User talk:Mtsmallwood

English: Welcome to the Commons, Mtsmallwood!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 05:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

images.google.com[edit]

Image:Celilo 1867.JPG[edit]

English | Italiano | +/−

It has been found that Image:Celilo 1867.JPG has "images.google.com" in its description. The images uploaded on Wikimedia Commons should always have a free license, explicitly given by the copyright holder. If you have the permission, send it to our OTRS system or the image will be deleted! This is an automatic message by Filbot.--Fil nik 07:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mosquito Fleet?[edit]

Re: [1]: Unless we know exactly what boat it is, it's hard to be sure it was part of the Puget Sound Mosquito Fleet rather than a lake steamer (probably not by the design, though) or something used up in the straits. Anyway, that's why I used the more general category. - Jmabel ! talk 18:12, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for coming to my talk page & explaining. Yes, it sure looks like the same boat! - Jmabel ! talk 20:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Steamboats of the east Kootenay region[edit]

I suspect you're not an admin and can't change the category name, but it's got to be done - it shoudl have been capital-E "East Kootenay" as in Category:Steamboats of the East Kootenay region; East Kootenay and West Kootenay are always capitalized, sometimes also North Kootenay (which is sometimes used for Revelstoke and Arrowhead/Nakusp etc); Central Kootenay only in reference oteh regional district, though, or that's my gut feeling and though not from that region the parlance woudl say "Central Kootenays" anyway; the RD-name is a recent fiction. Anyway if you have the power to change the name of the category, please capitalize thte "E" on East. It looks really strange without it. Like writing "south Dakota"....71.7.131.60 23:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

71.7.131.60, I made a request on your behalf at User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands, which is the right place to ask for presumably uncontroversial moves. - Jmabel ! talk 02:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS though this is more of a wikipedia issue, recmomended title for the article/template to the west of that is Steamboats of the Kootenai River and Kootenay Lake, although the precedent set by Steamboats of the Arrow Lakes in including Columbia River portions of the route without stating it in the title could also work i.e. Steamboats of Kootenay Lake; I was just trying to be nice to the Kootenai/y River...; I hadnt' thought of the "Columbia headwaters" in my title deliberations for an East Kootenay article because of the Kootenay River, which of course is only pat of the Columbia heaedwaters in a regional sense, i.e. not as uppermost drainage basin...71.7.131.60 23:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arrow Lakes were (before the dams) really a widening of the river into a large glacially-carved trench. Between Revelstoke and Arrowhead the Columbia River was a flowing river, and between Upper and Lower Arrow lakes there was a 15 mile stretch called the Narrows which was more river-like. Boats that ran on the river stretches also ran on the lakes. Larger lake vessels did not run up to Revelstoke, but by the time the very large boats like Bonnington were built, the rail line had been extended down the Columbia from Revelstoke to Arrowhead, which became the effective head of navigation. On Kootenay lake, similar things were happening. The Kootenay river was the major tributary, only this time at the south end. At first the rail line of the Great Northern only reached Bonners Ferry Idaho, and this was the starting point for navigation at least for traffic coming from the US. This required steamboat traffic to use the Kootenay (or Kootenai) River to reach Kootenay Lake. Eventually the rail line was extended from Bonners Ferry up to Kootenay Lake itself, and Bonner's Ferry was less important. There were other rivers running into Kootenay lake, and steamboats were used on these. However, the overall pattern was similar to Arrow Lakes, which is that all boats used the lake, and some of the smaller ones used the rivers. Probably not enough to justify separate articles. Downs and Turner discuss these operations in their books. Turner's book (Sternwheelers and Steam Tugs) I especially recommend.Mtsmallwood (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

I was hoping that you might help sort out some of the categories around Category:Steamboats of western North America, since you clearly know more about this area than I do.

Right now Category:Steamboats of western North America is in Category:Steamships of the United States, which seems wrong to me on two counts. For one thing some of these are in Canada: at the least, if we are putting it in a U.S. category we should also place it in a parallel category for Canada. But, more than that, most of these seem to be boats, not really "ships". One of the consequences of the current categorization is that none of the Puget Sound Mosquito Fleet is under Category:Boats in the United States. - Jmabel ! talk 02:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images from the German Federal Archive[edit]

Please do not remove useful categories from Category:Images from the German Federal Archive images (see [2]). Within Category:Poland during World War II category we try at add to each image categories related to time, place, people and subject. --Jarekt (talk) 04:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with categories you created like Category:Resettlement of Volksdeutsche. My only objection was the removal of Category:Poland during World War II, 1940, since I am trying to get most images from subcategories of Category:Poland during World War II to be in subcategories of at least Category:Poland during World War II by year and Category:Poland during World War II by location. So If there are existing categories in the image then keep them unless your category is more specific subcategory of the one you are replacing or unless they are wrong.

Another observation I have about your recent work is that although your categories are good, their names are not very specific. For example nothing in the names of Category:Targeted humiliation of people, Category:Collaborators in Poland or Category:Poles driven out of homes categories suggests that they are related to WWII events only. Eventually they will have to be changed. See Commons:Categories and Commons:Naming categories for guidelines. Otherwise I think you are doing a great job which is much appreciated. --Jarekt (talk) 14:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish people of Poland 1939 in German photographs[edit]

What's the use of this category? We have Category:Jewish people of Poland during World War II, where most of 153 (as for now) files are 1939 German photographs? They should be doubled? pibwl (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to my explanation on your talk page.Mtsmallwood (talk) 04:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Line categories[edit]

You categorised the Category:Swedish American Line‎ as Category:Ships of Sweden. In the case of both ships is it correct. I am working on all ships to bring them under IMO (almost 400 done) and found that some lines have ships in various countries. So my suggestion is to categorise Ships by country and Ships by operator. If usefull Operators of ships by country.

You started a category Motor ships by name. Useful, but I suggest to rename the category Ships by name. In that case I can add ships working on the IMO numbers. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume I solved the problem by creating a new Category:Ships by alphabet. Find a discussion on the Village pump. Regards, --Stunteltje (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polscy pocztowcy po kapitulacji Gdańsk 1.09.1939.jpg and File:Defenders of the Polish Post Office, Gdansk, 1939.jpg[edit]

Hello!

Defenders of the Polish Post Office in Free City of Gdańsk weren't soldiers. They were civilians who short time before the war, bought the weapon. They foresaw that would become something terrible. The defence of the Post Office didn't have the military meaning. For that reason categories which you added, are incorrect. Greetings from, Gdańsk! --Starscream (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the understanding. I appeared your work on Commons and I must praise. Excellent gathering. Because we explained the misunderstanding, I will withdraw Your edition on these two files with post-office employees. Greetings from Gdańsk! --Starscream (talk) 04:09, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,[edit]

gallerys on commons have to contain Files or they will be deleted without feauthure warning. Please post articles on the local-languaged Wikipedia. Thank you. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 10:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category names[edit]

Hi, please review Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Badly_named_categories, i renamed the categories Hitler, Goebbels, Göring, Himmler by year following an existing category scheme. Of course the categorization is very valuable, so keep your good work. Greetings, --Martin H. (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nice job[edit]

thanks for the rough translation on that pic of nebe , himmler, heydrich, etc. very useful!

File:Friedrich Jeckeln in Soviet custody.JPG[edit]

File:Friedrich Jeckeln in Soviet custody.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Blacklake (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great pictures! My dad fished parts of a rotting paddlewheeler out of the Columbia River a few years ago. We had part of a paddlewheel and a rudder leaning against our garage for a long time.

File:Liepaja_December_1941_massacres_01.jpeg[edit]

File:Liepaja_December_1941_massacres_01.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto_Drechsler.jpg[edit]

File:Otto_Drechsler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 19:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riga_war_damage_in_Nazi_propaganda.jpg[edit]

File:Riga_war_damage_in_Nazi_propaganda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 20:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Mtsmallwood!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:John Livingston.jpg was uncategorized on 24 August 2009.
Image:Kulshan grand celebration excursion 1910.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:La Connor Trading Company advertisement 1901 (cropped).jpeg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Potlatch (steamship) 02.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sol Duc (steamship).jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Camano raised after sinking.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bainbridge (motor vessel 1908).jpg was uncategorized on 16 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monohansett ad 1883.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Some of categories "by alphabet"[edit]

Category discussion notification

Some of categories "by alphabet" has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brant Point Light[edit]

While I applaud the recatting you're doing on lighthouses, it needs a touch of care. While generally I use Category:Lighthouses on the NRHP in XXX for both the current tower and old photos of any earlier tower, I don't think we should do that for places where both are still standing and one of the two is not on the NRHP.

That's the case with the subject -- there are actually two different lighthouses with the subject name, both still standing. The newer on is on the NRHP; the older is not. So, I've changed the older one out of your new cat. Similar situations exist in other places.

BTW, thank you for your care in leaving my user cat behind with the photo. Not every editor understands that. I appreciate it. Regards, . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 18:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. You seem to be adding

Category:National Register of Historic Places in Rhode Island to files that already have
Category:Lighthouses on the National Register of Historic Places in Rhode Island and the same in other states. My understanding is that generally you do not put a file into a category and its parent as shown here and at COM:OVERCAT. There are exceptions, but I don't think this is one of them. Or am I missing something? Regards, . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 18:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like I'm piling it on -- sorry --I've made this very mistake myself -- it's easy to mix up cases in i's and ells in this font -- but you mistyped Category:LIghthouses with detached keeper's quarters. Since commons is case sensitive, this will frustrate people who type it as you intended as Category:Lighthouses with detached keeper's quarters (note "LIg" vs "Lig"). . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 18:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Imperforate stamps[edit]

Hi, there already exists since 8th of march the Category:Stamps without perforation. What shell we do? And ist the right grammar not "Category:Imperforated stamps"? --R. Engelhardt (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that after I created the catetory. The usual philatelic term is "imperforate" but of course "stamps without perforations" is also accurate.Mtsmallwood (talk) 06:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will change the category. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shipwreck?[edit]

You added the Category:Shipwrecks to a picture of a Maersk ship. Is the ship wrecked? --Stunteltje (talk) 07:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

looks like it, but I wasn't there.Mtsmallwood (talk) 07:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She is on her way to Malaga now, ETA 5-4-2010, and was not wrecked. [3] I'll remove the category. Even no sign of grounding on the Danish Wiki for the Lighthouse --Stunteltje (talk) 07:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

must be a very narrow channel!Mtsmallwood (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. Might be the tele-effect of the lens, but even then. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She was built at the Odense Steel Shipyard, about three nautical miles south of the lighthouse, in the shallow Odense Fjord. Since the shipyard is the only industry in the fjord, she's almost certainly being taken to sea for the first time, which accounts for the crowd. The chart shows a channel with around 7 meters of water in the fjord (it's deeper where she is in the photo), which accounts for the broad expanse of bottom paint showing. And yes, the center of the channel is only 100 meters from the light and she has a beam of 56 meters. A tight squeeze.. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 14:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

did indeed look beached to me! Mtsmallwood (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Projet Monuments Historiques français[edit]

Dear Commons user,

We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français !

In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français.

We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please upload the original (maximum resolution) image[edit]

Can you please please upload the original size image for a flickr image? This can be found from the 'all sizes' button here...before you upload your cropped version of this image here. Why do you keep uploading the lower resolution image? Always, go to the "all sizes" button and click and save the 'Original' maximum resolution version of the photo before you crop, colour, edit (etc) this image and upload it here on Commons.

As I did here. Just look at the large resolution of the image here: File:Chan Chaya royal pavilion (Phnom Penh).jpg at 3,984 X 2,728 pixels compared to just 1024 X 681 pixels if I had Not chosen the 'all sizes' image.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:55, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories by place or year of construction[edit]

Category discussion notification

Some categories by place or year of construction have been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which they should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Execution of Henry Wirz.jpg[edit]

At File:Execution of Henry Wirz.jpg: why Category:Andersonville prison? Clearly that can't be the location (this is the Old Capitol Prison, now site of the Supreme Court building: you can tell by the Capitol in the background). So what's the connection? - Jmabel ! talk 07:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was the commandant of Andersonville.Mtsmallwood (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Jmabel ! talk 01:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But then isn't this redundant to Category:Henry Wirz? Isn't it Category:Henry Wirz that should be in Category:Andersonville prison rather than this particular photo? - Jmabel ! talk 01:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

could be. haven't really thought about it.Mtsmallwood (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for all the category work on the Civil War images I've uploaded. Much appreciated. MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome, these needed some work..Mtsmallwood (talk) 07:15, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and it's helpful to have someone who's familiar with the era doing the category work. I tend to jump around in different eras, and areas, so oftentimes I just try to find the best category I can in a hurry. Anyways, thanks. MarmadukePercy (talk) 10:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Brijot_millimeter_wave.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brijot_millimeter_wave.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brijot_millimeter_wave.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

–Tryphon ^☂ 17:13, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Brijot millimeter wave.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brijot millimeter wave.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brijot millimeter wave.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

–Tryphon ^☂ 08:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PSN ad 1904.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

When abstracting a category...[edit]

... do be careful about what should move into the new category and what is specific to the particular photo. This was one of several follow-up edits I recently did on your changes, where you moved a category that pertained to the source of a particular photo to the new category about the person in the photo. - Jmabel ! talk 03:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Schutzstaffel_post_World_War_II_depictions[edit]

Category:Schutzstaffel_post_World_War_II_depictions has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kramer Associates (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

American Civil War photographers[edit]

American Civil War photographers has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

dcljr (talk) 03:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Distributor (sternwheeler)[edit]

Distributor (sternwheeler) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--Geo Swan (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting "Cape"[edit]

I have reverted your three additions of default sorts which would have forced "Cape X Light" to sort as "X, Cape, Light". The USCG, the Admiralty, and WP:EN all sort lights by their full name, see, for example, Lighthouses in Maine or Category:Lighthouses on the National Register of Historic Places in Maine. I could also cite Commons' Lighthouses in Maine, but since I am almost the only contributor there, it does not prove any wide acceptance of my position.

The only exception generally made is to sort "The X Light" as "X Light, the" for names such as The Cuckolds Light and The Graves Light.

Thanks for all your work in creating new categories for those lights that did not have them. That's been on my to-do list, but almost all of my WMF time is spent doing Admin tasks which, while necessary, often do not advance the project. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Rock Harbor Light sm.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rock Harbor Light sm.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 18:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The_Holocaust_1933[edit]

The Holocaust 1933 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paldiski_lighthouse[edit]

Category:Paldiski_lighthouse has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Ivar (talk) 07:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:GalleassGirona.JPG[edit]

Greetings Mtsmallwood It's my own photo of a publicly funded display for which a copyright permission would have been obtained-but that is all. I am sure you are right about the origin.Best if you delete it as a copyvio.Regards Notafly (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that a photograph of a copyrighted work doesn't eliminate the copyright. I suppose it needs a tag for removal.Mtsmallwood (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oostmahorn_pump_station[edit]

Oostmahorn pump station has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lighthouses in Nova Scotia[edit]

Hi Mtsmallwood, thanks for your work on lighthouses in Nova Scotia! Regarding the Black Rock lighthouse, I've found it at lighthousefriends.com. In case you haven't noticed, pictures by Dennis Jarvis almost always have geographic location information attached to them (in this case coordinates of camera location: 45° 8′ 13.66″ N, 64° 51′ 41.63″ W) so you can check on a map where the picture was taken (in this case: definitely not St. Anne's Bay, Cape Breton). Regards, --X-Weinzar (talk) 23:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

oh, okay, will fix. Have been using The Lighthouse Directory as source, will go back to source to see where I went wrong.Mtsmallwood (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nazi_party_officials[edit]

Category:Nazi_party_officials has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Rudolph Buch (talk) 15:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ellis Island[edit]

Any idea why Category:Ellis Island is one of the categories on File:John Birkbeck.jpg? - Jmabel ! talk 23:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no.Mtsmallwood (talk) 03:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'm going to remove it. Looks quite unlikely. - Jmabel ! talk 06:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool image -- but isn't this a sailboat, not a steamboat?[edit]

-Pete F (talk) 18:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elder_Holocaust_victims[edit]

Category:Elder_Holocaust_victims has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Monopoly31121993 (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?[edit]

How can a picture of a person belong in Category:Steamboats of Lake Coeur d'Alene? - Jmabel ! talk 05:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

trust me on this one, the dude owned one of the main steamboat companies on Lake Coeur d'Alene, new wikipedia article will be coming out in a couple of weeks, I hope.Mtsmallwood (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter: he's still not a steamboat! It would be reasonable to create a category for him, and put his steamboats (or steamboat companies) in that category, but putting Category:Steamboats of Lake Coeur d'Alene on a portrait of him is like putting the "Model T" category on a picture of Henry Ford. - Jmabel ! talk 16:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steamboats include people associated with steamboats IMHO.Mtsmallwood (talk) 00:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Mind if we bring this to the Village pump? - Jmabel ! talk 01:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marine_engineers_and_naval_architects[edit]

Category:Marine_engineers_and_naval_architects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Fayenatic london (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art_styles_approved_by_Nazi_regime[edit]

Category:Art_styles_approved_by_Nazi_regime has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Instead of adding nonspecific categories such as Category:Oregon in the 1890s, could you add year categories such as Category:1895 in Oregon? Thanks! MB298 (talk) 03:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leschi dock ca 1910.PNG[edit]

I don't know if you are still around, but if you are: back in 2008 you wrote on File:Leschi dock ca 1910.PNG, "Archival source says date is unknown, but based on clothing styles and known dates of vessels running on lake matching those shown here, and style of postcard, this appears to be ca 1910." The University of Washington Libraries dates another printing of this same photo, File:Leschi Park on Lake Washington, ca 1901-1903 (SEATTLE 3955).jpg, as 1901-1903. Do you have any reason to think they're wrong? (I'm in frequent correspondence with them, and would pass it along if you do.) - Jmabel ! talk 05:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'm still around. One of the steamboats appears to be en:Cyrene (steamboat), which has the pilot house on the upper deck. This was a rebuild of the steamer in 1909, and the vessel was taken out of service in 1912. So circa 1910 seems appropriate.Mtsmallwood (talk) 20:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'll pass that on to the librarian there. - Jmabel ! talk 22:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Steamboats_of_western_North_America[edit]

Steamboats of western North America has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

– BMacZero (🗩) 17:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jews and communists arrested in Riga.jpg[edit]

File:Jews and communists arrested in Riga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martina talk 05:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern_lighthouses[edit]

Modern lighthouses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sionk (talk) 05:37, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American_Civil_War_famous_photographs[edit]

Category:American_Civil_War_famous_photographs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 19:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Friedrich Jeckeln in Soviet custody.JPG

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Postcards[edit]

Hello Mtsmallwood, thanks for uploading postcards on commons. Maybe you are interested in COM:WPPC. Best regards --sk (talk) 04:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thanks,will look.Mtsmallwood (talk) 03:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liepaja December 1941 massacres 01.jpeg[edit]

File:Liepaja December 1941 massacres 01.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Buidhe (talk) 07:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle_of_Antietam_maps[edit]

Category:Battle_of_Antietam_maps has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Enyavar (talk) 10:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deportation_of_Jews_from_Marseilles_1943[edit]

Deportation of Jews from Marseilles 1943 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sternwheel_riverboats[edit]

Sternwheel riverboats has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle_of_Champion_HIll[edit]

Category:Battle_of_Champion_HIll has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kenneth C. Zirkel (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mtsmallwood

images.google.com[edit]

Image:Celilo 1867.JPG[edit]

Mosquito Fleet?[edit]

Category:Steamboats of the east Kootenay region[edit]

Categories[edit]

Category:Images from the German Federal Archive[edit]

Category:Jewish people of Poland 1939 in German photographs[edit]

Line categories[edit]

File:Polscy pocztowcy po kapitulacji Gdańsk 1.09.1939.jpg and File:Defenders of the Polish Post Office, Gdansk, 1939.jpg[edit]

Sorry,[edit]

Category names[edit]

nice job[edit]

File:Friedrich Jeckeln in Soviet custody.JPG[edit]

File:Liepaja_December_1941_massacres_01.jpeg[edit]

File:Otto_Drechsler.jpg[edit]

File:Riga_war_damage_in_Nazi_propaganda.jpg[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Monohansett ad 1883.jpg[edit]

Some of categories "by alphabet"[edit]

Brant Point Light[edit]

Category:Imperforate stamps[edit]

Shipwreck?[edit]

Projet Monuments Historiques français[edit]

Please upload the original (maximum resolution) image[edit]

Categories by place or year of construction[edit]

File:Execution of Henry Wirz.jpg[edit]

Thanks[edit]

File tagging File:Brijot_millimeter_wave.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Brijot millimeter wave.jpg[edit]

File:PSN ad 1904.jpg[edit]

When abstracting a category...[edit]

Category:Schutzstaffel_post_World_War_II_depictions[edit]

American Civil War photographers[edit]

Category:Distributor (sternwheeler)[edit]

Sorting "Cape"[edit]

Copyright status: File:Rock Harbor Light sm.jpg[edit]

Category:The_Holocaust_1933[edit]

Category:Paldiski_lighthouse[edit]

File:GalleassGirona.JPG[edit]

Category:Oostmahorn_pump_station[edit]

Lighthouses in Nova Scotia[edit]

Category:Nazi_party_officials[edit]

Ellis Island[edit]

Cool image -- but isn't this a sailboat, not a steamboat?[edit]

Category:Elder_Holocaust_victims[edit]

Huh?[edit]

Category:Marine_engineers_and_naval_architects[edit]

Category:Art_styles_approved_by_Nazi_regime[edit]

Categories[edit]

File:Leschi dock ca 1910.PNG[edit]

Category:Steamboats_of_western_North_America[edit]

File:Jews and communists arrested in Riga.jpg[edit]

Category:Modern_lighthouses[edit]

Category:American_Civil_War_famous_photographs[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Postcards[edit]

File:Liepaja December 1941 massacres 01.jpeg[edit]

Category:Battle_of_Antietam_maps[edit]

Category:Deportation_of_Jews_from_Marseilles_1943[edit]

Category:Sternwheel_riverboats[edit]

Category:Battle_of_Champion_HIll[edit]

Navigation menu

Search