User talk:HNBS

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HNBS!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tre kvinder ser i et spejl.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tre kvinder ser i et spejl.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Selvportræt . Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på træ. ca.1929.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Selvportræt . Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på træ. ca.1929.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Forside til Katalog.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Forside til Katalog.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Side med EMB.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Side med EMB.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:47, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2 Ryttere . Elisa Maria Boglino.olie på lærred.1958.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2 Ryttere . Elisa Maria Boglino.olie på lærred.1958.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A photograph of someone else's photograph? (motif: the painter, her mother, some male bystanders )[edit]

See [1].
You did not take any photos around year 1930, is my view.
Perhaps you have taken photo of a print (that you either have in your possession - or not)?
Perhaps you have taken a photo, of one page in an unnamed publication?
I suggest that you write here, in Danish, what the situation is, regarding that photo.
Someone else or myself will hopefully translate your Danish, with little delay. Regards! 178.232.198.219 01:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC) Billedet er taget af en ukendt fotogra ca 1930. jeg har taget et foto af det gamle foto. jeg er ejer af det gamle foto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HNBS (talk • contribs) 02:00, 5 October 2018 (UTC)jeg har sendt samtykkeerklæringer for alle billeder, med filnavn, og oplysninger om ophavsret til stort set alle billederne,måske jeg har lavet en fejl med et enkelt[reply]

"The photo is taken by an unknown photographer around 1930. I have taken a photograph - of the old photo. I am the owner of the old photo"[edit]

  • Claim by user:HNBS: "The photo is taken by an unknown photographer around 1930. I have taken a photograph - of the old photo. I am the owner of the old photo"].


(She wrote in Danish language - @ 02:00, 5 October 2018 - "Billedet er taget af en ukendt fotogra[f] ca 1930. jeg har taget et foto af det gamle foto. jeg er ejer af det gamle foto").
Comment - She apparently has no right to upload the photo, if the above is her only justification, is my view.
Please let HNBS know more here, since my view on this matter, quite possibly will not be from the "top shelf of answers". 176.11.100.205 16:32, 7 October 2018 (UTC)/ 176.11.100.205 20:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gammelt billede[edit]

Jeg er ejer af negativet, til det foto, som ligger sammen med min slægtnings andre fotoer, i en ubrudt række af negativer.... Så det er taget med hans kamera. Han er selv med på billedet. HNBS (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Claim (above) by user:HNBS:
"I am the owner of the negative, of the photo, that lies together with my relative's other photos, [... on a strip consisting of] negatives.... So it was taken with his camera. He is in the picture.". 176.11.100.205 20:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)/176.11.100.205 14:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ryttere. Santa´Anastasia.Elisa Maria Boglino. Tush. ca.1955.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ryttere. Santa´Anastasia.Elisa Maria Boglino. Tush. ca.1955.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tekst fra kataloget fra udstillingen "Ferite dell´essere" om EMB.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyrighted text from a book
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Migebert (talk) 11:06, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pigeportræt.. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred. ca 1925.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pigeportræt.. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred. ca 1925.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Den barmhjertige Samaritan 0. Elisa Maria Boglino.Olie på lærred.1927.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Den barmhjertige Samaritan 0. Elisa Maria Boglino.Olie på lærred.1927.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 19:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Do not upload copyright violations. Jcb (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JCB, I have tried to show you , that we are the direct heirs to Elisa Maria Boglino , and that we agree to do this. Its a family project, we all have some of her paintings , and we agree to do it, and I am the writer. I have written lots af mails to permission.commons, about familymatters and our names. Many other wikis, told me that I should write on the filepage, that we were the heirs and had the copyright, then it would be ok. We are three persons who have copyright together.Its a very long story ....Is there any way , you could help me with this. Could I write you, in a more private way? The other day I tried to use the Template PD-heirs, that should be a possibility for relatives to release the works of an artist?Ciopone. (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reuploading deleted files is not an option. You have to wait until an OTRS agent handles the ticket. If they think the permission is valid, they will take care of undeletion. Jcb (talk) 19:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, today I actually got some photos from Elisas son about some of Elisa Maria Bolignos late paintings. Is their anyway I could possibly upload those photos in a more right way? from the beginning. Or shall I do , as I did with the other ones, and Have them deleted and wait for Commons?.Ciopone. (talk) 19:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not upload anything for now. Wait for OTRS to respond. Jcb (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I told you, at the moment all three os us have the copyright, could we make som kind of paper about this, .....do you know anything about the roules about this.?Ciopone. (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wait for OTRS, there is nothing else you can do at this point. Jcb (talk) 20:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One last question. Is there anyone, I could write an email to, and discuss this in a more private way?An administrador who has something to do with Commons? I am really sorry for all this mess, and I am sad about leaving the article without pictures?Ciopone. (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS is backlogged. Asking our attention repeatly in order to try to get priority over other waiting people is highly disruptive and only adds to the problem. Don't do it. Wait for your turn patiently. Jcb (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jcb. Some days go I sent this mail to Commons.Dear Commons.:

As you see, all the files have been deleted. I think I might have done many things wrong,when I uploadet theese files. As I have told you I have contacted a danish organisation who takes care of artists and copyrightholders named Visda:dk, so now you can contact them for further information: i talked with them about making a sign ©Elisa Maria Boglino.Visda.dk, so this could be used for the copyright. Maybe I was wrong too, in the "Release Generator" to answer that is was only the mediafile I released and not the work?The whole thing is very difficult for me to understand. I hope you will be able to communicate with me , what should bee on the filepages. I want to use the free common license 3.0 or 4.0 , I want to use the license that makes. it the most diffucult to abuse the files. All photos were taken by my self, directly from the paintings or drawings or old familyphotos. Apart from the files in this page , there are som other ones , which also were deleted.. If you think ,it would be more easy, if i made the whole thing over again, with this new copyrightsign, please write me back, as quick as possible.....

Do you think it would be ok, when the block is lifted, to upload just one photo to the introbox , and maybe one new painting , with this new copyright sign. Now in some days every thing will be signed and documented in Visda .dk. What is the right thing to write in source , at the filepage?Ciopone. (talk) 11:55, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expect someone to come along and delete[edit]

You have uploaded [2].
If you alone do not own the rights to the painting, then you alone can not give away, or license away, intellectual property.

Expect someone to come along and delete "your" file (if I have understood your situation correctly). Sju hav (talk) 18:14, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sju hav. We are three direct heirs , . We all own the copyright , and we all own some of her paintings, and some of her paintings, we own together. its a long story . I am not good at IT, and all this is very difficult for me. I have written so many mails to permission. commons about familymatters , and our names.All three of us agree to do this article. As for the lavandaia, before it was in my mothers house, when she died we gave it to my uncle.At the moment the painting is in Rome , but anyway, we still own the copyrigtht together. But I really dont understand all this mess, we are nor interested in earning money on the copyright, we agree to share her paintings with a free license. Is that wrong.?Or would it be better , with the other license 2.0? Actually I really could use a little bit of help with this. It has been so difficult. What do yuo mean about , that I expect someone to come along and delete my file.I have tried to listen to what other wikis say, and they said that I should write on the filepage , that we had the copyright.Ciopone. (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The user that has this talk page, has been blocked for one week.
First of all - do not edit Commons from any account, until the block has been lifted.
(And do not try write here while not logged in, or upload while not logged in, while you are blocked.)
When your block has been lifted, then perhaps choose one work, that user:HNBS owns alone,
I have not answered all your questions. Perhaps you might want to copy unanswered questions, to your Danish-wiki talk page. Sju hav (talk) 00:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: uploading unfree files after warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tidligt selvportræt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lavandaia. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred.1932.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 19:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donna e Bimbo. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred. 1930. Museo GAM Palermo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You have deleted the file : Donna e Bimbo. I have tried before to get a photo of this painting into the article about the artist Elisa Maria Boglino. Before I used a photo found on Flickr, and I have not been able to find the photografer...meanwhile the photo has dissapeared from Flickr and the internet, it was there for at least 10 years.. I have discussed this with Jcb at OTRS, he asked me to find the URL , and that has not been possible. This photo is taken by my uncle , who is the son to Elisa Maria Boglino. He, and I and my sister own the copyright together to the works af Elisa Maria Boglino, and this photo was taken by ourselves. I would have liked very much to use the photo found on Flickr, because it is better, but I have not until now been able to find the photografer/URL. I have written to Flickr about it and they cannot help me. The guys at OTRS (Arthur Crbz) who have helped me , with all the other photos in the article , knows about the copyright, papers and all that stuff. Hope you can help me get this photo into the article, I would be very thankfull. Thank youCiopone. (talk) 20:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Den Barmhjertige Samaritan. Elisa Maria Boglino. Tusch med turkis Akvarel. ca 1980.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jesus ved den syge Pige. Elisa Maria Boglino. Tusch og Akvarel. Ca.1970.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Gode Gerninger. Elisa Maria Boglino. Fresko. Ca.1928.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hej[edit]

Hej!

Jeg kan se, at der har været nogle problemer med at komme igennem systemet og få lov til at lægge billeder op.

Jeg er dansker og har adgang til OTRS men har været travlt optaget med andre ting, så jeg har ikke set korrespondancen før der var fundet en løsning.

Er der styr på alt nu, eller har du andre ting, du gerne vil have ordnet? Jeg kan se på din diskussionsside, at der er nogle gamle slettede filer.

Mvh. Michael --MGA73 (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tak Michael... Tror faktisk der endelig er styr på det... Vil huske på dig og Ciell... Hvis der skulle blive noget. Vh.

Ciopone. (talk) 22:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]