User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive31

picture of Jerseys

Why did you delete my page pictures?!?! They are all just picture of Jerseys worn by the UF cycling team! We had full permission from the university to wear them! I am new to Wikipedia and don't understand why this would happen.

I tried to reply to you when you first threatened to do this.— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:C3:C280:E20:A19C:EF35:61F0:B3D5 (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Could you please be more specific about files in question? Or at least login when asking quesion? I may be mistaken, but is university logo represents gator? If so, please read Commons:Derivative works --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Response to Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Texan1984

Hi, the images from the page Reza Dana were deleted without raising the concern or to let me give a response. I have the release letter from the owner, which will be uploaded to the Wikimedia commons. I cannot revert the deletion nor can I upload the files again. Please fix it and restore the changes. Texan1984

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and files undeletions. I don't have OTRS access. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Réponse à la supression de Lacanau Océan.jpg et autres fichiers de Geofan

Bonjour, je suis l'auteur de ces fichiers, c'est moi-même qui ai pris ces photos, l'auteur de ces œuvres est mon arrière-grand-père, les documents photographiés sont la possession de ma famille. Pourquoi avez-vous fait supprimer ces fichiers ? Merci de m'éclairer. Gilles Sajous, alias Geofan, arrière petit-fils de Franc Malzac

File:Jean desbordes.jpg File:Lacanau Océan.jpg File:Avérous réclamations aux chemins de fer.jpg File:Radium bazin apéritif riche.jpg File:Vermouth-Bar.jpg File:Photolux.jpg File:Fuséoline.jpg File:Dentifrices Alba Dentina.jpg File:Bouillie Perdoux.jpg File:Bitter gaillard.jpg File:Franc Quina affiche de Franc Malzac 1899.jpg File:Pangermanisme.jpg File:Affiches Franc Malzac.jpeg File:Franc malzac.jpg File:Echo des gourbis.jpg

Sorry, I don't know French :-( Owning physical copy doesn't make you copyrights owner, unless you are only heir. However photos may be in public domain by age. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France or other relevant countries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Respond for Deletion resquest of logo File:Look Magazine.jpg

Hi! This is an Isotype that the Magazine use for all the media they have, so that's why we uploaded it like that... is it really necessary to reupload it as SVG? I'm using the logo for the Magazine page in Wikipedia Spanish. Thanks in advance. --EDiin52 (talk) 06:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Article in Spanish Wikipedia is also nominated for deletion. Please read Commons:Project scope and w:es:Wikipedia:Artículos sin relevancia aparente. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, well i just changed the article the way the person who submit the deletion request told me, and I fully meet the requirements for the article to stay, so, I was wondering if there's a chance from you to help me with the logo or is there any other thing I have to do for the Isotype to stay. Thanks.EDiin52 (talk)

I closed deletion request as kept. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

wiki commons deletion of Earl E. Smith pages

I have spent the better part of a few years building Wikipedia pages for notable bands, and people in music who have had a significant historic impact. I would like to keep the pages and images as they are a product of my work and violate NO standards. I would like to question why they were tagged in the first place Earl E. Smith (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Who made these photos and posters? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

They are my work for the artists. I have permission to use their likeness, I am not profiting in any way from this nor will anyone else. It is simply for historical artistic reference and nothing has been licensed.

Earl E. Smith (talk) 02:52, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Please send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Response to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Caracal Rooikat

The use of national emblems is typically subject to certain restrictions outside the scope of copyright law designed to prevent disparaging or confusing uses and to avoid misrepresentations. Using a national emblem in a context where the display of the emblem might be construed to falsely imply an official endorsement is also generally forbidden. Any such usage restrictions are beyond copyright law, though. They are designed to prevent fraudulent abuses of emblems, in particular to prevent using them to imply an affiliation with or an endorsement by an official body when there is no such affiliation or endorsement. Merely showing such emblems (for instance, in a Wikipedia article) is, in our understanding, not subject to such emblem or insignia laws.

Please see answer in section below. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Response to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Caracal Rooikat

Wow. Im going to keep this short. These images of badges belong to an era in South Africa (pre 1994) that is the apartheid era. None of these images have copyright as the new national government of national unity redesigned emblems for the new defence force. There is no copyright in South Africa on this emblems and they are now purely historical in context. Please refer to South African or Military History wikipedians about something you obviously do not understand.

These files are definitely not your own work. If such symbols were exempted from copyrights, proper license tag should be used. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Africa. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Response to deletion request of photo of "Elío - El Señor de Elío.jpg" "Vizconde de Val de Erro (1775).jpg" "Vizconde Valderro.jpg" "Escudo Marqués de Gongora.jpg" "Marqués de Vessolla 02.jpg" "Vessolla Medallon.jpg" "Escudo de Duque de Elío GdeE.jpg" & "Escudo Marques Vessolla.jpg"

Hello there, I am Santiago Mendaro Elío, from Spain; the OWNER of all those historical coats of arms and all its copyrights, also the AUTHOR of all these final collage images, and the USER who has uploaded all the JPG files. Thanks.

Ownership doesn't assume authorship. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for proper license tag(s). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

"Ownership doesn't assume authorship" I don´t understand this issue. What do you need to know exactly ? or what can I do about this ? All those images are made from myself and they are not subject to copyright restrictions, so they can be used by anyone. The images are photos taken with my own camera in my house, and the drawings are made for me with a simple computer tool.

Scanning/taking photo of other work doesn't make you author of that work. See Commons:Derivative works. Most likely these coat of arms in public domain, but source information/(approximate) date of creation are needed as well as proper license tag. Again, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country for proper license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Ok, that´s very easy ! : photos and scans are taken from myself in my own house a couple of years ago from a book and two wall hangings which belongs to me (all those were my ancestors belongings) 1.- the book was made in 1775 and the title is "Inventario de Papeles y Escrituras de la Casa de Ayanz y sus Mayorazgos de Santamaría y Val de Erro. arreglados el Año de 1775. tomo 2" . This manuscript is in my private library, and there is also a scanned copy in the "Biblioteca del Arzobispado Pamplona" (I have include this info in the "Bibliography" and "References" sections in the articles) 2.- the wall hangings belongs to my family from several generations now (4 or 5) and probably were ordered and manufactured around end of XIX century.

You need to add such information into each file description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but don´t know what kind of "proper license tag" is needed for those images, they are not subject to copyright restrictions, so they can be used by anyone.

Looks like these files should be in public domain by age. What is country of origin for books? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

The origin country of those books (manuscripts) is Spain (Europe)

Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Done ! No problems.

Did you find proper license tag(s)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Response to deletion request of photo of "Rosas de Paulo Sangiuliano.jpg" And file "Our Lady Terminator of All Heresies.png"

I am Lucaspdantas, EugeneZelenko You are wrong, the file "Rosas de Paulo Sangiuliano.jpg" is the painter "Paulo Sangiuliano" and the name of the file already says the name of the artist, Just to be aware, I am the current owner of this work, I took this photo with my Samsung A3, it is absurd you mark it for exclusion, unless you misinterpreted it by not speaking Portuguese.

Ownership of physical copy doesn't mean copyrights ownership. Paulo Sangiuliano died in 1984 and Brazil protects copyrights for 70 years after. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Brazil. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

The Archive "Our Lady Terminator of All Heresies.png" was the one I did through digital art.

Please confirm your authorship via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

(Thank you for understanding Lucaspdantas 13:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC-4))

Hello EugeneZelenko, I saw the article and I sent an e-mail according to the instructions, thank you very much for helping me and for telling me how to proceed, have a great day.

Lucaspdantas (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Please also mention fact that permission was sent on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Deno logo File:Deno.svg

Hi, I saw a notice of potentially deleting the media. Please remove the licensing notice. I am the creator of Deno logo (my Github handle is also @kevinkassimo, major contributor to Deno project), and it is released under MIT license (a highly permissive license). Proof could be found here: https://deno.land/manual.html#logos and https://github.com/denolib/high-res-deno-logo. I did not found an option to use MIT license during the upload process, so I chose CC0 for it. If you believe this is not the right license to use, could you help me changing it to MIT (since I am not very familiar with the Wiki software)? Thanks. Kevinkassimo (talk) 04:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

You could edit file description page and use {{MIT}}. Please also fill Source and Permission fields and refer to relevant pages in GitHub. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

--User:Veoturbex have helped :)

As I mentioned please also add links to GitHub file and license in Source and Permission fields of {{Information}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

deletion notifications

I had always intended to have my uploaded images deleted, as I only needed them for relatively short periods of time to put together a project. That is why I rushed with many of them when it came to things like copyright. I am perfectly fine with them being deleted, if anything because I don't know much about copyright or wikipedia. Calvin Coolidge 2020 (talk) 11:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your files were mostly nominated for deletion because of Commons:Project scope, not copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

BeneluxA logo File:BeneluxA initiative.png

Could you please explain me what you mean with a license tag? Thanks. QuiYa (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

See File:BeneluxA initiative.png#Licensing. Countries coats of arms are not your work. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for proper copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

undelete logo

Can you please undelete the logo you deleted so I can add the info below (or you can do it) thanks.Sedimentary (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

This file is non-trivial corporate logo. Unless copyrights owner will make explicit permission it could not be hosted on Commons. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Fair use in Autocar Company

Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws, and the stricter requirements of Wikipedia's non-free content policies, because:

1. Description: Logo of American truck manufacturer Autocar, LLC
2. Source: www.autocartruck.com
3. Use in Article: Autocar_Company
4. Purpose of use in article: To serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question.
5. Not replaceable with free media because: Being a logo, there is no uncopyrighted equivalent.
6. It is a low resolution image, and thus not suitable for production of counterfeit goods.
7. The logo is not used in such a way that a reader would be confused into believing that the article is written or authorized by the owner of the logo.

You should upload non-free media locally into projects that allow them, like English Wikipedia. See also Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

New User responding to deletion request

Hello. I am new to Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. I see you requested deletion of several of my photos on the Tony A. Da Wizard article with the reason of "Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s)." I am not exactly sure how this all completely works yet but I can tell you there is nothing promotional in these photographs. I am not sure what "No evidence of permissions means but I am the copyright owner. I would ask that you consider withdrawaling your request for deletion because they do not break any guidelines that I am aware of. Thank you.

Please send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. One of photos is Commons:Derivative works from album covers, so you'll need to get permission from copyrights holder. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Response to deletion request of photo of "Johan Berger Mathiesen."

Hello. I see you requested that a photo I added to the page of "Johan Berger Mathiesen" (in Norwegian) be deleted. First of all, I want to stress that I possess an original of this photograph from the 1890s; and second, the only time it has been reproduced, to my knowledge, is in a book from 1915. I have thus been under the impression that the photo belongs in the public domain.

Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory to check is true or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

logo

Hello. I asked the graphic designer of the logo I submitted (found on the official website of the company) for a written autorisation to share it. Is it the right way to certify the correct use of a logo ? thank you for your help.

Logo design is {{PD-textlogo}}. You uploaded two variants. One of them is unused, so I nominated it foe deletion. See w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics for best format fos such images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

About Deletion requests/File:Escudo de San Javier Misiones.svg

I'm sorry, I'm a new user. I changed the license of the image, I think it is correct now. If not, would you please indicate how to do it?

It's OK now. I closed deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Bäcker-Janns-Kreuz

	Bäcker-Janns-Kreuz
	Sehr geehrter Eugene Zelenko, ich habe doch erklärt, dass Bäcker-Janns-Kreuz mein eigenes Werk ist und ich der Urheber bin! Das ist doch sicherlich genug!!!!! A.E.Schmölln (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know German :-( Your user name and name on document are different. Document also contain images that could have different author. Commons:OTRS is best way to resolve such copyrights ambiguities. By the word, it's much better to move text part to relevant WMF project and upload only images on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

About deletion request of USB_&_Thunderbolt_Speed_Comparison_tb3.svg

Thank you for checking my uploaded image. Can I think that the image was judged to be OK because the delete request was reverted? (The mysterious parts left on the upper left have been deleted and revised.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asukanagisa (talk • contribs) 04:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, it was my mistake. I didn't notice file extension. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Список лиц, имеющих право на участие в выборах в Государственную Думу 1906.pdf

I received a 'nomination for deletion' for recently published voters lists , 1906, Russian Empire, published in Mogilevskie Gubernskie Vedomosti newspaper in 1906. How can I keep it uploaded? regards, Alexander — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alx90865 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

You could find proper license tag on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

... deletion request...voters list published in newspapers -- You could find proper license tag on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia.

> You could find proper license tag on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. I cannot. The case of official newspapers published content, not a creative content (not a story, poem or photo), with free public access (newspapers available at local libraries, issues older than 100 years).

The following tags might suite: {{PD-old-100}} {{PD-RusEmpire}}

but they do not cover the specific of the subject. I suggest new tags like Template:PD-RusEmpire-Newspapers

What tag should I use? Thanks Alexander — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alx90865 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

{{PD-RusEmpire}} is correct license tag. Formally, all files are official document, but there is no need for special tag for that. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Hippomenes photos

Hi there - I'm concerned that some hard-to-get photos might get deleted following your proposal to delete: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hippomenes. I don't know much about the requirements for loading and describing photos and I suspect the uploader doesn't know either. So could you please be specific and in layman's terms about what is required. I'm very familiar with the content of two of them, and they seem legit for the reasons I've nominated on the deletion page (and i don't have reason to doubt the others which I'm not so familiar with). --Merbabu (talk) 01:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

From my new user page:

I am the author of these photos, in that I took the originals in the 1980s (two Sydney ferries, the view of Woolwich Sydney NSW from Birchgrove Sydney NSW, the interior of a Zimbabwean Vickers Viscount) on 35mm film and have been scanning the resulting negatives gradually over the last 9 months or so. I lived in London until 1983 before moving to Sydney, and regularly visited my childhood home in Zimbabwe around that time and since.

From my new user page:

Hippomenes is British-born (1954) Zimbabwean-educated (1961-1973) Australian-resident (1983-). Grandparents were refugees from Lithuania to UK in 1915. Father lived in UK retired to Kenya (1987-1997). Younger brother has lived in Brazil since 1977. I have been a mad-keen photographer since 1971, the first 33 years entirely 35mm format. As a result of all this I have a load of photos of a number of parts of the world, a lot of them 30+ years ago. I am finally in the process of scanning my way through the c10,000 negatives that this obsession has produced. I would like to upload interesting examples for which I am the author and for which I possess the original negative. I will obviously not do so if the Wikipedia attitude remains "delete all" rather than "what can we do to keep interesting photographs?". Hippomenes (talk) 03:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

I think authorship confirmation via Commons:OTRS is best way to confirm your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

We do not require GF editors to go through OTRS to confirm authorship of non-controversial photos with no reason to doubt their claims. Do not start now! Andy Dingley (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Historical photos may be controversial, since many uploaders claims own work even for 100 years old works. Other example are sport teams photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Wrong file extension used on wiki

I have used ogg extension instead of ogv on https://pl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infobot for file File:Infobot w Google Assistant.ogv that you have marked for deletion. There is currently an update pending. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oort7 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Reason for deletion request was Commons:Project scope, not file name extension. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I thought that it was marked for deletion because it was not used on any page and it was because I have used wrong filename in the article. If it is not the reason, which one from Project Scope is it? Oort7 (talk) 14:45, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Unused one(s). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

I see. So if it is now being used on https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infobot could it be unmarked for deletion? Oort7 (talk) 20:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Please mention this fact on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

I have mentioned it on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Oort7 - I hope it is the right place. Thank you. Oort7 (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure, it's right place. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Responding to Deletion Requests for Lexington, Kentucky media files

Proper license tags and attribution have been applied to the following: File:Lexington montage.jpg, File:Lexington Flag New.jpg and File:LexingtonKY Seal.jpg. Please remove deletion request on these files. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSlaughter3 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, both symbols designs are above threshold of originality. You should dig into Kentucky copyright laws. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Re: File:School of Arts and Science, Uyo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation

Hello Eugene, as an alumni of the School of Arts and Science, Uyo, and duly authorized by the executive members of the alumni to create/publish the informational article for the high school, uploading and using that logo for that specific intent is in complete compliance. That logo was uploaded by a fellow alumni (Dr. Ime Okonna) to our alumni group Facebook photos page, I downloaded the logo from the Facebook photos page and I included the hyperlink to the Facebook page in the references section of the informational article I created for the high school. You can find the draft of the informational article here Draft:School of Arts and Science. Please undelete that logo. Thank you. Emman369 (talk) 18:16, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Please ask school administration/legal council to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review and file undeletion. Otherwise you could upload logo locally to projects that allows non-free media, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

KHATIA EGIA

Hello mr Eugene Zelenko ! I'm interested what's wrong with file I publicated! And what I should do to upload information about this person! Thank you! Ufoufo727 (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

If you made this photo, you could upload it in full resolution with EXIF as proof on your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Villa Frohberg, Winterthur

Eugene Zelenco: This is the second time you are questioning my copyright about a picture that was shot for me and has been published on Winterthur-Glossar since 2015. Here is the Link, once again (3rd picture from top): https://www.winterthur-glossar.ch/app/default/pub/fw.action/wine.article?ce_id=338&ce_name=Building. Eugene: When I read your history, it seems to me that you are clearly a bit "over-zealous" (to put it mildly). Where is the trust in the word of people who have an unblemished history? I find your insistence to be offensive, but if you continue to insist, I will send you copy of a personal email that I received this morning from Heinz Baechinger, who is the administrator of Winterthur-Glossar. He confirms that he personally shot that picture for me and gives me permission to use it. A personal advice to you, Eugene: Don't try to be more catholic than the Pope and concentrate on issues that are clearly questionable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudyernst (talk • contribs) 15:05, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but Google Search link is wrong way to provide source information. winterthur-glossar.ch page doesn't provide information about license and author. If from Heinz Baechinger is photographer/copyrights owner, you could ask him to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Lloyd kaufman neon zombie.jpg File:Neon Zombie John Landis.jpg

I made those pictures. And the usage of the magazine within these pictures is absolutly fine in this context. It is not violating any copyright law nor is the content problematic. It also makes sense in the context of the article because the mentioned magazine is a film magazine about popular fantasy cinema and both directors and producers are well known for their work in this specific genre.--Filmjunkie137 (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. Magazine covers are not necessary to illustrate articles about people. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Neonzombielogo.png

In the German wikipedia it is common to recreate the logo of companies. It is absolutly fine under the very tough German copyright laws. Many, many Wikipedia pages for big corpoartions proof it. It is even common to recreate titles for films since it is not allowed to upload a filmposter. So the recreation of the magazine is fine.

Two other examples: The wikipedia page for the German film magazine "Cinema" using a recreated logo: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema The Wikipedia page for the movie "Top Gun" using a recreated logo: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Gun_%E2%80%93_Sie_f%C3%BCrchten_weder_Tod_noch_Teufel

--Filmjunkie137 (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Neon part of logo was definitely made with non-standard way, so logo doesn't fall under {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 July

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Uspořádání toku letového provozu - ATFCM

Dobrý den, pane Zelenko,

reaguji na Váš komentář k mému článku "Uspořádáni toku letového provozu - ATFCM". Mohu samozřejmě získat souhlas od spoluautorů knihy "Letecké služby", kterou uvádím jako použitý zdroj, ale obávám se, že to do 7 dnů nestihnu. Velmi bych ocenil, kdyby Vám stačilo mé ujištění, že tento článek, který je součástí uvedené knihy, je celý na 100 % moje vlastní dílo, ani jeden ze spoluautorů se na něm nepodílel. Vlastně jsem ani tuto knihu do použitých zdrojů uvádět nemusel, ale přišlo mi to správné. Pak jsem Vás chtěl požádat ještě o jednu věc. Tento článek je první, který jsem na Wikipedii zveřejnil. Nemám s editací moc zkušeností a umístil jsem ho do nesprávné rubriky. Rád bych přemístil do rubriky "Letectví" a podrubriky "Řízení letového provozu". Jak to mohu provést, nebo to za mě můžete udělat Vy? Druhý Váš komentář se týkal mé fotografie. Pokusím se dopátrat k panu fotografovi a získat jeho souhlas. Děkuji Vám za Vaši odpověď, s pozdravem Vladimír Soldán

Sorry, I don't know Czech/Slovak :-( Is this text notable to be stored as PDF or it could be added in wiki-markup to relevant project (Wikipedia? Wikibooks?) See Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

If your going to delete them then take a look at the rest

Hello there as I say if you're on the male masturbation there are about 30 videos I post one which in contrast is the same but this time a woman is doing it yet I see no one deleting all the male masturbation videos Yet one get posted of a female is not right yet the videos of the other sex is I mean it does show what female ejaculation is as so do the male ejaculation videos if your going to delete this then i find it odd you have not seen all the other male videos Also accounting for fellatio the video wasn't a porno it showed what it was now that you can delete yet if it was in black and white would you delete it yet there seem to be old videos of the same thing in black and white more sexual than the one I posted.

Commons has enough of explicit materials of any kind, so it's always good idea to ask what is still missing. I personally don't discriminate on kind of such media, but I could not patrol all new uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - testing other statements

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hannes Vartiainen and Pekka Veikkolainen.jpg

@EugeneZelenko: it was sent a couple of minutes ago. Alexeidmitriev (talk) 12:01, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

You could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment

Hi! Please comment. --Микола Василечко (talk) 13:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Response to deletion request for maps by jamaps

Hi there. I had request for deletion on some maps that I've uploaded (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Jamaps). I'm the author/creator of all these images and I would like them to remain on Wikimedia Commons and on Wikipedia. If I just change the license on my images to CC BY-SA 4.0, would that be okay?

Sure, it'll be good idea to re-upload images with proper license or better without boilerplate. Please mention this fact on deletion request page after re-uploading. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

File:CYGO.jpg

Привет! Расскажи что не так с загрузкой фото. Что я сделал не так? Если не трудно поправь что не так. Ичто за бот добавляет фото и зачем он??Vladimir Dmitrievich M (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Изображённый человек значим? Смотрите Commons:Рамки проекта и w:ru:Википедия:Значимость. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your message

Hi, I have changed that information you wanted for the first picture "Disegno di Legge" and for the first picture of Berta Autotrasporti. Can you tell me if I have made it correctly ? So I could change the informations for the other files. Thank you.--IlCommenda (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Some of your uploads are not you own work. They may be in public domain because of age or other reasons, but it's necessaary to have relevant information in every file as well as correct license tag. See Commons:Essential information and Commons:Copyright rules by territory. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion Enquiry

@EugeneZelenko: Hi, I hope things go well. You recently deleted my RighTel Communication photo here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RighTel_Communications.jpg Now, I am not here to bargain about that! However please delete a complete similar photo to that which I wanted to delete for ages but just unsuccessful here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RighTel.jpg Many thanks Milad Mosapoor 23:27, 04 August 2019 (UTC)

Design of card and user manual much simpler in this case and some may think it's {{PD-textlogo}}, so deletion request is appropriate for this file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

I see, then please comment on its decision to be deleted here and help me: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:RighTel.jpg Thanks Milad Mosapoor 14:57, 05 August 2019 (UTC)

I don't have strong opinion in this case. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Editing and deeting of content on Janja Vidmar subpage

Hello, ia am Anže Miš, ceo of Miš Publishing house, Janjas publisher. The photos that i have uploaded are of our copyrights. And that goes for both a photo of Janja Vidmar, that I perosnaly took in february 2012 and of book cover for Treja možnost - that i have made personaly as well. I am new to contributing to wikipedia, and do not know what to do to prove above mentioned.

Best regards, Anže Miš — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMousy (talk • contribs) 12:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

It's not obvious that AMousy is Anže Miš, so please send authorship confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Same should be done for book cover, but from official copyrights holder. After permission check file could be undeleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Request

Greetings Eugene: Could you review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%D0%9E%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3_-_73 ? I do not speak Russian and that gallery has almost all "own work" - although it would appear on the surface that much of it is not actually personally created. Thank you for you review. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done. I think you are correct, so I nominated almost all files for deletion. Some of them in public domain, but uploader should learn how to properly attribute such files as well as about relevant license tags. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletions request File:Ciudad de los Césares obra teatro.png / File:Baradit manifestacion.png

Eugene, hi. You request a deletion arguing "Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF." Both photographs has been taken by friends with my cellphone in one case, and a cellphone of their own in the other. Then were processed to reduce their resolution in order to upload them to wikisource.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodanogo (talk • contribs) 22:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

In both cases you need to ask your friends to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Files nominated for deletion

Hi Eugene,

Few of the files that I have uploaded in the past have been nominated for deletion. I'm sorry, looks like I haven't uploaded them properly or in a correct place. Could you please advice what has to be done in order for those files to stay on GFK Tikvesh page, or where else I can upload them. Kind Regards, F00700I (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

You need to find out if these images in public domain or not. It's necessary to look for source information: photographer(s), dates of his/her life or at least approximate date of creation if author is unknown. Then license tags must be fixed. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Eugene,

Thanks a lot for your prompt reply. I think some of the nominated images are in public domain. We can definitely determine the approximate date of creation. I had a close look at the link which you suggested, do you think the following License tag Template:PD-North Macedonia can help in any way, as some of the images are definitely published before 1946 or 1971. Just so you know the images have been freely used in the past by multiple parties on social media, football book, football forums, sports portals, flyers etc. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 07:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Answered on deletion request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Eugene,

I have made now License tag update on 5 of the nominated images, still need to update 1 more image. Please check if I have done it properly and it's sufficient enough.

• Angel Kimov.jpg
• Atanas Trajkovski - Vuko Karov.jpg
• FK Tikveš 1933.jpg
• Tikves 1970s.jpg
• Vuko Karov.jpg

Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Is it posssible to clarify source of original publication? Web-site didn't exist before 1971 :-) Several photos are definitely taken from newspapers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

2nd source added now on 4 images, hopefully that will be sufficient. I still need to update one image with correct tag and source. Kind RegardsF00700I (talk) 09:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Is "FK Tikvesh 1930-1995" a book? If so, could you please look into it for photos credits? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, "FK Tikvesh 1930-1995" is a book published in 1996, by Ilija Karovski, who sadly died on 23 January 2012. There are no direct photo credits to anyone written in the book, but on the very last 2 pages there is a chronological order of all of the photos in the book which are probably 50+ (In Macedonian: Легенди за сликите објавени во оваа книга), and it's only written on what page is a certain photo, when it's been taken and who is on the photo, but no other mention of author etc. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 20:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

If original sources could not be found (for example, libraries could keep newspapers), please make source description clearer ("FK Tikvesh 1930-1995" is book, and photos are not credited there). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

The additional explanation to the source is updated on all of the files. Hopefully the tags for deletion can be removed now. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

It'll be also reasonable to fix File:Kavadarci - early 20th century.jpg, File:FK Tikveš U-21 in 1949.jpg and File:AH143.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

OK no worries, I'll fix the tags on the other 3 images also. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The Licence tag has been fixed now on the other 3 files also. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

I can see that the deletion tags has been removed now from the images Eugene and the discussion page is closed, thanks a lot for your help, I really appreciated it. I was wondering what can be done for the old club's logo to be retrieved, the logo was deleted by User:Yann on the day you made the request for deletion of the other files. Its very significant logo in the clubs history, and it's shame not to be on the wiki page. If some tags needs to be changed then I'm more then happy to assist with that. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 21:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Logo seems to be recent. Does Macedonian Wikipedia allow fair use content? If so you could upload logo locally there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

I have just noticed that the logo is used on the Lithuanian wiki page for the club, lt:Vaizdas:Tikveš Kavadarci logotipas.gif can I use the same file? Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 12:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Lithuanian, but it looks like Lithuanian Wikipedia allows fair use content. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, it looks like they allow fair use content, I will link the logo to the main (English) page, hopefully will not be removed :) Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Файлы, загруженные Averev

Уважаемый Евгений!

Спасибо за Ваш отклик. Извините, за поздний ответ. Я полный новичек в ВИКИ и только сегодне обнаружил Ваше послание и увидел, что русский для Вас родной язык. Кроме того, сразу угроза удаления, сильно охладила мое желание писать и посылать материал в ВИКИ.

Конкретно по загронутым Файлам:

1) Фотография (портрет) Bolonkin Alexander Alexandrovich. Его биография есть в английской Википедии, но без портрета. Все биограции знаменитых ученых в Википедии с портретами. Поэтому я загрузил на ВИКИСКЛАД его фото с тем, чтобы попросить кого-нибудь из опытных участников поместить ее в его английскую биографию. Эта фото сделано мною и помещено во многих книгах Болонкина для публичного использования.

Кто сделал снимок? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

2) Fail: Circle Launcher and Space Keeper.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Averev/sandbox&action=submit I loaded it in my sandbox for help.
I think this project is suitable for WIKI. This Project is studied in serious scientific articles and presented in many American scientific Conferences and International Space Congress-2002, published in famous scientific "Journal British Interplanetary Society (JBIS), vol. 56, No 9/10, 2003, pp. 314-327"; published in scientific Collection famous scientific publish house Elsevier, 2006, 468 ps. Ch.3. ISBN-13: 978-0-080044-731-5, ISBN-10: 080044-731-7; and many others. (br/). I asked to help me to load pictures into English WIKI. I cannot to load pictures into WIKI.

I would appreciate, if you will help me. You can write answer me in Russian.
Averev (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Для подобных диаграмм лучше использовать формат w:ru:SVG. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Austro-Hungarian army footage HD.webm

Hi! Than you can change the right type of copy rights. It is more than 100 years old footage. Do not delete it just becaouse of wrong type of licence. Thanks!--Togaheather (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Just fix license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

I changed it to "PD-old". Is that correct?--Togaheather (talk) 14:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Should be if copyrights law in relevant countries account only publication date for films. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion requests for public domain works listed under incompatible licenses

Hey EugeneZelenko, you made deletion requests for several national flags and emblems under the argument that the licensing should be marked public domain (For example: [1] GFDL, [2] cc-by-sa). And I agree these works probably do fall under public domain as mentioned in the English Wikipedia essay here: Copyright on renderings of emblems. So... if the license needs updated, and the works are public domain (meaning there is no license holder), why delete them?

Deletion requests are not necessarily mean deletion. Anyway source/license information need to be fixed. You could suggest better process for that. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm asking because in response to your deletion request I was going to fall back to a better vector-based image, but that image has the same problem. It's licensed under a CC share-alike license, which is not compatible with public domain. Should I similarly nominate the SVG for deletion, or should I update the license? --Elephanthunter (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

I could not tell how complicated original image was, so does vectorization justify separate copyrights or not? Anyway proper license for source image must present in description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

File:BJP Flag (Green and Saffron BG).svg

Hi EugeneZelenko. You deleted File:BJP-Logo-Photos.jpg the other day as a "non-trivial logo". This svg file is pretty much the same logo and actually gives the jpg file as its source. Does that mean the svg also needs to go as well? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for help! I deleted this variant too. In past I cleaned Category:Copyright violations and didn't look outside. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for checking. File:BJP Flag (Saffron BG).svg is another one that probably needs to deleted as well and there are a few more in Category:Bharatiya Janata Party and Category:Flags of political parties in India that might be problems too. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

I deleted BPL logos. By the word, there are much more problematic files in Category:Bharatiya Janata Party: thumbnails and personal photos. Sorry, I didn't have time to work on Category:Flags of political parties in India, because I usually also look on other users contributions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look. I only came across those categories because a new BJP logo file was being added to a Wikipedia article as soon as one was deleted. I didn't really look too closely at the other files in those categories, but I try to when I get some time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Three Daughters of Eve.jpg

Hi again EugeneZelenko. You seem to have already deleted this once before, but it's been re-uploaded again by the same editor. I guess it could be a different file with just the same name as the one you deleted, but most likely it's just a re-upload. The uploader probably meant well, but this post on someone else's user talk page post and all of the notifications on their user talk page do seem to indicate that they might not be really understanding COM:L. I was thinking about adding a {{End of copyvios}} template to their user talk, but didn't want to come across as to en:WP:BITEy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

I think that {{End of copyvios}} is most appropriate course of actions and I added it. User uploaded too much files violating Commons:Licensing and should clearly understand consequences. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look at this as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Free source

Dear users, I did try to get the picture from the free source and i when i recieved it from a website without any copy rights tag than i thought it was good to go with. I am not on-purpose violating any laws. But by the next time i will look into the matter more carefully. Thankyou for your time. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 110.93.230.66 (talk) 10:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Please be more specific about file(s) in question. Please also read Commons:Licensing and about copyrights law to understand what cuould be uploaded on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Elephant style png.png

This is my own work and this is not a logo. This is a stylized drawing of an elephant, not a logo. Where is the problem ? Hackunoichi (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

This image is not used and w:en:Scalable Vector Graphics is much better format for such images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Oh, OK, I understand. I can transform to SVG. I can modify the file or I need to upload a new version in another file ? --Hackunoichi (talk) 16:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, file name extension should reflect format. Please also note that previous file's name included png twice. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

I have a big problem ! I have import a new file in svg ( File:Elephant style png.svg ), but I can't do the redirection. I am sorry, I come from Wikipedia fr, I don't use often Wikimedia commons. --Hackunoichi (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Redirect doesn't matter, because file was not used in past. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

About the deletion request of Gqom_Demo.wav

This is purely my media and I don't find it necessary to make use of an OTRS form. I am the owner of the above mentioned media, I have made it for the specific purpose of uploading it to Commons, to broaden the media range of audios. Ｎｘｇｅｎ. (talk) 07:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

I think authorship/copyrights ownership for songs confirmation via Commons:OTRS is reasonable procedure. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Per Commons:OTRS#When_contacting_OTRS_is_unnecessary it's not necessary if "I created the file myself, it hasn't been previously published, and I am the sole owner of its copyright.". The RedBurn (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Own work is not so obvious in case of songs. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Maybe, but an OTRS form wouldn't change that. The RedBurn (talk) 11:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

OTRS ticket contains real information about author which could be used in case of w:en:Digital Millennium Copyright Act removal requests. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Request for review

Can you please review my uploads? There are only a few of them. [This] is a direct link to my uploads. Vaibhavafro (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

I think this will be good test task for User:GODLBot. See Commons:Bots/Requests/GODLBot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. (I was a bit anxious since this was the first time I uploaded something) Vaibhavafro (talk) 22:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Before the bot reviews my uploads, could you please tell me whether they are fine or not? Just reply “yes” if you think they are fine. Regards, Vaibhavafro (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm not specialist in Indian copyrights questions, but as long as Twitter accounts belong to Indian government, files should be fine. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

I am providing proof that the Twitter accounts belong to the Indian government. [This], [this] and [this] can act as the proof. Can you now PLEASE license review my uploads? The bot doesn’t seem to work. Please forgive me for annoying you too much.—Vaibhavafro (talk) 11:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Please note that same task could be also performed by reviewers in addition to administrators. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Understood and thanks!Vaibhavafro (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi EugeneZelenko/Archive31,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Declaration-de-politique-wallonne-2019-2024.pdf

Hello. This file is a public document by the people who discuss the organisation of 2 Belgian governments. As such, I had a comment by one of these people that it could be uploaded to commons although I daught he has the authority to write it. It is also publically available on the web on some newspaper site but I fear it will disappear in the years to come. npettiaux (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Availability on Internet doesn't tell anything about copyrights status. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Belgium to find out are documents in public domain or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Uploads by Estefano 2

porque eliminas mi archivo Ver pelcula Toy Story 2 en línea gratis en HD Cliverto (1) .mp4 instantánea 00.29.12 (2019.06.20 14.15.15) .jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estefano 2 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry I don't know Spanish :-( Please Commons:Licencias before making new uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging

The development team is starting work on one of the last planned features for SDC v1.0, a lightweight tool to suggest depicts tags for images. I've published a project page for it, please have a look. I plan to share this page with everyone on Commons much more broadly in the coming days. The tool has been carefully designed to try to not increase any workload on Commons volunteers; for starters, it will be opt-in for auto-confirmed users only and will not generate any sort of backlog here on Commons. Additionally, the tool is highly privacy-minded for the contributors and publicly-minded for the third party being used, in this case Google. The implementation and usage notes contain more information about these and other potential concerns as a starting place. It's really important that the tool is implemented properly from the start, so feedback is welcome. Questions, comments, concerns are welcome on the talk page and I will get answers as quickly as possible as things come up. On the talk page you can also sign up to make sure you're a part of the feedback for designs and prototype testing. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

porque eliminas mi imagen my talking tom 2.png.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estefano 2 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Estefano 2

	Estefano 2
	porque eliminastes mi imagen my talking tom 2.png.jpg Estefano 2 (talk) 02:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi EugeneZelenko/Archive31,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion Request Needs Review

Hi EugeneZelenko You have an open deletion request for a document that I uploaded. I'd be grateful if you would review the nomination page comment. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:GAMBAS_from_Zip.pdf Thanks. Gerard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerardbuzolic (talk • contribs) 11:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Answered there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Is it current or obsolete currency?

Good day Sir/Madam! The photo of commemorative coins are no longer available in Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines), thus they are obsolete currencies. On the other hand, the one thousand peso bill photo is a current currency in the Philippines. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Please mention this on deletion request page. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I NEED TO KNOW

Tell me how can i find the site of the photos that i upload whom you request their deletion.i want to make a refrence to the site. Anasskoko (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Problem is not in references. If photos were made by other people they must be explicitly released under terms compatible with Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Response to deletion request of File:IMG-20190919-WA0001.jpg

This photo was uploaded to the Wiki Commons from a collection of photos which my brother and I had taken at a preseason warm up in Victoria. As such, it is original content. Theblackaviator (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Could you please upload it in original resolution with EXIF to proof you authorship? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Request to certify closure

Hello Eugene. I hope that this message finds you well. A request has been made at m:SRP#Jcb@commonswiki based on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 4). I'd appreciate if you or other bureaucrat could sign off the Meta-Wiki request. As far as I remember (and my memory is fragile here so excuse me any mistakes, please) such requests are usually closed by a 'crat and then taken to Meta-Wiki. While it appears prima facie that everything is alright, could you please just confirm that everything is alright indeed? Thanks. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 15:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello again. Your colleague Krd has assisted me in here. Thanks anyway and sorry for bothering you. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 16:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry to not do this myself, but I had limited time for Commons yesterday. Today is same but for different reason. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

eL

Thanks for nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ablaut490 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

You question was answered in details on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:El Toro Dinghy.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Pronunciation file names

Hi,

You left a message about "Pronunciation file names" on User talk:Vij~frwiki but even myself, a seasoned wikimedian who know the subject, I'm not sure to understand.

You are aware that these files name are created by Lingua Libre and that more than 150 000 files follow the same namming patern, qv. Category:Lingua Libre pronunciation ?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I know about Lingua Libre, but is it worth to introduce another naming and category convention? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I don't rally know for the convention (and is the old habit really a "convention"? and how do you deal with non-homophonic homograph with this old habit?) and Lingua Libre follow the old categories. Anyway, my point is: why blaming one specific newcomer user for a thing done by a tool and done more than 150 000 times. If you have concern or question, you should ask them to the LinguaLibra team. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:48, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

It's interesting why LinguaLibra team didn't try to look onto existing naming conventions. Could you please clarify where did you see blaming? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Is there an actual convention? And if so where can I find it? (I know the Lingua Libre team and I can pass it to them). "blaming" as maybe too strong, sorry about that; but still, why sending a message to someone who is not responsible. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I could not tell if convention was written or not, but file names in pronunciation categories tell enough. I think it's reasonable to point newbies to best practices. Same as in case of SVG, TeX, etc. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I give up here: I definitely don't understand at all you message "helping" this newcomer. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - modeling data

As you may have seen, there are community discussions underway on how to best model structured data on Commons.

Direct links to pages created so far:

• Date (talk)
• Source (talk)
• Author (talk)
• Copyright (talk)
• Licensing (talk)
• Location (talk)
• Quality (talk)

Please visit and participate in topics you might be interested in when you get some time. Thanks. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#EugeneZelenko's strange rationales for deletion requests. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi EugeneZelenko/Archive31,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Приказ Минздравмедпрома РФ от 19.06.1996 г. № 254 «Об отмене «Методических рекомендаций «Программа детоксикации».jpeg

Почему вы считаете, что это не пд-ру-экземпт? MBH 13:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

• На момент, когда я пометил файл, как не имеющий лицензии, там была лицензия {{PD-ineligible}}, что никак не соответствует истине. Дальнейшую его судьбу я не отслеживал. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Я полагал, что администратор, видящий неверно лицензированный, но всё-таки свободный файл, должен исправить лицензию, а не выносить файл на удаление из-за ошибочной первоначальной. В рувики, во всяком случае, делают так. Теперь бы ещё узнать список статей, куда файл был включен, потому что минимум из одной статьи в рувики он был удалён ботом: есть ли возможность это узнать? MBH 16:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

    Думаю, что участник, некорректно загрузивший файл, тоже должен участвовать в исправлении своих ошибок и чем-то в результате научиться. Вы можете посмотреть вклад робота. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Anne-Mar Zwart 2017.jpg

• Toestemming voor het gebruik van deze foto is verstuurd naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org
• Permission for the use of this picture has been sent to permissions-nl@wikimedia.org

--Ischa1 (talk) 17:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs

I've published a design consultation for the computer-aided tagging tool. Please look over the page and participate on the talk page. If you haven't read over the project page, it might be helpful to do so first. The tool will hopefully be ready by the end of this month (October 2019), so timely feedback is important. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Croatia-independence-day-2019-google-doodle-animated-gif.gif

Hello, you deleted these screenshots:

And also:

• File:Hrvatska Google Doodle 2019.png
• File:HrvatskaGoogleDoodle19.jpg

Copyright holder has provided permission for publishing unaltered screenshot of their homepage or search results page for illustrative or instructional purposes. The screenshot meets the criteria for Google product screenshots:

"You don’t need our permission to use an unaltered screenshot of the Google.com homepage (or the search results page) for instructional or illustrative purposes, as long as you follow the guidelines below. This applies for print and digital formats: books, magazines, journals, newspapers, web pages, DVDs, CDs, etc. Google product screenshots You may use unaltered screenshots of the homepage or search results page for instructional or illustrative purposes. “Unaltered” means no superimposed graphics, photos, or ad copy on the screenshot, and no changes to the way our product looks. Screenshots of our search results page may not be used in connection with advertising products or services (for instance, showing a top ranking on Google)." - https://www.google.com/permissions/products/

With that permission Commons:Screenshots conditions is satisfied, also usage of the screenshots and their content is trivial. Screenshot showing search bar is part of the Google.com homepage (or the search results page) on specific date, Google Doodle is not isolated from the Google.com homepage or the search bar under the logo. It is not used for marketing nor it is used to imply endorsing of web site by Google. It was deleted as as non-trivial logo.

There are plenty examples of the logos that are currently in use under the category Google logos

Screenshot depicts the article it was taken for, it's purpose is accompanying text in the section of the article, and it unambiguously corresponds with the article content. If needed Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline to the file page can be added.

Please restore deleted files and pages so required "Google and the Google logo are registered trademarks of Google LLC, used with permission." tagline for image featuring a Google product screenshot or data can be added.

Thank you. --Commando76 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Goolge terms of use sounds like w:en:Fair use. You could upload such files to projects that allow them, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Обложка Гарри Поттера и методов рационального мышления.png

Здравствуйте. Сабж распространяется по CC BY-SA 4.0, как сказано здесь. --Colt browning (talk) 09:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Кроме авторских прав на обложки книг существуют авторские права на персонажи. Есть ли разрешение от автора персонажа на подобное использование? Смотрите также Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Fixed copyright

I have fixed the copyright on all of the images listed here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Curbon7

I have changed the copyright from public domain (which they were) to the more specific Florida state government copyright, which specifies that the owners of all of the images, the Florida Archives and the Florida Senate, are both state organizations whose media is in the public domain. To quote directly: "Florida's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright (as well as trademarks) and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted without clear evidence to the contrary:

Florida Department of Transportation – §334.049(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2018) Florida Department of State – §286.031, Florida Statutes (2018) Florida Lottery – §24.105(10), Florida Statutes (2018) Space Florida – §331.305(4), Florida Statutes (2018) Water management districts – §373.608(1), Florida Statutes (2018) Florida Department of Citrus – §601.101, Florida Statutes (2018) Florida state universities and state colleges – §1004.23(1) and §1004.726(1), Florida Statutes (2018)"

Of which, neither of the organizations mentioned are listed above.

I think for works created and published before 1924, you could use {{PD-US}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

About the deletion request of Files_uploaded_by_Dordemuzica

Hello! File:Mircea_Popa_dirijor.jpg and File:Nicolae_Boboc.jpg are scanned images of photos from my father's archive. I am the owner of the photos after my father's dead and I agree that they can be used by anyone. I cut with a photo editor conducter's M. Popa text and signature, dedicated to my father but if you want, I can replace it with the entire image. The photos are made by amators, being present after a concert in Timisoara.

File:Dinu_Lipatii_si_Corneliu_Gheorghiu.jpg can be deleted, because I made a mistake in the title (Lipatti, not Lipatii). Owners - Mr Gheorghiu's family archive. It was his wish before the recent dead, for posting it on wikipedia, but I don't take the responsability, despite the 70 years after Lipatti's dead.

Thank you for the notification! Dordemuzica (talk) 20:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Answered of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dordemuzica. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion National Guard mexican

@EugeneZelenko: Those files that you want to delete are emblems of Mexico, therefore it does not have a copyright in accordance with Article 14, since I placed the valid license for those files, I ask that they not be deleted {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} --Roman Medellín (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Please respond--Roman Medellín (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Answered on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Puruan1. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

File:League of Legends logo 2019.png

hi, you deleted this file - at the same time there is a request for converting this file to svg: Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#League_of_Legends_vector_logo

this logo could not be on commons? what about local wikis, for example en? thx --Mrmw (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

This logo uses non-trivial background. You could upload such files in projects which allow fair use content, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact 002.jpg

広く市販されている製品を、自身が購入して撮影した画像をアップロードしたものです。--Mc681 (talk) 04:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC) (Translate to English.This is an image of a product on the market that you have purchased and uploaded.)--Mc681 (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC) Since it was mistranslated, I will try again. I bought and photographed a widely available product. I uploaded the image myself.--Mc681 (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Japanese :-( What is copyrights status of wallpaper shown on photo? If it's impossible to find out, it should be blanked to keep photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

ディスプレイに表示されている画像はプリインストールされているものです。 The image shown on the display is preinstalled.--Mc681 (talk) 01:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. Please read Commons:Screenshots and Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

DON'T (EVER) EDIT THIS FILE (PNG) AGAIN!

DON'T EVER EDIT THIS JPG FILE AGAIN! "File:B-for-a-day-in-your-courts.jpg.png" THANKS. Msangjunboon2018 (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, Commons is not your private server, so various rules applies on Commons, particularly Commons:Project scope. Also, quotes from Bible or any other source of wisdom could be created with wiki-markup and HTML tags, if you prefer non-standard fonts. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Translation help

Could you perhaps help with the translations of Template:Filemovermessage/i18n? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

I think faster and much better result could be archived if you'll ask same think from persons that maintain Russian translations in Commons. My main concern for translation is terminology consistency and it's much harder to archive from ground up: I didn't translate too much on Commons and historically don't use Russian interface here. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

File Max Papeschi

Hi Eugene! Thank you for the message about the copyright of he file Max Papeschi! I've followed your guideline and I've ask for the permission. I'm waiting for the response. Kisses

Flavia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cactus Biondo (talk • contribs) 18:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Mago7777

stop being a "hata" bro

Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative works carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Removal of Switzerland temperature graph with CC BY 4.0 license

Hi EugeneZelenko

You have removed the uploaded PDF "Temperaturbeobachtungen Schweiz" from Wikimedia Commons, and left a note "Please send permission for File:Temperaturbeobachtungen Schweiz 1981-2010 Sommer.pdf to OTRS". The PDF is taken from the official website of the Swiss government (the URL was provided when uploading it, it is https://www.nccs.admin.ch/nccs/en/home/data-and-media-library/data/ch2018-web-atlas%20.html ). On that same website, the license is given. It reads:

"NCCS (Pub.) 2018: CH2018 – Climate Scenarios for Switzerland. National Centre for Climate Services, Zurich.

The CH2018 scenario data and CH2018 web atlas graphics are provided under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Among others, this means that users are allowed to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon for any purpose, even commercially) the data and graphics, under the condition that proper reference is given to the CH2018 climate change scenarios (see citation above). Please note also that all material is provided without any warranties and guarantees."

I and a more experienced wikipedian have taken care to make the authorship clear when uploading it.

Would you elucidate why this is not sufficient to upload it to the commons?

Regards, Lysander_down — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lysander down (talk • contribs) 17:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Please use proper link in permission field. I was not able to find mentioning of Creative Commons license on source page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Administrators/Requests/Regasterios

Hi, do you address to me this one? If yes, I don't understand what about. --Regasterios (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to give title to this section at first. --Regasterios (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please look at your contributions and see do you always use edit summaries or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

OK, I understand. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 06:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quintorigo.jpg

Hello Eugene, it is normal that the image is on the net, I am the communication manager of the Italian music group Quintorigo and that is the official photo 2019, which is used for all communication, newspapers, magazines, webzines and specialized sites. Consequently, for the web, it has a low resolution. --Andrea Olimpi 09:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreaolimpi (talk • contribs) 09:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Please ask copyright holder(s) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Deleted file from Vida Urgente

Hi, you have requested to delete a file from Vida Urgente page arguing that it is unlikely to be own work. Actually, this is our own work, because the user Vidaurgente is our institutional profile (from Thiago Gonzaga Foundation and Vida Urgente programme) to edit and participate on Wikipedia. Therefore, we're going to upload it again and we ask you kindly not to request to delete it again. Thanks! If you have any doubt, please contact us! You can find us here with the Vidaurgente user, at our social media @Vida Urgente (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook) or at our website www.vidaurgente.org.br — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidaurgente (talk • contribs) 17:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

If copyrights were transferred to organization, please ask organization's lawyer to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. If not, you need to ask to do so every photographer. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Производная работа?

Здравствуйте, коллега. Наткнулся на этот файл File:Evangelion Test Type-01 at the site of Shanghai Metallurgical & Mine Machinery Factory.jpg и нуждаюсь в помощи, чтобы оценить имеет ли он право на существование на викискладе. С одной стороны он сделан в КНР, где действует свобода панорамы, с другой сама статуя - это производная работа (причём весьма хорошего качества и точно переданная) от дизайна робота из аниме "Евангелион" и на этот дизайн АП точно распространяется. Пожалуйста, разъясните ситуацию. Dantiras (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Я тоже затрудняюсь сказать. Вопрос, получил ли создатель скультуры разрешение от автора аниме или нет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

В книге рекордов Гиннесса статуя значится за студией Khara, китайцы только на подтанцовке. Так что по документам это абсолютно официальная статуя. Возможно, это стоит как-то отобразить в описании файла, во избежание эксцессов. Zero Children (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Думаю, что улучшение описания не помешает. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Свобода панорамы в Латвии

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! Возможно, Вы в курсе, существует ли свобода панорамы на памятники, скульптуры, здания в Латвии? Я её в этой стране не нашёл. Может я ошибаюсь? Заранее спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

На Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Latvia написано, что нет. Насколько знаю, законы об авторском праве всех стран на территории бывшего СССР писались как под копирку. Могу ошибаться, но только в России и Армении были приняты поправки, разрешающие свободу панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Regarding File:Danganronpa 3 - The End of Kibōgamine Gakuen THE STAGE 2018 logo.jpg

Considering that the image in question is nearly identical to all the other logos in Category:Danganronpa i assumed that it would be okay to upload the image to Wikimedia Commons with a {{PD-textlogo}} attached to it. --Trade (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Number 3 background doesn't fit {{PD-textlogo}}. I deleted other non-trivial logos in Category:Danganronpa. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

What part of the The End of Kibōgamine Gakuen logo makes you think it's non-trivial? Kind regards. --Trade (talk) 17:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Are you referring to same file? If so, see my previous comment. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Deletion request for File:Hibernensis Addenda Corrigenda.pdf

As the creator of this page I am not sure why it does not comply with the Wiki Commons guidelines. I don't mind moving it to another Wiki space if you can suggest an appropriate one, but otherwise it should not be deleted. It is a page serving the users of three different editions of the same medieval text, known as the Hibernensis (see Wikipedia entry), most of whom are students and academics, hence the entry has a clear educational purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hibernensis (talk • contribs) 17:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

This document seems to contains footnotes. Original texts belong to WikiSource and same is true for footnotes from publications in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

No, the document does not contain footnotes. Also it is not really appropriate for Wikisource, which is meant in the first place for published documents over which no copyright claims are made and which can be reproduced freely. The document that I uploaded has never been published anywhere and was created by me. Hence it s an original document, which complies with Wikicommons stipulations as far as I can tell. --Hibernensis

Sorry, I still think that wiki-text in relevant WMF project is best format for this document. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

What is the relevant WMF project? Please specify. --Hibernensis

What all this text is about? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

This is a list of additions and corrections to three books (their titles are given in the pdf document) which are frequently used by students of history and by historians of the medieval period. The additions and corrections allow readers to make better use of these books for studying or for research. This is why I think that the document is appropriate for Wiki Commons. --Hibernensis

Such errata make sense for Wikisource (if original books are in public domain), on Wikipedia (if there are articles about book) and Wikiversity (if there are courses based on that books). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Response to 'Pronunciation file names'

Thanks for the tip:

Please use language code prefix for pronunciation file names. See Category:Polish pronunciation for examples. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

I added polish (and also english) description as you suggested. Hope now it's clear and comply with the Wiki rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LPORP5 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

92. Response to Matt Talbot deletion Requests

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Matt_Talbot_shrine_1949.jpg Re: Matt Talbot shrine 1949

Hi, the reproduced photograph is of the shrine created at the spot that Matt Talbot died on Granby Lane in Dublin, Ireland. The photo has been in widespread circulation for decades.

I have endeavoured to obtain information about its origins. The only piece of information I did find out was that it dated to the year 1949. The priest who took the photograph has died and no one is sure from memory that it was exactly that took the picture.

This is the only information I can provide about its creation; if there is a problem about copyrights status and license tags leading to its deletion I understand.

Please take a look on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ireland to find out what are criteria for public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Cograng If you believe the 3 pictures are breaking the rules proceed and delete them.

I am a newby at this, so, my transgression was unintentional.

Two information stands are composed from historical photos. It would be OK to keep your photos if all original photos are in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Request undeletion of Predator Orion 3000 Gallery 01.png

I am requesting undeletion of File:Predator Orion 3000 Gallery 01.png,File:Predator Orion 5000 Gallery 01.png, and File:Predator Orion 9000 Gallery 01.png. If I read the legal notice about copyright usage of images from https://www.acer-group.com/ag/en/TW/content/legal-english#_ga=2.185740585.1225914375.1575777328-1996778958.1570411393 correctly, then these images should be able to be used. Since Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia are, in my understanding, non-profit organizations and not commercial companies, Acer gives permission for these images to be used. The original locations for these images are as follows:

File:Predator Orion 3000 Gallery 01.png https://static.acer.com/up/Resource/Acer/Predator_Minisite/Product_Series/Predator_Orion_3000/Photogallery/20180606/Predator-Orion3000_gallery_01.png
File:Predator Orion 5000 Gallery 01.png https://static.acer.com/up/Resource/Acer/Desktop/Predator_Orion_5000/Photogallery/20180323/Predator-Orion5000_gallery_01.png
File:Predator Orion 9000 Gallery 01.png https://static.acer.com/up/Resource/Acer/Predator_Minisite/Product_Series/Predator_Orion_9000/Photogallery/20171020/Predator_Orion_9000_Gallery_01.png

If this is not sufficient, please let me know what I need to do to get appropriate permission for these images. I'm quite new to this stuff and I would to get better, and avoid issues like this.

Thanks,

Beckoning Jinx (talk) 23:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Statement If you do not have a current contract directly with Acer, you are authorized to use such documents and related graphics only for your personal, non-commercial use (provided that all copyright and other proprietary notices are retained), and you may not reproduce, display, distribute or otherwise use them for any commercial purpose unless you receive specific written permission from Acer. contadicts Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Request for rivers the deleted files

HI,EugeneZelenko this file has deleted by you. If you want to delete any file then please check their author details to search in Google. Recently I have checked that lot of files you have deleted to hi.wikisource.org because of nominated. That guy who had nominated those files for deletion did not Google for author's death date. othervise neither nomination nor deletion will happen if anyone simply Google for author. You have not right to delete other language related files blindly. I request you to please reverse that file's which was deleted by you. नीलम (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC) For example: I am providing list of deleted file and author's death date which are more then 60 year ago and copyright free according to Indian copyright act.

• File:कर्बला.djvu-w:premchand(1880-1936)
• File:हिंदी विश्वकोष भाग ३.djvu
• File:हिंदी विश्वकोश खंड 2.djvu
• File:रहीम-कवितावली.djvuw:Abdul Rahim Khan-I-Khana(1556-1627)
• File:अतीत-स्मृति.pdfw:Mahavir Prasad Dwivedi (1864-1938)
• File:आदर्श हिंदू ३.pdf(mehta lajjaram Sharma-1863-1931)
• File:आदर्श हिंदू २.pdf(mehta lajjaram Sharma-1863-1931)
• File:आदर्श हिंदू १.pdf(mehta lajjaram Sharma-1863-1931)
• File:शैवसर्वस्व.pdfw:Pratap Narayan Mishra (1856-1893) नीलम (talk) 05:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

It's responsibility of uploader to put all necessary information into file descriptions and use correct license tags. Sorry, it's not trivial to find information about books authors when books use Indian script. Old books also may be edited or commented by later authors, so original authors information may be incorrect. Also deletion process provide enough time to fix all problems.

If you are willing to fix all problems on all these files, I could undelete them.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

3 Review requests on my talkpage

Dear Eugene Zelenko,

Please feel free to review or tag as no permission these 3 images that someone asked me to review. You had tagged a previous image the uploader messaged me as no permission. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

• PS: They say to assume good faith. However, I wonder if MO-Quotes is Sjrahem, the uploader of the second and third images since Sjarahem has sporadic activity and MO-Quotes is asking me to review this other user's 2 uploads suddenly? Rather strange. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Rt Rana famous Quote.jpg

Dear Eugene Zelenko , this image got no permission tag .and please help to keep this photo because This quote is very motivational and I like a lot that image so that i uploaded . and Daily people watching average:10 , Please keep this image thanking you Sjrahem (talk) 07:14, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

What image was used as background? See also Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

A work derived from many different sources

Dear Eugene, can you advise us what is the correct syntax of the "source" and "author" parameters in the {{Information}} template? In the case that the derived work (for example image) contains multiple images from different sources.

As far as I know, the {{Own based}} and {{Derived from}} templates can only be used if all sources come from Commons. But how if some sources come from Commons and others don't?

In this case, should one line "source" contain a mix of different templates, URLs, references to literature etc.? And how to list the original authors of these sources among these different sources? And what are the separators between these sources, "|" or ";" or what?

Or should these different sources be listed on different lines of the multiple "source" parameter? In other words, is the "Information" template able to contain multiple "source" lines (parameters)?

Could you please give us some links to examples of such complex derivative works where the Information templates are filled in correctly?

I am unable to find appropriate documentation on Commons for such cases.

Thank you, --Kychot (talk) 05:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Bombus borealis image

Dear Eugene, you recently deleted an image of the above mentioned taxon. I cant double check the problem identified as it was inmediately deleted. Cant I use images with a CC 4.0 license in Commons? I want to upload this bombus image now. Regards, Cbrescia (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

No. Sorry, but CC-BY-NC is incompatible with Commons:Licensing. Same for -ND variants. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Response to Nomination of Pictures Uploaded for Deletion for Wikimedia Norayr Mnatsakanyan

EugeneZelenko, the photos uploaded are my own work and I provided the exact dates and the location where I produced these photos. It is part of my family archive, and the artist is my father. Please, help me preserve these photos on his Wikimedia page - Norayr Mnatsakanyan. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noki (talk • contribs) 21:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

You need to find out information about photographers and ask them to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)