User talk:Halavar/Archive12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharpness. --Peulle 14:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Biblioteka (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Biblioteka (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The lower right corner is a bit bright, could you try to reduce the effect? Maybe you could use a graduate filter. --Basotxerri 11:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint! New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 11:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:07, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 06:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Biblioteka (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Zewnętrzna galeria, Devata (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Had probably been able to get something sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Płaskorzeźby w zewnętrznej galerii (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:25, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 10:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.PumpkinSky 21:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Rzeźba lwa strażnika (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:04, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Stupa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 13:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Płaskorzeźby w zewnętrznej galerii (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Nikhilb239 06:46, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Fort Phra Sumen (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qood quality --Capricorn4049 21:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Pomnik Demokracji (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Pomnik Demokracji (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Chana Songkhram (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Pomnik Demokracji (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Chana Songkhram (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Quality --Shishir 14:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Democracy Monument. Bangkok, Thailand. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Pomnik Demokracji (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The DoF is a bit more shallow than I'd like, but as long as the head is sharp... --Peulle 17:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Pomnik Demokracji (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Chana Songkhram (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 14:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (53).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Capricorn4049 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Capricorn4049 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 01:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the composition is very busy, but it's ok for QI --Carschten 01:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Płaskorzeźby w zewnętrznej galerii (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, but it would look better with more contrast I think --Carschten 01:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is leaning slightly to the right is it? Sixflashphoto 04:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done You're right, thanks for the hint! New, fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 19:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 08:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (63).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 15:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Sharp enough, and a good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 01:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 22:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support, head is slightly unsharp. --Basotxerri 05:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main temple of Wat Suthat, Bangkok. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Ulica Yaowarat (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Widoki z promu na rzece Menam (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO good use of DoF. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Ulica Chakrabongse (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wejście na ulicę Charoen Krung 10 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Ulica Khaosan (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

N. H. Feniak (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2018, Halavar! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Zewnętrzna galeria, Płaskorzeźby (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Zewnętrzna galeria, Płaskorzeźby (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Zewnętrzna galeria, Płaskorzeźby (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 15:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Brama Chinatown (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 14:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 14:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia, Zewnętrzna galeria, Płaskorzeźby (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 17:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Ulica Yaowarat (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Привет из Гюмри[edit]

Уважаемый Halavar, спасибо вам за то что вы делайте в википедии. Мне очень нравятся ваши фото. Вы или профессионал или профессиональный любитель фото. Я живу в Армении в городе Гюмри и вы были в Гюмри и сделали прекрасные фото. Я ваши фото поставил в статьи армянской википедии, спасибо вам. Еще я увидел что вы ставите категории к моим фото и это мня очень обрадовало, спасибо и за это. Меня очень воодушевили ваши фото, и я начал работать над качественными фото, но у меня пока не очень хорошо получаться, но армянская википедия нуждается в качественных фото. Я просто очень хотел сказать что очень ценю все что вы делайте и пожелать вам удачи. С уважением --Armenak Margarian (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Chana Songkhram (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualöity --Llez 17:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me--Armenak Margarian 22:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharp focus to main part of the photo --Michielverbeek 13:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but the top is a bit unsharp --Michielverbeek 14:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma i dwie stupy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 10:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough quality, but if you have a less tightly cropped version that may be better. --Prosthetic Head 12:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments f/8 might have been better. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 07:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Zachód słońca nad rzeką Praek Tuek Chhu (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments beautiful and good quality --Armenak Margarian 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pawilon Chanchhaya (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Halavar can you remouve spot in the sky, left part? If you don't find i can make a note? --Armenak Margarian 12:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 12:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentFix done, good quality. --Prosthetic Head 13:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)  Comment I love the details and side light, don´t wanna write something bcs. you have some spots, looking like digital white fault pix from screen (don´t must be real), but can you tell me? Light was really such bright?? --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (57).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 06:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Samphanthawong, Wat Traimit Witthayaram (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 16:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Zachód słońca nad rzeką Praek Tuek Chhu (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice image, however there are lots of spots (birds?) which I would remove of the image. --Basotxerri 18:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Trędowatego Króla (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:05, 6 january 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Wieże widziane z Tarasu Słoni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:05, 6 january 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality Lmbuga 12:05, 6 january 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--PumpkinSky 14:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--PumpkinSky 14:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality-- PumpkinSky 14:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality-- PumpkinSky 14:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality-- PumpkinSky 14:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 15:57, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 15:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Chau Say Tevoda (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Chau Say Tevoda (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Chau Say Tevoda (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main tree --Michielverbeek 21:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Chau Say Tevoda (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Wejście do ulicy Smitha - Chinatown Food Street (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Uliczka boczna w Ann Siang Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Biblioteka (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Chau Say Tevoda (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Jakubhal 16:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Fosa przy bramie południowej (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 13:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Główna świątynia (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Chau Say Tevoda (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 22:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama północna (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama północna (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby przy drodze do świątyni (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Fosa wokół świątyni (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby strażników przed wejściem (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 14:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Ta Prohm (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 14:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Rzeźby strażników przed wejściem (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan, Fosa wokół świątyni (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama północna (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (63).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (58).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Baphuon (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Brama południowa (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół Chrystusowy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Thepthidaram (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 21:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Plac obok bastionu Middleburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A pity that people can be seen. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Taras Słoni (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Banteay Kdei (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Right side is a bit blurry, but still ok --Poco a poco 17:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Łodzie w przystani Noppharat Thara (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat, Małpa (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Świątynia Chan She Shu Yuen (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum gubernatora (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 18:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 18:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Jayatataka Baray (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Preah Khan (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Thom, Bajon (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Baksei Chamkrong (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date templates[edit]

Hi Halavar
There is a category for Poland here [[1]]. Once you have added the date category you require you then have to create the category with this [[2]] hope this helps. I have also set up the day date category for your thailand image that you uploaded here [[3]]