User talk:Robert Flogaus-Faust/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Identification of Image:Vaisgina001.JPG
Hi. Actually, I'm not a good specialist of Botany. One familar biologist identificated this plant as Ajuga reptans. But looking to the leaves it seems to be Ajuga genevensis. If you better know differences between these species it's up to you to decide what it is. It was growing on the sunny slope of river valley, covered by natural grass. Regards, Hugo.arg (talk) 08:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- I asked in a German internet forum whether my opinion is correct. Two people answered and told me that your image shows Ajuga genevensis. So I changed the name of your plant and checked the links to the image. I hope that I copied the Lithuanian name correctly. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 12:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Kerčkaty rozraz
Hallo, Robert. Danke für die Korrektur von hsb:Kerčkaty rozraz. Der Komentar hätte allerdings auch in Deutsch gepaßt, weil die Sorben ja eine Minderheit in Brandenburg und Sachsen sind. Allerdings haben sie zwei Schriftsprachen, nämlich Ober- und Niedersorbisch, mit denen ich mich seit einigen Jahren beschäftige. Gruß --Tlustulimu (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hallo Tlustulimu, ich habe mich bemüht, einige Folgefehler falsch bestimmter Pflanzenbilder in einer Reihe von Wikis zu korrigieren, deren Sprache ich z. T. überhaupt nicht kannte. Solange ich nur einen Pflanzennamen durch einen anderen ersetzt habe, den ich im gleichen Sprachbereich finden konnte, oder aber ein Bild gegen ein anderes ausgetauscht bzw. in Einzelfällen ein Zusatzbild entfernt, konnte ich mich am wissenschaftlichen Namen orientieren. Ich meine damit einigermaßen sicher zu sein, die Seiten verbessert zu haben statt sie zu beschädigen, auch ganz und gar ohne Sprachkenntnis. Ich wusste in diesem Fall gar nicht, dass ich da eine sorbische Seite bearbeitet hatte. Aber vielen Dank für die Information und freundliche Grüße -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 05:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Saxifraga aizoides identification
Thanks for correct identification of the plant. I changed the description and marked the file for renaming (should be done soon). I'm doing my best to identify flora and fauna I've photographed, but sometimes I'm wrong :) -Tupungato (talk) 22:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Maybe you know this one too?
Perhaps you know what species this is? You identified my misidentified Saxifraga aizoides and this other plant was growing in the same area.
- I can see some Silene acaulis with fruits in the upper left corner, and also several plants from the Rubiaceae family in the picture. But I suppose that your question is about the reddish plants in the center of the picture. That might be Thymus praecox ssp. arcticus (see http://www.floraislands.is/plantlist.htm), but I am not entirely sure about this, because the plant is not in bloom any more. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Robert, thank you for modifications 
. I'm not an expert in flowers and I don't see that this flower have 5 corollas... I will check this on my book and notify you when it's done 
. @+ Binnette (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Binnette, just look at some of the old drawings and some typical photographs on the Commons to understand the different number of corolla lobes and the shape of the individual flowers. A Scabiosa species has 5-lobed corollae with some rather wide lobes, best visible in the large flowers at the edge of the flower head (File:Scabiosa_columbaria_Sturm3.jpg, File:Widderchen.jpg). Knautia has got 4-lobed corollae with some rather long and thin lobes, see File:Knautia_arvensis_Sturm2.jpg and File:Dipsacacea-2006-07-02-800-2.jpg. Please note that there are some more misidentifications. File:Knautia_arvensis_rmll.jpg, currently side by side with your image in the French Wikipedia, is also a misidentified image, which does not show Knautia arvensis, but also very likely a Scabiosa species. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear Robert, thank a lot again ! You seem to be right, my picture is probably not a Knautia Arvensis. My book only show Knautia species and no Scabiosa species... But I found an interesting website :
If you can help me identify my flower picrure, it could be great . See you Binnette (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Binnette, unfortunately there might be several species of Scabiosa in the area, several of which I have not found yet. A photograph of the whole plant and/or the leaves might have been extremely helpful. So I am sorry, but I don't believe that I can identify the species of the Scabiosa species on your photograph. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Re: Melampyrum
Hi, thanks a lot for the change and a nice explanation of the difference beetwen the two species. I spent some amount of time to identify the species, but finally wasn't fully sure. Kind regards, Nova (talk) 19:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you.
Thank you for that. I'm pretty horrible at actually identifying things when I'm taking pictures of them, unfortunately. I do know that the file that you moved was a picture of a plant that was not intentionally cultivated. It (and a few things quite like it) grows quite frequently in Southern California. --Neskaya (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Danke vielmals
Sie haben die Bestimmung an diesem Foto ("Geranium molle") korrigiert. Dafür danke ich Ihnen sehr, denn Sie haben natürlich recht. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Sten Porse (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
3 fehlbestimmte Bilder korrigiert
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. --Llez (talk) 21:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Danke
für das Bestimmen der Großen Sternmiere! :-) Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hallo! Danke für die Korrektur - ich habe da aber noch eine Bitte: anstatt die falsche Zuordnung zu streichen, kannst Du sie auch gerne ganz löschen. Was da früher mal stand, sieht man über die Versionsgeschichte des Bildes, daß etwas geändert wurde, sehe ich bei meinen Bildern auf meiner Beobachtungsliste (und das mit der Beo machen sicher die meisten anderen genauso). Herzliche Grüße und noch ein schönes Wochenende! --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ich werde dem Ratschlag (soweit sinnvoll möglich) folgen. Vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Danke! :-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Robert,
wenn es nicht Lonicera caprifolium ist, was könnte es dann sein? Ich habe das Bild ziemlich unkritisch benannt, weil ich mir nicht bewußt war, daß es ähnlich aussehende Arten geben könnte. Es stammt von einer städtischen Fassadenbegrünung. Der Stiel ist offensichtlich vorhanden.
Gruß, Daniel Fuchs
- Hallo Daniel, es ist dann jedenfalls ganz sicher kein Lonicera caprifolium und auch keine andere einheimische Art. Mit den Gartensorten kenne ich mich leider nicht aus. Es dürfte also wohl am besten sein, das Foto zu Category:Unidentified Lonicera zu verschieben. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Robert, danke für die Ident. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Corydalis cava
Thank you. File:Corydalis solida a1.jpg = File:Corydalis cava a1.jpg. Selso (talk) 11:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Misidentified Image File:Lamium purpureum a1.jpg
Thank you.
OK. Selso (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Robert, das Bild ist aus Hamburg, seit 1988 hat sich die Art hier sehr verbreitet.
- Hallo Malte, ich habe die beiden Kategorien Category:Senecio und Category:Unidentified Senecio bei deinem Bild durch die passende Kategorie Category:Senecio inaequidens ersetzt. Du kannst ja gelegentlich eventuell noch die Beschreibung und den Urheber (da sollte doch wohl Dein Name oder dein Pseudonym stehen) entsprechend korrigieren. Auch das "uncertain" im Namen ist eigentlich überflüssig. An der Artbestimmung kann es m. E. keine Zweifel geben. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Danke, Robert, ja ich will das bald mal angehen. Malte
Flora Batava
Category:Uncategorized Flora Batava images is being built up, contributions would be welcome. Thank you very much ;o) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Some of the drawings have got completely acceptable botanical categories, whereas the names of some others are rather unusual nowadays. I'll see what I can do regarding the botanical categories, but this might take some time. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thx ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION
Hi!
My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).
I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting a photo in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use it in my book.
Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the picture will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.
The photo which I would use is:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lonicera_caprifolium_RF.jpg
Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…
My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com
Bye,
Edoardo
--
- Permission granted. See also my personal mail. Best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 22:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 22:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Geranium pratense
- Hallo Robert,
- Vielen Dank für deinen Kommentar. Es stimmt: es ist kein geranium pratense. Die Sache ist dass ich keine Ahnung von Botanik habe. Ich bringe in Commons Fotos von meinen Spaziergängen durch verschiedene botanische Gärten. Dieses Foto habe ich in dem Parc Floral de Vincennes genommen. Ich gebe die Information über die Blume soweit ich sie habe. In diesem Fall, der Name stand auf einem Schild. Na ja, das war wahrscheinlich das Schild für die Blume nebenan. Es tut mir Leid. Ich habe deine Fotos deiner Website gesehen: großartig!
- Mit freundlichen Grüssen.
- Dinkum (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Danke für die Rückmeldung. Und es freut mich, dass dir meine Fotos gefallen haben. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Identification in the Nordics
Hi and thanks alot for helping me out with correcting all these mistaken IDs. It helped a great deal and made me find my Lid&Lid and Mossberg/Stenberg floras, on Norway and Nordics, respectively. Especially Lid&Lid is a "bible" up here in the north, so if you ever need me to look up anything - just give me a hint on my dicussion-page. PS: Your assistance made us identify two species (1, 2) that had never before been fotographed to Commons! Kind regards / Bis weiter, Bjoertvedt (talk) 00:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trifolium repens (white clover).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Danke
für diesen Edit.
Ich selbst kann nur über diejenigen den Kopf schütteln, die ihre Bilder mit UploadWizard auf Commons abladen, ohne brauchbare Bildbeschreibung, ohne Kategorien und dann nur noch auf gutmütige Mitmenschen warten, die ihnen hinterher räumen, um diese dafür auch noch spöttisch zu belächeln. Für mich ein Grund, bei der Nachkategorisierung konsequent nicht mehr mitzuarbeiten.
Bei meinen eigenen Bildern ist es mir nach wie vor wichtig, diese möglichst sauber zu beschreiben und zu kategorisieren. Nur wenn ich sehe, wie das dann für einzelne Regionen wie die Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar völlig unnötig und kontraproduktiv auf die Spitze getrieben wird - teilweise habe ich schon Mühe, meine eigenen Bilder überhaupt wieder zu finden (denn ob ein Spargelfeld nun noch in Schwetzingen liegt oder vielleicht doch in Plankstadt, herrjeh!) - dann geht mir das einfach zu weit. Und, ja es fängt an mich maßlos zu ärgern.
Nun bringt der Ärger niemandem etwas, vergeudet nur kostbare Lebensenergie. Um das zu ändern gibt es letztlich nur eine Möglichkeit: ich muss bei mir selbst anfangen. Da ich es vermutlich eh nicht mehr schaffen werde, alle Bilder, die ich hier gerne zur Verfügung stellen möchte, hochzuladen, und ich mich schlicht nicht weiter ärgern will, werde ich die Bildbeschreibung verkürzen, allerdings nur in dem Ausmaß, dass eine Zuordnung / Verwendung von Bildern dadurch nicht unmöglich wird: Bundesland, Naturschutzgebiet, botanischer Garten etc. werde ich daher weiterhin angeben.
Leider ist mein Wissen über die Fauna und insbesondere die Flora ziemlich rudimentär, daher an dieser Stelle herzlichen Dank an Dich, der Du in der Vergangenheit schon oft von mir fotografiertes bestimmt und eingeordnet hast! Ich wünsche Dir noch einen schönen und fröhlichen Ostermontag! --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Auch Dir vielen Dank für Deinen Edit. Gegen eine solche Verkürzung des Beschreibungstexts habe ich natürlich nichts einzuwenden. Ich wünsche Dir auch für dieses Jahr viele schöne Bilder und auch einen schonen restlichen Ostermontag! Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Ilex vs Mahonia
Ist das Bild wirklich ein Ilex aquifolium? Oder vielleicht ein Mahonia aquifolium? Wär ganz gut zu wissen, denn ich glaube, das Bild is auch mehrfach verlinkt. Grüße, --Stanzilla (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Ich muss sagen, dass intensives Anstarren von vielen Fotos, nicht gerade geholfen hat, ich bin jetzt schon ein bisschen verwirrt und gebe für heute auf.--Stanzilla (talk) 22:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Mahonia stimmt. Ilex aquifolium blüht ganz anders. Mahonia aquifolium ist in Deutschland wohl die wahrscheinlichste Art, auch wenn wohl weitere Arten der Gattung kultiviert werden. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hurra, danke für die Bestimmung, das gibt mir auch wieder ein bisschen Selbstvertrauen. :) Liebe Grüße, --Stanzilla (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Vorsichtshalber frag ich mal
Huhu, hab ich das richtig bestimmt? Falls nicht, kann ichs selbst verschieben. Grüße, --Stanzilla (talk) 21:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Leider bin ich kein Experte für Gartenzüchtungen wie diese, so dass ich hier leider nicht helfen kann. Warum probierst Du es nicht in einem Gartenforum oder bei der deutschen Wikipedia-Bestimmungsseite (de:Wikipedia:Redaktion_Biologie/Bestimmung)? Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ach, dann lass ichs einfach so und nehme an, dass es stimmt. Danke für die Antwort. :)--Stanzilla (talk) 10:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the correction
Hello !
Thank you for having corrected the description of the myosotis picture. Of course it wasn't a Veronica. I don't know what was on my mind... :-s
I'll change the descriptions of two pictures I uploaded, and ask for a renaming.
Have a nice day !
VerboseDreamer (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Wolfsmilch
Es gibt unzählige Arten von Wolfsmilch, was ich leider erst feststellte, als ich die Fotos schon gemacht hatte. Und nun bin ich doch neugierig, vor allem ist die hiesige Pflanzenwelt zumindest auf Commons nocht nicht besonders dokumentiert. Die Leute machen ja immer mehr Postkartenfotos. Daher hoffe ich, dass du vielleicht helfen kannst - wenn nicht, kann ich es dir nicht verdenken. Die Fotos wurde im Wald gemacht, Forêt Domaniale de Montfort auf dem Gemeindegebiet von Brestot.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Stanzilla (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ich halte das für die Mandelblättrige Wolfsmilch (Euphorbia amygdaloides). Allerdings habe ich keine Pflanzenliste oder aktuelle Flora für die Normandie. Bislang kenne ich dafür aber keine Verwechslungsarten, was aber leider nicht bedeutet, dass alle angeblichen Bilder der Art in den Commons korrekt bestimmt sind. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Vielen lieben Dank. Das sieht auch wirklich ganz plausibel aus. Liebe Grüße, --Stanzilla (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Cardamine pratensis
Hallo, Herr Flogaus,
Vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht. Ich bin mit der Korrektur einverstanden. Das Bild wurde in Deutschland aufgenommen auf einer Weide, die direkt am Haus gelegen ist. Dort wächst ebenfalls Meerrettich, den wir regelmäßig ernten. Ist halt eine Verwechslung gewesen.
Vielen Dank nochmal und Beste Grüße
--Christian Ude (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Danke für die prompte Antwort. Ich habe die Änderungen angebracht, aber (noch) keine Umbenennung des Bildes beantragt. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
ein kleines Dankeschön für Deine unermüdliche Bestimmungshilfe
wollte ich Dir hiermit nur mal aussprechen mit einem Blumenstrauss, den irgendwelche Naturfreunde im Simbachtal gesetzt haben. Neben Franz Xaver gehörst Du in meinen Augen zu den firmirtesten Botanik-Kennern. Ohne Eure Mithilfe hätte ich so schnell nicht weitergelernt. --anro (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Gern geschehen und danke für die Blumen, die auch noch ganz passend für mich Wildblumen sind. :-) Bei der Primula veris bin ich aber sehr unsicher, da diese schon sehr hell wirkt und offenbar stärker Primula elatior ähnelt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: Misidentified Veronica photographs
Hello Robert Flogaus-Faust/Archive 1,
Thank you for the correction, and for the explanation thereof. I confess I don't have any botanical knowledge. I will try to be more careful on my identifications of veronicae in the future, but I fear I am at risk committing other mistakes. Maybe I should use "unidentified" categories more when I upload, and then let other, more qualified people put them in more precise categories.
Thanks again and have a nice day ! VerboseDreamer (talk) 14:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Leaving the images in an "unidentified" category might be a good idea. I just started adding some IDs. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I hope I didn't cause too much of a mess. :-s VerboseDreamer (talk) 14:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Don't worry. I found just a single additional misidentification so far. Most of your IDs are correct. In one case I was probably wrong; so I reverted my edit. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I hope I didn't cause too much of a mess. :-s VerboseDreamer (talk) 14:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Vielen herzlichen Dank für die Mithilfe. Ich sehe schon, die "Kosmos-Naturführer" alleine reichen nicht aus.--Rosa-Maria Rinkl (talk) 20:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
misidentified image File:Euphorbia helioscopia 0.4 R.jpg Dear Rob Hille
It may be that I have the name error, the picture is also not optimal. But in any case, thanks and best wishes for the new year. Greetings Rob Hille
Re:Misidentified images of Hippocrepis
Thank you very much! I'm convinced you are right! Kenraiz (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Herzlichen Dank für Deine Hilfe und beste Grüße aus Niederösterreich!
Herzlichen Dank für Deine Hilfe und beste Grüße aus Niederösterreich. --GT1976 (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Melitaea didyma female RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veronica filiformis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Veronica chamaedrys
Thank you very much! I have requested a name change. Have a nice evening! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Just a wild try
I have been trying to pin down the identity of this species File:Slate Run - Sunflower 1.jpg. You were very helpful before so I thought maybe you have an idea or even could point me in the right direction. All the best, -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- This is probably some kind of Helianthus cultivar, see e.g. Helianthus cultivars. I do not know, however, whether this is simply Helianthus annuus or some hybrid or even a different species. With best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Polygonatum odoratum
Część! Nie znam się na roślinach. Jeśli uważasz, że opis jest nieprawidłowy, to go zmień. Mam do Ciebie zaufanie. Pozdrawiam. MOs810 (talk) 16:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- O.k., danke! Das ist mit automatischer Übersetzung für mich recht gut verständlich, auch wenn ich kein Polnisch kann! Ich habe die Umbenennung beantragt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Du erhältst einen Orden!
|
Der Fleißorden |
| Ich habe Ihre Arbeit bezüglich der Pflanzenwelt, die Sie in den vergangenen Jahren geschaffen haben, kurz bewundern dürfen und war vollends begeistert.
Meinen Glückwunsch zu dieser Leistung!
Horst70 (talk) 13:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Melitaea didyma2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lamium orvala 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Globularia punctata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calliptamus italicus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Armeria maritima subsp elongata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cirsium palustre RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rubus parviflorus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cyclamen purpurascens RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prunus avium RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chamerion angustifolium RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tussilago farfara RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Angelica archangelica 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acer campestre 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pholiota aurivella RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orthetrum brunneum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Actaea rubra 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veronica sublobata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Polemonium caeruleum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Daphne sericea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calluna vulgaris RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Verbascum spinosum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crocodylium pumilio 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Inula salicina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lotus biflorus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jacobaea incana subsp carniolica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crocodylium pumilio RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maianthemum stellatum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lathyrus clymenum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maianthemum racemosum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wulfenia carinthiaca 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Urospermum picroides RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quercus robur RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Matthiola tricuspidata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corydalis cava RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trollius europaeus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chrysosplenium alternifolium RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Scolymus grandiflorus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Scabiosa lucida RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heracleum sphondylium 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quercus robur 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Helleborus foetidus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Geranium phaeum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tozzia alpina 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salvia pomifera RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anthyllis hermanniae RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stachys sylvatica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Legousia pentagonia RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lomelosia cretica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Petromarula pinnata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Teucrium brevifolium 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mauremys rivulata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Matthiola tricuspidata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Carpobrotus acinaciformis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lunaria rediviva RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Limonium sinuatum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Helianthemum apenninum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glaucium flavum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Silene colorata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arion ater RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Potentilla anserina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Echium italicum subsp biebersteinii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orchis pallens RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dracunculus vulgaris RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Allium ursinum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Euphorbia acanthothamnos RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Carex mertensii 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bituminaria bituminosa RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|