User talk:Smooth O/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Cover of HKSAR e-Passport.jpg

File:Cover of HKSAR e-Passport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Urquhartnite (talk) 22:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

permissions for File:Balloon UpStage 2014.jpg

hi, on 15 august i received a notice from you requesting correct permissions for the image File:Balloon UpStage 2014.jpg. your notice on the page for this image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Balloon_UpStage_2014.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D) says that unless the issue is resolved, the file will be deleted after 7 days. today (17 august) i have sent a declaration of consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as instructed. i then looked at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS and see that the backlog for processing tickets in english is 15 days. i hope that this image will not be deleted because of this. if there's anything else i should do please let me know. we are doing our best to comply to your requests. Frock (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Can't do license review for File:MitchKapor.jpg

About this edit Commons:License review is "for files from Flickr, Picasa, Panoramio, YouTube and other external websites that provide images under different licenses." If it's not for an image claimed to be from an external website, we license reviewers can't do much about it. --GRuban (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Meggle kajmak.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Meggle kajmak.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_Western_Herzegovina.svg

Yes it's correct, that file should be renamed to avoid confusion Broj 123456789 (talk) 22:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Request to edit new version of File:Sarajevo.jpg

Hi,

Seeing as how you edited the last one, could you please edit one more time but this time use image File:Sarajevo City Panorama.JPG instead of the current File:Sarajevo,_pohled_na_město_z_parku.jpg ? If you could tell me how to do it, would gladly help out. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BiHVolim (talk • contribs) 16:40, 11 September 2015‎‎ (UTC)

Eto, uspio si. :) --Smooth_O (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Heads-up

Hi, as an active colleague on upload projects, I thought I'd drop you a personal heads-up for my request for adminship, today being the last day for views. RFA's tend to only have a small proportion of the community taking part, so it can be difficult to judge if this is representative. --Fæ (talk) 13:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Licensing for an image I uploaded

Hi, I'm still a noob at this. I thought that I provided clear evidence that the author of the image (Painted_bat.jpg) has allowed the use of his images. His website (http://www.merlintuttle.com/gallery/photographs-download/) details the terms he set forth. What do I need to do? Thanks. CSJordan (talk) 13:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I put this link as a permission and it will be reviewed. --Smooth_O (talk) 13:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright violation remarks

Hi! I see that you tagged two images, I have uploaded, with copyright violation. May I kindly ask your rationale since I have no idea what was wrong with them. Thanks. CeeGee (talk) 14:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Moj beogradski dnevnik d hudelist.jpg

Hi Smooth O,

thank you for notifying me about the file:"Moj_beogradski_dnevnik_d_hudelist.jpg".

The file was given by the author himself for an article that no longer exists on wikipedia so it is ok to delete the file.

Thank you, best regards,

V.boar (talk) 10:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

File:KraljAlexObrenovic.jpg

File:KraljAlexObrenovic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 08:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Shrimp versus shrimps

Was there any discussion before you moved Category:Shrimp to Category:Shrimps? That was a really backward move. The term "shrimp" for multiple shrimp(s) is much more common in English than the term "shrimps". --Epipelagic (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

It's reverted. --Smooth_O (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

It's that time of year....

Christmas tree worm, (Spirobranchus gigantic)
	Time To Spread Some Happy Holiday Cheer!!
	I decorated a special kind of Christmas tree* in the spirit of the season.* What's especially nice about the digitized version is that it doesn't need water, and it won't catch fire.
	Wishing you a joyous holiday season... ...and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉
	Atsme 📞 03:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)	Pure pun-ishment. [1]

Convertible Marks

How are File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Horizontal.png and File:Convertible Marks (banknotes and coins) – Vertical.png copyright violation if you can see SPECIMEN on them, they are on the web site of CBBiH, and coins are small resoultion + file is used in infobox to represent that currency (fair use) because we can’t go any other way except to put an image. These are reasons why I created one image so one-fair-use-per-article rule is met. --Obsuser (talk) 23:14, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

No fair-use on Wikimedia Commons, only on wikipedia. As you can see, image is not deleted from English Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Convertible_Marks_%28banknotes_and_coins%29_%E2%80%93_Vertical.png --Smooth_O (talk) 19:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

OK. Sorry. --Obsuser (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Miles High

Hello... I thought that using an image of what is clearly the album cover would be OK, no matter where it came from. I (wrongly) assumed that the cover is the cover, and it's out there, as it were... I'm obviously wrong, or you wouldn't have tagged it for deletion... I've just fired off an email to the record company to see if they'll give me an image. If not, can I scan my own CD cover and upload that scan? --SurfaceAgentX2Zero (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

If you receive permission from record company then it's ok, but otherwise it is not allowed. Please see here: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Album_covers. --Smooth_O (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

RE: permission request for LTS cover art

Thank you for notifying me of how I can confirm permission. You can delete the file now, I'm contacting Moving On about using the file as I write and I expect it to take a bit. General809 (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Rajomorphii

Hello,
About your modification on Category:Rajomorphii and Category:Batoidea:
Which source do you follow ? In fact I don't mind such changes but providing the source is recommended.
Also, changing a category implies a change of {{Taxonavigation}}, perhaps in all subtaxa.
Once we discussed that, I might help you.
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 13:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

I just unified it with data from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batoidea , please revert it if you think it's not right. --Smooth_O (talk) 14:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

ok, thanks, I added the info in the page.

Provide the source, Luke ;-)

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Synapse

Hallo Smootho please take a look at the source http://www.syndikat.org/en/the_syndikats_publications/ http://www.syndikat.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/synapse_nr7.pdf before talking bullshit no source. Thanks for nothing. --Sargoth (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Link with permission was broken: [2], now you changed link and it will be reviewed bi reviewer. --Smooth_O (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

How smart you are. Not smart enough to insert the new link, but smart enough to throw a template on my talk page. College education seems to be needed for that.

		The Commons Ambassador Barnstar
		message Sargoth (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Néstor Leonel Scotta - Revista El Cali.JPG

Hi! The image don't need a OTRS, because it is a derivated work from a CC content. The text of the image was taked from es.wiki and adapted in a new content, with the image. So the new content still have a CC licence. --Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 20:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

What is source of a photo in article? --Smooth_O (talk) 09:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

About Book Covers

Hi, the book covers you nominated to delete were shared here with CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license. I was unaware of the license before so I uploaded those picture. I am searching a better option to have those pictures again in wiki commons. For now you can delete those. If you have any idea please feel free to share. thanks -Krish Dulal (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Further more, copyright law of Nepal Section 18, 19 allows reproduction for teaching & learning and library archive. And all copyrighted materials come under public domain in 50 years after death of writer. Can anybody help me out to make a copyright template to use here?--Krish Dulal (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

So, you can add more details in file description (year of issue...) and you can change to this Template:PD-Nepal. --Smooth_O (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

About your permission request for ICFF poster for a guest performance in Macedonia.jpg

The source, www.cyclingfilm.de, just changed it's structure. Permission and file can be found here: http://www.cyclingfilms.de/presseseite/presslounge/ I'm sorry I do not exactly know where to place this information User:Bicycle minister 19:09, 11 march 2016 (UTC)

I change permission on file page, and it will be reviewed. --Smooth_O (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Eggs and slippers

Hi there, I just saw you edit my "eggs and slippers" file. Would you be so kind enough to "crop" that pic? I do not know how to do those things, and the picture would be much better without the slippers... Thank you. --E4024 (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Smooth_O (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

How quick! Thank you. Could we possibly delete the old one? --E4024 (talk) 09:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Comment It's quite easy to crop files with Commons:CropTool, just add this gadget in your preferences, and follow the instructions. --Smooth_O (talk) 09:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sebastià Salellas Memorial Poster.jpg

Thanks for your message. I have now sent an email to OTRS with the declaration of consent of the author of the picture, as described at the page Commons:Email templates. I have his permission since 2012, before I uploaded the picture to Commons. So, for your information I can tell you that the picture is free, CC-BY-SA, and with permission of the author.

--Ferran Cornellà (talk) 17:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Picture of Stormer (band) promotional poster

Thank you for your help. I am relatively new to editing on wikipedia. I added the source for the file that was found on a public website. If there is anything else I can do, please let me know. Thank you. Rockenthusiast1979 (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Translation notification: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion

Hello Smooth O,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to bosanski, srpski i hrvatski on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is medium.

Please help us to translate the speedy deletion policy in many language so that non-english speaker can read it as well.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Album Cover

Hi Smooth o, i just saw your message.Thx. I send to the mail addres a link where i took the picture with CC Lic. Here the page http://marcodimeco.altervista.org/discografia/. I hope it will be enough. --Airolo (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

OK, i just change source of image, and it will be reviewed by reviewer. --Smooth_O (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Brčko-bijela-džamija.jpg

File:Brčko-bijela-džamija.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Surtsicna (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Cover album

Hi Smooth o, i saw your message.Thx. I wrote the source link. I hope it will be fine.--Airolo (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Release information for Photos

Our chairman/ceo sent an email with release information for the two photos uploaded. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valhollaent (talk • contribs) 21:25, 24 April 2016‎ (UTC)

File:SaMED 2016 (24789582981).jpg

File:SaMED 2016 (24789582981).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 08:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Railway station Sarajevo (1).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Necromouse.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&page=File%3ANecromouse.jpg

Why was "Necromouse.jpg" deleted? Why wasn't a new discussion held at Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Necromouse.jpg? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Vrbanja bridge span view.jpg

File:Vrbanja bridge span view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Occupy movement protest in Sarajevo (15 October 2011)

Onih 20 slika sa protesta iz Sarajeva od 15. oktobra 2011 treba staviti u posebnu kategoriju. Predlažem ime kategorije: "Occupy movement protest in Sarajevo (15 October 2011)" na osnovu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Occupy_movement_protest_locations Tu kategoriju staviti kao podkategoriju u "Demonstrations and protests in Sarajevo" i "2011 in Sarajevo" My-wiki-photos (talk) 04:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Pa napravi tako, ti si stavio samo "Sarajevo protest 2011" što može biti bilo koji protest te godine. Stavio bih ja tako ali nisam znao o čemu se radi. --Smooth_O (talk) 09:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Malo sam istraživao da pronađem konkretnije ime za tu kategoriju, pa ću napraviti tako. My-wiki-photos (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Translation notification: Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n

Hello Smooth O,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to bosanski, srpski i hrvatski on Wikimedia Commons. The page Template:Abbedabb/ESC/i18n is available for translation. You can translate it here:

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 20:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Rafting Neretva (5984391544).jpg

Ne mogu 100% biti siguran, ali mislim da ovo nije Neretva.--Ma▀▄Ga 18:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

U pravu su, Vrbas je (vidi flickr link), a što sam tad napisao Neretva, ne znam. --Smooth_O (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Smooth O,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Translation notification: Commons:Picture of the Year/2015

Hello Smooth O,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to bosanski, srpski i hrvatski on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Picture of the Year/2015 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 05:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Query regarding deletion of categories

Hello Smooth O, It came to my notice that you've deleted the categories "Owls", "Birds of Prey" and "Strigiformes" from the image File:Common Owl.jpg and have added "Unidentified Birds" category. I am at a loss to understand the possible rationale behind your decision. Can you please let me know the reason(s)? Your feedback is welcome. -- Anand2202 (talk) 07:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Here's the image for your reference

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anand2202 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 01 July 2016 (UTC)

Don't worry it will be properly categorized later. It needs to be categorized by species, if you know what species it is you can categorize it now. Also, as info for you, you added duplicate categories, because Category:Owls is redirected to Category:Strigiformes. --Smooth_O (talk) 08:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of two photos I uploaded

Hello Smooth O,
I am a member of Israel Against Live Shipments. In Hebrew: ישראל נגד משלוחים חיים.
I uploaded two photos that I took myself in Eilat port in Isarel, and in Zofar cattle quarantine. The photos have our organization's logo. I uploaded them for an article in Hebrew that is now being written about Live export.
Please undelete the photos.
The photos are:
Live export from Australia to Israel - cow blinded from ammonia fumes.jpg
Live export cows with feaces on the way to quarantine.jpg

Thank you -Assialls (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Source of Image: Ostaci rimske naseobine u Sipragama.jpg

Dear Smooth O, The image "Ostaci rimske naseobine u Sipragama" is copied from the original scientific paper from 1892. published in Bulletin of the National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ref: Radimsky V. (1892): Ostanci rimskih naseobina u Šipragi i Podbrgju, za tim starobosanski stećci u Šipragi i uz Vrbanju u Bosni. Glasnik Zemaljskog muzeja u Sarajevu, Godina IV, Knjiga I: 75–80. 217.75.198.138 11:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Source of Image: Earlobe.jpg

Dear Smooth O, The image "Earlobe" is adapted image after: Mader S. S. (2000): Human Biology. McGraw–Hill, New York, ISBN 0-07-290584-0. 217.75.198.138 11:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Do you have permission to use this file? Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. See more here: Commons:Licensing. --Smooth_O (talk) 12:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Translation notification: Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads

Hello Smooth O,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to bosanski, srpski i hrvatski on Wikimedia Commons. The page Template:Abusefilter-warning-baduploads is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is medium.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 15:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:RioDulceIzabalOld.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RioDulceIzabalOld.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:RioDulceIzabalOld.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Lucilla

Hi Smooth O, as you can see in this file there is a proper license for that cover. It is the official blog of him, as you can see in the official website here. --Airolo (talk) 11:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

(Velika) Grebenica(e)?

Čini mi se da su ove dvije kategorije [3] [4] jedno te isto (iako nisam 100% siguran). Ne videći tvoju kategoriju, ja sam napravio ovu drugu, na osnovu članka na sr.wikipediji. Međutim, gledajući ovo izgleda da smo (što se tiče imena) promašili oba.--Ma▀▄Ga 19:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Onda je najbolje koristiti naziv Komisije za zaštitu spomenika kao relevantan. --Smooth_O (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Smooth O, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 10:54, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Kategorija Hutovo Blato

Ispravno bi bilo Hutovo blato.--Ma▀▄Ga 16:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Tyson Paul 2.jpg

Dear User:Smooth O, why a image I upload Since 2015 is showing File tagging Tyson Paul 2.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bablu Baghel (talk • contribs) 05:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Because at that time it didn't have OTRS permission. Now it's fine. --Smooth O (talk) 13:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:People_with_pigs

People with pigs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Achim (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Premissions for Adamir Jerkovic

Hello SmoothO, I see that you have marked images of Adamir Jerkovic for deletion but all the images have been released. Owner of the images has sent the decleration of release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with over 20+ images and i wrote the ticket number i file summary. Could you please help me by telling what else i need to do? Regards Momanovic (talk) 09:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Neko od OTRS volontera treba da postavi template na svaku sliku, jer ovako se ne vidi da je OTRS ticket validan. Ne brini pisao sam im ja na Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard, pa će to neko uraditi ako je sve ok. --Smooth O (talk) 11:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Greece–Bosnia_and_Herzegovina_Friendship_Building

Greece–Bosnia and Herzegovina Friendship Building has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Dans (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Old paintings and sources

Hi, it makes little sense to mark old paintings like File:The Glorification of the Virgin.jpg as no source. This puts them at short term risk of deletion when it would be fine to keep them indefinitely in a maintenance category. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 08:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. --Smooth O (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Alfa Romeo Iguana.jpg

you can ask the permission yourself instead deleting it, I have asked permssion with email, and they gave it, its not missing permission, if you say so , you say Im lier. So use your energy saving it instead deleting it, thanks --Typ932 (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Re: Problems with Luca Argentero

Good evening, I saw your notification and I'm here to solve the problem. Benedetta De Rossi is a friend of mine, she took the photo with Luca Argentero and posted it on her Facebook. I asked her if I could put it on Commons, and she answered me Yes, but didn't want to put the link to her prophile because it seemed to me like a violation to her privacy (or maybe I'm just exagerating). However, the link is this, and you can see, in the comments, my prophile too (Giacomo Antonio Lombardi). What do you suggest me to do now? Thank you for the attention. --GAL13 (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

You can send that link throurgh Commons:OTRS. --Smooth O (talk) 08:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Told her, she is going to send the mail in a few days. --GAL13 (talk) 22:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

About the other files:

File:Luca Barbareschi daticamera.jpg: every file produced by the Italian Chamber of Deputies should have a free license, and more than 1800 photos are here on Commons (you can look [:[Category:Images from Italian Chamber of Deputies|here]]);
File:Τσίπρας + Μέρκελ.jpg: in this case it says that a OTRS is needed, but I don't know who has to send it;
File:Claudio Zuliani.jpg: like for Luca Argentero, I will ask to this friend of mine to send the OTRS mail. --GAL13 (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Khan Academy logo old version white.png

Hi: The notice you posted is incorrect, since ALL Khan Academy materials are published by a free license, therefore, an OTRS permit is not necessary. Miguu (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Can you provide proof for that, or is this information available somewhere on their website? --Smooth O (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Biorock reef construction, photo 2.jpg + File:Biorock reef construction, photo 1.jpg + File:Hilbertz Wolf Toward Cybertecture 1970.pdf

Hi, you just sent me three (!) ridiculous notices one week before Christmas – are you even halfways serious? I am the author and of course I gave my permission! You might have the time for such make-work procedures one week before Christmas, but I have children and a family and I certainly do not have the time to waste at the moment. I will eventually find some time to deal with this, but certainly not before Christmas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilbertz (talk • contribs) 23:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Photo of Igman ski-jumping site

Hello Smooth O! I would like to use your photo of the Igman olympic ski-jumping site in the upcoming book about 1980s basketball. Would you be so kind and let me know if I could use it here or sending an e-mail to marjan.crnogaj@gmail.com. I would cite your name as a source. All the Best! (Sve Najbolje!) Marjan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcrnogaj1 (talk • contribs) 11:50, 23 December 2017‎ (UTC)

File:Hercegovački korpus

Hi Smooth O! I am not sure why you left a warning with regard to this file. It comes from a public facebook page. Br — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzombijaner (talk • contribs) 13:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

File:FIFA Mobile cover.jpg

Now I have provided more information about the image. Kindly please check it. Thank you -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bayernfan2003 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunate intervention?

Hi! Please check my answer in Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Yuanga. Thanks! --Yuanga (talk) 22:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Hristo Ivanov.jpg

[5]: What is the appropriate way to show a prove of permission in that case? Their entire site is cc-by: https://dabulgaria.bg/. Thank you. --Спас Колев (talk) 09:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

It's corrected now. Just needs to be reviewed by reviewer. --Smooth O (talk) 09:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Re Torre elefante

Hi you can delete the picture, the license is not free...sorry a mistake--Xoil (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

File:XowGo5D - Imgur.gif

Español: Buen día. Yo recuerdo que tenia una licencia CC, pero ahora veo que tiene otra. Por favor, si me apoya con el borrado.

English: Hi. I remember that he had a license CC , but now I see he has another one. Please, if you support me with the deletion

--petrohs (gracias) 17:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Aragvi Moscow.jpg

Dear SmoothO,

Mos.ru images are likely free on Commons since there is a specific license template for them. You do good work finding unmarked images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Ok, got it. Thanks. --Smooth O (talk) 10:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Boris Jovanović Kastel

Ne razumijem zašto mi šaljete za Vladiku Mihaila kad ja nijesam postavljao tu jedinicu. Drugo, za Borisa Kastela, Boris je moj rođak i drug i on mije poslao svoju biografiju sa slikom. Ukoliko imate primjedbi što se ne obratite Borisu.--Freemanmne (talk) 14:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Freemanmne

File:Mālāsana yoga pose.jpg

I only just noticed your message. License was granted by email which I applied for from author. I will send copy of email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Any issues let me know.--Penbat (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

This file has just been deleted yet I submitted a PDF of Proof of License to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org two days ago.--Penbat (talk) 08:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

You need to ask here Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard --Smooth O (talk) 08:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

My files

What did you do? Why did you do? I do not understand. Im very angry, its very hard job. So, what do I do? Hi! -Füleki (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

You can't upload copyrighted photos from other websites without permission. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. Please see more here: Commons:Licensing. --Smooth O (talk) 08:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Housemaid English Poster.jpg‬—Question

Hi, Smooth O. Thanks the the notice. I'm new to this, so your advice is appreciated. The file in question presumably migrated from Wikipedia to Commons because I failed to properly add Use Rational and licensing. So I should re-upload to Wikipedia and add those sections, right? Thanks for your help... --Kenfeisel (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Mesto Fiľakovo 1.jpg

Sorry, but on his website, there is no e-mail address. I cant send the authorization e-mail, and he doesnt speak English and Hungarian. What should I do now? Hi! -Füleki (talk) 13:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

I have a question, which is the good license on the flickr for the wikimedia commons? Hi! --Füleki (talk) 20:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Regarding images on Flickr, please see Commons:Flickr files, where you can find all acceptable licenses. --Smooth O (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Bandeau portail felin.jpg

Hello! I added source information in File:Bandeau portail felin.jpg. Is it ok? Regards, --Abujoy (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes it is. --Smooth O (talk) 20:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

File:UCU Library.jpg and File:Perfectial.jpg

Hi! As I saw yesterday, the uploaded by me images (such as File:UCU Library.jpg, File:UCU Library.jpg) was deleted. I have two questions:

1) File:UCU Library.jpg - the friend of mine who personally took this photo sent an email with written permission on "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org". It was done on the Ukrainian language in September 2017. Could you please restore the image or should I request undeletion?

2) File:Perfectial.jpg - The owner of the company Andriy Skoropad (by my request) personally sent the written permission on "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" today. Here is a ticket number -[Ticket#2018011110006965] (Confirmation of receipt). Could you please restore the image or should I request undeletion?

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chekannataliia (talk • contribs) 13:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Please place your question to the admins or to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --Smooth O (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for quick reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chekannataliia (talk • contribs) 14:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File CamachoAH.jpg

Hi, I've updated the file info. I took the photo several years ago and I uploaded to a currently inactive webpage. I don't know how I can demonstrate that the phot is mine. Maybe showing you the camera? --Yuanga (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Whitefield Green Man by Paul Sivell.jpg (missing permission)

Hello Smooth O,

I have forwarded the email chain I had with Paul Sivell, where he gave written permission to use the img file in question. The ticket number is below. Please let me know if you require anything further. Thank you.

[Ticket#: 2018011510009802] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgu56 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Logo antaragni.tiff

Hi Smooth O, I did not upload https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_antaragni.tiff I have changed my password just in case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vineethkuruvath (talk • contribs) 06:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bridge300.jpg

Nearly 4 years after publication you issue this notice! I was going to say it will take me some time to track down the builder again, but now I think what the heck. He gave his permission and I did my best. If someone like you wants to exercise their authority and feels good about reducing the quality of an article, then I say, "Go for it. Do your worst". naturalhomes 19:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Excuse me the picture's copyright owner is Evan Oxland and his website is quoted as the original source (although since closed) as per the rules then. The picture you threaten to remove was correctly attributed. Leave it alone. naturalhomes 17:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Flags_of_cities_of_Uruguay

Flags of cities of Uruguay has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Xeror (talk) 06:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - Ottoman Empire in 1856.png

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - Ottoman Empire in 1856.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - san stefano.png

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - san stefano.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - treaty of berlin.png

File:The ottoman empire and its successors (1923) - treaty of berlin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 13:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Ученые выяснили, насколько опасна игра Pokemon Go.jpg

Там лицензия

Все материалы сайта Hi-Tech.Mail.Ru (как текстовые данные, так и медиафайлы), авторские права на которые принадлежат Интернет-холдингу Mail.Ru, доступны на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported.

All materials of the site Hi-Tech.Mail.Ru (both text data and media files), copyrights to which belong to the Internet-holding Mail.Ru, are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. This means that these materials can be used (copied, distributed and transferred to others) for any, including commercial purposes, without restrictions on the possibility of processing and on who reprints and on what media; with the only condition: mandatory hyperlink Hi-Tech.Mail.Ru or hi-tech.mail.ru.

why did delete photos ? Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 ? you can take ? --Zelio007 (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Licence for Matica crnogorska

Since I received a mail with information from Matica crnogorska about their institution along with the logo to use it in Wikipedia, will it be sufficient to forward you that mail?--Freemanmne (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Freemanmne

Send that e-mail with permission through Commons:OTRS. --Smooth O (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Licence for logo PO

The image is from the site www.po.org.ar which is under cc-by license. It's the official logo of that organisation ¿What do you need to solve this problem? Mr. Moonlight (talk) 15:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

It will be reviewed. --Smooth O (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Bahnhof Röhrnbach

I asked the Photograhper in November 2013 in a E-Mail, if I could upload this picture of the station of Röhrnbach and another from the station of Freyung. He answered me that he has no problem with an upload, but I should write "fotografiert von C. Jobst", Quelle "railwalker.de" and Urheber "C. Jobst". I don't find this E-Mail anymore. -- Feuermond16 (talk) 09:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Blick über Sarajevo (5786299851).jpg

File:Blick über Sarajevo (5786299851).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 11:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Gedenkstätte Potočari (5786852262).jpg

File:Gedenkstätte Potočari (5786852262).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Orthodoxer Friedhof in Bratunac bei Srebrenica (5786850196).jpg

File:Orthodoxer Friedhof in Bratunac bei Srebrenica (5786850196).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Im Zentrum von Srebrenica (5786853694).jpg

File:Im Zentrum von Srebrenica (5786853694).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 12:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Tagging transfered files with no permission since

Hi Smooth O, you tagged File:ImmenstadtStJosef.jpg with no permission since, apparently as a web site was given as a source. Please be careful in case of transfered files such as this the original uploader does not get notified by the script. For this reason, I've converted this into a regular deletion request and notified the original uploader. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 07:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. --Smooth O (talk) 18:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Copyright rules File:Bosnian UH-1 Iroquois.jpg, File:Armored personnel carrier M113 (Bosnia and Herzegovina armed forces).jpg

I have read your message and visited the Copyright rules page, so as the result I will delete the mentioned files from the site. --Knockknock2 (talk) 14:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Iskra vodka.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

File:P1020390 (23123274).jpg

File:P1020390 (23123274).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:P1020384 (23123168).jpg

File:P1020384 (23123168).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:P1020382 (23123108).jpg

File:P1020382 (23123108).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:P1020388 (23123210).jpg

File:P1020388 (23123210).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

j.budissin^+/- 17:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 23:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, i am using that already. Where did i miss to notify uploader? --Smooth O (talk) 07:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

OK, now i see. I used only "speedy" template here File:Colonoscopia.jpg. --Smooth O (talk) 07:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bosnia coin.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bosnia coin.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bosnia coin.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 07:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Trnovo

To avoid some inane local designations I need this Trnovo categorized as geographical whole, whether, as I put it, as "Trnovo (Bosnia and Herzegovina)", or any other name of your choosing that will for sure indicate areal not as separate political entity but a geographical, hydrological, geological, scenic, natural whole (even hydroelectric energy production spans territories and political border of two absurdly separated municipalities).--Santasa99 (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ленинградский.jpg

File:Ленинградский.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Kralju, ovaj zadnji grb je slobodan i moze se koristiti. Zaxxor23 (talk) 15:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bosanska Dubica Old.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bosanska Dubica Old.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bosanska Dubica Old.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 08:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rudi supek.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rudi supek.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rudi supek.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Ізюмська Гора, Татусева книга

Dear, this is my property. I am the author of these books. Nobody is asking you to climb where they are not asked. Do not engage in occupation.--Вакуленко-К. Володимир (talk) 13:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Files ШСС-1 & PERC Respirator Guide

Good day, Thank You for your attention to the fulfillment of copyright.

File ШСС-1: The miners have done their wikipedia www.miningwiki.ru. There is a page illustrated with images of a miner’s self-rescuer: https://miningwiki.ru/wiki/Самоспасатель_ШСС–1

All illustrations of this article are licensed as CC-BY-SA 3.0.

Therefore, deleting a file is not justified.

File PERC Respirator Guide: Citation from the second page:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License by The Regents of the University of California, Davis campus, 2017. For information contact PERCsupport@ucdavis.edu

So, it is not clear why the file is set for deletion. In any case, I sent a request to the creators of this tutorial.

AlexChirkin (talk) 14:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

@AlexChirkin: Please note that NonCommercial CC license is not acceptable here. See: Commons:Creative Commons copyright tags, and for first image, original source is here, where you can see it's copyrighted by RIANOVOSTI. --Smooth O (talk) 14:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Sakab logo

Hi. You Deleted a logo currently published in the sakab.ir and en.sakab.ir. I dont know how can I find a permission. Regards Truth hurtss (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File deletion. File: Camino Camino por la Mixteca, libro escrito por Raúl Ruiz Bautista, su pluma fuente y sus lentes.jpg

Smooth O: I copy and paste the message I post to you about the file deletion warning you post to me. The file was: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Camino_por_la_Mixteca,_libro_escrito_por_Ra%C3%BAl_Ruiz_Bautista,_su_pluma_fuente_y_sus_lentes.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 . “Smooth O (talk) 10:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC) Smooth O: The image File:Camino por la Mixteca, libro escrito por Raúl Ruiz Bautista, su pluma fuente y sus lentes.jpg is my own work, as I wrote when I uploaded it in Commons. The image shows a book cover page, a pen and glasses, the belongings of a person who is mentioned in the article. The book that appears as part of the image is a work of a person that is mentioned in the article. The image is a composition. I think this composition no violates copyrights because it does not show the work contains, isn´t to get profits, and clearly contains the author references, it isn’t plagiarism. And as I already said, it’s a composition of belongings picture. Smooth O, no matter what I said, could you guide me to solve this trouble to keep the image published? I will appreciate your help very much if you tell me what I can do. Best regards from Mexico. --Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón (talk) 23:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón” . Smooth O: The file is now deleted, but I answered on time and you didn’t answer my post. I will appreciate if you let me know your considerations about the points I wrote to you. . Greetings from Mexico. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón (talk • contribs) 16:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

@Eduardo Ruiz Mondragón: Regarding book cover please read COM:BOOK. If you have permission for this book cover send it via Commons:OTRS and ask for undelition. --Smooth O (talk) 08:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

FoP categories

Hello Smooth O, firstly thank you for your maintenance work. I closed several deletion requests made by you, such as Commons:Deletion requests/Monument "Topola užasa" in Banja Luka, and I noticed that you added a category to the DR. That's very good, but it will be better if you could put the categories between the tag noinclude, example : <noinclude>[[Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina FOP cases/deleted]]</noinclude>. The explanations can be found in Commons:Deletion policy#Regular deletion, it is to avoid to categorize other pages, but it's nothing very serious. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for the info and this tip. --Smooth O (talk) 15:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Pokemon Go VR Character in Soweto.jpg

Hi Smooth O Thanks for pointing out that this might be a copyright violation. I didn't realise that the virtual overlay of the image onto what my phone's camera was seeing would be classified as a game screen. Thanks for advising me. Regards, Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 19:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Pitanje

Koji je razlog ovomu?--Ma▀▄Ga 18:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

@MaGa: Koordinate sa mapom se sada nalaze u Template:Wikidata Infobox koji je već postavljen u kategoriju Studenci necropolis. --Smooth O (talk) 08:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Aaaaa, ćorav pored zdravih očiju, uopće mi to nije palo na pamet. Hvala na odgovoru.--Ma▀▄Ga 18:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Prijedlozi za brisanje slika

Slike "Aleksandar Schulteis", "L. Bezeredy" i "Noć muzeja 2019, Čakovec - plakat" sam snimio u muzeju, gdje je dozvoljeno snimanje eksponata, te gdje i novinari-fotoreporteri i druge osobe snimaju. Osobe na slikama su odavno mrtve, a ne zna se tko je autor originalnih fotografija, tako da nema autorskih prava, licence ili slično. Takve slične fotografije sam već i prije radio, pa neka i ove ostanu u Commonsu. Pozdrav, --Silverije (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Nema odgovora? To je korektan odnos između suradnika? --Silverije (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Sabils_in_Egypt

Sabils in Egypt has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 03:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

COM:A

Hey Smooth O,

Have you considered being an admin here? I’d would like to nominate you for the role. -- 1989 (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

@1989: No, but i appreciate your proposal, thank you. --Smooth O (talk) 16:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Permission Poster

Hi Smooth O, I am confused what to do. I made this poster myself and have sent this mail: I hereby affirm that I, Robert P. Peters, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of Rob Møhlmann Poster-20e-ORT-2018-A3.jpg as shown here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onafhankelijke_Realisten_Tentoonstelling and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Robert Paul Peters Copyright holder April 8, 2019

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iMac Rob Peters | Buorren 4b | 8845SG Waaksens | Tel 0517 469069

to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Am I ok now? Thanks, Robert P. Peters (talk) 07:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

@Robert P. Peters: I asked this at OTRS noticeboard and will have response there. --Smooth O (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Can you please help me

It seems whatever picture I upload, i get notification that i need permission, but picture are taken with my camera. They are my own work. What permission should I use. I took photo of information table that is available to public. Whose permission I need to ask? I scanned a photo of my relative from family album, whose permission should I ask for? Mhare (talk) 10:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@Mhare: You need to have permission from original authors of a photo. You can't take photo of a photo and declare as own work. See here: Commons:Licensing, what files you can upload to Commons. --Smooth O (talk) 11:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@Smooth O: , I can understand that I need permission when I take picture of somebody's work. Does that include general information table that is present on site and available to public. I just croped information table. How do I licence that, should it be on Wikipedia at all? I am not interested in claiming it as my work, I just want it to be correctly licenced, but I am failing to grasp what licence to use. Also, if I scan image from a relative, and author is dead, does that belong to Wikipedia? I am just trying to understand which licence should I use. Mhare (talk) 11:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Smooth O/Archive 2,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)