Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2024.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 2024.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 31 2024 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 05:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

July 31, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: The Friederiken oak in Hasbruch near Hude (Oldenburg district) is supposed to be one of the thousand-year-old oaks. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Donnerschweer Str. 73 in Oldenburg. Cultural heritage monument of Lower Saxony with ID 37460412 --JoachimKohler-HB 04:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Inflorescence of a Oakleaf hydrangea Focus stack of 28 photos.
    --Famberhorst 04:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Cooling water pond Maasvlakte central model M1193 / M1217.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Research design of the new harbor mouth in IJmuiden M526. Part of the project.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bamberg Hauptsmoorwald, railway line, aerial view --Ermell 04:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bamberg Gereuth, railway line and Nürnberger Straße, aerial view --Ermell 04:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bamberg railway line and Nürnberger Straße as well as Bamberger Mälzerei, aerial view --Ermell 04:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bamberg Gereuth, railway line , aerial view --Ermell 04:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forchheimer Straße railway subway in Bamberg, aerial view --Ermell 04:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former Immaculate Conception church in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the Saints Acisclus and Victoria church in Bascara, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window of the Cathedral of Girona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Vincent church in Cardona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Torre de la Minyona in Cardona castle, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gypsum karst spring near Donnersdorf (geotope and natural monument) --Plozessor 03:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forest at the "Falkenberg" mountain near Falkenstein (Donnersdorf) --Plozessor 03:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mill race (side arm of the Itz) near Mürsbach/Rattelsdorf --Plozessor 03:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Backwater of the Main near the II. weir in Schweinfurt --Plozessor 03:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pasture west of Hebendorf --Plozessor 03:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lokma Zamidar Bari --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honey Run Covered Bridge Rebuild 2024 --Frank Schulenburg 02:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honey Run Covered Bridge Rebuild 2024 --Frank Schulenburg 02:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A non-breeding Black-Bellied Plover in the Scarborough Marsh, ME. --Needsmoreritalin 02:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An Eastern Chipmunk with stuffed cheek pouches in Kennebunk, ME. --Needsmoreritalin 02:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Snowy Owl with an American Black Duck in Biddeford, ME.--Needsmoreritalin 02:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Please add more categories of location. --Екатерина Борисова 02:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Paharpur Heritage Cafe --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This needs perspective correction and CA removal (and outside of the center it is quite blurry). --Plozessor 03:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sand dunes and road in Yazyavan natural monument, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Pskem river in Ugom Chatkal National Park, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dahlia in Lomonosov, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lanterns near Zimmerman house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bust of a Roman Emperor in Summer Garden, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horses near Khatgal, Khövsgöl Province, Mongolia --Bgag 02:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horse near Khatgal, Khövsgöl Province, Mongolia --Bgag 02:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yak (Bos grunniens) near Khatgal in Khövsgöl Province, Mongolia --Bgag 02:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline Image is not sharp. --Needsmoreritalin 02:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yak near (Bos grunniens) Khatgal in Khövsgöl Province, Mongolia --Bgag 02:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry. Image is not sharp and overexposed. --Needsmoreritalin 02:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deer stone at Uushgiin Uver, Mongolia --Bgag 02:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rectory on Einsiedlerweg #1, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is tilted (right side is leaning in) and distorted. Might be better to make right side a bit lower ("Transformieren/Neigen" in German PS). --Plozessor 03:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done @Plozessor: Thanks for your review. The objected issue was lifted. —- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South portal of the pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East part of the pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fields to the south backed by snow-capped Zanskar range, Testa, Zanskar, Ladakh --Tagooty 01:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paddy seedlings and hayrick amidst flooded fields, near Kaveri, Mandya district --Tagooty 01:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yedamuri Anicut (check dam), Kaveri river in spate, Mandya district --Tagooty 01:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ornate carved stone column and capital, Nataksala, Padmanabhapuram Palace --Tagooty 01:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Blossoms on Coffea canephora (Robusta coffee), Suntikoppa, Coorg --Tagooty 01:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not sharp enough. Fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 01:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

July 30, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Rock formations in Altyn-Emel national park, Kazakhstan. By User:MariSimonova --Екатерина Борисова 23:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mountaims in Bayanaul National Park, Kazakhstan. By User:Ivan ideia --Екатерина Борисова 23:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Shymbulak ski resort in Medeu national park, Almaty, Kazakhstan. By User:MariSimonova --Екатерина Борисова 23:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Lovely scene. Needs perspective correction to straighten the buildings electric poles --Tagooty 01:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Stream in Medeu national park, Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Екатерина Борисова 23:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Stream in Medeu national park, Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Екатерина Борисова 23:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Uglovaya Arsenalnaya Tower --Юрий Д.К. 19:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Reasonable contrast and sharpness, although the tail at the bottom left is partly cut out, which bugs me a bit. Then again, I honestly did not notice that at first, and it is not like quality images have to be brilliant like the featured ones. FreeMediaKid! 02:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Central Street, Voskresenskoe Settlement - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 18:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harbor seals, Ytri Tunga Beach, Iceland --Jakubhal 18:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Harbor seals, Ytri Tunga Beach, Iceland --Jakubhal 18:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Harbor seals, Ytri Tunga Beach, Iceland --Jakubhal 18:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karasev Street - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 18:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Veränderliche Krabbenspinne (Jungtier) --Romzig 20:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Episcopal Palace in Solsona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 18:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Michael church in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 18:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cloister of the Cathedral of La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 18:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Mary cathedral in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 18:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cal Mossen Andreu in La Seu d'Urgell, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 18:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Range Rover Evoque (L551) in Neu-Ulm --Alexander-93 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Hyundai Ioniq 5 N for sale in Neu-Ulm --Alexander-93 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Justitia, a small detailed statue at the façade of the gebiedshuisje, connected to the schepenhuis en belfry of Aalst. --Jaronax 16:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but it's not sharp.--Tournasol7 18:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A moving parade car during the Carnival of Aalst at night. --Jaronax 16:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Range Rover Evoque (L551) in Neu-Ulm --Alexander-93 15:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tesla Model 3 (2023) in Neu-Ulm --Alexander-93 15:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Range Rover Sport Series III in Neu-Ulm --Alexander-93 15:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Volkswagen Type 1 of ADAC Straßenwacht at Motorworld Munich --MB-one 10:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review The wheels disappear in the harsh shadow. It's a pity. Perhaps it could be brightened up a bit. -- Spurzem 12:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rotorvox CFRP autogyro cell at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 10:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Tractor controls on display at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 10:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Airbus A321 XLR on static display at ILA 2024 --MB-one 10:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review At first glance I thought the plane had two tail units. But that's probably not the case. -- Spurzem 12:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Marmot at Jackdaw hill, Enbekshilder district, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Ivan ideia --Красный 09:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bokter photographed from above. Qonaev city district, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 09:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marmot at Jackdaw hill, Enbekshilder district, Akmola Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Ivan ideia --Красный 09:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jaronax 16:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yurt in Jeti-Oguz sanctuary. Jeti-Oguz District, Issyk-Kul Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Elaman.toktoshev --Красный 09:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 11:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pskem river in upper part. Ugom-Chatkal national park, Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Красный 09:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 11:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New residential tower Karlatornet under construction. --ArildV 09:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clarion Hotel Draken, view from Järntorget. --ArildV 09:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 18:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A boat drifts on the golden waves --Wasiul Bahar 09:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Detail is too low / pixelation --Poco a poco 19:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A boatman --Wasiul Bahar 09:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, it's interesting, and I would love to promote it, but lousy framing (crop on the boat). It is also tilted, and the white balance seems off (too greenish) --Jakubhal 18:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cox's Bazar --Wasiul Bahar 09:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, too much noise --Jakubhal 18:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A dying river --Wasiul Bahar 09:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Serene village --Wasiul Bahar 09:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Arrow III car number 1331 of New Jersey Transit at Princeton (NJT station) --Mike Peel 08:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hobey Baker Memorial Rink, Princeton University --Mike Peel 08:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jadwell Hall, Princeton University --Mike Peel 08:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 19:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MG TC at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: MG TD at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review For QI we should at least see one of the cars completely. Also, the two white cars are a bit too bright above and the middle one too dark at the wheel. -- Spurzem 13:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opel Rocks Extreme in Munich (left) --AuHaidhausen 08:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
     Comment. The roof structure with the house in the background is very difficult to see. A QI should show it more clearly. -- Spurzem 13:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ornamental writing desck in Münchner Residenz --AuHaidhausen 08:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
     Question It is slightly  Underexposed – fixable? --Augustgeyler 13:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Augustgeyler: Good now? I would say QI. -- Spurzem 16:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Floor exercise during finals at the 1st FIG Artistic Gymnastics Junior World Championships 2019 in Győr, Hungary. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Minister-President of the 6th Landtag of Saxony-Anhalt, Reiner Haseloff. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Minister-President of the 6th Landtag of Saxony-Anhalt, Reiner Haseloff. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
     Comment Dust spot on the right. --AuHaidhausen 08:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination  Thank you. I did not notice that. --Augustgeyler 09:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination First recumbent bike from the Czech specialty bicycle manufacturer AZUB (image from 2005). By User:Kareltriska --Augustgeyler 08:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 16:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frauke Heiligenstadt, Lower Saxon politician (SPD) and Culture minister. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mud puddling behavior of Polytremis eltola (Hewitson, 1869) - Yellow-spot Swift. By User:Aniruddha97350 --Atudu 08:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Portal of the St Florian church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looks distorted. Fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 23:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sacred Heart church in Weimar, Thuringia, Germany. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rue Brassat in Aubin, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antigua ciudad de Pompeya, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FreeMediaKid! 02:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antigua ciudad de Pompeya, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow in the Lille Jardin des Plantes, France --Velvet 07:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Wiesenttal valley between Kirchehrenbach and Pretzfeld. Ebermannstadt can be recognised in the distance. Aerial photo. --Ermell 04:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weir and flood barrier gate in Neuses an der Regnitz, aerial view --Ermell 04:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix near Kauernhofen in the district of Forchheim --Ermell 04:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain in Forchheim city park --Ermell 04:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Christoph 20 landing at Bamberg Hospital --Ermell 04:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterloopbos. Research design of the new harbor mouth in IJmuiden M526. Part of the project.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waterloopbos, detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // formerly Delta Flume. (artists RAAAF en Atelier de Lyon)
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Russian Navy guided missile cruiser "Moskva" and Ukrainian Navy corvette Ternopil' -- George Chernilevsky 04:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trunk of "Hun's oak" natural monument near Untermerzbach --Plozessor 03:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow at "Lumpenhügel" ("rascal hill") north of Untereßfeld --Plozessor 03:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: "Fuchsmühlteich" ("fox mill pond") southeast of Schweinshaupten --Plozessor 03:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Agnes Monkelbaan: I had accidentally replaced the file with another one (that is already QI under a different name). Reverted it now, can you please assess the correct image? Thx and sorry! --Plozessor 15:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Populus nigra in "Grabenmühlbach" ("ditch mill stream") protected landscape element near Theres --Plozessor 03:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remote view of pilgrimage church west of Limbach --Plozessor 03:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tetmajera Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tetmajera Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tetmajera Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tetmajera Street in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tetmajera Street in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 03:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cicada killer on a black-eyed susan --Rhododendrites 03:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cicada killer on a black-eyed susan --Rhododendrites 03:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cicada killer on a black-eyed susan --Rhododendrites 03:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern amberwing --Rhododendrites 03:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern-tailed blue --Rhododendrites 03:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jangdokdae with onggi in Naganeupseong Walled Town, Suncheon, South Korea --Bgag 02:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Jinju and Nam River, South Korea --Bgag 02:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, composition. --Tagooty 02:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Jinjuseong Fortress, Jinju, South Korea --Bgag 02:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jagalchi Market in Busan, South Korea --Bgag 02:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of United Nations Memorial Cemetery, Busan, South Korea --Bgag 02:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guest house Zum Kirchen-Wirt on Kirchenstraße #58, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guest house Zum Kirchen-Wirt on Kirchenstraße #58, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Modern exterior with traditional interior, north facade, Testa village --Tagooty 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The upper part of the building looks unsharp and distorted after intense PC or lens distortion. --Augustgeyler 07:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Modern exterior with traditional interior, south facade, Testa village --Tagooty 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Willow and birch trees, Testa, Lungnak valley, Zanskar --Tagooty 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Testa village from the south, Zanskar --Tagooty 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Women stripping bark from willow sticks. Testa village --Tagooty 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

July 29, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Peugeot e-2008 Facelift at Autofrühling Ulm 2024 --Alexander-93 20:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: :2023 Hyundai i10 (AC3) at Autofrühling Ulm 2024 --Alexander-93 20:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination View of Piana, Arcadia. --C messier 20:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Large stone house with shops in Alonistaina, Arcadia. --C messier 20:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality! --Jaronax 20:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The church of Saint Paraskevi, Alonistaina. --C messier 20:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The watermill of Alonistaina, Arcadia. --C messier 20:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Magouliana, Arcadia. --C messier 20:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Dirk Martens, on the Grote Markt of Aalst, in the background the statue of Diederik van Aalst. While on the right, the currently being restored Herberg Graaf van Egmont is being restored. -- Jaronax 20:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, but too dark, noisy, and with low detail (probably due NR). Also CA. --Plozessor 03:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Drohne einer Feldwespe --Romzig 20:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jaronax 19:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mazda2 (XP210) at Autofrühling Ulm 2024 --Alexander-93 18:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fiat 600e on display at Autofrühling Ulm 2024 --Alexander-93 18:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ford Mustang VII Convertible at Autofrühling Ulm 2024 --Alexander-93 18:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A plastic manhole cover --Lvova 18:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover --Lvova 18:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: CoA of Castelnuovo Magra --Ashoppio 18:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: CoA of Borghetto di Vara --Ashoppio 18:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: CoA of Casanova Lerrone --Ashoppio 18:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: CoA of Stellanello --Ashoppio 18:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: CoA of Magliolo --Ashoppio 18:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Canterbury Cathedral (Kent, United Kingdom) - Ceiling of crossing --Benjism89 17:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very nice compositon and good light. But it lacks sharpness and detail. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salisbury (UK) - Cathedral - Baptismal font and nave --Benjism89 17:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salisbury (UK) - Cathedral - Ceiling of choir --Benjism89 17:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winchester (UK) - Cathedral - Vaulted ceiling --Benjism89 17:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salisbury (UK) - St. Thomas church - 15th-century fresco depicting the Last Judgment --Benjism89 17:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose This is a very challenging scene and I think it did not work out. You did need a very long DoF. I think f 13 was not enough because the foreground is not that sharp. Additionally you had to combine very bright and dark parts here. This could have been achieved by taking several images with different exposures (HDR). In this case just brightening the shadows led to intense chroma noise at the dark wood. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lion statue with the weapon of Aalst, on top of the gebiedshuisje at the UNESCO world heritage site of the Belfry of Aalst. --Jaronax
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, this image is not sharp enough for QI. No details in shadows and seems tilted. --Benjism89 17:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of Angera castle, Italy. --Phyrexian 13:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Perspective correction should be done. --Sebring12Hrs 14:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Comment @Sebring12Hrs: I tried to fix it. --Phyrexian 14:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    I tried to do a bit more. O. K.? -- Spurzem 16:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Spurzem: Thank you for your edit, but I feel the picture now is too much changed (I like the down perspective and the frame by the dark areas), so I prefer to restore it, and if you want you can upload your edit in a new file and candidate it. :-) --Phyrexian 18:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    * Oppose. The present version is too distorted, no QI for me. -- Spurzem 20:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Collection of the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations of Ankara, Turkey. --Phyrexian 13:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The crane isn't very sharp but I think it's acceptable given this is a picture taken in difficult conditions (inside and I suppose with tripod prohibited). But the bucket to the right is out of focus and the right crop is in the middle of an exhibit. The description page should also tell us what these objects are, who created them and when, etc. --Benjism89 17:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Security camera on the health center Lusanum in the Yorckstraße
    --F. Riedelio 13:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Security camera on the tower block in the Yorckstraße
    --F. Riedelio 13:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Security camera at the tram and bus stop at Berliner Platz
    --F. Riedelio 13:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is too much noise at the camera. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
     New version Denoised. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 17:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Nouveau display window in Charleroi --Jmh2o 13:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The image is  Overexposed and lacks sharpness. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The 18th century Sint-Catharina church of the Beguinage of Aalst, focus on the back of the church tower. --Jaronax 13:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose CCW tilted and heavy processed in shadow areas --George Chernilevsky 13:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gemälde „Flucht vor der Kritik“ von Pere Borrell del Caso, mit Rahmen, in der Ausstellung 1863 • PARIS • 1874: Revolution in der Kunst im Wallraf-Richartz-Museum & Fondation Corboud. By User:Elya --Smial 12:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hesitating between Love and Riches - William Adolphe Bouguereau - Paris 1863 – 1874: Revolution in der Kunst.  By User:Raymond --Smial 12:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nun at Samtavisi cathedral, Georgia. --Phyrexian 12:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Pincussion distortion. Noise reduction somewhat overdone. --Smial 13:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road in Dashman nature reserve. Bazar-Korgon District, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Panpanchik --Красный 10:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road in Dashman nature reserve. Bazar-Korgon District, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Panpanchik --Красный 10:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road in Dashman nature reserve. Bazar-Korgon District, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Panpanchik --Красный 10:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road in Dashman nature reserve. Bazar-Korgon District, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Panpanchik --Красный 10:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road in Dashman nature reserve. Bazar-Korgon District, Jalal-Abad Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Panpanchik --Красный 10:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination MG TC at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    I suggest cropping out the car on the right. --Augustgeyler 12:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    Cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support It looks good.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 22:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MG TC at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: MG TD at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment. "My" Opel Olympia Rekord was rejected as a QI seven years ago with six votes against. -- Spurzem 10:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    Sorry to hear that, I'd have supported it. I think the difference, though, is that multiple cars are intended to be depicted here. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:13, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination MG TF at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline Too tight cut and disturbing information sheet in the window -- Spurzem 10:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: MG TD and TF at Chiltern Open Air Museum --Mike Peel 08:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dahlia garden in the Lille Jardin des Plantes, France --Velvet 08:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sundial in the Lille Jardin des Plantes, France --Velvet 08:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination General purpose PCB for 16 Pin DIPI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 07:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Exposure, lighting and colours look good, but why ISO320 and why only 6 MPixels with a camera that offers 18 Mpixles. The depth of field and sharpness in general are not good enough either. --Smial 09:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jackfruit tree with fruit. I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 07:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bunch of Rakhi use in Rakhshabandhan festivalI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 07:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hindola toransThis is a photo of ASI monument numberI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 07:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination П36 0050 steam locomotive wheels in the Brest Railway Museum --Mike1979 Russia 07:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Красный 15:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: III class passenger wagon in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Suburban passenger wagon in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Су 250-30 steam locomotive wheels in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Some overexposed reflections, but not too disturbing. --Smial 12:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ChME2‎-209 Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Common soapwort (Saponaria officinalis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Closed wing resting position of Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758) - Tawny Coster. By User:Rijuroy89 --Atudu 07:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing basking position of Neptis cartica (Moore,1872) – Plain Sailer. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 07:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1962 Rolls-Royce Phantom V Saloon Coupé by James Young at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jaronax 19:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street sweepink attachment by Tuchel Maschinenbau at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The white brush on the left is blending into the bright background, so the object is not separated enough from its background. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skyted noise reduction mask at Passenger Experience Week 2023 in Hamburg --MB-one 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too narrow DoF here. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Alaport Café at Almaty Airport --MB-one 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panoramic view of the Akosombo Dam from reservoir level --MB-one 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Drone shot of Saint George church in Sovramonte (BL, Italy) --Syrio 07:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Bit too soft IMO --MB-one 08:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, TanzaniaT --Poco a poco 06:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover --Lvova 04:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An old manhole cover (gas) --Lvova 04:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Torre de l'Abadal in Avinyó, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the Our Lady of the Rosary church in Súria, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Vincent church in Cardona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Watch tower of the Castle of Cardona, Catalonia, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canon EOS R100, front side, cap removed. --FreeMediaKid! 04:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Too tight crop. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
    Here is an ad hoc solution. I am a bit dissatisfied with the result, particularly how the sunlight, though not directly, is reflecting off the silver ring. I will reshoot later in the day. --FreeMediaKid! 18:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination "Heinles" protected landscape element near Westhausen (Thuringia) --Plozessor 03:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Former sandstone quary north of Dürrnhof" geotope --Plozessor 03:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cheonggyecheon stream, at sunrise, with trees in Seoul center, South Korea. --Basile Morin 02:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There is something in the sky, left of the right building with the reddish windows. Is that a dust spot? --Plozessor 03:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
    Fixed Thank you very much -- Basile Morin 05:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Blue dasher --Rhododendrites 01:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The harsh side-lighting results in blown areas on the lower roof. The filials and the clock are blurry. --Tagooty 02:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. The blown areas on the lower roof were removed and the other issues improved. —- Johann Jaritz 05:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fields north of Testa village, Lungnak valley, Zanskar --Tagooty 00:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rue Brassat in Aubin, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 00:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 00:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 00:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed

July 28, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Milk-white brittlegills (Russula delica). Picked edible fungi in basket -- George Chernilevsky 20:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover --Lvova 19:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover --Lvova 19:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Veränderliche Krabbenspinne (Weibchen) --Romzig 19:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Icon of the Resurrection of Jesus - Resurrection Gate - Red Square - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 17:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Habitat of globeflower – wooded meadow in Keila, Northwestern Estonia. By User:Ivar Leidus --Nightflyer 16:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very good quality. But it needs a more precise description of location. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: In Trittau wurde im Jahr 2007 eine neue Doppeleiche gepflanzt unter Verwendung des Original Gedenksteins. By User: Volkone --Nightflyer 16:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Something is wrong with WB here. It looks too greenish. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fundamentreste der Alsenschen Drahtseilbahn in Oldendorf Der letzte erhaltene Mast in Oldendorf, einen weitereren gibt es in Itzehoe. --Nightflyer 16:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    To dark shadows here. The image might be slightly  Underexposed. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herniaria alpina --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too blurry, and the processing doesn't fully fix that, sorry. --FreeMediaKid! 06:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination TE3-3156‎ locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 09:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: СДПМ 1403 snow Blower in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 09:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The right wood pillar is leaning a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 21:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Photographed to the January 05th, 2024 in Offenburg (Germany). By --Ahmet Düz 09:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose I find the people too blurry. --Sebring12Hrs 21:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Photographed to the July 19th, 2024 in Rastatt (Germany). By --Ahmet Düz 09:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The building is leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 21:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Photographed to the July 19th, 2024 in Rastatt (Germany). By --Ahmet Düz 09:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review Unfavorable lighting, image too dark in places and far too bright in others, background slightly slanted, overall unfavorable image composition. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 09:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ADAC booth at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen --MB-one 08:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6 cutaway model at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 08:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
     Question Was the horizontal angle intentional here? --Augustgeyler 13:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cornmarket Street, Oxford --Mike Peel 07:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good quality but need perspective/tilt correction. Left building learning out. --ArildV 08:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
    Perspective corrected, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Thank you. --ArildV 10:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Horse relief and arch, Carfax, Oxford --Mike Peel 07:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ASI monument numberI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016. --Suyash.dwivedi 07:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment May be a bit dark in the shadows. --Sebring12Hrs 21:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ASI monument numberI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016. --Suyash.dwivedi 07:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose The image is lacking sharpness and detail. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ASI monument numberI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016. --Suyash.dwivedi 07:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The right part is dark and have a low level of details. Fixable? --ArildV 08:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Danube in Ulm in 2024 --Alexander-93 06:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Need perspective correction, also small traces of CA. --ArildV 08:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
    @ArildV: thanks for your review, I uploaded a new version. Please take into account: The tower is tilted in reality.--Alexander-93 18:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zheltoksan street, Balkhash, Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 00:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs denoising. Otherwise good --MB-one 07:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arman railway station of Karagandy children railroad phogtographed from above. Karaganda, Kazakhstan. --Красный 00:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FreeMediaKid! 06:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

July 27, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Porsche 911 Targa at Motortreff Bella Italia 2024 at Motorworld Munich --MB-one 23:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review The surroundings were apparently too dark for a good photo. At first glance, the reflections seem interesting or are they decorations on the cars that are meant to be shown as a special feature? -- Spurzem 09:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 1929 Rolls-Royce Phantom II Boattail at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 23:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
     Question What happend to the WB here? Was is that yellow inside? --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Children's table and chairs at leisure park Accra Park in Dzorwulu, Greater Accra --MB-one 23:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Good sharpness, but any chance to correct the perspective a bit ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flight navigation instruments by Bendix King at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 23:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose The instruments are not in focus enough, it's the same for inscriptions. In addition, I don't like the crop. --Sebring12Hrs 13:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination CUET Baluchora --Wasiul Bahar 18:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose  Level of detail too low and compression artifacts --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: baby cow --Wasiul Bahar 18:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review Unfavorable cropping of the photo, right eye of the animal too dark -- Spurzem 20:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover, part of which is made by hand welding (?) --Lvova 18:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A manhole cover, something between a sewer and a storm drain --Lvova 18:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Lower left part is a bit blurred. But good overall. --Sebring12Hrs 13:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Damaru instrumentI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 17:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose This shot seems to be easy. Not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination garlicI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 17:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Blurred at the edges, a bit noisy, not bery sharp... --Sebring12Hrs 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination inside Parliament of SwedenI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 17:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination typewriterI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 17:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't understand what is supposed to be shown here. If it is supposed to be a picture of a red typewriter, it should be better placed, without all the trimmings. For me, this is not a quality picture. -- Spurzem 18:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose I agree... --Sebring12Hrs 13:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: BMW G61 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Rear of the car is a bit blurred, while it's in the foreground, it should be in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 13:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Morris 8 at Wantage Road Garage, Didcot Railway Centre --Mike Peel 09:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --C messier 20:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Augustus in Naples --PaestumPaestum 09:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    unfavourable exposure, hand with pigeon out of focus --Georgfotoart 13:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Boat and Mount Vesuvius in the gulf of Naples --PaestumPaestum 09:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    too much water and sky, no one can do anything about the weather --Georgfotoart 12:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fisker Ocean in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 07:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment I think the focus failed a bit, the rear is not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 22:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Guardroom (view through the window to the entrance) in the Site Security Control Center at the Dülmen-Visbeck Special Ammunition Depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
     Info In case anyone is wondering about the blurred spots: These are stains and scratches on the glass of the window that cannot be removed. Given the age of the object, this is normal. --XRay 06:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Trail to Sovetov peak, Ile-Alatau national park, Almaty region, Kazakhstan. By User:Amarkiev --Екатерина Борисова 03:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support A bit overprocessed by the smartphone camera, but still ok. --Sebring12Hrs 22:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Phalanx CIWS Block 1B mounted on the Oliver Hazard Perry Class Frigate, USS Elrod (FFG-55) in mothballs at the Philadelphia Navy Yard. --Needsmoreritalin 02:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    This is tilted (otherwise very good) --Plozessor 04:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Low-water Charvak Reservoir in Ugom-Chatkal national park. Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Arina Pan --Красный 00:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted (see the flag and the tracks in background) --Plozessor 04:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

July 26, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Mercedes-AMG X254 43 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 18:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Noisy at the front - fixable? --Mike Peel 09:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Mike Peel: thanks for your review, I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 18:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 2024 Audi A3 8Y in Stuttagrt --Alexander-93 18:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The car seems tilted, fixable? --Mike Peel 09:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Mike Peel: thanks for your review, the car stood on a slope; the background is normal IMO.--Alexander-93 18:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clouded lizardfish (Saurida nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 17:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Could it be brightened to better highlight the fish? --Mike Peel 09:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 07:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gurudwara Shri Data Bandi Chhor Shahib GwaliorI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021. --Suyash.dwivedi 10:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction. Otehrwise good IMO --MB-one 12:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
    A pers. correction will cut (more) parts of the building, i.e. it will not improve it as required. --2015 Michael 2015 15:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Deep fried silver stripe round herring in carrot sauce as a dinner course at JR Hotel Yakushima. This is part of the 'Course "Yakushima"' dinner, labeled "Fried silver-stripe with carrot sticky sauce". --Grendelkhan 09:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Would have liked to see a better focus on the kibinago - in closer and from a higher angle. --GRDN711 12:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: White wagtail at Amangeldy street. Balkhash, Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 00:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not sharp and CA at the tail, any chance to improve it? --Plozessor 05:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

July 25, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Handball, Adriana Cardoso (BRA, 21). By --Stepro 22:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good photo but imo unnecessary strong noise reduction. --ArildV 08:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Handball, match ball Olympic Games Paris 2024, Molten A5000. By --Stepro 22:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too unsharp. --C messier 20:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Handball: Hanniball (GER, mascot). By --Stepro 22:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, though it could be tilted a bit more clockwise. --FreeMediaKid! 06:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mosaic tiles next to the entrance of Tilburg Central Station --ReneeWrites 21:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ford Kuga (third generation) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 20:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Partial open wing Nectaring of Pareronia hippia (Fabricius, 1787) - Indian Wanderer(Male) --Sandipoutsider 18:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Picture overall is grainy, and there is a noticeable glow around the petals. --FreeMediaKid! 06:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sea sponge (Theonella swinhoei), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 17:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: BMW Z8 Coupé prototype at Motortreff Bella Italia 2024 at Motorworld Munich --MB-one 09:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review Unfavorable lighting conditions and unfavorable perspective -- Spurzem 09:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pedelec city bicycle by Canyon at VELOBerlin 2024 --MB-one 09:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good, but I think it needs a bit of PC --Mike Peel 17:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Massimo Bulbi, Anchorman, Emilia-Romagna (Italy) Councillor. --Terragio67 08:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    high noise levels. Otherwise very good --MB-one 14:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ile-Alatau National Park: Ushkonyr. Sedum alpestre (Alpine Stonecrop) --Naziranildi 07:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sides are completly blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 22:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hôtel de la Chambre des députés in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kairakskiy waterfall. Ile-Alatau national park, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. By User:MariSimonova --Красный 06:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    a bit too dark --Georgfotoart 12:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Round manhole cover on manhole
    --F. Riedelio 06:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    blurred above, otherwise good --Georgfotoart 12:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

July 24, 2024

• 
  • Nomination A Griffin on a manhole cover --Lvova 21:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Manhole cover in Oldenburg, Lower Saxony. --Jacek79 21:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    a little tight at the top and bottom (because of the plaster ring) --Georgfotoart 11:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The municipality of Chalais as seen from Chermignon-d'en-Bas in July 2024. --Espandero 21:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    WB should be checked. --Ermell 22:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
    Ermell:  Done - Espandero 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 07:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The village of Lens in July 2024. --Espandero 21:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Slightly tilted CCW. Also not perfectly sharp but still acceptable. --Plozessor 04:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
    Plozessor:  Done - Espandero 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 07:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial view of the cloverleaf interchange "Heidelberg/Schwetzingen" between A 5 and B 535 --MB-one 09:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A little underexposed and needs more contrast in my opinion. I'd suggest cropping out the bottom fields to make the composition better. --Benjism89 18:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mushrooms on a tree trunk. Irtysh river floodplain sanctuary, Pavlodar Region, Kazakhstan. By User:Ivan ideia --Красный 08:28, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs major crop to focus on the main subject. --Tagooty 03:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ile-Alatau National Park: Ushkonyr. Scutellaria transiliensis --Naziranildi 06:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The out of focus parts in the background are distracting, can you crop to the parts in focus please? --Mike Peel 17:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Household items, Tekke Kottaram Heritage Museum --Tagooty 00:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    perspective distortion, correction is needed --F. Riedelio 13:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

July 23, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Church of Agios Ioannis, Alea, Arcadia. --C messier 21:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    This seems slightly tilted (the door is not vertical). --Plozessor 04:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Done --C messier 05:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Alrance River in Brousse-le-Château, Aveyron, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 19:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Looks somehow oversaturated. Fixable? --Alexander-93 19:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2024 Audi A3 8Y in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW G61 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 18:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pandit Rajan Sajan Mishra Performing at Bharat Bhavan Bhopal on 38th foundation day 13 February 2020I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 17:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2024 Renault Captur II in Echterdingen --Alexander-93 17:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination DS 7 (2022) in Echterdingen --Alexander-93 17:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nebraska's Holy Family Shrine in June of 2016 --Dmartin969 17:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Tilted. --ArildV 20:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: US Post Office in Celebration, Florida --Dmartin969 17:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs perspective correction --Екатерина Борисова 01:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Main grandstand at the Circuit of The Americas on the first practice day of the 2021 United States Grand Prix --Dmartin969 17:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Needs a perspective correction, particularly top-left --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: South facade of the Team Disney Orlando building(Arata Isozaki,1991) in Lake Buena Vista, Florida on July 22nd, 2024 --Dmartin969 17:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    perspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 13:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination from Burg (near Magdeburg) towards Brocken (Harz) --Georgfotoart 16:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Moments of Devotion, Muslims in Ruku during Namaz. --Felino Volador 09:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Great composition, I love it, but this image is very noisy and I'm afraid you have low details in the shadows. You should also crop out the objects appearing a the bottom. --Benjism89 18:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: White-fronted bee-eater (Merops bullockoides) --Charlesjsharp 08:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice scene. But the image is slightly  Underexposed hand has a borderline resolution. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 12:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hartzfeld's wrasse (Halichoeres hartzfeldii), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 07:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dashtijum Sanctuary: Khatlon Province, Shamsiddin Shohin District. By User:Pocboz --Красный 05:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock in Dashtijum sanctuary, Shamsiddin Shokhin District, Khatlon Region, Tajikistan. By User:Pocboz --Красный 05:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocks in Dashtijum Sanctuary: Khatlon Province, Shamsiddin Shohin District. By User:Pocboz --Красный 05:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View towards Signal Hill at night, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa --XRay 03:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose I've been there and seen the view, it looks nothing like this. --Mike Peel 17:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front facade, New Life Christian Fellowship Church, Nithiravilai --Tagooty 00:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    This is good but tilted (left side of the buidling is leaning) --Plozessor 03:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Plozessor:  Done Pl. review new version --Tagooty 13:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santo André sign in front of Armstrong Whitworth braking locomotives, Paranapiacaba --Mike Peel 00:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:07, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

July 22, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Ledger stone in the Great Church of Breda --ReneeWrites 23:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry: The upper part of the image is blurred. --F. Riedelio 13:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lexus LM 350h in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 20:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The side of the car looks very strange, like an over-processed image from a mobile phone with very strong noise reduction. Did something go wrong with the post-processing? --ArildV 20:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Interior of the Niavaran Mansion, Tehran, Iran --Lrkrol 19:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment It's a shame the chandelier is cut. --Sebring12Hrs 23:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks for the feedback! To explain: In this case, showing more of the chandelier would also have shown a number of distracting elements (information posters, some office clutter, etc.) in that corner, and taken attention away from the main hall. --Lrkrol 19:51, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Athyma pravara - Unbroken Sergeant. By User:B Savit --Atudu 11:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    WB looks a bit off (too greenish/yellowish) --C messier 22:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antigua ciudad de Herculano, Italia, 2023-03-27 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 07:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Needs PC --Mike Peel 09:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Poco a poco 07:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 08:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

July 21, 2024

• 
  • Nomination An old manhole cover on the territory of Railway clinical hospital, non-standart size --Lvova 18:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Unfortunately doesn't clearly show the subject, a cleaner cover would have been needed, sorry. --Mike Peel 09:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
    Both of them are made before 1917, so they are erased and yes, hardly readable. Don't sure it's possible to find another ones like that. Lvova 18:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
    I think it would be readable if cleaner, maybe after a rainstorm? This one also has some camera shake, btw. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Game Farm Park in Auburn, Washington --Roc0ast3r 09:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Lots of CA in the upper branches. --Trougnouf 23:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done Should be fixed now. --Roc0ast3r 00:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you. I will be without a computer screen for the next few days so someone else should assess the improved image. --Trougnouf 17:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry upon closer look there is not enough in focus due to f/5, only the very front of the path is focused and it doesn't quite reach the dangling leaves. I think f/8-f/11 would have been necessary since there isn't a clear focus point. --Trougnouf 10:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

July 20, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Rio de Janeiro Project --Wilfredor 17:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good quality. Need better description, more specific CAT. --Tagooty 02:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
     Done --Wilfredor 00:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 07:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Happiness is a state of mind, Rajasthan, India --Felino Volador 11:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good composition. Over-sharpened, noisy. --Tagooty 03:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: ASI monument numberI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016. --Suyash.dwivedi 06:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Slight CA on the edge of the roof and wahsed out colours. Otherwise ok. --MB-one 08:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

July 19, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: Lexus LM 350h (AAWH10) in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 11:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy. Otherwise good --MB-one 08:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
     Comment@MB-one: thanks for your review, I uploaded a new version.--Alexander-93 18:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chausath Yogini Temple, Mitaoli, MorenaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021. --Suyash.dwivedi 10:58, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    The CA should be removed, the bush at the left cloned out and the perspective corrected. --Ermell 09:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Malaya Almatinka gorge, Medeu park, Medeu District, Almaty, Kazakhstan. By User:Marat Rysbekov --Красный 07:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    needs a bit more clarity --MB-one 08:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

July 18, 2024

• 
  • Nomination: View from the Longchamp Palais, Marseille. --Kallerna 15:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Bad crop at right. --Sebring12Hrs 18:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Audience chamber in Münchner Residenz --AuHaidhausen 14:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    IMHO, underexposed and a bit noisy. Fixable? --C messier 21:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

July 17, 2024

• 
  • Nomination Route diagram of the Gulflander. --SHB2000 22:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    First of all, I'm happy that you nominate diagrams, QI isn't for photographs only. But : 1/ I think you should nominate the SVG versions of your diagrams rather than the PNGs, as SVG is the recommended file format for diagrams on Commons, and eases the translation of your diagrams. 2/ Does the information about accessibility come from any official source ? 3/ I don't know anything about this line but I notice that WP articles in English and Hungarian give a much longer list of stations. --Benjism89 18:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    Hi, thanks for the feedback. For 1, I'm forced to submit PNGs since Inkscape SVGs have errors in them (unlike Adobe Illustrate), which is annoying, but it is what it is. For 2 and 3, accessibility info comes directly from https://www.queenslandrailtravel.com.au/Planyourtrip/networkmap and it indeed only has 3 stations (mostly a tourist service anyway). --SHB2000 23:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
    Only one version of these images can be made QI, and I think it would be better if it was the SVG rather than PNG versions. Is it alright if I help with fixing the errors of the SVG diagrams so those can be nominated instead? ReneeWrites 08:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
    Yes, that would be greatly appreciated! --SHB2000 10:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
    Please convert text to path, note the font used in the description and submit it as SVG like it is commons standard. --Augustgeyler 13:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you for your answer but I notice the map you linked only shows wheelchair accessibility and the availability of hearing loops. There is no information about accessibility for blind or mentally disabled people for instance. So please submit your future SVG linee diagrams with a more precise description such as "wheelchair accessible". --Benjism89 17:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose As discussed above, PNG is not the ideal format for diagrams. --Plozessor 03:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Route diagram of The Inlander. --SHB2000 22:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Why did you nominate the PNG instead of the SVG? --Lrkrol 20:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
    Before the SVG had errors (Inkscape issue) – that's why I've been nominating the PNG files this entire time. --SHB2000 08:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Please nominate the SVG instead. --Plozessor 03:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Route diagram of the Kuranda Scenic Railway. --SHB2000 22:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Would promote the SVG version, it's superior. --MB-one 13:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Please nominate the SVG instead. --Plozessor 03:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aston Martin Vantage (2024) in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 17:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    It needs a perspective correction, too much noise in dark areas --Poco a poco 18:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
     Comment Well, the image was taken from a slope. I think, the proportions of the car are somehow natural. --Alexander-93 17:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Lille_lycee_baggio_jardin_des_plantes.jpg

• Nomination View of Lycée Baggio from the Lille Jardin des Plantes, France --Velvet 07:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
  Too harsh shadow at the tree on the left. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 07:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
   Support Left shadow isn't too disturbingin my view. --Sebring12Hrs 08:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
   Oppose I don't understand why intervention here was necessary before any vote was made. Now I have to oppose until this is fixed. --Augustgeyler 08:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Varese_-_Villa_Toeplitz_0023.JPG

• Nomination Fountain in Villa Toeplitz, Varese, Italy. --Phyrexian 13:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
   Oppose The image is tilted cw and its shadows are too harsch. --Augustgeyler 13:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Canon_EOS_R100,_front.jpg

• Nomination Canon EOS R100, front side, cap intact. --FreeMediaKid! 04:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
   Support The crop is quite tight, but ok. --MB-one 08:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
   Oppose The crop is too tight for me, the are only very few pixels space left --PantheraLeo1359531 09:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
  Should be better now. --FreeMediaKid! 18:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion {{{2}}}

File:Brugge_-_Koeleweimolen_0495.JPG

• Nomination City of Brugge, Belgium from one of the city historic windmills. --Phyrexian 12:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose CAs everywhere, and not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 12:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Very nice composition. But two things should be improved: chromatic aberration at the borders should be fixed. The very dark shadows should show a little more detail. --Augustgeyler 12:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Please do not cancel my vote, go to discuss... --Sebring12Hrs 14:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

• @Sebring12Hrs: I did not and would not do this. I am sorry but this must have been a coincidence. We were both reviewing this nomination more or less at the same time, both responding to this as an unreviewed item on the list. And because I must have pressed the send button later, my comment did overwrite your decline-status. But no problem, I think we pointed out mostly the same issues with this image. --Augustgeyler 06:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment No problem ;) --Sebring12Hrs 08:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

• Great composition. Personally I'd crop it at the left to make it symmetrical (so that the hole is in the center), but that is a matter of taste, I will not decline it due that. However, there is still purple CA around the upper part of the hole, thus  Weak oppose until that is fixed. --Plozessor 03:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 06:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Tooth_capping_(2).jpg

• Nomination Tooth cappingI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 07:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Blurred --George Chernilevsky 07:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support I disagree. Somewhat low DOF, but regarding the high resolution and somewhat special circumstances sharp enough for a decent A4 size print. --Smial 09:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Smial. According to QI guidelines low DOF is acceptable if it serves a purpose, which it does here. The capped tooth is the subject of this photo, and it's in focus. ReneeWrites 09:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support It serves its purpose. Good one. --Jaronax 19:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 09:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Per ReneeWrites and Jaronax. --Plozessor 03:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Plozessor 03:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Maria_Rain_Kirchenstraße_61_Pfarrkirche_Mariä_Himmelfahrt_Inneres_27072024_5242.jpg

• Nomination Interior of the pilgrimage and parish church Assumption of Mary on Kirchenstraße #61, Maria Rain, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree, the picture composition is "strange": The backside of the last bench ist most present. --2015 Michael 2015 18:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
• The image looks a little distorted. For example, is the big bench (?) in the foreground really as crooked as it seems? -- Spurzem 08:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Composition (with the prominent bench and the floor in foreground) ist probably not ideal but acceptable. However, it seems to lean out on the left side. --Plozessor 03:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Plozessor 03:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Capreolus_capreolus_in_Murg.jpg

• Nomination Fearful roe deer --UnFUG-Fabi 10:49, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Beautiful composition but it is very noisy. Fixable? --C messier 13:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Done I have denoised it a little better. --UnFUG-Fabi 09:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too strong NR resulting in artifacts and lack of detail and sharpness. --Plozessor 03:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Plozessor --George Chernilevsky 04:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 06:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Aaron_Douglas_by_Edwin_Harleston_(51419).jpg

• Nomination Aaron Douglas, 1930, by Edwin Harleston --Rhododendrites 01:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, the reflections of light on the face spoil the painting, when you compare with Google Arts & Culture's version https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/portrait-of-aaron-douglas-edwin-harleston/VAHluxT2x5reHQ?ms=%7B%22x%22%3A0.39356178503810696%2C%22y%22%3A0.29227352173045734%2C%22z%22%3A10.995145481481481%2C%22size%22%3A%7B%22width%22%3A0.488969756147055%2C%22height%22%3A0.23746436668109303%7D%7D --Basile Morin 02:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree that version is better, but this isn't VIC. There was no flash used and no protective glass -- this is how it was displayed in the museum. QIC is about whether it's a technically adequate capture, not the best version. Rhododendrites 04:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

• In my opinion, it is inadequate, because it gives the impression that these reflections are parts of the painting. Whereas they're not. You realize the reality only when you can compare, which is the case here. The artwork should be recognizable. It's not as if the photo was the masterpiece. The painting should be the piece of art. Then, if you produce an image with obvious flaws, it directly affects the original artwork, and its "quality" of course. Hence no QI for me -- Basile Morin 11:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Very good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment License or description info needs to be changed IMHO to reflect that the main subject is public domain. --C messier 07:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Oh right, I totally overlooked the description. It should actually use the "Art Photo" template to make it clear that the photo, not the artwork, is Rhododendrites'. --Plozessor 08:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

• I don't often upload photos of paintings. I'd be appreciative if someone who knows the appropriate template(s) could add it to the file page to reflect the point above. Rhododendrites 18:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites:  Done --Plozessor 19:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Not sure about the licensing though. Is this painting Public Domain in the US at all? --Plozessor 19:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

The painter died in 1931 so I think it is PD. --C messier 20:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Not necessarily because the copyright in US can be renewed in its 28th year to a maximum of 95 years. However, the majority of paintings was not renewed, and I could not find a renewal record for this painting in the publicly available databases. Thus it seems that it's Public Domain now and accordingly I added the PD-US-not renewed template, but still I'm not 1000 % sure. --Plozessor 08:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 11:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Brest_Railway_Museum_Л_0009_Steam_Locomotive_2023-03-05_3262.jpg

• Nomination Л 0009‎ Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 07:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Unfavorable crop on the left. I don't know if that's fixable. --Benjism89 18:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• The main object is steam locomotive and It is whole on the foto. The tender isn't object of this foto. --Mike1979 Russia 13:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support A bit soft, but good for QI. Composition is OK, not a great fan of the shadow bottom left. --C messier 07:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Plozessor 08:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Liège_BW_2019-08-17_15-07-30.jpg

• Nomination Belgium, Liège, Couvent des Mineurs --Berthold Werner 14:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Well exposed, but not sharp at full resolution and teh crop doesn't let the image breathe. --Needsmoreritalin 14:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support We should not overdo. For me the image is O. K. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose No issues with the crop, but this picture has extremely unnatural colors (can easily be seen when comparing it to the many other publicly available pictures of the same building). Signatur is missing.--August (talk) 06:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose No issues with the crop, but this picture has extremely unnatural colors (can easily be seen when comparing it to the many other publicly available pictures of the same building). --Plozessor 10:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

I wonder how you know what the ‘right’ colours should be. --Berthold Werner 15:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

• @Berthold Werner: Actually the colors of the sky in your picture are looking strange, that's why I checked at all. Found tons of picture of this building on the Internet, and from those it seems clear that something is wrong with 'your' colors. That should be not too hard to fix though. --Plozessor 16:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

• Temp  Oppose. The image sharpness is completely sufficient for QIC, considering the image resolution. The ancient lens is obviously still easily good enough for good A4 prints if you take care of the CA, which has been done well here. The colours of the building itself are fine, because we don't have direct sunlight here, as in most other photos of the same object, but rather a more or less blue sky, which is particularly noticeable on the roof. A polarising filter could have helped, but on the other hand this probably corresponds to the visual impression at the moment the photo was taken. The only thing that went wrong was with the sky itself, where there are a few strange processing artefacts and it generally appears slightly greenish to me. The treetops also seem to be too saturated in colour. --Smial 16:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Smial , we usually agree with the assessments. But I can't follow you here. Please take a look at some of the underexposed photos, for example, that we mark as QI and compare them with the picture presented here. Best regards -- Spurzem 10:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Ich hab mal zwei Notizen hinzugefügt. Da sind halt scharfkantige Flecken, die da so nicht hinpassen. --Smial 13:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

@Berthold Werner: Die Farbkorrektur ist jetzt in die andere Richtung gekippt, dann lieber die Originalfarben lassen, Hauptsache die komischen Flecken kommen irgendwie weg. --Smial 13:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Ich habe die Flecken retouchiert. --Berthold Werner 16:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Besser ;-)  Support. --Smial 09:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Colors are a bit dull, but sharpness and perspective are ok. --Sebring12Hrs 14:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, the WB is off. Additionally the sharpness is too low, especially on the upper left part of the building. --Augustgeyler 09:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --August (talk) 09:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Macaque_de_Gibraltar_(Macaca_sylvanus)_-_tête_(5).jpg

• Nomination Barbary Ape (Macaca sylvanus) at Monkey Mountain in Kintzheim (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 03:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Lvova 06:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed background. --2015 Michael 2015 06:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Picture including background is perfect IMO. --Plozessor 05:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Michael. --Smial 16:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support per Plozessor. There are some bright spots in the completely blurry background, but I don't think that this is disturbing. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I think the face was captured very well. But per Michael. Even some parts of the arms are  Overexposed . --Augustgeyler 08:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support "Overexposed background" does not mean that the PICTURE is overexposed. And it's different also from a burnt background, where the highlights are blown, when the camera reaches its technical limits and cannot capture enough nuances of shades. Different case here. It's very clear that reducing the intensity of the light would bring more details of this background, because it's not completely white. There are a few clear colors. So, the light is correctly managed in this situation. It is just a picture with important contrasts, subject in the shadow, and luminous background. Nothing wrong, and this photo is of the same kind. You may like or dislike the effect, but technically it is as acceptable as a luminous subject with dark background. Focus is correct, level of detail is important, animal is normally lit, no problem -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

File:The_Holy_Family_-_Sodoma.jpg

• Nomination The Holy Family - Sodoma --GoldenArtists 15:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 23:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose under-exposure, better is "Il sodoma, sacra famiglia.JPG" --2015 Michael 2015 15:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support For me, this one is much better and exposure is perfect. "Il sodoma, sacra famiglia.JPG" has a disturbing reflection at the top. --Plozessor 05:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, but I was writing about the exposure and exactly this aspect I mean. --2015 Michael 2015 (talk) 09:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't know the original painting. But I think that the photo here is much too dark. -- Spurzem 09:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

• Other photos of the same painting seem similarly dark to me, probably the painting it simply dark. At least I can't see any pitch black shadows here. --Plozessor 11:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August 11:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Topaasstraat_54,_Breda_2.jpg

• Nomination Large sticker mural on a window of potatoes being prepared in various ways --ReneeWrites 23:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose It lacks sharpness to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 23:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good. --Plozessor 05:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose It lack sharpness and detail due to intense noise reduction. --Augustgeyler 07:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 07:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Basilique_Saint-Donatien_et_Saint-Rogatien_2023_-_125-rec.jpg

• Nomination Statue du Christ, Basilique Saint-Donatien et Saint-Rogatien,Nantes, France. By User:François de Dijon --Augustgeyler 09:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose not enough detail imo --MB-one 08:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Above the bar for me. --Plozessor 05:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment. The statue is too dark under the very bright window. -- Spurzem 09:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:BMW_G61_IMG_9890.jpg

• Nomination BMW G61 in Böblingen --Alexander-93 16:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Unfavorable composition with the grey car in background (so that the subject doesn't stand out). --Plozessor 15:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good to me, subject stands out sufficiently in the composition. --Mike Peel 09:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --August (talk) 06:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:At Oxford 2024 039 - Balliol College.jpg

• Nomination Balliol College, Oxford. Was declined yesterday, but this rework should fix the issues (exposure, PC). Courtesy pings: @GoldenArtists, 2015 Michael 2015, Plozessor, Sebring12Hrs, and Augustgeyler: --Mike Peel 15:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Warning This was declined at 22:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC). Declined candidates can not be renominated. I suggest a re-upload.--Augustgeyler 16:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support When the user makes efforts to edit the picture, he can renominate. Lol... Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• Now OK (but to late improved). --2015 Michael 2015 18:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Was declined earlier for leaning and bad exposure, the rework fixes both those things. ReneeWrites 23:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Could not find an explicit rule that would forbid re-nominating declined images after they have been improved. Picture is good now. --Plozessor 06:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't believe what I see. Don't get me wrong, I think the image is very good now and I like seeing it promoted. But I am shocked how everybody is dealing with our rules here. It is simply not allowed to re-nominate declined candidates. How many times did you guys decline nominations with the statement "This was already declined on …"? There is an archive to make it possible to track this. Simple and easy, isn't it? Now everybody is voting against this best practice procedure here. Why? And where is the red line? How many hours / days may we accept between decline and re-nominating? Let's motivate others to renominate their declined candidates! With the precedence here we would have to allow it. --Augustgeyler 15:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

It is not allowed if the image wasn't improved, but in this case, it was. So I don't understand what you don't understand. --Sebring12Hrs 17:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

@Augustgeyler: It is simply not allowed to re-nominate declined candidates, I was guessing that such a rule would exist but could not find it anywhere. Can you tell where it is written? --Plozessor 04:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support It's ok for me. Although the file name could be more specific. --Tournasol7 14:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
  • File renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 08:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

  Mike Peel; Thanks a lot! Tournasol7 18:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Балхаш-2,_ТЭ33АС-0003.jpg

• Nomination TE33AS-003 at Balkhash-2 station. Balkhash, Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 00:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light from the wrong side. The side view of the train is too dark. Please discuss whether the photo is still a QI. --Spurzem 08:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Plozessor 06:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment The current version is not QI. But probably fixable.--ArildV 08:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment The dust spots and the CA should be fixed as well.--Ermell 15:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 15:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Bier-Bauch-Buche_bench,_Oberursel_(LRM_20240128_140326).jpg

• Nomination Wooden bench at the "Bier-Bauch-Buche" (Fagus bierbauchus) in Stadtwald Oberursel --MB-one 09:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting image with a story behind, but I don't think that these dark shadows and CA on branches make it QI. Let's discuss --Екатерина Борисова 03:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Екатерина. --Augustgeyler 08:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 08:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Esponja_(Cinachyra),_Anilao,_Filipinas,_2023-08-21,_DD_157.jpg

• Nomination Sea sponge (Cinachyra), Anilao, Philippines --Poco a poco 16:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Underexposed and noisy. Sorry. --Ermell 09:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Done I made some improvements, over the QI bar now IMHO, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 18:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough IMO --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 07:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Stemma_della_famiglia_Colonna.svg

• Nomination Coat of arms of the Colonna family --ZuppaDiCarlo 11:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Ashoppio 17:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too simple for QI --Poco a poco 18:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco a poco.--Tournasol7 14:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Tournasol7 14:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Church_bell_2017_G1.jpg

• Nomination Bronze church bell cast in 1905 -- George Chernilevsky 05:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 05:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment The bell is at the next picture upright, so which shows the reality? --2015 Michael 2015 16:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
• @2015 Michael 2015: This picture was already promoted. Did you want to object?
•  Support Picture is very good. No issues with one picture showing the bell in its actual position and another picture showing it straight. --Plozessor 05:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support For me, this picture is spectacular. --GoldenArtists 15:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good. --Needsmoreritalin 21:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support It's ok for me. Although the file name could be more specific. --Tournasol7 14:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Tournasol7 14:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Solar_bench_in_Dendermonde_(DSCF0484).jpg

• Nomination Solar bench in Dendermonde (Belgium) --Trougnouf 10:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Interesting, but let's sweep first? --Georgfotoart 17:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment That wouldn't be authentic and it's irrelevant here anyway. --Trougnouf 23:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, the cigarette butts are annoying --Georgfotoart 11:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Question Why has this been moved to Discussions without a single supporting or opposing vote? From my side  Weak oppose because of the perspective. --Plozessor 05:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, I overlooked --Georgfotoart 11:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support COM:I "good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations." This is the floor of a public place, not a palace. The pavements behind are not leveled, it will never be perfectly clean. No problem with the current perspective in my view. It is very appropriate to show the subject (solar panels and bench shapes) under this specific angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Basile Morin (talk) 02:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Общий_вид_на_центр_Москвы_с_Софийской_набережной.jpg

• Nomination General view of the center of Moscow from Sofiyskaya Embankment --Юрий Д.К. 16:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is tilted ccw. --Augustgeyler 21:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Doing… Will be fixed --Юрий Д.К. 03:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Info Changed back to "discuss". --Augustgeyler 22:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• @Augustgeyler: Hi. New version uploaded. --Юрий Д.К. 19:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 20:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my support Spurzem and Plozessor made a point here. I am not sure if this is QI now. I am undecided and hope others decide. --August (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Large parts of the area are too much in shadow. That's a shame, but in my opinion the photo is not a QI. --Spurzem 13:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment As this is an evening view it is obviously large parts will be in shadow. I don't understand how it may be a "shame", or we must forbid any evening photos here? --Юрий Д.К. 14:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment Composition is part of QI, that would include choosing a proper time to take a picture of an object (= when light is good). Personally I have an issue when the subject of an image is dark while the surroundings are bright (like here). --Plozessor 12:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --August (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Little_bee-eater_(Merops_pusillus_meridionalis)_Maputo.jpg

• Nomination Little bee-eater (Merops pusillus meridionalis) --Charlesjsharp 07:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Too small to be QI. Do you have full version to upload? --Екатерина Борисова 02:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Slightly above threshold, IMHO acceptable given the subject. --C messier 19:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Georgfotoart 20:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image appears to have been run through overzealous noise reduction. There isn't any feather detail, it looks somewhat posterized. --Needsmoreritalin 21:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too little detail and just above the hard 2 MP limit. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Robert Flogaus-Faust. Tournasol7 14:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Tournasol7 14:46, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Jesus_Church.jpg

• Nomination Jesus Church --Rione Colonna 15:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment The sky is noisy (fixable?). The filename and description would be better. --Tournasol7 16:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Done thank you --Rione Colonna 13:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment It's leaning at left. --Sebring12Hrs 07:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Done Ok now? Thank you --Rione Colonna 08:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 10:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Due to perspective correction the proportions are intensely distorted (see this image in comparison). --August 21:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment New work,ok now? Thank you--Rione Colonna (talk) 18:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 17:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Not the sharpest but in its fourth(!) version "18:04, 26 July 2024" it is OK. --2015 Michael 2015 10:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Brest_Railway_Museum_ТЭ_2596_Steam_Locomotive_2023-03-05_3216.jpg

• Nomination ТЭ 2596 Steam Locomotive in the Brest Railway Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Too harsh light here, partially  Overexposed --Augustgeyler 08:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  New version Reduce exposition. --Mike1979 Russia 11:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment It got better. But still to harsh light. Lets see what others think. --Augustgeyler 12:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support IMO ok. --Plozessor 06:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К. 11:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 07:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Trier,_08-12-2023_(actm.)_05.jpg

• Nomination Trier, view from the Petrisberg on the city of Trier. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The dust is ruling the picture which is not OK for an city portrait. --2015 Michael 2015 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I think it's mist, and I don't think pictures of landscapes taken in mist are inherently invalid for QI. ReneeWrites 23:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Note: There was fog hanging over the city of Trier that day and the photo was taken from a viewpoint high above Trier.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 21:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Fog is not a crime :) -- Екатерина Борисова 03:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment If you read an article about the city of Trier and then you see this image would you be "happy" with it or would you prefer a haze / fog free pic? imho: No tourist manager would ever accept it. This may be out of scope for an QI but it is for me important because Wikimedia has millons of pictures which should never be used nor uploaded. Btw: I like landscapes with fog, where fog improves the pic it is highly appreciated. --2015 Michael 2015 09:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Every town has its own beauty but no town is beautiful 24/7 all the time. To show it in different conditions is very useful not only for those who write articles about climate, environmental issues etc. but even for tourists who want to know what а town really looks like. So I don't see any problems with quality pictures that show places not as sweet as tourist managers always do. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk)

•  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Tournasol7 04:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Virgin_Mary_Queen_of_Poland_church_in_Znin_(1).jpg

• Nomination Virgin Mary Queen of Poland church in Znin, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voiv., Poland. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 07:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose not upright --2015 Michael 2015 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Verticals are OK, I don't see any problems with this image. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I was above not clear, correct is: For me it looks like as it is leaning to the right, i.e. a "perfect" perspective correction is sometimes the wrong attempt. --2015 Michael 2015 09:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose A clear and sharp image. But the intense PC applied here led to an unrealistic impression of the dimensions. --Augustgeyler 08:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Augustgeyler 08:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Parchau.jpg

• Nomination River landscape --Georgfotoart 17:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Below minimum height requirement. --C messier 21:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Done Sorry, new and bigger --Georgfotoart 17:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy and grainy with low detail, probably due strong JPG compression. --Plozessor 09:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Not too bad. --Smial 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough. --Sebring12Hrs 21:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose A nice panorama with balanced light. But the image should have an information (better a template) telling about how this panorama was made. How many images had been put together here by using which kind of projection? Additionally level of detail is just below minimum IMO. Plozessor is probably right about JPG compression. --Augustgeyler 21:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Augustgeyler --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:09, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Tue 23 Jul → Wed 31 Jul
• Wed 24 Jul → Thu 01 Aug
• Thu 25 Jul → Fri 02 Aug
• Fri 26 Jul → Sat 03 Aug
• Sat 27 Jul → Sun 04 Aug
• Sun 28 Jul → Mon 05 Aug
• Mon 29 Jul → Tue 06 Aug
• Tue 30 Jul → Wed 07 Aug
• Wed 31 Jul → Thu 08 Aug