User talk:Horst J. Meuter

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Horst J. Meuter!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Musée de Tram, Brussels.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Musée de Tram, Brussels.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Musée de Tram, Brussels.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Takeaway (talk) 01:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Paul Delvaux Musée 001.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Delvaux Musée 001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paul Delvaux Musée 001.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Takeaway (talk) 01:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Musèe de Tram. jpg | Paul Delvaux jpg.

Takeaway, danke für die Information, in beiden Fällen handelt es sich um Eintrittskarten, die von mir zur Info von eventuell interessierten Mitnutzern gescannt und hochgeladen wurden. Das auch diese einer ausdrücklichen Lizensierung bedurften, war mir - als "Neu-User" - nicht klar. Mit einer Löschung bin ich aufgrund dessen natürlich vollkommen einverstanden. Gruß Horst J. Meuter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horst J. Meuter (talk • contribs) 16:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Deine Reverts

Hallo Horst, deine Revertierungen auf File:Bad Laasphe Feudingen, Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein - 02 -.jpg und File:Bad Laasphe Feudingen, Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein - 01 -.jpg sind nicht sinnvoll, da du die Fotos überkategorisiert hast. Die "feinstmögliche" Kategorisierung auf Feudingen ist vollkommen ausreichend, die anderen Kategorien ergeben sich aus dieser vergebenen Kategorie. Bitte lies dir mal die Regeln zur Kategorisierung durch. Beste Grüße, --Joschi71 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Joschi, vielen Dank für deine nochmalige Überarbeitung und Korrektur, ich bin damit vollkommen einverstanden. Ich hatte angenommen, die Dateien seien durch die Änderung nicht mehr auffindbar, verlasse mich aber auf den Rat eines erfahrenen Users, wenn du meinst, ich habe die Fotos damit überkategorisiert. Beste Grüße --Horst70, 14:17, 10 January (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horst J. Meuter (talk • contribs) 13:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Please do not recreate deleted content

 

---

Your image or other content, Gallery: Horst J. Meuter, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

As I noted in the deletion comment both times, "User galleries must be in the user's own space. User galleries are not permitted in main space." You may create User:Horst J. Meuter/Gallery, but you may not have Gallery: Horst J. Meuter or Horst J. Meuter. See Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

I have taken the survey some weeks ago. Horst70 (talk) 16:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC) Regards horst70

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Do not overcategorize

I reverted your categorizations "Animals of Belgium" for the shrimping horses and "Forests in Belgium" for the Forêt de Soignes, because they are already in subcategories of those. Please read COM:OVERCAT. Henxter (talk) 09:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill (details) - Woluwe Saint Lambert - Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tangla Hotel Brussels - Woluwe-Saint-Lambert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woluwe stream - Vellemolenweg - Woluwe Saint Lambert - Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo seems a bit overworked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Strasbourg, Fachwerkhäuser, Gassen, EU 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

* File:Strasbourg, Fachwerkhäuser, Gassen, EU 01.jpg

• File:Strasbourg, Fachwerkhäuser, Gassen, EU 01.jpg

Hallo ShakespeareFan00, zunächst herzlichen Dank für den Hinweis auf die beantragte Löschung dieses Files. Mir war bislang absolut nicht bekannt, dass der EuGeH nicht abgelichtet werden darf und hier Beschränkungen bestehen. Wenn dem tatsächlich so ist, werde ich mich natürlich an die bestehenden Regeln halten und habe keinen Einwand gegen die Löschung dieses Files.

Nochmals danke für den Hinweis --Horst70 (talk) 13:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, for your message, The issue of the lack of FoP in some parts of the EU is something, you might want to take up with your local Wikimedia Chapter, especially on a prominent European building like the one in the photo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Horst J. Meuter,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Info!Horst70 (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streifengans - Indische Gans - Anser indicus - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streifengans - Indische Gans - Anser indicus - (1) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 03:14, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Strasbourg, Fachwerkhäuser, Gassen, EU 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufel und Marktfrau - Lousberg - Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCormick D326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I'd like to support it, but the garbage cans on the right should be cropped out. --Palauenc05 21:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)I hope it's correct so. Thank you for your consideration --Horst J. Meuter 13:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick ins Broichbach-Tal - Noppenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your message - and an information for you.

it-0

Quest'utente non capisce l'italiano, o lo capisce solo con notevoli difficoltà.

--Horst70 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 03.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Glasmuseum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 02.jpg
• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst. 03.jpg
• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.04.jpg
• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.05.jpg
• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.06.jpg
• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.07.jpg
• File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.08.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 00:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Hallo lieber A.Savin,

ich kann mich heute doch noch einmal mit einer neuen Information zurückmelden. Das Museum hat mich wieder kontaktiert: sie wollen bei den Künstlern nachfragen, ob diese eine Genehmigung erteilen möchten. Bei neuen Informationen melde ich mich bei Dir zurück. Best regards --Horst70 (Diskussion) 18:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Horst70 (talk) 18:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.06.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.05.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.04.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld - Lette - Museum für Glaskunst.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagne des Malchamps - ein Venn in Belgien. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 13:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagne des Malchamps - ein Venn in Belgien. 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagne des Malchamps - ein Venn in Belgien. 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagne des Malchamps - ein Venn in Belgien. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herzogenrath - Kohlscheid (Rumpen, Berensberg) im Herbst. (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jugendstil-Flaschenhalter auf schwarzem Hintergrund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! "Der Jälput", Bronzestatue, Würselen-Bardenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Promotion meiner Aufnahme.

Gruß Horst J. Meuter Horst70 (talk) 15:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)