User talk:XRay/Archive/2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office building "Villa Kunterbunt" of LVM Versicherung in Münster (Westphalia) at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Best wishes for 2014

) Feliz año nuevo --The Photographer (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flumserberg (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 1527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 11:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:San Francisco (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 4185.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 4185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok for QI --Martin Kraft 11:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London (UK), Bus -- 2010 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2003 -- 0415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Lewis Hulbert 20:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Montgolfiade 2007 -- 2007 -- 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but what about the copyright on this artwork? --A.Savin 12:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 Comment Which artwork? -- Smial 08:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 Question Sorry, which artwork? IMO the special shape isn't automatically artwork.--XRay 07:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Sorry XRay, you're probably right, I withdraw it. OK for QI otherwise. --A.Savin 22:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pismo Beach (California, USA), Pier -- 2012 -- 4767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pismo Beach (Californien, USA), Pier -- 2012 -- 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2004 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 6040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London (UK), Reliant Robin -- 2010 -- 1992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would prefer a composition where the car is positioned more to the left, but nonetheless OK here. --Tuxyso 07:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street, Angel's Flight -- 2012 -- 4797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pismo Beach (California, USA), Sign -- 2012 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather soft but with regard to the resolution OK. --Tuxyso 08:29, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2013 -- 1-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Wolfsburg, Autostadt, Audi-Pavillon -- 2009 -- 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsburg, Autostadt, Audi-Pavillon -- 2009 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA (most remarkably at the back of the car), strong color noise in the darker areas. Can you fix it? --Tuxyso 08:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. I've removed the lens flare and CAs and color noise best possible.--XRay 09:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Better. --Tuxyso 09:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice atmosphere. --Cayambe 08:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktstraße, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK despite some blurr on the flowers and a lens flare. Can you stamp it out? --Tuxyso 09:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your review. I removed the lens flare.--XRay 10:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Good now. --Tuxyso 11:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice mood. But can you work on the CAs at the left and right at the overexposed (inevitable with this shot) parts? --Tuxyso 09:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your review. I removed the CAs.--XRay 10:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Good now. Probably slightly CW tilted, but I am not sure. --Tuxyso 11:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Arkaden an der Münsterstraße, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 4553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 8766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, I'd anyhow crop a bit of the left to gain simmetry and get rid of the half tree --Poco a poco 12:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. It's now symmetrical. --XRay 08:26, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Stadtjubiläum 700 Jahre, Umzug (Lüdinghauser Straße) -- 2011 -- 0938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburg (Frankreich), Petite France -- 2011 -- 1759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pismo Beach (California, USA), Pier -- 2012 -- 4761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco (California, USA), Golden Gate Park -- 2012 -- 4221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zürich (Schweiz), Auto in der Bahnhofstraße -- 2011 -- 1425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Das war doch am 1. Dezember schon mal nominiert, kommt das jetzt als Monatsabo? --Kreuzschnabel 11:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Firestation of Putgarten, Rügen, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance of the Westdeutsche Lotterie in Münster, Germany, at night; View from the Weseler Straße.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, John Lennon -- 2012 -- 4990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Los Angeles (California, USA), Metro -Hollywood Western Station- -- 2012 -- 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Metro -Hollywood Western Station- -- 2012 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 09:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2004 -- 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Los Angeles (California, USA), Metro -Hollywood Western Station- -- 2012 -- 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Metro -Hollywood Western Station- -- 2012 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:13, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swinemünde (Polen) -- 2010 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 4853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Stadtjubiläum 700 Jahre, Umzug (Lüdinghauser Straße) -- 2011 -- 0912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks --Poco a poco 15:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktstraße, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Amboy (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amboy (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Santa Monica Beach -- 2012 -- 5301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard -- 2012 -- 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Pfannenwagen -- 2012 -- 3610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 12:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Stadtjubiläum 700 Jahre, Umzug (Lüdinghauser Straße), Wiesmann GT -- 2011 -- 1010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, The Doors -- 2012 -- 5040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 14:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pismo Beach (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 4768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good technical quality. --DXR 22:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet -An der Lehmkuhle-) -- 2008 -- 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 12:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, -Oldtimertreffen- -- 2004 -- 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yosemite National Park (California, USA), Yosemite Valley -- 2012 -- 4667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine for me now --DXR 17:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 5289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktstraße -- 2012 -- 7063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Sputniktilt 09:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swinemünde (Polen), Hafen -- 2010 -- 2522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heizkraftwerk Wolfsburg Nord in Wolfsburg, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, Oldtimertreffen -- 2007 -- 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 12:30, , 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Leonard Bernstein -- 2012 -- 4971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 5844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 09:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Bahnhof, Dampflokdurchfahrt -- 2004 -- 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Bahnhof, Dampflokdurchfahrt -- 2004 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann (Gewerbegebiet -An der Lehmkuhle-) -- 2008 -- 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Okay for me now, given that the resolution is pretty high --DXR 09:36, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Amboy, Kalifornien, USA, Hist. Route 66 -- 2012 -- 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amboy, Kalifornien, USA, Hist. Route 66 -- 2012 -- 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 5663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice quality --DXR 09:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amboy (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 5703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 5503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Jusy ok IMO (very small DoF) --Christian Ferrer 16:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 5259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now --DXR 10:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Prora, Eisenbahn- und Technikmuseum Rügen -- 2009 -- 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prora, Eisenbahn- und Technikmuseum Rügen -- 2009 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:30, , 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heringsdorf, Seebrücke -- 2010 -- 2618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 10:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amboy (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 5704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 10:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine quality --DXR 09:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 5666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 10:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 5444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective distortion at the very left --A.Savin 13:16, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. Perspective is now corrected. Additionaly the cut is changed to removed the person on the left.--XRay 16:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 Support --A.Savin 16:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Santa Monica Beach -- 2012 -- 5308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted and perspective (for tilt look at sea level just over the fence at right and left) (for perspective : after to have corrected the tilt make the verticals of the fence straight) --Christian Ferrer 12:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry, I haven't seen the sea level. All corrections done, but the fence post are not parallel. --XRay 17:07, 8 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:22, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 5689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Embarcadero -- 2012 -- 5464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you improve the crop (at least bottom left)? Poco a poco 18:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks! I improved the crop (and removed the small part of the disturbing car on the right.)--XRay 13:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park (California, USA) -- 2012 -- 5690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Hackesche Höfe -- 2011 -- 2446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yosemite National Park (California, USA), Yosemite Valley, Mirror Lake -- 2012 -- 4685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Several dust spots. Mattbuck 22:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advise. The dust spots should be removed now.--XRay 13:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
A bit sharper would be better, but ok. Mattbuck 00:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. The image is now sharper.--XRay 11:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), San Diego Avenue -- 2012 -- 5553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The background's distracting, but not as distracting as the big yellow thing in the foreground. --Mattbuck 09:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 Comment It probably should also receive a bit more precise description than that... --DXR 13:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), Fabulous Las Vegas -- 2012 -- 6260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), San Diego Avenue -- 2012 -- 5552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good, I would consider cropping it a bit and perhaps a bit of brightening. Car is a Hummer H2 SUT ;-) --DXR 14:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Strip -- 2012 -- 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice lights --The Photographer 16:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Central Park -- 2012 -- 6725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang im Winter -- 2013 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dustspots (see note) and perspectives (the house on the right are leaning in) --Christian Ferrer 06:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. Hopefully all fixed.--XRay 17:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 6047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good but purple CA at top right --Christian Ferrer 06:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Hopefully fixed, purple CAs removed.--XRay 17:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 7.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Los Angeles (California, USA), South Olive Street -- 2012 -- 7.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona-Nevada, USA) -- 2012 -- 6125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Strip -- 2012 -- 6215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Empire State Building -- 2012 -- 6436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Ilfracombe (Devon, UK), Damien Hirst's Verity -- 2013 -- 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nilfanion (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona-Nevada, USA) -- 2012 -- 6129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective correction necessary (see bridge), also there is magenta CA under the bridge roadway. Furthermore, I would suggest to crop a little bit of the big monotonous concrete surface at the bottom of the photo. --Cccefalon 06:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. It's corrected now.--XRay 12:14, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Pardon me, but the perspective is not done; might be you uploaded the wrong version. For now the stilts of the bridge and also the machine houses of the dam are tilted. Give it another try, please. --Cccefalon 12:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Now the perspective is corrected. It looks like another image.--XRay 15:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Indeed, it looks like QI now :) ... Honestly, it's far far better than before and the untilting resolved my issue with the boring concrete area. --Cccefalon 15:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Strip -- 2012 -- 6286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 18:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Central Park -- 2012 -- 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice --Christian Ferrer 06:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona), USA -- 2012 -- 6130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Gaslamp Quarter -- 2012 -- 5411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Empire State Building -- 2012 -- 6448 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support (For the reason that the bw photo conferres a great atmosphere. That overtrumps some weaknesses in the photographic quality IMO.) --Cccefalon 11:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 5898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, the essential parts are sharp. --EveryPicture 21:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona-Nevada, USA) -- 2012 -- 6132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Times Square-Duffy Square -- 2012 -- 6380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Empire State Building -- 2012 -- 6465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Gaslamp Quarter -- 2012 -- 5425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Manhattan -- 2012 -- 6703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your nominations on this Photo Challenge. Unfortunately they were taken before the challenge period and so are not eligible. This particular challenge theme had the restriction that photos must be taken during the challenge month. -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Rockefeller Center -- 2012 -- 6413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 11:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), South Rim nahe Tusayan -- 2012 -- 5895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Berlin, Hauptbahnhof -- 2008 -- 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin, Hauptbahnhof -- 2008 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 11:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), Fabulous Las Vegas -- 2012 -- 6263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 09:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Brooklyn Bridge -- 2012 -- 6630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good (maybe need a little sharpening) --Christian Ferrer 06:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Central Park -- 2012 -- 6732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentBlown whites at the top. Pleclown 12:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Fixed as good as possible.--XRay 17:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
OK now. Pleclown 20:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona-Nevada, USA) -- 2012 -- 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona-Nevada, USA) -- 2012 -- 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment a little bit overesxposed imo. Pleclown 12:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed You're right. It's now fixed.--XRay 17:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Pleclown 19:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 08:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Bürgerfest 2013 -- 2013 -- 3129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braunton (Devon, UK), Car -- 2013 -- 00213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London (UK), Jubilee Walkway -- 2010 -- 2061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2013 -- 2031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Bgag 14:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Frühlingsfest Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann -- 2013 -- 0127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For now, the photo is a nice collection of chromatic aberrations. I'm tempted to decline, because I'm not sure, if it can be handled properly. --Cccefalon 10:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thank you! And again: CAs fixed.--XRay 11:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Much better. The reflections are still borderline, but for me: Composition outweights those minor flaws. QI hence. --Cccefalon 15:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Statue of Liberty -- 2012 -- 6660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment With perspective correction it would look better --Moroder 10:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)✓ Fixed Sorry for delay. Perspective correction is done.--XRay 17:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Good quality. --Moroder 20:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Nevada (Arizona-Nevada, USA) -- 2012 -- 6099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but it needs perspective correction (tilted cw). --Cccefalon 10:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Problem with the crop (see note)--Lmbuga 11:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Embarrassing, sorry. Now fixed.--XRay 17:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, the crop is fixed. However, I have to be annoying with the tilt issue: The left side is still leaning inwards (flag pole, dodecaeders) --Cccefalon 18:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed You're right. Perspective correction is now done.--XRay 12:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
No more complaints, Your Honor :) --Cccefalon 15:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Shop -- 2013 -- 3802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vatican City (Vaticano), Petersdom -- 2013 -- 4330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vatican City (Vaticano), Petersplatz -- 2013 -- 3894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but ok --Poco a poco 08:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Frühlingsfest Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann -- 2013 -- 0134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Frühlingsfest Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann -- 2013 -- 0128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. Some smaller magenta CA and one really disturbing CA above the left lights; I made an annotation. You can get rid of the smaller CA by raising the Lens Correction - Colour - Amount in LR5.3 after applying the Remove chromatic aberration --Cccefalon 18:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. I reduced the CAs. It's not possible to remove all CAs, there is a dark border instead if I remove the CAs completely. Hopefully it's good now.--XRay 07:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay. I tried to resolve the problem myself but without remapping in PS or cloning out the dark border in LR, it's not possible to get a better result. Anyway, it's QI. --Cccefalon 14:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Door -- 2013 -- 3554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspectives : left and right are leaning in --Christian Ferrer 05:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Should be OK now.--XRay 17:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 22:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Evangelischer Friedhof -- 2012 -- 8087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments While the foregroudn could be a little bit darker and/or the luminance of the ewers could be reduced, it is already QI for me. --Cccefalon 06:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Frühlingsfest Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann -- 2013 -- 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Frühlingsfest Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann -- 2013 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Empire State Building -- 2012 -- 6440.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Pleclown 12:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Windows -- 2013 -- 3520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Odd but ok. --Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Frühlingsfest Sportwagenmanufaktur Wiesmann -- 2013 -- 0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Para agradecer y comentarle

Hola, XRay partiendo de los comentarios y sugerencias que emitieron algunos usuarios sobre sobre mi archivo: Sistema de regadío circular; , el cual usted sí emitió su voto a favor, algo que le agradezco mucho, y por la importancia e interés que considero pueda tener esta maquinaria para la agricultura, (además de su impacto visual por su forma y tamaño), donde pudiera ayudar apoyando algún proyecto de la comunidad, he decidido subir una nueva foto del mismo, pero donde puede verse el equipo en toda su magnitud con otra perspectiva, , e igualmente la he nominado a candidata a FP. Le hago saber esto pues agradecería y apreciaría muchísimo si usted pudiera pasar y dar su nueva valoración y opinión sobre esta foto actual. Muchas gracias nuevamente. Un saludo cordial Ivan2010

It's really difficult to answer. Please write in english (or german). But may be I understood your message: You ' re right, a geo position is not necessary, but IMO useful. Thank you. --XRay talk 11:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, William Bendix -- 2012 -- 4983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2010 -- 3037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 06:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2013 -- 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber -- 2012 -- 4980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:49, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Windows -- 2013 -- 3498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
OK when perspective corrected on both sides (easy to fix). --JLPC 18:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It's fixed now. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 16:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 Support : QI now. --JLPC 18:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Piazza Navona, Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi -- 2013 -- 3927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Gary Cooper -- 2012 -- 4981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amboy (California, USA), Hist. Route 66 -- 2012 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2010 -- 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Piazza Navona -- 2013 -- 4418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Little perspective correction necessary. --Cccefalon 06:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed The perspective is changed, but I it's really not rectangular. --XRay 16:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
I considered that. But at least the switch box at the upper left corner should be rectilinear :) --Cccefalon 20:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2013 -- 2075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice forest atmosphere! At least three dustspots in the sky. Bad crop of the left border. Please try to reduce whites and highlights a little bit to reduced the big burned out area next to the sun. --Cccefalon 06:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Oh dear. It's all fixed: light, dust, cutout.--XRay 16:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, but sorry, I have to disturb again: One part looks now a little bit like egg yolk (see annotation). Would you mind to alter the settings again? --Cccefalon 06:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I've changed the settings again. Hopefully more sun than egg. ;-) --XRay 11:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
It's still very yellow but I think that it might be the true colour at the time of shooting. It can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 19:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2010 -- 3038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment some burnt out areas. Fixable from RAW --P e z i 22:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I reduced the lights and so the burnout areas are fixed.--XRay 16:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)  Comment sorry for insisting, but on the containers there is still an overexposed area (see note) --P e z i 21:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I would expect too much blue at the time the photo was taken ... So the image is now a little bit darker to remove the overexposed area.--XRay 11:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Support for me it's OK now --P e z i 12:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Door -- 2013 -- 3558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a perspective correction (verticals are leaning outwards). --Cccefalon 06:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It's fixed now. Thanks for your advice. --XRay 16:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Stadtansicht (nahe der Borgmühle) -- 2014 -- 5506-8jpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 11:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Piazza di Santa Maria -- 2013 -- 4079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Two issues to resolve: The left side of the sign is leaning and the black letters bear a magenta fringe. --Cccefalon 09:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. It's fixed now.--XRay 13:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), -Little Tokyo- -- 2012 -- 4908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2013 -- 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Nat King Cole -- 2012 -- 4979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Jerry Lewis -- 2012 -- 4973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamburg, Hafen -- 2010 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Fixed The image is now darker, IMO it's better now.--XRay 10:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 SupportQI for me --Halavar 20:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Bürgerfest 2013 -- 2013 -- 3128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --JLPC 17:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rom (Italien), Tiber -- 2013 -- 3487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Strip -- 2012 -- 19.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Las Vegas (Nevada, USA), The Strip -- 2012 -- 19.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Shop -- 2013 -- 3610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Gregory Peck -- 2012 -- 4975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Useful and QI. --JLPC 18:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Mark Wahlberg -- 2012 -- 4984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 00:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Marktplatz, Weihnachtsmarkt -- 2013 -- 5355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 02:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walensee (Switzerland), Schwäne -- 2011 -- 1571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The thumbnail looked iffy, but in full view this is excellent. Love it. --Mattbuck 23:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Bot strangeness

Why is your bot adding "Category:2008 in Dülmen" to Trinity diagram files? -- AnonMoos (talk) 03:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, that may be a mistake. The Category was added because the image was categorized as "Anna Katharina Emmerick", who was a part of Dülmen. --XRay talk 04:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen -- 2014 -- 5879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Compared to the declined photo, the tree is sharp enough here and I have no objections. --Cccefalon 08:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

I was aware that Commons has a preference for level horizon lines, but I was unaware of any preference for shooting parallel to the ground. Is there any standard, guideline, etc. that you can point me to that indicates such a preference? (Maybe this is why I find most of the featured pictures boring, and feel like they all conform to one narrow aesthetic...) - Jmabel ! talk 19:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Please have a look to the guidelines (see at Distortion). And if you like to discuss: discussion. --XRay talk 05:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ortsansicht und Heubach -- 2014 -- 5883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 09:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 09:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Fixed I think that the impression is now better.--XRay 11:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 Support good quality (I would have taken as reference the river's edge, but good) --Lmbuga 12:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good for QI but I would expect a more instructive explanation of the purpose of that machine in the description. --Cccefalon 08:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. I don't know the exact purpose, but I added a short explanation for the general purpose (mining of quartz sand).--XRay 08:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Umland, Sonnenaufgang -- 2012 -- 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Hochzeitsallee -- 2014 -- 5916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good IMO--Lmbuga 14:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rome (Italy), Piazza della Rotonda, Hub of a Coach -- 2013 -- 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rome (Italy), Piazza della Rotonda, Hub of a Coach -- 2013 -- 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Hochzeitsallee -- 2014 -- 5917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you set the magenta fringe level to "2" to get rid of the magenta around the metal reflections? And brighten up the darks and shadows a little bit; the background is too dark. --Cccefalon 06:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks! It's all fixed.--XRay 16:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
ah, that's good!  Support --Cccefalon 21:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen -- 2014 -- 5880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not a great quality (there is also some overexposure) but just ok for QI to me --Poco a poco 21:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Bürgerfest 2013 -- 2013 -- 3150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

In Münster?

Eigentlich ist es mir natürlich egal. Aber interessiert mich doch irgendwie, warum Personen, die teilweise sogar nur indirekt, anderswo in Erscheinung getreten sind, in eine Kategorie, die sich "in Münster" nennt, gehören? Hipp Hipp, Meck Meck, määäähhhhh --Kürschner (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Das ist mehr oder weniger falsch. Aber die Personen sind Münster zugeordnet - und mein Skript kann das nicht unterscheiden. Ich entferne die Kategorie wieder.--XRay talk 11:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Danke für die Antwort, schönen Restkarneval. --Kürschner (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Ich habe die Personen jetzt ganz herausgenommen. Da gibt's dann doch zu viele falsche Zuordnungen. (Und ich mache derzeit alle Fehler bzgl. der Personen rückgängig.) --XRay talk 12:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Es ist gerade so schönes Wetter. Kannst Du mir nicht ein schönes Bild der Pelzfirma Mersmann Design, Roggenmarkt 4, stiften? Wenn Du Dich traust, darfst Du auch reingehen und fragen, ob Du Innenaufnahmen machen darfst. Mit Empfehlung vom Wikipedia-Kürschner. Schönes Wochenende. --Kürschner (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
;-) Schönes Wetter? Hier (leider) nicht. Aber ich bin auch gerade nicht in Münster. Aber die Region der Stadt ist fototechnisch in naher Zukunft wieder dran. --XRay talk 12:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry. Da hat mein Skript noch einmal verkehrt zugeordnet. Habe ich schon geändert.--XRay talk 12:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
No problem - in froher Erwartung, trotzdem ein schönes Wochenende (bei mir trübt es sich auch, pünktlich vorm Spazierengehen, ein). Gruß vom --Kürschner (talk) 12:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Hochzeitsallee -- 2014 -- 5919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rome (Italy), Windows -- 2013 -- 3492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Rathaus -- 2014 -- 5946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Heavy noise in the sky, but otherwise fine. Ok for QI imo.--ArildV 13:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I've reduced the noise in the sky.--XRay 14:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor -- 2013 -- 2316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor -- 2013 -- 2299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some CA even here. --ArildV 09:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed CAs removed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 14:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks, better now.--ArildV 19:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor -- 2013 -- 2305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --ArildV 09:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen -- 2014 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Schlossgarten, Tor zum Botanischen Garten -- 2014 -- 6672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Skulptur -- 2014 -- 5953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Bing Crosby -- 2012 -- 5009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 11:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Feldweg -- 2014 -- 6696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality image. May even be suitable for nomination as a Featured Picture. --DAJF 07:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Chuck Berry -- 2012 -- 4996.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (and OK for Chuck !). --JLPC 18:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Skulptur -- 2014 -- 5952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Rathaus -- 2014 -- 5951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Harrison Ford -- 2012 -- 5004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It would have been nice if the name was more clearly visible, but the picture as a whole is of good quality. --DAJF 05:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Silbersee III -- 2014 -- 5886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it’s good enough. Do these pipes actually transport sand? --Kreuzschnabel 16:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It's a little bit darker now, so IMO it's not overexposed. And the pipes actually transport sand with water from another sea (Silbersee II) nearby.--XRay 17:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Feldweg -- 2014 -- 6699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Again beautiful, but significant chromatic noise. --Mattbuck 00:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry. Chromatic noise is now reduced.--XRay 10:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
It happens. Mattbuck 12:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Baumart

Hallo! ich befürchte, dass man doch den wissenschaftlichen Namen braucht. Ich bin auch kein Biologe aber fotografiere gerne Pflanzen und Tiere aller Art. Ich verbringe dann halt etwas länger mit der Suche, aber meistens bin ich -vor allem mit Hilfe von Internet- fündig. Eine Alternative ist auch einen anderen Benutzer zu fragen, z.B. Biopics, VG, Poco2 21:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich werde baldmöglichst Quercus robur ergänzen, es muss die Art sein, da dort nichts anderes vorkommt. Bei den nächsten Nominierungen achte ich dann auf die biologischen Bezeichnungen. --XRay talk 04:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Ist erledigt. Derzeit ist die QI-Liste in Bearbeitung, so dass dort die Rückmeldung noch fehlt. --XRay talk 05:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Jack Lemmon -- 2012 -- 4999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor -- 2013 -- 2323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Venner Moor -- 2013 -- 2345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, James Dean -- 2012 -- 4997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Photo Challenge 1st Place

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations! Your picture File:Sellin, Strandkörbe am Hauptstrand -- 2009 -- 1.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge A bunch of stuff, in January 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.
Congratulations!!--Alurín (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Felicitaciones XRay por este primer lugar obtenido en el evento. Disculpa te escriba de nuevo en español, pero no manejo otro idioma, ojalá puedas entender mis letras al menos usando quizás algún software de traducción. Yo he participado en los 3 meses anteriores, no he tenido suerte aún, pero considero que es un proyecto excelente y seguiré participando!! Ahora nos llega la votación de febrero, te deseo suerte para ese mes igual, y lo espero con algún "aporte nuevo" para marzo. Un saludo cordial--Ivan2010 03:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
¡Gracias! Un software de traducción me ha ayudado a lo comprendí todo. :-) --XRay talk 06:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Roy Orbison -- 2012 -- 4988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Hollywood Boulevard, Walter Matthau -- 2012 -- 4998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Feld -- 2014 -- 6714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. --Mattbuck 00:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Löschanträge

Hallo, Warum stellst du massenhaft Löschanträge auf deine eigenen Uploads? Und warum entfernst du die Kategorien? --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Antwort kam per PN. --XRay talk 20:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, how does the above file fit the Category:2014 in Bocholt, Germany? Thank you, Oyoyoy (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. My script can't recognize the content. The image is a part of the category Bocholt (see comment of the version). I usally check the categories afterwards manuelly. --XRay talk 15:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Horsteberg -- 2014 -- 6915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 6918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 15:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Kiepenkerldenkmal (Spiekerhof) -- 2014 -- 6885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Dein Wunsch wurde erfüllt. Mein Schulenglisch liegt über vierzig Jahre zurück, und ich kenne viele aus der ehemaligen DDR, die als Fremdsprache nur Russisch hatten. Nach meiner unmassgeblichen Meinung sollte Sprachkenntnis kein Bewertungskriterium sein. Nichts für ungut! Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Ich hätte es dir glatt eingetragen, war aber schon erledigt. --XRay talk 05:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Michaelisplatz, Michaelisbrunnen -- 2014 -- 6850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo XRay! Ich habe gerade mal durch deine Fotos geschaut und finde u.a.

sehr gelungen. Spricht aus deiner Sicht etwas gegen eine KEB-Kandidatur? Willst du vorher noch ein paar Feinkorrekturen vornehmen? Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Tuxyso! Verwirrt ich bin ... Wofür steht KEB? Was auch immer das sein mag, gerne. Korrekturen nehme ich in den nächsten Minuten noch vor.--XRay talk 13:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Fertig. War kaum was. Ich sehe keine der üblichen Mängel. Danke für deinen Vorschlag! Ich kann bei meinen Bildern relativ schlecht beurteilen, was vielleicht geeignet sein könnte. Daher freue ich mich, wenn du die Idee dazu hast. (Ich werte KEB als "Kandidatur für ein exzellentes Bild".) Und die Erfahrungen mit dem letzten Bild (im deutschsprachigen Wikipedia) war durchwachsen. Bei manchen Begründungen konnte ich nur noch mit dem Kopf schütteln. Vielleicht erinnerst du dich an mein Bild der LVM-Versicherung in Münster. Es mag nicht jeden Geschmack treffen, aber ein Kontra, weil man keine Glasbauten mag oder die Etagen unterschiedlich hoch zu sehen sind, verwirrt mich doch sehr. Leider habe ich das erst zu spät gesehen. Bei dem Gebäude ist tatsächlich die obere Etage höher als die anderen. Der Grund mag darin liegen, dass ein Altbau darin verarbeitet wurde und es sich nicht um einen reinen Neubau handelt. Aber sei es drum.--XRay talk 13:26, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Genau, KEB steht für "Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder" - praktisch FPC in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia. Ich blicke bei den Kandidaturen dort z.T. auch nicht recht durch. Meine bisherige Erfahrung dort ist, dass der "enzyklopädische Wert" meist stärker im Vordergrund steht als das "Wow", das bei FPC eine größere Rolle spielt. Nachtaufnahmen haben es deswegen dort per se sehr schwer. Ich würde auf KEB z.B. nicht dieses Foto nominieren. Es sieht zwar toll aus, nur sieht man naturgemäß weniger wenn eben das "Licht" aus ist :) --Tuxyso (talk) 15:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Eine Sache noch: Hast du mal probiert den Vorsprung ganz unten links rauszucroppen? --Tuxyso (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Ich habe die eine Email geschickt. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Du hast ja echt ein gutes Auge. :-) Mir war zwar die störende Mauer aufgefallen, aber ich hatte erst gar nicht versucht, einen anderen Ausschnitt zu wählen. Ich hatte einfach Bedenken, dass unter dem Turm zu wenig Wasser bleibt. Geht aber. Danke! Das geänderte Bild lädt gerade hoch. (BTW: Dein Bild vom Duisburger Hafen finde ich richtig klasse.) --XRay talk 16:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Danke für das Lob! Ich habe dein Bild mal nominiert. Ich persönlich hätte nach unten hin noch etwas mehr Platz gelassen (geht aber nur durch Trickserei, s. meine Email). Ich finde die jetzige Lösung aber auch gut. Mal schauen, was so für Kommentare kommen. Ein Kommentar könnte sich darauf beziehen, dass das Foto bisher nicht im Artikel eingebunden ist. Allerdings ist der Artikel bereits sehr bilderlastig, deswegen würde ich erst mal abwarten. Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 16:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Ich hab's dann doch noch mal ein klein wenig am unteren Ende angepasst. ;-) --XRay talk 16:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Sieht gut aus. Mal schauen, was für Kommentare kommen. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6796-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Bgag 14:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 6796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me the quality is okay. --Badener 19:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Massenbearbeitungen

Hallo. Wie machst du eigentlich die ganzen sehr ähnlichen Bearbeitungen an deinen Dateien (Kategorien umsortieren, Datumskategorien einfügen etc.) beziehungsweise bei der Anlage von Kategorien. --Didym (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Reine Faulheit. Die Wikimedia-Software kennt eine Programmierschnittstelle ([1]). Mit mehreren in Perl geschriebenen Skripts nehme ich die Änderungen vor. Es sind aber nur Änderungen, die entweder meine Bilder selbst oder die regional naheliegenden betrifft. Wenn das Skript mal auf die wenigen Dateien losgelassen wird, die nicht zu mir gehören, kontrolliere ich das. Es können ja immer Fehler auftreten.
Und falls es dich interessiert: Ein Skript kontrolliert alle meine Bilder, auch um Fehler zu finden, die ich bei manueller Arbeit schon einmal hinterlasse. (Gestern noch habe ich so bei zwei Eintragungen entdeckt, dass das Datum nicht oder falsch angegeben war. Der komplette Durchlauf für alle Bilder ist aber die Ausnahme. Das soll eigentlich nicht sein. Aber da waren zwei Kategorien, die ich gerne bei all meinen Bilder haben wollte. Und der Aufwand von Hand wäre mir echt zu groß. Bei einigen wenigen Bildern habe ich das noch gemacht. Nun wird's bald vierstellig und ich habe noch sehr viele Bilder auf Vorrat, die ich in den nächsten Jahren hochladen möchte.) Das zweite Skript sorgt - allerdings nur hier im regionalen Umfeld - dafür, dass die Jahreshistorie ("YYYY in ...") gepflegt wird. Und das dritte Skript ergänzt fehlende Datumskategorien (im Stil von "YYYY-MM-DD" und "Photographs taken on YYYY-MM-DD"), denn die wurden bei meinen Bildern hin und wieder manuell eingetragen, ich möchte sie dann aber für alle meine Bilder haben. Und von Hand ist mir das zuviel Aufwand. Zudem sehe ich dann immer wieder die netten roten Links, dass die Kategorien fehlen. Also werden sie nachgetragen.
BTW: Ich hoffe, dass das statthaft ist. Es läuft ja alles unter gleichzeitiger Beobachtung und Kontrolle. Die Skripte läuft auch extra mit kleinen Pausen, um eine Belastung zu vermeiden. Und "Massenbearbeitungen" hat so einen negativen Touch ...--XRay talk 05:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Dir ist aber schon klar, dass das ein Botbetrieb ohne Berechtigung unter deinem Hauptbenutzerkonto ist, was so ein Sperrgrund wäre. Zudem sind viele dieser Bearbeitungen völlig sinnlos, da nur die Reihenfolge der Kategorien im Quelltext verändert wird, was an der Darstellung überhaupt nichts ändert. --Didym (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Verstehe ich allerdings nicht ganz. Wieso gibt es einen Zusammenhang mit dem Hauptbenutzerkonto? Soll dafür ein besonderer Account her? Im Grunde mache ich nichts anderes, als ich es manuell machen würde. Nur bei manueller Arbeit dauert es Wochen und Monate, so nur hin und wieder mal eine Stunde. Du hast Recht, wenn nur die Reihenfolge der Kategorien geändert wird, ist es im Grunde sinnlos. Aber es ist mir aufgefallen, dass immer mal wieder meine Bilder besucht wurden (durch andere als mich) und dann nur entweder die Kategorien sortiert wurden oder bei den Geo-Koordinaten ein paar Stellen weggestrichen wurden. Meine Bilder untersuche in in unregelmäßigen Abständen, um zu kontrollieren, ob ich alles richtig angegeben habe, also um Fehler zu finden, oder um Kategorien zu ergänzen. Hin und wieder werden auch Dinge an den Beschreibungen verändert, die nicht im Sinne des Motivs sind. Die Sortierung ist nur ein Nebeneffekt. Wie also ist der richtige Weg? Wenn du mir einen Tipp geben könntest ... Die Hinweise habe ich gerade gefunden. Den Account werde ich gleich mal einrichten. Sehe ich das richtig, dass ich dann quasi einen Antrag stellen muss? (BTW: Darf ich auf deine Unterstützung für den richtigen Weg hoffen?) --XRay talk 06:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Ich hoffe, es ist nun der richtige Weg eingeschlagen. Den Bot-Account habe ich eingerichtet und einen Antrag gestellt. Auf dass es so läuft. Wärst du so nett und schaust einmal auf den Antrag?--XRay talk 06:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Nur, um es noch einmal zu erläutern. Mein Verständnis der Bots war ein anderer. Ich hatte immer gedacht, diese Skripte müssten irgendwo auf einem Wikimedia/Wikipedia-Server laufen. Daher habe ich diesen Weg nie eingeschlagen. Dass damit auch mein auf meinem Heimrechner laufendes Skript gemeint sein könnte, kam mir nicht in den Sinn. (Trotzdem sind aus meiner Erfahrung heraus die Skripte sehr defensiv geschrieben, damit sie auf keinen Fall einen unüberschaubaren Schaden hinterlassen. Auch arbeiten sie vergleichsweise effektiv, um keine unnötigen Requests zu erzeugen.) Du hast mir mit der möglichen Sperre einen ganz schönen Schrecken eingejagt. Ich möchte gerne weiter aktiv sein auf Wikimedia, zumal auch noch viele tausend Bilder hochgeladen werden sollen. Aber du hast natürlich recht, es muss regelkonform sein. Allerdings stolpere ich schon hin und wieder in so eine Falle, allein weil sich manches Regelwerk nicht auf Anhieb erschließt. Trotz der vielen Jahre Aktivität auf Wikipedia und Wikimedia ist so ein hilfreicher Tipp wie von Dir schon sehr gern gesehen. So kann man wenigstens einen vernünftigen Weg finden. Vielen Dank auf jeden Fall an Dich!--XRay talk 09:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear XRay/Archive,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Aquarell -- 2014 -- 6970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg -- 2014 -- 6938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Ehrenmal -- 2014 -- 6969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 6991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 03:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Wegkreuz -- 2014 -- 6928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Aquarell -- 2014 -- 6972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 6993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice light --Ralf Roletschek 16:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, St.-Anna-Kapelle -- 2014 -- 6925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg -- 2014 -- 6934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg -- 2014 -- 6937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Malchen53 09:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Mariengrotte -- 2014 -- 6966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 6995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Klar, die Sonne ist überstrahlt aber das geht ja nicht anders. --Ralf Roletschek 19:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Aquarell -- 2014 -- 6976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Alfred-Flechtheim-Platz (und Stadtbücherei) -- 2014 -- 6873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --J.-H. Janßen 16:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Mariengrotte -- 2014 -- 6965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg -- 2014 -- 6940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Solarpark -- 2014 -- 7060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llorenzi 21:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can be a QI IMO --Cccefalon 10:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg -- 2014 -- 6935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg (XI) -- 2014 -- 6955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 16:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bachauen- -- 2014 -- 7031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice and good quality. --Iifar 06:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice and good quality. --Iifar 06:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg -- 2014 -- 6960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 09:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI --Cccefalon 10:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg (X) -- 2014 -- 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, St.-Anna-Kapelle -- 2014 -- 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective on the left side of the building is not perfect. Try to exclude the trees on the very left in the background from shadow brightening (for the building), imho they look a bit strange. --Tuxyso 11:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I fixed perspective and changed thr crop. Hopefully it's better.--XRay 06:13, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Better. --Tuxyso 20:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Kreuzweg (XII) -- 2014 -- 6956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, St.-Anna-Kapelle -- 2014 -- 6931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Hund -- 2014 -- 7130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please categorize with:Boxer (dog). --Cayambe 09:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed The category is fixed now. Thanks.--XRay 15:53, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and atmospheric. But please try to remove the contrail in the upper left corner. --Uoaei1 07:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It's fixed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 15:49, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur -Dolomit- -- 2014 -- 6907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspectives : lest and right are leaning out --Christian Ferrer 15:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ FixedThanks for your advice. It's fixed.--XRay 15:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sign of Roy's Cafe & Motel in Amboy, California (towards Los Angeles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Welte, Mobilfunksender -- 2014 -- 7052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Kiepenkerldenkmal (Spiekerhof) -- 2014 -- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ FixedThanks for your advice. It's fixed now.--XRay 14:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 Comment It's better, but I'm not convinced... Another advice ? Pleclown 20:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Moroder 13:02, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too high noise level and the sky is gone, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 18:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Noise level is reduced now. You can't see the sky. It was really foggy at this time and this are the first gliders went to the air field. Everybody was waiting for the fog. So there is fog in the background. IMO it's naturally.--XRay 16:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok, is better, no reason anymore for me to decline, I move back to the original status and let somebody else judge it Poco a poco 18:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
OKish. Mattbuck 22:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Frage Nachtaufnahmen

Hallo! Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du auf QIC eine Nachtaufnahme von mir positiv bewertet hast. Da du ja durchaus mehr Erfahrungen mit Nachtaufnahmen hast als ich, würde mich interessieren, ob du die beiden Aufnahmen auch etwas zu dunkel findest. Auf FPC haben zwei Reviewer einen entsprechenden Kommentar abgegeben, s.

Dort habe ich gefragt: Was wäre denn eine perfekte Belichtung für so ein Motiv. Fakt ist, im Grunde ist nur das Gebäude beleuchtet, viele Bäume rund herum. Ich musste zudem einen Moment abpassen, zu dem sich keine extrem starken Helligkeitsunterschiede im Himmel mehr zeigte (die Sonne geht rechts hinter dem Gebäude unter). Wann und wie hättest du denn dieses Motiv aufgenommen? --Tuxyso (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Gute Frage. Nachtaufnahmen mache ich gerne, finde sie aber auch sehr schwierig. Vieles ist Geschmackssache. Manche mögen Mondlichtaufnehmen, die quasi taghell belichtet sind. Dazu kommt immer die außerordentlich schwierige Mischlichtsituation. Ich finde es völlig in Ordnung, wenn man auch sieht, dass Nacht ist. Und dann dürfen auch nur die Dinge gut sichtbar sein, die beleuchtet sind. Die Blaue Stunde, die du (spät) genutzt hast, liefert immer noch ein nettes Restlich, welches hilft, die Konturen hervorzuheben. Wann hätte ich dein Motiv aufgenommen? Gute Frage. Am besten zur Blauen Stunde mit ein wenig mehr Helligkeit. Aber so ist sie auch völlig in Ordnung.--XRay talk 08:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Ich habe gerade noch mal ein komplett neues Stitching erstellt (RAW Files entsprechend bearbeitet):
. Zugegebenermaßen gefällt mir die neue Version schon besser. Was meinst du? Zur späten Nutzung der blauen Stunde: Ich habe permanet Testaufnahmen gemacht und empfand on location das Licht, insbesondere auf der rechten Seite des Gebäudes noch als schlicht zu hell. Meine Vermutung ist, dass die Blaue Stunde am Morgen perfekt wäre (vor Sonnenaufgang). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Stimmt, es ist insgesamt heller. Aber wie schon erwähnt, es ist Geschmackssache. Auch das neue Bild gefällt mir, ich selbst hätte es etwas dunkler gehalten. Möglicherweise kommen jetzt die ersten Stimmen, die es für zu hell halten...--XRay talk 08:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hehe, mal abwarten. Ich finde Nachtaufnahmen auch sehr schwierig und lasse meist die Finger davon, weil es darüber sehr unterschiedliche Auffassungen gibt - ich bin auch eher ein Vertreter von dunkel bleibt dunkel. Zuletzt sind mir im Duisburger Innenhafen aber ein paar schöne Aufnahmen gelungen, die auch ihre Zustimmung auf FPC gefunden haben. Es bleibt spannend :) --Tuxyso (talk) 08:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Der Duisburger Hafen reizt mich ja auch umgemein und ich habe da auch schon viele tolle Aufnahmen gesehen. Aber ich muss schon halbwegs sicher sein, dass es eine schöne Blaue Stunde gibt. Sonst lohnt sich die Anfahrt nicht. Meine nächste geplante Nachtsitzung ist in Münster Ende Mai - mit unserer VHS-Foto-AG. So nebenbei: Ich mache ja gerne Nachtaufnahmen, habe aber auch sehr durchwachsene Erfahrungen. Und meine APS-C-Kamera kommt da sehr schnell an ihre Grenzen.--XRay talk 09:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Also bei meinem letzten Besuch war die blaue Stunde dort SEHR ausgeprägt: , . Wenn du in Richtung Sonnenuntergang fotografierst kannst du dort auch extrem stimmungsvolle Fotos erhalten: (einer meiner Lieblingsfotos der letzten Monate). --Tuxyso (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, St.-Anna-Kapelle -- 2014 -- 6926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, I guess it might be difficult to get rid of the CA in the branches --Moroder 11:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:19, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 2464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 13:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 2466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Flumserberg (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 7.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flumserberg (Schweiz) -- 2011 -- 7.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, St.-Mauritius-Kirche -- 2014 -- 00586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Swimming pool Aquarell in Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (Entrance).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wegekreuz am Kappenberger Damm -- 2014 -- 00588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 17:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:17, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2014 -- 7858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Wegekapelle an der Appelhülsener Straße -- 2014 -- 00590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Hint: I had cropped 10px more at the right side to avoid the small part of a roof. --Cccefalon 06:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2014 -- 7861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 08:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten -- 2014 -- 7121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, QI for me. --J. Lunau 16:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Fixed I've added some text to the description. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 10:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Moroder 20:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Angel -- 2014 -- 7128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Fachwerkhaus -- 2014 -- 7077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI --Cccefalon 06:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 0056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 08:32, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wegekreuz am Kappenberger Damm -- 2014 -- 00587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I proposed a crop that gives more importance to the cross and gets rid of the blurry branches in the foreground --Cccefalon 08:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks! I've just uploaded the image with your proposed crop.--XRay 08:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Good now. --Cccefalon 08:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Storch auf einer Wiese -- 2014 -- 0050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright notice

Hallo, in deiner Copyright notice steht

In online media is in use in addition to the aforementioned copyright and license specifying a reference (link) to put on the original image - so this page with descriptions and license conditions.

Mit dem Satz ist irgendetwas falsch gelaufen; ich verstehe die Bedeutung nicht. Soll es heissen, dass das Bild direkt einen Link auf die Commons Beschreibungsseite tragen soll, so wie es in den Wikipedias gehandhabt wird? AxelBoldt (talk) 23:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Das kommt davon, wenn Google bei der Übersetzung hilft. ;-) Danke für deinen Hinweis. Ich habe ihn nun ein wenig umformuliert. (Aber so richtig gefällt er mir trotzdem noch nicht.) Und: Ja, ein Link auf die Quelle (bei Wikimedia Commons) und damit die Beschreibungsseite und die aktuelle, nicht weiter veränderte Datei soll sein. Das steht übrigens auch so in der CC-Lizenz.--XRay talk 16:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Sockenpuppe?

Hallo Dietmar, ich gehe ja nicht davon aus, dass Du auf Commons eine Sockenpuppe hast, aber schau dir mal dieses Photo bzw. dessen Lizenztext an. Dort steht Dein Name, aber der User spricht viel mehr Sprachen als Du ... Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Sehr aufmerksam von dir! Ich habe dem Autor eine Notiz geschrieben. Der Text kann natürlich kopiert werden, aber mein Name muss dann heraus. Ich möchte mir die fremden Bilder auch gar nicht aneignen. (Und eine Sockenpuppe habe ich übrigens tatsächlich nicht.) --XRay talk 13:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umspannstation -- 2014 -- 0005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Franzosenbach- -- 2014 -- 0037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO --Malchen53 11:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, content was not related to the city of Category:St. Gallen, therefore 'emptied', regards, Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Nunmehr hallo XRay, habe gerade bemerkt, dass Du 'Deine' Uploads aus dem Kanton St. Gallen in o.e. Kategorie 'untergebracht' hast ;-) Solltest Du Interesse an der weiteren Kategorisierung Natur-bezogener CH-Inhalte haben, sei doch bitte so nett z.B. für den Kanton St. Gallen auf die bislang übliche Schreibweise Canton of St. Gallen etc zu achten, und btw dass zB bereits 'season'-bezogene Kategorien für CH-Kantone (Wikimedia Commons = "Canton of xyz") zumindest teilweise bestehen. Dankeschön und Grüsse aus dem 'Schwyzer-Ländle', Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hallo! Danke für die Korrektur. Ich hatte mich leider schon mehrfach mit dem fehlenden "Canton of" vertan (und dann korrigiert). Deine sinnvollen Änderungen bzw. meine nur fast richtigen Kategorien habe wohl übersehen. --XRay talk 04:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Salü, kein Problem und gern geschehen, Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Formatänderung Lizenzheader

Bitte benutze bei zukünftigen uploads das Format int:license-header statt des alten int:license, dies spart unnötige Bot-Läufe zum Korrigieren. Danke. Das Einsetzen einer Leerzeile zwischen der Location-Vorlage und dem Lizenzheader wäre sinnvoll, erleichtert die Lesbarkeit.--Denniss (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Mein Korrektur-Bot macht das, aber Commonist generiert den Text leider so. (Und das Tool nutze ich.) In einem zweiten Schritt erfolgt die Korrektur.--XRay talk 14:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Das mit dem Commonisten habe ich mir fast schon gedacht. Ich hatte dem Autor mal 'ne Mail geschickt mit Bitte um Änderung aber die ist wohl im Nirvana verschwunden. --Denniss (talk) 15:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 0057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Franzosenbach-, Strotbach -- 2014 -- 0029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Annaberg, Mariengrotte -- 2014 -- 6963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, E-Bike-Ladestation am Dorfplatz -- 2014 -- 0131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 09:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:22, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2014 -- 7863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Ralf Roletschek 11:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Maibaum -- 2014 -- 0134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Fürstbischöfliches Jagdhaus -- 2014 -- 7074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted on left --Christian Ferrer 19:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your hint. It's now OK (hopefully). --XRay 14:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Certainly tilted, perhaps not QI anyway. Mattbuck 22:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It's fixed. Thanks you.--XRay 08:32, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not sure this is QI, but can't see an obvious reason for decline. I will leave this as  Neutral. Mattbuck 20:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Is it possible to put down just a little the highlight, please?, especially in the sky --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry for delay. It's now a little bit darker (and sharper).--XRay 15:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Karthaus, -London Taxi- -- 2014 -- 0224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Blur. --Graphium 17:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)  Support It's ok for a wide angle shot. --Sitacuisses 19:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Angel -- 2014 -- 7136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Leaves ahead are blurrer than the foreground, but inevitable in the situation. The ground nearest to the camera is sharp. --Graphium 18:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2014 -- 0214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Franzosenbach- -- 2014 -- 0180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Jacobskerk -- 2014 -- 0174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bright sky but very nice mood. --JLPC 16:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senden, Dortmund-Ems-Kanal -- 2014 -- 00592.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 20:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and better than the B&W version imo. --JLPC 16:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Jacobskerk -- 2014 -- 0164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 7050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. --Mattbuck 14:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2014 -- 0310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Historisches Rathaus -- 2014 -- 0281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Mariofan13 16:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Lamberti-Kirche -- 2014 -- 0288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Gyrostat 17:01, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Kiepenkerl -- 2014 -- 0292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Right side leaning in Poco a poco 17:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Karthaus, -London Taxi- -- 2014 -- 0226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly overexposed background, but still QI IMO --P e z i 00:05, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Background is now better. Thanks.--XRay 16:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Fixed New crop, part of the tree removed. Thanks for your advice, a good idea!--XRay 07:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 21:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Jacobskerk -- 2014 -- 0165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Fixed Sharpness improved. Hopefully it's OK now.--XRay 07:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 21:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sky overexposed at right, you can try a crop (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sky is now darker and crop at the right. Hopefully OK now. Thanks.--XRay 16:18, 26 May 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Storch auf einer Wiese -- 2014 -- 0053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 09:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Skulptur -Knelis en Willem- -- 2014 -- 0162.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Skulptur -Knelis en Willem- -- 2014 -- 0162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo, slightly disturbing background but good sharpeness and DOF.--ArildV 09:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, E-Bike-Ladestation am Dorfplatz -- 2014 -- 0132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Jacobskerk -- 2014 -- 0167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The sky colour looks a little pink, somewhat strange for a photo taken 10am?--ArildV 09:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Any chance of correcting horizontal perspective to get the horizontals horizontal? Mattbuck 22:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. CAs removed, WB, horizontally aligned (the two ledges below do not lie on a line, it is correct so, the horizontals are not all parallel)--XRay 06:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC) I think its ok now.--ArildV 13:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Jacobskerk -- 2014 -- 0160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I guess you should put the template "personality rights" --Moroder 11:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Thanks for your hint. I do not think that personal rights are concerned. The subject is the Church, the people are just accessories. (See Recht am eigenen Bild)--XRay 06:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2014 -- 0323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadthausturm -- 2014 -- 7879.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CAs (see note) and maybe a bit too bright IMO, can you dark it a little bit please? --Christian Ferrer 23:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for ypur advice. It's hopefully fixed.--XRay 16:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --D-Kuru 20:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Angel -- 2014 -- 7129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterswijk (Niederlande), -Jacobskerk -- 2014 -- 0168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments See note. --A.Savin 10:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now (and more green than yellow).--XRay 15:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 Support OK. --A.Savin 17:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Seebucht Hohe Niemen -- 2014 -- 1155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great photo, DoF could be slightly larger. --NorbertNagel 06:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn -- 2014 -- 7891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 06:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Dein Bot

Hallo, Solche 1 2 Edits sind trafficverschwendung. Magst du die Tasks bitte abstellen? Danke. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Ich habe es vorhin auch gesehen. Es ist mir allerdings noch ein Rätsel, wie es entstanden ist. Ich werden mal auf die Suche gehen, woran es liegt. (Und nach Möglichkeit stelle ich es ab. Einen zweiten Fehler gab es auch noch. Es gibt leider immer mal Umstände, die ich nicht vorhergesehen habe. Und dann passiert's. Glücklicherweise ist es eine Ausnahme.)--XRay talk 18:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Weg am Waldrand -- 2014 -- 0454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image quality, interesting composition -- Alvesgaspar 13:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 12:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, Skulptur am Eingang -- 2014 -- 00596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Vorprogramm -- 2014 -- 0487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Till.niermann 09:23, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 13:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Vorprogramm -- 2014 -- 0533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Seebucht Hohe Niemen -- 2014 -- 1147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Blumen an der Wildpferdebahn -- 2014 -- 0409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me now. --Cayambe 08:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it's tilted on right (look at the fence) --Christian Ferrer 03:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed IMO you're right. I've fixed it.--XRay 05:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. And nicely choosen crop! --Cccefalon 12:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Vorprogramm -- 2014 -- 0564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Motion blur as part of the motif acceptable. --Cccefalon 08:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Zeltstadt des DRK -- 2014 -- 7899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Blown parts and dust spots in the sky. --Kreuzschnabel 16:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry. There were really a lot of dust spots. I've fixed it (and the blown parts).--XRay 05:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 Support Much better, and you inflated it, too :-) --Kreuzschnabel 17:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2014 -- 0321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sythen, Haus Sythen -- 2014 -- 00607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The verticals are leaning outwards a little bit. Can be QI afterwards. --Cccefalon 05:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now.--XRay 12:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
QI now. --Cccefalon 08:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ivan2010 16:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7884.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Weg am Waldrand -- 2014 -- 7923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sky is not really good. You should eventually think about a graduated grey filter. However, I think, it can pass as QI. --Cccefalon 17:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Stadthausturm -- 2014 -- 7878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. IMO it's fixed.--XRay 13:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
That looks better. Mattbuck 22:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2014 -- 0263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right is leaning out a bit --Christian Ferrer 10:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed You're right. Problems on both sides. It's fixed now. Thank you.--XRay 17:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 0308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 7956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The perfect grey sky seems a bit strange ... --P e z i 19:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Comment It was a hazy morning. I have checked the image, the sky has indeed very few structures. IMO it's all right.--XRay 13:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)  SupportOK - QI. --P e z i 19:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Franzosenbach- -- 2014 -- 0186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments magenta CA on top --Cccefalon 07:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. The CAs are removed.--XRay 10:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
ok now --Cccefalon 14:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, Hangar -- 2014 -- 7954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 10:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 10:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 20:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Maibaum -- 2014 -- 0135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2014 -- 0223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I suggest to apply a tighter crop and/or another ratio to reduce the bright are top right. Nonetheless, its QI IMO. --Cccefalon 07:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sythen, Haus Sythen -- 2014 -- 00604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness of roof ridge borderline but still QI IMO --Cccefalon 07:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hünxe, Schloss Gartrop -- 2014 -- 00624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --JLPC 16:07, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hünxe, Schloss Gartrop -- 2014 -- 00622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hünxe, Krudenburg -- 2014 -- 00629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness slightly fading away on the last 5% of the photo on the right side, but still QI. --Cccefalon 05:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Alte Eisenbahnbrücke -- 2014 -- 676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top left corner some magenta in a stem but still good quality. --Cccefalon 05:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for promotion! The CAs (magenta) are removed.--XRay 17:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--ArildV 12:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Template:Date navbox

...noch jemand, der gerne von oben runter guckt (Fotos hat das Team wohl schon gemacht) und in der Pause mal kurz bei der WM reinschaut. Könnte doch wunderbar Deine Fotoflüge ergänzen? Ob da noch mehr Fotos kommen?

Hi XRay! Template:Date navbox is damaged (or a used template?): It Shows errors and if you look to one of the thousands of "day-categories" like Category:2014-06-23, you can see that the link to Category:2014 is not blue. It is in Category:23 June, but there is no visible category-link in Category:2014-06-23, so the recent changes in Template:YMDcat may be the reason?

Wenn ich mich damit auskennen würde ... die Tageskategorien-Reihe sah ja jetzt ganz passabel aus (abgesehen davon dass die WM-Fussball-Fans aus Freude über den jeweiligen Tag massenhaft ihre Fotos dort ablagern – anstatt in den Foto-Cat's. – oder gleich doppelt einsortieren), doch nun ist der Wurm in diesem Teil des Zeit-Archivs drin. Magst Du Dich um die beiden Vorlagen kümmern? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Der Fehler liegt nicht in dem Template von mir. Den richtigen Autor habe ich informiert. (BTW: Deinen Hinweis im Pressestammtisch habe ich gelesen. Es fehlen aus den Flügen noch deutlich mehr als 1000 Bilder. Mit meiner schmalen Internetleitung wird der Upload noch Monate dauern. Und es kommt noch ein Flug.) --XRay talk 08:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Danke auch, die Tageskategorien sehen jetzt wieder normal aus. – und noch so viele Fotos! Das wird die Wikipedia-Artikel für die Gegend sicherlich etwas anschaulicher machen. Bitte mach' Unterkategorien, wenn es irgend geht, damit die Tages-Foto-Boxen übersichtlich bleiben. Schön auch, dass Du bei Wikinews gelesen hast. Doch ich befürchte, dort ist wenig Bewegung, eine (kleine) Reportage über Eure Fotoflüge zu schreiben, weil Weltpolitik ist es ja nicht. Vielleicht entdeckt Ihr ja mittelalterliche oder steinzeitliche Siedlungen in den Äckern um die Bauernhöfe, oder es findet sich sonst ein interessanter Anlass für einen Kurzartikel (WikiLovesEarth-Sonderpreis für Fotografen aus Ghana/Mazedonien/??? mit Besuch für Wissenstransfer und Erfahrungsaustausch?). Bis denn. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0639.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0639.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Fußweg zur Wildpferdebahn -- 2014 -- 7895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Gebäude an der Wildpferdebahn -- 2014 -- 7886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. 1/2 f-stop darker would have been nice. --Smial 08:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It's fixed. Thanks for your advice (and promotion).--XRay 15:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, ich frag dich Mal als Ortskundigen. Die Kategorie hatte ich angelegt, aber mitlerweile überlege ich ob es sinnvoll wäre, sie umzubenennen oder eine neue fürs NSG anzulegen. Bezeichnet man mit "Merfelder Bruch" nur den NSG-Bereich (hatte ich damals angenommen, kanns aber nicht mehr genau nachvollziehen) oder geht das vielleicht darüber hinaus? Also als allgemeinere Bezeichnung für einen Landschaftsbereich, zu dem noch Teile der Umgebung gehören, die nicht im NSG liegen? Das lässt der NSG-Name „Wildpferdebahn im Merfelder Bruch“ ja vermuten. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 22:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


Gerne helfe ich dir weiter. (Ich habe auch schon ein wenig versucht, korrigierend bei Wikipedia einzuwirken, habe das ehrlich gesagt aber noch nicht vollständig gemacht.) Die ganze Sache ist - wie vermutet - nicht einfach. Fakt ist nach den Karten auf jeden Fall:

  1. Das Naturschutzgebiet "Wildpferdebahn im Merfelder Bruch" ist nur ein Teil des Merfelder Bruchs. Beispielsweise gehören die Wiesen und Wälder nördlich und westlich des NSGs zum Merfelder Bruch.
  2. Die gesamte Bruchlandschaft mit Lavesumer Bruch, Borkenberge, etc. umfasst eine Reihe von Naturschutzgebieten, die zu den Kreisen Borken, Coesfeld und Recklinghausen gehören. Das Stichwort lautet hier "Heubach" oder "Heubachniederung".
  3. Die von dir als Arena bezeichnete Anlage in dem Naturschutzgebiet ist die auf älteren Karten bezeichnete "Wildpferdefangbahn", - bezogen auf die Bezeichnung - paradoxerweise aber gerade samt der direkt benachbarten Wirtschaftsgebäude nicht Teil des Naturschutzgebietes.
  4. Es tauchen insgesamt vier Begrifflichkeiten auf: "Wildbahn", "Wildpferdebahn", “Wildbahngestüt” und "Wildpferdefangbahn". Am häufigsten wird "Wildpferdebahn" genutzt.

Du hast ja an anderen Stellen auch schon gesehen, dass es sich insgesamt um ein deutlich größeres Gebiet handelt. Aus den Fakten kann man diverse Schlüsse ziehen.

  1. Die Bezeichnungen gehen landläufig durcheinander.
  2. Die Bezeichnung der Arena als Wildpferdefangbahn hat sich heute auf den Lebensraum der Pferde erweitert.
  3. Der Lebensraum der Dülmener Wildpferde ist die Wildbahn oder Wildpferdebahn.

Es besteht meiner Meinung nach ein Unterschied zwischen der historischen und der heutigen Bezeichnung. Während früher (19. Jahrhundert) der Merfelder Bruch mit den benachbarten Gebieten rund um den Heubach als ein großes Gebiet mit Moor, Wiesen und Wäldern galt, sind es heute eine Reihe von Naturschutzgebieten im Wechsel mit nicht geschützten Bereichen, die die historischen Begrifflichkeiten zum Teil übernommen haben. Die übergeordnete Bedeutung kommt übrigens auch noch einmal deutlicher heraus, denn ein dort zuzuordnendes Vogelschutzgebiet umfasst gleich mehrere der Naturschutzgebiete.

Dieses Durcheinander war mir einerseits bei den Kategorien bei Wikimedia Commons schon aufgefallen, andererseits bei entsprechenden Beiträgen in der Wikipedia. Es ist auch schwierig zuzuordnen. So umfassen die Bilder des Wildpferdefangs Fotos vom Fang selbst (in der Arena, also außerhalb des NSGs) als auch Bilder im Bereich des NSGs. Die Kategorie der Dülmener Wildpferde umfasst natürlich Aufnahmen der Pferde in der Arena, im NSG und auch Aufnahmen außerhalb des NSGs. Die Kategorie des Merfelder Bruchs darf nun wieder die Aufnahmen des Wildpferdefangs beinhalten und auch Aufnahmen der Pferde, sofern diese im Merfelder Bruch entstanden sind. Ich glaube nicht, dass man eine wirklich glückliche Lösung finden kann. Aber vielleicht hast du ja eine Idee.

Besten Dank übrigens auch noch einmal für deine Nachträge in der Kategorie des Naturschutzgebietes der Heubachniederung. Die Bezeichnungen des Landes NRW hatte ich beim besten Willen nicht finden können. In den Listen des Landes treten sie nicht auf.

--XRay talk 10:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die hilfreichen Erläuterungen, man lernt ja nie aus ;) Werd mir das dann demnächst angucken. Grade geht WLE vor und ich hab auch noch keine schlaue Idee zum "wie am besten auseinanderhalten". Außer vielleicht, dass in eine NSG-Kategorie nicht unbedingt jedes Pferdchen müsste. Die sollten schon so zusammen bleiben wie du es schon sortiert hast. Ein paar passende Übersichts- Wald- und Blumenfotos finden sich schon noch fürs NSG.
Die Nummern kannst du für deine Ecke gut auf [2] nachgucken. Was auch gut geht, ist das Reinzoomen bei [3], und dann mit aktiviertem "i" (Infobutton) auf die Gebiete klicken. hat den Vorteil, dass das gleich die offiziellen Karten mit exakten Gebietsgrenzen sind. Gibts in NRW nur leider nicht für LSG. Holger1959 (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Seebucht Hohe Niemen -- 2014 -- 1135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

One more mistake I noticed: You are using CC BY-SA 4.0; but the link you provided here and in creditline are CC BY 4.0. Correct is http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode. Jee 06:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. It's fixed ... and another mistake too. --XRay talk 11:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 1087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 05:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It's tilted Ezarate 22:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. It's fixed.--XRay 07:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Good quality. fixed --Ezarate 18:21, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic Route 66 near Amboy, California (direction Los Angeles).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Will Rogers monument at Santa Monica Beach, California.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Sehr schöne Fotos. Eine Bereicherung für Wikimedia insgesamt!

Vielen Dank von meiner Seite :) Andreas Vogel (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Rhine bridge in Wesel, Germany (part on the west side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Notre Dame -- 2014 -- 1458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltern am See, Wald am Halterner Stausee -- 2014 -- 1146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Zeltstadt des DRK -- 2014 -- 7897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn -- 2014 -- 7889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments One big dustspot (hard to see) and magenta CA at the flag pole. --Cccefalon 06:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
unfortunately  Not done --Cccefalon 04:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Sorry. A little bit late. It's fixed now. (Set back to "Nomination".)--XRay 06:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. Thank you for catching up with resolcing the issues. --Cccefalon 07:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2014 -- 0220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CAs on the tree, top left --Christian Ferrer 11:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. It's fixed.--XRay 06:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC) Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Tribüne -- 2014 -- 0452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kevelaer, Geschäftshaus -- 2014 -- 00706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hünxe, Schloss Gartrop, Restaurant -- 2014 -- 00627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Zitadelle -- 2014 -- 00645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 0303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI, Nice--Lmbuga 22:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Weide am Naturschutzgebiet -Welter Bach- -- 2014 -- 0026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:16, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hünxe, Schloss Gartrop, Mühle und Torhaus -- 2014 -- 00620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Willibrordi-Dom -- 2014 -- 00637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 1037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Stadtansicht und Naturschutzgebiet -Rheinaue zwischen Büderich und Perrich- -- 2014 -- 668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please remove the fat, blurry bird. --Cccefalon 05:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed ;-) Thanks for your advice. Bird removed and size improved.--XRay 06:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Evangelische Kirche -- 2014 -- 00679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 15:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior sculptures of Notre-Dame de Paris (all statues of the Kings of Judea of the front view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Skulptur -Fußgängerparkplatz- -- 2014 -- 00644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI and interesting--Lmbuga 10:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Fußgängerzone -- 2014 -- 00641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sythen, Haus Sythen -- 2014 -- 00608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me -- DerFussi 13:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kevelaer, Kerzenkapelle -- 2014 -- 00710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather unshar. Mattbuck 21:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks. The sharpness is now improved.--XRay 06:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I still think the top and bottom are not sharp enough. Mattbuck 18:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed As a last attempt, the sharpness once again improved.--XRay 07:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
A bit better. Mattbuck 20:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Vorprogramm -- 2014 -- 0475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 00:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hünxe, Krudenburg -- 2014 -- 00630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 09:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Wolbeck, Wolbecker Tiergarten, Naturwaldzelle -Teppes Viertel- -- 2014 -- 7087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Stadtansicht und Naturschutzgebiet -Rheinaue zwischen Büderich und Perrich- -- 2014 -- 657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 14:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Zitadelle -- 2014 -- 00649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 12:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Paris, Notre Dame -- 2014 -- 1458.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris, Notre Dame -- 2014 -- 1458.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Kriemhildmühle -- 2014 -- 00703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Zitadelle -- 2014 -- 00647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:20, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Vorprogramm -- 2014 -- 0614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang, Vorprogramm -- 2014 -- 0622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, Klever Tor -- 2014 -- 00681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münster, Liudgerhaus und Diözesanbibliothek -- 2014 -- 0305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me, I like it.--~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --JLPC 16:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Zitadelle -- 2014 -- 00652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 0341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merfeld, Wildpferdefang -- 2014 -- 7887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kevelaer, Kerzenkapelle -- 2014 -- 00721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kevelaer, Kerzenkapelle -- 2014 -- 00711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be better imo with a tighter crop at the bottom and at the top but QI. --JLPC 17:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Thanks for your advice. A new image with a tighter crop is uploading ... --XRay 07:04, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Zitadelle -- 2014 -- 00651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 23:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, St.-Felizitas-Kirche und Christophorus-Brunnen -- 2014 -- 1746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre -- 2014 -- 1180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Statue -St. Johannes Nepomuk- -- 2014 -- 1730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 2745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Moulin Rouge -- 2014 -- 1220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge -- 2014 -- 1117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Zitadelle -- 2014 -- 00648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xanten, St.-Viktor-Dom -- 2014 -- 00685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 18:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Metro-Station -- 2014 -- 1216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 08:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre, Vorplatz -- 2014 -- 1183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 16:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köln, Deutzer Brücke -- 2014 -- 1850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Was übersehen ...

Schau mal https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Widok_na_miasto_Karakorum_15.jpg ... ich habe Anmerkungen gemacht. Das kann so eigentlich nicht durchs QI assesment gehen ... Vielleicht klärst Du das im Dialog mit Halavar. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Danke! Ich hab's wirklich übersehen.--XRay talk 06:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre -- 2014 -- 1199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Eiffelturm -- 2014 -- 1305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Eiffelturm -- 2014 -- 1259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Eiffelturm -- 2014 -- 1297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Interesting detail -- Spurzem 21:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wesel, Gotisches Rathaus -- 2014 -- 00633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO the perspective correction is overdone (too "perfect") because our eyes expect to see some convergence /\ and here the image seems to lean slightly to the right, no matter all the verticals are straight, except for the glass structure on the background. But I guess that is a matter of personal taste so it doesn't disqualify it as QI. --Stegop 20:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 Question Thanks for your review. What should be done about your opinion? Sometimes vertical lines are desired in most cases.--XRay 05:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
I would keep "a 1/1000" degree of the /\ convergence of the verticals. --Stegop 13:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Fixed I think you're right. It's fixed now.--XRay 17:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0202.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Am Enteborn- -- 2014 -- 0202.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Eiffelturm -- 2014 -- 1309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Moulin Rouge -- 2014 -- 1223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in spite of miner CA. --Poco a poco 16:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, Palais de Chaillot -- 2014 -- 1239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted

Vicuña-Probleme

Hallo Dietmar! Auf der Seite Commons talk:VicuñaUploader habe ich gesehen, dass du auch mit dem Uploader arbeitest bzw. gearbeitet hast. Das von dir angesprochene Problem mit den other_fields lässt sich sehr leicht mit dem dortigen Hinweis von El Grafo lösen. Hast du es inzwischen auch rausgefunde? Wenn nein, kann ich heute Abend etwas genauer meine Konfiguration beschreiben. Das andere Problem, das du benennst, hört sich nach einem Speicherproblem an. Ich hatte zunächst das Problem, dass der Uploader nicht mit großen Dateien (z.B. meine 30 MB Panoramen) zurecht kommt. Das ist ein Java-Speicherproblem. Leicht zu behebenm indem du in der Datei start.bat das Memory Limit erhöhst:

 java -jar vicuna.jar -Xms2048m

In Kombination mit den Templates (Details bei Interesse heute Abend) und dem erhöhten Speicherlimit ist der Vicuña für mich momentan der mit Abstand beste Uploader. Beste Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 07:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Danke! Es würde mir sehr helfen. Wenn das Speicherproblem lösen kann, versuche ich es gerne wieder. Derzeit warten bei mir rund 2.500 Bilder - vor allem aus den Fotoflügen - auf den Upload. Ein zuverlässiger Uploader ist da sehr entscheidend. Und wenn ich die Beschreibung möglichst gut vorbereiten kann, umso besser. Und die Hürde mit meiner Uploadrate (im Schnitt 10 Bilder pro Stunde) löst sich auch in den nächsten Monaten. --XRay talk 16:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

ːːIch habe den Uploadversuch mal mit einer Datei gestartet. Geht. Allerdings habe ich erst nach den Schlüsselwörtern für das Template suchen müssen. Wenn's dir hilft, diese fand ichː %DESC%, %DATE%, %COOR%, %CATEGORIES%, %LICENSE%. Danke noch einmal für deinen Tipp mit dem Speicher!--XRay talk 16:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Genau die Schlüsselwörter verwende ich auch (bis auf %LICENSE%, die habe ich direkt eingebaut oder kommen in eingebauten Templates vor). Also für mich lässt der Vicuña momentan keine Wünsche übrig. Ich wäre übrigens an einer Rückmeldung interessiert, ob sich die Probleme mit den Massenuploads mit meinem Speicherhinweis dann auch erledigt haben. Beste Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Ich versuche es am Wochenende mal. Wenn's gut geht, kann ich die Uploads für die Fotoflüge und WLM 2014 wesentlich besser vorbereiten und auch über Nacht laufen lassen. --XRay talk 06:26, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Nun sind mehr als 30 große Dateien mit VicuñaUploader bearbeitet. Ausfallerscheinungen hatte ich sonst früher, bisher geht's. Es ist teilweise eine überflüssige Klickerei, weil die Vorschläge zu häufig unterbreitet werden. Klicke ich in ein anderes Eingabefeld, dann muss das mit einem Klick klappen, auch wenn noch Vorschläge zu Kategorien zu sehen sind. Da benötige ich meist drei Klicks. Aber wie gesagt, bisher geht's.--XRay talk 07:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Ich muss doch noch etwas nachtragen. Auch, wenn ich mittlerweile 3072 MByte Speicher vergebe, bleiben einige Probleme bestehen. Ich vermute, dass die Daten für die Kategorienvorschläge nicht schnell genug kommen. Der Uploader hat also erhebliche Mängel, die sogar zur Nichtbedienbarkeit führen, wenn man quasi schneller arbeitet als die Daten nachkommen. Bei "Copy & Paste" und 2 MBit/s Downstream schnell passiert ...--XRay talk 11:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

QI Wildpferde

Hallo, alles in Ordnung :-). Freundliche Grüße, --Cayambe ([[User talk:Cayambe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Hi XRay,

in der ersten Kandidatur zu diesem Bild hast du mit pro gestimmt. Ich hatte die Kandidatur seinerzeit wegen einem Stitching-Fehler beendet, den ich nun behoben habe. Würde mich natürlich freuen, wenn du das Bild diesmal auch unterstützen würdest. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw ([[User talk:Taxiarchos228|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Notre Dame

Hallo Dietmar, Dein Foto Paris, Notre Dome -- 2014 -- 1510.jpg zeigt meines Erachtens nicht die Süd-West-, sondern die Süd-Ost-Fassade von Notre Dame. Stimmt's, oder sehe ich es falsch? Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Mannomann. Glücklicherweise gibt's immer jemand, der mitdenkt, vor allem, wenn ich das nicht mache. Du hast recht. Danke! Ich korrigiere das morgen. --XRay talk 15:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Descartes

Hello XRay !

No problem for any revert you did (Ich verstehe deutsch, aber ich mag lieber english schreiben, entschuldigung bitte).

I understand very well your way with the "Langswitch", now you have just two other translations more!

I disagree with your opinion about the "other versions" (just have a look on many other examples, like "Mona Lisa" or so)... In this case, I understand "other versions of the same subject", not "of the same image". But of course you are free, kein Ehrensache hier für mich !

I hope you enjoyed your stay in Paris, and yes, I'm afraid the clock of the Conciergerie is an impossible picture ! Every day I ask myself about how to "catch" it, I've not find any solution yet...--Jebulon ([[User talk:Jebulon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Ich kann dein Englisch gut verstehen. Da du Deutsch gut verstehst, antworte ich auf Deutsch. Fällt mir leichter. Natürlich freue ich mich über alle Ergänzungen. Mittlerweile habe ich mich dazu durchgerungen und meine auch, dass es der richtige Weg ist, wenn ich LangSwitch zu Gunsten der anderen Sprachtemplates tausche. Da wird aber mein Bot machen und dem muss ich das erst beibringen. "Other_Versions" ist meiner Meinung nach ein passendes Bild vom selben Ursprung oder aus derselben Bildserie, auf jeden Fall vom selben Autor. Bei Bildern von anderen Autoren wird's schwierig, denn dass kann man gar nicht nachhalten. Gibt's drei Bilder, müsste man ja bei allen drei Bildern die jeweils anderen beiden ergänzen. Dann kommt das Vierte ... Nochmals vielen Dank! Der Aufenthalt in Paris war spannend, aber zu kurz. Es hatte sich doch einiges verändert seit meinem letzten Besuch rund 20 Jahre vorher.--XRay talk 05:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Dreiradlieferwagen von Tempo, nicht von Goliath

Hallo, XRay, darf ich dich in aller Höflichkeit darauf aufmerksam machen, dass der von dir hochgeladene Dreiradlieferwagen ein Tempo Hanseat ist und kein Goliath. Ich habe den Bildertext und die Kategorisierung entsprechend verändert. OnkelFordTaunus ([[User talk:OnkelFordTaunus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Super! Danke für den Hinweis. Du hast es auch gleich geändert, freut mich. Es ist immer schön, wenn die Texte auch aufmerksam gelesen werden. Nur so ist es möglich, Fehler zu verbessern. Danke noch einmal!--XRay talk 07:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

About Colosseum

Hi, Dietmar ! I had a look at your nice pano of Colosseum and I placed some notes on the picture but, when I wanted to review it, Poco had already did the job ! I leave my notes : I hope they can help you ; feel free to rub them out when the (slight) problems are fixed. Best regards. --JLPC ([[User talk:JLPC|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your reviews. I can't believe that there are CAs, but they are. I will try to fix it. --XRay talk 18:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo XRay, das Aquarell ist wohl eher ein (Freizeit-)Bad als nur ein reines Schwimmbecken. Schaue mal in Category:Baths in North Rhine-Westphalia. Gruß, -- Ies ([[User talk:Ies|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Ich habe die Kategorie gerade angepasst. Danke für den Hinweis. (Hättest du aber auch gerne machen können. ;-) ) --XRay talk 08:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

A story of low bandwidth

Hi XRay,

Thanks for the explanation about the problems you have with upload size.

It triggered me into wanting to tell you a little story from my first times on Commons in 2007.

When I first started uploading images to Commons I was located in very remote little town in North-West Greenland. Access to the internet was via a satelitte connection transmitted via a parabolic antenna located in the town. I do not recall the exact upload times, except that they were awfully slow. My first large FPC (15 Mpixels, 4.6 MB) was uploaded via that connection, and I had to pay something like 2 € / MB (I do not recall the exact rates) for the connection and I think it took about 30 minutes for a file that size, and occasionally I would end up in upload time-outs.. That August 2007 I ended up with a sizeable bill of perhaps 250 € for internet use, mostly for uploading photos to Commons. After that I decided to throttle down the uploading until I returned to Denmark the month after.

What I really want to say with that is that I think you should go all in on FPCs, also if it is tedious with regard to upload speed. If there is an economic side to it as well, you have my understanding though. -- Slaunger ([[User talk:Slaunger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanation. Usually I upload a file with a better resolution with nominating as featured picture. It's a special case and no problem. I'll upload a file with a better resolution very soon.--XRay talk 18:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Now 9 MP and 5 minutes for uploading later: There is the other file with the better Resolution. Thanks again. (Next month we expect a better internet connection. More than 1.000 images are waiting for upload. The images are aerial views, most of them are not good enough for QI, but they are interesting enough.) --XRay talk 18:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi XRay. I'm sorry, but i was in a hurry, and so i've cut the category panoramic. Sorry! -- Lalupa ([[User talk:Lalupa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Featured picture candidates

Can you look at this [4] picture again? I different develop raw file.--Jacek Halicki ([[User talk:Jacek Halicki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

CaS

Hi,what mean CAs? --LivioAndronico talk 19:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi LivioAndronico! It's one of the typical abbreviations: CA = Chromatic aberration. At the beginning of reading the reviews of my images I had the same problems. It's useful to read the comments of the other images. Other usual abbreviations are DoF (Depth of Field), CW (clockwise) and CCW (counterclockwise). I wish you much success! --XRay talk 06:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Ok thanks,very nice.--LivioAndronico talk 07:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Twins

Hi,you have uploaded 2 times the same photos in QI, check please. --LivioAndronico talk 08:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. I haven't seen this. I've just removed the second iamge. It's better than "withdrawn" or "decline".--XRay talk 10:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
so I could say that i have declined some your pictures, joke Template:Clin --LivioAndronico talk 12:34, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
That's no problem ... and sometimes easy. I am nominating round about one year and many pictures were declined. But this helps to make better pictures. --XRay talk 12:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

King's Cross

I noticed your comment at QIC about King's Cross Platform 9 3/4. I was there the other day, and was watching the queue to have your photo taken holding the trolley which is built into the wall. There's actually a guy whose job it is to put a scarf around people's necks and then to hold the end up out of shot so that it looks like you're running! -mattbuck (Talk) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

A few days before a saw a photo of the trolley at platform 9 3/4 in our newspaper, just without tourists. So the story of Harry Potter was present and then your nomination. So I felt that a small nice comment must be allowed. Have a nice day (and good light for more photos)!--XRay talk 05:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta

Hallo Xray,thanks for your review,if you explaine better i can try to improve the pictures.What you mean for Asymmetric view? thanks guten abend. --LivioAndronico talk 16:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the short explanation. The way in your image is not in the center, but the castle is in the center. IMO it's better to have both in the center, a symmetrical view. The image is restless. Otherwise you can choose a non symmetrical view, but noteable, for example to the bottom-left corner. --XRay talk 18:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks,very kind --LivioAndronico talk 20:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted |IMHO unsuccessful lighting. No major detail which would be illuminated by the sun. --Max A.Khlopov 08:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)}} Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

You've entered 11 pictures into the challenage, some of which are of the same subject/view. Can I ask you to select which are the best. For example:

Reviewers only get three votes to share among everyone's images. It is unfair to ask them to use them up deciding between your pictures. It also reduces the chance that any one of your images will get sufficient votes. Expecting reviewers to choose between very similar images is fatiguing and no fun for them. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. Yes, you're right. I've reduced

the the number of images.--XRay talk 13:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014

Template:Mbox

Agradeciendo y explicandole

Hola XRay le agradezco y aprecio mucho su sugerencia sobre la imagen candidata a IQ: “Sistema de regadio circular en toda su magnitud”, , pero no poseo conocimientos suficientes como para hacer la descripción correcta en ingles, además de no contar con la posibilidad de geolocalizar. Agradecería mucho si alguien pudiese ayudarme en eso, ¿Eso seria posible? Muchas gracias nuevamente --Ivan2010

Photo Challenge - Secon Place

[[:#ifeq:{{{2}}}]] Photo Challenge - Second Place
Congratulations! Your picture Recklinghausen, Stadtmauer -- 2013 -- 2.jpg won the Second place in the Photo Challenge Coloured light, in December 2013. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Agradeciendole

Muchas gracias por su voto a favor y su comentario sobre mi archivo. Sistema de regadío circular en toda su magnitud. , Un saludo cordial. Ivan2010

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz

Hallo XRay,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo XRay,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Kalender-Poster für 2015 mit den Gewinner-Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2014

Hallo Dietmar,

auch in diesem Jahr gibt es dank der Förderung durch WMDE einen WLM-Kalender im Format A1 mit den Gewinner-Fotos. Insgesamt sind es mit den Nachrücker-Fotos sogar 132 Bilder von Kulturdenkmalen in Deutschland, die durch 64 WLM-Teilnehmer hochgeladen wurden. Sicherlich wirst du darin schnell Dein(e) Foto(s) entdecken.

Mit der Vergabe der 100 Preise – es gibt in diesem Jahr max. 3 Preise pro Gewinner, woraus die Nachrücker resultieren – kann jeder Preisträger auch ein oder mehrere dieser gedruckten Poster bekommen. Es wäre schön, wenn du einige Poster auch an Wikipedianer Deiner Region oder Freunde verteilst und ihnen dabei auch den Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments erklärst, an dem auch sie 2015 teilnehmen können.

Dieses Poster wird sowohl auf der Leipziger Denkmalmesse (6.–8.11.) als auch auf der Mitgliederversammlung von WMDE am 29.11. in Berlin erhältlich sein.

Solltest du daran Interesse haben - und weder in Leipzig noch in Berlin die Gelegenheit zum Erwerb haben -, so sende bitte Deinen Wunsch mit Angabe des Real- und Benutzernamens, der Anschrift und der gewünschten Anzahl (1,3,5 .. oder gar 10) bis zum 14.11. mit dem Betreff "WLM-Poster" an das WMDE-Team Community mittels der Emailadresse: community@wikimedia.de.

Dies gilt: solange der Vorrat reicht, nach Maßgabe des geplanten Versandkosten-Budgets sowie nach der Reihenfolge der eingegangenen Bestellwünsche. Der Versand wird Ende November erfolgen.

Viel Freude – und auch Vorfreude auf WLM-2015 - mit diesem Poster

wünscht Dir die WLM-Orga.

( Bernd Gross), 01.11.2014

Habe für uns ein paar Exemplare des WLM-Posters angefordert. Habe dich auf CC gesetzt. VG -- Watzmann Talk 13:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Wie gut, dass ich denselben Gedanken hatte. (Außer das mit dem CC.) ;-) Aber Wikipedianer gibt's im Münsterland ja genug. --XRay talk 14:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

HotCat

I noticed that you added Category:Taken with Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro to one of my images. I also noticed that said category is rather small. I probably have a thousand pictures on the commons taken with that lens, but they are all easily referenced through my licensing and meta template tag. It would be trivial to add that category to all of my images taken with that lens. You'd have to modify the following:


Ram-Man 19:54, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Deine Mailbox

weist Mails zurück. Schlund-Mailbox unavailable--Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Ich vermute eine ungültige Mailadresse. Ich schau mal. --XRay talk 07:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Featured

Hallo XRay Wie geht? HCan give a look at this [5] photo on Featured? I think they deserve Template:Clin danke.--LivioAndronico talk 09:08, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo XRay,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

  • Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.
WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreichen Teilnahme an WLM-2014

Hallo XRay,

auf der gerade zu Ende gegangenen Europäischen Denkmal-Messe in Leipzig konnten wir sehr erfolgreich die Ergebnisse unseres vierten Fotowettbewerbs „Wiki Loves Monuments“ einem breiten Publikum und der Fachwelt vorstellen. Impressionen findest du hier. Dazu gehörten auch die Gewinnerfotos für Deutschland. Zu dem darin eingeschlossenen Wettbewerbsbeitrag von Dir möchten wir Dich herzlich beglückwünschen.

Die Jury hat bekanntlich Ende Oktober die Preisträger auf der Grundlage eines Rating-Verfahrens ermittelt und ging in diesem Jahr davon aus, die Zahl der Preise auf 3 pro Teilnehmer zu begrenzen. Insgesamt wurden 100 Preise durch WMDE gestiftet. Durch das Nachrücken ergaben sich insgesamt 132 Bilder, die auch auf dem diesjährigen WLM-Kalender für 2015 dargestellt sind. Diese wurden durch 64 Preisträger eingebracht. Im Rahmen der Denkmalmesse konnten wir bereits die ersten 11 Bildpreise und 2 Fleißpreise an vier Projektteilnehmer überreichen.

Bis Ende November werden auch die Urkunden und Preise (Büchergutscheine) für die anderen Preisträger in der Geschäftsstelle von WMDE vorbereitet; ebenso der Versand der WLM-Posterkalender, sofern du Deine Wünsche per mail übermittelt hast. Anfang Dezember und damit rechtzeitig zum Weihnachtsfest wirst du also alles erhalten.

Es würde uns sehr freuen, wenn du auch im kommenden Jahr aktiv bei WLM wieder dabei bist.

Nochmals unseren Dank für Deinen Wettbewerbsbeitrag und Herzlichen Glückwunsch

übermittelt Dir die WLM-Orga.

( Bernd Gross), 11.11.2014

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

What??

What happened to the picture here?? ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC) It's a glitch. Sorry. ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

No problem.--XRay talk 17:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Merry Xmas and happy new year

Merry Xmas and happy new year Template:Smiley--LivioAndronico talk 11:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.png
Thank you very much. Merry Christmas and a happy new year too. Always good light for your photographs!--XRay talk 14:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Template:WLMCH2014 end

Dein WLM-2014-Preis zu Weihnachten

Hallo XRay,

der Fotowettbewerb "Wiki Loves Monuments 2014" liegt hinter uns und das Team Communitys von WMDE verschickt in diesen Tagen an die Gewinner die Urkunden und Preise. Sie sollten dich also rechtzeitig vor Weihnachten erreichen.

Gleichzeitig möchte ich Dich herzlich zu unserem nächsten Fotowettbewerb zum Themenbereich "Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit 2014/2015" einladen. Wir haben diesen am Nikolaustag gestartet und er läuft bis zum 16. Januar 2015. Nähere Informationen findest du auf der Projektseite bei Wikipedia.

Ich wünsche Dir eine schöne Advents- und Weihnachtszeit und einen erfolgreichen Start ins neue Jahr 2015.

Herzliche Grüße

( Bernd Gross), 09.12.2014

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted