User talk:Feuermond16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Feuermond16!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Feuermond16,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luftbilder von Kassel[edit]

Moin, ich habe deine Luftbilder vom Auestadion und der Husarenkaserne gesehen und in der neuen Denkmalliste zur Südstadt verwendet. Hast du eventuell noch weitere Luftbilder? Interessieren würde ich mich für dieses Grundstück neben der Husarenkaserne (nämlich die ehemalige Jägerkaserne) sowie ein Bild der Gesamtanlage Heckerstraße/Südstadt. Beide sind vom Boden aus schwer in ihrer Gesamtheit zu fotografieren, weshalb Luftbilder ideal wären. Falls du Fotos haben solltest, bitte gerne direkt hochladen und hier einbinden. Danke und Grüße, XenonX3 (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leider standen mir nur die beiden bereits hochgeladenen Bilder zur Verfügung. Du kannst aber aus dem Bild Auestadion Vogelperspektive.jpg ein neues hochladen, wo die Husarenkaserne vergrößert ist. Hat Codc nach Wunsch meinerseits beim Auestadion auch gemacht. MfG -- Feuermond16 (talk) 16:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gute Idee, werde ich so machen. XenonX3 (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@XenonX3: Du könntest versuchen vom Weinberg aus die Gesamtanlage Heckerstraße/Südstadt zu fotografieren. Müsste eigentlich vom Höhenunterschied her passen - vom Wetter her sowieso gerade ;) MfG -- Feuermond16 (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viele neue Bilder[edit]

Du bist ja unermüdlich im Bilder (machen und) hochladen, vielen Dank dafür, insbesondere die Bilder von der Gobert. Ich selber komme zwar aus der Region, habe es aber 25 Jahre nach Wegfall der Grenze noch nicht auf die Silberklippe geschafft. Soweit ich mich dort auskenne, würde ich bei den Gobertbildern (ev. auch noch ein paar andere) einige Ergänzungen und Kategorien nachtragen. Das Du die Koordinaten mit angegeben hast, macht es die Zuordnung der Bilder erheblich leichter. Bei Rückfragen kannst Du Dich bei mir melden.--79.214er (talk) 11:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@79.214er: Die hochgeladenen Bilder sind alle für den Wikivoyage-Artikel Werra-Burgen-Steig Hessen, den ich demnächst erstellen werde und nur eine kleine Auswahl von den Bildern, die ich insgesamt unterwegs gemacht habe (besonders die neben den Wegstudien separat hochgeladenen). Wenn Du also ein bestimmtes Motiv entlang des Werra-Burgen-Steiges Hessen (Nentershausen - Ringgau - Eschwege - Bad Sooden-Allendorf - Witzenhausen - Hann. Münden) benötigen oder vermissen solltest - die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass es noch auf meinem Computer liegt, ist ziemlich groß. Dafür sind es aber auch nur iPhone-Bilder. Gerne kannst Du Kategorien, Beschreibungstext und Ähnliches ändern oder ergänzen. Grüße -- Feuermond16 (talk) 20:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Du bist vermutlich nur den hessischen Teil des Wanderweges abgewandert, deshalb wohl die Bildbezeichnung X5H. Interessant für mich wären ev. noch ein paar Bilder zwischen Bad Sooden-Allendorf und Witzenhausen (z.B am Roßkopf, Schnellerskopf und Habichtsstein) und nördlich von Witzh. am Sandwald, im Bereich der Gobert: Infotafeln, Grenzsteine, Weg zum Schloss Rothestein (soweit vorhanden). Kannst Dir aber Zeit lassen und es reichen sicher auch einige wenige Bilder, es steckt ja doch ein gewisser Zeit- und Rechercheaufwand dazu. Grüße--79.214er (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bei den vielen Bildern zum Werra-Burgen-Steig Hessen könnte man für die einzelnen Abschitte eigene Unterkategorien anlagen, wäre ev. übersichtlicher. Wobei Du Dich beim Gesamtweg besser auskennst und Abschitte festlegen könntest bzw. gibt es da eine offizielle Einteilung?--79.214er (talk) 09:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Es gibt offiziell insgesamt 11 Abschnitte/Etappen. Sicher könnte man noch Unterkategorien anlegen, mir persönlich reicht aber eine Hauptkategorie, wo man alles auf einen Blick sieht. Und ob es dadurch einfacher wird zur Ansicht der Bilder zwischen den Unterkategorien wechseln zu müssen, finde ich fraglich. Ist wahrscheinlich Geschmackssache. -- Feuermond16 (talk) 12:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading Habichtswaldsteig-Extratour-2.png! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

-- User: Perhelion 22:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bahnhof Röhrnbach.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bahnhof Röhrnbach.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wandertafel Firnskuppe.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Max60watt (talk) 19:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]