User talk:Halavar/Archive9

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Restauracja Mepetubani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (07).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Katedra Sioni (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Katedra Sioni (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 17:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Katedra Sioni (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Dywany na ulicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 17:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ulica Erekle II (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 09:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ulica Erekle II (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Domy na Starym Mieście (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew Dżwaris Mama (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wielka Synagoga (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wielka Synagoga (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kościół Matki Boskiej Noraszen (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Katedra Sioni (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wielka Synagoga (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wielka Synagoga (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wielka Synagoga (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though I'd rather increase sharpness a bit. --ElBute 10:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Drewniane drzwi w starym domu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the shade, but good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Tablica elektroniczna z kursami walut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 10:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sioni Cathedral, Tbilisi, Georgia. Old bell tower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Budynki na ulicy Kote Abkhazi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It might have been sharper and less noisy, but it's good enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 20:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew Metechi (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have been a little sharper. but good for me.--Famberhorst 17:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 21:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew Metechi (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ulica Erekle II (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ulica Ioane Szawteli (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pałac królowej Daredżan (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 17:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Podium na placu Europy przed podpisaniem umowy stowarzyszeniowej Gruzja-UE (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 17:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik króla Wachtanga Gorgasali i cerkiew Metechi.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik króla Wachtanga Gorgasali i cerkiew Metechi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 17:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie Orbeliani (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kościół Matki Boskiej Noraszen (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 11:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew Metechi (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 18:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 18:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orbeliani Baths in Tbilisi, Georgia. Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sulfur baths in Abanotubani, Tbilisi, Georgia. Bath № 5..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Popiersie Heydəra Əliyeva (01).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The bust of Heydar Aliyev in Tbilisi, Georgia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 20:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pałac królowej Daredżan (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Zbawiciela (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Zbawiciela (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ruiny twierdzy Narikala (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy. --XRay 17:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (35).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some perspective correction on the left is needed --A.Savin 13:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)  Done You were right, thanks! New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 13:04, 21 June 2016 (UTC) OK --A.Savin 13:50, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Queen Darejan's palace in Tbilisi. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ruiny twierdzy Narikala (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 19:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ratusz (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Łaźnie siarkowe w Abanotubani, Płytki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Cerkiew Świętego Jerzego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Cerkiew Świętego Jerzego (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Rzeka Rioni widziana z Mostu Łańcuchowego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Stary dom, ulica Newport 29 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Stary dom, ulica Newport 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Płaskorzeźba obok stacji benzynowej (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Rzeka Rioni widziana z Mostu Łańcuchowego (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Rzeka Rioni widziana z Mostu Łańcuchowego (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Cerkiew Świętego Jerzego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George Church. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. View from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Wernaszen - Spitakawor (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (55).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Twierdza Ukimerioni i Katedra Bagrati (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Ruiny Twierdzy Ukimerioni (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:51, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Ruiny Twierdzy Ukimerioni (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Rzeka Rioni widziana z Mostu Łańcuchowego (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 22:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Widoki z twierdzy Ukimerioni (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Płaskorzeźba obok stacji benzynowej (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. W.carter 08:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Flagi Ukrainy i Gruzji obok Białego Mostu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment MAy be QI, but the blue garbage at the top is disturbing. Please try to clone it out. --XRay 04:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)  Done I did a better crop. Please see a new version. --Halavar 18:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC) OK now. Thank you. --XRay 05:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Ckaltubo, Dworzec autobusowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Ckaltubo, Stara stacja benzynowa obok dworca autobusowego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and cool place --Poco a poco 17:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Banoja, Znaki informacyjne na skrzyżowaniu dróg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might have been a little bit sharper, but good for me.--Famberhorst 16:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Ckaltubo, Stara stacja benzynowa obok dworca autobusowego (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Rezerwat przyrody Sataplia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me.--Famberhorst 17:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ruiny twierdzy Narikala (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Ckaltubo, Gruziński chłopak w samochodzie na dworcu autobusowym (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall, not a bad pic but it is a bit too bright and it could be a little cropped (see note) to focus more on the boy. W.carter 10:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the suggestions. I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 20:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Much better, now you notice the boy more. Good quality. W.carter 12:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Ruiny Twierdzy Ukimerioni (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Jebulon 09:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Soft, needs some sharpening IMO.--Jebulon 09:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)  Done You were right. Thanks for the hint! New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again --Halavar 13:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC) Support Not perfect but better, thanks--Jebulon 10:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The composition, subject and light are excellent, but it is not sharp enough. I wish other opinions.--Jebulon 09:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)  Done You were right. Thanks for the hint! New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again --Halavar 13:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC) Support Not perfect but better, thanks--Jebulon 10:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe a bit overprocessed, just a bit. --Hubertl 04:56, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:56, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:56, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition and light, ok quality. Maybe you can remove some noise from the sky--ArildV 10:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments and the same comment here --ArildV 10:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK but I suggest a slight left crop to get this more symmetrical. That would be more pleasant, wouldn't it? --Basotxerri 18:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 22:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC) Much better now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice street scene --Daniel Case 03:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and color --Daniel Case 03:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but acceptable. --Daniel Case 03:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gelati Monastery - Cathedral of the Nativity of the Virgin. Gelati, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia. View from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Ruiny Twierdzy Ukimerioni (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 12:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2016 в Україні

Вітаємо!

Триває міжнародний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінації: «Цивільні споруди доби Гетьманщини» та «Національний заповідник "Софія Київська"».

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки», 10:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in difficult conditions -- George Chernilevsky 04:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Kaplica (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Znak drogowy i plakat wyborczy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tutaj lepiej, choć lewy kościółek zdaje się kłaniać w prawo ;) --Pudelek 09:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good for sharpness and lighting, though I think perhaps a small perspective correction could be applied; the building's side walls lean outwards slightly to the sides when you approach the top.--Peulle 21:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 21:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Support I think that's OK. Perhaps still a little distorted on the top right, but generally good enough for QI, IMO.--Peulle 06:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Monastyr Gelati (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly unsharp to the upper end, but still OK. --Basotxerri 15:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy but OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Kaplica (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Noise reduction especially in the sky would suit the image well. --Ermell 06:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Cerkiew Archanioła (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Wielka Synagoga (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Mocameta, Klasztor Mocameta (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Imeretia, Gelati, Kaplica (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Aleja Szoty Rustaweli, Płaskorzeźba na budynku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The quality is OK but as I suppose that the bricks are of the same size it seems that there is some distortion. Perhaps you could correct it (by a horizontal correction)? --Basotxerri 14:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done You were right, thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC) That's it! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Fontanna na centralnym placu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for a Q1photo, also perspective good enough. IMO I would crop more of the top for emphasizing the fountain --Michielverbeek 15:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Cerkiew św. Nino (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Fontanna na centralnym placu (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Fontanna na centralnym placu (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Mężczyzni grający w szachy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Wielka Synagoga (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 05:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Cerkiew Przemienienia Pańskiego (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Cerkiew św. Nino (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Fontanna na centralnym placu (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:49, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Gelati Monastery. Gelati, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia. View from N-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment please change scope, to inform the exposure of the photo os the church, the category is enough to precise the place (it is unnecessary to precise "Gelati, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia.". Olivier LPB (talk) 15:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 Done --Halavar (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment in fact i prefer the scope "Gelati Monastery, Saint George church exposure from NW. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment I do that for 3 years here, in Valued images project, and there wasn't any problem. --Halavar (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Gelati Monastery. Gelati, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Mathieu MD (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Cerkiew Przemienienia Pańskiego (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina, Pawilon ochronny (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina, Pawilon ochronny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Hotel "Intourist" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Ratusz (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Cerkiew Przemienienia Pańskiego (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Płot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus a bit soft but all in all just over the line for QI. --W.carter 18:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Dzwonnica (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus a bit soft in some places but over all a good pic. QI. --W.carter 18:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 18:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Synagogue in Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. View from North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lado Meskhishvili State Drama Theatre in Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Twierdza Bebriscyche (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:44, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (01).jpg

And also:

• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (02).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (03).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (06).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (07).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (08).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (09).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (13).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (14).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (15).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (16).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (17).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (18).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (19).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (21).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina, Pawilon ochronny (01).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina, Pawilon ochronny (02).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina, Pawilon ochronny (03).jpg
• File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina, Pawilon ochronny (04).jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 16:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati, dzwonnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Dom Mirzy Rizy Chana (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good decission on the crop with the car. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 16:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gori, Muzeum Stalina (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment No FoP in Georgia? --A.Savin 12:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Klasztor Samtawro, Nagrobek (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This pic is saved by the grass, had it not been there the base would have been cut off by this crop. As it is now, QI. --W.carter 09:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Dom Mirzy Rizy Chana (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting building. Overall good quality and a nice photo but perhaps close to oversatured.--ArildV 19:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Dom Mirzy Rizy Chana (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please remove some CA (left side).--ArildV 07:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)  Done You were right, thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 16:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you, QI now.--ArildV 19:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Pomnik w parku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (035).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Katedra Bagrati (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Instytucja Świętego Franciszka (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynek-memoriał Proklamacji Niepodległości (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Architektury Malezji (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Znaczków Pocztowych (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Franciszka Ksawerego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight crop, but still good quality. --Smial 10:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Meczet Kampung Hulu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (064).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (056).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bagrati Cathedral - bell tower. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. View from N-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

WLM

Hello! Sorry But WLM ended... :(— Beqabai (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Pawła (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynek-memoriał Proklamacji Niepodległości (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Samtavro Monastery - church of the Transfiguration. Mtskheta, Georgia. Church portal..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 19:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Tamilski Kościół Metodystów (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół Chrystusowy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 15:01, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stadhuys (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (077).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Architektury Malezji (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 10:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Pawła (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kroton 10:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gruzja, Widoki z pociągu na trasie między Tbilisi a Kutaisi (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. DoF small. f/8 may be better. --XRay 06:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gruzja, Widoki z pociągu na trasie między Tbilisi a Kutaisi (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. DoF small. f/8 may be better. --XRay 06:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół Chrystusowy (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kościół św. Pawła (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 15:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - The foreground is sharp and the middleground and background are softer. I think that's OK and this is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 11:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Dworzec kolejowy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Budynek na ulicy 9 kwietnia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Znaki szlaków turystycznych (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Rzeźba obok Crowne Plaza Borjomi (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stadhuys (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wieża Zegarowa na Placu Holenderskim (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 16:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Widok na miasto z płaskowyżu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Znaki szlaków turystycznych (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Dworzec kolejowy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Widok na miasto spod katedry Bagrati (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Green is oversaturated. --A.Savin 16:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC) GQ --A.Savin 16:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 12:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Nowoczesny most na rzece Bordżomula (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Rzeka Bordżomula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Very good composition and quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Park Besika Gabaszwili, Diabelski młyn (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Tamilski Kościół Metodystów (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kutaisi, Tablice informacyjne odległości do miast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Sufficient quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Dworzec kolejowy (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Znaki szlaków turystycznych (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Widok na miasto z płaskowyżu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Meczet Kampung Kling (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - There appears to be a dust spot to the right of the minaret, a bit above the middle of it. So please remove that or explain what else it is, if it really was in the picture. Otherwise, the image looks to me like it's of acceptable quality, though I'd welcome a second opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 11:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment Could be a bird, too. I think I'd remove it. A bit noisy, the image, and there are some CAs one post on the left handside. --Basotxerri 15:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment Perfect, thank you! OK for me, I hope that Ikan Kekek agrees... --Basotxerri 18:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC) I do agree. Thanks, guys. -- Ikan Kekek 03:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Widok na wzgórza otaczające miasto (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - The focus is a little soft, but quite a nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's tilted to the left --A.Savin 14:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 16:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC) GQ --A.Savin 02:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Park Besika Gabaszwili, Diabelski młyn (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Widok na miasto z kolejki linowej (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Park Besika Gabaszwili, Diabelski młyn (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Hotel Wana Riverside (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Plac z fontanną (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Park Centralny (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Znaczków Pocztowych (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uplisciche, Rezerwat historyczno-architektoniczny (060).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Młyn wodny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Bastion Middleburg (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Somewhat weak support from me, as the focus is a bit tenuous, but I think this is good enough for QI, though only just. -- Ikan Kekek 11:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one. --Tsui 10:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Informacja turystyczna (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Building is slightly tilted to the left, please correct this. --W.carter 10:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 14:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 20:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Tsui 10:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Departament Muzeów (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Islamu (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very weak  Support Sharpness/DoF should be better (f/5.6). --XRay 11:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Bastion Middleburg (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice artistic houses, but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 20:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Paul's Church. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tamil Methodist Church. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malacca Stamp Museum. Malacca City, Malaysia. Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Francis Xavier. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. North exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useul --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - I'm bothered by the crop at the near left that prevents the entire museum from being in the picture, but overall, the picture is good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - When I was in Malacca in 1975 or '76, it looked like the foreground of this photo, not the tall buildings in the middleground. Anyway, the photo is a bit hazy, but I think its quality is sufficient for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 09:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wieża Taming Sari (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - A little hazy, but I think the focus on the tower is sufficient. It's possible others may find fault with the composition, but I kind of like the tower being sandwiched between two coconut trees. -- Ikan Kekek 09:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Sufficient focus to the cycle rickshaw for me. -- Ikan Kekek 11:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum UMNO (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 12:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Ludowe, Stara lokomotywa "Sungai Lukut" (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 13:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Sprzedaż biletów na Wieżę Taming Sari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wieża Taming Sari (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 13:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Ludowe, Stary samolot "Lang Rajawali" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be better without the fence, but still ok --Poco a poco 15:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Ludowe, Stara lokomotywa "Sungai Lukut" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Categorization of Armenian images

Hello Halavar, thank your for refining the categories of my images in Armenia, and also Georgia. Usually that is something I take care of after a few days (or rather after I upload all pictures I've to upload) but thank you anyhow for the help. I see you are also travelling around quite a lot. Best regards! Poco² 14:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum gubernatora (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The light was a bit hazy that day, but a quality photo, nevertheless. -- Ikan Kekek 10:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary brytyjski nagrobek (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and a sobering reminder of how quickly a loved and esteemed person is forgotten about, their gravestone eroded. -- Ikan Kekek 10:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widok na miasto z dawnej Twierdzy Malakka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus is a little soft at full size, but good quality, overall, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 10:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Pojazdy opancerzone obok Budynku-memoriału Proklamacji Niepodległości (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Moderate support for this promotion. Low depth of field; armoured trucks themselves are a little soft. But still good enough for QI, in my opinion. I will add some information about their names to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek 10:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowa riksza rowerowa (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I think Muzium UMNO should also be mentioned, so I hope you don't mind if I add it to your file description and tags. -- Ikan Kekek 10:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum gubernatora (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 10:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary brytyjski nagrobek (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Famberhorst 15:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stary brytyjski nagrobek (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although it would be great if you could raise shadows a bit for the sake of legibility of the inscription. --ElBute 10:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)  Done You're right. Thanks for the hint. --Halavar 11:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wejście do zabytkowej części miasta wpisanej na Listę Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tourist Information Centre. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. View from N-E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Malajska panna młoda (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Plac Holenderski (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Pojazdy opancerzone obok Budynku-memoriału Proklamacji Niepodległości (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum Malajów i Świata Islamskiego (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Muzeum UMNO (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Malajska panna młoda (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Plac Holenderski (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Stadhuys, Tablica informacyjna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Budynki nad rzeką Malakka (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Widok na miasto spod twierdzy Bebriscyche (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please improve sharpness and contrast. Very soft and dusty. --XRay 06:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC) Very weak  Support IMO better and good enough. Minor perspective problems. --XRay 05:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Kolorowy budynek na Jalan Tukang Besi (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Dom Orangutana na ulicy Lorong Hang Jebat (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wejście do Jonker Walk - słynnej dzielnicy chińskiej (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widok na rzekę Malakka z mostu na ulicy Jambatan Tan Kim Seng (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, in my opinion, and I like the reflections on the water. -- Ikan Kekek 13:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Plac Holenderski (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Chińska kaplica na rogu ulic- Jalan Tokong i Jalan Portugis (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Świątynia Cheng Hoon Teng (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Dom Orangutana na ulicy Lorong Hang Jebat (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Tabliczka z nazwą ulicy - Jalan Tukang Besi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wejście do Jonker Walk - słynnej dzielnicy chińskiej (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widok na rzekę Malakka z mostu na ulicy Jambatan Tan Kim Seng (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Plac Holenderski (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)