User talk:Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 10

My talk page 2022

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - November - Hedges/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Bailleul sur le vieux chemin de Lille.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Hedges, in November 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Heritage Belgium 2021

Beste vriend van Wikimedia België, U hebt meegedaan met de fotowedstrijd. Gelieve het juryrapport te lezen. Helaas hebt u niet gewonnen. Toch hartelijk dank voor uw bijdrage; vanaf 1 juli kan u opnieuw deelnemen.

Cher ami de Wikimedia Belgique, Vous avez participé au concours photo. Veuillez lire le rapport du jury. Malheureusement, vous n'avez pas gagné. Cependant, merci beaucoup pour votre contribution; vous pourriez participer à nouveau à partir du 1er juillet.

Dear friend of Wikimedia Belgium, You have participated in the photo contest. Please read the jury report. Unfortunately you did not win. However, thank you very much for your contribution; you can participate again from July 1st. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Cher Geertivp  Thank you. pour votre notification, ce sera avec plaisir que je participerai à l'édition 2022 de juillet. Bien cordialement,--Pierre André ^(talk) 17:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Becque Dewaziers

Category:Becque Dewaziers is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Palosirkka (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Vieux Quebec. La Fresque des Québécois.jpg

File:Vieux Quebec. La Fresque des Québécois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asclepias (talk) 16:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:La côte sauvage à la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon 2012 (3).jpg

Copyright status: File:La côte sauvage à la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon 2012 (3).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La côte sauvage à la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon 2012 (3).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:La côte sauvage à la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon 2012 (2).jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

@ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque0 Cordialement Pierre André ^(talk) 17:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Menhirs de Mané-Meur la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon.jpg

Copyright status: File:Menhirs de Mané-Meur la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Menhirs de Mané-Meur la pointe de la Presqu'île de Quiberon.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

@ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque. Cordialement --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bouquet d'automne Vera Ilyinichna Repina, by Ilia Répine- Tretyakov Gallery, Moscou.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ivan le Terrible et son fils Ivan le 16 novembre 1581, by Ilia Répine (1885) - Tretyakov Gallery, Moscou.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Св. Николай. Икона, ГТГ (Icon of Saint Nicholas) from 14th-century in Tretyakov Gallery of Moscow, unknown artist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculpture of Стрибог (Stribog) (1910), by Sergey Konenkov, Tretyakov gallery.- Moscow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Христос в величии Christ Pantocrator by Dionisius, 15th century, Tretyakov Gallery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I don't know what the work looks like, but File:Spas v silach from Vasilyevskiy chin (15th c., GTG).jpg is a better photo to me. I also tweaked the scope, but is the icon by Vasilyevskiy Menton or anonymous? The contradiction must be resolved. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you for your remark. The version you are referring to is an Icon formerly attributed to Andrej Rublëv (1408). In fact there is in the gallery another large Deisis extremely similar to that of Rublev File:Hall N59 (icons) Tretyakov gallery - Rublev 01 by shakko.jpg. The characters are almost identical and the central Christ sits enthroned on the same succession of shapes and colors. Dionysius and Rublev having worked together on several major projects, we must see in the two Déisis two variations on the same theme. I have attached in the other versions File:Moscou, galerie Tretiakov Icons by Dyonisius et ses fils, Déisis (détail - Saint Jean Baptiste, l'Apôtre Paul, Saint Demetrius).jpg. The carateristic is that Saint Michael does not find his usual counterpart here, instead there is Demetrius of Thessaloniki, the origin of the first name Dimitri so common in Russia. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, so there are various almost identical icons by different artists. But can you please resolve the contradiction between this work being "by Vasilyevskiy menton" (irregular capitalization, by the way) and "Anonymous Russian icon painter (before 1917)". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comments. I think I have resolved the contradiction between "Vasilyevskiy chin" and "Anonymous Russian icon painter (before 1917). In fact the painter is Dionisius (Russian: Диони́сий, variously transliterated as Dionisy or Dionysiy; also Dionisius the Wise; c. 1440 – 1502) was acknowledged as a head of the Moscow school of icon painters at the turn of the 15th and 16th centuries. His style of painting is sometimes termed "the Muscovite mannerism". Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Please correct the scope, in that case. How did you figure this out? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Done The scope has been corrected. I understood the difference with this file File:SpasVSilah Dionisiy 1500.jpg which refers to only one category (source). Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

• Please correct the scope, in that case. How did you figure this out? –

Ikan Kekek (talk) >]]) 02:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Done The scope has been corrected.  Thank you., best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

•  Support OK! Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Спас на престоле, с избранными святыми (Savior on the Throne, with a Selection of Saints), 13th-century, Tretyakov gallery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is very difficult. The other photo in the category is a much better image, but a very small file. Which is more useful now? -- Spurzem (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Thank you. I agree, thanks for advices best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:53, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope we disagree this time. This photo has much more detail than the tiny photo of the same work, and I'm comparing them only at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Знамение икона (Our Lady of the Sign), 13th-century, Tretyakov Gallery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Slight tweak to scope: In English, we capitalize the entire proper name, so Tretyakov Gallery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Photos de réserves naturelles

Bonjour Pierre-André,
À l'occasion du mois de mai et en l'absence du concours Wiki Loves Earth, voici quelques propositions de buts de promenade à photographier dans les Hauts-de-France :

• Category:Réserve naturelle nationale de la tourbière alcaline de Marchiennes
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale des monts de Baives
• Category:Réserve naturelle nationale du marais de Vesles-et-Caumont
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale de Grande-Synthe
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale de Pantegnies
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale de Pont d'Ardres
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale des prairies du val de Sambre
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale des prairies humides de la ferme du Moulin Fontaine
• Category:Réserve naturelle régionale du pré communal d'Ambleteuse

Meilleures salutations,
Pmau (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Bonjour Pmau, merci pour ces quelques propositions de buts de promenade à photographier dans les Hauts-de-France. J'en prends bonne note pour y organiser quelques randonnées en Juillet/Août. Bien cordialement,
  --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

• Bonjour Pmau, comme convenu j'ai organisé une rando autour de Marchiennes, en incluant la récente Category:Réserve naturelle nationale de la tourbière alcaline de Marchiennes, la mairie de Marchiennes a confirmé qu'il n'y a pas encore de chemin balisé. et que les seules visites se font occasionnellement avec des guides; la rando passant par la Category:Réserve naturelle régionale du pré des Nonnettes, j'y ai pris quelques clichés. Je ne perd pas de vue les quelques propositions de buts de promenade. Bien amicalement à vous. Meilleures salutations, Pierre André ^(talk) 10:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sosanto (ship, 1960) in Dorignies en 2014.jpg

Copyright status: File:Sosanto (ship, 1960) in Dorignies en 2014.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sosanto (ship, 1960) in Dorignies en 2014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque. Cordialement Pierre André ^(talk) 10:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

VI nomination for fishing boat Schtroumpf

Hello Pierre André:

I have no idea what is going on with your image but believe some setting is amiss with either your camera or post-processing software.

I suggest you go back to your file history of both images and revert them to the previous version as it was better than the revision.

Regretfully, I cannot vote in VI support for your image as the image quality is just not there. I do appreciate your efforts to address the issues.

The Lumix DMC-TZ60 listed as the camera has a maximum sensor resolution of 4896 x 3672 pixels, at a typical 8-bit color depth level should generate a maximum file size approximately 18.10 MB. One of the camera settings is what quality level you make images at, and it should be set to the maximum or highest quality. Your file when uploaded to your PC should have a file size of approximately 18 MB. For making post-processing editing, working with a RAW file format is better than JPG. I export and upload JPG files to Commons but do all post-processing like lightening the image in the RAW format.

Port d Erquy activités et bâteaux en 2017 (12)

i

Your original file is listed in Commons at (4,753 × 3282 pixels, file size: 1.82 MB). I would expect the file size to be much larger, close to 16 MB for a file at a typical 8-bit color depth for this pixel count.

‎

Fishing boat Schtroumpf in Port d Erquy

Your cropped file of the boat is listed in Commons as (3119 × 3230 pixels, file size: 1.2 MB) when it should be 9.60 MB file size at a typical 8-bit color depth for this pixel count.

It is a guess on my part, but I wonder if the export quality on your post-processing editing software is set to 4-bit color depth instead of 8-bit?

If further questions, please reach out to my talk page.

Best,

Gordon --GRDN711 (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sosanto (ship, 1960), bow view, at National Pardon of Boating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment "Front" and "side" are two different things. For the front, just use "front," please. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

 Done correction, thanks you, best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry to add more confusion on the sides designation but others preferred the use of nautical terms in one of my recent ship nominations. Suggest "bow view" as sub-scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment That's a good point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

• I agree,  Done "bow view" as sub-scope. Thanks, best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support, but I think whatever occasion is being marked is more obvious in the photo than the ship itself. I'm not familiar with this event, but French Wikipedia has an article about Pardon national de la batellerie. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Pierre André Leclercq, Ikan Kekek I have not voted in support of this image as it did not appear to be the typical bow view of this ship, except for the third weekend in June at the National Pardon of Boating. I am not in favor of overly descriptive scopes, but the event appears to drive the image view. Would a scope of “Sosanto (ship, 1960), bow view, at National Pardon of Boating” better reflect the nomination? --GRDN711 (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

• Yes, I think so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done thanks you for your advices.
•  Comment It is precisely the Fête & Pardon of the Batellerie Douai-Dorignies. Best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I confirm my supporting vote in the updated scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquila (ship), bow view, at National Pardon of Boating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment again, suggest "bow view" as subscope isntead of "front". --GRDN711 (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done bow view, as subscope. Thanks you for your advice. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Same remarks as for the other ship decorated for this occasion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks you for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment And I reconfirm my vote here, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FS Aldébaran (M772), port side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Per COM:VIS (5), image should be geocoded. Image sub-scope is port side. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Image sub-scope is port side. Image take in Camaret-sur-Mer, is already geocoded

  Camera location	48° 16′ 51.71″ N, 4° 35′ 40.72″ W	View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap

  , best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:09, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
  
  •  Support My apologies on the GPS coordinates - somehow missed them. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
  promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Joseph Roty II (IMO 7362500) in Saint-Malo

Hello Pierre André:

To keep the thousands of ship images in some kind of order, Commons has guidelines for creating and naming the category for a ship. See Category:Ship.

The category Factory Trawler " Joseph Roty II" (ship, 1974) should be changed to Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974).

Your ship category is correctly sub-categorized under Category:IMO 7362500

Best,

Gordon --GRDN711 (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gordon --GRDN711,

 Thank you. thank you for the details relating to the category of the trawler Usine Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974) which I have corrected, following your advice. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 21:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rubicon (ship, 1975), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Virtual-Pano (talk) 16:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 Comment I took the liberty to alter the description from 'stern' to 'bow and port side', hope you don't mind. A short translation of nautical terms for the layman and future reference (bow=front / stern=rear or backside / port=left / starboard=right)

• Many  Thank you. for changing the description from "stern" to "forward and port". I have a bad command of nautical terms. Best regards;--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barge Emilienne ( Cargo), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Needs a crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

• done a better crop. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zelpha (ship, 1959), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Are there two ships? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done I isolated the barge Zelpha (ship, 1959) from the original photo
  Is it better? Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SM 199078 Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974), stern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Rear would be stern. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Rear, thank you for advice. Best Regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm saying that the nautical English word for rear is "stern." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
• ok thank you for this precision, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 17:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Question Bonjour @Archaeodontosaurus: , j'avais affecté ce bateau la catégorie Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974), qui vient d'être renommée SM 199078 Joseph Roty II (ship, 1974). J(ai bien évidemment corrigé mais faut il relancer la procédure de validation du VICBot2? Merci! Bien amicalement,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

• Bonjour. Pas de problème dans ce cas il suffit de synchroniser le scope: c'est fait. Bonne soirée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Island Queen (ship), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valeriya (ship, 1971), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 10:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Naiade (ship, 1980), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Suggest "bow view" as sub-scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Done sub-scope "bow view", Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

 Support --GRDN711 (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maksim Litvinov (ship, 1991), stern and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taillefer 3 (ship, 2004), starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sola Gratia (ship, 1927), stern and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose regretfully. While this image is the only one in the ship category that meets the view sub-scope, the image is clipped at the stern of the ship. IMO the image needs to show all of the ship to meet the scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support What speaks objectively against this picture? Admittedly, the cut on the right is very tight and would have to be criticized for Featured Pictures. But this is about showing an essential part of a nearly 100 year old ship. I see no reason to declare the picture worthless. -- Spurzem (talk) 09:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

 Comment I have clearly stated my objection that this clipped image does not show the entire sub-scope. I have never said that this image was worthless (those are your words, Spurzem; not mine). Sola Gratia (ship, 1927) ENI 02301535 Port of Antwerp.JPG

Commons will not lose this 100-year-old ship .This other image does not match the sub-scope details but clearly shows all of the Sola Gratia. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

• Photography in Nigeria
• Photographing vehicles
• I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shlyuzovoy-133 (tugboat, 1975), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roselend (ship, 2000), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment View sub-scope is too narrow. To me this is a bow view only. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Correction sub-scope "Bow view". Thank you for your opinion.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

 Support with revised sub-scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

VI nomination of Cum Deo (ship, 1958)

CUM DEO RN4627 6003550, à quai aux usines Lesaffre à Marcq-en-Barœul (détail))

Hello Pierre André:

I am not sure but this VI image may be salvageable with some tonal tuning in post-processing.

If you lighten the overall exposure by at least 1/3 stop and then push up the shadows and black areas until there is some visible detail, it might make it. The image is sharp.

Also, this would be the stern view.

Best,

Gordon

Hello @GRDN711: Thanks for your advice. Global exposure correction +1/3 and improved shadows and black areas, Thanks for your advice. Best, Pierre André

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ship Niagara Wonder, port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arbon (ship, 1927), bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Too dark. Stern view? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Done exposure compensation, thanks for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@Pierre André Leclercq: Why "stern"? I see the whole ship, mainly the front part and the right side. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: , @Spurzem: ,  Done corrected subscope: "Bow and starboard view", thanks for your advice. Regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 14:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support. O.K. now -- Spurzem (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cum Deo (ship, 1958), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Done Global exposure correction +1/3 and improved shadows and black areas, Thanks for your advice. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Support O.K. for me -- Spurzem (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison des Dévotaires, facade north West, (Aire-sur-la-Lys).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. Maybe centered would have been nicer.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done better centering. Thanks --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Moulin le Comte d' Aire-sur-la-Lys, Southeast side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Éloi de Bachy, North side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mécanisme du moulin de Riele, 18th-century windmill in Wormhout.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Interesting and useful (but very red and yellow) -- Spurzem (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calvaire de Rumes, Southeast side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Persian windmills (type), Southeast side (Terdeghem), France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cog wheels in Steenmeulen windmill, Terdeghem.- France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• scope too vague - need to specify what type of mill. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

• @Charlesjsharp:  Done clarification "Cog wheels in Steenmeulen windmill" . Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore Postcard

Please help translate to your language

Greetings! Thank you for participating in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 Commons photography competition. Your contributions today have made the world a better place. We're sending you a digital postcard as an appreciation for you being one of the top 100 uploaders during this project. To receive your digital postcard, please complete this form by July 20, 2022.

We hope to see you next year in February 2023.

Gratitude and Wikilove

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de la Libération (La Glanerie), North west side, Belgique..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mémorial du Motard égaré (La Glanerie), front and left side. (Belgique).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Would be more valuable cropped to sculpture. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Done cropping of the sculpture. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support thanks Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôpital-Hospice Saint-Jean (Aire-sur-la-Lys), Portail, 52 Rue de Saint-Omer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Nieppe, France, viewed from the northeast..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Can the perspective be corrected on the right? -- Spurzem (talk) 12:27, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Done right-corrected perspective. Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment User:Pierre André Leclercq, I would call the scope incorrectly ordered. France applies to Nieppe, not to northeast (Nieppe is in fact in northwestern France). I suggest this for the scope: "Église Saint-Martin de Nieppe, France, viewed from the northeast." That is, if France needs to be mentioned. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: I fixed the misordered scope, thanks for the advice. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope, thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blockhaus B07 (Bray-Dunes), view from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calvaire des Marins de Bray-Dunes, view from northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Soleil Couchant (Bray-Dunes), view from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Marie-Bernard (Bray-Dunes), view from north-west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Might be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial in Haisnes, South exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Fine work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg

Copyright status: File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

• Merci AntiCompositeBot pour votre remarque, j'ai pposér un bandeau valide de copyright. et une licence ad-hoc au fichier File:La Scarpe à Marchiennes en 2022 (6).jpg . Cordialement, --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zavikon Island, view North north east side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 15:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose with regret. This image shows a tighter display of the topic, with the same view with better tone rendition. Close, but IMHO it is the better image and more valuable. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Support This image is by far the best because it clearly shows the insularity which is not the case of the other. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope--A1Cafel (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne Brasserie Dufour de Marchiennes, south view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

loop in your user category

Bonjour Pierre André Leclercq, by chance I found a category loop in your Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq. Assuming, that this is caused by subcategorizing Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq with Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq and vice versa. Besides shuffling all that stuff into one category (I can offer help to do that with VisualFileChange, or you can ask a bot), the cycle can be broken on each side by just having one category as the subcategory of the other. ahoi --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki Hi, it is with pleasure that you can correct the loop that remains in my user category. I do not master VisualFileChange, and therefore your help will be welcome. Thank you. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 21:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

to be sure, before I start: I will move everything from Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq (with space) to Category:Files by User:Pierre André Leclercq (without space) and redirect the first to the later. Please confirm. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki I trust you completely and therefore I confirm the procedure. Thank you. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 21:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

thanks for that lot of trust, done. I had to change your credit template with respect to the category name, the servers are still updating. In the morning Category:Files by User: Pierre André Leclercq should be empty (I will care for the rest). best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@Herzi Pinki Many thanks for your intervention and the change of my credit model in relation to the name of the category. I had noticed this malfunction in my categories, without being able to resolve it Sincerely yours. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 19:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate you loving my intervention. But please don't say thank you for all of my edits on your images :-) It might make me blush. best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source of Vleter Becque, (Godewaersvelde).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:

• Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:

• Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko)
• The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)

You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.

• Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
• And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.

Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2022!

Olá! O maior concurso fotográfico do mundo está de volta! Que tal participar mais uma vez (ou pela primeira vez!) do Wiki Loves Monuments? A etapa nacional da competição, que este ano está com novidades na faixa de premiação, ocorrerá de 01 a 30 de setembro.

Este ano, teremos novamente três categorias de premiação e um aumento na faixa de prêmios:

• Melhores Imagens, com prêmios de até R$2.500
• Maiores Contribuidores(as), com prêmios de R$200
• Melhor Imagem do Estado do Espírito Santo, com prêmio de R$2.500

Ficou animado(a)? Acesse aqui os mais de 15 mil monumentos listados para a competição deste ano! Fotografe-os e publique suas imagens no Wikimedia Commons durante o mês de setembro.

Ano passado o Brasil ficou em primeiro lugar na etapa internacional do Wiki Loves Monuments com a foto do Real Gabinete Português de Leitura, no Rio de Janeiro, tirada pelo fotógrafo lituano Donatas Dabravolskas. É a nossa chance de repetir este feito!

Para mais informações, confira a página do concurso!

Abraços, --EPorto (WMB) (discussão) 22:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Você recebeu esta mensagem pois já participou do Wiki Loves Monuments ou do Wiki Loves Earth anteriormente. Caso não queira mais receber essas comunicações, deixe uma mensagem em minha página de discussão ou envie um e-mail para eder.portowmnobrasil.org.

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste d'Audresselles, (south east side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte de Beaulieu, (17^th century) in Aire-sur-la-Lys.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Done I uploaded a new image lightening it, best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support looks good now. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Las Vegas, 2016 Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (1).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Vegas, 2016 Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (Mandala).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your edit on Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted

Hi Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 10, I just reverted your edit on Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted ([1]) because the two images that you added do not need categorization any more. They are already in a gallery (old "category"), Commons:Quality_images/Subject/Works_of_art, and they should not copied into this gallery twice. Generally, images are added to Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted by QICbot, not by human editors, unless there is some kind of malfunction of the bot. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Thank you. Robert Flogaus-Faust I hadn't noticed this duplicate. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 14:48, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pride of Canterbury (ship, 1991), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment These are small quibles but suggest a scope change to simpler {{c|Pride of Canterbury (ship, 1991)}}, port side view.. Also, consider cropping the right side of the image to achieve a better balance the left side space, and boosting the mid-tones that seem a little muddy. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

   Done Boosting the mid-tones, cropping the right side of the image, and I change the scope Thanks for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Good changes. Ship still seems tilted ccw and a correction would also help. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

   Done correction tilt -0,5°, regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompéi les places et les rues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

 Thank you. Pierre André ^(talk) 09:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (Mandala).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Las Vegas, Dale Chihuly Sculpture en verre du Bellagio (Mandala).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Frank ,

Thank you for your message, the proposed letter to the Wikimedia Foundation is an excellent initiative. The idea of launching an investigation into the best long-term solutions on the operation of the MediaWiki software will be welcome to work with its multimedia files. OK to sign the proposed letter, have a nice day. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 08:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de Chinchero, Peru - western exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crosse of couvent Santo Domingo, south exposure.- Cuzco, Peru.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mateo Pumacahua, relief, San Martin Square, Lima, Peru..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. I tweaked the scope a bit. Sorry about all those commas, but I think it's clearest that way. Is it OK with you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

  Ok, It's better  Thank you.. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basile Morin (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (1).ogg

Copyright status: File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (1).ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (1).ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Steenmeulen, le moulin de pierre Terdeghem (vidéo 2021) (2).ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@ AntiCompositeBot J'ai rajouté la licence que j'avais omise, et j'ai donc retiré le bandeau apposé sur le fichier. Merci pour votre remarque. Cordialement

Pierre André ^(talk) 14:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Online workshop this weekend

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.

I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne douane Franco-Belge (Estaimpuis), view from south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Azulejos in Paraty, on post office rua do Comércio..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment In my opinion, this is probably not a meaningful scope unless this is the only azulejo in Paraty. Otherwise, is it a similar scope to "Paintings in Paris" or "Sculptures in Washington, D.C."? Instead, I would think the specific composition would be the scope. But tell me what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: , Thanks for your advice I added to the category a few buildings adorned with azulejo frescoes. With regard to the image presented, I specified that it is an azulejo of the street of commerce. Best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• Great.  Support in this scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Saint Joseph (Bousbecque), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --John Samuel (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Town hall of Bousbecque, view from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
JER STE (cargo, 1962), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niche architecturale dédiée à Saint-Martin en façade de la Maison A Saint Martin Rue de Wervicq (Bousbecque ),.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- John Samuel (talk) 11:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de la Croix Blanche (Bousbecque ), view from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle ND-du-Bon-Secours (Bousbecque), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arsène (ship, 1950), bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

File:München, magasins du Tal (3).jpg

File:München, magasins du Tal (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 08:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Seligman Seligman, historic 66 en2016 (4).JPG

File:Seligman Seligman, historic 66 en2016 (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 05:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte aux Boules (Bergues), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oratoire Notre-Dame-du-Sacré-Cœur (Houplines), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 11:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte du Port (Bergues), view from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful --Tagooty (talk) 13:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Chemy, view from North East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful, but is "northeast" as a direction capitalized in any form of English? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cripayo (ship), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hudson ( Cargo ship), Bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delta (ship, 1957), starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maroni (ship, Li9891F), Bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manou (Cargo, 2004), stern and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Speed (Cargo ship), starboard view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deutscher Soldatenfriedhof Verlinghem, northwest view, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
statue of Saint-Chrysole, Verlinghem northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame de Lourdes (Bousbecque), northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Très heureuse disparition du poteau! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Délivrance du Doulieu, northwest view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette du Doulieu, east view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Citroën Ami 6, left front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre Dame du Sacré-Cœur de Boeschepe, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Marie-Consolation-de-la-peur de Boeschepe, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brasserie Catry (Wambrechies), view from Chem. de la Forte Cour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Moissons (Wambrechies), view from North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. I suggest to create a Wikidata item for this chapel. --Tagooty (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Butskop (ship, 1925), bow and starboard view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel (6).jpg

File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel (6).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame-de-la-Nativité de Fournes-en-Weppes, view from Rue Faidherbe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 07:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Marguerite (Comines), view from parvis Abbé Dervaux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ben Love (ship, 1988), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jessy (barge, 1954), port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --J. Lunau (talk) 14:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saketa (cargo, 1966), bow view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Question @Pierre André Leclercq: The Sony HX90V used to make this image has a sensor with a maximum resolution of 4896 x 3672 pixels (approximately 5.5 MB). This uploaded version is only 1,990 × 1,317 (928 KB). Is a higher resolution available? --GRDN711 (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

  GRDN711 Thanks for your advice. Higher resolution is available Saketa (ship) et Jessy (barge, 1954).jpg. I uploaded it to clarify the extraction. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 23:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trickster (ship), bow and port side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Noyelles-lès-Seclin, view from Rue d'Emmerin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Echevinal (Noyelles-lès-Seclin), view from place Alexandre Gratte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rupeldam (ship, 1957), bow and port side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontenay Abbey commendatory house, from the North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontenay Abbey Bookshops, view from north east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estaminet "Le Bruegel" à Bergues, view from rue du Marché aux Fromages.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brasserie-malterie Bécu ( Fampoux), view from Rue Paul Verlaine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
James V relief in Abbey Strand, at the gatehouse of Holyrood Palace, Edinburgh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Meilleur cadrage, meilleure colorimétrie, respect des proportions --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relais de poste de Chéreng, view from Rte Nationale.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapestries in Chapel Royal Stirling Castle, Scotland - Altar cloth in the Royal Chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Look at the scope changes --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

• Merci, cordialement --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferme de Torélies (Thimougies), view from chaussée de Frasnes, Frasnes-lez-Anvaing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Notre-Dame-et-Saint-Laurent d'Eu en 2021 (bis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

 Thank you. Pierre André ^(talk) 16:00, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Molenhof te Rodenborg, view from Abdijmolenweg, Kortrijk (Belgium).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferme la Cantine (Thimougies), view from Rue Pétrieux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
West facade of Collégiale Notre-Dame et Saint-Laurent d'Eu, view from Place Isabelle d'Orléans.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte-Pétronille d'Acquin, view from rue Principale in Acquin-Westbécourt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of arms of Fontenay abbey en 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulan Bator.- Gandan Monastery (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

 Thank you. Pierre André ^(talk) 09:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Incense burners from Gandan Monastery (Ulan Bator), Megjid Janraisig temple, Mongolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Pierre André Leclercq! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Queti in Gandan Monastery (Ulan Bator), Megjid Janraisig temple, Mongolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

* Oppose until perspective were fixed --Ezarateesteban 23:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Done @Ezarate: , thank you for your advice, corrected perspectives, --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Support ok now --Ezarateesteban 14:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fridrikha Engelsa Street 21, Irkutsk, view from East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

✴ Happy Holidays, Pierre André Leclercq ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! --Aristeas (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Happy holidays, Pierre André Leclercq! Hello Pierre André Leclercq, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It has been a pleasure to have you as a fellow Wikimedian this year. Wherever you are, enjoy the festive season and stay warm (if you're north of the Tropic of Cancer)! Your help in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikimedia Commons will always be appreciated. Greetings from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. --SHB2000 on 12:42, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Pierre André! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- Johann Jaritz talk 14:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Pierre André

for your best wishes. Wishing you also happy holidays and a healthy 2023. Greetings from Friesland.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Mes meilleurs voeux

Salut! Merci pour ta message, mon ami. Je te souhaite également, à te et à ta famille, un joyeux Noël et le meilleur pour 2023! Poco a poco (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

2023

Happy holidays Pierre André and a healthy 2023.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Prince Dimitry Donskoy blessed by Sergius of Radonezh, (15th century), Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Pierre André Leclercq! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. --Llez (talk) 09:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prokhorovs' chapel, view from Northwest, Novodevichy Convent, Moscow..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment You have to give the direction of the shot because we only see the back of the chapel here. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

   Done Thanks for your advice,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sofia Wulfert grave, view from North , Novodevichy cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main altar of the Aryapala Temple Meditation Center, Gorkhi-Terelj National Park, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Does the scope of "interior" really deserve only one picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

   Comment I change the scope, in Aryapala Temple in Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. is it more appropriate? Best rgards--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

• You made the scope even more general. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Done OK the correction is made, best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 17:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope, and I think this is a better scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Cemetery Novodievitchi, grave of Yuri Nikulin (1).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of Yuri Nikulin, view from North , Novodevichy cemetery (Moscow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vasily Timofeev grave, view from South, Novodevichy Convent, Moscow..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wegkapelletje Luingnestraat ( Aalbeke), Kortrijk, Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château d'Entre-Deux-Monts, Nuits-Saint-Georges, view from South, (Côte-d'Or).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Entre la permière image et la dernière correction le château penche à gauche... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

   Done left tilt correction; best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Merci Pierre

Thank you for these wishes! In my turn, if it is allowed to dream, I would like above all to wish to find a way towards peace! ---Ercé (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Demeure des Gouverneurs (Semur-en-Auxois), view from Rue Buffon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful detail of this view -- Spurzem (talk) 21:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window of Pius IX proclaiming Saint Joseph patron of Universal-Church, Saint Michael's Church, in Dijon..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Dilation en largeur: l'auréole de Joseph doit être ronde. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

   Done, correction de la dilatation de l'image, bien cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)