User talk:Josve05a/Archive 8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 → Archive 14

Drink brands

Is it ok or not to upload pictures of these bottles? Of course my own pictures and not the ones from the website. (antar att man bör skriva på engelska på commons) Skottniss (talk) 00:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skottniss: Du kan skriva på vilket språk du vill. Commons är ett "flerspråkigt" (multi-lingual) projekt. Det beror på om man kommer "bilden" på flaskan eller inte. Om löven syns "för mycket" så kan det anses vara huvudfokus av bilden och därmet bli en bild på ett upphovsskyddat "konstverk". Men om du vrider flaskan så löven knappt syns, så kan det vara ok. Hoppa det förklarade något. If you want me to write and explain in English instead, feel free to tell me to do so.(t) Josve05a (c) 00:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Skottniss: Flaskor som "Cuba Cola" och "Sockerdricka" bör vara ok, eftersom det inte har nån bild eller grafik som kan ge upphovsrätt. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, tog den här bilden, hoppas den är ok. Tack! Skottniss (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jadå, den blev bra! (t) Josve05a (c) 01:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getty images claiming copyright

If you look here this seems quite clear. Vauxhall 14-6 1938 (16676746182).jpg. Eddaido (talk) 11:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddaido: We would need COM:EVIDENCE (to OTRS) from the Getty photographer themself to that affect. It also says "and/or royalty free", which does not mean "free of copyright, but "free to be used as you wish" (one term is about copyright and one is about cost. It is not clear to me. (t) Josve05a (c) 11:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've since been through the other images belonging to that "photographer" and unless he is a travel agent who flies long distances and stays just a few days then I think it must be someone else's photo. I didn't notice that before. It (that picture) was important to me because it was the only image I could find of that particular model of car. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 23:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudhikumar Ambalaparambil - Flickr - treegrow.jpg

File:Sudhikumar Ambalaparambil - Flickr - treegrow.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sudhikumar Ambalaparambil - Flickr - treegrow.jpg Roland zh (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:City of Evian - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg

File:City of Evian - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:City of Evian - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg De728631 (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adela rufimitrella (17464991173).jpg

File:Adela rufimitrella (17464991173).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adela rufimitrella (17464991173).jpg Daphne Lantier 02:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Approaching San Francisco - Flickr - brewbooks (1).jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biology

What about creating a todo page (Biology task force todo list, Biology todo list ?) regrouping:

We would make publicity on this page, hoping that many would help ;-(
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 09:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

W could make such a page, but i doubt many people would maintain it, or watch it...but might be woth a try... (t) Josve05a (c) 12:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cojoba rufescens, known as Coralillo - Flickr - Dick Culbert.jpg

File:Cojoba rufescens, known as Coralillo - Flickr - Dick Culbert.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cojoba rufescens, known as Coralillo - Flickr - Dick Culbert.jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 07:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bucky Fuller biography - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

File:Bucky Fuller biography - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) lNeverCry 02:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Taken_with_Canon_EOS_6D_and_Canon_EF_24-105mm_F4L_IS_USM

Category discussion warning

Taken with Canon EOS 6D and Canon EF 24-105mm F4L IS USM has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

grendel|khan 22:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
hello . حمزة الودان (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Self Portrait - Flickr - brewbooks (1).jpg

File:Self Portrait - Flickr - brewbooks (1).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Self Portrait - Flickr - brewbooks (1).jpg Érico (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

QUESTION!

Is this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pallet&type=revision&diff=174333764&oldid=174309834 you?

It has come to my attention that you might be a sock puppet for one or both of these problem users....

I am only harassing you because I like that deletion notice you posted here. There should be a pallet pallette on the talk page of my pallet photograph here. I never wanted to be an administrator here, I only wanted to have their superpowers. -- RaboKarbakian (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File renaming

@Josve05a: this file requests renaming. Since you were the uploader, your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Lotje 05:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Done. (t) Josve05a (c) 10:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Time

Hi Josve, I don’t really have all the time in the world to be running around cross-wiki after your deletion sprees. It’s great you take your job very seriously but can you please just delete the video you tagged it’s not worth the time writing another OTRS request for. Wiki-Coffee (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Företagsloggor

Hej igen, finns det någon anledning till att loggor som uppenbart inte uppnår verkshöjd inte blir uppladdade på Commons? Tänker att ex. enwp och fiwp har laddat upp Fortums logga lokalt, men ingen har tidigare laddat upp loggan på commons: en:File:Fortum.svg fi:Tiedosto:Fortumin logo.svg. Jag har laddat upp loggan själv, även en del andra loggor som uppenbart inte uppnår verkshöjd, men det kanske är ett kontroversiellt område varav uppladdningen av sådana bilder är något ovanlig? Är jag ute och cyklar i att ladda upp sådana loggor eller har "övriga" bara "missat" att det är tillåtet? Skottniss (talk) 17:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Skottniss: Om loggor eller inte uppnår verkshöjd kan vara svårt att avgöra för visa personer, och väljer därför att göra det säkra före det osäkra och ladda upp de under fair use lokat på enwp. Eller så kan det vara att det var enklare att ladda upp lokalt än att gå till ett annat projekt. Jag vet inte hur andra personer tänker, tyvärr. (t) Josve05a (c) 23:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okej, jag förstår, tack. Ja givetvis vet du inte hur andra tänker, ville bara försäkra mig om att jag inte bryter mot reglerna. Vänligen, Skottniss (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Skottniss: Så länge du är säker att bilderna inte är över verkshöjden (COM:TOO) för det landet de skapades i, och att bilden inte varit på Commons innan men raderats, så bör det vara lugn. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:My brother and I - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

File:My brother and I - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:My brother and I - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg Daphne Lantier 21:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the recent images you tagged for speed deletion...!

Why are you doing this? I understand you found som pictures that they could be signed as screenshots, but I don't understand these:

The same thing with this pictures!!!

Also is the same problem with this!

The rest of the files I can understand for it's deletion, but I need your response inmediately!--VictorPines (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@VictorPines: The flickr user is not the original copyright owner of the artworks displayed on the screens/poster/covers, they are merly taking a photo of them, making the Flickr photos derivatives of copyrighted material. The flickr users do not represent e.g. Konami, and can therefore not license Konami owned artworks under free licenes. See also the loosly related topic of COM:Flickrwashing. (t) Josve05a (c) 08:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Josve05a is correct... the photos are copyright violations 'on Flickr', as they are derivatives of copyrighted works. - Reventtalk 09:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not talking you about the general pictures, I want a explanation of the pictures I listed to you.--VictorPines (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) @VictorPines: I'm talking about the specific images you listed. They are all photographs of copyrighted works, and thus derivatives of those copyrighted works. Per COM:DW, "In short, all transfers of a creative, copyrightable work into a new medium (i.e., from book to movie) as well as all other modifications of a work whose outcome is a new, creatively original work (e.g., from Shakespearean play into a modern rendition of a Shakespearean play with new wording or characters) are considered derivative works". If you (or the Flickr uploader) take a photograph that is specifically of a copyrighted work, the image is a derivative of that copyrighted work. See COM:Packaging, for example, which explicitly applies to several of these. - Reventtalk 09:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but Some of the pictures I listed here doesn't have any sense! For example, you said on here there's no evidence that the photos belong to the author, but that's not truth!:

The author's name is Nelo Hotsuma:

The author has two names, DJ Damien and Chris

— Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorPines (talk • contribs)

@VictorPines: All three are images of packaging. The designs shown on the packaging are copyrighted by companies, and cannot be licensed by the photographer. The photographer can only license their own creative contributions to the image... that's what 'derivative work' means. - Reventtalk 09:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nelo Hotsuma may have taken the photo, but a company made the packages, and artwork on the boxes, and that company owns copyright ower any artwork on their packages. (t) Josve05a (c) 09:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So, explain me about the rest of the images you didn't mention yet.--VictorPines (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@VictorPines: Again, the images are all derivatives of previously copyrighted material, and copyright violations on Flickr. - Reventtalk 09:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(more) Any photograph is a 'derivative work' of any copyrighted material that is depicted in it... it's only allowable if the copyrighted material is either licensed in a way that is compatible with the license of the photograph, or if certain legal exemptions apply (such as 'freedom of panorama', 'de minimis', or 'fair use' apply... fair use is not allowed on Commons, per a rule established by the WMF board). None of these apply here... the photos are clearly intended to depict the copyrighted material. - Reventtalk 10:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to understand licenses to add pictures to an article

Hello! I recently tried to add the ATLAS experiment's logo on the ATLAS experiment's wiki page. Here is the copyright information for the image I used: http://atlasexperiment.org/photos/copyright.html This link reads: "You are free to use ATLAS imagery, video and audio material for educational, scientific, or informational purposes, including photo collections, textbooks, public exhibits and Internet Web pages providing the copyright is shown as follows: ATLAS Experiment © 2016 CERN ATLAS images are under CERN copyright. If the ATLAS material is to be used for commercial purposes, it must not explicitly or implicitly convey CERN or ATLAS' endorsement."

Since a wikipedia article is educational purpose, and since I did add the "ATLAS Experiment © 2016 CERN" mention, I'm not sure what I did wrong. Could you point me in the right direction? It's strange not to have the experiment's logo on the page, when this logo clearly exists.

Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felleg (talk • contribs)

According to the CERN license mentioned in your link above, "the image may not be sold, distributed or otherwise made available for use by third parties." That seems condrodicatry to being a commercial license. Also there i no mention anywhere that derivatives may be allowed, which is a must to be an allowable licnese on Commons. (t) Josve05a (c) 01:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Felleg: The logo can probably be uploaded directly to the wikipedia where you wish to use it, under fair use. See, for example, en:Wikipedia:Logos. - Reventtalk 10:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's disgusting...

I talked to you on the discuss of this image and I waited a lot, but it looks like you don't want to answer. I know you have a life outside of Wikipedia, but this is not an excuse to don't say anything. Will you response someday? I know you're active on Commons! Do you think I didn't check your User contributions? This difference betrays your activity! You just like to tag pictures, but you hate to discuss and reach an agreement to keep an image with a modification. You're the worst administrator I ever saw in my life!--VictorPines (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VictorPines then you've not seen very many administrators. This is a volunteer project, you don't get to demand people participate, we give our time freely but we're limited in what we can do. You should stop being so bloody ungrateful. Some people, honestly. Nick (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) @VictorPines: I'd like you to assume good faith, and stop using personal attacks towards editors a myself. The linked edit I did was part of my job as Josve05a (WMF), only loggd in with my volonteer account, since it wasn't direclty connected to what I'm hired for. I will respond within the 7-day frame of the discussion if I have anything to add, and if I deem it worth discussing. Harrassing me here won't make me more willing to communicate with you. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File renaming by bot

Hej Jonatan. Can your bot do file renaming too? I'd like to rename a batch of files from Category:Thialf (ship, 1985). The original photographer at Flickr obviously got the name mixed up and we should change the affected file names from "File:Thailf ..." to "File:Thialf ..." De728631 (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@De728631: I do not have approval for my bot to rename files, but I can ue the batch rename tool with my normal account to do so, if you wish. (t) Josve05a (c) 23:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great. I don't have any experience with this tool, so please go ahead and correct the names. The renaming as such is covered by criterion No. 3 (obvious errors). De728631 (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: Done :-) (t) Josve05a (c) 23:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, tacks mycket!

DR

Hi Josve05a, Hope all is well,
When you're not busy could you close this DR please?, The nominator is apparently clueless when it comes to licensing!,
Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - much appreciated. –Davey2010Talk 00:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:- Flickr - gailhampshire (106).jpg

File:- Flickr - gailhampshire (106).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:- Flickr - gailhampshire (106).jpg Imedeiros (talk) 12:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

deleted images

File:2004 - 2005 Redbook International, International Fur Trade Directory (footer of the cover).jpg ‎
File:La pellicia in mostra, Pagin-edizioni, Marzo 1996 (Head of the front cover).jpg
Both pictures are now pixelized! Although I do not think, it was neccessary. The shown rests of the images had no copyrighted worth. Regards -- Kürschner (talk) 09:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A cropped image, while still showing a large part of that image, is still copyrightable. It wasnt blurred enough, to separate it as a non-copyratable COM:DW. (t) Josve05a (c) 17:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ultra Low Power Bioelectronics - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

File:Ultra Low Power Bioelectronics - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Daphne Lantier 06:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Josve05a

Hi, I'm a member of Unical Reparto Corse. I can't understand what's the problem with the page that I have written, can you explain me how can avoid the problems that have the page? Please help me because I am using Wikipedia to write this page for the first time, so I don't know how to resolve these problems. Thank you man! Write me in Facebook if you want: https://www.facebook.com/luca.marra.127 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca96Red (talk • contribs) 08:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Luca96Red: I've not seen the page you've written on Wikipedia, I've only tagged the files you've uploaded as possible copyright issues, and that the copyright owner needs to permit them to be licensed under a free licensed by sending an email to COM:OTRS. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement Maps

Hi Josve05a, I'm new to Wikimedia Commons and don't have much experience with its copyright and free use regulations, so even though I read the sections, there might still be some materials I missed. Since the previous maps used in this article were removed on copyright grounds, is it alright if I create substitutes using scribblemaps.com, which purports to a free map editing site? Would this be acceptable for upload on Wikimedia?

Thanks, The Pittsburgher (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Pittsburgher: Not if the map n question is copyrighted and not freely licensed (such as Google Maps) which from images I see on https://www.scribblemaps.com/ I believe they use. You can try maps from https://www.openstreetmap.org and use {{ODbL OpenStreetMap}} as a licnese. (t) Josve05a (c) 23:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. So all I have to do is use that site and then attribute the image to them in the citation?
The Pittsburgher (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. You can even use {{OpenStreetMap}} to attribute everything at once, and just add your own description. (t) Josve05a (c) 23:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Murray_D._Levy

Category discussion warning

Murray D. Levy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

PokestarFan (talk) 21:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

plants by month near the Equator

referring to your edit at File:Pilosocereus gounellei (21278823183).jpg and others I don't see any sense to categorize plants near to the Eqwuator by month. Howewer I addet it to Pilosocereus in March. --anro (talk) 22:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see the need wither, but since the caategory sturcture exists, I 'm complying with existing practise. Thank you for the categorization! Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robin Bengtsson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Deletion Requests

Please, just delete instead of nominating them. MechQuester (talk) 01:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MechQuester: Unfortunatly, since they are derivatives of copyrighted material, and not uploaded within the last 7 days, I have to nominate them instead of doing speedy deletions. Someone may want to redact the copyrighted elements and upload new versions of the files. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strategy review

Hi, I think you are now the coordinator for review feedback from the Commons community, is that right? Could you put a notification on the Village Pump about it? You may be interested in the WMCON discussion notes at m:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Sources/Commons_in-person_discussion_at_the_Wikimedia_Conference, still in a draft state. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sommartal 2015 in Stockholm 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems to have worked pretty well given the circumstances (although I wish you had actually described it in your nomination rather than thanking WM-SE) --Daniel Case 06:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permesso pubblicazione immagine File:Alice disegna la sua famiglia.jpg

Ciao. Come richiesto, ho inviato a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org la e-mail con copia del permesso di pubblicazione del File:Alice disegna la sua famiglia.jpg, compilato in tutte la sue parti. Spero che con questo il problema sia risolto. Grazie Rosapicci (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Make a sock...

Since you are using "Jonatan Svensson Glad" as your sig now, it would probably be a good idea to create an alternate account with that name, and redirect it to yours, to avoid drama at some point in the future. - Reventtalk 14:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Smart. Done and done. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm Pride 2015 Parade by Jonatan Svensson Glad 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nabis (Nabicula) flavomarginatus - Flickr - S. Rae (1).jpg

File:Nabis (Nabicula) flavomarginatus - Flickr - S. Rae (1).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nabis (Nabicula) flavomarginatus - Flickr - S. Rae (1).jpg Steinfeld-feld (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nabis (Nabicula) flavomarginatus - Flickr - S. Rae.jpg

File:Nabis (Nabicula) flavomarginatus - Flickr - S. Rae.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nabis (Nabicula) flavomarginatus - Flickr - S. Rae.jpg Steinfeld-feld (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atongo (5015825119).jpg

File:Atongo (5015825119).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atongo (5015825119).jpg Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jonatan

Please tell me the trick of wikimedia commons upload by google drive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddst40 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fantagsm file PNG

Hi Josve05, sorry but the file Fantagsm.png was created in game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcgiangio (talk • contribs) 09:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The game creators can still holdcopyright for the assets in-game. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama of Stockholm with Getty Images watermark.jpg

File:Panorama of Stockholm with Getty Images watermark.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Panorama of Stockholm with Getty Images watermark.jpg Flow234 (talk) 22:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gendxxi

Hi You delete the gendxxi's logo in the page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_professionnelle_nationale_des_militaires_de_gendarmerie This logo will be post qith the association's president and his staff. I have the rights for this logo. What must we do for put this image on the page? Thank a lot for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naib60 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Naib60: The organization needs to send in permission and a valid copyight release of that file, releasing it under a free license. Please read COM:OTRS. --03:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT

File:Gyömrő fitness, logo in Hungary.jpg

@Josve05a: Ez egy

Hungary

This reproduction is permitted under article 68 of the Hungarian copyright law (1999/LXXVI), which specifies that if a fine art, architectural or applied art creation is erected with a permanent character outdoors in a public place, a view of it may be made and used without the authorization of the author and paying remuneration to him.
Note: According to the article 68 Paragraph (5), the provision of Article 34, Paragraph (1), that "from a disclosed work any part may be cited by indication of the source and naming the author indicated as such", shall not be applicable to the use of fine art, artistic photographic and applied art creations. According to the article 67 Paragraph (3) the author’s name has to be indicated on a view if this is intended to present a specific fine art, architectural, applied art or industrial design creation or engineering structure. The author’s name has likewise to be indicated if such creations are used for presentation in scientific and educational lectures as well as for school education purposes (Article 33, Paragraph (4)).
See COM:CRT/Hungary#Freedom of panorama for more information.
English | magyar | +/−
kép! Kérem a visszaállítását! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A logo on a wall isn't erected with a permanent character. Ping deleting admin Jcb. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. FoP does not mean that one can publish pictures of whatever object, one has to take into account the country specific rules. Jcb (talk) 10:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tirumala natural stone arch.jpg

File:Tirumala natural stone arch.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tirumala natural stone arch.jpg Elisfkc (talk) 23:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:HSG Uni Rostock Stierlogo.png

Hello Jonatan,

I am the administrator of www.hsgunirostock.de and made the Logo for the association in Rostock, Germany. I also made the entry ot the "HSG Uni Rostock" on Wikipedia and uploaded my selfmade Logo. Please explain, why you marked my Logo as a copyright abuse and please restore it.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by S platty (talk • contribs) 06:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since the logo is copyrighted to the organization, we require that you (or who else is in power to release this copyright) send permission of thi file to our OTRS team.
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HI Josve05a Thanks for raising the issue of the use of the logo. I actually work for Ho Chi Minh City Football Club and have permission to use the logo for Wikipedia. However, I'm not quite sure how I can provide a source for this. Please advice. Thanks John arneVN John arneVN (talk) 04:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you can please email our OTRS verification team, and verify/state that you are the copyright owner,t hat would work.
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT
-Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Twitter bird logo

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bstandblues.jpg

I am the creator of Bstandblues.jpg that has been deleted by you and there has been no copyright violation since the logo belongs to me and my supporters club that I head. I am one of the heads of B-Stand Blues Supporters Club and created the logo for the supporters club. Please retrieve the logo. Thanks and Regards, Balaji — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaji 3003 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Balaji 3003: Since anybody can create an account here and claim to be anybody, we require you email COM:OTRS (see info in link) releasing your logo under a free license.
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affisch Afrikansk Gryning 1989 RU.tif

Hi. Why did you UDR this file, rather than more easily undeleting it yourself?   — Jeff G. ツ 01:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to go by the book, and have it doumented for future reference. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of two files in Wikimedia

Hi Jonatan,

I realised that you marked as copyright violation two files I uploaded File:Logo de la Universidad de Málaga.png and File:Logo de la Universidad de Málaga (transparencia).png. The University of Málaga changed it seal, and I replaced it in the main article of the university (which had the older seal uploaded ), in fact there is another image of the seal uploaded in Wikimedia https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1b/Seal_University_of_M%C3%A1laga.png and is used in the english Wikipedia article. My question is: Why the other tow seals aren't violating copyright issues, and mine yes?

Regards, Alvaro95114. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvaro95114 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That file which you link to is uploaded locally to the English Wikipedia, and not to Wikimedia Commons. Some language versions of Wikipedia allow copyrighted files under the premise of fair use, something which the cross-wiki project Wikimedia Commons does not; see COM:Fair use. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But, what about the other seal? (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logounimalaga.svg), the same university with the same copyright, and this was actually uploaded to Wikimedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvaro95114 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ta itu med otrs fel-tolkning?

Känner du för att ta itu med otrs fel-tolking? --Janwikifoto (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Janwikifoto: Jag gör det imorgon! Dock är det inte något fel med OTRS tolkning av CC-licenser, utan dn tolkning av Commons policys. Cmmons säger att om man säer att en url är en källa (source) så måste vi ha OTRS/LR-bevis. Du skulle ha sagt "Eget verk" som källa och sagt din hemsia som en attribuerings-fält. Men jag fixar det imorgon. ----Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation

Hi Josve05a, how can I upload a brand logo without copyright infringement? I'm working for the brand.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefano zanna86 Zanardi (talk • contribs) 06:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefano zanna86 Zanardi: Hi, either the company could release the logo under a free license (see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials), or upload locally to English Wikipedia under en:WP:Fair use. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stefano zanna86 Zanardi: if the logo is simple enough it can be uploaded to commons. See Commons:Threshold of originality. It would of course be ideal if the company released the logo under a free license though. Skottniss (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IELTS Speaking icon.jpg

File:IELTS Speaking icon.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:IELTS Speaking icon.jpg 2003:D2:1BD6:FA24:1E75:8FF:FE0C:CC91 19:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Q

How long were you working for the WMF? Cuz I saw your WMF account was locked. Also, I was wondering if I can get the GWLtolset. I want to upload alot of Met photos. MechQuester (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About 3 months as a contractor. Unfortunatly, I as an admin can not assign GWToolset user rights (have no idea who can). Sorry MechQuester --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket#2017052710009061

Hi, Mail have been sent to otrs by the copyright holder Perumalism Chat 15:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


TorrentPier.svg

There is no copyright violation. It's my own work posted on my repository https://github.com/torrentpier/torrentpier/blob/master/styles/images/logo/logo.png and my own site https://torrentpier.com/forum/styles/default/xenforo/bull-logo.svg on MIT license https://github.com/torrentpier/torrentpier/blob/master/LICENSE It's absolutely free and i did't know why you want to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exile 37 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Exile 37: I have resored te files. It was deleted, sicne you did not provide a source that it was freely licensed when uploading. Also, you specified a different license (cc-by-sa) instead of MIT when uploading. Withou evidence of it being a free file, it will be deleted as a possible violation. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About OTRS permission

Hello, Joseve05a. Do OTRS volunteers accept that Gmail or Email can be used for handling relevant problems? -- Music Stanislaw (talk) 07:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Music Stanislaw, I do not exactly understand your question, but OTRS is an email system with "verified users" handling the email responses (ticket), and accept mails from any email provider and adress. If you need OTRS assistance, feel freee to use which ever email prvider you feel comfortable. If you are asking if OTRS accepts that anybody else contact someone wit an isssue and try to reolve it with their Gmail-adress, we have nothing against help between users. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Just OTRS volunteer handling my photo needs me to use ' Email ' , both mails are available in fact. -- Music Stanislaw (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata validation

Hello my friend,
I saw that you edited Category:Sciophilini (perfect edition, a pleasure to read ;-))
You perhaps discovered that now {{VN}} validates wikidata values.
I need your help:

  1. did you see the red error message (in Category:Sciophilini ;-)) ?
  2. did you understand the red error messages (I am not always sure of my english) ?
  3. should I provide help on how to solve the wikidata issue ?

Cheers 11:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Liné1, how are you?
I have noticed these messages, and I'm trying to fix some from the category when I have time. I was doing other stuff at the same time while editing that, so I didn't bother with Wikidata then, an thought I would get beck to it later. Thank you for helping develop thse templates etc.! --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was not at all a reproach.
I just need someone review my work ;-)
Am I crazy, are my errors comprehensible, how vast is the universe. That kind of things.
Could you look at Category:Sciophilini and tell me if the messages are clear enough ?
Could you look at Category:Pages with biology property incorrect on Wikidata and tell me if my english is comprehensible ?
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
From what I've seen, it is understandable and good :) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IRC ping about video file

Hey :) You had pinged me about File:Morevna Project - Pepper&Carrot (animated comic) - Episode 6 - The Potion Contest.webm on IRC. Can you elaborate on what you wanted to know? (I am currently traveling in China for the rest of the week and internet access is spotty. I might only be able to get back to you when I am back home.) --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 10:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lydia Pintscher (WMDE): I just wanted to know if the structured data project which is in the works for the future can handle all the different license templates for different aspects of the file. One license template fr the music (with an OTRS template), one template for the animation (with a licnese review template), and one template for the illustrations (with a licnese review template), andone joint template with a compatible license for all of them. Will the 'new' Wikdata-e system be able to "attribute properly" for all these aspects? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How exactly it will be modeled will be up to the editors but I am confident it will be possible, yes. One way to do it is to have several statements about copyright and then use qualifiers to say what they apply to. Hope that helps. --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:A bit tired - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

File:A bit tired - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:A bit tired - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

orchid galleries/cats

Hi Jonatan, I've restored some galleries and categories (which you had deleted yesterday) per request by an orchid-specialist user who wants to add specific orchid-images to these pages/cats. --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: As long as images are added, I'm all for it! :D But if it is only one image/a "missing image placeholder", then they are out of scope. Mind checking on their progress later? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but give the user (Orchi), who is a longterm-contributor to Commons, some time. --Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Chi Minh City FC Logo

Hi. I uploaded this image as "fair use" described under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fair_use_images - I'm not sure what exactly I am supposed to do here. The image is clearly of fair use exception. Please advise. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John arneVN (talk • contribs) 04:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John arneVN. COM:Fair use images are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons (this website). Some Wikipedia versions (each language is its own version) does llow them locally, and you would need to upload them locally on e.g. English Wikipedia; see e.g en:WP:Fair use and en:WP:Upload for that. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

useWikidata=

Hello my friend,
About using useWikidata=: please avoid it when you can.
In the present case, the missing information was in wikidata: here.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 20:31, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see My bad. Is there any way to program {{VN}} to give an error when both useWikidata= and a sitelink is 'active'? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello my friend
Sadly useWikidata= can be used in some case (even with sitelink active).
See Category:Biology pages with wikidata item specified in VN
It is a nightmare.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 06:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In fact you are totally correct: I can add a check
When useWikidata= is used, the wikidata entry must have a non-empty wikicommons sitelink + a non-empty P373 (Commons category). But I cannot check thei value.
Thanks Liné1 (talk) 08:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just implemented 2 tests in your use case. Thanks a lot.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 16:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lobster Envy - Flickr - treegrow.jpg

File:Lobster Envy - Flickr - treegrow.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lobster Envy - Flickr - treegrow.jpg Mjrmtg (talk) 01:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2015.05.08 15.32.47 IMG 2029 - Flickr - andrey zharkikh.jpg

JuTa 23:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2015.05.15 22.05.06 IMG 2235 - Flickr - andrey zharkikh.jpg

JuTa 23:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2015.07.11 10.27.52 DSCN2593 - Flickr - andrey zharkikh.jpg

JuTa 23:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Henriettea succosa, manipueira - Flickr - Tarciso Leão (20).jpg

JuTa 23:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Psidium guineense, araçá - Flickr - Tarciso Leão (6).jpg

JuTa 00:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sorocea hilarii, pau-tiú - Flickr - Tarciso Leão (6).jpg

JuTa 00:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gridcoin_logo.png deletion

Ok. this was my second time uploading the file, and i have no idea how to do it properly apparently.

it is an open source image that was created for an open source program, and the author has given explicit permissions for it to be used by anybody in the Gridcoin community.

everyone is reasonably upset that our image keeps getting deleted, and i don't want to risk my ability to be an editor, so can somebody actually guide me through how to upload an open source logo without a license, so that i can stop being threatened and stuff? :D

thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by O0rino0o (talk • contribs) 16:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page File:Logo-roosevelt-couleur.png (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo -)

Hello, I do not understand why my image has been removed, because I have all the authorizations to publish it (that of the creator and that of the establishment). For the "non-free logo", I did not understand either because it is free (I may have made a mistake when putting on line). Can you help me affine that the image can be delivered. thank you, JojoRed (and google translate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JojoRed (talk • contribs) 23:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If a filehas been sed elsewere before being uploaded here, we require the copyrght wnerto email us to verify that they want to releae the file under a free license.
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT).→ VRT
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just wanted to express thanks for following up on your hunch and having the stones to follow through. I'm shocked and saddened that you were right, but grateful that we found out. Storkk (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am also a bit shocked, but most saddened that we are now loosing an admin doing great amounts of admnistrative work here. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Q regarding INC/Daphne

How did suspicion arise? 71.172.143.180 04:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

People on IRC were discussing them at the time logged in. I asked what was being discussed, and they said that the accounts were socks, but nobody had any evdence to proove it, just know it. I decided then to investigate and try and find the proof. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hi, I just restored your user page. It was deleted in the DL outburst and somehow forgotten in the restoration run. I found out, because User:Jonatan Svensson Glad appeared in the broken redirects report. Could you have a look to see if everything is in order now? Jcb (talk) 11:49, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks! Yeah, it did not look "deleted" because it was fetching a copy of my globl meta user page since thie deleted one was misssing, making my username appear blue regardless. Thank you for spotting this! --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PBS logos

Why were various flat PBS logos deleted? They have no reason other than the boilerplate message "Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo". I believe that the original PBS logo is pre-1978; the modern PBS logo is just the first initial with a simple repeated edge. I'd like them to be undeleted and discussed. The ones I saw on my watchlist are File:WIPB-color-pbs.jpg and File:PBS Logo.png but there are probably others. --Closeapple (talk) 14:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh: Looks like Commons:Deletion requests/File:PBS Logo.svg may have caused this. Do you still want to undelete these, or should I ask -Natuur12 since he closed the deletion discussion? (Apparently nobody noticed that most of the logo is pre-1978.) --Closeapple (talk) 14:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted these, since the logo on enwp is under fair use, and I believed it was above TOO, and I have no idea when it was created, or whether or not it had copyright notice back then. Feel free to go to COM:UNDEL and request undeletion from an uninvolved admin for the best course of action. :) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry on Copyright Status

Dear Josve05a, I have 2 images scanned from an 1899 Russian magazine (dated to Russian Empire) and I have intention to upload it into Wikimedia. However I am not sure on the copyright status of the images, and thus I haven't uploaded it. The original photographer of the images is unknown, but the magazine article is authored by A. Kunakhovich (which its date of death is also unknown). The image would be useful in the Wikipedia article "Vyatka Horse" and has a Wikimedia category dedicated to this entry (but my images are different from those already uploaded). The images are published in the magazine "Veterinarnyy Feldsher" (Volume 3, No. 12, 25 December 1899). My instinct tell me these images should be in public domain, but I am a newbie and I still need more guidance on determining the copyright status. Please help. Thanks. --Nick lzk1231 (talk) 12:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My first gut instict wants to tells me that they should be in the public domain, but given my uncertanty of copyright rules of Russia (haven't looked it up recently), I'd ask over COM:VP/C. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:The U.S. Chief of Mission Residence in Paris, France, Is Illuminated in Green to Celebrate Paris Agreement's Entry into Force - Flickr - U.S. Department of State.jpg

File:The U.S. Chief of Mission Residence in Paris, France, Is Illuminated in Green to Celebrate Paris Agreement's Entry into Force - Flickr - U.S. Department of State.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:The U.S. Chief of Mission Residence in Paris, France, Is Illuminated in Green to Celebrate Paris Agreement's Entry into Force - Flickr - U.S. Department of State.jpg Fmvh (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:P20140104-0002—Good to Last Drop Logo (11758356214).jpg

File:P20140104-0002—Good to Last Drop Logo (11758356214).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:P20140104-0002—Good to Last Drop Logo (11758356214).jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan and I on the hike from Obstruction to Deer Park - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

File:Dan and I on the hike from Obstruction to Deer Park - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dan and I on the hike from Obstruction to Deer Park - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg E4024 (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me at Mount Si - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

File:Me at Mount Si - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Me at Mount Si - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg Pricasso fan (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License for File:Tertulia de arte en el Madrid, años 60 del siglo XX.ogg

Hello Joseve05a. I have added a link to the license page, you can see it below the video. It is licensed under "Free Cultural Works" license. See: http://hastalostopes.blogspot.com.es/p/arte-en-el-madrid-de.html The original video was a 8 mm tape was seriously damaged. Fortunately we could repair it and transfer it to digital format. In case this is not a adecuate license please tell me and I will use a proper one; otherwise please proceed to withdraw the "missing license" tag. Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonio bisantiago (talk • contribs) 09:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please email COM:OTRS to provide evidence of ownership of copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Josve05a/Archive_8&oldid=372583290"