User talk:Velvet/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue gde chaussee 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue gde chaussee bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Wallaert fil au louis d'or ateliers fenetres cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 04:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille abbaye de loos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel rue gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 27 rue gounod bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble mure rue de maubeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille statue louis faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 03:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 31 place rihour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille statue faidherbe cote.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 03:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 13 15 pavillon de l'epinette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pont de la citadelle blason.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 50 52 rue de la victoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 47 rue henri peters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 50 - 52 Rue Barthélémy Delespaul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel intendance salle bal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 01:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille residence du beffroi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette aux enfants terribles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 58 60 rue de la victoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hellemmes chapelle d'elocques rue pierre curie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 10:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel intendance palier.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de l'intendance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 20:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rang rue masurel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rang refuge abbaye de loos rue de weppes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette ecluse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette syndicat initiative bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette ND de lourdes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 10 chemin de halage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 09:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 11 13 rue du college.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette tekpol 50 rue st charles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette etang Lesaffre internat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 29 rue du cheval blanc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 23 rue d'orchies garages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 18:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 45 47 pavillon de l'epinette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 36 22 rue du cheval blanc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 32 38 allee des ormes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille fontaine republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 03:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 03:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 39 41 rue boucher de perthes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 03:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 65 chemin poivre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Coke rue Thiers bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison renard.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq becque de marcq chemin pieton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq becque de Marcq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison folie moulins jardin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 14:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette ecluse bouee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 22 34 cite st charles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, I like the perspective --FlocciNivis 17:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette chemin canal de roubaix graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille fontaine place de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
An english description would be appreciated. --Valo139 21:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Sebring12Hrs 10:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Valo139 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq rue du docteur ducroquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq rue du cheval blanc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 11:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 929 avenue de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette parc innovation rue de menin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cafe euroistambul 15 rue sadi carnot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin allee bon pecheur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin parc heurtebise banc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin ferme du bocquiau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 90 rue racine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 606 620 av kuhlmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme haute deule peniche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 90 92 rue st charles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de ville porte de paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille eglise gd seminaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de ville face porte paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille porte de paris sud.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 722 730 av kuhlmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 09:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 670 680 av kuhlmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos graffiti tigre rue pierre gilles de gennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos graffiti ukraine rue pierre gilles de gennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin parc heurtebise sous bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bar le carre d'as.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 72 76 av de bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 21:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos 40 30 parc notre dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos graffiti fleurs rue galilee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos rond point route de sequedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chapelle gonnet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille anciennes halles centrales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 24 25 domaine de la clairiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 15 16 domaine de la clairiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette canal de roubaix ecluse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette canal de roubaix zephir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette nouveau cimetiere de la madeleine haies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality – cool view ;–). --Aristeas 11:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette zone humide site haut touquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support good quality --Matutinho 13:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette nouveau cimetiere de la madeleine allee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette entree domaine du vert bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Dark... but, nice. Good quality. --Terragio67 11:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Is that statue no longer copyrighted? Do you know when the sculptor died? -- Ikan Kekek 14:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this article could be useful: https://aesf.art/projects/angelsdemons/ --Terragio67 17:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. So it appears that this sculpture was completed in 2012 (or if not, in 2009). Unless it's stated anywhere that the sculptor has given permission for images of the sculpture to be used commercially without paying for licensing, Commons cannot host this image and it will eventually be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek 19:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea if they are copyrighted. They were made for a parade in Lille Metropolis. There were a lot, and after the event, some were spread in a few places over the metropolis --Velvet 09:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme standart rue hegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille ext.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not sure why so small, but fine --Poco a poco 20:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing usine av albert masurel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette domaine du vert bois pelouse arbres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues ferme 76 rue des ravennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux ferme 426 rue de tourcoing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 459 rue de tourcoing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing MJC La fabrique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 38 40 bd constantin descat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 209 213 rue claude bernard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 106 rue de paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille observatoire cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --PantheraLeo1359531 18:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing usine masurel rue de paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing mur protection voie rapide rue claude bernard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing canal voie rapide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing passerelle rue claude bernard graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing plaine image imaginarium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing 242 244 rue de paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 48 rue de tourcoing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix grands magasins blvd d'armentieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing usine masurel depuis rue pierre prevost mouvaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing usine masurel friche rue de paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq chateau blanc voie parc europe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 4 10 rue henri carette face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 75 79 rue emile dellette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 48 50 rue emile dellette face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal ecluse du noir bonnet face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal bibliotheque municipale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq gabions voie parc europe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq rond point av de la Marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Would be good if you can identify the monument. --Mike Peel 18:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal embranchement marque canalisee canal de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal ecluse du plomeux graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille citadelle rempart pointe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aciarium 20:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 42 52 rue emile dellette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal rond point rue emile dellette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support An additional cat about the wooden structure would be good (I have no clue what that is called), but good to go --Poco a poco 07:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 27 21 rue du touquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Well done. --Augustgeyler 11:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 2 12 rue claude debussy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille monument au pigeon voyageur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support slightly overexposed but good quality --Virtual-Pano 00:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette stockage 151 rue de l'union.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:54, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette 57 61 rue du touquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rang 2 a 14 rue de la monnaie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite napoleon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette cimetiere parterre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette canal roubaix cygnes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille parc des geants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette jardin public rue maurice ravel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette jardin public entree rue maurice ravel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons petit maroc 32 34 rue emile borel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette terreplein rue haut touquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 6 rue du barreau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille parc citadelle remparts douve heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA groupe scolaire josephine baker 15 allee des bacheliers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille chap st joseph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille fives pont tgv rue du pont de Tournai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue place theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille dondaines vue M651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pavillon entree port bd lorraine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 29 rue lestiboudois locaux industriels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille terreplein bd de la moselle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue deule port mouettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette stade du haut touquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette maisons semi provisoires pavillons epinette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 09:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille le quartier libre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin chateau cuvelier crepy 78 rue vanderhaghen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 22 30 rue albert vanderhaghen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin chemin de busignies voie ferree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sequedin 5 impasse calmette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 11:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cuvelier fauvarque 100 rue vanderhaghen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 11:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sequedin maison chemin de la plaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin chemin A25 haie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Acceptable. --Wee Hong 17:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA aire de jeux rue du blason.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette jardins familiaux chemin de wervick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hospice comtesse carreaux cuisine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cour notre dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA vue bibliotheque universite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 32 44 av de lassus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 49 59 rue fidele lhermite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA rond point av paul langevin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 129 rue auguste potie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 97 rue sadi carnot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin chateau cuvelier crepy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cargill vieux canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin rang cites carmel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin peniche depuis passerelle impasse de la roche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin gare cote quais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:52, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin friche Lever graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image. But please remove the Dust spots in the left part of the sky. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for your review. --Velvet 10:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin petit belgique rue general dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin 14 4 rue des catelaines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin pont voie ferree deule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin cargill rue general mesny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don maison 14 chemin de halage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haubourdin place de la gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue parc st ruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille logements caserne st ruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Billy berclau vue ilot de la haute deule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bauvin garage deule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille canal esplanade marin eau douce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille parc st ruth graffiti caserne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille caserne st ruth rue porte d'ypres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille parc citadelle hetre pourpre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille parc citadelle vue voie combattants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite aviateurs rue coli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite aviateurs rue nungesser pointe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bois blancs palissade graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ecole montessori chemin de halage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bois blanc jardin des Agrions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille sechoir friche Montpellier graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite aviateurs rue nungesser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
In upper-right purple CA that should be removed (see the note) --Halavar 17:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for your review. --Velvet 17:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. QI for me. --Halavar 10:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille plaine vachers aire jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bois blanc 6 rue de bergues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Contrast is quite high but still ok --MB-one 07:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massy gare TGV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite aviateurs chemin de halage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massy gare ancienne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palissade friche Montpellier graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue esquermoise.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison folie de wazemmes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre 70 72 de lattre tassigny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre caserne pompiers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre 127 129 rue de lambersart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre ecole musique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Very special sky. --Augustgeyler 06:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre deule anarchy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre 1 7 rue docteur calmette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 05:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille monument pasteur place philippe lebon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre kiosque graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre gds moulins rue felix faure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre place eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre rue de la filature aire de jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille porte paris face vue exterieure.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille CC lillenium int confinement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre rue de la filature aire de jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel part 281 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre stade caby.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, sharpness acceptable. --XRay 06:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre rue sainte helene face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre rue sadi carnot passage niveau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre rue felix faure graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 05:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre usine lemaire destombes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre stade ketels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre voie ferree rue villebois mareuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre hall filature parking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 291 297 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 73 rue turenne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 08:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre voie ferree rue sadi carnot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre rue villebois mareuil frene.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palissade av leon jouhaux graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille square marechal birdwood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue la bassee garages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq berge du riez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq 6 8 rue destombes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq château Verhaeghe face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq cafe du cycle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq eglise st piat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq maisons 42 44 rue bousbecque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 124 126 128 av de bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 74 rue de cassel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 21:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 40 rue turgot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq parc bois leurent belvedere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq maison paroissiale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq villa mon genie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq tour sechage poterie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq voie des belges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart au soleil 374 av de dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart rue de l'eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 1 av du colysee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Florstein 08:18, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq vue du riez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roncq ecuries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:42, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin coccinelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos rue donat agache.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos passage a niveau av kuhlmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 110 112 av de bretagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos kuhlmann palissade graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue bouguereau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I suggest removing chromatic aberration at the roof. --Augustgeyler 20:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review. Could you be more specific ? I cannot see it... --Velvet 10:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ecole desbordes valmore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos voie Kuhlmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos vue abbaye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 79 boulevard de strasbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sequedin vue CVO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin des plantes orangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite duvinage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille l'amour friche av hoover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but the file is unnecessarily big for this resolution --Poco a poco 08:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faches parc de la croisette chemin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place jacques febvrier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille periph sud immeubles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faches ferme rouge barre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faches parc de la croisette mer végétale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loos voie ferree rue clemenceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Personal opinion: A bit more saturation would be good --Grunpfnul 06:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faches 12 22 rue marechal joffre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille porte d'arras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille halle de glisse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue jeanne godart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 58 64 rue doyennette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue lesage senault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin chateau lamblin hotel de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin eglise ND de lourdes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice shot, but I think the picture would be better cropped without the advertising --MVmath20 17:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin rue du commerce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin rue de l'industrie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 92 86 rue leo delibes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin villa blanche 27 rue des fleurs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart rue simon vollant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre eglise sainte camille rue vrau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre chantier hospice incurables.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre garages av de la resistance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre ferme marechal tassigny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin ecole Laccore ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good to me. --Sebring12Hrs08:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing la tossee chaufferie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix vestiges terken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre tarterie chemin de messines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place guy de dampierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart voies allee des ormes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 15 rue de la digue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cafe augustin 57 rue valenciennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre 8 rue jean XXIII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St andre 8 rue jean de la fontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 30 22 parvis st michel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 26 rue solferino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 14:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing la tossee batiments.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA parc du heron vegetation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 30 22 parvis st michel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart cimetiere des ormes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GoldenArtists 22:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:GoldenArtists has much less than 50 edits. Therefore, the vote cannot be counted. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 281 rue de l'abbe bonpain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good picture. -- MJJR 13:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 301 rue de abbe bonpain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality. -- MJJR 13:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq jardin des senteurs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq conservatoire 929 av République.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 20 40 rue gustave engrand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 1 13 rue de la coppinerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 09:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing la tossee mur graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 148 rue ferdinand mathias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]