User talk:Peter17

Archives (old messages) : /2006

Cher Peter,

Je vous contacte car mon grand-père (Jean Lauwereins) et moi-même sommes en train de compléter l'arbre généalogique d'Adèle. J'ai rencontré votre nom en relation avec la famille CRÉQUY. Le logo de la famille Créquy se trouve sur le premier quart des armoiries de la famille Lauwereins. Peut-être savez-vous pourquoi et pouvez-vous préciser la signification de la cerise rouge sur les armoiries des CRÉQUY ?

Je vous remercie d'avance.

Je vous prie d'agréer, Madame, Monsieur, l'expression de mes salutations distinguées, Saber Lauwereins Ahmed

Requests for undeletion different files

I hereby affirm that I Pedro Solís García , the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of Cuerdas short film and La Bruxa short film [both the work depicted and the media] shown here: File:Pedro solis garcia.jpg File:Cuerdas still1.jpg File:La Bruxa still02.jpg File:La Bruxa still01.jpg File:Bruxa.jpg File:Cartel cuerdas.jpg

These media weere tried to be uploaded to Commons by me under my nickname Nmalario and deleted by Peter17, Túrelio and Sealle

and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

You can find more information about my work in my web site and the links to IMDb, premios Goya and Promofest that I am providing: Cuerdas Oficial Web site La Bruxa Oficial Web Site Cuerdas IMDb La Bruxa IMDb Pedro Solís GArcía IMDb Cuerdas Premios Goya La Bruxa Premios Goya

Cuerdas Promofest La Bruxa Promofest

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Pedro Solís García "Copyright holder" and "Director" 07/26/2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmalario (talk • contribs) 08:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Please follow instructions from Commons:OTRS. Regards. Peter17 (talk) 08:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Oncle_Vania.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Oncle_Vania.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

About images

Thanks for your concern. This images come from the www.tse.go.cr the Elections Supreme Tribunal of Costa Rica and are the flags fo Costa Rica's legal political parties. All images are public domain and are use to ilustrate the http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor%C3%ADa:Partidos_pol%C3%ADticos_de_Costa_Rica categorie.

Bye.

Photo église dscn0303b.jpg

Tu devrais poser la question directement à Jastrow, cette jeune femme qui a l'air brillante, me semble être l'experte incontestable de ce genre de chose.Romary 11:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Il ne faut pas croire Romary :-) Bon, la réponse est malheureusement non : il s'agit d'une architecture originale qui est protégée par le droit d'auteur. Si l'église a été bâtie en 1959, il n'y aucune chance pour que ça soit dans le domaine public. Dans certains pays, les bâtiments et/ou les statues situés dans l'espace public bénéficient d'une exception au régime normal du copyright, mais ce n'est pas le cas en France. Ceci étant dit, il existe une tolérance pour les photos de bâtiments sur l'espace public. Sur Commons on en a un petit paquet. À mon avis on ne devrait pas, mais il y a une polémique à ce sujet en ce moment même... Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Mmmh, je n'avais pas relevé que c'était de l'humour de sa part ! Je pense qu'il faudrait mettre davantage de précisions ici : Commons:À_propos_des_licences#Check-list car cette page dit de demander conseil. Peter17 17:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations for your beautiful paintings ! Peter17 10:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Merci pour le compliment! ArthurWeasley 14:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Catégories, tri alphabétique et projet Blasons

Bonsoir Peter,

J'ai vu que tu te préoccupais de la catégorisation des blasons, et même de l'ordre de tri dans chaque catégorie (cf. ta dernière modification sur Gonesse). Et je t'en félicite.

Pour info, tu peux utiliser le modèle Blason-fr-en (à la place du formulaire proposé en standard par Commons au chargement), qui présente entre autres avantages celui de classer facilement chaque blason dans une catégorie "par département" (pour les communes) et de donner un alias selon lequel sera trié par défaut ce dessin dans chaque catégorie. Il y a un certain nombre de paramètres prédéfinis, tous facultatifs, qui aident à décrire ton fichier (cf. par exemple Image:Blason Lillebonne.svg ou Image:Blason ville fr Parçay-les-Pins (Maine-et-Loire).svg).

Les différents paramètres sont un peu délicats à manier, mais cela vaut le coup à mon avis. N'hésite pas si tu as des questions. Bien cordialement, Bruno 22:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Merci pour ce conseil Bruno. Je vais y réfléchir. Le modèle par défaut me convient assez bien : je le trouve simple et pratique. J'essayerai l'autre à l'occasion. Cordialement. Peter17 22:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Biarritz

Salut hombré! merci pour ton message, je m´'excuse de l'oubli de la licence, c'est ok maintenant? quel sont les figures que tu penses je doit séparer et uploader?. Merci à toi encore, --SanchoPanzaXXI 18:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour Peter, voilà les figures sont uploadées maintenant, "Figure Blason Baleine Basque" + "Figure Blason Pecheurs Basques" mais pas trouvé les categories, peux-tu t'en occuper de les classer correctement? Salutations et "agur",--SanchoPanzaXXI 12:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Five o clock.JPG

Pourquoi cette image (du groupe Aphrodite's Child) a-t-elle été supprimée? Elle vient du Wiki anglophone!!!

Van Rijn

Bonjour Van Rijn !

L'administrateur qui a supprimé l'image a donné la raison suivante : « album/DVD covers not allowed; see COM:L and COM:DW »

Les jaquettes de CD sont sous copyright et donc pas sous licence libre. Elles sont par conséquent interdites sur Commons, contrairement au wiki anglophone qui tolère le « fair use » (utilisation d'oeuvres sous copyright).

D'autre part, « english wiki » n'est pas une source valable pour les images qui en proviennent car ce n'est pas Wikipédia qui les a créées. Si tu importes des images provenant de la Wikipédia anglophone, il convient de mettre comme source celle qui est mentionnée sur la page d'origine. Si cette information est manquante, l'image ne doit pas être importée sur Commons.

Les images Image:Heather O'Rourke.jpg et Image:HondaK20Z3.jpg risquent d'être supprimées rapidement car aucune information n'est donnée sur leur auteur.

Si tu as d'autres questions, n'hésite pas !

Cordialement. Peter17 13:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Marquess coronet

The article Marquess on en.wikipedia has an image of a coronet which is wrong in two respects as I have pointed out on the talk page (the purple should be red and the red "jewels" should be gold). Please would you be very kind and upload a corrected image? Many thanks. - 91.104.52.239 23:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Is this one correct ? If not, please have a look at this category. Peter17 08:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Blasons en SVG

Bonjour Odejea !

Pourquoi ne pas réaliser directement les blasons en SVG, en suivant les recommandations de fr:Projet:Blasons/Création ? Cela rendrait le projet plus productif et éviterait d'avoir à re-créer les mêmes blasons en SVG par la suite.

Cordialement. Peter17 12:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Tout simplement parce que le mode d'emploi d'Inkscape est imbittable. Avec Blender, j'ai mis cinq minutes à créer mon premier blason. Avec Inkscape, j'ai passé une soirée à essayer de comprendre comment ça marche et sans réussir la création d'un blason. Les explications sur Projet:Blasons/Création sont clairement insuffisante pour le néophite. Je n'ai pas compris comment modifier un calque que je viens de créer, ni comment insérer le gabarit d'un meuble dans un blason, ni comment le colorer. Si je n'ai pas une page qui m'explique étape par étape comment faire (au moins un exemple qui explique comment un des blasons déjà réalisés a été fait, et très détaillée), je ne ferais pas l'effort de faire des blason en SVG. Odejea 20:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Digital Human

Peter17, Thank you for advising me that I was incorrectly uploading files to Wikimedia Commons. I'm glad I got your message before I uploaded more files. I was under the assumption that any file I uploaded I had to do it to Wikimedia because I had each image licensed under the Creative Commons license. However, after reading your message that Wikimedia ONLY accepts free images. I believe these images have been deleted and added to the English Wikipedia. Thanks again and I'm sorry for the confusion.

LearnAnatomy

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrocygna bicolor - Nantes 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments detailed, good lighting, high resolution --Ianare 23:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Voiture de la DEV

Bonsoir, j'ai mis la syntaxte que tu m'as indiqué mais rien n'y fait le lien reste rouge! Je ne comprend plus très bien car je l'avait fait pour la grue de 85 t et le WSGI mais je ne parviens plus à reproduire la même chose, pourrais-tu regarder ce qui cloche et me le dire. (Article sur Wikipedia Voiture DEV AO)

Merci beaucoup!

Fabrice.BAREUX (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Il suffit juste de respecter la casse (JPG en majuscules !).

Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Merci de ton attention et je te souhaite de Joyeuses Fêtes de fin d'année et une bonne continuation !

Fabrice.BAREUX (talk) 06:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

French translation

Hello and thanks for the translation. Of course you can translate a second optical illusion description?

Français : Illusion d'optique : lignes juste tordu? :D Thanks a lot. Bernard Ladenthin (talk) 19:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Peter17 (talk) 22:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

French stamps

Hi, just in case you didn't notice, I grouped together several DRs you placed about French stamps here. If I missed some, or if you'd like to add other images, please feel free to add them on this page. Best wishes. --Tryphon (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

 Done OK, thanks. Peter17 (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Your Choice Records - the 7inches

I added the ok for the commerical reuse as suggested. thank you. Party diktator (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour!

I have seen your excellent work, and wish to talk with you about a project. Please contact me on AIM or Yahoo messenger at llloololoolll, or on MSN messenger at <address removed to avoid spam>

Thank you, and I look forward to talking soon!

Please feel free to talk here. Thank you. Peter17 (talk) 09:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Concorde FP

Bonjour Peter. En référence à votre réaction à mon vote sur votre FPC de l'obélisque de la concorde, veuillez noter que je suis très au courant des difficultés reliés a l'assemblage en panorama de photos (vérifiez vous même mes contributions ici). Ces difficultées a elles seules sont rarement suffisantes pour justifier un FP. Sauf cas exceptionnels, un FP a besoin d'être plus qu'un simple défi technique; il doit transmettre une certaine émotion aussi. Votre photo illustre très bien l'obélisque, mais je n'y vois pas le caractère exceptionnel, d'ou mon opposition. J'espère avoir clarifié mon vote. --S23678 (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Oui, oui, j'avais bien compris, pas de souci Je comprends la problématique et j'essaierai de tenir compte de ces remarques pour mes prochaines réalisations, même si je suis plus geek qu'artiste... Peter17 (talk) 11:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hello and thank you for tagging copyvios here on Commons! Please have also a look at w:Threshold of originality in order to tag logos correctly. Thanks, →Nagy 14:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

As above in terms of thanks. Can you also make sure you actually notify the uploaders too. Otherwise they merely upload the file again. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Pontos Pic

Peter

I am the creator and owner of all things for Pontos (film) including the poster that I created and designed myself in Photoshop. I do not understand why you marked it for copyright violation. I have uploaded the file once again. Please contact me before requesting that my file be removed for copyright infringement.

Regards

Peter

RE: File Tagging Image:Kamau - Non Ducor Duco.jpg

In response to:

---

== {{Autotranslate|1=Image:Kamau - Non Ducor Duco.jpg|base=Image permission/heading}} == {{Autotranslate|1=Image:Kamau - Non Ducor Duco.jpg|base=Image permission}} [[User:Peter17|Peter17]] ([[User talk:Peter17|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 05:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

---

Check the new informations about the imagem: Kamau - Non Ducor Duco.jpg. Used in pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_Ducor_Duco. Thank you.

Sorry, I just see a copyright violation... Please provide an OTRS ticket if it is not the case. Otherwise, the file will be deleted soon. Thanks. Peter17 (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Undeleted

Here - can you make sure source etc is dealt with now. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done thanks a lot! Peter17 (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

westernmagpies

hi peter17, i am really confused about the licensing processes. i tried to read the copyright stuff, but couldn't make much sense of it. i got the photos off the club website to use on the wikipage for the club, does that mean i am not able to use them? would you be able to help me out and explain to me how i can use photos on the page as they have all been tagged for deletion now. thanks!

thanks for that information, it's a much clearer explanation! the photos that are mine i have used the license that you recommended. all of the ones for the western magpies wiki were taken from the club website, which i assumed would have made it ok. i'm guessing from your explanation that that's not the case? any idea how to get photos that are able to be used for that wiki?

thanks again. i don't personally know who runs the website though, so it looks like i cannot use those images for the magpies website. it's a shame because im sure they wouldn't mind, but oh well!

File:Cucaracha.jpg

The explanation for speedy deletion you gave here is insuficient. Do you know for sure it's a french cartoon character? If it is, you should point which character is that, other users may have less insight on the topic. Or do you asume it may be a french cartoon, just because the text is in french? Belgrano (talk) 02:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Ready, I deleted the image. Sorry for the inconvenience, but I wanted to be sure before deleting. Next time try to provide more information, even if it means "stating the obvious", which may not be so obvious for users with other knowledges; the most clear the explanation is, the quickest the image will be deleted Belgrano (talk) 03:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

 Done Thanks! Ok, I'll provide more information next time. Peter17 (talk) 05:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Balavoineportrait.jpg

Hello Peter17, I've converted your speedy into a deletion request for further discussion. Thanks, –blurpeace ^(talk) 03:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

 Done Ok. Discussion was short! Peter17 (talk) 05:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 83097c6b6b7ddcc66a7a6f3dc080014d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

identification

Bonjour. J'ai identifié deux personnes sur vos photos de la réception de Shanghaï. J'ai mis des notes. je cherche pour la dame à gauche, je la connais, mais... Bon, ne psychotez pas, aucun de ceux que vous ne connaissez pas n'est membre du gouvernement ! Amicalement depuis Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done Merci beaucoup ! Peter17 (talk)

Permission

I am an Austrian physic school textbook author

http://www.oebv.at/sixcms/list.php?page=titelfamilie&titelfamilie=Big+Bang

and would like to offer downloadable teaching material to go with the books I've published. I saw your film

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:HardDisk1.ogg

on the internet and wanted to ask your permission to use it as a direct download with your source citation on my page. Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely yours, Martin Apolin

Hello Martin!

Certainely, you can copy this file on your website and allow people to download it from there, as long as my name « Peter Potrowl » is quoted near the video/link.

Please make this quotation be a link to my userpage (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Peter17) or my website (http://lesitemai.free.fr).

Thanks for asking. Peter17 (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

File mover

The functionality of the template {{Rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Peter17, thanks for offering to help renaming files. Before renaming files, please review the relevant policies for file moving. These are:

• Commons:File naming
• Commons:File renaming

According to current language policy, File:!!!!味の素グループ高輪研修センター0205.JPG should not be translated to English. Please avoid doing such renames in the future.

If you are not sure about the meaning or spelling of non-English names and terms, you might want to leave these files for other users to rename. -- User:Docu at 11:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Blanking pages

Hallo, can I remind you that for quick deletion of categories, the procedure consist of inserting {{Badname|Good name}} if another category names exist. Alternatively, {{Speedy|reason}} can be used. Blanking the page makes that the category appears several days later in Special:UncategorizedCategories which we try to keep as empty as possible, but requires significant work as we have to analyse each case if it concerns vandalisme, mistakes, beginners work (that may need assistance) or just a plain categorisation problem. So following the standard procedure saves us all unnecessary work and as a courtesy to the creators, the edit summary tells where the category has been moved to. Thank you and keep up the good work. --Foroa (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Mmmh... ok. Thanks for your comment. Peter17 (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

L'obélisque de la Place de la Concorde, à Paris, France.

Hello, Peter! I would really like to see panoramic pictures of all four sides of the obelisk in Paris. Can you help? I would be very grateful. My e-mail kolkov@mail.ru, Ivan

Hello, Ivan! As I am living in Shanghai right now, it will be difficult for me to help you! And when I'm in France, I don't live in Paris... If I go back there and have some time, I will try to think about it, but it might not be before several months... Have you watched all the images in Category:Obélisque de la Concorde? Maybe you can find the 4 sides in all those pictures... Best regards. Peter17 (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitrail de Sainte Philomène - Église Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette (Paris).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Mbdortmund 11:14, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Tournures tourmentées

Message pour toi entre autres là D'avance merci. Selen (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Atelier photo à Paris les 4 et 5 septembre

Bonjour !

Tu as exprimé de l'intérêt pour le projet d'atelier photo, et je t'en remercie chaleureusement puisque tu as contribué à le rendre viable. J'ai mis sur pied une page de coordination [1], n'hésite pas à y mettre à jour les informations qui le demandent, ainsi qu'à proposer ou demander ce qui est nécessaire ou opportun.

Merci encore et sans doute à bientôt ! Rama (talk) 09:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Shanghai Airlines

Thank you so much for getting that photo! WhisperToMe (talk) 18:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

• I added a brief Chinese description with the address in Chinese. I also added the picture to several articles on Shanghai Airlines across different language Wikipedias, and I added the picture to articles about the Jing'an district on the Chinese, French, and English Wikipedias. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Atelier photo, le Retour

Bonjour,

l'atelier photo qui avait lieu ce week-end s'est suffisemment bien passé pour que l'on envisage d'en organiser d'autres éditions. Comme tu avais exprimé de l'intérêt sans pouvoir venir, je me permets de t'écrire en priorité pour te demander s'il y a des lieux ou des dates qui t'arrangeraient ou te sembleraient pertinents. Si tu as des idées, tu peux les soumettre sur User talk:Rama/atelier photo 2.

Merci et peut-être à un de ces jours ! Rama (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violations?

Please check this file. regards Rauenstein (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi! It seems hard to know whether it is PD or not, since the source and the author are not indicated... I added {{no source}}. Thanks for reporting. Peter17 (talk) 08:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

And so on:

• File:Blason gresswiller.jpg
• File:Blason ergersheim.jpg
• File:Blason dinsheim.jpg
• File:Blason duppigheim.jpg
• File:Blason ernolsheim.jpg
• File:Blason dachstein.jpg (?)
• File:Blason mutzig.jpg (?)
• File:Neubois.jpg
• File:Blason soultzlesbains.jpg
• File:Blason Duttlenheim.gif
• File:Neuve Eglise.jpg
• File:Schwenheim.gif (?)
• File:Blason Saint-Pierre.jpg
• File:Reichsfe.jpg
• File:Blason pfaffenhoffen.png (?)
• File:Blason de Liepvre.png

(all files from ngw.nl/fra)

and

• File:Blason orig.gif from [2]

regards Rauenstein (talk) 21:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again. I will take care of that. I marked some as copyvios, some as images with no permission.

For the images marked as "own work" (what they are probably not), I will wait for them to be "unified" and them, ask the uploader to mark it as copyvios himeself... Peter17 (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. Rauenstein (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Peter17, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:La Molaire depuis Capbreton.jpg

Bonjour,
Merci pour avoir identifié cette montagne, cela ne faisait pas très sérieux... --Tangopaso (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

blasons de france

those images I replaced had all been superseded. Why shouldn't I replace them with the file that superseded them?

Hi Sportsfan92,

No, those images are not superseded. They perfectly comply with the rules of fr:Projet:Blasons (several people implied). User:Heralder (one guy) marked them superseded to incite people use his images but has no legitimacy to do so.

Contributors from Wikipedias should use the image they like. Contributors from French WP should use the images from fr:Projet:Blasons. The page Blasons de France is mainly maintained by people implied in fr:Projet:Blasons, so it should use the images from fr:Projet:Blasons to avoid useless reverts.

Best regards. Peter17 (talk) 08:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Brussels region's arms

Hi. I was wondering where you have seen the flower emblem of the Brussels region being used as the charge on a coat of arms? What's the source for "D'azur à l'iris des marais d'or."? Regards. - Ssolbergj (talk) 09:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Ssolbergj,

I made the coat of arms for that page: [3]. I assumed that the information on the page was correct, but I have no other element to assess that the coat of arms actually exists.

The description was already present in the first version of the page: [4], so, I don't know where it comes from.

Best regards. Peter17 (talk) 09:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I see. I've now asked the editor on french wikipedia the same question, I'll see what his answer is. Thanks! - Ssolbergj (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Tools/KIPI uploader

When is 2.8 going to be released? I didn't find any info on their website, you might want to update this page. --Nemo 23:31, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Nemo!

It should be released this week, I believe: http://community.kde.org/Digikam/GSoC2012

I will update the page soon.

Best regards. Peter17 (talk) 13:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Mur BD Yoko Tsuno by Roger Leloup, Brussels - cropped.jpg

File:Mur BD Yoko Tsuno by Roger Leloup, Brussels - cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Vera (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Peter17, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 02:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio/File «Sylvain et Sylvette »

Hello Peter17. I am sincerely sorry about copyvio created by this file. I owe you an apology. I have not been paying enough attention. Please accept my regrets. Sincerely yours, --Agota ^{Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir} 10:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Oups ! Vous êtes français comme moi. Bref le message est passé... Je suis relativement nouveau sur Commons et pensais que Flickr, d'où provenait le fichier, était une garantie de licence libre, or il n'en est rien. Je serai à l'avenir plus attentif aux mentions concernant les droits sur ce site. Bien à vous, --Agota ^{Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir} 10:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Pas de problème. Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 11:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Afin de ne pas faire de nouvelle bêtise, juste une question rapide : je suis possesseur d'un autographe signé de J.-L. Pesch, représentant le personnage BD de Sylvain ; question : ai-je le droit (puisque je suis le propriétaire), d'importer sur Commons une photographie du croquis ainsi qu'une autre de la signature, en vue d'utilisations sur WP ? Par avance merci de votre avis. Cordialement, --Agota ^{Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir} 17:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Là, tu me poses une colle ! La réponse devrait être indiquée sur cette page : Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag mais elle n'y est pas, puisque Pesch est français... Je te recommande de poser la question sur le Bistro, tu auras sans doute des avis plus éclairés ! Bon courage ! Peter17 (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Merci malgré tout de ta réponse ! Bonne idée ma foi... Cordialement, --Agota ^{Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir} 17:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Butée michell

Bonjour,

Nous faisons un TIPE sur la portance et la traînée et donc l'expérience de la butée michell nous intéresse. Pour la réaliser, serait-il possible de "fabriquer" le dispositif nous même ou il faut absolument utiliser un dispositif tout prêt?

Bonjour,

Je pense que la réalisation d'une butée Michell constituerait un sujet de TIPE à elle seule... À mon avis, le plus simple serait de contacter les universités les plus proches pour leur demander si vous pouvez réaliser vos expériences avec leur matériel. Les professeurs apprécient généralement que les étudiants s'intéressent à leur domaine et accepteront certainement. J'ai pris ces photos à l'université de Lille I, mais je n'y suis plus présent cette année. Bon courage ! Peter17 (talk) 18:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Public writers

Salut ! Je cherchais comment on peut appeler un "écrivain public" en anglais et d'après ce que j'ai lu à droite à gauche, "public writer" n'aurait pas beaucoup de sens pour un anglophone. Comme tu as créé la catégorie:Public writers tu as peut-être plus d'infos ? Est-ce que ça serait à fusionner avec Category:Scribes ? Ou une sous-catégorie comme Category:Scriveners ? Voir dans w:Scrivener et w:Scribe. Damouns இ 12:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Salut, non, désolé, je n'ai pas plus d'infos. Je pense que j'ai dû faire une traduction mot-à-mot parce que je trouvais que la catégorie manquait. Pas de problème si tu veux la fusionner avec une autre. Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

J'ai redirigé vers Category:Public letter-writers. Je me suis basé sur le grand dictionnaire terminologique de l'Office québécois de la langue française. Damouns இ 11:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Un grand merci

	Photographe-JMJiste
	Merci pour les photos des JMJ! Cordialement, Paralacre (talk) 10:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lille - Couvent des Dominicains - 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Lille - Couvent des Dominicains - 2.jpg
• File:Lille - Couvent des Dominicains - 3.jpg
• File:Lille - Couvent des Dominicains - 4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Suppression d'images ?

Bonjour, vous avez demander la suppression de plusieurs images que j'ai importées depuis le site Shipspotting.com. Pour information, j'ai envoyé des DEMANDES DE PUBLICATIONS au détenteurs des copyrights qui m'ont AUTORISE à publier leurs images sur Wikimédia Commons. Il est donc inutile de supprimer ces images qui ont été insérés avec l'autorisation de leur auteur. Il est clairement indiqué dans les descriptions des images concernés Picture taken by Nom de l'auteur Image prise par Nom de l'auteur.

Bonne journée.

Anthony

Bonjour Anthony,

Il n'est pas suffisant que tu ais reçu cette autorisation. Il faut encore prouver que tu l'as reçue : un administrateur OTRS doit recevoir, lire et constater que l'image est bien libre.

Notamment, il faut que l'auteur dise clairement qu'il autorise la réutilisation par quiconque et y compris à but commercial. En l'absence de ces informations, l'image sera supprimée.

Bonne soirée. Peter17 (talk) 19:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour.

Concernant les images que vous avez supprimés, puis-je envoyer à un administrateur OTRS des captures d'écran des messages envoyés aux détenteur de copyright et leurs réponses afin de faire remettre les images sur Wikimédia Commons.

Bonne journée.

--Lev. Anthony (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Please tell Lev. Anthony that he can send the email, and our representative will look at it. It depends on the nature of the email; I can't say yes or no. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Anthony,

Ce n'est pas moi qui ai supprimé les images. Ce sont des administrateurs. Tu peux transférer les emails aux administrateurs OTRS et ils te diront si cela convient ou pas. Ni Magog ni moi ne pouvons te dire cela sans voir les messages.

Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour. Désolé de répondre aussi tardivement, je ne me suis pas reconnecté depuis plusieurs jours. J'ai abandonné l'idée d'importer les images de Shipspotting (malgré les autorisations) car cela m'ennuie d'importer des images qui sont supprimées par la suite (dernière en date : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:SS_Kanguroo.jpg, dont le photographe d'origine est probablement décédé il y a plusieurs années, le navire ayant déjà coulé en 1916).

Bonne journée.

--Lev. Anthony (talk) 11:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

Dear Peter17,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.

Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »

We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.

—

User:Mono

Organizing Team

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Peter17, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Peter17, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Église du Saint-Esprit (Paris) 2.jpg

And also:

• File:Église du Saint-Esprit (Paris) 3.jpg
• File:Église du Saint-Esprit (Paris) 4.jpg
• File:Église du Saint-Esprit (Paris) 5.jpg
• File:Église du Saint-Esprit (Paris) 6.jpg
• File:Église du Saint-Esprit (Paris) 7.jpg

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

LMPT 02/02/2014

Pourquoi avoir modifié le titre de la catégorie ? Certaines manifs sont catégorisés dans des cat. intitulées Demonstration against same-sex marriage in lieu, date ; Manifestation contre le mariage homosexuel, lieu, date ou encore La Manif Pour Tous - lieu - date... On ne comprend plus rien... 92.142.187.221 18:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Le titre « Demonstration against same-sex marriage in ... » ne convient pas pour les manifestations d'hier, vu que ce n'était pas leur objet. Il est préférable d'utiliser leur nom. Rien n'empêche de renommer les autres catégories. Peter17 (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Pro git cover.jpg

File:Pro git cover.jpg , which You delete.

The entire Pro Git book, written by Scott Chacon and published by Apress, is available here. All content is licensed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 license. Print versions of the book are available
on Amazon.com. (©)

From http://git-scm.com/book . Therefore I think, what this image is sharing by license "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0" as part of the book. I please, what You will return image (or willn`t delete). To my high regret don`t I to add files to wikibooks (especially https://uk.wikibooks.org/wiki/Pro_GIT ), therefore I add image here. Thanks. DEngine86 (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I didn't delete this file. An administrator did.

Please make a undeletion request to the administrators and provide complete license information on the file description page. The information you gave about the file was not sufficient to distinguish it from a copyright violation.

Best regards. Peter17 (talk) 17:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks. DEngine86 (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Missing Email Contact / N'oubliez pas de saisir votre adresse de courriel

Madame, monsieur, merci pour votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments 2014. Il semblerait que vous n'ayez pas saisi votre adresse de courriel dans les préférences de votre compte utilisateurs Wikimedia Commons. Cette adresse est nécessaire afin que nous puissions vous contacter en cas de victoire de l'une de vos images. Vous pouvez la saisir dans vos préférences > options de courriel. Bonne fin de concours.

Hello, it seems you haven't entered your email address in vos préférences. This address is needed so that we can contact you if any of your picture is selected as a winner of the competition. Have fun with the competition.

Video contest

Hi Peter17! I'm one of the organizers of the video contest Videos für Wikipedia-Artikel in the German Wikipedia which aims at including more videos into Wikipedia articles. The topic of our contest is "Digital Society". I discovered that your video of a rotating hard disc is included in the German article about hard discs. Therefor I want to invite you to participate with this video in the contest. The procedure is very easy: You would just have to add the template {{Video für Wikipedia-Artikel 2014}}. Obviously, if you have other video material consistent with the topic "Digital Society", you are wellcome to participate with it as well. --ALi (VWA) (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks! Peter17 (talk) 09:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition

WLM CH (Deutsch) Liebe/r Teilnehmer/in des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014, Herzlichen Dank dass du zu Wiki4Alps beigetragen und deine Bilder mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast. Im Rahmen des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs sind über 2500 Bilder von Kulturgütern in alpinen Regionen auf Wikimedia Commons geladen worden. Und die Jury ist daran, diese Bilder zu bewerten. Wir kommen so bald wie möglich wieder auf Dich zu, um die Gewinner bekannt zu geben. Auf der Wettbewerbsseite http://wiki4alps.ch findet ihr alle notwendigen Informationen, oder ihr könnt euch auch gerne an info@wikimedia.ch wenden. Mit den besten Grüssen, Das Organisationskomittee

WLM CH (Français) Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH 2014, Nous vous remercions de votre contribution à Wiki4Alps, et de partager vos photos avec le monde entier! Le concours a réuni plus de 2500 photos du patrimoine culturel des Alpes et le jury a commencé l'évaluation. Nous reviendrons bientôt pour annoncer les gagnants. Vous trouverez sur le site web du concours http://wiki4alps.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch. Avec nos salutations les meilleures, le comité d'organisation.

WLM CH (English) Dear participants to the WLM CH contest 2014, Thank you for having contributed to Wiki4Alps and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! The contest gathered more than 2,500 pictures of cultural heritage objects of the Alps and the jury is currently evaluating them. We will come back soon to announce the winners. You will find the contest's website http://wiki4alps.ch necessary information there or you may write to us using the following address: info@wikimedia.ch. With our warmest regards, The organising committee

WLM CH (Italiano) Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014 Grazie per aver contribuito a Wiki4Alps e per aver condiviso le tue fotografie con tutto il mondo! Il concorso ha collezionato più di 2.500 fotografie del patrimonio culturale delle Alpi e la giuria ha cominciato la valutazione. Presto saranno noti i vincitori. Per ulteriori informazioni si prega di visitare il sito web http://wiki4alps.ch o potete scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch. Con i nostri migliori saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore

Category:Temple of Earth

Hi there. It's not very clear, judging by the media in it, what Category:Temple of Earth is supposed to be a category for. Can you explain why you have created this category? Regards, - Takeaway (talk) 12:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I created it for Category:Temple of Earth (Beijing). Please see [5]. Best regards. Peter17 (talk) 13:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Ha! It's funny how the category filled up with all sorts of unrelated items since then! I'll clean it out and change it to a redirect instead. Regards, - Takeaway (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Pour l'image de la mairie et de l'église Saint-Martin à Sare! Aarp65 (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Merci ! Peter17 (talk) 07:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition

WLM CH (Deutsch) Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH Gerne bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb WLM. Die Liste der Gewinner kann nun auf unserer Website sowie auch auf Wikimedia Commons eingesehen werden. Wir gratulieren den Gewinnerinnen und Gewinnern, die wir persönlich kontaktieren werden, ganz herzlich. Der Verein Wikimedia CH trifft gerade die Vorbereitungen für Wiki Loves Earth 2015, ein Fotowettbewerb rund um das Thema Natur und Nationalparks. Dieser neue Fotowettbewerb wird bereits am 1.Mai 2015 starten. Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr wieder mit dabei seid! Mit besten Grüssen, Das Organisationsteam

WLM CH (Français) Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Monuments CH, La liste des gagnants est disponible sur le site ainsi que sur son pendant Wikimedia Commons! Nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément. Wikimedia CH se prépare maintenant pour Wiki Loves Earth 2015, un concours photographique consacré à la nature et aux parcs, qui débutera le 1er mai prochain et auquel nous vous invitons à participer! Meilleurs messages, Le Comité d’organisation

WLM CH (English) Dear Wiki Loves Monuments CH participant, We would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published on our website as well as on Wikimedia Commons - our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually. Wikimedia CH is now gearing up for Wiki Loves Earth 2015, a photo contest dedicated to the nature and to parks. This new contest will start on May 1st, 2015: feel free to join! With our best regards, The organization's committee

WLM CH (Italiano) Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH Vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata sul nostro sito come anche su Wikimedia Commons - le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente. Wikimedia CH sta ora organizzando u nuovo concorso per Wiki Loves Earth 2015 dedicato alla natura e ai parchi. Questo concorso inizierà l'1 maggio 2015: ci auguriamo di avervi tra i nostri concorrenti! Saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore

OTRS pending - Christophe Dickès

Hello Peter17,

Aucun courriel ne semble être parvenu à OTRS pour les images de Christophe Dickès pour le moment.

Comme tu l'as bien indiqué dans les images postées, il nous faut évidemment la permission de l'auteur de la photo ou de la personne détenant les droits sur l'images. Aussi, une licence libre devra être indiquée.

Je pense que je ne t'apprends rien vu ton ancienneté, mais je voulais tout de même de donner un petit message à ce sujet :-)

Bonne journée

--Scoopfinder^(d) 12:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour Scoopfinder,

Ces images m'ont été transmises par Christophe Dickès lui-même et je les ai importées à sa demande. Il m'a écrit qu'elles étaient « libres de droits », sans préciser de licence.

Je lui ai demandé en retour d'envoyer un ticket à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org en suivant la procédure Commons:OTRS/fr pour qu'il précise lui-même la licence.

Ça date d'hier soir, donc je pense qu'il n'a pas encore eu le temps d'envoyer ce ticket.

Peut-on attendre jusqu'à la fin du week-end ?

Merci d'avance, bonne journée. Peter17 (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Peter17! (n'hésite pas à me notifier dans tes réponses)

Oui oui, sans souci, surtout avec la période de "fêtes" dans certains pays chrétiens actuellement. Les images avec OTRS pending ne sont générallement pas supprimées avant 1 semaine sans réponse (voir plus). Et, au pire, si elles sont supprimées, elles seront restaurées. --Scoopfinder^(d) 12:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status

File:Christophe Dickès - 1.jpg

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Christophe Dickès - 1.jpg|base=Image license}} Jarekt (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status

File:Christophe Dickès - 2.jpg

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Christophe Dickès - 2.jpg|base=Image license}} Jarekt (talk) 19:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

I know. It is explained just above (in French). The license is supposed to be sent in an OTRS ticket by Christophe Dickès himself. Regards. Peter17 (talk) 18:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright Violation: Pub TEPPAZ Femme Monde Vectorielle.svg

Bonjour Peter,

j'ai créé cette reproduction vectorielle de publicité dans le but de la rendre plus claire pour le visiteur, à défaut d'en trouver une numérisation convenable. Que puis-je faire pour rendre ce contenu Wikimedia en accord avec les règles du site, et ainsi prévenir sa suppression? Spécifier l'auteur original (Alain Gauthier) dans la rubrique "Description"? (j'avoue l'avoir précisé sur la page Teppaz et non sur la page Wikimedia). Ajouter des champs "copyright" manquants? Spécifier l'image dont je me suis servi comme modèle? (http://a398.idata.over-blog.com/1/09/44/33/Design/teppaz/Pub15.jpg)

Bien cordialement, bonne journée.

Bonjour,

La seule solution me semble être l'envoi d'un ticket Commons:OTRS/fr par le détenteur des droits d'auteur (l'auteur original ou plus probablement l'entreprise ayant commandité le travail) autorisant la réutilisation y compris à but commercial de cette œuvre. Sans cette autorisation explicite, l'image sera supprimée.

Je pense que le problème est le même pour File:Pub Teppaz Femme au Bain (Variante).svg et File:Pub Teppaz Vectorielle Simple.svg même si je n'ai pas trouvé l'image originale.

Bien cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 10:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

D'accord, oui cela risque d'être compliqué dans l'immédiat. Dommage, la page Teppaz en sera moins colorée!

Merci pour votre réponse rapide,

Bonne continuation.

Valued image

Pour information Commons:Valued image candidates/Salignac-Eyvigues - Église Saint-Rémy d'Eyvigues - 9.jpg Olivier LPB (talk) 12:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Rémy d'Eyvigues, NE exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Merci ! Peter17 (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Et aussi :

• Vitrail de Sainte Geneviève - Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste-de-la-Salle (Paris).jpg
• Guignonville - Église Saint-Félix - 3.jpg

Olivier LPB (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows of Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste-de-la-Salle (Paris) - Saint Genevieve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, the category linked to the scope needs to contain the image. DeFacto (talk). 21:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment There is a small mistake is not St. Elizabeth --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Archaeodontosaurus it's done. I had change the name of the file yesterday, but did a mistake on the scope Olivier LPB (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, good for me too - best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 16:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Félix de Guignonville SW exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Olivier LPB (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Merci ! Peter17 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Je me suis permis de faire un crop de l'image en gardant juste une petite marge d'ombre. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows of Église Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette (Paris) - Sainte Philomène.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good picture and good scope, it would have to be used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)  Done now on 3 wiki Olivier LPB (talk) 06:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

une autre Olivier LPB (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

Bonjour Peter17,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments en Belgique & Luxembourg
• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments (international, autres pays)

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guignonville - Église Saint-Félix - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tower could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Christophe Dickès - 1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Christophe Dickès - 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Code rangement alphabétique des catégories

Bonjour Peter17, J'ai pris en compte votre demande de rentrer mes photos déposées dans commons dans des catégories. Dur de tout comprendre. Suite mes photos déposées,vous avez créé "Église Saint-Martin de Goulet" que l'on retrouve dans churches in orne rangée à la lettre G. Suite votre demande, j'ai créé une catégorie "Église Saint-Paterne de Coulonces". Dans churches in orne, cette catégorie se range à la lettre É. Que faut-il faire pour avoir un rangement à la lettre C ? Merci chBougui — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChBougui (talk • contribs) 17:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour chBougui,

Merci pour vos efforts ! Pour trier les catégories, vous pouvez procéder comme ceci : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3A%C3%89glise_Saint-Paterne_de_Coulonces&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=227292131&oldid=227077766 : le caractère | ([Alt Gr] + [6]) est suivi par la chaîne de caractères à utiliser pour le tri : ici « Coulonces » pour la catégorie « Churches in Orne ».

Bonne continuation ! Peter17 (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

say no to packages from googleDrive!

Hi! Thank you for helping some users with the new bundles appimages of Digikam But I cannot install something from googleDrive :(

I saw a security bridge when I read "drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM": https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:KIPI_uploader&action=history

I've been traying to make KIPI work on different KDE image viewers untill I read your post: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:KIPI_uploader#Uploading_through_Digikam_KIPI_fails_due_to_inability_to_login.2C_authentication_failure

Here we are only at 5.5 :( https://github.com/KDE/digikam/releases

I would love to make it work, but not with a package from googleDrive :/

Best regards EasyKL (talk) 06:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Nobody is forced to install it from Google Drive. You can compile digikam from the sources and it will work. That's what I do. Regards. Peter17 (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

and now it works! THX :) EasyKL — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 171.5.162.200 (talk) 09:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Grégor Puppinck (5262058682).jpg

File:Grégor Puppinck (5262058682).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 08:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Une chartreuse n'est pas toujours un établissement religieux !

Bonjour. Je t'engage à lire l'article en français Chartreuse (construction) avant de continuer à faire des dégâts. Merci. Père Igor (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour. Ok, je comprends. Je pense qu'il faudrait au minimum renommer Category:Chartreuses (buildings) en Category:Chartreuses (houses) parce qu'une chartreuse (monastère) est précisément un "building"... donc on ne fait qu'entretenir la confusion, d'où mon erreur. Merci du signalement. Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Effectivement. Voilà, j'ai renommé la totalité. Crois-tu qu'il vaut mieux laisser les redirections ou je demande leur suppression ? Père Igor (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Merci ! Je pense qu'on peut conserver les redirections sans problème. Bonne continuation ! Peter17 (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Uganda - Arcidiocesi di Gulu.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Uganda - Arcidiocesi di Gulu.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

• File:Uganda - Arcidiocesi di Kampala.png
• File:Uganda - Arcidiocesi di Mbarara.png
• File:Uganda - Arcidiocesi di Tororo.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Arua.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Fort Portal.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Hoima.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Jinja.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Kabale.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Kasana-Luweero.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Kasese.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Kiyinda-Mityana.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Kotido.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Lira.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Lugazi.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Masaka.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Moroto.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Nebbi.png
• File:Uganda - Diocesi di Soroti.png

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Infobox Wikidata

Bonjour Marianne,

Pourquoi ajouter l'identifiant Wikidata en paramètre du modèle {{Wikidata Infobox}} ? [6]

Les informations s'affichent automatiquement dans l'infobox lorsque la catégorie est définie dans la section « Autres sites » de Wikidata... Donc cet ajout me semble inutile voire potentiellement problématique (si l'élément est fusionné avec un autre, je pense que l'infobox ne fonctionnera plus)...

Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Si une catégorie commons est liée à un élément Wikidata, je ne vois pas pourquoi il risquerais d'être fusionné avec un autre, mais j'avoue que je ne suis pas à 300% au top avec Wikitada.

Pour le moment, mon problème est de faire correctement le lien entre Wikidata et les catégories commons de monuments historiques, avec mise à jour du coté Wikidata, en parallèle, alors que certains lien se passent visiblement mal - voir Category:Mérimée ID not in Wikidata. Quand je peux, je fait les complément sur Wikidata, mais cela semble ne pas suffir. Avec l'ajout sur le modèle, {{Wikidata Infobox}}, cela semble fonctionner. As tu une autre solution ? Marianne Casamance (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Pour les éléments qui semblent mal passer, as-tu essayé de faire une modification nulle (cliquer sur « Modifier » puis sur « Publier » sans changer le wikitexte) ? Ça force le rafraîchissement de la catégorie dans le cache Mediawiki et, pour moi, ça résout le problème...

Dis-moi si ça convient... Bien cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 16:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Chapelle_Saint-François_du_couvent_des_Capucins_de_Céret

Chapelle Saint-François du couvent des Capucins de Céret has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zaloudock (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

qid dans le modèle Wikidata Infobox

Bonjour,

Merci pour cette modification. Je ne sais pas trop comment marche l'association entre les catégories commons et les entrées Wikidata ; comme je ne vois pas de « propagation » de l'un à l'autre en l'espace de quelques minutes, je doublonne à chaque fois en indiquant le qid sur Commons, et la propriété correspondate sur Wikidata. Cela me permet de vérifier instantanément le rendu de l'infobox sur Commons. Mais je suis conscient que ce n'est que temporaire… Litlok (talk) 11:39, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Litlok,

Merci pour ton message.

Pour associer l'élément Wikidata à la catégorie Commons, il faut définir le lien Commons de l'entité vers la catégorie : [7]. Ça se fait dans la section « Autres sites ». C'est une opération différente de l'ajout de la propriété P373. Par contre, ça prend parfois quelques minutes...

Bonne continuation. Peter17 (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Aaaaah ! Merci infiniment ! Litlok (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

@Litlok: Je rajouterai qu'en purgeant la page commons, on accélère le processus de propagation. Olivier LPB (talk) 08:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Merci Olivier LPB. Je purgeais bien (des deux côtés, d'ailleurs…) mais évidemment cela ne servait pas à grand'chose ! Litlok (talk) 10:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Palais - Église Sainte-Madeleine - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could use some cropping to improve the balance. Also the black areas on the left could do with some cleaning.--Peulle 11:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)  Done for the cropping Olivier LPB 12:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 12:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Anglet - Église Saint-Michel - 24.jpg

File:Anglet - Église Saint-Michel - 24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Jean-Philippe_Arrou-Vignod

Jean-Philippe Arrou-Vignod has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

J. N. Squire (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Chapelle_de_La_Broue_de_Saint-Firmin

Category:Chapelle_de_La_Broue_de_Saint-Firmin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fr.Latreille (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Famille Dickès

Bonjour Monsieur,

Je vois que vous connaissez personnellement Christophe Dickès, qui vous a fait don d'un portrait pour illustrer son article sur Wikipédia. Ne pourriez-vous pas voir avec lui pour obtenir une photo de son père, Jean-Pierre Dickès ?

Bien à vous,

Marc J. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.254.98.189 (talk) 11:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour Marc J.,

Je ne connais pas personnellement M. Dickès, mais j'ai été en contact avec lui par courriel et il m'a en effet transmis ce portrait pour que je l'importe.

Je viens de lui envoyer un courriel pour lui demander s'il pouvait faire de même avec un portrait de son père.

Bien cordialement. Peter17 (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Apostolic_Vicariate_of_San_Vicente

Apostolic Vicariate of San Vicente has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

·×ald·^es 04:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Restaurations ?

Bonjour Peter17,

J'ai vu que vous aviez restauré l'article sur Émile Duport et je vous en remercie. Bloqué indéfiniment, je n'ai jamais été banni : j'ai donc le droit de créer un nouveau compte pour collaborer de manière constructive (ce que j'ai toujours fait). Mais Lebrouillard se fiche des usages et des recommandations. Lorsque je crée un nouveau compte, il supprime toutes mes collaborations, tous mes commentaires en PdD et tous les articles que j'ai pu créer (tout en précisant être conscient que les collaborations ne posent pas problème, le problème étant ma personne : personnellement, j'appelle cela du vandalisme). Même les bannis ne voient pas leurs articles et modifications systématiquement supprimés !

Le plus « drôle », c'est que j'avais été bloqué indéfiniment car je souhaitais mettre fin à ma collaboration et, avant cela, supprimer une bonne partie de mes commentaires et discussions en PdD. On m'avait alors reproché ces suppression car c'était « contre le règlement ». Ni moi, ni personne d'autre ne pouvait (soi disant) supprimer d'anciennes collaborations (y compris les seuls discussions et engueulades en PdD) car elles appartenaient désormais au domaine public. Voilà qu'aujourd'hui ces collaborations et discussions en PdD n'appartiennent visiblement plus au domaine public, puisque Lebrouillard en fait ce qu'il veut. Parfois, il n'hésite d'ailleurs pas à supprimer un article que j'ai créé pour le recréer et s'en attribuer la paternité (ce qui est illégal, mais peu importe).

Un exemple de contribution supprimée : j'avais mis en forme la bibliographie de l'article Légitimisme, notamment pour mieux correspondre aux usages et supprimer les répétitions : Lebrouillard l'a supprimé sous prétexte que j'aurais fait ces modifications avec un compte "faux-nez" (quel rapport avec la suppression de la modification ? : cela nuit à l'encyclopédie !) !

Si vous souhaitiez restaurer d'autres pages, j'avais également créé :

• Jean-Pierre Brancourt
• Groupe de Saint-Gall
• Sanctuaire Notre-Dame-d'Afrique
• Marie-Paul Farran

Bien cordialement, 86.192.234.235 19:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Peter17,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Peter17,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Peter17,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Peter17,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Mistake on a Commons category

In Category:Église Sainte-Suzanne de Sainte-Suzanne (Arriège), i see a mistake : its [[Ariège]. Can you change it ? I dont know how to do it. Thanks. Sergio09200 (talk) 15:19, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for spotting this! Regards. Peter17 (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Peter17,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Locomotora del constructor Anjubault,

Hello

You requested a picture of Locomotora del constructor Anjubault, and now is available: [8]

Best --El Pantera (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Wonderful! Thank you very much! Peter17 (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Église_Saint-Marcel_de_Saint-Marcel_(Marseille)

Category:Église_Saint-Marcel_de_Saint-Marcel_(Marseille) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fr.Latreille (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

statue Notre-Dame de France

Bonjour Peter, Aurais tu par hasard une photo des vierges Pèlerine de Notre-Dame de France ? Pourrais tu en déposer une dans le dossier common de la statue de Baillet en France ? Merci. --Bergil (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Bergil, je n'ai rien sous la main... Si jamais je trouve quelque chose, je l'importerai bien volontiers ! Bon week-end ! Peter17 (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bernard_Ferrand

Bernard Ferrand has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sammyday (talk) 10:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

HardDisk1.ogv was nominated for MOTD

Your file has been nominated for a Media of the Day.

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file HardDisk1.ogv, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:HardDisk1.ogv, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Image coup de cœur du 6 septembre 2020 - Wiki Loves Monuments France

Votre photo « Poey-de-Lescar - Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste - 12.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 6 September 2020.

Maud-Sophie Leccia WMFr (talk)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Peter17,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Plaça de l'Hospici d'Elna.jpg

Bon soir / Good evening.

I see that you put the file File:Plaça de l'Hospici d'Elna.jpg into the category Monastère du Vallespir. I thing that it must be a confusion with this category. According to the coordinates in Wikidata, this monastery is in Elna, but according to the Catalan Wikipedia article https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monestir_de_Vallespir this monastery doesn't exist now, it was an old monastery in the region of Vallespir, and Elna is not in the Vallespir region. I thing that all is a confusion and that this category should be removed, also the coordinates in wikidata.--Jordi G (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

I think that what we can see in this photo is Sant Jordi de l'Hospital, because it's a chapel just next to an old hospital.--Jordi G (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jordi G! Thanks for your message. The reason is that the image was added on item Monestir de Vallespir (Q11937338) (see [9]). I will remove it. Thanks again! Best regards Peter17 (talk) 08:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Chapelle du Villardon

Bonsoir,

Je pensais avoir réglé correctement la distinction entre la chapelle du Villardon et l'autre chapelle, voisine certes, mais n'appartenant pas au hameau du Villardon, et que j'avais donc classée ailleurs (ce que j'avais déjà fait il y a plusieurs années, et que tu avais déjà révoqué -- mais l'historique correspondant me semble avoir disparu). Je vois que tu as préféré créer deux catégories de noms très voisins, ce qui entretient la confusion que tu déclares (en anglais) vouloir éviter. Bref, puisque tu tiens à ce que les photos de la chapelle du Villardon appartiennent à une catégorie nommée Chapelle Saint-Louis du Villardon, je pense qu'il faut maintenant faire disparaître la catégorie Chapelle du Villardon, et laisser, comme je l'avais fait, les deux photos de l'autre chapelle hors de la catégorie Villardon (par exemple Saint-Eusèbe-en-Champsaur). Ce sera clair, et dans ambiguïté. La situation actuelle n'est pas tenable. Peux-tu être enfin d'accord ? --Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Bonjour @Fr.Latreille: ,

Désolé pour la révocation dont tu parles, je n'en ai pas de souvenir.

Il y a une 1e chapelle qui d'après Mérimée et clochers.org s'appelle « Chapelle Saint-Louis » et est située au Villardon. Donc je propose de ne pas toucher à la catégorie Category:Chapelle Saint-Louis du Villardon. Ça me semble être une identification complète et non ambigüe pour cette chapelle (ce que signifiait mon commentaire de renommage).

Pour l'autre chapelle, que clochers.org ne nomme pas, je ne suis pas d'accord pour qu'on supprime la catégorie. J'essaie précisément que chaque édifice ait sa catégorie pour rassembler les photos d'un même édifice et ne pas le confondre avec un autre.

Par contre, je n'ai aucun problème avec un renommage de la catégorie. Je suis d'accord que le nom actuel laisse une ambiguïté. Que peut-on donner comme autre nom que Category:Chapelle du Villardon ? Est-ce que « Chapelle de Lantelmes » (puisque si j'ai bien compris, c'est le nom du lieu-dit où elle se trouve) te conviendrait ? Ou as-tu une autre proposition ?

Merci d'avance et bonne continuation. Peter17 (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

On y arrivera ! OK donc pour la catégorie Chapelle Saint-Louis du Villardon, bien que personnellement je ne suis pas favorable au fait d'insérer systématiquement le nom du saint patron dans le nom de la catégorie. Mais je sais que je suis un peu seul sur cette position. De même je suis réticent sur la constitution de catégories de un ou deux éléments. Je préfère les catégories larges permettant de visualiser d'un coup d’œil une multitude d'objets d'une même famille (ici les chapelles des Hautes-Alpes ; on pourrait se restreindre au Champsaur). Je trouve désagréable d'être obligé d'ouvrir une à une les sous-catégories pour en faire le tour. Cela étant, si tu insistes, le nom de Chapelle de Lantelmes paraît être le seul possible. Vas-y. Et on passe à autre chose. Bonsoir. Sans rancune. Fr.Latreille (talk) 20:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Merci pour ton retour. J'ai renommé. Bonne soirée ! Peter17 (talk) 21:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Église_Saint-Édouard_de_la_Madrague

Église Saint-Édouard de la Madrague has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fr.Latreille (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Abbatiale_de_Dol-de-Bretagne

Abbatiale de Dol-de-Bretagne has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sare - Église Saint-Martin - 4.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)