User talk:Titlutin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Titlutin.

This is the user talk page of Titlutin, where you can send messages and comments to Titlutin.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.
Babel user information
fr
Le français est la langue maternelle de cette personne.
en-3
This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English.
de-1
Dieser Benutzer hat grundlegende Deutschkenntnisse.
Users by language


Tagging copyvios[edit]

Bonjour,

Merci d'informer l'utilisateur lorsque vous taguez des images comme violation de droits d'auteur. Le mieux est d'utiliser le gadget. Voyez dans vos préférences. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Yann: Ok, pas de problème. C'est juste que j'avais vu des admins qui reprévenaient les personnes quand ils supprimaient un fichier copyvio, du coup ça faisait un peu des messages en double. Et je pensais que c'était une pratique courante et que donc ça serait un peu superflu de laisser un message. Mais pas de soucis, je le ferai quand même maintenant. Cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 23:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alex Hepburn (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Alex Hepburn (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tarajones2012 (talk) 02:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rachel Mwanza.jpg[edit]

File:Rachel Mwanza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Queryzo (talk) 09:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maripier Morin picture[edit]

Hello, why is my picture not ok? SophieDelDegan (talk) 02:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @SophieDelDegan: (je crois que vous parlez français ? =))
Vous avez pris l'image à partir d'un site internet. Cependant, ce site (et tout son contenu) est protégé par le droit d'auteur (c'est marqué tout en bas : « © 2016 Bell Média - Tous droits réservés »). Commons et Wikipédia ne peuvent héberger que des fichiers sous licence libre. Or, rien n'indique que cette photo a été publiée sous licence libre par son photographe (il n'y a rien de précisé concernant sa licence).
Cela pose un problème légal, car tout ce qui est publié sur Wikipédia se retrouve automatiquement placé sous licence libre, ce qui veut dire que tout le monde pourrait réutiliser, modifier voire utiliser dans un but commercial cette photo sans demander l'autorisation de son photographe. Cela ne pose pas de problème si ce dernier a donné explicitement son autorisation en plaçant sa photo sous licence libre. Mais ici, cela n'a pas l'air d'être le cas, rien n'est marqué.
Il faut donc soit contacter le photographe (ou l'ayant-droit) et lui demander s'il accepte de placer sa photo sous licence libre (et il faudra alors qu'il envoie un courriel d'autorisation, voir pour cela cette page Aide:Republication/Courriel Image), soit trouver une photo vraiment libre de droit, soit malheureusement s'abstenir.
En espérant vous avoir éclairé. Bien cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 03:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S : Vous avez aussi mis que l'auteur de la photo était Karl Hardy, mais il me semble qu'il n'est que l'auteur de l'article, pas le photographe.

Oui, ça m'éclaire beaucoup, merci pour les explications! Je n'avais pas bien saisi concept de Copyright, et en plus je me suis trompé sur l'auteur . Autre question: si un compte Instagram est public, peut-on utiliser des photos qui en proviennent? Merci! SophieDelDegan (talk) 04:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SophieDelDegan: Non, désolé, les photos publiées sur Instagram sont malheureusement elles aussi protégées par le droit d'auteur (même sur un compte public). Il faut vraiment que la licence soit explicitement mentionnée comme étant libre par le photographe. Si rien n'est précisé, la photo est considérée comme étant automatiquement protégée par le droit d'auteur.
Sur la page suivante, vous avez un tableau à droite résumant le nom des licences acceptés ici et leurs pictogrammes (utilisés sur certains sites comme Flickr) : Commons:Flickr files. Il s'agit principalement des licences appelées CC-BY et CC-BY-SA, ainsi que les photos mises dans le domaine public.
Sinon, si vous réussissez à contacter le photographe d'une photo qui vous intéresse, vous pouvez aussi lui demander d'envoyer un courriel d'autorisation à Wikipédia (voir le lien que j'ai donné dans mon précédent message).
Je sais que c'est très contraignant et frustrant, c'est pour ça qu'il y a beaucoup d'articles sans illustration. Mais c'est la seule façon pour Wikipédia de respecter la loi tout en étant libre (= son contenu pouvant être réutilisé par tout le monde). Cordialement--Titlutin (talk) 04:33, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Luc François, Jean-Louis Etienne et Gilles Boeuf.jpg[edit]

File:Jean-Luc François, Jean-Louis Etienne et Gilles Boeuf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dereckson (talk) 12:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

asked for deleti0n of File:SR20_pyranometer_solar_radiation_sensor.png[edit]

Hi, I was not aware of copyright of the picture you filed for deletion. I now have uploaded another, free of copyright, under the same name. However, this does not change the 'filed for deletion' status. Can you please revert this? Thank you, keep up the good work. Link to file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SR20_pyranometer_solar_radiation_sensor.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mont Viso (talk • contribs) 09:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC) Mt Viso — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mont Viso (talk • contribs) 09:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mont Viso: it is still written in the exif (the infos at the bottom of the page) : "Copyright by Hukseflux Thermal Sensors". I don't know if those are the remaining infos of the former picture. Maybe you should upload it as a whole new file if you're sure this one is free of use. Regards --Titlutin (talk) 12:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

permission & deletion[edit]

Hi, thank you for your messages. Christian Lu sent a first permission concerning the first 9 pictures to COM:OTRS a few days ago, and Arthur Crbz has validated them. Afterwards, Christian Lu sent a second permission for all remaining pictures. However, the authorized pictures have been deleted from the main page https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%86%E6%B0%B8%E5%AE%89. Could you please restore them ? Many thanks for your help. Merci beaucoup ! Best regards --HSUN (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HSUN: .
✓ Done: The pictures have been restored on the Chinese page.
Regards. --Titlutin (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin: Hi, Thank you very much! However, the file : File:Christian Lu photo.jpg has not been restored yet. Christian LU sent a second permission regarding this file as well as all other files a few days ago. So, please restore it when possible. Merci encore ! Best regards, --HSUN (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@HSUN: Hi. When this file is restored, just go to the Chinese page, click on the "history" button (I believe it is "查看历史" in chinese) and click on "撤销" ("undo") on my very last edit. It is when I had removed this file from the page, since it wasn't yet visible. By undoing my last edit, you'll restore the file on the page (but wait until it is restored on Commons as well, otherwise you will just see a red link). Regards --Titlutin (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin: Merci infiniment de votre explication et de votre aide. Bien cordialement ! --HSUN (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin: Hi, the file : File:Christian Lu photo.jpg has been already restored. However, I failed to undo ("撤销" ) on your very last edit to restore the picture. Could you please help me to solve this issue ? Many thanks ! Furthermore, 3 other pictures have been deleted from the page https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%86%E6%B0%B8%E5%AE%89. Do I need to ask the author to send the permission again regarding these files ? Best regards, --HSUN (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@HSUN: Hi. I restored the pic on the Chinese page. For the 3 pictures which were deleted, yes, the photographer should send a new email, because there must have been a problem with the validity of the authorization sent before ("No permission since 12 June 2017" says the deletion comment). Regards --Titlutin (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin: Thank you very much ! Bien cordialement, --HSUN (talk) 18:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Titlutin: Hi, the following three deleted pictures from the page https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%86%E6%B0%B8%E5%AE%89 have been already authorized with validated permission : File:Wiki bd 1.jpg File:Wiki bd 3.jpg File:Wiki bd 2.jpg . Could you please restore them to the page ? Many thanks ! Merci infiniment ! Best regards, --HSUN (talk) 13:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@HSUN: Done. --Titlutin (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin: Merci encore ! --HSUN (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romain-Grau-candidat-pour-En-Marche-Legislatives-2017-PO.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Titlutin. Si vous aviez consulté l'historique du fichier avant de demander sa suppression, vous auriez vu que son cas a déjà été traité : la mention cc-by-sa est incluse dans la source. Voir : User talk:Arthur Crbz#File:Romain-Grau-candidat-pour-En-Marche-Legislatives-2017-PO.jpg. Cordialement, Culex (talk) 05:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Culex: Ok, désolé. J'avais juste vu le copyright du site web. Cordialement. --Titlutin (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo - Violation de droits d'auteur[edit]

Bonjour, Nous avons téléchargé une photo de la Paris Healthcare Week 2017 (photo Paris Healthcare Week 2017.png) pour l'utiliser sur notre page Wikipedia (en construction). Cette photo a été supprimée pour violation de droits d'auteurs, car elle a été retrouvée sur un site web qui n'était pas le nôtre. Effectivement, elle a déjà été utilisée, mais cette photo est bien la nôtre. Comment peut-on faire pour utiliser cette photo dans la page Wikipedia ? Doit-on la reposter ou pouvez-vous annuler ce retrait dans la bibliothèque ? Un grand merci à vous, Excellente journée --Ndconseil (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Ndconseil: . Il faut que le photographe envoie un email officiel d'autorisation à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Tout est expliqué sur la page suivante, au bas de laquelle se trouve un modèle d'email à envoyer : Aide:Republication/Image. Bien cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylvain Boulouque (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Sylvain Boulouque (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 13:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Stéphane Henon[edit]

Bonjour , la photo de Stéphane Henon a été prise par moi même , je retire le copyright que j’avais mis sur mon site « commico du mistral » . Je la republie sans le copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elo250gto (talk • contribs) 14:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Elo250gto: . Supprimer le watermark de la photo ne suffira pas, il faut qu'elle soit placée officiellement sous licence libre. Mais vous m'avez dit que vous avez envoyé un email aux bénévoles OTRS, donc nous n'avons plus qu'à attendre leur validation. Bien cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help please![edit]

Hi, could you help me with something? I tried to upload an album cover art image and I thought I entered all the required info for wiki to justify the use but when it uploaded all the information was in the description and none of it went to the 'Author', 'Date' etc sections like I thought it would and I don't know what to do to fix it. This is the link to the file ->https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:I_Need_U_Japan_Single_Regular_Edition.jpg Could you delete it for me? I don't want a strike for doing something wrong and I've been at my wits end trying to figure out how to properly upload an image and get all the details right only for this to happen. I'm really tired and done with it, so I would appreciate it very much if you could kindly delete it for me since I apparently don't know what the hell I'm doing (or offer some guidance as to where I went wrong and what I didn't read properly or something).Carlobunnie (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Carlobunnie:
I'm really sorry, I can't delete it for you. Only an administrator of the English Wikipedia can do that, which I am not (also I'm not very active on this part of Wikipedia). But I see you managed to use the correct template, so there shouldn't be any more problem :) --Titlutin (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin After a good bit of reading thru Wikipedia templates/non-free related articles and some tinkering I figured it out. And my mistake, I thought you were but thanks for clearing that up and for replying! -- Carlobunnie (talk) 17:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maya Plentz Fagundes (40936038471).jpg[edit]

File:Maya Plentz Fagundes (40936038471).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MartinPoulter (talk) 15:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

International Maritime Organization[edit]

Hi Titlutin, I noticed that you transfer files from IMO's flickr stream over to Commons. Please remember to include Category:Kitack Lim. He is usually in all the photos. Thank you! // sikander { talk } 01:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sikander. Ok, I will do that next time. Sorry, I guess I didn't want to "flood" his category, there are so many pictures of him --Titlutin (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Titlutin: that's great, thank you. He has 158 photos right now and if the count keeps increasing, we can categorize them by year: Kitack Lim in 2018/2019 etc. In any case, this is better than having too few photos. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 21:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ce pays que tu ne connais pas (illustration de couverture).png[edit]

Hello Titlutin - this cover is my own work, the real cover looks like that

Thanks

लोकाः समस्ताः सुखिनो भवन्तु (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello लोकाः समस्ताः सुखिनो भवन्तु.
It is really close to the real cover though, I wonder if it can't be considered as a "derivative work". Also, I wonder what's the point of creating a fake book cover then? We can't use it on articles, what if the author / publisher notices it? They may ask for us to remove the fake cover, since we're pretending it's the real one (is it legal?). It doesn't seem like a good idea to me, book covers aren't usually free, but creating a fake book cover doesn't seem like a viable alternative. --Titlutin (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense - thanks for your answer and have a nice day. 78.253.149.82 03:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Arnault[edit]

Hi would like to use a photo in a documetary for broadcast TV, however I am confused by the terms.

We can credit you at the end of the programme however I do not understand providing a link to the license? As it's end credits for TV show it cannot be a link. Can anyone explain?


attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Thanks

Tanwen — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.54.38.237 (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you're talking about the pics of Bernard Arnault similar to this one, File:Bernard Arnault (2) - 2017 (cropped).jpg, you shouldn't credit me, because I am not the author. I uploaded them from Flickr. The name of the author is written in the file's description under the pic, it's Jérémy Barande.
Concerning your question, I do not know how it works for TV programs. You should ask this question on Commons:Village pump. --Titlutin (talk) 18:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Regards, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loup Flammarion (44994444315).jpg[edit]

File:Loup Flammarion (44994444315).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Kamanda Sywor Kamanda[edit]

Bonjour Titlutin,
The images where you added the template:No permission since have been provided by fr:User:Christiane.melancon with the authorisation of Kamanda Sywor Kamanda himself. If I remember correctly what happened in 2006, Kamanda and Christiane.melancon wrote en:Kama Sywor Kamanda and fr:Kama Sywor Kamanda and provided a bunch of photos of Kamanda. I moved those images from the English and the French Wikipedia, so yes obviously I’m not the author. But the author put them on Wikipedia in the first place. I don’t care enough to follow through with this. I’ve mostly clearly indicated who the author or where those pictures came from but users adding metadata didn’t seem to notice. I don’t have time to clean this up. Please contact the original uploaders and give them more than a week to comply as they are probably not frequent contributors. --moyogo (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Moyogo: (je crois que vous parlez français ? )
Y avait-il eu une autorisation OTRS d'envoyée ? Car je n'ai rien vu de tel sur les fichiers. Or, dire « J'ai l'autorisation de l'auteur », comme ce que cette contributrice a écrit sur certains fichiers, ne suffit pas (car comme vous le savez, n'importe qui peut se cacher derrière un pseudo), il faut le prouver en envoyant une autorisation (fr:Aide:Republication/Image).
En outre, plusieurs photos ne donnent pas le nom du photographe, et il y a juste écrit « Picture provided by Mr. Kamanda himself ». Cela est problématique, car ce n'est pas l'autorisation du sujet de la photo qui importe (en tout cas, pas seulement), mais aussi celle du photographe pour des questions de droit d'auteur.
Désolé pour les messages, ils s'envoient automatiquement à la personne ayant téléversé le fichier quand on dépose le modèle. Christiane.melancon~commonswiki en a reçu quelques-uns également, elle devrait être au courant, mais je vais aller la prévenir sur son compte fr:WP. Concernant le délai d'une semaine, ce n'est pas moi qui l'ai décidé, mais c'est le délai standard de cette procédure. De toute façon, même si les fichiers sont supprimés, ils pourront être restaurés quand le/les photographe(s) auront envoyé les autorisations nécessaires. Cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci pour les précisions. Christiane.melancon semble avoir envoyé au moins un message à permission@wikipedia.org en 2006 (voir fr:Discussion:Kama Sywor Kamanda#À propos de la photo). --moyogo (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Moyogo: J'ai prévenu la contributrice sur Wikipédia [1].
Merci pour l'info sur OTRS. Elle ne précise malheureusement pas si elle a envoyé l'autorisation uniquement pour File:Kamanda wiki.png ou pour toute les autres photos. Mais de toute évidence, vu que la photo en question n'a jamais été restaurée (et qu'aucune des photos n'a le bandeau {{PermissionOTRS}}), c'est qu'il y a dû y avoir un problème avec l'autorisation envoyée. --Titlutin (talk) 16:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Moyogo: Vu que les messages ne vous sont pas adressés à la base, n'hésitez pas à les supprimer de votre pdd si vous le souhaitez --Titlutin (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pas de problème. Merci pour le suivi ! --moyogo (talk) 19:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colas Gutman (32300795288).jpg[edit]

File:Colas Gutman (32300795288).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A01:E35:39FC:C1C0:BCF9:B231:FDDB:CC39 19:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Lebghil 2016 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Bonjour Titlutin, j'espère que vous allez bien. Je me permets de vous contacter au sujet de cette photo que vous avez téléchargée depuis https://www.flickr.com/. J'ai remarqué que de nombreuses photos du photographe Globetrotteur17 présentes sur flickr sont téléchargées dans wiki. J'aimerais connaitre la procédure que vous avez utilisée car sur flickr il est indiqué que la photo de William Lebghil est Tous droits réservés. Certains portraits de Globetrotteur17 m'intéressent afin d'illustrer d'autres pages d'artistes. Bien cordialement, Isacre (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Isacre !
Le fichier original n'a pas été importé par moi, j'ai juste fait un recadrage. L'orignal est File:William Lebghil 2016.jpg, il a été importé par l'utilisateur Judor92.
Cependant, je vois en effet que l'image est désormais protégée sur Flickr. Mais sur Commons, un relecteur avait confirmé en 2016 que la photo était bien sous licence libre en apposant le modèle {{Flickrreview}}. Globetrotteur17 a donc dû changer la licence de ses photos depuis. Ce qui fait que les anciennes importées alors qu'elles étaient libres peuvent rester sur Commons, mais importer de nouvelles photos désormais protégées n'est en revanche plus possible, elles seraient rapidement supprimées. Cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 10:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup pour vos éclaircissements. Cordialement, Isacre (talk) 17:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Œuvre dérivée ?[edit]

Bonjour, À propos de cette question, voir aussi quand même Commons:Deletion requests/File:Georges Maury Portrait.png. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour l'info Asclepias Clin --Titlutin (talk) 09:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moussa Faki Mahamat (34515259582).jpg[edit]

File:Moussa Faki Mahamat (34515259582).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Suzanne Plunkett (talk) 12:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JLS wiki.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, je remarque que vous avez supprimé ce fichier alors que j'ai la permission de la photographe. Voici le ticket [Ticket#2021040710006471] Et une copie du mail qu'elle vous a envoyé depuis son mail noellabarras88@gmail.com, le 7 avril à 12h39. Madame,Monsieur,

Je suis Melle Barras Noella photographe à Epinal. Je donne l autorisation à Mme Yasmina Sandoz d utiliser la photo de Monsieur Jean Luc Sandoz fichier num JL swiki JPG 5088k en pièce jointe. Le fichier est libre de droit pour Mme Yasmina Sandoz.

Je reste à votre disposition. Cordialement.

Melle Barras.

Je ajoute ici son mobile 06 37 51 70 33 et son telé à son agence photo 03 29 82 54 21 Studio Vilair Scherr à Epinal

Est-ce que cela est suffisant pour vous pour remettre la photo? Merci Yasminkaa (talk) 10:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yasminkaa: Bonjour !
Vous vous adressez à la mauvaise personne : je n'ai pas supprimé ce fichier (et je n'aurais pas pu le faire de toute façon, car que je ne suis pas administrateur). Comme précisé dans ses informations de suppression, ce fichier a été supprimé par l'administrateur JuTa, avec comme raison « No OTRS permission since 13 April 2021 ». Je vous conseille de le contacter directement sur sa page.
Bonne continuation --Titlutin (talk) 20:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sayoud rate la penalty.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Titlutin, je vous contacte car je crois que vous faites erreur en désignant cette photo pour une suppression. Il me semble assez évident que c'est son auteur lui-même qu'il l'a téléversée sur Wikimédia, et ce, pour plusieurs raisons : les données EXIF sont présentes, la photo est de bonne qualité, sa taille n'est pas suspecte et le nom de l'utilisateur l'ayant publiée est Oussbiad, ce qui correspond clairement à Oussama Biad, le nom du photographe indiqué dans l'EXIF. De plus, la photo ne contient aucun filigrane alors que, d'habitude, ce photographe tague toutes les photos qu'il publie sur Facebook avec son logo ou simplement son nom. Par ailleurs, et sans me faire l'avocat d'Oussama Biad, je constate que même lorsque ce dernier téléverse une photo qui n'est pas la sienne, il l'indique explicitement dans la description sans se rendre compte qu'il commet une faute, ce qui trahit une certaine méconnaissance du fonctionnement de Wikimédia mais témoigne également de la bonne foi de ce contributeur. Je parle en l'occurrence de cette photo, qui mériterait pour le coup d'être supprimée tant elle coche toutes les cases : pas d'EXIF, qualité basse, taille très petite, format PNG donc probable capture d'écran et, surtout, aucune autorisation alors qu'elle est tirée de la page Facebook d'un club de football. Voilà, j'espère vous avoir convaincu car je trouve qu'il serait vraiment dommage, étant donné la rareté des photos sur le football algérien, d'en supprimer une tout à fait valable. Cordialement. --Aziouez (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Aziouez et merci pour votre message. Je vous accorde que plusieurs indices font penser que l'utilisateur ayant importé cette photo est bien le photographe. Si vous souhaitez retirer la demande d'autorisation vous-même, je ne m'y opposerai pas. Je trouve qu'il aurait quand même été préférable que User:Oussbiad envoie une autorisation en bonne et due forme, car en soit, rien ne nous prouve que derrière le pseudo Oussbiad, il y a "Oussama Biad Photography" qui détient les droits sur cette photo (une usurpation d'identité est toujours possible).
Par contre, je vais proposer à la suppression File:Houssem Mrizegue.png, qui en effet n'entre pas dans les clous.
Bien cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 14:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup pour votre compréhension, je vais retirer la demande et tenter de contacter Oussama Biad sur Facebook pour l'inciter à envoyer une autorisation si c'est bien lui. --Aziouez (talk) 06:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:EP-131125A Gahler gr (52102013637).jpg[edit]

File:EP-131125A Gahler gr (52102013637).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:EP-131031A Delegation US (52103289449).jpg[edit]

File:EP-131031A Delegation US (52103289449).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stable Diffusion[edit]

Hi! When uploading Stable Diffusion pictures please state the license as {{PD-algorithm}} Trade (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trade. Sorry, I don't remember uploading such pictures. Can you please tell me which file(s) you're referring to? --Titlutin (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sry, wrong user Trade (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: No problem Clin --Titlutin (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dijana Vukomanović - May 2015..jpg[edit]

File:Dijana Vukomanović - May 2015..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikheil Janelidze - May 2016.jpg[edit]

File:Mikheil Janelidze - May 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikheil Janelidze - May 2016 (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Mikheil Janelidze - May 2016 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordana Čomić - May 2015.jpg[edit]

File:Gordana Čomić - May 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordana Čomić - May 2015 (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Gordana Čomić - May 2015 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Statue Thomas Sankara 2019.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Titlutin, You nominated a number of pictures that I uploaded today. Some indeed had some erratic licencing data, and I have attempted to correct these. But the nomination of the last two pictures, Statue Thomas Sankara 2019.jpg and Statue Thomas Sankara 2019(cropped).jpg, I don't understand, as I am the photographer and I think to have followed the standard procedure of the Uploadwizzard. Please can you clarify what exactly is wrong? MerciChescargot (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chescargot! Yes of course I can explain (and sorry for all the messages that added automatically on your talk page).
The photos are indeed placed under a free licence (by you, the photographer), but when taking a picture of an artwork, you have to take into consideration the artwork's own copyright.
This statue of Thomas Sankara was inaugurated in 2019 (as part of the Mémorial Thomas Sankara). It is therefore still protected by copyright according to Burkina Faso's copyright laws. The statue will become public domain 70 years after the artist's death or 70 years after it's creation in the case of an anonymous work (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Burkina Faso). So unfortunately, it is still protected for now and pictures of this statue cannot be used on Commons.
Now, some countries authorized pictures of artwork situated permanently in public places, which is called Freedom of panorama. However, Burkina Faso's freedom of panorama is limited only to noncommercial purposes, which is incompatible with Commons:Licensing. See COM:FOP Burkina Faso.
I hope this helps. Don't hesitate if you have any questions. --Titlutin (talk) 16:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying! Learning now about that Freedom of panorama, the restrictions and freedoms of which apparently change from one country to another. However, in COM:FOP Burkina Faso, I read the exception "... a photo that only incidentally includes architecture or sculpture should be fine". Thus, particularly the picture Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (3).jpg I took seems to meet that requirement as it is shown in context, thus making the object rather 'incidental'. Hopefully, at least that one can thus be preserved. Chescargot (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Chescargot: Yes, I saw this exception. But the examples shown in Commons:De minimis#Guidelines seem quite different to me. Also, Commons:De minimis works if the artwork isn't the main subject and only appear incidentally, but in the picture you took, the memorial (statue included) seem to be the main point of your photo, and not an incidental aspect of you trying to take a picture of something else. Without mentioning the graffiti / mural we see on the side (next to Héros de la nation). There are 2 copyrights to consider here: the copyright of the original photo on which the art was based + the copyright of the artist who did the artwork.
We can transform this « speedy deletion » demand into a regular « Deletion requests » so we can discuss it more further and other users can give their opinion if they wish. What do you think? --Titlutin (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cher Titlutin, yes I'd be happy with a conversion to « Deletion requests », as I feel that there is scope for interpretation. Whatever the outcome then is, I would accept. Thankyou for your understanding. Best, Chescargot (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Chescargot: It is done. You can add your arguments on the page Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue Thomas Sankara 2019 (3).jpg. Regards --Titlutin (talk) 17:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, appreciated. Chescargot (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benoît Potier 2013 (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Benoît Potier 2013 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hoyanova (talk) 14:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks[edit]

I would like to thank you for you help with aimory Cyberwolf (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Titlutin&oldid=871555248"