User talk:WikipediaMaster

English: Welcome to the Commons, WikipediaMaster!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 12:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Babylon6.svg[edit]

Hi!

I have deleted Image:Babylon6.svg because of two things:

It was broken. You cannot create SVG files that way: if you want to use a bitmap picture, you have to convert it to an allowed file type (PNG, I presume) and upload that. The SVG file you have created was nothing more than a link to that file, so that it was unusable for anyone else than you.
It was marked as non-free. Non-free images are not allowed on Commons, see Commons:Licensing. Only free-software screenshots can be uploaded here.

--Mormegil 14:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, didn't know how to delete the file. I marked it non free, as I did not know how to delete but found out, that only common screenshots are allowed! --WikipediaMaster 18:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images of undefined machine[edit]

Hello Jmabel!

Your undefined machine images show a three axis (XYZ) milling or grinding machine. No picture of a machine tool available? --WikipediaMaster 16:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't understand your question; could you clarify on my user talk page? But I will now caption according to your information. - Jmabel | talk 18:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Hi, not sure if you're aware, but {{delete}} is the ordinary deletion request on here, and it needs a reason, a subpage and an entry on the log for it to be processed. {{speedydelete|reason}} is the well, speedy one. Also, categories are generally redirected rather than deleted (see here). You can do this by placing {{cat redirect|name of new category without "Category:" prefix}} on the page.

That said, can you fix Category:Exhaust pipe, Category:Spherical bearings, Category:Thrust bearings please as the deletion requests are incomplete at the moment and will not be processed. Thanks & regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 09:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks for info, next time I would go for {{speedydelete|reason}} in such cases. --WikipediaMaster 17:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) -- Deadstar (msg) 08:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Some_godforsaken_canadian_plant_no_firestops.jpg&diff=10116636&oldid=10116632[edit]

Dude, nice catch! Industry buildings is probably a category easily enriched by adding in all sorts of the fire protection pix I uploaded.... --Achim Hering 00:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lueger[edit]

Hallo, du rufst zur Sub-Kategoriesierung der Category:Lueger auf. Der Upload stammt von mir. Damals hatte ich etwas Zeit un bin die DVD systematisch durchgegangen und habe von den 10.000 Bildern alles genommen was mir interessant erschien, ca. 500. Seitdem ist da nix weiter dazu gekommen und ich habe auch nicht die Absicht das zu ergänzen.

Es ist meine Standpunkt, dass es sich bei Lueger um eine Quellenkategoriesierung handelt. Bei Themengebieten wo eine gewisse Anzahl an Bildern zusammen kam, habe ich diese Subkategoriesierung schon nach bestem Wissen vorgenommen. Diese Subkategorien sind dann auch in den jeweiligen Themen einkategoriesiert. Bei anderen Themen wo sich nicht mindestens 5 Bilder finden würde ich vorschlagen, auf eine Subkategoriesierung zu verzichten und stattdessen die einzelnen Bilder direkt in Themenkats. einzuordnen. Momentan kann ich demnach kein Bedarf zu Subkategoriesierung erkennen. Könntest du dem zustimmen und deinen Edit wieder zurücknehmen? Danke.--Kolossos 08:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Kolossos, habe stark an der Kategorisierung in den Bereichen Engineering & Technology gearbeitet und dort einige Kats als Hauptkategorien definiert, Lueger ist nur eine davon. Was würdest Du z.B. von Subkategorien wie Category:Lueger/Architectural drawings und Category:Lueger/Technical drawings halten? Würden beide mehr als nur 5 Bilder enthalten und in die Category:Architectural drawings und Category:Technical drawings passen. Die eine oder andere existierende Lueger Kat wäre dann u.U. als Subkat einzugruppieren. Der Baustein ist übrigens kein Arbeitsbaustein, sondern ein Aufruf bei der Kategorisierung statt der Hauptkat möglichst Subkats zu nutzen. Ziel dabei ist es, die Hauptkats nicht zum "überlaufen" voll zu machen, sondern übersichtliche Kategorien zu haben. Gruß --WikipediaMaster 14:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Die Idee mit den Architekturzeichnung ist vielleicht garnicht so schlecht. Mal sehen ob ich mich da morgen mal dran setze. Da Lueger bei Category:Technical drawings schon komplett drin ist (was aus meiner Sicht die Sache schon ganz gut trifft) würde ich darauf verzichten wollen. --Kolossos 21:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cad-fm01s.gif[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Cad-fm01s.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GeorgHH • talk 22:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Could you watch if it's everything allright with the file Image:A. Kubilius.jpg. I've just uploaded it and I need to know if it can be used in wikiprojects. Thank you in advance. --Viskonsas 09:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if it would be your own work, no problem, but the picture is from a newspaper and what about the licence? Are you sure you are allowed to use and upload this picture? --WikipediaMaster 09:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I cropped it and it has a low resolution. I thought that the photos with low resolution from the newspapers can be used in Commons. Was I wrong? Besides, this photo was taken by w:ELTA (Lithuanian news agency) staff. --Viskonsas 09:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So the rights may be with w:ELTA. I don't know if your believe that a photo with low resolution from a newspapers can be used in Commons is correct! Maybe, but did you find this information somewhere? I believe you will have to investigate a little more! Have a look here: Commons:Upload --WikipediaMaster 09:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After I look for some photos of other politics, ([1], [2], [3], I found out that majority of them are from government websites. So would it be better if I upload photo from the official website of the Parliament of Lithuania - [4]? Thank you very much for help. --Viskonsas 10:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a good way! 1. Check source and licence for other politicians from your country in Wikipedia 2. Use the same source and licence for your upload. --WikipediaMaster 10:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Norms[edit]

Ich verstehe nicht so recht was Du damit vorhast. Wenn Du alles was nach Normen getan und hergestellt wird darin unterbringen willst, wird das bald die größte Kategorie von allen. Mir soll es egal sein wenn Du baulichen Brandschutz dort mit einrollst, aber ich habe Schwierigkeiten den Zweck zu erkennen. Auch sprachlich ist das bedenklich. Auf englisch sind das "Standards", nicht Norms, es sei denn Du meinst Norm's Bar & Grill oder so. Eine Norm ist ein Dokument, nicht die Produkte die in Anlehnung an die Norm hergestellt wurden... Was bewegte Dich zur Erstellung dieser Kategorie? --Achim Hering 02:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Achim,

zunächst einmal existiert der Begriff Norm (Plural Norms) auch in der englischen Sprache. Wird oft, aber nicht ausschließlich für Soziale Normen (social norms) verwendet. Google liefert z.B. für "Technical Norms" über 26.000 Ergebnisse und man spricht durchaus von International Norms and Standards oder Technical Norms and Standards. Aus meiner Sicht wäre daher durchaus eine category: Norms and standards statt der category: Norms und category: Standards (dort redirects) sinnvoll. Darunter dann weitere Unterteilung in category: EN standards, category: ISO standards, category: DIN standards, etc.. Mein Ausgangspunkt war übrigens die Category: Norm symbols. Bei der Sache mit dem Brandschutz gebe ich Dir recht, kann man anzweifeln. Habe in den vergangenen Wochen viel an den Kats in den Commons gearbeitet und da bleibt Kritik (positiv wie negativ) nicht aus, hilft aber allemal weiter! Gruß --WikipediaMaster 10:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So besser? ;-) --WikipediaMaster 13:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alles paletti :-) --Achim Hering 16:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nebenbei erwähnt, ich wohne in Kanada, bin kanadischer Staatsbürger und bin Mitglied in mehreren Ausschüssen gewesen zur Erstellung hiesiger Normen in den USA und Kanada. In dieser Welt selber sagt man nicht Norm, sondern STANDARD, wie bereits von Dir korrigiert. Wenn man hier NORM sagt, ist das eher als Volksmund zu sehen, nicht Terminus Technikus. Norm ist auch die Kurzform für den Männernamen Norman, oder verniedlicht: Normskibaby. --Achim Hering 22:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man lernt nie aus! ;-) Gruß --WikipediaMaster 16:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wer weiß? Meine 18-jährige Tochter weiß bereits ALLES! --Achim Hering 18:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auf die Gefahr hin, mich mit Dir (als treusorgendem Vater) und Deiner Tochter anzulegen: Oh wie dumm, wer sowas von sich behauptet!!! ;-o --WikipediaMaster 18:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meine ehemalige Frau behauptet sogar ausschließlich immer nur Recht zu haben! --Achim Hering 01:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dann war die Entscheidung fürs "ehemalige" absolut weise! --WikipediaMaster 16:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nur sauteuer...--Achim Hering 03:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token a5201763d0d3a19411bc80060d2a33a1[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --WikipediaMaster 14:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plotter diagrams vs Category:Plots[edit]

Moin, wo liegt der Unterschied zwischen diesen beiden Kategorien bzw warum hast du Plotter diagrams angelegt?--Ma-Lik 08:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weil mir die Kat Plots entfallen war?!? ;-) --WikipediaMaster 16:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Na dann, kein Problem ;-). Könntest du die Zwecks Klarheit im Kategorienbaum wieder schnelllöschen lassen oder einen Redirect anlegen?--Ma-Lik 16:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bin dabei! ;-) --WikipediaMaster 16:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hömma[edit]

Du hast zwar keinen unbehebbaren Schaden angerichtet, und ich werde nichts daran machen, da es mein Design ist, aber weißt Du eigentlich, daß CAJ8073 eine einzelne UL Zulassung (von zehntausenden) ist? Etwas wenig für eine Kategorie, meinst Du nicht? --Achim Hering (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wollte auch keinen Schaden anrichten, nur dafür sorgen, das man das was "irgendwie" zusammen gehört auch unter einer Kat findet. Ob das eine Kat Wert ist oder nicht wird die Zeit zeigen - sehe Wikipedia und deren Derivate als chaotisches System das zur Selbstorganisation neigt und dabei bin ich nur ein kleines Rädchen, dass auch korrigiert werden kann und darf, wenn's hier und da mal versagt. Gruß --WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sieh mal: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:DIN_4102 --Achim Hering (talk) 01:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mach ich ;-) --WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guck noch mal rein. Jetzt stimmt es: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:DIN_4102 --Achim Hering (talk) 02:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ISO_3166[edit]

re: [your creation]

I got as far as ISO=International Organization for Standardization (International Standards for Business, Government and Society) from one of the maps having a link.
But the question remains: WHAT GOES IN HERE?

Maps produced to some ISO specification?
Maps of Member companies in ISO

You really need to give the rest of us a clue when you're spinning off a whole new schema. So what's the deal on these? The few I sampled hadn't been categorized in other schemes yet. // FrankB 17:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, its about the codes for country and dependent area names used in this maps. They are according to ISO 3166. I hope this helps: Wkipedia EN: Category: ISO 3166 to clarify your questions! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually... Who, what, when, where, why... didn't you ever study reporting news stories? <g> In any event, you're defining a scheme, so don't you think you should tell us how the scheme is supposed to work. In other words, the category annotations, you haven't provided ... has to tell others 'what is' and 'what is not' allowable content. Sorry, dude, don't read minds. At least I made a start for you. // FrankB 06:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Screenshots[edit]

Hello, you remove the category "Image" of this category. I think you dont see it, but we also can have image of screen (camera, cinera...) I reverte your change, but do what you think better. ~ bayo or talk 08:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diagrams, charts, graphs[edit]

Hello. Please see

I did, but what I see is that subcategorizing is possible and there is no need for such complex named categories.--WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I made two changes to your Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Diagrams, charts, graphs by theme because I think it was incomplete. It should work now correctly. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images of low quality[edit]

Hello :)

I reverted your change to Category:Images of low quality; it belongs in Category:Quality assurance rather than Category:Images for cleanup because for the most part images tagged with {{Low quality}} can't be fixed. Instead they need to be replaced, which isn't within the scope of the Images for Cleanup categories.

If you don't agree please feel free to leave a message on my talk page :) Regards, -- Editor at Large • talk 01:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have recategorized it again into here: Category:Picture and image maintenance --WikipediaMaster (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality images have nothing to do with maintenance and everything to do with quality assurance. I certainly appreciate what you're trying to do with all these recats, but repeatedly sticking Category:Images of low quality in non-applicable categories isn't really achieving much - it's best just being left in the Quality Assurance category where it belongs :) -- Editor at Large • talk 05:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Statistical charts and diagrams[edit]

Hi, I proposed to rename the "Category:Statistical charts and diagrams", see Category talk:Statistical charts and diagrams. Could you take a look, and respond. Thanks. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 16:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I wonder if you noticed that I agree with your proposal (after all) on Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Diagrams, charts, graphs by theme to empty the Category:Diagrams, charts, graphs by theme. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 17:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have, see there ;-) --WikipediaMaster (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subcategorize[edit]

I noticed that you created a separate Template:Subcategorize, whereas before I had it redirect to Template:Categorise. What do you see as the essential difference between the two? Superm401 - Talk 02:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's about the text of the template(s). There are many categories with a lot of content that should get subcategorized, but they are not main categories (as the original template says) or root categories. Nevertheless the content should be subcategorized.--WikipediaMaster ( ) 18:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hello. Please see my latest comments at:

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Diagrams, charts, graphs by theme --Timeshifter (talk) 01:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests/Category:Diagrams, charts, graphs by theme[edit]

Hi, I made a final proposal to clear the Category:Diagrams, charts, graphs by theme in three days, see here. I will notify all people who contributed to this discussion. If you have any objections please contribute to the final discussion. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 23:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to always add an edit summary[edit]

Hi. You just added Image:Cocktail straws.jpg to Category:Fluorescence, but you did not include any kind of edit summary. It is really helpful if you could mention what you did, even very briefly like "+cat" to indicate you added a category; better would be "+Cat:Fluorescence" or "Added Category:Fluorescence". Thanks! --Willscrlt (Talk) 23:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video game hardware[edit]

Hello. I revert your change. This category is not about video game input/output, but about hardware, like video game plateform, and sure olso video game input/output. You can check the wikipedia category http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Video_game_hardware. Thanks. ~ bayo or talk 20:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was a missunderstanding / misinterpretation I did! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coastline schemas[edit]

Please see:

http://www.google.com/search?q=define:schema

Schema is not the correct word to use for Category:Coastline schemas.

I am changing it to Category:Coastline cross sections.

Looking at the revision history of Category:Coastline schemas I see that you did not create that category name. So I am just informing you of the new category name since you made a recent edit of its parent categories. --Timeshifter (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Timeshifter,

there are more categories in here: Category: Geological cross sections that you may like to change in the same way. I did not create this categories, just identified them as Geological cross sections and therefore added / moved them into this cat. --WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just bookmarked that category. I don't know when I will get around to working on it though. Any help is appreciated! --Timeshifter (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HÜTTE book image[edit]

Your recent change (adding the category Engineering books) is acceptable, is perfect. --Wikinaut (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of the Category:Information visualization [edit]

Hi, I noticed you started changing the content of the Category:Information visualization. Now this category is designed with a specific purpose as explained in the Category talk:Information visualization. Could you take a look a it because I don't understand your latest moves here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MDD, visualization of information can be done in different ways and I did not see the category with such a specific scientific background. I believe the categories I added fit together quite well with the category title but you are right, not in the way the article describes the field of Information visualization. Maybe we can find a different category title for the categories I added like graphs, schemas, .... ?! No problem for me - feel free to remove them from category Information visualization. Maybe you have a good proposal how to group them?! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 12:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. I understand your point of view, and even mentioned that in the beginning of the overview section of the w:Information visualization article. The term "information visualization" has a more general meaning, which I think, is maybe even beeing used more often outsite the scientific community.

I think you allready understand, that I want to narrow the categories in the field of visualization here all to very specific fields, which corresponds with the Wikipedia articles. On the other hand, I am creating a small series of more general categories, galleries and Wikipedia articles (for example mathematical diagrams, network diagrams, cluster diagrams...) to create some more overview... and I like to develop this into an new general Wikipedia article about visualization. But this will take some time.

So I admitt for now the problem remains with the categories you added like graphs, schemas... I don't think we need a different category title. I think in time, they can return to the Category:visualization. If you think they should stay in the Category:Information visualization, then I think we should at least change the introduction of that category, explaining that category is for multi purposes... -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 22:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment I would prefer to leave them in then and change the introduction text accordingly. DO you want to do that? --WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:File transfer cables[edit]

Hello there! I'm writing about the aforementioned category. Technically speaking, there is no such thing as a File transfer cable. FTP in this context stands for Foiled Twisted Pair, as explained here. There is no File transfer infrastructure either. Infrastructure refers to hardware, as in network infrastructure, protocol refers to software, as in network protocols or network services. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, adamantios (talk) 09:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your remarks! Nobody is perfect and knows everything, especially not me! :-)

What I learn is that abbreviations are sometimes difficult!I hvae corrected the errors! Thank you and best regards --WikipediaMaster (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure :) Thanks for all the good work. adamantios (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical computers[edit]

Hello. I see you move some computer on this category. I thing its not a very easy to use and to manage the content, every computer can be categorised here, an historical computer is not only a very old computer ; or its the POV of the contributor (then its hard to know the real content). That why i dont think “Historical” categories on Wikimedia Commons make sens. Maybe categories per years is more interesting ; it also create the history of every computers, but without need the think “is it historical?”. For example Category:Aircraft by period.

But it's just a proposal, i will not do anything :-D

Computer category tree need a very big work, good luck. ~ bayo or talk 22:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I agree with you that "by year" might be the better way but as you say, lots of work and I just did a start on that! You are right, what is today up to date tomorrow might be historical, but nevertheless we (why not U2? ;-) have to start somewhere!

Best regards --WikipediaMaster (talk) 10:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cutting[edit]

Hallo, diese Kategorie für Stecklinge ist Dir aber völlig aus dem Ruder gelaufen. Eigentlich hättest Du merken müssen, dass Category: Manufacturing technology mit Unterkategorien überhaupt nicht zu Category:Plant reproduction passt. Ich schlage vor, die Stecklinge nach Category:Cuttings (Plural) zu verlagern. Oder siehst Du da noch irgendwelche Kollisionen mit Schneidsachen voraus? -- Ies (talk) 14:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bereits erledigt! Gruß --WikipediaMaster (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bicycle road signs[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Bicycle road signs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 17:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Airband radios[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you removed Category:Airband radios from Category:Radios and added it to Category:Radio receivers. However airband radios are two-way devices (transmitter & receiver, sometimes called "tranceiver") and not normally classified as "receivers". Is there a reason for this? Sv1xv (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, maybe just a leck of knowledge about Airband radios on my side. Feel free to re-categorize in the best fitting categories! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I put it back in Category:Radios and Category:Avionics. Sv1xv (talk) 17:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commonist shell3.jpg & co[edit]

Hi,

This pictures are PD-ineligible, as there's nothing copyrightable on the screenshots, so I retagged them. --Dereckson (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK for me! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine so. Thank you. --Dereckson (talk) 16:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Motion[edit]

Hallo WikipediaMaster! Gibt es einen Unterschied zwischen Category:Motion und Category:Movement? (I think it is allways a good idea to create a description on every new category!) --Diwas (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, bin ich mir auch noch nicht sicher ;-) Beide Begriffe werden wohl synonym verwendet, aber je nach Zusammenhang ist mal der eine, mal der andere eher üblich. So ist auch die zweite Kat entstanden, denn in einem bestimmten Zusammenhang denkt man im Normalfall nicht an die andere Möglichkeit. Sucht in den Commons nach Motion, findet man ca. 2600 Ergebnisse, bei Movement fast die doppelte Anzahl. Vom Zusammenhang macht ja z.B. auch die category: Locomotion aber keine Kat Locomovement Sinn. Time will tell, wohin die Reise hier geht!

Gruß --WikipediaMaster (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für deine Antwort, Gruß --Diwas (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nouns[edit]

Hallo WikipediaMaster! Ich bin wieder mal neugierig. Sollen in die Category:Nouns alle Substantive direkt eingeordnet werden? Das wäre fast alle Kategorien, also zigtausende. Oder sollen alle Substantive in der Hierarchie unter der Category:Nouns also in Unterkategorien eingeordnet sein? Ist ja zu einem großen Teil schon so, beispielsweise unter Category:Knowledge und dessen Unterkategorien. Oder sollen nur die jetzt bereits unter Category:Nouns kategorisierten Substantive drin sein? Wenn das nicht angegeben wird, könnten bald wahllos viele Sustantive einsortiert sein, andere nicht. Gruß --Diwas (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of categories "by alphabet"[edit]

Category discussion notification

Some of categories "by alphabet" has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Norm symbols[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Norm symbols has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Wizard191 (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Category:1280x960 et al.[edit]

Please, see Category talk:1280x960. --Mormegil (talk) 11:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Booting[edit]

Could you please put in some pictures into the gallery so it doesn't get deleted. Thanks. Techman224^Talk 21:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Hi there. I've deleted your recently created disambiguation pages, CRM and CAD. Those sorts of pages are most likely out of scope at Commons, especially since they only contained one entry each. Perhaps it would be better to redirect them directly to their respective categories? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Windows Vista Login Manager[edit]

The images you've just put into this category are completely unrelated to the Windows Vista login manager. As mentioned in the description page, they are taken from the Vista-Inspirate icon theme, inspired by the look of Windows Vista, and are nominally icons for a login manager - but are used for many other purposes. Stannered (talk) 19:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint, I will change it! WikipediaMaster (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bicycle road signs, Category:End of bikeway signs[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Bicycle road signs, Category:End of bikeway signs have been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which they should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint, generally speaking I have no preferences regarding the categories names and created that ones for sorting reasons. When there is a conclusion for cycling signs coategory names in general, I will follow that. --WikipediaMaster (talk) 12:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category trees[edit]

Hi, I'm wondering why you applied {{Categorytree}} and {{category tree all|mode=parents|alignright=yes}} to many categories that had no need for them (or is that subjective ;)). For example, Category:Engineering drawing had only two subcategories and since there's only 55 files, both will be displayed on the first page. Are you aware that the natural category listing has the same functionality that allows you to expand and browse the subcategories? The parent mode one makes a little sense because you can browse sister categories however all you have to do to do that is navigate to the parent category, and the benefit of that is you can continue to go up the tree. I'm not sure it's worth cluttering up every category for this reason. Something that potentially applies to every category should be added via the MediaWiki interface, which would be better as a preference anyway. I think these trees are only useful when there's more than 200 category members as normally you would need to navigate through the category 200 items at a time just to see all the subcategories (this is something they hopefully improve soon). BTW, there's a preference where you can make the category bar appear at the top of the page. I found that this makes category work/navigation much more convenient. Rocket000 (talk) 02:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rocket,

yes it might be (partly) subjective! ;-) During my category works, I move a lot of files and the tries (parent and sister) are helpful when you want to look up categories during re-categorization. It was some time ago, when I added the the trees and I am not sure, that even the sister trees appeared in the way they do today, when I added them. But you are right, it would be good if both versions would be in the MediaWiki interface (GUI) for every cat. They are also helpful for cats with little content.

Regards --WikipediaMaster (talk) 10:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Components1.jpg[edit]

Hi. I see that you have add Category:Maple source code to image File:Components1.jpg. The src in not in Maple but in Maxima CAS. I do not know Maple but I think that it is not the same. Let me know if I'm wrong. Regards --Adam majewski (talk) 15:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THX for the correction, maple appears in the text, but I believe you are right! --WikipediaMaster (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tensile_steel_testing[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Tensile_steel_testing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Wizard191 (talk) 23:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Physiological_effects[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Physiological_effects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

98.172.62.190 01:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scientific_pictures_and_images[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Scientific_pictures_and_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Laserles (talk) 18:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Passages[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Passages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

ŠJů (talk) 17:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sound_carriers[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Sound_carriers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

:| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 05:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Audio_recording[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Audio_recording has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

:| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 05:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sound_records[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Sound_records has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

:| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 05:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pictures_and_images (inappropriate nomination)[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Pictures_and_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Egi finanda (talk) 09:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The CFD entry pointed to above was just a question being asked by a confused user. - dcljr (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you erase Cyprus in the File:State Religions.svg map, because Cyprus does not have a state religion, nor is there any provision in its constitution for a state religion.[edit]

Cyprus does NOT have a state religion, nor is there any provision in its constitution for a state religion. Here is a link to the Constitution of Cyprus for proof: http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/cy00000_.html Could you correct the "File:State Religions.svg" map by removing Cyprus? Thank you.

Category:Creatures[edit]

Creatures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Rd232 (talk) 14:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pictures and images[edit]

Pictures and images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Note that nine other similarly titled categories are being discussed in separate sections (since they most likely require different actions). See Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/02 for all the relevant nominations. - dcljr (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pictures_and_images_by_format[edit]

Category:Pictures_and_images_by_format has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

dcljr (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pictures_and_images_by_size_or_form[edit]

Category:Pictures_and_images_by_size_or_form has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

dcljr (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chromatograms[edit]

[5] this user apparently does not understand what means a "chromatic diagram". Maybe, all his changes to categories should be examined to find more such lapses. Please, do not help to categorize images in the way user:WikipediaMaster did. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/08/Category:Vacuum triode circuits[edit]

Overcategorization? Retired electrician (talk) 09:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gearlevers[edit]

Gearlevers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Windows_Vista_Login_Manager[edit]

Category:Windows_Vista_Login_Manager has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sound_records[edit]

Category:Sound_records has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

moogsi (blah) 20:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Screw_bits[edit]

Screw bits has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Nikola (talk) 11:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Adobe_Flex_charts[edit]

Category:Adobe_Flex_charts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rezonansowy (talk) 21:56, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Internet_applications[edit]

Internet applications has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

AVRS (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Computer_periphery[edit]

Computer periphery has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 02:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical_computer_periphery[edit]

Historical computer periphery has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 02:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black_and_white_photography[edit]

Black and white photography has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 11:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Screw_nuts[edit]

Screw nuts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RACI matrix[edit]

Hello, I'm questioning your category addition on en:Talk:Responsibility_assignment_matrix#No_history_paragraph, because I can't find any source asserting that it's dedicated or invented by the Six Sigma. JackPotte (talk) 20:55, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Communication_technology[edit]

Communication technology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

36.252.1.189 08:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:File_formats[edit]

File formats has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Navy_pictures_and_images[edit]

Category:Navy_pictures_and_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rsteen (talk) 09:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Screenshots_by_software[edit]

Category:Screenshots_by_software has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

AbdealiJK (talk) 07:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Co_pipelines[edit]

Category:Co_pipelines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Impressions[edit]

Impressions has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bitmap[edit]

Bitmap has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

Hello Wikipedians, you may have seen that I do not react on discussions regarding my past categorization works. Please improve what you think needs to be improved and don't forget I did this work when it was not as popular as today, the interest was lower, etc. WikipediaMaster

Category:Maritime_places[edit]

Category:Maritime_places has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 08:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bicycles[edit]

I see you edited Category:Historical bicycles and/or Category:Vintage bicycles, so you may be interested in Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/08/Category:Historical bicycles and Category:Vintage bicycles. - Jmabel ! talk 16:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Contrast[edit]

Contrast has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 09:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mechanical_tools[edit]

Mechanical tools has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mirror effect[edit]

Mirror effect has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rolling_elements[edit]

Rolling elements has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

85.115.58.180 15:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:3D_drawings[edit]

3D drawings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:BJT_circuits[edit]

BJT circuits has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 11:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths_by_cause[edit]

Deaths by cause has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tree_charts[edit]

Tree charts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Round_charts[edit]

Round charts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electrical_schemas[edit]

Electrical schemas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Statistical_charts[edit]

Statistical charts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pareto_diagrams[edit]

Pareto diagrams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 20:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Java_icons[edit]

Java icons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:VML[edit]

VML has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:High-resolution[edit]

High-resolution has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Motion_pictures[edit]

Motion pictures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Technical_institutes[edit]

Technical institutes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Institutes[edit]

Institutes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Colorful_objects[edit]

Colorful objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Computer_screws[edit]

Computer screws has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cardan_joints[edit]

Cardan joints has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scripts[edit]

Scripts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

RZuo (talk) 13:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Material_handling[edit]

Material handling has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 12:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Industries_dealing_with_natural_resources[edit]

Industries dealing with natural resources has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 13:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CdD notification[edit]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/12/Category:Cobblers; you have edited the related Category:Shoemakers. - Jmabel ! talk 04:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electricity_networks[edit]

Electricity networks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 05:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lueger/Engineering[edit]

Lueger/Engineering has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 16:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]