User talk:GuentherZ

Hi! welcome to the Wikimedia Commons!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikimedia. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the First steps Tutorial.
To sign your posts talk pages, pages etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
For commonly asked questions, take a look here.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikimedia: Licensing of images and copyright tags, Categories, Deletion guidelines, software, etc.
Please do not forget to always state the source of the images that you will be uploading.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikimedia. If you have any further questions, feel free to drop a note on my talk page or any other administrator.

Enjoy!

Gryffindor 21:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

categorisation[edit]

hello GuentherZ, thank you for your contribution of the image Image:GuentherZ 2006-11-24 Wien05 Volksbad Einsiedlerplatz 1114.jpg. I had to make some corrections in the categorisation scheme. Normally one or two categories suffice, if you have further questions I can highly recommend this link to you Commons:Kategorien, I hope it helps. sincerely Gryffindor 21:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:2006-12-01_GuentherZ_Wien19_Kaimauer_Nussdorfer_Wehr_1151.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2006-12-01_GuentherZ_Wien19_Kaimauer_Nussdorfer_Wehr_1151.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 16:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:2006-12-01_GuentherZ_Wien19_Kaimauer_Nussdorfer_Wehr_1151.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:2006-12-01_GuentherZ_Wien19_Kaimauer_Nussdorfer_Wehr_1151.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 16:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Rüdiger! Schaut so aus, als hätte ich das beim Hochladen übersehen/vergessen. Die Löschung bringt meine Welt aber nicht wirklich zum Einstürzen. PS: Mein Englisch ist nicht das Wahre, drum schreibe ich Deutsch. --GuentherZ 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Landstraße[edit]

hallo Günther, bitte höre auf, die falsche Kat. category:Landstraße zu verwenden, diese wurde unlängst per Bot umbenannt in category:Landstraße (Vienna). lg --Contributor 20:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Contributor! Das hat einen einfachen Grund: Ich habe mir sämtliche Kategorien, die ich öfter in Verwendung habe, in Word zusammengespeichert und da kommt der Bot nicht hin - Gott sei Dank! Aber ich werde das jetzt ändern, versprochen! Andere Frage: Ich habe mal eine Kategorie gefunden "Österreichische Grenzübergänge" oder so ähnlich? Ich finde ihn nur nicht wieder. Weißt du zufällig, wo ich den finde? Danke sagt --GuentherZ 15:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. Bilder von Österreichs Grenzen gehören in die Category:International borders of Austria. Eine gesonderte Kategorie nur für Grenzübergänge (engl. border crossings - du weißt ja, wenns kein Eigenname ist, werden Kats. englisch benannt) ist mir nicht bekannt. --Contributor 13:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Das war genau das, was ich gesucht habe! --GuentherZ 18:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen. Warum haben eigentlich einige deiner Bilder so eine geringe Auflösung? Mit dem handy gemacht? Finde das etwas schade. --Contributor 00:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Meine Kamera ist unschuldig! Für meine private Homepage, die sehr bilderlastig ist, habe ich die Fotos zwecks rascherer Ladezeiten der Seiten immer ziemlich runtergeprügelt. Und das ist mir geblieben, aber ich werde mich bessern. Versprochen ;-) --GuentherZ 18:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Damit ich das richtig verstehe: Hast du die älteren Bilder noch in höherer Auflösung rumliegen oder hast du die nur mehr als Briefmarkensammlung auf der Platte? Wenn dir rein die Arbeit des erneuten Hochladens zu viel ist, könnte man ja schauen, das man da was arrangiert. --Contributor 20:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um Himmel Willen, natürlich habe ich sie in Originalgröße!!! Erneutes Hochladen ist im Prinzip kein großes Problem, allerdings habe ich bei fast allen Bildern den Bildausschnitt zwecks Reduktion der Dateigröße teilweise recht kräftig zusammengestutzt (zum Beispiel den Himmel weggeschnitten, auch wenn er noch so schön blau ist). Ist also nur eine reine Zeitfrage und der Arbeitsmoral ;-) Aber für den Anfang wird es wohl reichen, jene Bilder zu verbessern, die schon im Umlauf sind. --GuentherZ 17:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:GuentherZ_2007-04-14_0322_Prottes_Erdoellehrpfad_Pumpe.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GuentherZ_2007-04-14_0322_Prottes_Erdoellehrpfad_Pumpe.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 23:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was my mistake! I corrected it today. --GuentherZ 13:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:GuentherZ_2007-0310_0058_Wien10_Quellenstrasse72.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GuentherZ_2007-0310_0058_Wien10_Quellenstrasse72.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 19:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was my mistake! I corrected it today. --GuentherZ 18:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:GuentherZ_2007-03-10_0062_Wien10_Quellenstrasse72.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GuentherZ_2007-03-10_0062_Wien10_Quellenstrasse72.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 19:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was my mistake! I corrected it today.--GuentherZ 18:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Betr. de:Diskussion:Film Festival auf dem Wiener Rathausplatz[edit]

"Unbekannt" ist ja -- im Gegensatz zu eindeutigen statischen IPs -- hier wohl jeder, der nicht seinen überprüfbaren Klarnamen verwendet ;) Daher hatte ich eine Vorliebe für ebendiese, vor allem seit mich deWP Laden nervte. Das hat sich inzwischen insofern geändert, als ich am 19. oder 20. von einem weiteren der dort administrierenden Hirnis "unbeschränkt" gesperrt wurde. Naja, in enWP und frWP sind die Leute weniger borniert (treiben sich scheinbar weniger Deutsche dort rum). Daher meine Antwort hier.

Deine Reflist sah wirklich nach Eigenwerbung des PID aus (32 von 33 Quellen, wenn ich recht erinnere; ich erinnere, "stinkt" geschrieben zu haben. Aber wie gesagt hab' ich mit deWP nix mehr am Hut.
Frage: Was versprichst Du Dir von deinem Kürzel in den Namen der von Dir hochgeladenen Dateien? Ich meine, Bilder zu einem bestimmten Thema sind ohnedies schwer zu finden, und wenn der Dateiname eindeutig und einprägsam wäre, hätte vielleicht auch Google eine Chance, ihn auszuspucken (ob google überhaupt WP-Bilder findet, die in keinem Artikel aufscheinen, ist mir allerdings noch nicht klar). Nimm's also als Meinung eines alten Grantlers. Mit Gruß, Wolfgang. any IP 10:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Spät, aber doch bekommst du doch noch Antwort von mir, aber ich bin heute seit einiger Zeit das erste Mal wieder da.

Warum ich meine Referenzen fast nur von wien.gv habe?: Hast du dich schon mal umgeschaut in Google und Co, welche Infos zum Thema sonst noch auf dem "freien Markt" erhältlich sind? Ist doch eigentlich fast immer das Gleiche, nur ein wenig abgewandelt. Und hier waren eben die besten Infos zu finden. Mit einem Beitrag, der auf ein "Filmfestival? ja, gibt es" rausläuft, wollte ich mich nicht abgeben.
Und warum der GuentherZ bei meinen Bildateien? Naja, zugegeben, ein bissel muss ich mir schon selber den Bauch pinseln, wenn du weisst, was ich meine. Aber ich bemühe mich auch, was Brauchbares in den Dateinamen reinzuquetschen.

Ich hoffe, ich habe deinen Grant damit ein wenig besänftigt. Und wenn nicht, ich stelle dir meine Schulter gerne zur Verfügung ;-) --GuentherZ 16:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aus dem Standard[edit]

Schau mal hier. -- User:JeLuF

Danke für den Hinweis! Ich fühle mich direkt geehrt, vom Standard "zitiert" zu werden. Nur Gage schaut dabei leider nicht raus ;-) --GuentherZ

Kategorie[edit]

GuentherZ (talk) 12:20, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, GuentherZ!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GuentherZ 2009-02-28 0015 Wien11 Otto-Herschmann-Gasse.jpg is uncategorized since 28 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GuentherZ 2009-07-06-B 0472 Tritonen- und Najadenbrunnen M-T-Platz.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
Image:GuentherZ 2009-08-25 1228 Laaerbergbad Eingang.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
Image:GuentherZ 2009-10-14 1482 Wien12 U-Bahn Laengenfeldgasse Tafel.jpg was uncategorized on 15 October 2009.
Image:GuentherZ 2010-08-21 0132 Retz Dreifaltigkeitssaeule.jpg was uncategorized on 7 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GuentherZ 2011-03-19 0047 Zwettl Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle Kriegerdenkmal.jpg was uncategorized on 20 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GuentherZ 2011-03-19 0041Zwettl Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle Tafel.jpg was uncategorized on 20 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GuentherZ 2011-03-19 0040 Zwettl Kriegerdenkmal.jpg was uncategorized on 20 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GuentherZ 2011-09-17 0214 Hollabrunn sowjetisches Heldendenkmal mit Soldatenfriedhof.jpg was uncategorized on 26 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tut mir leid, den hier habe ich vergessen. --GuentherZ (talk) 18:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GuentherZ 2008-04-27 0779 Bruecke ueber die Zeile.jpg[edit]

Auch wenn es dein eigenes Werk ist, gib bitte eine Quelle an, da sie sonst als Bild mit fehlender Quelle gekennzeichnet und gelöscht werden. Am besten du integrierst {{Own}} bei deiner Quelle
mfg --D-Kuru (talk) 01:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auweh, da habe ich offenbar was übersehen. Danke für die Ermahnung! --GuentherZ (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Wiener Freiwillige Rettungsgesellschaft, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Techman224^Talk 21:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Das ganze war ein technischer Fehler meinerseits. Wenn man eine Kategorie eingibt und dabei das Wort Kategorie bzw. Category vergisst, dann ... Naja ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:GuentherZ_2008-04-27_0779_Bruecke_ueber_die_Zeile.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:GuentherZ_2008-04-27_0779_Bruecke_ueber_die_Zeile.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe gerade nachgetragen, dass das Bild mein Werk ist. Ich hoffe, ich habe damti sein Überleben gesichert. --GuentherZ (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, "no source"-tag entfernt. Danke für den hilfreichen Nachtrag. --High Contrast (talk) 21:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen! Leider passiert sowas halt immer wieder. ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ_2007-06-15_0573_Transparent_Tierschutztag_Wien.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ_2007-06-15_0573_Transparent_Tierschutztag_Wien.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn ich damit unwissentlich "Böses" getan habe, dann soll es mir Recht sein. Danke für die Warnung sagt --GuentherZ (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nepomuk mit Feh[edit]

Passt zum vorstehenden Tierschutzthema. Mich muss der Teufel geritten haben, als ich meinte, Deine Nepomücker danach zu kategorisieren, ob sie eine Mozzetta aus Pelz tragen, Kurzschlusshandlung, war einfach zu beeindruckt von Deinen dauernden Neuerscheinungen. Zum einen ist mein Kategoriename falsch, es hätte gleich eine Mozzetta aus Fehfell sein können, beim kategorisieren wird man schlauer, zum anderen hätte ich es dabei belassen können, dass der Nepomuk sich an sich schon in den Rubriken "Clerics with fur" und "Squirrel (clothing) in art" befindet (stimmt doch hoffentlich, muss ich gleich mal nachgucken). Du musst ja wahnsinnig unterwegs gewesen sein, das alles zusammen zu tragen, meine Hochachtung, hoffentlich nicht alles mit dem Fahrrad. Auf jeden Fall eine tolle Arbeit, die bestimmt auch Freude gemacht hat und macht. Besten Dank dafür vom --Kürschner (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Dass ich kein (Kürschner)Fachmann bin, merkst du daran, dass ich mich über das "Feh" gewundert habe - ich habe an die Taschentücher gedacht ;-) Die Kategorisierungen stören mich nicht, je mehr Möglichkeiten es gibt, ein Bild zu finden, umso besser. Und du kannst beruhigt sein: mit dem Fahrrad jage ich die Nepomücker nicht. PKW; U, Bus und Bim in Wien und klarerweise per Pedes, wie es sich für einen Jäger gehört. Schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bin beruhigt. Gucke auch gleich nach, was Fehtaschentücher sind, meine Frau nimmt Tempo. Hatte gerade einen Professor mit Studentin hier, die waren begeistert, eine so schöne Fundgrube für pelzrelevante Kunst im Netz zu haben (Thema: Pelz in der südniederländischen (= belgischen) Kunst des 15. Jahrhunderts...). Waidmannsheil (ich jage Kürschnereien, wenn Du mal eine siehst, sofort schießen). --Kürschner (talk) 11:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wie schießt man eine Kürschnerei artgerecht bzw. waidmännisch? ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 11:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich gehe nachher auf die Rheinbrücke und schieß Dir 'nen Nepomuk, ~~artgerecht~~ (nein, ich schubse ihn nicht von der Brücke, um Himmelswillen, gestrichen) - dann wirst DU das schon auch noch hinkriegen! --Kürschner (talk) 11:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Im Moment brauche ich zwar vor allem österreichische Nepomücke, aber wer weiß. Vielleicht brauch ich auch mal welche aus deutschen Landen :-) --GuentherZ (talk) 11:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich nehm auch großdeutsche Kürschner ;) --Kürschner (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Einverstanden! Schönen Tag noch. --GuentherZ (talk) 12:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich verzichte auf ein eigenes Bild, entweder das Licht oder der Fotograf war zu schlecht. :( --Kürschner (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nur zur Info:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Bwag#Datei:Traiskirchen_Kirche_Innenansicht.JPG

Die JN-Statue ist Spitze! Schlägt in der Gestaltung komplett aus der Art, so dass ihn ein automatisiertes Wesen wie ich wohl nicht als solchen wahrnehmen würde. Und danke für die Info, ich habe mich dort zu Wort gemeldet. Schönen Tag noch sagt --GuentherZ (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2011-02-22 0839 Wien23 Promenadeweg Tafel Kinderwagenrampe.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:GuentherZ 2011-02-22 0837 Wien23 Promenadeweg Statue Johannes Nepomuk.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:GuentherZ 2011-02-22 0840 Wien23 Promenadeweg Statue Johannes Nepomuk.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

FF Franzen, NÖ[edit]

Hallo Günther, das ist ja mal wirklich "Kunst am Bau"! Sehr schöne Bilder von dem Feuerwehrhaus, ich habe erstmal lachen müssen. De728631 (talk) 17:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Freut mich, denn lachen ist ja gesund. Von Bildern her kenne ich das Gebäude ja schon länger, gestern war ich endlich dort. Erstaunt war ich nur, als ich in einem Buch vor kurzer Zeit herausfand, dass dieses Design aus der Zeit vor dem Zweiten Weltkrieg stammt. --GuentherZ (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wien12 Fockygasse02 2011-05-30 GuentherZ 0023.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Nimmst Du Bildwünsche an?[edit]

Hallo GuentherZ,

ich bin über File:Kalenderstein.jpg gestolpert. Hab einfach mal spontan geguckt, wer denn Bilder in der Umgebung von Pulkau macht und Dich gefunden :-) Könntest Du das mal bei Gelegenheit besser fotografieren und natürlich ohne Beschriftung hochladen? Der Artikel würde davon profitieren.

Grüßle, --Schwäbin (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour ins Schwabenland! Wenn es möglich ist, erweise ich mich gerne als "Auftragsfotograf" ;-) Die Ironie des Schicksals ist nur die, dass ich gestern wieder im Raum Pulkau unterwegs war und zeitweise kläglich geschwitzt habe. Aber ich werde deine Bitte bei Gelegenheit erfüllen. --GuentherZ (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Benennung deine Bilder[edit]

Hallo GuentherZ, mir ist aufgefallen das du viele Bilder zum Denkmal Projekt hoch lädst. Alle Bilder tragen die Bezeichnung "GuentherZ...". Ich bin der Meinung das eine Bezeichnung nach dem Ort sinnvoller ist weil dann das finden und zuordnen der Bilder leicht ist. z.b. "Ort-Objekt-User.jpg" oder so. Dann wäre dein Name auch im Filenamen, das Bild wäre dann aber nach der Ortschaft sortiert. lg --Naoag (talk) 10:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Das eigentliche Problem liegt darin begraben, dass es mir zu viel Arbeit ist, meine Bilder zweimal zu benamsen. Ich benamse alle meine Bilder nach dem Schema Datum-Bildnummer- Ort-usw. Die Bilder für die Commons kriegen keinen eigenen Namen, sondern das beanstandete GuentherZ vorgesetzt. So habe ich in den Kategorien wenigstens meine Bilder beisammen. Wenn sich eine Vereinheitlichung in deinem Sinne durchzusetzen beginnt, spiele ich gerne mit, aber bis dahin mache ich mir nicht die Arbeit der Doppelbenamsumg. Nicht böse sein, aber das ist die derzeitige Lage der Dinge. ;-) Bei der Suche über die Suchfunktion sind sie ohnehin auffindbar. Einen schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 17:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo GuentherZ, bitte entschuldige, dass ich mich einmische: Natürlich sind die Bilder über die Suchfunktion auffindbar. Du kannst ja einfach vergleichen: Suchbegriff Zissersdorf (Bilder von Dir) oder Suchbegriff Nürtingen (Bilder von mir). Deine erscheinen erst gegen Ende der Trefferliste, weil der Ortsname erst weit hinten steht, aber sie erscheinen. --Schwäbin (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo GuenterZ, ok. war ja nur ein Vorschlag:-) Klar sind die Bilder findbar, ich glaube da hat die Schäbin dich falsch verstanden? Einee einheitliche Benamsung ist aber sowieso schwer durch zu setzten und deswegen machen ja die Categorien Sinn:-) lg --Naoag (talk) 19:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, hat sie. Sie hat ein nicht gelesen, wo keines war... Kopf → Tisch --Schwäbin (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! In der Beziehung hätte ich wohl früher gestoppt gehört. Jetzt ist das einfach ein fixes System bei mir, das mir meine Arbeit erleichtert. Es gibt auch relativ wenige Bilder von mir, für die ich ein anderes System aufgstellt habe, die ich aber nicht für private Zwecke aufhebe. Und an die Schwäbin: Wenn ich dein Kopf → Tisch richtig deute, dann kann ich nur sagen, deinem klugen Kopf tut es nicht gut und der Tisch kann nix dafür ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 11:22, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategoriegröße[edit]

Hallo GüntherZ, es gibt zwar keine mir bekannten Regeln, die auf commons eine Mindestanzahl von Bildern je Kategorie fordern würden, ich finde aber trotzdem die Kategorien, die du zu einzelnen Bildern aus der de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Zellerndorf angelegt hast, etwas seltsam. Kommen mehr Bilder zusammen, dann kann die Kategorie immer noch angelegt werden, aber das Löschen von leeren oder einelementigen Kategorien ist viel schwieriger und aufwändiger. Ich finde, es erschwert das Finden eines Bildes, wenn ich durch viele Kleinkategorien durchsuchen muss. Die Denkmallisten kommen auch ohne commonscat-Eintrag zurecht. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Im Grunde genommen hast du Recht. Bei meinem Amokspaziergang geht es mir vor allem darum, die Kategorien halbwegs einheitlich zu gestalten. Außerdem kann ich sie dann gleich in den Denkmallisten verlinken und es braucht später niemand mehr zu überlegen/nachzuschauen, ob das schon passiert ist. Schönen Regentag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear GuentherZ,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die gute Botschaft sagt --GuentherZ (talk) 16:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC) ;-)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-04-30 0650 Wien Mistkuebel.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Schloss Ungarschütz[edit]

Hallo Günther, hast du zufällig noch eine Detailaufnahme von diesem Turm? Mich würde interessieren, ob man das hier erwähnte Wappen erkennen kann? Danke und Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 14:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Tut mir leid, hab ich nicht. Aber, und jetzt kommt das große Aber. Ich nehme an, du zielst auf das hier: Östlich quadratischer großer Vorhof mit umlaufenden Säulenlauben 1582. Am Torturm Wappen der Berchtold. Äußeres Schlosstor bezeichnet 1696. Ich hab nach meinem Besuch damals ein wenig gegraben und dabei festgestellt, dass es noch einen zweiten Turm gab, der allerdings irgendwann wegen der liebevollen Behandlung eingestürzt ist und daher nur noch ein unscheinbarer Bestandteil der Mauer mit Tor ist. Und dieses Tor ist jenes hier. Da es dir wohl zu klein sein wird – es stammt aus einer frühen Epoche von mir – laß mir eine Mail zukommen, dann schick ich dir das gute Stück in voller Größe. Schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Antwort. Da ich den Ausschnitt im Erfolgsfall sowieso hochladen wollen würde: Willst du die volle Größe nicht einfach über die bestehende Version drüberbügeln? Falls nicht, findest du meine Mailadresse auf de:Benutzer:Flominator. Gruß, --Flominator (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, das ging aber Schnelle ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kann auch schnell sein ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. --Flominator (talk) 07:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear GuentherZ,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:GuentherZ 2012-11-23 0294 Buch-Wien-12 Jutta Treiber.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear GuentherZ,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Public Art team

please delete my picture[edit]

Hello Günther,

i wanted to ask u to please delete this picture of me "2012-10-20 002 Ruth Wittmann Team NAVAX-AHTC 0102.jpg" cause i dont want people to see it when they search for my name! Thank u.

Greetings, Ruth

Hello! I am sorry, but I have not the rights to do this. But I ask a friend. --GuentherZ (talk) 15:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ist nicht sehr vorteilhaft aufgenommen. --JonnyBrazil (talk) 06:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ist ja auch nicht auf dem Red Carpet ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2010-02-28 0031 Wien Strassenbahn ULF Milka.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2010-02-28 0031 Wien Strassenbahn ULF Milka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

darkweasel94 09:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WLM 2013[edit]

Herzliche Gratulation zum 1. Preis in der WLM2013. Ein wirklich sehr schönes Bild mit zwei Denkmälern gut eingefangen. Wir sehen uns am 14. in der Hofburg --Böhringer (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte um Entschuldigung, dass ich erst heute reagiere, aber übers Wochenende war ich beschäftigt. Danke für deine Gratulation, aber deine Bilder - und auch die anderen, die in die Endrunde gekommen sind - sind auch nicht ohne. Aber wenn ich so dasitze und mir anschaue "1. Platz", dann muss ich mich regelmäßig an der Nase nehmen, dass hier keine messbare Leistung erbracht wurde, sondern im richtigen Moment der Geschmack der richtigen Leute getroffen wurde. Andere Juroren, anderes Ergebnis bei gleichen Bildern. Und jetzt ab auf die Straße, WLM14 kommt. ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC) PS: Dass wir uns sehen, will ich doch hoffen ;-)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2013-06-07 0104 Wien Guertel LinieU6 600135a Bruecke ueber die Schulgasse.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2013-06-07 0104 Wien Guertel LinieU6 600135a Bruecke ueber die Schulgasse.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, YiFeiBot (talk) 14:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte um Bekanntgabe, was hier genau nicht in Ordnung ist! --GuentherZ (talk) 18:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2013-11-16 0029 Wien Guertel LinieU6 Bruecken ueber die Friedmanngasse1.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2013-11-16 0029 Wien Guertel LinieU6 Bruecken ueber die Friedmanngasse1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:GuentherZ 2013-11-16 0032 Wien Guertel LinieU6 Bruecken ueber die Friedmanngasse1.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear GuentherZ,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:GuentherZ 2007-04-07 0122 Wien02 Praterstrasse72 Gedenktafel Max Steiner.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2007-04-07 0122 Wien02 Praterstrasse72 Gedenktafel Max Steiner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear GuentherZ,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Magst du ...[edit]

... das kurz erläutern? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 18:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was meinst du damit genau? --GuentherZ (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, sind Bridges over the Wien River und Brücken über den Wienfluss nicht dasgleiche? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 18:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In dem Fall nicht. Die "Bridges over the Wien River" sind eine Kategorie und "Brücken über den Wienfluss" ist der Name der Brücke(n) - es sind nämlich zwei ;-) Ich hab ja auch die Brücken unter den Bridges kategorisiert. --GuentherZ (talk) 18:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicht, dass ich dir nicht glaube, aber hättest du einen Link dazu? Und sicher dass es keinen besseren Namen gäbe? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 18:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ursprünglich hatte ich Angst, dass du deutsch kategorisieren möchtest, wie du es leider bei ~~den moisten~~allen Wiener Brücken getan hast. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 18:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hier meine Quelle: http://www.wien.gv.at/verkehr/brueckenbau/bruecken-gis.html Klick die „Brückeninformation Wien – Kartenansicht“ an, dann kriegst den Wiener Stadtplan. Such dir die gewünschte Brücke, klick auf das „i“ in dem Kastel links oben und dann auf die Brücke. Du kriegst dann die gewünschten Infos, zumindest den Namen (gelegentlich mit Rechtschreibfehler). Und was stört dich an der Kategorisierung der Brücken genau? --GuentherZ (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laut Stadt Wien ist z. B. auf diesem Bild nur diese Brücke zu sehen ... Und bei "Brücken über den Wienfluss" spuckt die Suche nichts aus. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 19:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tschuldige, Fehler von mir! Du must links vom Stadtplan unter "Karteninhalt" "Objekte der Wiener Linien" anhaken und darunter "Brücken" und "Tunnel". Dann warden auch die Wr.-Linien-Bauwerke sichtbar. In unserem speziellen Fall kriegst du ein Brückenpaar über den Wienfluss und ein weiteres über die Hadikgasse. Und jetzt Gute Nacht! --GuentherZ (talk) 20:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dann würde ich vorschlagen, die Brücken nach Bezirk und zusätzlich nach Art (null, Asfinag, Wiener Linien) zu kategorisieren. In die Kategorie Brücken über den Wienfluss haue ich ein Cat see also. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 20:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisieren nach Bezirk ist kein Problem, ich bin im Moment nur zu faul dazu ;-) Kategorisieren nach Art: Nein! Der zuständige Erhalter kann schneller wechseln als uns lieb ist und vor allem müssen wir das nicht erfahren und dann liegt das Bauwerk falsch. "Bridges over the Wien River" usw. wie gewohnt beibehalten. --GuentherZ (talk) 17:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sind nicht einfach alle U-Bahn-Brücken Wiener Linien und alle Autobahn-Brücken Asfinag? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 18:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Wahrscheinlich ja, festlegen möchte ich mich da aber sicherheitshalber nicht. Und wie gesagt, wenn sich da was ändert, muss es ja nicht publik warden ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich glaube, wir sollten uns mal persönlich kennenlernen und das Ganze ausplaudern. Ob du das schon mitgekriegt hast, aber im Abstand von ungefähr zwei Monaten treffen sich die Wiener Wikipedianer zum Diskutieren. Hier findest du die Einladungsliste Wikipedia:Wien/Einladungsliste (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wien/Einladungsliste) Trag dich ein. Und pass auf, was hier los ist: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wien#Oktober-Stammtisch_2013 Gute Nacht wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 19:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, vom Stammtisch habe ich schon gehört und auch schon ernsthaft überlegt hinzugehen … Vielleicht wird es ja einmal etwas in der Zukunft. Danke für die Einladung! |FDMS (WP: en, de) 09:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Naturdenkmal 457/620[edit]

Damit Du informiert bist: ein Bild habe ich verschoben ([1]) weil es so gut wie sicher nicht das Naturdenkmal 620, sondern 457 darstellt. Der Baum steht zwar mit 620er-Bäumen zusammen, hat aber eine eigene Nummer, weil er schon 20 Jahre früher unter Schutz gestellt wurde. Wenn man die Perspektive hier mit dem Stadtplan vergleicht, kommt man zu dem Schluss, dass es dieser Baum sein muss. Viele Grüße -- Clemen s 14:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Ich melde mich zwar leider spät, aber dafür mit Zweifeln. Und zwar, ob ich da überhaupt den richtigen Baum verewigt habe. Ich glaube, ich muss mir das mal aus der Nähe anschauen. Peinlich, aber es ist so. --GuentherZ (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Wiener Straßenbahn: Streckenkategorien[edit]

Hallo! Da du im Bereich der Wiener Straßenbahn mitgearbeitet hast, möchte ich dich einladen, Kommentare zu meinem Vorschlag, die Straßenbahnstrecken (nicht Linien) Wiens zu kategorisieren, abzugeben – etwa ob das so sinnvolle Kategorien sind oder man sie anders aufteilen sollte. Falls dich das nicht interessiert, darfst du diese Nachricht gerne entfernen. darkweasel94 09:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eindeckung Kurzgasse[edit]

Hallo, hast du in näherer Zukunft vor, in Category:Eindeckung Kurzgasse irgendwas reinzutun? Sonst schlage ich sie zur Löschung vor, leer bringt sie ja nicht wirklich was. darkweasel94 22:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Nein, da ist irgendein Pallawatsch passiert. Die "Eindeckung Kurzgasse" entspricht der befüllten "Eindeckung Kurzgasse/Palmgasse". Mit der Löschung würdest du mir sogar einen Gefallen tun. ;-) Danke sagt --GuentherZ (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2013-07-06 0339 Wien14 Ameisgasse Ameisbruecke.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2013-07-06 0339 Wien14 Ameisgasse Ameisbruecke.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've already fixed this, it was a syntax error. (Sorry for announcing this so late, my Internet connection broke down right after I had fixed the syntax error.) darkweasel94 21:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 08 Laengenfeldgasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 08 Laengenfeldgasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 08 Laengenfeldgasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 21:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bei diesen Tonaufnahmen gibt es keine Freigabe, da ich mich um keine bemüht habe in der Annahme, dass die oft zitierte Schöpfungshöhe nicht erreicht wird. --GuentherZ (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass derartige Tonaufnahmen sehr bald die Schöpfungshöhe erreichen. Es steht dir frei, meine "no permission"s in normale Löschanträge umzuwandeln und dich auf die Schöpfungshöhe zu beziehen, aber ich glaube nicht, dass es etwas ändern wird. darkweasel94 17:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mein Herz hängt nicht an diesen Aufnahmen, aber wenn du die Löschung über die Löschdiskussion machen würdest, ware es für andere Wikipedianer informativer als ein stilles Verschwinden. Die Entscheidung darüber überlasse ich dir, aber irgendwie klingt deine Argumentation nach "vorauseilendem Gehorsam" ;-) Schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 01 Huetteldorf GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 01 Huetteldorf GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 01 Huetteldorf GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 21:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in OeBB Schnellbahn Station Wien-Huetteldorf GuentherZ 2012-01-10.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in OeBB Schnellbahn Station Wien-Huetteldorf GuentherZ 2012-01-10.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in OeBB Schnellbahn Station Wien-Huetteldorf GuentherZ 2012-01-10.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 03 Unter-Sankt-Veit GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 03 Unter-Sankt-Veit GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 03 Unter-Sankt-Veit GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 04 Braunschweiggasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 04 Braunschweiggasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 04 Braunschweiggasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 07 Meidling Hauptstrasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 07 Meidling Hauptstrasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 07 Meidling Hauptstrasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 09 Margaretenguertel GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 09 Margaretenguertel GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 09 Margaretenguertel GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 06 Schoenbrunn GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 06 Schoenbrunn GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 06 Schoenbrunn GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 02 Ober-Sankt-Veit GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 02 Ober-Sankt-Veit GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 02 Ober-Sankt-Veit GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 05 Hietzing GuentherZ 2012-01-10.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 05 Hietzing GuentherZ 2012-01-10.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 05 Hietzing GuentherZ 2012-01-10.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Information Teilsperre U-Bahnlinie U1 Reumannplatz-Schwedenplatz GuentherZ 2012-07-11.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Information Teilsperre U-Bahnlinie U1 Reumannplatz-Schwedenplatz GuentherZ 2012-07-11.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Information Teilsperre U-Bahnlinie U1 Reumannplatz-Schwedenplatz GuentherZ 2012-07-11.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 10 Pilgramgasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 10 Pilgramgasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 10 Pilgramgasse GuentherZ 2012-01-07.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 11 Kettenbrueckengasse GuentherZ 2012-01-11.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 11 Kettenbrueckengasse GuentherZ 2012-01-11.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 11 Kettenbrueckengasse GuentherZ 2012-01-11.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 12 Karlsplatz GuentherZ 2012-01-11.ogg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 12 Karlsplatz GuentherZ 2012-01-11.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ankuendigung in U-Bahnlinie U4 Station 12 Karlsplatz GuentherZ 2012-01-11.ogg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

darkweasel94 22:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Brücken über die Gumpendorfer Straße[edit]

Hallo Günther, die Category:Brücken über die Gumpendorfer Straße beinhaltet nur eine Brücke. Ist das ein Eigenname oder ein Versehen und sollte in der beschreibenden Einzahl (Category:Bridge over Gumpendorfer Straße?) und englisch benannt werden? Auf der ganzen Gumpi gibt es nur diese eine und nicht mal da ist klar, ob das schon Gumpi ist. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Der Brückenname und damit die Category läuft deswegen in der Mehrzahl, weil es für jedes Gleis eine eigene Brücke gibt, also zwei über die Gumpi. Diese Nummer wird bei der ganzen Otto-Wagner-Strecke durchgezogen. Da hast du überall Brücken. Entweder vertraute man damals dem Stahlbrückenbau noch nicht so besonders, oder es erleichterte den Transport der Einzelteile. Alles Gute wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2010-10-30 0092 Wien13 Kennedybruecke Tafel Wientalhighway.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2010-10-30 0092 Wien13 Kennedybruecke Tafel Wientalhighway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FDMS 4 06:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2007-05-18 3098 Wien Festwochen-Fahne.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2007-05-18 3098 Wien Festwochen-Fahne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae (talk) 13:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

falsche orientierung[edit]

Hallo GuentherZ, manche deiner Bilder, so ist's mir aufgefallen, haben die falsche Orientierung. Im Thumbnail sind sie richtig, aber auf volle Größe dann irgendwie gedreht. Auch auf die Gefahr, dass du das schon weißt, das Problem lässt sich mittels RotateRequest um 0° beheben. Siehe etwa File:GuentherZ 2014-09-13 (16) Wien01 Herrengasse Hochhaus Herrengasse Michaelerkirche.JPG. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis! Nachdem ich meine Bilder ja kenne, schaue ich sie mir nach dem Hochladen nicht an und damit ist für mich die Welt (zumindest bei den Thumbnails) in Ordnung ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 17:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bild unklar[edit]

Hallo Günther, File:GuentherZ 2014-09-27 (77) Bad Voeslau Malfattiweg Cholerakapelle.JPG ist nicht ident mit dem Bild, das momentan unter der ID 69261 in die Bad Vöslauer Liste eingebunden ist. Nach deinen Kamerakoordinaten steht dein Bild im Park östlich des Schlosses Bad Vöslau, also nicht in der Malfattigasse. Kannst du bitte klären? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peinlich - Werde mir die Sache anschauen - Danke :-( --GuentherZ (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Günther, kommt da noch was? Du musst ja nicht hinfahren, um dir klar zu werden, wo du das Foto aufgenommen hast. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Entschuldige, bin nur etwas tiefer in mich gegangen. Im Internet hab ich leider keinen besonders genauen Plan von Bad Vöslau bzw. der gefragten Ecke gefunden. Aber ich weiß, dass meine Mutter und ich beim Malfattiweg vorbeigekommen sind. Und ich bin mir ziehmlich sicher, dass es dort bei dieser Kapelle war. Sollten im Verlauf des Malfattiwegs zwei Kapellen stehen, dann wäre es Pech. Aber wenn du willst, zieh das Bild aus dem Bewerb, ich hab nichts dagegen. Schönen Tag noch sagt --GuentherZ (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Günther, mit geht es nicht um den Bewerb, mir geht es um die Korrektheit (und zwar für WP). Das Problem sind die Koordinaten. Wenn du sie vor Ort mit einem GPS Tagger aufs Foto gebrannt hast, dann ist das Foto im Schlosspark, wenn du sie nachträglich dazugestrickt hast, dann ist alles möglich. Aber die andere Kapelle ist lt. Bild Annotation ziemlich sicher die Cholerakapelle. Beide können es nicht sein, da offensichtlich verschieden. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Da gibt es einen Vöslauplan, die Kapelle im Schlosspark ist als Pestkapelle eingezeichnet, am Malfattiweg fehlt jede Spur einer Kapelle. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, wenn ich mich einmische - das Foto von Günther zeigt die [Pestkapelle] im Stadtpark. lg -Duke of W4 (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duke of W4, kein Problem. Danke. Einmischung = It's a wiki, also quasi Geschäftsgrundlage. Aber damit ist es wohl eindeutig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Tut mir leid, aber so wie es ausschaut, liege ich tatsächlich mehr als falsch :-( Aber als meine Mutter und ich in BV waren, sind wir am Malfattiweg (die Malfattigasse in Wien ist bei uns in der Nähe) vorbeigekommen und ich war mir sicher, dass es hier war. Leider Nein. --GuentherZ (talk) 16:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kürschner[edit]

Hallo GuentherZ, mal eine ungewöhnliche Frage und Bitte. Wien galt einmal als die Stadt mit den schönsten oder zumindest der opulentesten Pelze. Wie wäre es, wenn Du gelegentlich an den noch verbliebenen Kürschnerbetrieben vorbei kommst, sie mal mit einem Foto für mich dokumentieren könntest? Hier sind die wenigen, von denen es bereits Bilder oder Dokumente gibt, eigentlich nichts wirklich Aktuelles: Category:Furriers in Vienna. Zumindest ich würde mich freuen. Beste Grüße aus Deutschland vom -- Kürschner (talk) 10:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Solange du mir nicht das Fell über die Ohren ziehst, werde ich schauen, was sich machen lässt. :-) Schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 16:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2014-05-03 (39) Havraníky Kaidling .JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2014-05-03 (39) Havraníky Kaidling .JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beschreibung zerschossen[edit]

Hallo GuentherZ, wie geht das und das (wiki syntax)? Arbeitest du noch immer mit Kopien von 2011? Versuch doch mal, über die Listen und den UploadWizard hochzuladen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Du hast Recht, das schaut wirklich nicht gut aus. Ich kann mich nicht mehr erinnern, ob ich da den alten Text verwendet habe oder ob sonst was passiert ist. --GuentherZ (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

magstdas ausbessern? Dafür kriegst von mir eine Brücke. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Die Brücke lasse ich mir nicht entgehen! Ich werde mich drum kümmern. ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab heute endlich das erste Bild verbessert. Mit dem zweiten warte ich noch ein paar Tage, falls neue Klagen kommen. Dann hab ich wenigstens nicht wieder zwei Bilder verbockt. ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 17:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich[edit]

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an infowikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über vereinwikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC) > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Danke für die Info. Bin gespannt, welches Naturdenkmal am Besten rauskommt :-) --GuentherZ (talk) 15:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Das bin ich auch. :-) --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 16:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Die Preisträger stehen fest[edit]

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. Nochmals danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Wettbewerb. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Info! Wieder einmal exzessiv-tolle Bilder dabei :-) --GuentherZ (talk) 17:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (01).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (01).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 06:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, das hab ich übersehen. Habe es soeben nachgetragen. :-( --GuentherZ (talk) 10:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (02).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (02).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 06:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, das hab ich übersehen. Habe es soeben nachgetragen. :-( --GuentherZ (talk) 10:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (03).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (03).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 06:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, das hab ich übersehen. Habe es soeben nachgetragen. :-( --GuentherZ (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (07).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GuentherZ 2015-10-29 Wien23 InzersdorferFriedhof sowjetischesHeldengrab (07).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 06:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, das hab ich übersehen. Habe es soeben nachgetragen. :-( --GuentherZ (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gratulation![edit]

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Foto File:GuentherZ 2015-07-11 (73) Retz Kalvarienberg Gruppe 4.JPG hat Platz 4 gewonnen. Zusätzlich gehört dein Foto File:GuentherZ 2015-04-23 (18) Wien02 Prater Riesenrad.JPG zu den 40 Fotos, die ex aequo Platz 11 belegen. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/2015/11/04/gewinner-wiki-loves-monuments-2015-oesterreich/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir Raimund! Gerade heute kann ich eine gute Nachricht gebrauchen. --GuentherZ (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-12-13 0295 Radio Wien Punschstand Am Hof Helga Fiala-Haselberger.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-12-13 0295 Radio Wien Punschstand Am Hof Helga Fiala-Haselberger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.121.234.1 20:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-12-13 0297 Radio Wien Punschstand Am Hof Helga Fiala-Haselberger.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-12-13 0297 Radio Wien Punschstand Am Hof Helga Fiala-Haselberger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.121.234.1 20:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2015-08-10 (203) Jaroslavice-Joslowitz Friedhof Grab Krasnick.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2015-08-10 (203) Jaroslavice-Joslowitz Friedhof Grab Krasnick.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:2015-08-10 (204) Jaroslavice-Joslowitz Friedhof Grab Vogl.JPG

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Übersehen, aber nachgetragen! --GuentherZ (talk) 18:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grab von Ferdynand Hompesch in Jaroslavice[edit]

Hallo. Du hast viele Photos aus Friedhof in Jaroslavice veröffentlicht. Hast Du vielleicht auch das Bild des Grabmals von Ferdynand Hompesch gemacht? Den flachen Grab kannst Du hier ansehen. MfG Lowdown (talk) 18:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Ich kann 3 Bilder anbieten. Leider ist das Grab nicht sehr gut gepflegt. Ich hoffe, du kannst sie trotzdem brauchen. Schönen Gruß aus Wien :-) --GuentherZ (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]

Servus GuentherZ,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen.
Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams, --Agruwie^Disk 14:56, 5 May 2016 (CET)

Danke für die Info. Mal sehen, ob ich noch was Hochladenswertes finde ;-) --GuentherZ (talk) 14:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-10-20 002 Ruth Wittmann Team NAVAX-AHTC 0102.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-10-20 002 Ruth Wittmann Team NAVAX-AHTC 0102.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

82.116.116.20 08:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-10-20 002 Ruth Wittmann Team NAVAX-AHTC 0117.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-10-20 002 Ruth Wittmann Team NAVAX-AHTC 0117.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

82.116.116.20 08:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khatchkar[edit]

Hallo Guenther, nach deiner freundlichen Unterstützung beim letzten Mal (Category:Memorial Khatchkar (Vienna)), hoffe ich auch diesmal auf deine Hilfe. Könntest du bei Gelegenheit eine kleine Serie zu diesem neuen Khatchkar machen? Danke und Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 14:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Arnd! Da ich zufälligerweise gleich erkannt habe, wo der(?) Khatchkar steht, ist das kein Problem. Ich brauche nur mal einen helleren Tag. Momentan ist es mir nach der Arbeit schon ein wenig zu dunkel. Aber es wird :-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Guenther, gibt es schon etwas Neues? ;-) --Arnd (talk) 11:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo retour! Entschuldige, dass ich dich habe warten lassen. Die Bilder hatte ich schon länger liegen, aber sie sind mit falschen Dateinamen in der Masse untergetaucht und die letzten Tage war ich nicht im Netz. Aber jetzt habe ich sie hochgeladen und sie warten auf dich, damit du sie genauer kategorisieren kannst. Am leichtesten findest du sie unter der Kategorie "Khatchkars in Austria". Bei weiterten Wünschen, Anregungen oder Beschwerden melde dich ruhig wieder. Bis zum nächsten Mal --GuentherZ (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zu deinen Gedenktafeln[edit]

Hallo GuentherZ, danke für dein intensives Bemühen um die Gedenktafeln in Wien. Es wäre mir ein Anliegen, dass du folgende Punkte mehr beachten könntest.

Der Dateiname / Kategoriename soll sprechend und eindeutig sein. Er muss nicht die ganze Beschreibung beinhalten. Dazu gibt es doch ein eigenes Feld in der Vorlage {{Information}}. ME ist die Erwähnung der Lebensdaten manchmal zur Unterscheidung gleichnamiger Personen notwendig, aber nicht, wenn schon durch die Ortsangabe Eindeutigkeit hergestellt wird (es ist dir vermutlich kein Fall bekannt, wo zwei gleichnamige Personen an derselben Adresse jeweils Gedenktafeln haben.)
Der Dagger † im Namen erschwert mE die Lesbarkeit (da kulturabhängig) und ist außerdem seit den Diskussionen auf de.WP mit einer katholisch kämpferischen Konotation versehen. Für ein internationales Projekt wie Commons ist das ungünstig. z.B. Category:Gedenktafel für zivile Bombenopfer († 1944)(Wien, Am Fuchsenfeld). (Hier wäre außerdem das exakte Datum 11. Oktober 1944 in der Form 1944-10-11 nützlich. Das ist dann kein Todesdatum, sondern ein Ereignisdatum, also etwas anderes.)
Zusätzlich sind mehrere Klammerzusätze ungünstig: Category:Gedenktafel für zivile Bombenopfer († 1944)(Wien, Am Fuchsenfeld)
Die langen Namen (etwa in Category:Plaques in Simmering) erschweren die Lesbarkeit, da neben dem Mehrspaltensatz auch noch jede Unterkategoriezeile umgebrochen wird. Und alles unter G wie Gedenktafel einsortiert wird - eine Sortierung nach Familienname wäre sinnvoller.
Gedenktafeln haben keine Lebensdaten, Personen haben Lebensdaten [2]. Wenn es für eine Gedenktafel eine Personenkategorie gibt, dann ist das der Platz für die Lebensdaten, aber nicht die Gedenktafel oder ihre Kategorie selbst. Die Wurzelkategorie ist Category:People by date of death, also People und nicht Gedenktafeln.
Hinweis: Kategorien können auch Beschreibungen haben.
Für mich ist es immer mühsam, durch viele Kleinkategorien zu blättern um die passende zu finden. Insoferne bin ich kein Fan von ein- oder zweielementigen Kategorien, aber das ist eh bekannt. Bei deinen Fotos ist mir nicht immer klar, was der Mehrwert zwischen einzelnen Fotos desselben Objekts ist (Category:Gedenkstätte für NS-Opfer (Wien, Grillgasse 48, ÖBB-Technische Service GmbH) Category:Gedenktafel für den Rondonell-Hof (Wien, Enkplatz 5)). Ich würde mir aber gerade bei Gedenktafeln eine entzerrte Version wünschen.
Es wäre mE nützlich, wenn der Text der Tafel in die Datei- / Kategoriebeschreibung übertragen werden würde. Dies erschließt den Text auch für Suchmaschinen, die ja sonst die Tafel nicht lesen können. Als Beispiel: File:Memorial plaque, cemetery, Weissenbach an der Triesting.jpg.

Ist jetzt kein Grund, da rückwirkend aktiv zu werden, aber als Hinweis für die Zukunft würde es mich freuen, wenn du meine Anregungen annehmen könntest. In manchen Fällen arbeite ich hinter dir nach, dieser Aufwand ließe sich sparen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki!

Ich hab deine Nachricht gestern gelesen, bin in mich gegangen und heute am anderen Ende wieder rausgekommen.

Deinem Einwand wegen der Lebensdaten kann ich problemlos folgen. Ursprünglich habe ich sie nicht geplant und habe dann irgendwann eine was-wäre-wenn-Panikattacke bekommen. Damit würden Klammern und Kreuze wegfallen und die Kat ein Stück kürzer.

An den Lebensdaten-Kategorien hängt mein Herz auch nicht. Wenn ich die weglasse, spare ich mir nur Arbeit.

Damit würde ich vorschlagen, für die Bezirke Simmering (theoretisch fast vollständig fertig, wenn nicht noch durch Zufallsfunde Gedenktafeln dazukommen) und Alsergrund (schon relativ viele GD erfasst) bleibe ich der Einheitlichkeit wegen bei den aktuellen Kategorien in der gekürzten Version.

Könntest du damit leben oder hast du einen anderen Vorschlag für die Schreibung der Kategorien?

Dass du Ein-Bild-Kategorien nicht magst, weiss ich. Aber in der gegenwärtigen Form geht es mir in den einzelnen Bezirken manchmal ein wenig zu kunterbunt zu. Deswegen mein Kategorisierungswahn in der Hoffnung, dass etwas mehr Übersicht reinkommt. ;-)

Einen schönen Abend wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, erst jetzt, aber ich habe schon gesehen, dass meine Bitten angekommen sind. Die Frage, warum du jeweils zwei Fotos, die sich nicht wirklich unterscheiden, hochlädst, ist noch offen. Ausgerichtete und bearbeitete Tafeln wären noch ein Hit. Ich finde, dass gerade dein Kategorisierungswahn nicht zu mehr Übersicht führt, er ersetzt das visuelle Suchen in einer Galerie / Kategorie durch das Suchen im Kategorienamen der Unterkategorien (ohne visuelle Unterstützung). Aber seis drum. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallöchen! Freut mich, wenn ich im Großen und Ganzen deine Anliegen erfüllen konnte. Um so mehr, da ich damit, dass ich andern Nutzern einen Service bieten wollte und mir nur damit zusätzliche Arbeit bereitet habe, die ich mir jetzt wieder erspare ;-) Ein klein wenig Service sind die beiden Bilder, eines hoch-, eines querformatig. Nur das Entzerren der Bilder spare ich mir. Denn ich fürchte, damit tue ich ihnen nicht wirklich was Gutes. Ansonsten hoffe ich, dass du mit mir leben kannst und wünsche einen schönen Tag noch :-) --GuentherZ (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:2017-07-18 GuentherZ Wien11 Zentralfriedhof Gruppe97 Soldatenfriedhof Wien (Zweiter Weltkrieg) (30).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2017-07-18 GuentherZ Wien11 Zentralfriedhof Gruppe97 Soldatenfriedhof Wien (Zweiter Weltkrieg) (30).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis! Was da schiefgegangen ist, ein Bild ganz ohne Beschreibungen hochzuladen, weiss ich nicht. Aber ich habe es nachgeholt. Schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:2017-08-15 GuentherZ (17) Unterretzbach Heimatdenkmal Rühringer.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Besser? ;-) Schönen Tag noch wünscht --GuentherZ (talk) 18:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-05-24 0049 Wien01 Tschechisches Zentrum Wien Sandra Kreisslova.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-05-24 0049 Wien01 Tschechisches Zentrum Wien Sandra Kreisslova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

46.135.36.254 10:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-05-24 0048 Wien01 Tschechisches Zentrum Wien Sandra Kreisslova.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-05-24 0048 Wien01 Tschechisches Zentrum Wien Sandra Kreisslova.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

46.135.33.234 11:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuentherZ 2012-10-20 002 Alexandra Moser Team Post SV Wien 0009.jpg[edit]

File:GuentherZ 2012-10-20 002 Alexandra Moser Team Post SV Wien 0009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wien19 Leopoldsberg 2017-04-29 GuentherZ GD Jahn 1340.jpg[edit]

Hallo Günther,

angeblich ist das Denkmal vom Jahn verschwunden. --JonnyBrazil (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo JohnnyBrazil! Du meinst, das Denkmal ist irgendwann seit meinem Foto verschwunden? Ich war vor ein paar Wochen oben, habe aber nicht drauf geachtet und kann daher nichts sagen. Ich wollte einfach nur zurück in mein klimaanlagengekühltes Auto. :-)--GuentherZ (talk) 17:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke![edit]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 17:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GuentherZ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GuentherZ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GuentherZ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gedenktafeln ums Rathaus mit OpenStreetMap und Wikidata verknüpfen[edit]

Hi! Ich bin über ein paar Gedenktafeln um das Rathaus gestolpert, wo du Fotos raufgeladen hast. Ich würde die gerne in OpenStreetMap und Wikidata eintragen, wüsste dafür aber gerne wo genau die sind. Kannst Du mir bitte helfen sie zu lokalisieren? Konkret handelt es sich um diese hier. Für eines hab ich bereits einen Wikidata-Eintrag erstellt: Q105826827. Danke! -- Skunk (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Echt stark. Altes Portal als Foto gesichert. Anton-kurt (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]