User talk:Stepro/Archive2010th

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stepro!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

TUSC token 81302c64fd670ac4da6f00232421c4e4

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token cd87d8ea45b1ff1b42c2d27d3c2d6c8e

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Logo Wiki Loves Munuments

Thank you for your support on my logo proposal. One support, yours, and few comments against a too childish drawing ! I am only 62 years old; is it so obvious ? --Barbetorte 08:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I like it, it looks so optimistic and friendly. But maybe we have to reach an adult age first. --Stepro 11:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Stepro, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum Landessieg! Klasse gemacht. :-) --Martina talk 20:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Dankeschön. Und vor allem auch vielen Dank für die Kamera! :-) Stepro (talk) 20:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Müssen die sichtbaren Autokennzeichen nicht aus deinem Osterwieck bild entfernt werden? --141.39.13.5 13:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Nein, siehe w:de:Benutzer:Ralf Roletschek/Kennzeichen verpixeln. --Stepro (talk) 11:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

COM:QIC

Just to let you know, I've reverted your attemt to censor my comment. Fortunately, here is not the German Wikipedia where productive contributors may not hope for any administrative protection. If you are willing to participate at QIC, FPC etc. you should do it in a constructive and neutral way, otherwise it will not last too long before a first block. I have modified my comment to sound bit more neutral though. --A.Savin 16:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Hallo A.Savin, ich denke mal, wir beide können uns untereinander durchaus auf Deutsch schreiben (zumindest lässt Dein de-4-Babel darauf schließen). Ich finde es befremdlich, dass Du mir gleich mit der Zensorkeule kommst und auch noch mit einer Sperre drohst. Ja, wir sind hier nicht in de-WP, sonst hätte ich Dich wohl bereits auf der VM gemeldet. Ich fand es bei der 1. Nominierung bereits sehr daneben, dass Du schriebst, mir kein AGF unterstellen zu können. Ich habe es, um eine Eskalation zu vermeiden, dabei belassen ohne weiter nachzufragen. Eigentlich empfinde ich es als Unverschämtheit, wenn mir schlechte Absichten unterstellt werden, nur weil ich mich nach jahrelanger Pause wieder einmal an einer Bilddiskussion beteilige.

Als Du nun von einer "Deutsche-Wikipedia-Stammtisch-Grillparty-Show" schriebst, war mir das Grund genug, diesen klar unsachlichen - weil zur Bilderdiskussion nicht beitragenden - Kommentar zu entfernen. Davon abgesehen ist es für mich eine grobe Beleidigung. Und zum dritten ist es - um mit klaren Worten zu sprechen - großer Käse. Ich selbst war nie bei einer der WP-Grillpartys, und habe keinen der an der QI-Disk-Beteiligten je auf einem Stammtisch getroffen, von denen ich bisher eh nur einen einzigen außerhalb Erfurts besucht habe. Wenn Du Dir mal die Mühe machen würdest, auf die Nutzernamen zu klicken, würdest Du erkennen, dass die Nominierung von einem Österreicher, und die 1. Pro-Stimme von einem Franzosen kam. Beide kenne ich nicht persönlich. Genau genommen kenne ich überhaupt nur Smial von den Pro-Stimmern persönlich, allen anderen bin ich noch nie begegnet und hatte meines Wissens auch noch nie mit Ihnen in irgendeiner Weise zu tun.

Zusammenfassung: Ich möchte Dich dringend bitten, Deine Haltung zu überdenken. Nur weil jemand inhaltlich anderer Meinung ist als Du, solltest Du diese Menschen nicht beleidigen oder ihnen böse Absichten unterstellen. Ich wüsste im Übrigen auch nicht, dass wir beide vor diesen QI-Diskussionen jemals miteinander zu tun gehabt hätten. Solltest Du mir aber weiter mit Sperre drohen, oder gar eine einsetzen, werde ich das sicherlich nicht mehr deaskalierend nur mit Dir persönlich besprechen. --Stepro (talk) 16:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Sehr lange Rede, kurzer Sinn. Wenn ein User, der sich sonst (so gut wie) nie an QIC beteiligt, gleich mehrmals bei Nominierungen eines bestimmten Fotografen (hier: Aliura) pro abstimmt, ist der Verdacht von Freundschafts-Stimmen nicht zwingend begründet, aber sicher auch nicht ganz abwegig. "Beleidigung"? Wenn das jemand aus der deutschen Wikipedia sagt, wo einige einflussreiche User schon mal unter administrativem Applaus Juden mit Kinderschändern vergleichen, da habe ich ehrlich gesagt nur ein müdes Lächeln übrig. Frohes Schaffen weiterhin --A.Savin 18:26, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Ich fasse zusammen:

• Mein sachbezogener Beitrag, gar mit konkretem Vergleich eines empfohlenen QI-DOF-Bildes, ist nicht "constructive and neutral". Dass Du hingegen kein einziges sachliches Argument anführst und statt dessen nur ad hominem argumentierst, ist völlig in Ordnung.
• Nutzer von de-WP sind per se nicht zu beleidigen, weil Dir eine spezielle Äußerung eines einzigen Nutzers dort nicht passt.

Danke, damit ist das Gespräch in der Tat für mich beendet. --Stepro (talk) 21:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Ailura (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Stepro (talk) 18:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Basílica de Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Candelaria, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-12, DD 05.jpg

Hallo, dein Kommetar war schon richtig. Ich habe das Bild "aufgewärmt". Es wäre super, wenn du es dir nochmals anschauen könntest, viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 10:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Poco, auch wenn es inzwischen sowieso zu spät ist: Ich finde das Bild ja nicht schlecht, aber für mich ist es kein QI. Ich habe es mal testweise farbkorrigiert, bis die Wand wirklich weiß war - da war der Himmel völlig weg. Ich vermute mal, Du hast das Foto in der Abenddämmerung geschossen, und entweder an der Kamera oder per Software die Farbbalance nach blau verschoben und die Helligkeit hochgezogen. Wie gesagt, das Bild ist gut, aber für mich eben kein QI. --Stepro (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharnhorstfest Großgörschen 2013 by Stepro IMG 1600 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gute Qualität. Ich persönlich hätte die Blende etwas weiter geöffnet, um die Bajonette im Vordergrund besser herauszuarbeiten, aber das ist letztendlich eine Geschmacksfrage. --Frank Schulenburg 12:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharnhorstfest Großgörschen 2013 by Stepro IMG 1617 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharnhorstfest Großgörschen 2013 by Stepro IMG 1560 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 09:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scharnhorstfest Großgörschen 2013 by Stepro IMG 1684 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really sharp --Poco a poco 08:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sharpened, maybe better now? --Stepro 22:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC) Looks better, although you helped yourself with downsampling Poco a poco 12:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Scharnhorstfest Großgörschen 2013 by Stepro IMG 1609 DxO.jpg

File:Scharnhorstfest Großgörschen 2013 by Stepro IMG 1609 DxO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 13:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtagswahl Nds 2013 - Linda Zervakis by Stepro IMG 9925.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 19:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Stepro, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:Ips-nscf-2013-immers-3686.jpg

Where is it unsharp? Thanks. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

COM:QIC

Please try to refrain to nominate too much pictures at once on COM:QIC, as written in the rules.

Please try to also assess images by other contributors. We are all volunteers, and any help is appreciated.

Pleclown (talk) 12:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torsten Sommer LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1068 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ina Scharrenbach LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1095 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inge Howe LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1124 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrea Asch LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1197 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rita Klöpper LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1214 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Susanne Schneider LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1221 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Sternberg LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1242 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's good, but a little bit bright. (Like the others.)--XRay 08:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Very Good. Glasses very well managed. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Sternberg LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1245 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1248 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Werner Lohn LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1277 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlheinz Busen LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1060 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlheinz Busen LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1059 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Preuß LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1113 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. I don't mind the tight crop here. --ArildV 13:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilka von Boeselager LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1100 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay, the scurfs could have been removed. DerHexer 15:18, 6 December 2013 (UTC) OK right, scurfs removed --Stepro 23:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

What the heck is wrong with the signature?

Hallo Stepro! Signaturen in gallery tags werden vom mediawiki parser nicht unterstuetzt. Auf COM:QIC gibt es dafuer ein (von mir geschreibenes) JavaScript Helferlein, welches die Ersetzung der vier Tilden uebernimmt. Ab und an klappt das leider mal nicht, dann bleibt die Signatur in Rohform stehen. Das ist wohl bei Dir gerade passiert. --Dschwen (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Ah, vielen Dank! Ich hatte mich nur gewundert, weil es schon das 2. Mal heute war, und ich das sonst noch nicht kannte. Das mit den Galerien wusste ich bisher nicht. :-) Stepro (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martina Maaßen LT NRW by Stepro IMG 1062 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fichtenzapfen by Stepro 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 21:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limburg Lahn Alter Friedhof Detail by Stepro IMG 4139 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition but rather soft, color fringing at the head, blown sky – can you do anything about it? --Kreuzschnabel 07:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC) OK sharpened, color adjusted, color borders removed, brightness adjusted --Stepro 01:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)  Comment Nice exposure but why is the result smaller than the original? DerHexer 23:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC) OK fixed; thanks for the hint, I obviously used wrong options during export --Stepro 01:23, 11 December 2013 (UTC) OK for me now. DerHexer 22:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Black Death Vodka.jpg

File:Black Death Vodka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 11:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterwieck Altstadt by Stepro DSC 5356-DSC 5364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs perspective correction. And no: Even leaning houses do not conical tapering. --Cccefalon 05:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC) OK More is not possible without disturbing proportions I think. --Stepro 23:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Considerably better! Good for QI! --Cccefalon 08:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limburg Lahn Alter Friedhof Detail by Stepro IMG 4139 DxO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition but rather soft, color fringing at the head, blown sky – can you do anything about it? --Kreuzschnabel 07:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC) OK sharpened, color adjusted, color borders removed, brightness adjusted --Stepro 01:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)  Comment Nice exposure but why is the result smaller than the original? DerHexer 23:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC) OK fixed; thanks for the hint, I obviously used wrong options during export --Stepro 01:23, 11 December 2013 (UTC) OK for me now. DerHexer 22:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maus Erfurt by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernd das Brot Erfurt by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Stepro, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patricia Wissel Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1724 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ines Saborowski-Richter Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1711 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 01:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edith Franke by Stepro IMG 1365 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 01:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin Gillo by Stepro IMG 1402 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antje Hermenau by Stepro IMG 1455 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. DerHexer 22:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolf-Dietrich Rost by Stepro IMG 1502 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 07:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaubär und Blöd nah by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support main subject is ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uta Windisch Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1628 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jan Löffler Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1648 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabine Friedel by Stepro IMG 1532 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petra Köpping Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1767 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop at the top is too tight. Why only the head here? IMHO portrayals of females are better with wider crop e.g. like here. --Tuxyso 07:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)  Comment There are some other portraits of her, see Category:Petra Köpping. But it's a question of style, what a crop somebody prefered. I for instance like this one very much. Sorry, but I just can not read this "crop is too tight/crop is too wide" anymore. This is just a question of photographic style and not of right or wrong. --Stepro 09:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Keep calm and please respect my opinion. I've not only written ("bad crop"). Have you read my complete comment? Probably it was not precise: The top crop should be definitely improved (this is a QI concern for me). The head is far too close to the image border. The second part of my comment was only a suggestion of personal style - I personally do not like those only-head-photos (but this is no QI issue) --Tuxyso 09:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Comment Sorry if my comment sounds harsh, it's not intended. I just wanted to figure out that for me even truncated hair is OK. --Stepro 11:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC) As non German, it is time for me to say that I'm a bit fed up with all these local (unknown for me) politicians (done !), but ok, these pictures are in general acceptable regarding the QI criteria. This one is technically very good, the crop works to me, and the face (eyes, smile) of this pretty lady are very pleasant. I support (after reading the discussion above, of course)--Jebulon 16:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Patt Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1781 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Barely OK. But I do not understand why you don't crop like here - more space on the left, less in the right, according to shoulder position. --Tuxyso 09:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jürgen Martens Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1826 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliver Wehner Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1872 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabine von Schorlemer Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1850 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good and clasical portrayal. Some bright spots on the skin but no problem for me. Please add an English description if possible. --Tuxyso 09:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markus Ulbig by Stepro IMG 1507 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 01:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patrick Schreiber by Stepro IMG 1585 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 01:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hannelore Dietzschold by Stepro IMG 1547 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 01:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steffen Flath by Stepro IMG 1581 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 01:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elefant Erfurt by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would crop out the tram on top. --Kreuzschnabel 18:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)  Done --Stepro 23:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Much better! Especially the enhanced white balance reproduces a a more naturalistic colour of the elephant. But please recover a little bit more speace in the top; at the moment it is really very tight! It is not necessary to have an exact 1:1 ratio. --Cccefalon 09:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I really like regular ratios, but maybe you're right. More space isn't left to the tram station. --Stepro 21:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)  Support This small augmentation of space is perfect. QI for me. --Cccefalon 07:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Whiskey Kilbeggan Stepro.jpg

And also:

• File:Whisky Grand Dulky Stepro.jpg
• File:Whisky Speyburn Can Stepro.jpg
• File:Whisky Speyburn Stepro.jpg
• File:Whisky Tomatin Can Stepro.jpg
• File:Whisky Tomatin Stepro.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Macht doch was Ihr wollt. Kompletter Schwachsinn. Irgendwann werdet Ihr auch den letzten Produktiven hier vertrieben haben. --Stepro (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

WLM Puzzles

Hallo, weißt du was aus den Puzzles bei dem WikiCon geworden ist? Mich würde da insbesonderes das von File:MGK05128 Kleinschwarzenbach Zum Weberhaus 10.jpg interessieren :-) Careerfromhome (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aline Fiedler Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1774 LR50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive2010th⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

FWS14

Hallo Stepro, ich wollte nur kurz fragen ob meine Emailantwort mit den Details für den Workshop angekommen ist? Careerfromhome (talk) 20:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Stepro,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Spiele

Deutsch: Ich sehe, dass Sie auf das Spiel waren. Muss ich eine Art der Akkreditierung um Fotos zu machen und passen müssen? Wie kann ich das Stadion Datensatz eingeben?

Polski: Widzę, że byłeś na meczu. Czy ja muszę mieć jakąś akredytację, aby wejść na płytę stadionu?

Zwiadowca ²¹ 20:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Zwiadowca, da es sich um ein Spiel der 1. Bundesliga handelt, ist eine Akkreditierung des DFB nötig, um im Stadion fotografieren zu dürfen. Ich sehe aber keine Notwendigkeit, diese in den Dateibeschreibungen anzugeben, da hier keinerlei Urheberrechte berührt werden. --Stepro (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Ich lebe in der Nähe von Heidelberg. Hier es gibt viele spannende Sportarten: Hockenheimring (Grosser Preis von Deutschland), SAP Arena, 1899 TSG Hoffenheim und viele andern. Ich will Foto machen, aber ich weiss nicht, wo kann ich Akkreditierung machen. Zwiadowca ²¹ 23:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Verstehe. Da hast Du Dir gerade die schwierigsten bis unmöglichen ausgesucht. :-) Bei Formel 1 sind bisher alle Anfragen gescheitert, bei Männerfußball erlaubt der DFB keine freien Lizenzen (nur für aktuelle Presseberichterstattung), also für Wikipedia/Commons nicht brauchbar.

Was leichter möglich ist: Handball, Volleyball usw. - praktisch alles außer Formel 1 und Fußball. Wenn Du eine Akkreditierung dafür möchtest, frag am besten bei der Freiwilligenunterstützung von WMDE nach: community@wikimedia.de. --Stepro (talk) 08:19, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Nachlese

lb. Stepro, du hast ja im Sept/Oktober mal das 400er aus unserem Pool verwendet. In der Nachschau des Ergebnisses nicht nur von dir sondern auch der Ergebnisse anderer Leute, die dieses Objektiv verwendet haben (inkl. meiner eigenen Erfahrungen damit) stelle ich fest, dass man nicht ganz zufrieden sein kann. Die Bilder sind im Ergebnis wächsern, auf wirklich großen Entfernungen scheint sich der Stabilisator eher negativ auszuwirken, auch gibt es bei Crop-Kameras chromatische Abbereviationen. Diese Probleme scheinen durchgehend zu sein. Unabhängig von der doch vorhandenen guten Qualität. Ähnliche Probleme interessanterweise auch mit dem 70-200er aus unserer Geschäftstelle. Natürlich weiß ich um die unterschiedlichen Verwendungen, je nachdem welche Kamera auf die Linse draufgeschraubt war.

Wir versuchen gerade, das Problem zu klären und hätten gerne eine wirklich sehr kritische Meinung zu den Ergebnissen von Dir. Ich möchte damit keineswegs jetzt deine Ergebnisse kritisieren, es geht mir darum, herauszufinden, welche Probleme es gibt, wie wir sie lösen können (speziell jetzt in so kritischen Einsätzen wie Sportfotografie). Das Ziel ist, dass wir eine Handlungsanweisung zustandebringen, welche wir denen zur Verfügung stellen wollen, welche sich das Equipment ausborgen. Es muss ja nicht jeder dieselbe Erfahrung machen, noch dazu da keiner der Fotografen etwas davon hat, wenn man diese Erfahrung nicht weitergibt.

Auch wollen wir Anfang nächsten Jahres einmal ein paar Tests unter ähnlichen, wenn nicht gleichen Bedingungen mit unterschiedlichem Gerät machen. Ich habe nämlich zumindest das 400er im Verdacht, dass es längst kalibriert werden sollte. Vielleicht bringt das dann eine Verbesserung.

Ich habe in letzter Zeit eine lange Reihe von Bildern analysiert und festgestellt, dass zB das 300er-Nikon-Objektiv von uns bessere Ergebnisse erzielt. Natürlich sind die Umstände nicht vergleichbar, umso wichtiger ist es, dass man diese - wie eben durch deine Kritik - aber vergleichbar und vermittelbar macht. lg aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 12:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Schon gesehen?

[1]

Viele Grüße --Jelizawjeta P. (talk) 20:31, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Ja, schon lustig, was die aus dem Foto gemacht haben. Aber dafür gibt es ja freie Lizenzen. :-) Liebe Grüße Stepro (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Patricia Wissel Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1724 LR50.jpg

File:Patricia Wissel Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1724 LR50.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Schon erstaunlich...

wie sich hier jetzt alle auf mich stürzen. Wo kommt ihr denn alle her?

Dafür gibt es ja verschiedene Meinungen, jeder kann seine vertreten.--Taliska~dewiki (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Taliska, ich verstehe Dein Problem nicht. Ich vertrete doch gerade meine Meinung, und zwar meines Erachtens durchaus sachlich und inhaltlich begründet. Und wo ich herkomme: Ich sehe Verschlimmbesserungen von Fotos, und schreibe das demjenigen welchen auf seine Disk. Was denn sonst?

Wenn sich plötzlich mehrere Nutzer kritisch über Deine Arbeit äußern, könnte es ja vielleicht sein, dass sie recht haben und Du Dein Vorgehen mal kurz überdenken solltest. Grüße, --Stepro (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Mein Problem ist -wie gesagt- dass das Bild zu dunkel ist. Ailura hat bereits bei diesem Bild im Nachhinein die Helligkeit auf Basis ihrer Datei verbessert. Eigentlich sieht man doch dass bei dem Bild das ich geändert habe es auch zu dunkel ist, oder?

Und jetzt auch noch meine Ängerung zurückgesetzt. Wie gesagt: Bei dem kleinen Bild bei der Finalistenanzeige interessiert es keinen Mensch ob die Qualität minimal geringer ist, da es keinem auffällt.--Taliska~dewiki (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Jan Löffler Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1648 LR50.jpg

File:Jan Löffler Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1648 LR50.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 17:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Mail

Moin Stepro,
irgenwie kommen meine Mails bei Dir nicht an, schau mal bitte ob jetzt eine Mail angekommen ist. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 07:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Uff. Frag' mich nicht warum, aber ich habe 3 Mails von Dir im Spam-Ordner. Sorry! Du kriegst auf jeden Fall noch heute Antwort. --Stepro (talk) 07:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

kein Ding, habe mir schon so was gedacht, daher dieser Weg. Super danke, das reicht locker. :) Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 08:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Landtagsprojekt Thüringen

Hello! Hab gerade die Fotos vom Landtagsprojekt gesehen, schöne Bilder! Aber schade dass ich das erst jetzt sehe, sonst wäre ich auch gerne dabei gewesen. Gab's da eine Planungsseite oder wie kann man beim nächsten Mal die Chance haben, dabei zu sein? Schöne Grüße aus Jena --Indeedous (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Indeedous, das Projekt hat (wie nahezu alle Landtagsprojekte) Olaf Kosinsky organisiert. Dieser hat mich auch angesprochen, da ich direkt in Erfurt wohne und auch schon oft bei solchen Projekten dabei war. Der große Unterschied zu den bisherigen: Das Ganze erfolgte ohne große Förderung, nur die Technik kam von WMAT. Das bedingt einerseits, dass das Team möglichst klein ist, und andererseits, dass nach Möglichkeit keine Fahrtkosten anfallen. Kurz: Es sollen die Beteiligten am Besten direkt vor Ort wohnen.

Beim Thüringer Landtag kommt hinzu, dass es nur wenige Abgeordnete gibt. Du bist tatsächlich derjenige, den wir angesprochen hätten, falls wir noch einen Fotograf gebraucht hätten (Carstor hatte Dich mir empfohlen). Tatsächlich war es aber so, dass wir uns schon so eher gelangweilt haben. Wir waren zu viert: Olaf und ich für die Fotos (wobei praktisch die meisten ich gemacht habe, und wie gesagt zeitlich nicht gerade ausgelastet war); und Thogo und Lucas für die Wikipedia-Artikel.

Und als "Lessons learned" kann man sagen, dass diese 4-Personen-Besetzung für eine solche Landtagsgröße auch völlig ausreicht. Wenn mehr Wikipedianer dran beteiligt wären, würden diese sich gegenseitig "auf den Füßen stehen" bzw. wären ziemlich gelangweilt. Wenn wir hätten aufstocken wollen, dann meiner Meinung nach eher noch einen dritten Autor für die Artikelarbeit.

Ich muss zugeben, dass ich anfangs auch skeptisch war, kann im Nachhinein aber sagen, dass die Entscheidung für eine minimale Besetzung meines Erachtens richtig war.

Beste Grüße, Stepro (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Bin da auch gar nicht böse drüber, hätte sowieso gucken müssen ob es zeitlich an dem Tag gepasst hätte und bin nun auch kein ausgewiesener Experte für Portraitfotos. War nur verwirrt ob ich irgendwelche Planungsseiten nicht auf dem Schirm hatte, passiert ja auch hin und wieder. Aber schön, dass alles geklappt hat und irgendwann schnuppere ich bestimmt auch mal bei einem ähnlichen Fotoprojekt rein. Bis dann, --Indeedous (talk) 13:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtagsprojekt Thüringen 2016 Heike Taubert IMG 9920 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernigerode Schloss by Stepro 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtagswahl Thüringen 2014 IMG 7960 LR7,5 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtagsprojekt Thüringen 2016 Dorothea Marx IMG 0011 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top cut very tight, but good for me.--Famberhorst 16:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtagsprojekt Thüringen 2016 Astrid Rothe-Beinlich IMG 9916 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luge world cup Oberhof 2016 by Stepro IMG 7854 LR5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luge world cup Oberhof 2016 by Stepro IMG 7703 LR5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Landtagsprojekt Thüringen 2016 Kristin Floßmann IMG 9827 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

File:Landtagsprojekt Thüringen 2016 Kristin Floßmann IMG 9827 LR10 by Stepro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetzlar-Dutenhofen WLMMH 30057 by Stepro IMG 2206.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. Rftblr 10:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staatskanzlei Erfurt Detail 03 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luge world cup Oberhof 2016 by Stepro IMG 7104 LR5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luge world cup Oberhof 2016 by Stepro IMG 7165 LR5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetzlar WLMMH 24804 by Stepro IMG 1625.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wetzlar WLMMH 24896 by Stepro IMG 1737.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me! --Hubertl 01:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staatskanzlei Erfurt Detail 04 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luge world cup Oberhof 2016 by Stepro IMG 7724 LR5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me. --Hubertl 19:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luge world cup Oberhof 2016 by Stepro IMG 7891 LR5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice head shot. Ram-Man 02:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

bitte bestücken ;)

Category:Stieleiche an der Weißenberger Straße 11 in Kittlitz
find' mein Bild grad nicht. --Anika (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Michael Hudecek IMG 5682 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Davis O. Nejo IMG 5686 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Holger Lang IMG 5729 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful.--ArildV 05:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Claudia Larcher IMG 5653 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Mercedes Echerer IMG 5771 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Davis O. Nejo IMG 5694 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 05:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Gustav Deutsch IMG 5581 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Aurelia Burckhardt IMG 5629 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremische Bürgerschaft Linda Neddermann 8672 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film David Ruehm IMG 5759 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Lena Reichmuth IMG 5591 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harald Baumann-Hasske (SPD) Landtagsprojekt Sachsen IMG 9339 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrea Dombois (CDU) Landtagsprojekt Sachsen IMG 9279 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albrecht Pallas (SPD) Landtagsprojekt Sachsen IMG 9320 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GC Ezarate 23:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreas Heinz (CDU) Landtagsprojekt Sachsen IMG 9314 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality but this kind of photograph should be in portrait format. --XRay 15:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Malicious assumption of criminal offenses

Servus. Bist du Admin? Ich nehme an, die Rechtslage ist dir bekannt? Herr Wolf hat bereits vor Gericht mit seinen Abmahnungen verloren. Hab mir das Ding durchgelesen. Sieht nicht nach einer Einzelentscheidung aus. Die Unrechtmäßigkeit ist damit nicht mehr umstritten. Unrechtmäßige Abmahnungen stellen einen gewöhnlichen Betrugsversuch dar. Warum löschst du mit der Begründung "assumption"? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Moin. Nein, um Diskussionsseiten bearbeiten zu können, muss man kein Admin sein. Ist Dir sicher schon aufgefallen. Ja, im Gegensatz zu Dir ist mir die Rechtslage in DE bekannt. Die Unrechtmäßigkeit ist sehr wohl umstritten, siehe zahlreiche entgegenstehende Urteile. Sogar explizit von Thomas wurde bereits eine Abmahnung gerichtlich bestätigt - man könnte also eher zu der Auffassung kommen, dass deren Rechtmäßigkeit statt deren Unrechtmäßigkeit nicht mehr umstritten ist.

Deine Unterstellung einer Straftat, die Du hier wiederholst, zieht üblicherweise eine Nutzersperre nach sich. Ich würde Dir dringend raten, dies ab sofort zu unterlassen. --Stepro (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Dass mir die Rechtslage nicht bekannt sei ist eine Unterstellung die du wovon ableitest?

Findest du gut, was Herr Wolf macht?

Ich finde keinen einzigen Beleg, dass ein anderslautendes Urteil existiert. Ich hätte sicher auf heise foto darüber gelesen. Es ist sehr seltsam, dass das Negativurteil abrufbar ist, das Positivurteil aber nicht. Hast du einen? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Ich leite das aus Deinen Einlassungen in der LD ab, in denen Du viel sachlich falsches schreibst. Thomas selbst hat Dich teilweise korrigiert, auch Ralf schrieb Dir, dass Deine Bemerkungen stark fehlerhaft sind.

Ob ich das gut finde, was Thomas macht, oder nicht, ist völlig irrelevant. Meine Meinung ist genau so unmaßgeblich wie Deine. Für Löschungen gibt es Löschregeln, wenn Du diese ändern möchtest, musst Du dafür an geeigneter Stelle eine Mehrheit finden. Eine Löschung entgegen der bestehenden Regeln bei einzelnen Bildern durchdrücken zu wollen wird hoffentlich nicht zum Erfolg führen.

Vielleicht solltest Du einfach erst einmal lesen, worauf Du antwortest. Thomas hat es mehrfach erwähnt, und auch recht nachvollziehbar erklärt, warum eben genau jene nicht durch die Medien gehen. Konkretes Beispiel von ihm zitiert: »Genau dieses Gericht hat seine Ansicht revidiert und mir mit Urteil vom 03.01.2017 (AZ: 125 C 60/16) in einer anderen aber vergleichbaren Sache die volle Summe zugestanden, die sich nach meinem Lizenzkatalog ergibt.« Das konkrete Aktenzeichen sollte auch für Dich als Beleg reichen, genauer geht es nicht mehr. --Stepro (talk) 08:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Ja ich gebe zu, dass ich da emotional bin, die ganze Sache ärgert mich. Es ist nun mal Abzocke und Herr Wolf macht damit sicher mehr Geld als mit dem regulären Verkauf, wenn er damit denn überhaupt Einnahmen generiert. Und ich weiß, dass auf dieser Disk nicht die finale Entscheidung getroffen werden wird. Ich versuche sachlich zu bleiben, aber meinen Argumenten steht praktisch keine Substanz gegenüber. Nur hören-sagen.

Eine Nummer eines Urteils, die aber nicht abrufbar ist (im Gegensatz zu der von mir angeführten, sehr seltsam), die Behauptung andere Gerichte hätten anders entschieden. Das eine Gericht soll seine Entscheidung revidiert haben, aber in einer anderen (???) Sache. Vom zweiten Urteil aus Frankfurt keine Rede. Die Behauptung einer einseitigen Berichterstattung, implizite Opferrolle als Lizenztroll, wobei dieses Konstrukt mit den Fotos gleichzeitig unter CC-BY-SA und kostenpflichtig relativ klar die Intention wiedergibt.

Inwiefern ich deutsches Recht falsch interpretieren soll sehe ich auch nirgends, außer dass jeder so oft er will dasselbe einklagen kann, was ich auch nicht bestreite (nur kommt immer dasselbe raus).

Und dass meine Ansprache eine Löschung des Bildes zur Folge hat, schließe ich aus. Bestenfalls kann ich erreichen, dass gefestigte Meinungen ein wenig hinterfragt werden, weil sie eben, wie ich meine, dem Interesse der Community entspringen und nicht der Rechtslage (wobei diese ja auch erst vor ein paar Tagen bestätigt wurde). Dass dem in den Commons-Regeln Rechnung getragen wird steht nochmal auf einem ganz anderen Blatt. Wird aber passieren. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 10:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Nur noch kurz, da diese Diskussion sichtlich zu nichts führt, und ich einen Löschantrag, von dem man selbst ausschließt, dass er Erfolg hat, ziemlich daneben finde: Das Urteil ist wie oben zitiert vom 03.01.2017, kann also frühestens heute Rechtskraft erlangt haben, und damit auch frühestens heute veröffentlicht werden - insofern keine der Parteien Rechtsmittel einlegt. Daher ist es nicht verwunderlich, sondern völlig selbstverständlich, dass es noch nicht online sein kann. --Stepro (talk) 10:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Projekt DLV 2016

Danke das du dich nochmal gemeldet hast. Also ist das so zu verstehen, daß Olaf Kosinsky, trotz Zusage, nicht erschienen ist? Wenn ich mich recht erinnere hatte ich euch beide angepingt, mit der Frage was passiert ist. Jedoch aus welchen Gründen auch immer keine Antwort erhalten habe.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrea Dombois (CDU) Landtagsprojekt Sachsen IMG 9277 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GC Ezarate 21:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Respect please

Please respect my engagements in this matter. The permission was sent by email to Wikipedia. Dont bother me anymore. Is that clear now? Tokota (talk) 00:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Zunächst darf ich Dich bitten, einen angemessenen Umgangston einzuschlagen.

Als nächstes die Aufforderung, auf Editwars zu verzichten. Es ist nicht in Ordnung, gelöschte Fotos unverändert erneut hochzuladen. Sollte eine Freigabe durch das Support-Team erfolgen, wird das gelöschte Foto wiederhergestellt.

So lange noch keine Freigabe durch einen OTRS-Berechtigten auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite eingetragen ist, verbleibt ein Hinweis auf der entsprechenden Seite. Da Du nun geschrieben hast, dass eine Freigabe angefragt ist, setze ich den entsprechenden Baustein auf die Seite. Dieser ist durch Dich bitte nicht zu entfernen! Im Übrigen war vorher nicht ersichtlich, dass Du eine Mail an permission geschrieben hast. Wie geschrieben: Einfach ein gelöschtes Foto erneut hochzuladen ist nicht statthaft. --Stepro (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Die Email war schon früher unterwegs aber wurde ignoriert. Nun? Tokota (talk) 05:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Sie wurde keinesfalls ignoriert, sondern schlicht noch nicht endgültig bearbeitet. Du hast eine automatische Antwortmail bekommen, in der Dir mitgeteilt wurde, dass die Bearbeitung mehrere Tage dauern wird. Du bist hier in einem Freiwilligenprojekt, auch wenn Dein Umgangston noch immer nicht so recht dazu passt. --Stepro (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dieter Bellmann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The Scope must link to a Commons Catagory. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

I think the value is the fact that it is the only photo of the now deceased. But for a single image a category should'nt be created. What do you suggest? --Stepro (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

I agree, I don't think category should be created for just one image. So I would think it's ok in this case. It is used and seems to meet the other criteria. so  Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

 Question - Aren't categories for ease in finding photos? So why is a category with one photo not a good idea? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

 Comment You may have a point. I've read that catagorys shouldn't be created that only have one image but that wasn't my idea and you do have a point. If the community thinks that there should be a category I wouldn't be opposed to it. It's a simple enough problem to fix. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

 Comment - I didn't realize such a guideline was written somewhere. Where? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I discussed this on German village pump. It seems to be OK to have a category with only one photo, so I was probably wrong when I transfered the recommendation from Wikipedia to Commons. I've now created the category. Thanks for your comments. --Stepro (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, but the scope shouldn't be a category but a link to a category (in whole or part). I've corrected the scope for you and now  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Statue of Rai Bahadur Ananda Chandra Roy at Comilla Victoria College.jpg

Hello!! I was put this photo in QI candidate list, but some one comment there to add more proper categories in this picture. So that's why i again put this photo in QI candidate list on yesterday. I hope you will again review this picture. Thanks!! Shahidul Hasan Roman (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7512 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 6878 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7659 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7744 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7511 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 6956 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7864 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7900 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7327 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 7137 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment This (and partially the other nominations, too) is overexposed. Did you do this intentionally? --Granada 09:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment They stood against the sun, as you can see at the shadow on the throat, and I didn't use flash. On the other hand the pictures were supposed to be pretty bright. Histogram seems to be OK. --Stepro 09:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC) Quite bright, but o.k. --Granada 17:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIS Skilanglauf-Weltcup in Dresden PR CROSSCOUNTRY StP 6906 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sympathique. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7684.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basketball, 1. Damen-Basketball-Bundesliga, ChemCats Chemnitz LR10 by Stepro IMG 7684.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

peopleByName bei Mercedes Echerer, etc.

Hallo Stepro! Bitte beachte, dass diese Vorlage laut Template:PeopleByName substituiert werden muss. Ersetzen von peopleByName durch subst:peopleByName. --GT1976 (talk) 08:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hallo GT1976, danke, dass Du mich drauf aufmerksam machst. Ja, das steht in der Template-Beschreibung. Es ist aber Unfug - es stimmt schlicht nicht. Hast Du Dir die Kategorgie nicht mal angesehen, bevor Du sie geändert hast ([2])? Sie war vollkommen korrekt in den betreffenden Kategorien einsortiert, genau wie jetzt mit den vielen Textzeilen auch. Was das mit dem Subst soll, werde ich mal im Forum erfragen. Ich halte es einfach für Blödsinn, das führt ja das ganze Template ad absurdum. --Stepro (talk) 09:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Das Template ist angeblich veraltet, daher soll es ersetzt werden. Es wird auch laufend ersetzt. Mir fällt es auf, weil ich selber diese Vorlage häufig eingesetzt habe. --GT1976 (talk) 10:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Ich habe es da: Commons:Forum#Template:PeopleByName mal angesprochen. Veraltet ist genau so ein Quatsch wie es zu ersetzen, es soll ja gerade den Wust an Kategorien samt Defaultsort in den einzelnen Personenkategorien beseitigen. --Stepro (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Das sehe ich grundsätzlich auch so. :-) --GT1976 (talk) 11:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

OTRS Ivana Španović

Hi Stepro, i saw you are in OTRS team. Could you solve this photo. I wrote him document, i hope he send it back to OTRS with that number, so all should be clear. --Mile (talk) 11:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Petar, I sent him the formal template to send it back to OTRS. You should have this mail, too. So the problem should be solved soon. :-) --Stepro (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

All done, ticket is referenced. --Stepro (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanx, and one more to solve. Balet dancer. --Mile (talk) 09:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi PetarM, the ticket is referenced. Thank your for organising the permissions. --Stepro (talk) 20:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

zwei kurze Fragen

Guten Tag, Stepro, nochmals Danke für die Freigabe des Bildes von einem Werk von Gabriele Evertz. Du hast eingetragen "selbst fotografiert", aber der Fotograf ist Yao Zu Lu, ich habe deshalb das mit den Rechten immer so geklärt: Künstlerin des gezeigten Werkes =Gabriele Evertz; Fotograf des gezeigten Werkes=Yao Zu Lu; Beide Rechteinhaber müssen genannt werden. - nun werde ich das Bild auch verwenden für den englischen Artikel über die Künstlerin. Muss ich dann den Rechtefreigabetext auch auf Englisch schreiben? (ist vielleicht eine blöde Frage, bitte, entschuldige). LG, --Gyanda (talk) 11:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Gyanda, ehrlich gesagt verstehe ich den großen Unterschied zwischen {{Own}} und {{Sf}} auch nicht so richtig. Laut deutscher Beschreibung von sf sollte man das nehmen, wenn der Fotograf nicht der Schöpfer des Werkes ist, wie hier. Aber ehrlich gesagt fände ich eine vernünftigere Quellenangabe besser. Vielleicht schreibst Du einfach rein, wo Du das Foto her hast?

Ich habe die Namensnennung mal mit einem Sprach-Switch versehen. Wenn man die Seite mit deutscher Spracheinstellung aufruft, bekommt man den deutschen Text angezeigt, in allen anderen Fällen den englischen. (Bitte gern den engl. Text korrigieren, ich bin da nicht gerade Sprachexperte.)

Ich fand es übrigens sehr gut, dass Du beide Freigaben eingeholt hast, und die auch gleich mit passendem Textbaustein beim OTRS ankamen, so dass es keiner Rückfrage bedurfte. Das ist in solchen Fällen leider eher selten. LG, --Stepro (talk) 20:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Ach, das ist ja lieb, ein Lob! DANKE!!! Ich mach mir echt Mühe, alles so korrekt wie nur möglich zu machen. Ganz toll auch das mit dem Sprach-Switch, super, das hilft sehr. Ganz herzlichen Dank für deine Mühen!!! LG, --Gyanda (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

FIFA Fußball-WM 2018, Pressevorstellung ARD und ZDF

Hallo Stepro,

vielen Dank für die Bilder. Du hast ein Gruppenfoto des ARD-Teams hochgeladen. Hast du auch ein Foto des gesamten ZDF-Teams, den du hier hochladen könntest? Dann könnte ich beide Bilder im Wiki-Artikel über die Fußball-WM 2018 einfügen. Grüße --Superbia23 (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Leider nein. Das muss ich irgendwie verpasst haben, oder 20 der anderen Fotografen standen mir davor. Dafür war ich außer dem eigenen ARD-Fotografen der einzige mit dem ARD-Gruppenfoto. ;-) --Stepro (talk) 14:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File:20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Kati Zambito IMG 5616 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

File:20160526 Fotoprojekt Oesterreichischer Film Kati Zambito IMG 5616 LR10 by Stepro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ClimbingGoat (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180920 Fussball, UEFA Europa League, RB Leipzig - FC Salzburg by Stepro StP 7964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180920 Fussball, UEFA Europa League, RB Leipzig - FC Salzburg by Stepro StP 8146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

RB Leipzig-Salzburg

Danke für die Fotos. Lg aus Salzburg --Werner100359 (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Werner100359, vielen vielen Dank für die Kategorisierungen! --Stepro (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180920 Fussball, UEFA Europa League, RB Leipzig - FC Salzburg by Stepro StP 8033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add suitable player name categories.--Peulle 09:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)  Done --Stepro 11:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180920 Fussball, UEFA Europa League, RB Leipzig - FC Salzburg by Stepro StP 8051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add suitable player name categories.--Peulle 09:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC))  Done --Stepro 11:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180920 Fussball, UEFA Europa League, RB Leipzig - FC Salzburg by Stepro StP 7936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please correct the perspective and crop a bit of the left border (cut-off leg). --Basotxerri 20:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)  Done --Stepro 03:45, 5 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good now --Daniel Case 22:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landtagsprojekt Thüringen 2016 Stefan Gruhner IMG 9769 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-11-02 Konzert -The Hellfreaks- in -Ilvers Musikbar- in Erfurt IMG 3469 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. If somebody objects: Given the very difficult circumstances (dark: see the ISO speed! and the subject is moving, and special lighting can even confuse autofocus), I consider this as really good. Also the balance of denoising (too much would make the image look plastic) is appropriate. --Aristeas 10:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-11-30 DFB presentation of the new head coach of the National Womens Team StP 6868 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-12-22 Deutsche Meisterschaften Skeleton StP 8086 LR7.5 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:54, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-12-13 Pressekonferenz zur Vorbereitung des Biathlon-Weltcups und der Umbenennung der Ski-Arena StP 7325 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-12-13 Pressekonferenz zur Vorbereitung des Biathlon-Weltcups und der Umbenennung der Ski-Arena StP 7327 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-11-02 Konzert -The Hellfreaks- in -Ilvers Musikbar- in Erfurt IMG 3414 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-01-03 BMW IBSF World Cup Bobsleigh and Skeleton Altenberg StP 0005 LR10 by Stepro-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO, and a pretty compelling photo. A word about the source description, though: "Self-photographed" makes it sound like you were photographing yourself while bobsledding. I'd strongly suggest you substitute a clear expression like "Own work". -- Ikan Kekek 00:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  InfoIkan Kekek: I moved from {{Own work}} to {{Self-photographed}} because of this discussion. --Stepro 06:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC) In that discussion: "As explained somewhere else: what about Self-photographed (or is this bad English?)" Answer: Yes, it's bad English, and do you understand why it's confusing in this context? It sounds like you mean a self-portrait (selfie). -- Ikan Kekek 09:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC) The totally unambiguous way to express what you want to express is "photographed by me". -- Ikan Kekek 09:48, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-02-08 Viessmann Luge World Cup Oberhof StP 0067 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-02-10 Viessmann Luge World Cup Oberhof StP 0274 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Bitte

Hallo Stepro, könntest Du bitte mal meinen Beitrag auf der Disk von Wiki Loves Love lesen und die Übersetzung korrigieren (ich kann dort ja nichts bearbeiten)? Vielen Dank! --Maimaid (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Maimaid, ich habe es geändert und den Unfug wieder entfernt. Aber wieso kannst Du die Seite nicht bearbeiten? Ich bin hier auch kein Admin, und da hat ja sogar eine IP rumvandaliert: [3]. Liebe Grüße, Stepro (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Danke furs Ändern! Ich wundere mich ja auch, aber ich finde trotz gründlichen Suchens auf der ganzen WLL-Seite keinen Reiter oder Button, der mir das Bearbeiten ermöglichen würde. Liebe Grüße --Maimaid (talk) 13:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Bei mir gibt's auf Commons:Wiki Loves Love 2019 ganz oben, wo normalerweise "Quelltext bearbeiten" steht, den Tab "Übersetzen". Dort ist immer, wo die Maus gerade ist, rechts ein Schreibstift. Klickt man den an, kann man bearbeiten. --Stepro (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Sliding sports pics

Hi Steffen, many thanks for all the great pics you uploaded in luge and skeleton, very appreciate your work. I think some categorizing work is needed as well :) I can give you my aid in this purpose. I'm waiting more about bobsleigh and bobsledders portraits, please hahaha! Greetings from Sardinia, Italy--Lou6977 (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lou6977, many thanks to you for categorizing the pics. Former I put the categories bevor uploading the photos in Lightroom. Today it's much more time-consuming, because I need to look at every person if he/she has subcats by year. I really waiting sitting on hot coals for structured data on Commons and the end of such (in my opinion redundand) subcats.

Some bobsledders and skeletonsledders are to come. :-) --Stepro (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

I think you ought not to worry about categorizations "by year". It can be done in a second moment, imho, if necessary.. I can help you by recognizing athlets (i think i can do it for 90% of them :) and putting proper category. Most important is to do some good images. There's a lack of bobsledders pics, unfortunately --Lou6977 (talk) 12:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Stepro/UEFA

User:Stepro/UEFA has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-03-30 Fußball, Männer, 1. Bundesliga, RB Leipzig - Hertha BSC StP 3845 LR10 by Stepro (cropped) 2.jpg

Moin Stepro,
schau doch mal bitte, ob die nun über die Handabschneider-Version drübergeladene Fassung für dich akzeptabler wäre. Ich wollte nicht enfach sofort löschen, weil die blöde Version auf :en benutzt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 06:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Ja, danke, das ist deutlich besser. Ich werde versuchen, im Herbst beim offiziellen Mannschaftsshooting dabei zu sein, damit wir von jedem RB-Spieler ein richtiges Portrait bekommen. --Stepro (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Torsten Herbst Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1793 LR50.jpg

File:Torsten Herbst Landtag Sachsen by Stepro IMG 1793 LR50.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

193.17.232.1 14:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Pjotr Wladimirowitsch Karpowitsch.jpg

File:Pjotr Wladimirowitsch Karpowitsch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0639 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 12:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0641 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 03:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0733 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0082 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0089 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1091 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. English description for your images would help --Podzemnik 00:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0040 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:07, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0119 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good portrait. One quibble: "Self-photographed" sounds like she photographed herself, whereas the photograph is by you. -- Ikan Kekek 07:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0139 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0789 LR10 by Stepro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1004 LR10 by Stepro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 03:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0826 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

File:2019-05-17 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0826 LR10 by Stepro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0059 LR10 by Stepro.jpg

File:2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 0059 LR10 by Stepro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Majora (talk) 16:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Incredible

I did not plan on commenting on this fuss going on about your uploads, but sincerely, you have started one of the most pointless and absurd arguments I have ever seen in my years as a Wikipedian. I get it, the crops are not of the best quality, but I crop them in order to be able to place those images on a player's infobox, it is a massive contribution towards defining an article on Wikipedia. Blurry and/or low-quality images are widely used over all Wikipedia, (see Asier Garitano and Jeison Murillo on Wikipedia as examples) if there are no other ones available, then it would be better to use the crappy photo rather than not a photo at all... of course this has its limits, if the quality is absolutely terrible, then yes, leave it alone. However, I am positive that my crops of your image are far from "terrible." Your images are being more than useful in this case, they are actually assuming their purpose and role on Wikimedia and Wikipedia. If you are THAT picky with these sort of things, then refrain from uploading more files on this website and move on to another page where you are the only one capable of editing them to your demands. I am the one who's supposed to be acting like a child by nature, I'm sixteen dude! But seems like the tables have turned. TheSoccerBoy (talk) 29 May 2019

I think in the deletion disputes one can see clearly who is right. I have nothing more to say. --Stepro (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-02 BeachVolleyball, Die Techniker beach tour Nürnberg StP 1703 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1075 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Tomer T 09:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-18 Fußball, Frauen, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais - FC Barcelona StP 1076 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-02 BeachVolleyball, Die Techniker beach tour Nürnberg StP 1983 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-31 BeachVolleyball, Die Techniker beach tour Nürnberg StP 1444 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

About the Photo of Tanja Bruske

Tanja Bruske has sent you an email explaining that the image is in the public domain. Why is there a threat of deletion of the picture? https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tanja_Bruske.jpg#mw-jump-to-license Avestaboy (talk) 18:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Avestaboy, there was never a deletion threat of this picture. It was tagged as "without permission", before the email was sent. Then I tagged it as "permission ongoing", to *prevent* a deletion. There was a communication between Tanja Bruske and support team, now all is fine and I added the permission.

You should now add a proper category to the picture. --Stepro (talk) 19:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 BeachVolleyball Weltmeisterschaft Hamburg 2019 StP 0506 LR by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 03:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-07 BeachVolleyball Weltmeisterschaft Hamburg 2019 StP 0831 LR by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 03:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 16 IMG 1914 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 03:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 16 IMG 2128 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-27 Volleyball, Bundesliga Frauen, Schwarz-Weiss Erfurt Volleyteam, Teampräsentation IMG 6123 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-27 Volleyball, Bundesliga Frauen, Schwarz-Weiss Erfurt Volleyteam, Teampräsentation IMG 6073 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although a little tight crop. --Tsungam 06:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-27 Volleyball, Bundesliga Frauen, Schwarz-Weiss Erfurt Volleyteam, Teampräsentation IMG 6055 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-27 Volleyball, Bundesliga Frauen, Schwarz-Weiss Erfurt Volleyteam, Teampräsentation IMG 6044 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 BeachVolleyball Weltmeisterschaft Hamburg 2019 StP 0299 LR by Stepro-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7811 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7913 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7716 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7740 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7781 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7825 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7928 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7749 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 06:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7828 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 06:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191002 Fußball, Männer, UEFA Champions League, RB Leipzig - Olympique Lyonnais by Stepro StP 0278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191002 Fußball, Männer, UEFA Champions League, RB Leipzig - Olympique Lyonnais by Stepro StP 0285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191002 Fußball, Männer, UEFA Champions League, RB Leipzig - Olympique Lyonnais by Stepro StP 0064-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191002 Fußball, Männer, UEFA Champions League, RB Leipzig - Olympique Lyonnais by Stepro StP 0004-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191002 Fußball, Männer, UEFA Champions League, RB Leipzig - Olympique Lyonnais by Stepro StP 0014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-09-16 TV, ARD, Cast -Rote Rosen- Staffel 17 IMG 7941 LR10 by Stepro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Small but ok --Poco a poco 07:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Maike Schirmer & Paulina Golla

Hallo Stepro, du selbst hast von den beiden Damen vermutlich keine single-shots. Vielleicht kannst du die ja bei Gelegenheit einmal "anvisieren", da wir jetzt gar kein Bild mehr von denen haben. BTW: bei der nächsten Nominierung dieser Art bitte möglichst ein Script aus der Toolbox (links auf Bildseite) nutzen, damit auch der Ersteller benachrichtigt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Photos of Heather Mitchell

Flickr has free images of Heather Mitchell. Can someone include the images in Wikimedia Commons?https://www.flickr.com/photos/cardinalspin/5491710170/in/photolist-5SRcfx-5LmNY3-2hzDmyp-2hbvsAs-2h9sh8x-kVhdN6-dUK55Q-VuspR7-bpzqVE-bjGMRr-bhowrT-TqNfYj-dtDa5F-6wCW84-9nhs77-9nhrN1-8JkhU-5MkDYr-5t3R2T-2gbEStX-2gbF6Wv-vMgyom-e42cWj-ut65v-Mht6CA-6p6owp-4NnsL4-8GkDwR-8VsxjM-2gjKYQs-bbEUJr-8cNuW6-nErfR7-27qzeHv-KQN9yC-DMEWfB-4NkZxV-HHooqb-56HbTA-56HbCm-2bNTNr-56HbPh-9xSe9F-2bNTKg-eS4CsF-2bNTM6-dhbfx-2bNTQK-2bNTL6-2bNTPP Avestaboy (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Why do you think they are free? I can read "All Rights Reserved". --Stepro (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Anthony ( Brandon ) Wong

Hallo ! Auf shutterstock gibt es lizensfreie Bilder von Anthony Wong . Kannst du mir helfen und die Bilder bei Wikimedia Commons reinstellen ? https://www.shutterstock.com/de/search/Anthony+wong Gruss Avestaboy (talk) 14:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo! Leider sind diese Bilder auch nicht frei genug für Commons. Alle sind mit "Nur zur redaktionellen Nutzung." gekennzeichnet, siehe auch [4]. --Stepro (talk) 14:40, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Bild von Husein Muhammed

Hallo ! Ich habe gestern Husein Muhammed per PN angeschrieben und die Erlaubnis bekommen die Bilder aus seinem Facebook Account lizensfrei zu verwenden. Das Datum des Bildes ist unbekannt da er sich nicht mehr daran kann wann er das Bild gemacht hat.Um die Arbeit zu erleichtern habe ich es unter eigenes Werk ( own work ) gespeichert. Nun möchte ich aber auch nicht dass das Bild vielleicht gelöscht wird . Wir könnten wir das Problem lösen?

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HMuhammed.jpg#mw-jump-to-license Avestaboy (talk) 21:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Hallo, er müsste eine Freigabe an das Supportteam schicken. Wie genau steht hier beschrieben: Commons:Email templates. Viele Grüße, Stepro (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)