User talk:Kritzolina
.jpeg){kind=link}
Danke!
[edit]
|
The Commons Barnstar | |
| Vielen Dank für deine Lösung im Fall Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by XRay. Es ist sicherlich auch im Sinne der Commons-Gemeinschaft. XRay 💬 07:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Covas del Drac - lit stalagmites and stalagtites 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Capocorb Vell 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Capocorb Vell 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fischzucht Aumühle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fischzucht Aumühle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Human footprint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jagoda Marinić at Republica 2024 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
You deleted this file with this rationale: per nomination and Com:Nude. The first part does not make sense, since no valid reason was given in the nomination or its replies.
Regarding COM:Nudity, this is the sort of file that would normally be subject to such a rationale. But in this case, I did argue that this file provided context for the uploader’s other upload, whose own deletion request is currently headed for a ‘keep’ result. What are your thoughts on that? Brianjd (talk) 11:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The wording of the nomination might not be expressed the way our policies read, but basically the person is saying this is nudity that is out of scope. I am not really convinced we should keep the other image, because while it might be high quality, it is also not adding anything educationally to the existing collection in the categories. But I will not decide both images, I am leaving this for someone else.
- But even if the other image is kept, I see no reason to keep both. Yes, you argued that this image is adding context. I don't follow this line of thought, I don't think the other image needs context. --Kritzolina (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Georgine Kellermann at Republica 2024 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Florian Zschiedrich at Republica 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Denise Schindler at Republica 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sabine Scholt at Republica 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Natasha A. Kelly at Republica 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yasmin Fahimi at Republica 2024 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Geraldine de Bastion at Republica 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jean-Paul Philippot at Republica 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catherine Tait at Republica 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fungi on a tree trunk in LSG Emmeringer Leite, Eichenauer Wald 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fungi on a tree trunk in LSG Emmeringer Leite, Eichenauer Wald 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fungi on a tree trunk in LSG Emmeringer Leite, Eichenauer Wald 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pressed wood 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sauerampfer auf der Emmeringer Leite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tree stump on the Emmeringer Leite 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pressed wood 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pressed wood 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tree stump on the Emmeringer Leite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Broken trees in the LSG Emmeringer Leite, Eichenauer Wald 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fußpfad auf der Emmeringer Leite 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! LSG Steinberg - Erlenweg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baum im LSG Steinberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bäume im LSG Steinberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Waldboden auf der Emmeringer Leite 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
 Comment Good image. Are you able to give a more precise location or even a geocode? --Augustgeyler 08:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Brezhoneg: (missing text) Sorry Augustgeyler, I don't have the exact coordinates, but I added more details about the location in the description. --Kritzolina 15:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 23:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puddle in the LSG Steinberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bäume im LSG Steinberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haltepunkt Geisenbrunn 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kornfeld im LSG Steinberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! S8 zwischen Geisenbrunn und Gilching-Argelsried 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bäume im LSG Steinberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puddle in the LSG Steinberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Why only 2 weeks?
[edit]I think you did a good job of calling a rapidly escalating discussion; but why only a 2-week block? Adamant1 has already been blocked for 2 weeks before, and it didn’t work; why not a month, or even longer? They clearly need more than a slap on the wrist to get them to stop pulling this crap, especially since they started a retaliatory noticeboard discussion almost immediately after mine. Dronebogus (talk) 15:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Last time it was edit warring, this is different. Also I don't believe punishment teaches anything at all. Harsher punishment is not more effective than any other punishment. I believe two weeks are enough time to get over the first frustration and start a useful discussion and start learning and understanding, if the person is willing to do that. If not they will quickly end up on AN/U again. The next block will be longer, if the blocking admin sees my message - not because it might change their behavior, but because it will give everyone else more time free of these disruptions. And yes, I saw the other report, but I am not going to get involved in that one as well, someone else needs to handle it. Kritzolina (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think Adamant1’s report is so frivolous that it wouldn’t be controversial to just procedurally close it without action. Dronebogus (talk) 16:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think so as well, but I believe in sharing responsibility in such cases. Kritzolina (talk) 16:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think Adamant1’s report is so frivolous that it wouldn’t be controversial to just procedurally close it without action. Dronebogus (talk) 16:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment I don't believe that an indefinite block is appropriate in this case. Users of reasonable standing should not have an indefinite block take place solely on their talk page. Please put it before the community or at least your fellow administrators for a broader consensus. It looks punitive, not changing behaviour. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am not totally sure what you are talking about - I didn't block Adamant1 indef. Kritzolina (talk) 13:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst, pinging you, as you might not have seen my reply Kritzolina (talk) 07:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies. I clearly didn't look at properly. I have clipped myself across the back of my head. Thanks for the ping. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, these kind of things happen. I just wanted to be sure you didn't think I abused my admin powers - because that would have been abuse at least in my eyes. Kritzolina (talk) 07:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies. I clearly didn't look at properly. I have clipped myself across the back of my head. Thanks for the ping. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst, pinging you, as you might not have seen my reply Kritzolina (talk) 07:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Hi Kritzolina, the above DR had another file (File:Den fantastiske bus - boy (2024-03-13).jpeg) that was not deleted on the closing, probably the script failed. Günther Frager (talk) 19:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Thanks, deleted now. Kritzolina (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! LSG Steinberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleines Erholungs- und Sportareal in Geisenbrunn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bäume im LSG Steinberg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland - Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme
[edit]
Hallo Kritzolina,
Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland ist beendet. Du hast mit deinen hochgeladenen Fotos zum Gelingen des Wettbewerbs beigetragen. Vielen Dank für deine Fotos, sie sind ein wertvoller Beitrag, das Thema Naturschutz in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Es wurden über 16.000 Fotos hochgeladen, du findest alle in der Kategorie Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Germany.
Bis zum 19. Juni 2024 kannst du die hochgeladenen Fotos im Vorjurytool bewerten. Vom 2. bis zum 4. August 2024 kürt dann die Jury die Siegerbilder, vielleicht ist eins deiner Bilder dabei.
Wir möchten den Wettbewerb besser machen, aus diesem Grund haben wir eine kleine anonyme Umfrage vorbereitet. Wir freuen uns, wenn du daran teilnimmst.
Vielen Dank im Namen des Organisationsteams und bis spätestens nächstes Jahr, wenn Wiki Loves Earth 2025 stattfindet. GPSLeo (talk) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kratzen at Puch Open Air 2024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is out!
[edit]Hi, Greetings
The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 is announced!
We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition. This year saw over 41,038 images from 1921 uploaders represented on Commons in over 140 countries. Kindly see images here.
Our profound gratitude to all the people who participated and organized local contests and photo walks for this project.
We hope to have you contribute to the campaign next year.
Thank you,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vierkornbrot 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kanaldeckel in der Weinstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Straßenschild in Freiham 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|