User talk:Gunnex/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 10

Ficheiro:Saturday Night Live.svg

Olá Gunnex, recentemente fiz o upload da imagem Saturday Night Live.svg, gostaria de saber se a imagem pode ficar no Commons mesmo, estou com quase certeza porque ela é formada de letras comuns, mais como não custa nada perguntar. Boas contribuições. Pablodiego15 (talk) 19:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Night Live.svg =  Keep :-) Gunnex (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Acertei, gostei disso. :D Pablodiego15 (talk) 20:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renomear arquivo

Olá. Poderias renomear o arquivo File:Rolante rural.jpg para Riozinho rural? Explico: Quando tirei a foto estava visitando a cidade de Rolante e meu GPS não conseguia identificar o lugar. Agora, no Panoramio vi que era no municipio de Riozinho.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Não deu certo (problemas com o banco de dados - provávelmente pela dimensão do arquivo = 7.998 × 2.261, 5,59 MB). Perdeu-se toda informação etc. Você poderia recarregar o arquivo sob outro título (que não seja File:Riozinho rural.jpg)? Ou - alternativamente - editar o arquivo File:Riozinho rural.jpg e inserir toda informação (descrição/licenciamento/categorias/etc.) necessária? Obrigado. Gunnex (talk) 00:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Acho que ficou tudo Ok. Inseri as informações. Obrigado>--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 11:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montagem de Florianópolis.jpg

that's bullshit, "you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.", so File:Montagem de Florianópolis.jpg follow this. And if you do not like how it is, is not a reason for exclusion, you fixe the way you that you like. I think indecent this type of action. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That´s no bullshit. Attribuition for each part of montage needed, as it is not entirely you own work. Btw, 2 files still missing... Gunnex (talk) 09:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
again "...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.", so, if I put a link, that's enough. And I fixed (e fiquei pensando pq vc não arrumou tudo...). Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 06:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

O Commons está precisando de muitas fotos do Rio de Janeiro. Não tem problema, pode apagar todos os da lista. Pouca gente conhece o Commons, e não cadastra aqui para carregar as fotos. Não tem como me recorrer a ajuda de fotógrafos amadores. Só se cadastrando aqui. É que não estava fazendo um tempo bom para tirar fotos, e estava ansioso por fotos. Gunnex, você não me bloqueia se eu continuar assim? Eu pedir para as pessoas se cadastrarem no Commons e carregar fotos, é o mesmo que pedir para não fazer isso. Só queria contribuir. Eduardo P (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo, continue o seu bom trabalho mas evite carregar material de outras páginas com licenciamento duvidoso e/ou restrito. E se estiver sem tempo para tirar fotos que tal dar uma olhada no Flickr. Esta busca por exemplo lista imagens relacionadas com "Laranjeiras Rio de Janeiro" que foram licenciados pelos autores com Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike, portanto compatível com o licenciamento aqui no Commons. Okay, há também alguns disparates nos resultados, mas mesmo assim vale uma visita. Esta busca sobre conteúdo "livre" você pode repetir usando a pesquisa avançada = http://www.flickr.com/search/?l=commderiv&m=text&q= . Existe também uma predefinição {{Flickr free}} que você pode integrar na sua página de usuário. Para carregar imagens livre do Flickr no Commons use este bot: É bem simples. Detalhes: Commons:Imagens do Flickr. Gunnex (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ele permitiu o uso das fotos. Teria como você manter as fotos no facebook? Eduardo P (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ele não pode permitir o uso porque ele não é o autor das imagens... Alias...

... foram roubados do Google Streetview. E as outras fotos foram roubados de outros sites:

Gunnex (talk) 08:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Boas. Criei um template para usuários do Rio Grande do Sul baseado no do Brasil. Estou com um problema para traduzir para o pt-br. Podes me ajudar ou me indicar alguem que possa?

Que tal adaptar o texto de pt:Wikipédia:Userbox/Rio Grande do Sul? Ver também pt:Categoria:!Userboxes por localização/Brasil/Estados. Gunnex (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vou tentar. Valeu.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos de carnaval

Gunnex, queria inventar uma categoria no Commons, assim: Categoria:Carnaval no Rio de Janeiro por ano. E por aí vai: Categoria:Carnaval no Rio de Janeiro em 2013, etc. Não sei como colocaria isso num inglês certo. Abraço. Eduardo P (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assim --> Category:Carnival of Rio de Janeiro 2013 ? Gunnex (talk) 13:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sim. Seria bom colocar em categorias por ano: 2012, 2011, 2010, etc. Eduardo P (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --> 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Gunnex (talk) 20:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Dear Gunnex,

first of all... I am Italian, so sorry for my bad English :)

I saw that you are going to delete pratically all photos I have uploaded. Sorry, you are right about many of them. I was a novice and so I did not know many rules (about copyright, for example). But all photos about the actors "Ruggero Dondi" and "Salvatore Landolina" I think they do not violate copyright. I have, infact, the original photos and I did the scans (I know personally the actors and I have their consent). Of course, I cannot demonstrate you this, but I please you to trust in me. All the others are a violation of copyright. Sorry I will try to upload them correctly. Thank you, Martin8 (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martin8! Thx for your response + don´t worry. I am German. My english is not better than yours :-)) I copied your answer at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Martin8 and made some comments. Do you have more information about the Italian actors related files? Year of creation and/or publishing? Local (Italy or somewhere else)? Please comment only at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Martin8 for aggregating all information at one page and feel free to edit the related files, providing eventually more info.Gunnex (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duvida sobre direitos autorais

Fiquei na dúvida sobre essa foto: File:Casadeartes.jpg. O uploader coloca que não havia copyright indicado na página onde ele buscou a foto. Isso é o suficiente para considerar livre? Te passo o caso.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 12:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --> Commons:Deletion requests/File:Casadeartes.jpg. Obrigado pelo aviso. Gunnex (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rio São Francisco III.jpg - copyright

Hi Gunnex! Thank you so much for your concer with possible copyright violation and thank you even more for your attention to the author's name. You're 100% right. I'm Oona Castro, the photographer of those pictures, and I decided to authorize comercial use too, which I can do, whenever - I just can not remove it now. Since I first published NC and then removed it, I don't see any problem. Should I add a note in the Overmundo website saying I do allow commercial use? This is also collaborative and I myself had published there (I was formerly the executive director for Instituto Overmundo - an equivalent relation Instituto Overmundo - Overmundo Website / Wikimedia Foundation - Wikipedia, Commons etc). Thanks again! --Oona (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help!!

Gunnex, essas imagens não existem na wikipédia em português, só na anglófona. Queria trazer pra wikipédia lusófona? en:File:GOZOCOATOFARMS.jpg e en:File:Mgarr Ix-Xini large.jpg. Qeria ilustrar o artigo Gozo (ilha). Agradeço a atenção. Eduardo P (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gozo + File:Flag of Gozo.svg não servem? Gunnex (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Direitos de autor

Poderias dar uma opinião neste caso? Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museu Municipal Carlos Nobre— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulo rsmenezes (talk • contribs)

✓ Done --> [1]. Gunnex (talk) 21:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 00:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"From now on I will avoid the category Building interiors". Por favor, não :-). O negócio é evitar fotografias de obras que possam ser protegidas por direitos autoriais e/ou que não se encontram em domínio público. Ou melhor: Evitar fotografias que tem como motivo central uma obra eventualmente protegida (exemplo). Porque há tolerâncias: Ver por exemplo File:Museu Valencia de la Il·lustració i la Modernitat, interior.JPG, fotografia tirada num museu espanhol. COM:FOP#Spain - de senso comum - não se aplique para locais "indoors", mas mesmo assim o carregamento no Commons é tolerado --> via Commons:De minimis (e/ou a tradução Commons:De minimis/pt-br).Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Conclave 12.03.2012 black smoke.jpeg

You have removed my photo! Why? I was there. I placed two photos of black smoke. G1a21 (talk) 08:09, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I marked this image as copyright violation considering previously published via http://election.democraticunderground.com/10022498469 (© 2001 - 2013 Democratic Underground, LLC.) = http://tribfox40.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/smoke.jpeg (last modified: 12.03.2013, 20:01). If you feel this might be an error, consider to use Commons:Undeletion requests. Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Copyright inspector Barnstar

Hallo!

Diesen "Copyright inspector Barnstar" hast du zu Recht! Besten Dank für deine Arbeit! Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke ;-). Grüße zurück. Gunnex (talk) 08:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gerne doch! Hättest du diesen Barnstar nicht bereits, dann würde ich ihn dir verleihen! Viel Spaß beim weiteren Mitwirken! Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Common Benjamin Trinks

Dear Gunnex,

I kindly ask you not to delete the pictures I uploaded from Benjamin Trinks because I´ve shot the pictures in-person. I am a still photographer for the second German television channel, known as ZDF. Benjamin Trinks asked me during the shootings of "Terra X" und "UMUV" to shoot some personal pictures from him at the shooting place and asked me to upload them here that they can be relinked. The historic pictures have been shot in August 2012 in Berlin, at "Rundfunkhaus Nalepastraße" at the German river "Spree". The picture of UMUV has been shot in Litua in 2012. So please do not delete these pictures.

Thanks and best regards Terra History X— Preceding unsigned comment added by TerraHistoryX (talk • contribs)

Hi Terra History X! Please use Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TerraHistoryX to contest the deletion. The already deleted files (the red underlined file names at your talk page) were previsously published via (example) http://www.tvspielfilm.de/kino/filmarchiv/film/rosamunde-pilcher-der-gestohlene-sommer,4660903,ApplicationMovie.html (credits: "ZDF, Jon Ailes", © TV SPIELFILM). Btw, I am only the deletion requester - as only an administrator will delete the questionable files - and this will depends on the discussion and on your reasonable argumentation. Btw, ich spreche Deutsch, aber auf Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TerraHistoryX bitte lieber auf Englisch argumentieren, damit es für Anderssprachige nachvollziehbar bleibt. Grüße. Gunnex (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm needing help about adding copyright tags

hello gunnex. first of all forgive my ill english. couple of days ago I did upload bunch of photoes at the same time and i didn't know about adding copyright information, I agree with my mistake. now i've just uploade an images of a physical music album which I've purchased one copy and it seems I can't add proper information and tags to it. I need help about Uploading cover albums. but if it's generally illegal to upload album cover tell me about it and please do know that there is no mean to copyright violations by me. File:Foals_Holy_Fire.jpg— Preceding unsigned comment added by Masadaynaka (talk • contribs)

Hi Masadaynaka! I think your question was already answered via Commons:Help desk#Copyright help regarding File:Foals Holy Fire.jpg. For further details, please read Commons:Licensing carefully (note that this page has some translated versions - maybe also in your language). If you still have doubts, feel free to contact me, but please: try first to familiarize yourself with the basics of the license policy of Wikimedia Commons. Gunnex (talk) 18:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dili-Palácio do Governo.jpg

Hallo Gunnex! Der Fotograf hat das Bild selbst hochgeladen. Ich habe ihn via Facebook kennengelernt. Er war selbst 1968/70 in Timor und hat zahlreiche Bilder bereits auf FB veröffentlicht. der Blog verwendet Fotos aus FB, Flickr und anderen Quellen von verschiedenen Rechteinhabern. Gruß, --Patrick (talk) 19:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. ✓ Done via [2]. Gunnex (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Sousa

Boa noite Gunnex,

Enviei, para "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org", no passado dia 22 de Janeiro os "copyright permissions" relativos às imagens das obras da minha mãe Teresa Sousa, que o Gunnex marcou para eliminação e foram elimoinadas do Commons.

Decorridos 2 meses, ainda não recebi qualque resposta. Uma vez que foi o Gunnex a desencadear o porcesso de retiradas das imagens, agradeço que agora desencadeie a respectiva reposição, uma vez que considero já ter decorrido suficiente tempo para o Wikimedia Commons dar uma resposta.

Refiro ainda que as imagens são de obras inéditas da minha mãe, Teresa Sousa, falecida há 50 anos. Não estão em mais lado nenhum. Apenas na internet se encontram reproduções na página do Centro de Arte Moderna da Fundação Calouse Gulbenkian (http://www.cam.gulbenkian.pt/index.php?article=66999&visual=2&langId=1&ngs=1&queryParams=,autor%7CSousa%20Teresa&queryPage=0&position=1), e num blog (http://blogdaruanove.blogs.sapo.pt/414688.html). Veja, por favor, ver a entrada "Teresa Sousa" na Wikipedia. Uma página de uma artista plástica, sem imagens das suas obras, de nada serve.

Cumprimentos,João Sousa Carvalho (talk)

Related User talk:Gunnex/Archive 2#Teresa_Sousa
Hi! I am sorry for this. The current permissions-commons queue is 75 days. Anyway, see new request of status at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Teresa Sousa II. Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oi! User:Érico Júnior Wouters, um membro da equipe OTRS, tentou achar o seu email mas não conseguiu. Qual foi o seu endereço de email que usou para mandar a mensagem? Foi mesmo no 22 de janeiro de 2013 que mandou a mensagem? Para permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? Gunnex (talk) 09:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daghoni khanqah.JPG

I marked this image and two other images like this photo uploaded by this user. I notice you tagged several images uploaded by this user as copyvios in the past. If you think this is a copy vio, feel free to create a DR on this and the other two images. I passed it since I thought it could be the flickr account owners own work and at 1024 X 681 pixel resolution, there would not be any camera metadata. But of course I am not perfect. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thx for the advice. Per updated Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by محمد افضل apparently all files coming from this Flickr account = Flickrvios:
Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I will revoke (or revert) my flickrpass to the 3 images that I marked from this account and will vote to  Delete in the DR you launched. This uploader is clearly doing a mass copyright violation. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Hi Gunnex. I've nuked the files, blocked the uploader, and blacklisted the Flickr acct. INeverCry 00:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thx! Gunnex (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Teresa Sousa (OTRS)

Oi, Gunnex. Eu vou procurar esse e-mail ainda hoje e depois te digo se encontrei ou não, e qual foi a resposta. Érico Wouters msg 23:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eu tentei achar, mas não consegui. Sabe por qual o e-mail usado por ele para mandar a mensagem? Isso iria ajudar bastante. Érico Wouters msg 00:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado pelo esforço! Não conheço o e-mail que o usuário usou para mandar a mensagem. Contactei o usuário para obter mais informações. Gunnex (talk) 09:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bom dia! Eu mandei a permissão do meu mail pessoal para o mail permissions-commons@wikimedia.org às 23H19 do dia 22 de Janeiro de 2013. Se for necessário poderei reenviar o mail de novo, pois também já o reenviei no dia 11 de Março de 2013 às 23H11 para info-pt@wikimedia.org. Cumprimentos, João Sousa Carvalho (talk) 12:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --> per [3] = todos os ficheiros relacionados foram restaurados e receberam o OTRS-ticket. Gunnex (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, Gunnex. Obrigado por informar. Eu não tinha achado porque acho que o e-mail era mais antigo e não é fácil achar e-mails mais antigos, especialmente se o e-mail não for informado. Abraço. Érico Wouters msg 23:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted files

I kindly ask you not to delete the pictures I uploaded from places in Paraguay because I´ve shot the pictures in-person. I live in San Ignacio, so why would I take pics from other accounts if I can take them in person. Hope you can help me, I just wanted to contribute and share the pics of my country, province and city. --I.AM.LATIN (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda

Oi Gunnex,

Eu carreguei esta imagem e depois fiquei em dúvida se isso é VDA. Como não entendo nada do assunto (principalmente na Espanha), você pode ajudar? É uma foto de um mapa em lugar público aberto à visitação e sem restrição para tomada de fotografias (Cathedral of Seville - no corredor entre o número 82 e 86 na foto, logo depois da entrada, que é no 79).

Valeu! José Luiz disc 14:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! A foto envolve diversos aspectos de copyrights que - no meu ver - justifica abrir uma discussão em Commons:Deletion requests/File:Floor plan - Cathedral of Seville.JPG. Espontaneamente, diria: sem problemas, mas para esclarecer dúvidas restantes, melhor ouvir uma outra opinião. Gunnex (talk) 20:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thx. Vamos ver no que dá. José Luiz disc 01:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Foi excluída. Acho que era de fato um trabalho derivado de uma obra com copyright, certo? José Luiz disc 10:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Propagandas?

Fiquei um tempo fora e quando voltei notei que o commons esta com propagandas. Isso é correto? ou foi algum tipo de invasão?--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Esqueça. Descobri 2 plugins do Firefox que estavam fazendo isso. Já os removi e o problema acabou. Para ficar registrado, os plugins são:
  • Dealply Shopping 2.0
  • FindLyrics 1.110

--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jamie Parker Henry V 2012.png

Hi. I know it was a while ago, and I'm sure you'll tell me you tag hundreds of files, but in this case you didn't provide any sort of description of the problem. The problem (it's a photo of a copyrighted poster) is of course obvious to you and probably to most admins, but you left the uploader rather bewildered. If you could take a few moments to explain the problem in future, it would be greatly appreciated and you might even educate someone. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! In critical cases, I usually (additionally to the automatic {{No permission since}}/{{No license since}}-tag edit and user notification) leave a message in the related file (regulary highlighted with {{Info}} to call attention for the uploader and the checking admin), what problem I encountered. This additional info (as a secondary edit) is also visible in the file history (sometimes only "+info", sometimes with full text of info). As an alternative I usually notify the uploader in some critical cases directly (recent examples I/II). Well, I said "usually" :-), maybe I failed here in this case. Anyway, you are completely right and I´ll try to optimize this issue in the future. Thx for the advice. Greetings. Gunnex (talk) 17:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viridiano Custódio.jpg

Então tu quis me dizer que a fonte da imagem é do Facebook? --Viridianosb (talk) 15:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sim. Mas você roubou a foto. Sem permissão (e sem licença) de Viridiano Custódio via COM:OTRS a foto será apagada. Gunnex (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apagar imagens carregadas

No Wikimedia Commons tem como apagar as imagens carregadas? Por exemplo, eu carreguei uma imagem para o Wikimedia Commons, e depois mais tarde se eu não quero mais aquela imagem carregada na minha conta, tem como excluir? --Viridianosb (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isto depende do caso, mas normalmente não é possível. Gunnex (talk) 22:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda em File:Arenatricolorcontraflu2013.JPG

Fui notificado por um usuário de que uma imagem que inclui File:Arenatricolorcontraflu2013.JPG estaria sem indicação de autor, mas está bem expresso que eu sou o "titular dos direitos autorais desta obra". O que preciso acrescentar mais? Obrigado desde já pela ajuda. Artur Vaz (talk) 14:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! Deve ser um engano. Reverti a edição. Gunnex (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado... Artur Vaz (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Script

Com quem eu posso falar para criar um script? Quando carrego fotos coloco sempre na categoria mais próxima possível e então tenho de criar todas as outras categorias dependentes. Isso consome bastante tempo. Se houver um meio de automatizar seria bem mais facil.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá! Conheço seu esforço nas categorias relacionadas com (entre outros) Rio Grande do Sul, mas hoje não vejo nenhuma possibilidade de automatizar isto com um "script". Ou melhor: Commons:Bots/Work requests / Commons:Bots pode ser uma solução (se um dos donos dos bots estiver disponível para colaborar) mas 1. o bot necessita de muita informação para funcionar, 2. não conheço a opinião do Commons, criando centenas de categorias vazias e 3. a árvore de categorias planejada deve ser discutida antes para refletir sobre aspectos de padronização etc. Outra solução (provisória) seria categorizar o ficheiro com a categoria mais próxima possível (mas sem criar) e com uma categoria relacionada já existente (deixando a criação da categoria em vermelho para um outro usuário). Aliás, você já deve conhecer Help:Gadget-Cat-a-lot que ajuda bastante na categorização, ou? Gunnex (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Carreguei esta imagem para explicar melhor File:CatholicChurches Diag.jpg. A ferramenta que proponho seria bem especifica, neste caso ela criaria todas as categorias relacionadas com a categoria Catholic churche em um determinado município. Não existe a questão de categorias vazias pois elas existem para conter outras categorias. Funcionaria da seguinte forma: seriam informados o municipio, o estado e o país e a ferramenta criaria a árvore de categorias automaticamente. Sempre partindo da categoria mais inferior para a mais superior. é similar a ferramenta de upload em alguns aspectos. Claro que esta ferramenta deve ser de uso restrito a usuários interessados em categorias. Quanto a deixar em vermelho para outro criar, não consigo fazer uma coisa pela metade. mais ou menos = mal feito. Se tiver alguma sugestão de alguem que eu possa entrar em contato me avise.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 23:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... File:CatholicChurches Diag.jpg é uma orientação, mas para um bot meio complicado. O negócio é dividir a tarefa do bot para não complicar as coisas. Exemplo:
Partindo da Category:Municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul...
--> Category:Aceguá ( = [[Category:{{MUNICIPALITY}}]] ) --> if not exist Category:Architecture of Aceguá, create [[Category:Architecture of {{MUNICIPALITY}}]] with [[Category:{{MUNICIPALITY}}]] + [[Category:Architecture of Brazil by city|{{MUNICIPALITY}}]] + [[Category:Architecture of Rio Grande do Sul|{{MUNICIPALITY}}]]
E assim por diante...
Eu não conheço um operador de bot. O negócio é apresentar a tarefa do bot em Commons:Bots/Work requests e... esperar :-)
Gunnex (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado pela atenção.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 22:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dupes

Oi Gunnex, quando for caso de duplicados, por favor use o {{Duplicate}} ou {{Dupe}}, agiliza o processo (passa à frente dos speedy normais) e evita confusões como a que eu fiz. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 18:47, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olá! Primeiro... welcome on board again :-) (7 meses de ausência já é meio - como vou dizer - preocupante...). Em relação à {{Duplicate}} (que conheço) só agora percebi que Category:Duplicate é uma sub-categoria de Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, portanto tem toda razão. Pensava que Category:Duplicate seria uma categoria de manutenção e que os ficheiros assim marcados precisariam mais um edit de um outro usuário para cair na speedy. Então, obrigado pela dica. Abraço, Gunnex (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado pelas boas vindas! Tenho andado bastante ocupado, de facto, e não tem sobrado muito tempo para aqui, mas é um projecto que tenho sempre presente, todos os dias. A ver se avanço mais qualquer coisa nisto, outra vez... Isso do {{Dupe}} é prático, pois geralmente são eliminações incontroversas, e quando alguém tem pouco tempo, ou não está para ter muitas chatices, vai lá e despacha aquilo, de modo que é uma cat que anda sempre vazia. :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell

As fotos foram todas tiradas por mim excepto a da ponte do qual eu tenho autorização do proprietário para postar, apagar essas fotos não tem cabimento nenhum.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Henriquehorta (talk • contribs)

Copy&paste de imagens de diversas contas do Panoramio, blogs etc., tudo isto sem permissão e declarando isto aqui aindo como "obra própria"... tsss. Gunnex (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O seu trabalho não só é péssimo como também descabido. Eu sou o user que fez o upload de maior parte das fotos do panoramio!! http://www.panoramio.com/photo/57585564 Eu sou o Henrique Maia! Estas fotos e mais algumas também foram tiradas por mim. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Casaavos.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fonte_santos.JPG

Recomendo-lhe a apagar essas notificações pois se quiser também lhe arranjo as restantes pessoas que fizeram uploads das fotos e me deram as respectivas autorizações . Afinal de conta, somos todos da mesma terra -.-

File:Associação Esportiva Araçatuba logo.svg

File:Associação Esportiva Araçatuba logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE:DICAS

Pelo que entendi das suas explicações, faço o carregamento normal, depois edito e incluo o {{Picasareview}}. Em relação à licença então é a primeira que aparece no momento do carregamento? Creative Commons - Atribuição - CompartilhaIgual 3.0 (licença jurídica).? Foi um descuido meu de não ter observado corretamente as licenças. Abraços.--NosLida (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"faço o carregamento normal, depois edito e incluo o {{Picasareview}}" --> Sim
"Em relação à licença então é a primeira que aparece no momento do carregamento? " --> Não. Exemplo: File:Willian Fernando da Silva (2010).JPG --> fonte = https://picasaweb.google.com/leopinheirofotos/CopaDoBrasil2010PalmeirasXFlamengoPiaui#5442664612194877906 --> à direita desta página há um trecho dizendo "Alguns direitos reservados" --> clique neste trecho que vai abrir a página do licenciamento escolhido pelo autor = http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ = CC BY-SA 3.0. = {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} <-- esta é a licença que você deve usar.
Gunnex (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tudo bem está parte do licenciamento eu já havia consultado. Estou falando em relação do carregamento do ficheiro.
  • Creative Commons - Atribuição - CompartilhaIgual 3.0 (licença jurídica) "Você está me pedindo para assinalar está opção"????
  • Creative Commons - Atribuição - CompartilhaIgual 2.5 (licença jurídica)
  • Creative Commons - Atribuição 3.0 (licença jurídica) "Estava assinalando esta opção"
  • Creative Commons - Atribuição 2.5 (licença jurídica)
OK.--NosLida (talk) 22:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Você deve usar o licenciamento idêntico que foi escolhido pelo autor. A ferramenta File info ajuda no processo de upload de ficheiros do Picasa e/ou Panoramio e configura todas as informações (incl. descrição, licença, e o tag "review"). No exemplo: [4]. Experimente :-) Gunnex (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Acredito que entendi, logo que vc me alertou alterei todos os ficheiros. Dá para vc me passar a do Flickr, eu acabei não anotando. Abraços.--NosLida (talk) 15:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Para Flickr? Ver User talk:NosLida#Dicas e as ferramentas que automatizem o processo do upload. Gunnex (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

Again? can't you see that the site where the pics are from has a 3.0 license? Really, dude, stop trolling. Soulflytribe (talk) 01:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, I don't want to participate in a site where people remove pics under 3.0 license just because they are related to a particular country that they don't like. Please delete all my pics and try to ban me from this site as well. I had enough. Thanks! Soulflytribe (talk) 06:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rotação

Gunnex, você poderia me ajudar, fazendo a rotação de File:Casa na Rua Conde de Baependi (3).JPG? Eduardo P (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done por User:Rotatebot. Eduardo P (talk) 03:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
The Copyright Watcher Barnstar may be awarded to those who helped keeping Wikimedia Commons clean from copyright violations.

-- Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Category:Gravornovo

Hello, Gunnex. You have new messages at Kosun's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Michgrig (talk) 08:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qual o melhor?

Para categorias por cidade, qual o melhor: by city ou by municipality?--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 22:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

For helping me out. I've learned about free images, etc and took a 3 moth break and will be more careful. WorldTraveller101Need someone to talk to? 23:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ALBO.jpg

I'm not the original uploader of the file. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of 2012 United Nations Climate Change Conference.jpg

File:Logo of 2012 United Nations Climate Change Conference.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bosques de Monterreal Coahuila Mexico.JPG

I wasn't the original uploader: I simply found that the pic was heavily distorted and I rotated it with GIMP. Best regards.--Carnby (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I know, the copyvio-note is sent automatically (per batch task) to the uploader and the last editor. Feel free to remove the note. Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas081094

Hi Gunnex. I've blocked this user indefinitely. If you see any socking from this user here on Commons, let me know, or post at COM:RFCU. INeverCry 01:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Erledigt" Kennzeichnung bei "Rechte auf Medien"

Hallo Gunnex, Du hast bei meiner Anfrage Rechte auf Medien einen Haken gesetzt und dazugeschrieben, die Sache wäre erledigt, aber auf Englisch... Das letzte Statement davor war, wir hätten ein Problem und man müsse mit abrasil Kontakt aufnehmen. Was ist denn nun herausgekommen? Ich bin da leider immer noch im Ungewissen. Mir ist es sehr sehr wichtig, diese GIFs zu verwenden, weil die das Thema einfach und klar darstellen. Danke --Monthyprada (talk) 20:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monthyprada! Mit "erledigt" meinte ich lediglich die von Turélio vorgeschlagene Kontakaufnahme - und zwar auf Englisch, weil mein Französisch selbst der Google-Translator nicht versteht :-). Eben gerade nochmal die Mails gecheckt: Sorry, aber bisher keine Antwort. Gunnex (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gunnex, der fette Haken sah für mich so aus, als stünde da nix mehr offen. Danke. --Monthyprada (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Besser so :-) ? Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ja - prima. Hoffentlich geben die bald eine Antwort. --87.174.51.74 18:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Es scheint niemand zu antworten. Was macht man bloß in so einem Fall? Die Rechte-Frage ist nicht sauber geklärt, obwohl jemand behauptet, die Dateien sind für Wiki nutzbar, derjenige, dem die Rechte möglicherweise gehören, reagiert nicht. Was also machen?--Monthyprada (talk) 15:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2 months without deleting Stadium's pictures

Hey Gunnex, it's been a while since the last time you deleted Brazilian stadium's pics with 3.0 attribution licenses. I would like to inform you that there are several new pics with 3.0 attribution licenses at 2013 FIFA Confederations Cup and 2014 World Cup waiting for you. Thanks! Soulflytribe (talk) 14:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[sarcasm "on", related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Soulflytribe] Great, but since yesterday I am treating uploads regarding sports venues from Spanish-speaking interwikis.[sarcasm "off"]. However, you recent uploads seem to be really better documented as it has been in the past and are license reviewed (or still in review process, but I see no problems). So, congratulations for you work and keep going :-) Gunnex (talk) 16:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problema com ficheiros

Você poderia apagar meus ficheiros, para eu carregar de novo com uma nova versão? Se não vou ter que contribuir no Flickr.

Um abraço. Eduardo P (talk) 15:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi Eduardo P! Não posso apagar os ficheiros (não sou administrador) mas vou tentar acelerar o processo de eliminação. No entretanto pode - se quiser - recarregar os ficheiros sob outros títulos (exemplo: File:Prédio na Ortiz Monteiro (Laranjeiras).JPG. Abraço. Gunnex (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Só para avisar: Em todos os ficheiros acima estou vendo uma nova versão (carregada hoje) e me lembro que você já experimentou problemas com a visualização dos seus uploads. Considerando isto: ainda quer que os ficheiros sejam apagados? Gunnex (talk) 16:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O cache do Commons demorou algumas horas para atualizar. Tudo resolvido! O Commons tem 17 milhões de ficheiros, creio eu que isso dificulta os uploads. Tudo certo! Eduardo P (talk) 21:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imagem TOC

Olá! Sobre a imagem, eu não sabia que ela tinha sido batida pelo Xandy Rodrigues! Por favor, não exclua! Valeu e saudações alvinegras! --CearáSC (talk) 15:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos minhas

Olá, eu sou RonanW e confirmo ser Humberto do Lago Müller, você me contactou sobre fotos postadas no Panoramio e eu não havia visto. Eu não tenho muita experiência com a wiki, na realidade não sei ao certo se estou respondendo no local correto da maneira correta. Tentei buscar outras formas de contato mas não consegui. Gostaria de uma orientação sobre o que fazer, devo remover as fotos do Panoramio para que não sejam excluídas aqui? Ou colocar links para as mesmas? Gosto de contribuir para a Wikipédia, mas realmente não sou experiente nisso. (Humberto do Lago Müller (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Olá! Na época eu (e - pelo que me lembro - mais um outro usuário) estava duvidando a ligação das contas RonanW (Commons) e Humberto Müller (Panoramio). Para mim, o assunto já se resolveu mas para ter certeza (e para evitar eventuais dúvidas de outros usuários do Commons) seria legal se você comentasse (logado como Humberto Müller) esta foto = http://www.panoramio.com/photo/83678459 com o comentário: "I hereby confirm that I am user http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:RonanW at Wikimedia Commons." e - depois - colocasse o seguinte código na sua página de usuário no Commons: {{User panoramio|1=2518360}}<sup>[http://www.panoramio.com/photo/83678459 ref]</sup>. Com isto, tiraria qualquer dúvida. Gunnex (talk) 20:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
Danke für all deine SLA's, etc. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
oh, den hatte ich dir ja schon gegeben. Hatte ich mich nichtmehr erinnert --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Copyright violations

Estimado Gunnex: Antes de acusarme de reincidir en la violación de las normas de Wikipedia, sea por favor tan amable de indicarme los motivos por los cuales asumió que debía eliminar la imagen Carlos-compagnucci.jpg, la cual ha sido generada por mí. Saludos, Spooler (talk) 03:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lo siento, he modificado imágenes con el objetivo de evitar infringir las normas mencionadas, pero he comprendido que el trabajo que les apliqué no fue suficiente. Mis disculpas. Saludos, Spooler (talk) 03:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hi, Gunnex

Before I make copyright of this media I ask the owner of this media and he accept my request.

ThoriqThoriq Dhiyaan Azka Rahmat (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thoriq Dhiyaan Azka Rahmat! Permissions are handled in Commons via Commons:OTRS. Unless we have clear, explicit written/textual, tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we cannot host it on Commons. Please follow the steps described in Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder. Gunnex (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I am checking this image, but after looking into the EXIF data (with exiftool) and the source code of the webpage I'm still unable to find where did you discover the 2010 date, could you please tell me? Thanks in advance. Lobo (howl?) 16:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! [using Firefox] open http://public-transport.net/bus/Sofia/sof_pic/MAN/8497_11.jpg --> [in Firefox] open "Extra" --> "Page properties" (or similar, I am using a german version). Or quicker: right mouse click (mouse pointing outside the image) --> "Page properties" = last modified: 05.12.2010. This works for mostly all images. Example: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/54803104 (uploaded on 26.06.2011). Page properties of http://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/54803104.jpg (small res) or http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/54803104.jpg (original) = last modified: 26.06.2011. Gunnex (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see... it works on my spanish version of Firefox too, though I normally use Chrome. Thanks for the tip :) Lobo (howl?) 20:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Museo.MartinGusinde

Hallo Gunnex, I just sent the permission for 5 fotos in Cat:Museo.MartinGusinde to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please, don't delete the files until their decision. BTW, do you know waht means [5]]?. --Createaccount 13:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thx. All related files tagged with {{OTRS pending}} which gives enough time for the correspondence. {{Monumento Nacional de Chile}} was added by bot via "based on usage in list" (whatever that means). Obviously monumentos.cl: CASA STIRLING is not related to es:Museo Antropológico Martín Gusinde. It may refer more to es:Casa Stirling. Considering this, I removed the template. Gunnex (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK and thanks. --Createaccount 10:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lago Jacob

Ola, a permissão da imagem: File:Lago Jacob.jpg já foi enviada pela autora da imagem para o referido endereço de e-mail (permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org) seguindo todos os requisitos mostrados. Como não houve nenhuma avaliação contraria a imagem desde que foi enviada a permissão, achamos que tudo estava de acordo com as regras de Wikimedia. Se ela já enviou a permissão o que devo fazer para que tudo esteja de acordo com as regras do Wikimedia Commons? Febo Apolo (talk) 00:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi! A imagem File:Lago Jacob.jpg foi eliminada anteontem e aparentemente não houve notificação que um e-mail foi enviado para OTRS. Bom, faça o seguinte:
  1. Pede para autora mandar a permissão via e-mail para você. De preferência a autora devia usar um e-mail que leva o nome da autora. Exemplo: maria.luísa@gmail.com = OK; fofinha1977_kkkk@gmail.com =  Not OK
  2. Verifique que a licença autorizada pela autora é adequada ao Commons. Ela devia usar - para evitar problemas - um dos modelos de e-mail disponíveis aqui.
  3. Em caso afirmativo, carregue a imagem na Wikimedia Commons com o título Lago Jacob.jpg e adicione-lhe a predefinição {{subst:OP}} = um aviso para alertar que um e-mail foi enviado para a equipe OTRS.
  4. Envie a permissão da autora para permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org, incluindo todo o cabeçalho e correspondência que tenha trocado com a autora e (importante!) o link para a imagem = http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lago_Jacob.jpg.
  5. Coloque a imagem na sua lista de páginas vigiadas: a equipe OTRS verificará a permissão e dará um aviso na imagem se a permissão foi aceita ou não. Isto pode demorar algumas semanas.
  6. Ver também Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder
Gunnex (talk) 08:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no license tags

Hi, I noticed that you sometimes tagging images as "no license" when there is actualy a license tag. Its better to tag those with "no permission" or raise a regular deletion request, cause there is a license and its just confusing the uploaders not knowing what wrong or what to do. Thx. --JuTa 17:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Well, actually {{No license since}} says "This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status." and the German version of this template says why = "Zu diesem Bild fehlen ausreichende und korrekte Angaben über die Quelle, den/die Urheber und/oder die Lizenz, unter der das Bild veröffentlicht wurde.". And the user advise via {{Image license}} appoints to these problems: "(...) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (...) has a license that is acceptable (...) must add an appropriate license tag (...) [if] license information is not available on the web you must obtain permission through the OTRS".
And that fits for the most files I tagged with {{No license since}}. See this example: File:Logo JPG..gif, uploaded by David733.
  1. author configured as David733 = wrong. Author is somebody from Hayel Saeed Anam Group
  2. license configured with "{{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} = wrong
  3. sourced with "own work" = wrong as it was grabbed from somewhere http://www.hsagroup.com.
  4. = {{No license since}} well..., tagged now with {{No permission since}}
In other words: If David733 were an expert at Commons, he could configure the file with author = Hayel Saeed Anam Group, source = http://www.hsagroup.com and license = {{PD-textlogo}}{{Trademarked}} --> without even needing a "permission". That´s the background for most my {{No license since}}-tags. Ok... I admit that on some occasions I slip the mouse too fast to the QuickDelete-menu clicking on the wrong tag :-) but on the other hand I admit that in a few cases I have my dificulties to select the appropriate tag... but did you understand my point? How would you tag this file? {{No source since}}? Hmm... author and source are given (even invented), {{No permission since}}? In fact, not needed and requiring a permission for an "own work" seems to be redundant and would confuse the uploader. {{Copyvio}}? Too hard, give the uploader a chance. DR? For a most likely PD-text-logo... no. As you see by my reaction you are revealing a little drama that occurs to me in those cases :-))) An orientation, based on File:Logo JPG..gif, would be appreciated. Gunnex (talk) 19:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, ich sehe grad, Du sprichst deutsch. Ich weiss es ist nicht immer leicht die jeweils richtige Aktion auszuwählen. Irgendwie passt manchmal alles ein wenig aber auch nicht richtig. Wie gesagt finde ich es verwirrend wenn bei einem Bild mit Lizenz-Vorlage steht es fehle eine Lizenz. Dann eher "no permision" oder ein normaler Löschantrag. Und wenn Du der Meinung bist in Bild wäre {{PD-textlogo}} und auch eine passende Quelle gefunden hast kannst Du auch die Bildbeschreibungsseite korregieren. Vielleicht dann noch ein par erklärende Worte auf der Benutzer-Disku-Seite dazu, damit der Uploader "was lernt". Gruß --JuTa 19:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you many images that I uploaded now they are delated

Hi, you can check on my talk what images I'm talking about. I am the autor of them, I took and edited that images, first I uploaded them on my Flickr own page. I don't undestand why you think they had to be delated. Maybe I think the reason was just because I published them as "Public Domain". In my images I prefer Public Domain License. Answer soon, bacause I need to know why you did that. Greetings.--Lomesi (talk) 19:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the coats of arms (seals)? The files are okay, as they are now configured with {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} (even considering Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Coa-Mexico, which revealed some aspects still to verify).
"I am the autor of them, I took and edited that images". File:Seal of El Fuerte.png too? Because this coat of arms was previously published via http://hazloporsinaloa.org/portal/index.php/conoce-nuestros-municipios (Copyright (c) 2012 AmorPorSinaloa.mx ) = http://hazloporsinaloa.org/portal/images/escudos/escudo_elfuerte_ok.jpg (last modified: 2012). Anyway, that´s not so important. The license {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} covers the Public Domain.
Regarding your collages, please read again Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lomesi. You mounted the collages with photos stolen from other authors without their permission(s). For each (free licensed) photo of a collage an internal source/author/license is needed. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details.Gunnex (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hello.. Just to inform you that request to OTRS team for File:NLO NewCover.jpg has been sent a few days ago and I am waiting to resolve license issue with them.. Sorry I did not notify you sooner.. Thanks you.. --BiH (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tidying up after yourself

Hello Gunnex
Although your work patrolling copyvio images and deleting is highly commendable, I am rather fed up of tidying up Wikipedia articles (Ibiza beach articles in particular) which are left with red ink to former image links. I suggest that when you delete an image you do a complete job and tidy up after yourself rather than leave others to do it.Sobrassada (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sobrassada! In fact, I am not "deleting" images - I am proposing images for deletion (mostly via copyvio or deletion requests). These files are deleted by COM:A and later removed by bot via m:User:CommonsDelinker (see e.g. enwiki). --Gunnex (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"this file is missing evidence of permission" tags on my photos.

Dear Gunnex,

I think that all those photos should be free to use on a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 (legal code) basis. When I first began putting this pages up, there was nothing other than the fact that I was working for LTI on this, but after digging around on the site I thought I discovered that a link to the site with the photos and the licensing information should prove that graphics were properly licensed. The webmaster at LTI placed such a graphic at the bottom of each page on the website, including the pages with photos, hoping to make this clear.

To make what this looks like on our server, I took some screenshots.

When I get the photos I get them here, from a database:

From my reading of the rules of proof, this seems sufficient. Is there something I am missing?

Thanks!

Charles..— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccmontgom (talk • contribs)

Hi Charles. The source http://klti.or.kr/ke_04_03_011.do (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0/Copyright ©2011 Literature Translation Institute of Korea. All Rights Reserved) and File:ShareAlike30.jpg/File:Genericshotofphotos.jpg indicates to a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 which does not allow commercial use. In Wikimedia Commons the license must meet the following conditions (my underline):
  • Republication and distribution must be allowed. OK
  • Publication of derivative work must be allowed. OK
  • Commercial use of the work must be allowed.  Not OK
  • The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable. OK
Resuming: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 ("NC" stands for NonCommercial) is not compatible with Commons´s license policy and we need permission from Literature Translation Institute of Korea and/or the respective copyright owner/photographer (as I doubt that Literature Translation Institute of Korea took all these picture). Please read Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses for further details. Gunnex (talk) 16:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gunnex, thanks for your response

So. let me see if I understand the two problems here...

1) The CC 3.0 CC attribution is not enough to use these photos even if LTI took them (even though is seems OK when I uploaded the pictures)? 2) You are concerned that the copyright resides with the photographer and not LTI Korea?

Are ALL licenses on this page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ appropriate for solving the first problem?

Thanks..

Charles..

Ccmontgom (talk) 00:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LOL.. LTI is working with me fast.. we hope, to clear this up...

The license now allows commercial use (I think it is appropriate) as you can see here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ (that's the page with the full license - each page now has the graphic, and the old "copyright" messages have been removed.

I think (pray?^^) that takes care of the first problem you identified.. Secondly, LTI says (in an email)


"Dear Charles,
All pictures are belong to LTI Korea and anyone can use the works under the CCL. Plus, I modified the CCL notification for allowing commecial use to meet the below condition.
Chanwoo
Coordinator | Education & Information Center
Literature Translation Institute of Korea (LTI Korea)
108-5 Samseong-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-873, Korea
TEL: +82.(0)2.6919.7782 | FAX : +82.(0)2.6919.7759
Email: cwpark@klti.or.kr
Website: http://www.klti.or.kr, http://list.or.kr (Books from Korea)

Is that notification sufficient?

Charles...

Ccmontgom (talk) 01:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ccmontgom!! As I could verify all entries from the author database available under http://klti.or.kr/ke_04_03_011.do are now configured with CC BY-SA 3.0 which is OK for Commons. But there are still some problems.
  1. You said: "All pictures are belong to LTI Korea and anyone can use the works under the CCL". Please check the entry for "Choi Seung-ho" and open the tab "Translations". There you see book covers, e.g. http://klti.or.kr/upload//mi//201112//9ca03dba-6962-47ab-a237-c9a519156cdf. This is a copyrighted book cover from German publisher "Wallstein" which itself is based on the copyrighted stock image available under http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-6837043-young-carrion-crow-corvus-corone.php. This is  Not OK as this is obviously not a work of LTI Korea and it is highly unlikely that publisher "Wallstein" and "GlobalP" from istockphoto.com would permit such licensing.
  2. I also still have some doubts about the rest of photos. For me it seems so that all the photos of authors were donated to LTI Korea under unclear conditions for use in their database. Or were they really taken by LTI Korea personell? The question is: How LTI Korea obtained all this photos? Did all the related copyright owner agreed that their photos would be licensed under a free license? Owning photos does not include the right to publish these photos under a free license without permission from the respective copyright owners...
    1. Example: File:KimYongman.jpg --> taken from entry "Kim Yong-man" in the author database = http://klti.or.kr/upload//mi//201308//597a1d19-3d0a-4252-bc29-12acfc70a8eb. This file was uploaded by LTI Korea in 08.2013 but it was already published in 2012 via http://www.ypsori.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=1334 (Copyright © 2012 양평시민의소리. All rights reserved. ) = http://news648.ndsoftnews.com/news/photo/old/news/20120427165829_5973.jpg or in 2009 via http://dsb.kr/detail.php?number=6419 = http://www.dsb.kr/wys2/file_attach/2009/11/03/1257251294-8.jpg or around 2010 via http://book.interpark.com/contents/PersonDicDetail.do?_method=initial&prsnNo=24730706 (Copyright ⓒ 2011 INTERPARK INT All rights reserved.) = http://bimage.interpark.com/milti/contents/upload/24730706_20101126162911.JPG (last modified: 2010, high res version with exif). So, regarding File:KimYongman.jpg  Not OK as this file is most likely not a work of LTI Korea and needs permission from the real copyright owner.
  3. Some files may be deleted in the meantime but they can be easily restored after having determined that everything is okay...
  4. Advice for LTI Korea: Licensing their author database with CC BY-SA 3.0 means that all content (text and images) are freely available for everyone to copy, distribute and transmit, to adapt and to make commercial use of the work.
You should do the following: Please forward all email-traffic with LTI Korea (including the email-headers) to the email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This is the email for Commons:OTRS. OTRS stands for Open-source Ticket Request System. Emails sent to OTRS are handled by a multilingual team of trusted volunteers which is reviewing permissions and analyzing copyright related stuff. Try to explain the situation (using English would speed up the process), cite your user name in Commons and indicate to some of your uploads which are "in trouble" using a direct link (e.g.: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KimYongman.jpg) . Please indicate also to this discussion here using the link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gunnex#.22this_file_is_missing_evidence_of_permission.22_tags_on_my_photos. to give the OTRS-team a further orientation. By the way, pease be patient, as the OTRS-team is overwhelmed daily by several request, has always a backlog and processing your request may take some days or weeks. Hope that helps as orientation for your next steps....
Gunnex (talk) 09:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gunnex/Archive_3&oldid=358730887"