User talk:Tyler de Noche/Archive 1

Image without license[edit]

File:Aerial and Boat Views of Amtrak Train Derailment, Mobile, Alabama.ogv[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:43, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/109aw/albums

Image without license[edit]

File:Kom-ombos--bas-relief 3109959019 o.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:INAUGURATION OF PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON, 01-20-1965.ogv[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr uploads[edit]

Hi Tyler, you can try and reupload those corrupted files from Flickr like File:Kapiti US Marines Trust Memorial Day service 2018 (28550000248).jpg. Just go to the source page on Flickr, download the original resolutionand then use this to "Upload a new version of this file" at Commons. I've done this for a bunch of your uploads, so there is no immediate need to delete them. What I noticed though is that the download from Flickr will sometimes be bugged. You'll have to keep trying until you get a valid download menu in these cases. De728631 (talk) 18:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ah ok. Thanks. I'll try now to fix them up. Tyler de Noche (talk) 01:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Independence Day, Wellington, July 2, 2018 (29290593438).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 01:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:NASA Astronaut Dr Yvonne Cagle visits the Cook Islands (40821461240).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, B dash (talk) 02:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kapiti US Marines Trust Memorial Day service 2018 (28756148058).jpg[edit]

File:Kapiti US Marines Trust Memorial Day service 2018 (28756148058).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 02:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2018 Space and Science Festival, May 5, 2018 (41197805854).jpg[edit]

File:2018 Space and Science Festival, May 5, 2018 (41197805854).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 02:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2018 Space and Science Festival, May 5, 2018 (41871774152).jpg[edit]

File:2018 Space and Science Festival, May 5, 2018 (41871774152).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 02:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veteran's Day Dawn Ceremony, Apia, Samoa, 11 November 2017 (38317957521).jpg[edit]

File:Veteran's Day Dawn Ceremony, Apia, Samoa, 11 November 2017 (38317957521).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 10:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:VP[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Village pump#Flickr2commons. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--B dash (talk) 15:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ambassador Scott Brown and Gail Brown on their second visit to Samoa - Feb 2018 (39138632985).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW center console.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seattle (34957479616).jpg[edit]

File:Seattle (34957479616).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 23:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:3316 4thofJuly2018 (42494378744).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. To answer your questions, yes, manual edits are useful indicators of positive behaviour - this website is not just about rapidly uploading large numbers of files. Your alter-ego has uploaded Flickr files with mangled descriptions. Please attend to them, fixing the descriptions and preferably using the {{Flickr}} template. I'm a little concerned that you’ve uploaded thousands of files in the last week or so but can you reassure me that you are checking them for errors? Green Giant (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorisation and other things[edit]

Hello, Tyler de Noche, avoid overcategorisation. You may check overcategorisation by using cat-a-lot, selecting all, and then fonction check overcategorisation. Also, try to name files before uploading, instead of asking for renaming after uploading. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Havang(nl), thank you for your note. Do you have any specifics where I should pay attention to? and y eah I should rename them a bit better. Thanks. Tyler de Noche (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The category system is in form of tree and branches. If category A is a subcategory of parent category P , the files in category A do not go into the parent category P. Try to study check overcategorisation for Category:Embassy of the United States in Berlin sponsored events, because that is a parent category containing events, not files. The events themselves are not files but subcategories, which contain the individual files. If you check a few of my doings, you will find out how it may work. PS. Do you already use cat-a-lot? --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OKE, you are doing fine. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Havang(nl). Sorry, I'll explain. I had temporarily re-added them to the page, but I had to do them all in one sweep to clear out {{PD-USGov}} because there was already {{PD-USGov-DOS}}. When I uploaded them, I had attached the -DOS part, but was not expecting the PD-USGov to be there, so I re-added and them removed them. Tyler de Noche (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, try to define correctly the persons on the images to find the corresponding person category, exemple Category:Javier García => Category:Alejandro García Padilla.--Havang(nl) (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awfully similar images[edit]

I'm all for uploading more than one image of a subject, but what possible reason is there to have all three of these?

Understand, I'd never have brought it up if they'd been decently categorized, but when they were just put in Category:Seattle that meant work for someone else (in this case me) keeping that category free of cruft. - Jmabel ! talk 23:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jmabel, I don't get it. Doesn't the software detect duplicates? Anyways, I'll tag them for deletion. Tyler de Noche (talk) 00:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't technically duplicates, they're just really similar photos. And there have been a lot of other equally similar ones in this batch you uploaded. - Jmabel ! talk 01:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

can you delete them?Tyler de Noche (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They don't meet any criteria for speedy deletion, and it's just as much work to start a deletion nomination process as to categorize them. I'm just suggesting you should look a bit more at what you upload, and consider doing the resulting categorization work yourself. When you do "blind" uploads, you create work for other people, with no apparent benefit in a case like this.

Another example I just came across:

03:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:FL52c49570-f938-45e1-ae23-365b0aa61734 (11721142156).png[edit]

File:FL52c49570-f938-45e1-ae23-365b0aa61734 (11721142156).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015-08-25 201336646 FA1D6 iOS (20740237590).jpg[edit]

File:2015-08-25 201336646 FA1D6 iOS (20740237590).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015-08-25 231550255 AFC1D iOS (20305683074).jpg[edit]

File:2015-08-25 231550255 AFC1D iOS (20305683074).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015-08-25 201341413 D709C iOS (20902011996).jpg[edit]

File:2015-08-25 201341413 D709C iOS (20902011996).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:JR Picnic (14850500014).jpg[edit]

File:JR Picnic (14850500014).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:FL52c4ca94-3508-40be-8d45-19dc0aa61734 (11721189246).png[edit]

File:FL52c4ca94-3508-40be-8d45-19dc0aa61734 (11721189246).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo contest GetOutdoors! First Landing State Park (41511313670).jpg[edit]

File:Photo contest GetOutdoors! First Landing State Park (41511313670).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Due to a mishap it was possible for a while to upload .mp4 files. You have uploaded one or more .mp4 files in that period. Please go to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MP4 files to see all files that are affected. If the video(s) are entirely your own work or properly licensed you can re-upload them with video2commons.

Yours sincerely, Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent uploads[edit]

Hi, I noticed that the images you're just uploading have a multitude of duplicated category entries. See e.g. File:Starr-130709-5764-Stellaria media-flowers-Ulupalakua Ranch-Maui (24924851730).jpg. These don't display on the file page, but you can see that the wiki code has dozens of repetitive instances of category tags. So if you're using some kind of upload script you might want to check it. De728631 (talk) 21:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take care of it. I should get a more sturdy browser before I press contrl paste more than once. Tyler de Noche (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Starr-170516-8668-Dicranopteris linearis-along stream-Road to Lower Kula Pipeline Haiku Uka-Maui (35099166241).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Starr-170516-8668-Dicranopteris linearis-along stream-Road to Lower Kula Pipeline Haiku Uka-Maui (35099166241).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Starr-170516-8668-Dicranopteris linearis-along stream-Road to Lower Kula Pipeline Haiku Uka-Maui (35099166241).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Also:

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:00, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

resolution[edit]

Thanks B dash for the help. Tyler de Noche (talk) 22:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit[edit]

Hi Tyler de Noche, would you mind if i do some minor edits like this to get rid of Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls? --Arnd (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

of course. go right ahead. :) Tyler de Noche (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but could you also consider this (especially the ||) for your future changes, please. Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Item in the Notre Dame Cathedral 13.jpg[edit]

File:Item in the Notre Dame Cathedral 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 02:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:13 hi rez (6990118886).jpg[edit]

File:13 hi rez (6990118886).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 02:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:14 lowrez (7136204915).jpg[edit]

File:14 lowrez (7136204915).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Te750iv (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Flickr review status[edit]

Dear Tyler de Noche, You removed two Flickr review statuses (and so removed "passed"), without giving a reason -like here. Could you give a reason for doing so? Vysotsky (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the same thing here (and a lot of similar pages). Could you clarify? Thanks! Effeietsanders (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in the description, it says "OTRS 2018080510004037", which I presume is some other way to actually give permission though. I thought it would supersede the flickr review things, so I removed it. I'll undo myself. Plus, it appears they sat there for a while. Tyler de Noche (talk) 21:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The OTRS ticket is only to confirm that the author gave permission to release it (the account on Flickr is not by the owner, but by an organization). That is not the actual release. You need both the permission and the Flickr confirmation for a full record. I don't know why the Flickr review doesn't happen. Effeietsanders (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Effeietsanders: because there was no valid Flickr link in the source. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 01:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: but then I fixed that (I thought that a link to the album would do the trick, apparently not), right? What should I have done different once I discovered the mistake? I assumed it'd end up in some error category if I did something wrong in resubmitting, so was waiting until someone would notice that. Effeietsanders (talk) 01:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that in your edit on one of the files, you just removed the review template. But it still needs to be reviewed by the bot, right? Effeietsanders (talk) 01:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Effeietsanders: the Flickr link needs to be in the source field. Requesting a review is done with {{Flickrreview}}, which I added, and the image is in the queue. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Eröffnung der Veranstaltungsreihe„Weltweites Exil“ in der US-Botschaft IMG 2165 (16400173342).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Eröffnung der Veranstaltungsreihe„Weltweites Exil“ in der US-Botschaft IMG 2165 (16400173342).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eröffnung der Veranstaltungsreihe„Weltweites Exil“ in der US-Botschaft IMG 2165 (16400173342).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Also:

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:ECBC Hall of Fame honors Dr. Baler and Dr. Salem-10 (29390578537).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:ECBC Hall of Fame honors Dr. Baler and Dr. Salem-10 (29390578537).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ECBC Hall of Fame honors Dr. Baler and Dr. Salem-10 (29390578537).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:USembassy_miscelleanous_events[edit]

Category:USembassy_miscelleanous_events has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:09, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

uploading duplicates[edit]

Hi, you recently uploaded a very lot of duplicates from flickr - see here. Can you please try to pre-select only those images not allready on commons for the transfer? You creating a lot of work for others to remove the dupes. Thx. --Ju Ta 00:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop immediatly your batch uploads - otherwise I will block your second account shortly. --Ju Ta 00:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I now blocked your Bot User:Tyler ser Noche for a day. Looks like its working unattanded :( --Ju Ta 00:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

:( I'll start looking and tagging. Tyler de Noche (talk) 00:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, but that doesnt change that you creating a lot of unneccessary work for you and others. Please try to pevent dupe uploads a good as possible in future. --Ju Ta 00:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The software doesn't detect that? Tyler de Noche (talk) 00:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it doesnt. Before you start a batch please check if the images are allready on commons. Or ask User:Fæ how he's managing it. He uploaded millions of flickr images nearly without duplicates. --Ju Ta 00:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you know the template {{Duplicate}}? Please use this one. Thx. --Ju Ta 01:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And please mark the younger image as duplicate. Thx. --Ju Ta 01:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In defense of Tyler de Noche, the problem with flickr is that flickr2commons uploads a lot of exact duplicates, when in previous years it didn't, but don't know why this reversion of functionality has happened. So the main responsibility is of the software, not the uploaders, as when the uploaders don't have tools, that existed in previous versions of flickr2commons, or they are broken for months or years, i think that to expect that users check thousand of uploads, one by one, is wishful thinking? Especially when tools have disappeared that did this work on the fly, and its replacement is substandard. Tm (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Tyler de Noche. The subject of your remediation of section #uploading duplicates above is discussed, but not by name.

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates[edit]

You massed flagged my Crystal Mall photos for deletion because of duplication despite the fact that I had uploaded them first, and I'm the copyright holder of those photos. — JJBers|talk 01:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes. I am going through the tagged ones later, and I will tag the duplicates, not yours. Tyler de Noche (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you should do the same for other pictures too, for example you tagged this image instead of the duplicate, even though the tagged one got uploaded before by the copyright holder, is a featured picture and also better categorized. 185.232.20.200 08:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^Who are you? Tyler de Noche (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You also tagged File:Davisville TTC walkway 141853000.jpg without any indication of what the duplicate is. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Secondarywaltz: The duplicate is File:Downsview Station (141853000).jpg, see File:Davisville TTC walkway 141853000.jpg#File usage on Commons. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 17:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Tyler de Noche (talk) 12:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Miscelleanous_events_of_the_United_States_Sixth_Fleet[edit]

Category:Miscelleanous_events_of_the_United_States_Sixth_Fleet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 08:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United_States_Fifth_Fleet_miscellaneous_events[edit]

Category:United_States_Fifth_Fleet_miscellaneous_events has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 08:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was the reason...[edit]

...for changing the license like this one? --Arnd (talk) 12:33, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, look at the description and click under the section that says "Image use policy". (Link). They explicitly say they release it under Images created by Forest Starr and Kim Starr are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, permitting sharing, adaptation, and commercial use with attribution..

i don't tihnk Flickr offers options to specify which one, 3.0 or 4.0, but only just Copyrighted, attribution with restrictions, or just plain attribution. Tyler de Noche (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:170512-N-AX546-090 (34487538501).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:170512-N-AX546-090 (34487538501).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:170512-N-AX546-090 (34487538501).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Stangel Murdough (3845556883).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 06:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Stangel Murdough 2012 10 (7815481104).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 06:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Removal of the Stockton Power House Tower Assembly (8617538100).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Removal of the Stockton Power House Tower Assembly (8617538100).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Removal of the Stockton Power House Tower Assembly (8617538100).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:13, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names[edit]

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:110718-A-BJ146-027 (5963618487).jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

Yann (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No! Don't change filenames from outside unless there is a damned good reason.

Yes, when creating a file upload from scratch, give it a descriptive name.

But if an image is imported from outside, especially when it either comes from some major hosting site like Flickr, or it's coming from NASA or the US military where there's already an establised identifier scheme, then don't mess with it. Filenames are ordinals, not descriptors. We have metadata on our images to give them proper names (and in multiple languages too). It is much easier for us to handle filenames from outside, where they have some "established" identifier (even a string of digits) if we keep that unchanged. We gain little from adding a description, we lose a lot by losing the consistent naming descriptor.

If you must change it, at least (as Yann has done here) keep the old identifier in place as a suffix.

If the names are "obviously wrong", then correct them to avoid propagating a confusing error.

If you add a name, it's also then your responsibility to make that name correct. Which can be hard, especially with bulk uploads from a foreign subject. And getting that wrong is far worse than just keeping the consistent identifier. See Category:Inverness to Kyle for what goes wrong when a well-meaning uploader decides to put the "meaningful" name on everything as a prefix. Apart from a handful, these images are nothing to do with either Inverness or Kyle. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk image issues.[edit]

Category:Media without a license: needs history check now contains a lot of your recent uploads. Are you on this, or do you need more hands? Maybe 'bot assistance?

Seems that a typo in moving them around recently also wiped out the CC-by tag that they'd had from Flickr. This needs fixing, otherwise automatic processes (and careless humans) are going to start seeing them as deletion targets.

There's also an issue (raised at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems that Colin seems to want them deleted as they shouldn't be CC-by. I presume that as they're probably US Government work they would be PD for that reason. Yet they were uploaded to Flickr as CC-by and I see no reason why WP should be questioning that (it's neither our role, nor useful, to do so). Andy Dingley (talk) 13:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems FLickr has a difference between "some rights reserved" and "US Govt work". It adds CC2 thing if the acct isn't marked as USGOVT. I'll be right back to see how this works. Tyler de Noche (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That should be done. ~

Flickr seems to be being a nuisance at present. Commons is busy deleting a lot of Flickr content marked as PD, because Commons' view of what's acceptable there doesn't match Flickr's. But Flickr should never change a licence outside the control of the uploader. 8-( Andy Dingley (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perry Lake Eagles Day (8430327918).jpg - there are still a lot affected. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bay Bridge surrounded by smog by nearby wildfires (44218944931).jpg[edit]

File:Bay Bridge surrounded by smog by nearby wildfires (44218944931).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: iStock photo

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 11:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BevinKacon: – can you please clarify what the issue was with this file. It's gone now so we can't see it, and the deletion message was "Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Although Flickr site says this is USDA photo, exif data states it is iStock Getty photo, therefore deleted per PCP"

What was the source for this file? Had this file itself come from Getty? There is a problem with Getty wherein they take PD files and claim them to now be Getty copyright. We shouldn't speedy delete files for "infringing" Getty copyright, they have to be checked more carefully than that. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's unlikely to be the same file, was this the image? https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2018/08/23/where-theres-fire-theres-smoke-and-its-bad-your-health (second one down)? Andy Dingley (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:VADM Lawrence Ethics Essay 039 (38115206151).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:VADM Lawrence Ethics Essay 039 (38115206151).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:VADM Lawrence Ethics Essay 039 (38115206151).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 11:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1], is it time to simply delete all questionable content uploaded by this editor and to block them from further uploads? (at least until they can agree to not run as such a high-volume time sink) Andy Dingley (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've agreed not to, much earlier in the page. Tyler de Noche (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So how do you explain this?

This has to stop. If I see another one, I will seek a block (I probably ought to now) Andy Dingley (talk) 08:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also I think you definitely need to have 'bot permissions withdrawn. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is clearly public domain by way of the US Government Tyler de Noche (talk) 16:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about whether it's public domain or not, it's about you removing _all_ the licence tags, so that it triggers hundreds of false positives in the 'bot category. There's no excuse for that, it's just sloppy de-tagging. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Media without a license: needs history check[edit]

Hi, you flooded these maintenance category. Please fix those files, so that we don't have to tag them one by one. Jcb (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. Tyler de Noche (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Jcb (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:February 5, 2015 Grad Days IMG 1973 (16452788555).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 02:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starr-100114-1331-Monstera deliciosa-sticky sweet fruit-Enchanting Floral Gardens of Kula-Maui (24376454274).jpg[edit]

File:Starr-100114-1331-Monstera deliciosa-sticky sweet fruit-Enchanting Floral Gardens of Kula-Maui (24376454274).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hiàn (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Converting CC-by to US-PD[edit]

See File:Perry Lake Eagles Day (8430327918).jpg and many more.

I'm concerned about this and it's a bulk issue, so I think it needs to be discussed. Probably at a noticeboard.

The file is from Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/55127822@N07/8430327918 It's described as CC-by and authored by the US Army Corps of Engineers. It wasn't tagged as PD-US-Gov

It was uploaded here and tagged as CC-by. Flickreview thus accepted it.

The uploader then removed the CC-by tag (unfortunately not replacing it until a bunch of auto-delete 'bottery had kicked off) and then replaced it with a PD-US-Gov. It now carries the following tags:

This image was originally posted to Flickr by Kansas City District at https://flickr.com/photos/55127822@N07/8430327918. It was reviewed on 4 September 2018 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0.

4 September 2018

I am not questioning this file's free licence and its suitability here.

My questions are thus:

Should a "US Gov" file from outside have its licence changed because "we think we know better"?
Should a CC-by in such a case be removed?
Should a PD-US-Gov be added?
Does the inconsistency now between the Flickr status and the tags here mean that it's likely to get hit by a 'bot again?

I am concerned particularly about removing the CC-by. Why would we do this? It's a valid licence, added by the creator. It also makes our records inconsistent with Flickr.

Thoughts? Andy Dingley (talk) 09:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Andy Dingley: as I said somewhere buried in a thread here: "The CC license (which, as would be immediately obvious from the license review) is there on Flickr. And it's a worldwide license, so it shouldn't be removed. It is valid for any country which is not certain to recognize PD-USGov. It is also valid in case the work turns out not to be covered by PD-USGov for any reason or if PD-USGov would be retracted in the future." While retraction may seem far-fetched, I believe there has been some buzz about it. While I wouldn't count on it and even less so in a retroactive manner, a dick move by the UK government in 1995/1996 restored copyright for loads of works that had already been PD for years. So I wouldn't call it impossible. In general it would be more likely we find out at some point we accidentally tagged works that were not made by the federal US government as PD-USGov.

Colin gave a link there to https://creativecommons.org/faq/#may-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-a-work-in-the-public-domain:

"Note that, in some cases, a work may be in the public domain under the copyright laws of some jurisdictions but not others. For example, U.S. government works are in the public domain under the copyright law of the United States, but may be protected by copyright laws in other jurisdictions. A CC license applied to such a work would be effective (and the license restrictions enforceable) in jurisdictions where copyright protection exists, but would not be operative if U.S. copyright law is determined to be the applicable law."

So the CC license should not be removed. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:06, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The legal status of RFC:2119 is arguable, but it's used and understood by CC in its usual meaning. Content creators should not apply CC-by to PD content, rather than must not. This is because it's broadly ineffectual, not because it's forbidden. If a creator still chooses to do so, then we should respect that. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: I'm not sure what RFC 2119 has to do with this, but Creative Commons clearly differentiates between works that are PD worldwide and those that may not be PD worldwide. The heir of an author in a 50 years p.m.a. country could license a work as Creative Commons for users in 70 p.m.a. countries. The CC FAQ essentially just warns not to tag PD works one did not create as CC. It's indeed not forbidden, I can tag the Mona Lisa with CC-BY-NC as much as I want. It's stupid and not enforceable but not illegal. While it would be ridiculous for the US government to sue foreign users, technically they could. The judge in the foreign country may still deny such a copyright claim because the user could not have reasonably expected this, but that's not certain. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's a separate issue. That's not about not CC- tagging because something is PD, it's to not tag things where you have no control over them – which is closer to what Commons is doing here (and what Getty does regularly), than what the Corps of Engineers had done. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is still going on, and just as chaotically. Where's the best noticeboard to raise this properly and see if we can get any agreement as to whether this should be done at all? Andy Dingley (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate images again[edit]

Hi, it seems you recently created more than guessed 1000 duplicates again in the last few days. Sometimes you uploaded the same image even 4 times - see File:FTX Fall 2017 IMG 1530 (27402429209).jpg and redirects. You uploading a lot of out of scope images too (see my deletion reuests). Not every image on flickr uploaded under cc-by or similar is suitable for commons. I get more and more the impression that your mass uploads creating more trouble for other people than they have a benefit. Please change this as good as possible, otherwise I think about a permanent block of your "second" accound. I know its not easy to detemine dupes at flickr2commons before upload, but you should take minumum the time to check that you otherwise creating work for others. I'm busy to remove and redirect dupes since months and in the past few weeks you are the very top user creating them. You creating them quicker than I am able to process them. I guess I spent allready several days or even weeks only to cleanup just your dupes. Again: Perhaps you can get some tips from User:Fæ, who uploaded millions of flickr images with a very low dupe rate. regards --Ju Ta 08:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could look at an example for an opinion, all those I see are deleted.

If F2C is failing to comply with SHA1 duplicate warnings, then it should not be used for large uploads until this is fixed.

The alternative is that EXIF data is varying, causing SHA1 values to change, in which case it may be possible to run imagehash checks to find matches, however that is expensive in processing and programming time and is only a post-upload housekeeping job. See User:Fæ/Imagehash.

I would also recommend finding the unique photo ID or VIRIN if available, and checking for its existence on Commons before upload by using a simple (cheaper) Commons textual search, but if someone is doing that, they are probably not using F2C. --Fæ (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fæ, you could look at i.e. File:FTX Fall 2017 IMG 1351 (38472342064).jpg, which is not proccessed yet. Likely tomorrow I'll process that one. --Ju Ta 10:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the 3 files have the same SHA1 value (API sandbox test), so on upload of the 2 later cases, the Commons API would have flagged the upload as a duplicate. I have not followed the bug discussion about F2C, but my presumption is that this is entirely down to the tool failing to handle the upload error correctly. In all cases of the standard duplicate error, F2C should drop-out for the duplicate file.

This is not the uploader's fault, so Tyler de Noche should be seen as an unfortunate victim of circumstances, however all batch uploaders should be advised to not use F2C on collections where duplicates are likely to occur. Until F2C is fixed, this should be our standard advice, especially as other tools exist and even the upload wizard can batch upload Flickr albums quite nicely, without (I think) this error scenario.

@JuTa: Looking at Phabricator I cannot find the bug listed, though a similar issue was fixed in 2016. Do you know where this is being managed as a bug or if it was already fixed? I'm wondering if this is serious enough to take preventative action until the bug is fixed. Addendum https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/flickr2commons/issues?status=new&status=open is the place where it's tracked. However no fix seems on the way. I am unsure if this is worth taking up on the VP or AN so that all users can be advised (formally) to use other tools without this problem.

In terms of general advice, I can think of ways of testing duplicates for this Flickrstream, either at the Flickr end or when live on Commons, but it's honestly not worth the volunteer programming time when uploaders can try a different method. --Fæ (talk) 13:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I now started Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Commons:Flickr2Commons_problems. Feel free to leave your comments there. reagrds. --Ju Ta 15:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, in the past 24 hours you uploaded about 6.000 new flickr files. If I only expect a dupe rate of 5% this results 300 dupes a day. The special page gets updated avery 3 days and I'm able to process about 400-800 in 3 days. You likely creating about 1.000 during that period. If this verifies at the next special page update on Monday, I'll block your account User:Tyler ser Noche permanently. regards --Ju Ta 07:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

its probably best I stop and contribute regularly. Tyler de Noche (talk) 12:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you again transfered more than 6000 images in the past 24 hours. That doesnt look like a carefull pre-check for duplicates. I'll wait for the next special page update and when I see a highly growing number of dupes again, I'm going to block you second account. See this as the final warning. --Ju Ta 18:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: How do you expect to someone can make an "carefull pre-check for duplicates"? If the tool Flickr2Commons is not working as a few years ago and there is not a single alternative tool, how do you expect someone can make a "carefull pre-check for duplicates", be it to 60 files or 6000 files? Please explain how is it a fault of users when there is no software (or disappeared) that warns or stops the upload of exact duplicates? Blame the work of users, when is the software that is broken? Tm (talk) 19:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then such unattended mass uploads has simple to be stopped until there is a tool doing things better. Its as simple as that. And if this takes years, then it takes years. I dont see a great benefit for commons for most of images Tyler tranfers anyhow, duplicate or not. A lot of them are out of scope in my eyes or even nearby. I allready started some deletion requests for some of his batches and he promplty agreed nearly every time to speedy delete them. This makes me think he transferes realy careless anything he finds on flickr with a free license but does not matter pre-upload if the content is suitable for commons (or if he created thousends of dupes) or not. Please see also: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Commons:Flickr2Commons problems. I.e. for this flickr set I dont see a big sense to have such images on commons. regards. --Ju Ta 19:30, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

understood. I had decided that a few images from the Us forest service. I thought files such as the ones in File:Photographs by the United States Forest Service would be useful if people wanted to use them. Tyler de Noche (talk)\

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2012 Dining In Dining in Set 1 100 (800x533) (8272297719).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 18:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your edits[edit]

Hi Tyler, please remove the duplicate pipe in your edits.[2]. Thanks in advance, --Arnd (talk) 04:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:CA_Luncheon_08/14/18[edit]

CA Luncheon 08/14/18 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

70.21.203.32 16:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License change - File:Braunlage, die Trinitatis-Kirche IMG 5182 2018-07-06 10.51.jpg[edit]

I have made and uploaded above mentioned file, but I really don't understand why you have change the license and think that I am a US-soldier. Probably I have deleted parts of the license during categorizing. Thanks for your work, but please correct my error correctly. --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:08, 15 September 2018 (UTC) BTW: this morning I have nominated the photo for Q1.[reply]

Now please categorize your thousends of Starr images properly.[edit]

Hi, I noticed you uploaded thousends of Starr images. Please now take the time (like days or weeks) to properly categorize these into their species categories. Most of them have the latin species names in their file name. So it shouldnt be a too difficult task. PS: by looking at some samples I didnt found dupes or out of scope up to new -> thats good. regards --Ju Ta 00:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have started since yesterday. I think all the images are uploaded so, I guess I'll just be categorizing. Tyler de Noche (talk) 16:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smoke from a wildfire (44218945101).jpg[edit]

File:Smoke from a wildfire (44218945101).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Achim (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NJ Route 18[edit]

I noticed you recently uploaded a bunch of photos of Route 18 in New Jersey. While I think they were mostly correctly showing Route 18, you also tagged the town of East Brunswick, New Jersey, which was mostly not correct. Please be careful with categories. Famartin (talk) 03:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just spent over an hour removing the Category:East Brunswick, New Jersey from all of them (since I'd estimate at least 85% were not in East Brunswick, but determining exactly where each one was is a significant task I didn't have time for), and moving each one to its appropriate sub category (Middlesex County or Monmouth County). If you would like to try to identify the towns each photo is actually located in, please feel free to do so, but please use the appropriate "Roads" category (I'm adding this category to all municipalities in New Jersey, Middlesex County already has them, Monmouth will have them shortly). Thank you. Famartin (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chief of Mission's Residence (4857444112).jpg[edit]

File:Chief of Mission's Residence (4857444112).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 11:10, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AVANT PREMIERE - Invasión del mundo Batalla Los Ángeles. (5496723925).jpg[edit]

File:AVANT PREMIERE - Invasión del mundo Batalla Los Ángeles. (5496723925).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted movie poster

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandparents and their grandson choosing apples (30519136348).jpg[edit]

File:Grandparents and their grandson choosing apples (30519136348).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Unfree Getty Image as given in the description

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AVANT PREMIERE - Invasión del mundo Batalla Los Ángeles. (5496723925).jpg[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:AVANT PREMIERE - Invasión del mundo Batalla Los Ángeles. (5496723925).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2018-47[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

You can vote on proposals in the Community Wishlist Survey. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can vote until 30 November.
There is an A/B test for sameAs data. This is to make it easier to find the right information with a search engine. This changes the metadata for a wiki page. It doesn't change how the page looks. [3]

Changes later this week

There is no new MediaWiki version this week.

Meetings

You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 21 November at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

The Wikimedia wikis use templates to show readers there are problems with the content on some pages. For example if there are no sources or the page needs to be rewritten. The mobile website will soon show more information when you use these templates. Some templates may need to be updated. [4]
The Education Program extension was removed from all Wikimedia projects. The database tables used by the extension will be archived. This will happen in a month. If you want the information on your wiki you should move it to a normal wiki page. [5]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Waterfront Sculpture, Reykjavik (4899032183).jpg[edit]

File:Waterfront Sculpture, Reykjavik (4899032183).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 22:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Classic Cars (16770575294).jpg[edit]

File:Classic Cars (16770575294).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Tyler de Noche/Archive 1

Image without license[edit]

File:Aerial and Boat Views of Amtrak Train Derailment, Mobile, Alabama.ogv[edit]

Image without license[edit]

File:Kom-ombos--bas-relief 3109959019 o.jpg[edit]

File:INAUGURATION OF PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON, 01-20-1965.ogv[edit]

Flickr uploads[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Kapiti US Marines Trust Memorial Day service 2018 (28756148058).jpg[edit]

File:2018 Space and Science Festival, May 5, 2018 (41197805854).jpg[edit]

File:2018 Space and Science Festival, May 5, 2018 (41871774152).jpg[edit]

File:Veteran's Day Dawn Ceremony, Apia, Samoa, 11 November 2017 (38317957521).jpg[edit]

COM:VP[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Seattle (34957479616).jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Overcategorisation and other things[edit]

Awfully similar images[edit]

File:FL52c49570-f938-45e1-ae23-365b0aa61734 (11721142156).png[edit]

File:2015-08-25 201336646 FA1D6 iOS (20740237590).jpg[edit]

File:2015-08-25 231550255 AFC1D iOS (20305683074).jpg[edit]

File:2015-08-25 201341413 D709C iOS (20902011996).jpg[edit]

File:JR Picnic (14850500014).jpg[edit]

File:FL52c4ca94-3508-40be-8d45-19dc0aa61734 (11721189246).png[edit]

File:Photo contest GetOutdoors! First Landing State Park (41511313670).jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Your recent uploads[edit]

Copyright status: File:Starr-170516-8668-Dicranopteris linearis-along stream-Road to Lower Kula Pipeline Haiku Uka-Maui (35099166241).jpg[edit]

resolution[edit]

Minor edit[edit]

File:Item in the Notre Dame Cathedral 13.jpg[edit]

File:13 hi rez (6990118886).jpg[edit]

File:14 lowrez (7136204915).jpg[edit]

Removing Flickr review status[edit]

Copyright status: File:Eröffnung der Veranstaltungsreihe„Weltweites Exil“ in der US-Botschaft IMG 2165 (16400173342).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:ECBC Hall of Fame honors Dr. Baler and Dr. Salem-10 (29390578537).jpg[edit]

Category:USembassy_miscelleanous_events[edit]

uploading duplicates[edit]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Duplicates[edit]

Category:Miscelleanous_events_of_the_United_States_Sixth_Fleet[edit]

Category:United_States_Fifth_Fleet_miscellaneous_events[edit]

What was the reason...[edit]

Copyright status: File:170512-N-AX546-090 (34487538501).jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Copyright status: File:Removal of the Stockton Power House Tower Assembly (8617538100).jpg[edit]

Please give images better names[edit]

Bulk image issues.[edit]

File:Bay Bridge surrounded by smog by nearby wildfires (44218944931).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:VADM Lawrence Ethics Essay 039 (38115206151).jpg[edit]

Category:Media without a license: needs history check[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Starr-100114-1331-Monstera deliciosa-sticky sweet fruit-Enchanting Floral Gardens of Kula-Maui (24376454274).jpg[edit]

Converting CC-by to US-PD[edit]

duplicate images again[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Please fix your edits[edit]

Category:CA_Luncheon_08/14/18[edit]

License change - File:Braunlage, die Trinitatis-Kirche IMG 5182 2018-07-06 10.51.jpg[edit]

Now please categorize your thousends of Starr images properly.[edit]

File:Smoke from a wildfire (44218945101).jpg[edit]

NJ Route 18[edit]

File:Chief of Mission's Residence (4857444112).jpg[edit]

File:AVANT PREMIERE - Invasión del mundo Batalla Los Ángeles. (5496723925).jpg[edit]

File:Grandparents and their grandson choosing apples (30519136348).jpg[edit]

File:AVANT PREMIERE - Invasión del mundo Batalla Los Ángeles. (5496723925).jpg[edit]

Tech News: 2018-47[edit]

File:Waterfront Sculpture, Reykjavik (4899032183).jpg[edit]

File:Classic Cars (16770575294).jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search