User talk:Halavar

• User talk:Halavar/Archive1 (till 31.12.2013)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive2 (January 2014 - June 2014)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive3 (July 2014 - October 2014)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive4 (November 2014 - December 2014)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive5 (January 2015 - February 2015)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive6 (March 2015 - August 2015)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive7 (September 2015 - January 2016)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive8 (January 2016 - June 2016)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive9 (June 2016 - October 2016)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive10 (November 2016 - February 2017)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive11 (March 2017 - July 2017)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive12 (August 2017 - January 2018)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive13 (February 2018 - April 2018)
• User talk:Halavar/Archive14 (April 2018 - October 2021)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (61).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aloxe 14:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Bażanowice, Stary folwark 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality image. --Aloxe 14:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Pawłowice, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kraków, Opactwo Benedyktynów w Tyńcu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 14:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat brzeski, Uście Solne, Kościół Nawrócenia św. Pawła Apostoła 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 14:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Pawłowice, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Kościół Świętych Piotra i Pawła 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Biblioteka miejska 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:59, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Given tht verticals are impossible with such sites as often nothing is vertical. --PsamatheM 19:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół kościoła i klasztoru Bernardynów 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół św. Barbary i św. Józefa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół dworu, Oficyna I 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bazylika katedralna Narodzenia NMP 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Strumień, Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Rybnik, Rynek 1, Kamienica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand

เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้ มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้ ขอแสดงความนับถือ ทีมผู้จัด Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand วิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย

Dear Fellow Wikimedians, Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021. There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category. If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest. Kind Regards, The organizing team of Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand Wikimedia Thailand

--Karto1 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Krzeszów, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Urząd Miasta 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Rybnik, Rynek 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (14).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Zachód słońca nad rzeką Praek Tuek Chhu (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Halavar! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Subcarpathian voivodeship

Thanks for adding the Polish and Slovak translations :) Cryptic-waveform (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2016 Singapur, Little India, Mural (01).jpg

And also:

• File:2016 Singapur, Little India, Mural (02).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Little India, Mural (03).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Little India, Mural (05).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Little India, Mural (06).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Little India, Mural (07).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Долучіться до опитування — допоможіть визначити, як проводити конкурс «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у 2022 році

Вітаємо! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо брали участь в українській частині міжнародного конкурсу «Вікі любить пам’ятки» у минулі роки. Зараз організаційна команда конкурсу вирішує, як проводити його під час повномасштабної війни в Україні.

Ми розуміємо, що цього року ми не зможемо провести конкурс у звичному форматі — зокрема тому, що фотографування об'єктів в Україні зараз ускладнене міркуваннями безпеки. Однак наша місія із документування української культурної спадщини є як ніколи важливою, тому розглядаємо варіанти, як можна провести конкурс у обмеженому форматі.

Для цього хочемо запитати поради у спільноти конкурсу. Просимо приділити 5—7 хвилин (не пізніше середи, 6 липня), щоби висловити свою думку.

• Пройдіть опитування за посиланням

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 17:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2022

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!

Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.

W imieniu organizatorów konkursu, Jamnik z Tarnowa ^Speak? 15:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

Привіт!

Цього року українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» пройде з 1 по 31 жовтня — через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки світлини зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно будуть прийматися в основній частині конкурсу.

В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже водинадцяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року знову пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

5 днів Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні / 5 days of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» вже почалася — за 5 днів фотозмагання Україна вийшла на 12-е місце за кількістю світлин у світі. Не кількістю єдиною, звісно, але гарно було б не надто сильно відстати від російської частини конкурсу, і хоча б потрапити до почесних топ-5.

Цього року вперше у конкурсі є спеціальна номінація «Фотоплівка» — на неї можна подавати скани світлин, зроблених на фотоплівці — мова може йти й про скани самої фотоплівки і скани з віддрукованих знімків із неї. Ця спецномінація покликана мотивувати оцифровувати й ділитися своїми фотоархівами: частина об'єктів уже виглядає дуже відмінно, а частина — більше не існує… Враховуючи сучасну ситуацію із російським вторгненням і можливість потенційної втрати таких фотоархівів, ця спецномінація — актуальна. Врахуйте, що для того, щоб світлина потрапила на спецномінацію, потрібно вибрати відповідне поле у Завантажувачі.

Автори світлин маловідомих пам'яток України зможуть позмагатися за відзнаку від «Україна Інкогніта».

Також уже традиційно пройде спецномінація «Відео» — для участі робіт у цій спецномінації не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — роботи зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук. У нас також є сторінка в інстаграмі та твіттері.

Важливо! Цього року ми проводимо конкурс вже за чинним адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Приймаються тільки ті світлини та відео, які були зняті до 23 лютого 2022 року включно.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Ще 3 дні! Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні триває до 31 жовтня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що ви та ваша родина у безпеці. Нагадуємо, що залишилося три дні до завершення конкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», і якщо у вас є можливість взяти участь у конкурсі цього року — долучайтеся!

Трохи статистики за результатами чотирьох тижнів конкурсу:

• завантажено понад 11000 світлин, які зображують майже 3700 об’єктів культурної спадщини;

  • з них фотографії 180 пам'яток — вперше подані на конкурс;

• понад 500 світлин подано у спецномінації «Фотоплівка»;
• вже більше 220 учасників та учасниць;

  • з них більше 130 — зареєструвалися вже під час конкурсу.

Найменш представлені регіони — Севастополь (1 фото), Донецька (19), Миколаївська (20), Кіровоградська (58), Крим (72), Херсонська (74) та Луганська (80). Конкурсні списки за регіонами можна переглянути тут: списки пам'яток.

Переглядайте свої фото- та відеоархіви й приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 08:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

File:2014 Suchum, Baner z wizerunkiem Władysława Ardzinby.jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Baner z wizerunkiem Władysława Ardzinby.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Halavar! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 01:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

File:2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Sklep z pamiątkami (02).jpg

File:2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Sklep z pamiątkami (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Halavar,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (046).jpg

And also:

• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (149).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (195).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (210).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (222).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (240).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (241).jpg
• File:2016 Singapur, Ogrody botaniczne (393).jpg

Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat bielski, Jaworze, Kościół Opatrzności Bożej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Grabówka, Spichlerz dworski 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat mikołowski, Orzesze, Kościół św. Wawrzyńca 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Wisła Mała, Kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Plebania 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Buków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Różańcowej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzanowice, Kościół św. Mikołaja 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Borucin, Kościół św. Augustyna 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, also nice color gradient of the sky. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Dawny zamek - obecnie Sąd Rejonowy 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs some adjusments of PC --Poco a poco 18:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)< Done New version uploaded, hope it's better now. -Halavar 18:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzanowice, Kościół św. Wacława 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Olza, Kaplica Świętej Rodziny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:24, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Lubomia, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Budynek starostwa powiatowego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Górki Wielkie, Dwór 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 11:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat bielski, Jaworze, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Borucin, Spichlerz drewniany 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Kościół Matki Bożej Bolesnej 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Kościół św. Stanisława 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Pielgrzymowice, Kościół św. Katarzyny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but can you please add a cat about the cross? --Poco a poco 11:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)  Done No problem, category added. Thanks! --Halavar 12:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kaplica przydrożna w Szerokiej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Rynek 15, Dom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Łopuszna, Dwór 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Dębno, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Pruchna, Kościół Zmartwychwstania Pańskiego 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Golasowice, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Nowy Cmentarz Ewangelicki, Kaplica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat mikołowski, Mikołów, Kościół św. Mikołaja 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Lubomia, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Pałac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top of the tower seems almost lost in the dark sky - is this something that perhaps could be addressed? --Scotch Mist 13:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Buków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Różańcowej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Walentego 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think it is slightly  Underexposed. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 14:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Very good now. --Augustgeyler 06:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzanowice, Kościół św. Mikołaja 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół św. Barbary i św. Józefa 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Olza, Kaplica Świętej Rodziny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Golasowice, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Kościół Świętych Piotra i Pawła 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Kościół św. Stanisława 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Delegatura NFZ 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now:) --Halavar 17:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Yes, thanks. --Imehling 05:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat wodzisławski, Gołkowice, Kościół św. Anny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Osprey on nest.jpg

I'm not sure I understand your review. When you say "Problematic description", are you referring to the description field on File:Osprey on nest.jpg, or do you mean the "This guy let me get within about 70 feet" comment I left in the review template? I'm also unclear what you mean by "lots of chromatic abberation". I think of chromatic abberation as color fringing due to focus defects in the lens. I'm not seeing any of that. Did you perhaps mean that the color temperature is off? RoySmith (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Walentego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 00:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Marcina 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 00:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Dawny zamek - obecnie Sąd Rejonowy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Dębno, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Borucin, Kościół św. Augustyna 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Brzeźce, Kościół Matki Boskiej Szkaplerznej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Marcina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Zamek 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Dawny zespół szpitalny Juliusz, Kaplica szpitalna św. Juliusza 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 16:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Dawny klasztor 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Olza, Kaplica Świętej Rodziny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Kaplica św. Urbana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Dawny klasztor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 09:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Kościół św. Anny 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 09:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Brzeźce, Kościół Matki Boskiej Szkaplerznej 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It could be sharper, but IMHO QI --Poco a poco 22:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 07:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Krzeszów, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 10:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Stary ratusz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Plebania 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goo picture, but could you maybe lighten the shadows (e.g. at the door) a bit to give it more detail? --FlocciNivis 19:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. Please take a look again. --Halavar 21:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)  Support That's better, good quality now --FlocciNivis 09:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture but statue in foreground could be enhanced with shadows lightened \ more detail. --Scotch Mist 08:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)  Done You're right, thanks for the hint. Please take a look again. --Halavar 08:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Cmentarz żydowski 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Ratusz 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 09:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Zamek 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat stalowowolski, Wola Rzeczycka, Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Lubomia, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 17:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Borucin, Kościół św. Augustyna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Zabytkowa ceglana brama do pałacu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Wisła Mała, Kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat bielski, Jaworze, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Ratusz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół dworu, Oficyna I 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it is slightly  Underexposed. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 11:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Yes, of course. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Very good now. --Augustgeyler 15:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, Rynek 24-25 i Matejki 2, Kamienice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Buków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Różańcowej 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Spurzem 20:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Delegatura NFZ 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, ul. Zamkowa 3, Dom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat bielski, Jaworze, Kościół Opatrzności Bożej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Budynek starostwa powiatowego 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Ogrodzenie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Ratusz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat brzeski, Uście Solne, Kościół Nawrócenia św. Pawła Apostoła 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół kościoła i klasztoru Bernardynów 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kaplica przydrożna w Szerokiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment. The gable wall is too dark. Perhaps you can improve it. -- Spurzem 20:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Done You're right. New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 20:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC) I tried to do a little bit more. The brightness is now more even. I think, it is good now. -- Spurzem 09:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Dawny klasztor 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Cmentarz rzymskokatolicki 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 06:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Rudnik nad Sanem, Młyn i elektrownia wodna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 06:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Borucin, Spichlerz drewniany 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Kościół Świętej Rodziny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, except that I don't like the crop on the right. Can you do anything about that? -- Ikan Kekek 02:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Done You're right about that crop. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 20:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC) I was hoping you could have added more to the right, but this is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 18:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Harklowa, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Kościół św. Anny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Dawny zespół szpitalny Juliusz, Budynek główny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Olza, Kaplica Świętej Rodziny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality. --Rjcastillo 23:49, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Kościół św. Stanisława 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Nowy Cmentarz Ewangelicki, Kaplica 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Kościół św. Anny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 19:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Wisła Mała, Kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 19:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Golasowice, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Budynek Sułtana Abdula Samada (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Galeria Miejska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Stacja kolejowa Kuala Lumpur (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 14:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynek-memoriał Proklamacji Niepodległości (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół św. Barbary i św. Józefa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The church looks nice, but the overexposed sign/banner on the front is a little distracting. --BigDom 19:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)  Done I tried to fix that. Hope it's better now, please take a look again. --Halavar 22:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --BigDom 16:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Agree. Good quality. --Stratokumulus 15:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Staw lotosów (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 10:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 21:08, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Stary ratusz i fontanna z figurą św. Jana Nepomucena 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:58, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat mikołowski, Orzesze, Kościół św. Wawrzyńca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Lubomia, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Dawny klasztor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Łodzie w przystani Noppharat Thara (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Kościół Ewangelicko-Augsburski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 05:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Brzeźce, Kościół Matki Boskiej Szkaplerznej 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół św. Barbary i św. Józefa 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)--

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat bielski, Jaworze, Kościół Opatrzności Bożej 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat wodzisławski, Gołkowice, Kościół św. Anny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Nowy Cmentarz Ewangelicki, Kaplica 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat bielski, Jaworze, Kościół Opatrzności Bożej 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowy Targ, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Marcina 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat wodzisławski, Wodzisław Śląski, Kaplica z klasztorkiem 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Kościół Matki Bożej Bolesnej 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Rynek 2, Dom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Bielsko-Biała, Kościół św. Stanisława 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Botahtaung (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kościół katolicki św. Jana Chrzciciela (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kheng Hock Keong (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica nr 26, Synagoga Musmea Jeszua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Maha Bandula widziana z Pagody Sule (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough quality, overall, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 20:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kheng Hock Keong (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Buków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Różańcowej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzanowice, Kościół św. Mikołaja 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 17:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality and good use of cropping. --多多123 17:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Most Cavenagha (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Brzeźce, Kościół Matki Boskiej Szkaplerznej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Plebania 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Delegatura NFZ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Siedziba "The Myanmar Times" (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, ul. Pocztowa 6, Dom 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (06).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:07, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 16:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Twierdza Bebriscyche (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Park Stalina (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:29, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Hotel "Intourist" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Ann Siang, Domy-sklepy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The upper part of the sky looks very dark. --Augustgeyler 06:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 07:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Ok to me now. --Sebring12Hrs 07:51, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (037).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 09:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Domy-sklepy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat wodzisławski, Lubomia, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Dawny klasztor 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Kościół św. Anny 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Kościół Matki Bożej Bolesnej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Rynek 15, Dom 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Neak Pean (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 09:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Kościół Matki Bożej Bolesnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Fullerton Heritage Promenade i Marina Bay Financial Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Right crop not ideal but good enough --MB-one 12:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 Powiat raciborski, Borucin, Spichlerz drewniany 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

«Вікі любить Землю» 2023 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Важливо! З міркувань національної безпеки та безпеки учасників і учасниць до участі у конкурсі допускаються тільки фото та відео, зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно!

Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні!

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (01).jpg

And also:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (02).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (03).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (04).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (05).jpg
• File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (01).jpg
• File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (02).jpg
• File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (03).jpg
• File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (04).jpg
• File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (05).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik króla Wachtanga Gorgasali i cerkiew Metechi.jpg

And also:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik króla Wachtanga Gorgasali.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

File:2014 Kutaisi, Plakat.jpg

File:2014 Kutaisi, Plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (01).jpg

And also:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (02).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (03).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (04).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (05).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (06).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (07).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego i Courtyard Marriott.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Kościół Ewangelicko-Augsburski 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Dawny zamek - obecnie Sąd Rejonowy 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 Rybnik, Rynek 7, Dom 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:22, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Pałac Sponza (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 09:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2015 Sokal, Pomnik Tarasa Szewczenki 01.JPG

And also:

• File:2015 Sokal, Pomnik Tarasa Szewczenki 02.JPG
• File:2015 Sokal, Pomnik Tarasa Szewczenki 03.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (01).jpg

And also:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (02).jpg
• File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (03).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Dubrownik, Pałac Sponza i dzwonnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Plac Wolności (02).jpg

File:2014 Tbilisi, Plac Wolności (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (35).jpg

File:2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (35).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Płaskorzeźba na ulicy Mikołaja Barataszwiliego.jpg

File:2014 Tbilisi, Płaskorzeźba na ulicy Mikołaja Barataszwiliego.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

File:2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (04).jpg

File:2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

File:2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (08).jpg

File:2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (08).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».10:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс.

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».10:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: перший тиждень

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс триває до 31 жовтня. За перший тиждень конкурсу в українській частині конкурсу завантажено понад 4000 фото, взяли участь майже 90 учасників.

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс. Єдиний виняток — спецномінація «Інтер'єри» можна подавати світлини без обмежень за датою створення.

Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут (серед нових спецномінацій цього року: «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Інтер'єри» та «Німецька спадщина»).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні: ще тиждень залишився! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: last week of the contest!

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс ще триває трохи більше тижня, до 31 жовтня, тож у Вас є ще можливість приєднатися.

У конкурсі є серйозне обмеження за часом створення фото- та відеоматерілів — тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно приймаються. Однак, є виняток — спецномінація «Інтер'єри», де можна подавати файли, які зроблені й під час конкурсу. Також, якщо є, можна відсканувати світлини, зроблені плівковим фотоапаратом на спецномінацію «Фотоплівка». Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 17:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні: ще 4 дні завантажити фото чи відео! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: last 4 days to upload pictures or videos!

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Залишилося ще дні завантажити власні фото чи відео пам'яток України!

Зверніть увагу! Попри те, що в конкурсі беруть участь тільки роботи, зроблені до 30 червня 2023 року, фото та відео інтер'єрів пам'яток обмежень за датою не мають. Також можна відсканувати власні світлини, зроблені плівковим фотоапаратом, на спецномінацію «Фотоплівка». Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – з повагою від імені оргкомітету «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (01).jpg

And also:

• File:2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (02).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

HQ photos from Kremlin.ru

Hello! Could you take part in uploading materials from the sites http://20.kremlin.ru and http://putin.kremlin.ru? Here the photographs are of high resolution, and this is very necessary due to the fact that many materials on the Russian presidential website were published more than 15 years ago and are of low resolution, which is incompatible with modern computers. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:50, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

File:2016 Phnom Penh, Posągi Decho Measa i Decho Yorta.jpg

File:2016 Phnom Penh, Posągi Decho Measa i Decho Yorta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)