User talk:JuTa/Archive 44

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Duplicate categories

Hello.What do you think of this?Thanks ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

I answered there. regards --JuTa 12:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Speculaaskruiden-spice.jpg

Hallo JuTa could you take a look at Takeaway talk page regarding my question? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

I answered there. regards --JuTa 12:47, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

excuse me, You said at the DR :"The youtube video is deleted, the license here not confirmed yet. There is no chance ever to get it confirmed." However, it has archived page and license info html screenshot, and the user Stefan2 already said: "I see CC-BY mentioned in the HTML source code of the archive.li page. The "show more" link doesn't work in Firefox (no additional information is displayed), but I don't see why that would matter given that the info is present in the source code. I note that the licence since has changed on the Youtube page." --Puramyun31 (talk) 10:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Puramyun31, nobody, including nobody involved at the deletion request was able or willing to confirm the {{License review}} tag. The fact that the video got deleted from youtube makes me highly doubt that the CC license was ever valid. But feel free to raise an COM:Undeletion request. Maybe I'm wrong or missing something. regards. --JuTa 18:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Upload a new version of photo

Hello Dear JuTa, 4 days ago you revorted one of "my edits". Already, I nominated that photo for deletion, but they kept it. So I decided to upload a new version of it, but you revorted it. Do you know why I think it is a wrong map? Please read "my reasons". Thanks. Mohammad.MSV (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

You may try to use "your" map in whatever wikipedia article if you think this map is misleading. But dont overwrite other images with your version. regards --JuTa 14:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. Mohammad.MSV (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Imam (given name) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Kaganer (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Undelete please

Can you undelete File:Dirk_Markus.jpg so I can see if there is any metadata to help verify the OTRS ticket received. Thanks. Please ping me. Ww2censor (talk) 17:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

OK. I've put {{OTRS pending}} to its description page. Please complete your task now. Thx. --JuTa 20:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Was Category:Wrestling singlets in the deleted category?

Or did I miss something?--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

According this is was never deleted. --JuTa 19:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Frage

Du, erzähl mir mal bitte etwas genauer, was daran falsch war: [1]. lg Bwag (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

In die Kategorie gehören nur andere Kategorien (von Frauen) und keine Bilder. Siehe auch das Hinweis-Schild {{Catcat}} dort. Gruß --JuTa 20:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Aha, thx! lg Bwag (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Please undelete

We have a good ticket for File:Shantanu Narayen - the CEO of Adobe Inc.jpg that you deleted. Please ping me when done. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ww2censor, its back. Please note: I've set OTRS pending with todays date. There is no license, I marked it as such. It will get redeleted in about a week if there is still no license. regards. --JuTa 00:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
That was quick. It's all done thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

vermeintlich leere Kategorien

Hallo JuTa, auf meiner Beobachtungsliste habe ich gesehen, dass du kürzlich die einst von mir erstellten Kategorien Category:1574 in Poland, Category:1521 in Poland, Category:1474 in Poland und Category:1385 in Poland gelöscht hast, Begründung "empty category". Da ich üblicherweise keine Kategorien zum Selbstzweck anlege, habe ich das recherchiert. Die Kategorien waren also tatsächlich leer, weil die vorhandene Unterkategorie zu Kraków (m.E. versehentlich) rausgenommen wurde, siehe hier. Ich habe das mittlerweile repariert (siehe hier) und eine Abhängigkeit zur Existenz der Zwischenkategorie eingeführt. Frage: Soll ich, darf ich die vorgenannten "Polen-Kategorien" einfach neu erstellen oder ist es besser, wenn du sie wiederherstellst? Inhalt ist jetzt wieder drin. Danke und viele Grüße, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 12:35, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, die jetzt genannten Kats hab ich wiederhergestellt. Weitere kannst Du auch einfach neu erzeugen, oder Dich nochmals bei mir melden. Ganz wie es Dir leiber ist. Gruß --JuTa 12:41, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Das ging ja schnell! Prima, danke! --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, JuTa! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Screenshots of programms

File:Aspects of New Public Management.jpg
hier sollten die Icons entfernt werden?

Hallo!

Gemäß Commons:Screenshots#To_create_a_free_screenshot würde ich Word-screenshots als nicht erlaubt auf commons sehen (In der de.Wikipedia wäre es unter der Schöfupfungshöhe, siehe Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen/Archiv/2018/12#Screenshots_(de.wikipedia), in der en.wikipedia wäre es fair-use)

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Then please mark it as "no permission" or start a deletion request. But next time please "properly" with correct parameters inform the uploader. Best you use the QuickDelete or [[Ajax Quick delete within your preferences. regards. --JuTa 11:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Categories

Hi JuTa, As I explained in my edit summary I have 2-400 images that now need categorising and that's without the 50 odd currently being uploaded now!,
The categories are doing no harm by being live and keeping them live stops the bots adding "uncategorised" to every image thus clogging up my entire watchlist and it also stops people from categorising them for me - I prefer to do things in stages so I know where I'm at,
I'd be than happy to keep them hidden but it would mean you delete all of images I have taken/uploaded and then it would mean you lose an editor, I don't really want to edit war over it but IMHO they're doing no harm as they are,
On a happier note I wish you and yours a very Happy New Year,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Well, they do harm if the unhidden, because the prevent the uncat tagging by bots and they suggest to other people that your maintenence cats are topic cats. Why dont you like possible help by others when they get tagges as uncat? regards --JuTa 17:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
But that's the point I don't want bots tagging them as I do them all myself,
I've always been the sort of person where I want to categorise everything I upload instead of leaving it to others to do - I hate people who transfer thousands of images from Flickr to here > dumps them in a folder > expects everyone else to do the leg work for them,
I completely understand my cats could cause confusion but that would be slim to none as these are all uploaded by myself under silly titles (like DSCN6466-Davey2010.jpg) so these wont be found anyway,
I've just realised the :Davey2010/Buses‎ category has no images inside so I've left your edit there as you were correct to hide that (my fault) but as I said I would prefer the rest to remain atleast until I can sort the images out,
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
I realy appreciate that you wanna categorize your images yourself, but why you dont wanna get help by others if they willing to? Might be they setting sensefull cats you would never think about, thats a chance for you and others to learn i.e. And why you wanna "disturb" or confuse other people watching your images with your maintenance cats? You can caegorize your images if the cats are hidden or not. Can can do it if the get tageed by a bot or not. I cant realy follow your logic. Its great that to wanna to categorize your stuff yourself, but you can do that if your maintenance cats are hidden or not. --JuTa 18:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
It's just something I've prefered to do and I don't mind doing it :)
I only generally take pictures of buses more or less so there's not much really categorisation to do,
No one would be watching my images tho
Because the bot clogs up my watchlist and then when I categorise them I then have to remove the "uncategorised" category - It just makes life easier if I do it the way I've been doing it for the past 3-4 years :)
Thanks :), –Davey2010Talk 18:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Removing the uncat tag is going automaticly if you using hotcat. You can hide bots from your watchlist. And hat about cats like [[:Category:Traffic in <City/Country/Region>]] or [[:Category:<City/Country/Region> in <Year>]]? That might be sensefull cats for your bus images you never thought about but could be set by others. regards --JuTa 18:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
I believe when I tried it last time it didn't hide the bot .... it may of changed but as I said it's what im used too but thanks anyway :)
Happy a Happy New Year :)
Regards ,–Davey2010Talk 18:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Then dont create complete blank categories. Then they don appear on Commons:Database reports/Blank single-author pages which I'm working on reguarly. PS: I allready thought about to bring up your handling of user categories i.e. at village pump if this is realy an accepted method or should be changed. --JuTa 07:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Ahhhh I didn't know they appeared there, What about a compromise - Once I've categorised images I'll usercat the category after what about that ?,
I also apologise for the message above, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
What ever you do with those cats, if I stumble over one during my regularly maintenance work, I will put a {{User category}} to it, cause they 'are user cats and should be hidden, like on Special:UncategorizedCategories. But I dont will start any edit war with you if you remove the hidden afterwards. --JuTa 20:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Or you could just not see it.... Just imagine it's not there :),
Like I said as a compromise I'd be more than happy to hide these after I've done my work (which should take a week per Cat maybe not even that)
I don't really want to have to rollback you especially when you're an admin I'd rather we resolved this on both sides that's all :),
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
If I "have to" do an edit, cause they are i.e. uncategorized I will do the correct edit in my eyes. If you are quicker than me and they are allready categorized I'll leave them as they are. But I'm still unhappy with your user cats. Its just not important enough to force it or to ask a larger audiance who is correct and wrong in our case. --JuTa 20:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello, I have made a deletion request here (bottom of the page): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Veverve However, several days later after my request, those images are still here. I allow myself to remind you of my deletion request, hoping that it does not bother you nor is against the rules. Veverve (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, normaly deletion reqquests running one week or longer. But I closed this one now. I deleted and redireted most of the as they were duplicates of other files. regards. --JuTa 00:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

A heads-up

You redirected File:The 2017 CFC Annual Gala & Auction (32565696961).jpg to File:Alex Paxton-Beesley and David Reale.jpg.

Didn't the later file have a different, and richer set of categories? Categorization is crucial to helping make sure our viewers can find the images we want. In my opinion that means it is important to not simply discard any work done categorizing images that turn out to be duplicates.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

I normaly do that but must have missed the cat that time. I copied it now. regards. --JuTa 19:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Redirect

Hallo JuTa,

Du hast die Weiterleitung File:Bangladesch Parlamentswahl 2018.svg wiederhergestellt, nachdem ich sie gelöscht hatte. Warum? Auf diese Seite verlinkt nichts, die Weiterleitung ist überflüssig. --Furfur Diskussion 09:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Es kann auch externe Nutzungen (also von außerhalb der Wikiwelt) geben. Deshalb sollten solche Weiterleitungen behalten werden, um diese Nutzungen nicht zu stören. Siehe Commons:File redirects. Gruß --JuTa 09:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Please do not delete the temporary files. It messed all my uploads. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hmm, the please leave a not that dupes should be deleted on the decsription pages. Otherwise its hard to determine which dupes can and cannot be processed as I'm regularly working on Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. regards --JuTa 15:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Point Purakanui Inlet Blueskin Bay Otago New Zeand.jpg

The work is from New Zealand (50 years PMA), so for {{PD-old-assumed}} it only has to be 100 years old. The date was stated as "early 1900s". If we can't keep this now, we need an undeletion date.

Pinging @Racconish, World's Lamest Critic, Geo Swan. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

But that was your (guessed?) change. Before its was from 2011 (likely the flickr upload date). According what exactly do you think or know the image is from early 1900s? --JuTa 12:51, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't know when this photo came from or when it was taken. The person who uploaded it to Flickr doesn't know where it came from or when it was taken. We don't have enough clues in the image to make an informed guess of when it was taken. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
JuTa, did I add it? (I can't remember) When exactly (time and date) did I add it? (if I know when I may be able to figure out what my source was) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Nevermind, I found my source:
"Not too sure where I sourced this photo. it interested me as I live in Purakaunui. Given the lack of surrounding housing in the photo I'm picking the photo is the early 1900s."
A statement by the Flickr uploader. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Hmm, I'm still not realy convinced, thou its not a 100% clear case for me. I would like to get more admin opinions. Alexis Jazz: could you please raise an Commons:Undeletion request and link to our discussion here? regards --JuTa 16:03, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Douglas Robert Ford

Hi, I noticed you moved Category:Doug Ford to Category:Douglas Robert Ford with a note "see wikidata". I think this should be reverted because barely anyone in Ontario and Canada refers to him as Douglas Robert Ford (see: [2], [3], [4]). Another example in support of this is Category:Bill Clinton instead of Category:William Jefferson Clinton. // sikander { talk } 18:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, the reason for that is this discussion. The given- and surname categries for people are built because of their wikidata items. There are serveral volounteers on wikidata who dont want to name him "Doug" but "ouglas Robert". I'm not happy with it but its the best workaround at the moment. regards. --JuTa 18:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Category: Police aircraft

Hello JuTa, thank you for cleaning up the mess I made yesterday... I was just trying to add a police helicopter to proper category hierarchy. There seems to be duplicate branching... (see Category:Helicopters_in_police_service and, for example Category:Police_helicopters_by_country ) --GeXeS (talk) 07:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

You are very wellcome. :) --JuTa 07:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello.What do you mean by "this is *not* a category"؟?Did you mean that this list should not be categorized?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Its a project name space page and not a category. In Category:Categories which are children or grand-children of themselves (as the name says) only Categories should be categgorized to. regards. --JuTa 18:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
The list is category's main topic (P301).See d:Q60861845.Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Which you created today. But If you like feel free to readd it. Anyhow it makes sense. regards. --JuTa 18:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
PS: I'm not sure if the bot will through it out again when it updates the page next time. --JuTa 18:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ju ta . I am really not good at this. I tried to replace the version of the Lavandaia, that has the OTRSmark in the Elisa Maria Boglino article....with this new photo, wich I got got from Italy recently.. the paiting has been washed and restored. I am the the heir and copyrighyholder ...Arthur Crbz knows about this. Maybe I did something wrong in the proces, but there is a possibility to to replace photos? Maybe you could help me with this?Ciopone. (talk) 14:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ciopone., File:Lavandaia. Elisa Maria Boglino.Olie på lærred.1932.jpg depicts the same painting like File:Lavandaia. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred.1932.jpg, but its a different image with different colouring etc. Therefor its not clear if the artist or his/her heirs are willing to publish this copy under a free license too. If you are the copyright holder you should send a releasing mail for the new image to the commons support team as documented on Commons:OTRS. Once this is done you should replace the problem tag on the file decription page with the template {{OTRS pending}} best with {{subst:OP}}. This will then prevent the deletion of if for at least 2 months or until the release will be procesed as valid or invalid by an OTRS volounteer. regards. --JuTa 18:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for answering. I have tried to do what you told me...but dont think I did it right. I have sent an email to OTRS. Anyway I dont understand why its still necessary to prove the copyright. I have sent so many papers to Arthur Crbz, and he has undeleted some of the files, and knows what it is all about.I thought , that when at first the copyright was proved it would not be so difficult to upload new files?How/when can I replace the old photo, with this one and keep the OTRSmark?I am sorry to still course problems, i know you are all so busy. Thank youCiopone. (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I fixed your edit. That now OK for the moment. Just wait until the Persission get confirmed by an OTRS agent by adding {{OTRS permission}}. That can take a long time as we have more than 100 days backlog at the moment. PS: You can use the new image even borfore that, but be aware that you might have to switch it back in case the new release would not be accepted. --JuTa 00:57, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, so very much:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HNBS (talk • contribs) 12:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)sorryCiopone. (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

About not cc0 tag

I rollbacked you here because I thought that source is in public domain --Photographer 23:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

No they aren't - see i.e. Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images#Status_of_PD_Mark_1.0. But you fixed it yourself. Thx for that. --JuTa 07:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Please, do not rename djvu/pdf files used in Wikisource. There are hundreds or thousands pages basing on their names to be exactly as they were. And changing that is not a simple work. Please revert. Or fully fix the result of your rename: s:pl:Historya Nowego Sącza, s:pl:Indeks:Jan Sygański - Historya Nowego Sącza.djvu. Ankry (talk) 12:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

I didnt renamed it. It was a duplicate file and I kept the older copy of it. But I will have a look later to the details... --JuTa 12:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
But we need it to exist under old name as file, not as redirect. And phab:T214759 shows than moving the file with a lot of thumpbnails mauy be destructive. Any hints?
File redirects are not properly handled in Wikisource and I do not know how to revert all changes in other projects that were triggered by your redirect creation / deletion and made by CommonsDelinker. Any hints? Wikisource users are complaining already. Ankry (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
OK, I have uploaded the file locally. Maybe it is the best solution if Wikisource cannot rely on DjVu filenames being unchanged. Ankry (talk) 13:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Thx, next time I will keep the copy with the lot of wikisource usage even its the younger one. regards --JuTa 13:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, now there is a problem undeleting the deleted file, see phab:T214843. Ankry (talk) 14:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Ankry, Should I switch the kept file with the redirect? --JuTa 14:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
No idea. I renamed & reuploaded the exact copies of the files because of outdated thumbnail and file rename problems. I do not know if this will work now as undeletion does not. I intended to merge/rename the files finaly. But now I am not sure whether renaming back would fix or cause extra problems. Maybe, we should just wait until the "problems" expire (I guess in 30 days) or the underlying bug is fixed (maybe infinite ETA). As the used copy is already in Wikisource uploaded locally, you can experiment here if you wish, IMO. Ankry (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
OK, then I leave it as it is, not to create more mess than allready... --JuTa 16:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. You seem to have deleted File:Gent ëd vista curta.ogg but this recording is my own voice that I recorded, and I had put it in public domain. Why was it deleted? It seems also other recordings of mine have been deleted. Please let me know. --pastellina (talk) 13:07, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi pastellina, you uploaded so much recordings with different voices and images obviously not your work claiming as your own work, that is impossible to trust this claim for some of them. Please send a releasing and confirming mail to the commons support team as documented unter Commons:OTRS. PS: I list of your uploads, including the deleted ones, you find under Special:Log/Pcastellina. regards --JuTa 15:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, long live Japan, sorry, please do not erase the textile team logo because it's the version of the previous version that Mani.Ghv has been designing and owning. Thanks Viera iran (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, what are you talking about?--JuTa 08:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I mean, this is a timely deletion of this image. [5] The owner and designer of the two I've written above. Thanks Viera iran (talk) 11:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Viera iran, it was uploaded as fair use, but commons does not accept fair use - see Commons:Fair use. Its simply a copyright violation would would need a license confirmation by the Club or designer of it through Commons:OTRS. PS: I didnt deleted it, I marked is as having no license. It was User:EugeneZelenko who deleted it as copyright violation. regards. --JuTa 15:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

HI, why does the history disappear when you delete it? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Because I deleted it?! It was a duplicate file and the only way to merge the 2 together is to delete the younger copy and redirect it to the older copy. See also Commons:Dupe. regards. --JuTa 21:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
For the moment the file remains as a redirect but the history only records your entry of the redirect. I'm asking why the rest of the history isn't there. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 21:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I want to be able to find out how the mistake happened. Eddaido (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
The history disappered because I deleted it. Thats the sense of deletion.
Here the content of the deleted copy:

== {{int:filedesc}} ==

{{Information

| Description = 1923 Checker H-2 taxicab

National Automotive and Truck Museum
1000 Gordon M. Buehrig Place Auburn, Indiana May 2017 | Source = 1923 Checker H-2 Taxi Cab | Date = 2017-05-09 11:04 | Author = Greg Gjerdingen from Willmar, USA | Permission = | other_versions= }}

{{Location dec|42.440141|-85.420592|source:Flickr}}

==Licensing==

{{cc-by-2.0}} {{FlickreviewR|status=passed|author=Crown Star Images|sourceurl=https://flickr.com/photos/52900873@N07 /34297682100|reviewdate=2019-02-02 08:34:15|reviewlicense=cc-by-2.0|reviewer=FlickreviewR 2}}

Category:Checker Model H
Hope that helps. --JuTa 21:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much for that, it was the edit history I wanted. I wanted to understand how the duplication occurred. But I've been enough trouble to you already. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 23:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi! As per COM:REVDEL I'm contacting you in order to request deletion of file verision of this file uploaded on 29 November 2010. This reuploaded version is by Parikas brothers per this archive entry and so copyright for this file version hasn't expired. Thank you! 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:C0DF:6D0E:91F4:7EED 12:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done --JuTa 12:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello.I want to work on this list by creating the wanted categories, but can I know the total number of items or get them alphabetically (not numerically) arranged?Thanks ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Not that I know, they are sorted by number of entries. There are many thousends of them - see here - you wont get more than 5000 and this "stops" currently by 7 entries. Likely there are another 50000 or so wirh less bu not listed. regards --JuTa 15:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Ok, I'll work on them soon ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Heya! The license is shown on the site: http://nikolakolodziejczyk.com/presskit/photo/ I couldn't find proper license template on Wiki (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Could you help me fixing that? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gradir (talk • contribs) 10:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC) --Gradir (talk) 10:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, NC (non commercial) and/or ND (non derivate) licenses are not accepted on commons - compare Commons:licensing. I'm sorry but this image cannot be kept. regards --JuTa 10:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

File Meria Theresia Garden Square

Please take the file back, it is no problem with license. The garden square is private and this photo given by owner. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DIP UZH (talk • contribs) 16:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but which file exactly you are talking about? --JuTa 17:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Nitaskinan en photos 2019

Hello JuTa,

Just a quick question. I created Category:Nitaskinan en photos 2019 couple days ago for the contest atj:Wikipetcia:Nanto masinatcikan 2018-2019, and my colleague Luc Patin just told me it was erased by you because empty Category. May I ask the reason why? Do you mind if I recreate it?

Thank you and best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I regularly work on Special:UncategorizedCategories. Cats with images/pages in I mark as uncategorized but empty and uncategorized cats I normaly delete on sight because they does not make sense. I now restored "your" cat. Please put it in some sensefull cats. regards. --JuTa 17:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you JuTa for precisions. Done. Best. Benoit Rochon (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Since when do we use full names as the titles for categories? It feels like you tried to fix something that wasn't broken. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Since we use {{Wikidata infobox}} for people categories. --JuTa 20:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
What you link to mentions nothing about using full names. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Look, The template automaticly sorting people into their given/family names as set on wikidata. If i.e. Category:Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain is sorted into Category:Mark (given name) its very confusion for readers finding him there. The name of a category, the (english) title in wikidata and the given- / family-names for those people cats should fit together. Or nother example: why should be Category:Danny Welbeck in Category:Tackie (given name)? --JuTa 20:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
I don't think that is such an issue. It feels like this format is your personal preference and that it isn't guided by any guideline or policy. If this were the case, I think more categories would follow this format. I mean, we have Category:Donald Trump and not Category:Donald John Trump, for example. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Donald Trump isnt sorted into Category:John (given name) because Donald has prefered rank on wikidata which supresing any other given name categories here on commons. --JuTa 20:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay. Is that recommended practice for the primary given name? Mattythewhite (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
It depends how the (eglish) articel is named. If one of the given names (and the article titles on wikipedia) i using only one given name then it should get the prevered rank, yes. But if people commonly known under multiple given names they should be categoried equaly like i.e. Category:Johann Sebastian Bach. --JuTa 20:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Peter Casey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Paulbe (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Daria Nyzankiwska-Snihurowycz.jpg

Hello JuTa, Does this fix the problem? I am unfamiliar with photos. Can you help me with this one? The photo is almost ninety years old and its copyright has expired in most countries, and it is in the public domain. If I don't have the proper tag, can you help me and insert the right one? I would be grateful for any help that you can give me. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Nicola Mitchell, why do you think the image was made and/or first publihsed in Canada? As far aas I read the source link she was in Europe before WW2. --JuTa 14:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
It would have been made in Ukraine, but then brought to Canada when the lady in the photo immigrated. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 14:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Then its more likely {{PD-Ukraine}}. regards. --JuTa 14:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
I've changed it then. Thank you. Nicola Mitchell (talk) 15:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

Could you undelete the file: File:Maciej_Zaborowski_(center),_lawyer_from_Poland.jpg. The proper agreement regarding this file has just arrived on OTRS: ticket:2018062910007154 Polimerek (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done. Please complete the OTRS task now. --JuTa 07:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Is there any way to preserve duplicated files?

  • You have deleted several files which were duplicated versions of another. All from category Category:Flora distribution maps of Poland. There are generalized maps of plant species distributions and generalization is the reason of duplication of some patterns of ranges. Each species should have own map (another solutions are far less useable - like putting all names in descriptions - how to find them?). I can prepare generally the same maps which differs in some pixels to avoid deletion, but there should be more reasonable solution (any template?). Kenraiz (talk) 09:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Kenraiz, I now added the other species to the descriptions and renamed the files to i.e. File:Achillea millefolium, Aegopodium podagraria, Agropyron repens, Agrostis capillaris, Agrostis gigantea distribution in Poland.svg, which I should have done directly by processing them as duplicates. Sorry for that. I am regularly working on Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. I dont see a good solution for this. I could leave "your" files as they are, but any user may mark them as duplicates in future and/or any admin might process them as duplicates any time in future. The best would be you upload slightly different files like you allready did on i.e. File:Alchemilla sericoneura distribution in Poland.svg and File:Alchemilla smytniensis distribution in Poland.svg. regards --JuTa 16:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for reply. I expected that. I am going to use these files in Wikibooks and Wikipedia and alphabetical order of them according to specific name of taxa is important. Also for anybody who would like to use maps - such organization of files is very clear and useful. In such case I am going to continue uploading slighty modified maps. Could you rename back the files File:Achillea millefolium distribution in Poland.svg, File:Alchemilla kulczynskii distribution in Poland.svg, File:Alchemilla glabricaulis distribution in Poland.svg and delete redirects like File:Alchemilla incisa distribution in Poland.svg? Kenraiz (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry I cannot follow... Why I should rename those files to what names? And why I should delete the last redirect. You (and anybody else) can use the files under their redirect names if you like or its more convinient. regards. --JuTa 17:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
In place of redirects I would like to upload new files with maps. I would like to get clear, alphabetical set of maps – in which each species will be presented on its own map (some of them will be very similar, but there will be no duplicates). Kenraiz (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
No I got it. ✓ Done. You can reupload the files... --JuTa 18:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Kenraiz (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Categories deleted

You often delete categories I have created. Do you see me as a very regular "offender"? Or is it you delete so many you wouldn't notice who created them. (I have looked at your 'contributions' but there is no record of deleted categories, I suppose because the category was deleted!?) It is all puzzling for me — they will have been created because I have given a file that category.

I am forever surprised by the emails I get to tell me about changes to image categorisations but there have been almost none regarding removing the categorisation causing the creation of the category. It is as if the system is set up to tell me of inconsequential things but not of things about which I will do battle. I think you are aware of unfinished business about coaches in Belgium. Do you simultaneously change the category of a file then delete the category it had been allocated by me? That's a possible explanation.

Anyway, my question is, do I stand out as a particular offender to your schemes for Commons? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Eddaido, I regularly work on Category:Incomplete deletion requests. Incomplete requests for empty categories I dont complete but just delete the empty category. This was the case for i.e. Category:State coaches of Belgium and Category:Horse-drawn taxis in Seville. I also work regularly on old and ampty categories through User:Achim55/Unused categories. This was the case for i.e. Category:Biota of Malta, Category:Land vehicles in Peru, Category:Carriages in Aragon and much more. I delete hundrets or thousends of categories every month, you are not the only one creating those empty (aenseless) ones. I dont treat you as an offender, but perhaps you should be more carefull while creating new categories and should think twice if they are sensefull and fit into the existing structure. regards. --JuTa 18:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
I always populate new categories. Why am I not advised when the item in that category has its categorisation changed. I do not suggest it is your fault. I do suggest there is something wrong with the system. There is unfinished business over Belgium. I strongly resent your suggestion :"you are not the only one creating those empty (aenseless) ones. I dont treat you as an offender, but perhaps you should be more carefull while creating new categories and should think twice if they are sensefull and fit into the existing structure"
The Changes that are made which you effectively (unwittingly?) support are of categories created to fit the existing overall structure. For example (Belgium) and Land vehicles in Peru. Someone (like (Belgium) takes irrational exception to the categorisation and removes it and I do not get advice of it. That's a system failure. I now have much experience of categories and I know how impossible it is to work through the category administrative system. It seems as if there is a system but the volunteers are swamped. You will be a volunteer too. I very strongly resent your incorrect imputations. How about looking at the system and working out why it is failing me. Eddaido (talk) 03:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
And, by the way, the only way I learnt of your response from the message symbol at the top of this page, no email. No visit Commons, no advice. Why is this? Eddaido (talk) 03:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Eddaido, I have the impression that you are very upset. Please try to keep calm, nobody is attacking you. The only thing I find are empty categories. Its in most cases nearly impossible to find out which images has been sorted out of it or if it has ever been populated. So: the only thing I can do is to delete them after +9 months. Thats normaly plenty of time to repopulate them. In case of i.e. Category:State coaches of Belgium there another user (User:Carolus) requested deletion with the reasoning Does not exist, only royal carriages in BE, unsourced and completely own theory + pushing of own categorie without any scientific source or proof for this categorie. That sounded reasonably to me. He should have informed you about the deletion request which he didn't. I recommand that you watch the categories of your interest in your watchlist and untick Hide categorization of pages. Then you should see which images getting sorted out of which of "your" categories and can either undo that or ask the user doing it for his reasons. In normal cases there is enough time to either repopulate the cats or to discuss and (hopefully) reach an agreement the case(s) the the other user(s). And about the "message symbol": Thats excctly what it is designed for - to inform users when they get named anywhere in a discusion - and a normal method of communication here. For details see meta:Echo (Notifications). regards. --JuTa 08:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Only upset by the passage written by you which I quoted. Carolus can have no reasonable objection to the category State coaches of Belgium. It does not affect his preferred categorisation, it makes Belgium fit in with all the other similar countries. Are his concerns somehow political? I mean is he anti-royalty? He can give no rational reason for his actions. (The statements he made to you may be right for Belgium, though I believe he is quite wrong, but the category for the same type of vehicle goes through all those European and Chinese and Japanese and South American monarchies. The categories you have deleted in the last six to twelve months have all been created in a major effort by me to create consistency in categorising vehicles throughout the world. Go and look at my record if you wish. I do strongly resent "you are not the only one creating those empty (aenseless) ones. I dont treat you as an offender, but perhaps you should be more carefull while creating new categories and should think twice if they are sensefull and fit into the existing structure". Very strongly. I get emails all the time about changes to categories in Commons. Why not those that give me particular concern? Eddaido (talk) 11:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
I dont know. Because you dont watch it? --JuTa 17:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Überraschungsbilder

Moin JuTa, Du hast mein Foto in die obige Liste aufgenommen. Natürlich bin ich etwas stolz. Nur: Wieso? Das ist ein altes Bild von vor dreizehn Jahren, was ist das Kriterium?

Dann könnte ich auch manchmal Fotos vorschlagen.

Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Nightflyer, die Kritierein sind recht einfach: ein möglichst von auf de: aktivem Benutzer selbstgemachtes Bild, das hübsch/interessant/überraschend... ist und mit dem man auch auf einen (interessanten) Artikel verlinken kann. Eine Beschreibung findest Du unter de:Benutzer Diskussion:Bdk/Bild des Tages. Wenn ich die Vorschläge "aufülle" klicke ich häufig auf de: auf "zufälliger Artikel" bis ich was passendendes finde, wechsle dann auch häufig in die dort verlinkte Commons-Kategorie und suche mir dort ein hübsches Bild aus. Und natürlich darfst Du auch gerne selbst Vorschläge machen. Gruß --JuTa 23:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Martin Grasegger

Hallo JuTa! Vielleicht kannst du mir helfen. Weißt Du, warum bei der Category:Martin Grasegger die Category:Grasegger (surname) nicht angezeigt wird, obwohl sie in Wikidata vorhanden ist? Danke und beste Grüße aus Österreich: --GT1976 (talk) 15:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Das hast Du ja selbst rausgefunden - siehe hier.--JuTa 18:20, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Bzw. Purge und/oder Nulledit helfen nach wikidata Änderung. --JuTa 18:22, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Ich bedanke mich für Deine Auskunft! --GT1976 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Kategorienverknüpfungen bei Wikidata

Hallo JuTa! Vielleicht kannst du mir helfen. Weißt Du, warum es diese Artikel gibt? Sollten die Commonskategorien zu diesen verknüpft werden, oder z. B. zu diesen? Danke und beste Grüße aus Österreich: --GT1976 (talk) 15:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Das hab ich mich auch schon gefragt, Kommt aber wohl öfter auf wikidata vor. Evtl könnte man versuchen die beiden Sachen zu "mergen". Gruß --JuTa 18:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Ich bedanke mich für Deine Auskunft! --GT1976 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Sortierung über Wikidata

Hallo JuTa! Vielleicht kannst du mir helfen. Weißt, was in Wikidata gemacht werden muss, damit in den commons-Kategorien die Artikel ohne Defaultsort richtig sortiert werden? --GT1976 (talk) 15:44, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Vor-und Nachnamensfelder müssen komplett (mit der englischen Variante) befüllt sein. Und in beiden sollten keine Umlaute, Snderzeichen o.ä. vorkommen; ansonsten "|defaultsort=no" verwenden, denn sonst ist die wikidata-Sortierung falsch. Gruß --JuTa 18:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Ich bedanke mich für Deine Auskunft! --GT1976 (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

photo "Jonathan Stamler.jpg"

Greetings JuTa. You marked this photo for deletion due to not having a copyright statement. During submission, I requested OTRS to contact the photographer directly by email to verify the status, but as a first time submitter I may have done so incorrectly. None of the listed atttribution license situations seemed to apply - I was given the photo by the subject to post here and had the photographer clear the embedded copyright info before uploading, and loaded the photo together with the photographer's contact information to verify the copyright status. I have now used the OTRS release generator to send an email to both Wikimedia and the photographer directly. Hopefully this is the correct method. If not, any advice appreciated. Thanks RPremont (talk)

Hi RPremont, whats mising is a license template of the copyright holders choice - compare Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. You should ask the copyright holder under which license he likes to publish the image and the add the coresponding template to the file decription page. Perhaps the User who added the OTRS template is able add this if the license war clearly stated within the mail to the support team. regards. --JuTa 00:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Sint Willibrordus Church in Rotterdam photos

Dear JuTa, in my article: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko%C5%9Bci%C3%B3%C5%82_%C5%9Bw._Wilibrorda_w_Rotterdamie I'd like to use photo from Reliwiki.nl but there is not possible to link it directly. Then I try to move it to Wiki Commons, it turned out that there is no license. I have already written to Reliwiki asking for permission. I am waiting for a response. Thank you for your remarks. Best regards TomRad888 (talk) 11:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi TomRad888, they should name the exact license (see Commons:Copyright tags) they like to publish the images and send this to the commons support team - see Commons:OTRS. Once you know they did this you should add the corresponding license template to the file description pages and ass {{OTRS pending}} to them. regards. --JuTa 11:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Category:Ali_Rana_(given_name) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Big Al / Alton Carson

Good day. What is the reason for the move of the category "Big Al Carson" to "Alton Carson"? The former is what he is known by professionally. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

In short: Thats a "problem" with the {{Wikidata infobox}}. See also Template talk:Wikidata Infobox#Problem with various people. --JuTa 03:28, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Emblem of Azerbaijan (1918-1920)

Hello. It was the emblem of Azerbaijan in 1918-1920: Azerbaijan emblem (1918-1920). CalalC99 (talk) 19:14, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry but what exactly you talking about? --JuTa 05:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Could you please restore this category? It contained Category:Spirit of Sir John A. Macdonald, which was redirected to Category:Canadian Pacific Railway 1095 (they are the same thing), but the categories at the target were not updated. I've now added the category, which merits restoration. Mindmatrix 14:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done --JuTa 18:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Hallo

Are 1928 photos in France PD? --E4024 (talk) 02:35, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

It depends when the photographer has died. More than 70 years ago, yes. Otherwise no.--JuTa 02:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello.What do you think of this talk?Do you think the category has a benefit? ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

The cat is about a specific Austria train. Looks Ok to me. --JuTa 07:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)