Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2014-11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mohammadimalayeri.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This file does not violate copyright as it is was scanned from personal photographs. Please let me know how I can demonstrate it. --Pparang (talk) 14:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Pparang (talk) 23:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since the subject died in 2002 at age 91, this appears to be at least fifty years old. If you are the actual photographer, then your claim of "own work" is accurate. If not, we will need a license from the actual photographer or his heirs, see OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim. Please email COM:OTRS to get the file restored -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ernährungs_Pyramide.svg [edit]

That was not an container for the JPEG Picture. Does nobody checks if the reason is valid before deletion? 

--FischX (talk) 07:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason to restore nothing -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flat Earth Society Logo (2005).png[edit]

I am the copyright holder for this image. I had submitted it to Creative Commons so that it could be published on the Flat Earth Society Wikipedia entry. Please undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielshenton (talk • contribs) 12:08, 30 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jupitar..jpg [edit]

This file is a picture of Jupitar performing live, taken by our colleague Ameyaw Debrah and was posted on his blog www.ameyawdebrah.com early this year.

We have persmission to use this picture but unfortunately we cannot find the original link where this picture was posted. It is only available on instagram and facebook, in which the owner of the picture has tagged Jupitar.

--Teamjupitar (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC) 30-10-14[reply]

In order to restore it, we will need a license from Ameyaw Debrah, see OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saille 2014.jpg [edit]

Ik heb per e-mail gevraagd of ik deze foto (Saille 2014.jpg) mocht gebruiken op alle versies van Saille. Ik heb toestemming gekregen via saillemetal@gmail.com. Deze foto is eigendom van hen.

I've asked for permission by mail to use this picture (Saille 2014.jpg)on all Saille items. I received permission by mail (saillemetal@gmail.com). They own the copyright for this picture.

W. v. Maele--Willemaele (talk) 07:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have the copyright owner send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antivor.png [edit]

Добрый день! В связи с чем связано удаление логотипа? Логотип является зарегистрированным товарным знаком Компании АНТИвор. Находится в шапке официального сайта. Прошу восстановить логотип. Спасибо. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Letsmeaddimg (talk • contribs) 11:04, 31 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

That may be, but you are not the copyright owner and it is probably not your own work, as you claimed. In order to restore it, we will need a free license from an authorized officer of the copyright holder, see OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Synagogue Stolac C.JPG[edit]

Reason: Permission received via OTRS (Ticket:2014103010024855). Thnaks Hanay (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -FASTILY 17:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roshan Khapung.jpg [edit]

plz

 Not done: Procedural close - image hasn't been deleted. INeverCry 08:14, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Erwin Wurm, 2014.png[edit]

Permission has been granted through OTRS (#2014102210010769) under CC BY-SA 4.0 ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 23:36, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But the ticket comes from the subject. So I doubt that we should accept this statement of permission without asking further. Natuur12 (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, check the CC. That's a big hint as well and using this info would make it quite easy to solve this problem. Natuur12 (talk) 00:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Natuur12 -FASTILY 03:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ernährungs_Pyramide.svg [edit]

That was not an container for the JPEG Picture. Does nobody checks if the reason is valid before deletion? --FischX (talk) 01:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think FischX's statement is correct. The deleted file, for reference: [1] -FASTILY 03:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 00:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fuegian Dog.jpg [edit]

It is quite scientific enough, and no original research. Scottishwildcat12 (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done COM:SCOPE. Commons is not a personal art gallery or webhost. -FASTILY 19:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Faridalizade2014aztv.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is my photo FaridAlizade (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Waflogo.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Because it's World Alpagut Federation logo and I'm President of World Alpagut Federation. www.alpagutfederation.org FaridAlizade (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jrobert.jpg[edit]

This image is public domain.The young men in the picture were one of the victims of the dictatorship ,and this kind of files and information are crucial after all many of them are being used at the called Truth Commission which determines the maximum of what was occurring at that time in court to enact sentences and even discover the whereabouts of certain persons and bodies.

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 19:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bloody sexy Jpeg image to undelete.[edit]

I don't understand the deletion of a image that is the cover to an anthology that I have a short story published in and have full permitted right to use. I understand copy right law very well, and I don't see how you can just decide to delete something on the maybe its a violation or via some troll reporting it as such without contacting me first. Please undelete.

Signing as Nicolajayne Taylor on 2.11.2014--Nicolajayne Taylor (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It is a copyright violation because the copyright is owned by the publishers rather than the author of one story. We operate under a precautionary principle which means that possible copyright violations must be deleted unlesss they have been explicitly licensed by the copyright holder. If you wish to have the image restored, you should ask the copyright holder to read COM:OTRS and send a license statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org using the sample statement at COM:ET. Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oslo Vigelandsanlegget 02.jpg[edit]

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Oslo_Vigelandsanlegget_01.jpg and further photos in category Vigelandsanlegget. --Smial (talk) 20:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Per Jim. Natuur12 (talk) 12:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pacho Flores.jpg[edit]

pacho flores Tengo los derechos para usar esta fotografía Pachotrpven (talk) 11:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Please do not re-upload images that have been deleted as copyright violations. Do ask the copyright holder to read COM:OTRS and send a license statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. You can find a sample license statement at COM:ET. Green Giant (talk) 12:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jcdecaux aussenwerbung IMGP4618 wp.jpg [edit]

The requested permission for the depicted artwork has meanwhile been sent by the artist to OTRS. -- Smial (talk) 22:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for getting that done. OTRS will restore the file once they process the email that was sent -FASTILY 20:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aymanelrefaie.jpg [edit]

please undelete this image is free to use--A gamaly (talk) 12:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose. The image is from a Facebook account and the uploader provided no evidence of a free license. Please ask the photographer to read COM:L and COM:OTRS and if they wish to license the image they can send a statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org using the sample at COM:ET. Green Giant (talk) 13:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 17:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nacktbaden.jpg [edit]

Mein eigenes Werk unter einer freien Lizenz eingestellt. (Naturist (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

This is a copy of a file available on the web. If you own the copyright, please send a permission following the procedure at COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 17:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Schnitt okofen pellematic vakuumsaugsystem.jpg[edit]

Durch die Unkenntnis des Systems wurden wahrscheinlich falsche Angaben gemacht. Alle Rechte für die Datei liegen bei mir. Stefanortner (talk) 15:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 20:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Akin_Receiving_An_Award.jpg[edit]

The file with link below was deleted after i got approval from Akin Busari the creator and sole owner pictures link below. This request is made in good faith to help me promote his work as his publicist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azujapan (talk • contribs)

The file with link below was deleted after i got approval from Akin Busari the creator and sole owner pictures link below. This request is made in good faith to help me promote his work as his publicist and i sincerely believe that the deletion is not a breach of contract agreement between both parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azujapan (talk • contribs)

The file with link below was deleted after i got approval from Akin Busari the creator and sole owner pictures link below. This request is made in good faith to help me promote his work as his publicist and i sincerely believe that the deletion is not a breach of contract agreement between both parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azujapan (talk • contribs)

The file with link below was deleted after i got approval from Akin Busari the creator and sole owner pictures link below. This request is made in good faith to help me promote his work as his publicist and i sincerely believe that the deletion is not a breach of contract agreement between both parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azujapan (talk • contribs)

The file with link below was deleted after i got approval from Akin Busari the creator and sole owner pictures link below. This request is made in good faith to help me promote his work as his publicist and i sincerely believe that the deletion is not a breach of contract agreement between both parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azujapan (talk • contribs)

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antonique Smith.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am Antonique Smith. i am the person in these pictures. These pictures are of my likeness and i have full worldwide rights to use them. I signed up to wikipedia under the name unistarmusic so that i could edit my page (Antonique Smith) without people knowing that i edited it. my email address is antoniquesmith@me.com Please let me know what other proof you might need. I would like these pictures back on my wikipedia page asap. Thank you. Unistarmusic (talk) 23:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 00:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:シャロウムちゃん.gif[edit]

The usage of the file is authorized by the holder of copyright.

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SOS 2009 University of Honk Kong ph Benedetta Mori.jpg [edit]

Hallo i am requesting undeletion because i think that the file did not violate any copyright. If you check the original source on flickr you will see that it is licensed as CC-BY-4.0, hence a free licence. Am I wrong? --Chiarensal (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I undeleted it, and created a DR instead. At least this needs a discussion. Yann (talk) 10:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Братська могила жертв фашизму (Романів).JPG[edit]

Please recover file: File:Братська могила жертв фашизму (Романів).JPG [Ticket#2014110410016527] Josef Tabachnyk (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Permission given.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Quentin mosimann TOP100DJ 2014.jpg [edit]

The file has been deleted, stating I'm not owner. I work for Quentin Mosimann as an administrator for all his Web sites. This pictures is supplied by Quentin Mosimann himself to show in his Wikipedia page. He is the owner, and so I'm on his behalf. Can you please retore the file, so Quentin Mosimann pages (FR and EN) show right? Many thanks in advance for your hrlp, Regards, --Froglight (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
As I said on my talk page, this image was published on the web before you uploaded it here, therefore a permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 23:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Братська могила радянських воїнів (Романів).JPG [edit]

Please recover file: File:Братська могила радянських воїнів (Романів).JPG [Ticket#2014110410016527] Josef Tabachnyk (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Permission given.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Erwin Wurm, 2014.png[edit]

Permission has been granted from the photographer through OTRS (#2014102210010769) under CC BY-SA 4.0 ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 20:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 23:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FTL Exotic Matter.pdf[edit]

FTL travel undeletion: I created the file myself, how could this be a copyright violation? Do you wish me to remove my pre-existing creative commons seal?

Each word of that file was typed personally, I do not understand how it can violate copyright, save the creative commons seal I placed on it, would removing this seal nullify this problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikos1997 (talk • contribs)

On the first page of the PDF a non-commercial, non-derivative license is indicated. Other than that, I'm not sure a self-made PDF is within COM:SCOPE. INeverCry 23:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Certainly out of scope. We don't keep personal works from creators who are not notable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Out of scope. INeverCry 16:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LogoUniversitätsklinikumFreiburg.jpg[edit]

Ich beantrage die Wiederherstellung des Logos des Universiätsklinikums Freiburg.

Der Nutzer momo22071994 hat die Datei vom Klinikum erhalten und ist berechtigt die Datei hochzuladen. Allerdings hat er die falsche Lizens angegeben.

Die Bilder sind nach der cc-by-sa-3.0 Lizenz freigegeben (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/)

Bei weiteren Rückfragen zu dieser Datei können Sie sich an mich wenden UKF — Preceding unsigned comment added by UK Freiburg (talk • contribs)

 Not done Eine OTRS Freigabe wird benötigt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gastronomy in Sierra Leone holidays.jpg[edit]

This is my photo and relevant to the "fooods of Africa" section in wiki commons. there is no copyright violetion or any other reason that this file must be deleted. If there is a reason, please explain so I know for the next time I will try to contribute to wiki commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportfishing Sierra Leone (talk • contribs)

 Not done: Full-res version or OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 16:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:omega_diatribe_band[edit]

Hello!

This picture is made by me! This picture is contain my band, and the right is 100% mine! Please undelete it!

Hello!

This picture is made by me! This pictures contains my band's debut records cover. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omegadiatribe (talk • contribs) 11:55, 5 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holders required. INeverCry 16:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gravure jean de bart.jpg[edit]

File (a scan of a 17th century engraing) was abusively removed, allegedly because it was using Institution:Bibliothèque nationale de France as a source, which is true because it was taken from http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8407615r (the digital library of the Bibliothèque nationale de France). Alex de bart (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yes, right. Yann (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Beth Castro.jpg [edit]

A imagem é um recorte de uma imagem de direito da Globo Comunicações e Participações S.A.

que se apresenta no referente link http://memoriaglobo.globo.com/data/files/68/C6/84/81/B439D310EB54F8D3494B07A8/globo__O%20Bem%20Amado-Beth%20Castro_%20Paulo%20Gracindo%20I0003532__gallefull.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor4343 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 5 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose The source site has a clear copyright notice and the image itself is probably from the Brazilian TV series O Bem-Amado, which, according to IMDB, aired 1980-84 and therefore will be under copyright until at least 1/1/2051. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Copyright violation. INeverCry 23:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RBX MED LET 0267.jpg[edit]

The file (a scan of an early 1930's advertising) was abusively deleted, allegedly because it was not on the mentionned source link ( http://www.bn-r.fr the Roubaix municipal library website), but you just have to type "jean bart" (the name of the product) in the research field to find the actual page http://www.bn-r.fr/fr/notice.php?id=Let_0267&from=&searchurl=%2Ffr%2Frecherche-resultat.php%3Fq%3Dbart . As this is not a permalink, I have used the general link. Alex de bart (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Êtez-vous sûr que l'auteur est inconnu ? Le dessin est signé "Le Monnias"(?). Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure that the author is unknown ? The drawing is signed "Le Monnias"(?). Regards, Yann (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Il y a en effet une signature, mais Le site de la bibliohtèque dit "Les images animées ou non, les sons et les vidéos présents sur le site sont (sauf mention contraire) des documents libres de droits" ( http://www.bn-r.fr/fr/mention.php ). Il n'y a pas de mention contraire sur la page correspondant au scan de cette image. Merci d'avoir pris en compte ma demande aussi vite. Alex de bart (talk) 18:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Honnêtement, l'explication donnée ici n'a aucun sens d'un point de vue juridique. En effet, si ces images sont "libres de droit", pourquoi ensuite écrire Dans le cas d'un usage public ou commercial, pour toute forme de publication (papier ou électronique, à des fins commerciales ou non), vous devez vous adresser à l'établissement qui conserve le document original pour solliciter une autorisation ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:43, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Souvent, les bibliothèques et musées mettent ce genre de mentions pour obliger les gens à acheter des reproductions "officielles". Tant pis. En tout cas je vous remercie de votre réponse rapide. Alex de bart (talk) 18:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Il s'agit probablement de Henry Le Monnier (1893-1978), et donc ce dessin ne sera dans le domaine public qu'en 2049. Désolé. Yann (talk) 19:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Not really anonymous, probably still under a copyright. Sorry. Yann (talk) 09:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RBX MED LET 0265.jpg[edit]

The file (a scan of an early 1930's advertising) was abusively deleted, allegedly because it was not on the mentionned source link ( http://www.bn-r.fr the Roubaix municipal library website), but you just have to type "jean bart" (the name of the product) in the research field to find the actual page http://www.bn-r.fr/fr/notice.php?id=Let_0265&from=&searchurl=%2Ffr%2Frecherche-resultat.php%3Fq%3Dbart . As this is not a permalink, I have used the general link. As for the previous, the library website clearely states that unless an explicit mention, all the files in the digital gallery are in public domain and no such mention is to be found for both of the files. Alex de bart (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Idem ci-dessus. Le dessin est signé "Jacq. Godard". Yann (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Je n'ai pas trouvé de dessinateur nommé Jacques Godard. Il faudrait qu'il soit mort avant 1943 pour que ce dessin soit dans le domaine public. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, we could do without "abusively removed" and "abusively deleted" in these requests. It has turned out that two of them were entirely correctly removed and the third, while OK for Commons, did not have the source cited in the usual way. Commons Admins delete around 1,500 images a day. Around one tenth of one percent of those are honest mistakes, and the incidence of abuse may be three or four in every million deletions. In such cases the Admin responsible often loses his position. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Not really anonymous, probably still under a copyright. Sorry. Yann (talk) 09:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nacktbaden.jpg [edit]

File:Nacktbaden.jpg Mein eigenes Werk (Ticket:2014110610007855) --Naturist (talk) 09:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done OTRS ticket still in progress. --Krd 12:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Mmoru[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mmoru, the following files needed an OTRS ticket:

We now have ticket#2014110610010225 from Panoramio user S. Ionut (fwd from RSocol) in which he claims he is Mmoru. I think the email is sufficient for the files to be restored and I will add the {{OTRS}} template.--Strainu (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 22:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hinchada Rampla.png and File:Hinchada Cerro.png [edit]

No entiendo por qué los borraron, supongo que de pura maldad.

Si pueden contestarme en español les agradezco, no entiendo por que me borraron este archivo y los otros que subí con mi mismo usuario, creo que no tienen nada de malo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elgranchafalote (talk • contribs) 10:37, 6 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • The images are small and have no EXIF, so it is suspected that you are not the actual photographer as you claimed.
Las imágenes son pequeñas y no tienen EXIF, por lo que se sospecha que usted no es el fotógrafo real como usted reclamó.
translator: Google

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Español: Por favor, envía un email a OTRS y explica tu situación. Si todo se encuentra en orden, ellos restauraran tu archivo. Gracias

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 02:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Puthenthope.jpg [edit]

File:Puthenthope.jpg i am requesting that don't delete this file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentojustin (talk • contribs) 10:00, 7 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

There is no DR or other reason to expect that the file will be deleted. The file is in use, so it will not be deleted except for copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Schnitt okofen pellematic vakuumsaugsystem.jpg[edit]

Die Datei wurde mit falschen Angaben zur Lizenz hochgeladen, da ich noch nicht so viel Erfahrung mit dem System habe. Alle Rechte liegen bei mir.

Stefanortner (talk) 07:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim. Green Giant (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JRE Podcast Joe Rogan & Brian Redban.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have email permission to put on Wikipedia by the Owner of the copy right K.A.Gesell (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission required. INeverCry 21:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

URAA: 540 files mass-deleted by Fastily, that are still all redlinks.[edit]

In Yann's close of Commons:Massive_restoration_of_deleted_images_by_the_URAA, Yann wrote, "Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. " but it looks like there's been no request / discussion in COM:UDR of a Massive restoration of deleted images 'by' the URAA. Yann confirmed it's appropriate to open one, so here one is. User:Fastily's mass deletions have not been reversed or self-reverted. example. I request restoration of these mass-deleted images, which are one entry in User:Avenue's list: 540 files mass-deleted by Fastily, that are still all redlinks. Fastily is active; is it appropriate for the community to prod him to self-revert? I will not participate further in the discussion; IMO there's been enough discussion already, and consensus has been determined. I respectfully request that everyone leave this alone unless you have the authority to override consensus, or have performed the undelete, or have something else to say that is NOT related to the URAA or positions on or arguments about appropriateness of URAA-impacted content. (Clarification/process comment to Dereckson: I'm requesting undeletion of 540 files mass-deleted by Fastily, not a discussion thereof. This is the correct undeletion process Yann suggested, per here and here)--Elvey (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No oppose for a while,  Doing… --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
List of 540 files
* File:LA2-Blitz-0008.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mondriaanmode door Yves St Laurent (1966).jpg [edit]

This image was deleted with the reason "not covered by FOP in the Netherlands". The dresses in the image are as explained in the discussion released by Yves St Laurent. So the reason must refer to the painting by Mondriaan. The page Com:FOP says "... which are made to be permanently located in public places, as long as the work is depicted as it is located in the public space." In the image a painting located in a public place, the Haagse Gemeente Museum, is visible. Only one painting is displayed. Therefore, freedom of panorama does apply. Please undelete the image. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to COM:FOP, a museum is not a public space in the Netherlands. "The parliament and the literature explicitly mention that schools, opera buildings, entrance halls of businesses, and museums are not public places..."--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Museum's are not a public place in the Netherlands. And yes of course I refer to the painting since the dress has nothing to do with FOP. Natuur12 (talk) 21:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is very disappointing. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per above -FASTILY 22:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Okupa ArteBA 2012.jpg [edit]

I have permission from the copyright holder to use this material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolas.quintieri (talk • contribs) 20:52, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

 Not done: Please have the copyright holder send an email to OTRS confirming the permission. INeverCry 04:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alexis Montoya Aca10.jpg [edit]

esta imagen es tomada desde el programa al cual esta dedicada la redaccion del articulo, por lo cual no contiene derechos de autor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertojavierflores (talk • contribs)

 Not done Los derechos de autor de esa imagen pertenecen o bien a una cadena de TV o a una productora. Por lo que es una clara violación de los derechos de autor al no poseer un permiso explícito de liberación en nuestro sistema de OTRS. Alan (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saranyana.jpg [edit]

Saranyana.jpg Solicito que se vuelva a incluir dicha imagen, ya que tengo el permiso expreso del archivo de fotografía de la Universidad de Navarra, que es la propietaria de dicha imagen. Un saludo.--Hard2 (talk) 12:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • In the file description, you claimed that you were the photographer. Now you say that the University of Navarre gave you permission to upload their image. In any case, it can be restored only if an authorized officer of the University sends a free license using the procedure at OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from University representative required. INeverCry 20:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Katowice, willa, 1924 02.JPG and File:Bytom, budynek zarządu elektrownia Bobrek 05.JPG [edit]

W związku z ciekawą interpretacją Regulaminu konkursu "Wiki Lubi Zabytki" zgłaszam zdjęcie jako nie spełniające "jakościowych" standardów Wikimedia Commons. Ponadto uważam że Wikimedia Commons nie dotrzymała warunków licencji na jakiej udostępniłem zdjęcie. Proszę o usunięcie pliku z repozytorium Wikimedia Commons--polar123 (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close. These images were kept at their DR, not deleted, so they cannot be undeleted and discussion here is not appropriate. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PALO!_Afro-Cuban_Funk_Band_From_Miami,_Florida_2014.jpg[edit]

Permission has be mailed to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org under [Ticket#2014102910002738] for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PALO!_Afro-Cuban_Funk_Band_From_Miami,_Florida_2014.jpg Correctionsgalore (talk) 20:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Green Giant. --Alan (talk) 21:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ju Thai no Brasil Fight 4.jpg [edit]

I'm a professional photographer in Belo Horizonte and this picture is my own creation. The website http://mmapremium.com.br/ which was touted as being violated rights, actually are violating my copyright. I'm sending an e-mail to the web site as well. How can you say I copied the photo of the site if the photo I posted is with much better resolution? I'm the only one to own this image in full resolution. Cidcn (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 00:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nairlady.jpg [edit]

The reason for deletion was "No license since 18 October 2013: you may re-upload, but please include a license tag". The license tag can be included. {{PD-India-URAA}} Achayan (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two requests[edit]

It is a scan from the photo in my own home archive (which was clearly stated in description). This photo made by my grandfather and depict my great grandfather. It is not the case of OTRS or something like it - it is my low quality photo, from my table!--Вантус (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was 84-year old photo from my archive which was made by my great grandfather.--Вантус (talk) 12:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Assuming that these are Russian images, in either case, if the photographer died before 1944, then the image is PD. If not, then the copyrights to the photos belong to all of the heirs of your grandfather (in the first case) and your great-grandfather (in the second case). In the unlikely case that you are the only heir, then you can send a license to OTRS and the images can be restored. If you are not the only heir, then you must first get written permission from all of the heirs. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 09:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Necklace road.jpg[edit]

It is my work only. My name is Abhishek. Earlier I used AB as my watermark. Later on I changed it to TripodStories- AB. If you want evidence regarding the same. Please goto the below link:

http://500px.com/abhishekandlens

https://www.facebook.com/TripodStories

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1984abhionwiki (talk • contribs) 03:19, 12 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to undelete, because the file has not been deleted (yet). The correct place to discuss this is at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Necklace road.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong forum. File has not been deleted -FASTILY 09:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gedeon_G._Quijano_with_President_Garcia.jpg [edit]

The file is now owned by Mborromeo, the grandson, since the copyright predates 1964. --Marjoe Quijano Borromeo (talk) 04:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The arguments raised at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gedeon G. Quijano with President Garcia.jpg seem sound. It seems unlikely that this was your own work. (I assume that User:Mqbor is also your account.) The copyright is most likely held by the photographer or the photographer's heirs. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per above -FASTILY 09:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jhony Mosquera.jpg [edit]

--Djandry507 (talk) 05:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! It looks like you forgot to state the reasons for the request, even though there's a reminder to do so just above. You'll need to address the concerns that were raised at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jhony Mosquera.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close - no reason given for undeletion -FASTILY 09:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paul Marselje 2011.jpg[edit]

Also: File:Paul Marselje 2011 - 2.jpg

I request this picture to be undeleted. There is no violation of copyright, since I am the holder/owner of that copyright --Paulmarselje (talk) 09:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 09:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

URAA: 408 files mass-deleted by Sven Manguard, that are still all redlinks.[edit]

In Yann's close of Commons:Massive_restoration_of_deleted_images_by_the_URAA, Yann wrote, "Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. " but there's been no request / discussion in COM:UDR of a Massive restoration of these deleted images 'by' the URAA. Yann confirmed it's appropriate to open one, so here one is. User:Sven Manguard's mass deletions have not been reversed or self-reverted. example. I request restoration of these mass-deleted images, which are one entry in User:Avenue's Commons:Massive_restoration_of_deleted_images_by_the_URAA#Some_figures_on_URAA_tags_and_deletions list: 408 files mass-deleted by Sven Manguard, that are still all redlinks. Sven Manguard is active; is it appropriate for the community to prod him to self-revert? I will not participate further in the discussion; IMO there's been enough discussion already, and consensus has been determined. I respectfully request that everyone leave this alone unless you have the authority to override consensus, or have performed the undelete, or have something else to say that is NOT related to the URAA or positions on or arguments about appropriateness of URAA-impacted content. (Clarification/process comment to Dereckson: I'm requesting undeletion of 408 files mass-deleted by Sven Manguard, not a discussion thereof. This is the correct undeletion process Yann suggested, per here and here). This nigh identical request WAS honored and fulfilled last week - by Steinsplitter: diff: 540 files restored by Steinsplitter

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CaodaiHomeAltar.jpg [edit]

Hi Wiki team,

This picture is a public property of our religion, i.e. the Cao Dai religion. Nobody has the the right to claim copyright of it. It is sacred and indispensible for the Cao Dai article. Kindly help undelete it.

Thanks, Phu

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 09:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Wohnen-das-froehliche-M-Moebel-Trends-Ideen-Haus-Saarlouis.jpg[edit]

Ich beantrage hiermit die Wiederherstellung folgender Dateien,

  1. 1. Wohnen-das-froehliche-M-Moebel-Trends-Ideen-Haus-Saarlouis.jpg
  2. 2. Wohnen-das-froehliche-M-Moebel-Trends-Ideen-haus-homburg.jpg

es handelt sich hierbei um unsere Einrichtungshäuser, welche wir in unseren Wikipedia-Artikel einbinden möchten. Wir "das fröhliche m" besitzen die Rechte an den Bildern. (siehe http://www.das-froehliche-m.de/einrichtungspartner/ueber-uns.html)

Vielen Dank

--Klein Jörg (talk) 10:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hindu Heritage Centre, Bird's Eye View.jpg[edit]

This picture was uploaded on both the official website hinduvision.com as well as the official facebook group before being uploaded on facebook. Using the official camera of the Hindu Heritage Centre, this picture was not taken from a drone or helicopter. There is a radio tower on the corner of the property, under the supervision of a technician, a picture was taken from the radio tower of the Hindu Heritage Centre. As for the size, I can easily send the biggest size if that is really an issue, as the photo is still on the camera. Again I want to make clear that I as a representative of the Hindu Heritage Centre own full exclusive rights for the image, I am also the admin for the official facebook page and website page which explains how the picture has been found all over the internet. All i want to do is educate readers on the architecture of the Hindu Heritage Centre by providing a good image taken from a height. Thanks! Kushagr.sharma1 (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RitrattoGianniPalminteri.png[edit]

(Italian version below) I reqest to undelete the file File:RitrattoGianniPalminteri.png, since it has been uploaded with permission of the author, Sergio Fantinel, who sent today the required license (CC-BY-SA-4.0) to permissions-it@wikimedia.org with subject: "integrazione ticket OTRS #2014102010020716 Opere di Gianni Palminteri".

There are no other copyright holders, so I kindly request to restore the file, which is referenced by the wikipedia page https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianni_Palminteri. Thank You, Alberto Cammozzo

Richiedo di ripristinare il file File:RitrattoGianniPalminteri.png, che è stato caricato con il permesso dell'autore Sergio Fantinel, che ha inviato in data odierna la licenza (CC-BY-SA-4.0) all'indirizzo permissions-it@wikimedia.org con sibject: "integrazione ticket OTRS #2014102010020716 Opere di Gianni Palminteri".

Non vi sono altri soggetti titolari di copyright, pertanto richiedo gentilmente il ripristino del file che è referenziato dalla pagina wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianni_Palminteri. Grazie, Alberto Cammozzo

Great, thanks for doing that. Once OTRS processes the email that was sent, they will restore the file -FASTILY 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PPCC Stacked Logo CMYK.png[edit]

Permission has been granted through OTRS (#2014111210023549) under CC BY-SA 4.0 ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 23:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -FASTILY 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gargoyles S2V2.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is the DVD cover which is free to use. The other DVD covers are on the Gargoyles page too and are also free to use. Ostrogorsky (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oberflächeneffizienz bei verschiedenen Grundtypen geometrischer Körper.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Author has given his permission of use. TheOzymandiasII (talk) 10:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BMT_Advert-Worthy.jpg [edit]

REQUESTING THE UN-DELETION OF FILE: BMT_Advert-Worthy.jpg

Whilst I admit that there has been submitted a request for deletion on the (subjective) basis that the photograph in my photograph is blurry or the camera focus is in the wrong area of the .jpg; I feel that without this picture of the SUBWAY's flagship sandwich -- the Italian BMT -- we are left with photographs which do not accurately present the contents of the sandwich sufficiently. The BMT is famous for it's generous portions of 3 distinct meats and appropriate salads and dressings. The only other file in the Commons section is a full length/footlong, toasted version of the sandwich. The meats are not visible (presumably lost within the sandwich's fold) -- we can only see a row of salad contents but no apparent sauce. The title claims that it is an Italian BMT, but the picture shows us no evidence of this. at first glance, it could even be a Veggie Delight which contains no meat! I am only speculating, however. : https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Subway_BMT.jpg

The image: BMT_Advert-Worthy.jpg was made by myself at the time I was employed in a Subway store. I followed the strict sandwich building guide, portion-control and presentation which leads to a sandwich which not only could appear on a photographical commercial still but one which emerges as a prime example of what the Subway sandwiches are built to look like, despite customer requests for customisation and the rushed demeanour of certain staff can lead to unrecognisable food items; like the example I discussed earlier.

About myself. After delivering products to this consistent standard, I was approached by upper management and marketing to revise the correspondence and training materials delivered to new employees; as well as involving myself with the food marketing side of the business; long story short, my sandwiches (and now pizzas and burgers) have been featured on billboards and TV advertising. So I know an important picture when I see one.

The file BMT_Advert-Worthy.jpg conveys the ingredients and the build quality of Subway's sandwiches and help to indicate that the product can be ordered and delivered in a way which meets the high standard of food advertising the public have come to expect. I think my image helps with this goal and would therefore ask that you undelete the picture so it may one day be the face of Italian BMT on Wikipedia again.

Thank you.

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 05:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vanilla - Cooking with one of the world's finest ingredients.jpg[edit]

we are the copyright holder of this image and endorse its publication in commons

--Thessinger-Wishart (talk) 07:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose That seems unlikely to be correct. The image is the cover of a book by Janet Sawyer, published by Ryland Peters & Small, which a London based publisher. According to its Facebook page, Thessinger-Wishart is a Melbourne based distributor of baking ingredients. I wouldn't be surprised if T-W sells the book, but I would be very surprised if it actually owns the copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you have reloaded the file as File:Vanilla; Cooking with one of the world's finest ingredients.jpg. Reloading a file while an UnDR is pending is a violation of Commons rules. Please don't do it again. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done please send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Mr-Clarke-and-Maisie[edit]

This image is my own work as stated when uploaded 213.104.226.208 14:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose First, it is not your image -- IP users are not allowed to upload images. I assume you meant to say File:Mr-Clarke-and-Maisie.jpg which was deleted because the left half of it is an obvious screen capture from Borstal Boy which is a copyrighted movie.

The same user recently reloaded the same image as File:Mr Clarke and Maisie.jpg, which I have also deleted for the same reason. It is a violation of Commons rules to reload an image while an UnDR is pending. Please do not do it again. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim -FASTILY 01:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Xi_Jinping_Banner_in_Mong_Kok_20141026.jpg[edit]

 Support，強烈要還原！

明明喺之前嘅討論，係7票keep，對2票delete，係7對2呀！！7對2呀！！結果居然可以係delete？！咁唔係暴政，又係乜嘢？！喺百科，係畀fair use嘅，但係叫人放圖就要放commons。上到嚟commons，你班刪除派就話咩commons唔畀fair use。咁唔係有心玩嘢，又係乜嘢？！你哋啲用時間盤據百科同commons嘅刪除派，自己set到啲例自相矛盾，咁就立即改番正，改番啲例唔好自相矛盾啦！憑乜嘢理由，用呢啲你哋班刪除派搞出嚟嘅自相矛盾嘅惡法，去大開殺戒任意河蟹真實紀錄？！--Tvb10data (talk) 11:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Google translate does not do well with the remarks above, but I think there are two points. First, he comments on the fact that the "vote" in the DR was 7 to 2 in favor of keep. As we all should know, DRs are not votes and the closing Admin is free to ignore any comments that do not correctly reflect the law and Commons policy. "Fair use" is also mentioned (as it was by several of the "keep" voters, which is why they were, correctly, ignored. Again, as we all should know, "fair use" is not permitted on Commons.
This is an image of a poster with a crowd looking at it and photographing it. The image is clearly a derivative work of the poster and therefore infringes on the poster's copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that User:Tvb10data is a single purpose account, used only at the subject DR and here, so I ran a CheckUser and found that Tvb10data is a likely sock of User:Wing1990hk, the uploader of the image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
James Lwoodward, actually you don't have any evidence that to proved me that I have created Tvb10data or Tony YKS accounts in commons. Except you check the IP records in today. Your action makes me feel very disappointed and angry. If you still try to attack me again. I will boycott commons and it is not good for Wikipedia development.Wing1990hk (talk) 14:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I support the request of undeletion. Even though it is not a vote, users that support deletion are outnumbered. Tvb10data is saying that, overriding our objection and deleting the photo is tyranny, as well as "river crabbing" (censorship). Tvb10data is also complaining that the rules of Wikimedia Commons are self-contradictory. I don't know much about who enforced those rules and whether the rules are self-contradictory or not (I will check this later), but deleting the photo, despite that users supporting deletion are minority, is obviously a bad decision. Ending the discussion by ignoring the objection of majority is dictatorial.
In my opinion, this controversy is about the conflict between copyright and "self-censorship". I agree that copyright has to be protected, but it is not the reason to allow "self-censorship", because acts of "self-censorship" will severely damage the reputation of Wikimedia Foundation. Photos are necessary to provide facts about the Umbrella Movement, as well as other articles. We need to strike a balance, because this issue will possibly affect all photos regardless of the contents. Rather than to remove all photos about Umbrella Movement no matter how many users oppose deletion, we should review the policy of Wikimedia Commons, in order to solve this problem.
I am outraged that Tvb10data is accused as "sock puppets" and blocked only because of the undeletion request. Accusing users as "sock puppets" and blocking them do absolutely NOTHING to achieve consensus. Instead, it will be considered as a threat to the freedom of speech, and will completely destroy the reputation of Wikimedia Foundation! From the User Contributions of Tvb10data in Wikipedia, Tvb10data is clearly NOT a "sock puppet"! Accusing Tvb10data as the "sock puppet" of Wing1990hk, just because of Tvb10data's demand of undeletion, is clearly unreasonable! The act of blocking Tvb10data is tyrannizing other users and threatening the freedom of speech! Furthermore, as stated by another Wikipedia user, "Hong Kong is a city-state of highest population density in the world. Accusing puppet by the similarity of IP addresses should not apply on Hong Kong Wiki users." I demand to unblock Tvb10data immediately!
Tony YKS (talk), 10:20PM, 16/11/2014

 Not done "Fair use" media files are not allowed on Commons --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The High Priest - 1916234235071.jpg[edit]

The rights holder accidentally set the flickr page private. The situation has been remedied. (See User talk:McZusatz#File:The High Priest - 1916234235071.jpg for further details). --Iustinus (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fernando Gaspar.jpg[edit]

BrightRaven (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Copy from the web, no reason to undelete. Yann (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Camões (série Personagens para uma História).jpg[edit]

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need a permission from w:Fernando Gaspar for these files. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon,

Being the assistant painter Fernando Gaspar insert two photos (identified below) for their work in the Commons, which were removed for alleged breach of copyright. Please, please confirm my identity and role of the artist in stie http://www.fernandogaspar.com/contactos.html and please restore the pictures in your Wiki page.

16h32min de 23 de maio de 2014‎ CommonsDelinker (Discussão | contribs)‎ m . . (5 565 bytes) (-82)‎ . . (Removendo "Fernando_Gaspar.jpg", por ter sido apagado no Commons por Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation: higher resolution: [2]) (atu | ant) 16h31min de 23 de maio de 2014‎ CommonsDelinker (Discussão | contribs)‎ m . . (5 647 bytes) (-143)‎ . . (Removendo "Camões_(série_Personagens_para_uma_História).jpg", por ter sido apagado no Commons por Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation: Works by living artist [[commons::en:Fernando Gaspa...)

Adélia Vasques — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelia.vasques (talk • contribs) Assistant GSM +351 966407653

Fernando Gaspar www.fernandogaspar.com

As I said above, a formal permission is necessary. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 00:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Scholarship In the Memory of Late Mr. & Mrs. Subramaniam.JPG[edit]

and File:Markham Maniam at a Drama in Canada.JPG

Based on my discussions with the nominator for the deletion here and the admin who deleted here, I request to undelete the above image.Pathmaraman (talk) 14:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose I don't think that either of the reasons given proves that the subjects are notable. Generally our standards are the same as those of WP and donating a scholarship -- unless it were millions of dollars -- or performing in a non-professional drama are not evidence of notability. Both User:Antan0 and User:Fastily said that you could start an UnDR, which is,of course, your right, but neither suggested that he would support it.

Furthermore, the first of the images is a formal portrait of the two people in an oval frame and clearly shows the moire artifacts of having been copied from a printed work. Unless you are the actual photographer and publisher of the printed work, your claim of "own work" is incorrect.

The second image also shows moire artifacts, so it is also copied from a printed work. The same problem applies to it as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If only the Notable subjects can have a space on Wikimedia Commons, can you explain on which basis these images are decorating at the Commons?
Yes, I have scanned the images on a anniversary book(2002) on them; I have the permission from the son of the diseased.Pathmaraman (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To your first question, many of them are user page images, which, within limits, are permitted. Others should be deleted. We have almost 24 million images on Commons. My best guess is that at any one moment about 1% -- almost a quarter of a million -- should be deleted for one reason or another. For any given image you can always find a similar image on Commons, one that ought to be deleted.
As for your second point, the copyright belongs to the actual photographers or their heirs. The son has no right to license the images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your first point is the grey area in Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons which many can't understand; I am there since 2006 on both and edited under a different name and left the account over geopolitical issues.
I disagree with your second point on this case. If these people are VIPs, their photos will come under the ethics of the professional photography. We can't assume the usage of these photographs will affect the photographers' professions or their income source.Pathmaraman (talk) 09:38, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is no basis in copyright law or in Commons policy for "their photos will come under the ethics of the professional photography". Try telling that to the Associated Press or to Bachrach both of whom enforce their copyrights vigorously. These are copyright violations, plain and simple. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Copyvios and possibly out of scope. INeverCry 00:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ian Chen Disney Red Carpet 2014.JPG[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I was physically there during the movie premiere event and took the picture with my iphone Alplab (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose This was deleted because it appeared at http://www.zimbio.com/Ian+Chen in October, a month before your upload, and is claimed to be copyrighted by Getty Images. INeverCry 00:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. It some how ended up on my photo stream and I thought that is the one I took. I will upload the one I took.

 Not done per above. Эlcobbola talk 20:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg [edit]

it is a very useful file.<ref>http://indiarailinfo.com/train/1092/1/2314</ref> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanmay Tarun (talk • contribs)

Sorry, what file did you want to restore? Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 05:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to reffer File:Mithila Express Route Map 2.png, due to missing sources. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No valid reason to restore given. Image is also clearly a Google Earth/Maps screenshot with certain routes highlighted (presumably by the uploader) - thus a derivative work of an unfree map that cannot be hosted here. Эlcobbola talk 20:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bettina Encke von Arnim Werke 74.jpg [edit]

We have a Permission via ticket:2014090410009325, so they can be undeleted. --Emha (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 04:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Koms pl building.jpg [edit]

Why this file was deleted?

I am the author of this file. I created and modified it specifically for the article in Wikipedia.

Please, restore this file and place it into article again (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%89%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%8C_(%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE)

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozysoft (talk • contribs) 11:38, 19 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • The image was deleted because it appears on the copyrighted page http://kanaduchi.livejournal.com/12576.html. Policy requires that licenses of images which have appeared elsewhere under copyright be confirmed by the photographer using the procedure at OTRS. Once that is done, the image will be restored to Commons without further action on your part. You will, however, have to replace it in the WP article. Please note that like all WMF projects, OTRS is entirely volunteers and often runs a backlog of several weeks..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 23:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jo Baer 2014-1 (1 van 1) 300 dpi.jpeg [edit]

I have just sent the permissions form to the author Rineke Dijkstra, could you please wait for her to send her permission? --15:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

It has already been deleted. It will be restored if and when the permission is received and processed by OTRS. Note that OTRS is all volunteers and is understaffed -- their backlog often runs several weeks. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: File can be restored once OTRS permission is processed. INeverCry 23:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AprilByronAwards.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Currently working on ticket:2014052910004121; need to see the image to confirm copyright Microchip08 (talk) 14:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you refund File:AprilBarry.jpg too? Thanks, Microchip08 (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 23:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Charlotte_Erlanson.jpg[edit]

Jag försäkrar härmed att jag, Charlotte Erlanson-Albertsson är upphovsman och/eller enda upphovsrättsinnehavare till File:Charlotte Erlanson.jpg.

Jag godkänner härmed att detta verk publiceras under de fria licensvillkoren Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0.

Jag är medveten om att detta innebär att jag ger vem som helst rätten att använda verket i kommersiellt eller annat syfte och att förändra verket efter eget behov under förutsättning att de följer licensvillkoren och gällande lagar.

Jag är medveten om att detta godkännande inte är begränsat till Wikipedia eller webbplatser med anknytning till Wikipedia.

Jag är medveten om att jag behåller upphovsrätten till mitt verk och rätten att anges som upphovsrättsinnehavare i enlighet med den valda licensen. Ändringar gjorda av andra ska inte påstås vara gjorda av mig.

Jag är medveten om att den fria licensen endast rör upphovsrätten, och jag behåller rätten att vidta åtgärder mot den som använder verket på ett sätt som strider mot lagar om förtal, personlig integritet, varumärkesskydd och så vidare.

Jag är medveten om att jag inte kan återkalla detta godkännande och att Wikimedia fritt kan välja om verket ska tillhandahållas permanent eller inte.

Charlotte Erlanson-Albertsson upphovsrättsansvarig talesman 2014-11-07

Godkännande från fotografen: Hej, du får hjärtans gärna använda fotot varsomhelst, uppge mig även som fotograf, inget villkor. Det var så fint ljus i din trädgård.

Hälsningar Gunnar Ericsson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medfak1 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 20 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose The file description says that the subject, author, and source are all the same person. Since this is probably not a selfie, that is unlikely to be correct. If Google Translate is correct with the message above, the photographer is one Gunnar Ericsson, who has given a very informal permission for Erlanson-Albertsson to "use the photo anywhere". The bulk of the statement above is therefore irrelevant and incorrect because "I hereby declare that I, Charlotte Erlanson-Albertsson am the creator and / or sole copyright owner of File: Charlotte Erlanson.jpg." is not correct. She is certainly not the creator or the sole copyright holder and Ericsson's informal permission does not give Erlanson-Albertsson the right to sub-license the image to Commons or elsewhere. In order to restore this we will need a free license acceptable to Commons from Ericsson, using the procedure at OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 23:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

FK Sarajevo crest history.jpg [edit]

The file in question was made by me on Photoshop. The usage of the club logo is licence-free, as can be seen on the official website of the club: http://www.fcsarajevo.ba/en/grb. Furthermore, the historical logos that I used in my Photoshop work are also licence-free because they have been debunked for years and can be found here: http://kassiesa.nl/uefa/clubs/html/FK-Sarajevo.html. PeppermintSA (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose What I see at the named site is a clear copyright notice. There is no indication whatever of a free license. "Debunked for years" does make anything free of copyright. Depending on the life-span of the creator, a copyright can easily be in place for 100 years after creation and 150 years is by no means impossible. The second site cited above has no indication of a free license and specifically notes that permission of the copyright holder may be needed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Jim. No evidence of free licenses. The second website appears to be a case of fair use, which may be permitted locally on some Wikipedias but is not allowed on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kornbluth Ocean.JPG[edit]

Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

This is a historically significant work that could not be conveyed in words. Inclusion is for information, education, and analysis only. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows a major type of work produced by the artist. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work and would be unlikely to impact sales of prints or be usable as a desktop backdrop. It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.

 Not done Fair use not allowed on Commons. Yann (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


How may I get these migrated to wikimedia? JipJoy1939 (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is Wikimedia. They cannot be restored here without formal permission from the creator's estate, see OTRS. If you mean to ask how they can be migrated to Wikipedia, you claim in the file description that you are the photographer, so presumably you can simply upload them there. I make no comment on whether or not your fair use rationale will be acceptable at WP:EN. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:東郷克美.jpg [edit]

I myself took this picture at the residence of Professor Togo, then I clipped and uploaded it. I believe that the copyright belongs to me. Therefore I am making this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trentehuitornex (talk • contribs) 22:40, 21 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 23:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Himno-Nacional-Orquestado.ogg[edit]

This file has been nominated by Green Giant, indicating the Privacy Policies of the SECOM (based on the the Decree 100 of 2006) forbids the comermcial uses of the media published in the government Websites.

But, in 2010, Ena von Baer wrote and published the Oficio Ord. 112/14 in reference of the Law 19.032, that explicitilly instructs all the media released by the Government of Chile and its institutions must be licensed under the CC-BY. Therefore, all the media works (pictures, audio and video) released/published after the December 30 of 2010 are automatically covered under the {{CC-GobCL}}, according to the current Law.

Also, the Article 4 of the Decree 14 0f 2014 derogated the Decree 100 of 2006, making the Privacy Policies indicated by Green Giant also derogated and not longer valid. Only the Oficio Ord. 112/14 of 2010, the Law 19.799 and the Law 19.032 (and other Laws) are now valid and legal for this effect. So, this older file is also covered under the CC-BY license.

In summary, the file is efefctivelly covered under the CC-BY license according to the current Chilean Laws. So, please undelete this file.

Anyway, I' ve contacted to the Government of Chile according to the Ley de Transparencia, in order to clarify the doubts of the non-chilean people that are not familiar with the Chilean laws, and specifically, the licensing of the National Anthem of Chile. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are several issues here. Amitie has explained here (for the first time) that the decree on which the problematic privacy policy is based has been overruled. That's good. However, there is also the question of whether the Chilean government actually owns all of the necessary copyrights in order to make this performance PD. The national anthem, as a work, is probably PD, but musical performances have many copyrights and it is not clear that all of them are PD in this case.
Orchestral works have separate copyrights for the music, for the lyrics (if any), for the arrangement (the composer of a national anthem usually writes it for one instrument -- an orchestral performance requires that it be arranged separately for each of the orchestral instruments), and for the performance itself. Even if the government says that the work is PD, please make sure that you can prove that the government actually owns the copyright to the performance -- I don't know the Chilean law on the subject, but in the USA for that to be true, all of the orchestra would have to be employees of the Federal government. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No doubts about all the works released after December 30 of 2010 are automatically covered under the CC-BY (that the Chilean Laws say clearly), but the licensing of the works released between June to December of 2010 (like this specific file) is disputed, I agree; as I know, these works are also covered under the CC-BY (unlike the Patrimonio cultural común or PD, as I previously mentioned). So, as I said, I've contacted to the Government of Chile, so the answer will clarify the actual licensing of the National Anthem, and will be the definitive answer to the case. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I just recived the answer from the Government of Chile. The official answer says the file is efefctivelly covered under the CC-BY license. Bellow is the email recived (in spanish) (publicly available according to the Ley de Transparencia):


Message from the Government of Chile:
De: Transparencia <transparencia@presidencia.cl>

Fecha: 17 de noviembre de 2014, 12:00

Asunto: Respuesta a solicitud de información

Para: "david.munoz.vergara@gmail.com" <david.munoz.vergara@gmail.com>

ANT.: Ingreso Nº AA001W-0000915

Estimado David Muñoz Vergara:

Se ha recibido en esta Institución, la solicitud de información pública citada en el antecedente, mediante la cual requiere lo siguiente:

“Estimados. Solicito información sobre el uso y licenciamiento de los símbolos oficiales del estado, específicamente el Himno nacional dispuesto para descarga en http://www.gob.cl/himno-nacional/ Según la información provista, dichas versiones del Himno están publicadas bajo la licencia CC-BY-SA, la cual permite usos comerciales, pero en otro documento contradice eso. El problema es que el archivo fue convertido de MP3 a OGG y subido a Wikimedia Commons para ser usado en Wikipedia, pero ha sido borrado debido a las inconsistencia en el licenciamiento de esta "obra derivada" de un trabajo del siglo XIX. Si el himno original está en el Patrimonio cultural común, ¿Eastán estas versiones del Himno Nacional en el Patrimonio cultural común también o bajo una licencia específica? Agradezco una pronta respuesta Atte: David Muñoz V.”

Al respecto, informo lo que a continuación se indica:

1.- La Presidencia de la República, tiene como función apoyar en todo lugar, a S.E. la Presidenta de la República y sus asesores, brindándoles los servicios necesarios para su gestión, administrando eficaz y eficientemente los recursos humanos, financieros y materiales disponibles, fundados en los valores de lealtad y transparencia y entre otros suscribir los contratos de suministros de bienes y servicios que se requieran para el desarrollo y funciones de esta institución. Aclarada la misión institucional, la Presidencia de la República no concentra la información de todos los órganos y servicios públicos que forman parte de la Administración del Estado, solo aquella que dice relación con la misión institucional.

2.- En virtud de lo dispuesto en el artículo 13 y 30 de la Ley Nº 20.285 y Reglamento respectivo, dispone que: “En caso que el órgano de la Administración requerido no sea competente para ocuparse de la solicitud de información o no posea los documentos solicitados, enviará de inmediato la solicitud a la autoridad que deba conocerla según el ordenamiento jurídico, en la medida que ésta sea posible de individualizar, informando de ello al peticionario. Cuando no sea posible individualizar al órgano competente o si la información solicitada pertenece a múltiples organismos, el órgano requerido comunicará dichas circunstancias al solicitante”, por lo cual informo a usted que derivo la solicitud en referencia, a la Subsecretaría General de Gobierno, del Ministerios Secretaría General de Gobierno, mediante Oficio Nº 1001, de fecha 17 de noviembre de 2014, el que adjunto.

Saluda atentamente a usted,
Director Administrativo
Presidencia de la República

Therefore, please restore this file. Anyway, I sended a message to OTRS. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The people at Presidency have, basically, derivated the request to another State organ, the Government General Subsecretariat. We will have to wait until the guys at the Subsecretariat respond to your query. This email does not prove the anthem is CC-BY. In fact, it does not say anything of value. --Diego Grez return fire 19:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is just the message recived. The original message with an attached document with the ORD.: 001 has been sended to OTRS. Si, I'll update any newer answer and I'll send the to OTRS too. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have made several transparency requests over time to the Presidency of Chile, and based on the text you've attached above, they haven't given you any response in regard to the copyright status of the Chilean anthem. As I told you, we'll have to wait until the Subsecretariat responds, regards, Diego Grez return fire 17:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then, I'll just wait. And also, for the other UD bellow, I'm waiting for more than a month from the Gendarmerie of Chile. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close as currently inactionable; this needs to be resolved via OTRS when we hear back from the presidency of Chile anyways -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo-webrtc.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: If this file contains what I think it does, it may well be seen as a case for template:PD-textlogo, so we don't need any permission.

I'd say it is a fitting case, but I'd also like to hear other opinions on how high we should consider the threshold of originality to be... Kulandru mor (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is definitely a complex image and therefore non-eligible for PD-simple. If you'd like to use it, I suggest uploading it locally at the wiki you would like to use it at under fair use -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jonathan-Oppenheimer.jpg [edit]

This file is owned by me and has no copyright restrictions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wendzt (talk • contribs)

 Comment Seems to copied from thebrenthurstfoundation.org. Yann (talk) 12:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Metusa-Dortmund-2014-group 1.jpg [edit]

Ich hatte euch die Genehmigung der Fotografin weitergeleitet. Leider bekam ich auch keine Info, dass das Foto gelöscht wurde.

Xalarian (talk) 19:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DJ TTB on set for MyTV Africa.jpg [edit]

the file File:DJ TTB on set for MYTV Africa.jpg was my personal work.Maobii (talk) 20:47, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

cowgirl boudoir[edit]

Das betreffende Bild zeigt die US_Sängerin Kimmie Rhodes. Dieses Bild wurde mir von Kimmie Rhodes selbst zur Verfügung gestellt. Kimmie wird dieses Bild als Cover ihrer im März 2015 erscheinenden CD benutzen. Das Bild selbst wurde von dem Fotografen Gray Hawn gemacht.

Wahrscheinlich liegt mein Fehler darin, dass meine Beschreibung des Bildes nicht ausreichend war (Es war mein erster Versuch, ein Bild hier reinzustellen). Ich bitte daher um Feischaltung dieses Bildes, damit ich zeitnah den (fertigen) Artikel über Kimmie Rhodes in den öffentlichen Bereich transferieren kann.

Gruss Gerspacher — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManfredGerspacher (talk • contribs) 10:18, 22 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zapiski rp.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It's my work for this movie by agreement with producer Oleg Ryaskov, it was free use in internet from and 2010 with the full consent of the copyright holder. Martybeta (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:5964 Lettre abri cap blanc.JPG [edit]

Sorry for the late answer. I don't go in wikimedia commons as often as before. This file was obtained wy making a picture of a letter in a museum. I am not the author of the letter, but I am the author of the picture. The letter was written in 1909. It relates the finding of the cap blanc neolitic carvings, and as such is of historical interrest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berrucomons (talk • contribs) 15:13, 22 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dissipated Eight - Bermuda Tour (2008).JPG[edit]

Dissipated Eight - Bermuda Tour (2008).JPG

I took this picture. Re-uploading it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrozenMan (talk • contribs) 18:11, 22 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

You may re-upload the file, but please specify a source in the file's description page -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NQ Mobile Logo.jpg[edit]

I want to put the logo on the NQ Mobile Wikipedia webpage. [[3]]

If this is not the correct way to put the logo on please let me know how it is done.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgeurts (talk • contribs) 18:54, 22 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

This is a copyrighted logo which is prohibited on Commons. If you'd like to use this image in another wiki, please upload it there locally under fair use -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jingle Ball Tour 2014.jpg [edit]

Reasons for an undelete request of the file "File:Jingle Ball Tour 2014.jpg":

  • There is no copyright violation being committed by uploading this image on Commons and using it in the Wikipedia.
  • I am not claiming any copyright ownership for this file, in-fact, I am giving the copyright holder credit for their image and not claiming any credit for it.
  • Credit is being given to whom took the picture as well as the copyright owner and whom published the image.

--Smilerslove (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 20:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MediaWiki_Vagrant_Visualization.jpg (And possibly other files uploaded by Willowbl00)[edit]

I'd like to use File:MediaWiki_Vagrant_Visualization.jpg on mw:MediaWiki-Vagrant, to help break up what is currently quite a large wall of text. It was originally deleted for being out of scope (see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Willowbl00). If I did use it on that page (And other editors don't disagree with my adding it and revert me), that would automatically take care of the scope issue for that file. I also think that perhaps Willowbl00's other files could use more careful discussion about if they are in scope. They seem more useful for an educational purpose than a significant portion of things that are regularly uploaded and kept here. It should be noted that there is also a related thread at Commons:Village_pump#Visual_representations_of_lectures.2C_concepts.2C_and_theories. Thanks. Bawolff (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't have a use for the other files (The vagrant one is the only one that really applies to a wiki where I edit). I find the deletion rationale for the files somewhat questionable as it seems to me like the material is clearly educational in nature (albeit not with the formal tone necessary to say illustrate Wikipedia) and thus probably in scope (Or at least I guess them to be, I can't look at said files). Bawolff (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I reopened the discussion closed by Fastily, seeing comment by Bawolff. I would support undeletion. @INeverCry and EugeneZelenko: Other opinions? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure where is the best place to respond, so I guess here, I would also support undeletion, I suspect this is just a misunderstanding and that the nominator and the deleter did not realise the use of these files Oxyman (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also not sure where to respond. Posted the following over here:
AkiraChix Women In Technology Conference], which they've use on their site about engaging with high school girls with in-school programs towards the empowerment of Kenyan women in technology, would be legitimate? If so, what process do I go through? Request an undelete with a reference to the stubbed page here, the less relevant page here, and add Category:Technology_stubs as there doesn't seem to be a page dedicated to ICT for girls in Kenya?
As another example, to be sure I understand, the framework for consent policies currently in use by the Engine Room and Amnesty International to teach people about how to address consent in their digital initiatives (I just loaded the image directly to their servers instead), do I need to tag that as Amnesty, even though it's not directly on their Wikipedia page? And then, do I request it be undeleted?
Willowbl00 (talk) 07:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think education is process of becoming adult, so concepts should be adult, not forever childish. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Out of that large DR, we've so far had one person ask for restoration of one file they had a specific use for. This doesn't lead me to agree that the whole huge bunch, none of which were in use at the time of the deletion should be restored. INeverCry 23:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm ok with this, tho a bit sad. In future, at Wikimania etc, should I link specific files to the topic it is relevant to? Should I not upload things unless specifically requested? Etc. SJ, any thoughts on this? Willowbl00 (talk) 00:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko: Respectfully, I don't think that's how I'd define education. I would say its about learning something that someone didn't know before (Or to quote COM:EDUSE - "providing knowledge; instructional or informative [broadly construed]"). Educational material comes in a multitude of forms, and what sort of form is appropriate depends on the audience, the context and what is attempted to be taught. Material that is entirely inappropriate in one context could still be usefully educational in another. The reason I bring up the subject of undeletion for the remaining images is that it seems inconsistent that these files be deleted well other files are considered unquestionably in scope as "educational" well at the same time are probably in reality much less likely to educate someone. If you hit the random file button, you get an image like File:Hutchinson_Island_FL_Gilberts_HoR_beach06.jpg (First one I got when I hit the random file button). Now I think images like that one are important and should be here, but realistically, someone is more likely to learn something from Willowbl00's images than that picture of the beach (And this isn't even bringing up the more questionable areas of commons' collection, like anything ever uploaded from mobile). Finally, while usage outside of Wikimedia shouldn't really affect whether a file is in scope, as that is an intrinsic property of the file for non-in use files, if material is being used outside of Wikimedia in educational contexts (And isn't what COM:SCOPE calls "Excluded educational content"), I'm not sure how one could reasonably say that the material could not realistically be used for an educational purpose, given the existence of such a counter-example. Bawolff (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody prevents to create same diagrams in formal style. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The style of the file is irrelevant, what matters is the information it contains Oxyman (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Will be good idea to see will mainstream scientific publications develop same attitude or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant, opinion. I'm surprised at the bigotry against disabled people expressed here, on commons of all places. Isn't there supposed to be laws demanding organisations make reasonable adoptions for disabled people? Now I did try to assume good faith originally, supposing that there was a misunderstanding. but if the the Nominator and deleter actually understand the use of these files, yet continue to oppose them here the only conclusion left is that they are very bigoted individuals, there really is no other alternative to consider. In the face of such bigotry is it possible to have an independent individual, without some sort of hateful agenda against people with learning disabilities look at this case? Oxyman (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore I have a difficulty to understand opinions like "I think education is process of becoming adult, so concepts should be adult, not forever childish"; which is an insult to the artist. Further, "Nobody prevents to create same diagrams in formal style." Note "formal" may very boring and so incapable to bring the attraction of the viewers. It seems wrong people (not all people are capable to understand the value of all topics) evaluate the matter. Better reopen the DR (and temporarily restore the files) and allow some fresh eyes to re evaluate them. Jee 11:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You have difficulty understanding those opinions as evidently you aren't just a bigot. You are correct that the above contributor insults disabled people. No doubt the same contributor would never dare insult someone who has a more fashionable or visible disability such as being in a wheelchair, such is the cowardice of such people. Does Wikimedia have a equal acces policy of a policy against discrimination? Oxyman (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so as EugeneZelenko is a respected user here having crat privileges. He may have a language difficulty to express his real thoughts, or simply failed to understand this topic. :( Jee 15:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I said in my post above "I did try to assume good faith originally, supposing that there was a misunderstanding" but that user did not change his actions and continued with his bigotry. contributors here have to be judged by their actions, not their "crat privileges". You may not understand yourself how ingrained bigotry can be against certain types of disabilities, titles, respect and privileges given by a society that does at large condone this type of bigotry really prove nothing in this case. Though I may be wrong, that user could restore the files and wholeheartedly apologise at the first opportunity. If not I can only assume I am totally correct. Now I ask again, Does Wikimedia have a equal access policy or a policy against discrimination? Oxyman (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your throwing in, User:Oxyman, but I find the focus on bigotry, perceived or real, as distracting from the conversation at hand. Willowbl00 (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the problem of the bigotry here can so easily be dismissed as perceived as the actions of such people speak for themselves and sadly I'm afraid when you are confronted by such bigots there is little point in holding discussions. Again I ask, Does Wikimedia have a equal access policy or a policy against discrimination? Oxyman (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
wmf:Non discrimination policy Jee 02:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well if that policy means anything these files should be reinstated, I note that this is yet to happen. Also people who fail to follow that policy should loose their "crat privileges" should they not? Oxyman (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm; I took time to follow you. Do those files are useful/intended for people with such disabilities? Jee 16:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
These files are for people who prefer Visual learning as opposed to walls of impenetrable text, this preference can be a result wholly or partially of dyslexia but also from other factors. This shouldn't be a disability but in a society that insists everyone learns in the same way it is. The removal of these files combined with the pontification expressed by users here as to exactly how we should be educating ourselves does amount to discrimination and intolerance against people who have learning disabilities or prefer to learn in a different way Oxyman (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I hope some detailed categorization will help the reviewers here to understand the importance of such learning technologies. Jee 02:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see many pictures were in use on the blog http://blog.bl00cyb.org/ and now showing broken links. Jee 15:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Odder, what you think? The files were in some off wiki use, and the blog seems to serve some educational purposes. Jee 15:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jee — thanks for the ping and apologies for the lateness in answering. I understand that the file appears to be somewhat controversial due to its style (comic-like rather than an academic diagram), but given that it is currently in use on a sister Wikimedia project (MediaWiki.org) and can be useful for an educational purpose (here: helping explain what MediaWiki Vagrant is), I would opt to have it restored rather than deleted. If need be, I would also encourage a further discussion regarding similar files. odder (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking into this. Jee 02:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Some have been re-posted on my Flickr and on my viz website. Hope this helps. Thanks! Willowbl00 (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Beautiful; and seems more useful than Polandball. :) Jee 02:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Those are amazing, Jkadavoor. Close-ish to Scandinavia And The World. Willowbl00 (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PAP and NSP posters at Pioneer SMC.jpg [edit]

The blog moshiyenwei and the photo are mine. Will request if the photo is restored for reference purpose, but not to be posted on any Wikipedia articles. Thank you! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenwei (talk • contribs) 13:02, 23 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose The image is a derivative work of the two posters shown in it and therefore infringes on the copyrights belonging to the two creators. I'm not sure what you mean by
"Will request if the photo is restored for reference purpose, but not to be posted on any Wikipedia articles."
The image cannot be kept on Commons for any purpose without the permission of the two creators. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Copyvio per COM:DW. OTRS permission from copyright holders of posters required. INeverCry 22:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dunfermline collage.png [edit]

Hi there, I recently tried to update my town's collage of images in its info box. I used Flickr images (all from the same user) and used the correct upload references and Flickr attribution. The user has allowed free use of the images and proper, full credit has been noted to the user by username and name - plus a link to his profile.

If this deletion could be reviewed it would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

 Not done: All photos (see this, this, this, this, this and this are under the CC-BY-NC-ND licence, which does not allow Commercial Use and Derivative Works. The montage itself is a derivative work and a copyright violation, additionally Commons does not accept images which do not permit Commercial Use and Derivative Works in any case, so would be deleted on that basis too. Wikimedia Commons only accepts CC-O, CC-BY and CC-BY-SA licences, all other versions (those with No Commercial Use and No Derivative Works) cannot be used. Nick (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Also, even if all the Flickr images were CC-BY or CC-BY-SA (without NC or ND), and all from the same author, you would still have to list each of them out separately in the file description of the montage, both for correct attribution and so that a licensereviewer could properly check their license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done as per Nick. Yann (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ClaudiaKoppert.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: we have a permission via ticket:2014072710004228 Emha (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Steinsplitter: Danke! --Emha (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:5964 Lettre abri cap blanc.JPG [edit]

Sorry for the late answer. I don't go in wikimedia commons as often as before. This file was obtained wy making a picture of a letter in a museum. I am not the author of the letter, but I am the author of the picture. The letter was written in 1909. It relates the finding of the cap blanc neolitic carvings, and as such is of historical interrest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berrucomons (talk • contribs)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 14:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reopened. We don't know when the author of the letter, Raymond Peyrille, died, so there may still be a literary copyright in place. He was foreman of the dig, so probably 30+ years old in 1909, but probably not more than 50, so he could have easily lived past 1944. Yann, you have had amazing skill at finding obscure French deaths in the past -- perhaps you can work your magic again? If we don't have his death date, I don't think we should keep this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the notes at the bottom of page 186 of http://paleosite.free.fr/news/2009/La%20Roche%20de%20Lalinde%20200%20compr.pdf it states Raymond Peyrille (1870-1942). INeverCry 01:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Death date is 1942. INeverCry 05:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:T Baas.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: the photo is requested to be placed by mr. T. Baas himself. there is no licence on the photo and mr. Baas himself did request me to change the picture to this one. PLUT (talk) 22:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is weird. You just uploaded the picture 'File:Baas.jpg' under CC-BY-SA-4.0, you previously uploaded File:T Baas.jpg which is basically the same picture under 'CC-BY-3.0' and now you claim there is no license on that picure. - Robotje (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose – not having a license for the file isn't a valid reason for undeletion, it's a reason for deletion. If you or Mr T wants the photo here, you need to get the copyright holder (most likely the photographer) to agree to publication under a license that allows anyone to use the photo in modified or unmodified form for any purpose, including commercial purposes. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 01:55, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo sot.jpg[edit]

I've previously requested the undeletion of this file, but because the lack of evidences provided by me, Administrators decided to keep the file deleted.

Therefore, I've investigated deeper and requested information to the INAPI, DIBAM and the Gendarmerie of Chile, but I'm still awaiting an official answer.

But, according to the Oficio Ord. 112/14 of 2010 and the Law 19.032, all the media released by the Government of Chile and its institutions (including the Gendarmerie of Chile) after 2010, are covered under the CC-BY license. This is discussed deeper in an above thread, requesting the UD of another important file (the National Anthem).

The file has been released and uploaded to Commons after 2010, so it is covered under the CC-BY license according to the Laws. Please restore. I'll edit the description to add the correct license. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of which organization is this? --Diego Grez return fire 19:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The logo is from Gendarmerie of Chile. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you obtain the file? (So I can have a look at it) Diego Grez return fire 08:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The file has been uploaded arround June of 2010, but I don't remember the exact date. An admin can answer them. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: No te pregunté cuándo subieron el archivo, sino que de dónde fue obtenido, quiero verlo y revisar por mi cuenta su estado de copyright. (I didn't ask you when was it uploaded, but rather I want to know where was it obtained from, I want to see it and check by myself its copyright status) --Diego Grez return fire 16:32, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh I didn't uploaded the file, and therefore I don't know where has been downloaded. In the summary is the information, but only an admin can see them. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The deleted file for reference: [4], [5] -FASTILY 19:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded in April 2 of 2014, but I don't the date of creation of the logo. So, the file is very likely to be covered under the CC-BY. But I still awaiting the answer from the Gendarmerie of Chile. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fastily for providing access to the file! The file in question is not available in any Government website, not even in snapshots of the Internet Archive; since it has not been published on the official government website, this file is under copyright and is not licensed under the CC-BY license. --Diego Grez return fire 05:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as inactionable, seeing that we're waiting on a reply from the government of Chile. If their response indicates that this image is freely licensed, then this matter should be forwarded to COM:OTRS for resolution. -FASTILY 06:56, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo We help you Onlus.gif[edit]

The copyright of pic (logo) is owned by WE HELP YOU ONLUS. Please leave it in the wiki.

thanks stefano WE HELP YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimbe5 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 23 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Medical Centre Centro de la Salud.JPG[edit]

I posted this myself to Panoramio, thus I confer copyright on myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arrecifazo (talk • contribs) 20:51, November 23, 2014‎ (UTC)

@Arrecifazo: It's listed as © All Rights Reserved by armeria on Panoramio: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/10203650. If that's your account you can switch to a free license there, and we can restore it here. INeverCry 05:47, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As INC says, if you change the license statement on Panoramio to a Commons-compatible free license, then please feel free to re-upload -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roboy's Hand.jpeg [edit]

I request the undeletion of Roboy's Hand.jpeg, because an email consisting the necessary permissions has been sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

Great, thanks for doing that! OTRS will restore the images when they process the email(s) that was/were sent -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:miosugita.jpg [edit]

Reason: I'm miosugita supporter. I'm created this photograph. please don't delete. miosugita office did permit of upload to this page.

please don't delete of miosugita.jpeg.

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%89%E7%94%B0%E6%B0%B4%E8%84%88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NEPUNET (talk • contribs) 14:03, 24 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose This image is a professional studio portrait and is only 230x306px. It appears in many places on the web at higher resolution. That makes it doubtful that you actually are the photographer as you claim.
If you are actually the photographer, please upload the image at full resolution using the same file name. If you are not actually the photographer, then this image can be restored only if the actual photographer sends a free license via OTRS. Please ask him or her to provide a full resolution version as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I did upload full resolution file. Please check it out.

  • We now have a 2159x2879px version of the same image. I am inclined to  Support this request as that is large enough to be available only from the photographer. Since the new version is now in place, no action needs to be taken if the closing Admin agrees. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! jim. I want to remove the image of the full resolution. Please don't delete of MIOSUGITA-PF.jpeg. Thank you for fast reply.

I have deleted File:MIOSUGITA-PF.jpg. Commons always keeps only the highest resolution file that is available. If it is needed at a smaller size, the Wiki software scales it down on the fly. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed your use of the image file at 杉田水脈. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 01:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:François Ouimet.jpg[edit]

Hi, My name is Stephanie O'brien. I work for the office of M. Ouimet and I wish to contest the deletion of his picture on his wikipedia page. This picture was taken by the Liberal Party of quebec and our office has full rights to us it.

stephanie obrien 24.11.2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by F.Ouimet (talk • contribs) 19:06, 24 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Although you claimed in the file description that you were the photographer, your comment above suggests that is not correct. Also, the image has appeared on the Party's copyrighted web site. Therefore, policy requires that the actual photographer or license holder send a free license using the procedure at OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. INeverCry 01:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Benn Northover.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission was acquired from the source for this usage. {{Copyrighted free use provided that/layout |text=The [[w:copyright|copyright holder]] of this file allows anyone to use it '''for any purpose, provided that {{{1|<span style="color:red; font-size:120%;">appropriate conditions and references, including permissions for derivative work and commercial use (unless those are specifically mentioned elsewhere on the page), are filled in as parameter 1 (use "{{Copyrighted free use provided that{{!}}1='''provisions'''}}" if your provisions contain one or more equal signs)'''</span><includeonly>{{{category|[[Category:Pages that do not follow the directions in Template:Copyrighted free use provided that]]}}}</includeonly>}}}. |smalltext=Please check that the conditions given above are compliant to the [[Commons:Licensing|Commons licensing policy]]. Most importantly, derivative work and commercial use must be allowed. |lang=Current requests }} Ado64 (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Don & Marilyn.jpg [edit]

Please be advised this was sent to permissions-commoms. Please undelete the file you deleted. - thank you...

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ________________________________________ I hereby affirm that I, Tyler Turkle am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Don_%26_Marilyn.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

I agree to publish these works under the free license of either: 

“Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Or Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. 

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

NAME & DETAILS: Tyler Turkle, American Contemporary Artist and Filmmaker. AUTHORITY: Creator, photographer and owner of the art and image of the art. November 24, 2014

Great, thanks for doing that! OTRS will restore the images when they process the email(s) that was/were sent -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tim Storrier.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I work for Tim Storrier. He owns the image and has approved it for his Wikipedia page. He would like the current image of him removed and replaced with this one. Claudia Rosen (talk) 02:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Colegio-santo-tomas-de-aquino.jpg[edit]

File:Colegio-santo-tomas-de-aquino.jpg

File:Colegio Santo tomas d.jpg
File:Colegio santo tomas.jpg

Mi Motivo de solicitud es que las imágenes fueron borradas supuestamente por violación de derechos de autor, lo cual es una falacia, ya que mágemes fueron tomadas por mi, hay parecidas en internet pero no las mismas, por lo que creen que es violación de derechos de autor, pero no lo es. Por consiguiente exijo la restauración mas pronta posible de las imágenes. Muchas gracias por su atención.

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edificio Usos Multiples Cartaojal.jpg[edit]

La foto la hice yo. Se puede publicar porque tengo todos los derechos de la misma.--Bandolerox (talk) 00:10, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieve Cartaojal.jpg

Esta fotografía es mía y la puedo usar.--Bandolerox (talk) 01:30, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peña de los Enamorados Cartaojal.jpg

Esta fotografía es mía y la puedo usar. Tengo todos los derechos. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romería de Cartaojal.jpg

La fotografía es mía y tengo todos los derechos para usarla. Ha sido borrada sin darme plazo para añadir cualquier dato que pudiera faltar. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Efebo Peña Cartaojal.JPG

Esta foto es mía y tengo todos los derechos para usarla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Polaco Cartaojal.jpg

Esta foto la hice yo y soy el propietario de la misma. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edificio Usos Multiples Cartaojal.jpg

Esta foto la hice yo, soy el propietario de la misma y tengo todos los derechos para usarla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Futbito cartaojal.jpg

Soy el propietario de esta imagen, tengo todos los derechos y puedo usarla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piscina Cartaojal.jpg

Soy el propietario de esta foto, la hice yo y tengo todos los derechos para usarla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panoramica Cartaojal.jpg

Soy el propietario de esta imagen, la hice yo y tengo todos los derechos para usarla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Semana Santa de Cartaojal.JPG

Soy el propietario de esta foto, la hice yo y tengo todos los derechos sobre ella para usarla y distribuirla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pregón Semana Santa Cartaojal.JPG

Soy propietario de esta foto, la hice yo y tengo todos los derechos para usarla y distribuirla.

File:Cartaojal.jpg

Soy el propietario de esta foto y tengo todos los derechos para usarla y distribuirla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cortijo Echevarría en Cartaojal.jpg

Esta foto la hice yo y puedo usarla y distribuirla. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Presentador Telecartaojal.JPG

La foto es mía y yo soy quien creó ese personaje. Puedo distribuir la foto porque tengo todos los derechos. --Bandolerox (talk) 01:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All these files are available on the web. Please send a permission following the procedure at COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish). Regards, Yann (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Español: Todas esas imagenes están disponibles en Internet. Por favor, envía una autorización siguiendo el procedimiento descrito en COM:OTRS/es. Gracias
--The Photographer (talk) 11:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Nada que añadir a lo indicado por The Photographer. Alan (talk) 11:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Unvanquished_tyrant.png and File:Unvanq mainpage icon.png [edit]

Were both deleted for possible COM:COPYVIO

Artwork for Unvanquished is all at least Creative Commons BY with only a few exceptions (mainly sound effects) not exhibited in these images. Additionally I (Veyrdite, William Hales) am part of the development team and these screenshots are Copyright Unvanquished Development.

I likely did not put enough licensing and source-linking information on the commons pages for these two images, but it's been a while and I can't check until after they are undeleted. If it is missing I will add it. --Veyrdite (talk) 03:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done The license is probably OK, but it's not very clear which license is used. Please add a link to show that, or send a permission to COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:后羿射日.png[edit]

File:后羿射日.png was deleted as "copyvio" without any further discussion. If I remember correctly, the file should have had a {{PD-China}} license and/or an additional {{PD-self}} license (code cleanup, contrast tweeks). If I had forgotten them, I am sorry! Please undelete this file, and possibly add the licensing. PS, These etchings are from Wuliangci around the year 151 CE. --Shibo77 04:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Please fix the source, the author, and the date. Yann (talk) 10:40, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Corvus_orru_map.jpg[edit]

A very simple map of a bird distribution that was made by User:Steve_nova on the English Wikipedia and uploaded there in 2004 and when the Commons project was created, it was automatically moved. Apparently the author was indicated as User:Steve_nova but the source was not marked as "own work". Image has been around for 10 years and there is no indication that this has been copied from any pre-existing source. It was speedily deleted (without evidence of copyright violation) - deletions of old images should go through a better process - these files were uploaded before policies were in place or even before Commons came into existence. Shyamal (talk) 03:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you say makes sense, however we are still left with a map that has no source. Obviously the base map is not the work of Steve Nova -- he took it from somewhere. Back in 2004 PD base maps were not as easy to find as they are now, so we cannot assume that the base map is PD. I also think that this map would be better if it were not on a world map, but one of Indonesia and Australia, since that is the only area where Corvus orru appears. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your point - the source can be fixed as own work - whether that base map is PD or not seems to be arguable and should therefore go via a deletion discussion. I agree also with the point that a better map can be made with SVG with just the region in focus. The use of speedy deletion to remove what appears to be unsourced (which might even be the result of vandalism) of content that has been around for a decade sets a very unfortunate precedent for unaccounted content erosion. In other words, undelete and if needed, use the deletion discussion process. Shyamal (talk) 09:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Handling of old files are tough, and I think Ellin Beltz should be more careful. If I remember well, he she added "no source" to some US Gov files recently which was reverted by Dennis. Better ask expert opinion than deleting files in use for years. Jee 11:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ellin is a woman, a very active Admin. I agree that it would be good if we had a policy that files that predate Commons should always go to DR rather than being a {{Speedy}}, so I will  Support restoring this file if the Admin restoring it starts a DR at the same time. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seems a wise opinion; thanks. Jee 12:31, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is also the point of the Source of the Information. That map (and it's base map) didn't spring into being without a source of information. How is one to know that this is a real map, based on real data without a source? I'm sorry if Jkadavoor thinks I should be "more careful", I do the best I can assuming AGF at all times. I don't mind if my "no sources" are reverted by other admins, this is a cooperative project we're supposed to work together for the benefit of the Commons, and the very few "speedies", "no sources" and "no permissions" which have been "problems" pale in the light of the thousands I've dealt with which have not been "problems." I will be delighted to send old files with problems to DR's instead as suggested by (Jameslwoodward). Sounds like a great idea. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ellin Beltz, the file was used as an example of how an "ideal" bird taxobox should look on the English language bird wikiproject, so it has had a fair number of eyes looking over its accuracy. That said it is most certainly not "ideal". Glad you agree that the deletion request is preferable to speedy deletion. Shyamal (talk) 23:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ellin Beltz: It seems (I can't see deleted files or its histories) that file is here for more than ten years, transferred from other wiki, and in use. So such files need to be discussed (DRed). I've no doubt about your intentions; but old files are a mess, and need to be handled carefully. Please don't add {{No permission}} or {{No source}} on them. :) Jee 02:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@ Shyamal: There is no evidence of vandalism to the file in the file history. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jkadavoor, The file was not speedily deleted, nor did I put a no permission or no source on this file. The file was listed as "no source" by Josve05a. At that time the entire file template read:
== {{int:filedesc}} ==
{{Information
|Description =
|Source =
|Date =
|Author = {{Template:User at project|Steve_nova|wikipedia|en}}
|Permission =
|other_versions =
== {{int:license-header}} ==
{{GFDL-user-w|User:Steve_nova|migration=relicense}}
[[Category:Corvidae distribution maps]]
[[Category:Corvus orru]]

As you can see, the file is light on description, source, and date. It is up to the uploader to provide source and license; this file has a license, but no source making licensing a problem. User Josve05a was thus quite correct: there was no source of data, none of base map. The file was placed as no source at 13:04, 8 November 2014 by Josve05a. The file remained with the warning tag on it for eight days, when at 02:31, 16 November 2014, I deleted the file. At any time during that eight days anyone else was welcome to take the file to Deletion Nomination. I saw it for the first and last time on 16 November when - in the absence of any source - I deleted it. I saw no difficulty in removing the image - but will take Jim's suggestion in future when I am nominating images for deletion, but remind all that in the absence of any prior written guideline to this effect, compliance at some time in the past to a guideline suggested today was quite obviously impossible in the absence of a functional timemachine. If you have same, please forward it, I can certainly use one! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored for DR -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

plastic legend crop.jpg [edit]

Apologies to you if I was to not post here - I also sent letters to OTRS...

Hello I believe i inadvertently did not add permissions to this image when uploading. If you will please undelete I will then add a link to the permissions website page http://www.tylerturkle.com/wikipedia-permission-letter/ . - thank you...

Please be advised the below email was sent to permissions-commoms. Please undelete the file you deleted. - thank you...


To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Tyler Turkle am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image: Plastic legend crop.jpg

I agree to publish these works under the free license of either: “Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Or Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

NAME & DETAILS: Tyler Turkle, American Contemporary Artist and Filmmaker.
AUTHORITY: Creator, photographer and owner of the art and image of the art.
November 24, 2014

 Not done NC licenses are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:dynasplat.jpg [edit]

Apologies to you if I was to not post here - I also sent letters to OTRS...

Hello I believe i inadvertently did not add permissions to this image when uploading. If you will please undelete I will then add a link to the permissions website page http://www.tylerturkle.com/wikipedia-permission-letter/ . - thank you...

Please be advised the below email was sent to permissions-commoms. Please undelete the file you deleted. - thank you...

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Tyler Turkle am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image: Dynasplat.jpg

I agree to publish these works under the free license of either: “Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Or Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

NAME & DETAILS: Tyler Turkle, American Contemporary Artist and Filmmaker.
AUTHORITY: Creator, photographer and owner of the art and image of the art.
November 24, 2014

You do realize that Commons is a free content project and that we therefore don't host content restricted to noncommercial use, right? —LX (talk, contribs) 14:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
CC-BY-SA and CC-BY-NC-SA are allowed per Commons:Multi-licensing. Example: {{Cc-by-nc-sa-2.0-dual}}. Please, edit web and add I agree to publish these works under the free license of either: “Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Or Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license (as above). Cheers. Alan (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's obviously not what the copyright holder wants to do, since they also removed the part of the standard consent declaration that states that "I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product". If they don't want to do that, they shouldn't upload it to Commons. Dual licensing isn't a solution to the problem at hand, and suggesting it just risks causing confusion. We shouldn't try to trick people into giving their rights away. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done NC licenses are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sina-Peschke.jpg [edit]

Hiermit beantrage ich die Wiederherstellung des Bildes mit angabe eines Linkes: http://www.landeswelle.de --Rettungssani Meiningen (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any reference to a free license at the source. Please send a permission following the procedure at COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ezra Decker homestead demolition with Scarlets Way sign, Sugar Loaf, New York, Oct 2014.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission received via OTRS (Ticket:2014100510004674). --Mdann52talk to me! 17:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Evan-Craft.jpg[edit]

Hola me agradaria si este archivo no se borrara para que el sujeto sea conocido.. File:Evan-Craft.jpg --Varela olave (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Not a valid reason to undelete anything -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Data_synchronization.png [edit]

File:Data_synchronization.png [edit]

Reason[edit]

User Ellin Beltz 18:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC), submitted the delete request for this file with the following reason: "Graphic elements swiped from here and rearranged with new labels. Not user's own work but COM:COPYVIO."[reply]

Counter Argument[edit]

The picture reported for deletion is my very own work. I created this picture on 23 NOV 2014 at GLIFFY. Here is the original picture's URL: ORIGINAL and this is my account id at [6] "3415779". Gliffy provide us with all such graphics to use them in our diagrams. Muhammad Usman 14:38, Wednesday, November 26, 2014 (EST).

Wrong forum, file has not been deleted -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logoefc1929.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Essa imagem foi editada por mim, relacionada com o Clube ELÉCTRICO FUTEBOL CLUBE, do qual eu faço o seu histórico na wikipedia. Jotamourinho (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Derivatives of non-free content are forbidden on Commons -FASTILY 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:plastic legend crop.jpg [edit]

Thank you for continuing assistance in this matter. The permissions letter is now updates and the website page is also. The website will be noted under permissions once you undelete them. Thank you... Please undelete plastic legend crop.jpg

Permissions: http://www.tylerturkle.com/?p=551

Permissions now reads:

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Tyler Turkle am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image:

plastic legend crop.jpg[edit]

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license:

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Tyler Turkle

Creator, Sole Owner

November 26, 2014

Great, thanks for doing that. OTRS will restore the file(s) once they process the email that was sent. Your continued patience is appreciated -FASTILY 02:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chaya toma.jpg[edit]

Permission received via OTRS (Ticket:2014110510013475). Hanay (talk) 04:01, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: INeverCry 04:03, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fromageeducative.jpg [edit]

What is the problem with that logo? I designed this image myself for the foundation I'm working to. As a webmaster, I'm updating our Wki page. I have full authorisation to use that pictures as iti is ours.

Best regards, Benjamin Baye

Hello, Benjamin. In order to have it restored, you must prove that you are in fact the owner by sending an e-mail according to the instructions here. You must also be willing to release the logo under a free license that allows commercial use (as explained in the instructions).
If you are not willing to do that, you should upload it to the French Wikipedia and the English Wikipedia. Both sites accept non-free logos under fair use.
Please reply below if you have any more questions. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 18:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 21:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pregón Semana Santa Cartaojal.JPG [edit]

I am the author of this photo. My name is Angel López and you can see many of my work in cartaojal.com

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 08:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Aquí se puede comprobar la autoría y licencia de la foto. https://www.safecreative.org/work/1411282614110-efebo-pena-flamenca-de-cartaojal --Bandolerox (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quintonscerri-corporate.jpg [edit]

This file is of public domain and has been used by the person in photo as an official public photo. There are no copyrights of the photo.

File:Quintonscerri-jesc.jpg

This is a public photo and can be found easily on the public account of the person in question, Mr. Quinton Scerri.

File:Quintonscerri-presidentofmalta.jpg

This is a public photo which was used in Maltese media and can also be found on the Facebook of Quinton Scerri. The photo has no copyright and is for th e share of public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joecamillerimt (talk • contribs)

 Not done Every new picture has a copyright. You are not allowed to upload it here without a permission from the photographer. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:plastic legend crop.jpg[edit]

Thank you for continuing assistance in this matter. The permissions letter is now updated and the website page is also. The website will be noted under permissions upon once you undelete them. Thank you...
Please undelete plastic legend crop.jpg

Permissions website: http://www.tylerturkle.com/?p=551

Permissions now reads:

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org I hereby affirm that I, Tyler Turkle am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image: plastic legend crop.jpg I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Tyler Turkle

Creator, Sole Owner

November 26, 2014

 Not done please send permission (via e-mail) to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:dynasplat.jpg[edit]


Thank you for continuing assistance in this matter. The permissions letter is now updated and the website page is also. The website will be noted under permissions upon once you undelete them. Thank you...
Please undelete dynasplat.jpg

Permissions website: http://www.tylerturkle.com/?p=554

Permissions now reads:

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org I hereby affirm that I, Tyler Turkle am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the image: dynasplat.jpg

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Tyler Turkle

Creator, Sole Owner

November 26, 2014 --Webmeister1 (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done along with three others. Green Giant (talk) 20:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nieve Cartaojal.jpg [edit]

File:Nieve Cartaojal.jpg

Esta foto está hecha por mi y puedo usarla libremente. Podéis comprobar las licencias en el siguiente enlace:

https://www.safecreative.org/work/1411282614097-nieve-en-cartaojal

--Bandolerox (talk) 12:28, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At www.safecreative.org the license is CC-BY-SA-NC. NC licenses are not permitted on Commons. In order to restore it here, the actual photographer will need to provide a free license, see OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Unacceptable NC license. INeverCry 01:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Piscina Cartaojal.jpg [edit]

File:Piscina Cartaojal.jpg

Adjunto enlace para comprobar licencia y que sea restaurado el archivo: https://www.safecreative.org/work/1411282617418-piscina-de-cartaojal --Bandolerox (talk) 23:14, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose. Content published under licenses restricted to {{Noncommercial}} use cannot be hosted on Commons. Please read Commons:Project_scope/Summary/es. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Unacceptable NC license. INeverCry 01:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rob Lang Colorist (www.postcolorist.com).jpg [edit]

This photograph is publicly used for all company related profiles of Rob Lang with authors knowledge. I am the copyright holder of this image and made a mistake when following the upload wizard adding details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pixionstudios (talk • contribs) 06:49, 29 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Subleq.png [edit]

--Laiza Signor (talk) 11:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 29/11/2014[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Multiple files for fair-use on English Wikinews[edit]

Request temporary undeletion

The following two files are (well, were) in-use on an archived English Wikinews article, and are perfectly acceptable for local upload and fair-use on that project.

--Brian McNeil / talk 11:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than undel, would emailing you copies do the job? If suggested when a DR is active, there's a bot that can handle this. --Fæ (talk) 11:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd want the full image page details; so it would not just require the images, but page details too. Since I know one of the images is Ralf's, putting his details on it is important for attribution. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I have had the image page text and image file emailed to me in the past, though I'm unsure how easy that is as a workflow for the average, less tech-minded, admin. :-) --Fæ (talk) 15:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ temp undeleted Tell me when done, and I'll re-delete and close. — Revi 15:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • They're up locally on enWN now. For future reference, anything that ends up in a published Wikinews article would be eligible for local upload; it would be nice if there was a mechanism to deal with that; one which does not require Wikinewsies to watch for deletion requests on Commons. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ deleted again IIRC there was a bot to upload fair-use materials, but I don't remeber the name. — Revi 16:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum
The bot in question is Commons fair use upload bot.
I have created User:Fæ/Wikinews DRs which will update each day and may meet Brian's needs. Following up on his talk page... --Fæ (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BTR-80 LNR.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Фотография моя, почему удалили не понятно. LNR1 (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oscart2014.jpg and File:Oscart2014toss.jpg[edit]

OTRS ticket #2014110610002421 seems to have been clarified. Pinging Green Giant, who originally handled it. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 18:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done -FASTILY 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nieve Cartaojal.jpg [edit]

File:Nieve Cartaojal.jpg

La licencia de este archivo es correcta y no debe ser borrado. https://www.safecreative.org/work/1411282614097-nieve-en-cartaojal

--Bandolerox (talk) 19:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The targeted webpage clearly states CC by-sa 4.0. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Image previously published here -FASTILY 22:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Peña de los Enamorados Cartaojal.jpg [edit]

File:Peña de los Enamorados Cartaojal.jpg

El archivo es de mi propiedad y tiene la licencia correcta. Debe ser restaurado https://www.safecreative.org/work/1411282614394-pena-de-los-enamorados-desde-cartaojal --Bandolerox (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done COM:NETCOPYRIGHT -FASTILY 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The targeted webpage clearly states CC by-sa 4.0. -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Image previously published here -FASTILY 22:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FresnoGriffinsLogo-210x210.jpg [edit]

Taken off the teams website with permission from team. --Joker4lifead (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to OTRS and explain your situation to them. If all is found to be in order, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 22:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2014-11&oldid=182608056"