanted to thank you and commons Wikimedia for respecting digital copyrights and your assistance in this matter. Attached is the photo from our staff photographer (Janet Frost).

Once this issue is resolved we had an inquiry in regards to help with Wikipedia and getting the page name “James Naleski”. Thanks again!

Best,

Painted Legacy Team

File:Release contract for James Naleski.jpeg.jpg
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpaul03342 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose as:
  1. the enclosed scan is not a free license permission as required by Wikimedia Commons.
  2. if you wish to make the image freely-licensed, please follow COM:OTRS instructions.
Ankry (talk) 21:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:15-03-20 Zonsverduistering (8).jpg

I am the OWNER of the picture of the solar eclipse picture of 20 march 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herdervriend (talk • contribs) 21:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I am Herdervriend, I am Remco F. Gerritsen, I am RFGFotografie, the picture I shared on this page is MINE!

Page 1: http://www.rfgfotografie.nl/?p=63377 Page 2: http://www.rfgfotografie.nl/?page_id=16

Says enough. I only use/upload my own material! If someone uses my material THEN I would want this to appen.

I got multiple accounts on the internet. What more proof do you want? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herdervriend (talk • contribs) 21:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Oppose Use Commons:OTRS to verify that the copyright status is in accordance with Commons:Licensing. Also, a permission restricted to Wikimedia foundation is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Parque Ibirapuera Conservação (PIC).png

O logo é de minha autoria e nao há nenhuma infracao de copyright i designed the logo and there is not copyright infraction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voluntario55a (talk • contribs) 03:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:存个档 甄姬——游园惊梦 (4).jpg,File:牛津街街拍 (2).jpg

These files has a evidence of cc-by-2.5 licensing, (this link is a screenshot of its source page of 牛津街街拍 (2).jpg, and the link https://i.imgur.com/E1N8Yb5.png is a screenshot of small cc-by-2.5 icon. also this link is a screenshot of its source page of 存个档 甄姬——游园惊梦 (4).jpg, and the link https://i.imgur.com/4X9k7BL.png is a screenshot of small cc-by-2.5 icon.) but the admin who deleted the files still disagree undeletion. Also there are several license reviewers already on Commons who has reviewed lofter files, for example, user:explicit, user:chiyako92, user:Anarchyte, User:1989, etc. Please note I have no bad faith that "make screen captures of the pages so that you would have evidence to trump any arguments that could be made against your uploads", since I did not expect the deletions when I uploaded these files. Puramyun31 (talk) 13:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @KTo288 for comment.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Jeff G for the headsup, for everbody's information the above is part of the exchange from User_talk:KTo288#File_deletions.--KTo288 (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
I came across these files during a review of newly uploaded files. On examination I noticed that the uploader of the files here is not the original author of the files. On examination of the sources given, e.g. http://postmodernism.lofter.com/post/2b50f5_108cd54c , I was unable to discern the copyright status of the images in question and that they had been released under a free license, I therefore speedied the images with the rationale that there was no indication that the author had released the images with the copyright permissions claimed. On notifying the uploader I saw that he/she has a history of questionable uploads and added a stop copyvios template to the talkpage, before attempting to audit his uploads, I had deleted one other file (see entry above) before the uploader protested, leading to the exchange on my talkpage. The uploader insisted that LOFTER operates under a free license for its content, that others have reviewed content from LOFTER and found that images from there were licensed in a way that allowed its upload here. Rather than trust his word on this I asked for a link to LOFTER's terms of use indicating that this was the case. Instead of such a link I was instead provided with links to static screenshots of what are claimed to be the original upload of these images and evidence that they are indeed free. I might have believed a link to an actual live link, but the repeated dependence on screenshots of no longer available pages as evidence, and the history of troublesome uploads on his page leads me to doubt the veracity and trustworthiness of this uploader.--KTo288 (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
@KTo288: You can see a (small) cc-by icon on the live link you provided http://postmodernism.lofter.com/post/2b50f5_108cd54c. The screenshots Puramyun31 provides are only to show you where to find the cc icon on the page. --Wcam (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay, I'm going to have to hang up and try another machine/browser because that's not how my page looks and for the life of me I can't see that icon.--KTo288 (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Note: Lofter's terms of use is irrevelent, since like flickr or youtube, lofter is a blog platform and the copyrights of its contents in the blog are belongs to the indivisual blog users. Puramyun31 (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

@KTo288: Please don't use abusive language, I looked your edit summary (okay will shut up now and...). Puramyun31 (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

@KTo288: While browsing http://postmodernism.lofter.com/post/2b50f5_108cd54c, search for the text "2017-07-13". The cc-by icon is at the end of that line, and links to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/deed.zh, which is sufficient for our purposes. Sure, the icon could be bigger and have text attached.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't actually see that text at all let alone the icon, but if you and WCam can see something that I cannot, the problem must be with me, not the file nor the uploader. I'll chalk this down as a mistake on my part and restore the files.--KTo288 (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
@KTo288: Thank you. I see it in multiple browsers on multiple machines and OSs after canceling the popup (or looking around it). However, in Puffin I get "Error 118 (net::ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT) when loading URL". So what do you see?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I'm using Chrome on a Lenovo tablet running Android 4.4.2, I see the pics, a box which opens to reveal a couple of words wrt the pics some hashtags and a link for the author, no date or other text, clicking on the author link takes me to a page with a photo roll of all the author's posts, again no copyright data or icons, but this time there are dates. Clicking on the dates however leads back to where I started. Below the author link is a link to open the page in the LOFTER app which leads me to a page asking me if I would like to download it, however clicking on this, makes my tablet protest that opening the app might damage it and it refuses to co-operate.--18:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
@KTo288: In Chrome 66.0.3359.158 on Android 5.1.1 on my LG Spree (K120) phone, I ask for the desktop version and get a very different page than the mobile version.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: facepalm, asked for the desktop version, I can finally see what everyone else could. Thanks for having the patience to walk me through this.--KTo288 (talk) 19:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
@KTo288: Sure, this just exemplifies a danger of using defaults.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted. --Yann (talk) 11:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:20171011kalkscheune50 dennis-kenji kipker kathrin moeslein.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am a employe of Dr. Kipker and he gave me the task to connect this picture to his wikipedia page. The picture may already be published at other websites, in fact Dr. Kipker owns the copyright and wants to upload it to wikimedia under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. Therefore here is no copyright violation. Hövels (talk) 21:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:45, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DJ VIRGIN PLAYING.png

Hey I took the picture with the artists authorisation how is it copyright violation!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diogopedrol (talk • contribs) 17:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Presumably about File:DJ VIRGIN PLAYING.png. Photo was published on Instagram without a free license before being published here. Thuresson (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Psittacula derbiana on postage stamps.jpg

This graphics is a collage, which constitutes a new work. Postage stamps scans used to form this collage are used within right to quote in my understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdabro (talk • contribs) 20:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose As per Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Fair use. Modern poststamps from various countries. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alessio Di Zio - Portrait.jpg

File:Alessio Di Zio, New York, Portrait.jpg I own the copyright of this picture. As stated before this is my own work and I'm uploading it here because I want it to be free to use.

I uploaded that image on IMDb as well. This shouldn't be deleted. I've already sent my certification via email under the Creative Commons Attribution. --Howardlovy (talk) 00:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Howardlovy: when you say "sent my certification via email" you mean you followed the instructions for OTRS? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
@Howardlovy: Assuming that, the files have been marked {{subst:OP}} on your behalf. However, this is the wrong venue, as the files have not been deleted. If they are deleted, please see {{Odelay}}.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image was not on IMDB as of at least 18. February 2017, meaning Howardlovy uploaded it there sometime thereafter. The image, however, appeared on Flickr, with all rights reserved and credited to "saraharives", on 18. April 2013, years before Howardlevy produced it on IMDB. While this may or may not be true, it needs explanation. The image also appeared on Flickr before upload to the Commons (and likely to IMDB as well) with a credit to "Dazed & Confused Magazine" which, given the subject, lack of camera EXIF, visual characteristics, etc., seems most credible and, in any case, also needs explanation. {{OP}} is/was not appropriate given these infirmities. Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Эlcobbola.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FC Mecklenburg Schwerin 150px.png

And File:FC Mecklenburg Schwerin Logo.pdf: While these are non-trivial logos, the entire non-trivial part is identical to File:Mecklenburger Bulle (Landeswappen).svg (with some small parts in red rather than yellow) which is in the public domain. The logo consists of that CoA in a circle with a simple text in them (see here). I therefore believe the entire logo is in the public domain. (There are versions of the logo with a knight to the right, my post does not apply to that.) --Redeemer (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: for the PNG file, the PDF is out of scope per its format. Please use the svg instead. Ruthven (msg) 15:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Valerie Stark - CEO @ Huggle, board director @ Bumble, CMO @ Badoo.jpg

The copyright holder submitted 2 permissions through permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Tickets: 2018052610004959 and 2018052610004913 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorinlove (talk • contribs) 14:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: @Editorinlove: an answer has been sent on the 28th. Once the permission will be cleared, the file will be restored. Ruthven (msg) 15:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1800Legionflag.jpg

I do not understand why this is being threatened with deletion again. As I said in the additional note at the bottom of the page, all four flag pictures come from the NYPL Digital Collection (for some reason, when I use the NYPL citation Wiki rejects all but one as duplicates related to NYPL). The pictures come from the Vinkhuijzen collection, which is a scrapbook of bits cut out by a Dutch doctor prior to 1910. The link is at n.32. The NYPL says that as a result of it being a donation to them by the Dutch doctor and being before 1910, all the pics are public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveHMBA (talk • contribs) 11:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[12]

I have told you enough times that this comes from a collection donated to the New York Public Library before 1910 and which the NYPL says is in the public domain. I have used the correct citation they require and the other flags shown in the item are from the same collection.

NOW STOP WASTING MY TIME!!!!!!!! HOW MANY TIMES?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveHMBA (talk • contribs) 20:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
But you hadn't add any license (template). --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
@DaveHMBA: I reproduced your post to File talk:1800Legionflag.jpg (which may soon be deleted) above. The problem is that under US copyright law, without information about the lifetimes of the authors of those bits and the countries in which those bits were created, we cannot assume that those bits are in the public domain until at least 120 years have passed, that is until 2030. Krdbot came to that conclusion because you didn't use a license tag, but didn't tell you that because it didn't use parameters with {{Copyvionote}}, perhaps @Krd can configure it to do that.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: It was reuploaded, please delete.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
This seems to be {{PD-1923}}. Yann (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS Ticket:2017092210019016

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017092210019016 alleges permission of File:ata_bozaci-mp-mls_black_neon.jpg (email address is easily ascertainable in his website). Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation and mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ganímedes: I can't see the OTRS ticket or the file, but this guy works for Getty. If the photo is one he made for Getty, he probably doesn't own the copyright anymore. (and as a result can't give us permission) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
I'll ask and report. Thanks a lot. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: : The user says this picture was a previous work, not for Getty, and he upload the picture in other places as well. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
@Ganímedes: In that case I don't see a problem and it's a good thing this has been cleared now. I don't think votes count here, but I  Support undeletion to further assess the status. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: File restored temporarily. Ruthven (msg) 15:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:libro conversazione.jpg

libro conversazione.jpg

si tratta di una foto di un carrettino da gelati scattata più di 60 anni fa da me personalmente. grazie.--Giusfiori (talk) 08:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

It is a picture of an ice cream cart taken more than 60 years ago by me personally. thank you.
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Senza la data, non si può dire di quando è la foto. È stato caricato come una foto del 2018 e il libro di cui è la copertina è anche recente. Ruthven (msg) 15:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wesley Duncan countryside.jpg

I don't understand why it was deleted. It came from File:Palmcard2.pdf. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:43, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

May have been an oversight in tagging the files, but I'm not sure... @Ruthven: could you take a look please? Storkk (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: I restored the file and added the OTRS tag. It was clearly identified as a DW from a file with permission, but the OTRS agent forgot this specific file, and the admin that deleted it didn't checked. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tamar_Gendler.jpg

To whom it may concern,

I would like to request an un-deletion of the photo in this request - both the photographer ('Ian Christmann' <ian@ianchristmann.com>) and I have sent permission to Wikipedia commons to have this photo reinstated. We are doing this on behalf of Tamar Gendler, the individual described at this link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamar_Gendler), who instructed me to get this photo taken so it can be added to her Wikipedia page. All previous efforts to add the photo have failed, I would greatly appreciate consultation on how to add this photo without being deleted.

Thank you for your help in this!

Robert Roche — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertproche (talk • contribs) 12:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Permission added. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Russell Cooper.jpg

The copyright holder submitted 2 permissions through permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Quoit 120 (talk)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:M6iEFJJ.jpg / Cotebonn2.jpeg

File:M6iEFJJ.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregB90 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please restore this file, I have tried to upload this photo twice now. It is my work but was originally taken down because I uploaded it to IMGUR. I have removed it (and all other photos of this house from IMGUR). The last upload was deleted because the image had been previously deleted. --GregB90 (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:43, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:C.K. Williams (1986).jpg

This file was released via email by the copyright holder Catherine Mauger, widow of C.K. Williams on 5/15/18. Copy of email as follows.

From: Catherine Mauger-Williams Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 1:44 PM To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Cc: Vance Bell Subject: image release

I hereby affirm that I, Catherine Mauger, am the creator and / or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Catherine Mauger 2018-05-15

Vbell (talk) 00:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Vbell: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mike Jackson (auto) CHairman and CEO AutoNation.jpg: File:Mike Jackson - High Resolution 04-26-2018.jpg Please undelete and allow for correction of copyright use declaration.

Wrong Copyright included by mistake. --CorporateMapWiki (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@CorporateMapWiki: What would be the correct license tag, and why?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: No anwser. --Yann (talk) 06:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eclipse Lunar Total. 15.06.2011.jpg

Hello!... It's a surprise to me dominate this file for deletion, becasue I prepare this advertisement for a conference by the date and for that eclipse!!!... Well please don't delete it. You are wrong to do it!!!...

Yours truly. 

Fernando T. de Gorocica 11:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

See the original works, before to delete the fileː

https://www.facebook.com/El.Observador.Astronomico/photos/a.169724149754615.44960.130803233646707/169874719739558/?type=3&theater

https://www.facebook.com/pg/El.Observador.Astronomico/photos/?tab=album&album_id=169724149754615

Yours truly. Fernando T. de Gorocica 21:55, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. Please send a permission via OTRS. --Yann (talk) 06:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PhilipMEpstein.png

I have direct written authority by the creator (J Studio) and the copyright owner (Epstein Cole LLP) to use this photo as this image proves:

File:Photo use permission.png
photo use permission

Rddavistoronto2 (talk) 12:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Rddavistoronto2: this is why that won't be accepted as proof
I already told you the copyright owner needs to contact OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Link on image page (http://epsteincole.com/team/philip-m-epstein/) clearly says "© 2018 Epstein Cole LLP All rights reserved.". Copyright holder must go to COM:CONSENT to validate the permission. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elysia Crampton by Boychild.jpg

I have the permission of the author to upload the photo.--Kristina Millona (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lilián Pallares.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the photographer and have given permission for this photo to be shared on wikimedia. You will also find the photo on our website https://www.antenablue.com/p/antenablue.html which Lilián and I run. C.olsen (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS.  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:83be263b.jpg

The file is considered to be official, promotional art. Under U.S. law ,the reproduction of this work falls under use, as it's main use is for people wishing to do more research on this character, and falls under Educational use in Japanese law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiguelAmaro (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kirsten_Harms_21.jpg Undelete

Ich habe asuführlich begründet mit Emails, dass diese Datei freigegeben ist von den Inhabern der Rechte: Bernd Uhlig, dem Fotografen, und der Deutschen Oper Berlin, deren Intendantin Kirsten Harms von 2004-2011 war und auf deren Webseite das Foto zuerst veröffentlicht war. Eine Rückfrage von Olaf Kosinsky, Wikimedia-Support-Team, habe ich ebenfalls ergänzend beantwortet. Und ich habe ihn gebeten, den Email-Wechsel zwischen Frau Harms und der Deutschen Oper, den ich dort mit weitergegeben habe und der leider in der Foto-Legende mit einzusehen ist, zu löschen. Darum möchte ich weiterhin bitten, weil die privaten Email-Adressen nicht öffentlich sichtbar sein wollen. Aber vor allem möchte ich bitten, dass das Foto endlich freigegeben wird, weil es von den Rechte-Inhabern freigegebn wurde.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Aribengeorge (talk) 03:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Basically, I explained with emails that this file is released by the owners of the rights: Bernd Uhlig, the photographer, and the Deutsche Oper Berlin, whose artistic director was Kirsten Harms from 2004-2011 and whose website the photo was first published on. I also answered a query from Olaf Kosinsky, Wikimedia Support Team. And I asked him to delete the email exchange between Mrs. Harms and the Deutsche Oper, which I passed on with him and unfortunately can be seen in the photo legend. That's why I would like to continue asking, because the private email addresses do not want to be publicly visible. But above all, I would like to ask that the photo is finally released because it was released by the rights owners. Best regards
 
translator: Google via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Also, please note that it is a serious violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion as you did here. It wastes your time and that of other Commons editors. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2018-05&oldid=567279317"