User talk:Charly Bernasconi

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Charly Bernasconi!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Heilig Geist Innenraum 1973.jpg

Ciao Charly Bernasconi. Genanntes Bild ist zwar interessant. Ich bezweifel aber, ob seine Veröffentlichung (Scan aus einem Buch?) hier rechtens ist. Danke fürs Abklären, Gruß, --Martin Sg. (talk) 22:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Martin Sg. Ich wurde von Memorino ebenfalls darauf aufmerksam gemacht, ich bin am Abklären und warte nun auf die Antwort von Seiten der Kirchgemeinde... --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 03:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Die Erlaubnis der Pfarrei Heilig Geist (Zürich-Höngg) wurde am 13. Juni bei Commons hinterlegt. --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorri aber du brauchst nicht die Zustimmung des Besitzers der Kriche, sonder die Zustimmung des Fotografen. Ohne Zustimmung des Urheberes ist ein Urheberrechtsverletzung.

Gleiches gilt übringes auch für diene selbstgemachten Innenaufnahmen in Kirchen. Acuh da ohen Zustimmung des Urhebers ist es immer eine de:Urheberrechtsverletzung. Du ahst ganz vile Innenaufnahmen von modernen Krichen hochgeladen die alle Urheberrechtsverletzungen sein müssen, Denn die kunstlerische Gestaltung einer Kirche -die noch keine 70 Jahre lang steht-, ist immer urhebererechtlich geschützt. Denn das Urheberrecht erlischt erst am 1. Januar nach dem 70 Todesjahr des Urheberes entgültig (70 Jahre PmA), davor ist in der Regel immer eine Zustimmung erforderlich. Von daher werden wir leider sehr viele Bilder von dir auf Commons löschen müssen. --Bobo11 (talk) 18:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Bobo11, ich habe mich bei meinem Mentor Memorino vorgängig erkundigt, wie das mit Aussen- und Innenaufnahmen bei Kirchen ist. Er hat mich darüber informiert, dass ich mit Erlaubnis der Kirchgemeinde als Besitzerin des Kirchgebäudes Panoramafotos von Innenräumen machen kann. Wenn dem nicht so ist, bitte ich dich, das mit Memorino zu klären. Liebe Grüsse--Charly Bernasconi (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Dann hat man dich Memorion ganz klar eine Falschauskunft erteilt. Denn in der Schweiz gibt es in Innerräume keine Panoramafreiheit! Das es von Vorteil ist vom Eigentümmer eien Fotoerlaubniss zu haben ist eine ganz andere Geschichte. Fakt ist aber dass die Panoramafrheit in der Schweiz ganz generell in Innenräume nicht gilt. Da sind die Komentrare dazu recht klar. Lies mal in de:Panoramafreiheit#Schweiz den letzten Satz. Das steht „In der Schweiz besteht im Inneren von Gebäuden hingegen keine Panoramafreiheit, auch wenn sich das Gebäude in öffentlichem Besitz befindet.“ Das ist eigentlich sehr deutlich formuliert! --Bobo11 (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Lieber Bobo11, wenn die rechtliche Lage so eindeutig ist, dann habe ich als Neuling etwas falsch verstanden, was mir natürlich leid tut. Auch Memorino und Martin Sg. sind dieser Meinung. In diesem Fall werde ich nicht all den Hinterbliebenen von Künstlern für eine nachträgliche Erlaubnis nachgehen können. Deshalb habe ich heute bei Commons beantragt, dass alle Fotos, die gegen die Richtlinien verstossen, sofort gelöscht werden. Ich wollte nichts Unrechtes tun und werde mich in Zukunft auf das Fotografieren von Aussenfassaden der Kirchen beschränken oder aber entsprechende Bewilligungen bei den Künstlern einholen und diese bei Commons hinterlegen. --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Wenn er die Erlaubnis hat, im Innenraum Fotos zu machen, soll er das nicht dürfen? Doch höchstens, wenn er dabei etwas (Bilder, Kunstwerke usw.) fotografiert, dessen Urheber noch keine 70 Jahre tot ist. Wobei hier doch eh noch zu hinterfragen ist, ob diese Kunstwerke nicht eh als permanente Bestandteile der Kirche zu betrachten sind. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe nach ähnlichen Problemen, die ganz öffensichtlich über Tausend Bilder von Schweizer Kirchen auf Wikipedia Commons betreffen, mich vertieft mit der Frage der Panoramafreiheit im Innern von Gebäuden in der Schweiz auseinanderzusetzen. Dabei bin ich zum Ergebnis gelangt, dass die sich Aussage, die Bestimmungen von Artikel 27 URG wären nicht auf das Innere von Gebäuden anwendbar sich weder durch das Gesetz noch durch die Rechtspraxis stützen lässt und sich lediglich auf eine persönliche Meinung von Bär und Karrer und im Stämpfli-Kommentar stützt, die ihrerseits wiederum an der Auslegung durch ein Gericht in Deutschland beeinflusst waren, Urteile, welche für die Schweiz irrelevant sind. Es gibt jedoch zahlreiche Hinweise in anderen Gesetzen (z.B. Gesundheitsgesetze, Tabakprävention, Litteringverordnungen), dass mit allgemein zugänglichem Grund die Innenräume öffentlicher Gebäude mitgemeint sind. Zu dieser Auffassung gelangten auch ganz intuitiv all die Hunderte von Fotografen, die solche Bilder gemacht und eben auch auf die Wikipedia hochgeladen haben und die Tatsache, dass bis her nicht in einem einzigen Fall ein solches Foto von einem der Urheber der fotografierten Kunstwerke beanstandet worden ist. Ich habe mit Martin hier eine Diskussion in dieser Sache begonnen. Da die Angelengenheit nicht nur zwei oder drei Duzend sondern Hunderte von Bildern betrifft und deren Löschung für Wikimedia Commons doch ein herber Verlust wäre, denke ich, dass es sich lohnt, die Angelegenheit einmal wirklich vertieft abzuklären. Das beste wäre natürlich ein klärendes Bundesgerichtsurteil, mangels eines Klägers ist aber ein solchen nicht in Sicht. Es bleibt daher nur ein vertieftes Rechtsgutachten. Ich werde mich in den kommenden Wochen um ein solches bemühen. Einiges deutet aber schon jetzt darauf hin, dass die Aussage, in der Schweiz gäbe es im Innern von Gebäuden keine Panoramafreiheit, in dieser Absolutheit falsch und nicht haltbar ist. Es ist wohl so, dass im Innern von Gebäuden der Hausherr (durch ein Fotografieverbot) die Möglichkeit hat, diese Panoramafreiheit einzuschränken, dass aber dort wo er dies nicht tut, eben Art. 27 des URG Geltung hat, darauf deutet jedenfalls die Auslegung des Begriffs "allgemein zugänglich" in zahlreichen anderen Verordnungen (wo dessen Gültigkeit im Innern von öffentlichen Gebäuden in einigen Fällen sogar explizit formuliert wird). Der Satz wie er im Artikel Panoramafreiheit in der Schweiz in der Wikipädia zitiert wird, scheint somit so nicht zutreffend zu sein. Zumindest ist das überhaupt keine rechtlich eindeutige Sachlage, wie oben in dieser Diskussion behauptet wurde. Ich hoffe, dass ich diese Frage in den kommenden Tagen etwas befriedigender klären kann und sobald ich ein brauchbares Rechtsgutachten vorliegen habe, würde ich dann gerne eine entsprechende neue Diskussion eröffnen, wo wir gemeinsam beraten können, wie wir mit all diesen Bildern nun verfahren wollen. - Ich sehe eine gute Chance, dass wir sie nicht löschen müssen und die bereits gelöschten wieder herstellen können.DidiWeidmann (talk) 14:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Konkret gibt es einen jüngeren Kunstler, der gar keine Freude hätte, wenn ich sein Werk in Wikipedia zeigen würde, da er ein gebranntes Kind sei und nicht möchte, dass aufgrund eines solchen Fotos jemand anderer ein Foto eines seines Kunstwerkes in den Händen hätte. Es ist also ganz wichtig, dass ich weiss, was Sache ist, bevor ich mein Vorgehen rund um die Kirchenartikel ändere. Ich danke dir sehr für deine Recherche und wünsche dir viel Erfolg!

Rechtsanwalt Tobias Hauser von Hauser & Hauser, Zürich hat mir folgende Auskunft erteilt: Bildrechte von Werken eines Künstlers, die sich im öffentlichen Raum befinden - und dazu zählen Kirchen ja - sind in der Schweiz nicht geschützt. Im Nachhinein erscheint mir das logisch, denn sonst dürfte man ja auch keine Fotos machen, wenn man eine Kirche besichtigt. Dies mein Beitrag zur laufenden Diskussion. Wie geht es mit dieser Auskunft in Wikipedia weiter? Wer notiert das wo, damit das allen klar ist? Danke für eine Antwort und mit herzlichem Gruss! --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Maria Krönung Witikon Innenraum 01.tif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Maria Krönung Witikon Innenraum 01.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Maria Krönung Witikon Lichtführung.tif

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Der Fotograf hat am 27. Juni 2013 das Formular creative commons Namensnennung Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 erhalten, das er bei Commons deponieren wird. Das Hochladen dieser Bilder ist sowohl mit dem Fotografen als auch mit der Kirchgemeinde abgesprochen. --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Die Lizenz zu diesem Bild und zu den anderen von Maria Krönung (Zürich-Witikon) wurde vom Fotografen am 3. Juli 2013 bei Commons hinterlegt.--Charly Bernasconi (talk) 14:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Maria Krönung Witikon Innenraum 01.tif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Maria Krönung Witikon Innenraum 01.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Solved. Lymantria (talk) 16:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Charly Bernasconi. You have new messages at Lymantria's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Maria Krönung Witikon Lichtführung.tif

And also:

• File:Maria Krönung Witikon Innenraum 01.tif

Yours sincerely, Krd 11:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Der Architekt der Kirche, Prof. Dr. Justus Dahinden, hat am 9. Juli 2013 seine Bestätigung an permissions-de@wikimedia.org geschickt, dass die beiden erwähnten Fotos auch von Seiten des Architekten die Erlaubnis haben, von Wikipedia und von Dritten gebraucht zu werden. --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 04:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Charly Bernasconi. Das ist für diese beiden Bilder nun erledigt. Bitte schau mal durch Deine Uploads, welche Innenraumaufnahmen eventuell noch betroffen sind. Danke, Gruß… --Krd 14:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Krd, herzlichen Dank für deine Hilfe! --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Danke

für die vielen tollen Bilder aus Zürich und dem Kanton, insbesondere von den Orgeln. Ich mache so etwas ähnliches 90 km Luftlinie entfernt (gefühlt leider wegen Bodensee und Grenze eher 250 km...), siehe Churches in Landkreis Ravensburg… Ich habe viele Deiner Bilder nachkategorisiert, so finden sich jetzt z. B. viele in Category:Pipe organs in Zürich, aber auch Category:Church bells in Switzerland, Category:Stained glass windows in the canton of Zürich oder Category:Tabernacles in Switzerland, sowie Category:Josef Eberle. Herzlichen Gruss --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:48, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Lieber Andreas, danke für dein Feedback und für deine Hilfe beim Kategorisieren! Machen wir weiter so - mit Freude an der Arbeit und am Ergebnis! Herzliche Grüsse --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 18:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eglisau Altar Auferstehung.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eglisau Altar Auferstehung.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Eglisau Altar Heilung.jpg
• File:Eglisau Altar Jünger Jesu.jpg
• File:Eglisau Altar Speisung.jpg
• File:Eglisau Altar geschlossen.jpg
• File:Theresia Friesenberg Heilige Familie.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Maria Krönung Gossau

Hallo Charly, handelt es sich bei dem erwähnten Glasmaler vielleicht nicht um Hans, sondern um Paul Stöckli? Zu dem Hans habe ich jedenfalls nichts gefunden. --Túrelio (talk) 18:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Lieber Turelio, du bist mir zuvor gekommen. Ich habe gerade jetzt mit dem Ticket#2014062810009545 die Lizenz hochgeladen und gesehen, dass ich die beiden Kunstler verwechselt habe. Es ist natürlich Paul Stöckli, nicht Hans Stöckli. Ich hoffe, dass du das richten kannst. Herzlichen Dank für deine Hilfe und mit lieben Grüssen --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 18:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke. Dann gibt es allerdings ein Problem. Paul Stückli ist erst 1991 gestorben, weshalb seine Werke bis Ende 2061 geschützt sind, was auch für Fotos derselben gilt. Wie in Deutschland gilt auch in der Schweiz die Panoramafreiheit nicht für Innenräume. Wer hat die oben erwähnte Genehmigung ausgestellt, ein Erbe von Stöckli? --Túrelio (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Ja, die Tochter und alleinige Erbin von Paul Stöckli hat die Lizenz unterzeichnet. Ich hoffe, dass damit die Unklarheiten beseitigt sind und die Fotos mit der Lizenzerklärung verlinkt werden können. Danke für deine Hilfe und mit liebem Gruss --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Prima. --Túrelio (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Dieselbe Problematik besteht übrigens bei Category:Hans Stocker. --Túrelio (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Auch da kann ich dich beruhigen. Ich habe im Verlauf meiner vielen Artikel und Bilder gelernt, wo die Tücken für das Hochladen von Bildern ist. Ich lade ausschliesslich Bilder hoch, deren Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Urheberrechts entweder via E-mail oder via Unterschrift auf Papier die entsprechende Lizenz, die Wikipedia verlangt, unterzeichnet haben. Wenn du Zeit und Lust hast, mir zu helfen und die entsprechenden Lizenzen mit den Fotos zu verbinden, würde mich das natürlich freuen. Falls du eine Ticketnummer brauchst, um mir zu helfen, wende dich bitte direkt an mich. In diesem Sinne hoffe ich auf eine gute Zusammenarbeit! --Charly Bernasconi (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Ich kontrolliere häufig die neuen Uploads (recent upload patroling), weshalb mir Problemfälle schnell auffallen, bin aber kein OTRSler und kann deshalb die Tickets nicht einsehen. Aber gut zu wissen, dass du da entsprechend sensibilisiert bist. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Datum

Hallo Charly Bernasconi, schau mal nach dem Datum von File:Bruder Klaus Urdorf grosses Fenster.jpg. 1899 kann irgendwie nicht stimmen. VG, --Wikiwal (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Sankt_Karl_Luzern

Sankt Karl Luzern has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 08:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Matthäuskirche Zürich innen.JPG

File:Matthäuskirche Zürich innen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Krematorium Nordheim Zürich Halle II.JPG

File:Krematorium Nordheim Zürich Halle II.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Johannes Wängi innen quer.jpg

And also:

• File:Johannes Wängi Kapelle.jpg
• File:Johannes Wängi Kirche quer.jpg
• File:Johannes Wängi Orgel quer.jpg
• File:Johannes Wängi Orgel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kirche St. Sebastian Rebstein Empore.jpg

And also:

• File:Kirche St. Sebastian Rebstein innen.jpg
• File:Kirche St. Sebastian Rebstein Orgel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Altar.jpg

And also:

• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Altarraum 2.jpg
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Altarraum.JPG
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Decke.JPG
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Empore.JPG
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen innen.JPG
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Orgel.JPG
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Pfeiler.JPG
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Taufstein.jpg
• File:Mauritius Oberengstringen Werktagskapelle.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gallus Fischenthal Dachfenster.JPG

And also:

• File:Gallus Fischenthal innen südwest.jpg
• File:Gallus Fischenthal innen.jpg
• File:Gallus Fischenthal Innenansicht nord.jpg
• File:Gallus Fischenthal Orgel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Karl Luzern Chor.jpg

And also:

• File:Karl Luzern innen.JPG
• File:Sankt Karl Luzern Orgel.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Agatha Dietikon innen Lanhaus.JPG

And also:

• File:Agatha Dietikon innen.jpg
• File:Agatha Dietikon Orgelempore.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Pfarreizentrum St. Petrus Embrach Innenraum.JPG

File:Pfarreizentrum St. Petrus Embrach Innenraum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Heilige Familie Schoeftland innen quer.jpg

And also:

• File:Heilige Familie Schoeftland innen.jpg
• File:Heilige Familie Schoeftland Orgel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 06:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bruder Klaus Basel Altarraum quer.jpg

And also:

• File:Bruder Klaus Basel innen.jpg
• File:Bruder Klaus Basel Krypta Altarraum quer.jpg
• File:Bruder Klaus Basel Krypta.jpg
• File:Bruder Klaus Basel Orgel.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Heilig Geist Deckengestaltung.jpg

And also:

• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Altar Orgel.JPG
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Altar und Orgel.tiff
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Altarraum 1990-2013.JPG
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Altarraum.JPG
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Andachtsecke neu.tiff
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Andachtsecke.JPG
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Innenansicht 1973 farbig.jpg
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Innenansicht 1973 von Südwesten.jpg
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Innenansicht 1973 von Westen.jpg
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Kirchenraum frontal.tiff
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Orgel 1973.jpg
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Tabernakel 1973.jpg
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Treppenhaus.JPG
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Werktagsaltar Taufstein.tiff
• File:Heilig Geist Höngg Werktagskapelle.JPG
• File:Heilig Geist Zürich Höngg Orgel.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Allerheiligen 3357-b7.jpg

And also:

• File:Allerheiligen Altarraum Orgel.JPG
• File:Allerheiligen Zürich Krypta Altar mit Inschrift.jpg
• File:Allerheiligen Zürich Krypta Tabernakel.jpg
• File:Kirche Allerheiligen Zürich, innen.JPG
• File:Kirche Allerheiligen Zürich, Orgel.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Antonius Münchwilen innen quer.jpg

And also:

• File:Antonius Münchwilen innen seitlich.jpg
• File:Antonius Münchwilen innen.jpg
• File:Antonius Münchwilen Orgel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Josef Matzingen innen hinten.jpg

And also:

• File:Josef Matzingen innen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jakobus Steckborn Empore.jpg

And also:

• File:Jakobus Steckborn innen quer.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:St. Theresia Zürich Blick zur Orgel und zur Theresienkapelle.JPG

And also:

• File:St. Theresia Zürich innen.jpg
• File:St. Theresia Zürich Innenansicht.JPG
• File:Theresia Zürich Werktagskapelle 1933-1978.jpg
• File:Theresia Zürich Werktagskapelle 1979.tif
• File:Theresia Zürich-Friesenberg historisch innen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Felix und Regula Zürich Hard Innen.JPG

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Katholisch Lichtensteig innen quer.jpg

And also:

• File:Katholisch Lichtensteig innen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)