User talk:Infrogmation/Archive 20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:DollFeetNOLASanFranAnne.jpg[edit]

File:DollFeetNOLASanFranAnne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Olivia Dunne.jpg[edit]

I note that the file is still used in that Wikipedia article, described as Olivia Dunne’s childhood home. Rather than rename the file to reflect that, you dropped the reference to Olivia Dunne completely. Why? Brianjd (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to explain the reasoning for my actions in my comment at the deletion request linked above. The file description still mentions that the house was the childhood home of Dunne. I thought calling the file "Olivia Dunne" was misleading as it not a photo of that person, but rather of a house (where according to the uploader Dunne once lived). (I don't know the details; if you think the file description can be described better, go ahead and edit it accordingly if you wish.) As to en:W - I said "Whether the photo should be used in the en:W article is a question for discussion on en:W, not here." My closing the deletion request and renaming the file to something less misleading was to take care of things here on Commons. 1)Do you object to my actions here on Commons regarding this file, and if so, do you have thoughts on what I should have done instead, and what should be done now forward? 2) Do you think I should take some actions over on en:W, and if so, what are your recommendations? (Note I did nothing about the en:W article. I haven't followed whatever discussion is going on there if any. However I can take a look if you like.) Thanks for your work and feedback. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the file should not be called ‘Olivia Dunne’, as that is not what it depicts. But the file does depict Olivia Dunne’s childhood home, per both the file description and the en:W caption, so I thought that an appropriate name would be something like ‘Olivia Dunne’s childhood home’ or ‘Childhood home of Olivia Dunne’. But instead of using a name like that, you chose a name that doesn’t reference Dunne at all. That is what I was asking about. I have no other objections to your response here on Commons.
Regarding the file’s use in the en:W article, I thought that if that use turned out to be illegitimate, then the file might be out of scope here. It turns out that is not the case, so I agree that further discussion should take place at en:W, not here. I will start a discussion on the article’s talk page. Brianjd (talk) 08:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think I went too far the other way in renaming, feel free to re-rename the file, "House in Hillsdale, New Jersey in 2022, childhood home of Olivia Dunne" or whatever variation you think best. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacky V.jpg[edit]

I wrote at that deletion request that the file needs to be renamed per the principle of least astonishment. But what name to use? At least the uploader seems to have stopped overwriting the file, but the uploader’s other uploads were deleted without discussion, and I now wonder whether those are in scope too. Could you (as an admin) have a look?

In the meantime, here are my thoughts: ‘Jacky V’ looks like the name of the uploader, who is presumably also the subject. So (assuming that’s not a copyright problem) we can rename it to ‘Jacky V practising scatophilia’. Brianjd (talk) 07:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good suggestion. Or maybe "Coprophilia - Jacky V". Agree something more descriptive is appropriate. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon, I guess I mistakenly assumed you were an admin - Feel free to ask me to take care of renaming proposals you think are needed. I'll rename this one momentarily. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am, of course, not an admin. Hence I cannot see this user’s deleted uploads. That’s why I asked you to check whether they are in scope after all, given this latest DR. Brianjd (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait of Aimee Schweig.jpg[edit]

Hi Infrogmation; though I obviously agree with your decision to delete that file, I think you didn't use a quite fitting rationale, as you wrote "Artist died too recently to make it PD-Art". As it apparently (most likely) is an US work, it isn't the artist's year of death that determines the copyright protection for this work. Maybe modify your closing comments? The fitting reason for deletion, I think, would be that the year of first publication isn't early enough / unclear. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to thank you for the advice re RISD images[edit]

The email has been forwarded to COM:VRT as recommended. Thanks! Mabalu (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lamilli deletion request[edit]

Hi! I'm writing since in your comment in the Files uploaded by Lamilli deletion request, as well as in your closure, you mentioned that you would not oppose to a renomination if the scope was narrower. I've thought about opening another request, choosing only pictures with low quality or resolution, and those that are in broad categories. I've also thought that starting one for nudity and other with not nudity could also help. Do you think this is a good criteria and would you be alright with it? Best regards! NoonIcarus (talk) 11:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delreq[edit]

Hello!

Thanks for closing Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nihonjoe. Two files seem to have not been deleted along with the rest. Jonteemil (talk) 04:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks pointing that out. Fixed. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Walter Cameron of Lochiel, 25th Chief 2.jpg[edit]

Hi, the nominator has reopened Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Walter Cameron of Lochiel, 25th Chief 2.jpg after you closed it as Keep. They have updated the File and File Talk pages but have not readded it to the deletion queue, meaning it is an orphaned discussion that no one can see is open. What is the best way to handle this? Revert the nominator so it is closed as Keep or humour them and relist it as an active discussion? From Hill To Shore (talk) 08:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me. I reverted the unilateral reopening, which was out of procedure. I alerted the user to this - and noted that they are free to renominate if they think I made a mistake, and I'm happy to let another admin decide the next listing. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Art work, I don't think it's graffiti. (6582137565).jpg[edit]

What about File:Brick Lane Graffiti - 7826138576.jpg (uploader was notified) and File:Street sign, Pedley Street E2 - geograph.org.uk - 3337414.jpg (bot maintainer was pinged) which also featured the same artwork? Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much, taken care of. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Felix Leitner (AUT) 2020.jpg[edit]

Smash. In the face of the authors. You show us, how unimportant we are and that we have to give and then to be silent.

If all Admins would act like you, Commons would be dead, because no Author would longer give his work. And why, with earning such a disrespect. Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your comment. I take it you disagree with my call to keep an in-use free licensed photo - if you could explain how this is disrespectful to authors, I'm willing to listen to explanation. Good day, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Objection to Deletion --> About:16 March 2023 diffhist b 藤原朋子‎ 23:29 −26‎ ‎CommonsDelinker talk contribs‎ (Infrogmation によってCommonsから削除された Tomoko_Fujiwara_1965-.jpg を除去。理由: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5).)[edit]

この写真は「厚生労働省公開画像（2020年）」。行政の人事広報資料として公開された顔写真は原則として自由に転載できるものであるから削除は間違いと思う。 This photo is a "Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare public image (2020)." In principle, mugshots published as administrative personnel publicity materials can be freely reproduced. I think the deletion is a mistake. IyataYada (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lotta Svärd.svg[edit]

How do you do? Could you please explain why this file got deleted? Sincerely, Kwasura (talk) 12:05, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Lotta_Svärd.svg, not yet public domain -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about? I created the .svg file, it is my drawing. --Kwasura (talk) 17:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You might wish to ask User:Abzeronow. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you already have. See Commons:Derivative works - even if you make a new version, the copyright of the original version can remain. Hope this helps. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corrado Giustozzi e Ron Rivest 1999.jpg[edit]

Hi, Is there a chance you might please leave Commons:Deletion requests/File:Corrado Giustozzi e Ron Rivest 1999.jpg open for a few days instead of speedy closing it? -- Asclepias (talk) 15:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The image is in use in more than a dozen projects, and there was no suggestion of challenge to the free licensed status. It seemed to fit the criteria for a speedy keep to me. Perhaps I'm missing something - are there other factors that would warrant longer discussion? Thanks, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would have preferred to keep the discussion on the DR page, although the file would probably have been kept anyway. Ok, nevermind, thanks. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I posted my comment on the page User talk:Ronald L. Rivest#File:Corrado Giustozzi e Ron Rivest 1999.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History of Turkmenistan by century[edit]

Just checking but isn't Category:History of Turkmenistan by century the same as Category:Turkmenistan by century? All the categories seem like they would be the same. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like they should be combined/redirected into Turkmenistan by century. (If I had any reason to use the "History of" at the time, I don't remember it, and I don't see any reason for it to be separate now.) Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:It's Just the Sun by Don McLean US vinyl.png[edit]

I wonder whether you can adjust your rationale. The copyright notice with a ℗ is intended for the sound recording. Unsure whether it applies to the whole image itself as I don't see © anywhere within it. George Ho (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the input. I said deleted per nom. It is clearly not a simple text logo. I added the info that it had a copyright notice in case someone would try to argue that PD-US-no notice would apply - I agree that it is unclear if the notice refers to the recording, label, or both. At this point, I'm not sure what modifying my deletion comment would do. Do you have thoughts on what defects the current text has that needs addressing, and what specifically should be said to improve the deletion notice? Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Umm... Well.... You can leave the rationale as-is if you like. Oh, for further guidance, here's one discussion about one image that has all text and plain elements. It contains a copyright notice, but that's intended for a sound recording. George Ho (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pud Kent in 1911.jpg[edit]

I think you might have made a mistake - you closed the discussion as "keep" ("Kept: Listing withdrawn by nominator") but then it seems you deleted the file? BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much, fixed. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Structure at Cohn & Lowerline Streets[edit]

Hi, Infrogmation, Do you know if there is a photograph of the structure at the corner of Cohn Street and Lowerline Street in New Orleans, which supposedly is "Sewer Lift Station No. 1" and is a very unusual structure. It was featured in a January 24, 2023, article in nola.com. I can't find a picture of this structure, and it seems like something worth documenting for posterity. Thanks again for all your efforts! Nolabob (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're talking about the little thing with steps behind the automobile seen in File:MoldMobileAwning.jpg? Something I sort of noticed but didn't pay attention to. Not far away from a part of town I expect to be in within the next week or so, so I'll try to get a better photo. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's it! I look forward to there being a better photograph on the Commons. Nolabob (talk) 01:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

St. Frances Cabrini Church[edit]

Hi, Infrogmation, I don't mean to sound like I am piling work on you, but I have another request of you. I'm currently working on improving the Wikipedia article on St. Frances Cabrini Church in New Orleans, which needs a good bit of TLC. There is a Wikimedia Commons category on this church, but it only contains photos of the church after Hurricane Katrina. So my question is: Do you know of any photos in the public domain of this unique structure taken before the hurricane? Many thanks. Nolabob (talk) 00:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, I don't, sorry. (So many things I wish I could send a message back in time for me to photograph back then!) Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, I have extensively upgraded the Wikipedia article on St. Frances Cabrini Church and removed the notability tag because of the upgrades. Hopefully one of these days one of us will find public domain photos of this distinctive New Orleans church when it was in its heyday. Best regards, Nolabob (talk) 11:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you keep some of the files in Commons:Deletion requests/File:20210324 181230 HDR.jpg?[edit]

Why did you keep some of the files in Commons:Deletion requests/File:20210324 181230 HDR.jpg? I think I have mentioned valid reasons why all files should be deleted and did not get a counter reaction. The arguments of Mdd are not valid as I explained in Reactions to remarks by Mdd. JopkeB (talk) 03:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hm, thanks for your feedback. I was rather just closing a request without recent comments according to how comments voted. Looking again with your comments in mind, I've deleted 3 more. I've left the 2 collages at top and File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd Bram van de Lek met ant, Bestanddeelnr 927-1925.jpg which I think have a fair argument that the DW portion is de minimis. I have no objection to having those 3 relisted if you think I was mistaken. Perhaps someone more familiar with relevant Netherlands/EU than I can help make judgement. Thanks for your work. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your reaction. Yes indeed, I would like that someone more familiar with relevant Netherlands/EU copyright law would look into this. I'll make a new Deletion request.
    And I thought that judging deletion requests because of copyright violation is not about voting, but about true application of the law (I experienced on Commons that there are too many people who do not know the law well, but give their opinion anyway and vote in their favor). Is that not true? Regards, JopkeB (talk) 05:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, it is indeed about copyrights, not about number of votes. However sometimes a closing admin is steered by comments by people who seem more familiar with the issues than they are. In this case, perhaps I assumed Mdd knew what they were talking about more than I should have. Perhaps I should have left the discussion open in hopes that eventually someone else more familiar with the details would come along. I am generally confident and proud of my work with deletion requests, but in dealing with thousands of listings I make no claim that there are no instances when I might have done better - so thank you for feedback and work helping make improvements. Cheers. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand, thanks for your reaction. You do many good things here, you indeed may be proud of your work. It's OK, I made the DR for the other three and I'll see what happens. JopkeB (talk) 15:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Traffic cone hats[edit]

Hiya, I see that you might not be aware of Category:Traffic cone hats, as you haven't tagged some of your images with this category. I removed Repurposed traffic cones to add the cone hats category as the Repurposed traffic cones part is normally for uncategorized uses of traffic cones, but these ones contain hats. Thanks, 多多123 18:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip, and thanks for your work. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Train station in Vega Alta, Cuba[edit]

Hi, shouldn't Category:Train station in Vega Alta, Cuba be called "Category:Vega Alta train station (Cuba)" like in Category:Santa Clara train station (Cuba)? CubanoBoi (talk) 21:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no strong opinion on that. If the latter is the usual for train stations in Cuba, go ahead and propose a move, I don't object. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interior of Paramount Northwest Theater[edit]

Not that Clusternote's prior category here wasn't already weird, but how can Category:Interior of Paramount Northwest Theater be a subcat of Category:Theater organs in the United States? In fact, now that I look, nearly every subcat of Category:Theater organs in the United States looks unlikely. These are theaters with organs (past or present, I'm guessing), not theater organs as such. - Jmabel ! talk 03:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that something seemed to look wrong. I just made some geographic subcats. The theater organs categories seem to need a more comprehensive reworking. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are you considering taking that on? Or Clusternote, any interest in helping sort this out? Seems to me that the "organ" categories should be for organs, not buildings. - Jmabel ! talk 14:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've brought up the issue at Category_talk:Theater_organs. Let's discuss how to usefully subcategorize there. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на Алжир из Хилтона - panoramio.jpg[edit]

Hi

We can't add this photo to category:Mohammadia, Algiers Province since it shows nothing of the city of Mohammadia itself but Algiers. The photo has been taken from an hotel of Mohammadia located of the opposite side of the bay of Algiers. This why I have created : Category:Views from Mohammadia, Algiers Province. Poudou99 (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much. I was just going by the photo metadata location. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Les frères Moutoussamy accueillis par une famille bordelaise à Belcier, le 15 août 1951.jpg[edit]

I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the close. I agree that the U.S. would require those formalities, but if this wasn't published inside the U.S. before/within 30 days of publication abroad, then we have to account for URAA considerations, and the close seems to ignore that. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The same comment goes for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cover page of the Vytis Union statute. It contains 50 points explaining future agricultural, industrial and educational reforms.jpg. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They seemed to me to be PD both in source country and in the USA, so OK. If I missed something, I'd appreciate you linking to it so I don't miss it again. Thanks. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirty Linen Clothing - Ragdoll.jpg[edit]


 File:Dirty Linen Clothing - Ragdoll.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. Wikimedia Commons doesn't permit uploading personal files unless you are using them for personal use or an educational purpose.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Emu.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirty Linen Clothing - Ragdoll.jpg[edit]

File:Dirty Linen Clothing - Ragdoll.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 19:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


West Bend Mayor Images Copyright[edit]

A few months ago you deleted many of the mayoral portraits on the West Bend Wikipedia page. Most of the images you did delete came from the a png file the City of West Bend had released publicly. These images would fall into the category of public records which you do not need permission to use. -- MiniatureTZ (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. "Public records" and "released publicly" do not always mean free licensed. Commons requires media to be either explicitly free licensed or public domain/out of copyright; see COM:Licensing for details. If there is explicit statement of free licensed status on the source website, great, include a link to that information. If you have been authorized by someone in charge to share under a free license, again great, have them email verification as detailed at COM:VRT. If you can show anything you uploaded which was deleted is actually free licensed, you can list at Commons:Undeletion requests. If you have questions about using Commons you can't find an answer to, ask! Cheers -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banksy Hip Hop Rat.jpg[edit]

File:Banksy Hip Hop Rat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:McFoxy, Kyiv, Ukraine 2012.jpg[edit]

File:McFoxy, Kyiv, Ukraine 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 18:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reginald Baliol Brett, 2nd Viscount Esher.png[edit]

hi Infrogmation,

I would like to ask if you could restore this 1922 portrait by Glyn Warren Philpot the copyright should be correct, as the license inherent in the painting is the one that follows his death date, so if it were correct this thing could be restored?? Ladrrionesius (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ladrrionesius: Hello. I see that the admin who deleted it was @Krd: , not me. I'm unfamiliar with other details about this. See Commons:Undeletion requests for requesting undeletion. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for the hint--Ladrrionesius (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LittleHavanOct06CafeteriaArt.jpg[edit]

File:LittleHavanOct06CafeteriaArt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 01:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]




Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Infrogmation/Archive_20&oldid=857532640"