User talk:Chescargot/Archive

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Delfau-louis-personnage sur une jetee .jpg

File:Delfau-louis-personnage sur une jetee .jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://images.arcadja.com/delfau_louis-personnage_sur_une_jetee~MN1c5168~10204_20181122_54251_88.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.arcadja.com/auctions/fr/delfau_louis/artiste/363928/&h=123&w=168&tbnid=MOZNbHn1pYmg9M&tbnh=123&tbnw=168&usg=AI4_-kRIrQmF4CDGxhXiSRmBaY5abO9zFw&vet=1&docid=4LYlzgSAyHkIgM

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

轻语者 (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Albert Boeken

Dag, Chescargot. Voor de afbeeldingen m.b.t. Albert Boeken heb ik weliswaar een Category aangemaakt, maar zijn werk is niet rechtenvrij: dat wordt het pas per 1 januari 2022. Ik zal de bestanden niet voor verwijdering nomineren, maar de kans is groot dat iemand anders dat wel zal doen. Nu zie ik echter dat je net File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png hebt geüpload, waarvan de naam doet vermoeden dat het een screenshot van Google Streetview is en dat is beslist niet toegestaan – is mijn vermoeden juist? Zo ja, dan moet die afbeelding weg. Ik heb ook vraagtekens bij File:AlbertBoeken.jpg, want je zegt wel dat het je eigen werk is, maar dat lijkt me bepaald onwaarschijnlijk – aan dat euvel lijden overigens vele van je uploads, daar zul je wat mij betreft in het vervolg nauwkeuriger mee moeten omspringen: wat is de bron? wie is de auteur/fotograaf? etc. Het spijt me dat ik hier een beetje boeman moet spelen, maar werk waarop nog auteursrecht heeft in beginsel geen plek op Commons, daar blijf je gewoon af, en hetzelfde geldt ook voor screenshots, etc. Toch met vriendelijke groet, Eissink (talk) 14:42, 17 July 2020 (UTC).

Ten overvloede wellicht: je kunt dus ook niet werk van Boeken (tekeningen, etc.) vrijgeven met de tekst "Ik, de auteursrechthebbende van dit werk, maak het hierbij onder de volgende licentie beschikbaar:" en er vervolgens een licentie aan verbinden die Boeken zelf niet heeft gegeven. Eissink (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC).

Beste Eissink (talk, dank voor de alert. Ja, ik heb het met die plaatjes en Commons nog niet helemaal in de vingers, en vind het ook maar een vervelend klusje. Dus raffel ik een beetje de formaliteiten af om de plaatjes maar snel in de artikels te krijgen. Maar daar mogen auteursrechten natuurlijk niet onder lijden. Normaal gesproken pas ik het owner, source, etc gedeelte vrij snel aan na het plaatsen, maar dat is er bij deze twee artikels vooralsnog bij ingeschoten.

Kun je me vandaag de tijd geven om eea in Albert Boeken’s artikel en zijn kunstwerk nog na te lopen en dat te corrigeren? Dan kun jij alsnog bepalen wat er toch echt uit moet.

Zou je me kunnen adviseren of ergens een lijstje dat aangeeft welke licenties waarvoor gebruikt kan worden? Ik ken die van 70+ in het publieke domein en nog eentje die ff niet in me opkomt, maar als er een lijstje is dat als naslagwerk gebruikt kan worden zou mooi zijn.

Betreffende de Google Streetview plaatjes, ik meende toch echt ergens (Kroeg? Help? Auteursrechtencafé?) gelezen te hebben dat die een uitzondering vormden en gebruikt mochten worden. Ik ping bij deze @Vysotsky: en — bertux want ik had ze toevallig een half uur geleden dezelfde vraag voorgelegd.

BesteEissink, ik heb voor het aanzichtplaatje van de zonnewijzer een aanpassing in de licentieverklaring gemaakt. Om precies te zijn, ik heb er een link toegevoegd naar het archief en de pagina daarin dat, voor zover ik begrijp, de gebruiksrechten bespreekt. Ik heb geen idee hoe het in de juiste formule/sjabloon gegoten moet worden. Kun je me hierover adviseren?

Streetview afbeeldingen

Betreffende het Streetviewplaatje, ik heb de vraag nog even voorgelegd in de Helppagina van Wikipedia, en wacht reactie af. mvrg--Chescargot (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Inmiddels antwoord ontvangen, "een collega schreef: dit schrijft Arnoud Engelfriet, https://blog.iusmentis.com/2010/03/03/zit-er-auteursrecht-op-google-streetview/." Is dit in lijn met MediaCommons' beleid? --Chescargot (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Tekeningen van Albert Boeken uit het HNI archief.

Beste Eissink (ik ping ter info tevens B222,Encycloon, vysotsky, en Ceescamel), na enig speuren heb ik wat meer bevestiging gevonden over de auteursrechten met betrekking tot de plaatjes van Albert Boeken op Het Nieuwe Instituut. In onderstaande extracten van het HNI’s Reproducties pagina zijn de relevantste passages vet gedrukt, en tussen [] mijn toevoegingen:

Er zijn verschillende mogelijkheden om reproducties uit de collectie van Het Nieuwe Instituut te bestellen of te maken. Afbeeldingen kunt u via het Zoekportaal downloaden of bestellen, u kunt zelf kopieren, scannen en (digitaal) fotograferen.

Reproducties bestellen via het Zoekportaal

Reproducties van archiefstukken kunt u bestellen via het Zoekportaal. Stukken die als object zijn beschreven kunt u bestellen via het winkelwagentje onderaan de pagina. Stukken die u vindt in de boomstructuur van een archief bestelt u via het winkelwagentje op de thumbnail van de afbeelding. Alle afbeeldingen kunnen gratis op klein formaat worden gedownload.

Scannen en kopiëren

In het Study Centre kunt u zelf zwart-wit kopieën maken op A4 en A3 formaat. Het Study Centre beschikt tevens over een A4 scanner om zelf teksten en afbeeldingen te scannen en digitaal op te slaan op een externe drager (cd-rom of usb-stick). Archiefstukken als tekeningen, foto's en schetsen mag u niet zelf reproduceren, daarvoor dient u gebruik te maken van de Reproductieservice. Boeken, tijdschriften en foto's uit de fotodocumentatie kunt u wel zelf kopiëren en scannen.

Auteursrecht en het gebruik van collectiemateriaal

De rechten op de stukken in de collectie liggen in de meeste gevallen bij Het Nieuwe Instituut [dit is ook specifiek aangegeven in de archiefstukken over Albert Boeken]: bij de overdracht van archieven verkrijgt Het Nieuwe Instituut tevens de exploitatierechten over het materiaal: het recht op beschikbaarstelling, openbaarmaking en vermenigvuldiging.U bent vrij om de stukken te gebruiken voor werkstukken, op websites of in publicaties. Het Nieuwe Instituut brengt daarvoor geen extra kosten in rekening. Om recht te doen aan het afgebeelde werk vragen wij u wel om in een bijschrift of verantwoording maker en titel van het werk te vermelden, en de herkomst ervan (Collectie Het Nieuwe Instituut / Archiefcode, inventarisnummer). [die info is beschikbaar in de archiefstukken en kan toegevoegd worden in de digitale opslag]

[Hier is dus mijn vraag aan de wikipedia/Commons gemeenschap: welke licentie code moet gebruikt worden in de file informatie? Met het antwoord kan ik de plaatjes op orde brengen]

[Ten overvloede, in het geval dat] Het auteursrecht ligt niet bij Het Nieuwe Instituut

In sommige gevallen ligt het auteursrecht bij andere partijen dan Het Nieuwe Instituut. Bij publicatie van dit materiaal moet dan toestemming gevraagd worden aan de rechthebbenden of gelden andere voorwaarden. Klanten van Het Nieuwe Instituut zijn zelf verantwoordelijk voor het regelen van rechten bij publicatie uit de collectie. Uiteraard informeren wij u graag over voorkomende rechtenkwesties. Bij de overdracht van een archief aan Het Nieuwe Instituut verkrijgen wij niet de rechten op werk van derden, zoals fotografen. Bij publicatie van foto's moet daarom in veel gevallen toestemming gevraagd worden aan de fotograaf of de collectieve beheersorganisatie die de rechten van die fotograaf beheert, bijvoorbeeld het Nederlands Fotomuseum, het Maria Austria Instituut of het Nationaal Archief.

Met antwoord op mijn bovenstaande vraag en gegeven informatie komen we er wel uit, toch? Met vriendelijke groet, --Chescargot (talk) 10:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Zolang er auteursrechten rusten op het werk van Boeken, maakt het niet uit wat Het Nieuwe Instituut meedeelt over de wijze waarop ze het materiaal beschikbaar stelt. Met betrekking tot de rechten op de stukken in de collectie, die "in de meeste gevallen" bij Het Nieuwe Instituut zouden liggen, zeg je "dit is ook specifiek aangegeven in de archiefstukken over Albert Boeken", maar ik zie nergens dat Het Nieuwe Instituut de auteursrechten van Boeken zou bezitten: graag een duidelijke link.

Wat betreft de screenshots van Google Streetview: op Wikimedia Commons worden zulke screenshots niet geaccepteerd. Ik heb gezocht naar specifieke richtlijnen dienaangaande, maar die heb ik nog niet kunnen vinden. Hoewel sommigen lijken weg te lopen met Engelfriet (misschien omdat ze van juridische zaken geen kaas hebben gegeten en verder geen juristen kennen), vind ik zijn schriftelijke adviezen telkens weer zeer onder de maat; de man is een belabberd auteur, en dat is voor een jurist bepaald geen aanbeveling. In elk geval is zijn advies daar niet in lijn met de praktijk op Commons. Ik zal je upload van de streetview-afbeelding voor verwijdering nomineren, en ik vermoed dat die dan zonder omhaal zal worden verwijderd, maar in elk geval kan daarna de afhandelend moderator om nadere toelichting worden gevraagd.

Een licentie kan slechts worden gebruikt als de rechthebbende expliciet een licentie heeft toegekend. Aan een licentie zit altijd een rechthebbende vast, die heeft bepaald dat de licentie van toepassing is. De vraag welke licentie kan worden toegepast op het werk van Boeken is dan ook geen goede vraag, althans niet zolang het werk niet onder een licentie is vrijgegeven. Ik vind bij Het Nieuwe Instituut nergens vermelding van licenties, dus dat is hier niet aan de orde.

Je ping naar andere gebruikers is mislukt, omdat je {{}} had moeten gebruiken i.p.v. [[]]. Herstellen heeft geen zin, zo heb ik altijd begrepen, je zult het opnieuw moeten doen in een nieuwe edit.

Tot zover, groet, Eissink (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC).

Betreffende de tekeningen van Albert Boeken: ik heb meerdere mailtjes naar het HNI gestuurd om duidelijkheid te krijgen over die licenties, en doe er deze week een telefoontje achteraan, als het emailen niet het gewenste resultaat levert. Tot die tijd zal ik niet aan de files tamperen, om andere Commonsers niet onnodig wakker te schudden.

Betreffende Google Streetview, ik zag de nominatie en ja, dat plaatje gaat er terecht uit: het is welliswaar streetview, maar het is een foto die daar is opgeladen door een met naam vermelde individu. Wel jammer, want het was wel een illustratief plaatje van de huidige situatie van het kunstwerk. Maar het zij zo.

Betreffende de mechanisch gegenereerde Streetview afbeeldingen waar geen greintje creativiteit aan te pas komt, ben ik wel benieuwd om te horen wat de Commons moderator / beleid er precies over zegt. Hoe kunnen we het preciese hiervan uitvinden?

Ik ping nog eenmaal @B222: ,@Encycloon: , @Vysotsky: , en @Ceescamel: , hopelijk correct ditmaal, zodat zij iig op de hoogte zijn. mvgr, --Chescargot (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Misschien is het interessant om over Streetview-screenshots te informeren in Commons:Village pump. Mij lijkt de redenatie "geen greintje creativiteit" veel te gemakkelijk, althans zou ik als ik Google was nogal gepikeerd zijn wanneer iemand het gehele camerawerk zou downloaden om voor een eigen site te gebruiken "omdat het toch van iedereen is"; men kan van vele door menselijke hand gefotografeerde plaatjes evengoed zeggen dat er geen greintje creativiteit aan te pas is gekomen, al hangt het natuurlijk af van de definitie van 'creativiteit' (maar wat is het verschil tussen een robotcamera op het dak van een auto en een fotograaf die vanuit een lijnbus fotografeert, of vanaf zijn fiets of vanaf een willekeurig punt waar zijn voertuig hem heeft gebracht?) Afijn, ik kan mij er dus van alles bij voorstellen dat zulk materiaal niet zomaar door iedereen kan worden geclaimd, maar naar een meer precieze Wikimedia Commons rationale ben ik ook wel benieuwd.

Ik las overigens op NLwiki je concept-'portalen' voor schaken en (consumptie)slakken: interessante onderwerpen, veel succes gewenst ermee. Groet, Eissink (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC).

Advies: op het moment dat de tekeningen van Boeken onverhoopt genomineerd worden voor verwijdering, voeg dan {{Undelete in 2022}} aan de metadata toe, en bespaar je de tijd om in discussie te gaan. Hopelijk gebeurt die nominatie niet, maar als het wel zo is, worden de afbeeldingen in elk geval begin januari 2022 teruggezet in Commons (niet automatisch in het artikel). Vysotsky (talk) 20:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Bij Streetview zal het Nederlandse auteursrecht geen rol spelen, maar wel het databaserecht. Dat geldt voor databases die aanzienlijke middelen vereisten voor de totstandkoming, wat beslist van toepassing is op Google Maps! Dat betekent alvast, dat je niet zonder meer een grote reeks streetviews of kaartfragmenten mag overnemen. Maar eentje, mag dat dan wel? Vermoedelijk wel, databaserecht is vrij soepel, maar hier op Commons zal dat niet tot eentje beperkt blijven. Voor kans op succes zul je dus aan moeten tonen dat jouw streetview waardevoller is voor het project dan al die andere. Ik weet niet waar je woont, maar een retour van Luxemburg naar de zonnewijzer zal je vermoedelijk minder uren kosten dan toestemming om een Streetview op Commons te plaatsen. Bedenk dat ik hierboven alleen het Nederlands recht heb aangehaald, terwijl uploads naar Commons (en ook teksten op Wikipedia) zowel aan de Nederlandse als aan de Amerikaanse rechtsregels moeten voldoen. Als je dat plaatje per se wilt hebben, kun je beter een oproep op Facebook plaatsen of iemand een foto wil maken. Maar goed, dat zijn algemene overwegingen. Ik ken het beleid van Commons niet, als je het gaat bestuderen hoor ik graag je resultaten — bertux 21:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BOEK t73-1-ZONNEWIJZER.jpg

Copyright status: File:BOEK t73-1-ZONNEWIJZER.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BOEK t73-1-ZONNEWIJZER.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:BOEK t73-2.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png

File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 12:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Albert Boeken (2)

Chescargot, ik geloof dat je door meerdere personen duidelijk is gemaakt dat op het werk van Boeken auteursrecht rust, en je hebt niet aannemelijk kunnen maken dat dat auteursrecht aan de archiefhouder is overgegaan. Ik heb, mede omdat het 'maar' om anderhalf jaar gaat en omdat aan mij toch al de reputatie van boeman kleeft, vorige week niet degene willen zijn die het werk voor verwijdering nomineert, maar nu ik zie dat je gewoon doorgaat met uploaden van Boeken's werk, alsof er niets aan de hand is, zal ik alsnog verzoeken de betreffende uploads te verwijderen. Je hebt kennelijk geen boodschap aan auteursrechten, en dat moet je geheel zelf weten, maar dat is niet zoals het op Commons werkt. Ik ping hier nogmaals de personen die je eerder om advies hebt gevraagd, B222, Encycloon, Vysotsky en Ceescamel, ter kennisgeving. Groet, Eissink (talk) 15:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC).

Dank voor de ping.

Chescargot, ik heb de door jou aan mij doorgestuurde mail van HNI nog even hierop doorgelezen en er staat alleen: De tekeningen zijn overgedragen aan Het Nieuwe Instituut en mogen jullie tonen op Wikipedia. Voor Commons zal er a) bewezen moeten worden dat het auteursrecht ook (officieel) is overgedragen en b) dat het instituut de tekeningen (expliciet) vrijgeeft onder de juiste licentie. Ik geef Eissink dus gelijk. Mvg, Encycloon (talk) 15:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Cc B222, Encycloon, Vysotsky en Ceescamel

Beste Eissink. Het zij zo dan. Ik zal in de resterende tijd dat die rechten van Albert Boek bestaan geen poging meer ondernemen tekeningen van hem op te laden. En ik laat de verwijdering van de reeds opgeladen beelden dus zonder verder protest toe. Je vraagt me overigens de opgeladen afbeeldingen te verwijderen, maar ik geloof dat dat automatisch gebeurt na de nominatie? Ik zou iig niet weten hoe dat verwijderen moet).

Slechts ter verduidelijking, het is niet dat ik "geen boodschap aan auteursrechten" heb. (het bezigen van deze terminologie zou voor mij de enige reden zijn je als de boeman te bestempelen ) Na advies van jou en andere personen heb ik diverse dingen geprobeerd om alsnog op legale wijze die afbeeldingen erdoorheen te krijgen (m.n. betreffende instituut benaderd- die bevestigde dat het materiaal vrij gebruikt mag worden, alleen niet met bewijs kwam; diverse pagina's licenties bestudeerd, etc), maar dat is allemaal dus niet gelukt.

Wat ik wel wil laten weten, en dit is opbouwend kritiek naar Commons toe, is dat ik (en mogelijk vele andere Commons-leken) geen wijs word uit het Commons-beleid. Er zijn welliswaar regels die ervaren Commonsers lijken te kennen, maar wanneer ik vraag naar waar precies de regels in Commons te vinden zijn, krijg ik het antwoord in de trant van “de regel is zo, maar waar precies het bepaald wordt weet ik niet”. Die Google Streetview discussie van afgelopen week aan de Villagepump (waar je me naar verwezen had) is een voorbeeld hiervan. Op mijn toch heel specifieke vraag (“waar staat het in het beleid dat GoogleStreetview niet gebruikt kan worden”) volgde welliswaar een inzichtgevende discussie, maar geen antwoord. Toen ik het nogmaals vroeg, werd nog maar eens bevestigd dat GoogleStreetview toch echt niet kan, maar wederom geen info waar dat precies staat. Mijn suggestie hier is dat het Commonsbeleid wat helderder wordt, mogelijk in de lijn als dat van Wikipedia. Wanneer binnen Wikipedia om uitleg over een zekere beleid gevraagd wordt kan elke moderator en ervaren Wikipediaan de exacte pagina geven waar het staat, met eigen toelichting.

Ik heb een x aantal pagina’s binnen maar ook buiten Commons bestudeerd over welke licenties er nu precies zijn en heb er tientallen zo niet honderden gevonden. Ik heb een paar licenties verzameld waarvan ik dacht dat ze gebruikt kon worden. (bijvoorbeeld, vandaag had ik Pollock nagezocht, een artiest dat ook minder dan 70 jaar geleden overleden is. Ik zag hiervan een schilderij op Wiki/Commons, en heb hiervan de licentie gecopieerd. “Als die kan, waarom zou ie niet voor Boeken van toepassing zijn, en als het niet kan, dan merk ik het wel...” zo was mijn logica (en gemerkt heb ik het :/). Op dit punt is mijn suggestie aan Commons, waarom is er niet een flow chart waar gebruikers doorheen kunnen lopen om op basis waarvan het beeldmateriaal dat ze hebben te kunnen bepalen welke licenties al dan niet van toepassing zijn? Ik zou als leek best een bijdrage willen leveren aan het ontwikkelen van zo’n flowchart.

Enfin, zoals gezegd dit zijn slechts twee suggesties. Ik laat het aan de ervaren Commonsers (jij misschien?) om te zien of het zin heeft hier iets mee te doen. Van mij zul je iig met betrekking tot 2D afbeeldingen van Boeken verder geen last hebben. En ik zal meer voorzichtigheid betrachten bij toekomstige uploads.

Dank iig voor het geduld en begrip. Vriendelijke groet--Chescargot (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Nee, een "ervaren Commonser" alszodanig ben ik ook (nog steeds) niet, maar al doende leert men wel. Wat betreft de vraag naar "precieze regels", schiet mij een uitspraak van een gemeentejurist te binnen: "In het recht is alles grijs," wat ik maar interpreteer als dat het niet altijd zwart of wit is, en dat weliswaar het recht zwart op wit staat geschreven, maar de (uit)werking schuift met jurisprudentie en tijdgeest en mogelijk met aanpalende rechten en wat dies al niet meer zij. Dat wil niet zeggen dat handleidingen en beleid niet duidelijker kunnen, en een soort flow chart is inderdaad een aardige suggestie, maar de kern van het auteursrecht zou toch de gemiddelde gebruiker wel op het netvlies moeten komen. Dat er binnen Wikipedia meer exact op regels kan worden gewezen, heeft wellicht deels te maken met het loutere feit dat veel beleid daar niet afhankelijk is van constituties met nationale en grensoverschrijdende werking: die materie is eenvoudiger en grotendeels een kwestie van zeden en ander gebruik, hoezeer ook vaak gekoppeld aan de internationale Wikipedia-beweging. Ik heb wel gezien dat je hebt getracht je in te lezen, en dat is te prijzen, maar als ik een knoop moet doorhakken, dan kan ik dat niet met een botermes doen, en dus kwam ik wellicht met dat "geen boodschap" wat al te scherp uit de hoek. In elk geval heeft Commons, wat mij betreft, een goede naam, en die wordt hooggehouden door vele vrijwilligers als jij en ik, dus het is zeker geen last als je je kennis en interesse zou aanwenden om bijvoorbeeld in samenspraak met anderen een flow chart op te stellen, iets waartoe je ongetwijfeld beter bent uitgerust dan ik. Verder zullen de afbeeldingen van werk van Boeken, als ze worden verwijderd, wat ik verwacht, in 2022 weer beschikbaar komen. Met vriendelijke groet, Eissink (talk) 21:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC).

Beste Chescargot, Het is inderdaad geen gesneden koek. Auteursrecht is al niet simpel, en de handhaving ervan op Commons maakt het nog iets ingewikkelder. Deze regels ken je vast al. Vuistregels Nederlands auteursrecht: vrij te gebruiken indien fotograaf, schrijver of schilder ›70 jaar dood of fotograaf echt onbekend en foto ›70 jaar oud. Vrijheid van panorama en toegestaan op Commons indien gebouw of kunstwerk in NL openbaar zichtbaar is. Vysotsky (talk) 21:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Waar het gaat om toestemmingen in het algemeen, vind ik zelf deze Wikipedia-pagina met subpagina's het overzichtelijkste. Encycloon (talk) 12:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

File:AB Grafisch Werk4 1937.png

File:AB Grafisch Werk4 1937.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:PERSPECTIEFBOEK s316-1-11.jpg

File:PERSPECTIEFBOEK s316-1-11.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Situatieplan.png

File:Situatieplan.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:BOEK t73-2.jpg

File:BOEK t73-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:De8enOpbouwNo1.jpg

File:De8enOpbouwNo1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:AB Grafisch Werk 1937.png

File:AB Grafisch Werk 1937.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:AdamSWBOEK t10-1.jpg

File:AdamSWBOEK t10-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Monument RotterdamBOEK t29-2.jpg

File:Monument RotterdamBOEK t29-2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:BOEK t63.4-1.jpg

File:BOEK t63.4-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:BOEK t63.1-1.jpg

File:BOEK t63.1-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:BOEK t2-5Cropped.jpg

File:BOEK t2-5Cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:BOEK t73-1-ZONNEWIJZER.jpg

File:BOEK t73-1-ZONNEWIJZER.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:BOEK d301-1.jpg

File:BOEK d301-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Hervormde KerkRestauratieBOEK t39-4.jpg

File:Hervormde KerkRestauratieBOEK t39-4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While being informed on the violation of copyrights on the work of Albert Boeken (1891-1951), user continues to upload his work, even with false or insufficient licenses

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:AlbertBoeken.jpg

File:AlbertBoeken.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Definitely not uploaders own work

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eissink (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:AlbertBoeken.jpg

File:AlbertBoeken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vysotsky (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Undelete in 2022

Ha @Vysotsky: , Dank nog voor de Undelete in 2022 - tip. Het is ongehoopte is dus bewaarheid geworden. Dus ga ik die tip nu maar implementeren. Wanneer je zegt "metadata", bedoel je dan deze code in te plakken in de brontekst onder het kopje "Licensing" van de afbeelding? Groet, --Chescargot (talk) 21:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Is al gebeurd, mede met hulp van Eissink. Vysotsky (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:FranzSeraphHaindl.jpg

File:FranzSeraphHaindl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

El Grafo (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Beste Ciell, verwijzende naar bovenstaande verwijderde afbeelding (zie de file met argumentatie : File:FranzSeraphHaindl.jpg ), kan ik inmiddels bevestigen dat de familielid die deze foto gemaakt heeft, de weduwe van Franz Seraph Haindl is, namelijk Anna Verbeek-Haindl. De foto is zonder commerciële doeleinden gemaakt en komt "uit de familiedoos".

Ik hoop dat dit voldoende is om de foto te un-deleten en weer terug op zijn plek in het artikel te plaatsen. --Chescargot (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Chescargot, in dat geval het alleen aan mevrouw Verbeek-Haindl om de toestemming te geven voor het gebruik onder de vrije licentie-voorwaarden. Zij kan mailen met Commons:OTRS. Ciell (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

zij is een in de zestiger jaren overleden familielid van me, vandaar dat ik sprak van een familiedoos die via erfenis is doorgeschoven.

En wie is de erfgenaam? Ciell (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Dat was een oom van me, en inmiddels ben ikzelf dat. Ik zie werkelijk geen probleem in het publiceren van genoemde afbeelding en pleit de terugplaatsing hiervan. --Chescargot (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ciell: Ik dacht dat je automatisch bericht kreeg, wanneer een bijdrage gedaan wordt aan een discussie waarin je betrokken bent, maar niet schijnbaar. Derhalve bij deze een ping. --Chescargot (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ciell: , @Ellywa: : Inmiddels een ruim jaar verder en ik weer iets Wikimedia Commons-wijzer. En weer wat wijzer over deze foto 'uit de familiedoos'. In tegenstelling to wat ik eerder begrepen had, deze foto blijkt helemaal niet door mevrouw Haindl-Verbeek gemaakt te zijn. Door wie wel, we hebben geen idee. Persoonlijk heb ik wel een vermoeden - de fotograaf van het Morks artikel, die ook de foto van 1923 die nu in het artikel staat heeft gemaakt, maar dat is mijn vermoeden en geenszins na trekken. Derhalve bij deze het verzoek of deze foto teruggeplaatst kan worden. Indien gewenst, kan ik het ook zelf weer opnieuw laden met de licentie {:{:PD-anon-70-EU}}. GroetChescargot (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Foto's die meer dan 70 jaar geleden anoniem gepubliceerd zijn, zijn vrij van auteursrechten, zoals het geval lijkt met de foto op het artikel. De foto op het artikel is net even anders dan de verwijderde foto. Als de fotograaf onbekend is, en als deze foto niet gepubliceerd is... moeten we wachten tot 120 jaar na het moment van de opname. Dat duurt dus nog tot na 2043. Dit is een "verweesd werk", niemand zou er aanstoot aan nemen, maar er rusten toch nog rechten op. Over verweesde werken is veel te vinden op internet. Groet, Ellywa (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Kijk, dat is nou duidelijk. Die regel kende ik nog niet: "Als de fotograaf onbekend is, en als deze foto niet gepubliceerd is, moeten we wachten tot 120 jaar na het moment van de opname." Dank voor de opheldering. Chescargot (talk) 09:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:SassenheimStrAdamStreetview2.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SassenheimStrAdamStreetview2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SassenheimStrAdamStreetview2.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Thankyou for the alert BevinKacon. I have now nominated the image for speedy delete. --Chescargot (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Inlezen

Hi,

Gezien de vele afbeeldingen die we van jouw alweer hebben moeten verwijderen, zou het erg (èrg) fijn zijn als je je eerst even in gaat lezen op het beleid hier op Commons, in plaats van alles te uploaden dat je vindt op het internet.

De meeste links staan wel in het welkomstsjabloon bovenaan deze pagina, maar begin eens bij Commons:Licensing. Ciell (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Ha Ciell . Ok ik stop geheel. Maar ik begrijp niet waar je naar refereert want ik heb geen enkele melding ontvangen mbt de uploads die betrekking hebben met Franz Seraph Haindl, een artiest die onerleden is in 1931. Vandaag ben heb ik idd een aantal van zijn werken opgeladen en vanwege tijdsrestrictie dacht ik morgen de licenties etc op orde te brengen. Is dat waar je naar refereert? Indien zo, morgen is dat in orde, maar uit de categorie die eraan geplakt is ziet men toch wel dat het een werk in voortgang is? Alle plaatjes doe ik op die manier. Chescargot (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

P. S. Wat bedoel je met "alles te uploaden dat je vindt op het internet"? Vandaag waren allemaal eigen foto's... Chescargot (talk) 19:57, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Van de 26 onderwerpen hierboven op je overleg, zijn er 24 23 over afbeeldingen die je niet goed hebt beoordeeld bij de upload: ook over de afbeelding van Franz Seraph Haindl heb je hier bericht gehad. Verder zul je èèrst de licenties uit moeten zoeken, en daarna pas tot uploaden overgaan. Ciell (talk) 20:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Die 26 onderwerpen zijn alweer van een tijdje terug, sindsdien is eea verandert in mijn werkwijze. Die van Franz Seraph Haindl heb ik idd gezien, en is overlegd geweest met BevinKacon, die tevreden was maar het eindoordeel aan Commons zou laten. Van Commons heb ik echter sindsdien niet meer gehoord. Wat is daarvan de conclusie? Met die foto is naar mijn weten echt niks aan de hand.

Ik zal de procedure herbestuderen opdat ik niet langer de werkwijze volg waar je je als administrator aan schijnt te storen. Het was wel een handige en snelle procedure die ik als tip van een ervaren Wikipediaan had meegekregen. --Chescargot (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Inmiddels de plaatjes van vandaag geactualiseerd met de juiste licentie etc.

Done --Chescargot (talk) 20:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Ik heb momenteel geen tijd om al je uploads te gaan monitoren, maar verkeerde licentie, geen pd want onbekende fotograaf en geen 120 jaar oud, plus ook nog eens verkeerde bron, verkeerde licentie plus verkeerde bron, verkeerde bron, verkeerde bron. Je bedoelt het goed, maar je moet secuurder zijn met wat je doet. Vraag anders even in de Commons:Kroeg of iemand je helpen wil, want alles moet aangepast of verwijderd. En kijk inderdaad even bij die andere DR die ik gesloten hebt, en de afbeeldingen allemaal verwijderd. Daar staat ook een link bij naar wat er verkeerd gaat. Ciell (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Beetje ontmoedigd door wat ik als heisa ervaar in Commons heb ik het tot heden even gelaten bij wat het was. Nu probeer ik de draad weer op te pakken. Kun je verduidelijken wat je bedoelt met "die andere DR"? --Chescargot (talk) 08:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ciell: --Chescargot (talk) 15:10, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Ha Chescargot, mijn Commons volglijst overstroomt nu de structured data bots zijn aangezet, dus een ping werkt beter inderdaad.

Het principe op Commons is dat je alleen afbeeldingen uploadt die je helemaal zelf hebt gemaakt, of waarvan je zeker weet dat ze vrij zijn <u<en dat kunt bewijzen In het geval van deze en deze kon je dat niet, net als de meeste van je afbeeldingen helaas. Ik heb deze twee afbeeldingen daarom verwijderd vanuit het 'voorzichtigheids-principe'. Net als dat je teksten op Wikipedia geen werk van iemand anders mogen zijn, zijn we op Commons in dezelfde mate oplettend op afbeeldingen. Heb je al tijd gehad om de links te lezen die ik jee eerder gaf, onder 'inlezen'? Het is pittige tekst in het Engels, dus misschien vind je nl:Wikipedia:BGM fijner. Die is niet altijd helemaal bij wat betreft Commons, maar is in de grote lijnen wel correct en legt de termen uit die we gebruiken hier. Ciell (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ThomasHaulogNavis.png

Copyright status: File:ThomasHaulogNavis.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ThomasHaulogNavis.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Ter info: je bent hier dus een licentie vergeten. Dit soort dingen moet je echt uitzoeken voordat je afbeeldingen online zet: hiermee staat en valt of een afbeelding gebruikt kan worden. Ciell (talk) 18:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Ha Ciell, ik had deze niet vergeten en had het er bewust ingeplakt. Echter, ik zag dat er idd iets mis was en heb direct de assistentie van Elly ingeroepen om het rond te krijgen. Uiteindelijk heeft Vysotsky het opgelost. Ik wil hiermee zeggen, dat ik er bovenop zit om te zorgen dat het in orde is. Meanwhile, de door jou gesuggereerde links en suggesties staan op mijn lijstje en ik ga me er zeker nog doorheen werken.

Ik denk overigens dat je m'n andere ping, die betreffende Franz Seraph Haindl over het hoofd gezien hebt. Zou je daar nog naar kunnen kijken? Groet, --Chescargot (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Hoi Chescargot, in het ene bericht heb ik beide vragen naar mijn mening beantwoord. Als jij niet de maker bent van de afbeelding, heb jij in principe ook geen auteursrechten erop in je bezit. Dus mag je ze niet vrijgeven. Ciell (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Aquileia Basiliek-situatiekaartje.png

File:Aquileia Basiliek-situatiekaartje.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: satellite image, quite similar to google maps 2020, with the campanile replaced by graphics. Compare the 2 cars on the oval car park on the right side.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Johan de la Court Silver Medaille.jpg

File:Johan de la Court Silver Medaille.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Mosteiro dos Jerónimos-Plan2 (NL).jpg

File:Mosteiro dos Jerónimos-Plan2 (NL).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SiegbertTarrasch.jpg

Copyright status: File:SiegbertTarrasch.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SiegbertTarrasch.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 21:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Chescargot,

Ik zou toch wat nauwgezetter zijn bij het uploaden van bestanden. Kijk even wat Vysotsky heeft gedaan bij SiegbertTarrasch.jpg en memoriseer dat of noteer het; idem voor de andere bestanden die gered zijn, bestudeer waar het probleem lag en hoe je dat kunt voorkomen. Mijn bereidheid om je te helpen op Commons heb je al grotendeels verspeeld door oude fouten nonchalant te herhalen. Op Wikipedia ligt het anders, maar ik stoor me ook daar aan de overmaat aan slordigheden. Voor nieuwelingen willen collega's graag bijspringen, maar dat neemt uiteraard af.

Met vriendelijke groet → bertux 08:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Dag Bertux. Betreffende Wikipedia, ik ben me niet bewust van de overmaat aan slordigheden die ik schijnbaar bega aldaar. Zou je kunnen aangeven om wat voor type slordigheden het gaat, zodat ik daar beter op kan letten?

Betreffende Commons, tja, ik dacht juist een verbetering gevonden te hebben door eindelijk die Oplaad Wizard te gebruiken ipv opladen via Wikipedia. Dat Vysotsky het daarna geupdated had, had ik niet eens in de gaten. Sorry about that. Dat gezegd hebbende, Tarrasch is de enige van meerdere plaatjes die ik recentelijk opgeladen heb waar een probleem uitgerold is? Ik kijk nu naar mijn Watchlist en zie geen andere (recente) aanpassingen door derden. --Chescargot (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Beste Chescargot, Twee vuistregels die ik zelf gebruik: voor Wikipedia de tekst een uurtje of een dag laten liggen en herlezen voordat ik publiceer (plus spellingscontrole); op Commons een checklist van zes punten gebruiken (Description, Author, License, Date, Source, Category) die ik vantevoren naloop. Uiteindelijk spaart dat mezelf ook tijd uit. Vysotsky (talk) 08:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Is mijn spelling een van de slordigheden waar Bertux naar verwijst? Ik zal er beter op letten. Ik zal nieuwe teksten in klad behouden, zoals je aangeeft.

Dank voor de checklist voor Commons. Ik begrijp dat hoewel zaken met de Wizzard stukken eenvoudiger is dat het door de gemeenschap zeer gewaardeerd wordt als tekst zoals Description netter uitgewerkt wordt. Dat raffelde ik tot op heden idd maar snel af om het plaatje opgeladen te krijgen. --Chescargot (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Ik zal een keer een recente bijdrage onder de loep nemen, dan weten we beiden hoe het er op dat moment voor staat → bertux 13:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Saint Paul Cathedral Abidjan.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Konstanzer Richental Chronik Verkauf von von Fischen, Fröschen und Schnecken 25rCropped2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Konstanzer Richental Chronik Verkauf von von Fischen, Fröschen und Schnecken 25rCropped2.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Konstanzer Richental Chronik Verkauf von von Fischen, Fröschen und Schnecken 25rCropped2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pompejanum1931.jpg

Copyright status: File:Pompejanum1931.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pompejanum1931.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:AndreasStassenBidprentje.jpg

Copyright status: File:AndreasStassenBidprentje.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:AndreasStassenBidprentje.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Palaver meeting in Togo.jpg

Copyright status: File:Palaver meeting in Togo.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Palaver meeting in Togo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Beleg van Alkmaar.jpg

Copyright status: File:Beleg van Alkmaar.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Beleg van Alkmaar.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Oldies

Beste Chescargot, Vandaag bracht ik drie oude Hoogovens-foto's naar Commons. Ik vind het aardig dat ik foto's vond van de oude Van Foreesten (foto 1), maar foto 2 en 3 zijn ook niet onaardig. Wil jij me helpen met de identificatie van foto 2 en 3? Het gaat me er met name om dat ik denk dat ik een zeldzame foto van Boris Kostic gevonden heb, maar zou jij dat willen bevestigen? (Of ontkennen, natuurlijk!) Vysotsky (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Arnold van Foreest speelt tegen zijn broer Dirk van Foreest (1952!). Donner en Bouwmeester kijken toe
Ook Hoogovens 1952
Alle tien de deelnemers aan Hoogovens 1952

Vysotsky (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Beste Vysotsky, ik zal mijn best doen! Ik ben deze week echter op reis, heb vanaf volgende week meer ruimte om naar de identiteiten te jagen. Met jouw goedvinden denk ik er tevens over deze foto's ook ter identificatie naar mijn contacten bij de KNSB en bij Max Euwe Centrum te sturen.

Als ik je goed begrijp, gaat het om de identificatie van alle personen, inclusief bevestiging of dat we Kostic in de tweede foto zien. Chescargot (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Geen probleem. Hou het maar even beperkt en stuur het liever niet naar anderen. Ik kijk zelf ook nog wat beter. Vysotsky (talk) 20:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Done Vysotsky (talk) 22:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Dat heb je rap gedaan. Enkele observaties: De tweede foto behoeft mogelijk extra toelichting, want hoewel het het hoogoventoernooi betreft, gaat het hier vermoedelijk om een analyse van de remisepartij? De mannen lijken in een bezemhok omgetoverd tot analysezaaltje te spelen, met een groep jongens die met hun neus bovenop het bord toekijken. In de toelichting van de derde foto ontbreekt de naam van de meest rechtsstaande figuur. Ik tel elf mensen op de foto, maar slechts tien zijn er genoemd.

Overigens een merkwaardige prijs, met persisch/arabische (?) stijl en tekst... Ik ga proberen te achterhalen wat dit betekent. Chescargot (talk) 22:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Die elfde persoon is hoogstwaarschijnlijk de wedstrijdleider, want hij reikt de prijs uit. (Naam is wel te achterhalen, maar dat doe ik als ik een keer tijd over heb.) Overigens was Euwe behalve speler en winnaar van het toernooi gewoon bezig met zijn werk (waardoor hij één partij thuis mocht spelen) en ook nog eens verslaggever, zie dit merkwaardige verslag, waarin ook de "salonremise" tussen Fuderer en Kostic beschreven wordt. Ik las gisteren in een oude krant ook een stukje over een zijzaaltje en tien zetten, maar dat kan ik niet meer vinden. (Dat moet in een avondkrant van 15 jan. of een ochtendkrant van 16 jan. staan.) Als je de details van die merkwaardige prijs vindt, neem ik mijn hoed af. Vysotsky (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

'Uitdaging' aangenomen :). En ik zal ook proberen de naam vd elfde persoon te achterhalen. Maar al met al, zoals jij al schreef, dit zijn aardige foto's. Ze lijken een schaakcultuur uit een ver verleden te vertellen, althans vanuit het perspectief van de relatief jonge Nederlandse schaakgeschiedenis. Chescargot (talk) 08:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

De wedstrijdleider was Piet Veldheer. Volgens de Leeuwarder Courant (21 jan.) gaf hij Euwe "een geschenk". Dat helpt echt. Vysotsky (talk) 11:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

In gedachten houdend dat je de foto nog niet aan de grote klok wilde hangen, had ik slechts de Wikimedia Commons link gestuurd aan mijn contact van het Max Euwe Centrum. Hij heeft het echter voortvarend aangepakt en ipv achter de schermen rond te vragen, heeft ie er een zoekadvertentie in het Max Euwe Nieuwsbrief nr 101 (p.8) van gemaakt... _Sorry about that_, maar wel een goede kans dat het mysterie over "het mysterieuse tafeltje" opgelost gaat worden. Chescargot (talk) 09:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Leuk stukje. Dat gaat vast en zeker informatie opleveren. Goede aflevering van de Nieuwsbrief trouwens, met fijne informatie over het yoghurtgambiet. Smullen. Zou je voor mij willen informeren wat de bron is voor de foto van Keres en Albert Becker? Vysotsky (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Ik heb de vraag uitgezet. Chescargot (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Reactie is binnen: de foto komt rechtstreeks uit de fotocollectie van het MEC... Ze weten niet hoe ze eraan gekomen zijn, helaas. Chescargot (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Dank voor je moeite. In de kranten uit juli 1936 vind ik vooral foto's van Tartakower vs. Euwe, met zes anderen om het bord, zonder naam van de fotograaf. 86 jaar geleden, geen fotograaf genoemd. Ik zoek nog wat verder, maar zonder contra-indicatie breng ik de foto van Keres vs. Becker naar Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 10:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

PS

Wil je de berichten op deze pagina niet na een maandje of zo automatisch in je archief hebben? Vysotsky (talk) 20:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Tja ik ben niet zo actief op Commons, maar het wordt hier idd een zootje... Ik zal binnenkort eens op jaar archiveren. Dank voor de hint :)) Chescargot (talk) 20:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Dat kan automatisch. Als je het goed vindt, zet ik er een botje bij. Duurt even, maar dan heb je ook wat. Vysotsky (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Oh dat is aardig van je. Ja graag! Chescargot (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Als het goed is, gaat dat archiefdoosje nu vanzelf vollopen. Ik weet niet hoe snel dat gaat, maar het gaat. Vysotsky (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Dankje! Chescargot (talk) 22:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Snails and calemares.jpg

Dear, I am writing you regarding the title file. You locate it at the 2011 Aplec del Cargol, but I don't see any snails in the photo. It shows squid, mussels, clams and pork and rabbit, so it's probably a rice dish but no snails. That's why I have recategorized the file. Thank you and a hug. AlbertRA (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the alert. No problem at all for the relocation. When I toke the picture, I was told there were snails inside it as well - which seemed only logical, considering the goal of the festival, so I didnt question it at that point. If only I could have tasted that one, I would have noticed. Anyways, from your phrasing I gather you are familiar with what is being cooked in that particular (giant) dish. So thanks for the correction. Chescargot (talk) 09:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Barbapapa&Barbamama (cropped).jpg

And also:

File:Barbapapa&Barbamama.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Patara Bath of Nero-Vespasian in 2013 4719 (cropped).jpg

Dag,

Ik begrijp dat u een deelvergroting hebt gemaakt. En ben blij dat u niet, zoals sommige mensen doen, mijn foto hebt overschreven. Een tip: als u iets van een bewerkingsprogramma hebt, haal dan even de optie Auto Color (of zoiets) over een dergelijk beeld, dan krijg je een witter contrastrijker beeld. Ik doe dat veel met bordjes in musea en aan de openbare weg e.d.Dosseman (talk) 07:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Dag Dosseman, dank voor de tip. Daar heb ik deze keer idd niet aan gedacht en zal ik tzt zeker werk van maken. Groet uit Istanbul Chescargot (talk) 08:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Patara Bath of Nero-Vespasian in 2013 4719 (cropped and cleaned).jpg

Copyright status: File:Patara Bath of Nero-Vespasian in 2013 4719 (cropped and cleaned).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Patara Bath of Nero-Vespasian in 2013 4719 (cropped and cleaned).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tuikwerd2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Tuikwerd2.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tuikwerd2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:H.Breust-19e eeuw.jpg

Copyright status: File:H.Breust-19e eeuw.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:H.Breust-19e eeuw.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:HuisBreust-vanuit het zuiden gezienEind19eEeuw.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

File:TelluricCurrentAustralia1991.jpg

Hi Chescargot, would you mind stating at the image what map system the map at the image File:TelluricCurrentAustralia1991.jpg is based on, for copyright reasons? I presume it is based on a free map like OSM? That way, it can be categorised into a category like Category:OpenStreetMap maps of Australia, for example. Calistemon (talk) 08:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Calistemon, of course I wouldnt mind. The map is directly from Wikimedia Commons, and the yellow lines I drew in myself, basing on a map from a magazine referred to in nl:François Chamalaun. I will state the requested details as soon as I am on my computer (currently I am on mobile). Chescargot (talk) 09:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Cheers! Calistemon (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Done :) Chescargot (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Portret Fr. Arnoldus van der Voort.jpg

Copyright status: File:Portret Fr. Arnoldus van der Voort.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Portret Fr. Arnoldus van der Voort.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:KlingerFactory-Gumpoldskirchen.jpg

Copyright status: File:KlingerFactory-Gumpoldskirchen.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:KlingerFactory-Gumpoldskirchen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Amelie Albrecht 2021 Cropped.jpg

File:Amelie Albrecht 2021 Cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peterweter23 (talk) 13:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Siege UNIR PS Ouaga (cropped).jpg

File:Siege UNIR PS Ouaga (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: WP:DW : picture of another picture. No photographer's name, no context to the original picture (date, place, etc). Commons:De minimis doesn't apply when zooming on the copyrighted content.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 14:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:ProfileThomasSankara.jpg

File:ProfileThomasSankara.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: WP:DW : picture of another picture (File:Siege UNIR PS Ouaga.jpg). No photographer's name, no context to the original picture (date, place, etc). Commons:De minimis doesn't apply when zooming on the copyrighted content.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 14:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (3).jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (3).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No freedom of panorama in Burkina Faso (COM:FOP Burkina Faso). The statue was inaugurated in 2019 (Mémorial Thomas Sankara), so it isn't public domain yet.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (2).jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (2).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No freedom of panorama in Burkina Faso (COM:FOP Burkina Faso). The statue was inaugurated in 2019 (Mémorial Thomas Sankara), so it isn't public domain yet.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (cropped).jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This statue was inaugurated in 2019 (Mémorial Thomas Sankara), so it isn't public domain yet + No freedom of panorama in Burkina Faso (COM:FOP Burkina Faso

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019.jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This statue was inaugurated in 2019 (Mémorial Thomas Sankara), so it isn't public domain yet + No freedom of panorama in Burkina Faso (COM:FOP Burkina Faso)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (3).jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Titlutin (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019.jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (2).jpg

File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 08:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:LSI1948-Gevangen2(poets).jpg

Copyright status: File:LSI1948-Gevangen2(poets).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:LSI1948-Gevangen2(poets).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

File:MomiMaiga 04 (cropped).jpg

File:MomiMaiga 04 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The use of this image from Discogs is in violation of Discogs' Terms of Service

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ErikvanB (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

File:MomiMaiga 04.jpg

File:MomiMaiga 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The use of this image from Discogs is in violation of Discogs' Terms of Service

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ErikvanB (talk) 17:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

File:MomiMaiga 01.jpg

#invoke:Autotranslate ErikvanB (talk) 17:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

File:MomiMaiga 03.jpg

#invoke:Autotranslate ErikvanB (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

File:MomiMaiga 02.jpg

#invoke:Autotranslate ErikvanB (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Ha Erik, zowel volgens de bovengegeven link naar Discogs voorwaarden (ihb "You may only contribute content which is in the public domain (i.e., expired copyright or public from inception) or otherwise available through a CC0 “No Rights Reserved” license, or content for which You are the rights holder.") en in deze link (onder "Intellectual Property Rules") lijken deze foto's wel degelijk bruikbaar? Kun je me uitleggen waarom ik het mis zou hebben? Chescargot (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Chescargot, ik had alleen deze pagina gelezen, waar staat "or content for which You are the rights holder" en "We grant You a limited license to access and make personal use of the Service and not to download (other than page caching) or modify it, or any portion of it, except with Our express written consent." Maar de extra link die je geeft schrijft weer: "By uploading images to Discogs you agree that the image meets one of the following requirements: ... You own the rights to the image and agree to make it available via a CC0 "No Rights Reserved" license; or (...) Fair Use." Dus nu weet ik het ook niet meer. "Fair use" is in elk geval iets dat we op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia niet gebruiken. Misschien kan je op de overlegpagina's van de foto's een verdediging geven zoals je hierboven hebt gedaan? Bedankt voor de info in elk geval! Hartelijke groet, ErikvanB (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Zal ik morgen doen dan, wanneer ik weer achter mn computer zit. Prettige avond! Chescargot (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Ha Erik, ter info: ik heb mijn bezwaar hier ingediend. Bij de andere genomineerde afbeeldingen heb ik een link naar dit bezwaarschriftje gemaakt. Groet, Chescargot (talk) 13:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:MomiMaiga 04 (cropped).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy ([[User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Audio Art Roland Kuit Paris (cropped).jpg

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Nele Paelinck.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Agouti

Bonjour Chescargot, concernant vos importations sur de la viande de brousse (celle-ci par exemple), l'animal a été identifié comme un agouti du genre Cuniculus (un grand rongeur d'Amérique du Sud). Mais comme les photos semblent provenir d'Afrique de l'Ouest, ne s'agirait-il pas plutôt d'un grand aulocode du genre Thryonomys ? Ellicrum _{{bablute [...]}} 12:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Bonjour Ellicrum, merci pour votre intérêt a ce sujet. En effet, j'ai pris cette photo une heure de route au nord de Lomé, la capitale de Togo. Je ne suis pas expert de sujet et peut seulement dire que les gens à Togo, ainsi que ceux a Benin, et même à Nigeria (plutôt anglophone), l'appellent sans exception "agouti". Toutefois, suivant votre observation et voyant les textes et photos Wikipédia sur le grand aulacode, je vois que vous avez probablement tout à fait raison de suggérer qu'il s'agit la dernière espèce. En ce cas-là, je devrai supprimer mes ajouts dans la version Néerlandaise sur l'agouti et faire des ajouts dans l'article du grand aulocode. Merci bien pour la notification ! Chescargot ([[User talk:Chescargot#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting the subpage, transclusion, year, month, day, and notice to the page creator. Here, Template:T2 is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the Template:T2 template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the headsup Jeff, I will study the info and will make sure to try and not make the same error again. Chescargot ([[User talk:Chescargot#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Willem Barentz (Joop Puntman)

Template:Autotranslate FakirNL ([[User talk:FakirNL|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Chescargot/Archive

Albert Boeken

Copyright status: File:BOEK t73-1-ZONNEWIJZER.jpg

Albert Boeken (2)

File tagging File:SassenheimStrAdamStreetview2.png

File tagging File:Zonnewijzer in Den Haag-StreetView2014.png

Inlezen

Copyright status: File:ThomasHaulogNavis.png

Copyright status: File:SiegbertTarrasch.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Copyright status: File:Konstanzer Richental Chronik Verkauf von von Fischen, Fröschen und Schnecken 25rCropped2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Pompejanum1931.jpg

Copyright status: File:AndreasStassenBidprentje.jpg

Copyright status: File:Palaver meeting in Togo.jpg

Copyright status: File:Beleg van Alkmaar.jpg

Oldies

PS

Snails and calemares.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Copyright status: File:Patara Bath of Nero-Vespasian in 2013 4719 (cropped and cleaned).jpg

Copyright status: File:Tuikwerd2.jpg

Copyright status: File:H.Breust-19e eeuw.jpg

File:TelluricCurrentAustralia1991.jpg

Copyright status: File:Portret Fr. Arnoldus van der Voort.jpg

Copyright status: File:KlingerFactory-Gumpoldskirchen.jpg

Copyright status: File:LSI1948-Gevangen2(poets).jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Agouti

Navigation menu

Search