Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 21:04:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Polemaetus (Martial Eagle)
- Info The endangered martial eagle, Africa's largest eagle. One FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 20:58:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family:Strigidae (Athene noctua)
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Surely not as good as current FPC of same species? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support good for 500 mm. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 14:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! Henrysz (talk) 19:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 13:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
- Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Disclaimer: I so desperately miss this German custom. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 10:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
- Info Finalist in Pesto Genovese contest - Pesto Genovese ingrideints. My work. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The whites are slightly overexposed, but it's a nice well executed photo El Golli Mohamed 11:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition, educational and pleasing for the eye and reminding my tastebuds of pleasant things --Kritzolina (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done. --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The focus stacking issues around the green leaves and above the pot are a bit distracting at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin True and corrected. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe one of your best food pictures, Mile. Thanks for sharing! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Overall, well done. Listing the represented ingredients is a definite plus. If I were trying to imrprove this arrangement, a little higher camera perspective and gathering the ingredients more tightly together would let you move in tighter and strengthen the impact. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 06:36:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by Luca Aless - nominated by ★ -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 06:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support User:Luca Aless 17:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
- Info Snowflake moray (Echidna nebulosa), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of genus Echidna. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry infortunate crop, we can't see the whole fish. This black thing is disturbing, also the sharpness is not so good.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have applied a slight crop to the right bottom corner, so that what I believe is a feather star (black thing), is not on the way. Even if that could be an improvement, I don't see what is wrong with the crop, morays live in holes and rarely go out during the day as they are nocturnal predators. I also have to say that this animal is rare, and probably that's the reason why we have no FPs of the whole genus. That conditions to take pictures under water are more challenging than over the water is something that I don't need to elaborate, I guess. --Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The whole moray would be be too big to fit in the image, so I will assume the author meant to only picture its head. The crop is fine. The black thing is
mildlynot distracting. The bottom of the moray where it turns is a bit blurry, probably OoF. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I am not a professional photographer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a full body image of this species for comparison. Also, isn't it pretty clear the author only wanted to picture its head? --Zzzs (talk) 23:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing is big to fit in an image. We managed to photograph galaxy clusters in a single photo. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is good and intentional; hope this is not an FPC revenge vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have little doubt after reading the same words I used "Infortunate (sic) crop" in my review. That's an statement that doesn't speak for the reviewer. Again, we have no FP of the genus Echidna, but we have already 4 FPs of the species (not genus) Himantopus himantopus. I've definitely supported more images that I've opposed of El Golli Mohamed, so I have no personal issue here and no problem with the photographer, let alone free-license photographers. If I'm convinced, I support the image if not, I oppose, that has nothing to do with whom is behind the camera and in most of the cases people believe that and are thankful for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course anyone may criticise and oppose; that is the essence of FPC. But El Golli Mohamed was banned from Commons in April for two weeks for insulting behaviour stemming from his revenge votes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why don't we have the right to criticize, otherwise it's a revenge vote? Is it a dictatorship here? Is the justification for my vote true or not? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail for an underwater picture. Interesting close up and the light is fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Cangrejo porcelana (Neopetrolisthes maculatus) en una anémona alfombra de Mertens (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 223.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order : Decapoda (Crabs, Shrimps and Relatives)
- Info Aprox 4 centimetres (1.6 in)-long porcelain crab (Neopetrolisthes maculatus) on a Mertens' carpet sea anemone (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of the whole family Porcellanidae (porcelain crabs). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Should be comfortable carpet :-) Nice angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a bad choice for carpet textures --Zzzs (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 04:16:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Primulaceae
- Info Ripening seed capsule on the spiral of a Cyclamen Hederifolium. Focus stack of 27 photos. The spiral distributes the seeds around the plant.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 08:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I wondered about the role of the spiral. I found this online which explains it well: "As each flower fades, the flowering stem retracts the old flower though a clever spiral coiling mechanism. The coil pulls the developing seed back to the ground-level corm, where it holds on tight until the seed is ripe. The ripe seeds are then cleverly coated with a sugary substance known as elaiosome, which is enticing to ants and wasps, who then unknowingly assist with seed dispersal." Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your clear explanation. Nature has a solution for everything (except for the environmental problems caused by humans themselves)--Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- +1 Terragio67 (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding "human", I prefer
would have preferreda natural background rather than an industrial one -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) update -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)- Note: If you mean the background of the photo, that's just grass from the lawn in the garden.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure it's not "a kind of decor" like here? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm very sure! The photo was taken last week on June 18, 2024 06:47. Since all that criticism (including from you) we have stopped photographing the plants and flowers against an artificial background. We haven't done that for a while. So your comment is an annoying unjustified assumption.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Okay, if the background is natural -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm very sure! The photo was taken last week on June 18, 2024 06:47. Since all that criticism (including from you) we have stopped photographing the plants and flowers against an artificial background. We haven't done that for a while. So your comment is an annoying unjustified assumption.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure it's not "a kind of decor" like here? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: If you mean the background of the photo, that's just grass from the lawn in the garden.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The spike makes this remind me of something that killed me in a video game. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 16:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support True, per Rhododendrites --Terragio67 (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The spike looks more like the needle that always makes people pass out during shots/blood draws --Zzzs (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really nice Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 10:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
- Info Miltiades (Roman replica). My shot. --Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Renomination, i have feeling this is FP. Citate from one who use it few days ago "Is the best image on the internet, very clean and high resolution." Nothing to add. Made few improvements.-- Mile (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 00:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 08:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
- Info This artwork was made by Giacomo Raibolini, aka Giacomo Francia. He was the son of the more famous artist Francesco Francia, well known as a goldsmith and painter and a close friend of Raphael. This is an author belonging to the mannerism of the late Italian Renaissance. The exact date of the painting is not known, but it can be attributed between 1520 and 1540, when it was influenced by the painter Dosso Dossi, another mannerist tending towards his Venetian Renaissance. This picture is important because shows a Mannerism offspring from the Italian Renaissance. It is worth noting the resemblance of the Saint Sebastian depicted with his [father] to whom he was extremely devoted. The artwork was imported from Google Arts and Culture stitching 7880 tiles. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Info Uploaded another version just to verify the artwork, in case you cannot download the original file due to its size. Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 05:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Herbert A. Hale - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not surprised by this comment. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's incredibly good quality for 1898. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Adam Cuerden's comment --Llez (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 00:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 21:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
- Info created by NASA/Kim Shiflett - uploaded by Ras67 - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zzzs (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Iconic picture --Ras67 (talk) 04:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 18:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 21:18:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Aix
- Info Female wood duck (Aix sponsa). The male wood ducks get all the attention, but the females are pretty, too! Nominated this a while back and withdrew after the first voter pointed out issues I didn't have time to address. Improved now and renominating. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco a poco --Zzzs (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 17:24:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Others
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Info Orange Skies Day was a rare climatological event where the sky became dark orange due to extreme wildfire smoke. This photo was taken at 10:39 am in the morning. dllu (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 18:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Apocalyptic impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ten days later, the smoke reached Sweden and we got the orange glow. Scary... --Cart (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Scary indeed. Your photo is also impressive. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ten days later, the smoke reached Sweden and we got the orange glow. Scary... --Cart (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Whew! Thought it was the end of the world! --Zzzs (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support outstanding! Chepry (talk) 08:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice but apart from the billboard it's too dark Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 09:01:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
- Info created by Houssembo - uploaded by Houssembo - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice but I'd crop a bit on the left and looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco a poco --Zzzs (talk) 22:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 08:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks
- Info created and uploaded by Smailtn, nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Smailtn (talk) 09:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition. --August Geyler (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Though maybe a touch oversaturated? — Rhododendrites talk | 12:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- contrast level corrected image Smailtn (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you, contrast level corrected image Smailtn (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great shot, though a little noisy. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you, noise level corrected image Smailtn (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This image of a ship graveyard at Rimel Beach, south of Bizerte, Tunisia seems a little dark - suggest lightening. The blue and red freighter on the left is the general cargo ship, Hamada S - IMO 7946643; MMSI 271002029 (formerly named Hakan Kalkavan). This should be entered in the image description and categorized as such. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you, image corrected to clair Smailtn (talk) 22:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tilted in ccw direction, otherwise very nice Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you Smailtn (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean with that? Please, fix the tilt, otherwise I'll oppose. I don't see why an image with an obvious problem that can be easily fixed shoul be promoted to FP. Poco a poco (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- As announced I
Opposeuntil the tilt is fixed Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Moving to Neutral as the tilt is fixed but the image looks overprocessed to me with low level of detail Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- As announced I
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Very important tilt, yes. I don't understand why Poco's remark is ignored. It should be corrected. Sea level clearly not horizontal-- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Thank you for fixing the tilt Smailtn (talk) 22:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, the tilt are corrected Smailtn (talk) 22:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
OpposePing me when tilt corrected. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Thank you, the tilt are corrected Smailtn (talk) 22:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
OpposeThe tilt should not be ignored. --Zzzs (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)- Oppose I didn't notice it. Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 04:07:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Cairina
- Info: feral Muscovy duck drake at Capitão Lake, Azores. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good for QI but enough wow in this wild Muscovy image for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, it lacks wow Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good but not outstanding. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 05:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe lacks wow, but somehow beautiful and attracts attention. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Ermell. Common bird and ordinary top-down view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 22:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo, sharpness not good. -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 18:03:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zzzs (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 08:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry the head is overprocessed. You may have tried adding sharpness but it gives a weird result.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 16:55:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
- Info One existing FP, also from the Kruger Park. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 06:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting subject but a bit too "static"" IMO, likely because of the row of trees. Also, it lacks of dramatic atmosphere. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Quality image but limited wow factor in my view. The lower part with the half cut reflection is not very successful, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd say the water vapor casting shadows is very impressive looking Henrysz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 11:37:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good for QI but lacks of enough wow for FP. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support special mention for the composition, a pity there is not a bit more sun light. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice architectural elements, but the bridge is crushed between the foreground and the background, making the composition cluttered, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 09:06:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created and uploaded by Paul Danese, nominated by Yann
- Support Perfect composition. The cat seems to be hunting, and using camouflage. Nice light, very sharp. -- Yann (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Sharp subject but shadows too dominant in this image. Only one eye is in the light. And I don't think this cat uses "camouflage" technique, it rather seems hard to distinguish with poor contrast and same background color -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It's a great photo but the background is so noisy.. Henrysz (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 08:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice compo and subject, but the light is a bit harsh, and details are not very crisp. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per Christian Ferrer -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 17:02:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Abraham Ortelius - uploaded by ¡0-8-15! - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 17:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think the yellow tint of the background could be improved, if not totally removed. Yann (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Here is a link to a version with the foxing/yellowing removed from the map. The background is a cream-colored tint instead. It's yours if anyone wants it: link. --Cart (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar, Llez, Agnes Monkelbaan, and MZaplotnik: I uploaded the version edited by Cart. Much better IMO. Yann (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, Cart! ★ 23:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar, Llez, Agnes Monkelbaan, and MZaplotnik: I uploaded the version edited by Cart. Much better IMO. Yann (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Domplatz 11 in Sankt Pölten
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 12:09:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Main facade seen from the right side
-
Main facade seen straight on
-
Main facade seen from the left side
-
Gable
-
Windows
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job --El Golli Mohamed 15:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done! Your hard work has not gone unnoticed. Wolverine XI 17:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry Krzysztof, but neither this is a valid set, nor all these images are FP in my opinion. I'd support though the first one as FP. Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only #1 and #2 are FP level in my opinion, and I agree with Poco this set falls short with the guidelines (see "Not acceptable: the facade of a church plus an organ"). Personal taste: I find the Sparkasse Bank logo out of step with the architectural style and unfortunately the juxtaposition quite inharmonious. No wow for the last one, sorry, in a set all the candidates should be extraordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tournasol7: The second one is clearly a FP. ★ 03:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 07:12:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 07:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 07:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 09:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 21:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Overprocessed and why F/2,8 at 1/8000 s ? It's a static scenery. F/13 would have given the flowers of the foreground in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support /! --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Camera setting not optimal but still impressive.--Ermell (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin. --imehling (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose With Basile Morin. --August Geyler (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Basile Morin --Zzzs (talk) 05:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)