User talk:Jean-Frédéric/2011

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise)

Details for image upload

Hi Jean-Fred: I just wanted to touch base regarding the image donation I'm about to embark upon for the Children's Museum of Indianapolis. It's going to be small to start off and I'll likely be doing things manually, rather than going through the motions of a batch upload. I do want to make sure that I'm incorporating the right templates and information as I go about it, though. I have created an Institution template for the Children's Museum which is now located in its Category page. I was going to create a Commons:Children's Museum of Indianapolis page, but didn't know if it'd be appropriate to do so because it will be a much smaller project and not involve all of the bots, etc. Would this be useful, or no?

My other question involved the information templates. I've read through all of your helpful guides and looked through the Artwork, Information, and Book templates. I feel like what I need for the Children's Museum is a mix between the Artwork and Information template; one is too specific and the other too broad. Would it be worthwhile to have an "Artifact" template created? Many of my images will be of natural or cultural artifacts that will have accession numbers, dates, and histories, but do not have artists, mediums, or notes (such as credit lines and foundry marks). Would it be appropriate to use the Artwork template but just disregard artist in every instance? Whatever you feel would be more helpful, I'll do. I just want to iron things out before I dig in. Thank you very much for your time! HstryQT (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Lori,

This is great news!

• I moved the Institution template to the Institution namespace, Institution:The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, so that it can be used on every upload.
• Sure, a Commons:Children's Museum of Indianapolis page would be useful. The scope of these pages has never been defined well anyway, but the idea is to give some background on the project − and to build a nice resource to show for PR purposes :-) The usual layout can be found in my toolbox.
• {{Artwork}}, which used to be for paintings only, was expanded a lot lately (especially during the Brooklyn Museum donation) so that it can be used for pretty much everything (and it is, see for example File:Coelodonta antiquitatis Crane.jpg). The lack of defined artist came up too during the Brooklyn upload, but this is not a problem. Please use it, and disregard irrelevant fields (most of them are indeed optional). On the contrary, if you feel like some metadata you have do not fit into the template, please tell so and we may expand it further.

Anyway, since you start with a few uploads, this will be the perfect occasion to review and improve them if needed.

One question : the correct name for the Museum is « The Children's Museum of Indianapolis » with « The » up front, right? Shall we rename the category?

Last thing, I would like to thank you for taking the time to prepare your uploads, study the templates and all. All too often people only care about the images and disregard templates and metadata. So it is really a pleasure to work with someone who really cares about that.

Jean-Fred (talk) 00:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much Jean-Fred, this is really helpful. I'll certainly use the Artwork template and if I come upon any pertinent data that would make it useful to add a field, I'll let you know. Looking at it, it seems as if it should cover everything, it will just have a great many unused fields (which should be fine).

Moving the Category to The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is a good idea, if you're willing to make that move for me. There are multiple subcategories that would need to be moved too. We constantly battle the lengthiness of the name versus the branding of the appropriate name of the museum. I think it'd be smart to lean towards accuracy. Thank you for bringing it up, as file naming conventions are something we're discussing right now too.

I will work on creating the Commons project page next week when I'm at the museum and I appreciate you sharing the link to the layout; I hadn't come upon that yet. I also appreciate you making a specific institution template for me. For some reason I am slow to transfer over the skills I've learned with templates from Wikipedia to Commons. I feel like it's another world over here :). You make it much more welcoming!

I'm all too willing to go about things in a prescribed manner, I suppose that's what makes for a good Wikipedian-in-Residence, eh? :) Perhaps we should suggest that to Liam and the gang as they're discussing parameters for what it means to be a GLAM Ambassador: "Follow guidelines for cultural partnerships in Commons!!" Thanks again for your help and, even more so, your clarity! I will be in touch. HstryQT (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

All right, the category is now Category:The Children's Museum of Indianapolis. If you need to make other moves, just ask me and I will be glad to handle that for you (we sysops have access to tools to make our lives easier).

A few things that come to my mind (nothing urgent, but if I don't write it down now I'll forget :-) :

• Subcategories organisation : I read what you wrote over there :
  • Category:Images from the Children's Museum of Indianapolis is a source category : it should not be divided, but have all the images given by the TCMI (as opposed to visitors photos) ;
  • it becomes standard to have a top-level category Category:Collections of the Children's Museum of Indianapolis, further divided for each collection − see Category:Collections of the Muséum de Toulouse for an example.

This is no policy, and personally I do not have strong opinions on that matter, but this is current practice. Does it appear sensible to you? Or should we make something different?

• File naming conventions : glad you mention and are looking into that, consistent names are always nice. Just to tell that as far as I know there is no guideline for this, just common sense to have unambiguous, descriptive titles (something we should document too anyway). I'm sure you folks will work out a nice convention.

Well, what we need is documentation for all this stuff − Multichill and I have begun to write down some stuff (and I am happy to learn that it is read and found useful !) ; but there are still lots to do (we should coordinate with Fellow Liam for that too :-). Thanks for your precise questions, they are a precious help in finding obscure points.

Jean-Fred (talk) 23:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello again! My mentor made a good point about the new Category:The Children's Museum of Indianapolis. Is it too late to move the category to Category:The Childrens Museum of Indianapolis in order to remove the apostrophe and avoid the %27 from showing up in our url? This is the way we are doing the file names too. Sorry I didn't notice it earlier! HstryQT (talk) 18:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Gurjar

Hi, Appropriate title for the category is "Category:Gurjar" because wikipedia also has en:Gurjar as the title not other forms such as gujjar, Gujar etc.So empty the Gujjar category and move all images into Category:Gurjar.RegardsKushana (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Rename Category:Gujjar to Category:Gurjar (74 entries moved, 0 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username. Gujjar;Gurjar;r;

Besoin d'une mise à jour delete french recent architecture

Bonjour, je suis un ancien administrateur de Commons. Je voudrais savoir s'il est possible de mettre cette image dans les suppressions immédiates. Si c'est pas la cas en quoi cette image est devenue libre ? Si c'est le cas, pourquoi y'en a tant d'images de France à supprimer et comment allez-vous les supprimer rapidement. Bonne continuation Petrusbarbygere (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Patrouilles

OK. Merci. Thierry Caro (talk) 21:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Aircraft.JPG

Screenshots/Artworks from copyrighted videogame.

It is NOT a screenshot. It's graphic arts (looks like some missions) , but it's not screenshot or art from game. Oleum (talk) 16:00, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, my bad, then. I restored the file.

I am not sure I get it though. You say it does not use any resource from the mentioned game. But if the graphical style is heavily inspired from it, then it constitutes a derivative work, and is thus unfree as well.

Jean-Fred (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Translation of Template:Created with CombineZP

Hi Jean-Frédéric.
I contact you because you translated Template:Created with CombineZP into another language. I've done some changes on Template:Created with CombineZP/en to improve the templates Quality. Would you kindly translate that addition as well.
Thanks a lot --D-Kuru (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

thanks a lot :-) --D-Kuru (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Création de template

Hello, j'ai essayé de créer un template pour le collège des Bernardins mais j'ai du chier quelque chose, si tu pouvais jeter un œil et corriger ce qui ne va pas, ça serai sympa. Par avance merci. --Thesupermat (talk) 08:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Bon, j'ai trouvé ma coquille, par contre, si tu pouvais regarder le syntaxe en anglais, ça serait sympa. --Thesupermat (talk) 09:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Content que tu t’en sois sorti :-) Ça m'a l'air nickel. Jean-Fred 22:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Jean-Frédéric/Sandbox

User:Jean-Frédéric/Sandbox has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

NoUploadWizard

Qu'est-ce- que ce NoUploadWizard ? Pierre cb (talk) 03:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Un gadget que j’ai créé hier rien que pour toi

Va dans Special:Preferences#preftab-8, coche la toute première case : tu as retrouvé le lien vers l'ancien formulaire de versement.

Jean-Fred (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Merci. Pierre cb (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Merci aussi pour ce gadget, j'ai expérimenté un peu avec les variants différents de changement de lien, mais le tien/le votre est le plus efficace. Il est très utile, il faut faire de la publicité :) — NickK (talk) 20:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

« Retrait de l'obligation abusive de mention d'un copyright. »

Bonjour Jean-Frédéric, Autant pour moi, le copyright est par défaut sur toutes les créations.
Selon moi, cette mention devrait être supprimée quand on choisit de changer cette licence en domaine public (ou assimilé). Sinon, un copyright devrait être stipulé par défaut pour tous les autres auteurs sur Wikimedia commons.
C'est toi qui doit être obligatoirement cité en qualité responsable de l'importation de ces œuvres sous licence CC. S'il y a fraude, tu peux être attaqué en justice par l'auteur de l’œuvre ou ses ayants-droits.
As tu demandé l'avis d'un administrateur sur ce sujet ?
Avec mes salutations les meilleures, Daniel --Copyleft (talk) 11:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Daniel. Désolé, j’avoue avoir du mal à te suivre et à voir où tu veux en venir. J’ai du coup un peu de mal à te répondre. Pourrais-tu repréciser tes questions SVP ? Jean-Fred (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Good resolutions, thanks

Thanks to the WMF board for the recent resolutions. They appear well thought through and appropriate. --99of9 (talk) 23:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

To be clear: I am not involved in the WMF board in any way. Just noticed their announcement and though it was of interest to our community. You’d better thank them ;-) Jean-Fred (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Ooops! --99of9 (talk) 11:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

help needed

Salut Jean-Frédéric,

I have to ask for your help: I am trying to create a template similar to "Mérimée" for here [1]. I just cannot figure it out. The new template can be called "Wien eine Stadt stellt sich vor" or so and should have a white background with a red frame. There is no external link however for the numbers, each number of the edifice will have to be put in individually unless you find a better way. Can you please help? If you have further questions, please let me know. A number of other buildings listed on this index can be seen here [2]. Merci beaucoup. Gryffindor (talk) 23:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Salut,

Sorry for the delay. I drafted {{Wien – eine Stadt stellt sich vor}}, does it suit your needs? Let me know is it needs tweaking. Jean-Fred (talk) 13:43, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci, it looks great. Could you just add the word "number" after ", under the reference", so it reads ", under the reference number"? Gryffindor (talk) 21:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done, sorry again for the delay. Interestingly, I was in Vienna one week ago, and it was kind of funny to see for real this Wienna sign on so many buildings.Thanks for this discovery then ;-). Jean-Fred (talk) 15:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Purge

Salut, tu peux purger User talk:Jean-François CLARISSE stp ? Moyg (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done, page supprimée vu que rien à récupérer. N’est-ce pas ? Jean-Fred (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Bonsoir, je viens de prendre connaissance de cette purge, je vous informe que je ne suis pas en mesure de l'accepter, en effet en date du 1er avril 2011, une personne dont l'IP est là, bien reconnu me menace de mort, plaintes multiples auprès de services de police de France, Suisse, Russie sont en court. Le 1er avril 2011 c'était à vous de purger cette menaces de mort. ! D'autres part cette page et de nombreux commentaires sont entre les mains de la police criminelle de trois pays. merci de la remettre en route

A vous lire

Jean-François Clarisse

Wikimedia Commons est une médiathèque en ligne. Les conflits que vous rencontrez dans votre vie privée n'ont rien à faire ici. Toute intervention n'ayant aucun lien avec ce projet est systématiquement supprimée. Si la police a besoin de voir des versions supprimées, elle saura elle-même demander aux personnes habilitées (ni moi, ni Jean-Fred) de les lui fournir. Moyg (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

License cc-by-sa plus additional restrictions

Bonjour Jean-Fred, Je viens de lire ta réaction sur VP concernant la CC-BY-SA et l'usage qui en est fait. J'ai remarqué que des contributeurs demandent en outre (ou suggèrent fortement) l'ajout de la mention du site web commercial dans leur attribution avec license CC-BY-SA 3.0, en plus du positionnement "in the immediate vicinity of the image" (exemple). Cela semble possible puisque l'auteur peut définir la façon dont il souhaite voir son travail attribué, mais cela me trouble, et je tends à trouver cela abusif. A ton avis ? --Myrabella (talk) 09:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Myrabella, pour autant que je sache, cela est permis par les licences CC, cf. Commons:Texte d'attribution. Jean-Fred (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Orthographe

Merci pour l'ajout concernant les recherches d'images avec google, dans les préférences. Petite correction orthographique : GoogleImages tab: Recheche des images similaires sur Internet avec Google Images : Recherche et non Recheche. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MHM55 (talk • contribs) -- 08:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done Bien vu. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Droits de renommeur

Merci :-) Remi Mathis (talk) 18:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Merci pour le flag autopatrolled :) Si j'ai bien compris, il y a un flag pour pouvoir renommer des fichiers et, pour renommer des catégories, il faut être admin ? Léna (talk) 08:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

You’re welcome :-). Yup, il y a un flag dit Filemover. Le renommage des catégories n’est pas possible en tant que tel ; mais les sysops peuvent utiliser le user:CommonsDelinker pour faire ce travail. Plus d'infos sur Commons:Rename a category. Jean-Fred (talk) 12:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Harcourt images: no consensus?

Hi Jean-Frédéric, I've cleaned up after these images. Thanks again for catching me on this. I wanted to ask you, on User talk:Materialscientist, you mentioned the fr:Wikipédia:Sondage/La_signature_du_studio_Harcourt, but you also said it had no authority. I'm not sure what you meant by that; was that the only discussion regarding the removal of the signature? Is there a discussion perhaps on Commons or elsewhere where the consensus (even if "no consensus") was a little more clear? Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 13:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi, no problem. When the files were uploaded last year by French studio Hacourt, there was debate on the French wikipedia about this signature/watermark, which prompted that poll. I referred to the poll as evidence of a debate. The problem is that this poll mixed up many things, like « do we have the right to remove the mark » , « should we remove it », « which version should we use in Wikipedia articles », which in my opinion make the poll useless. (and even then, I did not want to imply whatever decisions taken over there have authority here on Commons).

Some debate occured on Commons on File talk:AZEMA Sabine H-24x30-1996.jpg. Jean-Fred (talk) 14:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Great, and thanks for the link to the extra discussion. I suppose eventually a full-on discussion should probably take place. For the moment, though, the solution for now, as you said, was to upload the files separately. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 14:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

removal watermarks in pictures

Dear Sir, concerning the pictures you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (for instance: [3], see the page on watermarks ([4]). Wikimedia commons prefers pictures to be uploaded without watermarks. For the reasons for this, see the same page. Citypeek (talk) 13:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, but I am not the uploader of the aforementionned pictures (but well aware of this policy). It is controversed whether this mark should be considered a watermark or an artwork signature. In such cases, the guideline is to avoir overwriting the files, which I enforced by splitting the history, moving the alternate version under a new name and restoring the original version. Sincerely, Jean-Fred (talk) 14:15, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. Regards, Citypeek (talk) 06:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Will you check one file?

Hi Frederic,

Saw you are active at the moment. Will you please check if there will be too much commotion about deleting this file for the license? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alfried_Krupp_von_Bohlen_und_Halbach_Krupp_Prozesse.jpg There are some who just want to delete files as you know, admins are a big one among them, and any mistake and loopholes that are there can surely be expected to be taken advantage of. So please check if this gives those people, including perhaps you, that kind of an opportunity. Thanks. --Logos112 (talk) 14:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Re:

You are welcome. I'd also like to briefly explain why I took the time to chime in. After reading WMF members about gender gap and the sudden need to be nice among us, I'm starting to see things from another point of view. Are people unnecessarily harsh with me because I am a female? Would we have attack Martina if, instead of being a wikipedian, she worked for any of our cultural partners, just asking us for an explanation? This was the welcoming environment I found on the list. Been barely a lurker since then. Bye, --Elitre (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

To be checked

Please see Category talk:To be checked. - dcljr (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC) P.S. - You got this message because you created Template:To check category header, which is included on many of the categories I'm referring to. - dcljr (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Intersect categories

Merci pour l'astuce :) Léna (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Files of User:Historicair

Thanks for cleaning these up after he got mad at me.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

category-based RSS feed

Merci Jean-Frédéric pour l'outil.

Je l'ai utilisé, il m'a bien sorti 100 images associées à la catégorie Pays de Brest. Mais bizarrement il m'a aussi sorti une 10aine de photos datant 2009 et 2004 (de haudi et ifernyen) parmi les autres datant de ces 5 derniers jours.

Finalement j'ai compris car il y a eu une modif de catégorie sur ces fichiers ces derniers jours. ~~

Voici le lien du flux

Merci encore pour cette astuce ça m'a enlevé une bonne épine du pied ;-))

On organise une collecte de photos (cf page de discussion d'un utilisateur)

--Gaëlle FILY (talk) 21:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

J'avais posté ce message il y a qq jours, pour t'informer que mon flux avait du mal à fonctionner. Avec cette URL, ça charge pendant de longues minutes et au final ça n'affiche rien. J’avais effacé mon message de ta page de discussion car en fin de journée ça avait marché. Mais là depuis 2-3 jours c'est pareil. Merci si tu as possibilité de m'expliquer le pourquoi du comment ? --Gaëlle FILY (talk) 12:32, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

PD-Art ou CC-By

Pour cette photo d'une fresque du XIII ou XIV mais prise dans son environnement, ie le musée ? Léna (talk) 13:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Ni l’une, ni l’autre, les deux.

Théoriquement, PD-Art ne devrait être utilisée que lorsque ce n’est pas toi qui as pris la photo (PD-Art = Commons considère que toute reproduction de PD est PD, et l’on peut s’asseoir sur les prétentions du photographe et les juridictions disant autrement). C’est le sens de {{PossiblyPD}}. Quand c’est toi qui as pris la photo et que tu adhères à cette politique, épargne à Commons le hoola-hoop juridique et déclare que tu renonces à tous les droits qu'on pourrait te prêter dessus (notamment en France).

• Pour la fresque, un {{PD-old-100}} pour dire qu'elle est PD.
• Pour ta photo, c’est à toi de voir. Vu que ce n’est pas une reproduction fidèle d'une œuvre 2D, Commons considère que tu peux prétendre à un droit d’auteur dessus. Aussi, libre à toi de la publier sous CC-BY, ou bien de la placer sous {{Cc-zero}} pour renoncer à tes droits dessus.

Jean-Fred (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nintendo 64.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question Why is the PNG format, not the JPG format? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I asked myself the same question, and went for the PNG version because it is on transparent background which makes it more useful in my opinion (for the purposes I can imagine, though there are probably many that I don’t) and that I could not identify any loss of quality between the two versions. That being said, the JPG one is valuable as well. Jean-Fred (talk) 13:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment If a gallery exists, please use that in the scope and add the nominee to the gallery (for taxa, always create the gallery with taxo info if it doesn't exist). W.S. 15:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

  Ah, ok, I did not know about that. I see Archaeodontosaurus just dit it (thanks!). I’m a bit surprised though, this means we actually encourage to use galleries? Well, I guess this is not the place to have a debate on that . Jean-Fred (talk) 07:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope -- Matthew Proctor (talk) 01:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki loves monuments: French infrastructure on Commons

Hello Jean-Frédéric,

I'm trying to build a infrastructure on commons for use in the upload form for Wiki loves monuments (and for use with bots) See this page. Can you help me setting this up for France?

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 12:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi =)

Hi Jean-Frédéric - really great to meet you at Wikimania and I look forward to working with you through Wikimedia and seeing you again hopefully the next Wikimania. Ciao! Missvain (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Question sur les séries

Bonjour Jean-Fred, je suis en train de créer une série sur le travail du maréchal-ferrant. Cependant j'ai des interrogations. En effet, sur la première photo, j'ai la petite flèche bleue qui me permet de passer à la photo suivant et sur cette dernière, cette flèche n'est plus active et je dois cliquer sur +2 pour accéder à la 3ème photo. Comme ce n'est pas très user friendly, je te demande de regarder pour savoir si j'ai fais une coquille ou que cela est normal. Merci de ta réponse.--Thesupermat (talk) 07:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Ah tiens je le connaissais pas ce {{Series}}, intéressant. Le souci était dans le paramètre "index", qui doit être le numéro de la photo dans la série. J'ai corrigé, ça a l'air de marcher. Jean-Fred (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Because let's face it : you're awesome ! Léna (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Kittys

Grey and white kitty facing right walking on green grass and WikiLoving it.

PierreSelim (talk) 09:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Versailles highlights

Bonjour,

Un petit tour par le portail 'Versailles' de WP me propose en lien "toutes les images labellisées de 'Commons' sur Versailles". Or la catégorie 'Versailles highlights' vers laquelle on est renvoyé semble ne recenser que les images labellisées prises lors des partenariats. Ainsi, j'ai cinq autres QI perso, prises en simple visiteur, qui n'y figurent pas, et je crois qu'il y en a d'autres, chez d'autres contributeurs (je pense notamment à une FP (de toute beauté) de la Chapelle Royale par Benh, si je ne me trompe pas). Dois-je les rajouter à la main, ou ça va bien comme ça ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

correction, la FP est de Diliff, pas de Benh.--Jebulon (talk) 23:45, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm... J'ai créé cette galerie "Highlights" seulement pour les images primées dans le cadre du partenariat (à des fins de com', pour de futurs partenariats). La lier depuis le Portail WP avec un "toutes les images labellisées de 'Commons' sur Versailles" me semble une erreur, il n'y a effectivement pas de raison que ces photos soient plus mis en avant que les autres. Personnellement j'aimerais bien garder cette galerie telle quelle (com' & co), mais je pense qu'il serait bon d'en créer une autre, complète, vers laquelle renverrait le Portail WP. Jean-Fred (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Merci de ta réponse. Je comprends ce que tu veux dire. Mais alors, l'intitulé n'est pas bon. Laissons les choses en l'état. Par ailleurs, non, ton modèle "Mérimée" n'est pas si mal, crois-en un utilisateur 'lambda' tel que moi (). Merci pour cette création qui n'est pas un échec, loin de là.--Jebulon (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Monuments_historiques_in_France_by_name

Monuments historiques in France by name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--  Docu  at 04:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Jean-Frédéric, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Killer feature

Hello, my name is Phil and I am the Product Manager of Mobile at Wikimedia and saw your comment on the Village Pump page about Wiki Loves Monuments.

Killer feature: being able to pass along parameters to the template (in the WLM case, would have been the monument ID pre-filled in the Wikipedia lists). Jean-Fred (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Could you clarify what this means? My specific interest is designing a usable version of the photo upload feature for mobile devices. I have a general understanding of how files are submitted to Commons and then how they are used in Wikipedia. But honestly, I am somewhat new here and would appreciate more explanation rather than less! If you would like to email me directly, my address is pchang@wikimedia.org.

Sorry if you emailed me and I missed it. Please try again.

PDD sur les bâtiments récents

Salut Jean-Frédéric !

Le vote est ouvert ici : fr:Wikipédia:Prise de décision/Remise en cause de l'exception au droit d'auteur sur les bâtiments récents.

Bonne journée. Peter17 (talk) 07:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

question pour toi (churches in...)

User_talk:Esby#Question_about_categories Moi pas trop classer églises, donc moi pas trop pouvoir répondre au monsieur. Si tu as un avis. Esby (talk) 16:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, maybe you are the user I should ask. :) Could someone tell me if I started the discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion correctly? I don't know which user originally created them, because they were French and ot moved. So instead I add the template here.--Stanzilla (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Churches in the canton of Beuzeville

Churches in the canton of Beuzeville has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Category:Categories_by_company

Categories by company has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

24.130.86.30 23:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Amélioration de modèle

Salut JeanFred, J'ai fait une ébauche de modèle qui pourrait être très intéressante pour les catégories commons... Vois-tu des choses à améliorer avant que je l'officialise ? voir :Commons_talk:Geocoding#Link_commons_categories_of_buildings_to_the_OSM_ID, merci Otourly (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons_talk:Upload_Wizard#Location_template_and_geo_entry_boxes

Hallo Jean-Frédéric, just a note: your discussion/suggestions are now here: Commons_talk:Upload_Wizard#Location_template_and_geo_entry_boxes. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:22, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

N64

Bonjour, Euh en fait je n'ai pas souvenir d'avoir fait cette modification. Désolé pour le dérangement. Amicalement.--Pixeltoo (talk) 13:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

File:PanoramiquePorteParis.jpg

Bonjour,

J'ai constaté que tu as commis une méprise sur la portée de l'absence de liberté de panorama en France concernant File:PanoramiquePorteParis.jpg. En effet, selon la Cour de cassation - 03-14.820, le bâtiment en question (le beffroi de la mairie), n'est pas le sujet principal de la place de la Porte de Paris mais en n'est que l'accessoire. L'objet principal, — et centré, — est la Porte de Paris qui est dans le domaine public son architecte devant être décédé depuis plus d'un siècle à l'en croire son inscription aux monuments historiques en 1875. Selon la Cour, « Mais attendu qu’ayant relevé que, telle que figurant dans les vues en cause, l’œuvre de MM. X… et Z… se fondait dans l’ensemble architectural de la place des Terreaux dont elle constituait un simple élément, la cour d’appel en a exactement déduit qu’une telle présentation de l’œuvre litigieuse était accessoire au sujet traité, résidant dans la représentation de la place, de sorte qu’elle ne réalisait pas la communication de cette œuvre au public. » Nous entrons bien dans ce cas de figure.-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → ^(Talk) 17:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Vibia Sabina statue - Vaison-la-Romaine.jpg

Bonjour,

Es-tu certain d'avoir voulu marquer cette image comme sans licence ? Teofilo (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour Template:Uwlsubst/fr

Hallo Jean-Frédéric, merci for translating Template:Uwlsubst/fr! :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:France FOP cases

Coucou Jean-Fred. On m'a signalé le problème des noinclude à ajouter en même temps que cette catégorie. Est-ce qu'il n'y a pas moyen de faire ça directement dans la catégorie ? Je ne comprends rien aux includeonly & co. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Coucou. Malheureusement, non, j’ai pas mieux que la réponse James. Comme la DR est transclue sur d’autres pages, il faut mettre ce que tu ne veux pas transclure en noinclude.

Enfin bon, t’inquiètes pas trop, je passe régulièrement dans les catégories de Category:France FOP cases pour mettre en noinclude ce qui ne l’a pas été

(Les includeonly, c’est pire ; et les onlyinclude, n’en parlons pas :-)

Jean-Fred (talk) 20:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)