User talk:Halavar/Archive14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kaplica św. Jana Nepomucena w Moszczenicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat wodzisławski, Gołkowice, Znaki szlaków rowerowych R4 i 24C (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat wodzisławski, Gołkowice, Kościół św. Anny (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too bad about the cut bottom. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Kheng Hock Keong (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat wodzisławski, Uchylsko, Kaplica Nawiedzenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok now The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:45:53 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat wodzisławski, Godów, Dawny dworzec kolejowy, Pomnik powstańców śląskich rozstrzelanych przez Grenzschutz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
ok The Photographer Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:45:53 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Ulica Anawratha (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 14:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Pielgrzymowice, Kościół św. Katarzyny (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Park Zdrojowy, Letnia kawiarenka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat wodzisławski, Mszana, Kościół św. Jerzego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Bogumin, Stary Bogumin, Pomnik poległym podczas II wojny światowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 14:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Tilt fixed now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to the fallen during World War II. Náměstí Svobody, Starý Bohumín. Bohumín, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Вікі любить Землю триває до 31 травня![edit]

Вітаємо!

31 травня завершиться шостий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Цього року є трохи змін у правилах. Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english). 22:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Park Zdrojowy, Dom Zdrojowy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sky is oversaturated --Daniel Case 22:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Alright, the sky is still a little noisy but I've seen a lot worse here --Daniel Case 03:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1760s in Islam[edit]

Hi. Halavar, you made this edit but forgot to complete the red cat, Category:1768 in Islam. Best. --E4024 (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2018 в Україні[edit]

Вітаємо!

1 вересня вже традиційно стартувала українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Цього року є трохи змін у правилах конкурсу:

  • фотографії пам'яток, для яких на момент початку конкурсу (відповідно до відомої Організаційному комітету інформації) не було жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт рівний 7 (для кожної пам'ятки);
  • фотографії автоматично вантажаться у категорію, яка бере учать у номінації за найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації за найкраще фото потрібно вибрати необхідні налаштування у завантажувачі.

Також у конкурсі є спецномінація банерів для статей у Вікімандрах, детальніше за посиланням.

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 22:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Ще 4 дні до завершення «Вікі любить пам'ятки»[edit]

Привіт!

Наш цьогорічний конкурс добігає свого кінця — залишилося ще 4 дні. Проміжні підсумки конкурсу опубліковано на сайті. У нас зараз понад 13500 світлин, і це значить, що Україна посідає четверте місце, поступаючись Росії (23 тисячі), Німеччині (21 тисяча) та Італії (19 тисяч). Загалом, понад 200 учасників цього року уже. Дякуємо, що вантажили фото у попередні роки, якщо б Вам захотілося ще взяти участь цього року, то може бути корисно переглянути цей пост із покроковою інструкцією як вантажити світлини: «Як подати свою роботу на конкурс». Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Цього року у конкурсі також є ще одна спеціальні номінація — «Єврейська спадщина». Детальніше про неї можна прочитати за посиланням.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».21:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2019! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Halavar! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Suchum, Tablica reklamowa turnieju piłki nożnej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 02:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Kościół Narodzenia NMP (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Stonawa, Widok na kopalnię Darkov (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Pałac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Plebania rzymskokatolicka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, ul. Fryštátská 3, Kamienica (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 17:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Ratusz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sky is on the dark side. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Olbrachcice, Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Rybnik, Kościół św. Teresy od Dzieciątka Jezus (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Wisła Mała, Ulica Borsuków, Widok na pole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Krzyż pokutny niedaleko kościoła parafialnego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Ulica Bukowa, Widok na pole (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are strange halos, see the grey ones around the clouds --Poco a poco 20:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
New fixed version uploaded. Hope it's better now:) --Halavar 21:55, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's quite overprocessed. Maybe too much saturation and clarity? --Podzemnik 11:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I made your suggestions. Hope it's better now --Halavar 11:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better I think, even though the sky is still a bit too blue to me --Podzemnik 06:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, ul. Fryštátská 8, Kamienica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There's a CA on the roof edge. Apart from that good. --MB-one 14:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 21:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Pszczyna, Pokazowa Zagroda Żubrów (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the animals --Michielverbeek 20:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)--Horst J. Meuter 20:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Pszczyna, Oficyna pałacowa (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Pszczyna, Pałac (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Pszczyna, Pokazowa Zagroda Żubrów (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Adorable, good quality. That's a mother doe, 3 fawns and, is that a goat? You could mention all that in your file description. -- Ikan Kekek 05:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Rybnik, Bazylika św. Antoniego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Pszczyna, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear Halavar,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 08:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¡Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Colombia ha comenzado![edit]

¡Hola! Gracias por tu participación anterior en Wiki Loves Monuments o en Wikivacaciones. Nos alegra anunciar que otro concurso fotográfico internacional está ocurriendo en este momento: Wiki Loves Earth 2019. La idea del concurso es tomar imágenes de nuestro patrimonio natural – nuestras áreas protegidas. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar la naturaleza de Colombia y mostrarla al mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos. Esta es la primera vez que Colombia participa en el concurso, ¡así que necesitamos imágenes hermosas!

Por favor ve a la página del concurso y lee las reglas: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Colombia. Ahí encontrarás también cómo participar en el concurso. Si tienes alguna duda, por favor no dudes en preguntarnos escribiéndonos a contacto@wikimediacolombia.org.

Gracias,
Comité organizador de Wiki Loves Earth en Colombia
--19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:2016 Singapur, Kampong Glam, Meczet Sułtana (18).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Contains unlicensed derivative works in the form of the photograph and the text.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

SGconlaw (talk) 14:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

1 вересня вже традиційно стартує українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До кінця вересня Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше про те, як взяти участь, можна прочитати за посиланням.

Із детальними правилами можна ознайомитися тут. Для тих, хто раніше уже брав участь у конкурсі — зауважте, що цього року є певні зміни:

  • у номінації «Найкраще фото» — файли повинні мати не менше 4 МПкс;
  • у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» — оцінка фотографії пам'ятки складається із суми базового та додаткових балів (в останній враховується чи ця пам'ятка вже фотографувалася іншими авторами та скільки фотографій пам'яток уже є з цього населеного пункту);

Нагадаємо, що фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Також цього року маємо спецномінації «Єврейська спадщина» та «Млини». Також окремо відзначатимуться найкращі відео із пам'ятками.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна».

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso![edit]

English | Italiano | +/−


Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Hi Halavar/Archive14!

You are receiving this message because you have previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in India. We would be very delighted if you would do so again this year, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes.

You can find more details in this page. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India team)--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019: Wiki Loves Monuments Malaysia is here again![edit]

Dear Halavar,

You're receiving this message because you've previously participated in the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Malaysia. It would be great if you can participate this year as well, Because the more you participate better will be your chances to win the the local and international contest.

You can find more details at the Monuments in Malaysia. Or if you have taken photographs in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's competition runs until 30 September 2019.

Looking forward to your participation.

Many thanks,
Ammarah Khalid (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019![edit]

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020, Halavar! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Опитування щодо «Вікі любить Землю» 2020 / Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Ukraine Survey[edit]

English version below

Доброго дня! Ви отримуєте це повідомлення, бо раніше брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні.

Зараз організатори конкурсу проводять опитування для учасників, аби вирішити, чи варто його проводити цього року — і якщо так, то коли. Видається, що через пандемію COVID-19 було б недоречно проводити українську частину «Вікі любить Землю» у традиційні дати, тобто протягом травня. Однак ми можемо провести його у червні або липні. Щоб визначитися, нам цікава ваша думка.

Детальніша інформація і опитування — за посиланням. Опитування буде відкрите до 14 квітня включно.

Якщо маєте питання, пишіть на wle@wikimedia.org.ua. Дякуємо! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! You are getting this message because you have participated in Wiki Loves Earth in Ukraine before.

Organizers of the contest are holding a survey for participants to decide on whether to hold the contest this year — and when to do it. It seems that holding Ukrainian Wiki Loves Earth within traditional dates in May would not be reasonable because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, we can hold the contest in June or July. To decide, we need your opinion.

More info and the survey can be found by this link. The survey will be open by April 14th.

If you have any questions, contact us at wle@wikimedia.org.ua. Thanks! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 20:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Działkowa_street_in_Katowice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


MacQtosh (talk) 22:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Pod_Kasztanami_street_in_Katowice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


MacQtosh (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 липня: Долучайтеся![edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 липня триває восьмий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом липня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи.

Ви брали участь у конкурсі в минулі роки — можливо, вам було б цікаво долучитися і зараз. Інструкцію, як взяти участь, читайте тут. Також ознайомтеся зі списками пам'яток природи України і переліком основних та спеціальних номінацій конкурсу

У порівнянні з минулим роком у регламент були внесені невеликі зміни, читайте про них тут.

Більше інформації — на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися на wle@wikimedia.org.ua – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English) 09:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Welcome to
Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
­ India

Hello Halavar/Archive14!

From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "taken on"[edit]

Hi, you just made several edits like this one, removing a valid {{Taken on}} template and replacing it with manual categorization. Why? I see no point in this: it is useful to see in the date field as well that this is the date the photo was taken and not some other date; even though it is not obligatory, removing it when it is already there seems wrong. Also: Why are you randomly moving categorization wikicode from one place to another? That makes it harder to see what you actually changed. Tokfo (talk) 21:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please do not make edits like this one either. It's useful information that the date is based only on the camera settings and wasn't actually entered by the uploader or photographer. Tokfo (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. З найважливіших змін цього року:

  • у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» — збільшився додатковий бал за фотографії пам'яток (якщо світлин пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено, то можна отримати 21 бал.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року теж є спецномінації «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини» та «Відео». Також є спеціальна номінація від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — у ній автоматично беруть участь світлини всіх пам’яток міст України, через які пролягає Via RegiaДубно, Рівне, Острог, Львів, Броди, Городок (Львівська область), Луцьк, Володимир-Волинський, Радомишль, Житомир та Київ. Цього року у Завантажувачі не передбачено окремих параметрів для спецномінацій — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 06:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020![edit]

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Gołkowice, Kościół Ewangelicko-Augsburski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Gołkowice, Kościół św. Anny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Olza, Kaplica Świętej Rodziny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół św. Barbary i św. Józefa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Olza, Kaplica Świętej Rodziny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Łaziska, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

QI categories[edit]

Hi Halavar, I think regarding this, "Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments Poland" should be in "Quality images of cultural heritage monuments in Poland", so over-categorization. --A.Savin 02:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A. Savin. You're right. I saw how that thing looks like in other countries and I did now edits as you said, according to Germany good example. Sorry for mass edits BTW. --Halavar (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Łaziska, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for 2014 standards. --Peulle 10:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Darków, Most żelbetowy 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Sule (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 01:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Pagoda Szwedagon (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Brzezówka, Ulica Leśna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok , slitghly dark imo. --ArildV 06:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Łaziska, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Rybnik, Zabytkowa Kopalnia Ignacy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rangun, Urząd Celny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Pałac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Buków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Różańcowej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Karwina, Frysztat, Plebania rzymskokatolicka 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality though the very tight crop below -- Spurzem 10:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Drogomyśl, Dawny pałac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Drogomyśl, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 11:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Strumień, Rynek 17, Dom 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Zbytków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Szkaplerznej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Zabytkowa ceglana brama do pałacu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Kamienica Edwarda Raczyńskiego 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Strumień, Ratusz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Not sharp enough IMO. Fixable? --Ermell 13:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Kościół Świętego Krzyża 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Barbakan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Kościół św. Barbary i św. Józefa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Composition could be more balanced vertically, but that's not a problem for QI --MB-one 10:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Pomnik przyrody - dąb szypułkowy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vincent60030 07:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2020 в Україні: залишилося два тижні! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Ukraine: two weeks are left![edit]

Привіт!

Українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки» триватиме ще два тижні, до 30 вересня!

За перші два тижні учасники завантажили понад 16 тисяч фото українських пам’яток. Це поки найбільший результат серед усіх 29 країн, які цьогоріч організовують конкурс. Свої роботи на українську частину конкурсу вже подали 239 авторів, половина із них вперше долучилися до змагання. На знімках представлені пам’ятки з усіх регіонів України. Загалом сфотографовано 5568 об’єктів із конкурсних списків.

Найменш представленими поки є Луганська (69 фото 45 об’єктів) і Херсонська (81 фото 38 об’єктів) області та місто Севастополь (136 фото 39 об’єктів). Якщо у вас (чи у ваших друзів та знайомих) є світлини з цих регіонів — без вагань долучайтеся до фотозмагання!

У рамках спеціальної номінації «Єврейська спадщина» завантажено понад 650 світлин 126 пам'яток, з яких знімки 42 — завантажено вперше. Якщо ваш населений пункт має об'єкти єврейської культурної спадщини, але їх нема у списках, напишіть нам, щоб ми їх додали до списків!

Спеціальна номінація «Млини» — понад 640 фото 144 об'єктів, знімки 44 — завантажено вперше. Загалом база млинів зараз нараховує понад 615 об'єктів, і вона постійно доповнюється.

Вперше цього року ми втілюємо спеціальну номінацію від проєкту «Via Regia Ukraine» — на жаль, ще зовсім нема світлин із Бродів та Радомишля. І з Житомира є тільки 7 світлин, а з міста Рівного — 8 фото.

У спеціальній номінації «Відео» — понад 20 робіт.

Попереду ще два тижні конкурсу. Встигніть долучитися самі та запрошуйте друзів.

Чекаємо на ваші роботи!

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться тут: wlm.photo. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки» раніше чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цього конкурсу).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. 22:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Drogomyśl, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Rybnik, Zabytkowa Kopalnia Ignacy 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Kościół Świętego Krzyża 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Drogomyśl, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Synagoga Tempel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Dom Landauów 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Kamienica Ohrensteina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Były ratusz kazimierski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Liridon 13:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Bazylika Bożego Ciała 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Zamek Królewski na Wawelu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Synagoga Stara 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Baszta Sandomierska 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Kamienica Ohrensteina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Teatr im. Juliusza Słowackiego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Bazylika archikatedralna św. Stanisława i św. Wacława 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Bazylika archikatedralna św. Stanisława i św. Wacława 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Baszta Złodziejska 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Ul. Józefa 12 ul. Bożego Ciała 20, Kamienica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat wodzisławski, Buków, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Różańcowej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Bazylika archikatedralna św. Stanisława i św. Wacława 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Bazylika archikatedralna św. Stanisława i św. Wacława 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Liridon 12:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Powiat raciborski, Krzyżanowice, Pałac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Powiat cieszyński, Drogomyśl, Dawny pałac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Kościół Świętych Apostołów Piotra i Pawła 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Pałac Górków 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Rybnik, Rynek 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Rybnik, Rynek, Fontanna z figurą św. Jana Nepomucena 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Baszta Sandomierska 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Baszta Złodziejska 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Zamek Królewski na Wawelu 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Pałac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 09:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Bieńkowice, Plebania 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 15:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Zamek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Dzięgielów, Zamek-dwór obronny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 10:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Zamek 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ogrodzona, Kościół św. Mateusza 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:12, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Very good composition, but it could be sharper. --Augustgeyler 21:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sharpness added. Please take a look again. Hope is better now:) --Halavar 00:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support  Weak support It did improve. But the sharpness is still low, but meeting the mimimum for QI. --Augustgeyler 09:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Rybnik, Zabytkowa Kopalnia Ignacy 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly dark imo. --ArildV 13:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Vincent60030 15:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak support well executed, the very top of the steel tower is blurred, hence only a weak support --Virtual-Pano 23:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support G.Q. --Fischer.H 12:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Zabytkowa obora-stajnia folwarku Karłowiec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Dzięgielów, Zamek-dwór obronny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality. --Fischer.H 12:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality. --Fischer.H 12:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 11:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat oświęcimski, Brzeszcze, Kościół św. Urbana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Bażanowice, Stary folwark 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Dawny budynek szpitalny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Bażanowice, Stary folwark 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Krzyżowice, Kościół św. Michała Archanioła 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Quality. --Fischer.H 15:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Pawłowice, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good focus, exposure. Verticals are fine, but the horizontal lines a tilted slightly to the left. --Tagooty 16:10, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. Hope is better now. --Halavar 19:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot at the top left --Poco a poco 19:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint about that dust spot. --Halavar 22:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Zamek 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Nice lighting and balanced composition. --Lion-hearted85 16:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Rybnik, Rynek, Fontanna z figurą św. Jana Nepomucena 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ogrodzona, Kościół św. Mateusza 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good picture, except for dust spots on the upper left side of the picture. --Fischer.H 15:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 15:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC) I'm sorry, but the dust stain is still there. --Fischer.H 16:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed one dust spot. I don't see the second one. Please make a note on the image shwoing the location of that second stain. --Halavar 19:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC) Support Good Quality.--Fischer.H 16:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Ruiny pałacu 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Liridon 10:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Powiat raciborski, Tworków, Kościół Świętych Piotra i Pawła 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 00:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Rybnik, Rynek, Fontanna z figurą św. Jana Nepomucena 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kraków, Wawel, Baszta Senatorska 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Wielkie, Pałac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ogrodzona, Kościół św. Mateusza 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat pszczyński, Studzionka, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Possible to add some sharpness? --Ermell 18:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Yes, of course. Sharpness added. Hope it's better now:) --Halavar 21:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support better --Ermell 13:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Halavar,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Marcin! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Food time![edit]

Wiki Loves Food 2021
­ India

Hello Halavar/Archive14!

Do you roam around in search of delicious mouth-watering foods and take photographs of them before you put them into your mouth? Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India photo-competition is then waiting for you! Participate in the competition from March 15 to April 14 this year, photograph and upload all kinds of foods and beverages originated from or found in Indian sub-continent and get a chance to win exciting prizes!

-- Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India team
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of categories[edit]

I'm confused by your removal of rail transport categories in this and other photos. Could you explain why you've removed them? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Erywań, Kaskady (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

62.216.207.133 09:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 в Україні пройде з 1 по 30 червня[edit]

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — цього року конкурс відбудеться протягом червня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу буде таким же, як у минулі роки. Протягом травня ми опублікуємо детальні умови та можливості для участі у спеціальних номінацій. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Фейсбуці, Інстаграмі або у блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Під час зйомок у заповідних територіях просимо дотримуватися правил їх відвідування і встановлених карантинних обмежень. Найважливіші правила ми зібрали тут.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у червні! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 13:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Szablon[edit]

Cześć! Czy ok? --Nickispeaki (talk) 07:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć! Tak, wszystko ok:) Dobra robota! --Halavar (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 проходить до 30 червня: Долучайтеся![edit]

Вітаємо!

До кінця червня триває щорічний конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні. Його метою є зібрати якомога більшу базу фотографій пам'яток природи України; для переможців передбачені цінні призи у різних номінаціях. Ви брали участь у конкурсі в минулі роки — можливо, вам було б цікаво долучитися і зараз.

Корисні посилання

Більше інформації — на сайті конкурсу та у соцмережах (ФейсбукІнстаграмТелеграм). Якщо у вас є запитання, можете писати на wle@wikimedia.org.ua --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 15:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

Hi! Is template for date and country: {{Taken on|date|location=Ukraine}}. --Микола Василечко (talk) 07:07, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. Please explain:) Best regards from Poland --Halavar (talk) 11:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You edit in this file and other taken in Ukraine. --Микола Василечко (talk) 13:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm moving pictures from months by year categories in Ukraine to "Ukraine photographs taken on" categories, also adding oblast by year categories. I do not see any problems:) --Halavar (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"by Voivodeship in Poland" categories[edit]

Just FYI, these categories should use lower case for the word "voivodeship" in the title. I'm going to rename them and change the template. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Welcome to
Wiki Loves Monuments 2021
­ India

Hello Halavar/Archive14!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2021[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!

Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.

Pozdrawiam, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 15:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat oświęcimski, Oświęcim, Zamek, Gotycka wieża obronna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Czeski Cieszyn, Aleje Masaryka 16, Willa Fuldy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 19:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring my QI nom[edit]

@Halavar: Hello Halavar,

I just wanted to say that is there a reason skipping my noms every time? Today I re-nominated my file for QI after 8 days of passing the old nomination and after approximately 2 hours, Alexander-93 nomed a file and you instantly promoted it. I just feel bad that you all ignore us (fairly new editors) and focus on experienced editors. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 15:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Kraków, Opactwo Benedyktynów w Tyńcu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The right side seems to leaning in. --Tournasol7 06:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 08:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Could be a bit sharper, but good enough for me. --Tournasol7 19:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat chrzanowski, Mętków, Kościół Matki Bożej Częstochowskiej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:11, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Zamek Królewski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 14:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Dzwonnica 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Ogrodzenie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Alexander Novikov 14:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:50, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Kraków, Zamek Królewski na Wawelu 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Kraków, Opactwo Benedyktynów w Tyńcu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Kraków, Klasztor norbertanek 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat brzeski, Uście Solne, Kościół Nawrócenia św. Pawła Apostoła 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat brzeski, Uście Solne, Kościół Nawrócenia św. Pawła Apostoła 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Ogrodzenie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Czeski Cieszyn, Aleje Masaryka 12, Dom 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Cieszyn, Góra Zamkowa, Wieża Ostatecznej Obrony 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Dzwonnica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 13:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Cieszyn, Kościół św. Jerzego, Pomnik św. Jana Nepomucena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 14:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Ratusz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Dzwonnica 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat oświęcimski, Oświęcim, Byłe Polskie Zakłady Tytoniowe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 11:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat chrzanowski, Mętków, Kościół Matki Bożej Częstochowskiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Biplab Anand 03:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat chrzanowski, Mętków, Dzwonnica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat chrzanowski, Mętków, Dzwonnica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 23:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Powiat cieszyński, Wisła, Zamek Prezydenta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you sharpen the castle? --Steindy 23:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 21:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:56, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 16 i 17, Kamienice 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat brzeski, Uście Solne, Kościół Nawrócenia św. Pawła Apostoła 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 17:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Ogrodzenie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bazylika katedralna Narodzenia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 16 i 17, Kamienice 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction is needed (tilt a bit to the left). --F. Riedelio 12:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sorry for the delay. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 10:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:The_National_Gallery_in_Shusha has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


CuriousGolden (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, Kościół Świętej Trójcy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bima starej synagogi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bazylika katedralna Narodzenia NMP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Since this has a known ID, do we know what the statue depicts? Perhaps we could get some of that specificity into the descriptions and categories?--Peulle 09:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Peulle - thanks for the good advice. I added proper category and updated description. --Halavar 10:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 16 i 17, Kamienice 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bazylika katedralna Narodzenia NMP, Pomnik Jana Pawła II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bazylika katedralna Narodzenia NMP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, ul. Matejki 2, Kamienica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 17:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Rynek 29-32, Kamienice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 12:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, Kościół Świętej Trójcy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Kościół Świętej Rodziny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- Александр Байдуков 20:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bima starej synagogi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Ratusz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Zamek 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 15:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Oranżeria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment It seems to me that the building is leaning a little bit to the left on its left side. This is visible in the windows in the upper floor and the column on the left. The left edge of the column is vertical, but it should not be since its width decreases towards the top. Can this be corrected? --Carsten Steger 15:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Hope it's better now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 18:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Dawny kościół i klasztor dominikanów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bima starej synagogi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Ujeżdżalnia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Zamek 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Ujeżdżalnia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Dawne kasyno oficerskie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would be better if brighter, IMO --Velvet 07:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. New version uploaded, please take a look again. --Halavar 13:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Rynek 20, Kamienica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would be better if brighter, IMO --Velvet 07:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. New version uploaded, please take a look again. --Halavar 13:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół dworu, Oficyna I 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół dworu, Muzeum Ziemi Leżajskiej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół kościoła i klasztoru Bernardynów 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela i św. Barbary, Dzwonnica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 09:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela i św. Barbary 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Rudnik nad Sanem, Młyn i elektrownia wodna 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 09:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Krzeszów, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Ratusz 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Powiat pszczyński, Pielgrzymowice, Kościół św. Katarzyny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 17:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat stalowowolski, Zaleszany, Kościół św. Mikołaja 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 17:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół kościoła i klasztoru Bernardynów 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, ul. Mickiewicza 41, Drewniany dom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you sharpen your photo? --Steindy 10:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, Rynek 25 i Matejki 2-8, Kamienice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you sharpen your photo? --Steindy 10:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, Rynek 21-24, Kamienice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Underexposed. --Kallerna 06:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 SupportBetter now. --Kallerna 17:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Pałac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Walentego 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć, czemu usunąłeś kategorię Wiki Loves Monuments ze zdjęcia? Zdaję sobie sprawę, że to zdjęcie nie ma szans w konkursie, ale dodałem je do niego celowo. Zgodnie z instrukcją konkursu nie muszę używać formularza z mapy do tego celu. Zamiast tego mogę po prostu dodać kategorię do zdjęcia, co zrobiłem. -- Jakubhal 10:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Kończyce Małe, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Powiat pszczyński, Pielgrzymowice, Kościół św. Katarzyny 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Walentego 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat stalowowolski, Zaleszany, Kościół św. Mikołaja 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Biblioteka miejska 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Marcina 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Dey.sandip 16:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Goleszów, Kościół ewangelicki 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I will support, good quality. --Andrey Korzun 12:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Zamek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Zespół kościoła i klasztoru Bernardynów 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Bank Spółdzielczy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Krzeszów, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I will support, good quality. --Andrey Korzun 12:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat leżajski, Leżajsk, Ratusz 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wonderful sky and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowy Targ, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Rynek 32, Kamienica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the dirt spot. --Steindy 23:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 09:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat łańcucki, Łańcut, Zespół zamkowy, Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The photo is leaning to left. --Steindy 23:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 09:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bima starej synagogi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Rynek 19-20-21, Renesansowe kamienice 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Rzeszów, ul. Matejki 2 i Rynek 22-25, Kamienice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Pomnik Trędowatego Króla (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Walentego 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Cmentarz rzymskokatolicki 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Tarnów, Bazylika katedralna Narodzenia NMP 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would benefit from a new aspect ratio, it looks too streched out in the vertical axle --Poco a poco 13:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the good advice. New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 14:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Indeed, thanks --Poco a poco 11:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 13:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat stalowowolski, Wola Rzeczycka, Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 13:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat wielicki, Niepołomice, Kościół Dziesięciu Tysięcy Męczenników, Dzwonnica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Drogomyśl, Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 13:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Pałac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 09:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good.--Jebulon 14:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentNot that sharp at the top. Improvable ? If not, I should decline.--Jebulon 14:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC) SupportGood enough, but just above the limit IMO. Thanks for effort.--Jebulon 18:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 13:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Zamarski, Kościół św. Rocha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Plebania 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021 Powiat cieszyński, Zebrzydowice, Pałac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 14:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 14:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowy Targ, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej, Brama-dzwonnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Łapsze Niżne, Kościół św. Kwiryna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 Powiat pszczyński, Pielgrzymowice, Kościół św. Katarzyny 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 19:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Walentego 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat cieszyński, Ochaby, Kościół św. Marcina 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot at the top in the middle --Poco a poco 17:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks! New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 18:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela i św. Barbary 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 15:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat stalowowolski, Zaleszany, Kościół św. Mikołaja 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 15:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Rudnik nad Sanem, Młyn i elektrownia wodna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Krzeszów, Kościół Narodzenia NMP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good Quality. --ADARSHluck 15:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kościół Wszystkich Świętych 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:30, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Cieszyn, Ulica Michejdy 10, Willa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Cieszyn, Rynek 11, Kamienica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowa Biała, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A bit soft at the top, but OK. --Aristeas 07:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elly (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Pre Rup (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Nowy Targ, Kościół św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 19:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Powiat niżański, Ulanów, Cmentarz rzymskokatolicki 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 19:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 13:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby przy drodze do świątyni (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 13:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Kacwin, Kaplica Matki Boskiej Śnieżnej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020 Powiat nowotarski, Krempachy, Kościół św. Marcina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals should be vertical. --Ermell 18:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done The tower narrows upwards, so vericals won't be fully straight. Hope that new version is better now:) --Halavar 22:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012 Powiat cieszyński, Cieszyn, Rynek, Dom Narodowy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The photo has barrel distortions in the horizontal. --Steindy 12:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. Hope it's better now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 13:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]