User talk:Krd/archive/2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Black-and-White-Striped-Banner (NFT, Bullet, 2021).gif

Hi Krd, seems you have clicked the wrong button? Stang★ 10:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Good catch, indeed, now corrected. Thank you! --Krd 10:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Mitgliederrechte

Du hast meine von Reinhard Kraasch veranlasste Mitgliedschaft auf der Liste von der lP Sperre Ausgenommener gelöscht. Wieso? 2003:E4:2F3A:8D82:9D60:57C5:AB67:6EFC 16:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Help Volunteer Response Team/Volunteering

Salut I just asked for help to change my nickname from VRT volunteer. Also my password doesn't work. I would like help thanks.--Adoscam (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Please contact me by e-mail. --Krd 10:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Slinky Springs to Fame Krd 03.jpg


 File:Slinky Springs to Fame Krd 03.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: The image created by you, KRD unless you are a sculptor.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : TakashiHokaido.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

2 FOP; 1 unknown, not my photo. --Krd 15:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Bochum Total 2015 Bastian Bielendorfer 01.jpg


 File:Bochum Total 2015 Bastian Bielendorfer 01.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: What about the license of the poster? Copyvio)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : TakashiHokaido.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Fixed. --Krd 15:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Guido Seiler

Hallo Krd. Kleine Frage: In Category:Guido Seiler figuriert die Universität Nürnberg-Erlangen – keine Ahnung, wie die dort hineingekommen ist. Richtig wäre die Uni Zürich, und Zürich müsste auch unter Wirkungsort erscheinen. Wie kann man das korrigieren? Offenbar nicht über Wikidata, denn die dortige Korrektur hatte keinen Einfluss auf die Angaben in der Kategorie. LG, --Freigut (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Kann es sein dass die Änderung auf Wikidata nicht sofort angezeigt wird, und ein Nulledit hier auf Commons nötig ist? --Krd 16:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Tatsächlich – danke! Wieder einmal etwas gelernt ... --Freigut (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Checkusers/Statistics/table

Hi. I think you need to update the bot to remove Magog the Ogre as they resigned in July and add Fitindia as they became one in January. Apologize if I'm missing something. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Fixed for next month. Thank you! --Krd 06:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Angst vor Weiterbenutzung und Veränderung

Hallo Krd. Eben habe ich in Absprache mit der Urheberin (der Gattin des im Dezember verstorbenen Dargestellten) die Foto File:Alfred Egli.jpg eingestellt. Nun aber sieht sie im Zustimmungsformular, dass die Foto «weiterverwendet» und «verändert» werden darf, und will das Bild wieder zurückziehen (dabei hatte ich ihr das im Voraus alles mitgeteilt). Bevor ich dich bitte, es deshalb wieder zu löschen, versuche die Urheberin aber noch zu überreden ... Frage: Gibt es allenfalls eine Lizenz, die das Bild besser schützen würde, also in einem Sinn, den sie beruhigen würde? Oder habt ihr selber noch Argumente auf Lager, mit denen man verunsicherte Urheber beruhigen kann, dass eine entwürdigende Weiterverwendung oder Veränderung unwahrscheinlich ist? LG, --Freigut (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Licensing/Justifications --Krd 13:11, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Danke. Leider nicht sehr sexy geschrieben, darauf kann man kaum verlinken. Aber ja, ich versuche selbst etwas. Wenn du nichts mehr von mir hörst, habe ich Erfolg gehabt – ansonsten melde ich mich hier wieder. --Freigut (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Sehr gern. Wenn Du einen besseren Text findest, den man weiter benutzen kann, sollte er irgendwo auf Commons veröffentlicht werden. --Krd 16:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Konnte sie offenbar überzeugen, mit ein paar Beispielen aus der Praxis. Die Zustimmung sollte eingetroffen sein. Schönen Abend! --Freigut (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Meines Wissens ✓ Done. --Freigut (talk) 10:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

mailing list

Hi, Krd - for some reason, I'm not getting copies of the emails I send to the otrs-permissions-l@lists.wikimedia.org - where do I go to check/adjust my preferences? Atsme Talk 📧 17:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Found it!! B) Atsme Talk 📧 17:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Please reopen my PeerBot request

Since you closed my PeerBot request, there have been some developments: I have open sourced the code (but it is not yet deployed anywhere) and I implemented it to use dumps. But dumps (nor SQL tables) provide all data I need, so I still have to use API calls. Being able to do more requests in parallel would help me speed up indexing. So I would like to ask to reopen the request. I could make a new one if that is preferred, but I think it is better to have history of the request? Mitar (talk) 07:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 10:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! Mitar (talk) 11:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello.

Wow, you think you've blocked all of the sock puppets of Jawico666 well, you haven't. Also, isn't it funny that Rodhullandemu got banned? Too bad I didn't get to have freedom for that much time. But now, I do.Marry May Morse (talk) 19:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Thing.

Have a nice day! AngeredJawico (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Falun Gong.svg

Please check your mentioning at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Falun Gong.svg. Thank you, Doc Taxon (talk) 13:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 18:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Solomon Islands poster. Hao Yu Usim Kloset, 1976-80.jpg

Hi, Please could you have a look at this Ticket:2022031010013018. I received a email regarding this. Thank you. Regards --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

The ticket is open and unlocked, feel free to take. --Krd 16:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Moving from en.WP to Commons

Hi, Krd - I am unfamiliar with the process of moving an image from en.WP to Commons and was hoping you had a moment to explain. I'm thinking Ticket:2022032910002245 may be a candidate for it. Also, how should we link a ticket # on en.WP to direct an admin or other editor? Do all admins have access to VRTS tickets? Atsme Talk 📧 17:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

You can put {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} to files that are suitable, and as far as I can see the rest will be done for you. No need for any manual admin assistance. --Krd 05:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Jaber_al_Mahjoub.jpg

Hallo lieber Krd

kannst du Dich bitte vielleicht um die Bildfreigabe von https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jaber_al_Mahjoub.jpg kümmern?

[Ticket#: 2022040610012365]

Ich wäre Dir sehr dankbar! --Armin Pangerl (talk) 07:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Die Freigaben werden in einer Reihenfolge bearbeitet; einen Vorgang vorzuziehen würde bedeuten, dass alle anderen länger warten müssten. Bitte hab Verständnis dafür. --Krd 12:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Bot

Hi. In the last days I've seen this several times: a permission accepted and then a tag of permission received in the same file. Is this a bot problem or is it normal? --Ganímedes (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

I can imagine there are things missing after the OTRS to VRT migration. Will look into this tomorrow. --Krd 17:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Should be fixed now. Please let me know if it happens again. --Krd 04:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Request

Hi, how I can request another checkuser for a user I requested for, but with another Suspected related user? Karim185.3 (talk) 05:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Please feel free a to add a new request to the existing case page. --Krd 05:11, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Dateiverwendung im Internet zur "Datei" statt zur "Disk"?

Hallo Krd, kennst Du eine Möglichkeit, die Verwendung einer Datei im Internet in die Beschreibung einer Datei einzufügen? (Wenn ich eine Datei verwende und daran denke, hinterlege ich die Infos dazu auf der dazugehörigen Disk.) Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 17:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Meiner Meinung nach wäre das auf der Dateiseite nicht angebracht. Dort sollte man sich auf die wesentlichen Informationen zur Datei beschränken. Die Datei-Disk sollte dafür ausreichend sein. --Krd 04:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
okay, danke für Deine Rückmeldung. --Molgreen (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Molgreen (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Krdbot

Could you, please, verify if the Krdbot action here is what was intended? Ankry (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I will change the code so that these additions are only done for file uploaded less than a month ago. For older files is is most likely that there is some kind of mistake. Thank you! --Krd 06:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
This should be done now, waiting for test case. --Krd 14:55, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:55, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Book cover, Italy 1967

Hi, Krd, how are you? Just so that I know for next time, could you tell me why this is not a copyvio? Many thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I think it isn't, is it? --Krd 08:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I read the email correspondence which took me to this. According to the last email exchange, the CC by SA 4.0 permission was granted. Atsme Talk 📧 13:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, Atsme – obviously, the page didn't carry an OTRS tag when I nominated it for speedy deletion, and I was too dumb to notice that Krd had added one. I've now read the correspondence – I'd managed to blank out all recollection of that interminable Benzoni timesink. Question for either or both of you: do you see anywhere, there or elsewhere, permission from the publisher, Garzanti? Or permission received directly from the claimed artist or his estate (because we don't accept forwarded permissions, do we?). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I have a different question: Do we need to discuss ticket details publicly on Commons? Krd 15:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Obviously we're not going to discuss any personal or private data in the open; but the name of the publisher of the book is a matter of record – you know, it's written in big letters on the front cover, as is the name "Benzoni". Would you care to reply to the question I asked (privately if you prefer), or shall I go ahead and nominate the image for deletion? To be clear, I'm not an expert of any kind on copyright in general or Italian copyright in particular; all I'm seeing is permission that appears to be inadequate, and since it was you that added it, I'm a little perplexed. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I think the ticket is valid. If you disagree please feel free to follow up the ticket. --Krd 10:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Japanese

Hi, Krd - ticket:2022060210007688 needs translation. It is the company's confirmation confirming the uploader's authority to upload & license the image. Atsme Talk 📧 13:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I cannot read this language. --Krd 14:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I was hoping you knew someone who did, or could direct me to a list of editors who speak English + other languages? Does such a list exist? Atsme Talk 📧 14:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I think the ticket is in the right queue. I suggest to wait for it being processed. --Krd 15:29, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Pz III N.jpg

File:Pz III N.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Your acceptance of the permission is under discussion.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Rechte-Inhaber

Hallo Krd. Frage: Wenn man etwas unter CC BY-SA 4.0 stellt, hat man dann das Urheberrecht an Creative Commons (wer auch immer das ist) abgetreten oder aber nur Creative Commons eine Lizenz erteilt, Unterlizenzen zu vergeben, das Urheberrecht aber behalten? LG, --Freigut (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Nachtrag: Interpretiere ich die Aussage hier, dass «Creative Commons Public Licenses sind standardisierte Zusammenstellungen rechtlicher Bedingungen, die Urheber und andere Rechteinhaber verwenden können, um ihre selbst geschaffenen Werke und andere Materialien, die urheberrechtlich oder durch bestimmte andere Rechte geschützt sind, die unten in der Public License genauer benannt werden, zur Nutzung freizugeben» richtig, dass man das Urheberrecht behält? --Freigut (talk) 15:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Durch die CC-Lizenz wird anderen ein Nutzungsrecht eingeräumt. Der Urheber bleibt das Urheber und auch Rechteinhaber. Er kann z.B. über die CC-Lizenz hinausgehende Rechte zusätzlich nutzen. --Krd 15:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Nachfrage: Dann kann der Rechte-Inhaber das eingekringelte c gebrauchen? Oder wäre das anders zu lösen, wenn man sagen will, wo die Rechte liegen? Ich frage mich überdies, wie man in einem gedruckten Text wie gefordert die Lizenz verlinken soll – muss man dann «(Lizenz: CC BY-SA 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de)» schreiben? Ein etwas langer Sermon. --Freigut (talk) 16:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Ich bin kein Anwalt und kann keine Rechtsberatung anbieten. Ich glaube das eingekringelte c hat keine Funktion. Die Lizenzangabe müsste so rein, zudem noch die Namensnennung der Urheber. --Krd 16:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Ok, danke. --Freigut (talk) 16:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

VRT

Hallo Krd, bei folgenden Bildern war ich dem Autoren bei den Mails an das VRT behilflich. Die Mail sollte schon vor Wochen eingegangen sein. Könntest Du da vielleicht mal nachschauen? File:Groningse Bachvereniging (01).jpg File:Groningse Bachvereniging (02).jpg File:Groningse Bachvereniging (03).jpg File:Groningse Bachvereniging (04).jpg File:Johan van der Meer.jpg Dank und Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 13:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Es gibt dazu keinen offenen Vorgang. Der Rechteinhaber möchte uns das bitte nochmal schicken. --Krd 13:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Aaah, vielen Dank! Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Could you close out the two deletion requests for the files you just stamped with VRT permission received, please?

You removed the deletion tags from the files, so should probably close out Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chaz Stevens with Pole cap.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chaz Stevens with Pole cap (cropped).jpg. Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 04:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Gibt es einen Ort (eine Liste) wo unerfahrene User einen Wunsch zur Umbenennung einer Datei hinterlassen können?

Hallo Krd, gibt es einen Ort (eine Liste) wo unerfahrene User einen Wunsch zur Umbenennung einer Datei hinterlassen können? (siehe auch: https://github.com/commons-app/apps-android-commons/issues/4991#issuecomment-1207197500 - gerne auch dort antworten) Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

template:Rename --Krd 19:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Molgreen (talk) 11:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Bot request

Krd, please be cautious with submit bot request(s) to votes without the applicant's consent (15 August 2022). It was not there because I was still drafting my request. Such practice may end to torpedoing the bot application by submitting an intermediate, messy draft page to the votes. In understand it's good intended, but the consent of the applicant is necessary.
The request is now (17 August 2022) ready to be voted. Yug (talk) 11:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Bot requests are not votes. Please prepare drafts in own user space. --Krd 13:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
My mistake, it's a peer review of the submitted application.
Commons:Bots/Requests's point II currently assigns the task of adding the template into the list of applications to the applicant, not the reviewvers. I'm ok with either way, but the guideline and the practice should align, applicants should not be surprised by practices contrary to the stated guidelines.
May we move this conversation to Commons talk:Bots/Requests ? Beyond this little case with no detrimental impact, this conversation is relevant to the project and guidelines, which need a revamp, so to reduce and avoid such surprises and unnecessary frictions. It could help the project to work more smoothly in the future. Yug (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
We had some cases whre bot requests were created but never listed, so never got noticed. To avoid that, requests should be listed immediately or kept in a different place for preparation.
Please feel free to move the discussion as suggested. --Krd 05:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Anstellung des Stadtarchivs Dr. Schulte, Münster.png

Hallo Krd,

ich hatte die Datei im März in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anstellung des Stadtarchivs Dr. Schulte, Münster.png behalten, weil ich denke, dass hier wegen gänzlich unoriginellen Inhalts keine Genehmigung benötigt wird. Dass jetzt Monate später die Datei wegen nicht oder nicht richtig geschickter Genehmigung gelöscht wird, war eine nicht bedachte Nebenwirkung dieser Genehmigungs-Geschichte.

Denkst du, wir können die Datei ohne weitere Formalitäten wiederherstellen? Oder soll das über COM:UNDEL laufen? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Bitte schau mal, ob benachbarte Dateien auch betroffen sind, und stell Sie gern selbst wieder her. (Das "ticket received" sollte dann raus, wenn es nicht mehr relevant ist. Danke!) --Krd 18:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Zwei weitere vom selben Hochlader habe ich wiederherstellen können und einige wenige in Undeletion-Kategorien einsortieren. Beim Großteil fehlen leider urheberrechtlich verwertbare Daten und Anhaltspunkte in Beschreibungen. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Danke! --Krd 03:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

SPI

Hello Krd, Could you please take a look at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dineshs01102000 since you did the last check. Thank you. Suneye1 (talk) 16:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 16:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of 2022 Taipei Open photo

I'm uploader of series photo 2022 Taipei Open, such as . On September 1, a chinese VRT member, whose name is 'Curry Lee', had replied a mail to me, said these photos do not need to be permited.－Terry850324（Talk） 14:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Are you also the photographer who created these photos? I don't find the at the Flickr source mentioned during the upload. --Krd 15:47, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
The photographer is my friend and his Flickr space is full, so he can just let me release the photos on Commons and mark a link to his Flickr space.－Terry850324（Talk） 03:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
If we cannot the license at Flickr, we please need the permission in the ticket. Can you arrange this accordingly? --Krd 05:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't understand. I follow the page Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team, and sent declaration mail to 'permissions-zh-hant@wikimedia.org' when I uploaded the photos. A few days later, a team member called 'Curry Lee' replied me these photos do not need to be permitted.－Terry850324（Talk） 11:21, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
I cannot read the language and so cannot judge what went wrong, but for the mentioned file I think a ticket is required. --Krd 11:24, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
I will try to contact Chinese VRT. Thanks for help.－Terry850324（Talk） 12:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
If it makes sense you can also consider to have the permission resent in English,. --Krd 13:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Mick Schnelle

Hallo Krd, du hast File:Mick Schnelle.jpg mit der Begründung "No ticket permission achieved for more than 30 days" gelöscht. Die Datei hatte ja einen Baustein, dass unter der Nummer 2022080910007626 ein Ticket eingegangen sei. Ich hatte Ordercrazy hier um das Einholen einer Freigabe gebeten. War sie ungenügend? Gestumblindi (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Ja, die Freigabe kam in dem Ticket nicht zustande. --Krd 05:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
OK, schade, aber dann ist das halt so, danke für die Auskunft. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Hkb 013-63 57.tif

Hallo Krd, du hast gerade eben die o.g. Datei gelöscht. Ich hatte für diese und andere am gleichen Tag eine Nutzungserklärung des Fotografen hochgeladen. Es kann gut sein, dass ich diese aufgrund der bloßen Masse für diese Datei vergessen hatte einzufügen (bzw. der abarbeitende Admin dies vergessen hatte). Die Vorlage für die Freigabe der anderen Dateien habe ich unten angefügt. Ich möchte dich bitten, die Datei wiederherzustellen. -- Platte U.N.V.E.U. 16:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

{{PermissionTicket|id=2022072010000596|user=DCB}} Platte U.N.V.E.U. 16:13, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Platte. Das ist jetzt erledigt. --Krd 16:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Dankeschön. -- Platte U.N.V.E.U. 17:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

ticket:2021102710004931

Hallo Krd, ich habe gerade entdeckt, dass Du anscheinend bei diesem Bild die Ticket Permission eingesetzt hast. Diese stellt mich vor Rätsel. Vielleicht kannst Du dieses Rätsel auflösen:

In den Metadaten des Bildes hat der Fotograf mit ziemlichem Nachdruck seinen Namen, seine Kontaktdaten und seine Rechtsansprüche hinterlassen.

Der Hochladende hat ausdrücklich bestätigt, dass er nicht der Fotograf ist und dass er bislang auch keine Genehmigung des Fotografen zur Veröffentlichung unter CC-Lizenz vorliegen hat. Ja, mehr noch: Er sagt, es hätte hierzu keine Korrespondenz mit dem VRT-Team gegeben. Da frage ich mich doch: Was kann dann überhaupt in diesem Ticket bzw. in dem VRT-Schriftverkehr drinstehen?

Ich habe vor einigen Tagen dazu auch auf dem VRT-Noticeboard eine Anfrage gestellt, aber die Antwort, die ich dort bislang erhalten habe, lässt mich vermuten, dass der Antwortende sich mehr mit dem angelsächsischen Copyright als mit dem österreichischen Urheberrecht auskennt.

Gruß, --217.239.2.67 22:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Es ist ja in de:Benutzer Diskussion:Pascalstorer#Foto ziemlich klar dargelegt, dass das Unternehmen die Nutzungsrechte hat. Welches Problem genau siehst Du? --Krd 02:03, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I don't like (or don't understand) the whole idea, so I don't have much to add. Sorry. --Krd 07:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:미야와키사쿠라.jpg

I was wondering how long it will be until you can confirm permission for the image? Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest and File:Paa Kwasi (Artist).jpg

Over at english Wikipedia, we're discussing whether the uploader of that photo has a relationship to the subject of the photo. Since you added the ticket permission to that photo, it would be great if you could state whether the ticket suggests a COI. Thanks. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't think that information from a permission ticket can be made public to discover a COI. VRT users are bound to the VRT confidentiality agreement and any information disclosure had to be discussed with WMF legal first. --Krd 04:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Fuzhou Gezhi High School the Corridor of Academicians.jpg

Hi Krd, I noticed your bot made this edit, but seems mentioned ticket has no relationship with this file. Is this a bug? Thanks. Stang★ 17:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for the report! Is is bug, a good one, and a good test case. Will look into it. --Krd 05:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Should be fixed, please let me know if it happens again. --Krd 05:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Deleting files

Hallo Krd,

По какой причине вы удаляете файлы (15:29, 29 августа 2022 Krd deleted pageFile:...) с полученным разрешением от автора?

[Ticket#2022041010005669] Date: Monday, 11 April 2022, 0:11 +03:00

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al_Parygin_KGallery_2022_Lana_Konokotina_Photo-1.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al_Parygin_KGallery_2022_Lana_Konokotina_Photo-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Al_Parygin_KGallery_2022_Lana_Konokotina_Photo-3.jpg

Просьба их восстановить. Artcurator (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The ticket is not processed, so no permission is achieved yet. The files will be restored as soon as the permisison process is complete. --Krd 03:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Warum Streichung?

Hallo Krd, mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass sich die deutsche Übersetzung von {{Permission received}} etwas seltsam liest. "Beim Volunteer Response Team ist eine E-Mail bezüglich dieser Datei eingegangen, die von Mitgliedern des Teams hier eingesehen werden kann. Die möglichen Gründe dafür könnten sein: das Fehlen einer freien Lizenz, die Herkunft der E-Mail ist unklar, oder sie kam nicht vom Urheber bzw. Inhaber der Nutzungsrechte." Da schien mir etwas zu fehlen ("Die möglichen Gründe dafür könnten sein..." scheint sich nicht recht auf "ist eine E-Mail bezüglich dieser Datei eingegangen" zu beziehen), und beim Blick auf das englische Original sehe ich davor tatsächlich den Satz "However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file." So ergibt dann auch der folgende Satz Sinn. Ich sehe nun, dass er in der deutschen Übersetzung mal enthalten war, du hast ihn aber 2019 gestrichen. Würde etwas dagegen sprechen, ihn wieder einzusetzen? Gestumblindi (talk) 11:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Das "Leider genügten die bisher eingegangen E-Mails noch nicht unseren Anforderungen für eine Freigabe." habe ich rausgenommen, weil es nicht zwangsläufig zutreffend ist. Es kann auch genauso gut sein, dass die Freigabe völlig in Ordnung ist, aber nur noch nicht bearbeitet wurde. Das führte in einigen Fällen zu Verwirrung. Wenn Du eine bessere Formulierung findest (die das ganze nicht zu sehr aufbläht), könnte man natürlich gern wieder etwas einsetzen. --Krd 12:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Grundsätzlich finde ich ja, dass sich die Texte von Templates in den verschiedenen Sprachversionen nicht zu sehr voneinander unterscheiden sollten. Dein Argument wäre genauso sehr auf den englischen Text anwendbar, wo der Satz aber noch drin steht (sogar fett hervorgehoben). Müsste er dann nicht auch dort gestrichen werden? Jedenfalls entsteht durch die ersatzlose Entfernung ein Logikbruch. Ich schlage vor, zumindest so umzuformulieren: "Die möglichen Gründe dafür könnten sein:" weglassen und stattdessen einfach schreiben: "Möglicherweise fehlt eine freie Lizenz, die Herkunft der E-Mail ..." etc. OK? Gestumblindi (talk) 13:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Der Unterschied scheint zu sein, dass deutschsprachige Kunden offenbar besonders gern Verständnisfragen stellen. Daher möchte ich, flapsig formuliert, dort möglichst nicht "es könnte sein: a) oder b) oder c)" stehen haben, sondern eher "es ist noch nicht fertig, bitte nicht fragen sondern einfach abwarten". Du kannst aber gern machen, man kann es ja nochmal probieren, und wenn es zu schlimm wird wieder ändern. --Krd 14:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Danke, ich habe die Stelle also mal wie vorgeschlagen umformuliert und dann sehen wir weiter :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Cometdiscovery.jpg

Hi Krd. Can you also check File:Cometdiscovery.jpg to see whether it can be covered by ticket #2022090310005306 that was sent in for File:Dm img.jpg. The uploader is the same person (she states she's the wife of the subject of the photo) and perhaps there's a way that she could be emailed and asked if she also wants the VRT ticket to cover this photo as well.

She also uploaded File:Visual Comet Discoverer Donald Machholz.jpg and File:Don Machholz Comet Discoverer.jpg: these are essentially the same photos as the "Dm img" photo which means they too probably would seem to be covered by the same ticket. Since the "Visual Comet Discoverer Donald Machholz" file was the first to be uploaded, maybe the {{PermissionTicket}} template should be added there and the other then linked via {{Other version}} but not sure. FWIW, "Dm img.jpg" and "Don Machholz Comet Discoverer.jpg" seem identical except for the file name; so, I'm not sure both are needed. Maybe the uploader wasn't sure how to request a file name change and tried to accomplish that by simply reuploading the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I asked them now accordingly in the ticket. --Krd 12:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for checking on this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ahrtal one year after.jpg

Hallo Krd, danke für die Freigabe meines o. gen. Fotos. Verstehe ich das richtig, dass weitere Fotos dieses Motivwagens damit auch freigegeben sind und ich den betreffenden Baustein dafür verwenden kann? Beste Grüße Palauenc05 (talk) 10:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich verstehe die Freigabe so, dass sie nur für das konkrete Foto gilt. Herr Tilly könnte das aber gern formlos auf weitere Bilder erweitern. Krd 11:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hatte es so verstanden, dass die Freigabe für das Motiv gilt. Er hat sicherlich nichts dagegen, konnte schon die erste Anfrage nicht nachvollziehen. Aber ich werde ihn nicht noch einmal mit einer Anfrage nerven. --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Ich hab ihn im Ticket gefragt, ob es auch für andere Bilder dieses Wagens gilt. --Krd 14:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Danke, mal sehen, ob er nochmal antwortet. Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Die Antwort ist positiv, d.h. Du kannst weitere Fotos dieses Wagens hochladen, und auf die Freigabe verweisen. --Krd 15:12, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Prima, werd ich tun. Gruß --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Bild mit gemischtem Inhalt

Hätte in diesem Fall die Vorlage {{fop}} nicht wegen der im rechten Bildabschnitt sichtbaren Skulptur (Brunnen) enthalten bleiben müssen? Die Freigabe von Jacques Tilly bezieht sich ja auf den im Bildinhalt abgebildeten Motivwagen. An der Skulptur hat er (vermutlich) keine Urheberrechte. mfG - Martin (Rede gerne mit mir) 12:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Der Wagen fällt aber eher nicht unter fop. Man müsste also herausstellen, worauf es sich bezieht. --Krd 13:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Richtig. Die Freigabe von Jacques Tilly bezieht sich auf den abgebildeten Motivwagen und für den Brunnen müssten wir aber fop angeben. Nur: Wie kann man das kombiniert und getrennt herausgestellt machen. Oder kann man der Vorlage fop noch Zusatztext (= worauf bezieht es sich?) mitgeben - ich habe hier nichts gesehen.
Alternativ könnte @Palauenc05 (als Inhaber der Bildrechte) das Bild so beschneiden, so dass die Brunnenskulptur nicht mehr enthalten ist. Das Bild würde dadurch aber in meinen Augen etwas an Wert verlieren. mfG - Martin (Rede gerne mit mir) 13:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Ich hab es mal geändert und denke, es müsste so gehen. --Krd 13:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
+1, Danke! mfG - Martin (Rede gerne mit mir) 15:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:St. Francis Xavier Church, Velim.jpg

Can I know the update of this file? It's been more than 2 weeks there seems to be no new update. Thanks  Rejoy2003  07:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

The ticket is closed as unsuccessful because no permission statement has been achieved. --Krd 08:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Permission statement? What do you mean? I did told the person who holds copyright to send the email with all the details and correct format. How can this be fixed?  Rejoy2003  11:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

The copyright holder did not complete this process, perhaps because of some language barrier. Please ask them to try again and to consider to send it in a different language. --Krd 12:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Prepona laertes laertes MHNT.jpg

Hello, Can you put back this file that you probably deleted by mistake, Thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. The image is now restored, I think this was some kind of mistake. --Krd 13:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:West Yorkshire Society of Architects, Heritage Architecture by DM Jones

On Tuesday 9 August 2022, Crispin Jones, copyright owner of 19 images, sent me the following email:

DM Jones images Inbox

Crispin Mason-Jones Tue, 9 Aug, 15:38 to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, me, Paula

Sir/Madam


Re: Permission email to the Volunteer Response Team, ref. number [Ticket#2022042210003942]


I give permission for the whole of the following category of 19 images which were uploaded by Storye book to Commons on 9 April 2022, to be held there under the free-use licence Cc-by-sa-4.0. The artist was my late father, and I am the copyright holder of the work.


  • the name of the images: 19 numbered images in the above category, with filename "West Yorkshire Society of Architects, Heritage Architecture by DM Jones"
  • author (Denis Mason Jones)
  • copyright owner (Crispin Jones)


Note: all of the images are of the whole, or of part, of the same painting. I.e. only one painting is represented in the whole set of 19 images. This is a painting titled, The Heritage Architecture of the City of Leeds to the Year 1933, painted and originally copyrighted by my father Denis Mason Jones (19 March 1918 - 8 January 2010)


Crispin Jones

Please let me know why you have not acknowledged this email, and why you have deleted the whole set of 19 images, which were here: Category:West Yorkshire Society of Architects, Heritage Architecture by DM Jones ?

If there is something wrong with his permissions letter, why did you not let us know what was wrong, so that he could replace it with a more correctly-worded letter? He has been trying to send you permission for some time. His first letter was refused, but we were not told what was wrong with it. He has been trying to give you permission in good faith. At least let him (and me) know what is wrong with the application. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Please provide the ticket number, or a link to one of the deleted images. Krd 16:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Ticket number: ticket:2022042210003942.
Links to the 19 deleted files:
Storye book (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
It appears the ticket was accidentally closed. Now done. --Krd 05:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Krd. I see that Crispin has received a confirmatory letter about this from WP, also. Your prompt assistance has been much appreciated. Storye book (talk) 10:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Request for verification of ticket:2022080610000629

My photos were tagged to be no permission in August, while most of the photos were taken by me, including:

I uploaded the original files of the above photos to permissions-common@wikimedia.org of the above image on August 7. All my tickets are handled by a VRT named Valera Domínguez (as stated in her email), she said all the tickets have been combined into ticket:2022080610000629, but they have not been verified for over a month, while some of them were deleted by bot.

When I asked her when the photos will be verified yesterday, she said she can't verify authorship since she cannot see the files with metadata.

However, I can see there are Metadata when I download the images from that email on both of my Windows and Mac computers (the Metadata cannot be shown if I download it on my phone and tablet). To proof it, I tried uploading one of the photos again (File:Olympian City 2 New Atrium 2019.jpg) to Wikimedia Commons, which also shows Metadata. Could you help me with this issue and verify the images tagged above? Thanks a lot.

I have also added a discussion on the Noticeboard and a volunteer named Jeff G. said he don't know why these files have no {{Permission received}}. Would you please check the deleted files' metadata? Dhl130herman (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

The ticket is still open and will be processed, please be patient. --Krd 04:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent permission statement and the original file to the email, you said this ticket is still being processed, why did you delete all my pictures on 26 September 2022? Dhl130herman (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Sadly we have no capacity to track which ticket is still open and which not. The images will be restored upon successful completion of the ticket. Please accept this maybe frustrating workflow, because everything else would slow down the whole process a lot. Thank you, Krd 17:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Aerial_view_of_Teffont_Evias_looking_north.jpg

Dear Krd,

I paste the email from its originator- which I can forward to you if required. I hope that you, or I, can reinstate the image. If you could let me know the approved method of including the email in the upload, that would be great:

Thanks for checking, Here's the statement! And if you need any more commercial drone imagery/video created for venues etc let me know! I hereby affirm that I am Alex Evans the creator of the media work as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aerial_view_of_Teffont_Evias_looking_north.jpg and have legal authority to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Alex Evans <evnalx@gmail.com> Mon, 29 Aug, 20:34


to Dan, Richard.Keatinge Richard Keatinge (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Please ask the copyright holder of the photo to send this to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org --Krd 07:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Wissenschaft_und_Restaurierung_ISL_Enderlein_Tyroller_2022.pdf

Hallo Krd, es tut mir leid, dass die Genehmigungen für die Datei nicht rechtzeitig eingingen und Du sie löschen musstest. Ich habe die beiden anderen Autor*innen jetzt noch einmal angeschrieben und hoffe, es ein nächstes Mal besser koordinieren zu können. Was wäre weniger aufwendig für die OTRS-Helfer*innen:

eine Wiederherstellung der Beschreibungsseite und der Datei (mit gleicher OTRS-Ticketnummer) oder
ein erneutes Hochladen der gleichen Datei?

Vielen Dank im voraus, --ThT (talk) 14:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo ThT. Wir bevorzugen die Wiederherstellung der bestehenden Datei sobald die Freigabe eingegangen ist. --Krd 14:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:SJE selfie.jpg

Hi Krd. Should the description for File:SJE selfie.jpg be updated to reflect VRT verification? It seems that it can't be the uploader's "own work" and they can't be the author since the photo is supposed to be a selfie taken by the subject of the photo who then sent it to the uploader so that they could upload it to Commmons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The copyright holder gave permission to publish the image and did not request any specific change to the information. So I think we can and should not change it. --Krd 14:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
For what it's worth I've had the file moved to File:Stephen Eichhorn selfie.jpg to fix the name, and updated the information to actually match reality. Primefac (talk) 16:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. --Krd 16:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Anupam Tripathi at the 2022 Seoul International Drama Awards on September 22, 2022.jpg

Hello Krd. I would like to know how long it will take until you can add the ticket to my image? I went through the process of sending an email confirming I released it under a license. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 21:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

It usually takes some days. Please stay patient. --Krd 06:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
I'll wait until then. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 07:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Confirm the use of files

Hello Krd!

I have a request for you: please, help confirm the use of files for Wikimedia Commons.

The author of files sent his permission to use it to permissions-uk@wikimedia.org two weeks ago. Please, help.

Links to files:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kraken_logo.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Velichko_Sergey_Olegovich.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nemichev_Konstantin_Vitalievich.jpg

Thank you in advance. Best regards. Kristallz (talk) 11:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I cannot read the language, but it appears the tickets have been answered today. --Krd 11:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Well... if the tickets were answered today, then why hasn't anything changed on the file pages? Kristallz (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I'd guess because there are still questions. As said, I cannot read the language. Please be patient and/or encourage the permission sender to react to e-mail. --Krd 16:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorcerex

Unblock Sorcerex, this user doesn’t like Cheng123xx’s sock puppet request the Hong Kong photo for deletion. Most of Cheng123xx’s sock puppets are reported by this user and all of them finally blocked 203.145.94.92 06:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

File:NHCSSG.png

Hi Krd, I've just come across your deletion of File:NHCSSG.png. Based on the edits it was used in it is clearly a part of , which has uploaded hundreds of copyvios over the years. I cannot see the user who uploaded the file (not an admin), but if they uploaded any others they are going to be copyvios as well. The user should probably also be blocked and tagged, if they are not so far. Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

You can see the uploader in the logs: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ANHCSSG.png --Krd 15:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! That's very helpful. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

IMDB

It seems like we have a strong pattern of newly created accounts taking images from IMDB and uploading to Commons. Too much to be a coincidence.

Think there is a connection between the uploaders? Trade (talk) 23:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Dear Trade, how shall I know if you don't mention any examples? --Krd 04:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

RFCU Archiving

Thank you for streamlining it!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Kühnapfel

Betrifft: File:Museum Kurhaus Kleve PM15-12.jpg
Hallo Krd. Heute haben Sie vielleicht dieses Photo gelöscht, bzw. unsichtbar gemacht ohne das darüber jemals eine Löschantrag gestellt wurde. Ich wurde von diese Löshung oder das Vorhaben dazu nie in Kenntnis gestellt. Es hat keine Löschdiskussion gegeben. Wohl wurde gefragt ob ich die Lizenz noch mal überprüfen konnte.

Daher habe ich der Künstler via Email um Erlaubnis gebeten, und diese Erlaubnis auch schriftlich erhalten und an VRT weitergeleitet. Ich habe Ihn die Lage geschildert, das Bild genannt, und die Konzequenzen der Genehmigung erklärt. Er schrieb mir "Ja das geht das kannst du machen, Mit freundlichen Grüßen Thomas.". Das sollte alles im VRT dossier dokumentiert sein.

Da hierbei angeblich formelle Fehler zu bemängeln gab, hab ich der Künstler am 5 Okt. nochmals eine preparierte Vordruck geschickt und zum zweiten Male um seine Mitarbeit gebeten. Das ist kaum 15 Tage her. Das das Bild nun anstatt mit Gütesiegel plötzlich gar nicht mehr sichtbar ist, überrascht mich sehr und erschwert natürlich erheblich das Abwicklen der formellen Lizenz. Ich bitte Sie höflich das voreilig gelöschte Bild noch mindestens zwei Wochen zurück zu stellen. Bevor man überhaubt mal eine formelle Löschantrag startet und mich davon dann auch korrekterweise benachrichtigt. Peli (talk) 16:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Peli. Das Bild ist jetzt wiederhergestellt und die Freigabe eingetragen. --Krd 05:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Krd. Das freut mich sehr. Vielen Dank. Peli (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Daily maintenance categories

Thank you for taking care about Category:Media missing permission. Could you please teach bot to do the same for Category:Media without a license and Category:Media without a source? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Are there any templates to use, or just use the existing text as example? --Krd 15:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done, please check is everything looks good. --Krd 07:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! Everything looks fine. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You‘re welcome. If there is more like this, please let me know. --Krd 15:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Pedro María Egea Bruno.jpg

Hi! I am contacting to you because I have seen that in August you deleted the file File:Pedro María Egea Bruno.jpg because the ticket permission was not achieved. I think there must have been a problem with the way the permission statement was written, since in February I had an email conversation with Egea Bruno himself and he assured me that he had contacted Wikimedia Commons to communicate the release of rights. Best, P4K1T0 (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Please let the copyright holder send the permission again. --Krd 05:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion

It seems that you forgot to delete File:An uncircumcised penis glans.jpg after you closed the DR as deleted. A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Now done, thank you! --Krd 05:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mapa zabytków w województwie poznańskim.jpg

Deleted per nomination? The anonymous nomination that simply says copyvio? What happened? Brianjd (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

The file page said "Unknown author, date 1988" and I see no reason for cc-0. It can of course be restored after clarification. --Krd 05:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Sound Rush 04.jpg

Hallo, Ich habe gerade dieses Foto gefunden, dass du von Sound Rush gemacht hast. Da ich an einem Wikipedia-Artikel zu den beiden arbeite, wollte ich fragen, ob es rechtlich i.O. ist, das Foto in den Artikel einzubinden. Den Artikelentwurf findest du hier: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Lovethedance/Baustelle Beste Grüße Lovethedance (talk) 11:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Ja, das kannst Du gern machen, genau dafür ist es ja da! --Krd 12:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Super, vielen Dank :) Lovethedance (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Moin, wenn ich mir die erweiterten Metadaten von c:File:Michael_Brecht_(2019).jpg anschaue, liegt dort wahrscheinlich auch eine Copyright-Verletzung vor, oder? Kümmerst du dich darum? Danke vorab. Aidepikiw-nick (talk) 08:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Was heißt "auch"? Wie ist der genaue Zusammenhang? --Krd 09:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Auch weil deswegen. Aidepikiw-nick (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Ok. Ist erledigt. --Krd 09:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Decora the rapper.jpg

Hello Krd,

You deleted this photo with the reasoning "No ticket permission achieved for more than 30 days," but as far as I know, I had included the correct licensing and permissions at the time of uploading to Commons. Can you please provide more information behind the reason for deletion? What do I need to do to get this undeleted?

Thank you. Rob-ALVB (talk) 15:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

You please need the copyright holder to send permission, see: COM:VRTS --Krd 15:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Erdély Dániel

you deleted a file from a Hungarian page of Erdély Dániel with a {pp} sablon - why?? Speedron (talk) 18:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand the question. Permission has not been achieved, so what would be the option? --Krd 07:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Sayaguesa Lippeaue5.jpg

You deleted one of my photos that were uploaded by me, so there is no problem with the permission at all because it was MY photo. I would like to ask you why you deleted it without notifying me or giving me any chance to clarify the situation. Thanks. DFoidl (talk) 10:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Are you the photographer who created the photo? --Krd 10:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Of course, and the file also said so. There was no reason to delete it. DFoidl (talk) 10:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I have restored the file. --Krd 10:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
OK thanks. DFoidl (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

DFoidl has also removed {{No permission since}} from several of their other uploads. Those uploads, along with the one discussed here, are mostly low resolution with no camera metadata. They recently edited a file description to go from attributing someone else to attributing themselves, and have been uncivil at User talk:Justlettersandnumbers#My photos. Do you want to respond, or should I open a DR? Brianjd (talk) 14:15, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

All of those photos are MY photos, so no reason to delete them. Justlettersandnumbers is simply bored and doesn't have anything better to do, unfortunately. DFoidl (talk) 14:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
I wanted to leave it there, but @DFoidl posted on my talk page. I don’t want to fork the discussion, so I am replying here.
Anyone can upload anything and say it is theirs. Commons:Project scope/Evidence says that the onus is on the uploader to provide evidence that the work is free. Brianjd (talk) 14:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
What do you think this evidence should look like? I took those photos in 2013. That's the story. Basta. DFoidl (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
If you delete MY photos, which are MY photos because I TOOK THEM, I will upload them again and again and again because I see no problem with them. Any use can upload its own photos, like I did. Basta. DFoidl (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) @DFoidl I don’t know, but it needs to be discussed, especially with the attribution change I mentioned above and the issues raised at past DRs. That’s why I suggested opening a new DR if Krd declines to intervene further. Brianjd (talk) 14:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Dear Brianjd, are you serious? You are asking for EVIDENCE, but don't know what that EVIDENCE is supposed to look like? Those are MY photos. I took them in 2013 and I declared those files as MY, so there is NO problem with it. DFoidl (talk) 14:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
@Brianjd: As far as I'm concerned, please feel free to open a DR if there is significant doubt. (And I agree that lack of civilty is also becoming an issue.) --Krd 15:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
I am looking forward to see what kind of "evidence" I have to provide in order to "prove" that MY photos are MY photos. Thanks for all the great effort guys, you are doing an amazing job. (I personally have a life) DFoidl (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
The procedure is outlined at COM:VRT. --Krd 14:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Helmut Weitz

Salve, vorrei sapere perché ha eliminato l'immagine di Helmut Weitz (File:Helmut Weitz.jpg) che ho caricato su commons. Con l'occasione le auguro buona serata Frax05 (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

The file was deleted because no permission was shown. Who is the photographer who created it? --Krd 05:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
all'epoca non c'ero sennò ora avrei 80 anni, non l'ho scattata io però l'ho migliorata mediante photoshop quindi la foto nuova è opera mia
@Krd Frax05 (talk) 20:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
We need permission from the original photographer, or any other reason based on copyright law. --Krd 05:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review

Hello, I'm trying to understand the justification behind this closure. This is an image I took, of the subject in this entry. None of the points raised in the discussion are valid. It is not an image of a mural, it is an image of the artist. If it were an image of the mural, the mural is freely licensed. Can you restore, or should I seek a deletion review? Bangabandhu (talk) 00:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I don't see any hint that the mural is freely licensed. If it is, I think the image can be restored. Please provide evidence. Krd 05:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
I own the work and its copyright. I don't want to disclose my personal information. If I post the image without the artist, would that constitute evidence? If someone owns a mural, how do they demonstrate that it is free for public use? Bangabandhu (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
We need permission from the artist who created the mural. See: COM:VRT --Krd 15:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Alright, I'll submit that. Please don't destroy the file. Thanks. Bangabandhu (talk) 14:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo

[1] - was genau war das Problem? --Nicola (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Die Freigabe ist nicht erfolgt. --Krd 19:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Ok - das geht normalerweise nicht so schnell. Die Freigabe ist im Übrigen deshalb nicht erfolgt (nach Diskussionen), weil der von mir angegebene Fotograf angibt, ich selbst hätte das Foto gemacht. Ich habe ein ganzes Album mit Fotos des letzten Sechstagerennen von mir und ihm, und ich dachte, es sei von ihm, er bestreitet das. Was mach ich jetzt? --Nicola (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Wenn ihr nicht wisst, wer der Fotograf war, kann das Foto nicht verwendet werden, da keine Freigabe möglich ist. (Habe ich die Frage richtig verstanden?) --Krd 10:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Nicht ganz. DAs Foto ist entweder von ihm oder von mir - er sagt, es sei von mir, da er es nicht gemachte habe, ich glaubte, es sei von ihm, aber dann ist es wohl von mir. --Nicola (talk) 10:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Kann denn jemand sagen "Ich bin der Fotograf und ich gebe das Bild frei"? --Krd 10:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Ich. Es gibt nur zwei Möglichkeiten, und die kommt nicht in Frage, dann wohl die andere :) Vielleicht habe ich verdrängt, dieses Foto gemacht zu haben, weil ich den Typen, der drau ist, nicht ausstehen konnte :) --Nicola (talk) 10:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Ich hab das Bild wiederhergestellt. Schau bitte ob alles stimmt. --Krd 10:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Ok - danke :) Ist halt über 20 Jahre her.... --Nicola (talk) 12:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Den Kommentar kann man wohl nicht mehr löschen... --Nicola (talk) 12:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Welchen Kommentar? --Krd 13:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion reason?

Hi, Krd. I didn't understand your reasoning for deletion in this thread: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mapa zabytków w województwie poznańskim.jpg. What was the problem with the copyright? I'll tag User:Brianjd, too, because I think he'd be curious as well. Thanks in advance for replying when you have a spare moment.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi. It is a map eligible for copyright, dated 1988 and the creator is unknown. It isn't shown who is the current copyright holder or why the map is in the public domain. --Krd 05:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
And this problem appears to apply to nearly all uploads of that user. Can you encourage them to send permission for all of them? --Krd 05:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
I forget who uploaded it, but I don't think I recognized the user's screen name. So as I understand, the copyright situation of the map overrides the general licensing of the The State Archive in Poznań. That makes sense to me, and thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
See: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Kustoszka --Krd 13:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 191476292@N03

Would you please comment on why you did not feel PD-Iraq was sufficient to retain the images at this DR? You did not mention it in your closing statement. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I'm happy to restore them if you want to put pd-iraq into them, and you can feel free to restore them yourself. I didn't do that because I don't know if it fits, but if you think it does, please go ahead. --Krd 14:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

RivièreBeemer.jpg

La page Interaction Qui sur Wikipédia a été modifiée par CommonsDelinker le 12 novembre 2022, voir https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction_Qui pour la version actuelle.

Bonjour, veuillez prendre note de ce qui suit concernant ce fichier  :

Français : Il s'agit d'un duo d'artistes québécois.Les droits concernant les photographies du duo d'artistes Interaction Qui appartiennent à Interaction Qui ltée. Ces photos sont libres de droit comme en fait foi cette résolution de l'organisme

--TaconSite (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Français : RÉSOLUTION

EXTRAIT DU PROCÈS-VERBAL

PROPOSITION No : 2015-11-15

Du Conseil d’administration Interaction Qui Ltée tenue à Alma le 15 septembre 2015 INTERACTION QUI LTÉE 3135 rue des Mésanges Alma (Qc)
G8B 5V3

La présente assemblée fut convoquée suivant les règlements de la corporation et il y a quorum.

Dépôt des documents du duo d’artistes Interaction Qui aux fonds d’archives de la Société d’histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean

CONSIDÉRANT que le duo d’artistes Interaction Qui (Alain Laroche et Jocelyn Maltais) va dissoudre leur association le 30 septembre 2015;

CONSIDÉRANT que les documents (textes, photographies et vidéographies) appartiennent de droit à l’organisme Interaction Qui ltée;
CONSIDÉRANT que les documents (textes, photographies et vidéographies) sont actuellement entreposés dans les locaux de Interaction Qui ltée ;

CONSIDÉRANT que Interaction Qui ltée ne possède pas les services d’accessibilité à ces documents ;
CONSIDÉRANT qu’il est important de permettre aux chercheurs et personnes intéressés par la carrière artistique du duo d’artistes Interaction Qui de consulter et d’utiliser les documents (textes, photographies et vidéographies) à des fins d’information publique;
CONSIDÉRANT qu’il est important de conserver de façon pérenne les documents (textes, photographies et vidéographies) du duo d’artistes Interaction Qui;

EN CONSÉQUENCE, Il est proposé par M. Jocelyn Maltais, secondé par, Mme Claire Maltais, et résolu à l’unanimité de déposer les documents concernant le duo d’artistes Interaction Qui (textes, photographies et vidéographies) aux fonds d’archives de la Société d’histoire du Lac- Saint-Jean. Ces documents pourront être consultés et utilisés pour fin de travaux de recherches et d’information sur le duo d’artistes Interaction Qui. Cependant les auteurs devront citer les sources. Tous les documents sont libres de droit.

Vraie copie certifiée

Raymond-Marie Lavoie

secrétaire-trésorier

Merci de prendre en considération ce message.

--TaconSite (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

See: COM:VRT. --Krd 08:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2022 Bermeko kaian.jpg

Hello Krd, you deleted my photo in my personal page in basque wikipedia. It's my own photo, obviously. So there is no problems with the permission at all. I don't understand why was deleted. May you please explain me it? Thanks a lot. Iñazio Irizar Iñazio Irizar (talk) 17:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Please provide a link. Krd 17:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello again Krd, I don't understand the request for a link. What it means? Thanks for your information. Iñazio Irizar Iñazio Irizar (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Which file are you talking about? --Krd 05:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello again Krd, I'm talking about a very serious file: my personal page in the basque wikipedia. May you please restore my own photo there? Thanks in advance, Iñazio Irizar 83.213.135.125 14:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Is this: File:2022 Bermeko kaian.jpg the file we are discussing? If yes please advise who is depicted in the photo, and who was the photographer who created it. --Krd 14:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Yes, this is the file. The person in the photo is myself, obviously, regarding that it is my personal basque wikipedia page. And the the photo was taken with my smartphone in Bermeo by my wife. Iñazio Irizar Iñazio Irizar (talk) 14:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The image is now restored. --Krd 14:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello Krd, When should appear the restored image in my personal page? Thanks for your help. Iñazio Irizar Iñazio Irizar (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You are great job on Commons. Sibil Sadesh (talk) 13:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. --Krd 14:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Good Job on Commons. Sibil Sadesh (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. --Krd 14:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

File:1982-a-love-marriage.jpg

Dear Krd,

The file File:1982-a-love-marriage.jpg had been used on nl.wiktionary (WikiWoordenboek) for over 4 years, when it was suddenly removed without us getting any prior notice. This doesn't look like a proper procedure in a co-operative movement. Because the image has been removed, I cannot assess the possibility to resolve the issue raised or look for a fitting replacement. For these reasons I ask you to restore the image for a limited time period. MarcoSwart (talk) 06:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

The image had no permission, and can be restored only after release from the copyright holder. --Krd 06:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
My request is just for a temporary undeletion. How are we supposed to obtain a release from the copyright holder if we cannot see the picture and the associated data? MarcoSwart (talk) 09:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Whom do you want to talk to regarding the release? The uploader is inactive and likely not the copyright holder, and here is no hint who the copyright holder could be. --Krd 09:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
How am I supposed to answer your questions if I cannot see the picture for myself? It is quite possible that replacing the picture would be a better solution, but how do I replace a picture I cannot see? Your fellow administrators usually simply grant a request like this, probably because it streamlines the cooperation between projects. If it hasn't been a problem to have this picture visible for at least 4 years, keeping it so for a few weeks shouldn't be that much of deal, would it? MarcoSwart (talk) 11:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I think "a few weeks" is definitely unacceptable. Krd 12:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
What period would be acceptable? MarcoSwart (talk) 08:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
What about one hour from now? --Krd 08:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Unfortunately I'm reading your message only now. Please remember I am a volunteer working on a dictionary in my spare time. I suppose you are a volunteer too. Do you think it is fitting we start to determine working hours for one another? If you really want to limit the time period to one hour, could we please agree on a slot that fits my schedule? Today, 11:00 to 12:00 (UTC) would be fine. MarcoSwart (talk) 10:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
I guess you weren't around. My next option would be tonight, after 20:00 (UTC). --MarcoSwart (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Please continue, --Krd 05:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
I have seen the picture and was able to find a suitable replacement. Thanks! MarcoSwart (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Bot flag

Hey Krd. Thanks for approving my bot request. Would you recommend I use the bot flag moving forward? Cryptic-waveform (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand the question. The bot flag can and should be used now. --Krd 05:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
I was confused by the question in the bot request about whether I need the bot flag or not. Looks like it's set automatically now. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 05:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

One file not deleted in a DR

Hello, you processed a DR I had started, and it seems that one of the images was not deleted with the others: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to the memory of president J.K. Paasikivi. kyykaarme (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I think the gadget's work has to be always double checked sadly. --Krd 08:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
That's a shame, more time-waste for volunteers. Thanks for your work! kyykaarme (talk) 09:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Urheberrechtsfrage

Hallo Krd, wie ist die Lizenz für das NASA-Foto File:James Webb Space Telescope Launch (NHQ202112250021).jpg zu verstehen, wenn in Flickr die Lizenz NC beinhaltet? . Bei der Lizenz steht NASA ist frei, wenn nichts anderes angegeben ist. Ist diese Angabe in Flickr nicht unter etwas anderes angegeben zu verstehen? --danke -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 08:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo. Wenn es von der NASA erstellt wurde, ist es public domain, wenn nicht, dann nicht. Was hier zutrifft weiß ich leider nicht. Krd 08:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Das ist schon klar, aber ist https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasahqphoto/51775785692/in/photostream/ ein NASA-Foto unter anderer Lizenz ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 08:43, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Ich weiß es nicht. Wenn man das Bild behalten will, müsste man es klären. Wenn man es löschen will kann man einen Löschantrag stellen. Was möchtest Du erreichen? Krd 08:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Na ich will da nicht stören, ich wollte da nur Info, weil ich mich nicht auskenne. Auf alle Fälle danke, ich bleib da raus --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 11:43, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Ohne konkreten Anlass möchte ich mich da auch nicht einmischen. Krd 12:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Na passt schon, war nur eine Frage, brauchst deshlab nix unternehmen. lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 15:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Wrongly deleted photo

Good day. You deleted a photo of a guitar player Pavel Klepetko that was on Wikipedia page of band Youlie. But I sent permissions to use all of our photos on Wikipedia and it was approved and you still deleted one of them even though it has the same permission as the others. Can you please revert your deletion? Thank you, Jiří Šašek. MrSasek (talk) 11:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Please provide a link. Krd 12:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Back in 2020 you said you felt "forced to make thoughts about physical safety" due to what I said on my talk page here/talk pages on metawiki.
I'm not sure I ever apologized for that specific part. I was angry and handled the situation poorly, but I never meant to make anyone feel that way. I never wanted or intended for anyone to worry about their safety. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

It's good to hear that there never was anybody in danger. As your statement comes out of blue, I think it troubles me more than it helps. --Krd 14:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Some recent events have caused me to re-evaluate things in my life. And my life as a whole. I was never able to put the whole "grilling the sheriff" debacle behind me because nobody corrected the faulty interpretation of statements in the noticeboard discussion: the community believed I made threats off-wiki. I had written some awful comments on-wiki, but people's imagination ran wild on what those supposedly off-wiki threats would contain. This has been eating away at me, rather badly. To this day I'm afraid of how this could affect me in the future IRL and can only pray it won't.
I can't make you or anyone else make that clarification, that there never were any off-wiki threats, though I'd still appreciate it greatly if you'd consider it. For myself, this apology is my way of finding some form of closure for the whole thing. I want to be better. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Realizing you may not have much of an incentive to help out, let me offer something in return: I'm willing to donate 50 EUR or USD to a charity/non-profit of your choice. Humanitarian help for Ukraine, animal shelter, Doctors without Borders, FSF, archive.org, Wikimedia or something else entirely - you name it. Or if you'd rather see the 50 €/$ in your own account so you can help a local charitable cause or donate without disclosing the name of the charity, I have no problem with that either. Your choice.
All I'm asking from you is a public clarification that all the awful things I said were on-wiki. ("All the awful things Alexis said were on-wiki." would suffice) You'd be taking a load of my mind, I don't mind parting with 50 €/$ for that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't know why you make so much pressure and prefer a quick over a carefully considered answer, but I hope it helps you when I say: All the awful things Alexis said were on-wiki. Yours, --Krd 15:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! I couldn't know if you were merely thinking about the best way to phrase your answer or if you didn't think an answer was needed. Your statement is all I really needed. This should clear up the rumors that surrounded the situation for so long. I feel much lighter, thank you.
The charity offer still stands. If you don't care either way, I can pick a charity myself. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't have any preference, please fee lfree to choose. Thank you. --Krd 18:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Kinocine

Hi, IMO there is no issue with File:Han Sun-hwa.2019.jpg. This user has consistent EXIF data across their uploads. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Ok. --Krd 12:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque, Muscat

Hello Krd. Are several files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Interior of Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque, Muscat meant to be kept or were just technical issues? Thanks in advance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Technical issues. Thank you! --Krd 18:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello again Krd, better post here to save archival space in the future. Are 2 files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Navigation Palace, Galați meant to be kept or are to be deleted? Thanks again in advance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
I thought I had double checked all today, but it appears not correctly. Sorry for the trouble. --Krd 07:32, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
It's OK. I'd rather air my dismay on the 110+ countries that still do not have new media-friendly FOP which causes us to conduct such deletion requests. :-( JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello again, posting it here to save archival space. Is File:Vienuolynas prie kryžių kalno, Jurgaičiai, Litva.jpg meant to be deleted or not? Found while browsing through Lithuanian FOP cases/pending case pages. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted as always when nothing has explicitly specified. I will write a tool to find these orphans as soon as possible. Krd 05:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Restore WH40K images

Oh God. I've had SO MANY ARGUMENTS defending this image and I wake up today to find that it's been deleted because I got sick for a while and so couldn't catch this latest kerfuffle.

I would like you to restore File:Keno mini wargame.jpg and File:Operation Sci-Fi Con 2015 WH40K.jpg. I've argued that these images are acceptable under DE MINIMIS because none of the individual miniatures are shown in focus, in high resolution. In fact you can barely recognize that they are WH40K minis. Kurzon (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

I don't think that DM can apply here. If you'd remove all copyrighted things here was a picture on an empty table, which doesn't make any sense, so the items are the main motive of the image. --Krd 05:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Look at the Wikipedia article for De minimis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_minimis). The article shows a panorama picture of the Georgian skyline. This is what the caption says:

The country of Georgia has no legally recognized freedom of panorama, and a strict interpretation of copyright law makes commercial reproduction of a likeliness of any modern Georgian building a likely copyright violation. However, a panorama of a Georgian city (here, Batumi), which does not focus on any building in detail, is likely allowed due to de minimis principle

If you removed all the buildings in the image, the image wouldn't make sense either. I apply the same logic to that WH40K pic. None of the figurines are shown in detail. Just because their presence is necessary, it doesn't follow that they are violations. Kurzon (talk) 08:46, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

The skyline as a whole isn't copyrighted, but the game as a whole likely is. If you disagree please raise at COM:UNDEL; I support undeletion if I'm mistaken, but I don't think I am. --Krd 10:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

My user page deleted

Hi Krd. I saw that you deleted my userpage. I can'not understand, anyway, if not to possible to restore it, could you send me the text was include in it? Or copy in User:MrKeefeJohn/test Thank you. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 13:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear MrKeefeJohn. I sadly have no idea what happened there, I cannot explain it. The page is restored now. Sorry for the trouble, and thank you for pointing out! --Krd 14:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
No problem. Thank you for restoring the page. Bye MrKeefeJohn (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Undelete an image

Hi @Krd, please undelete File:Jose Gomez de Vargas.jpg to allow me verify VRT permissions per ticket:2022112810000841. I've recently cleared all of my history and I need to re-login to the VRT and that's perhaps why I'm asking here. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 05:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Please restore 3 images to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Carpenter

Dear Krd, I would very much appreciate your help in restoring three images to my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gail_Carpenter . I was late in sending permissions, and apologize for this. The email that I sent on November 25, 2022, is copied below. Please let me know if I need to do anything else to restore the images, one of which is my portrait. I can resend the images, if you need these. Thank you. Gail Carpenter (gail@bu.edu)

COPY: To photosubmission@wikimedia.org November 25, 2022 On Nov 25, 2022, at 10:20 AM, Gail Carpenter <gailacarpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

<Gail Carpenter 2021 January 14 Gail A Carpenter photo copy.jpeg><Gail Carpenter 2003 July 20-24 INNS Board of Governors photo copy.jpg><Gail Carpenter Distributed ART model (dART) Gail A Carpenter .png>I hereby affirm that I, Gail Carpenter, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work: content attached to this email I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Gail Carpenter 2022-11-25

[generated using relgen.js] 2601:192:4800:9E10:452D:B70E:EE7E:C976 20:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Gail, if this was sent by e-mail, you will receive and answer by e-mail. --Krd 04:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

File:L'homme, cet inconnu.djvu

Bonjour Krd, J'ai vu que vous aviez supprimé l'ouvrage l'Homme cet inconnu d'Alexis Carrel. Je pense qu'il ne viole aucun droits car l'auteur est mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Je ne savais pas quoi mettre dans la notice de copyright et j'ai demandé de l'aide pour la remplir. Avant d'avoir la réponse, vous avez supprimé cette œuvre. Qu'est-ce que j'aurais dû écrire, sachant que l'ouvrage a été publié en 1935 ?

Lien : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=333116424

Fortelle65 (talk) 11:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 12:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Female body hair removal.jpg

Hello Krd. Recently, you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Female body hair removal.jpg as Kept with the rationale "no deletion reason". Perhaps this was a mistake as I quoted the guidelines that were at issue in the nomination. In the deletion discussion there was debate about whether this rationale should also be applied to the uploader's other uploads as well, but there was no disagreement or question about whether it applied to the nominated image. There seemed to be consensus that the image did in fact violate a Commons guideline, namely Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. If you believe that isn't the case, perhaps you could explain why. Stating simply "no deletion reason" doesn't seem accurate, however. Thanks for your consideration. Nosferattus (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello Nosferattus. I don't see any consensus in the DR, and also no evidence or even a single hint the no susbject's consent has been reached. Nor do I see any possibility for the uploader to prove that he has the subject's consent. If you disagree feel free to nominate again. --Krd 05:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Nosferattus, it's COM:NETCOPYVIO per www[dot]luscious[dot]net/albums/amateur_teen_babe_posing_naked_292867/ (October 2017) and 4chanarchives[dot]com/board/s/thread/16595416 [2]. (March 2016) (replace [dot] with period, at least one of these domains is blacklisted)
Krd, I'd appreciate it if you could confirm you've seen my apology above, even if you might not have anything substantive to add to it. Again, I wasn't on my best behavior (to put it mildly) at that time. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Krd: My apologies, but I'm not sure I understand your reply. Are you suggesting that the burden of proof is on the nominator to prove non-consent, rather than on the uploader to assert consent (in cases of identifiable people in private places)? I'm also confused by your statement that you do not "see any possibility for the uploader to prove that he has the subject's consent". Uploading a model release to the VRT would certainly suffice, although according to COM:IDENT, "Normally it is sufficient that the uploader asserts that appropriate consent was given." Any guidance you can provide in this area would be appreciated, as there seems to be little to no documentation on how to actually handle non-compliance with COM:IDENT. Nosferattus (talk) 00:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Yes. The VRT doesnot process modell releases, for a whole lot of reasons I'm would prefer not to discuss today. One of the reasons is that if you request modell release for any image you like, we have to delete all images depicting persons, because nobody is able to handle that. --Krd 04:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
That's fine, but as COM:IDENT says, "Normally it is sufficient that the uploader asserts that appropriate consent was given." So I don't really understand your point about proving consent, as no one is arguing that such proof is necessary. All that is necessary is for the uploader to assert that they acquired consent. Would you say that is correct or not? Nosferattus (talk) 01:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
At the time COM:IDENT was written, that may have been correct. I'm not sure if it is correct today. As the file is deleted now, we perhaps should consider that questions may exist that could stay unanswered. --Krd 06:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kabhi2011

Footer says that files were deleted, but only one of two files was actually deleted. Brianjd (talk) 06:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Note to self: Categorise DR correctly after this is resolved. Brianjd (talk) 06:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
See section above. Please wait until I can debug my monitoring tool. --Krd 06:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Грустный Кофе

На каком основании вы удалили мои файлы? Я отправил на почту Викимедии письменное разрешение на каждый файл. Грустный Кофе (talk) 07:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Please advise which exact file you are discussing. --Krd 10:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Все Грустный Кофе (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Please provide any kind of detail. --Krd 05:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Какую информацию, я отправил на почту Википедии письменную копию разрешения на каждый файл. Но вы их удалили. Я прошу Вас удалить эту проблему. Грустный Кофе (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Жду вашего ответа 

Грустный Кофе (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
In order to help, you please need to providy anything so that we get able to undertand what is being talked about. Which image is it? Say the link please. --Krd 17:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

юнышей.jpgхор.jpgМариинский.jpgМарпосада.jpgФото.jpg89Марпосад.jpgКадышев.jpgFile:Евгений Кадышев.jpgFile:Сергей Елисеев (чиновник).jpgFile:Администрация Марпосада.jpgFile:Гимназия 1Мариинский Посад.jpg Грустный Кофе (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Вы зайдите на мою страницу обсуждения найдите раздет "Статус изображения Марпосад 20 век", просмотрите это обсуждение, там вы увидите удаленные файлы. Я отправил на почту копию письменного заявления на каждое изображение, но не понимаю почему вы их так и удалили. Прошу помочь мне, я начинающий, вы разберитесь пожалуйста. Заранее спасибо. Грустный Кофе (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

For every image that shows a copyright protected work, i.e. artwork or a photograph created by somebody else, we please need written permission sent to: permisisons-ru@wikimedia.org --Krd 05:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Добрый день, я его отправил неделю назад Грустный Кофе (talk) 13:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Я отправил на почту Википедии копию разрешения Грустный Кофе (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Did you received any answer? What is the ticket number? --Krd 14:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
The user writes very strange permissions and doesn't answer on requests of additional information. His/her idea is that all files is {{Own}}, as far as I understand. Грустный кофе, служба получает Ваши письма, но мы не можем принять разрешения в текущем виде. Пожалуйста, ответьте на письма, объясните в них ситуацию. Анастасия Львоваru/en 08:32, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Could you undelete and formally nominate files by User:狄の用務員?

Most of their uploads are AI generated own works that superficially look like proffesional art, and they’re an inexperienced good-faith user who might not understand how the ticket system works. I’d like to send them through standard deletion process to see if my hypothesis is correct. Dronebogus (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

@Dronebogus: I thought those images were ok, but Not only did they receive deletion and copyright tags at Wikimedia, also received criticism at Wikipedia:ja last week. I initially hope to keep the images, but I came to think that they were better off being deleted because of its time consuming of dealing with frequent claims, then I told to withdraw my application to VRT. I will wait for another opportunity to upload images. Anyway I deeply appreciate your consideration, thank you very much. 狄の用務員 (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
@Dronebogus: I think the process can be done for the remaining images, and the deleted ones can be done afterwards or in the same case. If I'm mistaken please advise. --Krd 14:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Most of the remaining ones appear to have been confirmed as AI/self. Dronebogus (talk) 14:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
And the same applies to the deleted ones? You said you want to guide the user through the VRT process, so why can't we do this for all affected files with one e-mail? --Krd 14:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
I do not understand the VRT process either. The user simply tagged or told me they were AI generated and they generally have AI-typical flaws (generally a “melty” appearance in spots) Dronebogus (talk) 14:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
See: COM:VRT --Krd 14:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
The user replied above and said they withdrew from the process for personal reasons, I’m not sure there’s anything left to do. Dronebogus (talk) 14:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Ok, the I consider this done. If any thing additional arises, please advise. --Krd 14:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

DR

Hast du hier absichtlich nur eine der beiden Dateien gelöscht oder war das wieder der übliche Fehler des Tools? --Didym (talk) 15:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Wohl letzteres, aber es sollte nicht mehr so schlimm sein, da die Dateien dann in User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests auftauchen sollen. Ich lass das daher mal nen Tag so stehen um zu schauen, ob es klappt. --Krd 18:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Es gibt da noch ein paar Probleme, die brauchen leider ein neue Testfälle. --Krd 09:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 19:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Hegedűs Miklós, 2022.jpg

Dear Krd! Thank you very much for all you have done for my deletion request! One of the images I requested to be deleted has now disappeared from Wikimedia Commons (File:Hegedűs Miklós, 2022.jpg). I am glad about that.

However, I also requested the following files to be deleted:

The rights holders have not consented to the publication of the images, partly because they have the right to publish them in pictorial form (the image of the paintings), and partly because the caption and content contain data that violate personal rights and which they do not wish to publish (place of burial and anthroposophical connection).

The pictures of Miklós Hegedűs are from Ibolya Beluk, not from his heirs, and since the painter died in 2022, permission would have to be obtained from his descendants, which they refused to grant on 12 November. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the process of deletion here. You know the options here, please help me to get these files I uploaded on 11 November removed from Wikimedia Commons.

Thank you very much! Sorry to bother you, but as I said, I am not familiar with the methods here. Welcome and thank you. Bizottmány (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 13:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Krd!

Thank you very much for your quick help! I will always turn to you if such a case arises! You are very kind! I am grateful! --Bizottmány (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Wrong deletion

Dear colleague, why did you delete File:Concrete shelter in Mykolaiv, 2022-11-04.jpg? Did you look at it? Sneeuwschaap (talk) 12:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I have restored the image. --Krd 12:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete

Please undelete File:"The Ghosts" Genrik Ibsen BDT Director Roman Markholia-19.jpg. The whole set was kept according to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Роман Мархолиа. What is the exact problem with the file? --ssr (talk) 13:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 16:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Unverständliche Löschungen

Vor etwa einem Monat wurden zahlreiche Bild-Dateien gelöscht, für deren Veröffentlichung bereits im Mai diesbezügliche Genehmigungen vorlagen und an permissions-de@wikimedia.org geschickt wurden. Es folgt der Inhalt:
Betreff: Bildrechte Urheber: Stiftung «Vier-Quellen-Weg im Gotthardmassiv»
"Guten Tag. Ich melde mich bezüglich Bestätigung der Bildrechte. Die mit der von User:FkMohr vorgenommenen Übertragung der Bilder (Dateien): Witenwasseren-KWS.pdf & Witenwasseren-3W.pdf - Urheber: Peter Stadler, Sabbioni-NO.jpg, 3W-Witenwasseren.pdf & KWS-Witenwasseren.pdf - Urheber: BINARY one / Beat Schuler, Hüenderstock.jpg, Rheinquelle.jpg & Wasser-UR-VS-TI.jpg - Urheber: Stiftung «Vier-Quellen-Weg im Gotthardmassiv» unter der Lizenz cc-by-sa-3.0-ch bin ich einverstanden. Bitte diese nicht löschen. Die vorgenommenen Einträge werden hiermit bestätigt. Freundliche Grüsse Armin Furrer, als Vertreter o. g. Urheber bzw. Rechteinhaber Danke für Ihre Bemühungen und freundliche Grüsse."
Ich bitte daher um Wiederherstellung der genannten Dateien. Friedo (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo FkMohr. Wenn die Freigabe an permissions-de@wikimedia.org geschickt wurde, hat der Einsender zeitnah eine entsprechende Rückmeldung erhalten und wurde vermutlich um weitere Informationen gebeten, die er vermutlich nicht geliefert hat. Bitte sprich möglichst den Rechteinhaber an den Bildern nochmal darauf an, und lass ihn gern die Freigabe erneut senden. --Krd 17:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Ich werde ihn anschreiben; bitte den Absatz hier stehen lassen, da ich ihm einen Link senden werde. Schönen Abend wünscht Friedo (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

VRT generator

Hi, do you have time to do these fixes in the VRT generator? -> Commons_talk:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator#c-Jeff_G.-20221126231400-Kaganer-20221111112000

Maybe @Jarekt: can set the matter. Otherwise, I can do it this week or the next one, but I need temporarly IA rights. Cheers, Ruthven (msg) 09:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

I will look as soon as possible, but I will be quite busy the next days, so maybe not before Sunday afternoon. Krd 09:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Sadly I have no clue where this has to be fixed. --Krd 07:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Al Bayt Stadium.jpg

Hi. I'd like to kindly ask you to undo your action of deleting File:Al Bayt Stadium.jpg. The deletion did not reach a consensus that it was a FoP violation and I disagree with the nominator's assessment, followed by you, of it not being own work. The file actually contained EXIF data showing the clear chronology of the picture being created and prepared for upload here. Tvx1 (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

After having looked into it again, I think you are right. I have restored the image. Thank you for pointing out! --Krd 13:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Stop Nzs9 (talk) 19:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Löschung von File:El Gigante 2.jpg

Du hast diese Aufnahme gelöscht, obschon ich mit dem Künstler in Kontakt über die ordnungsgemässe Freigabe bin. Ich habe dies in der Löschdiskussion erwähnt. Gestern habe ich ihm deswegen wiederum ein Mail geschrieben. Die Kommunikation mit Guatemala und seine Unerfahrenheit mit Wikimedia verzögerten den Ablauf. Ich finde. Admins sollten etwas mehr Geduld haben. BBCLCD (talk) 20:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo BBCLCD. Die Dateien werden wiederhergestellt, sobald die Freigabe vorliegt. Bis dahin ist es eine Urheberrechtsverletzung. --Krd 03:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

AR-ANH-OL-3-260.jpg and AR-ANH-OL-3-267.jpg

Hi! We forgot to add the license to this files: File:AR-ANH-OL-3-260.jpg and File:AR-ANH-OL-3-267.jpg, they are bot telegrams from 1896 and 1898 in the public domain. Could you restore them, so i add the proper license? Thanks! Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 04:13, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Deleted image of Dragan Dimcic

Hello @Krd, I am Gorana Gomirac, GLAM Manager at Wikimedia Serbia and I have been coordinating Wikipedian in residence projects in Serbia. In one of the projects recently, Wikipedian in residence at the Faculty of Dramatic Arts, you have deleted one photo (on Decembar 9th) that we delivered permission for (on December 7th). The photo was called File:Dragan Dimčić.jpg and the ticket number is #2022120710012357. Can you please tell me why it was deleted? Thank you in advance! Gorana Gomirac (VMRS) (talk) 12:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Gorana Gomirac. good question, obviously this was a mistake. The file is now restored. --Krd 14:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Request for undeletion

Dear Krd, could you undelete these following files, please?

I'm currently taking a look at the incoming email in the system regarding these files. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Please say the ticket number. --Krd 15:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Here it is: ticket:2022120710006819. Related deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rancak Dilabuah.pdf. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I don't see much overlap between the DR and this list, and in the ticket there is no list at all. This would have been better discussed at VRT wiki, because the next question is why the ticket covers these files, and the answer should not be posted here. --Krd 16:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I understand that, but there is the list of the files connected in the email attachment ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I missed the second page of the document. Anyway that's not machine readble, so my tool to restore them with two click doesn't work. *sigh* --Krd 16:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done --Krd 16:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Neural picture deletion

You deleted this file, so I want to know why all of these files was kept: Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/08/06#File:Bathingbayc_a_mechanical_dove_by_beeple_low_camera_angle_cute_2daa1f69-e280-45d0-956d-8b89208ac53e_(cropped).png and below. I'm pinging an admin who made this decisions: user:Mdaniels5757. MBH 18:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

I deleted this file when I read something about -nc- in the terms of use of the source site, but reading it again maskes me think that the file should be restored if the uploader has a paid account there, which should be clarified. What Do you think? --Krd 05:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
As you can read on discussion from my link, this files was kept because AI-generated images doesn't protected by copyright at all, as stated in Template:PD-algorithm. Is this template provides wrong information and must be deleted?
"Keep. Note that all previous nominations for MidJourney, DALL-E, Craiyon and DALL-E 2 images have closed "keep" on consensus that the output of computer programs is ineligible for copyright (i.e. that's why they are {{PD-algorithm}}). JPxG (обсуждение) 00:39, 8 августа 2022 (UTC+7)" MBH 03:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
I cannot say that I disagree, but if it is not copyrighted, then nobody will be able to put it under a cc-by-sa license. If have restored the file, please add the correct license template to it. --Krd 09:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Scott Schwab official photo.jpg

Hello, I sent a message to the KS Secretary of State’s office office and they advised they’ve sent an email with permission this morning. Are you about to check that for me? Thanks, Corky 18:35, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Of course, it will be checked at it's turn. --Krd 05:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:57, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Pictures deleted

Hello @Krd, you deleted some pictures from my article about father Jose Maria Arizmendiarrieta. The 11th of June of 2021, I asked for permission to use them to the Arizmendiarrieta Christian Foundation, and some days later they sent me a written response certifying that "The same day that you requested authorization for the use of photographs from our website, we left a message on your telephone answering machine, indicating that you can count on our authorization." My question is: what should I do to get restored the pictures? Thanks in advance for your help, best regards-- Iñazio Irizar (talk) 17:12, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

We need files permissions by e-mail as described in COM:VRT. Anything else is not possible. --Krd 09:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Template Freigabe

Hallo und Sorry für Störung. Da du {{Permission received}} aber gebaut hast: Ich hatte neue Bilder hochgeladen und das Amt für Kulturgüter hat eine Freigabemail gesendet. Mir dauerte das etwas lange und Ich hab auf der Hilfeseite mal nachgefragt. Ich hab den Text nur mit dem Parameter, dass das in der Warteschleife ist - keine Probleme benannt. Das ist ja automatisch? Ein Missverständnis scheint, dass die 30 Tage auch für die Warteschleife gelten? Machen kann/muss ich ja jetzt nix? Ich lese da eher, dass das nur gilt, wenn ICH innert 30 Tagen auf eine Bearbeitung eines Agenten nicht reagiere. Eventuell könnte man in dem Fall, dass das nur wartet, den unteren Text noch weglassen und nur sagen, dass es wartet? Vielleicht noch, wie lange ungefähr. Erst wenn eine konkrete Frage kommt, also der Parameterwert nicht 1 ist, sollte man auf die 30-Tage-Frist aufmerksam machen? Verstehst du, was ich als Unbeleckter meine und verstehe? Aber das mit den ganzen Bildern ist kompliziert genug…--Meginrat (talk) 11:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Meginrat. Die Bilder werden gelöscht, wenn nach 30 Tagen keine Freigabe erfolgreich bestätigt ist, und werden wiederherstellt, wenn die Freigabe komplett ist. Das Support-Team hat keine Ressourcen, irgendwelche Zwischenstände zu dokumentieren. In der Regel liegt die löschung daran, dass der Einsender der Freigabe nicht auf Rückfragen reagiert. --Krd 11:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
danke, auf der Hilfeseite hat jetzt jemand die Probleme genannt, die ich aber nur halb verstehe. Wir haben uns eine Mail gesucht und die ausgefüllt und das Amt (keine Ahnung von Wikipedia) hat die gesendet. Nun ist unklar, ob die das dem Amt rückgemeldet haben und was die genau tun sollen. Sprich müssen das Amt als Rechteinhaber UND der Fotograf eine Mail senden und reicht EXIF für das Datum nicht? Ich würde die Mails vorbereiten, der nächste Schuss sollte dann aber sitzen. Danke. --Meginrat (talk) 12:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Wichtiger als eine gute Vorbereitung ist, dass Rückfragen beantwortet werden. --Krd 12:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
OK, bisher haben wir aber keine gehabt (die Frau vom Amt hat Weihnachtsurlaub, falls da was eingegangen wäre). Das heute kam ja nur nach Intervention. Es wäre schon gut, wenn der Uploader auch informiert wird. Die Diskussion auf der Hilfeseite ging weiter. Im Kern läuft es wohl darauf hinaus, dass auch der Fotograf die Freigabe erteilen muss. Dass ist machbar. Die ganzen inhaltlichen Fragen auch auf commons einzuarbeiten wie gewünscht mag schön sein. Aber ich wüsste gar nicht, wo und wie (nur der Uploadassistent hatte mehr Felder). Für mich steht auch aus Zeitgründen im Mittelpunkt, in WP einen gut bebilderten Artikel zu der Kapelle zu haben. Commons sollte da keine "Konkurrenz" anstreben. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meginrat (talk • contribs) 13:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Wir optimieren die Prozesse im Support über die Gesamtmenge der Vorgänge und nicht auf jeden einzelnen. Solange die Kommunikation im Ticket stattfindet, wird alles gut werden. Diskussionen auf Hilfeseiten sind eher nicht zielführend. --Krd 14:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Hab mir auch überlegt, ob das der richtige Ort ist. Zumal wenn das dann so gemacht wurde, das man das dazu findet. Wie kann man aber als gewöhnlicher User im Ticket kommunizieren? Auf der Hilfeseite ist es ja abgeschlossen und ich werde in die mail von dem Fotografen oder dem Amt den Link darauf als Hinweis einbauen. Ihr dürft bei allem die Anfängerperspektive nicht aus dem Auge verlieren. Es hat mich schon an Verständnisgrenzen geführt.--Meginrat (talk) 14:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Nochmal: Falls der Einsender der Freigabe eine Rückfrage erhalten hat, ist das in aller Regel eine sehr einfach Frage, die man einfach beantworten kann. Es hilft absolut nichts, ihm dazu noch etwas zu erklären. Einzig entscheidend ist, dass er antwortet.
Im Vorgang involviert bleibt man, indem man dem Rechteinhaber nicht nur schreibt "Bitte senden Sie … an …", sondern auch "bitte nehmen Sie mich in Kopie." --Krd 18:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Die Rückfrage an das Amt war so einfach, dass die das selber schon beantwortet haben. Vermutlich hast du recht, dass die die Rechteinhaber nicht zu sehr stressen wollen. In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft ;-) Danke für die moralische Unterstützung. --Meginrat (talk) 13:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
DANKE für Deinen Einsatz! Alles ist gut, die Permissions sind da. Du kannst das nun erlen. So können wir den Artikel denen doch noch zu Weihnachten schenken. --Meginrat (talk) 16:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

File:20171023-FAS-PJK-040 TONED 1 (37857517892).jpg

Hi, this photo was reviewed by the Flickr review bot. See source here: https://flickr.com/photos/41284017@N08/37857517892 Joofjoof (talk) 00:43, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi. The photo didn't contain a valid license tag. --Krd 08:00, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:00, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Jesus Torres at Hull House Kilns (1927)

Hello, @Krd: I was working on the page for Jesus Torres for a class, and the photo I uploaded from the University of Illinois at Chicago Jane Addams Hull House Collection was removed, due to a lack of clear copyright. I therefore have two questions:

1) If I wait until January 1, 2023, would that image (pub. 1927) enter the public domain?

2) If not, should I contact the UIC Special Collections Library and have them sort the copyright out? As I understand it "all non-commercial use" is insufficient, correct?

Update: I just found out that I uploaded it from a different username (TCMcGrath), which is also me. Sorry for that confusion. The file used to be at: — Preceding unsigned comment added by TCMcG (talk • contribs) 02:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Jesus_Torres_at_Hull-House_Kilns_(1927).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

Thanks very much, Tom McGrath TCMcG (talk) 01:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Non-Commercial is not sufficient. Created is different that published. I'm not sure if the image will be PD in 2023, I currently see no reason for that. --Krd 04:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Fair enough. Thanks for the response. I've moved on to requesting more information from UIC Special Collections. Happy Holidays! TCMcG (talk) 01:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Picture Robin L'Houmeau deleted

Dear @Krd, Last December 14th, you deleted the picture File:Robin L'Houmeau, autoportrait.jpg because there was no permission but he had sent his permission to the email adress permission-commons@wikimedia.org on December 7th. This picture had been upload for that pedagocigal project: https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Projets_p%C3%A9dagogiques/C%C3%A9gep_de_l%27Abitibi-T%C3%A9miscamingue#Automne_2022 Is it still possible to put it back or do we have to upload it again? Erbvdat (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

If the image is still deleted, the permission likely has not been achieved yet. Please ask the copyright holder to send the permission again. There is no need to upload the iamge again. --Krd 18:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Dan Pyle - West Hollywood Porsche 2018.jpg

Hallo Krd,

IgorU wundert sich, warum die Datei gelöscht wurde, er schrieb an den Lokalen Raum in Berlin (WikiBär) und fragte, ob ihm jemand helfen könne. Kannst Du nachvollziehen, welche Informationen fehlten? Kann er die noch nachreichen? Grizma (talk) 17:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Grizma. Der Benutzer hat eine Nachricht aus seiner Diskussionsseite. Was genau ist ihm unklar? --Krd 17:40, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, geht es darum, dass er keine Freigabe des Urhebers an Permissions übersandt hatte oder fehlte noch mehr/etwas anderes? Es ist für Einsteiger nicht immer leicht, die Anforderungen nachzuvollziehen. Ich erkläre es ihm gerne, aber dazu brauche ich etwas Hintergrund. --Grizma (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Das ist leider schwer zu sagen. Es gibt im Support jeden Tag hunderte Vorgänge, viele davon ohne Angabe, worum es überhaupt geht; wir können also nicht sinnvoll suchen. Der Rechteinhaber möchte bitte die Freigabe senden und dann auf Rückfragen reagieren. Krd 12:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

File:押川方義(左)本田庸一(右).jpg

Did you delete this by accident? It survived a deletion request earlier this month and I do not see any no permission tag in the page history. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Wait, I see the no permission tag now. A couple of editors were edit-warring it in and out. In any case, it did survive the DR so it should probably be undeleted. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Restored and reverted. Thank you for pointing out! --Krd 05:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

File:押川方義(左)本田庸一(右).jpg

明治学院歴史資料館の小杉さんと話してるんですか？私は事前に了解を得て掲載しました。 直接明治学院に出向き了解を得て投稿した画像を削除した。ブルーメンタールさん貴方の独断をあたかも法規に見せかけて削除した貴方の悪意はこれで今、明らかになった。即刻、再生なさい。 かんがくたろう (talk) 07:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Unable to read this language, sorry. --Krd 07:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Gelöschte Files auf Commons

Hallo @Krd,

vor einigen Tagen wurden ein paar Bilder zum Theater in Magdeburg gelöscht. Mich würde der genau Grund interessieren, da manche der Dateien schon recht lang auf Commons vorhanden waren. (z.B. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schauspielhaus_Theater_Magdeburg_.jpg)

Viele Grüße Bildersindtoll (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Bildersindtoll. Die Bilder wurden gelöscht, weil keine Freigabe durch den Fotografen vorliegt. Siehe: COM:VRT. --Krd 12:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Undeleting cropped Yvonne Rust photo

Could you possibly undelete File:Yvonne Rust potting 1974 Caffyn (cropped).jpg? It's an extracted image of File:Yvonne Rust potting 1974 Caffyn.jpg created with CropTool, so should inherit its permissions, but it looks like this didn't happen. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 07:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 10:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Photographs of full bottles

Hi, The files in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Big Red bottle.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/2021 Pepsi Blue bottles were deleted "per nomination"? Should we not apply the established consensus to keep such images per the Ets-Hokin court case? -- Asclepias (talk) 13:59, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Please provide details about the case. --Krd 14:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Violation of Copyright?

good morning Krd, I want to kindly ask you the reason why you removed the images I have posted on the page I am working on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silly_Mountain_(Arizona) on the section "Gallery" for "copyright violation". I think it is a mistake, all the images I posted about Silly mountain have the proper permission since I personally got in touch with the owner of the photos I posted and we followed precisely the copyright protocol. Team5DTMaddalena (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

The problem is not with the photos but with what is depicted in them. They show signs which themselves are copyright protected but no permission is achievable. Perhaps the images can be used directly in the English Wikipedia per Fair Use rationale. --Krd 15:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

File:東北學院 Masayoshi Oshikawa,.jpg

2022年12月24日 (土) 08:11 Krd トーク 投稿記録 がページ「File:東北學院 Masayoshi Oshikawa,.jpg」を削除しました (No permission since 6 December 2022)

同じ画像を有する事前に学校法人東北学院の東北学院史歴史資料センターの 学校法人東北学院の阿部理事の了解を得て 個人アルバムから転写した画像である。 全く問題がない。さらに画像を有効利用する目的で東北学院の賛同を得ている。 即刻、再生されたい！ かんがくたろう (talk) 18:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

See: COM:VRTS --Krd 19:00, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

同じ画像を有する事前に学校法人東北学院の東北学院史歴史資料センターの 学校法人東北学院の阿部理事の了解を得て 個人アルバムから転写した画像である。 全く問題がない。さらに画像を有効利用する目的で東北学院の賛同を得ている。 即刻、再生されたい！ かんがくたろう (talk) 19:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Parrot (Digital Art).jpg

Deletion process is asking me to "please contact the user who kept it before re-nominating", apropos of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parrot (Digital Art).jpg. I must have been unable to find the exact image URL last time, but trying again I can track it down to https://i.natgeofe.com/n/e3ae5fbf-ddc9-4b18-8c75-81d2daf962c1/3948225_3x4.jpg if that's not a dynamic URL - you will notice the feathers along the back of the bird's neck have the same silhouette. Belbury (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

I'd appreciate if you could put that into the deletion request. --Krd 05:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

File:GRCLogoOnly Purple&White Solid.png

Could you elaborate what you meant by: "No permission since December"?

Looking at Github the file appears to be licensed under CC0. Nathanielcwm (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Looks like it was previously licensed under CC BY-SA which is still allowed afaik. Nathanielcwm (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
There was a google drive link given as source, and the image is likely not own work of the uploader. At the Github link i see only the programm code to be CC-0, but there is no logo mentioned. Please advise. --Krd 15:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
I believe that this is the same file as what was on commons. Nathanielcwm (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Yes. --Krd 05:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted images of Washington and Stone Bridges

Hello. You deleted 8 images of these bridges on 10 December due to lack of permission received. While I understand they can't remain indefinitely, the copyright holder's representative, who also approved File:Stone Bridge - RI.jpg, had told me he approved these on 17 November using the VRT Release Generator. I was not aware of a time-limit after which the images would be deleted without warning and, instead, thought the VRT was just very busy. Obviously, I cannot expect you to consider them as approved based solely on this message but, if he resubmits the approval, can they then be restored? Waz8 (talk) 04:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Please advise the ticket number, or please ask the copyrright holder to send the permission again. Krd 05:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
He did not receive a ticket number but will resubmit a release for this batch as well as the ones I uploaded on 16 November, which were recently deleted. Can you determine whether a release e-mail was received for File:Sakonnet River Bridge during construction.jpg? I uploaded this and 8 others on 1 December, and he says he approved them on 8 December via the Release Generator. I have no insight as to whether their permission is still pending due to the current backlog (14 days per the VRT Noticeboard) or the release e-mail was never received, acknowledged, or filtered as spam. Thank you in advance. Waz8 (talk) 03:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Should I post this to the VRT Noticeboard instead? Waz8 (talk) 05:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
There is no backlog. They either have got an answer, or the e-mail was not received. Krd 15:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
We were unable to determine what happened with the previous e-mails, but the copyright holder's representative has informed me that he will resubmit a release for all of these images. Thanks for the reply; you can consider this thread closed. Waz8 (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

VRTS templates

Hi, I need your IA powers! Can you please fix this request? Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 10:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Sadly I don't have enozgh time in the next days. Would you be able to fix this with temporary IA rights? --Krd 10:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, yes, I was thinking about this second solution. Temporary AI rights would be fine (say 1 week? hoping that I've time in the next days myself) Thanks Ruthven (msg) 14:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done --Krd 14:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi again. What have we decided to do with MediaWiki:Grouppage-OTRS-member? --Ruthven (msg) 09:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't think there was any decision, but I think this should be moved to MediaWiki:Grouppage-VRT-permissions-agent and the content changed to Commons:Global VRT group. But I'm not 100% sure. --Krd 10:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
OK, I write an email about this. There's still OTRS-stuff in the Mediawiki namespace, but the next 2 weeks will be quite busy for me. I'll ask for IA rights again later to complete the job, if it's not an issue. Ruthven (msg) 13:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Please advise: Is this resolved? (I sadly cannot follow any more what exactly it was about.) Krd 11:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I'd completely forgot that :)
According to this search, there might be some fixes that still need to be done. Ruthven (msg) 14:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Bot didn't close DR

Hello!

Why didn't Krdbot close Commons:Deletion requests/User:Pascal666/vector.js? Jonteemil (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

I think this is written only for files. --Krd 16:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Aha, maybe it can be updated to find all namespaces? Unless it's too much of a trouble.Jonteemil (talk) 06:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
That would be some amount of work, and I currently think it's not worth the effort. Let's reevaluate if it happens frequently. --Krd 08:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Probably not frequent in non-file namespaces, nvm then if it's some amount of work.Jonteemil (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Let's put this on the backburner, I'm not sure if I see all possible side effects. --Krd 04:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krd/archive/2022&oldid=865976968"