User talk:Alan/Archivos/2014 01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Archivo de discusiones
Archivos (Archives)
→ Archivo actual | agosto de 2024

Bienvenidos a mi archivo de discusión (ene 2014)

Welcome to my discussion archive (jan 2014)





File:Jardín de niños.jpg

[edit]

Hello. I answered in the discussion.--Samaniego123 (talk) 23:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I lied. All I wanted was to have a picture but I can not take a picture. My sincerest apologies. Also the second picture is a violation of copyright. I will accept the consequences.--Samaniego123 (talk) 23:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On deleting File:Sabhan Adam Portrait.jpeg

[edit]

How come the file is deleted only 4 minutes after it is nominated for deletion (and I get notified about it)? Shouldn't there be some time frame to allow the user to fix the situation! I mean... 4 minutes?!

I am going to re-upload it and put some clarification in the talk page.

Please, in the future, give a realistic time frame that is longer than 4 minutes, between your message and deleting the file, to allow anyone to fix the situation, we are users not bots. Aularon (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.
Image was tagged with {{Copyvio}} (Speedy deletion) as copyright violation from sabhanadam.com. Read Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion and Commons:Deletion policy. A violation of copyright can not be solved nor hosted on Commons, COM:L.
Regards, --Alan (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalismo

[edit]

He visto que has revertido lo que ayer corregí. No conozco las reglas de la comunidad... y sólo uso mi sentido común que por su propia naturaleza debería coincidir con el tuyo... (por eso de común). Creo que es una falta de etiqueta llamar vándalo a alguien que hizo lo que yo hice: corregir la muy deficiente redacción de algo... para que el próximo que lo leyera... comprendiera mejor --RodRuzVal (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Corregir un comentario de una persona en una zona no enciclopédica o principal de un proyecto, el café en este caso, no es una buena práctica, es considerado entre otras una falta a la etiqueta (para muchos una falta de educación o respeto). Sería comparable a corregir a alguien en una conversación amigable en la calle por decir algo mal. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ACER ONE D255 - 1.JPG

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ACER ONE D255 - 1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ACER ONE D255 - 1.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 16:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

[edit]
Gute Verbesserungen
Moin Alan, Vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe passende Namen für den Fotos zu finden. Tschüß Ra Boe watt?? 16:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COM:RFR

[edit]

I think you might be interested in this. I knew why that lorem ipsum came out already. I typed the wordings I typed that time while requesting file mover right to my sandbox and those came out. That was my 2nd test just now. I think lorem ipsum will come out for requests that uses that '{{subst:rfr|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|reason}} Thank you. ~~~~' code and inside that reason that uses bracket links ([link description]). I knew what happened already. Thanks. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WTF? O_O Alan (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Shall I raise this matter at ANI? Jianhui67 talk★contribs 17:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please. Alan (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I already raised that matter at the administrators' noticeboard. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 18:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all! Cheers, Alan (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wapenschild Hulst.svg

[edit]

The only page where it was used has been deleted. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Deleted. Alan (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Una pregunta a destiempo

[edit]

Hola Alan, espero que estes bien.

Resulta que hace más de un año me puse a enviar solicitudes de peticiones de fotos en Flickr para usar en el proyecto, enviándoles solicitudes a varios usuarios; algunos me respondieron otros no, otros se negaron a ceder sus fotos y sólo uno envió el formulario a Commons de manera formar (ya conoces ese caso). El caso es que los que me respondieron positivamente para darme el permirso de utilizar sus fotos lo hicieron informalmenete y sin enviar el formulario a Commons. Entonces, qué se hace en estos casos. Al parecer a ellos les resulta algo tedioso enviar el formulario o no sé qué será, espero tu respuesta, saludos.--Inefable001 (talk) 08:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! Para darlo por válido debe ser el propio titular de los derechos quien mande una autorización a OTRS. Si te lo remiten a ti y tu lo reenvías no se da por válido ya que en el pasado se abusó de este sistema falsificando los correos, y como es evidente generó más de un problema.
Respecto a si es el modelo exacto de la plantilla o no; tampoco es tan njecesario siempre y cuando se expecifiquen las siguientes cosas:;
Origen de las fotos, documentos, .... de forma clara (URL exacta)
Que se quiere liberar bajo una licencia válida en Commons sin limitar su uso.
Por ejemplo esto sería válido parea un usuario de Flickr:
Como titular de los derechos autorizo a publicar todas las imágenes contenidas en la cuenta de usuario de Flickr Pepito12345 (https://www.flickr.com/usuario/Pepito123456) bajo la licencia CC-BY-SA 3.0 (Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Compartir Igual 3.0).
Esto es un texto muy simple pero como norma lo solemos dar por bueno. No obstante es recomendable utilizar la plantilla parea evitar problemas futuros.
Un saludo, --Alan (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por responder. Pues entonces no valen de nada los mensajes de ellos que tengo en mi bandeja de entrada de Flickr diciendome que no hay problema y que puedo utilizar las fotos dondales los créditos correspondientes, qué pena. Hace tiempo le reenvié un mensaje a algunos de ellos para que lo hicieran formalmente mediane OTRS, pero todavía hasta la fecha no me responden. Esas peticiones las envié cuando yo no conocía bien el proceso de envío de formulario a OTRS y por eso me apena perder esas otras fuentes de imágenes que servirían mucho. Ahora me da apuros volver a escribirles para lo mismo, pero quizás intente en otra ocasión y espero no pasar por molestoso jeje. Pues nada, y gracias por todo. Saludos.--Inefable001 (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Por volverles a contactar no creo que se molesten. Por intentarlo no pierdes nada creo yo. --Alan (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, puede que me atreva a pedirles que envien el formulario otra vez. Muchas gracias.--Inefable001 (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido de revisión

[edit]

Hola estimado Alan. Hacia ya un buen tiempo que no pasaba por aquí a saludarte. Bueno, junto con el saludo quería pedirte si puedes revisar un caso. Desafortunadamente ya es un poco tarde y bueno, mañana salgo de casa así que no podré hacerlo yo. Se trata de las contribuciones del usuario Ezekiel7. Me parece que algunas de sus contribuciones son tomadas de sitios como este. En OTRS reportaron un caso, y al ver en Webarchive.org, vi que quien denunciaba en el ticket tenía razón. Además vi que al usuario ya le habían borrado algún archivo, por lo que mejor sería curarse en salud. En fin, espero que pases bien y aprovecho un poco tarde para desearte un feliz 2014. Un saludo, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 05:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Hola! Lo reviso mañana a ver. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 22:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bueno, finalmente he tenido tiempo de revisar este caso y esto es lo que encontré.
No sé si debo revisar las otras imágenes.
Algunas imágenes como File:Evolución de la población en Casariche (1847-2011).png quizás no violen derechos de autor, al ser formas simples o texto, pero digo quizás, pues no sé si haya otras razones que apliquen. Pero en lo que concierne a fotos y demás, es obvio que todas las imágenes subidas por este usuario infringen derechos de autor y deben ser eliminadas. Un saludo, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 17:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
@Jmvkrecords, Me acabo de dar cuenta de... Se me olvidó.... :( Voy a ello ahora y te cuento algo. --Alan (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Este tema lo he acabado zanjando con un borrado masivo; foto que revisaba -> violación de copyright. Así que en virtud de COM:PRP, he borrado todas sus contribuciones excepto una que está claramente en dominio público. Y de paso una semana de bloqueo para reflexionar. --Alan (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por la ayuda con los botones. Un abrazo, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 21:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

confirmation of permission for file uploaded for none-user

[edit]

Dear Alan, You have reverted my query on the OTRS/Noticeboard where I hoped to find help with my problem with permissions. I'd be grateful if you let someone less experienced (or even dumb) know what was wrong and how to mend it. Thanks for your patience. --Julius Eugen (talk) 16:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your query has not been eliminated, there continues. Alan (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erwin Pfrang.jpg

[edit]

Please add a license tag according to the OTRS permission you added. --Denniss (talk) 16:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm out. I've reverted my change. I'll check when I get back. I have seen a small problem. Cheers. Alan (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"no license" and OTRS-pending templates

[edit]

Regarding this file mentioned in this discussion, should summarily-delete-after-date templates like {{No license}} be on the same page as a legitimately- and recently-applied {{OTRS pending}}? I was under the understanding that the mere presence of an properly-used OTRS pending template that hadn't been processed yet (or which was "on hold") meant that the page should generally not be deleted for any issue that the OTRS permission, once received, will likely resolve. Was I mis-informed? Davidwr (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It remains with the template but have not deleted when appropriate (7 days later). --Alan (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re: your close & delete of File:Man performing Autofellatio.jpg

[edit]

the link you provided DOES NOT WORK, please provide proper source information for the alleged copyvio?

Lx 121 (talk) 09:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lx 121. Fixed (Google link worked fine). I removed the result of Google Images and I put 4 direct (previous in date, 2013 vs 2014) links. Cheers. --Alan (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

otrs:2014012710012079

[edit]

I realize that the contents of the ticket are confidential, but simply deleting an image by citing the ticket certainly counts as the opposite of transparent. At the very least, would it have been possible to open a deletion request instead? Considering you only deleted one image citing this ticket, it leads me to believe that this is a copyvio claim or something? Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 03:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Howcheng, This is an email claiming use without permission (provides evidences). I did not realize adding more information deleted, sorry. I've restored and to be sure, I sought the opinion of another OTRS agent. After reviewing it I entered a Doubt. Cheers. --Alan (talk) 07:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SUL request at th wiki

[edit]

Hi. Your SUL request at th wiki has been processed. You can now merge the "Alan" account at th wiki. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Lerdsuwa. --Alan (talk) 18:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alan/Archivos/2014_01&oldid=115396750"