User talk:Tobias ToMar Maier

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tobias ToMar Maier!

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Tobias ToMar Maier,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:25, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jakob (Burlafingen) - Latin RIP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nice back for Wikipdeia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The filename should be improved. --XRay 02:39, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulm - Balconies in tight spaces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 02:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rectangular hay bale in Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seelhausbrunnenwerk Museum Ulm - Plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 02:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neptune figure made by stone cutter family Moll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Tobias, ich komme auch zum Fotoworkshop nach Nürnberch. Ich werd am Freitagmittag mit dem Auto in Türkheim losfahren - wenn du mitfahren willst, hole ich dich gerne ab. Solltest du wie auf der Seite notiert nach Wien weiterwollen: Ailura wird vermutlich von Nürnberg Richtung Wien heimfahren :) --Ordercrazy (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red evening bodysuit with integrated bra - Backside - modeled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red evening bodysuit with integrated bra - Front - modeled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red evening bodysuit with integrated bra - In front of white wall - modeled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments No categories --MB-one 01:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)  Comment ✓ Done on all 3 of them --Tobias ToMar Maier 01:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. I added more categories so you can get inspired next time :) --Podzemnik 05:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava as suggested fashion piece for winter 2018-modeld by ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A fine shot. --Peulle 22:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - Indeed. Possible FP, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 23:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava as suggested fashion piece for winter 2018 composite image-modeld by ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Very useful. Please more :) --Podzemnik 00:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jakob (Burlafingen) - former church bell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:05, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Balaclava as suggested fashion piece for winter 2018-modeld by ModelTanja.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balaclava as suggested fashion piece for winter 2018-modeld by ModelTanja.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuit with opaque cotton front and transparent lace backside - worn with low rise denim shorts ankle boots and over sheer to waist tights - ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please give a brief description the next time you nominate a photo. Extensive details belong in the description on the file page, if anywhere. -- Ikan Kekek 03:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jakob (Burlafingen) - Figure of titular Saint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:05, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuit with opaque cotton front and transparent lace backside - worn with low rise denim shorts ankle boots and over sheer to waist tights - ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please give a brief description the next time you nominate a photo. Extensive details belong in the description on the file page, if anywhere. -- Ikan Kekek 03:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untilting an Intentional camera tilt with posing of the model - example in fashion photography for filling the frame - ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 00:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intentional camera tilt or Dutch angle - example in fashion photography for filling the frame - ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 00:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Africa series - Circular knitted sleeveless catsuit worn with flat seamed tights underneath - Emjay Rosso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circular knitted clothing pieces - Body shaping shirt and tights - both described as opaque - Emjay Rosso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, especially the DoF is perfectly balanced --MB-one 03:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron gate leading nowhere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality of focused subject, detailed image. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lined lace bodysuit as part of a typical window portrait in lingerie - Joanna Eva Photomodel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lined lace bodysuit in public - Joanna Eva Photomodel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lace bodysuit with bra underneath - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basic lingerie that may be partly visible in public - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan top and tights in relaxed pose - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights with a wrap skirt - an exercise in leading lines 2 - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights with a wrap skirt - an exercise in leading lines 1 - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Treggings worn over a lace bodysuit with thong back - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Balaclava as suggested fashion piece for winter 2018 - modelled by ModelTanja.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights - backside - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights - without blouse insert - version 1 - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights - without blouse insert - version 2 - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights - frame filling pose - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cosmopolitan bodysuit and tights with a wrap skirt in a serious but creative office space - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Fatal dress in black over Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy with a red lace shrug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 01:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy and red lace shrug on black leather couch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lace bodysuit with thong back under a jumpsuit - zipper partly open - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lace bodysuit with thong back under a jumpsuit - modelled by Anastasia Voloshina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austrian 500 US-CAR DAYS 2019 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite a lot of "hurly-burly" in the background; the Camaro doesn't really come into play. -- Spurzem 11:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support It would indeed look nicer with a shallower DoF. Nevertheless certainly a QI --MB-one 13:41, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 06 24 poncho and hair colour matched.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lined lace bodysuit as part of a typical window portrait in lingerie - Version 2 - Joanna Eva Photomodel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 14:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy and red lace shrug on black leather couch - landscape version of the image.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calvin Klein underwear - pose 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calvin Klein underwear - pose 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calvin Klein underwear and Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder and a blouse - light-footed pose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calvin Klein underwear and Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - relaxed pose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 15:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Kaga tau 18:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simple sweater dress with with turtleneck - pose 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simple sweater dress with with turtleneck - pose 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishnet bodystocking as it might be worn under a dress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishnet bodystocking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishnet bodystocking - open crotch visible.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you reduce/remove the CAs at the branches in the top-right corner? --Aristeas 09:07, 12 February 2020 (UTC)  Comment Done --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Sulzburg (Lautertal) - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you reduce/remove the CAs at the branches in the top right corner? --Aristeas 09:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)  Comment Done --Tobias ToMar Maier 18:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-08 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-19a - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I quite like this. -- Ikan Kekek 23:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-22a - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-22b - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-44 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-54 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-01 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice one, but I'm not sure whether those are or aren't two dust spots more or less in line with the diagonal of her upper left leg. -- Ikan Kekek 23:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)  Comment I can't tell either. But respect to you for spotting them. Perhaps you can recognize them in the other 12 images.--Tobias ToMar Maier 08:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - I haven't seen anything that might be a dust spot in any of the other photos in this series so far. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-19b - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support And I like this one. The golden glow has been captured impressively. --Aristeas 11:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 20-10 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice --Poco a poco 11:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava with modern cut in red made of thin fabric with polar fleece on the inside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Negligee made of transparent white lace on black leather couch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 19-21 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tobias ToMar Maier, I really like this series. Would you like to select your favorite photo from the series (though perhaps not one of those with a lens flare) and nominate it at FPC? If not, I'll select one and nominate it, but I think several could be good FP candidates. -- Ikan Kekek 20:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like you to select the ones you find suitable as I'm curious to see what others like. Just tell me which ones you selected. --Tobias ToMar Maier 01:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - OK, I'll put some on my list of possible FP nominees and make a decision later on which one to nominate. I'll let you know when I nominate one. -- Ikan Kekek 03:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Contouring the cheekbone with makeup in proper and wrong pose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly business casual Informal wear - pose 2 with fishnet tights.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 00:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly business casual Informal wear - pose 1 with fishnet tights.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly business casual Informal wear - pose on couch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly business casual Informal wear - possible look underneath - pose 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - nipple censorship 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly business casual Informal wear - pose 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 08:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - nipple censorship 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Excellent --Wilfredor 00:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford fatal dress as a mini dress to cover the see trough part of a too thin jeggings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Nice pose --Wilfredor 00:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford fatal dress as a short top and jeggings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Good --Wilfredor 00:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Going commando - possible example.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Very well --Wilfredor 00:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Going commando - possible example - nipple censorship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 00:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden hour to sunset - 2019-08-27 18-50 - modelled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Here the soft veiling and the low contrast (in the face etc.) are obviously part of the artistic conception. Very well done IMHO. --Aristeas 10:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly Business casual Informal wear - pose 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP nomination[edit]

Hi, Tobias. Here it is. I hope they like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slightly business casual Informal wear - possible look underneath - pose 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuit worn with black tights underneath to dispel the illusion of naked skin underneath the transparent lace fabric - colour - Joanna Eva Photomodel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strapless evening dresses with hoop skirt - rear view with lacing in the back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 11:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Related bodies - Leotard and Bodysuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, both women are sharp --Michielverbeek 21:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dress with circle skirt in the wind - pose 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 00:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dress with circle skirt in the wind - pose 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 00:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shapewear bodysuit underneath transparent shirt - Modelled by Lady Alexi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jumpsuit with pleated legs - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Drei Mohren Augsburg Büste Mitte 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Drei Mohren Augsburg büste rechts 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leather jacket with quilted details - worn with low rise denim shorts and a bodysuit over sheer to waist tights - ModelTanja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Drei Mohren Augsburg Büste links 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you please add a more specific category to this and the other 2 busts than "hotel"? --Poco a poco 08:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The hotel is called "the three (black)moores". And those are the three. But I added a few categories as requestet.--Tobias ToMar Maier 20:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks --Poco a poco 21:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gray blazer brown shirt black split skirt sheer tights and strappy heels - modeled by Marina Daschner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black slip and pantyhose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition --Cvmontuy 01:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy and red lace shrug on black leather couch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grizma (talk) 14:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Relaxed pose on the railing but noticing someone taking an perhaps inappropriate long look admiring the smooth buttocks - Modelled by Lady Alexi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grizma (talk) 14:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - nipple censorship 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grizma (talk) 14:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Going commando - possible example.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grizma (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy and red lace shrug on black leather couch - landscape version of the image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grizma (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martini-Palais 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martini-Palais door detail 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martini-Palais window detail 1 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martini-Palais window detail 2 2020-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just sending this mensage to say that i voted to keep all your images that have deletion requests pending as i think that none are smut, porn or the objectification of women, like as you said "What it shows is no different to the images you find on the packages in the supermarket. Only the pose is different and not all pubic hair is removed.". and clearly they are in scope and with educational value.

Besides, as you have shown in the links you provided in these deletion requests clearly shows that clothing companies use this kind of imagery in their advertising of pantyhoses, so there is nothing abnormal in this images and your previous comments, so it causes a bit of surprise to me that you asked or voted to the deletion of this three images saying that they have replacements.

The fact that these three images were considered quality images alone clearly show that there is scope and educational use. And, in my opinion, what you call replacements are not that, but complements, as they merely either show pantyshoses themselves or the pantyhoses in the legs. These last two "replacements" could be made with an mannequin themselves and are, respectfully and not wanting to claim anything bad about you, more "objectifying" (using this term for the lack of a better one) than the original one as they do not depict a woman wearing a pantyhose, as said Trougnouf in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - nipple censorship 2.jpg, "a whole human, or having both perspectives available, is more informative than a pair of legs". Tm (talk) 23:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry forgot to put the : in the images. Hope you reconsider and vote keep, given what you said in the first place in several deletion requests and, if it did happen, reject with it some potential and unwarranted previous pressures. Tm (talk) 23:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Fatal dress in black with long evening gloves worn with Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Fatal dress in black worn over Kunert Beauty 7 tights in the colour candy with a red lace shrug -Pose with less emphasis on the missing panty line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer tights (pantyhose) with two zone control top and sandal toes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - pose and editing more suited for educational purposes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 00:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Raffinesse Net tights in the colour powder - pose and editing illustrating the depiction in mail order catalogs and online shops.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entscheidungen (Decisions).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 00:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Blue Showpiece - fishnet tights made from sustainable materials - worn with a jumper - facing right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 00:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunert Blue Showpiece - fishnet tights made from sustainable materials - Rear facing right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 00:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Painting above the altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 20:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - sculptures and images inside the chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - view towards the altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice to see a photo of a church by you. -- Ikan Kekek 12:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - view towards the door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. In this case the wide angle distortion works to me --Wilfredor 19:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - left sider and the bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - right side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Burnt Maria figurine inside the chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - chapel on the hill behind the bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - front and right side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - benches and front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - front and left side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Wayside shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Wayside shrine besides bridge - wide DOF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:38, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Wayside shrine besides bridge - narrow DOF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:38, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - view down from the bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Interesting view angle by the used lense. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - another view down from the bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Interesting view angle by the used lense. --J. Lunau 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Prayer Beads hanging besides the altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - altar inside the chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the description needs improvement. --F. Riedelio 06:55, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - Window in the door from the outside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konradskapelle (Mohrenhausen) - view from the bridge toward the chapel with the waning sighn in view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, though a bit noisy. Could try mild noise reduction? --Tagooty 05:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Better this way?--Tobias ToMar Maier 18:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Improved. Will be useful to add the location/country in the Caption and Description. --Tagooty 02:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tagooty: You will get there trought main categorys and geocoordinates.--Tobias ToMar Maier 01:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
True. However, those take one or more clicks and page visits, zoom out, navigation. The Caption/Description are visible immediately with the image. --Tagooty 05:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazda MX-81 at the Mazda-Museum Augsburg - Front one quarter view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazda MX-81 at the Mazda-Museum Augsburg - rear one quarter view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazda Familia first generation 1966 at the Mazda-Museum Augsburg - Front one quarter view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazda 626 GC at the Mazda-Museum Augsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA lens - Assembled to be put in to storage - DSC01100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA lens - bottom left hand side with lens hood - DSC01109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA lens - front cover and lens hood - DSC01104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 21:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opaque Tights with visually separated panty section in limoges blue - 80 Denier - typical sales presentation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer Tights or Pantyhose with simple control top and lavishly decorated transition between panty and leg section in the color beaver – rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 12:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer Tights or Pantyhose with simple control top and lavishly decorated transition between panty and leg section in the color beaver – front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 12:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA lens - ready to be mounted on the camera - DSC01107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Sebring12Hrs 13:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony FE 50mm F1.4 ZA lens - bottom right hand side with lens hood - DSC01108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Sebring12Hrs 13:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirndl backside with often to find decorative seams.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knitted folklike sheer to waist net tights with ajour pattern in the colour white – worn under red girdle knickers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knitted folklike sheer to waist net tights with ajour pattern in the colour white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Folk like shirt bodysuit with short puffed sleeves in white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer Tights or Pantyhose with low waist top in the colour black - rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 10:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knitted folklike tights with smooth panty section and legs in subtle crochet look in the colour black – front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knitted folklike tights with smooth panty section and legs in subtle crochet look in the colour black –rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer Tights or Pantyhose with low waist top in the colour black - front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not easy to display this at full screen at the office lol, but it's good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs: b/c you are male or b/c you don't shop for clothing online? Serious question.--Tobias ToMar Maier 21:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am male ;) --Sebring12Hrs 07:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Fotoworkshop Nürnberg - DSC3622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Females with brassieres in public has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Brianjd (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. May have forgotten about it or image(-s) have been deleted. Added a few I knew from the top of my head. Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inner side of the unbuttoned crotch of a Wolford merino wool bodysuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planter with openings for a pallet jack or forklift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Electric motor on the slewing bearing of a remote controlled yellow Liebherr tower crane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Wikipedia models has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


186.175.31.170 09:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cotton Velvet Rib bodysuit and tights.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment. The picture is too bright. There is almost no contrast between the foot and the floor. -- Spurzem 18:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'm aware of the “almost”. This is one of the reasons I made a black and white version with the clarity slider all the way to the right from the same RAW file. The “almost” is also welcome because it shows that the opaque tights are not totally non see through as the pink skin underneath adds a little contrast to the “white on white” situation. And I already tried a light grey background on another occasion. It just looks wrong and too dark.--Tobias ToMar Maier 23:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolford Cotton Velvet Rib tights in white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breuninger Stuttgart - below the glass dome - close up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:10, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer tights or pantyhose in caucasian skin and black colour with modern bikini style panty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 20:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheer tights or pantyhose in black and caucasian skin colour with modern bikini style panty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava wearing women - Variant 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava wearing women - Variant 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuits and hosiery for a wedding and its night - model-kartei choice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 23:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuits and hosiery for a wedding and its night - Models choice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 23:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ski mask wearing woman - choice 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ski mask wearing women.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corvin Tondera-Klein am 3 April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stefanie Anhalt am 3 April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuits and hosiery for a wedding and its night – image variant that may be best suited for a thumbnail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodysuits and hosiery for a wedding and its night – image variant showing the full wedding dress and a peek behind the curtain so to say.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! On purpose crooked building in Ehingen (Donau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mobile radio studio of German SWR - Rear and front side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --6uy7t44t 11:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mobile radio studio of German SWR - Front and right side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 13:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corvin Tondera-Klein und Stefanie Anhalt am 3 April 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, the resolution is also rather high --PantheraLeo1359531 18:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rasender Rad-Reporter Thomas Bormann am 3 April 2014 in Ehingen (Donau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]