User talk:Velvet/Archive 8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pavillon ste Marthe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue ferdinand mathias loco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but can you identify the locomotive? --Mike Peel 11:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for your review. --Velvet 17:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 09:18, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 7 11 villa saint georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue plaine metallurgistes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 16 rue marcel raschia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 07:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 2 48 rue champollion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tiny dustspot and a bit oversharpened (check the cable edges). Otherwise good. --MB-one 08:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for your review. --Velvet 10:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --MB-one 11:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 29 31 av 8 mai 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 07:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille plaine metallurgistes jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 36 42 allee de la prairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 35 37 av president kennedy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart jardins du colysee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart briqueterie mur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 14 30 rue des champs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and sharp --PantheraLeo1359531 12:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 80 av marechal leclerc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart jardins allee st clement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 102 108 av marechal leclerc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 1 9 rue winston churchill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 05:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart piscine guerecheau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 30 38 rue de Lompret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would have cropped bottom and top to centralize the sharp main object --Michielverbeek 06:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin 8 12 rue van der meersch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme rue wulverick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin 15 19 rue du mont fleuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin 12 16 rue verhaeren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin ancien canal port plaisance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin 27 35 route de neuville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin hotel de ville face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin cour devos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin cite windels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart ferme mont garin vaches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 47 9 av du champ de courses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin plage bungalows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin moulin hollebecque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme garage rue jean jaures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not an interesting photo, but quality good --Michielverbeek 05:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menen noordkaai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin friche pavee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 172 rue du grand but.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menen oostkaai aire jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menen oostkaai graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place vieux marche aux chevaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme chti creux gd but.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin champ lin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme jardins ouvriers rue lompret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme ecole cirque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme LGV rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halluin port industriel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart vue briqueterie vestiges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme parc urbain jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme lycee jean prouve struct beton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme lycee jean prouve parvis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille mediatheque lomme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualitry --Michielverbeek 07:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin fremy courbet jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 74 84 rue bir hakem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart vue cimetiere allemand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart biscuiterie rue de verlinghem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart ferme 143 chemin des muchaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart ferme 1 allee st paul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme acces TGV gd but.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marquette chemin halage ferraille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verlinghem rue de verlinghem voies ferrees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme bassin rue lompret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wambrechies chemin du mouton boulonnais passage niveau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wambrechies carriere delannoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wambrechies 500 chemin du mouton boulonnais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verlinghem chemin muchots chevaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin 17 19 rue docteur roux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:49, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wambrechies chemin du mouton boulonnais tiny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin 95 91 rue de burgault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin 49 cites jardins chat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin fremy courbet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme stade des ormes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin gare local technique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue de luxembourg erables.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin salle leon carlier st joseph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin maison dujardin 137 rue burgault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville 2 4 rue d'halluin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin square auguste et albert boldin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville 86 88 rue de reckem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:46, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville 25 rue des fromets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seclin 80 82 cites jardins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 11:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville confiserie du nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:09, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville eglise st quirin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville chevaux masque anti mouches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville rue du docteur schweitzer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville etang sentier triez des pretres ter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville rue du vertuquet tilleul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville champ choux datura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing kreabel rue de la potente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but IMO a top and bottom crop would have been much better --Michielverbeek 17:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing chaus fernand forest friche thirion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing rue maurice sarraut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing friche J flipo cheminee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 1 allee du bosquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville rue marechal leclerc garages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 30 rue massena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuville vue sentier bord A22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 05:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 11 rue de la gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 2 rue de dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA gare ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin andre ballet zebre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, FP IMO, it's quite attractive to the eyes having a zebra-like shape in the foreground with the contrast of an urban area in the background. --多多123 11:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA cafes place gare ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA av de brigode carrefour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 42 46 av du bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The vehicle should also be categorized --Ermell 08:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Although I don't know the make of the car. --Velvet 08:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing et jules flipo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Are you btw considering to review also the images of other users here not just posting yours? --Poco a poco 08:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did it at one time, but I made a few mistakes and am not sure I am competent enough for satisfactory reviews (I practice a very limited style of photography) --Velvet 08:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The more feedback you get from others, the more you are ready to review others' work. Be bold, this is a wiki! --Poco a poco 13:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per Poco, I think you are competent enough and don't be afraid to make mistakes --Michielverbeek 17:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I don't understand the discussion here, but this picture is QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 2 rue d'erquinghem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wambrechies chateau robersart face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourcoing filature malfait desurmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA ascq 57 bd comte montalembert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 15:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille site des pyramides jonquilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 57 rue jean jaures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 47 53 rue jules ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 41 43 rue jules ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 29 45 av roger salengro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 16 rue du progres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 166 rue jules lebleu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 86 rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 61 rue jules ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 61 rue du nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres gare quai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres ecole natation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres rond point place fraternite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres rang av pierre brossolette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres quai derivation jonction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres maison freres mahieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres magasin mahieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres cafe rue du bas d'enfer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres rue des capucins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres cite boutaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres av roger salengro friche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres av pierre mauroy ruches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres vue brasserie MC malterie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres vue brasserie MC 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres vue brasserie MC travaux 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin 10 rue gustave delory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin 6 8bis rue gustave delory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille flandres entree TER.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes cimetiere entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes mairie face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes PTT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres vue chemin du halage lys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 20:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lille cite administrative.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin cafe civette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin 18 30 rue petite chapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin plan eau merchin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 21:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin cimetiere arbres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 19:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin 97 103 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 41 29 rue du capitaine ferber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesquin vue gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin pont chemin des loups.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes 25 29 rue theatre de verdure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes entree cotonniere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres entrepots rue de strasbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 05:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin 174 182 rue louis braille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin 21 25 rue woodrow wilson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin parc ste rictrude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronchin institut place abbe de l'epee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille siege de la MEL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille monument pigeon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille mon morts face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hospice comtesse cour int.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres vue cimetiere Cité Bonjean 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres vue cimetiere Cité Bonjean 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vieille bourse face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --IM3847 13:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA promenade hessel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin pont A23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --WikiEuropian 08:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin des plantes vue baggio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille facade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille halles 1955 rue gallieni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --1municipio 08:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille euratechno allee julie victoire daubie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quesnoy vue port eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme rue gallieni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme cafe pre vert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille graffiti maisons rue du fg de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 16:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille fresque M-CITY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 16:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille jardin des plantes entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 16:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place bettignies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 08:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ENSAM cheminees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille place mitterrand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lille mon bettignies.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin chemin des loups pylones.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille sous la pluie rue des augustins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Lomme 9 rue neuve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes 48 rue roger salengro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes eglise st vaast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes bureaux av industrielle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes 38 40 rue jean jaures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 2 20 rue philippe de girard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes ferme 4 rue pasteur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wambrechies deule aire repos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Discrepancy between coordinates, fixable? --F. Riedelio 10:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ye, I tried to fix it several times, but didn't succeed. Either the procedure does not work, or I misunderstood it...--Velvet 07:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Coordinates changed according to structured data, correct? --F. Riedelio 12:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Riedelio, but no, it was the structured data which was wrong and I couldn't change --Velvet 12:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. I have changed the coordinates in the structured data to the notation "50.6913, 3.0508". Why the notation 50°41'28.7 "N, 3°3'2.9 "E does not work is probably a bug. --F. Riedelio 07:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. --Velvet 06:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes hotel de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes hangars av industrielle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes manoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplin ancoisne parc JJ rousseau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes palettes rue paul colette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes 132 144 rue emile zola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- Radomianin 08:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes rue des combattants afn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- Radomianin 08:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sequedin rue docteur calmette passage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes rond point rue de wavrin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes chemin bord N41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 17:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wavrin 46 rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes ferme waldeck rousseau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux 54 56 rue louis deffontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux 50 52 rue louis deffontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 14:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chapelle gonnet face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux 269 273 rue du bicentenaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux 74 86 rue louis deffontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes 44 46 rue leon gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND treille nef.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND Treille chap St Charles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ND Treille Chap Ste Anne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chantier SWAM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux carrefour rue louis deffontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux 457 485 rue mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes prison sequedin entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux maisons chemin basse couture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue parc dondaines labyrinthe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis 14 rue de la gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes rue de sequedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallennes rond point rue leon gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis 64 66 rue de menin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis 34 36 rue de menin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis rue de france.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis college de la salle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron eglise du christ roi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron 61 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux ferme 1944 48 rue deffontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 17:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wavrin hangar voie charlot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 07:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos fresque train.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos ancienne gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA galerie des céramiques.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stifone 21:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA galerie sculptures.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stifone 21:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos l'etaque bar bourloire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the most interesting photo but good quality --Michielverbeek 08:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos hotel de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis 10 rue de la gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos pcuk belvedere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos pcuk chemin terril gypse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA salle triptyques face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK imo. --ArildV 09:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 5 rue camille desmoulins bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos pcuk gd terril chrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos pcuk terrils chrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos pcuk graminees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA vroubel cheminee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA vue salle 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA Rouen plats.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, please change the filename to something more descriptive. --Plozessor 04:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos parc lion bassin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 31 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 31 rue du silo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 38 40 rue henri catoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 77 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 14:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lecce san giovanni battista.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 08:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin Bauvin gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 07:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin ecole notre dame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA cabinet espagnol.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality; but you should have adjusted the seating. -- Spurzem 13:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA st francois st antoine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin rue du silo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos pcuk chemin phosphogypse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit overexposed / too high contrast. Developed with less exposure or contract this could be really good. --Plozessor 11:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for your review, new version uploaded --Velvet 17:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now! --Plozessor 05:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 11 19 rue jean pottie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 5 7 rue de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 121 rue de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 39 41 rue de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems friterie manu steph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems agrotech.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 82 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 00:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems monument aux morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 12 rue voltaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fives cail bureaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA coupole int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok imo- --ArildV 09:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille PdBA galerie ceramiques ter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems 3 rue de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 10 16 rue des victoires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 10 12 rue gustave engrand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provin 73 rue nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 11bis rue du vercors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vieille bourse gd place.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Chainwit. 18:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 76 84 rue renoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA mairie ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA M506 graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA place de la nativite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA rond point rue tremiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA quais gare annappes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 44 60 rue yves decugis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willems paysage labour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chateau des buissonnets bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 2 12 rue watteau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille batiments port bd de la lorraine haie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chateau des buissonnets bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA allee des paquerettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 2 12 rue watteau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille chateau eau rue dieu de marcq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA square brassens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 213 rue fbg roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templemars couvent benedictines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA square rue cezanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fretin 3 rue clemenceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin rue de lille croix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin rue de la marque vue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 196 198 rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks overprocessed to me --MB-one 08:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 10:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainghin 8 18 rue jean duthilleul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Also on the verge of overprocessing, but still ok. --MB-one 08:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 234 rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 218 rue de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templemars 118 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA eglise saint sebastien annappes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templemars 18 28 rue du president pompidou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Underexposed imo. Maybe a tighter crop to remove the car in the foreground? --ArildV 14:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. New version uploaded. --Velvet 18:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Still slightly dark imo, but ok. --ArildV 21:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA place de la republique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 09:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templemars rue de reims mais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies 33 rue carnot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies entrepots av parc horloge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies eglise st leger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fretin rond point rue clemenceau bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 15:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies etang agache saule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies rue maquis de vendresse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies folie du meuble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies etang agache.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 10:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies vue mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies soutien agricole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies 1 7 rue francoise dolto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA allee des allumoirs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (although it would be better at portrait orientation). --C messier 20:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques 328 378 rue roger lecerf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques 2126 rue de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Premesques 2052 rue de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies usine agache brasserie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies diner's rue des navettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 15:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perenchies garages rue du nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hem chateau d'eau rue vallee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hem 417 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hem tombe leclercq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit dark overall. --Plozessor 07:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for your review. New version, a bit brighter, uploaded. --Velvet 08:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannois 12 18 rue du colysee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lannoy pavillon 29 rue de tournai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannois 65 rue JB Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannoy monument de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannois eglise st luc face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:17, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannois 20 24 rue cohem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannoy eglise st luc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannoy 4 rue alfred bara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys-lez-lannoy mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys lez lannoy 25 rue JB Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joyeux Noël![edit]

Christmas star decoration at a window with the reflection of a sunset Happy Holidays, Velvet

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hem vue cimetiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix canal love quai de wattrelos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 10:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix 189 bd gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix canal quai de wattrelos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leers parc evenementiel rue suffren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joyeux Noël ![edit]

Traditional German advent wreath in Lonsee, my home village

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2024!
Joyeux Noël et une bonne année 2024 !
Frohe Weihnachten und alles Gute für 2024!

AFBorchert (talk) 08:01, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix decheterie rue de leers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix CIL bd gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 08:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hem monument kuiper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add the name of the artist to the description of the image, Dick van Wijk. --Cayambe 10:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix lycee 173 bd gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix rond point bury courcelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos canal vue pcuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wattrelos filature du sartel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 17:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix pont nyckes tomy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit noisy in the shadows, but the compo is good overall. --Sebring12Hrs 20:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]