User talk:Velvet/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille gd place arc en ciel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice! --Palauenc05 11:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ancienne faculte medecine pharmacie place lebon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Pierre André Leclercq 10:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille faculte medecine pharmacie moxy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A bit too much sharpening for my taste, but this is, yes, a matter of taste. --Aristeas 14:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ancienne fac lettres sciences po.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison des chercheurs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but is a residence a hotel, or is that an incorrect category? Can you stay at this residence for a day, as you could at a hotel? And can you call room service? -- Ikan Kekek 16:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
* I did not find a proper equivalent to "résidence hotellière" in english (althought, I am sure there is one). It is a residence with services as in a hotel (reception 7/7 & 24/24, breakfast, cleaning...) where one can stay a few days or several months, alone or with his family. But you have to be invited to stay. --Velvet 08:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Maybe hotel-style residence for visiting international researchers? That seems most explanatory. -- Ikan Kekek 11:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, but it is not an existing commons category --Velvet 22:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can use this category, but your file description doesn't explain why, so it's best to improve your file description. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yous are right, thank you --Velvet 10:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks, very good description. -- Ikan Kekek 00:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Hôtel Catel-Beghin bd de la liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de ville cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison rue fabricy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille le why.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The sky is noisy. --Tournasol7 09:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review, sky denoised --Velvet 13:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. Thanks! --Tournasol7 08:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille palais rameau face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Sacre coeur face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille monument a pasteur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille filature Wallaert fil au louis d'or bureaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille filature Wallaert fil au louis d'or ateliers face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille filature Wallaert fil au louis d'or cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Wallaert fil au louis d'or ateliers tour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Maison 32 Bd Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but if you had waited 2 seconds, the guy would have disappeared. --Palauenc05 11:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris st denys la chapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 20 22 Bd Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Traces of CAs at the branches (but not irritating) and IMHO a bit too rigid sharpening, but that’s a matter of taste. --Aristeas 09:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin vauban marionnettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 8 10 12 Bd Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality to me, and a nice building. -- Ikan Kekek 10:04, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 54 56 Bd Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is some purple CA at the top --Poco a poco 10:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. CA reduced --Velvet 14:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 179 bd liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Difficult motive behind this tree. --Milseburg 16:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille canal de l'esplanade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille citadelle aire picnic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille residence porte de la barre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GHood quality --Michielverbeek 20:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 219bis Bd liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeubles 199 203 Bd liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful light and good quality, but I think you are somewhat COM:OVERCAT. Both apartment buildings and houses? -- Ikan Kekek 10:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review. Regarding the categories, the picture represents one house and two appartment buildings --Velvet 14:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 27 rue delesalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 342 rue gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille citadelle porte royale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but there is a slight tilt --Poco a poco 15:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. Tilt corrected --Velvet 19:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 13 rue delesalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 181 rue solferino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 2 bd lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart villa st etienne 1 av courbet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart villa cecile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel delbecque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 07:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue royale 1bis 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart villa 13 av Foch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 40 rue des arts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine 234-240 av de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel bellevue cote gd place.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Madeleine hotel art deco cote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine ancien couvent st maur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Contrast is IMHO too high, causing some oversaturation and very dark shadows --Poco a poco 14:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done You're right, contrast reduced --Velvet 16:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine maison art deco 183 bd republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The crop at the sides could be better. --Ermell 09:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 161 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille atelier Baert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 32 rue d'antin bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 24 26 rue du plat face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the CAs. --XRay 07:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for the review, CAs reduced --Velvet 09:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Still minor CAs at the windows, but IMO OK for QI. --XRay 09:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 218 rue gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeubles 5 et 7 rue esquermoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 09:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Versailles hotel de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. a bit small --Wilfredor 23:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeubles 34 36 rue esquermoise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Geoprofi Lars 13:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bat indus rue princesse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Weak support. There are halos around the building and sharpness could be better. --XRay 12:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for the review and support. New version uploaded --Velvet 15:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 135 rue du fg de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 56-60 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Sharpness could be better. Why not f/8? --XRay 07:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review and support. When there is enough light, I'm used to preset 100 ISO and f/5,6 (best setting for sharpness on my camera) but yes, it could have been f/8 considering the angle and the size of the building --Velvet 13:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 102-104 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 32 rue vantroyen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
could you raise the shadows at the bottom? --Tesla Delacroix 20:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. New version uploaded --Velvet 12:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality; Thanks! --Tesla Delacroix 23:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chapelle catho.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 53 rue st gabriel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 14 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I really like your project of photographing buildings in Lille. You might also nominate these photos at COM:VIC when you have the chance. -- Ikan Kekek 07:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 6 chapelle ND des anges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille statue equestre jeanne d'arc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 15:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 92 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 86 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille residence albert le grand 48 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 24 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 80 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bihorel eglise saint jean eudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 44 rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 90 rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille atelier 8 rue moliere bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 40 bd Vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel militaire des bleuets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but without car would have been better --Michielverbeek 07:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 52 rue delespaul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 14 rue de gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but strong shadows --Michielverbeek 07:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 18 a 22 lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and nice. --Aristeas 11:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille sphinges du pont napoleon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and nice sculpture. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 08:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 15 rue maire andre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The wall on the left does not look straight, perhaps it could use some lens correction? --Nefronus 18:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. New version uploaded --Velvet 08:31, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison de bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Personally I would try to lift the shadows at the left a bit, but this is a matter of taste, and while the sensor of the dp1 Quattro is great in good light, I remember having read that it is not very tolerant in the shadows, so probably it is best to leave the photo as it is ;–). --Aristeas 09:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pignon cite philanthropique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Question Two pieces of the building upper part are cropped out. Is it possible to fix? --LexKurochkin 08:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid not, and not with my camera (the street is quite narrow) --Velvet 13:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak support OK for QI, despite the minor problem per my comment --LexKurochkin 06:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille platane square ramponneau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice tree. --LexKurochkin 14:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marais de fretin 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 1 rue macquart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 1 square rameau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 13 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peronne en melantois vue du marais de Bonnance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 17 bd Vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 15 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 57 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice house. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 18:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 43 rue patou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 4 rue du priez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris musee bourdelle maison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (although the left crop could be better). --C messier 20:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille opera vue frontale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Túllio F 08:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 45 rue des tanneurs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 37-41 bd bigo danel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good, but just as a suggestion to make the photo even better: The white balance seems a bit off to me (too cold/too much green). Could you try to fix that? Thank you! --Aristeas 08:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank's for the review. You're right, warmer version uploaded --Velvet 10:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you! --Aristeas 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 67 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 07:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 4 rue leonard danel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 118 rue des postes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille facade 73 rue d'angleterre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 77 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 1 place de bethune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille deconstruction forum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA on the branches at the top right; no metadata available. --F. Riedelio 15:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review, branches removed. I used Hugin to straighten the perspective and this erases the metadata. But Photo Information is available in the description.--Velvet 06:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 13:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cafe du bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille carlton depuis place du theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 10 rue tenremonde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 6 rue du vert bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison de l'emploi ancien commissariat central.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille nouveau siecle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 14 rue tenremonde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 06:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 99 101 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille les bains lillois entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support the very top of the building is slightly blurred, but OK. --LexKurochkin 08:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 13 place simon vollant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel Nicodeme 138 140 bd de la liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 08:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 25 rue malus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:36, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble art deco 150 bd liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 00:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison cordonnier 142 bd Liberte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 07:36, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 44 rue des pyramides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 10:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison-atelier 24 rue de lens face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 65 rue d'artois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, main object is not shadowed --Michielverbeek 18:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble cooperative union de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille le flow depuis rue d'Arras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks slightly off vertical (clockwise) - maybe a slight counter-clockwise correction? --PsamatheM 11:47, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for the review --Velvet 16:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 21:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble muré 25 bis Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille residence du beffroi rue mauroy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 08:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine maison pagnerre 121 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 34 rue gabriel peri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq chateau lesaffre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq immeuble 1031 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macq maison 46 rue de verdun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maison 30 rue jean-baptiste ducrocq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maison 50 rue de verdun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq La coupole 2 av de la marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals are right but the perspective looks strange. Sending the metadata is always polite and helpful. --Ermell 07:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review, but could you be a little more specific about the strange perspective ? I uploaded a new version with EXIF datas (I finally found a way to transfer them after using hugin to correct perspective) --Velvet 17:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The building looks like it is expanding upwards. There have been many discussions here about this type of perspective correction. But added meta it is ok for me now. --Ermell 06:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maison rateau 199 rue de la rianderie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maison 889 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maison 32 rue gabriel peri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Discostu 07:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maison 899 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine maison 59 rue Legay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine 185 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maisons jumelles 54 56 rue de verdun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
the wires are messing up the composition --Wilfredor 21:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The wires are really there. Good quality. Wilfredor, go ahead and oppose if you think Velvet should clone out the wires. I would oppose that. -- Ikan Kekek 21:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maisons jumelles 905 907 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I had cropped a bit wider (especially at the left bottom). Nonetheless QI for me. --Tuxyso 21:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maisons jumelles 26 28 rue ducrocq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 117 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maisons jumelles 18 20 rue ducrocq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 131 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel mutualite 9-11-13 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good. I can't see any CAs in the trees ! --Sebring12Hrs 18:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Hotel Baudon 7 bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq maisons 861 859 av republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 21 rue de bourgogne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille mairie quartier centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison bord canal 4 rue baignerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille facade maison 44 rue des pyramides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 2 rue vert bois pouillet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison coquilles 16 rue basse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 77 rue mauroy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue st francois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, quite narrow street :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 84 - 86 av du peuple belge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 59 61 rue mauroy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Sainte Claire rue des Augustins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support It would be great if you could get a photo of this in better light, but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille coke 30 rue Thiers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 3-7 rue de la vieille comédie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel particulier 10 rue des Poissonceaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 12-14 rue de la monnaie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq villa vitrail 24 rue ducrocq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 4 square rameau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeubles art deco 33-39 rue mauroy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:24, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris gare nord.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 41 rue thiers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 6 place bethune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 74 rue royale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille villa 2 rue desmazieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue du palais rameau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Good light. Some very little parts are IMHO overexposed, but they are really very small and the overall lighting and exposure is very good. --Aristeas 09:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille nouveau siecle parvis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 9 rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 5 rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 1B rue veronese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good, but can you clone out a part of car? --Tournasol7 06:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for your review. I don't very much like to do this (after all, cars are everywhere in our cities), but, in this case, it was small enough to be done --Velvet 07:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, the cars are everywhere and it's difficult to take photos without them. However it's good work and good quality now :) --Tournasol7 09:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble cariatides place république.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 07:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for your review, new version uploaded --Velvet 15:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue du palais rihour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 4 a 16 rue gounod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 88 rue fbg de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 7 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 9 rue negrier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pavillon hopital st sauveur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 41 rue blanche bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison art nouveau 61 rue st etienne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc vert bois allee cerisiers bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues chateau vert bois vue arriere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc vert bois prairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:38, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc du vert bois rotonde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 13:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc vert bois conciergerie chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, interesting subject. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 11:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc du vert bois alleee principale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, I like the setting --PantheraLeo1359531 18:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc vert bois allee platanes bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 45 rue frederic mottez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bondues parc vert bois allee peupliers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison eclectique place jeanne d'arc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble rue de maubeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons art nouveau 15 17 rue frederic mottez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 17 19 rue du molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel 30 32 rue de thionville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 18:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison pouillet 112 rue delespaul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Lmbuga 13:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 32 rue gounod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 35 rue de gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de Madre 23 rue de gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Madeleine villa antoinette avenue verdi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 4 rue de la halle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 49 rue de gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille noao 30 rue de weppes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. As it depicts a bar, please add the name of the bar in the Caption and Description. --Tagooty 12:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for your review --Velvet 13:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks! --Tagooty 13:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 31 rue de gand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faches thumesnil maison 129 rue carnot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me, maybe adding coordinates? :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 10 rue du bazinghien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 11:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vestige moulin st pierre face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 20 rue desmet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 72 rue de la bassee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 22 rue desmet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 49 rue nicolas leblanc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 63 rue d'artois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons jumelles 12 14 rue des pyramides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 104 rue royale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeubles 19 21 place rihour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ancien moulin 11 rue de jemmapes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison de gaulle rue princesse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 18 20 rue st sebastien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 8 rue de la monnaie facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ancienne usine 31 rue princesse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux parc du centre spirituel du hautmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin ferme 56 rue victor hugo porche bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin maisons thomson 37 39 rue sadi carnot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble PTT cheques postaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin hotel de ville beffroi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 9 place general de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille mairie quartier wazemmes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble st marc bd montebello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux centre spirituel du hautmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 10 rue boissy d'anglas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:40, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 28 rue catel beghin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:40, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 30 rue d'isly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 29 rue bonte pollet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 42 rue des stations.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 41 rue de canteleu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 88 rue de la bassee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 51 rue de canteleu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 108 rue du port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 108 rue d'isly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cimetiere est tombe famille delebart mallet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons rue de dieppe 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 35 rue alfred de musset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cimetiere est tombe colas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue du monument aux morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons 32 34 rue d'isly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Lille vue cite administrative.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue cite administrative.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 15:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 32 bis rue de maubeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue du rang de beauregard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel castiaux 7 rue desmazieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 3 rue manuel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maisons rue de valenciennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Villas Lesay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La chapelle montligeon ermitage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:31, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 15 rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 57 61 rue ratisbonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel de ville face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille maison 73 rue du port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 61 rue jean sans peur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart maisons 21 27 avenue de verdun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 20 22 av courbet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:51, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your photos[edit]

Hello Velvet,

I just want to thank you for your series of architectural photography from Lille. I am a fan of crisp photos of interesting buildings with nice light, and your images are a real joy for me. They make me want to visit Lille; maybe I will never achieve that, but thanks to your excellent documentary work I can study the beautifuly façades in all detail right now.

Your photos are also very interesting because you make really good use of the Sigma dp1 Quattro. Some time ago I gathered information about the Foveon sensors and especially about the dp cameras; on the one hand they seemed breathtaking, on the other hand there were these problems with low light, and I could not find good examples about using them for architectural work (apparently most people use them for other subjects). Therefore I moved on to the next more Bayer sensor camera. Now your photos show me what can be done with the Sigma dp1 Quattro regarding architectural shots, and I think you are taking full advantage of the camera and its lens.

(Of course there are also many very good and excellent photos you have done in other places and with the Sony RX100 etc.! I just focus on the Lille/dp1 Quattro photos here because they are your current series and I have seem most of them on the QI page.)

Best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC) (just another Commons photographer)[reply]

Hi Aristeas, Thank you for your kind message and encouragement. I hope some day you can visit Lille and its surroundings, which, like all regions hardly hit by revolutions and wars, has a very varied architecture. Although I am still a beginner with the dp1 Quattro, it seems to me that it is indeed a very nice tool for this kind of photography. Best regards, --Velvet (talk) 07:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme groupe salengro entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille euratechnologies depuis av delwaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme maison cadres EDF GDF rue winston churchill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille euratechnologies depuis quai hegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine 29 a 35 rue docteur legay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine 5 av general gallieni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine 57 rue docteur legay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine maison pagnerre 52 jean bart 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin des geants 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine maison pouillet 68 jean bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 512 av de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rang des arbaletriers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 20 rue boissy d'anglas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq 514 av de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:28, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 38 rue camille desmoulins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 10 rue boissy d'anglas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]