User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Очередной вопрос[edit]

Здравствуйте, Евгений! Все фото, которые я загрузила за последние 4-ре месяца, помечены к удалению. Большинство фото, исключительно моя работа и те, которые были найдены на других сайтах тоже. Картины, тоже фотографировала я. Старые фото, работа другого фотографа. Мне необходимо обработать все фото в соответствии.Что от меня требуется, каких доказательств, что это моя работа? Буду благодарна за совет. (Ne monro (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Загрузите свои собственные фотографии в полном разрешении с EXIF. Для фотографий другого фотографа и картин Вам надо попросить их авторов послать разрешение (образец: Commons:Email templates) в Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Евгений, и еще один вопрос. Дело в том, что авторов старых фото театра, к примеру, я не знаю. Кто должен дать мне разрешение на использование. Директора театра?

Автора картин нет в живых , фотографа старых фото художника думаю тоже.Значит мне нужно запрашивать разрешения у родных?

Скорее всего родственники являются правообладателями после смерти автора. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Какую лизенцию применяют, в случаях, когда "концов" не найти.

Анонимные работы переходят в общественное достоянии через 70 лет после публикации. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Что происходит после того, как отправляешь запрос от автора? Приходит обратное письмо с инструкцией , что делать, в котором прописан код новой лизенции?

Выставила на фото Герб, лизенцию , применяемую к гербам. Что дальше? Эту лизенцию проверять и далее будут решать что же делать с этой картинкой? Боюсь, что я что то упустила и фото удалят.

Выглядит так, что герб взят из старой книги. Может он уже в общественном достоянии? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Наверняка, что он действительно в общественном достоянии. Значит ли это, что мне надо обязательно поставить шаблон лицензии "общественного достояния" или я могу оставить лицензию, применимую только к гербам?
Для того, чтобы говорить об общественном достоянии, нужна некоторая информация: автор или источник и год публикации для анонимных работ. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Что происходит дальше? Кто проверит мои фото вновь, учитывая изменения лицензии? Я отправила письмо об авторстве, пытаясь "спасти" одну из фото. Должен прийти ответ? Или со страницы фото исчезнет рамка, что фото надо удалить.
Укажите о том, что письмо послано, на странице запроса на удаления. Ускорить обработку писем в OTRS можно через Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ведь, я могу потерять время, не зная, сдела ли я правильно? Или через пару дней страницы лишаться фото? Евгений, не могли бы вы разъяснить мне этот процесс. Спасибо за помощь!!!! Ne monro (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос[edit]

Здравствуйте. Заметил, что вы удалили три залитые мной фотографии File:Танос. пример игрушки.jpg, File:Танос.png и File:Танос (Thanos).jpg. Могу ли узнать причины удаления? Заранее спасибо. И еще, я совсем не знаток движка Media Wiki, можно ли вас попросить помочь правильно залить эти файлы? Tez.romach (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Очень сомневаюсь, чтобы Marvel распространял комиксы под свободными лицензиями. Вы можете загружать файлы, охраняемые авторскими правами в Википедию на русском языке. Смотрите также Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ладно, спасибо. Как эксперт подскажите, как мне использовать в статье Танос[1] файл File:Thanos.png[2]?
Честно говоря, давно этим не занимался :-) Думаю, Вам стоит прочитать w:ru:Википедия:Критерии добросовестного использования, а также посмотреть описание файлов из статей с подобной тематикой. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос[edit]

Почему Вы удалили изображение обложки нотного сборника моего отца. Это его рукописный сборник. И никаких авторских прав на это изображение не требуется. Это из его архива, а точнее сказать, сборник создан им для моей дочери и подарен ей в то время, когда училась в музыкальной школе. Если Вы что-либо удаляете из ВикиСклада, то потрудитесь хотя бы объяснить свои действия. Не знаю, Вы ли удалили и обложки и других нотных сборников моего отца, хотя были указаны авторы рисунков, положенных в основу этих изображений и созданных мной лично, а следовательно, авторское право принадлежит в данных случаях именно мне.

Либо, Вы должны объяснить, что является причиной Ваших действий, извините, не знаю Вашего настоящего имени. Могу только догадаться, что Вы Евгений Зеленко и Вы белорус, а родной язык для Вас русский.

Или Вы занимаетесь этим для набора "очков"

Потрудитесь объяснить. Эти файлы были использованы на соответствующих страница ВП, в том числе и в татарской версии. Соответственно они исчезли и там. Понимаю, что тут вправе любой заниматься правками, на то ВП и свободная, но не надо этим заниматься, если у Вам нет достаточных причин для такого действия.

И, прошу Вас, отвечать на русском языке, тем более он для Вас родной, чтобы не читать "электронный нелепый перевод" Вашего сообщения.

Камиль Энверович Бакиров.

И ещё, я не хочу публичного обсуждения как своих, так и Ваших действий, а потому, прошу Вас, пишите мне по адресу kamilbakir@mail.ru

Kamilbakir (talk) 08:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Думаю, ничего секретного в обсуждении не будет, поэтому лучше будет ответить тут.
Насколько понимаю, Ваш отец был композитором. Но был ли он также художником, или сборники оформляли другие люди? Что указано на странице с информацией про книгу? В последнем случае Вам надо будет получить разрешения (пример) от художников и послать их в Commons:OTRS.
Для тех файлов, автором которых являетесь Вы или Ваш отец (а Вы - правообладатель как наследник), пошлите подтверждение через Commons:OTRS.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Its is very annoying when you mark a file for deletion and it is then removed without any discussion whatsoever. Gamweb (talk) 03:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please be more specific about file in question? I left at least one message on you talk page. If I deleted several your files, it means that they had similar problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You probably deleted my images because you think they're under copyright, and you're right. But i'm allowed, as one of Graffiti Art's editor to use them. It took me at least 30 minutes to understand how it works and put correctly the images, so if you can put them back, i'll be pleased.

Upload picture[edit]

What do I have to do while upload image?

If this question is about Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Elnurvl, please upload images in original camera resolution with EXIF information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Man, why did you remove all my images (Graffiti Art). I'm from this magazine, that's why i'm writing this article. Please answer me and put the images again

Please ask magazine's legal stuff to send permission to Commons:OTRS. See example on Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UICET Logo Scalable Vector Graphics.svg[edit]

Hi eugene I see that you have deleted quite a few images that I posted about UICET. I am a member of UICET working group and this logo is free for use on the internet. As a member of the committee i request to undelete whatever images that you have deleted. Thanks and regards..

Please ask university to confirm permission for images via Commons:OTRS. See Commons:Email templates as example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Ok thanks !

Klondike Image[edit]

Hi Eugene,

I see that you took down an image I uploaded on the Klondike page. I work for the advertising agency for Unilever (Klondike's parent company) and they specifically requested we add this image, which they own. Can you please explain to me why you took it down? Or please let me know what I can do to verify that this was requested by Klondike themselves. I can't even upload the image again with a different file name because it looks like you blocked it from the site entirely. This is a fairly urgent matter as Klondike is depending on us to do this for them, so please get back to me as soon as possible. If you want, it'd be easier for me if you just emailed me at mhurley@theviaagency.com. Please let me know.

Thanks, Mark

Klondike should send permission (see Commons:Email templates as example) to Commons:OTRS. After that you could use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to request permission review and undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

elgun babayev[edit]

Прошу меня понять я плохо знаю английский поэтому загружаю многое не понимая что там написано. Как мне загрузить к примеру эту фотку "File:Nokia 808 PureView" чтобы не удаляли потом? напишите пожалуйста.Спасибо --Elgun.babayev (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вам надо взять и сфотографировать телефон самому. Но в выключенном состоянии, т. к. графика тоже может охраняться авторскими правами. Смотрите также Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Коллега спасибо за ответ, но вот к примеру LG Optimus One LG Optimus 3D тут явно не фотали на телефон тоже взято с интернета что скажете по поводу этого? --Elgun.babayev (talk) 11:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Для того, чтобы сказать что-то, хотелось бы ссылки поточнее :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
: Извиняюсь [3] [4]--Elgun.babayev (talk) 06:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Похоже (в корейском я не силён :-) на фотографии для официального блога LG под свободными лицензиями. Попробуйте найти интересующие Вас модели там. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Drsidius[edit]

Hi Eugine i just noticed that you have taken down a picture i uploaded. With regards to the "File:Solar Plexus Compilation Album.jpg", i got the image from the record labels website and contacted the site admin for the name of the creator and i put his info while i was uploading the image if there a step i missed while filling in the license please advise as to how i can correct this.

You need to ask creator of cover or copyright holder (if not same) to send permission (see Commons:Email templates as example) to Commons:OTRS. After that you could use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to request permission review and undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

about my uploadings[edit]

Hi ... actually i'm new in this domain so i'm so so so sorry .. i have just read the alerts about rights violations .. so i'll be cautious next times ... my apologizes --Anes-D (talk) 16:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Commons:Licensing will be very useful for you to understand what is accepted on Commons and what is not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, see "aLBÜMZ" tab in bANDİSTA offical website.

"copyleft, bandista armağanıdır. çoğaltınız! dağıtınız! copy! distribute!"

Thanks. --Bilalokms (talk) 13:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please ask them to be more specific and choose license. Copyleft is too ambiguous term. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource[edit]

Здравствуйте! На английском Wikisource у Вас нет страницы пользователя. Исправьте, пожалуйста, на ru. --Abanima (talk) 16:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Можно сделать, но как-то лениво - там я гость :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lost In The World[edit]

So, why did you actually deleted the 'official' Lost In The World Cover?

In most cases album covers are copyrighted and you need special permission from painter/copyrights holder to release it under term of free license. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually not a Album Cover, it's a Single-Cover! But I can try to upload it again!

It doesn't matter is it single, album, book, DVD, etc. cover. What is matter was artwork released under terms of free license or not. If not - such files will be deleted and you may be blocked if you'll continue to violate Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file you deleted was taken by Jack Delano for the Farm Security Administration and as such falls under {{PD-USGov-FSA}}. Other than cropping, no editing was done for the album cover (esp. no text was added), so derivative work does not apply. Yours, ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I restored image. I'm sorry for my mistake. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. For an album cover, this is admittedly a very unusual case. Best, ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the warning. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:27, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Eugene, you're right. I created a RfD for all their uploads indeed (here) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I understand. It's just that I wanted to listen for others' opinions. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:54, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Isidoro Castaño[edit]

Por la presente declaro que soy el único propietario de los derechos de autor exclusivos de OBRA publicada en http://hanoos.com/ y http://hanoos.blogspot.com.es/ y doy mi permiso para reproducir sus imágenes. Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre Licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-Compartir bajo la misma licencia 3.0 (CC-BY-SA-3.0). Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades. Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas. Soy consciente de que la licencia libre solo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas. Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia. FECHA Y NOMBRE Y DNI DEL PROPIETARIO DE LOS DERECHOS DE AUTOR 30 de mayo 2012 Hanoos Hanoos DNI. 507 41 285 L --Isidoro Castaño (talk) 17:54, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This is the second time you have marked the athletic logo for the Green B. Trimble Technical High School Wikipedia article for deletion. The most recent file name was Green_B._Trimble_Technical_High_School_Bulldog_Athletic_Logo.png.

Let me be clear: I created this logo. I am an employee of the school. Even if I didn't create the logo, it's the work of a government employee on government time. I, the creator, released it into the public domain. I mentioned that in the information on the file, but you didn't bother paying attention.

Stop deleting my stuff.

Please ask school administration to send permission to Commons:OTRS (see example on Commons:Email templates). As far as I know schools in USA funded not exclusively by federal government, so you can't claim federal copyrights on their works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arulraja[edit]

Hi Eugene,All the pictures uploaded are my own work. But you recommended for deletion.What need to be done to keep those in wiki ? Thanks Arulraja (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Arulraja. Here are the other files. AyyaDharmalingaSwamighal.jpg, KagaAshramMedHall.jpg, KagaAshramTemple.jpg, KagaAshramPooja.jpg, KagaAshramGopuram.jpg, Bhairavar.jpg, Ruru Bhairavar.jpg, Asithaanga Bhairavar.jpg, Bheeshana Bhairavar.jpg, Unmatha Bhairavar.jpg Samhaara Bahiravar.jpg, Krotha Bhairavar.jpg, Kabaala Bhairavar.jpg, Kaala Bhairavar.jpg[reply]

Files like File:Shanda Bahiravar.jpg looks like scan from book or postcard.
If you are copyright owner for CD covers like File:CD11.jpg, please confirm this via Commons:OTRS.
Please upload other photos in full resolution if you really shoot them.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Thanks for the reply. Yea they are scanned from a poster that we paid to draw. The original is with me, i will take a snap of them and upload. Thanks.Arulraja (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]
Was copyright transferred to people who commissioned poster? If not please confirm your identity via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What appen with my photos[edit]

Hello, You try to remove my photos from my page http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C3%A2teau_de_Canchy Most of these photos are from my own work or I have the licence to use it. Can you telle me what to do to put these photos again ?

Thank you.

Part of images were historical, but you claimed authorship over them. They may be in public domain but proper source (date of creation, photographer name if known) should be provided.
Please upload full resolution images with EXIF data for rest of photos to support your claim of authorship.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FC Hodnet Pictures[edit]

Can you let me know why you deleted the club badge from the FC Hodnet Wikipedia page? This was created by myself to use for our football club which the page is based on? And you have also marked the pictures of the team as well, which were taken by myself?

Please ask club officials to send permission for logo to Commons:OTRS (see example on Commons:Email templates).
Please upload full resolution images with EXIF data for rest of photos to support your claim of authorship.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Фотографии Belarus MFA[edit]

Уважаемый EugeneZelenko, все фотографии, которые загружены с этого профиля являются собственностью Министерства иностранных дел Республики Беларусь. Тот факт, что они сделаны разными камерами, объясняется тем, что они были сделаны сотрудниками МИД, работающими в загранучреждениях Республики Беларусь. Данные фотографии размещены на сайтах посольств Беларуси. То же касается фотографий руководства МИД. По всем имеющимся вопросам можете обратиться в управление информации МИД (017) 289.15.48 info@mfa.gov. by С уважением, BelarusMFA

На сайте министерства написано © 2007-2011, Министерство иностранных дел Республики Беларусь (в английской и русской версиях). Думаю, чтобы исправить ситуацию надо написать там (а также на сайтах посольств), что все фотографии распространяются на условиях свободной лицензии (по выбору министерства, но должно быть совместимо с Commons:Licensing) или же оформит разрешение по образцу {{Kremlin.ru}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Уважаемый EugeneZelenko,вставлять дополнительную строчку на всех(!) сайтах загранучреждений, а также прибегать к помощи разработчиков, чтобы поместить дополнительную строчку на главном сайте ради того, чтобы с официального(!) логина загрузить фотографии собственных(!) посольств, оригиналы которых размещены на сайтах этих посольств, а также загрузить фотографии руководства Министерства, сделанные сотрудниками МИД только по причине того, что Вы посчитали их "неоригиналалами" и нарушающими авторские права? С фотографией Elena Kupchyna.jpg уже были такие проблемы, когда один пользователь дал ссылку газеты, где была эта фотография, указав нам на то, что мы нарушаем авторские права. Выяснилось, что фотография была взята с сайта посольства. И мы подтвердили ее оригинал. Вы можете предоставить нам материалы или опровергнуть тот факт, что фотографии, которые загружены пользователем BelarusMFA нарушают авторские права? По всем имеющимся вопросам можете обратиться в управление информации МИД (017) 289.15.48 info@mfa.gov.by
С уважением, BelarusMFA
Условия использования материалов - весьма важная строка. И если МИД РБ как организация принял решения разрешить их использование на условиях свободных лицензий (что весьма похвально), то это должно быть отражено в документах (включая сайт, где материалы распространяются) организации. Это также будет только способствовать дальнейшему распространению материалов.
Выяснять, кому принадлежит учётная запись в Commons: стороннего лица или создана она по инициативе отдельного сотрудника никак не одобренной вышестоящими сотрудниками, как-то неразумно.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hellohappy[edit]

Hello Eugene, You have nominated Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hellohappy for deletion. Thanks for your concern. Can you explain me the Reason, I dont understand the problem. What can be done to address the issue ? -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 17:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User could re-upload images in original resolution with EXIF data. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. Still I dont understand how the EXIF data got missing ? -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 17:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is result of further image processing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eglise_Saint_Martin_de_Vendresse.jpg and File:Allée_de_douglas_Vendresse.jpg[edit]

WHY do you delete my own work and my own files ! I took these photos during the summer and last winter, and I then added to wikipedia because I wanted to illustrate Vendresse page and you as a Big Brother, you delete the images without even informing their author, Cavour find that normal? Sorry for grammar, Google speaks better English than me ... Mattpet

Sorry, but you was notified. Please see your talk page.
If you took these photos yourself, please re-upload them in full resolution with EXIF data.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting sports team logos[edit]

Hi, you recently deleted WellingtonSaints.jpg and other basketball logos I had uploaded to commons. If logos can be used on wikipedia under a "non-free" license like the one on the Miami Heat page, then how can I upload logos to be used there if they'll just be instantly deleted? Thanks Rudolph89 (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]

You need to upload such logos locally into projects which allow non-free images (like English Wikipedia). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of File:GreentopMo2.jpg[edit]

I believe this file was wrongfully deleted. The sign, if one will take the time to look closely at the printing on it, is not an advertisement. It is a sign stating that Greentop, Missouri is the hometown of Bluegrass music superstar Rhonda Vincent. How is that advertising? She really doesn't gain financially, nor does the town, from the billboard. If it stated something like "Buy her new album Taken at Wal-Mart" I could see where it might be disallowed. Further, the town and Vincent family members were the ones who made and put up the sign so I don't see how anyones copywright could be violated. The town itself owns the sign if anything. If we follow your logic train, a photo of a building that might have a Pepsi sign hanging in the window would be a copy vio because a derivative of the Pepsi copywrighted logo is visible. Likewise, a photo taken of a freeway sign (i.e. Interstate 70) could be construed as a vio because the state had the sign made and placed at the roadside. I think we need to use a little more common sense here folks. Sector001 (talk) 16:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If somebody made artwork (city or persons), copyrights belong to them. So you need to ask permission from them, if they didn't use free licenses explicitly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So, for example, if I were to take a photo of a float in the local high school Homecoming parade and then attempted to use is in a Wikipedia article on the school by your way of thinking I'd have to get copyright permission from all the students who built the float? Can you not see the absurdidty of that? I believe the entire policy needs revisited because it suffers from a complete lack of common sense! Sector001 (talk) 03:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In principle, floats of nontrivial design is copyrighted. Anyway without efforts of this students, could you take such picture? And do you really need such picture to illustrate article about school? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please Read image descriptions[edit]

MOST OF THEM HAVE COPYRIGHT AUTHORISATION IN THEIR WEBSITES so please keep them and also some have copyright issues and should be deleted, here is my list.

  • File:Jalauddin haqqani crop.jpg THIS IS FROM COMMONS SO IT WAS ALREADY HERE with copyrights and now the source has dissapeared so if you want to delete you can.
  • File:Mena airport.jpg This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. See Copyright.
  • File:Georges Schoeters.JPGFormal authorization granted by the author November 30, 2006 to distribute the book in The Classics of Social Sciences, the publisher no longer has any rights over the work. Digital edition prepared by Diane Brunet, volunteer, guide, museum Pulperie, Chicoutimi.
  • File:FLQ Founding members.jpgFormal authorization granted by the author November 30, 2006 to distribute the book in The Classics of Social Sciences, the publisher no longer has any rights over the work. Digital edition prepared by Diane Brunet, volunteer, guide, museum Pulperie, Chicoutimi.(GOOD COPYRIGHT PLEASE KEEP)
  • File:Black eagles.JPG THIS ONe was a manifesto that they printed and tried to get people to read it. DELETE?

I know I did some copyright pictures before and wrote as if they where my own work , but i was a noob before and i am beginning to understand how it works now. I TOOK MY TIME (and balls) TO ASK SOMEONE famous FOR their PICTURE TO ADD TO WIKIPEDIA AND i tell you people its something that is hard to do compared to tag somethings with a delete tag. do you want to delete every page that doesnt have an exif ? SO PLEASE RECONSIDER the deletion of SOME OF THESE PICTURES as it took HOURS of work. Vjiced (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]

File:Louis trichardt.png[edit]

Seems to be directly from google. JMK (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! You could use {{Copyvio}} for such cases in future. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ошибки и баги[edit]

Почему при загрузке изображений на Викисклад выскакивает ошибка badfilename? Кохане пиес (talk) 08:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Честно говоря не сталкивался с такой проблемой, поэтому возможно будет лучше спросить на Commons:Help desk. Но нужны детали: название файла, С помощью чего Вы загружаете: старая форма или UploadWizard? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2 accounts for 1 person[edit]

Hello Eugene,

I would need your suggestion here. First, my name is Benoit Rochon, and I'm the coodinator of Wikimedia Canada. Last week we organised a "Wikipedia Takes Quebec City", and one of our participant create 2 accounts by mistake :

She upload her contest pictures under "Ondée", but she would like to keep her real name "Muriel Leclerc" since she is using it also on Flickr. As you can see she is already wikifying her name in the description field [5].

So, I would like to know what is the best way to put the 12 pictures under User:Muriel Leclerc, without reuploading them. I know fusions of accounts can't be done, but there's surely a way to make it. Thank a lot for your help and suggestions. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 01:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done User:Muriel Leclerc was renamed to User:Muriel Leclerc (usurped) and User:Ondée was renamed to User:Muriel Leclerc. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Super, thanks a lot for this quick response. I'll tell her this good news right away. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 18:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this editor's uploads for the past year or so are problems. He writes pretty good English, but he has asked for a Russian speaker to deal with his various problems. He seems to think that just because he "needs" an image for a WP:RU article that we should find a template that will allow him to use it.

I copied this summary from the middle of a long discussion -- "you" is Krupski:

  • Some, such as File:Krupski Mikoaj.jpg, File:Крупский А. К..jpg, and File:А. К. Крупский.jpg, appear to be copyright violations, but more information about when and where the images were first published might allow them to be kept on Commons.
  • Some, such as File:Стр.3.jpg, are scans from recent books and appear to be clear copyright violations. They cannot be kept without permission from the publisher.
  • [:File:Александр Крупский в 1984.jpg]] and File:Второй становится первым.jpg are scans of recent (1980s) publications that are still under copyright. They cannot be kept without permission from the owner of the copyright.
  • File:DSC04474.JPG, File:DSC04471.JPG, and File:DSC04472.JPG, infringe the copyright of the sculptor or architect and cannot be kept on Commons without permission from those people.
  • I have just tagged File:Family Krupski M. A..jpg. The description suggests that this image has never been published before its publication here. If that is true, then it will have a US copyright until 2064 (120 years after creation in 1944). That copyright belongs to the heirs of the unknown photographer, so there is no one from whom we can get permission.

Thanks,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are correct in most case. Only File:Крупский А. К..jpg and File:А. К. Крупский.jpg definitely may be kept as {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. As I said in the DR, I thought they might be PD-Old -- when I put the {{Delete}} on them, they did not have any dates.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Hi, I recieved a notification about deleting my images.

I will explain for you how i got each picture:


This is a scanned egyptian " stamp " for Mohamed Elbaradei and his father. The 3 stamps are on a paper and then they are scanned.


This is my arm actually :D ... I have a Kodak EasyShare Z1015 IS .. I took the shot in my house and then a screen shot from the picture instead of saving the large file from the camera to my computer and wasting time...if you neeed the orignal one I can upload it to you.


This picture was taken by Mohamed Elbaradei's assistant and he passed it to me and gave me the copyright to share it and use it. I upload it here and I own the copyright, I guess.


This is a screen shot of a section in a website called www.zabatak.com. This image is a screenshot of a copyrighted web page, and the copyright for it is most likely held by owner of the website. This image illustrates how the website works ... it is like a flow chart or someting like that.


This is a screen shot of a website called www.zabatak.com. This image is a screenshot of a copyrighted web page, and the copyright for it is most likely held by owner of the website.It is re sized image and small and low quality.



This is my aunt's friend's baby.. He suffers from " Milk allergy " ... she gave me the pic and I took a screen shot and I uploaded here.


This picture is from http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/42-23598363/lactobacillus-acidophilus-bacteria-are-grampositive and they wrote " Restrictions " of using it

Rights Managed (RM) © Dennis Kunkel Microscopy, Inc./Visuals Unlimited/Corbis.

((Restrictions)): Not available for use in a retail print or poster.


Yours, --Mr Revolution (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for for explanations, but please use deletion request page next time.
Please upload you own image in full resolution. If you have any permissions for other people works, please use Commons:OTRS. Commons is not accepting copyrighted materials. See also Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • Also i have 2 questions, If i found an image used by many websites, how to trace the copyrights of it ? ... The second Question, how to add photos from flickr without being removed from COMMONS ? --Mr Revolution (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think in best case web sites should provide attribution and term of use information for each image. Or at least link to original site.
Each image of Flickr has license information (see Owner settings section there). Two licenses (CC-BY-2.0 and CC-BY-SA-2.0) are compatible with Commons, so you could upload images with such licenses. Similar free images could be found on Panoramio or Picasa. If I'm not mistaken UploadWizard could help with Flickr images upload including license checking.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Next step ?[edit]

Hello EugeneZelenko, what should i do to prevent deleting my images after explainig how i got each here : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EugeneZelenko#Notification_about_possible_deletion

I uploaded a picture using my KODAK Camera I told you about it : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Royal_Poinciana_Tree_Seeds.JPG

As I wrote, please reflect this on deletion request page. Other administrator will close request, so he/she need to know which actions you made to resolve issues. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I copied your first comment from this page there, but not those about re-uploaded images. So pleas make subsequent updates yourself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just re-upload photos which are your own work in full resolution with EXIF and then leave comment on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mr Revolution. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why you deleted my pictures[edit]

all the photos I uploaded are i have the rights (i'm the owner), why you deleted my pictures??

Please use Commons:OTRS to confirm your identity and permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу согласовать администрирование[edit]

Так как "User:PierreSelim" и "User:Jameslwoodward" (и им подобные) не знают историю и специфику жизни в СССР и стран СНГ. Много уходит времени и усилий на объяснение им элементарного (тривиального), что понятно русскоязычным пользователям из бывшего СССР и СНГ. Они мои цифровые файлы (с Кибер-Шот) фото с "Доски почёта" (Tafel der Besten) для статьи о провинциальном Аркадаке Саратовской обл. России трактуют как "Панорама", мои фотографии как "профессиональные" (якобы не моя собственность). А переданные мне лично чёрно-белые фотографии из семейного альбома однофамильцев (для оформления в Википедии биографии их родственника) - опять как профессиональные. Хотя я в юношестве (и многим другим известно) ч/б фото делали в квартире собственными руками (без лицензий): 36 мм плёнка с полифным покрытием, лампа с увеличительным стеклом, проявитель, фиксаж, сушка и т.д. из подробностей получения фотографий с фотоаппарата "Зенит". Они глупо трактуют правила Википедии, доводят до абсурда (не советуют какой шаблон лицензию применить в моей ситуации), а сразу с ригоризмом ставят шаблон "удалить" - они играют с правилами (Википедия:Не доводите до абсурда). В результате "User:Jameslwoodward" злоупотребляя своей виртуальной властью заблокировал мой ай-пи адрес (идентификатор блокировки — 99664). Самое интересное, что на многие мои файлы также ставили шаблон "удалить", хотя сделаны они мною с моего сканера, с ксерокопий старинных книг и карт изд. до 1917 г., которые я брал лично в библиотеках и архивах (о чём имею абонемент, квитанции оплаты и др. юр. свидетельства). Прошу мои файлы и переписку вести со мной тем, кто знает русский язык, имеет опыт жизни в СССР или СНГ. Они не понимают тривиального и элементарного - у нас фотографии делали дома, ретушировали, делали художественное нанесение изображений через трафареты или посредством частичного нанесения проявителя, делали художественную обрезку и т.п. (это и я делал). Это вовсе не означает, что фото из ателье профессиональные и другой автор, а не я. Они не знают элементарного по истории СССР, что воен.форма в СССР была ведена в 1943 г., и на моем фото этот период. Тот кто прислал мне это фото - это его правнук (он мне передал через электронную почту свою родословную подтверждающую его степень родства). У них в голове вообще нет мысли, что это такое. Я заметил - ОНИ НЕ ЗНАЮТ РУССКОГО ЯЗЫКА И НЕ СПОСОБНЫ АНАЛИЗИРОВАТЬ мои файлы с текстами и т.п.. Поэтому прошу, чтобы между собой решили кому и кого администрировать. С уважением --Krupski Oleg (talk) 16:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Думаю, что обвинения в адрес других участников не помогут исправить ситуацию. Никакой особой специфики в странах бывшего СССР нет, надо просто стараться делать описания и выбирать лицензии более аккуратно.
Фотографии на доске почёта были сделаны другими фотографами, соответственно Вы не являетесь единственным автором и не можете распоряжаться фотографией по своему усмотрению (смотрите w:ru:Википедия:Свобода панорамы).
Если фотографии перешли в общественное достояние, то надо указать их источник (книга, журнал, архив и т. д.) и выбрать соответствующую лицензию.
Если Ваши однофамильцы являются обладателями авторских прав на фотографии, то надо получить от них разрешение (смотрите Commons:OTRS и Commons:Email templates).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Eugene, as you can tell I am not that familiar with the rules when uploaded (or as I call them, the new rules as these rules only started effecting me recently). I saw your warnings and was honestly about to just ignore it and just decide not to upload but then I saw the warning that I could be blocked on here so that is why I am here. As I said in the paratheses, I started uploading photos sense August of 2011 and never had a problem. It was upload, provide logo license etc done. So far I have not gotten in trouble with them. It is only now I have been receiving messages and all that. At this moment in time I have no time to go through all that stuff about licensing. The only thing I know is that I need editor permission and that I can forward and email to commons but I cant do that for logos like Mizoram Premier League as I dont know who made it and my only contact connected with that organization is an executive for one of the teams in that league. So I am just asking if you can help me understand this because I want to start using commons to upload pictures but dont want to get caught in another problem again. Thank you. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 18:31, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely need to read Commons:Licensing. All media is copyrighted unless it come into public domain or authors release it with free license. This also relates to logos. Only very trivial ones is permitted (see {{PD-textlogo}}). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. Will do that. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 18:03, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, let me get this right because I just read though Commons:Licensing and then went to Commons:Fair use. Basically because of copyright laws in other countries the logos that I uploaded should really only be uploaded on English wikipedia as that allows fair use logos on it. I will continue reading on but just want to know if I get it or not. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you understood correctly. Please note that you need to not only upload files, but also justify usage in each article. Please read related English Wikipedia rules. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi Eugene,

Just FYI, I have raised a question, which relates to approval of bots by 'crats. If you get the time, I would appreciate to hear your opinion regarding this. Thanks, --Slaunger (talk) 19:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete[edit]

  • Please restore this image, File:HuffPo Mount Kilimanjaro.jpg, which was released into the public domain. That is stated quite clearly in the article which the image's description page linked to.
More to the point, the image was in use on an archived (i.e. fully-protected) article on Wikinews. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that text of term of use is very clear: is it relates to text of article or images too. Also authorship of images is not clear. Anyway it this only one image of Mount Kilimanjaro on Commons? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление скриншотов сайта со страницы Доктор на работе[edit]

Уважаемый Евгений, зачем вы удалили скриншоты страниц [Доктор на работе]? Ни в американском, ни в российском праве скриншот страницы, которую я вижу в своем браузере, не является объектом правообладания. Я уже не говорю о том, что я представляю компанию-владелец сайта.

Пожалуйста, прочитайте Commons:Screenshots. Вы можете попросить юридический отдел Вашей компании послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). Но надо быть уверенным, что на снимках экрана не присутствуют произведения третьих лиц, например, личные фотографии. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jpmeena[edit]

Your worries are addressed here regarding Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jpmeena. I know that your attention towards the issues is genuine but I should inform you that importance of these files for some articles is very high. Hence I request you to remove the deletion request.Jpmeena (talk) 06:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload original images with EXIF information to support your claim of authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raul Julia-Levy[edit]

Hello, Eugene,

This correspondence is in response to your decision to delete an image posted on the Raul Julia-Levy page. Please see: (Removing "Julia_Levy_Magazine_Article2.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by EugeneZelenko because: Copyright violation: Magazine article.)

I ask that you reverse your decision due to the following legal facts: 1. I was the one who took the images for this now-defunct magazine 2. My news archival company owns the legal rights to this page that bears a total of three images 3. This page from the defunct magazine is now considered historical data 4. As sole proprietor of my company, I have given Wikimedia Commons the right to publish said page.

I appreciate your cooperation in this matter. 37celsius (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Commons:OTRS to confirm your authorship/ownership. You could request undeletion if images after confirmation will be received. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Eugene. I have sent an appropriate email to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org with an attached file. Do you know how long it will take for me to receive a response? 37celsius (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to make things faster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FAGE[edit]

Please note that Jschav88 is the vice-president of FAGE, so you should ask for an OTRS instead of deleting the pictures. --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not so trivial to guess :-) Anyway, images could be restored after receiving OTRS. By the word, does FAGE own all logotypes on File:Carte fage.png? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eugene ! I would like to know why you are asking Wikipedia to delete my pictures, since it is a representation of our work. It is not advertisment material, rather an explanation and description of our work.

Would you please cancel your request? I think I do understand Wikipedia's policy.

Kind regards.

Please be more specific about request since you created another account. Please use Commons:OTRS to confirm your company permission. But even after that I don't think that every image you uploaded fits into Commons:Project scope. This include every logo variant you uploaded. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Speed: Deleted file (EQMM anthology cover)[edit]

Hi, Eugene; it would seem that, at roughly the same time u were deleting the aforementioned image, warnings re that image & the other two I uploaded were being posted on my Commons page by the user, 'Art-top.' I messaged him yesterday; tho, as he says, his English is limited (& God knows my legal-speak is non-existent, & my computer skills only marginally more than that), he did remove the warnings, albeit with the advice that I 'clarify' the situation at Commons:Village pump/Copyright (tho, after visiting the page, I must admit I'm still unclear as 2 what further action I'm supposed 2 take.) Of course, that doesn't address the already deleted image. In any event, since the points in my brief note yesterday apply just about equally 2U, I'm simply reproducing it below, complete w/ A-t's even more concise response. Any further advice u can offer will be gratefully received:

Hi, Art-top. Regarding the two Jane-Speed related files, esp. "WHO-DUN-IT." The author, a frequent EQMM contributor btw 1963 & 1980, is my mother, deceased as of 3/5/1991. So I'm not exactly sure what u require in the way of authorization, or how I could secure it, but whatever it is, please let me know. The LAST thing I wish 2 do is cause any legal difficulties for the valuable institution that is Wikipedia. As 4 the already deleted "Jane Speed Anthologized" file, which, of course, is not an image of her work, but merely the cover of a long out-of-print EQMM anthology including one of those works, on which her name is prominently displayed, I must again ask your advice. If there's anything I can do 2 make this 'kosher' (e.g. contact EQMM, perhaps, & secure the appropriate authorization), please instruct me. Thanks in advance --DavidESpeed (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I speak bad English. I understand that you are the copyright owner of downloaded files. I'll take warning from these two files. But, in order to avoid similar problems in the future, would recommend that you finally clarify the situation here: Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Art-top (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Again, Eugene, thanks 4 your attention 2 this matter --DavidESpeed (talk) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What was your mother role in contributions to book? Did she write or paint? If she was only write, you'll need to get permission also from painter of book cover. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Die HolidayChecker.jpg[edit]

Die HolidayChecker.jpg permission to use datea was sent by copyrightholder to: 'Permissions - Wikimedia Commons' for: "File:Die HolidayChecker.jpg" on: Montag, 9. Juli 2012 11:24

Best Regards Joggingjack

Please use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to verify permission and request undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You deleted my image AENK_Logo_Fixed.jpg AENK is a Multi-Sports Club located at Kifissia-Greece. I am a member of a University of Peloponnese students team that organized a charity match between AENK and another greek Basketball club named: "Τρίποντο Χαράς" (Score 3-points for Happiness) (link: http://www.onsports.gr/basket/B-Ethnikh-Andrwn/item/218344-Triponta-haras-gia-To-Hamogelo-toy-Paidioy). Due to lack of a proper team crest in digital form, to be placed on the promotional posters (link:http://topontiki.gr/img/imagecache/202x250_133707471361.jpg), and the banners placed inside the court, I created one from scratch. This image is entirely my work which I thought it would be helpful to contribute to the club's Hellenic Wiki Article.Bap56trew23flsee (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you just reproduced existing logo in digital form, you could not claim authorship over logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it was obvious that I was granted permission to reproduce the team crest since it was used as a promotion for television, newspaper and internet. There is NO copyrighted crest for the team. In minor-league clubs in Greece, only the name, court, paid players and staff have legal standing, team colours and emblems are subject to change depending on the clothing provider/sponsor. Copyrighting crests in Greece is rare since many teams from different cities share the same name and emblem (kinda like FC Zenit Saint Petersburg and FC Zenit Penza but with NOT copyright claim for the crests). If you still feel there is a problem let it be, I am done. You have administrative privileges on the Commons for a reason, I am just another guy undermining server space.Bap56trew23flsee (talk) 19:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not familiar with logos of football clubs of Greece, but logo you uploaded looks quite non-trivial and somebody should create it. However, you could ask club administration to send permission for logo to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The most known department of AENK is its basketball one, this is the one that I have an affiliation with. Smaller division teams in Greece regardless of the sport do not copyright the image of the crest since it varies season by season. In the charity match stated above, when asked for the logo the club officials refered us to the clothing provider, who had an old and part-corrupted Corel Draw file (which had no resemblance to the one on the jerseys). Anyways I think I'll try the verification method sometime after the finals or I 'll ask them to do it by themselves, they are the ones benefited by a complete wiki article. ThanksBap56trew23flsee (talk) 21:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does Greek copyright law require to copyright something? Wasn't it unified with rest of European Union? Fact of creation should be enough. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Просьба[edit]

Добрый день, Евгений! Можно попросить перевести Foroa, чтобы он не уничтожал харьковские категории - редиректы, чем он занимается несколько лет. Во-первых, невозможно установить при загрузке: фром, ин, он или офф Харьков что-то он переименовал, маленькими или большими буквами, и сразу поставить категорию. Что, по 10-15 минут искать её с точностью до одной буквы? Во-вторых, со старых категорий, которые он поудалял (удаляет, как только увидит простой редирект - чтобы максимально затруднить категоризацию и увеличить потраченное загрузчиком время, что ли?), иногда ведут ссылки со статей русской Википедии. Большое спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 10:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Не верю в успех, увы. Главная причина в том, что и вы, и другие администраторы считают нормальным то, что Фороа уничтожает категории вместо их переименования, при этом уничтожает и описания, и интервики. Всё это удаление может показаться вандализмом, но здесь принято считать, что такое удаление — норма.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо, вопрос ДЕЙСТВИТЕЛЬНО в удобстве - и ссылках из русской, украинской и др. Википедий. Фороа стирает категории, которые он никогда не заполняет. Я создаю категорию, наполняю её, вставляю в статью - потом раз - ссылка из статьи в никуда, её вообще нет (перенаправления нет), куда мне добавлять фото? Во что именно, поскольку получается пустота? (в мега-категории "Харьков" уже скоро будет двести подкатегорий: сколько именно надо времени, чтобы найти именно ту, как её переназвал Фороа - очень правильно в английском правописании и длинно, так что её вручную иногда не наберёшь). Потом, те же улицы, события, периоды и всё остальное может быть и "в" городе, и "города", и "город в" (периоде), и "Период в" (городе), и т.д. и т.п. - то есть и фром, и офф, и ин, и он, и Харьков как прилагательное, и город в войне, и война в городе... --Vizu (talk) 18:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coki Ramírez[edit]

Hello, I want to detain or to know, the motive of which the photographed files are erased.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coki_Ram%C3%ADrez_firmando_aut%C3%B3grafos_en_el_Hospital_Gutierrez_(Buenos_Aires).jpg?uselang=es http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:FloresBlacas.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coki_Ram%C3%ADrez_en_America_(Argentina).jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CokiRam%C3%ADrez_America_(Argentina).jpg

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Camiii B. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ego vs. Objectivity ?[edit]

I completely agree with User:Gamweb! You have identified 3 photos on the net and you made sure to delete all of the photos I have uploaded. How do you know if I haven't asked for license by the family/individual/company/freelance/medium (thus referencing and giving credit like I did for the last 30 images) etc for each and every one. Then you also deleted my own pictures taken from my own phone (Samsung HD 8 megapixels by the way BUT YOU SAY LOW RESOLUTION). What is wrong with you ? Wikipedia editors are running lower by the year (50.000 in 2007 vs 30.000 today). We come in with passion only to have guys like you take it away. There is not a single complain for any of my photos. This is a power/ego booster for you and not an objective reasoning. I write/edit 2 articles per week and have been very passionate about objectivity, clarity and referencing. Pictures complete the articles and the Wikipedia project. User:Euclidthalis

Please use Commons:OTRS to document permissions for other people works. See Commons:Email templates as example. And you can't claim authorship over other people works as you did in some images you uploaded.
Please notice small/inconsistent resolutions in original nomination.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Восстановление файла[edit]

Добрый день, EugeneZelenko. У меня к Вам просьба, как к администратору. Пожалуйста, восстановите файл File:Narum SC lbj cover.jpg. Участник, загрузивший файл, говорит, что отправил подтверждение авторства в OTRS. Шаблон я проставлю. --Art-top (talk) 07:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarus-Minsk-New Railway Station-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 08:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarus-Minsk-New Railway Station-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 08:12, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarus-Minsk-New Railway Station-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.250 08:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ответ на предупреждение[edit]

По всем фото лицензии в процессе оформления. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ekaterina_Rybakova Не могу разобраться с возможностью их удаления самостоятельно. На время пока жду всех ответов. Подскажете как это сделать?

С уважением, Екатерина

Чтобы помочь Вам с лицензированием изображений, хотелось бы понять ситуацию. Какие изображение создали Вы лично? Какие созданы третьими лицами? Можете ли Вы получит разрешения от третьих лиц? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
В основном изображения не мои. Но запросы уже отправлены, жду ответы. Разобралась с этим. А про удаление спросила для справки. И плюс, по опыту, не могу понять, как восстановить файлы, которые были удалены, но на них уже получено разрешение. Ибо система не пропускает. А по названиям я не могу на 100% соотнести.. Сможете как-то посодействовать??

Какие-то из этих: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Ekaterina_Rybakova Могу дать ссылки на то, как выглядят фото на IMDb: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3726030080/nm0094080 http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3256268032/nm0094080 http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3457594624/nm0094080 http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4162237696/nm0094080

Разрешение на них, если что, вот:

VRT Wikimedia

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2012062010005487.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2012062010005487
Find other files from the same ticket: SDC query (SPARQL)


Заранее спасибо за помощь!!--Ekaterina Rybakova (talk) 12:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Для запросов по обработке разрешений Вы можете использовать Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Там же можно указать названия удалённых файлов и то, что надо будет их восстановить. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

День добрый, EugeneZelenko. Большая просьба к Вам удалить две последние версии файла File:Ворохта.jpg. Вторая версия - копивио (весь вклад участника удалён), а третья - копия первой. --Art-top (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Удалил вторую. К сожалению, копию удалить нельзя. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо! Главное, копивио не осталось. --Art-top (talk) 15:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый администратор, помогите, пожалуйста, разобрать данную категорию (практически все файлы вынесены на удаление). См. также User talk:Russavia#Template:PD-Russia. Alex Spade (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Постараюсь с тем, т=что явно было сделано после 1943 или во время Великой Отечественной. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Загружать на Викисклад или в Википедию?[edit]

Здравствуйте! Подскажите, пожалуйста, куда мне лучше загружать фотографии украинских городов: в Википедию или на Викисклад? Или где почитать рекомендации на эту тему? В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Но не хочется перезагружать одни и те же фотографии по несколько раз для разных языковых разделов. Да и часто приходится видеть украинские фотографии на Викискладе. Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Если фотографии старых зданий и скульптур (архитекторы, скульпторы и т. д. умерли более 70 лет назад) - то такие изображения можно загружать сюда с соответствующими описаниями. Фотографии современных объектов - в разделы Википедии, которые разрешают такие изображения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ясно, спасибо! Значит [6] и [7] надо из Викисклада перенести в ВП, [8] и [9] из ВП на Викисклад и т.д. Подскажите, пожалуйста, как делать запросы на такой перенос? Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Думаю, что эти фотографии можно оставить. Танк всё-таки не произведение искусства :-) Колоннада тоже не сказать, чтобы художественная, а награды на Украине не охраняются авторским правом. Старые фотографии стоило бы перенести сюда, но думаю, что проще это сделать вручную. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо за объяснения! Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 15:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sysop[edit]

Thanks! However, I do believe the last vote I received should not count as it arrived late. Regards, --Elitre (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this will change something :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, Eugene. Если не трудно, посмотрите запрос на удаление в топике. Мне кажется, что администратор, массово закрывая запросы на автомате, слегка поспешил. Перепроверьте, пожалуйста, может я не прав. --Art-top (talk) 10:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Закрывший запрос оправдывает своё имя :-) По своему списку наблюдений могу предполагать использование скриптов для массового закрытия запросов.
Всё-таки в разрешениях изображений разнобой, думаю, стоило бы попросить участника загрузить исходные изображения с EXIF для подтверждения авторства.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ну да, закрывая по 5-8 номинаций в минуту (см. вклад этого администратора за 21-22 число) навряд ли возможно вникнуть в каждую ситуацию, возможно он даже не читал номинаций. Оставлю этот вопрос на его совести. --Art-top (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Впрочем, загрузившему я всё же предложил загрузить полные версии. Пусть решает сам. --Art-top (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpation of BeeJay[edit]

Hello and thank you for your answer.

I haven't been on WP for very long... How on earth do I usurp an alias? How do I know if it is actively used? If it isn't used on Commons, can't I take that alias on Commons, if nobody else uses it?

If I have to usurp on 4 or 5 sites, I'd better give up alltogether :-(

Bye

--92.149.112.19 21:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please usurp name in other projects first. Alternatively you could find unique name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear EugeneZelenko, why did you speedydelete this work? This is obviously covert by section 18b of the Dutch copyright law. Please undelete. Multichill (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that advertisement is something what installed permanently. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Las Kellies[edit]

Dear EngeneZelenko

You deleted the photo that I added for the article of Las Kellies.

What do I have to do to put it back ? Do I have to ask permission to Las Kellies (I'm in contact with them !)

--ShineOn (talk) 19:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could ask group to send permission (example: Commons:Email templates) to Commons:OTRS. After permission will had been sent, you could ask permission review and undeletion on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a great job![edit]

I came across some of your deletion requests recently, and thought that you were doing excellent work. I just wanted to stop by and say that. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 08:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but it's not only me who is responsible :-) Tools like MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js and their maintainers are great! Anyway help in reviewing new uploads and problematic areas like files without license/source/categories/etc. is always required. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

How to put licence for club logo correctly? I have a lot of problems with understanding it and whatever I do it`s been nominated for deleting? Help needed --Borac Banja Luka (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you can not get official permission from club to use logo under terms of free license, you could upload logo locally into projects which allows fair use images.
Please also read Commons:Licensing to understand what Commons accepts and what doesn't.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deleting Palmarès Olympique de Marseille[edit]

Hello,

I wonder why did you erased the photograph i took of the painting under the Velodrom stadium.

Can you explain it to me ?

--Matieu Castel (talk) 13:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both images are non-trivial logotypes. I think will be good idea if you'll read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


OK, then you should go to the Velodrom stadium and erase all the paintings since you are so respectful of logotypes. It'a a photo of a drawing under the stadium I took myself. Where is the problem ?

Do you know that in western country you can use logotypes for information purposes ?

EDIT : And we both know that Olympique Marseille or UEFA will never suit WK for this picture. In french, we call that being "plus royaliste que le roi", wich means doing things that even the king don't ask you to do (and don't want you to do).

This is craziness.

Matieu Castel (talk) 19:25, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it seems that you have some problems with the works of other peoples and that you are here only to destroy links or discourage peoples to contribute to WK. Since this is a photography I took myself of a painting made by ultras under the stadium, and since this painting isn't under any legal protection I'm gonna re-upload it and put it back.

If you want to remove it, you may open a subject of discussion and then we will talk about that. Matieu Castel (talk) 13:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think will be good idea if you will read French copyrights law and Commons:Licensing before making such accusations.
As far as I know French Wikipedia accepts non-free images like logotypes.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
the thing is I don't understand where do you see logotypes in this photograph. I mean, french flag is a logotype for you ?

Matieu Castel (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about French law, but in ex-USSR ones state symbols are exempted from copyright. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I don't understand you. What do you mean exactly with "non trivial logotypes". I don't get it at all.

Matieu Castel (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See {{PD-textlogo}} and {{PD-shape}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marianagodrojas[edit]

Hi. You deleted all pictures uploaded by this user, but didn't close it's DR. Thanks. --Andrea (talk) 17:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice request. Thank you for reminder. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Посмотрите, пожалуйста, на вклад участника Simpex (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Я его предупредил, что нельзя удалять предупреждающие шаблоны, но он продолжает это делать. --Art-top (talk) 06:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Заблокировал на 1 день и возвратил шаблоны на удаление. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

За что?[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arantz&redirect=no С уважением, но "втф"? Ты что делаеш, дорогой, зачем желаешь стиреть мои фото? Так же ведь каждый может ставить марку. Приглошаю на http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Arantz this is signed by Arantz (talk) 17:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ответил там. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Боже, друг, что ето http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Student_Scientific_Society.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 ))) наверное забыл смотреть в описание. Arantz (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Где можно увидеть условия использования логотипа? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Как я помню, я использовал {{attribution}}, разве не достаточно, автор сейчас сидит в своем кресле, не жалеет для создания лого, и его надо сфотографировать? Arantz (talk) 20:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
О, еще вопрос, я здесь увидел просьба для восстановления фото, нежели файлы не стирают с сервера? Arantz (talk) 22:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Проблема не в шаблоне, а в том, где можно увидеть подтверждение лицензии. Если у организации нет сайта, то можно попросить автора послать подтверждение в Commons:OTRS (образец: Commons:Email templates). После этого надо попросить проверить его на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard и восстановить файл. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Когда это решится:: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Arantz ? Друг, не понимаю просто, если есть ответ, проши извенить мою глупость,, все же,, какой смысл маркировать другие фотографии? Arantz (talk) 20:26, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Трудно сказать, когда запрос будет закрыт, но это будет сделано другим администратором.
Если бы мир был идеален, то и не надо было ничего делать :-) Но людям своственно иногда делать то, чего они не понимают... Сам этим грешен :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибки за откровенность. Arantz (talk) 18:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ты доволен? Без обосновании взяли, удалили все фото. Я буду ждать восстанавления файлов. Arantz (talk) 10:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вы можете обсудить необоснованно по Вашему мнению удаление с администратором, который закрывал запрос. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Это и деляю. Просто, чтоб ты знал :)) Arantz (talk) 15:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Фото с логотипами, размещенными в публичных местах[edit]

Вы удалили фото Barnaul-Zoo1.JPG и Barnaul-Zoo3.JPG. Эти файлы - части моей фотографии входа в зоопарк. Фотографии, сделанные на улице, разрешены, если это не произведение исскуства и единственный объект фото. А здесь что не так? Kraulinn (talk) 02:09, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Логотип достаточно нетривиален, чтобы охраняться авторскими правами. Смотрите также Commons:Производные произведения и w:ru:Википедия:Свобода панорамы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день! Не могли бы Вы восстановить этот файл? На странице обсуждения загрузивший пишет, что отправил разрешение. Ничего, что я время от времени Вас прошу об административных действиях? --Art-top (talk) 07:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Если надо помощь - чем смогу, помогу. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

username change - nuttyrave[edit]

Dear Sir,
I have found your name amongst the Wikimedia Commons bureaucrats, and would like to change my username from
nuttyrave
to
donan.raven
Please advise on how to procede
With kind regards, Nuttyrave (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Standard procedure is Commons:Change username. Couple of questions. Do you plan to rename accounts on other projects? New name seems to be first and last name. Are you sure to use donan.raven? Or may be Donan Raven? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I plan to rename accounts on other projects, namely en.wikipedia.org and fr.wikipedia.org. Nuttyrave is established as a global account so is there a strategic way to change it on all projects at once?
donan.raven
is an available username on all projects and using a dot suits me well. I thank you for your help. Nuttyrave (talk) 23:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Изображение под несвободной лицензией[edit]

Я загрузил изображение Файл:Barnaul-Zoo-Logo.gif (он в Википедии) под несвободной лицензией, посмотрите, что я сделал не так. Я не вижу сделанного мною обоснования добросовестного использования.Kraulinn (talk) 19:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Кажется, Вы уже сами исправили проблему. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files upload[edit]

Hi Eugene, I would like to verify that the photos that have been uploaded are all my photos,I am a Wikipedia user from Mizoram, all photos I have uploaded can be viewed from my blog- www.miyzone.blogspot.com, all photos that I have uploaded are donated to wikimedia community.

Answered on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Coolcolney. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
resulta que tengo una queja... no entiendo porque me borrar la pagina, es la quinta vez que la creo y la borran, e hecho TODO lo que me dice en las indicaciones, y sigo sin entender, ¿Sera que wikipedia es discriminadora? lo digo ya que en la paginas anteriores borradas he tenido informacion de los jovenes, ya que resulta que la mayoria de los adolescentes busca respuestas en Wikipedia, lo unico que encuentran es informacion erronea, es decir, informacion sin sentido.

se despide atte Camila Conejera, Chile Seita-kun (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( I think will be good idea if you will read project rules (especially Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope) before your next upload. You could also ask help from Spanish speaking administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Фотографии детей[edit]

Добрый день! Не подскажите ли, есть какие-нибудь ограничения на публицию фотографий детей на Викискладе? Вроде бы где-то проскакивала информация, что без разрешения родителей такие фотографии публиковать нельзя. Вопрос возник после обнаружения этого вклада. --Art-top (talk) 12:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

К сожалению, не знаю на него ответа. Бегло просмотрел Commons:Child protection и Commons:Personality rights, но там нет чёткого ответа или ссылки на правила относительно фотографий детей (если это не порнография или раскрывается персональная иформация). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо за ссылки, полазил. Судя по всему, согласно этому правилу согласие всё-таки требуется. Но не из-за детей, в Германии согласие нужно на фотографии любых персон. Кроме этого очень странно смотрится описание, например этого кадра: «Кадр из документального фильма "Технология парного обучения", Германия, 2009», причём этот «кадр» сделан на Canon EOS 400D в явно не видео-разрешении (3888 × 2592). То ли перефотографированное видео (по качеству и не скажешь), то ли ложное описание. --Art-top (talk) 18:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

How come that a company logo available on the official website of such entity for download is not much of use? Hope this one, extracted from a free image, is good enough for you, however of a lower quality.

You could upload copyrighted logos into projects which allow non-free images. I doubt that uploader of marathon certificate is creator of such. See also Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello, can you please help out here? Thank you--Bassem (talk) 16:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

estoy enfadada!! señor estupido! ¬¬

Seita-kun (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

hi! eugene! ams... i don't understand !! de nuevo me has eliminado la pagina! no entiendo... si no entiendes esto entonces ve al traductor de google!

Seita-kun (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for Spanish-speaking administrator help on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление версии[edit]

Добрый день! Не могли бы Вы удалить вторую сверху версию (логотип, явно несвободный) этого изображения: File:OptimusandJazz.jpg. Заранее спасибо. --Art-top (talk) 04:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CivisHibernius Photos[edit]

It's actually my own work. There were three devices which I used to take these pictures. One was a digital camera; the other two were camera phones. These photos were taken over a number of years - the earliest from February 2007. CivisHibernius (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: Yes the resolution is quite poor. I'm saving up to purchase a proper camera. But in my opinion some of the photos are ok. I don't see why every one of them needs to be deleted. CivisHibernius (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are three photos with resolution and file names typical for photo hosting services and without EXIF. If you made them, please upload original photos. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just to verify, are these the three without EXIF data: 2145740378a5266083495l.jpg, 2145740378a5266078872l.jpg and 2145740378a5266123054l.jpg. Sorry about this, I'm only getting to grips with wikicommons. I'll re-upload the files. Just to let you know, photos from my camera phones were transferred to my laptop via bluetooth. I'm just wondering if this would effect EXIF data?

CivisHibernius (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, only those three files are without EXIF. I don't think that transfer itself removed EXIF. Most likely image editing software or photo hosting service did so. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shame that they wound up being deleted. The three files without EXIF data didn't have it as well on my computer - something which I find odd because I took them using a camera. PS is it possible I could re-upload some of the photos previously deleted? CivisHibernius (talk) 20:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I restored all of your uploads except three problematic ones we discussed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deleted images[edit]

I took these images with my digital camera canon ixus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--MFZBCN (talk) 19:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marcosfaundez.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carlosguirao.JPG

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Santi_Pic%C3%B3.JPG

File:Svartsot-Album-Svundne Tider.JPG and other files with an OTRS deleted without a warning[edit]

Why? --MGA73 (talk) 17:23, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. I didn't notice OTRS. I restored these files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Removing "I_control_my_brain_logo.gif",[edit]

Dear Sir

(cur | prev) 17:14, 12 August 2012‎ CommonsDelinker (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (6,628 bytes) (-115)‎ . . (Removing "I_control_my_brain_logo.gif", it has been deleted from Commons by EugeneZelenko because: Copyright violation: Logo. Not text only.) (undo) (cur | prev) 17:14, 12 August 2012‎ CommonsDelinker (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (6,743 bytes) (-58)‎ . . (Removing "Journey_logo.gif", it has been deleted from Commons by EugeneZelenko because: Copyright violation: Organization logo. Not text only.) (undo)

Could you please reconsider the issue with copy right violation, the organization logo and the logo of prevention campaign is not copy write. Republic of Maldives do not have copy right rules... In addition I talked with the NGO they told all the logos are free and can be used, they told those logos will be available from google also.. If you want a written statement from them,,,, they told they will provide it to me.. so could you please undo it.. or give me some guidance.

Thank you.

At least Maldives participates in some of List of parties to international copyright agreements.
If NGO is willing to license its artwork under terms of free license it could do so on own web site or could send permission (example: Commons:Email templates) to Commons:OTRS.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photos concerning Trude Sojka[edit]

Dear Mr. Zelenko,

I am Trude Sojka's daughter and Director of the Trude Sojka Cultural house in Quito, Ecuador. Could you please explain what we have to do to avoid deletions? My family is the owner of all photos we would like to publish in Wikipedia.

Thank you for your answer.

Anita Steinitz Sojka

I think you need to confirm your identity and copyrights ownership over works of your mother via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

I wanted to report this instance of vandalism to you: File:Rotating earth (large).gif, as the file is widely used. INeverCry 19:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other administrator fixed problem already. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cover image[edit]

Hello! You left a message concerning the following file :

File:Cover of Božidar Kantušer's 'Sire Halewyn'.jpg

I took the photo of this score, and made some adjustments (microsoft editing tool). The photographed score is mine (it is a personal copy by Bozidar Kantuser, the composer, my father, deceased). Grace Renzi (which I mentioned because she provided the cover work for the score) is also deceased, and since she was my mother, the rights (would) go to me. I don't see the (eventual) copyright problem.

Thanks

Please use Commons:OTRS to confirm your and your parents identity as well as copyrights ownership. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at Strainu's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

otrs[edit]

Я обратился к OTRS, но не знаю к чему это, так как ты, прости, ленился смотреть в EXIF, и скажи, мне еще ждать, или ты восстановишь, или снова загружу файлы. Я про это. Arantz (talk) 04:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS - это к вопросу о логотипе. Я восстановил всё, что было в оригинальном разрешении с камеры. Для остальных файлов, пожалуйста, найдите и загрузите оригиналы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Окей, большое спасибо. Arantz (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Но, все же, или я очень глупый, или кропировать нельзя (crop, не нашел слово). A это File:Dictarture.jpg половиной графика. Arantz (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Конечно можно, но EXIF при этом остаётся (во всяком случае той программой, что пользуюся я). Какие-то из вырезанных фотографий, которые Вы загрузили, EXIF не содержали. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Фото с альбома Amber and ashes[edit]

Добрый вечер! Скажите пожалуйста, а разве обложка альбома не являеться свободным файлом? --93.72.76.168 18:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Нет, если этого явно не захотел(и) её автор(ы), что выражается в свободной лицензии. Смотрите также Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Thanks for your patience in patrolling, wish you have your good time. Arantz (talk) 19:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Восстановление файла[edit]

Добрый день! Не могли бы Вы восстановить файл File:Vikash kumar.png. Он удалён как неиспользуемый, на самом деле он использовался на странице пользователя через редирект File:11.png. --Art-top (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

I tried deleting this: File:Melanie C at London 2012.jpg but got an error message. Looks to be this: bugzilla:39221. I didn't close the dr. INeverCry 18:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I restored file and deleted it again. This time it was deleted properly. I remember similar problems in past. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I closed the dr. INeverCry 02:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Уданелие[edit]

Привет, можешь удалить File:HH & LXH.jpg, поскольку существует File:HH EV LXH.jpg. Arantz (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Если не секрет, в каком году издана карта? По законодательству Армении карты охраняются авторскими правами. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Это уж, я не знаю кто автор, кто нет. Arantz (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Запрос[edit]

Еще здес есть вот что, закрой запрос если не трудно Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armenia-and-Artsakh-vector-map-en.svg. Но не вижу суть удаления этой вектор карты. Arantz (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я не знаю немецкого, чтобы понять часть дискуссии. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
А ты проблему видишь смотрев на страницу файла, я нет? Дискуссия к тому, что "Карабах официально не признана, к чему этот файл?". Arantz (talk) 15:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Может всё к тому и сводится, но я не могу принимать решения, когда чего-то не понимаю (в данном случае - языка). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

melanie dekker[edit]

hi eugene, why do you think the two photos are fan-/promo-shots?!? the two images (as well as THE WHOLE ARTICLE) are MADE by a member of elephant ears entertainment (= company of melanie dekker) and are given for FREE USE! that's what the license says too. otherwise i wouldn't have uploaded them at wikicommons! i'm not stupid, coz "stupid is a stupid does!", forrest's mum said! :) so, tell us your problem with those pics, i don't understand it...!? if you need infos about permission about these shots you can just save your time by mailing melanie dekker herself at mel@melaniedekker.com ... it's the easiest way instead to "assume" anything... best regards elephant ears (entertainment) :)

Please confirm permission from Elephant Ears Entertainment via Commons:OTRS. See example on Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

okay, no problem. though i'm an appointed represental and also can do this OTRS-mail, i will forward this to melanie dekker herself to make that wiki-mail. but it will take a few days, so be patient. hope that's okay for you. EEE ... PS: i'm yet waiting for an answer WHY you think these are fan/promo-shots!? the reason please, to make it transparent for all. thank you! :)

Photos look professional, but resolutions are inconsistent and EXIF missing. And such kind of photos are often uploaded here in addition to album covers :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User rename[edit]

Sorry i just noticed your request here, and have done as you asked, thank you--Bassem (talk) 02:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for a little bit different thing :-) I clarified my question on request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of file about "kefir"[edit]

уважаемый! You have deleted the photo I've taken and uploaded, it's ok if it considered as "(Derivative of non-free content: Commercial packaging)", but I uploaded it after reviewing these files: "File:Kefir.jpg" and "File:Fermented milk products OSM Sanok 2.JPG". Then, these are should also be concerned as Derivative of non-free content. Isn't it?--Drsrisenthil (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted both. Thank you for pointing to problem.
Actually kefir was sold in USSR in plain glass bottles (at least up to 1980s) :-) So you definitely don't need package to illustrate this delicious product.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
:), thank you. I agree with you. I live in Minsk and like that brand of kefir. :).--Drsrisenthil (talk) 11:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you enjoy time there! I'm also from Minsk :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
cool! Yes, of course, I like this place. --Drsrisenthil (talk) 18:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done[edit]

✓ Done: here--Bassem (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

Recently you deleted the Virtuemart Logo attached to the english language Virtuemart article at [[10]] because apparently you thought it violates the owner's copyright. I did upload this one (I'm a Virtuemart team member), because for some reason nobody in the long article history apparently thought of adding a Virtuemart logo to the english version of this article. If I remember correctly, I did include the copyright information when I uploaded it. The logo is part of a small collection of publicly available VirtueMart Logo/Artwork and does bear the required Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 license as stated on the Virtuemart website here: http://dev.virtuemart.net/documents/1.

Do you need any additional information or can you just undo your deletion? (I can see an "undo deletion" link in the article history, but thought it might be better to talk to you instead of clicking on "undo" myself :-)

Greetings

Joerg

I restored file. However original description lacked license and source information. Please be more accurate when uploading files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I thought I had included license and source...

Flattermann (talk) 18:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте![edit]

Очень бы хотелось узнать почему вы удалили логотип ГК "Каустик"?

Это нетривиальный современный логотип, который скорее всего охраняется авторскими правами. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
PORFAVOR NO CAMBIE LOS ARCHIVOS QUE SUBI ESO NO ES DE TU PAIS ES DE MI PAIS Y NO TE IMPORTA PORFAVOR VUELVE A SUBIR MIS ARCHIVOS .|. LAMPARA Stbnn3 (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Sport club logos you uploaded are definitely not {{PD-textlogo}}. Please read Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, apologies for such a belated reply. Unfortunately, I will not be able to take care of this users' uploads—I am too busy with the latest preparations for Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 to have time for anything else. Maybe another Polish-speaking admin could help you here? odder (talk) 16:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help with name change...[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko,

You reviewed my initial name change request here. I wondered if there's any chance you might be able to take another look at it? I am now using the Lorelei account as you can see, so it would be really great if I could get my contributions from my other name transferred over...

With all best wishes,

Lorelei (talk) 13:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think will be good idea if you'll make your chosen name unique across WMF projects by usurping used accounts, or choose another unique name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Объединение учетных записей[edit]

Евгений здравствуйте. В результате переименования моей учетной записи[11] в русском разделе Википедии, на Викискладе у меня образовалось две учетных записи User:Wisky и User:Petrov Victor. Вы не могли бы объеденить их вклад? С уважением. --Petrov Victor (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

К сожалению, объединение учётных записей невозможно. С обоих Вы сделали достаточно большой вклад, и с новой даже побольше. Я бы оставил всё как есть, разве что можно сослаться со страниц участника на другую учётную запись.
Правильнее было бы после переименования в русской Википедии запросить переименование здесь, но прошлого не вернёшь :-(
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you guide someone from ru.wp to Anaxibias ru.wp talkpage so that this user receives help in Russian? I think this is required, the user operates multiple accounts here and uploads very large numbers of copyright violations. --Martin H. (talk) 22:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. I added w:ru:Википедия:Запросы к администраторам#Участник:Anaxibia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ScareHouse photos[edit]

Hi Eugene!

There are a few versions of the photos I've uploaded that do not have the proper copywrite sharing information, I'm in the process of getting the correct licensing--for most of the photos they are under the share alike release, I'm going to sort through and make sure that the ones I want to add are under the correct agreement. 

Thanks!

Hi this is Party diktator and I was away for quite some time. I am a little confused here. Did you seriously delete all the pictures that I have added? It was a lot of work. Why did you do this? Please let me know! Best Party diktator (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Party_diktator[reply]

I you an photographer, could you please upload images in better resolutions with EXIF (if applicable)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, hope you're well. I was wondering if you could clarify your reasons for nominating the files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Party diktator for deletion. Now that I look at it, I'm honestly not too sure why I closed the discussion as delete D: Thanks, FASTILY (TALK) 20:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I looked to some of them and they were thumbnails resolutions. There are no clear term of use on source web site. Will be good idea to look onto OTRS ticket. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll inform the uploader of this. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 01:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю. Толькі заўважыў у сваіх размовах, што выдалілі гэты файл. Хоць і не памятаю, што яго загружаў, але калі б выяву бачыў, то можа і дадаў бы неабходную інфармацыю. Напэўна прыжыццыёвыя выявы Урублеўскага даўно ў грамадскім здабытку. --Maksim L. (talk) 12:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вы пакінулі ў апісаньні {{No license}}. Наколькі разумею, выдаляў робат, які далей гэтага шаблёну не чытае. Я аднавіў выяву. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]