User talk:Alan/Archivos/2014 03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Bienvenidos a mi archivo de discusión (mar 2014)

Welcome to my discussion archive (mar 2014)





Before marking files suspected as copyvios

[edit]

please always check for dates; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Akt-landschaft-2007-14.jpg regarding File:Akt-landschaft-2007-14.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 13:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alan, This is my first time that I participate in such a discussion in Commons. I would like to understand how long its take to close such a discussion and how it is done. In He:wiki we have another mechanism. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hanay. This a special and delicate case. The only ones who can dictate the norm is the WMF.
Following the conference call WMIL, WMES, WMAR <-> WMF (yesterday?) we just wait to see what they decide.
Currently there are no closing date. I'm sorry. --Alan (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I hope it wiil be soon. Hanay (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alan, did you see YWelinder (WMF) clrification in Talk:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge on 03:39, 14 March 2014 ? I think it can help you to close the discussion. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 17:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reading. Thnaks for the advice :-) --Alan (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Faltas de respeto

[edit]

Hola Alan, espero que estés bien. He dejado aquí una queja sobre el usuario Fry1989, quien me ha faltado al respeto y se dedica a acosarme en mis aportaciones, aparte de continuas faltas de etiqueta y modificaciones sin fuentes, llevando a cabo guerras de ediciones. No sé si es el sitio correcto. El caso es que ningún administrador ha contestado todavía. Un saludo cordial. --Echando una mano (talk) 22:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Echando una mano. No se muy bien de qué trata el tema ya que estoy muy liado con asuntos "de la vida real", pero si no ha respondido nadie, entiendo que se está tratando el asunto. Las decisiones no siempre las toma un administrador de forma idependiente al momento, también buscamos el consenso entre varios para ser más justos. Ten paciencia. Un saludo, --Alan (talk) 23:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por tu respuesta. Un saludo. --Echando una mano (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Alan: Al final ha sido archivada automáticamente la denuncia sin sanción. Lo que no sabía es que en Commons se permitía insultar y faltar al respeto sin problemas ni consecuencias. ¿O solo depende del usuario? Un saludo, --Echando una mano (talk) 22:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hola. No se qué habrán decidido, no estoy al tanto estos días. Lo que si te puedo indicar es que no se trata a nadie de forma especial, mira su registro de bloqueos y lo comprenderás. Te recomiendo preguntes a algún administrador que ha tomado parte en este caso, yo no te puedo decir nada más ya que no lo se. Un saludo. --Alan (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Alan: Gracias por tu respuesta pero, lamentablemente, no puedo preguntar a ningún administrador porque ninguno se ha implicado en el asunto; parece que se le está dando un trato de favor al dicho usuario dejando correr el tema. Un saludo. --Echando una mano (talk) 22:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Solo para que veas de lo que te hablo: Aquí han bloqueado, a instancias suyas, a otro editor durante un mes por algo muchísimo más leve que lo que yo denuncié. Un saludo. --Echando una mano (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vue

[edit]

Bonjour, Vous avez renommé le fichier «File:Coubertin interieur vue du fond.jpg» en «File:Coubertin interieur vu du fond.jpg» [1]. Cela me semble être une erreur. En effet, en regardant la photographie, on constate qu'il s'agit d'une vue du fond de la salle. La photographie montre le fond. De la même façon, «File:Courbertin interieur vue de l'entrée.jpg» est une vue de l'entrée. Il s'agit du nom «vue», pas du participe «vu». On peut aussi comparer au fichier «File:Coubertin vue extérieure 01.jpg», qui est une vue extérieure du stade. Le téléverseur a vraisemblablement utilisé le nom «vue» de la même manière pour ces fichiers téléversés le même jour. «Coubertin interieur vue du fond» n'est évidemment pas une phrase. Il s'agit d'une vue du fond de l'intérieur du stade Pierre-de-Coubertin Coubertin. Apparemment, la logique du titre du fichier comporte trois niveaux de précision, du général au particulier, dans le sens suivant : Coubertin, intérieur, vue du fond. Votre changement de titre fait dire à celui-ci le contraire de ce que montre la photo. Cela dit, si vous estimez utile de modifier le nom du fichier, il pourrait y avoir plusieurs autres choix possibles, mais pas celui que vous avez utilisé. On pourrait aussi en profiter pour corriger le mot «intérieur». Cordialement, -- Asclepias (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Alan/Archivos,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COM:A

[edit]

Hola Alan, podrías modificar esta página. Está protegida, y no puedo remover a INeverCry de la lista.Pidió su revocación del permiso y fue aceptada por los steward. Te puedes encargar. Gracias de antemano ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 22:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Actualizados 3 listados de admins, 2 de checkusers y añadido a la lista de antiguos administradores. Alan (talk) 22:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LR

[edit]

Hola Alan, Cómo puedes hacer eso. ¿Cómo puedes aceptar/revisar varias licencias a la vez. Usas un programa semi-automático como VCF?. Saludos ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 18:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Eso está hecho a mano. Si te fijas hay patrones de grupos. Abres bastantes, abres sus fuentes y las revisas todas juntas. Las cierras y marcas todas las revisadas seguidas. Es la forma más rápida de revisar imágenes en masa. A parte, las imágenes coreanas comparten una misma fuente entre varias, lo que lo convierte en algo muy sencillo. Alan (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 18:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tema de licencias (validez)

[edit]

Hola Alan, soy el usuario que subió el archivo de Clanes Vascones.png. El tema de la licencia la he preguntado en el Café. Me están resolviendo la duda, en poco lo arreglaré.

Un saludo. - Lector d Wiki Zer? 19:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request

[edit]

To close it like that is pretty easy. Even you share my opinion I want to ask you why the file should not be restored. Some of the points are next complee nonesense to me and no one did take some time for a short explanation why it should be that way. How can there be a real "consensus to restore" if there is no conversation. The arguments get dropped on the page and if I try to share my view, nobody replys and that is considered no consensus. Only four people dropped their thoughts so far. So why closing it?
Since the de minimis and main object part seems to be up to the objective view of the individual viewer and there is no real law that restricts the image tell me why I shouldn't reopen the discussion till the internet breaks down or undelete the file myself. From my point of view this is a case of misinterpreting Commons and other/international law.
May you have the time to explain to me the view points I mentioned in my reopening --D-Kuru (talk) 02:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. See Jim's explanation. Regards, --Alan (talk) 12:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional flag issue

[edit]

Being one of the users involved in my DsR on fictional flags, please have a look at User:Antemister/Fictional flag issue for a general discussion on that topic.--Antemister (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would like to LR it, but cannot find it on the source webpage given. Help?    FDMS  4    15:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@FDMS4: Source fixed. --Alan (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, ✓ Done. Could you grant me rollbacker rights BTW?    FDMS  4    15:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Granted, please read the guideline. --Alan (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]