User talk:Krd/archive/2021

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Can you help me deleting this picture?

Hello Krd, I'm the photographer and the model of this picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MadMouse.tif) and I do not give my permission to use it. It has been stolen an it has copyright as you can see on my website: https://www.lidiavives.com/pop/mad-mouse Could you please delete it? Thank you!

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

OTRS again

Sorry to bother you again, Krd, but I'm just curious to follow up about User_talk:Krd/archive/2020#OTRS_permissions_for_Images_from_Khalili_Collections_partnership. I'm just looking for any information on what may be holding up those tickets. Thanks in advance for any help, MartinPoulter (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

There are no open tickets on this issue, so it is either resolved as the permission was received, of the sender failed to answer our followup questions. Do you know the ticket number? --Krd 16:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Alec Smithson

Hello, since you're a check user, here we found another SP IP of that user. I've added it to the related category. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. Is there anything more to do on Commons related to this? --Krd 17:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Grimmepreis 2019 032.jpg

Guten Morgen Krd, ich wollte fragen, ob es in Ordnung ist, dass ich dein Bild in den englischsprachigen Wikipedia-Artikeln über Erol Yesilkaya (Drehbuchautor) und Sebastian Marka (Regisseur) eingebunden habe. Wenn das rechtlich nicht möglich ist, entferne ich das Bild selbstverständlich schnellstmöglich wieder. Viele Grüße--FilmMusikUndAnderes (talk) 06:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo FilmMusikUndAnderes. Da brauchst Du nicht zu fragen, bitte gern einfach machen. --Krd 06:38, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Krd, herzlichen Dank. Aber ich war mir da etwas unsicher. Diese Sache mit den Bildrechten ist doch teilweise sehr komplex. Dir noch eine schöne Woche!--FilmMusikUndAnderes (talk) 15:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Krd

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Uploads by Firedrop

Hello, I have tagged some of their uploads as missing permissions and you have added an OTRS ticket on one. Would you mind checking the others ? Thanks, — Racconish ^💬 12:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

The ticket mentions only one photo. I asked them now about the rest. --Krd 12:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 12:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Explanation

Both Edgar181 and Sealle have been the same situation, but yet you choose to block one but not the another, even giving them user rights despite their deception. Also, you failed to address the votes that called for a block as well in your closing note. Why is that? 1989 (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

At very first, this is the wrong tone here. Please try again. --Krd 17:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me? 1989 (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:AGF against me, ever heard of that? --Krd 17:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

All I asked was to explain your actions. It should be quite simple Krd, come on. 1989 (talk) 17:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

All I asked for is being asked in an at least somewhat polite way, in the time I need to make myself familiar again with the Edgar181 case. I hope that's not asked too much. --Krd 17:36, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

In what way was I not polite? Please, tell me. 1989 (talk) 17:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

I have either the time nor the crayons to explain politeness. --Krd 17:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Of course you won't explain your issue with me and yet I'm the problem here? Look in a mirror. 1989 (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Edgar181 was blocked by me in my function as checkuser who handled the CU request. Edgar181 edited the day before the block. His admin status was removed by stewards after he retired during the desysop request, in which I've not been involved at all. Other user rights were likely not restored be cause he was blocked anyway.

Sealle got his admin bit removed by me as closing crat after the desysop request. I restored previous minor rights per common practice in the same step. I made absolutely no call about whether he shall be or shall not be blocked. The desysop request was not a vote to block or not to block, but if you like to have that, I'm not opposed.

As I now feel involved in the case, I choose to leave this decision to any other Commons admin. I suggest to put that on the admin noticeboard. --Krd 17:57, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Fehlerhafter Upload

Hallo Krd, weißt Du, was mit File:Schwarzenborn (Cölbe) Ev. Kirche (02).jpg schiefgelaufen ist? Die Datei ist leer und mir gelingt es nicht das Bild nochmal hinterherzuladen. Es heißt: "Es ist keine Datei dieses Namens vorhanden. Du kannst jedoch diese Datei hochladen." Aber wenn ich das versuche, kommt die Antwort, dass dieselbe Datei schon vorhanden ist. Dank und Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 07:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Es sieht so aus, als hättest Du nur die Seite angelegt ohne eine Datei hochzuladen. Ich hab es mal gelöscht, bitte schau ob Du es jetzt neu hochladen kannst. --Krd 07:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Klappt leider auch nicht. Es kommt die Warnung:

"Eine Datei dieses Namens ist bereits vorhanden. Bitte prüfe File:Schwarzenborn (Cölbe) Ev. Kirche (02).jpg, sofern du dir nicht sicher bist, ob du sie ändern möchtest. File:Schwarzenborn (Cölbe) Ev. Kirche (02).jpg Die hochgeladene Datei ist ein exaktes Duplikat der aktuellen Version von File:Schwarzenborn (Cölbe) Ev. Kirche (02).jpg."

Und unter neuem Namen kann ich es auch nicht hochladen, weil es dann heißt:

"Diese Datei ist ein Duplikat der folgenden Datei: Schwarzenborn (Cölbe) Ev. Kirche (02).jpg Bitte ändere unten die Dateibeschreibung und versuche es erneut."

VG, --Wikiwal (talk) 08:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Schick mir die Datei bitte mal per E-Mail. --Krd 08:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hab's an die wikimedia-Adresse geschickt. Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 08:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Bin sehr froh, dass das Bild (wieder) da ist! Vielen Dank! Bei mir erscheint die Datei nur im Lesemodus. Im Hinblick auf OTRS gilt dasselbe wie für File:Schwarzenborn (Cölbe) Ev. Kirche Orgel.jpg. Nochmals herzlichen Dank für Deine Mühe! VG, --Wikiwal (talk) 09:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Ich hab Deine Mail noch gar nicht bekommen, daher auch nichts weiter gemacht. Sehr seltsam. Es sieht aber jetzt gut aus. --Krd 09:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Da bin ich ja froh, dass ich nicht der einzige bin, der Probleme mit der Datei hat. :-) Danke fürs Wiederherstellen. Jetzt kann man wieder normal bearbeiten. Alles bestens. Gruß, --Wikiwal (talk) 10:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Malformed DR

Hi. Should this RD be deleted? I made a DR for the uploader/nominator of that certain file. I think this RD does not even show the "history" of edits. Therefore...? --E4024 (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I think the DR shall stand as the file appears out of scope. --Krd 06:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Krd,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Admin actions mistake user:Jean-Frédéric

Hi Krd, looks like you made a mistake with user:Jean-Frédéric. JF signed Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2020 the last run (13 August 2020) and he did more than 5 admin actions as required by Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. Please restore his rights and an apology is probably in place. Multichill (talk) 09:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out! --Krd 09:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

COM:HD#Media is missing permission information

Hi, I would welcome your input there. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

hu:Óriás Nándor photo

@Krdbot: Dear Krdbot! The photo was taken more than 70 years ago (1939), please allow permission, the author is unknown https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%93ri%C3%A1sN%C3%A1ndor63-800x800.jpg Regards --SiposBéla1945 (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

hu:Abay Gyula (közgazdász) photo

@Krdbot: Dear Krdbot! The photo was taken more than 70 years ago (1945), please allow permission, the author is unknown File:AbayGyula50-800x800.jpg - Wikimedia Commons Regards --SiposBéla1945 (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

See: COM:LIC --Krd 18:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Frage zur: "CommonsDelinker": Arbeiterwohnungsbaugenossenschaften der DDR Stand 1980er Jahre - Hausordnung und Statut - see also OTRS-[Ticket#2020122410001705]

Guten Morgen Krd, "CommonsDelinker" hat an folgenden Stellen:

die Links zu den gelöschten Dateien:

19800101_xl_Statut-fuer-Arbeiterwohnungsbaugenossenschaften-der-DDR-Stand-1980er-Jahre-Kennzeichen-AW-2a-Ag-311-56-83-V-19-18.pdf
19800101_xl_Hausordnung-Arbeiterwohnungsbaugenossenschaft-Gemeinnuetzige-Wohnungsbaugenossenschaf-AWG-GWG-der-DDR-Stand-1980er-Jahre-Kennzeichen-AW-8b--Ag-311-82-86-WV-6-1-10-1592.pdf
19800101_xl_Hausordnung-Arbeiterwohnungsbaugenossenschaft-Gemeinnuetzige-Wohnungsbaugenossenschaf-AWG-GWG-der-DDR-Stand-1980er-Jahre-Kennzeichen-AW-8b--Ag-311-82-86-WV-6-1-10-1592-Seite-02.jpg
19800101_xl_Hausordnung-Arbeiterwohnungsbaugenossenschaft-Gemeinnuetzige-Wohnungsbaugenossenschaf-AWG-GWG-der-DDR-Stand-1980er-Jahre-Kennzeichen-AW-8b--Ag-311-82-86-WV-6-1-10-1592-Seite-01.jpg

entfernt. Das hätte ich nicht erwartet. Im Falle von 19891002_xl_Postkarte-Wurzelfichte-bei-Buckow-in-der-Maerkischen-Schweiz-Fotograf-unbekannt-Heimat-und-Bild-Reichenbach-Vogtland.jpg ist das nicht geschehen. Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht? An wen kann sich wenden um das zu korrigieren? Viele Grüße --Molgreen (talk) 06:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Ich denke er weiß es nicht besser. Entweder erst nach der Löschung dort eintragen, oder die Edits einfach zurücksetzen, was ich jetzt mal gemacht habe. --Krd 07:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank! Könnte es passieren, dass der Bot bei einem nächsten Durchlauf, wieder denselben Löschvorgang ausführt? --Molgreen (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Diese Bot macht normalerweise jede Sache nur einmal, das sollte also jetzt ok sein. --Krd 16:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Template help

Hi Krd,

I have submitted OTRS Ticket#: 2021031010000104, with signed public domain permission from a photographer named A.S. Thanumaleayan for Project #4. A modified version of this template would be helpful, as it will likely save OTRS volunteers and me some time and effort.

Additionally I received another 1000 or so photos of remote pre-12th century historic monuments for Project #5 last week, from a different photographer, under the ongoing heritage digitization project. I hope to find time to review that collection of photographs, select the useful/good quality ones, and then upload the select ones to commons later this month. Would need another template for that one. I will submit the signed public domain permissions form for Project #5 separately. Just a heads up.

Thank you for all your past help, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

(ps): Sent the signed permissions for Project #5, OTRS Ticket# 2021031010007171. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 11:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I'm busy currently, expect answer in a few days. --Krd 14:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Please take your time, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I have now answered via OTRS/e-mail. --Krd 15:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/ShufaBot

Hello Krd, Could you unlock this bot request ? Bot is ready to run its test round. :) Yug (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 07:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your input

As one of our most active OTRS image volunteers, please join the discussion at Commons_talk:Wikimedia_OTRS_release_generator#Proposal_to_modify_the_release_generator. Thank you in advance, ^Atsme _Talk 📧 13:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 13:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Damir Krznar 2021.jpg

Hi I reverted your edit on File:Damir Krznar 2021.jpg (adding permission tag). Go to the source page to see that the video is licensed under CC.— Dudek1337 (talk) 13:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Thx! --Krd 13:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Shai Navot

Hello,

Just letting you know I've let the Social Change Collective know that they have 7 days to send permission for File:Shai Navot.jpg or it gets deleted. Hopefully they send it through in time.

Nexus000 (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok. --Krd 20:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Changed license

Dear Krd, On 11 March User:Bmwz3hm (active since 2014) added this image to Commons, under a CC-zero license. On 18 March you added OTRS-permission to this nice photo, but also changed the license from CC-zero to CC-BY-SA-4.0. That might have been on special request from the uploader or photographer, but aren't CC-licenses irrevocable? Vysotsky (talk) 11:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. CC licenses are irrevocable, but if no license has been validly granted, there is no revocation happening. We could discuss how this case may have been, but I don't think this is of much relevance. If I'm mistaken, please advise. --Krd 12:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Is it okay if I can ask you about anything? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 00:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

If possible, only reasonable questions please. --Krd 06:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Is it a huge no-no if someone makes copyright logos as their own vector creations? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 09:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright protected work may only be reproduced with permission from the copyright holder. --Krd 10:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

OTRS received: just wondering

Hi Krd,

Just wondering: I just processed a ticket in OTRS and wanted to add the OTRS-received template to the images concerned, but your bot added these two weeks ago already. According to the template (and our policy), the images will be deleted if after the first response by an agent there is no response of the uploader.

How can we make this visible for the "normal" Commons user? They might think that the images I am working on now can be deleted in 16 days, but instead the uploader still has 30 days from today. Should I replace the OTRS-received tag with yet another template, should I (manually?) change the date in the template? This seems to be to be an new step in our process, how do I proceed? Ciell (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please provide a link the the ticket or the files. --Krd 12:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I'm talking about these kind of edits by your bot: [1] Ciell (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

What is for me, as the OTRS agent, the next step to confirm I've responded to the email sent, and the 30 day period starts from today onward? Ciell (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I think in most cases as soon as the OTRS user has replied the first time, the solution of the ticket happens quickly, so no additional action is required. Of course you can always renew the OTRS-received template manually.

I you think the bot should act different or not at all, please suggest. --Krd 07:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I wonder: would it be an option to use the op-template, or even creating a whole new template that says "email received but not yet processed"? Or maybe adding the OTRS-received after the first response is sent from OTRS? Ciell (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

One intention of the current bot job is to avoid deletion after 7 days when the file is tagged no-permission or has a deletion request. If we try to add after the first OTRS response, this would be pointless for most cases, as the file then is already removed.

I also think the the current template says exactly what you propose, so I'm still unsure if I get your point correctly. --Krd 16:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

The bot confirms receiving the email in the queue, but we only (should only) start the 30 days when the first response by an OTRS-agent is send. So either your bot could maybe do a second run for changing the date, or it needs to get it's own template imho. We sometimes have 7-14 days backlog, depending on the complexity of the older tickets in the queue. This should not have consequences for tickets that are still waiting, so a restart of the clock sounds most reasonable to me. Ciell (talk) 18:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I still think we don't talk about the same thing, as I don't get the point. Does it help regarding your workflow if we disable this bot for permissions-nl? --Krd 07:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the other queues have a backlog sometimes as well, right? So it could be a broader problem? What triggers your bot to place the {{OP}} on the file page? Ciell (talk) 19:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

I have disabled the part of the bot that edits any files. --Krd 19:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay. You've already done that? Forever? Or just temporarily? Do we still need to find some kind of solution for this? Ciell (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Not forever, but at least until anybody requests different. If it causes any pain, it should be disabled. I'd be happy to help to find any solution, but that is difficult as long as I don't see or don't understand the problem. --Krd 20:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Oké, thank you. Ciell (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Ticket 2021032210011026

Strange, I remember something about this ticket, my user name is shown as owner, but all the correspondence is yours. My 1st question is did you accept the uploader's representation as legal representative? Any idea what I might have done for my name to be on the ticket as owner? ^Atsme _Talk 📧 13:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I cannot discuss content of the ticket on a public wiki. Please ask in a private place, perhaps OTRS wiki. --Krd 17:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I understand about non-disclosure and didn't expect you to say anything beyond what is included on the Otrs permission template that we attach to a file. But to be on the safe side, I'll ping you at OTRS wiki. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 18:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

What I can answer here would be „No.“ and „Owners are irrelevant.“ but I‘m not sure if that would be polite and/or helpful. For anything more a nonpublic discussion makes more sense to me. --Krd 21:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't have a problem with that - you answered what I needed to know, thank you. I just didn't want you to think I imposed on a ticket you were already handling. I'm not even sure how my name got there, but like you said, it's irrelevant. Cheers! ^Atsme _Talk 📧 23:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:10, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Otrs template

Hi, Krd - any idea what happens to the otrs templates now that we've had a name change? ^Atsme _Talk 📧 22:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Everything about that in on the project page on OTRS wiki. --Krd 07:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

I couldn't find anything here. Do you have a link to another project page where I can find the info? ^Atsme _Talk 📧 13:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

otrswiki:Migration from OTRS to Znuny LTS --Krd 13:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Oh, wow - thank you! I didn't know that page existed. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 13:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

It is linked in the sitenotice of OTRS wiki and was announced several times on all mailing lists. --Krd 13:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

My bad - I simply didn't pay attention to the url, I just clicked on the links provided in the list emails. Now I know, and apparently, the answer to my original question is be patient. Alrighty then, I'll just sit tight. Ironically, all of this back and forth could have been avoided with a simple, "we're working on it, be patient" but then I would not have become aware of the otrs-wiki url, which will probably be changed, anyway. The good news is that it has made me more diligent in checking actual urls rather than simply taking links for granted. Enjoy the upcoming weekend and try not to work too hard. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 13:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Interview for Commons APIs

Hi Krd! My name is Seve and I am the Product Manager for the Platform engineering team at WMF. I am currently taking an audit of our different APIs to better understand how they are being used and the challenges and issues that these interfaces currently present. I wanted to ask if you're available for an interview to specifically shed light on the API(s) around Wikimedia Commons. I am happy to set up a time that works with your schedule.

Looking forward to chatting! SKim (WMF) (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not sure if I'm the best candidate for this, but please feel free to make suggestions how to proceed. --Krd 07:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

User:VRTS Migration Bot

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Krd 14:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

OTRS Volunteer Co-working Session

Hi @Krd, It's good to see you being so active on the OTRS platform and I was wondering if we could organize a Meet and Co-working session for OTRS volunteers to get together on a Google Meet/Zoom call where we can close some tickets together and share expertise with each other. Would you be interested in something like this? Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm be available to support that, but it is beyond my limits to organise it. As this appears to be an internal matter, please move discussion to OTRS wiki. --Krd 14:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Permission query

Hi Krd, just a query in regards to the OTSR ticket for File:Seagulls at Dusk, St Kilda Beach Water’s Edge, Archival Poster, (102.41cm x 76.81cm).jpg. Is this ticket for just that image or all by the uploader? I'm asking because I just tagged File:The Boardwalk, St Kilda Beach Water’s Edge, Archival Print Poster.jpg, File:Lighthouse View at Nearly Night, St Kilda Beach Water’s Edge, Archival Print Poster.jpg and File:Boardwalk Palms at Dusk, St Kilda Beach Water’s Edge, Archival Print Poster.jpg by the same uploader for deletion but I'm happy to remove the tag if the images have the proper permission. Calistemon (talk) 04:20, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Sadly it's even worse, I have revoked the permission now for the file as our e-mail answer to the sender appeared to bounce, so we have to consider the permission to be invalid at all. --Krd 06:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Danke schön!

Hi, Krd, ich kann gar nicht glauben, dass ich die en-Fassung der description vergessen hab. Unfassbar, wie viele Kleinigkeiten man vergessen kann :-). Herzlichen Dank für das Nachtragen! LG, --Gyanda (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich hab leider keine Idee worum geht geht, aber schön wenn ich helfen konnte. :-) --Krd 18:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Krdbot timestamps

Hi again. Would you please configure Krdbot to use English month names when closing DRs on Commons, according to the default locale convention (language, script, date and time format) on Commons? It appears to be using month names in another language instead, for example in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 16:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

I hope this is fixed now. Sorry that it wasn't detected earlier. --Krd 17:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, thanks! — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 00:29, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021

Greetings,

I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 27 June, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.

Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 15:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Template permission, Project 7, ticket:2021052710009142

Hi, I submitted a signed permissions form to OTRS about a week ago, seeking permission to use the template. I am still working through the previous Project 6, hoping to finish it soon. Then I will like to review and upload the hundreds of photos of historic/archaeological sites from Project 7, once I have your/OTRS okay to use the template. Please see OTRS ticket 2021052710009142 when you have a moment. Thank you for your help on Project 1 through 6 so far, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 11:09, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Done, see e-mail--Krd 11:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

吹笛牧童

Please take a look at these two IP accounts:

The person behind the account claims to be "User:吹笛牧童." Please see my warning on 吹笛牧童's talk page. I tried to warn him before reporting here but he seemed to ignore it. Because another IP (2402:7500:4DC:A091:7470:C6E7:889F:D1F6) did the same to me. I don't know what their intentions are. It's really annoying to talk to someone I don't like very much—especially people hiding behind IP addresses. However, I can see no evidence that they are the same person. Should this issue go here or to a request for checkuser first?--Kai3952 (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Ich cannot read the language, so I have some difficulties to understand the situation. Maybe it better to involve another admin who has understanding of the language? --Krd 07:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Trust me, it didn't work out for a reason. Because they all ignored me. I do not know why. As long as it involves the Chinese language, I'll ask them (eg. King of Hearts, Minorax, Shizhao, Mys 721tx, etc) for help. However, the question is whether they'll help me.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Is there any misuse from the account or the IPs? I cannot make a call about this when unable to read the language. Please alaborate. --Krd 11:09, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Batch editing protected files (continuation)

Hi Krd, thanks for your proposal to help. To be able to edit SDC components of protected files, we would need the following:

You would need to get oAuth login details for your account. This can be done by m:Special:OAuthConsumerRegistration/propose (using an owner-only consumers). In this step you can restrict the rights; as far as I see only basic rights and edit protected files is needed.
Please save the python script from User:SchlurcherBot/commonsapiaddclaimsoauth in a file (please note that the line breaks are only properly preserved in the source code view). Please name the file commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py
Add your oAuth login details generated in step 1 to line 60.
Please make sure you have the dependencies installed from line 37-40.

The python script will contact the API and perform the SDC edit. I perform a lot of pre-processing and post-processing outside of python. We can skip these and I can send you directly self-containing commands as follows. I think one can quess what is happening, but they are not directly human readable. Note that these are one-liner python calls:

File:David Mamet 2 by David Shankbone.JPG (fully-protected)

python3 commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py -i "M3942539" -o "automatically modify [[Commons:Structured data|structured data]] based on file information: date copyright license" -v "{\"claims\":[{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P571\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"time\":\"+2008-04-25T00:00:00Z\",\"timezone\":0,\"before\":0,\"after\":0,\"precision\":11,\"calendarmodel\":\"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1985727\"},\"type\":\"time\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P6216\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50423863,\"id\":\"Q50423863\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50829104,\"id\":\"Q50829104\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":14946043,\"id\":\"Q14946043\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"}]}"

File:P art.png (cascade-protected)

python3 commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py -i "M207328" -o "automatically modify [[Commons:Structured data|structured data]] based on file information: date copyright license" -v "{\"claims\":[{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P571\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"time\":\"+2011-07-05T00:00:00Z\",\"timezone\":0,\"before\":0,\"after\":0,\"precision\":11,\"calendarmodel\":\"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1985727\"},\"type\":\"time\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P6216\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50423863,\"id\":\"Q50423863\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50829104,\"id\":\"Q50829104\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":14946043,\"id\":\"Q14946043\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"}]}"

Please let me know if we can proceed this way. If this test is successful, I would send you a complete list of commands for all files. Thanks again for your proposal to help. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

First one finished, please check. Second one does not work, sadly without error message. Is there any way to make it more verbose? --Krd 12:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Exit code 150. Interesting. Any idea what right is missing? --Krd 12:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Ok, got it, please check. --Krd 12:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into this. The script is intentionally quiet, as I do the post-processing in a different language (I'm not very good in python). 600 more commands are here User:SchlurcherBot/Blocked if you may. I also added a sleep command after each one to space them out a bit. --Schlurcher (talk) 05:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 08:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Image crop

Could you please help me to crop this image? I just want only the image of Tina Dabi, the second from left. Planning to create an article on her. Thank you, Kichuz996 (talk) 09:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please see: Commons:CropTool --Krd 09:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Kate Bolz.jpg

Greetings Krd! May I ask for the reason why you removed the missing permissions tag and changed the license from cc-by-3.0 to cc-by-sa-4.0? Regards, Howhontanozaz (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

I changed the permission back to the one that was set before vandalism. I now reinstated the no-permission. --Krd 05:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Kit body sunderland1415h.png

Please add the following categorization: Category:Football kit body/Sunderland AFC Thanks. Allforrous (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 06:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

File:LL-number.jpg

This does not violate any copyrights: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LL-number.jpg

I took the picture from the 2021 version of this brochure https://www.vdl.lu/sites/default/files/media/document/De%CC%81pliant%20promenade%20Bambesch%202017%20-%20BAT.pdf

The owner is the City of Luxembourg. All material are published under the Creative Commons license. https://www.vdl.lu/en/legal-notice

Regards Carrasco (talk) 06:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

The mentioned permission applies to text documents only, so not to the file in question. --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

bots

gudn tach!
ergaenzend zu meinem bot-request (danke uebrigens fuers freischalten):

aus erfahrung in dewiki denke ich, dass der eigentlich redundante link auf die user page des bots einige redundante fragen verhindert/beantwortet, da viele leute sonst nicht auf die idee kommen, dort zu suchen. deswegen wuerde ich den hinweis erstmal drin lassen. was meinst du mit "misleading"? inwiefern koennte das verwirren?
gibt's hier auf commons einen ort, an dem man sich ueber bots austauschen kann? Commons_talk:Bots wird teilweise dazu genutzt, aber da haette ich vermutetet, dass es eigentlich eher um die verbesserung der seite Commons:Bots gehen sollte, oder?
bist du der einzige user, der hier MediaWiki::Bot intensiv verwendet? die entsprechende kategorie bezieht sich eigentlich auf perlwikipedia und nicht auf mediawiki-bot; dennoch scheinen da hauptsaechlich mediawiki-bot-user drin zu sein (weshalb ich camelbot jetzt doch auch da hinzugefuegt habe). deren scripts sind allerdings meist winzig, was mich vermuten laesst, dass perl hier kaum noch eingesetzt wird.
weisst du zufaellig, wie man mit MediaWiki::Bot solche caption-aenderungen macht? falls du's nicht aus dem stegreif weisst, ist's ok. dann schaue ich mir's selbst mal genauer an.

-- seth (talk) 06:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Moin. Ich prsönlich denke, dass der Hinweis auf den Bot in der Zusammenfassung die User eher verwirren kann, aber das ist wie gesagt ein untergeordneter Punkt, kannst du gern so machen wie Du denkst. Von einem Austausch über Bots auf Commons hab ich die letzten Jahre nichts mitbekommt; ich denke da findet nicht viel statt abseits der bot requests. Bzgl. MediaWiki::Bot glaube ich, dass Wdwdbot auf auf perl läuft. Ich selbst nutze eine uralte Version die ich nach und nach selbst angepasst und erweitert habe, was auch s. #Krdbot MediaWiki::Bot version gerade zum Problem wird. Captions habe ich mir noch nicht angeschaut, aber ich denke das wird man einfach selbst coden können. Für Wikidata habe ich damals die Sachen gebaut, die ich konkret brauchte. Ich kann Dir dazu vielleicht ein paar Abschnitte anbieten; in wie weit das kompatibel ist, müsste man dann sehen. --Krd 07:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

gudn tach!

versions-gedoens: oha, verstehe. erschwerend kommt hinzu, dass selbst die neuste MediaWiki::Bot-version in teilen veraltet ist und selbst ein simpler bugfix-pullrequest 2 jahre vor sich hinduempelte und noch immer nicht gemergt ist. ich habe diese woche noch zwei weitere pull-requests gestellt und die drei verantwortlichen leute angemailt, in der hoffnung, dass sich da mal wieder was tut.

open source ist dein code nicht, oder? -- seth (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Nein, open source ist das eher nicht. Die meisten Sachen sind schnelle Lösungen die keinen Fokus auf Allgemeingültigkeit haben und damit in lokalen Abhängigkeiten feststecken. --Krd 09:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

An issue on Permissions gadget

Hi, before all i want to thank you for undeleting all files due to my requests on VRT-wiki. I found that there is an issue on MediaWiki:Gadget-PermissionOTRS.js, because when i try to validate a permission on a file that has already a {{OTRS received}} with a ticket number, the gadget don't autofill with the ticket number the field on the gadgets window, so i have to fill it manually again. On File:Обкладинка книги "Вівся" Павлишин Г.П.jpg you can see this behaviour. Can you fix this issue?--Andriy.v (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Please test now. --Krd 05:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunatly the issue isn't fixed. The curious thing that is working when the gadget is used in edit action, but not when it used in view action. I think this because the variable editform is null when the gadget is used in view action. Looking in the history i hadn't see any changes other than otrs → vrts, so this behaviour is very strange.--Andriy.v (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

I have exactly the same thoughts, and sadly no idea how to fix that. --Krd 08:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Found it and fixed

Revision #576936789. Thanks for help.--Andriy.v (talk) 08:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Nice. I'd never found that. --Krd 08:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

J Michael Bailey

Hello, I wondered if you could add the permission from File:J. Michael Bailey.jpg to also be on File:J. Michael Bailey cropped.jpg. Thanks! Sxologist (talk) 07:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 07:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Political party logo marked as copyright violation

Greetings. Yesterday I added the image 'Gana_Fuerteventura_Logo.png' to the page | Gana Fuerteventura, which is a political party, and as far as I knew, political party logos are in the public domain, as is the logo for the PSOE or for Canarian Coalition. Why has this party logo been marked as a violation?

Hope this can be fixed.

--Woodywyatt (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Please provide some evidence that the logo is in the public domain. --Krd 18:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:50, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Possible merge

Hi, Krd - I didn't want to do something you might have to undo, so I thought it best to ask first. Should the following 3 VRT tickets be merged: 2021080210006758, 2021080210001191, and 2021080210001235? All are from the same person. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 17:43, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

I'd say it depend on which images are affected. If all are the same image, or different images of the same type, then yes. If the cases are different, then no. --Krd 20:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria

You recently deleted Category:Commemorations of Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria. It has 29 sub-categories and a number of member images. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

This happend during a mass deletion of things created by a long-term abuser, but of course it makes no sense to delete this category. I have now restored it. Thank you for the note! --Krd 20:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Tahsin mukofoti.jpg

Salom Krd!
Tahsin mukofoti tasviri (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tahsin_mukofoti.jpg) muallif ruhsati berilmagan deb o‘chirilgan ekan, lekin fayl muallifi Shohruh Haydarov (the Shakhdarov) tomonidan 1-iyul kuni permissions-commons@wikimedia.org pochta manziliga OTRS maktubi yo‘llangan. Menimcha bu yerda qandaydir tushunmovchilik ro‘y bergan. Iltimos, shu masalaga aniqlik kiriting. Eng yaxshi tilaklarim. Wikieditor2077 (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Do you know in which language the author sent the permission, or can you provide the 16 digit ticket number? --Krd 09:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Author sent the permission in English: "I hereby affirm that I, Shohruh Haydarov, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the following media:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tahsin_mukofoti.jpg

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Shohruh Haydarov 2021-07-01

[generated using relgen.js]", 16 digit ticket number is not exist. Wikieditor2077 (talk) 09:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

The permission was sent from a e-mail address that doesn't work, so we have been unable to reply. Please send again from a functioning e-mail account. --Krd 10:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Nacktheit

Beispiel Bildunterschrift: Braucht Commons wirklich mehr davon? (Affe mit langem Schwanz)

Hallo Krd, auf der Seite bin ich gerade über das Foto des Hahns am unteren Ende gestoßen. Im Englischen ist die Abbildung zusammen mit dem Wortspiel ja sinnvoll; im Deutschen dagegen ziemlich sinnfrei. Man könnte es entweder ersatzlos streichen oder durch eine sinnvolle Text-Bild-Kombi ersetzen. Ich hätte es selber geändert, aber die Seite ist aus gutem Grund geschützt. Magst Du Dir das mal anschauen und nach Deinem Gusto korrigieren? Beste Grüße --Zinnmann (talk) 13:19, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Ich hab das mal so übernommen, bitte schau mal ob es passt. --Krd 13:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Merci. Besten Dank --Zinnmann (talk) 13:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:48, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Verify

Hey Krd, Please verify this image by email.Nethmi Roshel--Superatp (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Ticket from today, please stay patient. --Krd 17:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Sir Krd, I got the ticket — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superatp (talk • contribs) 17:44, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Resignation to adminship

Hi, I confirm my resignation. Thank you for the concern and I'm sorry, I could've been more clear. Dantadd✉ 18:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for clarification, and thank you for your service! --Krd 05:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syngenta Group Headquarters, Basel, Switzerland.jpg

Gehe ich richtig in der Annahme, dass dieser DR geschlossen werden kann? Oder übersehe ich etwas? --Leyo 08:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ja, nun erl. --Krd 08:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Official portrait of General SM Shafiuddin Ahmed.jpg

Hi,

I noticed you left a message on my talk page about File:Official portrait of General SM Shafiuddin Ahmed.jpg. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any additional information on the website I retrieved the image from. I have attempted to contact the copyright holders (the Bangladesh Army) through use of the system on their website which was fruitless. The image had a passage of text attached beneath it which states "copyright under fear usage policy" is this not sufficient enough? Please can you advise me on what to do next.

Kind regards, AMomen88 (talk) 20:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

No. If we don't have permission, we cannot use the image. --Krd 07:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

KRD bot on DR

Hi KRD, your usually very helpful archiving bot seems not to archive a large part of Commons:Deletion requests/2021/01/08, e.g. the sections about the Louvre pyramid, wich appear all handled. This is the transcluded file: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid Can you find out what goes wrong? Perhaps it is the top section with NOTOC and a template:Cot. Thanks, Elly (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

It is the top section. Will fix that as soon as I‘m back at my desk. --Krd 05:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Elly (talk) 07:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Done --Krd 10:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

permission to check

Hi Krd, could you check the permission for File:Alexander Jung, Botschafter für mentale Gesundheit.jpg and File:Alexander Jung, Unternehmer.jpg which now have been copyvio-tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

I still think the ticket is valid, but to be absolutely sure I now sent a followup question to the ticket sender. IMHO no reason for speedy deletion, but it can be degraded to Template:Permission received to track the ticket. --Krd 10:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: It has been clarified in the ticket that the Exif information is wrong. There is no reason for deletion. --Krd 19:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Jan Eliasson 2010-06-17 003.jpg

Hello Krd, Hope you're well, I see you've deleted File:Jan Eliasson 2010-06-17 003.jpg as per an OTRS ticket,
Could you very kindly undelete the file and send it to DR please as as can be seen here and here people very much disagree with the deletion of their files.
Many thanks, Kind Regards, Dave // –Davey2010^Talk 12:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

I missed the DR, and have now restored the file. --Krd 14:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks Krd appreciate that, Take care. –Davey2010^Talk 14:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Rudraksha adverts

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/Rudraksha adverts ruling to keep the files for reasons which were not discussed. My understanding is that the decision should reflect the outcome of the discussion, not overrule it. Your decision does not reflect the consensus of the discussion; my request received no objections prior to closure. Had you replied with your reasons, I would have responded but you instead closed the discussion immediately without allowing for a reply. Scyrme (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

There was no discussion but only the original nomination, and the closing admin has discretion and obligation to take obvious arguments into account. If the images are widely used in Wikipedia articles and contain no advertising themselves, and no other strong reason for deletion exists, they have to be kept. File pages can be redacted if required, but I don't even see that here. --Krd 15:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

An unopposed nomination should still count for something, and it wouldn't have been any trouble to let me at least respond to your arguments before closing. I wasn't even given the chance to reply.

As for the arguments: The files were created as adverts, which qualifies them for speedy deletion. The only reason there even was a discussion was because I was unaware of the process and started the normal process first. The files being in use is meaningless here, because they were distributed to make the ads easier to find. The photographs themselves are literally products of stock for sale taken from selling page. It's not even clear that the Creative Commons license they were uploaded under is valid, given their commercial origin. I would be very surprised if Wikimedia Commons policy permits such images to remain if their source is obscured. There are plenty of alternative photographs available which were not created as ads which could replace these particular files where they are used. Scyrme (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I fail to see how this can be considered an advert. Images require a source. Shall we discourage all images previously found on any commercial website? --Krd 16:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

My understanding is that all non-free images are already discouraged. Additionally, these images aren't random stock photos someone merely found but are photos of products for sale uploaded with the intention of linking to a shopping page. That images require a source is exactly why these files should be deleted rather than only edited to delete the source attribution and obscure the source. I know that to you these may as well just be generic pictures of walnuts and therefore they don't look like ads, but you may be missing the context. To the intended market, the images are sufficient to entice clickthrough because these items are revered objects. For example, the "13-mukhi-rudraksha" is on sale for ₹9599.99 (~€110 for 1) with the page claiming all sorts of nonsense like that wearing the product can cure arthritis and grants you superior leadership abilities. Attempts to advertise these items on Wikipedia goes beyond just uploading these images. The Rudraksha article on the English-language Wikipedia page, for example, has recently had its protection escalated in response to repeated incidents of more blatant advertising/spam, but those protections don't prevent ads being quietly uploaded to Wikimedia Commons so they've been left unchallenged until now. Scyrme (talk) 23:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I cannot follow at all, but just in case I am completely missing something I have reverted the DR closure. --Krd 03:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Krdbot MediaWiki::Bot version

Hey!

It seems Krdbot is using an ooold (from 2010) version of MediaWiki::Bot (3.2.6), which is meaning it's still doing some long deprecated calls to the MW API to request tokens, see phab:T280806.

At some point in the near future, that's probably going to be broken (as it's been deprecated for nearly 7 years). Looking at the changelog, you need to be on >= 5.006000 from 2014-09-01.

Any chance you can look at updating the version of the library you use?

Thanks!

Reedy (talk) 14:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

It can of course be done, but that will mean rewriting all scripts nearly from scratch. Maybe with a scale of end of 2021, as there are too many concurrent issues at the moment. --Krd 16:37, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Just be aware that your bot may break at some point in the future until its updated. Reedy (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the note, but I currently see no way to expedite this, so we sadly will have to live with it. --Krd 17:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

I looked over the stuff a bit, and I think it is possible to port the relevant changes into my modified old version. It's nothing I'd like to do without need, but it's not a showstopper and can be done with not too much pain when the deprecated calls are removed. --Krd 11:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

It'd be appreciated if you can fix them before we turn them off... It makes the tracking the improvement easier, especially if it's fairly easy. Reedy (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Following up from IRC... You will need to change your code and/or the library you're using. The change in MW is https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/153110 from November 2014. The two queries I see KrdBot making at action=query&prop=info&intoken and action=query&prop=revisions&rvtoken.

You can probably just look for intoken and rvtoken in your code.

A query like https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&rvtoken=rollback&titles=User:Reedy needs replacing with https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=revisions&meta=tokens&type=rollback&titles=User:Reedy. The position of the token in the output may vary.

A query like https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=info&intoken=edit&titles=User:Reedy becomes https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=info&meta=tokens&type=csrf&titles=User:Reedy

Note, a few of the intoken token types have been changed/condensed. intoken was one of block, delete, edit, email, import, move, protect, unblock, watch as per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=query%2Binfo, but now it's createaccount, csrf, deleteglobalaccount, login, patrol, rollback, setglobalaccountstatus, userrights, watch; many of them have just become csrf as per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=query%2Btokens

In most cases, you just need to swapout the intoken=foo and rvtoken=foo for a meta=tokens&type=foo type call.

HTH. Reedy (talk) 22:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Will have a look. --Krd 05:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Regarding login sessions, unless they're explicitly invalidated, most should in theory last a year. The MediaWiki API has an assert framework, where you can pass assert=user or assert=bot... Or even assertuser=USERNAME to confirm you're logged in and such. As for reusing tokens, I think it may depend on the type of token... Reedy (talk) 15:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

hi and gudn tach!

as a side note: i'm now helping to maintain MediaWiki::Bot.

recently i released a new version 5.006004, where i fixed some bugs. if you need more adaption/improvements, i could try to help. furthermore i could try to help you in updating/migrating your scripts.

imho it might make sense if we put important and often used functions into MediaWiki::Bot. this would keep our bot code a bit cleaner and more maintainable. -- seth (talk) 21:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

This is good to know, but I fear I have to fix this now keeping the complete mess I have, and make the rewrite of everything a separate step. I get back to you as soon as possible. --Krd 08:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

@Lustiger seth: Where do I find the 5.006004 version? --Krd 06:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

gudn tach!

https://metacpan.org/pod/MediaWiki::Bot and https://github.com/MediaWiki-Bot/MediaWiki-Bot. -- seth (talk) 07:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

I made some changes into the blue now, and hope that not too much will break. --Krd 06:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Just an FYI

Hi, Krd - just letting you know that I'm in the middle of a major move but have been checking in and handling tickets as time allows. After I've finished moving (after 43 years in the same location) and have settled comfortably into my new home, I will try to make-up for lost time. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 07:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for the notice, and good luck for the move! --Krd 07:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

About my bot request

Hello, Krd! I have finished the script for my bot Commons:Bots/Requests/PencakeBot. Could you please re-open the request and check that? Thanks. (More info on [Commons_talk:Bots/Requests/PencakeBot|the talk page] --虹易 (talk) 09:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC).

Done --Krd 09:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you.--虹易 (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Onion previously found on the street.jpg

Hallo Krd, kannst Du bitte noch ein Lizenz-Review bei der o. g. Datei machen? Sonst stellt noch irgendwer in der Zukunft einen Löschantrag, weil die Lizenz der Quelle ja nicht mehr überprüfbar ist. Danke --Ras67 (talk) 20:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Hallo. Ich denke das ist nicht nötig, da die Quelle für Admins ja noch sichtbar ist. --Krd 08:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Karl Johann Wagner-dekoriert.jpg

Hallo Krd, Du kannst die Datei: Karl Johann Wagner-dekoriert.jpg löschen. Es ist mir zu dumm mit solch einem Typen auf Permissions - German Wikipedia zu diskutieren, der so keine Ahnung vom Urheberrecht hat. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

188.162.254.152

Please also revoke talk page access and delete it. The user clearly uses a bot. --jdx ^Re: 13:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Done, please let me know if there is anything more. --Krd 13:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

image deletion File:Online Poster 2.jpg

Before being trigger happy and marking an image for deletion, maybe check the time stamp as to when it was uploaded. Copyright permission was already sent to permissions-commons 48 hours ago but its the weekend and they haven't had a chance to see it. The image hasn't even been used yet. Just a thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhedenberg (talk • contribs) 05:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Bhedenberg: You neglected to 'place the tag {{subst:PP}} ("Permission Pending") on the file description page' File:Online Poster 2.jpg and to specify the file's URL in your email message as instructed at VRT. I did that for you. See also COM:SIGN. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

I think this was already resolved at the time this message was posted. --Krd 08:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

COM:VP#Why can't we have individual pages for undeletion requests?

Hi. Would you be amenable to coding a method of archiving COM:UDR if it were split into subpages? Please see the subject section. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes. Perhaps not from one to to the next, but in general I think this will be possible. --Krd 16:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

That's great, but what do you mean by "from one to to the next"? I envision the subpages to be like DRs, but for undeletion. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 22:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

I mean even if may take only an hour to build that, it may be a week or two required to get a timeslot for that. Although I have very some active days currently, this changes from day to day for my current personal situation, and I cannot say in advance when I will have time and when not. Please let me know here as soon as this is ready for implementing and testing. --Krd 05:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

I envision individual requests of the form Commons:Undeletion requests/Example.jpg being transcluded into existing Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests, and those transclusions being archived into the existing structure under Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 08:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

I will prepare the code today or at least until mid of next week. --Krd 07:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

I think the code is ready for testing, but not yet activated. --Krd 10:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Great! Would you consider testing it on Wikimedia Commons BETA? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Perfect idea, but will take some time because of the issue one section above. --Krd 15:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, that looks more important. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 16:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

I think it's ready, see: https://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Krdbot --Krd 06:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, what do you think of what I did on Commons BETA today? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Sadly I don't have the time to look into detail. Please ask more specific if possible. --Krd 08:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

I added wikitext and pages to support undeletion subpages stemming from this edit. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 18:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Shall I let the archiver run at beta so that you can test a bit more? --Krd 07:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Yes, please. Will we need copies of {{Udelh}} and {{Udelf}} there? Also, should {{Udelh}} be outside the section (traditional UDR) or inside (more sensible)? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

I don't need the templates to exist. Now active every 15 minutes. --Krd 13:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Do we still need the test at beta? --Krd 07:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

What do you think we need to move this to production? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

As far as my part is concerned, you can start the migration at any time. --Krd 19:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

So the code for this is running on production Commons? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 06:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

No, but it is prepared and can be easily switched on, and I don't expect many problems. --Krd 08:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please turn it on and let it run for a day before migration of the final piece to UDR itself. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 08:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Done (and switched off for beta.) --Krd 08:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Closing down my PeerBot request

I saw that you closed down Commons:Bots/Requests/PeerBot bot request. Not sure why? I mean, it became stale because others have not engaged. But I was still waiting for others to chime in. What is the process here or what should I do differently? Mitar (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

We can reopen the request at any time, but I don't think we will get additional feedback just by waiting, and I don't know where else this could be discussed. Any suggestion welcome. --Krd 18:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

File:《觅画西藏》外观照片.jpg

Hi Krd!

A photo of the book cover itself does not have copyright due to TOO. The photographer cannot license it in the first place. Mys_721tx (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I cannot follow. A photograph is a photograph and therefore copyrighted. The book cover is copyrighted, too. Am I mistaken? --Krd 19:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

No, any works below the threshold of originality do not have copyright on their own. The photographer cannot claim copyright for that photo precisely because the book cover is indeed copyrighted. . Mys_721tx (talk) 01:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

I disagree, a photo always is above TOO unless it is comparable with a scan, which is not the case here. --Krd 07:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Granz sw.tiff

Hallo,

was sind denn Quelle und Urheber "HOMEBASE"? --Magnus (talk) 07:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Magnus. Gute Frage, ich musste auch suchen. Das ist der Name der Agentur, die das Bild zur Verfügung gestellt hat, und die sich diese Form der Namensnennung gewünscht hat. --Krd 08:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Danke für's Ticket, damit ist das geklärt. --Magnus (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 22:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Can you please conclude a discussion?

Hello @krd can you please conclude a deletion discussion, our files are justified to be on commons. It’ll be helpful if you can stop the proposed deletion. Please look into this. Thank you.File:Anurag Jha at Red Carpet of DRE7MS film screening 2021.jpg

I'm was already involved with these files, so any other Commons admin should make the conclusion of the deletion discussion. --Krd 15:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Saint John the Baptist Preaching by David Finn.jpg

When you closed Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs from the David Finn Archive as 'keep' you removed {{Delete}} and added {{PermissionTicket}} to all of the nominated files except for File:Saint John the Baptist Preaching by David Finn.jpg, which is still tagged for deletion. This looks like a mistake. Is the license for this file confirmed by these tickets? Verbcatcher (talk) 07:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

I think this happened because for this file there was chosen a different license during the upload. I fixed it now, thank you for the notice! --Krd 08:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Krdbot

Congratulations! Task 6 was approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Krd 19:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 19:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Ticket:2021121610010745

Would be happy to know why did you cancel ALL (yes, all) my photos that illustrated Gianni A. Sarcone work since he gave me the permission to use them for educational purpose. So that in the future I can be more aware what I should write or post on WP. It appears that Sarcone is the only visual artist without a portrait and without illustrations of his work. Do you think it is normal? Please, respond me in a calm and responsible manner. Thank you.

The permission sender clearly said that no commercial use will be allowed, so there was no permission achievable. It now appears they may have changed their mind, which is still under discussion. --Krd 08:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

The artist Gianni A. Sarcone (permission sender) never said that no commercial use will be allowed to WP, he just said that I (me) shouldn't sell the pictures of his work. That's a big difference. The odd thing is that these photos have been uploaded to wikimedia for years without creating any problem, quite the contrary. Some of the gif's you cancelled (Dynamic Müller Lyer, for instance) are of scientific interest and have been shown in many scientific magazines and social media. I just thought your readers / visitors would appreciate such an educational material. But apparently you have some obscure reasons to cancel in just one click (sic!) all the work I did to illustrate Sarcone's work. Reasons that apparently have little to do with copyrights and permission releases. Sarcone didn't deserve that, I am really sorry for him. Thank you --Ruotailfoglio 20:48, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

The options have been outlined to the permission sender, if they confirm the release the files will be restored. Absolutely no reason for any drama. --Krd 08:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Please, keep cool, there is no drama at all! The world goes on with or without my pictures on WP. I was just surprised by your sibylline sentence dated December 17th : "NO (sic!) permission to be expected", which made me suspect that you have decided in advance that whatever I (or the permission sender) do, the images will not be restored. That's all... But maybe I misunderstood and you have an explanation for this strong unequivocal sentence. Thank you. Ruotailfoglio (talk) 15:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I cannot follow at all where I have not been calm, but this doesn't have to be clarified. --Krd 15

39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I didn't ask you to clarify your mood, but your sentence "NO (sic!) permission to be expected". We (the permission sender and I) sent again all the permissions you requested dully certified and signed, still waiting an answer from you. Ruotailfoglio (talk) 00:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

The ticket is still open, please be patient. --Krd 12:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Promo

Please see the image description. It reads like an advertisement. We don't allow such promotional material on en.WP and I would think the same applies here, does it not? There are several photos of the same person that appear to be pure promos. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 00:22, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

The image appears to be in scope, although the description should be cleaned, which I have done now. Are there more affected images? --Krd 13:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Wow - there are many! See the Streamy Award categories like this one, this one and this one, which is unbelievable. Not all the images have the promo description but lots of them do. Is there a bot we can use to fix them - something like the Auto-Wiki Browser? ^Atsme _Talk 📧 01:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps we should ask @Josve05a: why these images are uploaded with such promotional description texts? --Krd 07:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

In order to keep attribution etc. the original descriptions from Flickr was retained when the images were transferred to Wikimedia Commons. It's sad to see that there was this much promotional text however, which has been rightfully been removed from some images already. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you assist removing it from the other uploads? --Krd 19:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

@Josve05a: ? --Krd 06:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@Krd: Due to off-wiki real life things I've been away from Wiki for a month or two and will need to do so for a while longer. I will gladly help when I've got time to do so if needed, but right now I need to not be here. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Iforgot about this and will get to this tomorrow! Focusing on uploads by this Flickr user, but if I find more related things, I'll do them as well. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! --Krd 06:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

@Josve05a: Can you please provide some feedback on this? --Krd 10:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

vollautomatisches ersetzen einer Syntax

Du bist ja insbesondere Genehmigungstechnisch einer der Experten was bot-edits angeht, daher habe ich eine Frage an dich:

Gemäß Diskussion auf Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2021/10/Category:PD_textlogo_(road_signs) hätte ich gerne alle bei allen Bilder in Category:PD_textlogo_(road_signs) den Text von {{PD-textlogo|type=road signs}} in {{PD-sign|type=road signs}} geändert. Das Attribut type ist zwar überflüssig, aber falls {{PD-sign}} nicht nur für road signs verwendet werden, könnte man es leicht trennen, oder ist meine Überlegung schwachsinnig.

Ich hab mit meiner Sockenpuppe User:JoKalliauer2 bereits einige mit AWB verschoben, aber ich sehe keinen Sinn darin 3400 mal auf "Save" zu klicken. Ich müsste mich einarbeiten wie ich vollautomatisiert das ausführen könnte, gibt es einen Nutzer/Bot den man darum nerven könnte? — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Hallo. Das könnte man schon halbwegs einfach machen, was mir allerdings noch ein wenig fehlt ist der Konsens, dass das auch wirklich sinnvoll ist. Anhand der recht kurzen verlinkten Diskussion kann ich das nicht nicht so ganz erkennen.

Ich nehme mal als Beispiel: File:Australia road sign R5-23R.svg Da stehen PD-shape|type=road signs und PD-textlogo|type=road signs drin, d.h. das pd-textlogo durch pd-sign zu ersetzen reicht nicht ganz aus, man müsste sich auch mit den Lizenzvorlagen beschäftigen, die sonst noch auftauchen. Wir würden wir damit umgehen? --Krd 08:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Bezüglich fehlenden Konsens gebe ich dir Recht, ich weiß aber anderseits auch nicht ob sich mehr an der Diskussion beteiligen wollen. Kann man eine Bot-Berechtigung anfragen, dass man anschließend einen Botbetreiber, der die notwendigen Komptenzen hat, darum bitte diese genehmigten Anfrage abzuarbeiten?

`PD-shape|type=road signs` und `PD-sign` kategorisieren in Category:PD_ineligible_(road_signs).

Möglichkeiten wie man damit umgeht fallen mir viele ein. Ich versuche grundsätzlich so wenig wie möglich zu ändern und hätte nur {{PD-textlogo|type=road signs}} in {{PD-sign|type=road signs}} geändert. Aber man könnte beispielsweise auch die Vorlage PD-shape|type=road signs so ändern dass es PD-sign aufruft, dann sollte man bei File:Australia road sign R5-23R.svg das PD-textlogo|type=road signs ersatzlos streichen. Aber zwei unterschiedliche PD-Lizenz-Tags auf der Beschreibung zu nennen sehe ich kein Problem.

Ich halte es für falsch Verkehrszeichen als Textlogos zu kategorisieren, wie man das umsetzt ist mir nicht wichtig.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Wie eilig ist das? Wenn es ein paar Tage Zeit hat, sprich mich bitte ab dem 22. nochmal darauf an, bis dahin habe ich mir dann Gedanken gemacht und vielleicht etwas vorbereitet. --Krd 19:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

kein Stress

Noch ein paar Tage/Wochen abwarten ist eh gut, vl. will sich noch jemand an der Disk. beteiligt, dann gibt es vl. auch ein klareres Bild was zu tun ist.

Aber die Kategorie Category:PD_textlogo_(road_signs) gibt es seit ca. 2Jahren (und niemand hat sie bisher gestört), wäre schön wenn sie in 2Jahren nicht mehr da ist (oder anderes geklärt wäre).

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Ich habe etwas dafür vorbereitet, sag bitte Bescheid wenn es losgehen soll. --Krd 15:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

{ping|JoKalliauer}} Ist das hier noch aktuell? --Krd 10:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Batch editing protected files (from 2021 archive)

Hi Krd, thanks for your proposal to help. To be able to edit SDC components of protected files, we would need the following:

You would need to get oAuth login details for your account. This can be done by m:Special:OAuthConsumerRegistration/propose (using an owner-only consumers). In this step you can restrict the rights; as far as I see only basic rights and edit protected files is needed.
Please save the python script from User:SchlurcherBot/commonsapiaddclaimsoauth in a file (please note that the line breaks are only properly preserved in the source code view). Please name the file commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py
Add your oAuth login details generated in step 1 to line 60.
Please make sure you have the dependencies installed from line 37-40.

The python script will contact the API and perform the SDC edit. I perform a lot of pre-processing and post-processing outside of python. We can skip these and I can send you directly self-containing commands as follows. I think one can guess what is happening, but they are not directly human readable. Note that these are one-liner python calls:

File:David Mamet 2 by David Shankbone.JPG (fully-protected)

python3 commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py -i "M3942539" -o "automatically modify [[Commons:Structured data|structured data]] based on file information: date copyright license" -v "{\"claims\":[{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P571\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"time\":\"+2008-04-25T00:00:00Z\",\"timezone\":0,\"before\":0,\"after\":0,\"precision\":11,\"calendarmodel\":\"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1985727\"},\"type\":\"time\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P6216\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50423863,\"id\":\"Q50423863\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50829104,\"id\":\"Q50829104\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":14946043,\"id\":\"Q14946043\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"}]}"

File:P art.png (cascade-protected)

python3 commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py -i "M207328" -o "automatically modify [[Commons:Structured data|structured data]] based on file information: date copyright license" -v "{\"claims\":[{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P571\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"time\":\"+2011-07-05T00:00:00Z\",\"timezone\":0,\"before\":0,\"after\":0,\"precision\":11,\"calendarmodel\":\"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1985727\"},\"type\":\"time\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P6216\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50423863,\"id\":\"Q50423863\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":50829104,\"id\":\"Q50829104\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"},{\"mainsnak\":{\"snaktype\":\"value\",\"property\":\"P275\",\"datavalue\":{\"value\":{\"entity-type\":\"item\",\"numeric-id\":14946043,\"id\":\"Q14946043\"},\"type\":\"wikibase-entityid\"}},\"type\":\"statement\",\"rank\":\"normal\"}]}"

Please let me know if we can proceed this way. If this test is successful, I would send you a complete list of commands for all files. Thanks again for your proposal to help. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

First one finished, please check. Second one does not work, sadly without error message. Is there any way to make it more verbose? --Krd 12:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Exit code 150. Interesting. Any idea what right is missing? --Krd 12:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Ok, got it, please check. --Krd 12:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into this. The script is intentionally quiet, as I do the post-processing in a different language (I'm not very good in python). 600 more commands are here User:SchlurcherBot/Blocked if you may. I also added a sleep command after each one to space them out a bit. --Schlurcher (talk) 05:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Nochmals rausgekramt aus dem 2021er Archiv mit gleicher Frage: Würdest du mir nochmals helfen vollgesperrte Dateien, insbesondere solche mit Kaskadenschutz (die ich 2021 größtenteils vergessen hatte) zu bearbeiten? Ich würde das Ganze wieder als Befehl wie oben herausschreiben. Hast du zufällig das Skript von damals commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py noch aufgehoben, dann wäre das viel einfacher? Grüße, Schlurcher (talk) 07:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Hallo. Können wir gern machen, aber bitte nicht vor Freitag. Lass mir gern die nötigen Daten schonmal zukommen. Ich glaube das python-Zeug habe ich nicht mehr. Krd 12:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Danke. Es wird noch etwas dauern, bis ich die Liste zusammen habe. Ich wollte erst einmal nach der generellen Bereitschaft fragen, sodass ich jetzt weiß, dass es sich lohnt die Liste zu erstellen. Ich melde mich wieder wenn es soweit ist. --Schlurcher (talk) 07:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Perfekt. Krd 13:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, ich hab es gestern Abend doch geschafft knapp 50 weitere voll geschützte Dateien zusammenzustellen.

Der ganze Prozess wäre ähnlich wie zuvor:

You would need to get oAuth login details for your account. This can be done by m:Special:OAuthConsumerRegistration/propose (using an owner-only consumers). In this step you can restrict the rights; as far as I see only basic rights and edit protected files is needed.
Please save the python script from User:SchlurcherBot/commonsapiaddclaimsoauth in a file and please name the file to commonsapiaddclaimsoauth.py
Add your oAuth login details generated in step 1 to Step 1: Login details from OAuth in the python script.
Seach and replace each instance of "assert" : "bot" to "assert" : "user"
Please make sure you have the dependencies installed from line 37-40.

The python script will contact the API and perform the SDC edit. All calls are given here: User:SchlurcherBot/Blocked

Eventuell würde ich dir kurz nach deinem Durchlauf nochmals ein Paar schicken, da ich dann erst sehen kann was noch fehlt. Vielen Dank schonmal! --Schlurcher (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Ich weiß jetzt wieder, warum ich python nicht mag. Der Kram läuft nicht. Krd 08:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Alles klar, Danke nochmals. Ich frage dann bei Gelegenheit bei jemand anders an. Grüße Schlurcher (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Ich wollte damit erstmal nur sagen, dass man da nochmal genauer schauen müsste, und dass ich evtl. etwas Hilfe brauche. Wenn es natürlich ein anderer mit weniger Arbeit hinbekommt, nehm ich das natürlich auch. Krd 06:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Entschuldige die späte Antwort, ich war beruflich eingebunden. Ich habe keinen echten Plan B und würde sonst im Admin-Board nach Hilfe fragen. Ich glaube der Fehler könnte in Schritt 3 beim Parameter "bot" : "" liegen. Das würde den Edit als Bot Edit markieren, was bei einem Nutzeraccount natürlich nicht möglich ist. Ein Löschen des Parameters könnte also helfen. Falls auch das nicht hilft, so habe ich jetzt mein Skript so angepasst, dass es wesentlich mehr herausschreibt: User:SchlurcherBot/commonsapiaddclaimsoauth. Falls du es nochmals probieren könntest wäre das toll. Danke --Schlurcher (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Das Problem ist eher, dass das Skript gar nicht läuft. Die Fehlermeldungen würde ich aber nur ungern öffentlich besprechen. Krd 05:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Alles klar. Dann kommen wir natürlich nicht wirklich weiter. Ich frage dann erstmal am Board nach, vielleicht ist das dann die effizientere Lösung. --Schlurcher (talk) 12:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Template:OTRS ticket

Hi, this template was under the radar! Template:OTRS ticket should be renamed Template:Ticket reference (or something like that), but modified as well, in order to have the ticket number as sole parameter (see talk page). it is possible to modify all the existent ticket by bot (replacing the ticket number, and using only the second parameter)? --Ruthven (msg) 15:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I think we should replace most of them with Template:PermissionTicket at first and then see what remains. I think this template can perhaps be completely removed. --Krd 15:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Or simply by the [[ticket:xxx]] link. --Krd 15:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Mostly

Done, but there are still a few transclusions that should or should not get fixed. --Krd 22:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Krd/archive/2021

Can you help me deleting this picture?

OTRS again

User:Alec Smithson

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Uploads by Firedrop

Explanation

Fehlerhafter Upload

Malformed DR

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Admin actions mistake user:Jean-Frédéric

hu:Óriás Nándor photo

hu:Abay Gyula (közgazdász) photo

Frage zur: "CommonsDelinker": Arbeiterwohnungsbaugenossenschaften der DDR Stand 1980er Jahre - Hausordnung und Statut - see also OTRS-[Ticket#2020122410001705]

Template help

Your input

File:Damir Krznar 2021.jpg

Shai Navot

Changed license

Hi

OTRS received: just wondering

Ticket 2021032210011026

Otrs template

Interview for Commons APIs

OTRS Volunteer Co-working Session

Permission query

Danke schön!

Krdbot timestamps

Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021

Template permission, Project 7, ticket:2021052710009142

吹笛牧童

Batch editing protected files (continuation)

Image crop

File:LL-number.jpg

bots

An issue on Permissions gadget

J Michael Bailey

Political party logo marked as copyright violation

Possible merge

Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria

File:Tahsin mukofoti.jpg

Verify

Resignation to adminship

File:Official portrait of General SM Shafiuddin Ahmed.jpg

KRD bot on DR

permission to check

File:Jan Eliasson 2010-06-17 003.jpg

Rudraksha adverts

Krdbot MediaWiki::Bot version

Just an FYI

About my bot request

File:Karl Johann Wagner-dekoriert.jpg

image deletion File:Online Poster 2.jpg

Closing down my PeerBot request

Can you please conclude a discussion?

Promo

vollautomatisches ersetzen einer Syntax

Batch editing protected files (from 2021 archive)

Template:OTRS ticket

Navigation menu

Search