User talk:Gothika

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gothika!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--LegobotOperatortalk 21:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freiburg Minster 2008 (15).jpg[edit]

hi there,

well not really, one is higher than the other. I thought maybe combining them would be best. cheers Gryffindor 17:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Villa Castello Florence 3.jpg[edit]

That is amazing work, how did you do that, what program do you use? Whenever I use autostich I get a very warped image in the end, it bends on both ends, but this one has a perfect straight roof. Good job. Gryffindor 17:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Do you think you could take a look here and create some magic as well? Image:Imperial Council dome March 2008.JPG? thanks. Gryffindor 20:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there I have some requests I put in a while ago, unfortunately nothing has happened yet, see here Category:Plans of Topkapı Palace and Image:Model Topkapi Istanbul (3).JPG, Image:Model Topkapi Istanbul (1).JPG, Image:Model Topkapi Istanbul (4).JPG, as well as Image:Pergamon Museum Berlin 2007110.jpg, Image:Pergamon Museum Berlin 2007109.jpg, Image:Pergamon Museum Berlin 2007108.jpg? Thank you so much. Gryffindor (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This vector version you’ve uploaded contains some improper curves on the inner side of the tips. I can see that when zooming in using Inkscape, and the source code seems to contain too much numbers for such a simple image. --AVRS (talk) 09:25, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(fixed) Thanks. --AVRS (talk) 11:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

congratulations[edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For your work with retouching and creating panoramic images. Gryffindor (talk)

plans of Topkapi Palace[edit]

hi there Gothika, I have to ask you for a favour: could you add the northern direction into the map Image:Plan Third Court Topkapi Palace..svg and Image:Plan Harem Topkapi Palace Istanbul.JPG? The direction can be found on this map here [1] on the left side. Of course it would be great if you could create a complete map from the image, however I am not sure what the copyright status would be in such a case... also please try to convert Image:Plan Harem Topkapi Palace Istanbul.JPG into an .svg, thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

requests for cleanup[edit]

hi there Gothika, do you think you could help out with these? Image:Palace Basilica Constantinople.JPG, Image:Aya Sophia Floor Plan.jpg, Image:Forum Theodosius Istanbul March 2008 (15).JPG, Image:Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna June 2006 038.jpg, Image:Kunsthistorisches Museum Vienna June 2006 073.jpg, Image:Weltliche Schatzkammer Wien (261).JPG, Image:Weltliche Schatzkammer Wien (220).JPG, Image:Weltliche Schatzkammer Wien (219).JPG, Image:Edo Castle plan 1849.svg? Gryffindor (talk) 06:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you[edit]

Wow, thanks alot, I certainly wasn't expecting that... thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 21:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 1e6fb76f4ab7c80691f6c13c3e16977a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Gothika ( ) 11:00, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No...[edit]

...most már rendesen belejöttem :)--Istvánka (talk) 08:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Köszi! --Istvánka (talk) 11:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterano5.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:S. Giovanni in Laterano6.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Cecil (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original upload log[edit]

Hi! Please don't remove the original upload log. If the CommonsHelper does not create it in a readable way, then please repair it. Whenever you transfer an image, please add this log (also when doing it without bot) and the exact location of the image at the other project (even if it is deleted there). If there are problems later it is easier to follow the way of the image to Commons. And in case of some licences this log is also a necessary requirement (e.g. GFDL). -- Cecil (talk) 10:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK --Gothika (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please fix Image:Seasons1.svg. Where it says "Northern winter/Southern fall" is should say "Northern winter/Southern summer". Thanks! Cantus (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --Gothika (talk) 09:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A much belated thank you. Any chance of doing simmilar versions for other Diagrams in the same category as this one? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gothica, this plan (I like it) is 180° twisted towards the rough plan of Palace and Gardens above (in deWP). Would it take considerable effort to "turn" it? The generally used view is from the main entrance, i.e. from the upper side of your pic. TX (looking forward to your answer), --WeHaWoe (talk) 20:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will upload a new one. OK? (Image:Schoenbrunn Palace plan2.svg)--Gothika (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great!, &thanks. --WeHaWoe (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops: When using #_2 for de:Schloss_Schönbrunn, I see just now that your "North" symbol is wrong. Compare to Google, for instance, or better go to http://www.wien.gv.at/stadtplan/spread.asp?lang=de - search for "Schloß Schönbrunn" and zoom in. Both displays are "North-up". In case it would help, you might contact me by mail, so that I could send you screenshots of that official plan: "Schönbrunn Management" is unfortunately, at least, "poorly accurate" about the facts they provide. Please inform Gryffindor on this, if appropriate. -- I'm in a hurry. Best, Wolfgang --WeHaWoe (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are absolutely right. It was my mistake, I forgot to rotate the index. --Gothika (talk) 17:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice vectorization -- good work. AnonMoos (talk) 15:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Gothika (talk) 17:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Langlois Bridge[edit]

Hi, as you're oviously Hungarian, I'd like to inform you that I recently did considerable edits on de:Brücke von Langlois, mainly based on a catalogue for the actual van Gogh exhibition in Vienna, Austria. As the according huWP page is designed pretty close to the former deWP one, you might like to inform major contributors there (in an appropriate talk page) to possibly look up for news in detail or layout. Thanks, for the sake of any WP-user, --Wolfgang H.W. (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve left a message to Szilas, on his talk page (he wrote the Hungarian article). --Gothika (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Köszi, Gothika, danke schön, Wolfgang H.W., I'll look into it and develop further the Hungarian article. By the way, the main photo of the German article is mine, too. Thanks again. Sorry, it looks like I wasn't logged in properly yesterday :-))--Szilas (talk) 11:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:SunLayers.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-The RedBurn (talk) 10:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for dis information, but the original uploader it wasn't me. I just removed the text from picture (see page history).--Gothika (talk) 12:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Numele imagini[edit]

Dragă RomânescEsteLatin! În legătură cu numle imagini Image:2980116171 9f406e3c20 b.jpg etc. ar fi mai bine să schimbi numele pe un nume mai uşor de reţinut. Înainte de a trimite un fisier poţi schimba numele imagini. Dacă numele imagini nu este bun, sau din oricare alt motiv vrei să-l schimbi foloseşte formatul: {{rename|aici scrie numele nou}}. Toate cele bune.--Gothika (talk) 13:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mersi pentru sugestie si directie, Gothika. Numirile fisierelor sunt reglate. Salut. -- RomânescEsteLatin (talk) 06:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PNG[edit]

hi Gothika,

thanks for removing the frame from so many images. Can I ask you why you create .png images of the same .jpg after it has been cleaned up? It suffices for the .jpg to be cleaned, you don't need to do the extra work of creating a .png file of the same image. Thanks alot. sincerely Gryffindor (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryff! When I remove a frame, or background from a non-squarish jpg image the background will be white (like a new border). But if I save the image in png format, the background will be transparent. So yesterday I was thinking to leave the original images untouched (only the non-squarish images) and upload a other one, in png format, with the necessary modifications. --Gothika (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok I understand now. Yeah it's ok, the background can remain white in that case, you don't have to do the extra work and make it transparent. thanks for your help. Gryffindor (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. My pleasure :)--Gothika (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Bailey Gatzert new version[edit]

I don't see the difference between the new and the old versions of this -- is there something I'm missing?Mtsmallwood (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the uncut version with dark borders on the upper and lower part of the picture. And this is the new one whitout dark borders. Where is the problem?--Gothika (talk) 07:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Gothika!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 16:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original image looks more realistic, so I reverted it. I suggest you to upload the retouched version with a different name and use the {{RetouchedPicture}} template. Yuval Y § Chat § 13:57, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it seems that all your corrections would better be in different image names... Yuval Y § Chat § 14:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Joanmariewhelan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Stifle (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, almost like new... ;-) - Erik Baas (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :)--Gothika (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Why are you doing mirror plane of this photo? --Insider (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Insider! I made this reflection because it doesn't look good in infobox (where this picture is in use) if the person from the photo "look out from the screen". But if you want the original, you can upload another one in a different image name.--Gothika (talk) 07:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry, but this is licensed NC-ND on Flickr, therefore not allowed on Commons.--Túrelio (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ops, sorry :(--Gothika (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this new version OK now? --Oren neu dag (talk) 10:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Please ask User:Gryffindor, he made the original one.--Gothika (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File:WheelofTime.JPG[edit]

You left a message in my talk concerning this file for what reason? I don't think I have had any interaction with the mentioned file...well...ever.JavierMC 21:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded that file. --Gothika (talk) 08:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Um,wrong answer. I didn't upload that file. I have absolutely no idea what your talking about, and maybe you need to take the time to run through all my contributions, then maybe you will get your facts straight, hmmm? Don't leave warnings on my talk when they don't apply to me. I find it offensive in the extreme. Thanks.JavierMC 04:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The message is automatically posted. Here is a copyrighted picture: File:Radio max.jpg, go there and press Report copyrighted picture (left side on your monitor, where usually the interwikis is), allow pop ups and then you will see what will happened. Ask an admin to revert WheelofTime.JPG picture, and you will see who was the last uploader.--Gothika (talk) 06:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Javier,
I would like to ask you to stay calm I think there is a small misunderstanding here, the automatic copyvio script always warns the last uploader of the image, in this case you.

# 23:11, 8 October 2008 . . JavierMC (Talk | contribs | block) 300×300 (98,273 bytes) (remove border and adjust image levels for clarity) # 16:47, 1 October 2008 . . Eclemif (Talk | contribs | block) 321×320 (27,014 bytes) ({{Information |Description={{en|1=www.1001inventions.com}} |Source=www.1001inventions.com |Author=Eclemif |Date=31 May 2008 |Permission= |other_versions= }}

So that is why you recieved the copyvio note, I dont think anybody would mind when you remove the template off from your talk page, and I'm sure Gothika didn't mean to make you look bad. The problem with Commons is that Commons is a very big project where a lot of things happen with automatic scrips or with bot, and when there is no human interferiance errors wil happen, there is no need to fight about that, we all busy with them same goal, making Commons the best project we have. Huib talk 11:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing background of rounded paintings[edit]

Dear Gothika, I want to remove the background/border of the following round and oval paintings. I saw you did this earlier yourself with some of the paintings from the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam/Paintings/Rotterdam Dutch East India Company series. If you have some time, could you show me how this is done?

Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 13:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK--Gothika (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thank you, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 21:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Looks good. I tried myself without much luck. Thanks. -- User:Docu at 08:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all :)--Gothika (talk) 08:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More paintings with borders[edit]

Hello Gothika, I have found two more images of paintings which need their border (frame) removed. They are:

I still haven't worked out how to do this myself. I'm sorry. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I use to work with pen tool (Photoshop).--Gothika (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ok, thanks, I will try. btw, I received a message from someone, who isn't happy with the changes. I will take care of that. Otherwise I think they're fine. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Beauti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 21:56, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am afraid I cannot see how this file is better than the original. I am very much in favour of the use of SVG, but there are many instances when it not appropriate. In this case the conversion to SVG has resulted in the loss of a great deal of information and produced a file that is more that three times the size. Perhaps I am not understanding something? Globbet (talk) 22:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The File:Cambrian Railways map c.svg is a simple trace of the original image. I'm not saying anywhere that File:Cambrian Railways map c.svg is better than the original. And yes the File:Cambrian Railways map c.svg is a mess, it have to be retraced.--Gothika (talk) 11:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Phelc_pic.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Phelc_pic.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Phelc_pic.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

malo (talk) 00:59, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Székely[edit]

Az időszakba nem volt más képem es eszt a fotot Székelykevén csinaltam. Asztán monták meg hogy ez nem eredeti Székely népviselet ugy hogy maradot ugy ahogy maradot, de te kijavitotad. Kőszőnőm...Másik Sékely.----László (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rég volt de csak most olvastam el: ...Székelykeve Szerbiában van, de neve ellenére nem székelyek a lakói. Csak aszt akartam le irni hogy Székelykevén mégis székelyek a lakoi. Bukovinabol jöttek, vagyis jöttünk és Madéfalva környekröl származunk. Üdvözlet----László (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Akkor inkább csángók, ha Bukovinából mentek oda.--Gothika (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Én Székelykevei származásu vagyok és nem vagyok csángó (igaz hogy Székelykevén vannak csángók is). Olvasd el esztett hu:Bukovinai székelyek----László (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mi székelyföldi székelyek, csak a székelyföldi székelyeket tekintjük székelyeknek, akik elmentek (elcsángáltak) önszántukból-e vagy sem az mindegy, azokat hívjuk csángóknak. Persze nem azokra érvényes akik mostanában léptek le. Ezen kár vitatkozni. De ha te székelynek tartod magad, akkor az is vagy :) Ember ez is, az is.--Gothika (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ezt találtam a Magyar Néprajzi Lexikonban: "1941-ben néhány család kivételével az egész Bukovinában maradt székelységet a magyar állam a Jugoszláviától akkoriban visszacsatolt Bácskába költöztette. Nagy részüket az 1920 után létesített, de a magyar bevonulás miatt elhagyott szerb telepesfalvakban helyezték el. A bukovinai székelyeknek 1944 őszén a hadi események miatt ismét menekülniük kellett. 1944–45-ben Vas, Veszprém, Zala és Fejér megyék falvaiban húzódtak meg. Végül 1946–47-ben Tolna, Baranya és Bács megye kiürített német falvaiban mintegy tizenháromezren kaptak házat és földet." forrás. --Gothika (talk) 20:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Raphael_Viola.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Raphael_Viola.jpeg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ytoyoda (talk) 01:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maquette_chateausaint-cloud.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarry1250 (talk) 18:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duomo_Firenze_Apr_2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.147.55.7 10:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fájl:Platón-Vonalhasonlat.svg[edit]

http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:Plat%C3%B3n-Vonalhasonlat.svg

Hello Gothika,

I would like to use your illustration of Plato's Divided Line (2008. augusztus 4., 13:18)in the English Wiki. Would you be kind enough to post an English version or to let me make a copy? Thank you!

Szeretném használni Platón Vonalhasonlatot (2008. Augusztus 4., 13:18) az angol Wikin. Lenne oly kedves hogy keszitsen egy angol verziót, vagy megengedne másolatot készíteni? Köszönöm! BlueMist BlueMist (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you can use it.--Gothika (talk) 14:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely MorganKevinJ(talk) 18:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bartok Bela szobra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Liliana-60 (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Murad I Manyal Palace Museum.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finnish girl in Istria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pete F (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jedlik's electric-car.PNG[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jedlik's electric-car.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jedlik's electric-car.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jedlik's electric-car.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Iaaasi (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 19:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2 puppchen.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2 puppchen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2 puppchen.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:A-Karyaka.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:A-Karyaka.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ninomaru_Palace_Nijo_Castle_plan[edit]

Dear Gothika, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your images from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nij%C5%8D_Castle#/media/File:Ninomaru_Palace_Nijo_Castle_plan.svg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia, or we can use your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 12:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File source is not properly indicated: File:CapeVerdeIslands.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CapeVerdeIslands.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:CapeVerdeIslands.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 12:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Removal Candidate Notification[edit]

Hello. The featured picture Manhattan00.jpg, which was produced, uploaded, or nominated by you, has been nominated for delisting and/or replacement. Please view that page to vote or comment on the discussion. --Cart (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates[edit]

We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
Dear Gothika,
Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating sounds for the FS tag.

You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 19:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bawa-Portrait-small.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ernesto Guevara - Altra Gracia -10ca- Indio.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ernesto Guevara - Altra Gracia -10ca- Indio.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Wilfredor (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 00:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 08:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]