User talk:Oleksiy.golubov

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Oleksiy.golubov!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Oleksiy.golubov!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

I'll ask Admin Eugene Zelenko to comment here as he speaks Russian. The problem is Commons Cannot accept images at upload with "Non-Commercial" (NC) or "No-Derivative" (ND) use restrictions on their licenses. That is why I passed this image below..which has no NC or ND restriction here by you:

I cannot explain it anymore. except to say that this license is not free enough for Commons because of the ND restriction. Only Admin Zelenko can suggest how the license on panoramio may be changed. I am on flickr, not panoramio. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Изображения с других севисов[edit]

Думаю, Вам стоит прочитать Commons:Лицензирование перед тем, как загружать файлы. Вкратце, Commons требует, чтобы фалы мог использовать каждый в любых целях. Этим критериям удовлетворяют лицензии СС-0, CC-BY CC-BY-SA. -ND запрещает создание производных работ, -NC - запрещает использование в коммерческих целях. смотрите также w:ru:Лицензии и инструменты Creative Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should get an E-mail permission from your friend (with his or her E-mail address attached) and have you friend state that he/she allows you 1. to upload images from the geograph account to WikiCommons and 2. how he wishes to license the pictures--whether its 'CC BY SA GENERIC 3.0' or CC BY GENERIC 3.0' or GFDL. The permission statement would have to be sent to 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org' and a link attached to the Commons picture you uploaded. Once an image is on Wikicommons, it can be used by other websites too, not just be wikipedia--it could be facebook, etc--since its copyright free. Your friend must also identify his geograph account in his E-mail statement.

Personally, you should ask the same question you asked me to the Commons Admin and OTRS volunteer MGA73 here first on his talkpage. He knows the exact words to say--and what license to choose. I am not an Admin or an OTRS volunteer. He has more experience here, I'm afraid. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your post on Leoboudv's talk page and thought I should comment. All geograph.co.uk and geograph.ie images are licenced under a free Creative Commons Attrbitution licence, like one mentioned above, per http://www.geograph.org.uk/faq3.php?a=68#68 so no new permission would be necessary? Many geograph images have already been uploaded to the commons. Ww2censor (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, these web-pages are really marvellous! But I'm mostly working in the geography of Ukraine, and they have nothing like this there, so that any single image appears to be very precious... Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When you wrote geograph, I assumed you were referring to those websites but Flickr and Panoramio are good places to look. AFAIK only Flickr allows you to make selective searches under the Creative Commons licences here but only the first and last licences are acceptable to us. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 18:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for causing a misunderstanding (maybe, Leoboudv misunderstood me too...) I only wrote geography, meaning that these were photos of Ukrainian monuments and churches. (Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

In response to your message on my talkpage and the discussion above I have a few comments.

According to Commons:FOP#Ukraine there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. So Architectural works (plans, models, and actual buildings, as well as a statues and sculptures are objects of copyright. So unless the monuments and churches are old then photos of them may not be eligible for Commons.

If your friend has uploaded the photos to a website he could make a statement on the website that the photos are license as Cc-by-sa-3.0 for example. He could also send a mail to us. If the photos are not uploaded on a website he should send a mail.

He/you could copy the standard text from Commons:Email templates/Consent and fill in the missing parts and send it to the adress mentioned on the page. --MGA73 (talk) 22:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mordvynivka Memorial.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mordvynivka Memorial.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 19:01, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Corrected. Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 01:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BalakliiaShevchenkoMonument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 11:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamboli Plate, Melitopol.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 00:16, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honorary Citizen of Melitopol Medal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 00:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BalakliiaLenin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 00:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mordvynivka Lenin Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 00:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaque of Grigory Chukhray, Melitopol.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 10:58, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old Alexander Nevsky Cathedral Melitopol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Ирука13 13:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 04:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]