User talk:Michaeldsuarez
Feel free to leave any messages below:
.jpg){kind=link}
Among the missing[edit]
[1]. This is hilarious. You properly removed a provocative comment implying a conspiracy, but left a provocative comment asserting that the user was "very courteous and civil in discussions." The user was capable of civility on occasion, but also was often uncivil to the point of vicious, where his reactivities were poked, such as his belief that any nudity was "sexual," and his holding on to disputes long after they were moot. He was blocked many times, on many wikis, for incivility and related disruption. What he really was, was a cute puppy. He would apologize with big eyes, sometimes soliciting an admin on IRC, and it was irresistible, he'd be unblocked. Then he'd go back to the same behavior. I'm certainly not going to bring this up there. However, that kind of comment could eventually bring that page down. I'd almost suspect it as an attempt to do that, by creating controversy. Naw, that user wouldn't do that, would he? Probably not.
I just looked at the user's talk page, before and after he blanked most of it. This is a long-term experienced user, a former Wikiversity sysop, and for a time, he bragged once, with some reason, he ran the place. He was a Wikipedia refugee, and I had supported him on Wikipedia, when he had stood up for a topic-banned teenage girl, who had been attacked. He had been blocked for incivility in that. He did not know how to stand up for someone without being uncivil! I did handle that case, though I was blocked in the middle of it because of a misunderstanding and my work was completed by another user whom I'd defended. He did a very good job, the topic ban was lifted, and the truly disruptive user behind it all disappeared.
So when I came to Wikiversity, and asked about rollback, he suggested I become a probationary custodian, so I did, with him as my mentor. Then, one day, he was grossly uncivil, and gratuitously so, based apparently on other-wiki conflict. So I warned him. He blew it off, so I blocked him for two hours. He went completely ballistic, unblocked himself, revision-deleted everything relevant, thus hiding his own self-unblock, and went to meta for an emergency desysop, lying to them about Wikiversity policy. I was desysopped because they do not investigate. That's okay, because it could easily have been fixed, and it was eventually fixed (with a new mentor!). (And a 'crat reviewed that block and concluded it was within reasonable discretion.) Meanwhile, the user's actions ultimately led to his desysop and he never forgot it, even though I did not file the process (I had drafted it in my user space as a warning, but a 'crat took it and used it), and he retaliated whenever possible. He was indef blocked at one point, and unblocked without discussion, by a friend. He always had friends. If he came back to Wikiversity today and did what he did in the past, and didn't stop when warned, his account there would be toast. Quickly. But he hasn't edited there in over a year, except for 3 edits on one day in September, all related to me, the first two were supporting a sysop at the time who was desysopped over his behavior, the last supporting the only oppose comment in a permanent custodianship discussion, from that same sysop, with a question that demonstrates why Wikiversity was greatly blessed when our "civil" user here was desysopped. He believes that admins should be doing a lot of deleting, when, on Wikiversity, we organize content, mostly we don't delete it if it is created in good faith, and sysops use a deletion template like everyone else, with a second opinion needed for deletion. He also used to block users for no good reason, just his own opinion, when he had the tools.
So, "civil and courteous," wow! Look at his talk page here! Yes, he would do a spectacular about-face, sometimes, and apologize. Problem is, he still believed he was right, and that comes out, eventually. --Abd (talk) 22:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, that listing stands, of course, as it should. There is another listing for a missed user, who was highly privileged and who had seriously burned out and was doing much damage. I was tempted to remove it, because it has only one listing. But there is no point. So what if someone misses him? Notice: in spite of all that argument on the talk page, the page process is working. Users are actively adding listings, and there are few removals. You are not going to revert war over the removal of two listings. Now, what would get "interesting" is if someone confirms a listing and then someone still removes it. If it is the original remover, that is revert warring. Naughty, naughty! The original lister, if he or she reverts that, is not restoring the same content as was originally created. We either have 2:1 for listing, or 2:2. If it's 2:1, it's obvious what should stand, until more get involved.
- If it is 2:2, this is the sequence:
- A adds listing
- B removes.
- C restores listing plus signs
- D removes.
- A reverts, restoring B's edit.
- B reverts, restoring D's edit.
- No revert warring so far. So at 2:2, the edit says out, if the two opposed really insist.
- This could continue for a long time, and after a few iterations, it would be obvious that roughly half of the interested community wants the listing, and that the other half is attempting to suppress this. What happens at the next step:
- E adds and signs. 3 users are in on it.
- At this point, it meets the standard that Slaunger wanted, only with less fuss, no extra page to maintain and then transfer listings to, and incivility in this process should be addressed. It is not necessary to attack a "missed user." The person could be a horrible troll. So what? If someone somehow actually is is a horrible troll, do we need to say it? Is it in order?
- F removes. 3:3.
- It could get quite interesting. A and C may restore without revert warring. What is being tested: the ability of the community to discriminate between what is important and what is not. Generally, if people feel a certain way, if they are suppressed in expressing it, they are likely to resent the suppression. I have been pushing for civility rules. They would be more strongly enforced in central discussion than on user talk pages between consenting users. People need to be able to let off steam.
- What would happen, if this does not devolve into revert warring, is that one side or the other would give up. However, there is no time limit. And no rules against canvassing.
- Personally, I'd be very reluctant to dive into a series of edits like this unless I actually missed the user in some way. I wouldn't do this to please my friend. Rather, I'd encourage the friend to communicate, about the missed user, with others who might miss the user also. A "victory" here is not worth fighting over. One can "miss" a user on their talk page, usually. More powerful. But there is something about this public missing that could be healing. It will be more so if the community will learn to respect users' feelings, and not attack "wrong feelings," which any sane parent has learned not to do with their kids.... Unfortunately, many of us had parents who were not fully sane.
- So I missed Russavia and INeverCry. That was genuine. Notice the supports pouring in for INeverCry. Does that mean that INeverCry is missed more than Russavia? No, it doesn't mean that. It could mean that more were motivated to sign the one, perhaps, and/or fewer were afraid to sign the other. --Abd (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]
Thank you !!! Seendgay (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
I need major help[edit]
My page is continuously under attack: https://ps.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%88%D9%BC%DA%A9_%D9%88%D9%87%D9%84
- Arabic words are used instead of Pashto making it unintelligible
- Pictures are removed
- Page is nominated for deletion and I am nominated for being blocked.
How can I defend such articles. Please help Seendgay (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Michael, I strongly doubt that User:Alterego, who claimed "I created this file" is really the creator of the 2 pope-photos in this collage. On meta he probably used it under a fair-use-premise. However, on Commons that's not acceptable. I did a check for the left photo of pope Benedict: it is abundant all over the web, however, I couldn't find it on Commons or Wikipedia. IMO, we need to either remove the image from Commons or edit the 2 pope-portraits from it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
|
File:Christophore.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 03:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Skin cosmochips.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Storkk (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Russavia[edit]
Hi, Don't do that. Russavia is banned, as you know very well. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
THANK YOU![edit]
by the Holy Islamic state of the Germanic Nation--206.125.61.133 03:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- You're welcome. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
File:1 Cecco di Pietro St John the Baptist, Petit Palais, Avignon.jpg (my error)[edit]
Thanks for fixing that... in the process of running essentially the same VFC job over and over and over on that category, I apparently brainfarted and typed the wrong word that time. Searches don't indicate any others broken the same way, but if you notice any please fix them. Revent (talk) 01:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
This image was uploaded to Commons for one specific narrow purpose only. If you don't think it fulfills that purpose, then nominate it for deletion, but stop messing with the file description. AnonMoos (talk) 09:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- I was very aware that those comments were not part of the original upload description (just as the translations were not part of the original upload description), but that does very little to make your edits acceptable. AnonMoos (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 |
File:VoAsreen5.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Palosirkka (talk) 15:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
|
File:Wp-tillwe-pamir.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Palosirkka (talk) 15:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
|
File:Ugly sidebar mediawiki1.3 i.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Palosirkka (talk) 15:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Wp-tillwe-pamir.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alan (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:VoAsreen5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alan (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ugly sidebar mediawiki1.3 i.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alan (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
|
|
File:BapTiny.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 19:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Bèrto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 19:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:C 0209 Alan EN.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:MV 2010 Rechenschaft SM.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 11:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
|
|
File:MV 2010 Rechenschaft.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 11:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
|
File:Ticket péage.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
ThatBPengineer (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Carribbean spiny lobster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
CaribDigita (talk) 08:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
North Macedonia?[edit]
Excuse me, What's this feat (if you're considering ignoring this warning, please keep in mind that it comes from an admin)? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- I don't question the name change. I question the mess generated by you. Massive changes must be agreed and -- most of all -- planned. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of bureaucracy. Is a technical matter: moving of large amount of data requires even a small amount of planning, let apart warning some sysops for emergences. It's the basis of any project, not only IT. Volunteering doesn't mean doing things without any guideline. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
P.S. For example, you've moved {{North Macedonia}}: did you know that such template lays on a module that brings names from Wikidata? Did you know that before moving it you should have warned someone for the label on Wikidata to be updated?- Yes but please write down what you're moving, so if there's any problem we can fix it. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of bureaucracy. Is a technical matter: moving of large amount of data requires even a small amount of planning, let apart warning some sysops for emergences. It's the basis of any project, not only IT. Volunteering doesn't mean doing things without any guideline. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Endnotes2.png[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Endnotes2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Endnotes2.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Chiyako92 (talk) 09:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, GMGtalk 21:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Fckeditor1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Gumax-3-2-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Hugegraph.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:May 07 2012 Dokumen Aktivitas PL 2012 Wawancara televisi2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
pandakekok9 13:22, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:James 142px sleeves.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Langcom member statistics.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Langcom statistics.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:LanguagesOfBritainAndIrelandWikipediaPortal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Openmeetings microsoft clippy popup.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
You moved this from Meta some time ago. It is still in use there. Davidwr (talk) 23:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:MikhoMosulishvili.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Draceane talkcontrib. 12:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Integral sign.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WIKImaniac 15:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Orange-background.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Sqrt-on-macosx.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WIKImaniac 18:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 |
File:Wanjau.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion. Wikimedia Commons doesn't permit uploading personal files unless you are using them for personal use or an educational purpose.
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Malcolma.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ratatosk-mockup-2006-10-09.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Rc-bug.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:RegexMania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Range-ballot-example.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ratatosk-mockup-2006-09-17.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Rc-bug2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 |
File:Teco seperated aircon outside unit MA-750B.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: typo)
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Solomon203.
And also:
- File:Teco seperated aircon outside unit MA-750B.jpg ( Nominator : Solomon203 | Reason : typo )
- File:Teco seperated aircon outside unit MA-750B.jpg ( Nominator : Solomon203 | Reason : typo )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
File:Sculpture on Millenium Park (1).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Broken redirect (迷子のリダイレクト))
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : MathXplore.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 09:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
|
Rendered names of countries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |